[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (727)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = post-COVID-19 syndrome

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 4987 KiB  
Article
Investigation of Long-Term CD4+ T Cell Receptor Repertoire Changes Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Different Severities of Disease
by Emma L. Callery, Camilo L. M. Morais, Jemma V. Taylor, Kirsty Challen and Anthony W. Rowbottom
Diagnostics 2024, 14(20), 2330; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14202330 (registering DOI) - 19 Oct 2024
Abstract
The difference in the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with mild versus severe disease remains poorly understood. Recent scientific advances have recognised the vital role of both B cells and T cells; however, many questions remain [...] Read more.
The difference in the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with mild versus severe disease remains poorly understood. Recent scientific advances have recognised the vital role of both B cells and T cells; however, many questions remain unanswered, particularly for T cell responses. T cells are essential for helping the generation of SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses but have also been recognised in their own right as a major factor influencing COVID-19 disease outcomes. The identification of T cell receptor (TCR) family differences over a 12-month period in patients with varying COVID-19 disease severity is crucial for understanding T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2. Accordingly, using TCR vb family data, we analyse COVID-19 patient responses (n = 151) across multiple timepoints and disease severities alongside SARS-CoV-2 infection-naïve (healthy control) individuals (n = 62). Applying a machine learning approach, we can classify blood samples from hospital in-patients with moderate, severe, or critical disease with an accuracy of 94%. Furthermore, we identify significant variances in TCR vb family specificities between disease and control subgroups, suggesting advantageous and disadvantageous TCR repertoire patterns in relation to disease severity. Following validation in larger cohorts, our methodology may be useful in detecting protective immunity and the assessment of long-term outcomes, particularly as we begin to unravel the immunological mechanisms leading to post-COVID complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases and Microorganisms)
36 pages, 3132 KiB  
Review
The Ambivalence of Post COVID-19 Vaccination Responses in Humans
by Radha Gopalaswamy, Vivekanandhan Aravindhan and Selvakumar Subbian
Biomolecules 2024, 14(10), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14101320 - 17 Oct 2024
Viewed by 521
Abstract
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has prompted a massive global vaccination campaign, leading to the rapid development and deployment of several vaccines. Various COVID-19 vaccines are under different phases of clinical trials and include [...] Read more.
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has prompted a massive global vaccination campaign, leading to the rapid development and deployment of several vaccines. Various COVID-19 vaccines are under different phases of clinical trials and include the whole virus or its parts like DNA, mRNA, or protein subunits administered directly or through vectors. Beginning in 2020, a few mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273) and adenovirus-based (AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S and the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S) vaccines were recommended by WHO for emergency use before the completion of the phase 3 and 4 trials. These vaccines were mostly administered in two or three doses at a defined frequency between the two doses. While these vaccines, mainly based on viral nucleic acids or protein conferred protection against the progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection into severe COVID-19, and prevented death due to the disease, their use has also been accompanied by a plethora of side effects. Common side effects include localized reactions such as pain at the injection site, as well as systemic reactions like fever, fatigue, and headache. These symptoms are generally mild to moderate and resolve within a few days. However, rare but more serious side effects have been reported, including allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis and, in some cases, myocarditis or pericarditis, particularly in younger males. Ongoing surveillance and research efforts continue to refine the understanding of these adverse effects, providing critical insights into the risk-benefit profile of COVID-19 vaccines. Nonetheless, the overall safety profile supports the continued use of these vaccines in combating the pandemic, with regulatory agencies and health organizations emphasizing the importance of vaccination in preventing COVID-19’s severe outcomes. In this review, we describe different types of COVID-19 vaccines and summarize various adverse effects due to autoimmune and inflammatory response(s) manifesting predominantly as cardiac, hematological, neurological, and psychological dysfunctions. The incidence, clinical presentation, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of different adverse effects and possible mechanisms contributing to these effects are discussed. The review highlights the potential ambivalence of human response post-COVID-19 vaccination and necessitates the need to mitigate the adverse side effects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Summary of host response to COVID-19 vaccines. The COVID-19 vaccination-induced host responses can be broadly divided into immediate or delayed hypersensitivity. While the former response elicits allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, the latter response results in mild, moderate, or severe adverse events. The immediate hypersensitivity response is caused either by a classical, IgE-mediated activation of mast cells and basophils or an alternative non-classical pathway involving IgG and other antibodies activating neutrophils and basophils. Autoimmunity due to COVID-19 vaccination can be caused by molecular mimicry, bystander activation of immune cells, viral epitope spreading, or adjuvant-mediated immune response. The overall magnitude and durability of immune response as well as adverse effects mediated by COVID-19 vaccination are determined by several factors, including the age, sex, genetic makeup, immune status, and underlying health conditions of the host as well as the nature of the vaccine used. Image created in Biorender.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of COVID-19 vaccination-induced immunity. Following vaccination, the immune response against COVID-19 is mediated mainly by the development of Abs against SARS-CoV-2 proteins. The magnitude of immune response developed and its impact on the host protection is determined by the nature of Ab response elicited. An effective neutralizing Ab response neutralizes the virus, controls the infecting viral load and protects the vaccinated host against severe disease and/or death due to infection. However, a sub-optimal non-neutralizing Ab response leads to poor neutralization of the virus and ineffective control of viral load in the organs and may also contribute to Ab-mediated adverse effects (AE), which may enhance the disease manifestations. Image created in Biorender.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Key pathways of COVID-19 vaccine-induced adverse immune reactions. The COVID-19 vaccine is comprised of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein (either as mRNA or protein) combined with an adjuvant such as polyethylene glycol (PEG). In the classical pathway, internalization of the viral and adjuvant-derived antigens (Ag) in the vaccine by antigen-presenting cells (APC) results in the presentation of antigenic epitopes to the T helper (Th) cells, which produces cytokines and activates Ag-specific B cells to produce various antibodies, such as IgG, IgE, IgM, etc. The Ag-specific IgE Abs binds to the FcεR1 and activates basophils and mast cells to produce histamine, which leads to allergy and/or anaphylaxis reactions. In the non-classical pathway, the antigens were taken up directly by the MRGPRX2 receptor on mast cells, which results in the induction of histamine and allergic responses. In addition, the immune complex formation by the Ag-specific and/or anti-idiotypic IgG, IgE, IgM Abs activates the C3a and C5a complement components, which ultimately results in complement activation-related pseudo-allergic reaction (CARPA). Finally, in the alternative/additional pathway, the antigen–IgG complex is taken up by neutrophils through FcγRs, which activates these polymorphonuclear cells to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), proteases such as neutrophil-elastases (NE), Protease-3 (PR3), cathepsin G (CatG), and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETosis). The combined action of these pathways may contribute to the overall allergy and anaphylactic response due to COVID-19 vaccination. Image created in Biorender.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Various mechanisms of adverse immune activation by COVID-19 vaccines. The viral S protein, either as mRNA or recombinant, adenovector-DNA, is endocytosed through Toll-like receptors (TLR) present on antigen-presenting cells (APCs). These endosomes trigger intracellular signaling pathways that result in the activation of Interferon regulatory factor-7 (IRF-7) and nuclear factor k B (NFkB) networks. Activated IRF7 and NFkB upregulate the production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNFα. Alternatively, the viral components can escape from the endosome and trigger the cGAS signaling pathway, which activates STING/IRF3 network that ultimately results in the upregulation of proinflammatory type I interferons (IFN) response. Finally, the viral nucleic acids are translated into peptides and presented by the APC to activate T cells through the T cell receptor (TcR). Activation of naïve T cells results in the production of cytokines. Exposure to IL-4 skews the naïve T cells to an anti-inflammatory, Th2-type T cells that produce IL-3, IL-5, and IL-9, all of which can activate mast cells to elicit an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. In contrast, exposure to IL-12 and IFNγ polarizes the naïve T cells into Th1-type cells, which contributes to the proinflammatory response. Apart from the viral-derived molecules, vaccine adjuvants, such as CpG, can be recognized by TLR on the APC, with further activation of the NFkB pathway, leading to the production of inflammatory response. The viral nucleic acids also form a complex with platelet factor-4 (PF4) produced by the blood platelets. This complex activates Ag-specific B cells to produce anti-DNA/PF4 complex IgG, which binds with the FCγRIIa receptor on the platelets and activates these cells to form aggregates, leading to vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Thus, both APCs and platelets play divergent roles in mounting immune dysregulation upon exposure to viral antigens and/or adjuvants. Image created in Biorender.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1216 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Current Status of OCT and OCTA Imaging for the Diagnosis of Long COVID
by Helen Jerratsch, Ansgar Beuse, Martin S. Spitzer and Carsten Grohmann
J. Clin. Transl. Ophthalmol. 2024, 2(4), 113-130; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcto2040010 - 17 Oct 2024
Viewed by 317
Abstract
(1) With persistent symptoms emerging as a possible global consequence of COVID-19, the need to understand, diagnose, and treat them is paramount. This systematic review aims to explore the potential of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and/or optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in effectively [...] Read more.
(1) With persistent symptoms emerging as a possible global consequence of COVID-19, the need to understand, diagnose, and treat them is paramount. This systematic review aims to explore the potential of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and/or optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in effectively diagnosing long COVID. (2) The database PubMed and, to reduce selection bias, the AI research assistant Elicit, were used to find relevant publications in the period between February 2021 and March 2024. Included publications on OCT and OCTA analysis of participants with acute COVID symptoms, those after recovery, and participants with long COVID symptoms were organized in a table. Studies with participants under the age of 18, case reports, and unrelated studies, such as pure slit-lamp examinations and subgroup analyses were excluded. (3) A total of 25 studies involving 1243 participants and 960 controls were reviewed, revealing several changes in the posterior eye. Long COVID participants displayed significant thinning in retinal layers in the OCT, including the macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and inner plexiform layer (IPL). Divergent findings in recovered cohorts featured mRNFL reduction, GCL increase and decrease, and GCL-IPL decrease. Long COVID OCTA results revealed reduced vessel density (VD) in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP), intermediate capillary plexus (ICP), and deep capillary plexus (DCP). In recovered patients, SCP consistently showed a reduction, and DCP exhibited a decrease in five out of six publications. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was enlarged in five out of nine publications in recovered participants. (4) During various stages of COVID-19, retinal changes were observed, but a comparison between long COVID and recovered cohorts was aggravated by diverse inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as small sample sizes. Changes in long COVID were seen in most OCT examinations as thinning or partial thinning of certain retinal layers, while in OCTA a consistently reduced vessel density was revealed. The results suggest retinal alterations after COVID that are variable in OCT and more reliably visible in OCTA. Further research with larger samples is important for advancing long COVID diagnosis and management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>OCTA-images of the macula taken with a Topcon DRI Triton: (<b>a</b>) Example of a modified B-scan. The capillary plexus is highlighted in red and purple on the left. On the right, an enlargement of the retina is shown with retinal layers labeled and partially colored for a better visualization. mRNFL = macular retinal nerve fiber layer, OCTA = optical coherence tomography angiography, GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, OPL = outer plexiform layer, ONL = outer nuclear layer, RPE = retinal pigment epithelium, CC = choriocapillaris. There are two nomenclatures for the classification of the capillary plexus in the retina. The commonly used nomenclature on the left divides the vascular plexuses by retinal layers, while the newer nomenclature on the right measures the anatomic location of the RPCP and ICP separately. SCP = superficial capillary plexus, DCP = deep capillary plexus, RPCP = radial peripapillary capillary plexus, SVP = superficial vascular plexus, ICP = intermediate capillary plexus [<a href="#B19-jcto-02-00010" class="html-bibr">19</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Example of an en face image of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) centered in the macula.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow diagram of publication selection via the PubMed and Elicit database and cross-references. All publications that matched our search terms in the PubMed database and additional ones from other sources were identified. They were then screened for relevance, with irrelevant publications excluded. All remaining publications were found eligible for inclusion in this review.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Fundus image with: (<b>a</b>) EDTRS Scale Illustration: SO = superior outer, SI = superior inner, IO = inferior outer, II = inferior inner, TO = temporal outer, TI = temporal inner, NO = nasal outer, NI = nasal inner. (<b>b</b>) pRNFL Scale Illustration: C = central, T = temporal, I = inferior, S = superior, N = nasal, IT = inferotemporal, ST = superotemporal, SN = superonasal, IN = inferonasal.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
Maternal and Fetal Outcome of COVID-19 Infection among Pregnant Women
by Eman M. Khalil, Yasmin M. Madney, Mahmoud Hassan, Alzhraa M. Fahmy, Saud O. Alshammari, Qamar A. Alshammari, Heba A. Abou-Taleb, Ahmed A. Taha, Marwa O. Elgendy and Hamada A. A. Ali
Medicina 2024, 60(10), 1676; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101676 - 12 Oct 2024
Viewed by 320
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Pregnant women face an increased risk of experiencing negative consequences due to COVID-19 infection. Our study aimed to identify outcomes for both mothers and fetuses associated with COVID-19 during each trimester, as well as to identify post-COVID symptoms in [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Pregnant women face an increased risk of experiencing negative consequences due to COVID-19 infection. Our study aimed to identify outcomes for both mothers and fetuses associated with COVID-19 during each trimester, as well as to identify post-COVID symptoms in this population. Materials and Methods: Among the total population, 14 females were infected during the first trimester, 25 during the second, and 66 during the third trimester. Weekly follow-ups were conducted until delivery. Seventy-five females (71.4%; 95% CI:26.9–115.9%) were admitted to the hospital secondary to COVID-19 infection. Maternal hospitalization was independently associated with COVID-19 severity (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.9; 95% CI: 1.6–9.2 at p = 0.002 relative to the reference group (mild infection)) and the presence of dyspnea at initial assessment (aOR = 6.9; 95% CI: 1.7–28.2 at p = 0.007 relative to nondyspneic patients). Results: The duration of hospitalization (mean ± SD) was higher in the third trimester than the first and second trimesters (10.1 ± 0.8 vs. 4.0 ± 1.2 days and 10.1 ± 0.8 vs. 6.2 ± 1.4 days, respectively, at p < 0.05). The number of maternal deaths in the third trimester was higher than in the first and second trimesters (16 (24.2%) vs. no deaths and 16 (24.2%) vs. 1 (4%) deaths, respectively, at p < 0.05). In terms of fetal outcomes, a good fetal condition was more likely if the mother was infected during the first trimester (92.9%) than the second (80%) or third trimesters (66.7%), but the difference was not significant. The percentage of preterm deliveries was insignificantly higher in the second trimester (16%) than the first (7.1%) and third (4.5%) trimesters. Conclusions: The most common post-COVID symptoms included persistent loss of smell, dry eyes, post-partum depression, knee pain, and myalgia. Post-COVID symptoms were more prevalent in patients infected during the third trimester. The adverse outcomes of COVID-19 infection for both mother and fetus were more severe in cases where the infection occurred during the third trimester compared to the second and first trimesters. Therefore, it is crucial to adhere to precautionary measures against COVID-19, prioritize vaccination, and provide comprehensive care for pregnant mothers. Full article
13 pages, 3219 KiB  
Systematic Review
Exploring the Effects of Qigong, Tai Chi, and Yoga on Fatigue, Mental Health, and Sleep Quality in Chronic Fatigue and Post-COVID Syndromes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
by Hermann Fricke-Comellas, Alberto Marcos Heredia-Rizo, María Jesús Casuso-Holgado, Jesús Salas-González and Lourdes María Fernández-Seguín
Healthcare 2024, 12(20), 2020; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12202020 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 349
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and post-COVID syndrome (PCS) pose a substantial socioeconomic burden. The aim of this systematic review was to assess current evidence regarding the effect of the most popular forms of movement-based mindful exercises, i.e., qigong, tai chi, and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and post-COVID syndrome (PCS) pose a substantial socioeconomic burden. The aim of this systematic review was to assess current evidence regarding the effect of the most popular forms of movement-based mindful exercises, i.e., qigong, tai chi, and yoga, on fatigue and associated symptoms in CFS and PCS. Methods: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where qigong, tai chi, or yoga were compared with waitlist, no intervention, or active controls were included. Independent reviewers participated in data extraction, and evaluated risk of bias, spin of information, completeness of intervention description, and certainty of the evidence (GRADE). Meta-analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was the level of fatigue. Secondary measures were the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms and sleep quality. Results were expressed as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Thirteen RCTs with 661 participants were included, with most studies presenting a moderate or high risk of bias. Mindful exercises were more effective than control interventions to alleviate fatigue: SMD (95%CI) = −0.44 (−0.63 to −0.25), I2 = 48%, p < 0.0001. Positive effects were also observed for secondary outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was low or very low. Conclusions: Qigong, tai chi, and yoga may be effective to reduce fatigue and improve anxiety, depression, and sleep quality in adults with CFS or PCS. However, serious methodological concerns limit the clinical applicability of these findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart diagram of studies through the review process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Risk of bias summary. Green circles indicate a low risk of bias; yellow circles with a question mark indicate an unclear risk of bias; red circles indicate a high risk of bias [<a href="#B34-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B35-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B37-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B39-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B40-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">40</a>,<a href="#B41-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">41</a>,<a href="#B42-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">42</a>,<a href="#B43-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B44-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">47</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Risk of bias graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Forest plot of treatment effect for physical fatigue [<a href="#B34-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B36-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B39-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B43-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B45-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">45</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Forest plot of treatment effect for mental fatigue [<a href="#B34-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B36-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B39-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B43-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B45-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">45</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Forest plot of treatment effect for overall fatigue [<a href="#B34-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B36-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B39-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B43-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B45-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-healthcare-12-02020" class="html-bibr">46</a>].</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 244 KiB  
Article
Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Community-Dwelling Women in Rural Areas of Greece in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era
by Vaios Peritogiannis, Alexandra Mantziou, Nikolaos Vaitsis, Stamatina Aggelakou-Vaitsi, Maria Bakola and Eleni Jelastopulu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5985; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195985 - 8 Oct 2024
Viewed by 556
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Depressive and anxiety syndromes are associated with elevated disability and are more prevalent in women. Data on the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in the rural context are limited and contradictory. It is relevant to study common mental disorders in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Depressive and anxiety syndromes are associated with elevated disability and are more prevalent in women. Data on the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in the rural context are limited and contradictory. It is relevant to study common mental disorders in rural areas in the most vulnerable population of women, particularly in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted in two primary healthcare sites in the rural region of Farsala, Central Greece after the obviation of all restrictive measures that had been posed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. All consecutive female patients that attended the study sites for any non-emergent reason were asked to participate in the study. For the recording of symptoms of depression and anxiety, the self-reported Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) was used. Results: The study sample consisted of 129 women. The majority of participants were >50 years, with 27.9% being older adults. A small percentage (13.2%) suffered a chronic physical disease. A large proportion of the sample, slightly exceeding 40%, reported clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety, whereas a lower percentage of women with depressive symptoms was detected (17.1%). Symptoms of anxiety and depression were found to be interrelated, while a number of sociodemographic variables were associated with both, such as older age, education (primary), living status (alone, OR 123.5; 95% CI: 7.3–2098.8 for anxiety; OR 3.5; 95% CI: 1.3–9.8 for depression), employment (not working, (OR 0.157; 95% CI: 0.06–0.41 for anxiety; OR 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01–0.62 for depression) and the history of a chronic disease (OR 33.8; 95% CI: 4.3–264.7 for anxiety; OR 37.2; 95% CI: 10–138.1 for depression). Self-rated financial status was not related to symptoms of anxiety or depression. Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of inquiring for symptoms of depression and anxiety in women attending the rural primary care setting. The use of valid and reliable self-reported instruments that are easy to administrate may be helpful in this regard. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)
17 pages, 1376 KiB  
Article
Process-Specific Blood Biomarkers and Outcomes in COVID-19 Versus Non-COVID-19 ARDS (APEL–COVID Study): A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
by Olivier Lesur, Eric David Segal, Kevin Rego, Alain Mercat, Pierre Asfar and Frédéric Chagnon
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5919; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195919 - 4 Oct 2024
Viewed by 589
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are often considered separate clinico-radiological entities. Whether these conditions also present a single process-specific systemic biomolecular phenotype and how this relates to patient outcomes remains unknown. A prospective cohort study was [...] Read more.
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are often considered separate clinico-radiological entities. Whether these conditions also present a single process-specific systemic biomolecular phenotype and how this relates to patient outcomes remains unknown. A prospective cohort study was conducted, including adult patients admitted to the ICU and general floors for COVID-19-related (COVID+) or non-COVID-19-related (COVID−) acute respiratory failure during the main phase of the pandemic. The primary objective was to study blood biomarkers and outcomes among different groups and severity subsets. Results: A total of 132 patients were included, as follows: 67 COVID+, 54 COVID− (with 11 matched control subjects for biomarker reference), and 58 of these patients allowed for further pre- and post-analysis. The baseline apelin (APL) levels were higher in COVID+ patients (p < 0.0001 vs. COVID− patients) and in SARS COVID+ patients (p ≤ 0.02 vs. ARDS), while the IL-6 levels were higher in ARDS COVID− patients (p ≤ 0.0001 vs. SARS). Multivariable logistic regression analyses with cohort biomarkers and outcome parameters revealed the following: (i) log-transformed neprilysin (NEP) activity was significantly higher in COVID+ patients (1.11 [95% CI: 0.4–1.9] vs. 0.37 [95% CI: 0.1–0.8], fold change (FC): 1.43 [95% CI: 1.04–1.97], p = 0.029) and in SARS patients (FC: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.05–2.6], p = 0.032 vs. non-SARS COVID+ patients, and 1.73 [95% CI: 1.19–2.5], p = 0.005 vs. ARDS COVID− patients) and (ii) higher lysyl oxidase (LOX) activity and APL levels were respectively associated with death and a shorter length of hospital stay in SARS COVID+ patients (Odds Ratios (OR): 1.01 [1.00–1.02], p = 0.05, and OR: −0.007 [−0.013–0.0001], p = 0.048). Conclusion: Process-specific blood biomarkers exhibited distinct profiles between COVID+ and COVID− patients, and across stages of severity. NEP and LOX activities, as well as APL levels, are particularly linked to COVID+ patients and their outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04632732). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study design: from screening to patient allocation. ARF: acute respiratory failure, ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome, SARS: severe acute respiratory syndrome.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Baseline blood biomarkers in cohort patient groups. Data are displayed as scatter plots, with red triangles representing COVID+ patients and red squares representing COVID− patients. Bars indicate medians with interquartile ranges (IQR), with dark gray for COVID+ and light gray for COVID−. Data are shown on Log10 or linear scales on the x-axis. Biomarkers measured by EIA include IL-6, SP-D, and APL (upper panel), while enzyme bioactivities for NEP, ACE2, and LOX are shown in the lower panel. RFU: relative fluorescence units. Comparisons were made between COVID+ and COVID− patients. Data were first analyzed using one-way ANOVA with the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-parametric data, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. A significance threshold of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 was used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Baseline blood biomarkers in severity subsets of cohort patients. Data are displayed as scatter plots with medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) on Log10 or 2 scales on the x-axis. Biomarkers measured by EIA include IL-6, SP-D, and APL (upper panel), and enzyme bioactivities for NEP, ACE2, and LOX (lower panel). Four subsets are shown: severe COVID+ (SARS-CoV-2) in black lozenges; less severe COVID+ patients in black triangles; severe COVID− patients (ARDS) in inverted black triangles; and less severe COVID− patients in black squares. RFU: relative fluorescence units. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric data or Fisher’s exact test, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. A significance threshold of <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 was used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time-course values of blood biomarkers in cohort patients. Data are displayed as individual black circle plots. Biomarkers were measured by EIA for IL-6, SP-D, and APL (upper panel) and enzyme bioactivity for NEP, ACE2, and LOX (lower panel). The median value for control subjects is indicated by a dashed blue line in each panel. Representative medians for cohort patients are shown with red lines and squares. Black circles representing individual values from the baseline to the respective endpoint are connected by black lines, illustrating variability (i.e., D7 to D28) among patients. All available data are presented.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1083 KiB  
Review
Cytokine Storms and Anaphylaxis Following COVID-19 mRNA-LNP Vaccination: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches
by Toru Awaya, Hidehiko Hara and Masao Moroi
Diseases 2024, 12(10), 231; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12100231 - 1 Oct 2024
Viewed by 3645
Abstract
Acute adverse reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are a major concern, as autopsy reports indicate that deaths most commonly occur on the same day of or one day following vaccination. These acute reactions may be due to cytokine storms triggered by lipid nanoparticles [...] Read more.
Acute adverse reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are a major concern, as autopsy reports indicate that deaths most commonly occur on the same day of or one day following vaccination. These acute reactions may be due to cytokine storms triggered by lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and anaphylaxis induced by polyethene glycol (PEG), both of which are vital constituents of the mRNA-LNP vaccines. Kounis syndrome, in which anaphylaxis triggers acute coronary syndrome (ACS), may also be responsible for these cardiovascular events. Furthermore, COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines encompass adjuvants, such as LNPs, which trigger inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6. These vaccines also produce spike proteins which facilitate the release of inflammatory cytokines. Apart from this, histamine released from mast cells during allergic reactions plays a critical role in IL-6 secretion, which intensifies inflammatory responses. In light of these events, early reduction of IL-1β and IL-6 is imperative for managing post-vaccine cytokine storms, ACS, and myocarditis. Corticosteroids can restrict inflammatory cytokines and mitigate allergic responses, while colchicine, known for its IL-1β-reducing capabilities, could also prove effective. The anti-IL-6 antibody tocilizumab also displays promising treatment of cytokine release syndrome. Aside from its significance for treating anaphylaxis, epinephrine can induce coronary artery spasms and myocardial ischemia in Kounis syndrome, making accurate diagnosis essential. The upcoming self-amplifying COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines also contain LNPs. Given that these vaccines can cause a cytokine storm and allergic reactions post vaccination, it is crucial to consider corticosteroids and measure IL-6 levels for effective management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Potential mechanisms of acute adverse effects following COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccination. mRNA = messenger RNA; LNP = lipid nanoparticle; PEG = polyethylene glycol; IL = interleukin; ACE2 = angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; Ang II = angiotensin II; ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Specific treatments for immediate and short-term reactions to COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccinations. Contrary to conventional vaccines, treatment strategies following the administration of COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines must consider allergic reactions and the cytokine release mechanism. In light of the challenges of distinguishing between a cytokine storm and anaphylaxis, corticosteroids are recommended as a treatment option to address both conditions. mRNA = messenger RNA; LNP = lipid nanoparticle; PEG = polyethylene glycol; IL = interleukin.</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 215 KiB  
Article
Implications of Long COVID for Society: Insights into the Physical, Social, and Financial Impacts from Patient Interviews
by Alice A. Gaughan, Laura J. Rush and Ann Scheck McAlearney
Challenges 2024, 15(4), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/challe15040039 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 535
Abstract
Long COVID affects millions of people worldwide and has emerged as a major health consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. While quantitative studies have helped paint a picture of ongoing symptomatology, there are very few longitudinal qualitative studies that present patients’ perspectives about the [...] Read more.
Long COVID affects millions of people worldwide and has emerged as a major health consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. While quantitative studies have helped paint a picture of ongoing symptomatology, there are very few longitudinal qualitative studies that present patients’ perspectives about the significant and persistent impact Long COVID has on their daily lives. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with nine Long COVID patients about 15 months after we performed an initial set of interviews with those patients who were seeking care at a Long COVID specialty clinic. Most patients that we re-interviewed reported having lingering symptoms that continue to impact their lives. Many described suffering with mental health issues, particularly depression and anxiety. Others described financial stress. Most reported not yet being unable to return to their pre-COVID level of health and well-being. Our work demonstrates the ongoing need to study Long COVID and provide robust social support, mental health resources, and healthcare focused on symptom relief. Full article
9 pages, 4296 KiB  
Brief Report
Neuroimaging Correlates of Post-COVID-19 Symptoms: A Functional MRI Approach
by Marine M. Tanashyan, Polina I. Kuznetsova, Sofya N. Morozova, Vladislav A. Annushkin and Anton A. Raskurazhev
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2180; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192180 - 29 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1342
Abstract
Backgrounds and Purpose: Post-COVID syndrome is characterized by persistent symptoms, including fatigue and cognitive impairment. These symptoms may be experienced by up to 80% of patients. We aimed to identify possible patterns of brain activation underlying post-COVID fatigue. Methods: The study used functional [...] Read more.
Backgrounds and Purpose: Post-COVID syndrome is characterized by persistent symptoms, including fatigue and cognitive impairment. These symptoms may be experienced by up to 80% of patients. We aimed to identify possible patterns of brain activation underlying post-COVID fatigue. Methods: The study used functional MRI (Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma 3T scanner with a specially created protocol) of the brain in 30 patients with post-COVID fatigue syndrome and 20 healthy volunteers. Task functional MRI (fMRI) was performed using a cognitive paradigm (modified Stroop test). Eligible patients included adults aged 18–50 years with a >12 weeks before enrolment (less than 12 months) prior history of documented COVID-19 with symptoms of fatigue not attributable to any other cause, and with MFI-20 score > 30 and MoCA at first visit. Healthy control participants had no prior history of COVID-19 and negative tests for severe acute coronavirus respiratory syndrome with MFI-20 score < 30 and MoCA at first visit. Task fMRI data were processed using the SPM12 software package based on MATLAB R2022a. Results: Cognitive task fMRI analysis showed significantly higher activation in the post-COVID group versus healthy volunteers’ group. Between-group analysis showed significant activation differences. Using a threshold of T > 3 we identified eight clusters of statistically significant activation: supramarginal gyri, posterior cingulate cortex, opercular parts of precentral gyri and cerebellum posterior lobe bilaterally. Conclusions: Post-COVID fatigue syndrome associated with subjective cognitive impairment could show changes in brain functional activity in the areas connected with information processing speed and quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Areas of cortical activation in healthy volunteers during modified Stroop test performance (shown in green).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Areas of cortical activation in post-COVID patients during modified Stroop test performance (shown in yellow).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of between-group analysis. Clusters of greater activation in patients’ group are shown in red.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2606 KiB  
Article
Pro-Resolving Inflammatory Effects of a Marine Oil Enriched in Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediators (SPMs) Supplement and Its Implication in Patients with Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS)
by Asun Gracia Aznar, Fernando Moreno Egea, Rafael Gracia Banzo, Rocio Gutierrez, Jose Miguel Rizo, Pilar Rodriguez-Ledo, Isabel Nerin and Pedro-Antonio Regidor
Biomedicines 2024, 12(10), 2221; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102221 - 29 Sep 2024
Viewed by 534
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the eicosanoid and pro-resolutive parameters in patients with Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS) during a 12-week supplementation with a marine oil enriched in specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs). Patient and methods: This study was conducted on 53 adult patients with [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the eicosanoid and pro-resolutive parameters in patients with Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS) during a 12-week supplementation with a marine oil enriched in specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs). Patient and methods: This study was conducted on 53 adult patients with PCS. The subjects included must have had a positive COVID-19 test (PCR, fast antigen test, or serologic test) and persistent symptoms related to COVID-19 at least 12 weeks before their enrolment in the study. The following parameters were evaluated: polyunsaturated fatty acids EPA, DHA, ARA, and DPA; specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), 17-HDHA, 18-HEPE, 14-HDHA, resolvins, maresins, protectins, and lipoxins. The eicosanoids group included prostaglandins, thromboxanes, and leukotrienes. The development of the clinical symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea were evaluated using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale. Three groups with different intake amounts were evaluated (daily use of 500 mg, 1500 mg, and 3000 mg) and compared to a control group not using the product. Results: In the serum from patients with PCS, an increase in 17-HDHA, 18-HEPE, and 14-HDHA could be observed, and a decrease in the ratio between the pro-inflammatory and pro-resolutive lipid mediators was detected; both differences were significant (p < 0.05). There were no differences found between the three treatment groups. Fatigue and dyspnea showed a trend of improvement after supplementation in all groups. Conclusions: A clear enrichment in the serum of the three monohydroxylated SPMs could be observed at a dosage of 500 mg per day. Similarly, a clear improvement in fatigue and dyspnea was observed with this dosage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of the 14-HDHA values during the 12 weeks of the study. Group A = 3000 mg per day, Group B = 1500 mg per day and group X = 500 mg per day of dosage. Circle: outlayres. Black dot = median value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of the 17-HDHA values during the 12 weeks of the study. Group A = 3000 mg per day, Group B = 1500 mg per day and group X = 500 mg per day of dosage. Circle: outlayres. Black dot = median value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of the serum values for 18-HEPE. Group A = 3000 mg per day, Group B = 1500 mg per day and group X = 500 mg per day of dosage. Circle: outlayres. Black dot = median value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sum of the three investigated monohydroxylated parameters. During the treatment there was a significant increase of 14-HDHA, 17-HDHA and 18-HEPE in all groups. Group A = 3000 mg per day, Group B = 1500 mg per day and group X = 500 mg per day of dosage. Circle: outlayres. Black dot = median value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sum of the pro-inflammatory parameters. Group A = 3000 mg per day, Group B = 1500 mg per day and group X = 500 mg per day of dosage. Circle: outlayres. Black dot = median value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Development of the ratio between inflammatory and resolutive parameters. The differences were significant. Group A = 3000 mg per day, Group B = 1500 mg per day and group X = 500 mg per day of dosage. Circle: outlayres. Black dot = median value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Development of the fatigue scale for the three treatment groups. A clear trend to a clinical improvement can be observed. The group A, B and X were the ones receiving the active substance in the dosage of 3000 mg, 1500 mg and 500 mg per day respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Development of the dyspnea scale for the three treatment groups. A clear trend to a clinical improvement can be observed. Group A = 3000 mg per day, Group B = 1500 mg per day, Group C = Placebo and group X = 500 mg per day of dosage.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 238 KiB  
Article
How Long Is Long COVID? Evaluation of Long-Term Health Status in Individuals Discharged from a Specialist Community Long COVID Service
by Rochelle Bodey, Jennifer Grimaldi, Hannah Tait, Belinda Godfrey, Sharon Witton, Jenna Shardha, Rachel Tarrant and Manoj Sivan
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5817; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195817 - 29 Sep 2024
Viewed by 2343
Abstract
Background: Post COVID-19 syndrome or long COVID (LC) is a novel fluctuating condition with a protracted course in some patients. Specialist LC services have been operational in the UK since 2020 and deal with a high caseload of patients. Aims: To evaluate long-term [...] Read more.
Background: Post COVID-19 syndrome or long COVID (LC) is a novel fluctuating condition with a protracted course in some patients. Specialist LC services have been operational in the UK since 2020 and deal with a high caseload of patients. Aims: To evaluate long-term outcomes in patients discharged from a community-based LC specialist service. Methods: A service evaluation study that included patients who were well engaged in the services [completed the standard Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and received intervention from clinician(s)] and had been discharged for at least 3 months from the service. They consented to the study and completed standard PROMs: COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRS), EQ-5D-5L and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria for myalgia encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Results: Out of 460 patients contacted, 112 (average of 37.6 months since infection and 9.8 months post-discharge) completed the PROMs. Of these, 90.2% patients continued to experience LC symptoms and disability and had not returned to their pre-COVID-19 health status. The average EQ-5D-5L index score was 0.53 (SD 0.29), highlighting a significant disability and that LC had become a long-term condition (LTC) in the majority of patients who responded to the survey. Of these patients, 43% met the criteria for suspected ME/CFS. Conclusions: A proportion of LC patients develop persistent long COVID (PLC) consistent with a LTC and had a significant overlap with ME/CFS. Full article
10 pages, 767 KiB  
Article
Development of a Risk Predictive Model for Erectile Dysfunction at 12 Months after COVID-19 Recovery: A Prospective Observational Study
by Fernando Natal Alvarez, Maria Consuelo Conde Redondo, Nicolas Sierrasesumaga Martin, Alejandro Garcia Viña, Carmen Marfil Peña, Alfonso Bahillo Martinez, Mario Jojoa and Eduardo Tamayo Gomez
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5757; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195757 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1846
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a risk prediction model for the identification of features involved in the prediction of erectile dysfunction (ED) at 12 months following COVID-19 recovery. Methods: We performed an observational prospective multicentre study. Participants were classified according to their history [...] Read more.
Objectives: To develop a risk prediction model for the identification of features involved in the prediction of erectile dysfunction (ED) at 12 months following COVID-19 recovery. Methods: We performed an observational prospective multicentre study. Participants were classified according to their history of COVID-19: (I) patients with a past history of COVID-19 and (II) patients without a previous microbiological diagnosis of COVID-19. A total of 361 patients (past history of COVID-19, n = 166; no past history of COVID-19, n = 195) were assessed from January 2022 to March 2023. Patients with a past history of COVID-19 were assessed at 12 months following COVID-19 recovery. The primary outcome measure was ED, assessed through the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Data concerning epidemiologic variables, comorbidities and active treatment were also collected. We performed a binary logistic regression to develop a risk predictive model. Among the models developed, we selected the one with the higher Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results: The median age was 55 years in both groups. The ED prevalence was 55.9% in patients with past history of COVID-19 and 44.1% in those with no past history of COVID-19. The best predictive model developed for ED comprised 40 variables and had an AUC of 0.8. Conclusions: We developed a regression model for the prediction of ED 12 months after COVID-19 recovery. The application of our predictive tool in a community setting could eventually prevent the adverse effects of ED on cardiovascular health and the associated unfavourable economic impact. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research flow chart showing the procedures implemented for the creation of the model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart showing the process for selection of the study sample. After the identification of the eligible individuals, we applied the exclusion criteria and then withdrew those individuals who were declared to be non-sexually active. We finally achieved the final study sample.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 572 KiB  
Review
Proteomic Signatures of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Associated with COVID-19: A Narrative Review
by Maria-Myrto Dourdouna, Elizabeth-Barbara Tatsi, Vasiliki Syriopoulou and Athanasios Michos
Children 2024, 11(10), 1174; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101174 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 409
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is a post-infectious complication of COVID-19. MIS-C has overlapping features with other pediatric inflammatory disorders including Kawasaki Disease (KD), Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS), Toxic Shock Syndrome and sepsis. The exact mechanisms responsible for the clinical overlap [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is a post-infectious complication of COVID-19. MIS-C has overlapping features with other pediatric inflammatory disorders including Kawasaki Disease (KD), Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS), Toxic Shock Syndrome and sepsis. The exact mechanisms responsible for the clinical overlap between MIS-C and these conditions remain unclear, and biomarkers that could distinguish MIS-C from its clinical mimics are lacking. This study aimed to provide an overview of how proteomic methods, like Mass Spectrometry (MS) and affinity-based proteomics, can offer a detailed understanding of pathophysiology and aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of MIS-C. Methods: A narrative review of relevant studies published up to July 2024 was conducted. Results: We identified 15 studies and summarized their key proteomic findings. These studies investigated the serum or plasma proteome of MIS-C patients using MS, Proximity Extension, or Aptamer-based assays. The studies associated the proteomic profile of MIS-C with laboratory and clinical parameters and/or compared it with that of other diseases including acute COVID-19, KD, MAS, pediatric rheumatic diseases, sepsis and myocarditis or pericarditis following COVID-19 mRNA immunization. Depending on the method and the control group, different proteins were increased or decreased in the MIS-C group. The limitations and challenges in MIS-C proteomic research are also discussed, and future research recommendations are provided. Conclusions: Although proteomics appear to be a promising approach for understanding the pathogenesis and uncovering candidate biomarkers in MIS-C, proteomic studies are still needed to recognize and validate biomarkers that could accurately discriminate MIS-C from its clinical mimics. Full article
15 pages, 6187 KiB  
Review
Assessment of Microvascular Function Based on Flowmotion Monitored by the Flow-Mediated Skin Fluorescence Technique
by Andrzej Marcinek, Joanna Katarzynska, Katarzyna Cypryk, Agnieszka Los-Stegienta, Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer, Renata Walczak-Jedrzejowska, Jacek Zielinski and Jerzy Gebicki
Biosensors 2024, 14(10), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14100459 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 691
Abstract
This review summarizes studies dedicated to the assessment of microvascular function based on microcirculatory oscillations monitored by the Flow-Mediated Skin Fluorescence (FMSF) technique. Two approaches are presented. The first approach uses oscillatory parameters measured under normoxic conditions, expressed as flowmotion (FM), vasomotion (VM), [...] Read more.
This review summarizes studies dedicated to the assessment of microvascular function based on microcirculatory oscillations monitored by the Flow-Mediated Skin Fluorescence (FMSF) technique. Two approaches are presented. The first approach uses oscillatory parameters measured under normoxic conditions, expressed as flowmotion (FM), vasomotion (VM), and the normoxia oscillatory index (NOI). These parameters have been used for the identification of impaired microcirculatory oscillations associated with intense physical exercise, post-COVID syndrome, psychological stress, and erectile dysfunction. The second approach involves characterization of the microcirculatory response to hypoxia based on the measurement of hypoxia sensitivity (HS). The HS parameter is used to characterize microvascular complications in diabetes, such as diabetic kidney disease and diabetic foot ulcers. Based on research conducted by the authors of this review, the FMSF parameter ranges characterizing microvascular function are presented. The diagnostic approach to assessing microvascular function based on flowmotion monitored by the FMSF technique has a wide range of applications and the potential to be integrated into widespread medical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biosensors and Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Front (<b>A</b>) and back (<b>B</b>) views of the AngioExpert device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Exemplary FMSF trace recorded using AngioExpert device. (<b>A</b>): Visualization of three main parts showing key parameters (RHR, HS, NOI) for each part. (<b>B</b>): Analysis of oscillations at baseline. (<b>C</b>): Analysis of oscillations at reperfusion line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of the log(FM) (<b>A</b>) and NOI (<b>B</b>) parameters in a group of highly trained endurance athletes (triathletes—16; long-distance runners—6), n = 22; 15 males; 7 females; mean age 20.0 (16–40 y). Measurements were taken before exercise, after exercise until exhaustion, and after 1 h of rest. The differences between the parameters of the compared groups were considered statistically significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. The <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values were calculated by one-way ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The comparison (<b>A</b>) and distribution (<b>B</b>) of the NOI parameter in the control group (n = 32, 19 males, 13 females, mean age 37.8 (30–50 y)) and post-COVID group (n = 45, 19 males, 26 females, mean age 41.5 (30–50 y)). The differences between the parameters of the compared groups were considered statistically significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. The <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values were calculated from the Mann–Whitney test. Reproduced from [<a href="#B28-biosensors-14-00459" class="html-bibr">28</a>]. 2022, Dove Medical Press Ltd. Publisher, Auckland, New Zealand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Power Spectral Density (PSD) of the fluorescence signal recorded for a prediabetes patient (male, age 75 y) at the baseline in intervals of endothelial (&lt;0.021 Hz), neurogenic (0.021–0.052 Hz), and myogenic (0.052–0.15 Hz) activity. (<b>A</b>): Changes recorded before the appearance of psychological stress. (<b>B</b>): Changes observed under prolonged psychological stress. (<b>C</b>): changes observed after a week of therapy with a beta-blocker (nebivolol at a daily dose of 1.25 mg). Reproduced from [<a href="#B33-biosensors-14-00459" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. 2023, Dove Medical Press Ltd. Publisher, Auckland, New Zealand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A comparison of the log(FM) (<b>A</b>), log(VM) (<b>B</b>), and NOI (<b>C</b>) parameters for a group of men without erectile dysfunction (ED) (n = 40, mean age 41.2 (24–57 y)) and a group of men with ED (n = 39, mean age 53.3 (27–72 y)). The differences between the parameters of the compared groups were considered statistically significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. The <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values were calculated from a two-sample <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test for comparisons (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and the Mann–Whitney test for the comparison (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>): A comparison of the log(HS) parameter in healthy individuals (n = 21, 8 males, 13 females, mean age 46.2 (30–68 y)), DM patients without complications (n = 33, 13 males, 20 females, mean age 44.4 (21–74 y)), and DKD patients (n = 30, 7 males, 23 females, mean age 62.8 (29–88 y)). (<b>B</b>): The correlation between the log(HS) parameter and nephrological parameter in the diabetic population (n = 63) (Pearson correlation). The differences between the parameters of the compared groups were considered statistically significant when <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. The <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values were calculated by one-way ANOVA with the Scheffe post hoc test. Reproduced from [<a href="#B52-biosensors-14-00459" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. 2022, Elsevier B.V. RELX Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Significant changes in FMSF traces recorded at different time points for a patient with DFU (male, age 67 y, DM2). (<b>A</b>): First measurement. (<b>B</b>): Measurement performed after one year. Reproduced from [<a href="#B53-biosensors-14-00459" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. 2021, Dove Medical Press Ltd. Publisher, Auckland, New Zealand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Ranges of FMSF parameters: NOI (normoxia oscillatory index) and HS (hypoxia sensitivity). Reproduced from [<a href="#B21-biosensors-14-00459" class="html-bibr">21</a>]. 2024, MDPI AG Publisher, Basel, Switzerland.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop