[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = phenethylamine analogues

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3341 KiB  
Article
In Vitro Activation of Human Adrenergic Receptors and Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 by Phenethylamine Analogues Present in Food Supplements
by Nicole E. T. Pinckaers, W. Matthijs Blankesteijn, Anastasiya Mircheva, Xiao Shi, Antoon Opperhuizen, Frederik-Jan van Schooten and Misha F. Vrolijk
Nutrients 2024, 16(11), 1567; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111567 - 22 May 2024
Viewed by 923
Abstract
Pre-workout supplements are popular among sport athletes and overweight individuals. Phenethylamines (PEAs) and alkylamines (AA) are widely present in these supplements. Although the health effects of these analogues are not well understood yet, they are hypothesised to be agonists of adrenergic (ADR) and [...] Read more.
Pre-workout supplements are popular among sport athletes and overweight individuals. Phenethylamines (PEAs) and alkylamines (AA) are widely present in these supplements. Although the health effects of these analogues are not well understood yet, they are hypothesised to be agonists of adrenergic (ADR) and trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs). Therefore, we aimed to pharmacologically characterise these compounds by investigating their activating properties of ADRs and TAAR1 in vitro. The potency and efficacy of the selected PEAs and AAs was studied by using cell lines overexpressing human ADRα1A1B1D2a2B12 or TAAR1. Concentration–response relationships are expressed as percentages of the maximal signal obtained by the full ADR agonist adrenaline or the full TAAR1 agonist phenethylamine. Multiple PEAs activated ADRs (EC50 = 34 nM–690 µM; Emax = 8–105%). Almost all PEAs activated TAAR1 (EC50 = 1.8–92 µM; Emax = 40–104%). Our results reveal the pharmacological profile of PEAs and AAs that are often used in food supplements. Several PEAs have strong agonistic properties on multiple receptors and resemble potencies of the endogenous ligands, indicating that they might further stimulate the already activated sympathetic nervous system in exercising athletes via multiple mechanisms. The use of supplements containing one, or a combination of, PEA(s) may pose a health risk for their consumers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sport Supplementation for Performance and Health (Volume II))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Molecular structures of (<b>a</b>) well-known activators of sympathetic nervous system: adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine, (<b>b</b>) phenethylamines and (<b>c</b>) alkylamines present in nutritional supplements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Concentration–response relationships (mean ± SD) of compounds that activated human adrenergic receptor (ADR) α<sub>1A</sub> (<b>a</b>), α<sub>1B</sub> (<b>b</b>) and α<sub>1D</sub> (<b>c</b>) in chem-1 cells overexpressing these receptors. Data are presented as percentages of maximal fluorescent Ca<sup>2+</sup> response obtained by adrenaline (n = 7–9).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Concentration–response relationships (mean ± SD) of compounds that activated human adrenergic receptor (ADR) α<sub>2A</sub> in chem-1 cells. Data are presented as percentages of maximal fluorescent Ca<sup>2+</sup> response obtained by adrenaline (n = 8).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Concentration–response relationships (mean ± SD) of compounds that activated human adrenergic receptor (ADR) β<sub>1</sub> (<b>a</b>) and β<sub>2</sub> (<b>b</b>) in chem-1 cells overexpressing these receptors. Data are presented as percentages of maximal fluorescent Ca<sup>2+</sup> response obtained by adrenaline (n = 8).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Concentration–response relationships (mean ± SD) of (<b>a</b>) phenethylamine, tyramine, methyltyramine and higenamine, (<b>b</b>) phenethylamine, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-synephrine, hordenine, dimethylphenethylamine and halostachine, and (<b>c</b>) phenethylamine, β-methylphenethylamine, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-octopamine and isopropyloctopamine, which activated human trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) in HEK293T cells stably transfected with this receptor. Data are presented as percentages of maximal intracellular cAMP level obtained by phenethylamine (n = 3–5).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>(<b>A1</b>) Gene expression of human trace amine-associated receptor 1 (hTAAR1) as fold change in GAPDH in untransfected HEK293T cells and in hTAAR1-transfected HEK293T cells. Data are presented as mean (± SEM) of 2–3 independent experiments which were run in duplicate. (<b>A2</b>) cAMP production in cells as percentage of maximal signal obtained by phenethylamine (PEA) in hTAAR1-transfected HEK293T cells exposed to PEA (triangles) or RO5166017 (squares) and in untransfected HEK293T cells exposed to PEA (diamonds). Data are presented as mean (±SEM) of 2–3 independent experiments which were run in duplicate.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Concentration–response relationship (mean ± SD) of adrenaline (closed circles) that activated adrenergic receptor (ADR) α<sub>2B</sub> in chem-1 cells. Data are presented as percentages of maximal fluorescent Ca<sup>2+</sup> response obtained by adrenaline (n = 8).</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Concentration–response relationships (mean ± SD) of alkylamine analogues 1,3-dimethylamylamine (closed bar), dimethylbutylamine (vertical striped bar), dimethylaminoethanol (open bar) and dimethylhexylamine (checkered bar) that activated human trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) in HEK293T cells transfected with this receptor at a concentration of 300 µM. The data are presented as percentages of the maximal intracellular cAMP level obtained by phenethylamine (n = 3).</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 5870 KiB  
Article
Unraveling the In Vitro Toxicity Profile of Psychedelic 2C Phenethylamines and Their N-Benzylphenethylamine (NBOMe) Analogues
by Daniel Martins, Eva Gil-Martins, Fernando Cagide, Catarina da Fonseca, Sofia Benfeito, Carlos Fernandes, Daniel Chavarria, Fernando Remião, Renata Silva and Fernanda Borges
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(8), 1158; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081158 - 15 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2586
Abstract
Mescaline derivative (2C phenethylamines) drugs have been modified by the introduction of a N-2-methoxybenzyl group to originate a new series of compounds with recognized and potent psychedelic effects, the NBOMe-drugs. Although they are prevalent in unregulated drug markets, their toxicity profile is [...] Read more.
Mescaline derivative (2C phenethylamines) drugs have been modified by the introduction of a N-2-methoxybenzyl group to originate a new series of compounds with recognized and potent psychedelic effects, the NBOMe-drugs. Although they are prevalent in unregulated drug markets, their toxicity profile is still poorly understood, despite several reports highlighting cases of acute intoxication, with brain and liver toxicity. Thus, in this study, mescaline, 2C-N (insertion of a nitro in the para position of the 2C phenethylamines aromatic ring) and 2C-B (insertion of a bromide in the para position of the 2C phenethylamines aromatic ring) and their corresponding NBOMe counterparts, mescaline-NBOMe, 25N-NBOMe and 25B-NBOMe, were synthetized and the in vitro neuro- and hepatocytotoxicity evaluated in differentiated SH-SY5Y and HepG2 cell lines, respectively. Cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, metabolic and energetic studies were performed to evaluate the main pathways involved in their toxicity. Our results demonstrated that the presence of the N-2-methoxybenzyl group significantly increased the in vitro cytotoxicity of 2C phenethylamines drugs in both cell lines, with the NBOMe drugs presenting lower EC50 values when compared to their counterparts. Consistently, our data showed a correlation between the drug’s lipophilicity and the EC50 values, except for 2C-B. The 2C-B presented higher cytotoxic effects in both cell lines than mescaline-NBOMe, a result that can be explained by its higher passive permeability. All the NBOMe derivatives were able to cross the blood–brain barrier. Considering metabolic studies, the cytotoxicity of these drugs was shown to be influenced by inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP), which suggests a potential role of this enzyme complex, especially CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 isoenzymes in SH-SY5Y cells, in their detoxification or bioactivation. Furthermore, in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, the drugs were able to induce mitochondrial membrane depolarization, and to disrupt GSH and ATP intracellular levels, these effects being concentration dependent and more pronounced for the NBOMe derivatives. No ROS overproduction was detected for any of the drugs in the tested experimental conditions. A correlation between a drug’s lipophilicity and the EC50 values in both cell lines, except for 2C-B, was also obtained. In summary, the introduction of a NBOMe moiety to the parent drugs significantly increases their lipophilicity, brain permeability and cytotoxic effects, with GSH and ATP homeostasis disruption. The inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 emphasized that CYP-mediated metabolism impacts the toxicity of these drugs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State of the Art of Medicinal Chemistry in Portugal)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Chemical structures of serotonin and the classic serotonergic psychedelics, psilocybin, and its active metabolite psilocin, <span class="html-italic">N</span>,<span class="html-italic">N</span>-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), mescaline and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Phenethylamine-based psychedelics. Chemical structures of 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamines (2C) drugs and their corresponding <span class="html-italic">N</span>-(2-methoxybenzyl)phenethylamines (NBOMe) drugs. Phenethylamine scaffold is outlined.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Concentration–response (cell death) curves of the tested drugs (0–1500 µM) obtained, in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, by the neutral red uptake and the resazurin reduction assays, 24 h after exposure. Results are presented as mean ± 95% CI of at least 4 independent experiments (performed in triplicate). The concentration–response curves were drawn using the least squares method as a fitting method. CI—confidence interval.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Impact of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated metabolism on the cytotoxicity of the tested drugs assessed through the neutral red uptake assay, in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, 24 h after exposure to the drugs in the presence or absence of different CYP inhibitors: 1000 μM ABT (non-selective CYP inhibitor), 10 μM quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) or 1μM ketoconazole (CYP3A4 inhibitor). Results are presented as mean ± SD of at least 4 independent experiments (performed in triplicate). Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test [* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control (0 μM)]. In all cases, <span class="html-italic">p</span> values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition on the drugs-induced cytotoxicity in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, 24 h after exposure to the tested drugs, in the presence or absence of two MAO inhibitors: 1 μM clorgyline—MAO-A inhibitor or 1 μM rasagiline—MAO-B inhibitor, through the neutral red uptake assay. The results are presented as mean ± SD of at least 4 independent experiments (performed in triplicate). Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test [* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control (0 μM)]. In all cases, <span class="html-italic">p</span> values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mitochondrial membrane potential, evaluated with the JC-1 dye, in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, 24 h after exposure to the tested drugs. The results were calculated as red/green fluorescence intensity ratios and expressed as percentage of control cells. Results are presented as mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments (performed in triplicate). As positive control, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (100 µM, 4 h) was used. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc test. [*** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control (0 μM)]. In all cases, <span class="html-italic">p</span> values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Intracellular levels of total glutathione, evaluated through the DTNB-GSH recycling assay, in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, 24 h after exposure to the tested drugs. Results are presented as mean ± SD of at least 5 independent experiments (performed in duplicate). Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc test. [*** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control (0 μM)]. In all cases, <span class="html-italic">p</span> values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels, evaluated through an ATP bioluminescence assay, in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, 24 h after exposure to the tested drugs. Results are presented as mean ± SD of at least 4 independent experiments (performed in duplicate). Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc test. [* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control (0 μM)]. In all cases, <span class="html-italic">p</span> values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Concentration–response (cell death) curves of the tested drugs (0–2000 µM) obtained in HepG2 cells by the neutral red uptake and the resazurin reduction assays, 24 h after exposure. Results are presented as mean ± 95% CI of at least 4 independent experiments (performed in triplicate). The concentration–response curves were drawn using the least squares method as a fitting method. CI—confidence interval.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Impact of the metabolism via cytochrome P450 (CYP) on the cytotoxicity of the tested drugs assessed through the resazurin reduction uptake assay, in HepG2 cells, 24 h after exposure to the drugs in the presence or absence of different CYP inhibitors: 1000 μM ABT (non-selective CYP inhibitor), 10 μM quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) or 1μM ketoconazole (CYP3A4 inhibitor). Results are presented as mean ± SD of at least 4 independent experiments (performed in triplicate). Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test [* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 vs. control (0 μM)]. In all cases, <span class="html-italic">p</span> values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Correlations between EC<sub>50</sub> values obtained in both metabolic and lysosomal activity measurements (cytotoxicity assays) in both cell lines tested with the lipophilicity (<b>A</b>) and calculated passive permeability (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">
37 pages, 1989 KiB  
Review
New Psychoactive Substances Intoxications and Fatalities during the COVID-19 Epidemic
by Alfredo Fabrizio Lo Faro, Diletta Berardinelli, Tommaso Cassano, Gregory Dendramis, Eva Montanari, Angelo Montana, Paolo Berretta, Simona Zaami, Francesco Paolo Busardò and Marilyn Ann Huestis
Biology 2023, 12(2), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12020273 - 8 Feb 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3093
Abstract
In January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, declaring the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic in March 2020. Stringent measures decreased consumption of some drugs, moving the illicit market to alternative substances, such as New Psychoactive [...] Read more.
In January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, declaring the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic in March 2020. Stringent measures decreased consumption of some drugs, moving the illicit market to alternative substances, such as New Psychoactive Substances (NPS). A systematic literature search was performed, using scientific databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and institutional and government websites, to identify reported intoxications and fatalities from NPS during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search terms were: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, coronavirus disease 2019, intox*, fatal*, new psychoactive substance, novel psychoactive substance, smart drugs, new psychoactive substance, novel synthetic opioid, synthetic opioid, synthetic cathinone, bath salts, legal highs, nitazene, bath salt, legal high, synthetic cannabinoid, phenethylamine, phencyclidine, piperazine, novel benzodiazepine, benzodiazepine analogue, designer benzodiazepines, tryptamine and psychostimulant. From January 2020 to March 2022, 215 NPS exposures were reported in Europe, UK, Japan and USA. Single NPS class intoxications accounted for 25, while mixed NPS class intoxications represented only 3 cases. A total of 130 NPS single class fatalities and 56 fatalities involving mixed NPS classes were published during the pandemic. Synthetic opioids were the NPS class most abused, followed by synthetic cathinones and synthetic cannabinoids. Notably, designer benzodiazepines were frequently found in combination with fentalogues. Considering the stress to communities and healthcare systems generated by the pandemic, NPS-related information may be underestimated. However, we could not define the exact impacts of COVID-19 on processing of toxicological data, autopsy and death investigations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Prisma flowchart of the literature search on NPS intoxications and fatalities cases during the pandemic period (January 2020–March 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Number of single- and mixed-NPS intoxications and fatalities during the pandemic period by year (January 2020–March 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Number of NPS single intoxications and fatalities. (<b>a</b>) NPS mixed intoxications and fatalities (<b>b</b>) during pandemic period (January 2020–March 2022). Designer Benzodiazepines, DZBP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Number of NPS single intoxications and fatalities cases; (<b>b</b>) NPS mixed intoxications and fatalities cases by year (January 2020–March 2022). Designer Benzodiazepines, DBZP; others (see <a href="#sec3dot3-biology-12-00273" class="html-sec">Section 3.3</a> and <a href="#sec3dot4-biology-12-00273" class="html-sec">Section 3.4</a>).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop