Physics 4
Physics 4
Physics 4
ix
iy
11.
To account for the variations you saw in the Photogate velocity
measurements, repeat the calculation in Step 10 for the minimum and maximum
velocity. These two additional points show the limits of impact range that you
might expect, considering the variation in your velocity measurement. Mark these
points on the floor as well.
12.
After your instructor gives you permission, release the ball from the
marked starting point, and let the ball roll off the table and onto the floor. Mark
the point of impact with tape. Measure the distance from the floor origin to the
actual impact and enter the distance in the data table.
time
state 1
state 2
velocity (m/s)
2.1-2.27
1, 0
1, 0
.1723
.493
4.31-4.49
1, 0
1, 0
.1867
.455
1.8-2.01
1, 0
1, 0
.1697
.501
1.89-2.07
1, 0
1, 0
.1778
.478
2.66-2.83
1, 0
1, 0
.1696
.501
2.54-2.7
1, 0
1, 0
.1814
.469
1.9-2.1
1, 0
1, 0
.1715
.496
4.32-4.49
1, 0
1, 0
.1719
.494
1.8-2.05
1, 0
1, 0
.1804
.471
Maximum Velocity
0.501 m/s
Minimum Velocity
0.455 m/s
Average Velocity
0.484 m/s
Table Height
.951 m
0.20554 m or 20 cm
20 cm or .2 m
CALCULATIONS:
-xusing average velocity
x=v t + 12a t
x=(0.478m/s)(0.43s) + 12(0m/s )(0.43s)
x=0.205m or 20.5cm
-x using minimum velocity
x=v t + 12a t
x=(0.455m/s)(0.43s) + 12(0m/s )(0.43s)
x=0.196m or 19.6cm
-x using maximum velocity
x=v t + 12a t
x=(0.501m/s)(0.43s) + 12(0m/s )(0.43s)
2
ix
ix
ix
x=0.215m or 21.5cm
-a using average velocity
y= v t + 12a t
0.951m=(0.478m/s)(0.43s) + 12a (0.43s)
0.951m=(0.478m/s)(0.43s) + 12a (0.1849s )
0.951m=0.20554m + (0.09245s )a
0.74546m=(0.09245s )a
8.05m/s = a
RESULTS: In this lab, we took the Vernier program and used it to calculate the time
it took for a ball to pass through the gates. With that given information, we were
about to figure out the velocity the ball was traveling and in turn, solve for the
acceleration. We could ever calculate for the distance the ball traveled with a
specified velocity and acceleration. This allowed us to see how these equations work
with a real life objective. I think that the procedures could be explained in a better
way or differently in general. The procedures were a little difficult to understand and
caused a lot of confusion amongst our groups. Errors could occur with
misinterpretation of the procedures or small measuring errors when placing the
photogates or where to roll the ball.
CONCLUSION: By using the Vernier computer interface and our given knowledge,
we were able to accomplish our objectives. There werent many problems with this
lab, besides confusion with the procedures
y
iy