[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
946 views1 page

Property Division in Dael v. IAC Case

Cesario was first married to Bienvenida and they had five children together. After Bienvenida died, Cesario married Bienvenida's sister Victorina. Private respondents filed a case regarding the property of Cesario and Bienvenida. The trial court found that the copra business was formed during Cesario and Bienvenida's marriage and Victorina used the same facilities and capital to manage the business. The appellate court affirmed this decision. The issue is whether the marital community of proprietary interest continued after Cesario and Bienvenida's marriage dissolved due to Bienvenida's death. The Supreme Court held that Cesario and Bienvenida's marriage dissolved upon her death and

Uploaded by

Jen S. Gallano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
946 views1 page

Property Division in Dael v. IAC Case

Cesario was first married to Bienvenida and they had five children together. After Bienvenida died, Cesario married Bienvenida's sister Victorina. Private respondents filed a case regarding the property of Cesario and Bienvenida. The trial court found that the copra business was formed during Cesario and Bienvenida's marriage and Victorina used the same facilities and capital to manage the business. The appellate court affirmed this decision. The issue is whether the marital community of proprietary interest continued after Cesario and Bienvenida's marriage dissolved due to Bienvenida's death. The Supreme Court held that Cesario and Bienvenida's marriage dissolved upon her death and

Uploaded by

Jen S. Gallano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

G.R. No.

L-68873, March 31, 1989


Lucilda Dael v. Intermediate Appellate Court, ET. Al.

FACTS:
Cesario Cabutihan was married to Beinvenida Durana, whom he had five children, upon the death
of the wife; Cesario contracted a second marriage with his former wifes sister Victorina.
Private respondents filed settlement over the property of their deceased parents. Trial Court
rendered a decision holding that Victorina Durana had no paraphernal properties brought to her marriage
with Cesario. That the copra business was formed during the first marriage and Victorina used the same
facilities, credit and capital in managing the business, and the main source of the income not only of
Cesario and also of Victorina during their respective lifetimes was the copra business. Hence, the extent of
the Estate of Victorina shall consist only of her share in the inheritance of the Estate of Cesario Cabutihan.
Intermediate Appellate Court affirmed the decision of the lower court.

ISSUE:
Is the marital community of proprietary interest continued to exist in the second marriage, even
after the Cesario-Beinvenida conjugal partnership has been dissolved by the death of Bienvenida?

HOLDING:
The first conjugal partnership was automatically dissolved because of death of Bienvenida and it
was converted into an implied ordinary co-ownership. There should be liquidation of properties before
contracting another marriage. Since there was none, the total mass of the partnership property shall be
divided between the different partnerships in proportion to the duration of each and to the property
belonging to the respective spouses.
One-half (1/2) of the properties that pertain to the first conjugal partnership belong to Cesario as
his conjugal share therein, while the other half shall be considered as inherited by him and his five children
as the heirs of Bienvenida.
The properties pertaining to the second partnership shall also be equally divided, one-half (1/2) to
belong to Cesario and the other to Victorina as their respective shares in their conjugal partnership
properties. The share of Cesario should then be divided among his heirs, namely, Victorina and his five (5)
children.
To recapitulate, the estate of Victorina for distribution to her heirs shall consist of her one-half (1/2)
share in the conjugal properties of the aforesaid second marriage and her one-sixth (1/6) share in the
estate of Cesario as an heir.

You might also like