[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (413)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = wildland fire

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 5335 KiB  
Article
Deep Learning Approach for Wildland Fire Recognition Using RGB and Thermal Infrared Aerial Image
by Rafik Ghali and Moulay A. Akhloufi
Fire 2024, 7(10), 343; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7100343 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 642
Abstract
Wildfires cause severe consequences, including property loss, threats to human life, damage to natural resources, biodiversity, and economic impacts. Consequently, numerous wildland fire detection systems were developed over the years to identify fires at an early stage and prevent their damage to both [...] Read more.
Wildfires cause severe consequences, including property loss, threats to human life, damage to natural resources, biodiversity, and economic impacts. Consequently, numerous wildland fire detection systems were developed over the years to identify fires at an early stage and prevent their damage to both the environment and human lives. Recently, deep learning methods were employed for recognizing wildfires, showing interesting results. However, numerous challenges are still present, including background complexity and small wildfire and smoke areas. To address these challenging limitations, two deep learning models, namely CT-Fire and DC-Fire, were adopted to recognize wildfires using both visible and infrared aerial images. Infrared images detect temperature gradients, showing areas of high heat and indicating active flames. RGB images provide the visual context to identify smoke and forest fires. Using both visible and infrared images provides a diversified data for learning deep learning models. The diverse characteristics of wildfires and smoke enable these models to learn a complete visual representation of wildland fires and smoke scenarios. Testing results showed that CT-Fire and DC-Fire achieved higher performance compared to baseline wildfire recognition methods using a large dataset, which includes RGB and infrared aerial images. CT-Fire and DC-Fire also showed the reliability of deep learning models in identifying and recognizing patterns and features related to wildland smoke and fires and surpassing challenges, including background complexity, which can include vegetation, weather conditions, and diverse terrain, detecting small wildfire areas, and wildland fires and smoke variety in terms of size, intensity, and shape. CT-Fire and DC-Fire also reached faster processing speeds, enabling their use for early detection of smoke and forest fires in both night and day conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Fire Science Models, Remote Sensing, and Data)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The proposed architecture of DC-Fire. P1 and P present the predicted probabilities of the input aerial image belonging to the non-fire and fire class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The proposed architecture of CT-Fire. L1 and L refer the predicted probabilities of the input aerial image belonging to the fire or non-fire class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>FLAME2 dataset example. (<b>Top</b>): RGB non-fire images; (<b>Bottom</b>): Their corresponding IR non-fire images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>FLAME2 dataset example. (<b>Top</b>): RGB fire images. (<b>Bottom</b>): Their corresponding IR fire images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Loss curves for the proposed DC-Fire and CT-Fire during training and validation steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Confusion matrix of both DC-Fire and CT-Fire using both IR and RGB images (both models obtained the same results).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Classification results of DC-Fire and CT-Fire models using RGB fire images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Classification results of DC-Fire and CT-Fire models using RGB non-fire images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Classification results of DC-Fire and CT-Fire models using IR fire images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Classification results of DC-Fire and CT-Fire models using IR non-fire images.</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 3669 KiB  
Article
Smoke Emissions and Buoyant Plumes above Prescribed Burns in the Pinelands National Reserve, New Jersey
by Kenneth L. Clark, Michael R. Gallagher, Nicholas Skowronski, Warren E. Heilman, Joseph Charney, Matthew Patterson, Jason Cole, Eric Mueller and Rory Hadden
Fire 2024, 7(9), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7090330 - 21 Sep 2024
Viewed by 476
Abstract
Prescribed burning is a cost-effective method for reducing hazardous fuels in pine- and oak-dominated forests, but smoke emissions contribute to atmospheric pollutant loads, and the potential exists for exceeding federal air quality standards designed to protect human health. Fire behavior during prescribed burns [...] Read more.
Prescribed burning is a cost-effective method for reducing hazardous fuels in pine- and oak-dominated forests, but smoke emissions contribute to atmospheric pollutant loads, and the potential exists for exceeding federal air quality standards designed to protect human health. Fire behavior during prescribed burns influences above-canopy sensible heat flux and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in buoyant plumes, affecting the lofting and dispersion of smoke. A more comprehensive understanding of how enhanced energy fluxes and turbulence are related during the passage of flame fronts could improve efforts to mitigate the impacts of smoke emissions. Pre- and post-fire fuel loading measurements taken during 48 operational prescribed burns were used to estimate the combustion completeness factors (CC) and emissions of fine particulates (PM2.5), carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO) in pine- and oak-dominated stands in the Pinelands National Reserve of southern New Jersey. During 11 of the prescribed burns, sensible heat flux and turbulence statistics were measured by tower networks above the forest canopy. Fire behavior when fire fronts passed the towers ranged from low-intensity backing fires to high-intensity head fires with some crown torching. Consumption of forest-floor and understory vegetation was a near-linear function of pre-burn loading, and combustion of fine litter on the forest floor was the predominant source of emissions, even during head fires with some crowning activity. Tower measurements indicated that above-canopy sensible heat flux and TKE calculated at 1 min intervals during the passage of fire fronts were strongly influenced by fire behavior. Low-intensity backing fires, regardless of forest type, had weaker enhancement of above-canopy air temperature, vertical and horizontal wind velocities, sensible heat fluxes, and TKE compared to higher-intensity head and flanking fires. Sensible heat flux and TKE in buoyant plumes were unrelated during low-intensity burns but more tightly coupled during higher-intensity burns. The weak coupling during low-intensity backing fires resulted in reduced rates of smoke transport and dispersion, and likely in more prolonged periods of elevated surface concentrations. This research facilitates more accurate estimates of PM2.5, CO, and CO2 emissions from prescribed burns in the Pinelands, and it provides a better understanding of the relationships among fire behavior, sensible heat fluxes and turbulence, and smoke dispersion in pine- and oak-dominated forests. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pre- and post-burn fuel loading by forest type for prescribed burns: (<b>a</b>) 48 prescribed burns conducted in the Pinelands from 2004 to 2020, and (<b>b</b>) the 11 instrumented prescribed burns. Data are tons ha<sup>−1</sup> ± 1 standard error for understory vegetation, 1 h + 10 h woody fuels, and fine litter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pre-burn fuel loading and estimated consumption of (<b>a</b>) understory vegetation, (<b>b</b>) 1 h + 10 h woody fuels on the forest floor, and (<b>c</b>) fine litter and woody fuels on the forest floor during prescribed burns conducted in the Pinelands from 2004 to 2020. All values are tons ha<sup>−1</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Estimated emissions of (<b>a</b>) PM<sub>2.5</sub>, (<b>b</b>) CO<sub>2</sub>, and (<b>c</b>) CO during low- and high-intensity instrumented prescribed burns. Values are means ± 1 standard error calculated using field measurements of pre- and post-burn fuel loading (M) or by using pre-burn fuel loading and the appropriate combustion completeness factors (CC) in <a href="#fire-07-00330-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time series of above-canopy (<b>a</b>) air temperature measured at 10 Hz, (<b>b</b>) vertical wind velocity measured at 10 Hz, and (<b>c</b>) horizontal wind velocity measured at 10 Hz during a low-intensity backing fire in a pitch pine–scrub oak stand at Cedar Bridge in 2008 (blue line) and a high-intensity head fire in a pitch pine–scrub oak stand near Warren Grove in 2013 (yellow line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Maximum (<b>a</b>) Δ air temperature (°C), (<b>b</b>) Δ vertical wind velocity (m s<sup>−1</sup>), and (<b>c</b>) Δ horizontal wind velocity (m s<sup>−1</sup>) measured at 10 Hz, at 1 s and 1 min intervals, measured above the canopy during low- and high-intensity prescribed burns. Values are means ± 1 standard error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relationships between above-canopy air temperature and vertical wind velocity measured at 10 Hz during low- and high-intensity prescribed burns in pine–oak and pine–scrub oak stands. Shown are (<b>a</b>) a backing fire at JBMDL in 2006 and (<b>b</b>) a flanking fire in Brendan Byrne SF in 2011, (<b>c</b>) a backing fire at Cedar Bridge in 2013 and (<b>d</b>) a head fire near Warren Grove in 2013, and (<b>e</b>) a mixed-behavior fire at Cedar Bridge in 2020 and (<b>f</b>) a head fire near Warren Grove in 2014. Blue dots indicate low-intensity burns and yellow dots indicate high-intensity burns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Time series of above-canopy (<b>a</b>) sensible heat flux calculated at 1 min intervals and (<b>b</b>) turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) at 1 min intervals measured during a low-intensity backing fire in a pitch pine–scrub oak stand at Cedar Bridge in 2008 (blue symbols) and a high-intensity head fire in a pitch pine–scrub oak stand near Warren Grove in 2013 (yellow symbols).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Examples of the relationship between 1 min values of sensible heat flux (kW m<sup>−2</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) and TKE (m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−2</sup>) at the top of the canopy during fire front passage during low- and high-intensity prescribed burns in the same pine–oak and pitch pine–scrub oak stands shown in <a href="#fire-07-00330-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. Panels represent (<b>a</b>) a low-intensity backing fire at Fort Dix in 2006 and (<b>b</b>) a high-intensity flanking fire in Brendan Byrne State Forest in 2011, (<b>c</b>) a backing fire at Cedar Bridge in 2013 and a (<b>d</b>) head fire at Warren Grove in 2013, and (<b>e</b>) a mixed-behavior fire at Cedar Bridge in 2020 and (<b>f</b>) a head fire near Warren Grove in 2014. Slopes and intercepts of the linear relationship between H and TKE are shown, along with values of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and significance levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mean and maximum 1 min Δ values of sensible heat flux (kW m<sup>−2</sup>) and turbulent kinetic energy (m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−2</sup>) measured at the top of the canopy during fire front passage. Values are (<b>a</b>) mean and (<b>b</b>) maximum 1 min Δ sensible heat flux, and (<b>c</b>) mean and (<b>d</b>) maximum 1 min Δ turbulent kinetic energy. Colored squares and error bars are average Δ values ± 1 standard error, and colored circles are Δ values from individual towers in burn areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Relationships between Δ 1 min sensible heat flux (kW m<sup>−2</sup>) and Δ 1 min turbulent kinetic energy (m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−2</sup>) measured above the canopy during fire front passage for all burn area towers. Values are (<b>a</b>) mean 1 min values of ΔH and ΔTKE, and (<b>b</b>) maximum 1 min values of ΔH and ΔTKE.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>The relationship between pre-burn loading and calculated combustion completeness factor (CC<sub>x</sub>) for (<b>a</b>) understory vegetation, (<b>b</b>) 1 h + 10 h woody fuels, (<b>c</b>) fine litter, and (<b>d</b>) total forest floor material. Pre-burn fuel loading is in g m<sup>−2</sup>, and mean ± 1 SD values for each coefficient are shown to the left of each scatterplot.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 2387 KiB  
Article
Preliminary Assessment of Tunic Off-Gassing after Wildland Firefighting Exposure
by Kiam Padamsey, Adelle Liebenberg, Ruth Wallace and Jacques Oosthuizen
Fire 2024, 7(9), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7090321 - 14 Sep 2024
Viewed by 430
Abstract
Evidence has previously shown that outer tunics (turnout coats) worn by firefighters at structural fires are contaminated with harmful chemicals which subsequently off-gas from the material. However, there is limited research on whether this phenomenon extends to wildland firefighter uniforms. This pilot study [...] Read more.
Evidence has previously shown that outer tunics (turnout coats) worn by firefighters at structural fires are contaminated with harmful chemicals which subsequently off-gas from the material. However, there is limited research on whether this phenomenon extends to wildland firefighter uniforms. This pilot study aimed to explore if the tunics of volunteer bushfire and forestry firefighters in Western Australia off-gas any contaminants after exposure to prescribed burns or bushfires, and whether there is a need to explore this further. Nine tunics were collected from firefighters following nine bushfire and prescribed burn events, with a set of unused tunics serving as a control. Chemical analysis was performed on these tunics to assess levels of acrolein, benzene, formaldehyde, and sulphur dioxide contamination. The assessment involved measuring chemical off-gassing over a 12 h period using infrared spectrometry. Tunics worn by firefighters appear to adsorb acrolein, benzene, formaldehyde, and sulphur dioxide from bushfire smoke and these contaminants are emitted from firefighting tunics following contamination at elevated concentrations. Further investigation of this research with a larger study sample will be beneficial to understand this phenomenon better and to determine the full extent and range of chemical contaminants absorbed by all firefighter clothing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Summary of acrolein off-gassing from fire-fighting tunics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Summary of benzene off-gassing from firefighting tunics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Summary of formaldehyde off-gassing from firefighting tunics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Summary of sulphur dioxide off-gassing from firefighting tunics.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6359 KiB  
Review
A Review of the Occurrence and Causes for Wildfires and Their Impacts on the Geoenvironment
by Arvin Farid, Md Khorshed Alam, Venkata Siva Naga Sai Goli, Idil Deniz Akin, Taiwo Akinleye, Xiaohui Chen, Qing Cheng, Peter Cleall, Sabatino Cuomo, Vito Foresta, Shangqi Ge, Luca Iervolino, Pierrette Iradukunda, Charles H. Luce, Eugeniusz Koda, Slobodan B. Mickovski, Brendan C. O’Kelly, Evan K. Paleologos, Dario Peduto, Evan John Ricketts, Mojtaba Sadegh, Theo S. Sarris, Devendra N. Singh, Prithvendra Singh, Chao-Sheng Tang, Guillermo Tardio, Magdalena Daria Vaverková, Max Veneris and Jan Winkleradd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Fire 2024, 7(8), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7080295 - 22 Aug 2024
Viewed by 2262
Abstract
Wildfires have short- and long-term impacts on the geoenvironment, including the changes to biogeochemical and mechanical properties of soils, landfill stability, surface- and groundwater, air pollution, and vegetation. Climate change has increased the extent and severity of wildfires across the world. Simultaneously, anthropogenic [...] Read more.
Wildfires have short- and long-term impacts on the geoenvironment, including the changes to biogeochemical and mechanical properties of soils, landfill stability, surface- and groundwater, air pollution, and vegetation. Climate change has increased the extent and severity of wildfires across the world. Simultaneously, anthropogenic activities—through the expansion of urban areas into wildlands, abandonment of rural practices, and accidental or intentional fire-inception activities—are also responsible for a majority of fires. This paper provides an overall review and critical appraisal of existing knowledge about processes induced by wildfires and their impact on the geoenvironment. Burning of vegetation leads to loss of root reinforcement and changes in soil hydromechanical properties. Also, depending on the fire temperature, soil can be rendered hydrophobic or hydrophilic and compromise soil nutrition levels, hinder revegetation, and, in turn, increase post-fire erosion and the debris flow susceptibility of hillslopes. In addition to direct hazards, wildfires pollute air and soil with smoke and fire suppression agents releasing toxic, persistent, and relatively mobile contaminants into the geoenvironment. Nevertheless, the mitigation of wildfires’ geoenvironmental impacts does not fit within the scope of this paper. In the end, and in no exhaustive way, some of the areas requiring future research are highlighted. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of Western U.S. active fires in September 2020 [<a href="#B22-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">22</a>]; (<b>b</b>) near-surface smoke (µg/m<sup>3</sup>) over Western U.S.A. on 17 September 2020 [<a href="#B23-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of Western U.S. active fires in September 2020 [<a href="#B22-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">22</a>]; (<b>b</b>) near-surface smoke (µg/m<sup>3</sup>) over Western U.S.A. on 17 September 2020 [<a href="#B23-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>U.S. drought monitor map of 4 October 2022 [<a href="#B28-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Wildfire regions in Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa on 24 August 2021 [<a href="#B34-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Number of fires in Mediterranean countries from 1980 to 2017 [<a href="#B36-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Photo (<b>a</b>) before and; (<b>b</b>) after the August 2021 megafire on the Island of Euboea, Greece.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Hypothesized long-term changes in soil water repellence [<a href="#B83-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">83</a>]. Solid line: overall response; dotted line: short-term changes generated from fire; dashed line: long-term changes induced by increased biotic activity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Water Droplet Penetration Test (best-fit third-order polynomial) for a coarse-grained soil sample at hydrophobicity-inducing surrogate dilutions of (<b>a</b>) 0.6%, (<b>b</b>) 0.7%, and (<b>c</b>) 0.8%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Water Droplet Penetration Test (best-fit third-order polynomial) for a coarse-grained soil sample at hydrophobicity-inducing surrogate dilutions of (<b>a</b>) 0.6%, (<b>b</b>) 0.7%, and (<b>c</b>) 0.8%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic diagram of root–soil system failure evolution with time after fire: (<b>a</b>) before the fire; (<b>b</b>) in the event of a fire; (<b>c</b>) one year after the fire; (<b>d</b>) two years after the fire, where <span class="html-fig-inline" id="fire-07-00295-i001"><img alt="Fire 07 00295 i001" src="/fire/fire-07-00295/article_deploy/html/images/fire-07-00295-i001.png"/></span> indicates infiltration (created based on [<a href="#B128-fire-07-00295" class="html-bibr">128</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 15128 KiB  
Article
Wildfire Threshold Detection and Progression Monitoring Using an Improved Radar Vegetation Index in California
by Dustin Horton, Joel T. Johnson, Ismail Baris, Thomas Jagdhuber, Rajat Bindlish, Jeonghwan Park and Mohammad M. Al-Khaldi
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(16), 3050; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16163050 - 19 Aug 2024
Viewed by 724
Abstract
To address the recent increase in wildfire severity and incidence, as well as the subsequent financial and physical costs, forest managers and wildland firefighting agencies rely on remotely sensed products for better decision-making and mitigation efforts. To address the remote sensing needs of [...] Read more.
To address the recent increase in wildfire severity and incidence, as well as the subsequent financial and physical costs, forest managers and wildland firefighting agencies rely on remotely sensed products for better decision-making and mitigation efforts. To address the remote sensing needs of these agencies, which include high spatial resolution, immunity to atmospheric and solar illumination effects, and day/night capabilities, the use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is under investigation for application in current and upcoming systems for all phases of a wildfire. Focusing on the active phase, a method for monitoring wildfire activity is presented based on changes in the radar vegetation index (RVI). L-band backscatter measurements from NASA/JPL’s UAVSAR instrument are used to obtain RVI images on multiple dates during the 2020 Bobcat (located in Southern CA, USA) and Hennessey (located in Northern CA, USA) fires and the 2021 Caldor (located in the Sierra Nevada region of CA, USA) fire. Changes in the RVI between measurement dates of a single fire are then compared to indicators of fire activity such as ancillary GIS-based burn extent perimeters and the Landsat 8-based difference normalized burn ratio (dNBR). An RVI-based wildfire “burn” detector/index is then developed by thresholding the RVI change. A combination of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and F1 scores for this detector are used to derive change detection thresholds at varying spatial resolutions. Six repeat-track UAVSAR lines over the 2020 fires are used to determine appropriate threshold values, and the performance is subsequently investigated for the 2021 Caldor fire. The results show good performance for the Bobcat and Hennessey fires at 100 m resolution, with optimum probability of detections of 67.89% and 71.98%, F1 scores of 0.6865 and 0.7309, and Matthews correlation coefficients of 0.5863 and 0.6207, respectively, with an overall increase in performance for all metrics as spatial resolution becomes coarser. The results for pixels identified as “burned” compare well with other fire indicators such as soil burn severity, known progression maps, and post-fire agency publications. Good performance is also observed for the Caldor fire where the percentage of pixels identified as burned within the known fire perimeters ranges from 37.87% at ~5 m resolution to 88.02% at 500 m resolution, with a general increase in performance as spatial resolution increases. All detections for Caldor show dense collections of burned pixels within the known perimeters, while pixels identified as burned that lie outside of the know perimeters have a sparse spatial distribution similar to noise that decreases as spatial resolution is degraded. The Caldor results also align well with other fire indicators such as soil burn severity and vegetation disturbance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Earth Observation for Emergency Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A comparison of optical imagery taken over the Caldor wildfire on 29 August 2021, using (<b>a</b>) the VIIRS-based normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) [<a href="#B25-remotesensing-16-03050" class="html-bibr">25</a>] and (<b>b</b>) Copernicus/Sentinel imagery [<a href="#B23-remotesensing-16-03050" class="html-bibr">23</a>]. Both images highlight the deleterious impact of fire-generated smoke on optically based observations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The histogram results comparing the UAVSAR-based classical RVI [<a href="#B50-remotesensing-16-03050" class="html-bibr">50</a>] using a pre-factor of 8 (left-hand column) and the improved RVI using a pre-factor of 6.57 (right-hand column). The comparison is performed for the 3 different regions being studied and the results are combined to highlight different dominant land classifications: (<b>a</b>) classical RVI; (<b>b</b>) improved RVI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A map of the wildfire test sites. The Bobcat fire of 2020 is identified by the red pentagram, the Hennessey fire of 2020 is identified by the blue pentagram, and the Caldor fire of 2021 is identified by the green pentagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Wildfire site satellite imagery (left-hand column) with burn extent perimeters on UAVSAR flight dates and National Land Cover Database (NLCD) [<a href="#B78-remotesensing-16-03050" class="html-bibr">78</a>] maps (right-hand column) with a summary legend of the most common land class types. (<b>a</b>) Bobcat fire satellite image; (<b>b</b>) Bobcat NLCD map; (<b>c</b>) Hennessey fire satellite image; (<b>d</b>) Hennessey NLCD map; (<b>e</b>) Caldor fire satellite image; and (<b>f</b>) Caldor NLCD map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Wildfire site satellite imagery (left-hand column) with burn extent perimeters on UAVSAR flight dates and National Land Cover Database (NLCD) [<a href="#B78-remotesensing-16-03050" class="html-bibr">78</a>] maps (right-hand column) with a summary legend of the most common land class types. (<b>a</b>) Bobcat fire satellite image; (<b>b</b>) Bobcat NLCD map; (<b>c</b>) Hennessey fire satellite image; (<b>d</b>) Hennessey NLCD map; (<b>e</b>) Caldor fire satellite image; and (<b>f</b>) Caldor NLCD map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The change in the improved RVI, with k = 6.57, (negative values indicate RVI decrease and vegetation loss) at 100 m spatial resolution for the Bobcat wildfire using UAVSAR measurements taken on 18 September and 14/15 October 2020, the Hennessey wildfire using UAVSAR measurements taken on 3 September and 14 October 2020, and the Caldor wildfire using UAVSAR measurements taken on 25 August and 31 August 2021. The color scale includes small negative changes (orange), with extreme negative changes in black. (<b>a</b>) Bobcat northern-most line (line 1); (<b>b</b>) Bobcat southern-most line (line 2); (<b>c</b>) Hennessey northern-most line (line 1); (<b>d</b>) Hennessey line 2; (<b>e</b>) Hennessey line 3; (<b>f</b>) Hennessey southern-most line (line 4); and (<b>g</b>) Caldor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>The change in the improved RVI, with k = 6.57, (negative values indicate RVI decrease and vegetation loss) at 100 m spatial resolution for the Bobcat wildfire using UAVSAR measurements taken on 18 September and 14/15 October 2020, the Hennessey wildfire using UAVSAR measurements taken on 3 September and 14 October 2020, and the Caldor wildfire using UAVSAR measurements taken on 25 August and 31 August 2021. The color scale includes small negative changes (orange), with extreme negative changes in black. (<b>a</b>) Bobcat northern-most line (line 1); (<b>b</b>) Bobcat southern-most line (line 2); (<b>c</b>) Hennessey northern-most line (line 1); (<b>d</b>) Hennessey line 2; (<b>e</b>) Hennessey line 3; (<b>f</b>) Hennessey southern-most line (line 4); and (<b>g</b>) Caldor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Landsat 8-based difference Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR): (<b>a</b>) Bobcat wildfire; (<b>b</b>) Hennessey wildfire. The Landsat 8 dNBR information [<a href="#B67-remotesensing-16-03050" class="html-bibr">67</a>] is used to identify pixels within the wildfire perimeter that are identified as not being burned (dark green areas) between the UAVSAR dates of interest for use with ground truthing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>“Ground truth” reference maps at 100 m spatial resolution developed for this study. White pixels indicate a “not burned” classification, black pixels indicate a “burned” classification, and gray pixels are indicative of flagged pixels. Dashed black lines mark UAVSAR coverage limits. For Bobcat, the magenta and blue lines represent burn perimeters on the dates indicated and green represents the nearby Ranch2 fire; for Hennessey, the blue line represents burn perimeters on UAVSAR dates and green represents the nearby Glass fire. (<b>a</b>) Bobcat line 1; (<b>b</b>) Bobcat line 2; (<b>c</b>) Hennessey line 1; (<b>d</b>) Hennessey line 2; (<b>e</b>) Hennessey line 3; (<b>f</b>) Hennesey line 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and red dashed 1:1 lines for the Bobcat and Hennessey wildfires using data at 5 m (“SAR”), 25 m, 50 m, 100 m, 200 m, and 500 m: (<b>a</b>) Bobcat line 1; (<b>b</b>) Bobcat line 2; (<b>c</b>) Hennessey line 1; (<b>d</b>) Hennessey line 2; (<b>e</b>) Hennessey line 3; (<b>f</b>) Hennessey line 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>F1 scores for varying threshold values and 100 m resolution: (<b>a</b>) Bobcat line 1; (<b>b</b>) Bobcat line 2; (<b>c</b>) Hennessey line 1; (<b>d</b>) Hennessey line 2; (<b>e</b>) Hennessey line 3; (<b>f</b>) Hennessey line 4. Maximum Z1 scores are indicated by the vertical dashed line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Wildfire detection maps using RVI change detection at 100 m resolution; black dots indicate “burned” pixels. (<b>a</b>) Bobcat line 1; (<b>b</b>) Bobcat line 2; (<b>c</b>) Hennessey line 1; (<b>d</b>) Hennessey line 2; (<b>e</b>) Hennessey line 3; (<b>f</b>) Hennessey line 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Wildfire detection maps using RVI change detection at 100 m resolution; black dots indicate “burned” pixels. (<b>a</b>) Bobcat line 1; (<b>b</b>) Bobcat line 2; (<b>c</b>) Hennessey line 1; (<b>d</b>) Hennessey line 2; (<b>e</b>) Hennessey line 3; (<b>f</b>) Hennessey line 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>A wildfire detection map at 100 m resolution for the Caldor wildfire using a detection threshold of −0.0349.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 12986 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Fuel Thinning on the Microclimate in Coastal Rainforest Stands of Southwestern British Columbia, Canada
by Rhonda L. Millikin, W. John Braun, Martin E. Alexander and Shabnam Fani
Fire 2024, 7(8), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7080285 - 14 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1631
Abstract
Prescriptions for fuel management are universally applied across the forest types in British Columbia, Canada, to reduce the fire behaviour potential in the wildland–urban interface. Fuel thinning treatments have been advocated as a means of minimizing the likelihood of crown fire development in [...] Read more.
Prescriptions for fuel management are universally applied across the forest types in British Columbia, Canada, to reduce the fire behaviour potential in the wildland–urban interface. Fuel thinning treatments have been advocated as a means of minimizing the likelihood of crown fire development in conifer forests. We hypothesized that these types of prescriptions are inappropriate for the coastal rainforests of the Whistler region of the province. Our study examined the impact of fuel thinning treatments in four stands located in the Whistler community forest. We measured several in-stand microclimatic variables beginning with snow melt in the spring up to the height of fire danger in late summer, at paired thinned and unthinned stand locations. We found that the thinning led to warmer, drier, and windier fire environments. The difference in mean soil moisture, ambient air temperature, and relative humidity between thinned and unthinned stands was significant in the spring with approximate p-values of 0.000217, 9.40 × 10−5, and 4.33 × 10−8, respectively, though there were no discernible differences in the late summer. The difference in mean solar radiation, average wind speed, and average cross wind between thinned and unthinned locations are significant in the spring and late summer (with approximate p-values for spring of 9.54 × 10−7, 0.02101, 1.92 × 10−9, and for late summer of 2.45 × 10−7, 4.08 × 10−6, and 2.45 × 10−5, respectively). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location and elevation of the community of Whistler in southwest British Columbia, Canada. Source: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-383-2016" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-383-2016</a> (accessed on 15 June 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of GIS-derived sampling points (thinned and unthinned) in Cheakamus, one of the four areas sampled in Whistler’s coastal rainforest area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field measurement of microclimate variables (<b>left</b>), soil moisture and fuel data (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Exponential decline in moisture over time for treated sites at Lost Lake. Materials included needles, wood, cones, humus, and moss.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Drying method for fuel moisture data, where (<b>A</b>) represents the volume (cm<sup>−3</sup>), (<b>B</b>) represents the weight (g), (<b>C</b>) is the dehydration tray, and (<b>D</b>) is the dehydrator (Excalibur set at 74 °C for 1.0–24 h).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Example grid overlay for image analysis with the accompanying excel data for the (<b>left</b>) unthinned canopy and (<b>right</b>) ground views at the Alpine site. The red line marks the grid being analysed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Example photos of the ground cover by site and treatment, taken while collecting ground fuels. Note: though samples were taken close in time (date and time of day), the light (UV penetration) is dappled at unthinned (UT) sites versus full sun exposure at thinned (T) sites. Also note the loss of water-holding ground plants and large woody debris after thinning compared to sampling locations in the same forest stand that were not thinned.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Example photos of the ground cover by site and treatment, taken while collecting ground fuels. Note: though samples were taken close in time (date and time of day), the light (UV penetration) is dappled at unthinned (UT) sites versus full sun exposure at thinned (T) sites. Also note the loss of water-holding ground plants and large woody debris after thinning compared to sampling locations in the same forest stand that were not thinned.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Example photos of the ground cover by site and treatment, taken while collecting ground fuels. Note: though samples were taken close in time (date and time of day), the light (UV penetration) is dappled at unthinned (UT) sites versus full sun exposure at thinned (T) sites. Also note the loss of water-holding ground plants and large woody debris after thinning compared to sampling locations in the same forest stand that were not thinned.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Reduced forest ecosystem resilience in thinned areas: tree bole damage (<b>left</b>), and soil erosion (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Quantile–quantile plots of ambient air temperatures (<b>left</b>) and relative humidity (RH) conditions (<b>right</b>) at thinned and unthinned sites. Deviation from the reference line indicates that the distributions are different at the thinned and unthinned sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>The mountainous topography of the Whistler region of southern British Columbia versus the flatter terrain found in the Fort Nelson area of the province. Source: Brian Carter, Mapmonsters, Victoria, BC., Canada.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Box plots of the slope equivalent wind speed at 10 m above the forest canopy and in-stand, for thinned (open circles) and unthinned (red circles) sites in the spring and at the height of fire danger in late summer, at the four forest site locations in the Whistler community forest.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 297 KiB  
Article
Occupational Injuries of Spanish Wildland Firefighters: A Descriptive Analysis
by Fabio García-Heras, Juan Rodríguez-Medina, Arkaitz Castañeda, Patxi León-Guereño and Jorge Gutiérrez-Arroyo
Healthcare 2024, 12(16), 1615; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161615 - 13 Aug 2024
Viewed by 880
Abstract
The work of wildland firefighters, especially of the so-called ‘Brigadas de Refuerzo contra Incendios Forestales’, is characterised by high physical demands and extreme operating conditions. These professionals face long workdays (12 h), walking with heavy loads (~25 kg), being exposed to high temperatures [...] Read more.
The work of wildland firefighters, especially of the so-called ‘Brigadas de Refuerzo contra Incendios Forestales’, is characterised by high physical demands and extreme operating conditions. These professionals face long workdays (12 h), walking with heavy loads (~25 kg), being exposed to high temperatures (>30 °C), and handling specialised tools in high-risk environments. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of occupational injuries among members of the ‘Brigadas de Refuerzo contra Incendios Forestales’ and its relationship to variables such as age and work experience. A total of 217 wildland firefighters (18 female and 199 male) correctly answered a questionnaire developed on an ad hoc basis to meet the study’s objectives. A high prevalence of occupational injuries was observed among them (~76%). Age and work experience were shown to be significantly associated with injuries. Individuals over 35 years of age with more than 10 years’ experience had a higher probability of injury (OR = 2.14, CI = 1.12–4.06 and OR = 2.46, CI = 1.30–4.67, respectively). Injuries occurred mainly during physical training (~46%), followed by preventive work (~33%) and forest fires (~20%). The most common injuries were tendonitis and muscle pain (~44% and ~21% respectively), followed by sprains (~21%). The results underline the need for physical activity programmes adapted to help wildland firefighters, especially older and more experienced individuals. The identification of risk factors such as age and work experience can contribute to the prevention and management of occupational injuries among this group of highly specialised forestry workers. Specific preventative measures during training are required to mitigate the risk of injury among these crews, who play a crucial role in protecting the environment and public safety. Full article
11 pages, 250 KiB  
Article
Perceptions of Exposure and Mask Use in Wildland Firefighters
by Tanis Zadunayski, Natasha Broznitsky, Drew Lichty and Nicola Cherry
Toxics 2024, 12(8), 576; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12080576 - 7 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1104
Abstract
Wildland firefighters are exposed to airborne particulates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and other hazardous substances. Respiratory protection is indicated, but information is lacking on the tasks and conditions for which mask wearing should be advised. Studies to assess respiratory protection in wildland firefighters [...] Read more.
Wildland firefighters are exposed to airborne particulates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and other hazardous substances. Respiratory protection is indicated, but information is lacking on the tasks and conditions for which mask wearing should be advised. Studies to assess respiratory protection in wildland firefighters were carried out in western Canada in 2021 and 2023. Sampling pumps measured airborne exposures and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-HP) was assayed to indicate PAH absorption. Participants in 2021 reported the time for which they wore the mask during each task. In 2023, the use of masks was reported, and firefighters rated the smoke intensity. In 2021, 72 firefighters were monitored over 164 shifts and, in 2023, 89 firefighters were monitored for 263 shifts. In 2021, mask wearing was highest for those engaged in initial attack and hot spotting. Urinary 1-HP at the end of rotation was highest for those reporting initial attack, working on a prescribed fire and mop-up. In 2023, firefighter ratings of smoke intensity were strongly associated with measured particulate mass and with urinary 1-HP, but masks were not worn more often when there was higher smoke intensity. The data from the literature did not provide a clear indication of high-exposure tasks. Better task/exposure information is needed for firefighters to make informed decisions about mask wearing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Firefighters’ Occupational Exposures and Health Risks)
16 pages, 1224 KiB  
Article
Characteristics of Pyrolysis Products of California Chaparral and Their Potential Effect on Wildland Fires
by Mahsa Alizadeh, David R. Weise and Thomas H. Fletcher
Fire 2024, 7(8), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7080271 - 5 Aug 2024
Viewed by 685
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the pyrolysis of selected California foliage and estimate the energy content of the released volatiles to show the significance of the pyrolysis of foliage and its role during wildland fires. While the majority of the [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to investigate the pyrolysis of selected California foliage and estimate the energy content of the released volatiles to show the significance of the pyrolysis of foliage and its role during wildland fires. While the majority of the volatiles released during the pyrolysis of foliage later combust and promote fire propagation, studies on the energy released from combustion of these compounds are scarce. Samples of chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), Eastwood’s manzanita (Arctostaphylos glandulosa), scrub oak (Quercus berberidifolia), hoaryleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus crassifolius), all native to southern California, and sparkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), native to the southern U.S., were pyrolyzed at 725 °C with a heating rate of approximately 180 °C/s to mimic the conditions of wildland fires. Tar and light gases were collected and analyzed. Tar from chamise, scrub oak, ceanothus and sparkleberry was abundant in aromatics, especially phenol, while tar from manzanita was mainly composed of cycloalkenes. The four major components of light gases were CO, CO2, CH4 and H2. Estimated values for the high heating values (HHVs) of volatiles ranged between 18.9 and 23.2 (MJ/kg of biomass) with tar contributing to over 80% of the HHVs of the volatiles. Therefore, fire studies should consider the heat released from volatiles present in both tar and light gases during pyrolysis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of the pyrolysis products’ collection system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of tar compounds derived from various types of biomass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Coke formation from methylated phenols (with permission) [<a href="#B49-fire-07-00271" class="html-bibr">49</a>].</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 14515 KiB  
Article
Neighborhood-Scale Wildfire Evacuation Vulnerability in Hays County, TX
by Chad Ramos and Yihong Yuan
Geographies 2024, 4(3), 481-499; https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies4030026 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 655
Abstract
Despite increasing wildfire severity and range, rapid development in the fire-prone Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) has continued, and many neighborhoods are at risk of a constrained wildfire evacuation due to a high ratio of houses to community road-network exits. In Texas, Hays County is [...] Read more.
Despite increasing wildfire severity and range, rapid development in the fire-prone Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) has continued, and many neighborhoods are at risk of a constrained wildfire evacuation due to a high ratio of houses to community road-network exits. In Texas, Hays County is prone to fire, and rapid population growth has created a substantial WUI. Despite this, there is not sufficient research addressing neighborhood-level evacuation risks. The goal of this research, then, is to search Hays County for neighborhoods that face the highest combined risk of wildfire and potential evacuation difficulty. This research provides a limited use case wherein local decision-makers can quantify the combined risk of wildfire and constrained evacuation at the neighborhood scale by making use of standard spatial analysis techniques and publicly available datasets. The results show an alarming trend of low-egress neighborhoods in fire-prone areas within Hays County which carry the risk of a very difficult evacuation in cases when wildfire warning time is short. By using publicly available datasets and standard techniques, this research provides methods for local decision-makers across the state to identify these at-risk neighborhoods within their own jurisdictions which may aid in emergency planning and mitigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of Geographies in 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Hays County study area, located in central Texas, USA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Hays County Wildfire Threat Index as described by Texas A&amp;M Forest Service [<a href="#B36-geographies-04-00026" class="html-bibr">36</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Hays County Wildland–Urban Interface as described by Texas A&amp;M Forest Service [<a href="#B36-geographies-04-00026" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) A subsection of the Hays County road network; (<b>b</b>) a subsection of the Hays County road network dissolved and stylized based on the Neighborhoods attribute, such that each neighborhood is represented by a different color and non-neighborhood roads are represented in black; (<b>c</b>) a subsection of the Hays County road network with exits illustrated at the intersections of neighborhood and non-neighborhood roads; (<b>d</b>) neighborhood roads buffered by 100 ft with address points used to estimate the number of households in each neighborhood.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The TWRA Wildfire Threat Index dataset overlayed on neighborhood polygons; (<b>b</b>) the Wildfire Threat Index apportioned to neighborhood polygons as the percent of overlap between the neighborhoods and the levels of wildfire threats.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Hays County WUI neighborhoods with an egress ratio above 200 houses per community exit and the Wildfire Threat Index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The Woodcreek neighborhood and the fire intensity potential of the surrounding wildlands. Note the black and white dots which represent the only road network exits from the community.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A subsection of the Woodcreek neighborhood exemplifying the density of both houses and trees. Note that the white triangles represent address points. The structure density in these compact subsections is approximately 2.7 structures per acre.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A subsection of the Woodcreek neighborhood with house footprints and a 50 ft buffer representing the minimum defensible space recommendations. Note the overlap in defensible spaces between houses.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4307 KiB  
Article
Effects of Fuel Removal on the Flammability of Surface Fuels in Betula platyphylla in the Wildland–Urban Interface
by Xintong Chen, Mingyu Wang, Baozhong Li, Lixuan Wang, Jibin Ning, Guang Yang and Hongzhou Yu
Fire 2024, 7(7), 261; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7070261 - 22 Jul 2024
Viewed by 825
Abstract
This paper aimed to provide technical support for fuel management by exploring different strengths of fuel removal on the physical and chemical properties and flammability of Betula platyphylla forests in the wildland–urban interface. After investigating the northeastern region during the forest fire prevention [...] Read more.
This paper aimed to provide technical support for fuel management by exploring different strengths of fuel removal on the physical and chemical properties and flammability of Betula platyphylla forests in the wildland–urban interface. After investigating the northeastern region during the forest fire prevention period in May 2023, a typical WUI area was selected, and three different treatment strengths, combined with a control, were set up to carry out indoor and outdoor experiments for 27 weeks. Compared with previous studies, this study mainly investigated and analyzed the dynamic changes in the physical and chemical properties and fuel flammability after different intensities of treatments on a time scale. By processing and analyzing the data, the following results were obtained. Significant differences existed in the fuel loading of different time-lag fuels over time (p < 0.05). The ash and ignition point of 1 h time-lag fuel after different treatment intensities generally increased first and then decreased, and the higher heat value and ash-free calorific value generally decreased first and then increased. The physical and chemical properties of 10 h and 100 h time-lag fuel fluctuated with time, but the overall change was insignificant. The indicator that had the greatest impact on the combustion comprehensive score for different time-lag fuels was fuel loading. The change in the flammability of dead surface fuel with time varied significantly, and different treatment intensities effectively reduced the fuel’s flammability. The reduction effects, presented in descending order, were as follows: medium-strength treatment > low-strength treatment > high-strength treatment > control check. In conclusion, different treatment intensities have significant effects on the flammability of the fuel, and the medium-strength treatment has the best effect. Considering the ecological and economic benefits, adopting the medium-strength treatment for the WUI to regulate the fuel is recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Fuel Treatment and Fire Risk Assessment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pictures of sample plots with different treatment intensities: (<b>a</b>) CK; (<b>b</b>) LST; (<b>c</b>) MST; (<b>d</b>) HST.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes of fuel loading with different time-lag fuels after different-strength treatments; (<b>a</b>) 1 h time lag; (<b>b</b>) 10 h time lag; (<b>c</b>) 100 h time lag; and 0 for initial data before treatment. Different letters at the same treatment in different times represent significant differences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The change trend of heat per unit area of fuel after different treatment strengths; 0 indicates initial data before treatment. Different letters at the same treatment in different times represent significant differences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The change trend of fuel flammability after different treatment strengths; 0 indicates initial data before treatment. Different letters at the same treatment in different times represent significant differences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Correlation between time, strength treatment, different time lags, and physical–chemical properties and flammability; F indicates fuel loading, IP indicates the ignition point, HHV indicates the higher heating value, AFCV indicates the ash-free calorific value, A indicates ash, P indicates the heat per unit area, and Zi indicates the comprehensive combustion score.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2561 KiB  
Article
Predicting the Integrated Fire Resistance of Wildland–Urban Interface Plant Communities by Spatial Structure Analysis Learning for Shanghai, China
by Manqing Yao, Deshun Zhang, Ruilin Zhu, Zhen Zhang and Mohamed Elsadek
Forests 2024, 15(7), 1266; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071266 - 20 Jul 2024
Viewed by 616
Abstract
Fire is a prevalent hazard that poses a significant risk to public safety and societal progress. The continuous expansion of densely populated urban areas, exacerbated by global warming and the increasing intensification of urban heat islands, has led to a notable increase in [...] Read more.
Fire is a prevalent hazard that poses a significant risk to public safety and societal progress. The continuous expansion of densely populated urban areas, exacerbated by global warming and the increasing intensification of urban heat islands, has led to a notable increase in the frequency and severity of fires worldwide. Incorporating measures to withstand different types of calamities has always been a crucial aspect of urban infrastructure. Well-designed plant communities play a pivotal role as a component of green space systems in addressing climate-related challenges, effectively mitigating the occurrence and spread of fires. This study conducted field research on 21 sites in the green belt around Shanghai, China, quantifying tree morphological indexes and coordinate positions. The spatial structure attributes of different plant communities were analyzed by principal component analysis, CRITIC weighting approach, and stepwise regression analysis to build a comprehensive fire resistance prediction model. Through this research, the relationship between community spatial structures and fire resistance was explored. A systematic construction of a prediction model based on community spatial structures for fire resistance was undertaken, and the fire resistance performance could be quickly judged by easily measured tree morphological indexes, providing valuable insights for the dynamic prediction of fire resistance. According to the evaluation and ranking conducted by the prediction model, the Celtis sinensis, Sapindus saponaria, Osmanthus fragrans, Koelreuteria paniculata, and Distylium racemosum + Populus euramericana ‘I-214’ communities exhibited a high level of fire resistance. On the other hand, the Koelreuteria bipinnata + Ligustrum lucidum, Ginkgo biloba + Camphora officinarum + Ligustrum lucidum, and Ligustrum lucidum + Sapindus saponaria communities obtained lower scores and were positioned lower in the ranking. It is emphasized that the integration of monitoring and regulation is essential to ensure the ecological integrity and well-being of green areas in the Wildland–Urban Interface. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Forestry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Factors shaping plant community development: influence of climate, soil, and terrain in fire-prone environments. In regions with hot and dry climates, characterized by high-temperature heatwaves and droughts with minimal rainfall, plant communities have evolved a resilience mechanism. This mechanism involves regulating the species composition, spatial structure, and community types in response to frequent fire disturbances. The plants develop characteristics that make them resistant to fire and well adapted to fire-prone environments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The visualization of (<b>a</b>) Map of research area and (<b>b</b>) Examples of study plant communities and on-site photos in green belt of Shanghai—dominated by deciduous and evergreen broadleaf forests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The visualization of (<b>a</b>) The central point of a 3 m × 3 m grid was selected and a 1 m × 1 m area was framed as a reference square to collect and weigh the mass of surface litter and (<b>b</b>) Take the <span class="html-italic">Camphora officinarum</span> community as an example.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation diagram of community spatial structure index. All values followed by * are significantly different at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, and by ** are significantly different at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The visualization of (<b>a</b>) The correlation between community spatial structure and fire resistance indexes. and (<b>b</b>) The correlation between community spatial structure and comprehensive evaluation of fire resistance. All values followed by * are significantly different at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, and values followed by ** are significantly different at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2871 KiB  
Article
Sensitivity of Fire Indicators on Forest Inventory Plots Is Affected by Fire Severity and Time since Burning
by James E. Smith and Coeli M. Hoover
Forests 2024, 15(7), 1264; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071264 - 20 Jul 2024
Viewed by 792
Abstract
Forest inventory data are useful for determining forest stand structure, growth, and change. Among the information collected on forest inventory plots by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, attributes characterizing various types of disturbance provide researchers a means of selecting [...] Read more.
Forest inventory data are useful for determining forest stand structure, growth, and change. Among the information collected on forest inventory plots by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, attributes characterizing various types of disturbance provide researchers a means of selecting plots specifically affected by disturbances, such as fire. We determine the performance of three of these attributes as indicators of recent fires on forest inventory plots of the United States by comparing them to independent records of wildland fire occurrence. The indicators are plot-level observations of fire effects on (1) general site appearance, (2) tree mortality, and (3) damage to live trees. Independent spatial layers of wildland fire perimeters provide an approach to test indicator performance and identify characteristics of fires that may affect detection. The sensitivities of indicators are generally higher in the West relative to the East. Detection rates exceed 90 percent for the Pacific Coast forests but seldom reach 80 percent in the East. Among the individual indicators, site appearance has higher identification rates than tree indicators for fires in the Pacific Coast, Great Plains, North, and South regions. Tree mortality is the most important single indicator for identifying Rocky Mountain fires. Tree damage is more important than tree mortality in the South; otherwise, the tree damage indicator is of relatively lower importance, particularly where high-severity fires are common, and tree survival is low. The rate of detection by the indicators is affected by the severity of the fire or the recency of the fire. The joint effect of severity and recency influence all three indicators for the Pacific Coast and Rocky Mountain fires, as well as the site appearance indicator in the South. Only a small proportion of fires are clearly missed by all three of the indicators. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Hazards and Risk Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Regions as defined for this analysis. Pacific Coast, Rocky Mountains, and Great Plains are considered west, with North and South as east.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Percent mortality of tally trees according to the burn severity class assigned to the intersection of inventory plot and MTBS burn perimeter (from inventory years 2013–2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of burn severity and time on the frequency of detecting an MTBS fire in the Pacific Coast and Rocky Mountains regions. Panels summarize the effect of elapsed time intervals (between fire and subsequent plot visit) for bins of 0–2 years (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>), 3–5 years (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>), and 6–8 years (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>). Groups of bars represent combined (‘any’) and the individual indicators. Bars represent burn severities 2 through 4 (low to high).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of burn severity and time on the frequency of detecting an MTBS fire in the South region. Panels summarize the effect of elapsed time intervals (between fire and subsequent plot visit) for bins of 0–2 years (<b>a</b>) and 3–5 years (<b>b</b>). Groups of bars represent combined (“any”) and the individual indicators. Bars represent burn severities 2 through 3 (low to moderate).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of burn severity and time on the frequency of detecting an MTBS fire in the Great Plains and North regions. Panels summarize the effect of elapsed time intervals (between fire and subsequent plot visit) for bins of 0–2 years (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>), 3–5 years (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>), and 6–8 years (<b>c</b>). Groups of bars represent combined (“any”) and the individual indicators. Bars represent burn severities 2 through 3 (low to moderate).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 18545 KiB  
Article
Active Wildland Fires in Central Chile and Local Winds (Puelche)
by Hiroshi Hayasaka
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2605; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142605 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 611
Abstract
Central Chile (CC, latitudes 32–40°S) experienced very active fires in 2017 and 2023. These fires burned large areas and killed many people. These unprecedented fires for CC presented a need for more defined fire weather conditions on the synoptic scale. In this paper, [...] Read more.
Central Chile (CC, latitudes 32–40°S) experienced very active fires in 2017 and 2023. These fires burned large areas and killed many people. These unprecedented fires for CC presented a need for more defined fire weather conditions on the synoptic scale. In this paper, fire weather conditions were analyzed using various satellite-derived fire data (hotspots, HSs), wind streamlines, distribution maps of wind flow and temperature, and various synoptic-scale weather maps. Results showed that local winds, known as Puelche, blew on the peak fire days (26 January 2017 and 3 February 2023). The number of HSs on these days was 2676 and 2746, respectively, about 90 times the average (30). The occurrence of Puelche winds was confirmed by streamlines from high-pressure systems offshore of Argentina to the study area in CC. The formation of strong winds and high-temperature areas associated with Puelche winds were identified on the Earth survey satellite maps. Strong winds of about 38 km h−1 and high temperatures above 32 °C with low relative humidity below 33% were actually observed at the weather station near the fire-prone areas. Lastly, some indications for Puelche winds outbreaks are summarized. This paper’s results will be used to prevent future active fire occurrences in the CC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Application in the Carbon Flux Modelling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Maps of Chile and the study area in central Chile (CC). The study area is shown by the yellow rectangle. (<b>a</b>) Map of Chile. The base map is a NASA Worldview image on 26 January 2017 (<a href="https://worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov" target="_blank">https://worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov</a>, accessed on 18 April 2024). The boundary of Chile is shown by the thin white zigzag line. The Tropic of Capricorn is shown as a red dashed line. Ocean currents are indicated by blue and green-yellow arrows indicating the direction of flow. (<b>b</b>) The study area in CC (32–40°S, 70–74°W). The boundary of Chile is shown by the thin yellow zigzag line. The area of a 1° grid cell (yellow dashed line rectangle at 33–34°S) is about 10,000 km<sup>2</sup>. Yellow figures such as 267, 541, and so on show the average number of hotspots (HSs year<sup>−1</sup>, excluding 2017 and 2023 HS data) in each 1° grid cell. Two red numbers 3405 and 3297 are the number of hotspots in each 1° grid cell in 2017 and 2023, respectively. Talcahuano (36.71°S, 73.11°W) is located approximately 14 km northwest of Concepción. Base map: Google Earth Pro.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Average dry period and fire periods in CC. (<b>a</b>) Average dry and rainy periods. (<b>b</b>) Average fire period. Ave.: Average, Tran.: Transition, J: January, F: February, M: March, A: April, M: May, J: June, J: July, A: August, S: September, O: October, N: November, D: December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Recent annual fire trends in Chile from 2003 to 2023. σ: standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fire trends in 2017, 2023, and 2016 (reference year). The red, green, and blue solid lines show the daily HSs in 2017, 2023, and 2016, respectively. The red, green, and blue broken lines indicate the daily HS for 2017, 2023, and 2016, respectively. The two red lines with arrows show the active fire periods in 2017 and 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Worldview satellite images with HSs and MERRA-2 weather maps. (<b>a</b>) Satellite image on 26 January 2017. (<b>b</b>) Satellite image on 3 February 2023. (<b>c</b>) Satellite image on 3 February 2016. The yellow rectangles show the study area. HS is showed by red spots. Very active fire areas in 2017 and 2023 are indicated by the yellow dotted ovals in (<b>a</b>) and (<b>b</b>). The yellow circles are the location of the weather station (Talcahuano). (<b>d</b>) Weather map at 12Z on 26 January 2017. (<b>e</b>) Weather map at 12Z on 3 February 2023. (<b>f</b>) Weather map at 12Z on 3 February 2016. The wind streamlines toward the study area are shown by red color. The blue rectangles show the study area. H and L in (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) represent high-pressure systems and low-pressure systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Worldview satellite images with HSs and MERRA-2 weather maps. (<b>a</b>) Satellite image on 26 January 2017. (<b>b</b>) Satellite image on 3 February 2023. (<b>c</b>) Satellite image on 3 February 2016. The yellow rectangles show the study area. HS is showed by red spots. Very active fire areas in 2017 and 2023 are indicated by the yellow dotted ovals in (<b>a</b>) and (<b>b</b>). The yellow circles are the location of the weather station (Talcahuano). (<b>d</b>) Weather map at 12Z on 26 January 2017. (<b>e</b>) Weather map at 12Z on 3 February 2023. (<b>f</b>) Weather map at 12Z on 3 February 2016. The wind streamlines toward the study area are shown by red color. The blue rectangles show the study area. H and L in (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) represent high-pressure systems and low-pressure systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Strong winds and high-temperature areas at ground level in CC made by Earth. (<b>a</b>) Strong wind areas at 12Z on 26 January 2017. (<b>b</b>) Strong wind areas at 12Z on 3 February 2023. (<b>c</b>) Strong wind areas at 12Z on 3 February 2016. (<b>d</b>) High-temperature areas at 12Z on 26 January, 2017. (<b>e</b>) High-temperature areas at 12Z on 3 February 2023. (<b>f</b>) High-temperature areas at 12Z on 3 February 2016. Areas of strong winds and high temperatures in CC are indicated by white-dashed circles. The red-dashed rectangles, small light-green circles (〇), and white-dashed curves in (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) are the study area, location of the weather station (Talcahuano), and major wind streamlines toward the study area, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Strong winds and high-temperature areas at ground level in CC made by Earth. (<b>a</b>) Strong wind areas at 12Z on 26 January 2017. (<b>b</b>) Strong wind areas at 12Z on 3 February 2023. (<b>c</b>) Strong wind areas at 12Z on 3 February 2016. (<b>d</b>) High-temperature areas at 12Z on 26 January, 2017. (<b>e</b>) High-temperature areas at 12Z on 3 February 2023. (<b>f</b>) High-temperature areas at 12Z on 3 February 2016. Areas of strong winds and high temperatures in CC are indicated by white-dashed circles. The red-dashed rectangles, small light-green circles (〇), and white-dashed curves in (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) are the study area, location of the weather station (Talcahuano), and major wind streamlines toward the study area, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Weather maps of average height (AH) at 12Z on from 24–27 January 2017. (<b>a</b>) AH on 24 January, (<b>b</b>) AH on 25 January, (<b>c</b>) AH on 26 January. AH at the upper-air level (500 hPa). The white rectangle indicates the study area. (<b>d</b>) AH on 24 January, (<b>e</b>) AH on 25 January, (<b>f</b>) AH on 26 January. AH at the lower-air level (1000 hPa). The red rectangle indicates the study area. H and L represent high-pressure systems and low-pressure systems with their height (m). The blue lines and grey dashed lines are ridges and troughs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Weather maps of average height (AH) at 12Z on from 1–3 February 2023. (<b>a</b>) AH on 1 February, (<b>b</b>) AH on 2 February, (<b>c</b>) AH on 3 February. AH at the lower-air level (1000 hPa). White rectangle indicates the study area. (<b>d</b>) AH on 1 February, (<b>e</b>) AH on 2 February, (<b>f</b>) AH on 3 February. AH at the upper-air level (500 hPa). Red rectangle indicates the study area. H and L represent high-pressure systems and low-pressure systems with their height (m). The blue and grey dashed lines are ridges and troughs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Air pressure (AP), HSs, and the Puelche winds in 2017, 2023, and 2016 (reference year). The red curves are for AP in 2017 and 2023. The blue dashed curves are for AP in 2016. The two green dashed lines at the top of the figure are the average AP values for 2017, 2023, and 2016. The green dashed line at the bottom of the figure is the average HSs value for 2017, 2023, and 2016. The Puelche wind events are indicated using straight lines with arrows at both ends, <span class="underline">Puelche</span>, and <span class="underline">P</span>. (<b>a</b>) AP and HSs in 2017 and 2016. (<b>b</b>) AP and HSs in 2023 and 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Wind speed (WS), wind direction (WD), and hotspots in 2017, 2023, and 2016 (reference year). The red curves are for WS and WD in 2017 and 2023. The blue dashed curves are for WS and WD in 2016. The two green dashed lines near the top of the figure are the average values of WS and WD for 2017 and 2023. The green dashed line near the bottom of the figure is the average WS and WD values for 2016. The Puelche winds events are indicated using straight lines with arrows at both ends, <span class="underline">Puelche</span>, and <span class="underline">P</span>. (<b>a</b>) WS and HSs in 2017 and 2016. (<b>b</b>) WS and HSs in 2023 and 2016. (<b>c</b>) WD and HSs in 2017 and 2016. (<b>d</b>) WD and HSs in 2023 and 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Air temperature (AT), relative humidity (RH), and hotspots (HSs) in 2017, 2023, and 2016 (reference year). The red curves are for AT and RH in 2017 and 2023. The blue dashed curves are for AT and RH in 2016. The two green dashed lines near the top of the figure are the average values of AT and RH for 2017 and 2023. The green dashed line near the bottom of the figure is the average AT and RH values for 2016. The Puelche winds events are indicated using straight lines with arrows at both ends, <span class="underline">Puelche</span>, and <span class="underline">P</span>. (<b>a</b>) Air temperature and HSs in 2017 and 2016. (<b>b</b>) Air temperature and HSs in 2023 and 2016. (<b>c</b>) RH and HSs in 2017 and 2016. (<b>d</b>) RH and HSs in 2023 and 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Weather maps of average height anomaly (m) at the upper- and lower-air level. The black-dashed line rectangle indicates the study area. ΔHa: average height anomaly (m) from 1991–2020 climatology, (<b>a</b>) 24 January 2017, (<b>b</b>) 25 January 2017, (<b>c</b>) 26 January 2017 (HS peak fire day), (<b>d</b>) 26 January 2016 (reference year), (<b>e</b>) 1 February 2023, (<b>f</b>) 2 February 2023, (<b>g</b>) 3 February 2023 (HS peak fire day), (<b>h</b>) 3 February 2016 (reference year).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 4723 KiB  
Review
Research Trends in Wildland Fire Prediction Amidst Climate Change: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis
by Mingwei Bao, Jiahao Liu, Hong Ren, Suting Liu, Caixia Ren, Chen Chen and Jianxiang Liu
Forests 2024, 15(7), 1197; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071197 - 10 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1138
Abstract
Wildfire prediction plays a vital role in the management and conservation of forest ecosystems. By providing detailed risk assessments, it contributes to the reduction of fire frequency and severity, safeguards forest resources, supports ecological stability, and ensures human safety. This study systematically reviews [...] Read more.
Wildfire prediction plays a vital role in the management and conservation of forest ecosystems. By providing detailed risk assessments, it contributes to the reduction of fire frequency and severity, safeguards forest resources, supports ecological stability, and ensures human safety. This study systematically reviews wildfire prediction literature from 2003 to 2023, emphasizing research trends and collaborative trends. Our findings reveal a significant increase in research activity between 2019 and 2023, primarily driven by the United States Forest Service and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The majority of this research was published in prominent journals such as the International Journal of Wildland Fire, Forest Ecology and Management, Remote Sensing, and Forests. These publications predominantly originate from Europe, the United States, and China. Since 2020, there has been substantial growth in the application of machine learning techniques in predicting forest fires, particularly in estimating fire occurrence probabilities, simulating fire spread, and projecting post-fire environmental impacts. Advanced algorithms, including deep learning and ensemble learning, have shown superior accuracy, suggesting promising directions for future research. Additionally, the integration of machine learning with cellular automata has markedly improved the simulation of fire behavior, enhancing both efficiency and precision. The profound impact of climate change on wildfire prediction also necessitates the inclusion of extensive climate data in predictive models. Beyond conventional studies focusing on fire behavior and occurrence probabilities, forecasting the environmental and ecological consequences of fires has become integral to forest fire management and vital for formulating more effective wildfire strategies. The study concludes that significant regional disparities in knowledge exist, underscoring the need for improved research capabilities in underrepresented areas. Moreover, there is an urgent requirement to enhance the application of artificial intelligence algorithms, such as machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning, and to intensify efforts in identifying and leveraging various wildfire drivers to refine prediction accuracy. The insights generated from this field will profoundly augment our understanding of wildfire prediction, assisting policymakers and practitioners in managing forest resources more sustainably and averting future wildfire calamities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A summary of the flowchart and study design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Number of publications in each year from 2003 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cited journal network collaboration map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>National cooperation network diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Research institution collaboration network diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Paper co-citation network analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Keyword co-occurrence network in wildland fire prediction research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Keyword cluster map for wildland fire prediction research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Top 25 burst keywords with the highest emergent intensity in wildland fire prediction research.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop