Search Results (313)

Background: Delirium or an acute confusional state (ACS) is characterised as being a frequent and complex hospital complication in older adult patients, which can affect their level of independence and increase patient morbidity and mortality. Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently develop ICU delirium, leading to longer hospital and ICU stays, increased mortality and long-term impairment. Objectives: This review aims to assess existing evidence of interventions that can be considered effective for the management and prevention of delirium in ICUs, reducing short-term morbidity and mortality, ICU and hospital admission times and the occurrence of other long-term complications. Methodology: For this systematic review, we searched Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, LILACS, SciELO and Dialnet from January 2018 to August 2024, in English, Spanish and French. MeSH descriptors were adjusted to search the different databases. We also checked Prospero for ongoing systematic reviews. Main results: The electronic search yielded a total of 2656 studies, of which 14 trials met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 14,711 participants. We included eight randomised clinical trial (RCTs), four cohort analyses, one systematic review and one observational trial, including participants over 65 years admitted to the ICU. Ten of these studies were based on pharmacological interventions, three of them examined non-pharmacological interventions and the remaining study examined mixed (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions. Six placebo RCTs were included, plus four reported comparisons between different drugs. Regarding non-pharmacological interventions, nursing programmes focused on optimising modifiable risk factors or the use of therapies such as bright light are emerging. Regarding mixed interventions, we found the combination of invasive techniques and with sedoanalgesia. Conclusions: Due to its satisfactory level of sedation, dexmedetomidine is presented as a viable option because, although olanzapine offers safer results, postoperative administration angiotensin inhibitor systems significantly reduced the incidence of delirium. As for propofol, no significant differences were found. Among the non-pharmacological and mixed therapies, bright light therapy was able to reduce the incidence of delirium, and the combination of epidural/general anaesthesia was effective in all subtypes of delirium. Concerning the remaining interventions, the scientific evidence is still insufficient to provide a definitive recommendation. Full article

Only some subpopulations of natural killer (NK) cells have cytotoxic functionality, and the effects of anesthetics on these subpopulations are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects of various anesthetics, both alone and in combination, on the distribution and cytotoxic function of NK cells and their subpopulations. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from eight healthy volunteers were treated for 4 h in vitro with dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, lidocaine, propofol, sevoflurane, and combinations in clinically relevant concentrations or left untreated. Flow cytometry was used to quantify the percentage of sampled NK cells and evaluate their distribution (CD56^brightCD16^neg, CD56^brightCD16^dim, CD56^dimCD16^neg, CD56^dimCD16^bright, and CD56^negCD16^bright) and cytotoxicity (Granzyme B (GrzB) and perforin) of NK cell subpopulations. Although the percentage of total NK cells did not change following exposure to anesthesia, the most important cytotoxic subpopulation (CD56^dimCD16^bright NK cells) decreased after exposure to both propofol (−3.58%, p = 0.045) and sevoflurane (−16.10%, p = 0.008) alone, and most combinations, especially in combination with lidocaine (propofol with lidocaine (−9.66%, p = 0.002) and sevoflurane with lidocaine (−21.90%, p < 0.001)). Dexmedetomidine and remifentanil had no effect on CD56^dimCD16^bright NK cells. Furthermore, no anesthetic regimen or combination altered the expression of GrzB and perforin in NK cells or NK cell subpopulations. In short, propofol and sevoflurane suppressed the highly cytotoxic phenotype (CD56^dimCD16^bright) of NK cells, with those exposed to sevoflurane combinations showing greater reductions. Immunosuppression was intensified with the inclusion of lidocaine in the anesthetic regimen. Full article

Objectives: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, but it may be poorly tolerated and unsuccessful. We sought to evaluate a protocol for sedation and endoscopy-assisted (SEA) HRM in patients who previously failed standard HRM and assess patient perspectives towards it. Methods: Adult patients who previously failed HRM were prospectively enrolled. Under propofol sedation, an upper endoscopy was performed during which the HRM catheter was advanced under endoscopic visualization. If the catheter did not reach the stomach on its own, the endoscope itself or a snare was used to help it traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Results: Thirty patients participated (mean age 67.8, 70% female). The technical success of SEA-HRM was 100%. Twenty-two (73.3%) were diagnosed with a motility disorder including thirteen (43.3%) with achalasia. Eighteen (60%) had previously failed HRM due to discomfort/intolerance, while twelve (40%) failed due to catheter coiling in the esophagus. Subjects in the coiling group were more likely to need endoscopic assistance to traverse the EGJ (91.7% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.001) and have a motility disorder (100.0% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.010), including achalasia (75.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.004), compared to the discomfort/intolerance group. All patients preferred SEA-HRM and rated it higher than standard HRM (9.5 ± 1.3 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1, p = <0.001, on a scale of 1–10). Conclusions: SEA-HRM is a highly successful and well-tolerated option in patients who previously failed standard HRM. This should be the recommended approach in cases of failed HRM rather than secondary tests of esophageal motility. Full article

Background: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is commonly performed in emergency departments (EDs) to reduce anxiety, discomfort, or pain during a procedure. The primary goal of PSA is to produce a state of relaxation and drowsiness without eliminating the patient’s protective reflexes. Despite the discovery of new techniques and medications to deliver PSA, there is a paucity of research evaluating PSA in EDs over the last decade. We aim to describe the current practice of PSA in an Australian tertiary mixed ED with 75,000 presentations per year. Methods: A retrospective study of the initial 3 months of a PSA registry, which was part of the Tasmanian Emergency Care Outcomes Registry, was analyzed; Results: All told, 80 consecutive cases were entered over a 3-month period, with pediatric patients (<14 years old) making up 35% of all cases. Joint reductions (17, 39%) and fracture reductions (13, 29%) were the most common indications for the adult population, whilst fracture reductions (9, 36%), laceration repairs (7, 28%), and other distressing procedures (7, 28%) were the most common indications in the pediatric cohort. Pharmacological approaches also differed between groups, with ketamine (25, 92%) preferred in the pediatric cohort whilst the combination of propofol and fentanyl (22, 42%) was preferred in the adult cohort. No adverse events were recorded in the pediatric cohort whilst 6 (8%) minor events occurred in the adult population, with no severe events occurring for either cohort. PSA also occurred more frequently at 0900–1000 and the incidence was reduced between 0000 and 0800. Conclusions: PSA is commonly performed in our tertiary mixed ED and is both safe and effective, with non-severe complication rates similar to those in the reported literature. Severe complications are rare and therefore a larger cohort will be required to assess this aspect. The approach to ED PSA is also different between pediatric and adult populations and therefore research needs to differentiate both populations. Full article

Ischemic stroke, caused by the interruption of the blood supply to the brain, requires prompt medical intervention to prevent irreversible damage. Anesthetic management is pivotal during surgical treatments like mechanical thrombectomy, where precise strategies ensure patient safety and procedural success. This narrative review highlights key aspects of anesthetic management in ischemic stroke, focusing on preoperative evaluation, anesthetic choices, and intraoperative care. A rapid yet thorough preoperative assessment is crucial, prioritizing essential diagnostic tests and cardiovascular evaluations to determine patient frailty and potential complications. The decision between general anesthesia (GA) and conscious sedation (CS) remains debated, with GA offering better procedural conditions and CS enabling continuous neurological assessment. The selection of anesthetic agents—such as propofol, sevoflurane, midazolam, fentanyl, remifentanil, and dexmedetomidine—depends on local protocols and expertise balancing neuroprotection, hemodynamic stability, and rapid postoperative recovery. Effective blood pressure management, tailored airway strategies, and vigilant postoperative monitoring are essential to optimize outcomes. This review underscores the importance of coordinated care, incorporating multimodal monitoring and maintaining neuroprotection throughout the perioperative period. Full article

Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening systemic allergic reaction that can result in fatal outcomes if not promptly and appropriately treated. The diagnosis of the cause of anaphylaxis during anesthesia can be challenging due to the complexity of the perioperative environment. Propofol-induced perioperative anaphylaxis is uncommon, occurring in perioperative anaphylactic shock cases. We present a case of perioperative anaphylactic shock in a patient with no known allergies who had been exposed to the same anesthetic agents, propofol, rocuronium, and remifentanil, three times previously without incident. Cardiac arrest occurred 50 min after induction, which showed pulseless electrical activity with decreasing saturation without bronchial spasm and skin erythema or edema. After prompt and appropriate management including cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the patient recovered without complications. The diagnosis was confirmed as propofol-induced anaphylactic shock by an elevated serum tryptase level, measured in a timely manner, and by skin tests (skin prick test and intradermal test), which revealed strong hypersensitivity to propofol. This case is notable for the cardiovascular collapse that occurred without respiratory symptoms or skin manifestations, as well as the delayed onset of anaphylaxis (>50 min). This case underscores the importance of vigilance for anaphylaxis, even with repeated exposure to previously well-tolerated drugs, as sensitization can lead to more severe reactions. It also highlights the potential for anaphylaxis to occur outside the acute phase and without typical clinical features. Full article

Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist, is favoured in intensive care for its minimal respiratory depression. This study evaluated the reporting frequency of rhabdomyolysis with dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam and propofol using the European pharmacovigilance database Eudravigilance. We conducted an observational, retrospective analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from 1 January 2013, to 31 December 2023. Primary and secondary outcomes included the reporting frequencies of rhabdomyolysis and its indicative signs and symptoms, respectively. We retrieved 19,268 ICSRs, of which 364 reported rhabdomyolysis associated with dexmedetomidine (3.8%), midazolam (10.2%), propofol (76.9%), or combinations thereof (9.1%). Dexmedetomidine showed a significantly lower reporting frequency of rhabdomyolysis compared to propofol (ROR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19–0.55) but no significant difference compared to midazolam. Subgroup analyses revealed higher frequencies in males, especially with propofol. Despite limitations such as underreporting, our findings suggest dexmedetomidine poses a lower rhabdomyolysis risk than propofol, supporting its safe use for sedation in high-risk patients. It is important to note that due to the retrospective design of this study our findings are indicative of correlations rather than causation. Continuous monitoring and further studies are recommended to validate these results. Full article

Background/Objectives: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are not usually necessary during the induction of general anesthesia in patients using supraglottic airway (SGA) devices. In this study, we assessed the incidences of rocuronium use in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia using SGA devices. Methods: From September 2022 to August 2023, the medical records of adult patients (≥19 years) who underwent orthopedic surgery using SGA devices were retrospectively investigated. The incidences of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction were analyzed according to the anesthetic induction drug. The association of rocuronium use during anesthesia was analyzed in terms of demographic (age, sex, height, and weight), surgical (surgical time), and anesthetic factors (premedication, anesthetic agent, anesthetic time). Results: In total, 321 patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction was 28.3%. In the subgroup analysis, patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol (PPF) and remifentanil showed a markedly lower incidence (14.4%) than the other anesthetic groups. Premedication or short anesthetic duration was associated with lower incidences of rocuronium use. Demographic and other anesthetic factors did not seem to affect the incidences of rocuronium use during anesthesia. Conclusions: The incidence of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction with SGA devices was significantly lower with the PPF-TIVA compared to that using remimazolam-TIVA or inhalational anesthesia. Premedication with midazolam and shorter operation times were associated with a significantly lower incidence of rocuronium use. Full article

Accurate and generalizable classification of brain states is essential for understanding their neural underpinnings and improving clinical diagnostics. Traditionally, functional connectivity patterns and graph-theoretic metrics have been utilized. However, cortical gradient features, which reflect global brain organization, offer a complementary approach. We hypothesized that a machine learning model integrating these three feature sets would effectively discriminate between baseline and atypical brain states across a wide spectrum of conditions, even though the underlying neural mechanisms vary. To test this, we extracted features from brain states associated with three meta-conditions including unconsciousness (NREM2 sleep, propofol deep sedation, and propofol general anesthesia), psychedelic states induced by hallucinogens (subanesthetic ketamine, lysergic acid diethylamide, and nitrous oxide), and neuropsychiatric disorders (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia). We used support vector machine with nested cross-validation to construct our models. The soft voting ensemble model marked the average balanced accuracy (average of specificity and sensitivity) of 79% (62–98% across all conditions), outperforming individual base models (70–76%). Notably, our models exhibited varying degrees of transferability across different datasets, with performance being dependent on the specific brain states and feature sets used. Feature importance analysis across meta-conditions suggests that the underlying neural mechanisms vary significantly, necessitating tailored approaches for accurate classification of specific brain states. This finding underscores the value of our feature-integrated ensemble models, which leverage the strengths of multiple feature types to achieve robust performance across a broader range of brain states. While our approach offers valuable insights into the neural signatures of different brain states, future work is needed to develop and validate even more generalizable models that can accurately classify brain states across a wider array of conditions. Full article

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in aortocoronary bypass surgery, potentially via extracellular vesicles (EVs) and their micro-RNA content. Clinical data implicate that propofol might inhibit the cardioprotective RIPC effect. This prospective, randomized study investigated the influence of different anesthetic regimes on RIPC efficacy and EV micro-RNA signatures. We also assessed the impact of propofol on cell protection after hypoxic conditioning and EV-mediated RIPC in vitro. H9c2 rat cardiomyoblasts were subjected to hypoxia, with or without propofol, and subsequent simulated ischemia-reperfusion injury. Apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry. Blood samples of 64 patients receiving anesthetic maintenance with propofol or isoflurane, along with RIPC or sham procedures, were analyzed, and EVs were enriched using a polymer-based method. Propofol administration corresponded with increased Troponin T levels (4669 ± 435.6 pg/mL), suggesting an inhibition of the cardioprotective RIPC effect. RIPC leads to a notable rise in miR-21 concentrations in the group receiving propofol anesthesia (fold change 7.22 ± 6.6). In vitro experiments showed that apoptosis reduction was compromised with propofol and only occurred in an EV-enriched preconditioning medium, not in an EV-depleted medium. Our study could clinically and experimentally confirm propofol inhibition of RIPC protection. Increased miR-21 expression could provide evidence for a possible inhibitory mechanism. Full article

This study evaluated the antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine-nalbuphine vs. dexmedetomidine alone in jacks undergoing field castration under total intravenous anesthesia. Jacks were premedicated with intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine (5 µg/kg), either alone (Group D, n = 6) or in combination with 0.3 mg/kg nalbuphine (Group DN, n = 6). IV ketamine (1.5 mg/kg) and propofol (0.5 mg/kg) were used to induce general anesthesia, which was maintained by a continuous propofol (0.2 mg/kg/min) IV infusion. The quality of anesthesia, analgesia, and recovery were evaluated. A simple descriptive scale (SDS) was used to measure pain from the recovery time to 6 h later. The DN group exhibited improvements in analgesic and recovery quality and SDS of pain at 1-, 2-, and 3-h post-recovery. There was an apparent improvement in cardiac status, as evidenced by the enhanced heart rate and electrocardiogram findings compared to group D during surgery and recovery time. The DN group had a lower level of inflammatory cytokines, both during the surgery and shortly after recovery. Therefore, the dexmedetomidine-nalbuphine combination prior to IV anesthesia of ketamine and propofol in jacks undergoing field castration resulted in a stable surgical plane of anesthesia, improved antinociception, less pain postoperatively, and better cardiac stability. Full article

Background and Objectives: The impact of anesthetic agents on memory and cognitive function following general anesthesia is of great interest, particularly regarding their effects on the developing pediatric brain. While numerous studies have examined the relationship between anesthetic drugs and brain function, research focusing on early cognitive function following sedation remains limited. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 148 pediatric patients scheduled for hematological procedures, specifically bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). Patients were divided into two groups based on the primary anesthetic used: the inhalational sedation group (IHG), in which sevoflurane was used, and the intravenous sedation group (IVG), which received propofol infusion. Apart from the main anesthetic agent, all sedation methods were consistent across both groups. A cognitive function test administered before sedation involved memorizing four distinct images, each associated with a different number. Then, the patients were asked to identify the omitted image upon awakening in the recovery room. Herein, this pre- vs. post-sedation test is called the early recognition assessment (ERA) tool. The primary outcome was the correct response rate after sedation for the two groups. Secondary outcomes included the sedation score, the behavior response score, and the correct response rates according to the number of sedation procedures. Results: This study included 130 patients in the final analysis, with 74 originally assigned to each group. The initial cognitive assessment revealed no significant difference in performance between the anesthetic agents. In addition, no differences were observed in the rates of correct responses or post-sedation scores after repeated procedures. However, the IVG demonstrated higher behavior response scores compared to the IHG. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the rates of correct responses using the ERA tool between the two groups, irrespective of the number of sedation procedures performed. While some differences were noted in preoperative, intraoperative, and post-anesthesia care, these did not significantly impact the cognitive outcomes measured. Full article

Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is a common and potentially serious complication of general anesthesia. This meta-analysis (Prospero registration number: CRD42024566321) aimed to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the perfusion index (PI) for PIH in patients undergoing general anesthesia. A comprehensive literature search was performed using multiple electronic databases (Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE). Studies involving adult patients undergoing general anesthesia, with the PI measured before anesthesia induction and reporting PIH incidence, were included. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the PI in predicting the probability of PIH. The secondary outcome was the pooled PIH incidence. Eight studies with 678 patients were included. The pooled incidence of PIH was 44.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.9%–60.8%). The combined sensitivity and specificity of the PI for predicting PIH were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.65–0.94) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70–0.90), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) analysis revealed an area under curve of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.92). The Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test indicated no significant publication bias. The PI demonstrates high predictive efficacy for PIH in patients undergoing general anesthesia, indicating that it can be a valuable tool for identifying those at risk of PIH. Full article

Background: Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) belongs to the group of mitochondrial encephalomyopathies. Anaesthesia for patients with CPEO may be associated with an increased risk due to known drug effects on mitochondrial metabolism. Therefore, the aim of this analysis was to evaluate anaesthesiological concepts in patients with CPEO requiring ophthalmic surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective, monocentric cohort analysis of eleven patients with CPEO undergoing ophthalmic surgery either with general anaesthesia or local anaesthesia in a German university hospital from January 2012 to February 2022. Results: A total of twelve ophthalmic surgery procedures were performed in eleven adult patients with CPEO. Six patients underwent surgery after receiving local anaesthesia (LA cohort). Five patients underwent six surgical procedures under general anaesthesia (GA cohort). In five cases within the GA cohort, propofol and remifentanil were used for the maintenance of anaesthesia. In one case, balanced anaesthesia with desflurane and remifentanil was used. The median duration of general anaesthesia was 37.5 min (range, 25–65 min). Patients stayed in the recovery room for a median of 48.5 min (range, 35–70 min). All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. No relevant complications occurred in either the LA or GA cohort. Conclusion: Both local and general anaesthesia are feasible concepts for patients with CPEO undergoing ophthalmic surgery. Propofol, at least with a short duration (less than one hour) of use, appears to be a feasible hypnotic drug in CPEO patients. Full article

Opioids are administered epidurally (PV) to provide trans- and postoperative analgesia. Twenty healthy female cats aged between 6 and 24 months and weighing between 2 and 3.7 kg, undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy (OVH), were induced with propofol (8 mg/kg), followed by continuous infusion (0.1–0.4 mg/kg/min). Three groups were defined: CG (0.1 mL/kg of iodinated contrast, n = 6), G0.1 (0.1 mg/kg of morphine, n = 7), and G0.2 (0.2 mg/kg of morphine, n = 7) per VP. All received 0.1 mL/kg of iodinated contrast per VP and injection water to obtain a total of 0.3 mL/kg. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), temperature, expired CO₂, oxygen saturation, and number of rescue analgesics were monitored. Postoperatively, a multidimensional scale was used to assess acute pain in cats for 12 h. The mean HR and SBP in the CG were higher at the time of maximum noxious stimulation and required fentanyl in all groups. Postoperatively, 83%, 28%, and 7% of the animals in CG, G0.1, and G0.2, respectively, received rescue analgesia. In cats undergoing OVH, epidural morphine at doses of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg did not prevent the need for intraoperative rescue analgesia but reduced the postoperative analgesic needed. Full article