[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (2,999)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = weeds

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 3985 KiB  
Article
Interactions between Weeds, Pathogen Symptoms and Winter Rapeseed Stand Structure
by Lucie Vykydalová, Petra Martínez Barroso, Igor Děkanovský, Mária Neoralová, Yentriani Rumeta Lumbantobing and Jan Winkler
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2273; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102273 - 2 Oct 2024
Abstract
Rapeseed, weeds, and pathogens interact with each other. However, these interactions are not well understood. The aim of our work was to describe the relationships between weed vegetation and pathogen manifestations in rapeseed stands. Results from the four seasons show that different rapeseed [...] Read more.
Rapeseed, weeds, and pathogens interact with each other. However, these interactions are not well understood. The aim of our work was to describe the relationships between weed vegetation and pathogen manifestations in rapeseed stands. Results from the four seasons show that different rapeseed stand structures produce different weed and pathogen responses. Eighteen weed species were identified in the rapeseed stands. The selected characteristics of rapeseed stands, pathogens, and weed manifestations were evaluated using redundancy analysis. Rapeseed stands with the highest levels of pathogens present (Alternaria brassiceae (Berk.) Sacc., Botrytis cinerea (De Bary) Whetzel, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, Verticilium longisporum (C.Stark) Karapapa, Bainbr & Heale) had the lowest seed yield. There, the weeds Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Tripleurospermum inodorum (L.) Sch. Bip., Sonchus arvensis L. were more abundant in dense stands, and Phoma lingam (telomorph: Leptosphaeria maculans Ces. & De Not.) was more common. Mutual positive interactions may also include the relationship between weed species of the Asteraceae family and increased manifestations of Phoma lingam. A similar relationship can be expected for the weeds Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik., Descurainia sophia (L.) Prantl and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum symptoms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Weed Ecology, Evolution and Management)
49 pages, 5210 KiB  
Review
Agricultural Pest Management: The Role of Microorganisms in Biopesticides and Soil Bioremediation
by Alane Beatriz Vermelho, Jean Vinícius Moreira, Ingrid Teixeira Akamine, Veronica S. Cardoso and Felipe R. P. Mansoldo
Plants 2024, 13(19), 2762; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192762 - 1 Oct 2024
Viewed by 707
Abstract
Pesticide use in crops is a severe problem in some countries. Each country has its legislation for use, but they differ in the degree of tolerance for these broadly toxic products. Several synthetic pesticides can cause air, soil, and water pollution, contaminating the [...] Read more.
Pesticide use in crops is a severe problem in some countries. Each country has its legislation for use, but they differ in the degree of tolerance for these broadly toxic products. Several synthetic pesticides can cause air, soil, and water pollution, contaminating the human food chain and other living beings. In addition, some of them can accumulate in the environment for an indeterminate amount of time. The agriculture sector must guarantee healthy food with sustainable production using environmentally friendly methods. In this context, biological biopesticides from microbes and plants are a growing green solution for this segment. Several pests attack crops worldwide, including weeds, insects, nematodes, and microorganisms such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses, causing diseases and economic losses. The use of bioproducts from microorganisms, such as microbial biopesticides (MBPs) or microorganisms alone, is a practice and is growing due to the intense research in the world. Mainly, bacteria, fungi, and baculoviruses have been used as sources of biomolecules and secondary metabolites for biopesticide use. Different methods, such as direct soil application, spraying techniques with microorganisms, endotherapy, and seed treatment, are used. Adjuvants like surfactants, protective agents, and carriers improve the system in different formulations. In addition, microorganisms are a tool for the bioremediation of pesticides in the environment. This review summarizes these topics, focusing on the biopesticides of microbial origin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Topics in Botanical Biopesticides—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Pesticide classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Data obtained from Ref. [<a href="#B126-plants-13-02762" class="html-bibr">126</a>], re-processed in an R environment using the taxizedb [<a href="#B127-plants-13-02762" class="html-bibr">127</a>] and ComplexHeatmap [<a href="#B128-plants-13-02762" class="html-bibr">128</a>] packages. (<b>A</b>) Heatmap of occurrences between the genres of antagonists (row) and targets (column); (<b>B</b>) pie chart of the sum of the antagonist microorganism phyla.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scheme of the toxicity potential of Bt δ-endotoxins against different organisms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Pesticide cycle in the environment.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 596 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Common Ragweed (Ambrosia Artemisiifolia L.) Seed Predation in Crop Fields and Their Adjacent Semi-Natural Habitats in Hungary
by Zita Dorner, Mohammed Gaafer Abdelgfar Osman, Ágnes Kukorellyné Szénási and Mihály Zalai
Diversity 2024, 16(10), 609; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16100609 - 1 Oct 2024
Viewed by 214
Abstract
Ambrosia artemisiifolia has turned into a noxious weed species in agricultural fields and landscapes in Europe. Durable control options are still needed to limit the abundance of this species. Weed seed consumption by naturally occurring seed predators is a key ecosystem service in [...] Read more.
Ambrosia artemisiifolia has turned into a noxious weed species in agricultural fields and landscapes in Europe. Durable control options are still needed to limit the abundance of this species. Weed seed consumption by naturally occurring seed predators is a key ecosystem service in agricultural areas. Seed predation levels of common ragweed were examined in wheat and maize fields and adjacent semi-natural habitats (SNHs). To evaluate the weed seeds’ exposure to invertebrate seed predators, 20 cards each were set on the soil surface inside the crop field and in SNHs with four replications. Twenty seeds of ragweed were attached to sandpaper. Seed removal was assessed every 24 h of exposure for 5 days in June and November 2019, October 2020, and June 2021. The seed consumption level was measured according to the number of removed seeds from the seed cards. High consumption rates of ragweed seeds were found in all sampling rounds in both seasons and habitats. The seed predation rates in 2019 were stronger within crop fields in summer than in autumn with a slight difference between SNHs and inside fields. Our results demonstrate the possibility of seed predation contributing to Integrated Plant Protection (IPM) of common ragweed in rural areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Seed predation affected by different habitats during 5-day survey periods in 2019–2021, Gödöllő, Hungary (<span class="html-italic">p</span> values indicate the significant differences between habitats on the same days based on the accumulated seed predation between day 0 and the given day; blue, crop fields; orange, semi-natural habitat; ns, not significant on 95% confidence level).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2816 KiB  
Article
Phytotoxic Activity of Sesquiterpene Lactones-Enriched Fractions from Cynara cardunculus L. Leaves on Pre-Emergent and Post-Emergent Weed Species and Putative Mode of Action
by Daniela Rosa, Carlos Rial, Teresa Brás, Rosa M. Varela, Francisco A. Macías and Maria F. Duarte
Plants 2024, 13(19), 2758; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192758 - 1 Oct 2024
Viewed by 223
Abstract
Sesquiterpene lactones (SLs) are compounds that are highly produced in Cynara cardunculus leaves, known for their phytotoxic activity. This study aims to assess SL-enriched fractions’ (cynaropicrin, aguerin B, and grosheimin) phytotoxic potentials and putative modes of action, compared to an initial extract, using [...] Read more.
Sesquiterpene lactones (SLs) are compounds that are highly produced in Cynara cardunculus leaves, known for their phytotoxic activity. This study aims to assess SL-enriched fractions’ (cynaropicrin, aguerin B, and grosheimin) phytotoxic potentials and putative modes of action, compared to an initial extract, using two approaches: first, against a panel of nine weed species in pre-emergence, and then on Portulaca oleracea L.’s post-emergency stage. The SL-enriched fractions demonstrated greater phytotoxic activity when compared with the C. cardunculus leaf initial extract. The SL-enriched fractions had higher activity at root growth inhibition over the panel tested, doubling the activity in five of them at 800 ppm. Regarding the post-emergence bioassay, the SL-enriched fractions had a higher influence on the plants’ growth inhibition (67% at 800 ppm). The SL-effects on the plants’ metabolisms were evidenced. The total chlorophyll content was reduced by 65% at 800 ppm. Oxidative stress induction was observed because of the enhancement in MDA levels at 800 ppm compared to control (52%) and the decrease in SOD-specific activity from 4.20 U/mg protein (400 ppm) to 1.74 U/mg protein (800 ppm). The phytotoxic effects of the SL-enriched fractions suggest that they could be used for a future bioherbicide development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytochemical and Biological Activity of Plant Extracts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Trifolium repens</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Plantago lanceolata</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Dactylis glomerata</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Phalaris arundinacea</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Lolium rigidum</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Festuca rubra rubra</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Daucus carota</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Matricaria recutita</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Trifolium incarnatum</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effects of the initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and herbicide (HBC) on the growth of <span class="html-italic">Portulaca oleracea</span> roots and shoots. The values are expressed as the percentage difference from the control, and Welch’s test was used for statistical analysis. Letters <span class="html-italic">a</span> and <span class="html-italic">b</span> indicate significance for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively. (Adapted from [<a href="#B17-plants-13-02758" class="html-bibr">17</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Cluster analysis of the phytotoxic effects of initial extract (IE), SL-enriched fractions (F1–F4), and the herbicide Stomp<sup>®</sup>Aqua (HBC) (positive control) on <span class="html-italic">Portulaca oleracea</span>, <span class="html-italic">Plantago lanceolata</span>, <span class="html-italic">Phalaris arundinacea</span>, <span class="html-italic">Trifolium repens</span>, <span class="html-italic">Trifolium incarnatum</span>, <span class="html-italic">Matricaria recutita</span>, <span class="html-italic">Daucus carota</span>, <span class="html-italic">Festuca rubra rubra</span>, <span class="html-italic">Lolium rigidum</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Dactylis glomerata</span> root and shoot growth inhibition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Cluster analysis of the susceptibility of weed species exposed to the SL-enriched fractions: (<b>a</b>) root growth; (<b>b</b>) shoot growth; and (<b>c</b>) root and shoot growth combination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Values for <span class="html-italic">P. oleracea</span> DW determination at each treatment: IE—initial extract; SL-EF: SL-enriched fractions; HBC—herbicide (positive control). The values are expressed as percentage difference from control. Letters indicate significance between treatments and concentrations for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, where a represents the higher negative value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Total chlorophyll content in the leaf tissues of <span class="html-italic">P. oleracea</span> for each treatment: IE—initial extract; SL-EF: SL-enriched fractions; HBC—herbicide (positive control). The values are expressed as percentage difference from control. Letters indicate significance between treatments and concentrations for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, where a represents the higher negative value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>SOD activity in the leaf tissues of <span class="html-italic">P. oleracea</span> in response to different treatments IE—initial extract; SL-EF: SL-enriched fractions; HBC—herbicide (positive control). The values are expressed as U/mg of protein. Letters indicate significance between treatments and concentrations for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, where a represents the higher value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>MDA content in the leaf tissues of <span class="html-italic">P. oleracea</span> for each treatment: IF—initial extract; EF: SL-enriched fractions; HBC—herbicide (positive control). Values are expressed as percentage difference from control. Letters indicate significance between treatments and concentrations for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 676 KiB  
Article
Effect of Feed on the Growth Performance, Nutrition Content and Cost of Raising the Field Cricket (Gryllus madagascarensis) as a Sustainable Nutrient Source in Madagascar
by Henlay J. O. Magara, Sylvain Hugel and Brian L. Fisher
Foods 2024, 13(19), 3139; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13193139 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 391
Abstract
The field cricket, Gryllus madagascarensis, is a sustainable and nutritious food resource that has the potential to mitigate global malnutrition. Feeds provided to this cricket can influence its growth parameters, nutritional content, and the cost of raising it for food. The current [...] Read more.
The field cricket, Gryllus madagascarensis, is a sustainable and nutritious food resource that has the potential to mitigate global malnutrition. Feeds provided to this cricket can influence its growth parameters, nutritional content, and the cost of raising it for food. The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of feeds formulated from weeds, agro-byproducts, and chicken feed (control) on the growth parameters and nutritional content of G. madagascarensis. The formulated feeds included CFB (25.0% protein), CFC (24.5% protein), CFD (24.0% protein), CFE (23.5% protein), CFF (22.5% protein), CFG (21.5% protein), CFH (20.0% protein), CFI (14.5% protein), and CFJ (13.5% protein), and chicken feed (CFA) (28% protein) was used as the control. The formulation of the feeds was based on the acceptability and protein content of the 12 selected weeds and agro-byproducts. Proximate, mineral, and fatty acid analyses were conducted to determine the nutrient content of each feed, as well as the crickets raised on these feeds. The fastest development time was recorded with CFE and CFC. The highest survivorship (98%) was observed in CFG, CFE, and CFC. The highest body mass (1.15 g) and body length (26.80 mm) were observed in crickets fed CFG. By comparison, crickets fed control feed averaged a body mass of 0.81 g and a body length of 23.55 mm. The feed conversion ratio for G. madagascarensis fed CFG, CFE, and CFC was 1.71. Crickets raised on CFH and CFG had the lowest cost of feeding per kg live mass gain. Crickets fed on CFF had the highest quantity of protein (67%), followed by those fed CFG (65% protein); crickets with the lowest protein content (50%) were fed CFJ. Crickets fed on CFG had the highest mineral content. Linoleic acid, oleic acid, and palmitic acid were the major fatty acids. The findings indicate that formulated feeds from weeds and agro-byproducts have great potential to be used as an alternative feed source for crickets for two reasons: their capacity to positively influence the biology and nutrition of the cricket, and they can serve as an inexpensive replacement for chicken feed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Uses and Applications of By-Products of the Food Industry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The mean values ± standard deviation of development time of <span class="html-italic">Gryllus madagascarensis</span> cricket reared on different formulated and reference feeds. Different letters in a column indicate significant differences, Student–Newman–Keul test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). CFA—16% soybean meal + 22% a mixture of fine wheat and wheat flour + 15% broken rice+ 25% maize + 5% bergafats + 1% lysine amino acid +1% DCP + 1% methionine + 1% vitamin-mineral premix + 1% lime + 15% fish meal; 20% cassava leaves, 20% maize bran, 10% rice bran, 10% cowpea bran, 20% navy bean bran; CFB—98% cassava leaves + 1% sugar + 1% baking powder; CFC—20% silver leaf desmodium + 20% wheat bran + 40% cowpea bran + 20% maize bran; CFD—30% tropical African morning glory, 30% maize bran, 20% navy bean bran, 10% maize germ, 10% rice bran; CFE—20% tropical African morning glory, 20% cassava leaves, 20% maize bran, 10% rice bran, 10% cowpea bran, 20% navy bean bran; CFF—30% tropical African morning glory + 40% cassava leaves powder + 20% cowpea bran + 10% of navy bean bran; CFG—20% tropical African morning glory, 20% gallant soldier, 15% cassava leaves, 20% cowpea bran, 10% navy bean bran, 10% maize bran, 5% wheat bran; CFH—30% cassava leaves + gallant soldier + 20% cowpea bran + 10% tropical African morning glory + 10% taro leaves; CFI—99% wheat bran and 1% baking powder; CFJ—33% maize bran, 33% cassava tuber bran, 33% wheat bran, 1% baking powder; DCP is dicalcium phosphate. Dotted line shows how formulated feeds compare with the reference feed (CFJ).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Survival rate of <span class="html-italic">Gryllus madagascarensis</span> reared on different feeds: CFA—16% soybean meal + 22% a mixture of fine wheat and wheat flour + 15% broken rice + 25% maize + 5% bergafats + 1% lysine amino acid + 1% DCP + 1% methionine + 1% vitamin-mineral premix + 1% lime + 15% fish meal; 20% cassava leaves, 20% maize bran, 10% rice bran, 10% cowpea bran, 20% navy bean bran; CFB—98% cassava leaves + 1% sugar + 1% baking powder; CFC—20% silver leaf desmodium + 20% wheat bran + 40% cowpea bran + 20% maize bran; CFD—30% tropical African morning glory, 30% maize bran, 20% navy bean bran, 10% maize germ, 10% rice bran; CFE—20% tropical African morning glory, 20% cassava leaves, 20% maize bran, 10% rice bran, 10% cowpea bran, 20% navy bean bran; CFF—30% tropical African morning glory + 40% cassava leaves powder + 20% cowpea bran + 10% of navy bean bran; CFG—20% tropical African morning glory, 20% gallant soldier, 15% cassava leaves, 20% cowpea bran, 10% navy bean bran, 10% maize bran, 5% wheat bran; CFH—30% cassava leaves + gallant soldier + 20% cowpea bran + 10% tropical African morning glory + 10% taro leaves; CFI—99% wheat bran and 1% baking powder; CFJ—33% maize bran, 33% cassava tuber bran, 33% wheat bran, 1% baking powder; DCP is dicalcium phosphate.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 2564 KiB  
Article
Bioactive Compounds and Valorization of Coffee By-Products from the Origin: A Circular Economy Model from Local Practices in Zongolica, Mexico
by Emanuel Bojórquez-Quintal, Damián Xotlanihua-Flores, Loretta Bacchetta, Gianfranco Diretto, Oliviero Maccioni, Sarah Frusciante, Luis M. Rojas-Abarca and Esteban Sánchez-Rodríguez
Plants 2024, 13(19), 2741; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192741 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 384
Abstract
The by-products of green coffee processing are rich in compounds that can be recycled for their possible use in the production of beverages, fertilizers and weed control in production areas. The objective of this work was to identify the organic and inorganic bioactive [...] Read more.
The by-products of green coffee processing are rich in compounds that can be recycled for their possible use in the production of beverages, fertilizers and weed control in production areas. The objective of this work was to identify the organic and inorganic bioactive compounds of green coffee and the coffee by-products related to the production of origin, such as dried cascara (skin-pulp), parchment and silverskin (unroasted), in order to investigate the role their biomolecules may have in reuse through practices and local knowledge, not yet valued. The metabolomic profile by HPLC-ESI-HRMS of the aqueous extract of the dried cascara highlighted 93 non-volatile molecules, the highest number reported for dried cascara. They belong to groups of organic acids (12), alkaloids (5), sugars (5), fatty acids (2), diglycerides (1), amino acids (18), phospholipids (7), vitamins (5), phenolic acids (11), flavonoids (8), chlorogenic acids (17), flavones (1) and terpenes (1). For the first time, we report the use of direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) for the identification of metabolites in aqueous extracts of dried cascara, parchment, silverskin and green coffee. The DART analysis mainly showed the presence of caffeine and chlorogenic acids in all the extracts; additionally, sugar adducts and antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols were detected. The mineral content (K, Ca, P, S, Mg and Cl) by EDS spectrometry in the by-products and green coffee showed a relatively high content of K in the dried cascara and green coffee, while Ca was detected in double quantity in the silverskin. These metabolomic and mineral profile data allow enhancement of the link between the quality of green coffee and its by-products and the traditional local practices in the crop-growing area. This consolidates the community’s experience in reusing by-products, thereby minimizing the impact on the environment and generating additional income for coffee growers’ work, in accordance with the principles of circular economy and bioeconomy. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Macrolocation and coffee landscape of the Sierra de Zongolica, Veracruz, Mexico. (<b>a</b>) Location of the coffee-growing regions of the State of Veracruz and coffee-growing municipalities of the Sierra de Zongolica. (<b>b</b>) Coffee landscape observed from a panoramic view from southwest to northwest. Interaction between the producer, coffee grower and the coffee plantation, and the slopes with shade and light. Maps and photos by DXF and JMR. Geographic maps based on INEGI data and prepared with the ArcGis Pro v3.3 program.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Processing and reuse of coffee by-products by local practices in the Sierra de Zongolica, Veracruz, Mexico. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Harvesting and sorting of ripe coffee cherries. (<b>c</b>) Products from dry and wet processing of coffee cherries, dried coffee cherries and parchment coffee. (<b>d</b>–<b>h</b>) Processing, drying and collection of dry coffee husks after dry and wet processing. (<b>i</b>–<b>k</b>) Reuse of by-products (dried cascara/husk and parchment) by local practices as free fertilizer, tea-type beverages and weed control. Photos by DXF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mineral microanalysis in cascara, parchment, silverskin and green coffee by energy dispersive X-rays spectroscopy (EDS). (<b>a</b>) Cascara (husk), (<b>b</b>) parchment, (<b>c</b>) silverskin and (<b>d</b>) green coffee. The relative content of each element is indicated as a percentage. The spectra show the identification of each chemical element by its characteristic X-ray lines (KeV). Five measurements were made per coffee by-product and green coffee sample. Data are reported as mean ± standard error of the mean (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Different letters (italics) indicate significant differences between samples for element (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; Tukey’s test). Asterisks indicate the presence of the element in the sample, * magnesium (Mg) and ** phosphorus (P) and chlorine (Cl).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 1497 KiB  
Review
Laser Weeding Technology in Cropping Systems: A Comprehensive Review
by Muhammad Usama Yaseen and John M. Long
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2253; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102253 - 29 Sep 2024
Viewed by 421
Abstract
Weed infestations pose significant challenges to global crop production, demanding effective and sustainable weed control methods. Traditional approaches, such as chemical herbicides, mechanical tillage, and plastic mulches, are not only associated with environmental concerns but also face challenges like herbicide resistance, soil health, [...] Read more.
Weed infestations pose significant challenges to global crop production, demanding effective and sustainable weed control methods. Traditional approaches, such as chemical herbicides, mechanical tillage, and plastic mulches, are not only associated with environmental concerns but also face challenges like herbicide resistance, soil health, erosion, moisture content, and organic matter depletion. Thermal methods like flaming, streaming, and hot foam distribution are emerging weed control technologies along with directed energy systems of electrical and laser weeding. This paper conducts a comprehensive review of laser weeding technology, comparing it with conventional methods and highlighting its potential environmental benefits. Laser weeding, known for its precision and targeted energy delivery, emerges as a promising alternative to conventional control methods. This review explores various laser weeding platforms, discussing their features, applications, and limitations, with a focus on critical areas for improvement, including dwell time reduction, automated navigation, energy efficiency, affordability, and safety standards. Comparative analyses underscore the advantages of laser weeding, such as reduced environmental impact, minimized soil disturbance, and the potential for sustainable agriculture. This paper concludes by outlining key areas for future research and development to enhance the effectiveness, accessibility, and affordability of laser weeding technology. In summary, laser weeding presents a transformative solution for weed control, aligning with the principles of sustainable and environmentally conscious agriculture, and addressing the limitations of traditional methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Graphical explanation of machine learning and deep learning models. The hourglass symbol indicates low processing, the lightning bolt shows quick processing, and the plus sign (+) indicates the detection of weed or crop.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Platforms of laser weeding technology in row crops. (<b>a</b>) [<a href="#B67-agronomy-14-02253" class="html-bibr">67</a>], (<b>b</b>) [<a href="#B17-agronomy-14-02253" class="html-bibr">17</a>], (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) [<a href="#B68-agronomy-14-02253" class="html-bibr">68</a>], (<b>e</b>) [<a href="#B69-agronomy-14-02253" class="html-bibr">69</a>], (<b>f</b>) [<a href="#B70-agronomy-14-02253" class="html-bibr">70</a>].</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 4545 KiB  
Article
SkipResNet: Crop and Weed Recognition Based on the Improved ResNet
by Wenyi Hu, Tian Chen, Chunjie Lan, Shan Liu and Lirong Yin
Land 2024, 13(10), 1585; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101585 - 29 Sep 2024
Viewed by 164
Abstract
Weeds have a detrimental effect on crop yield. However, the prevailing chemical weed control methods cause pollution of the ecosystem and land. Therefore, it has become a trend to reduce dependence on herbicides; realize a sustainable, intelligent weed control method; and protect the [...] Read more.
Weeds have a detrimental effect on crop yield. However, the prevailing chemical weed control methods cause pollution of the ecosystem and land. Therefore, it has become a trend to reduce dependence on herbicides; realize a sustainable, intelligent weed control method; and protect the land. In order to realize intelligent weeding, efficient and accurate crop and weed recognition is necessary. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are widely applied for weed and crop recognition due to their high speed and efficiency. In this paper, a multi-path input skip-residual network (SkipResNet) was put forward to upgrade the classification function of weeds and crops. It improved the residual block in the ResNet model and combined three different path selection algorithms. Experiments showed that on the plant seedling dataset, our proposed network achieved an accuracy of 95.07%, which is 0.73%, 0.37%, and 4.75% better than that of ResNet18, VGG19, and MobileNetV2, respectively. The validation results on the weed–corn dataset also showed that the algorithm can provide more accurate identification of weeds and crops, thereby reducing land contamination during the weeding process. In addition, the algorithm is generalizable and can be used in image classification in agriculture and other fields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GeoAI for Land Use Observations, Analysis and Forecasting)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General description of the methodology for weed classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structure of a residual block: x is the data input to layer1, F(x) is the output after the data are computed by layer1 and layer2, and there is a skip connection between x and F(x) such that the output of the residual block becomes x + F(x).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Improvement of residual blocks: x is the data input of ayer1 (the output of the layer before layer 1 in the network), x0 are the original input data, and F(x) is the output after the computation of layer1 and layer2. After deriving F(x), x0 is re-inputted so that the output of the residual block is changed to x0 + F(x).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The framework of ResNet, SkipResNet, and SkipNet. (<b>a</b>) The 18-layer ResNet, which is equivalent to the 18-layer SkipResNet when k = 1; (<b>b</b>) the 18-layer SkipResNet, which shows the first input in the middle layer of the path (k = 2); (<b>c</b>) the 18-layer SkipResNet, with the figure showing the second input path at the middle layer (k = 3); and (<b>d</b>) evaluation of the 18-layer SkipNet for the CIFAR-10 dataset, with an input image resolution of 32 × 32. Here, k is the input path labeling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>The framework of ResNet, SkipResNet, and SkipNet. (<b>a</b>) The 18-layer ResNet, which is equivalent to the 18-layer SkipResNet when k = 1; (<b>b</b>) the 18-layer SkipResNet, which shows the first input in the middle layer of the path (k = 2); (<b>c</b>) the 18-layer SkipResNet, with the figure showing the second input path at the middle layer (k = 3); and (<b>d</b>) evaluation of the 18-layer SkipNet for the CIFAR-10 dataset, with an input image resolution of 32 × 32. Here, k is the input path labeling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example images of the plant seedling dataset [<a href="#B29-land-13-01585" class="html-bibr">29</a>]. The labels in this figure correspond to the labels in <a href="#land-13-01585-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>. (<b>a</b>) Black-grass, (<b>b</b>) charlock, (<b>c</b>) cleavers, (<b>d</b>) common chickweed, (<b>e</b>) common wheat, (<b>f</b>) fat hen, (<b>g</b>) loose silky-bent, (<b>h</b>) maize, (<b>i</b>) scentless mayweed, (<b>j</b>) shepherd’s purse, (<b>k</b>) small-flowered cranesbill, and (<b>l</b>) sugar beet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Weed–corn dataset [<a href="#B14-land-13-01585" class="html-bibr">14</a>]: (<b>a</b>) bluegrass, (<b>b</b>) chenopodium album, (<b>c</b>) cirsium setosum, (<b>d</b>) sedge, and (<b>e</b>) corn.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>CIFAR-10 dataset [<a href="#B30-land-13-01585" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Confusion matrices of SkipResNet18, ResNet18, VGG19, and MobileNetV2 on a test set of 12 plant seedlings: (<b>a</b>) SkipResNet18; (<b>b</b>) ResNet18; (<b>c</b>) VGG19; (<b>d</b>) MobileNetV2. The 12 species considered were (1) black-grass, (2) charlock, (3) cleavers, (4) common chickweed, (5) common wheat, (6) fat hen, (7) loose silky-bent, (8) maize, (9) scentless mayweed, (10) shepherd’s purse, (11) small-flowered cranesbill, and (12) sugar beet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Confusion matrices of SkipResNet18, ResNet18, VGG19, and MobileNetV2 on a test set of 12 plant seedlings: (<b>a</b>) SkipResNet18; (<b>b</b>) ResNet18; (<b>c</b>) VGG19; (<b>d</b>) MobileNetV2. The 12 species considered were (1) black-grass, (2) charlock, (3) cleavers, (4) common chickweed, (5) common wheat, (6) fat hen, (7) loose silky-bent, (8) maize, (9) scentless mayweed, (10) shepherd’s purse, (11) small-flowered cranesbill, and (12) sugar beet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Precision–recall plots for (<b>a</b>) SkipResNet18, (<b>b</b>) ResNet18, (<b>c</b>) VGG19, and (<b>d</b>) MobileNetV2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Precision–recall plots for (<b>a</b>) SkipResNet18, (<b>b</b>) ResNet18, (<b>c</b>) VGG19, and (<b>d</b>) MobileNetV2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Confusion matrices for SkipResNet18 and ResNet18 on four weed and corn test sets. (<b>a</b>) SkipResNet18 and (<b>b</b>) ResNet18. The 5 species considered were (1) bluegrass, (2) chenopodium album, (3) cirsium setosum, (4) corn, and (5) sedge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Accuracy of SkipNet18, ResNet18, VGG19, and ResNet34 models on the CIFAR-10 dataset.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 4657 KiB  
Communication
Assessment of the Performance of a Field Weeding Location-Based Robot Using YOLOv8
by Reetta Palva, Eerikki Kaila, Borja García-Pascual and Victor Bloch
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2215; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102215 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 325
Abstract
Field robots are an important tool when improving the efficiency and decreasing the climatic impact of food production. Although several commercial field robots are available, the advantages, limitations, and optimal utilization methods of this technology are still not well understood due to its [...] Read more.
Field robots are an important tool when improving the efficiency and decreasing the climatic impact of food production. Although several commercial field robots are available, the advantages, limitations, and optimal utilization methods of this technology are still not well understood due to its novelty. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a commercial field robot for seeding and weeding tasks. The evaluation was carried out in a 2-hectare sugar beet field. The robot’s performance was assessed by counting plants and weeds using image processing. The YOLOv8 model was trained to detect sugar beets and weeds. The plant and weed densities were compared on a robotically weeded area of the field, a chemically weeded control area, and an untreated control area. The average weed density on the robotically treated area was about two times lower than that on the untreated area and about three times higher than on the chemically treated area. The testing robot in the specific testing environment and mode showed intermediate results, weeding a majority of the weeds between the rows; however, it left the most harmful weeds close to the plants. Software for robot performance assessment can be used for monitoring robot performance and plant conditions several times during plant growth according to the weeding frequency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Precision and Digital Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental research 2 ha sugar beet fields (<b>a</b>) and a view of the FarmDroid 20 weeding robot with robotically weeded and untreated field areas (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Images collected from the sugar beet field by an action camera installed on the robot from a 2 m height (<b>a</b>) and a drone camera from a 4 m height (<b>b</b>). The distance between the plant rows was 0.5 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A field map assembled from field images collected by a drone without accurate fitting between the images taken on 27 June 2023 (<b>a</b>) and 5 July 2023 (<b>b</b>). The field was divided into areas analyzed in the study: robotically weeded area, chemically weeded area, and untreated area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Convergence of the YOLOv8 model training with mAP50 and F1 for detecting sugar beets, weeds, and their average validated by the validation set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plant and weed density and covering area distributions for the robotically weeded area, chemically weeded area, and untreated control area measured on 27 June 2023 and 5 July 2023. (<b>a</b>) Plant density, 1/m<sup>2</sup>, 27 June 2023; (<b>b</b>) weed density, 1/m<sup>2</sup>, 27 June 2023; (<b>c</b>) Plant area, %, 27 June 2023; (<b>d</b>) Weed area, %, 27 June 2023; (<b>e</b>) Plant density, 1/m<sup>2</sup>, 5 July 2023; (<b>f</b>) weed density, 1/m<sup>2</sup>, 5 July 2023; (<b>g</b>) Plant area, %, 5 July 2023; (<b>h</b>) Weed area, %, 5 July 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Weed (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and plant (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) density maps based on drone images taken on 27 June 2023 (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and 5 July 2023 (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Drone images taken over the same place in the robotically weeded area on 27 June 2023 (<b>a</b>) and 5 July 2023 (<b>b</b>), in the chemically weeded area on 27 June 2023 (<b>c</b>) and 5 July 2023 (<b>d</b>), and in the untreated area on 27 June 2023 (<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5690 KiB  
Article
Mechanism of Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth Resistance to Nicosulfuron
by Jing Guo, Zeqian Xu, Ting Jiao, Hong Gao, Yuechao Wang, Liguo Zhang, Mukai Li, Xiaomin Liu, Chunxiu Yan and Yujun Han
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2210; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102210 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 270
Abstract
Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth, the main weed in corn fields, has gradually developed resistance to nicosulfuron due to continuous and extensive application. We identified a biotype showing resistance to ALS inhibitor nicosulfuron with a resistant index 13.83, but without any target spot mutation. [...] Read more.
Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth, the main weed in corn fields, has gradually developed resistance to nicosulfuron due to continuous and extensive application. We identified a biotype showing resistance to ALS inhibitor nicosulfuron with a resistant index 13.83, but without any target spot mutation. Herein, transcriptome sequencing was used to analyze the differences in gene expression at the transcriptional level between nicosulfuron-resistant E. villosa HEK-40 varieties and sensitive E. villosa HEK-15 varieties. The resistant and sensitive varieties comparison revealed 9931 DEGs after nicosulfuron application, of which 5426 and 4505 genes were up-regulated and down-regulated, respectively. Some contigs related to metabolic resistance were identified based on differential expression via RNA-Seq, which includes ABC transporters (ko02010), glucosinolate biosynthesis (ko00966), 2-oxocarboxylic acid metabolism (ko01210), alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism pathways (ko00250). Seven CYP450 genes, four GST genes, ten ABC transporter genes, and two GT genes related to metabolic resistance were identified. The 10 candidate genes screened were validated using q-PCR. This validation indicates that activities associated with P450 enzymes, ABC transporters, and glutathione S-transferases (GST) may play a role in conferring resistance, which is important for reducing the impact of weeds on corn fields and ensuring food security. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Weed Science and Weed Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Growth of HEK-40 and HEK-15 varieties treated with different doses of nicosulfuron. HEK-40 varieties constitute a resistant population, and HEK-15 varieties constitute a sensitive population.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Contains principal component analysis plots for the experimental and control group samples, and (<b>B</b>) shows the dissimilarity values between the 4 groups. S, treated susceptible plants; S_CK, nontreated susceptible plants; R, treated tolerant plants; R_CK, nontreated tolerant plants. Anosim analysis method was applied for data processing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Differential gene expression volcano maps. The horizontal axis represents the fold change (log (B/A)) in gene expression differences between different groups of samples, while the vertical axis represents the <span class="html-italic">p</span> value, indicating a statistically significant difference in gene expression. The smaller the <span class="html-italic">p</span> value is, the larger the -log (<span class="html-italic">p</span> value) is, and the more significant the difference. Each point in the graph represents a gene, where red represents up-regulated genes, green represents down-regulated genes, and black represents non DEGs. S, treated susceptible plants; S_CK, nontreated susceptible plants; R, treated tolerant plants; R_CK, nontreated tolerant plants. (<b>A</b>) shows S vs. S_CK; (<b>B</b>) shows R vs. R_CK; (<b>C</b>) shows R_CK vs. S_CK; and (<b>D</b>) shows R vs. S.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Venn diagram showing the number of DEGs common or specific to treated and nontreated tolerant and susceptible plants. S, treated susceptible plants; S_CK, nontreated susceptible plants; R, treated tolerant plants; R_CK, nontreated tolerant plants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Alignment of the unigenes of <span class="html-italic">Eriochloa villosa</span> with those of homologous species in the NR database.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>GO functional annotation and classification of DEGs. (<b>A</b>) S vs. S_CK; (<b>B</b>) R vs. R_CK; (<b>C</b>) R_CK vs. S_CK; and (<b>D</b>) R vs. S. The blue area represents the Biological Process, orange represents the Cellular Component, and green represents the Molecular Function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs. (<b>A</b>) S vs. S_CK; (<b>B</b>) R vs. R_CK; (<b>C</b>) R_CK vs. S_CK; and (<b>D</b>) R vs. S.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>RT-qPCR validation of 10 DEGs associated with metabolic resistance to nicosulfuron in <span class="html-italic">Eriochloa villosa</span>. Error bars represent the mean ± SE of three biological replicates. Significant difference at each treatment between R and S by Tukey’s test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Lowercase letters indicates the significance between different treatments by Tukey’s test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 3994 KiB  
Article
From Weeds to Feeds: Exploring the Potential of Wild Plants in Horticulture from a Centuries-Long Journey to an AI-Driven Future
by Diego Rivera, Diego-José Rivera-Obón, José-Antonio Palazón and Concepción Obón
Horticulturae 2024, 10(10), 1021; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101021 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 574
Abstract
Given the increasing food needs of humanity and the challenges cultivated species face in adapting to the climatic uncertainties we experience, it is urgent to cultivate new species. A highly relevant repertoire for this purpose is offered by the array of edible wild [...] Read more.
Given the increasing food needs of humanity and the challenges cultivated species face in adapting to the climatic uncertainties we experience, it is urgent to cultivate new species. A highly relevant repertoire for this purpose is offered by the array of edible wild plants. We analyzed data from Murcia (Spain), involving 61 species and 59 informants, and the Global Database of Wild Food Plants, which includes 15,000 species, 500 localities, and nearly 700 references. Using local consensus, global distribution, and GBIF occurrence data, we built simple unimodal or bimodal models to explore their limitations. Our study highlights that approximately 15,000 wild or feral plant species are consumed as food, underlining the urgent need to support existing crops with new species due to current food crises and climate irregularities. We examined wild plant diversity from a horticultural perspective, considering their relationships with weeds and invasive species. Partial criteria, such as local consensus or global use, were found insufficient for selecting candidate species. We propose developing a specific artificial intelligence to integrate various factors—ecological, nutritional, toxicological, agronomic, biogeographical, ethnobotanical, economic, and physiological—to accurately model a species’ potential for domestication and cultivation. We propose the necessary tools and a protocol for developing this AI-based model. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Prospects of Using Wild Plant Species in Horticulture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical Distribution of zones where our laboratory studied Wild Food Plants in the Huerta de Murcia (Murcia, Spain). 1. Algezares, 2. Alquerías, 3. Beniaján, 4. Cabezo de Torres, 5. La Alberca, 6. La Arboleja, 7. Llano de Brujas, 8. Los Garres, 9. Monteagudo, 10. Puebla de Soto, 11. Puente Tocinos, 12. Rincón de Beniscornia, 13. Rincón de Seca, 14. Torreagüera. Image by Diego Rivera with a base map from Google Earth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geographical distribution of information sources for the Global Database of Wild Food Plants. Image by Diego Rivera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of Relative Frequency of Citation or percentage of informants citing each species in the Huerta de Murcia, expressed in terms of numbers of species. Graphics by Diego Rivera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationships between the number of species and the number of informants or records in the Huerta de Murcia, expressed in terms of cumulative percentages. Graphics by Diego José Rivera-Obón.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationships between species and localities registered in the Global Database of Wild Food Plants at different geographical levels (Huerta de Murcia, Spain, Mediterranean, World). Graphics by Diego José Rivera-Obón and Diego Rivera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relationships between global occurrences of wild food plants from Huerta de Murcia recorded in GBIF and global occurrences of their use as food. Graphics by Diego Rivera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of local consensus levels and global occurrences of wild food plants from Huerta de Murcia. The graph illustrates the correlation between the consensus level in terms of the number of informants for wild food plants in Huerta de Murcia and their global occurrences as food species in terms of the number of zones. Graphics by Diego Rivera.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 5107 KiB  
Article
Nitrate Removal by Floating Treatment Wetlands under Aerated and Unaerated Conditions: Field and Laboratory Results
by Jenna McCoy, Matt Chaffee, Aaron Mittelstet, Tiffany Messer and Steve Comfort
Nitrogen 2024, 5(4), 808-827; https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen5040053 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 452
Abstract
Urban and storm water retention ponds eventually become eutrophic after years of receiving runoff water. In 2020, a novel biological and chemical treatment was initiated to remove accumulated nutrients from an urban retention pond that had severe algae and weed growth. Our approach [...] Read more.
Urban and storm water retention ponds eventually become eutrophic after years of receiving runoff water. In 2020, a novel biological and chemical treatment was initiated to remove accumulated nutrients from an urban retention pond that had severe algae and weed growth. Our approach installed two 6.1 m × 6.1 m floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) and two airlift pumps that contained slow-release lanthanum composites, which facilitated phosphate precipitation. Four years of treatment (2020–2023) resulted in median nitrate-N concentrations decreasing from 23 µg L−1 in 2020 to 1.3 µg L−1 in 2023, while PO4-P decreased from 42 µg L−1 to 19 µg L−1. The removal of N and P from the water column coincided with less algae, weeds, and pond muck (sediment), and greater dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and water clarity. To quantify the sustainability of this bio-chemical approach, we focused on quantifying nitrate removal rates beneath FTWs. By enclosing quarter sections (3.05 × 3.05 m) of the field-scale FTWs inside vinyl pool liners, nitrate removal rates were measured by spiking nitrate into the enclosed root zone. The first field experiment showed that DO concentrations inside the pool liners were well below the ambient values of the pond (<0.5 mg/L) and nitrate was quickly removed. The second field experiment quantified nitrate loss under a greater range of DO values (<0.5–7 mg/L) by including aeration as a treatment. Nitrate removal beneath FTWs was roughly one-third less when aerated versus unaerated. Extrapolating experimental removal rates to two full-sized FTWs installed in the pond, we estimate between 0.64 to 3.73 kg of nitrate-N could be removed over a growing season (May–September). Complementary laboratory mesocosm experiments using similar treatments to field experiments also exhibited varying nitrate removal rates that were dependent on DO concentrations. Using an average annual removal rate of 1.8 kg nitrate-N, we estimate the two full-size FTWs could counter 14 to 56% of the annual incoming nitrate load from the contributing watershed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Photos and schematics of biological and chemical approach used by McKercher et al. [<a href="#B2-nitrogen-05-00053" class="html-bibr">2</a>] to restore eutrophic ponds. Photos are of Densmore Pond (Lincoln, NE, USA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photographs of field experimental units (pools) used for Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic and photograph of lab-scale mesocosms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photographs of Densmore Pond from 2020 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temporal changes in PO<sub>4</sub>-P, NO<sub>3</sub>-N, and dissolved oxygen concentrations in Densmore Pond from 2020 through 2023. Error bars on symbols represent standard errors; where absent, bars fall within symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Field Experiment 1. Top: Temporal changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations inside treatment pools and outside (ambient). Bottom: Temporal changes in NO<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations in aerated, unaerated, and control pools. Error bars on symbols represent standard errors; where absent, bars fall within symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mesocosm Experiment 2. Top: Temporal changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations inside treatment pools and outside (ambient). Bottom: Temporal changes in NO<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations in aerated, unaerated, and control pools. Error bars on symbols represent standard errors; where absent, bars fall within symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Photographs of FTW1 and FTW2 (above water). (<b>C</b>) Underwater photographs of rooting system of FTW1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>Top Left</b>): Diurnal fluctuations in dissolved oxygen concentrations beneath FTW 1 (red star). (<b>Bottom Left</b>): Diurnal fluctuations in dissolved oxygen concentrations outside of FTW1 (yellow star). (<b>Right</b>): Schematic of MS-5 Sensor deployments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Laboratory Experiment 1. Top: Temporal changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations in aerated and unaerated mesocosms. Bottom: Temporal changes in NO<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations in aerated, unaerated mesocosms. Error bars on symbols represent standard errors; where absent, bars fall within symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Laboratory Experiment 2. Top: Temporal changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations in aerated and unaerated mesocosms. Bottom: Temporal changes in NO<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations in aerated and unaerated mesocosms. Error bars on symbols represent standard errors; where absent, bars fall within symbols.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1085 KiB  
Article
Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Annual Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) in the Southeastern Cropping Region of Australia
by Gulshan Mahajan and Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2206; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102206 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 279
Abstract
Annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) is a problematic weed in winter crops and fallows in the southeastern cropping region (SCR) of Australia. This weed has evolved resistance to multiple herbicide groups, globally. In Australia, L. rigidum is more prevalent in the western [...] Read more.
Annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) is a problematic weed in winter crops and fallows in the southeastern cropping region (SCR) of Australia. This weed has evolved resistance to multiple herbicide groups, globally. In Australia, L. rigidum is more prevalent in the western and southern regions than in SCR. To assess the herbicide resistance status of L. rigidum, the response of five L. rigidum populations (collected from the SCR) to glyphosate, glufosinate, paraquat, haloxyfop-P-ethyl, and clethodim is determined using dose–response curves. Three parametric logistic models are used to determine the herbicide dose required to achieve 50% survival (LD50) and 50% growth reduction (GR50). The LD50 values for 50% survival at 28 days after treatment range from 1702 g a.e. ha−1 to 8225 g a.e. ha−1 for glyphosate, 1637 g a.i. ha−1 to 1828 g a.i. ha−1 for glufosinate, 141 g a.i. ha−1 to 307 g a.i. ha−1 for paraquat, 11 g a.i. ha−1 to 107 g a.i. ha−1 for haloxyfop-P-ethyl, and 17 g a.i. ha−1 to 48 g a.i. ha−1 for clethodim. The resistance factor, based on GR50 value, is highest in the S7 population (2.2 times) for glyphosate, the S11 population (2.3 times) for glufosinate, the S11 population (2.0 time) for paraquat, the S7 population (3.9 times) for haloxyfop-P-ethyl, and the S3 population (3.1 times) for clethodim, compared with the susceptible or less tolerant population. The S11 population is found to be resistant to five tested herbicides, based on resistance factors. Similarly, the S3 population is highly resistant to glyphosate, haloxyfop-P-ethyl, and clethodim compared with the W4 population. These results suggest that L. rigidum populations in the SCR exhibit resistance to multiple herbicide groups at labelled field rates. The findings highlight the necessity of adopting an integrated management approach, including the use of residual herbicides, tank mixing herbicides with different modes of action, and rotating herbicides in conjunction with cultural and mechanical control methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Herbicides and Chemical Control of Weeds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dose–response curves for different herbicides [(<b>a</b>) glyphosate, (<b>b</b>) glufosinate, (<b>c</b>) paraquat, (<b>d</b>) haloxyfop, and (<b>e</b>) clethodim] against five populations of <span class="html-italic">Lolium rigidum</span> used to assess LD<sub>50</sub> values (based on survival percentage). Data were subjected to three parametric logistic models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dose–response curves for different herbicides [(<b>a</b>) glyphosate, (<b>b</b>) glufosinate, (<b>c</b>) paraquat, (<b>d</b>) haloxyfop, and (<b>e</b>) clethodim] against five populations of <span class="html-italic">Lolium rigidum</span> used to assess GR<sub>50</sub> values (based on shoot biomass). Data were subjected to three parametric logistic models.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 10618 KiB  
Article
Combining UAV Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data with CPO-SVR to Estimate Seedling Emergence in Breeding Sunflowers
by Shuailing Zhang, Hailin Yu, Bingquan Tian, Xiaoli Wang, Wenhao Cui, Lei Yang, Jingqian Li, Huihui Gong, Junsheng Zhao, Liqun Lu, Jing Zhao and Yubin Lan
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2205; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102205 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 343
Abstract
In order to accurately obtain the seedling emergence rate of breeding sunflower and to assess the quality of sowing as well as the merit of sunflower varieties, a method of extracting the sunflower seedling emergence rate using multi-source remote sensing information from unmanned [...] Read more.
In order to accurately obtain the seedling emergence rate of breeding sunflower and to assess the quality of sowing as well as the merit of sunflower varieties, a method of extracting the sunflower seedling emergence rate using multi-source remote sensing information from unmanned aerial vehicles is proposed. Visible and multispectral images of sunflower seedlings were acquired using a UAV. The thresholding method was used to segment the excess green image of the visible image into vegetation and non-vegetation, to obtain the center point of the vegetation to generate a buffer, and to mask the visible image to achieve weed removal. The components of color models such as the hue–saturation value (HSV), green-relative color space (YCbCr), cyan-magenta-yellow-black (CMYK), and CIELAB color space (L*A*B) models were compared and analyzed. The A component of the L*A*B model was preferred for the optimization of K-means clustering to segment sunflower seedlings and mulch using the genetic algorithm, and the segmentation accuracy was improved by 4.6% compared with the K-means clustering algorithm. All told, 10 geometric features of sunflower seedlings were extracted using segmented images, and 10 vegetation indices and 48 texture features of sunflower seedlings were calculated based on multispectral images. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient method was used to filter the three types of features, and the geometric feature set, the vegetation index set, the texture feature set, and the preferred feature set were constructed. The construction of a sunflower plant number estimation model using the crested porcupine optimizer–support vector machine is proposed and compared with the sunflower plant number estimation models constructed based on decision tree regression, BP neural network, and support vector machine regression. The results show that the accuracy of the model based on the preferred feature set is higher than that of the other three feature sets, indicating that feature screening can improve the accuracy and stability of models; assessed using the CPO-SVR model, the accuracy of the preferred feature set was the highest, with an R² of 0.94, an RMSE of 5.16, and an MAE of 3.03. Compared to the SVR model, the value of the R2 is improved by 3.3%, the RMSE decreased by 18.3%, and the MAE decreased by 18.1%. The results of the study can be cost-effective, accurate, and reliable in terms of obtaining the seedling emergence rate of sunflower field breeding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI, Sensors and Robotics for Smart Agriculture—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic location of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>UAV image acquisition equipment: (<b>a</b>) DJI M300 with Zenmuse P1; (<b>b</b>) DJI M210 with multi-spectral Sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Technology roadmaps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sunflower buffer for weed removal: (<b>a</b>) sunflower visible light image; (<b>b</b>) excess green index binarized image; (<b>c</b>) constructing a sunflower graphic buffer; (<b>d</b>) weed removal. Note: The red boxes in (<b>b</b>) are weeds. The red area in (<b>c</b>) is the sunflower graphic buffer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>K-means clustering segments of each color component: (<b>a</b>) HSV-S; (<b>b</b>) YCbCr-Cb; (<b>c</b>) CMYK-M; (<b>d</b>) L*A*B-A. Note: The white area is the sunflower seedling, and the black area is the background.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Algorithm for dividing sunflower seedlings and mulch: (<b>a</b>) K-means clustering; (<b>b</b>) GA-K mean clustering. Note: The white area is the sunflower seedling, and the black area is the background.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Training and validation of sunflower plants using the CPO-SVR model with four feature sets. Note: (<b>a</b>) texture feature set; (<b>b</b>) vegetation index set; (<b>c</b>) geometric feature set; (<b>d</b>) preferred feature set. The blue line is the training set fitting line, and the red line is the test set fitting line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Number of seedlings of sunflower varieties.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution of seedling emergence in sunflower breeding plots.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 6830 KiB  
Article
Short-Term Growth Dynamics of Spontaneous and Planted Vegetation on Subtropical Extensive Green Roof as Renaturalized Biotope
by Caroline Man Yee Law, Min Pan, Yik Tung Sham and Kenrick Chun Kiu Ho
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8314; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198314 - 24 Sep 2024
Viewed by 524
Abstract
Spontaneous vegetation within a managed green space is often regarded as unwelcoming and insignificant weeds. This perception is still deep-rooted among green-space managers and the general public worldwide; they are generally uncertain about the management needs after allowing these groups of flora to [...] Read more.
Spontaneous vegetation within a managed green space is often regarded as unwelcoming and insignificant weeds. This perception is still deep-rooted among green-space managers and the general public worldwide; they are generally uncertain about the management needs after allowing these groups of flora to take root. The short-term growth dynamics of both spontaneous and planted vegetation should be analyzed, and a widely acceptable, feasible management plan to balance aesthetic and ecological functions should be formulated with the backing of data and analysis for such fast-growing flora in tropical and subtropical regions. A manicured, extensive green roof with only seven (two native, five exotic) plant species was transformed into a renaturalized biotope by replacing 15 native ferns and forb species over 15 months. After planting, a baseline plant survey was conducted, with 54 plant species representing spontaneous growth and 14 planted species alive (7 planted native species survived, plus 7 species planted prior to renaturalization revived). Three quarterly plant surveys recorded the cover-abundance of each species, and the growth dynamics of the planted and spontaneous plant species were evaluated over the first year of study. During each quarterly survey, the number of planted and spontaneous plant species remained stable (ranging from 14 to 16 species and 51 to 54 species, respectively), with a constant turnover of 11 to 12 die-out species and 11 to 12 newly colonized or revived species. Plant coverage of different plant forms fluctuated slightly (within 7%) in the quarterly surveys according to seasonal changes, except for ferns, which outperformed (12% increase in coverage in a year) all the other plant forms. The height of the planted vegetation fluctuated in a year, being shorter during the summer, while the height of spontaneous vegetation remained stable throughout the year, exhibiting resilience to scouring heat. The seasonal growth tendencies of both planted and spontaneous plants were illustrated in relation to their species ranks, and further hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted for the clustering of spontaneous species. Their differential growth patterns provided comprehensive information or supported decisions regarding plant selection and maintenance, which is a scientific novelty within this unexplored topic. Management recommendations based on the findings were suggested to fulfill both aesthetic and ecological needs. Species with stable and less stable growth patterns could be useful to meet maintenance efficiency and biodiversity enhancement needs, respectively. These findings provide insights to form guiding principles for choosing plant species for renaturalization projects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainability, Biodiversity and Conservation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Hand-drawn planting design for the renaturalization of green-roof site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Original vegetation was removed, and some native pre-grown plants were placed in location according to the planting design plan (May 2013).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) First phase of planting was partly finished in May 2013. (<b>b</b>) Well-established planted ferns and spontaneous plants 20 months after the major phases (1st and 2nd) of renaturalization work ended (photo taken in May 2015).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Methodology flowchart of this research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Area-weighted plant height of planted and spontaneous species throughout the monitoring period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Plant coverage percentage grouped under different plant forms in the 4 survey dates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>). Accumulative species abundance of spontaneous/revived plants in 4 survey periods illustrated as a stacked area chart. (<b>b</b>). Species abundance distribution of spontaneous/revived plants in 4 survey periods. Species rank is based on the accumulative coverage of respective species. The dotted lines are linear regression functions in 4 survey periods. Regression equation based on data from Nov 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>). Accumulative species abundance of spontaneous/revived plants in 4 survey periods illustrated as a stacked area chart. (<b>b</b>). Species abundance distribution of spontaneous/revived plants in 4 survey periods. Species rank is based on the accumulative coverage of respective species. The dotted lines are linear regression functions in 4 survey periods. Regression equation based on data from Nov 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accumulative species abundance of planted species in 4 survey periods illustrated as a stacked area chart. (<b>b</b>) Species abundance distribution of planted species in 4 survey periods. Species rank is based on the accumulative coverage of respective species. The dotted lines are linear regression functions in 4 survey periods. Regression equation based on data from Nov 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accumulative species abundance of planted species in 4 survey periods illustrated as a stacked area chart. (<b>b</b>) Species abundance distribution of planted species in 4 survey periods. Species rank is based on the accumulative coverage of respective species. The dotted lines are linear regression functions in 4 survey periods. Regression equation based on data from Nov 2015.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Dendrogram for hierarchical cluster analysis of the trend on relative coverage abundance of 77 spontaneous plant species in the 4 surveys from Oct 2014 to Nov 2015. Vertical lines indicate cut-point for 7 clusters.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop