[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,926)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = photosynthetic efficiency

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 2679 KiB  
Article
MicroED: Unveiling the Structural Chemistry of Plant Biomineralisation
by Damian Trzybiński, Marcin Ziemniak, Barbara Olech, Szymon Sutuła, Tomasz Góral, Olga Bemowska-Kałabun, Krzysztof Brzost, Małgorzata Wierzbicka and Krzysztof Woźniak
Molecules 2024, 29(20), 4916; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29204916 - 17 Oct 2024
Abstract
Plants are able to produce various types of crystals through metabolic processes, serving functions ranging from herbivore deterrence to photosynthetic efficiency. However, the structural analysis of these crystals has remained challenging due to their small and often imperfect nature, which renders traditional X-ray [...] Read more.
Plants are able to produce various types of crystals through metabolic processes, serving functions ranging from herbivore deterrence to photosynthetic efficiency. However, the structural analysis of these crystals has remained challenging due to their small and often imperfect nature, which renders traditional X-ray diffraction techniques unsuitable. This study explores the use of Microcrystal Electron Diffraction (microED) as a novel method for the structural analysis of plant-derived microcrystals, focusing on Armeria maritima (Milld.), a halophytic plant known for its biomineralisation capabilities. In this study, A. maritima plants were cultivated under controlled laboratory conditions with exposure to cadmium and thallium to induce the formation of crystalline deposits on their leaf surfaces. These deposits were analysed using microED, revealing the presence of sodium chloride (halite), sodium sulphate (thénardite), and calcium sulphate dihydrate (gypsum). Our findings highlight the potential of microED as a versatile tool in plant science, capable of providing detailed structural insights into biomineralisation processes, even from minimal and imperfect crystalline samples. The application of microED in this context not only advances the present understanding of A. maritima’s adaptation to saline environments but also opens new avenues for exploring the structural chemistry of biomineralisation in other plant species. Our study advocates for the broader adoption of microED in botanical research, especially when dealing with challenging crystallographic problems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Structure)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><span class="html-italic">Armeria maritima</span> is depicted as follows: (<b>a</b>) a general view of the plant in the flowering phase. This perennial herbaceous plant is characterised by its narrow lanceolate leaves arranged in a rosette and its purple capitate inflorescences (photo: Arnstein Rønning); (<b>b</b>) SEM image showing the salt gland (marked by red arrow) and the polycrystalline material excreted by the gland.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Results of the microED analysis of crystals from the surface of <span class="html-italic">A. maritima</span> leaves (the measured microcrystal, an exemplary frame showing the diffraction signal, and the crystal packing of the compound): (<b>a</b>) sodium chloride (halite), (<b>b</b>) sodium sulphate (thénardite), and (<b>c</b>) calcium sulphate dihydrate (gypsum).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The asymmetric unit of the crystal lattice of the investigated compounds—sodium chloride (<b>a</b>), sodium sulphate (<b>b</b>), and calcium sulphate dehydrate (<b>c</b>)—with the atom labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Computational analysis of CaSO<sub>4</sub> 2H<sub>2</sub>O system. (<b>a</b>) Analysis of hydrogen bonds with isosurfaces of ELI-D (2.7) along <span class="html-italic">x</span>-90° and <span class="html-italic">z</span>-90° axis. (<b>b</b>) Large basins of ELI-D indicate the regions in which the likelihood of finding an electron pair relative to the whole molecular system is high. A visible basin of ELI-D along a hydrogen bond indicates a significant covalent contribution. ELI-D is a dimensionless quantity. (<b>c</b>) Isosurfaces of ED Laplacian along x-90° axis (0.5 e A<sup>−5</sup>). (<b>d</b>) Contour map of ED Laplacian along a hydrogen bond.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1550 KiB  
Article
Non-Invasive Detection of Nitrogen Deficiency in Cannabis sativa Using Hand-Held Raman Spectroscopy
by Graham Antoszewski, James F. Guenther, John K. Roberts, Mickal Adler, Michael Dalle Molle, Nicholas S. Kaczmar, William B. Miller, Neil S. Mattson and Heather Grab
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2390; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102390 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 267
Abstract
Proper crop management requires rapid detection methods for abiotic and biotic stresses to ensure plant health and yield. Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is an emerging economically and environmentally sustainable crop capable of yielding high biomass. Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduces hemp plant growth, [...] Read more.
Proper crop management requires rapid detection methods for abiotic and biotic stresses to ensure plant health and yield. Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is an emerging economically and environmentally sustainable crop capable of yielding high biomass. Nitrogen deficiency significantly reduces hemp plant growth, affecting photosynthetic capacity and ultimately decreasing yield. When symptoms of nitrogen deficiency are visible to humans, there is often already lost yield. A real-time, non-destructive detection method, such as Raman spectroscopy, is therefore critical to identify nitrogen deficiency in living hemp plant tissue for fast, precise crop remediation. A two-part experiment was conducted to investigate portable Raman spectroscopy as a viable hemp nitrogen deficiency detection method and to compare the technique’s predictive ability against a handheld SPAD (chlorophyll index) meter. Raman spectra and SPAD readings were used to train separate nitrogen deficiency discrimination models. Raman scans displayed characteristic spectral markers indicative of nitrogen deficiency corresponding to vibrational modes of carotenoids, essential pigments for photosynthesis. The Raman-based model consistently predicted nitrogen deficiency in hemp prior to the onset of visible stress symptoms across both experiments, while SPAD only differentiated nitrogen deficiency in the second experiment when the stress was more pronounced. Our findings add to the repertoire of plant stresses that hand-held Raman spectroscopy can detect by demonstrating the ability to provide assessments of nitrogen deficiency. This method can be implemented at the point of cultivation, allowing for timely interventions and efficient resource use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Precision and Digital Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Agilent Resolve spectrometer scanning the upper node, leaflet 2, of ‘TJ’s CBD’ hemp.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The mean and standard deviation (shaded region) of Raman spectra of hemp leaf samples after 7 days under N-deficient (n = 36) versus complete nutrition (n = 36) in the two-cultivar trial [<a href="#B39-agronomy-14-02390" class="html-bibr">39</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variable importance in projection scores for the three-component PLS-DA model for (<b>a</b>) early and (<b>b</b>) later-stage nitrogen deficiency detection. A VIP score &gt; 1 implies that the wavelength contributes significant information towards the model’s predictions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photos of hemp leaf samples from the first experiment after (<b>a</b>) 7 days of nitrogen-deficient nutrient solution and (<b>b</b>) 7 days of complete solution. (<b>c</b>) Differences in mean SPAD readings between the two trial periods. Error bars represent measured standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 39533 KiB  
Article
Identification of High-Photosynthetic-Efficiency Wheat Varieties Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing from UAVs
by Weiyi Feng, Yubin Lan, Hongjian Zhao, Zhicheng Tang, Wenyu Peng, Hailong Che and Junke Zhu
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2389; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102389 (registering DOI) - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 230
Abstract
Breeding high-photosynthetic-efficiency wheat varieties is a crucial link in safeguarding national food security. Traditional identification methods necessitate laborious on-site observation and measurement, consuming time and effort. Leveraging unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology to forecast photosynthetic indices opens up the potential for [...] Read more.
Breeding high-photosynthetic-efficiency wheat varieties is a crucial link in safeguarding national food security. Traditional identification methods necessitate laborious on-site observation and measurement, consuming time and effort. Leveraging unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology to forecast photosynthetic indices opens up the potential for swiftly discerning high-photosynthetic-efficiency wheat varieties. The objective of this research is to develop a multi-stage predictive model encompassing nine photosynthetic indicators at the field scale for wheat breeding. These indices include soil and plant analyzer development (SPAD), leaf area index (LAI), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gsw), photochemical quantum efficiency (PhiPS2), PSII reaction center excitation energy capture efficiency (Fv’/Fm’), and photochemical quenching coefficient (qP). The ultimate goal is to differentiate high-photosynthetic-efficiency wheat varieties through model-based predictions. This research gathered red, green, and blue spectrum (RGB) and multispectral (MS) images of eleven wheat varieties at the stages of jointing, heading, flowering, and filling. Vegetation indices (VIs) and texture features (TFs) were extracted as input variables. Three machine learning regression models (Support Vector Machine Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and BP Neural Network (BPNN)) were employed to construct predictive models for nine photosynthetic indices across multiple growth stages. Furthermore, the research conducted principal component analysis (PCA) and membership function analysis on the predicted values of the optimal models for each indicator, established a comprehensive evaluation index for high photosynthetic efficiency, and employed cluster analysis to screen the test materials. The cluster analysis categorized the eleven varieties into three groups, with SH06144 and Yannong 188 demonstrating higher photosynthetic efficiency. The moderately efficient group comprises Liangxing 19, SH05604, SH06085, Chaomai 777, SH05292, Jimai 22, and Guigu 820, totaling seven varieties. Xinmai 916 and Jinong 114 fall into the category of lower photosynthetic efficiency, aligning closely with the results of the clustering analysis based on actual measurements. The findings suggest that employing UAV-based multi-source remote sensing technology to identify wheat varieties with high photosynthetic efficiency is feasible. The study results provide a theoretical basis for winter wheat phenotypic monitoring at the breeding field scale using UAV-based multi-source remote sensing, offering valuable insights for the advancement of smart breeding practices for high-photosynthetic-efficiency wheat varieties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Precision and Digital Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical Location of the Research Area and Distribution of Experimental Materials.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Exclusion of soil background; (<b>b</b>) delineation of the ROI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Extracting TFs through GLCMs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The flowchart of the experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Correlation analysis between UAV imagery features and photosynthetic indices during the filling period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Training and validation of the optimal predictive model for the nine photosynthetic indices during the filling stage: (<b>a</b>) SPAD; (<b>b</b>) LAI; (<b>c</b>) Pn; (<b>d</b>) Tr; (<b>e</b>) Ci; (<b>f</b>) Gsw; (<b>g</b>) PhiPS2; (<b>h</b>) Fv’/Fm’; (<b>i</b>) qP. The blue and red shaded areas represent the 95% confidence bands of the training set and the verification set, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Predicted value cluster analysis and measured value cluster analysis of 11 varieties. (<b>a</b>) Clustering analysis is based on the predicted values; (<b>b</b>) Clustering analysis is based on the measured values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The variation trend of photosynthetic indices in four key growth periods. WV1, WV2, WV3, and so forth represent the varieties SH05604, SH06144, Guigu 820, Jimai 22, Yannong 188, Xinmai 916, Liangxing 19 Jinong 114, Chaomai 777, SH05292 and SH06085. (<b>a</b>) SPAD; (<b>b</b>) LAI; (<b>c</b>) Pn; (<b>d</b>) Tr; (<b>e</b>) Ci; (<b>f</b>) Gsw; (<b>g</b>) PhiPS2; (<b>h</b>) Fv’/Fm’; (<b>i</b>) qP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Performance of different machine learning algorithms in the prediction of different photosynthetic indexes.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Correlation analysis between UAV imagery features and photosynthetic indices in three key growth stages: (<b>a</b>) Jointing period, (<b>b</b>) Heading period, and (<b>c</b>) Flowering period.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1 Cont.
<p>Correlation analysis between UAV imagery features and photosynthetic indices in three key growth stages: (<b>a</b>) Jointing period, (<b>b</b>) Heading period, and (<b>c</b>) Flowering period.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 29919 KiB  
Article
The Synergistic Effect of the Same Climatic Factors on Water Use Efficiency Varies between Daily and Monthly Scales
by Guangchao Li, Zhaoqin Yi, Liqin Han, Ping Hu, Wei Chen, Xuefeng Ye and Zhen Yang
Sustainability 2024, 16(20), 8925; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208925 - 15 Oct 2024
Viewed by 331
Abstract
The coupled processes of ecosystem carbon and water cycles are usually evaluated using the water use efficiency (WUE), and improving WUE is crucial for maintaining the sustainability of ecosystems. However, it remains unclear whether the WUE in different ecosystem responds synchronously to the [...] Read more.
The coupled processes of ecosystem carbon and water cycles are usually evaluated using the water use efficiency (WUE), and improving WUE is crucial for maintaining the sustainability of ecosystems. However, it remains unclear whether the WUE in different ecosystem responds synchronously to the synergistic effect of the same climate factors at daily and monthly scales. Therefore, we employed a machine learning-driven factor analysis method and a geographic detector model, and we quantitatively evaluated the individual effects and the synergistic effect of climate factors on the daily mean water use efficiency (WUED) and monthly mean water use efficiency (WUEM) in different ecosystems in China. Our results showed that (1) among the 10 carbon flux monitoring sites in China, WUED and WUEM exhibited the highest positive correlations with the near-surface air humidity and the highest negative correlation with solar radiation. The correlation between WUEM and climate factors was generally greater than that between WUED and climate factors. (2) There were significant differences in the order of importance and degree of impact of the same climate factors on WUED and WUEM in the different ecosystems. Among the 10 carbon flux monitoring sites in China, the near-surface air humidity imposed the greatest influence on the WUED and WUEM changes, followed by the near-surface water vapor pressure. (3) There were significant differences in the synergistic effects of the same climate factors on WUED and WUEM in the different ecosystems. Among the 10 carbon flux monitoring sites in China, the WUED variability was most sensitive to the synergistic effect of solar radiation and photosynthetically active radiation, while the WUEM variability was most sensitive to the synergistic effect of the near-surface air humidity and soil moisture. The research results indicated that synchronous responses of the WUE in very few ecosystems to the same climate factors and their synergistic effect occurred at daily and monthly scales. This finding enhances the understanding of sustainable water resource use and the impact of climate change on water use efficiency, providing crucial insights for improving climate-adaptive ecosystem management and sustainable water resource utilization across different ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of the climate zones and ChinaFLUX sites and (<b>b</b>) spatial distribution of the land use types in 2010.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Synergistic effect of climate variables on the ecosystem WUE at different time scales.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Multiyear daily mean variations in the GPP (orange line), ET (green line) and WUE (blue line) in the different ecosystems in China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Multiyear monthly mean variations in the GPP, ET and WUE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the WUE and climate factors at the different time scales at the 10 carbon flux monitoring stations in China. Cyan indicates a negative correlation between the WUE and each climate variable, and orange indicates a positive correlation between the WUE and each climate variable. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Summary of the XGBoost SHAP value (impact on model output) results for WUE<sub>D</sub> at the 10 carbon flux monitoring sites in China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Relative importance (impact on model output) of the different drivers at the 10 carbon flux monitoring stations in China for WUE<sub>D</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Summary of the XGBoost SHAP value (impact on model output) results for WUE<sub>M</sub> at the 10 carbon flux monitoring sites in China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relative importance (impact on model output) of the different drivers of the 10 carbon flux monitoring stations in China for WUE<sub>M</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Synergistic effect of the climate factors on WUE<sub>D</sub> at the 10 flux monitoring sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Synergistic effect of the climate factors on WUE<sub>M</sub> at the 10 flux monitoring sites.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 5820 KiB  
Article
Characterization of Low-Temperature Sensitivity and Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Yellow Leaf Mutants of Tomato
by Shujing Ji, Yifan Zhang, Minghua Xu, Mingrui Zhao, Huixin Chen, Yongen Lu, Shengqun Pang and Wei Xu
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2382; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102382 (registering DOI) - 15 Oct 2024
Viewed by 247
Abstract
Leaf color mutants serve as valuable models for studying the regulation of plant photosynthesis, alternations in chloroplast structure and function, and the analysis of associated gene functions. A yellow leaf mutant, ylm, was separated from the wild tomato M82, with its yellowing [...] Read more.
Leaf color mutants serve as valuable models for studying the regulation of plant photosynthesis, alternations in chloroplast structure and function, and the analysis of associated gene functions. A yellow leaf mutant, ylm, was separated from the wild tomato M82, with its yellowing intensity influenced by low temperature. To assess the low-temperature sensitivity of this mutant, the photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of ylm and M82 were examined under different temperature conditions. In this study, the ylm mutant and its wild type, M82, were exposed to three temperature levels, 16, 25, and 30 °C, for 48 h. The impact of these temperature treatments on leaf color change, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic performance, and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mutant ylm was investigated. The results revealed the following: (1) After exposure to 16 °C, the ylm mutant exhibited significant yellowing, a marked reduction in chlorophyll content, and a notable increase in carotenoid content. At 25 °C, the differences were less pronounced, and at 30 °C, the differences between ylm and M82 were minimal. (2) The photosynthetic rate of the ylm mutant was lower than that of M82 at 16 °C, with the gap narrowing as temperature increased, eventually converging at higher temperatures. (3) The fluorescence transient curve (OJIP) of the ylm mutant differed significantly from that of M82 at 16 °C, with higher fluorescence intensity at the O point and lower intensity at the J, I, and P points. This difference was decreased at 25 °C and nearly disappeared at 30 °C. Additionally, the Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, PIabs, PItotal, ABS/CSm, TRo/CSm, and ETo/CSm values of ylm were lower than those of M82 at 16 °C, while the ABS/RC and DIo/RC values were higher, with no significant differences observed at 30 °C. These findings suggest that the ylm mutant is highly sensitive to low temperature, with pronounced yellowing, reduced light energy absorption and capture efficiency, and impaired electron transport at lower temperature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Breeding and Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Photosynthetic pigment analysis in leaves of tomato plant wild types (M82) and <span class="html-italic">ylm</span> mutants under different temperature conditions: (<b>A</b>) Plant phenotype under different temperature treatments, (<b>B</b>) chlorophyll a content, (<b>C</b>) chlorophyll b content, (<b>D</b>) total chlorophyll content, (<b>E</b>) carotenoid content. Note: * and **, significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Photosynthetic pigment analysis in leaves of tomato plant wild types (M82) and <span class="html-italic">ylm</span> mutants under different temperature conditions: (<b>A</b>) Plant phenotype under different temperature treatments, (<b>B</b>) chlorophyll a content, (<b>C</b>) chlorophyll b content, (<b>D</b>) total chlorophyll content, (<b>E</b>) carotenoid content. Note: * and **, significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photosynthetic response curve analysis in leaves of tomato plant wild types (M82) and <span class="html-italic">ylm</span> mutants under different temperature conditions: (<b>A</b>) Net photosynthetic capacity, (<b>B</b>) intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, (<b>C</b>) stomatal conductance, (<b>D</b>) transpiration rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters analysis in leaves of tomato plant wild types (M82) and <span class="html-italic">ylm</span> mutants under different temperature conditions: (<b>A</b>) Fv/Fm fluorescence imaging, (<b>B</b>) Fv/Fm, (<b>C</b>) Y(II), (<b>D</b>) qP, (<b>E</b>) qN. Note: * and **, significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters analysis in leaves of tomato plant wild types (M82) and <span class="html-italic">ylm</span> mutants under different temperature conditions: (<b>A</b>) Fv/Fm fluorescence imaging, (<b>B</b>) Fv/Fm, (<b>C</b>) Y(II), (<b>D</b>) qP, (<b>E</b>) qN. Note: * and **, significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>OJIP curves analysis in leaves of tomato plant wild types (M82) and <span class="html-italic">ylm</span> mutants under different temperature conditions: (<b>A</b>) 16 °C, (<b>B</b>) 25 °C, (<b>C</b>) 30 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>JIP test parameters analysis in leaves of tomato plant wild types (M82) and <span class="html-italic">ylm</span> mutants under different temperature conditions: (<b>A</b>) Fm, (<b>B</b>) Fv/Fo, (<b>C</b>) PIabs, (<b>D</b>) PItotal. Note: * and **, significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>PSII activity and energy distribution analysis in leaves of tomato plant wild types (M82) and <span class="html-italic">ylm</span> mutants under different temperature conditions.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 821 KiB  
Review
Sun Protection as a Strategy for Managing Heat Stress in Avocado Trees
by Francisco José Domingues Neto, Débora Cavalcante dos Santos Carneiro, Marcelo de Souza Silva, Marco Antonio Tecchio, Sarita Leonel, Adilson Pimentel Junior, Elizabeth Orika Ono and João Domingos Rodrigues
Plants 2024, 13(20), 2854; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202854 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 290
Abstract
The increasing incidence of heat stress due to global climate change poses a significant challenge to avocado (Persea americana) cultivation, particularly in regions with intense solar radiation. This review evaluates sun protection strategies, focusing on the efficacy of different sunscreen products [...] Read more.
The increasing incidence of heat stress due to global climate change poses a significant challenge to avocado (Persea americana) cultivation, particularly in regions with intense solar radiation. This review evaluates sun protection strategies, focusing on the efficacy of different sunscreen products such as kaolin, titanium dioxide, and calcium oxide in mitigating thermal stress in avocado trees. The application of these materials was shown to reduce leaf and fruit surface temperatures, improve photosynthetic efficiency, and enhance fruit quality by preventing sunburn and dehydration. Despite these benefits, challenges remain, including the optimal timing and dosage of application, and the potential residue impacts on fruit marketability. The review emphasizes the need for ongoing research to develop more effective formulations and to integrate these sun protection strategies with other agronomic practices. The role of extension services in educating producers about the proper use of these technologies is also highlighted as crucial for the successful adoption of sun protection measures in avocado farming. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Graphical abstract of sun protection as a strategy for managing heat stress in avocado trees, 2024.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 5359 KiB  
Article
Opportunities for the Early Diagnosis and Selection of Scots Pine with Potential Resistance to Root and Butt Rot Disease
by Valentyna Dyshko, Ivan Ustskiy, Piotr Borowik and Tomasz Oszako
Forests 2024, 15(10), 1789; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101789 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 346
Abstract
Pine stands affected by root and butt rot (Heterobasidion annosum s.l.) contain pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) that can survive for a long time without showing external symptoms of the disease (‘conditionally resistant’ refers to trees that survive without symptoms despite [...] Read more.
Pine stands affected by root and butt rot (Heterobasidion annosum s.l.) contain pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) that can survive for a long time without showing external symptoms of the disease (‘conditionally resistant’ refers to trees that survive without symptoms despite infection). The establishment of stands from the seeds of such trees can significantly increase the effectiveness of artificial afforestation. Since the growth and development of pine trees is determined to a certain extent by the number of cotyledons after seed germination, this article examines this trait in the progeny of trees that are potentially resistant and those that have already been attacked by root pathogens. The number of cotyledons and the resilience of trees is fascinating and not generally known. Presumably, the number of cotyledons can be linked to disease resistance based on increased vigour. Biologically, a larger area for carbon assimilation leads to better photosynthetic efficiency and the production of more assimilates (sugars) necessary to trigger defence processes in the event of infection. From an ecological point of view, this can give tree populations in areas potentially threatened by root system diseases a chance of survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the potential of using the number of cotyledons and other seedling characteristics to predict the resistance of trees to root and butt rot disease. The collected data show that the seedlings from the group of diseased trees exhibited lower growth rates and vigour. However, the seedlings from the group of potentially resistant trees are similar to the control, meaning the trees that show no disease symptoms because they have not come into contact with the pathogen. Our observations suggest that monitoring germinating cotyledons could serve as an early diagnostic tool to identify disease-resistant pines, although further research is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Conceptual diagram of the idea of the reported experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Often one (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) or a group (<b>d</b>) of living, asyptomatic trees remains in the gap that has arisen in the stand. The cause of the death of the other trees is the fungus <span class="html-italic">Hetereobasidion</span> spp., whose fruiting bodies grow on the remaining stumps (<b>c</b>). The dead trees initially remain standing (<b>b</b>) and are then blown over by the wind (<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photos of seeds and seedlings taken during the experiment. (<b>a</b>) Seeds counted and prepared for weighing. (<b>b</b>) Germinated seedlings in a Petri dish. (<b>c</b>) Seedlings prepared for measurements. (<b>d</b>) A single seedling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Weight of batches of 50 seeds compared to the treatment variant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Number of germinated seeds in lots of 100 from each of the considered trees versus the treatment variant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The average weight of a batch of 50 seeds collected from a tree compared to the proportion of germinated seeds. Ninety percent confidence ellipses are plotted as a guide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mean number of cotyledons in seedlings germinated from trees from different experimental treatment categories. Visualisation of the variability of the mean values by tree from which the seeds were collected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mean stem length of the germinated seedlings of trees belonging to different experimental treatment categories. Visualisation of the variability of the mean values according to the tree from which the seeds were collected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mean root length of germinated seedlings of trees belonging to different experimental treatment categories. Visualisation of the variability of the mean values depending on the tree from which the seeds were collected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Mean needle length of germinated seedlings of trees belonging to different experimental treatment categories. Visualisation of the variability of the mean values according to the tree from which the seeds were collected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Mean ratio of stem/root length proportion of germinated seedlings of trees belonging to different experimental treatment categories. Visualisation of the variability of the mean values by tree from which the seeds were collected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Proportion of seedlings from seeds of a given tree compared to the number of developed cotyledons. Comparison between treatment groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The ratio between stem and root length compared to the number of developed cotyledons in the seedling. Comparison between the treatment groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Phases of mitosis in apical meristems of roots of tree seedlings with different resistance to <span class="html-italic">Heterobasidion</span> under a light microscope (100× magnification).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5923 KiB  
Article
Integrated Analysis of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, and Column-Average CO2 Concentration in South-Central Brazilian Sugarcane Regions
by Kamila Cunha de Meneses, Glauco de Souza Rolim, Gustavo André de Araújo Santos and Newton La Scala Junior
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2345; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102345 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 316
Abstract
Remote sensing has proven to be a vital tool for monitoring and forecasting the quality and yield of crops. The utilization of innovative technologies such as Solar-Induced Fluorescence (SIF) and satellite measurements of column-averaged CO2 (xCO2) can enhance these estimations. [...] Read more.
Remote sensing has proven to be a vital tool for monitoring and forecasting the quality and yield of crops. The utilization of innovative technologies such as Solar-Induced Fluorescence (SIF) and satellite measurements of column-averaged CO2 (xCO2) can enhance these estimations. SIF is a signal emitted by crops during photosynthesis, thus indicating photosynthetic activities. The concentration of atmospheric CO2 is a critical factor in determining the efficiency of photosynthesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between satellite-derived Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF), column-averaged CO2 (xCO2), and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and their association with sugarcane yield and sugar content in the field. This study was carried out in south-central Brazil. We used four localities to represent the region: Pradópolis, Araraquara, Iracemápolis, and Quirinópolis. Data were collected from orbital systems during the period spanning from 2015 to 2016. Concurrently, monthly data regarding tons of sugarcane per hectare (TCH) and total recoverable sugars (TRS) were gathered from 24 harvest locations within the studied plots. It was observed that TRS decreased when SIF values ranged between 0.4 W m−2 sr−1 μm−1 and 0.8 W m−2 sr−1 μm−1, particularly in conjunction with NDVI values below 0.5. TRS values peaked at 15 kg t−1 with low NDVI and xCO2 values, alongside SIF values lower than 0.4 W m−2 sr−1 μm−1 and greater than 1 W m−2 sr−1 μm−1. These findings underscore the potential of integrating SIF, xCO2, and NDVI measurements in the monitoring and forecasting of yield and sugar content in sugarcane crops. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Horticultural and Floricultural Crops)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Main sugarcane producing regions in Brazil and localities used in this study. Source: CANASAT (2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Average temperature (°C) and precipitation (mm) in a monthly period of 2015–2016 in localities (<b>a</b>) Araraquara-SP, (<b>b</b>) Iracemápolis-SP, (<b>c</b>) Pradópolis-SP, and (<b>d</b>) Quirinópolis-GO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Surplus (EXC) (mm) and monthly water deficit (DEF) (mm) in localities (<b>a</b>) Araraquara-SP, (<b>b</b>) Iracemápolis-SP, (<b>c</b>) Pradópolis-SP, and (<b>d</b>) Quirinópolis-GO in the 2015–2016 period, estimated by the Thornthwaite and Mather model (1955) with available water capacity equal to 100 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Monthly average tons of sugarcane per hectare (TCH, t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and total recoverable sugars (TRS, kg t<sup>−1</sup>) of all studied locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Monthly average of tons of sugarcane per hectare (TCH, t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and total recoverable sugars (TRS, kg t<sup>−1</sup>) in the localities (<b>a</b>) Araraquara-SP, (<b>b</b>) Iracemápolis-SP, (<b>c</b>) Pradópolis-SP and (<b>d</b>) Quirinópolis-GO in the 2015–2016 period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Principal component analysis with variables. NDVI = Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, XCO<sub>2</sub> = column-averaged CO<sub>2</sub>, SIF = Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, EXC = water surplus, P = precipitation, TCH = tons of sugarcane per hectare, T = mean air temperature, TRS = total recoverable sugars, DEF = water deficit, PC1 = Principal Components 1, and PC2 = Principal Components 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Monthly average of SIF-757 nm, xCO<sub>2</sub>, and NDVI for south-central Brazil, from the 2015–2016 period. T is tillering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Monthly moving averages of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF 757 nm), column-averaged CO<sub>2</sub> (xCO<sub>2</sub>), and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) of the localities: (<b>a</b>) Araraquara-SP, (<b>b</b>) Iracemápolis-SP, (<b>c</b>) Pradópolis-SP, and (<b>d</b>) Quirinópolis-GO, between 2015 and 2016.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>3D response surface plot for Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) estimation in function column-averaged CO<sub>2</sub> (xCO<sub>2</sub>) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>3D response surface plot for tons of sugarcane per hectare (TCH, kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and total recoverable sugars (TRS, kg t<sup>−1</sup>) estimation in the function of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF), column-averaged CO<sub>2</sub> (xCO<sub>2</sub>), and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). (<b>a</b>) TCH in function with NDVI and SIF, (<b>b</b>) TRS in function with NDVI and SIF, (<b>c</b>) TCH in function with NDVI and xCO<sub>2</sub>, (<b>d</b>) TRS in function with xCO<sub>2</sub> and NDVI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Estimation of tons of sugarcane per hectare (TCH, kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and total recoverable sugars (TRS, kg t<sup>−1</sup>) using SIF (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), xCO<sub>2</sub> (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), and NDVI (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>).</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2814 KiB  
Article
Vegetation Growth and Physiological Adaptation of Pioneer Plants on Mobile Sand Dunes
by Yingfei Cao, Hong Xu, Yonggeng Li and Hua Su
Sustainability 2024, 16(20), 8771; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208771 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 360
Abstract
The Hunshandake Sandy Land is one of the largest sandy areas in China and the closest source of sand dust to the Beijing and Tianjing areas. Sand fixation by vegetation is considered the most efficient strategy for sand control and sustainable development, so [...] Read more.
The Hunshandake Sandy Land is one of the largest sandy areas in China and the closest source of sand dust to the Beijing and Tianjing areas. Sand fixation by vegetation is considered the most efficient strategy for sand control and sustainable development, so clarifying the vegetation coverage and plant adaptation characteristics in the Hunshandake Sandy Land is helpful in guiding restoration and improving local sustainability. Here, we investigated the vegetation growth on the mobile sand dunes in the Hunshandake Sandy Land and specified the photosynthesis and stomatal characteristics of the pioneer plants for sand fixation. The vegetation survey showed that the windward slopes of the mobile sand dunes had far lower plant coverage (6.3%) and plant biodiversity (two species m−2) than the leeward ones (41.0% and eight species m−2, respectively). Elymus sibiricus L. and Agriophyllum squarrosum (L.) Moq. were the only two sand-fixing pioneer plants that grew on both the windward and leeward slopes of the mobile sand dunes and had higher plant heights, greater abundance, and more biomass than other plants. Physiological measurements revealed that Elymus sibiricus L. and Agriophyllum squarrosum (L.) Moq. also had higher photosynthetic rates, transpiration rates, and water use efficiency. In addition, the stomata density (151–197 number mm−2), length (18–29 μm), and area index (13–19%) of these two pioneer species were smaller than those of the common grassland species in Inner Mongolia, suggesting that they were better adapted to the dry habitat of the mobile sand dunes. These findings not only help in understanding the adaptive strategies of pioneer plants on mobile sand dunes, but also provide practical guidance for sand dune restoration and the sustainable development of local areas. Pioneer sand-fixing plant species that are well adapted to sand dunes can be used for sowing or aerial seeding in sand fixation during ecosystem restoration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Soil moisture content of different soil layers on the windward and leeward slopes of the mobile sand dunes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Plant species composition and characteristics, including plant cover (<b>a</b>), abundance (<b>b</b>) and height (<b>c</b>) on windward and leeward slopes of sand dunes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Aboveground biomass (<b>a</b>) and root biomass (<b>b</b>) of each plant species on the windward and leeward slopes of the sand dunes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Community diversity index (<b>a</b>) and above-ground biomass (AGB, (<b>b</b>)) and below-ground (BGB, (<b>c</b>)) biomass on the windward and leeward slopes of the sand dunes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Photosynthetic rates (<b>a</b>), transpiration rates (<b>b</b>), and water use efficiency (<b>c</b>) characteristics of two pioneer plants, <span class="html-italic">Elymus sibiricus</span> L. and <span class="html-italic">Agriophyllum squarrosum</span> (L.) Moq., on the windward and leeward slopes, reflecting the physiological adaptation of these two species to the mobile sand dunes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Stomatal shape and distribution of the upper epidermis of the leaves of <span class="html-italic">Elymus sibiricus</span> L. ((<b>a</b>), dumbbell type) and <span class="html-italic">Agriophyllum squarrosum</span> (L.) Moq. ((<b>b</b>), kidney type) on the windward slope, which reflect the stomatal adaptation of these two species to the mobile sand dunes.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 3566 KiB  
Article
Excellent Canopy Structure in Soybeans Can Improve Their Photosynthetic Performance and Increase Yield
by Shuyuan He, Xiuni Li, Menggen Chen, Xiangyao Xu, Wenjing Zhang, Huiling Chi, Panxia Shao, Fenda Tang, Tao Gong, Ming Guo, Mei Xu, Wenyu Yang and Weiguo Liu
Agriculture 2024, 14(10), 1783; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101783 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 419
Abstract
In the maize-soybean intercropping system, varying degrees of maize leaf shading are an important factor that reduces the uniformity of light penetration within the soybean canopy, altering the soybean canopy structure. Quantitative analysis of the relationship between the soybean canopy structure and canopy [...] Read more.
In the maize-soybean intercropping system, varying degrees of maize leaf shading are an important factor that reduces the uniformity of light penetration within the soybean canopy, altering the soybean canopy structure. Quantitative analysis of the relationship between the soybean canopy structure and canopy photosynthesis helps with breeding shade-tolerant soybean varieties for intercropping systems. This study examined the canopy structure and photosynthesis of intercropped soybeans during the shading stress period (28 days before the corn harvest), the high light adaptation period (15 days after the corn harvest), and the recovery period (35 and 55 days after the corn harvest), using a field high-throughput phenotyping platform and a plant gas exchange testing system (CAPTS). Additionally, indoor shading experiments were conducted for validation. The results indicate that shade-tolerant soybean varieties (STV varieties) have significantly higher yields than shade-sensitive soybean varieties (SSV varieties). This is attributable to the STV varieties having a larger top area, lateral width, and lateral external rectangular area. Compared to the SSV varieties, the four top areas of the STV varieties are, on average, 52.09%, 72.05%, and 61.37% higher during the shading stress, high light adaptation, and recovery periods, respectively. Furthermore, the average maximum growth rates (GRs) for the side mean width (SMW) and side rectangle area (SRA) of the STV varieties are 62.92% and 22.13% in the field, and 83.36% and 55.53% in the indoor environment, respectively. This results in a lower canopy overlap in STV varieties, leading to a more uniform light distribution within the canopy, which is reflected in higher photosynthetic rates (Pn), apparent quantum efficiency, and whole-leaf photosynthetic potential (WLPP) for the STV varieties, thereby enhancing their adaptability to shading stress. Above-ground dry matter accumulation was higher in STV varieties, with more assimilates stored in the source and sink, promoting assimilate accumulation in the grains. These results provide new insights into how the superior canopy structure and photosynthesis of shade-tolerant soybean varieties contribute to increased yield. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Soybean test layout. Figure (<b>a</b>) shows the experimental layout of the soybeans in field conditions. Figure (<b>b</b>) represents the original image generated by an RGB camera; Figure (<b>c</b>) shows the layout of the field environmental test and the real state of canopy photosynthesis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes in dry matter content in leaves, main stems, and branches with emergence time. The red solid line in the figure indicates the day of the corn harvest. STV-1, STV-2, SSV-1, and SSV-2 represent ND12, NJQP, C103, and BYH soybean varieties, respectively. “M” represents soybean monoculture, and “I” represents soybean and corn intercropping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Figures (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represent, in sequence, soybean yield per plant, number of grains per plant, 100-grain weight, number of branches, number of pods on branches, and number of pods on the main stem. The significance analysis in this study is conducted at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05 level. In the figures, lowercase and uppercase letters are used to distinguish between sole cropping and intercropping levels. Lowercase letters indicate sole cropping, while uppercase letters indicate intercropping, and the same applies to the following figures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diurnal variation of canopy photosynthetic rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Light response diagram. Figures (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent the light response curves of soybeans at 28 days before corn harvest, and at 15, 35, and 55 days after corn harvest, respectively. The solid line in the figure represents the information concerning the canopy light response curve, and the dashed line represents the apparent quantum efficiency of the STV-1 and SSV-1 varieties.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Whole-leaf photosynthetic potential map. The red solid line in the figure indicates the day of the corn harvest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Four canopy structure parameters related to the top area. The significance analysis in this study is conducted at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05 level. In the figures, lowercase and uppercase letters are used to distinguish between sole cropping and intercropping levels. Lowercase letters indicate sole cropping, while uppercase letters indicate intercropping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Four canopy structure parameters related to the top area. The significance analysis in this study is conducted at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05 level. In the figures, lowercase and uppercase letters are used to distinguish between sole cropping and intercropping levels. Lowercase letters indicate sole cropping, while uppercase letters indicate intercropping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Two canopy structure parameters related to side width. The significance analysis in this study is conducted at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05 level. In the figures, lowercase and uppercase letters are used to distinguish between sole cropping and intercropping levels. Lowercase letters indicate sole cropping, while uppercase letters indicate intercropping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>1_5, 2_5, 3_5, 4_5, 5_5 side width diagram. In the figure, M represents the net planting mode, and I represents the intercropping planting mode; 1–4 represent STV-1, STV-2, SSV-1, and SSV-2, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Illustrates the mechanism of STV variety yield prominence. The blue rectangles in the canopy structure represent the top and side bounding rectangle areas, and the yellow circles represent the top bounding circle area. The gray boxes highlight the advantages of STV varieties in terms of canopy structure, photosynthetic activity, and assimilate accumulation, which lead to their outstanding yield performance.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 42225 KiB  
Article
Comparative Insights into Photosynthetic, Biochemical, and Ultrastructural Mechanisms in Hibiscus and Pelargonium Plants
by Renan Falcioni, Werner Camargos Antunes, Roney Berti de Oliveira, Marcelo Luiz Chicati, José Alexandre M. Demattê and Marcos Rafael Nanni
Plants 2024, 13(19), 2831; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192831 - 9 Oct 2024
Viewed by 642
Abstract
Understanding photosynthetic mechanisms in different plant species is crucial for advancing agricultural productivity and ecological restoration. This study presents a detailed physiological and ultrastructural comparison of photosynthetic mechanisms between Hibiscus (Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L.) and Pelargonium (Pelargonium zonale (L.) L’Hér. Ex Aiton) [...] Read more.
Understanding photosynthetic mechanisms in different plant species is crucial for advancing agricultural productivity and ecological restoration. This study presents a detailed physiological and ultrastructural comparison of photosynthetic mechanisms between Hibiscus (Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L.) and Pelargonium (Pelargonium zonale (L.) L’Hér. Ex Aiton) plants. The data collection encompassed daily photosynthetic profiles, responses to light and CO2, leaf optical properties, fluorescence data (OJIP transients), biochemical analyses, and anatomical observations. The findings reveal distinct morphological, optical, and biochemical adaptations between the two species. These adaptations were associated with differences in photochemical (AMAX, E, Ci, iWUE, and α) and carboxylative parameters (VCMAX, ΓCO2, gs, gm, Cc, and AJMAX), along with variations in fluorescence and concentrations of chlorophylls and carotenoids. Such factors modulate the efficiency of photosynthesis. Energy dissipation mechanisms, including thermal and fluorescence pathways (ΦPSII, ETR, NPQ), and JIP test-derived metrics highlighted differences in electron transport, particularly between PSII and PSI. At the ultrastructural level, Hibiscus exhibited optimised cellular and chloroplast architecture, characterised by increased chloroplast density and robust grana structures. In contrast, Pelargonium displayed suboptimal photosynthetic parameters, possibly due to reduced thylakoid counts and a higher proportion of mitochondria. In conclusion, while Hibiscus appears primed for efficient photosynthesis and energy storage, Pelargonium may prioritise alternative cellular functions, engaging in a metabolic trade-off. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photosynthesis and Carbon Metabolism in Higher Plants and Algae)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Representative of Hibiscus (<span class="html-italic">Hibiscus rosa-sinensis</span> L.) and Pelargonium (<span class="html-italic">Pelargonium zonale</span> (L.) L’Hér. Ex Aiton) plants. Hibiscus leaves exhibit a waxy surface and large size, while Pelargonium leaves are smaller, lobed, and covered with trichomes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spectral analysis of leaves (in vivo) and pigments (in vitro) in Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>) Reflectance factor (Ref) from 350 to 2500 nm. (<b>B</b>) Transmittance factor (Trans) from 350 to 2500 nm. (<b>C</b>) Absorbance factor (Abs) from 350 to 2500 nm. (<b>D</b>) Spectral analysis of chloroplast and extrachloroplast pigments from 350 to 750 nm, with specific peaks for chlorophylls (green arrow) and flavonoids (pink arrow). The solid lines represent the adaxial surface, and the dashed lines represent the abaxial surface. The arrows highlight peaks for chlorophyll and flavonoid concentrations. Blue arrows denote water-specific spectral signatures. Peak shifts indicate variations due to pigments such as chlorophylls, carotenoids, and phenolic compounds. (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 100).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Spectral analysis of leaves (in vivo) and pigments (in vitro) in Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>) Reflectance factor (Ref) from 350 to 2500 nm. (<b>B</b>) Transmittance factor (Trans) from 350 to 2500 nm. (<b>C</b>) Absorbance factor (Abs) from 350 to 2500 nm. (<b>D</b>) Spectral analysis of chloroplast and extrachloroplast pigments from 350 to 750 nm, with specific peaks for chlorophylls (green arrow) and flavonoids (pink arrow). The solid lines represent the adaxial surface, and the dashed lines represent the abaxial surface. The arrows highlight peaks for chlorophyll and flavonoid concentrations. Blue arrows denote water-specific spectral signatures. Peak shifts indicate variations due to pigments such as chlorophylls, carotenoids, and phenolic compounds. (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 100).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Concentrations of compounds in Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>) Chlorophyll a (g m<sup>−2</sup>). (<b>B</b>) Chlorophyll b (g m<sup>−2</sup>). (<b>C</b>) Total chlorophyll (<span class="html-italic">a</span>+<span class="html-italic">b</span>) (g m<sup>−2</sup>). (<b>D</b>) Carotenoids (g m<sup>−2</sup>). (<b>E</b>) Chl a/b ratio. (<b>F</b>) Car/Chl a+b ratio. (<b>G</b>) Flavonoids (nmol cm<sup>−2</sup>). (<b>H</b>) Phenolic compounds (mL cm<sup>−2</sup>). (<b>I</b>) Chlorophyll a (mg g<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>J</b>) Chlorophyll b (mg g<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>K</b>) Total chlorophyll (a+b) (mg g<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>L</b>) Carotenoids (mg g<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>M</b>) Flavonoids (μmol g<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>N</b>) Radical scavenging (% of antioxidant activity). (<b>O</b>) Lignin (mg g<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>P</b>) Cellulose (nmol mg<sup>−1</sup>). Asterisks over bars indicate statistically significant differences in the <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01). Mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 100).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Daily curves between 6 and 20 h were evaluated over three days for Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) Net assimilation rate (μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) Internal CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (μmol CO<sub>2</sub> mol<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>G</b>–<b>H</b>) Net transpiration rate (mmol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>J</b>–<b>M</b>) Stomatal conductance (mol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). Black bars indicate darkness, and yellow bars indicate light environments. Mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 20).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Response curves for Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>) Net photosynthetic light (<span class="html-italic">A</span>-PPFD) response. (<b>B</b>) Net photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> (<span class="html-italic">A</span>−<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub>) responses. (<b>C</b>) Stomatal conductance (<span class="html-italic">g</span><sub>s</sub>) and transpiration rate (<span class="html-italic">E</span>). (<b>D</b>) Intrinsic water use efficiency (<span class="html-italic">i</span>WUE) response curves. The red arrow indicates the inflection point of 426 μmol mol<sup>−1</sup> CO<sub>2</sub> for decreased <span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub> in leaves. Mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 10).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Fluorescence response curves obtained simultaneously with the photosynthetic response to light in Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>) Effective quantum yield of PSII (Fv’/Fm’). The inset shown in the bar graph indicates the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) in dark−adapted leaves. (<b>B</b>) Operational efficiency of photosystem II (ΦPSII). The inset shows the electron transport rate (ETR). (<b>C</b>) Nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ). (<b>D</b>) Photochemical dissipation quenching (qP) and nonphotochemical dissipation quenching (qN). Asterisks over the bars indicate statistically significant differences according to the t-test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01). “ns” denotes no statistical significance. Mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 10).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetic parameters derived from the JIP test in Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>) Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction kinetics using normalised data. (<b>B</b>) Pipeline leaves display phenomenological energy flow through the excited cross-sections (CSs) of leaves. Yellow arrow—ABS/CS, absorption flow by approximate CS; green arrow—TR/CS, energy flow trapped by CS; red arrow—ET/CS, electron transport flow by CS; blue arrow—DI/CS, energy flow dissipated by CS; circles inscribed in squares—RC/CS indicate the % of active/inactive reaction centres. The white circles inscribed in squares represent reduced (active) QA reaction centres, the black circles represent non-reducing (inactive) QA reaction centres, and 100% of the active reaction centres responded with the highest average numbers observed in relation to Hibiscus. Arrow sizes indicate changes in the energy flow to Hibiscus plants. (<b>C</b>) ΨEO. (<b>D</b>) ΨRO. (<b>E</b>) ΦPO. (<b>F</b>) ΦPO. (<b>G</b>) ΦRO. (<b>H</b>) ΦDO. (<b>I</b>) δRO. (<b>J</b>) ρRO. (<b>K</b>) KN. (<b>L</b>) KP. (<b>M</b>) SFI<sub>ABS</sub>. (<b>N</b>) PI<sub>ABS</sub>. Different asterisks inside the arrows indicate significance, as determined by a <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01). Mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 100).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Representative images of optical microscopy (OM) in top–bottom and anatomical analyses of Hibiscus (first and second columns) and Pelargonium (third and fourth columns) plants. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) Cross-sections. (<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>) Historesin cross-sections under false colour. (<b>I</b>–<b>L</b>) Details of the leaf thickness and cells. (<b>M</b>–<b>P</b>) Structures present in cellular tissues. Green arrows indicate chloroplasts, red arrows indicate diffuse crystals, and yellow arrows indicate dense cytoplasmic content. Accumulative and secretory structures of the adaxial epidermis are highlighted. Scale bars = 200 µm and 50 µm, left to right, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of adaxial and abaxial surfaces of Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>I</b>,<b>M</b>) Adaxial surface of the Hibiscus. (<b>B</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>J</b>,<b>N</b>) Abaxial surface of the Hibiscus. (<b>C</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>K</b>,<b>O</b>) Adaxial surface of Pelargonium. (<b>D</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>L</b>,<b>P</b>) Abaxial surface of Pelargonium. Scale bars = 250 μm (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>), 150 μm (<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>), and 50 μm (<b>I</b>–<b>P</b>), top to bottom, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of chloroplasts in Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>I</b>,<b>J</b>,<b>M</b>,<b>N</b>,<b>Q</b>,<b>R</b>) Hibiscus. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>K</b>,<b>L</b>,<b>O</b>,<b>P</b>,<b>S</b>,<b>T</b>) Pelargonium plants. Scale bar = 4 μm (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>), 1 μm (<b>E</b>–<b>P</b>) and 600 nm (<b>Q</b>–<b>T</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of mesophyll cells in the leaves. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>,<b>I</b>,<b>J</b>) Hibiscus. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>K</b>,<b>L</b>) Pelargonium plants. Scale bar = 4 μm (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>), 1 μm (<b>E</b>–<b>P</b>) and 600 nm (<b>Q</b>–<b>T</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Multivariate analysis of Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. The 2D PCA biplot of principal component analysis (PCA) displayed two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2) and the contribution of the 20 most important variables to explain the formed clusters. See the abbreviation in <a href="#sec4-plants-13-02831" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparative scheme of Hibiscus and Pelargonium plants. It highlights the superior photosynthetic efficiency of Hibiscus, emphasising its enhanced cellular structure, including higher chloroplast density, which contributes to improved photosynthesis and energy storage. In contrast, Pelargonium exhibits cellular adjustments, including changes in thylakoid count and a higher proportion of mitochondria, suggesting resource allocation to alternative cellular functions. Detailed insets and labels elucidate the distinct morphological, biochemical, and photosynthetic adaptations between the two species. Thicker lines indicate more efficient electron flow in the electron transport chain. Elements of the figure were created using Biorender.com (accessed on 5 October 2024).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 5873 KiB  
Article
An Excessive K/Na Ratio in Soil Solutions Impairs the Seedling Establishment of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) through Reducing the Leaf Mg Concentration and Photosynthesis
by Yu Cheng, Tibin Zhang, Weiqiang Gao, Yuxin Kuang, Qing Liang, Hao Feng and Saparov Galymzhan
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2301; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102301 - 6 Oct 2024
Viewed by 737
Abstract
In saline conditions, establishing healthy seedlings is crucial for the productivity of sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.). Excessive potassium (K+) from irrigation water or overfertilization, similar to sodium (Na+), could adversely affect sunflower growth. However, the effects of salt [...] Read more.
In saline conditions, establishing healthy seedlings is crucial for the productivity of sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.). Excessive potassium (K+) from irrigation water or overfertilization, similar to sodium (Na+), could adversely affect sunflower growth. However, the effects of salt stress caused by varying K/Na ratios on the establishment of sunflower seedlings have not been widely studied. We conducted a pot experiment in a greenhouse, altering the K/Na ratio of a soil solution to grow sunflower seedlings. We tested three saline solutions with K/Na ratios of 0:1 (P0S1), 1:1 (P1S1), and 1:0 (P1S0) at a constant concentration of 4 dS m−1, along with a control (CK, no salt added), with five replicates. The solutions were applied to the pots via capillary rise through small holes at the bottom. The results indicate that different K/Na ratios significantly influenced ion-selective uptake and transport in crop organs. With an increasing K/Na ratio, the K+ concentration in the roots, stems, and leaves increased, while the Na+ concentration decreased in the roots and stems, with no significant differences in the leaves. Furthermore, an excessive K/Na ratio (P1S0) suppressed the absorption and transportation of Mg2+, significantly reducing the Mg2+ concentration in the stems and leaves. A lower leaf Mg2+ concentration reduced chlorophyll concentration, impairing photosynthetic performance. The lowest plant height, leaf area, dry matter, and shoot/root ratio were observed in P1S0, with reductions of 27%, 48%, 48%, and 13% compared to CK, respectively. Compared with CK, light use efficiency and CO2 use efficiency in P1S0 were significantly reduced by 13% and 10%, respectively, while water use efficiency was significantly increased by 9%. Additionally, improved crop morphological and photosynthetic performance was observed in P1S1 and P0S1 compared with P1S0. These findings underscore the critical role of optimizing ion composition in soil solutions, especially during the sensitive seedling stage, to enhance photosynthesis and ultimately to improve the plant’s establishment. We recommend that agricultural practices in saline regions incorporate tailored irrigation and fertilization strategies that prioritize optimal K/Na ratios to maximize crop performance and sustainability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental device in this study. P1S0, P1S1, and P0S1 indicate treatments with K/Na ratios of 1:0, 1:1, and 0:1 at the same external concentration (4 dS m<sup>−1</sup>), respectively. CK indicates no added salt in the tap water.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Daily air temperature and relative humidity during the seedling stage of sunflower. (<b>A</b>) Daily air temperature and relative humidity of the first batch of experiments from 13 March (planting date) to 27 April (harvest date). Sunflower was harvested at the end of the seedling stage. (<b>B</b>) Daily air temperature and relative humidity of the second batch of experiments from 10 May to 24 June. (<b>C</b>) Data dispersion of air temperature and relative humidity in two batches of experiments by box plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Plant height and leaf area of sunflower during the experiments, dry matter, and site photos at the end of the seeding stage under different K/Na ratios in the first batch experiment (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) and second batch experiment (<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>). P0S1, P1S1, and P1S0 indicate treatments with K/Na ratios of 0:1, 1:1, and 1:0 at the same external concentration (4 dS m<sup>−1</sup>), respectively. CK indicates no added salt in the tap water. Different small letters on the same color bar or point in (<b>C</b>,<b>G</b>) indicate significant differences among treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Na, K, Ca, Mg, and Cl concentration of each organ of sunflower at the end of the seeding stage under different K/Na ratios in the first (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) and second (<b>F</b>–<b>J</b>) batch experiments. P0S1, P1S1, and P1S0 indicate treatments with K/Na ratios of 0:1, 1:1, and 1:0 at the same external concentration (4 dS m<sup>−1</sup>), respectively. CK indicates no added salt in the tap water. Different small letters on the same organ in the subfigure indicate significant differences among treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Na, K, Ca, Mg, and Cl accumulation of each organ of sunflower at the end of the seeding stage under different K/Na ratios in the first (<b>A</b>) and second (<b>B</b>) batch experiments. P0S1, P1S1, and P1S0 indicate treatments with K/Na ratios of 0:1, 1:1, and 1:0 at the same external concentration (4 dS m<sup>−1</sup>), respectively. CK indicates no added salt in the tap water.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The photosynthetic characteristics (<span class="html-italic">Evap</span>, <span class="html-italic">P<sub>n</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">g<sub>s</sub></span>, and <span class="html-italic">C<sub>i</sub></span>), <span class="html-italic">Ls</span>, and resource use efficiency (<span class="html-italic">WUE</span>, <span class="html-italic">LUE</span>, and <span class="html-italic">CUE</span>) under different K/Na ratios in the first batch experiment (<b>A</b>–<b>H</b>) and second batch experiment (<b>I</b>–<b>P</b>). <span class="html-italic">Evap</span>, transpiration rate; <span class="html-italic">P<sub>n</sub></span>, net photosynthetic rate; <span class="html-italic">g<sub>s</sub></span>, stomatal conductance; <span class="html-italic">C<sub>i</sub></span>, intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration; <span class="html-italic">Ls</span>, stomatal limitation; <span class="html-italic">WUE</span>, water use efficiency; <span class="html-italic">LUE</span>, light use efficiency; <span class="html-italic">CUE</span>, CO<sub>2</sub> use efficiency. P0S1, P1S1, and P1S0 indicate treatments with K/Na ratios of 0:1, 1:1, and 1:0 at the same external concentration (4 dS m<sup>−1</sup>), respectively. CK indicates no added salt in the tap water. Different small letters in the subfigure indicate significant differences among treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Correlation matrix between the K/Na ratio, ion concentration of plant organs, gas exchange parameters (<span class="html-italic">Evap</span>, <span class="html-italic">P<sub>n</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">g<sub>s</sub></span>, and <span class="html-italic">C<sub>i</sub></span>), PH, LA, and DM in the first batch experiment (<b>A</b>) and second batch experiment (<b>B</b>). Root-Na, Root-K, Root-Ca, and Root-Mg indicate the Na, K, Ca, and Mg concentration in the roots, respectively. Stem-Na, Stem-K, Stem-Ca, and Stem-Mg indicate the Na, K, Ca, and Mg concentration in the stems, respectively. Leaf-Na, Leaf-K, Leaf-Ca, and Leaf-Mg indicate the Na, K, Ca, and Mg concentration in the leaves, respectively. <span class="html-italic">Evap</span>, transpiration rate; <span class="html-italic">P<sub>n</sub></span>, net photosynthetic rate; <span class="html-italic">g<sub>s</sub></span>, stomatal conductance; <span class="html-italic">C<sub>i</sub></span>, intercellular carbon dioxide concentration; PH, plant height; LA, leaf area; DM, dry matter weight. The gradient of the legend is a function of the strength of the correlation (darker colors indicate stronger correlations); ellipse slopes indicate a negative or positive correlation (i.e., increasing towards the right indicates a positive correlation, and decreasing towards the right indicates a negative correlation). The shape of the ellipse also indicates the strength of the correlation; a wide shape indicates a weak correlation and a narrow shape indicates a strong correlation. * indicates <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. For example, the DM and <span class="html-italic">P<sub>n</sub></span> were significantly and strongly positively correlated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Response of crop organ ion concentration and leaf photosynthesis to an excessive K/Na ratio.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 8773 KiB  
Article
On the Relationships between Clear-Sky Indices in Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Broadband Ranges in Overcast and Broken-Cloud Conditions
by William Wandji Nyamsi, Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan, John A. Augustine, Antti Arola and Lucien Wald
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3718; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193718 - 6 Oct 2024
Viewed by 412
Abstract
Several studies proposed relationships linking irradiances in the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) range and broadband irradiances. A previous study published in 2024 by the same authors proposes a linear model relating clear-sky indices in the PAR and broadband ranges that has been validated [...] Read more.
Several studies proposed relationships linking irradiances in the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) range and broadband irradiances. A previous study published in 2024 by the same authors proposes a linear model relating clear-sky indices in the PAR and broadband ranges that has been validated in clear and overcast conditions only. The present work extends this study for broken-cloud conditions by using ground-based measurements obtained from the Surface Radiation Budget Network in the U.S.A. mainland. As expected, the clear-sky indices are highly correlated and are linked by affine functions whose parameters depend on the fractional sky cover (FSC), the year, and the site. The previous linear model is also efficient in broken-cloud conditions, with the same level of accuracy as in overcast conditions. When this model is combined with a PAR clear-sky model, the result tends to overestimate the PAR as the FSC decreases, i.e., when fewer and fewer scattered clouds are present. The bias is equal to 1 W m−2 in overcast conditions, up to 18 W m−2 when the FSC is small, and 6 W m−2 when all cloudy conditions are merged. The RMSEs are, respectively, 5, 24, and 15 W m−2. The linear and the clear-sky models can be combined with estimates of the broadband irradiance from satellites to yield estimates of PAR. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map showing the locations of the seven SURFRAD sites (black diamonds). The orographic <span class="html-italic">basemap</span> is in the public domain and is from the Etopo1 data set from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States of America.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic overview of the astronomical quantities, measurements, and derivatives.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mean of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> for each data subset, each year at each station and all stations merged (ALL).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation coefficients between <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>B</mi> <mi>B</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> for each data subset, each year at each station and all stations merged (ALL).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Slopes of the affine functions obtained by least-squares fitting for each subset, each year at each station and all stations merged.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Intercepts of the affine functions obtained by least-squares fitting for each subset, each year at each station and all stations merged.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The 2D histogram of measured <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.05, 0.30] (C1), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The 2D histogram of measured <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.30, 0.60] (C2), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The 2D histogram of measured <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.60, 0.95] (C3), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The 2D histogram of measured <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.05, 0.95] (any broken-cloud), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The 2D histogram of measured <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.05, 1.00] (any cloudy), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The 2D histogram of measured <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.95, 1.00] (overcast), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Bias in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> at each station as a function of the solar zenithal angle (SZA) for each class of cloudy conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Standard deviation (STD) of errors in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> at each station as a function of the solar zenithal angle (SZA) for each class of cloudy conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The 2D histogram of measured PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>W</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.05, 0.30] (C1), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The 2D histogram of measured PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>W</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.30, 0.60] (C2), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The 2D histogram of measured PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>W</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.60, 0.95] (C3), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>The 2D histogram of measured PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>W</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.05, 0.95] (any broken-cloud), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>The 2D histogram of measured PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>W</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.05, 1.00] (any cloudy), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>The 2D histogram of measured PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (horizontal axis) and estimated PAR <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>W</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mn>2024</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (vertical axis) for the class ]0.95, 1.00] (overcast), all stations merged. The color bar indicates the number of pairs in each class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Bias in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> at each station as a function of the solar zenithal angle (SZA) for each class of cloudy conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Standard deviation (STD) of errors in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> at each station as a function of the solar zenithal angle (SZA) for each class of cloudy conditions.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3445 KiB  
Article
StEPF2 and StEPFL9 Play Opposing Roles in Regulating Stomatal Development and Drought Tolerance in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
by Le Kang, Junke Liu, Hongqing Zhu, Leqin Liao, Muying Ye, Yun Wei, Nairong Liu, Qingbo Ke, Ho Soo Kim, Sang-Soo Kwak and Quanlu Zhou
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(19), 10738; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910738 - 5 Oct 2024
Viewed by 500
Abstract
Stomata are essential for photosynthesis and water-use efficiency in plants. When expressed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants, the potato (Solanum tuberosum) proteins EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR 2 (StEPF2) and StEPF-LIKE9 (StEPFL9) play antagonistic roles in regulating stomatal density. Little is known, however, [...] Read more.
Stomata are essential for photosynthesis and water-use efficiency in plants. When expressed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants, the potato (Solanum tuberosum) proteins EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR 2 (StEPF2) and StEPF-LIKE9 (StEPFL9) play antagonistic roles in regulating stomatal density. Little is known, however, about how these proteins regulate stomatal development, growth, and response to water deficit in potato. Transgenic potato plants overexpressing StEPF2 (E2 plants) or StEPFL9 (ST plants) were generated, and RT-PCR and Western blot analyses were used to select two lines overexpressing each gene. E2 plants showed reduced stomatal density, whereas ST plants produced excessive stomata. Under well-watered conditions, ST plants displayed vigorous growth with improved leaf gas exchange and also showed increased biomass/yields compared with non-transgenic and E2 plants. E2 plants maintained lower H2O2 content and higher levels of stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity than non-transgenic and ST plants, which resulted in higher water-use efficiency and biomass/yields during water restriction. These results suggest that StEPF2 and StEPFL9 functioned in pathways regulating stomatal development. These genes are thus promising candidates for use in future breeding programs aimed at increasing potato water-use efficiency and yield under climate change scenarios. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Engineering of Plants for Stress Tolerance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Bioinformatics analysis of the StEPF2 and StEPFL9 proteins. Structural models of (<b>A</b>) StEPF2 and (<b>B</b>) StEPFL9. SP: signal peptide; Pro: pro-peptide: Mature: mature peptide. (<b>C</b>) qRT-PCR analysis of <span class="html-italic">StEPF2</span> and <span class="html-italic">StEPFL9</span> expression; the potato gene <span class="html-italic">StEF1α</span> and <span class="html-italic">actin</span> were used as an internal control. (<b>D</b>) Western blot analysis of non-transgenic (NT) and transgenic plants. Data show the mean ± SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between transgenic and NT lines by Duncan’s multiple range test; *: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Phenotypic analyses of stomatal density in transgenic potato plants. (<b>A</b>) Photographs of the mature abaxial leaf epidermis of 3-week-old plants showing stomata. Scale bars: 40 μm. Red dots denote positions of stomatal complexes. (<b>B</b>) Stomatal density of non-transgenic (NT) and transgenic plants. Data show the mean ± SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between transgenic and NT lines by Duncan’s multiple range test; ns: no significant difference; **: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photosynthetic responses of non-transgenic (NT) and transgenic potato plants. (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pn-PPFD</span> curve. (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pn-Ci</span> curve. (<b>C</b>) <span class="html-italic">Gs-PPFD</span> curve. (<b>D</b>) Water loss from detached leaves of 3-week-old NT and transgenic plants. Data show the mean ± SE. Leaves from the same position on each plant were used in this experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Phenotypic analyses of non-transgenic (NT) and transgenic potato plants under short-term drought stress conditions. (<b>A</b>) Appearance of plants before and after drought treatment. (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pn</span>, (<b>C</b>) Fv/Fm, and (<b>D</b>) H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> content in non-transgenic (NT) and transgenic plants. Leaves from the same position on each plant were used in this experiment. Data show the mean ± SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between transgenic and NT lines by Duncan’s multiple range test; ns: no significant difference; *: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of transgenic potato plants under long-term drought stress. (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Pn</span>, (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">Tr</span>, (<b>C</b>) <span class="html-italic">Gs</span>, (<b>D</b>) iWUE, (<b>E</b>) Y(NPQ), and (<b>F</b>) Fv/Fm in non-transgenic (NT) and transgenic plants after 7 or 21 days under well-watered and water-restricted conditions. Leaves from the same position on each plant were used in this experiment. Data show the mean ± SE. Asterisks indicate transgenic and NT lines differed significantly by Duncan’s multiple range test; ns: no significant difference; *: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effect of long-term drought treatment on production of NT and transgenic potato plants. (<b>A</b>) Phenotypes of 2-month-old aerial parts of NT, E2, and ST plants under well-watered and water-restricted conditions. (<b>B</b>) Phenotypes of tubers produced by NT and transgenic potato plants after harvest. (<b>C</b>) Daily water consumption of each line during drought treatment. (<b>D</b>) Biomass/tuber yield of NT and transgenic potato plants. Data show the mean ± SE, and each sample (three plants per pot) was replicated five times. Asterisks indicate transgenic and NT lines differed significantly by Duncan’s multiple range test; ns: no significant difference; *: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 5419 KiB  
Article
Strategic Light Use Efficiency Optimization of Hydroponic Lettuce Exposed to Different Photosynthetic Photon Flux Densities
by Peyton Lou Palsha, Marc W. van Iersel, Ryan William Dickson, Lynne Seymour, Melanie Yelton, Kuan Qin and Rhuanito Soranz Ferrarezi
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2281; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102281 - 4 Oct 2024
Viewed by 900
Abstract
Light use efficiency characterizes the ability of a crop to convert radiation into biomass. Determining optimum cultivar-specific photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) values from sole-source lighting can be used to optimize leaf expansion, maximize biomass, and shorten the production period. This study evaluated [...] Read more.
Light use efficiency characterizes the ability of a crop to convert radiation into biomass. Determining optimum cultivar-specific photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) values from sole-source lighting can be used to optimize leaf expansion, maximize biomass, and shorten the production period. This study evaluated the growth of hydroponic lettuce (Lactuca sativa) ‘Rex’ cultivated under different PPFD levels using sole-source lighting. At lower PPFD levels of 201 to 292 µmol·m−2·s−1, the plant projected canopy size (PCS) and specific leaf area increased to enhance light capture by 36.2% as compared to higher PPFD levels (333 and 413 µmol·m−2·s−1), while plants exhibited 10.3% lower canopy overlap ratio and 27.8% lower shoot dry weights. Both low and high PPFD conditions lead to a similar trend in PCS among plants. Light use efficiency was not a major factor in influencing lettuce growth. Instead, the critical factor was the total incident light the plants received. This study showcased the importance of incident light and PPFD on the growth, morphology, and biomass accumulation in lettuce. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Light distribution indicating the photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) inside the growth chamber (four rows × eight columns) for each individual plant growth space, represented by red squares (<b>left</b>), and a picture of the study layout and light spectrum ranges (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Shoot and root dry weight and (<b>B</b>) shoot and root fresh weight of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span> ‘Rex’) grown at different PPFDs in deep water culture hydroponics. The lines represent single regression analyses, indicating significant PPFD interactions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Each data point represents one plant subjected to varied PPFD levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Water content of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span> ‘Rex’) grown at different PPFDs in deep water culture hydroponics. The line represents the single regression analysis indicating significant PPFD interactions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Each data point represents one plant subjected to varied PPFD levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Shoot dry weight of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span> ‘Rex’) grown at different water contents in deep water culture hydroponics. The line represents the single regression analysis, indicating significant water content interactions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Each data point represents one plant subjected to varied PPFD levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Total leaf area (TLA) and final projected canopy size (PCS), (<b>B</b>) specific leaf area (SLA) and canopy overlap ratio (COR) of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span> ‘Rex’) grown at different PPFDs in deep water culture hydroponics. SLA was calculated by dividing the leaf area by the plant’s dry weight. COR was calculated by dividing the TLA by the final projected canopy size (the final canopy size measurement was from the last image taken before harvest). The lines represent the single regression analyses, which indicate significant PPFD interactions for all but the PCS (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Total incident light of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span> ‘Rex’) grown at different PPFDs in deep water culture hydroponics. The line represents the single regression analysis, indicating significant PPFD interactions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Each data point represents one plant subjected to varied PPFD levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Shoot dry weight of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span> ‘Rex’) grown at different total incident light levels in deep water culture hydroponics. IL was calculated by multiplying DLI by the projected canopy size. The line represents the single regression analysis, indicating significant IL interactions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Each data point represents one plant subjected to varied PPFD levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Light use efficiency of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span> ‘Rex’) grown at different PPFDs in deep water culture hydroponics. The line represents the single regression analysis, indicating significant PPFD interactions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Each data point represents one plant subjected to varied PPFD levels.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop