[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (486)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = refractive error

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
37 pages, 12365 KiB  
Article
A Novel Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Optical Receiver Decision Unit Strategy Based on a Convolutional Neural Network
by Intesar F. El Ramley, Nada M. Bedaiwi, Yas Al-Hadeethi, Abeer Z. Barasheed, Saleha Al-Zhrani and Mingguang Chen
Mathematics 2024, 12(18), 2805; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12182805 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 442
Abstract
Underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) systems face challenges due to the significant temporal dispersion caused by the combined effects of scattering, absorption, refractive index variations, optical turbulence, and bio-optical properties. This collective impairment leads to signal distortion and degrades the optical receiver’s bit [...] Read more.
Underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) systems face challenges due to the significant temporal dispersion caused by the combined effects of scattering, absorption, refractive index variations, optical turbulence, and bio-optical properties. This collective impairment leads to signal distortion and degrades the optical receiver’s bit error rate (BER). Optimising the receiver filter and equaliser design is crucial to enhance receiver performance. However, having an optimal design may not be sufficient to ensure that the receiver decision unit can estimate BER quickly and accurately. This study introduces a novel BER estimation strategy based on a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to improve the accuracy and speed of BER estimation performed by the decision unit’s computational processor compared to traditional methods. Our new CNN algorithm utilises the eye diagram (ED) image processing technique. Despite the incomplete definition of the UWOC channel impulse response (CIR), the CNN model is trained to address the nonlinearity of seawater channels under varying noise conditions and increase the reliability of a given UWOC system. The results demonstrate that our CNN-based BER estimation strategy accurately predicts the corresponding signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and enables reliable BER estimation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>ML algorithms in optical performance monitoring.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Eye diagram essential features.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The layout of a typical UWOC system [<a href="#B62-mathematics-12-02805" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Typical direct detection optical receiver model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Probability density function (PDF) tails obtained from an eye diagram (ED).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Density vs. SNR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Components and the functions of an artificial neuron.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A schematic representation of predicting SNRs with various numbers of filters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Examples of eye diagram images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The CNN architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The CNN architecture and implementation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Scheme of calculating the MAE of True and Predicted data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Learning curves of CNN regression models using (<b>a</b>) 16, (<b>b</b>) 20, (<b>c</b>) 24, and (<b>d</b>) 28 filters, measured via loss and RMSE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Learning curves of CNN regression models using (<b>a</b>) 32, (<b>b</b>) 36, (<b>c</b>) 40, and (<b>d</b>) 44 filters, measured via loss and RMSE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Learning curves of CNN regression models using (<b>a</b>) 32, (<b>b</b>) 36, (<b>c</b>) 40, and (<b>d</b>) 44 filters, measured via loss and RMSE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Learning curves of CNN regression models using (<b>a</b>) 48, (<b>b</b>) 52, (<b>c</b>) 56, (<b>d</b>) 60 and (<b>e</b>) 64 filters, measured via loss and RMSE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>Learning curves of CNN regression models using (<b>a</b>) 48, (<b>b</b>) 52, (<b>c</b>) 56, (<b>d</b>) 60 and (<b>e</b>) 64 filters, measured via loss and RMSE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Number of filters vs. training and predicting time for all CNN models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Number of filters vs. training and validation for both loss and RMSE for all CNN models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Number of filters vs. loss and RMSE ratios for all CNN models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Number of filters vs. number of trainable parameters for all CNN models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Performance of the CNN models, the true versus the predicted SNR (<b>left</b>) and BER (<b>right</b>) values. Various channel models are employed to simulate the behaviour of water in harbours (represented by the colour blue) and coastal areas (represented by the colour green) for different pulse widths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>SNR vs. BER for harbour water (<b>left</b>) and coastal water (<b>right</b>). The true (red) and predicted (blue) values are for different pulse widths using different channel models.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 1826 KiB  
Article
Determination of Drying Characteristics and Physicochemical Properties of Mint (Mentha spicata L.) Leaves Dried in Refractance Window
by Mohammad Kaveh, Shahin Zomorodi, Szymanek Mariusz and Agata Dziwulska-Hunek
Foods 2024, 13(18), 2867; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182867 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 347
Abstract
Drying is one of the most common and effective techniques for preserving the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of medicinal plants in the post-harvest phase. Therefore, in this research, the effect of the new refractance window (RW) technology on the kinetics, thermodynamics, greenhouse gasses, [...] Read more.
Drying is one of the most common and effective techniques for preserving the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of medicinal plants in the post-harvest phase. Therefore, in this research, the effect of the new refractance window (RW) technology on the kinetics, thermodynamics, greenhouse gasses, color indices, bioactive properties, and percentage of mint leaf essential oil was investigated in five different water temperatures in the form of a completely randomized design. This process was modeled by the methods of mathematical models and artificial neural networks (ANNs) with inputs (drying time and water temperature) and an output (moisture ratio). The results showed that with the increase in temperature, the rate of moisture removal from the samples increased and as a result, the drying time, specific energy consumption, CO2, NOx, enthalpy, and entropy decreased significantly (p < 0.05). In addition, the drying water temperature had a significant effect on the rehydration ratio, color indices, bioactive properties, and essential oil percentage of the samples (p < 0.05). The highest value of rehydration ratio was obtained at 80 °C. By increasing temperature, the main color indices such as b*, a*, L*, and Chroma decreased significantly compared to the control (p < 0.05). However, with the increase in temperature, the overall color changes (ΔE) and L* first had a decreasing trend and then an increasing trend, and this trend was the opposite for the rest of the indicators. The application of drying water temperature from 50 to 70 °C increased antioxidant, phenol content, and flavonoid content, and higher drying temperatures led to a significant decrease in these parameters (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the efficiency of the essential oil of the samples was in the range of 0.82 to 2.01%, and the highest value was obtained at the water temperature of 80 °C. Based on the analysis performed on the modeled data, a perceptron artificial neural network with 2-15-14-1 structure with explanation coefficient (0.9999) and mean square error (8.77 × 10−7) performs better than the mathematical methods for predicting the moisture ratio of mint leaves. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Food Engineering and Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A schematic diagram of the refractance window drying system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of ANNs with two input and two hidden layers for moisture ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Moisture ratio vs. drying time at different water temperature levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The rehydration ratio of the dried mint leaf varieties conducted at 50 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of experimental and predicted moisture ratio (MR) values of dried mint at 70 °C for Page model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison between the experimental and predicted moisture ratio values during the training, validation, and testing of the best ANN model.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 15208 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Influence of Refraction-Parameter Deviation on Underwater Stereo-Vision Measurement with Flat Refraction Interface
by Guanqing Li, Shengxiang Huang, Zhi Yin, Nanshan Zheng and Kefei Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(17), 3286; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173286 - 4 Sep 2024
Viewed by 377
Abstract
There has been substantial research on multi-medium visual measurement in fields such as underwater three-dimensional reconstruction and underwater structure monitoring. Addressing the issue where traditional air-based visual-measurement models fail due to refraction when light passes through different media, numerous studies have established refraction-imaging [...] Read more.
There has been substantial research on multi-medium visual measurement in fields such as underwater three-dimensional reconstruction and underwater structure monitoring. Addressing the issue where traditional air-based visual-measurement models fail due to refraction when light passes through different media, numerous studies have established refraction-imaging models based on the actual geometry of light refraction to compensate for the effects of refraction on cross-media imaging. However, the calibration of refraction parameters inevitably contains errors, leading to deviations in these parameters. To analyze the impact of refraction-parameter deviations on measurements in underwater structure visual navigation, this paper develops a dual-media stereo-vision measurement simulation model and conducts comprehensive simulation experiments. The results indicate that to achieve high-precision underwater-measurement outcomes, the calibration method for refraction parameters, the distribution of the targets in the field of view, and the distance of the target from the camera must all be meticulously designed. These findings provide guidance for the construction of underwater stereo-vision measurement systems, the calibration of refraction parameters, underwater experiments, and practical applications. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Refractive geometry for air–glass–water medium with two flat interfaces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Refracted light in the dual-medium scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Air–water dual-medium visual-measurement scenario with one flat interface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Target area and four feature points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Simulation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Coordinate deviation of the target area at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when the relative refraction is 0.99843<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mi>r</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mi>max</mi> <mo> </mo> </mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>mm</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Coordinate deviation of the target area at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when the distance is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>0.805</mn> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mi>max</mi> <mo> </mo> </mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>mm</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Coordinate deviation of the target area at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when the rotation angle of the normal direction of the refractive surface is 0.195°. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mi>max</mi> <mo> </mo> </mrow> <mfenced> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>mm</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>X</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the relative refraction is 0.99843<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mi>r</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Y</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the relative refraction is 0.99843<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mi>r</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Z</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the relative refraction is 0.99843<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mi>r</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>X</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the distance is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>0.805</mn> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Y</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the distance is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>0.805</mn> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Z</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the distance is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>0.805</mn> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>X</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the rotation angle of the normal direction of the refractive surface is 0.195°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Y</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the rotation angle of the normal direction of the refractive surface is 0.195°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Z</mi> </semantics></math> coordinate deviation of the target area at different distances from the camera when the rotation angle of the normal direction of the refractive surface is 0.195°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Relationship between the coordinate components of the four target points and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Z</mi> </semantics></math> when the relative refraction is 0.99843<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mi>r</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Relationship between the coordinate components of the four target points and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Z</mi> </semantics></math> when the distance is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>0.805</mn> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Relationship between the coordinate components of the four target points and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>Z</mi> </semantics></math> when the rotation angle of the normal direction of the refractive surface is 0.195°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Relationship between target-coordinate deviation and relative refractive index deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Relationship between target-coordinate deviation and camera-to-refractive-interface distance deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Relationship between target-coordinate deviation and normal direction of refraction interface.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5626 KiB  
Article
Improving GNSS-IR Sea Surface Height Accuracy Based on a New Ionospheric Stratified Elevation Angle Correction Model
by Jiadi Zhu, Wei Zheng, Yifan Shen, Keke Xu and Hebing Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(17), 3270; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173270 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 303
Abstract
Approximately 71% of the Earth’s surface is covered by vast oceans. With the exacerbation of global climate change, high-precision monitoring of sea surface height variations is of vital importance for constructing global ocean gravity fields and preventing natural disasters in the marine system. [...] Read more.
Approximately 71% of the Earth’s surface is covered by vast oceans. With the exacerbation of global climate change, high-precision monitoring of sea surface height variations is of vital importance for constructing global ocean gravity fields and preventing natural disasters in the marine system. Global Navigation Satellite System Interferometry Reflectometry (GNSS-IR) sea surface altimetry is a method of inferring sea surface height based on the signal-to-noise ratio of satellite signals. It enables the retrieval of sea surface height variations with high precision. However, navigation satellite signals are influenced by the ionosphere during propagation, leading to deviations in the measured values of satellite elevation angles from their true values, which significantly affects the accuracy of GNSS-IR sea surface altimetry. Based on this, the contents of this paper are as follows: Firstly, a new ionospheric stratified elevation angle correction model (ISEACM) was developed by integrating the International Reference Ionosphere Model (IRI) and ray tracing methods. This model aims to improve the accuracy of GNSS-IR sea surface altimetry by correcting the ionospheric refraction effects on satellite elevation angles. Secondly, four GNSS stations (TAR0, PTLD, GOM1, and TPW2) were selected globally, and the corrected sea surface height values obtained using ISEACM were compared with observed values from tide gauge stations. The calculated average Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) were 0.20 m and 0.83, respectively, indicating the effectiveness of ISEACM in sea surface height retrieval. Thirdly, a comparative analysis was conducted between sea surface height retrieval before and after correction using ISEACM. The optimal RMSE and PCC values with tide gauge station observations were 0.15 m and 0.90, respectively, representing a 20.00% improvement in RMSE and a 4.00% improvement in correlation coefficient compared to traditional GNSS-IR retrieval heights. These experimental results demonstrate that correction with ISEACM can effectively enhance the precision of GNSS-IR sea surface altimetry, which is crucial for accurate sea surface height measurements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SoOP-Reflectometry or GNSS-Reflectometry: Theory and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The electron density map of the United States region; (<b>b</b>) the electron density map of the Spain region; (<b>c</b>) the electron density surface distribution map of the Australia region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The flowchart of the new ionospheric stratified elevation angle correction model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Basic principle diagram of GNSS-IR sea surface height measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of GNSS stations and Fresnel reflection regions diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Diagram of angle correction quantities for ionospheric stratified elevation angle correction model stations: (<b>a</b>) The angular correction for TAR0 station; (<b>b</b>) The angular correction for PTLD station; (<b>c</b>) The angular correction for GOM1 station; (<b>d</b>) The angular correction for TPW2 station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison between the inverted height sequence values after correction using the ionospheric stratified elevation angle correction model and the observed tidal sequence values: (<b>a</b>) TAR0 station; (<b>b</b>) PTLD station; (<b>c</b>) GOM1 station; (<b>d</b>) TPW2 station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Pearson correlation coefficient between the inverted height sequence after correction using the ionospheric stratified elevation angle correction model and the observed tidal sequence value: (<b>a</b>) Image of the correlation coefficient for TAR0; (<b>b</b>) Image of the correlation coefficient for PTLD; (<b>c</b>) Image of the correlation coefficient for GOM1; (<b>d</b>) Image of the correlation coefficient for TPW2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of height inversion sequences and tidal observation sequences before and after correction by the ionospheric stratified elevation angle correction model for four stations: (<b>a</b>) TAR0 station; (<b>b</b>) PTLD station; (<b>c</b>) GOM1 station; (<b>d</b>) TPW2 station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of residual plots between height inversion sequences and tidal observation sequences before and after correction by the ionospheric stratified elevation angle correction model for four stations: (<b>a</b>) Residual image of TAR0; (<b>b</b>) Residual image of PTLD; (<b>c</b>) Residual image of GOM1; (<b>d</b>) Residual image of TPW2.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1725 KiB  
Article
Lens Factor Choice in IOL Power Calculation after Laser Refractive Surgery: The Right Constant for Advanced Lens Measurement Approach (ALMA)
by Ferdinando Cione, Maddalena De Bernardo, Margherita Di Stasi, Martina De Luca, Rosa Albano and Nicola Rosa
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5186; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175186 - 1 Sep 2024
Viewed by 490
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the advanced lens measurement approach (ALMA) formula accuracy using different lens constants available on the user group for laser interference biometry (ULIB) and IOL Con platforms. Methods: In this retrospective, comparative, case-series study, 150 eyes of 160 patients with [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the advanced lens measurement approach (ALMA) formula accuracy using different lens constants available on the user group for laser interference biometry (ULIB) and IOL Con platforms. Methods: In this retrospective, comparative, case-series study, 150 eyes of 160 patients with previous myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), who underwent uneventful cataract surgery and IOL implantation, were examined. The ALMA formula was evaluated to calculate the refractive prediction error (PE), analysing four different categories of lens constants: both nominal and optimized A-Constant for SRKT, which are available on the ULIB and IOL Con platforms. An additional analysis was carried out in this study, evaluating if a decreased ULIB optimized constant (DUOC) with different fixed factors (−1.2 −1.3 −1.4 −1.5) could improve refractive outcomes. Median absolute error (MedAE) and percentage of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopters (D) of prediction error were measured as the main outcomes. Results: Comparing the lens factors available on ULIB and IOL Con platforms, the ALMA formula reported a lower MedAE and higher percentages of eyes with a refractive PE within 1.0 D using ULIB nominal constants (all p < 0.05). Using DUOC (−1.3), and there was a statistically significant improvement of both MedAE and of the percentages of eyes with PE within ±0.50 D with the ALMA method compared to nominal ULIB constants (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: The impact of different lens factors in the IOL power calculation after myopic LRS should be carefully evaluated. The ALMA formula, in the absence of optimized constants by zeroing the mean error, should be used by subtracting 1.3 from the optimized ULIB constants available on the IOL Con website. This finding suggests further studies to test which of these constants could work better with the other post-refractive surgery formulas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Boxplot of comparison between IOL Con and ULIB constants with the ALMA method. (<b>B</b>) Percentage of eyes within 0.5 D and 1.0 D with different lens factors with the ALMA method. Thick line: Median; Whiskers: range of non-anomalous values; Dots: mild outlier values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Boxplot of comparison between different lens factors with the ALMA method. (<b>B</b>) Percentage of eyes within 0.5 D and 1.0 D with different lens factors with the ALMA method. Thick line: Median; Whiskers: range of non-anomalous values; Dots: mild outlier values.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1663 KiB  
Article
Objective Refraction Status before and after Cycloplegia: From Childhood to Young Adulthood
by Karola Panke and Megija Jorova
Vision 2024, 8(3), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision8030051 - 30 Aug 2024
Viewed by 372
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical information revealed after cycloplegia and assess how age and non-cycloplegic refractive status influence the classification of types of refractive error, as well as the relationship between age and cycloplegia-induced changes in the power of refractive errors. [...] Read more.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical information revealed after cycloplegia and assess how age and non-cycloplegic refractive status influence the classification of types of refractive error, as well as the relationship between age and cycloplegia-induced changes in the power of refractive errors. We analysed the records of 472 non-population-based ophthalmology practice patients aged 3–28 years (mean ± SD: 9.1 ± 4.6). Cycloplegia was induced with one drop of cyclopentolate 1% in each eye, and eye refraction was measured 30 ± 5 min later using an objective autorefractometer. Cycloplegia induced a clinically significant (≥0.50 D) hyperopic shift in the spherical equivalent of 60.2% of participants and a myopic shift in 1%, resulting in a 34.1% increase in the frequency of participants with hyperopia, while the frequency of those with myopia and emmetropia decreased by 5.5% and 23.3%, respectively. The average spherical equivalent difference (mean ± SD) induced by cycloplegia was 0.72 ± 0.73 D, with the highest difference observed in the 3–5 years age group (1.18 ± 0.85 D). The differences in astigmatism power (p = 0.84) and astigmatism axis (p = 0.97) between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions were not statistically significant. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the patient record review process representing participant selection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Frequency of cycloplegic eye refractive status stratified by age.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Frequency of refractive errors in different age groups before (dotted line: non-cycloplegic) and after (solid line: cycloplegic) cycloplegia: (<b>a</b>) Frequency of hyperopia, (<b>b</b>) Frequency of myopia, (<b>c</b>) Frequency of emmetropia, and (<b>d</b>) Frequency of astigmatism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Difference between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic condition determined by spherical equivalent (SE) change stratified by age group. The mean SE difference after cycloplegia is shown as ×, and the median is represented as a line inside the box. The whiskers extend from the top of the box (Q3) to the largest data point ≤ 1.5 times the IQR and from the bottom of the box (Q1) to the smallest data point &gt; 1.5 times the IQR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The total occurrence of clinically significant astigmatism (&gt;0.50 D) is represented by a dashed line (n = 128, 27%). The 100% stacked column chart displays the frequency of the clinically significant astigmatism axis in the cycloplegic condition stratified by age.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1348 KiB  
Article
Accuracy Validation of the New Barrett True Axial Length Formula and the Optimized Lens Factor Using Sum-of-Segment Biometry
by Sumitaka Miyamoto and Kazutaka Kamiya
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4639; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164639 - 8 Aug 2024
Viewed by 759
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to verify the accuracy of a new calculation formula, Barrett true axial length formula (T-AL), and the optimized lens factor (LF) for predicting postoperative refraction after cataract surgery. Methods: We included 156 Japanese patients who underwent cataract surgery using [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study aims to verify the accuracy of a new calculation formula, Barrett true axial length formula (T-AL), and the optimized lens factor (LF) for predicting postoperative refraction after cataract surgery. Methods: We included 156 Japanese patients who underwent cataract surgery using Clareon monofocal intraocular lenses at our clinic between January 2022 and June 2023. Postoperative spherical equivalent was calculated using subjective refraction values obtained 1 month post-surgery. The LFs were optimized so that the mean prediction error (PE) of each calculation formula was zero (zero optimization). We calculated the mean absolute PE (MAE) to assess accuracy and used a Friedman test for statistical comparisons. The accuracy of T-AL and the optimized LFs was compared with that of the conventional Barrett Universal II formula for ARGOS (AR-B) and OA-2000 (OA-B) with equivalent refractive index. Results: For T-AL, AR-B, and OA-B, the MAEs ± standard deviations were 0.225 ± 0.179, 0.219 ± 0.168, and 0.242 ± 0.206 D, respectively. The Friedman test showed no statistically significant differences among the three groups. The device-optimized LFs were 2.248–2.289 (T-AL), 2.236–2.246 (AR-B), and 2.07–2.08 (OA-B); the corresponding zero-optimized LFs were 2.262–2.287 (T-AL), 2.287–2.303 (AR-B), and 2.160–2.170 (OA-B). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in prediction accuracy among the formulas. However, the accuracy of LF optimization varied by device, with T-AL being closest to the value under zero optimization. This suggests that T-AL is clinically useful for predicting an accurate postoperative refraction without zero optimization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Box plots of the absolute prediction errors for each formula. T-AL: Barrett true axial length formula, AR-B: Barrett Universal II formula for ARGOS, OA-B: Barrett Universal II formula for OA-2000.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scatter plots of the prediction refraction correction amount before and after zero optimization vs. anterior chamber depth and axial length. T-AL: Barrett true axial length formula, AR-B: Barrett Universal II formula for ARGOS, OA-B: Barrett Universal II formula for OA-2000.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter plots of anterior chamber depth and axial length measured by ARGOS vs. OA-2000.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 502 KiB  
Review
Vision-Specific Tools for the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) in Children and Adolescents with Visual Impairment: A Scoping Review
by Tshubelela Sello Simon Magakwe, Rekha Hansraj and Zamadonda Nokuthula Xulu-Kasaba
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(8), 1009; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081009 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1125
Abstract
Vision-related quality-of-life (QoL) measures offer a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of eye conditions and the effectiveness of treatment on important aspects of QoL. A substantial number of tools for assessing health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in adults have been reviewed. However, despite [...] Read more.
Vision-related quality-of-life (QoL) measures offer a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of eye conditions and the effectiveness of treatment on important aspects of QoL. A substantial number of tools for assessing health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in adults have been reviewed. However, despite the high prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors causing visual impairment (VI) in children, there is a notable lack of similar tools for this vulnerable population. This review aimed to systemically map evidence on the availability and use of vision-specific instruments for assessing HR-QoL in children and adolescents with VI. This review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines (2020) and the framework by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. (2010). We conducted systematic searches through databases PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus and search platforms Web of Science and EBSCOhost to source reviews published in English from the date of their inception to December 2023. The findings are reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We reviewed twenty tools, nine of which were developed for children in the United States and three of which were developed for children in developing countries; no tools specifically developed for children in Africa were found. In the reviewed papers, the tools were presented to children, parents, or proxies in an interview or questionnaire format. For most of the tools, reliability was assessed using internal consistency (n = 12) and test–retest reliability (n = 12). The most dominant measures of validity were construct (n = 16), content (n = 8), internal (n = 4), and criterion (n = 4). There appears to be a need for more tools developed for children in middle–low-income countries, especially for African children. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for systematic reviews, including searches of databases and registries.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1695 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Effective and Actual Lens Position by Different Formulas. Postoperative Application of a Ray-Tracing-Based Simulated Optical Model
by Diana Gargallo Yebra, Laura Remón Martín, Iván Pérez Escorza and Francisco Javier Castro Alonso
Photonics 2024, 11(8), 711; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11080711 - 30 Jul 2024
Viewed by 535
Abstract
(1) Background: This study compares the effective lens position (ELP) and intraocular lens power (IOLP) derived from SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, and Haigis formulas with the actual lens position (ALP) and the implanted IOLP after cataract surgery. Additionally, it aims to optimize [...] Read more.
(1) Background: This study compares the effective lens position (ELP) and intraocular lens power (IOLP) derived from SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, and Haigis formulas with the actual lens position (ALP) and the implanted IOLP after cataract surgery. Additionally, it aims to optimize ALP using a ray-tracing-based simulated optical model to achieve emmetropia. (2) Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 43 eyes implanted with the same monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). Preoperative and postoperative biometric data were collected using the Lenstar LS900. Postoperative measurements included ALP, subjective refraction, and refraction error (RE). Optical simulations (OSLO EDU 6.6.0) were utilized to optimize ALP for emmetropia (ALPIDEAL). (3) Results: Paired t-test results between REOSLO-REOBJ (p-value = 0.660) and REOSLO-RESUB (p-value = 0.789) indicated no significant statistical differences. However, statistically significant differences were found between ALP and ALPIDEAL (p < 0.05), with a difference of −0.04 ± 0.45 mm [ranging from −1.00 to 1.20 mm]. A significant correlation was observed between ΔALP (ΔALP = ALP − ALPIDEAL) and RESUBJ. (4) Conclusions: This customized ray-tracing eye model effectively achieves refractive outcomes similar to those obtained both subjectively and objectively post-surgery. Additionally, it has enabled optical simulations to optimize the IOL position and achieve emmetropia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Visual Optics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Model of pseudophakic real eye using OSLO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bland–Altman plots between (<b>a</b>) RE<sub>OSLO</sub> and RE<sub>OBJ</sub> (<b>b</b>) RE<sub>OSLO</sub> and RE<sub>SUBJ</sub>. Mean dif. RE<sub>OSLO</sub>-RE<sub>OBJ</sub> = 0.02 ± 0.35 D and LoAs (−0.65, 0.70) D. Mean of dif. RE<sub>OSLO</sub>-RE<sub>SUBJ</sub> = −0.01 ± 0.27 D and LoAs (−0.47, 0.44) D. The gray area indicates ±0.25 D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) RE<sub>OBJ</sub> vs. ΔALP (mm). (<b>b</b>) RE<sub>SUBJ</sub> vs. ΔALP (mm).</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1818 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Scleral Flap versus Scleral Pocket Technique for Sutureless Intrascleral One-Piece Lens Fixation
by Paola Marolo, Paolo Caselgrandi, Michele Gaidano, Fabio Conte, Guglielmo Parisi, Enrico Borrelli, Matteo Fallico, Mario Damiano Toro, Luca Ventre, Agostino S. Vaiano and Michele Reibaldi
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4452; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154452 - 29 Jul 2024
Viewed by 769
Abstract
Objectives: This study compared long-term surgical outcomes of the scleral flap versus scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece intraocular lens (IOL) fixation. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at a single center, involving consecutive patients undergoing sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study compared long-term surgical outcomes of the scleral flap versus scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece intraocular lens (IOL) fixation. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at a single center, involving consecutive patients undergoing sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL implantation, between January 2020 and May 2022. Eyes were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: group 1 underwent scleral flap (n = 64), and group 2 received scleral pocket technique (n = 59). Visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and complications were assessed over a minimum 24-month follow-up period. Results: Both groups showed improvements in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), increasing from 0.84 ± 0.56 logMAR at baseline to 0.39 ± 0.23 logMAR (p = 0.042) at 24 months in group 1 and from 0.91 ± 0.63 logMAR at baseline to 0.45 ± 0.38 logMAR (p = 0.039) at 24 months in group 2. No significant differences in BCVA were observed between the groups at baseline (p = 0.991), 12 (p = 0.496) and 24 months (p = 0.557). Mean spherical equivalent (−0.73 ± 1.32 D in group 1 and −0.92 ± 0.99 D in group 2, p = 0.447), refractive prediction error (−0.21 ± 1.1 D in group 1 and −0.35 ± 1.8 D in group 2, p = 0.377), and surgically induced astigmatism (0.74 ± 0.89 D in group 1 and 0.85 ± 0.76 in group 2, p = 0.651) were comparable between the two groups. An IOL tilt of 5.5 ± 1.8 and 5.8 ± 2.0 degrees (p = 0.867) and an IOL decentration of 0.41 ± 0.21 mm and 0.29 ± 0.11 mm (p = 0.955) were obtained, respectively, in group 1 and group 2 at 24 months. Mean endothelial cell density remained stable at 24 months in both groups (p = 0.832 in group 1 and p = 0.443 in group 2), and it was 1747.20 ± 588.03 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1883.71 ± 621.29 cells/mm2 in group 2 (p = 0.327) at baseline, 1545.36 ± 442.3 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1417.44 ± 623.40 cells/mm2 in group 2 (p = 0.483) at 24 months. No cases of endophthalmitis were observed. Conclusions: The scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL fixation is comparable to the traditional scleral flap technique in terms of long-term visual outcomes and safety. The scleral pocket technique offers a simplified approach and a viable option even for less experienced surgeons. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Ocular Surgery and Eyesight)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of the two surgical techniques: scleral flap (<b>a</b>) versus slceral pocket (<b>b</b>). The figures show the sutureless intrascleral one-piece lens in the background, indicating its placement in the posterior chamber with sutureless scleral fixation of the haptics. (<b>a</b>) illustrates the scleral flap technique: on the right, the scleral flap before closure on the IOL haptics, and on the left, the flap closed. (<b>b</b>) shows the scleral pocket technique: on the left, the scleral pocket still open with the IOL haptics inside, and on the right, the pocket closed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the two study groups throughout the follow-up.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Frequency distribution of spherical equivalent (<b>a</b>), refractive prediction error (<b>b</b>), and surgically induced astigmatism (<b>c</b>) in the two study groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Boxplot of IOL tilt (<b>a</b>) and decentration (<b>b</b>) at 24 months in the two study groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mean endothelial cell density in the two study groups throughout the follow-up.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2365 KiB  
Article
An Innovative Virtual Reality System for Measuring Refractive Error
by Chin-Te Huang, Chien-Nien Lin, Shyan-Tarng Chen, Hui-Ying Kuo and Han-Yin Sun
Diagnostics 2024, 14(15), 1633; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151633 - 29 Jul 2024
Viewed by 549
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to validate a novel light field virtual reality (LFVR) system for estimating refractive errors in the human eye. Fifty participants with an average age of 22.12 ± 2.2 years (range 20–30 years) were enrolled. The present study compared [...] Read more.
In this study, we aimed to validate a novel light field virtual reality (LFVR) system for estimating refractive errors in the human eye. Fifty participants with an average age of 22.12 ± 2.2 years (range 20–30 years) were enrolled. The present study compared spherical equivalent (SE) and focal line measurements (F1 and F2) obtained by the LFVR system with those obtained by established methods, including closed-field and open-field autorefractors, retinoscopy, and subjective refraction. The results showed substantial agreement between the LFVR system and the traditional methods, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for SE ranging from 82.7% to 86.7% (p < 0.01), and for F1 and F2 from 80.7% to 86.4% (p < 0.01). Intra-repeatability for F1 and F2 demonstrated strong agreement, with ICC values of 88.8% and 97.5%, respectively. These findings suggest that the LFVR system holds potential as a primary tool for refractive error measurement in optical care, offering high agreement and repeatability compared to conventional methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eye Diseases: Diagnosis and Management—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic and photograph of the light field virtual reality (LFVR) system. (<b>A</b>) Schematic representation of the LFVR system’s eye box architecture. The system employed a microlens array (MLA) and a microdisplay to project a virtual reality image, with the central depth plane (CDP) and reconstructed depth plane (RDP) highlighted. (<b>B</b>) Photograph of the LFVR device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bland–Altman plot comparing the mean spherical equivalent component across three instruments and the light field virtual reality system evaluated in this study. Each panel depicts the mean differences (MDs) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA), along with the confidence intervals for the LoA. The shaded areas represent the 95% confidence intervals. (<b>A</b>) Comparison between LFVR and CFA. The mean difference is −1.5 D, with 95% LoA from −4.1 D to 1.0 D. (<b>B</b>) Comparison between LFVR and OFA (open-field autorefractor). The mean difference is −2.1 D, with 95% LoA from −4.6 D to 0.5 D. (<b>C</b>) Comparison between LFVR and RET (retinoscopy). The mean difference is −1.6 D, with 95% LoA from −4.4 D to 1.1 D. (<b>D</b>) Comparison between LFVR and SR (subjective refraction). The mean difference is −1.9 D, with 95% LoA from −4.5 D to 0.7 D (CFA: closed-field autorefractor; D: diopter; LFVR: light field virtual reality; OFA: open-field autorefractor; RET: retinoscopy; SE: spherical equivalent; SR: subjective refraction).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparative analysis of refraction error measured by the light field virtual reality system against four clinical instruments. (<b>A</b>) The correlation between LFVR and CFA, (<b>B</b>) the correlation between LFVR and OFA, (<b>C</b>) the correlation between LFVR and RET, and (<b>D</b>) the correlation between LFVR and SR. The LFVR exhibited a stronger correlation with the open-field autorefractor than the other three instruments, although correlations with all four measurements were substantial, highlighting LFVR’s reliability for refraction error assessment (CFA: closed-field autorefractor; D: diopter; LFVR: light field virtual reality; OFA: open-field autorefractor; RET: retinoscopy; SE: spherical equivalent; SR: subjective refraction).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 472 KiB  
Article
Relations between Neurocognitive Function and Visual Acuity: A Cross-Sessional Study in a Cohort of Premature Children
by Chun-Hsien Tu, Wei-Chi Wu, Wei-Chih Chin, Shih-Chieh Hsu, I Tang, Jen-Fu Hsu, Hung-Da Chou, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang and Yu-Shu Huang
Children 2024, 11(8), 894; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11080894 - 25 Jul 2024
Viewed by 587
Abstract
Background: Premature children with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) have been reported to an have increased risk of visual and neurocognitive impairments, yet little is known about whether vision could affect specific neurocognition. This study aimed to clarify the correlations between neurocognition and vision [...] Read more.
Background: Premature children with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) have been reported to an have increased risk of visual and neurocognitive impairments, yet little is known about whether vision could affect specific neurocognition. This study aimed to clarify the correlations between neurocognition and vision in premature children. Materials and Methods: This is a nonrandomized, cross-sectional, observational study in a pediatric cohort with five groups: (1) full-term (n = 25), (2) prematurity without ROP (n = 154), (3) prematurity with ROP but without treatment (n = 39), (4) prematurity with ROP and with bevacizumab (IVB) treatment (n = 62), and (5) prematurity with ROP and with laser/laser + IVB treatment (n = 20). Neurocognitive function was evaluated by the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Fourth Edition (WPPSI-IV) around the age of 4 years. Visual acuity (VA) and refractive errors were tested. Correlations between WPPSI parameters and visual outcomes were analyzed across five groups. Results: Among the 300 recruited children (mean age = 4.02 + 0.97 years, male = 56.3%), 297 were assessed by WPPSI-IV and 142 were assessed by vision tests. The Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) index was worse in the premature groups. After adjusting for covariates, seven items, including FSIQ-Index (p = 0.047), fluid-reasoning index (p = 0.004), FR-percentile ranking (p = 0.008), object assembly (p = 0.034), picture concept (p = 0.034), zoo locations (p = 0.014) and bug search (p = 0.020), showed significant differences between groups. The better the best corrected VA (BCVA), the higher the scores on Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), VCI-PR, and the subtest of information. Conclusions: Specific cognitive dysfunctions are related to the BCVA in this large cohort. Subtest performance profiles in WPPSI can be affected by prematurity, ROP treatment, and different ROP treatment. FSIQ is generally lower in premature children and even lower in children with ROP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Neurology & Neurodevelopmental Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of the study protocol (Abbreviations: IVB: intravitreal injection of bevacizumab; ROP: retinopathy of prematurity; Tx: treatment; WPPSI-IV: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Fourth Edition).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2811 KiB  
Case Report
Genotype–Phenotype Correlation Model for the Spectrum of TYR-Associated Albinism
by Mirjana Bjeloš, Ana Ćurić, Mladen Bušić, Benedict Rak and Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer
Diagnostics 2024, 14(15), 1583; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151583 - 23 Jul 2024
Viewed by 635
Abstract
We present two children aged 3 and 5 years who share identical TYR genotype, yet exhibit contrasting phenotypic manifestations in terms of eye, skin, and hair coloration. The patients are heterozygous for TYR c.1A>G, p. (Met1?), which is pathogenic, and homozygous for TYR [...] Read more.
We present two children aged 3 and 5 years who share identical TYR genotype, yet exhibit contrasting phenotypic manifestations in terms of eye, skin, and hair coloration. The patients are heterozygous for TYR c.1A>G, p. (Met1?), which is pathogenic, and homozygous for TYR c.1205G>A, p. (Arg402Gln), which is classified as a risk factor. The children manifested diminished visual acuity, nystagmus, and foveal hypoplasia. The first patient presented with hypopigmentation of the skin, hair, and ocular tissues, while the second patient presented with hypopigmentation of the skin, hair, retinal pigment epithelium, and choroid with dark brown irises. Furthermore, the brown-eyed subject presented astigmatic refractive error and both global and local stereopsis capabilities, contrasting with the presentation of hypermetropia, strabismus, and the absence of stereopsis in the blue-eyed individual. Herein, we propose a genotype–phenotype correlation model to elucidate the diverse clinical presentations stemming from biallelic and triallelic pathogenic variants in TYR, establishing a link between the residual tyrosinase activity and resultant phenotypes. According to our proposed model, the severity of TYR variants correlates with distinct albino phenotypes. Our findings propose the potential association between reduced pigmentation levels in ocular tissues and binocular functions, suggesting pigmentation as a possible independent variable influencing the onset of strabismus—an association unreported until now in the existing literature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Eye Diseases, Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Ultra-widefield imaging depicted brightly pigmented retina on both eyes, consistent with grade 1 fundi (<b>top row</b>). Fundus autofluorescence image of the both eyes was isoautofluorescent (<b>bottom row</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging showing the right (<b>A</b>) and left (<b>B</b>) macular area of the first patient and the right (<b>C</b>) and left (<b>D</b>) macular area of the second patient. Foveal hypoplasia grade 4 according to the Leicester Grading System was evident.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Ultra-widefield imaging showing pronounced light pigmented retina consistent with grade 2 fundi and absent macular reflexes on both eyes (<b>top row</b>). Fundus autofluorescence image showing isoautofluorescent signal on both eyes (<b>bottom row</b>).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 13531 KiB  
Review
Applications of RIM-Based Flow Visualization in Fluid-Solid Interaction Problems: A Review of Formulations and Prospects
by Hanqi Zeng, Deping Cao, Hao Chen, Qi Chai and Tianze Lu
Water 2024, 16(14), 2055; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142055 - 20 Jul 2024
Viewed by 589
Abstract
Over the past three decades, optical visualization measurements based on the Refractive Index Match (RIM) method have played a significant role in the experimental studies of fluid-solid interaction. The RIM method, which coordinates the refractive indices of the liquid and solid materials in [...] Read more.
Over the past three decades, optical visualization measurements based on the Refractive Index Match (RIM) method have played a significant role in the experimental studies of fluid-solid interaction. The RIM method, which coordinates the refractive indices of the liquid and solid materials in the experiment, dramatically reduces the observation error due to optical refraction. However, the existing literature on RIM has not systematically reviewed the various applications of this technique. This review aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of the RIM technique, examining its role in material selection for fluid-solid interaction studies, and scrutinizing its applications across various engineering disciplines. The paper begins with a brief introduction to the RIM technique and then turns to material selection and its various applications in fluid-solid interaction. It also enumerates and analyzes specific RIM-based optical measurement techniques such as Laser Doppler Velocimetry (LDA), Particle Tracking Velocimetry (PTV), and Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) from various research perspectives in previous studies. In addition, it summarizes RIM formulations categorized by different applications in liquid-solid interaction fields. RIM-based measurement techniques generally offer intuitive, non-intrusive, cost-effective, and convenient advantages over traditional methods. The paper also critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of different materials used in RIM experiments and suggests directions for future research, emphasizing the need to develop environmentally friendly and cost-effective RIM materials. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Comparison of optical visualization of glass beads in water and formulated solution from our validation tests following Rousseau and Ancey [<a href="#B1-water-16-02055" class="html-bibr">1</a>]. Glassbeads (<b>a</b>) fully submerged in the liquids, (<b>b</b>) partially submerged in the liquids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Demonstration in our validation experiments following the procedure given by Byron and Variano [<a href="#B17-water-16-02055" class="html-bibr">17</a>]. The hydrogels prepared with varying concentrations of PAC exhibited satisfactory optical transparency. The strength of the hydrogels exhibited a positive correlation with the concentration of PAC.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3487 KiB  
Article
An Improved Remote Sensing Retrieval Method for Elevated Duct in the South China Sea
by Yinhe Cheng, Mengling Zha, Wenli Qiao, Hongjian He, Shuwen Wang, Shengxiang Wang, Xiaoran Li and Weiye He
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2649; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142649 - 19 Jul 2024
Viewed by 557
Abstract
Elevated duct is an atmospheric structure characterized by abnormal refractive index gradients, which can significantly affect the performance of radar, communication, and other systems by capturing a portion of electromagnetic waves. The South China Sea (SCS) is a high-incidence area for elevated duct, [...] Read more.
Elevated duct is an atmospheric structure characterized by abnormal refractive index gradients, which can significantly affect the performance of radar, communication, and other systems by capturing a portion of electromagnetic waves. The South China Sea (SCS) is a high-incidence area for elevated duct, so conducting detection and forecasts of the elevated duct in the SCS holds important scientific significance and practical value. This paper attempts to utilize remote sensing techniques for extracting elevated duct information. Based on GPS sounding data, a lapse rate formula (LRF) model and an empirical formula (EF) model for the estimation of the cloud top height of Stratocumulus were obtained, and then remote sensing retrieval methods of elevated duct were established based on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) remote sensing data. The results of these two models were compared with results from the elevated duct remote sensing retrieval model developed by the United States Naval Postgraduate School. It is shown that the probability of elevated duct events was 79.1% when the presence of Stratocumulus identified using GPS sounding data, and the trapping layer bottom height of elevated duct well with the cloud top height of Stratocumulus, with a correlation coefficient of 0.79, a mean absolute error of 289 m, and a root mean square error of 598 m. Among the different retrieval models applied to MODIS satellite data, the LRF model emerged as the optimal remote sensing retrieval method for elevated duct in the SCS, showing a correlation coefficient of 0.51, a mean absolute error of 447 m, and a root mean square error of 658 m between the trapping layer bottom height and the cloud top height. Consequently, the encouraging validation results demonstrate that the LRF model proposed in this paper offers a novel method for diagnosing and calculating elevated ducts information over large-scale marine areas from remote sensing data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of GPS sounding stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>ISCCP cloud classification [<a href="#B34-remotesensing-16-02649" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relationship between atmospheric modified refractivity and air/dew point temperature profiles under an ideal elevated duct condition [<a href="#B17-remotesensing-16-02649" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The NPS physical model. The green line shows the effective lapse rate, and the red line shows the dry adiabatic lapse rate (for cloud-free region) and pseudo-adiabatic lapse rate (for cloud region) [<a href="#B30-remotesensing-16-02649" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Correlation between cloud top height of Stratocumulus and trapping bottom height of elevated duct.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Profiles of relative humidity and atmospheric modified refractivity (the cloud top height was 623 m (green line), and the trapping layer bottom height was 579 m (gray color)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Relationship between cloud top height and temperature difference between the cloud top and the sea surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relationship between trapping layer bottom height and cloud top height of MODIS Stratocumulus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relationship between trapping bottom height of elevated duct and cloud top height of Stratocumulus calculated by four inversion methods. (<b>a</b>) SMDH; (<b>b</b>) NPS; (<b>c</b>) EF; and (<b>d</b>) LRF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Distribution of the cloud top height of MODIS Stratocumulus (<b>left panel</b>) and the trapping layer bottom height (<b>right panel</b>) over the SCS on 27–28 June 2012.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop