[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,310)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = no till

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3929 KiB  
Article
The Usefulness of Soil Penetration Resistance Measurements for Improving the Efficiency of Cultivation Technologies
by Jacek Klonowski, Aleksander Lisowski, Magdalena Dąbrowska, Jarosław Chlebowski, Michał Sypuła and Witold Zychowicz
Sustainability 2024, 16(16), 6962; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166962 - 14 Aug 2024
Abstract
The research results of soil penetration resistance (SPR) tests carried out on sandy clay using four cone probes with different dimensions of the measuring tip are presented in this study. It was indicated that the values of SPR can be used to diagnose [...] Read more.
The research results of soil penetration resistance (SPR) tests carried out on sandy clay using four cone probes with different dimensions of the measuring tip are presented in this study. It was indicated that the values of SPR can be used to diagnose the cultivation layer and, on this basis, determine whether it is necessary to cultivate it and select tools for the required treatment. Tests were carried out on three levels of soil density, 1.37, 1.43 and 1.51 g∙cm−3, and two moisture contents, 7.64% and 10.4%. The results show that the probe with the smallest cone with apex angles of 30° and 60° on the least dense soil indicated higher SPR by over 50% more than other probes with the highest cone and the same opening angles. The change in cone opening angle from 30° to 60° led to an increase in probe indications in the range of 10–25%, depending on the diameter of the cone tip. The statistical analysis shows that values of probe indications were statistically significant and were influenced by soil density, probe cone tip dimensions, the surface of the base and the apex angle. The values of SPR are fundamental in diagnosing the quality of the soil’s top layer, determining the necessity of breaking it up, and selecting the optimal tools for this procedure. To improve the efficiency of agricultural crop cultivation technologies. This is particularly important when carrying out cultivation procedures in an environmentally friendly manner. The measurements will help support the introduction of sustainable farming practices, including direct seeding, no-till cultivation, or precision agriculture, reducing soil degradation and increasing environmental benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Measurement preparation stages, leveling of loosened soil (<b>a</b>), compaction with a roller (<b>b</b>) and soil compaction measurements (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes in penetration resistance of soil with moisture of 7.64% at individual depths, measured with probes with K30 (<b>a</b>) and K60 (<b>b</b>) cones at three levels of soil compaction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Changes in penetration resistance of soil with moisture of 7.64% at individual depths, measured with probes with K30 (<b>a</b>) and K60 (<b>b</b>) cones at three levels of soil compaction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Changes in penetration resistance of soil with moisture of 10.4% at individual depths, measured with cone probes with an opening angle of 30° (<b>a</b>) and 60° (<b>b</b>), at three levels of soil compaction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Changes in penetration resistance of soil with moisture of 10.4% at individual depths, measured with cone probes with an opening angle of 30° (<b>a</b>) and 60° (<b>b</b>), at three levels of soil compaction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in average penetration resistance of soil with moisture of 7.64% at three levels of its density, measured with probes with cone opening angle of 30° (<b>a</b>) and 60° (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in the average soil compaction with a moisture content of 10.4% at three levels of its compaction measured with probes with a cone with an opening angle of 30° (<b>a</b>) and 60° (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 3203 KiB  
Article
Stratified Effects of Tillage and Crop Rotations on Soil Microbes in Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles at Different Soil Depths in Long-Term Corn, Soybean, and Wheat Cultivation
by Yichao Shi, Alison Claire Gahagan, Malcolm J. Morrison, Edward Gregorich, David R. Lapen and Wen Chen
Microorganisms 2024, 12(8), 1635; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081635 - 10 Aug 2024
Viewed by 347
Abstract
Understanding the soil bacterial communities involved in carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling can inform beneficial tillage and crop rotation practices for sustainability and crop production. This study evaluated soil bacterial diversity, compositional structure, and functions associated with C-N cycling at two soil [...] Read more.
Understanding the soil bacterial communities involved in carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling can inform beneficial tillage and crop rotation practices for sustainability and crop production. This study evaluated soil bacterial diversity, compositional structure, and functions associated with C-N cycling at two soil depths (0–15 cm and 15–30 cm) under long-term tillage (conventional tillage [CT] and no-till [NT]) and crop rotation (monocultures of corn, soybean, and wheat and corn–soybean–wheat rotation) systems. The soil microbial communities were characterized by metabarcoding the 16S rRNA gene V4–V5 regions using Illumina MiSeq. The results showed that long-term NT reduced the soil bacterial diversity at 15–30 cm compared to CT, while no significant differences were found at 0–15 cm. The bacterial communities differed significantly at the two soil depths under NT but not under CT. Notably, over 70% of the tillage-responding KEGG orthologs (KOs) associated with C fixation (primarily in the reductive citric acid cycle) were more abundant under NT than under CT at both depths. The tillage practices significantly affected bacteria involved in biological nitrogen (N2) fixation at the 0–15 cm soil depth, as well as bacteria involved in denitrification at both soil depths. The crop type and rotation regimes had limited effects on bacterial diversity and structure but significantly affected specific C-N-cycling genes. For instance, three KOs associated with the Calvin–Benson cycle for C fixation and four KOs related to various N-cycling processes were more abundant in the soil of wheat than in that of corn or soybean. These findings indicate that the long-term tillage practices had a greater influence than crop rotation on the soil bacterial communities, particularly in the C- and N-cycling processes. Integrated management practices that consider the combined effects of tillage, crop rotation, and crop types on soil bacterial functional groups are essential for sustainable agriculture. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Soil bacterial community diversity indices affected by the interaction of tillage and soil depth (<b>A</b>) and the interaction of tillage, rotation, and crops at 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm soil depths (<b>B</b>). CT, conventional tillage; NT, no-till; C, corn; S, soybean; W, wheat. Error bars represent standard errors. Different letters across all treatments in panel A and across all treatments under CT and NT in panel B represent significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Sidak adjustments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil bacterial community structure affected by tillage, rotation, crop type, soil depths, and soil physicochemical properties determined by db-RDA. Soil bacterial community structure affected by the interaction of tillage and soil depth (<b>A</b>), the interaction of tillage and crops (<b>B</b>), and all factors (<b>C</b>), and soil bacterial phyla affected by tillage at 0–15 cm (<b>D</b>) and 15–30 cm soil depths (<b>E</b>) and by depth under NT (<b>F</b>). CT, conventional tillage; NT, no-till; 0–15, 0–15 cm soil depth; 15–30, 15–30 cm soil depth. Error bars represent standard errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Functional genes associated with carbon fixation, as predicted by PICRUSt2. The relative abundances of KEGG orthologs (KOs) that were significantly influenced by the tillage practices at either 0–15 cm or 15–30 cm soil depth within four key modules from map00720 (other C fixation pathways except Calvin–Benson cycle) are shown, including the reductive citric acid cycle (M00173), the hydroxypropionate–hydroxybutylate cycle (M00375), the 3-hydroxypropionate bi-cycle (M00376), and the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway (M00377) (<b>A</b>). Additionally, KOs within the Calvin–Benson cycle module (M00165) were significantly influenced by the crop types (<b>C</b>). The corresponding enzyme IDs (EC) for each KO are provided on the right side of the panels. Different letters across all treatments in panels (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) represent significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Sidak adjustments. Panels (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>) display heatmaps showing the abundance of bacterial genera significantly affected by tillage (<b>B</b>) or crop types (<b>D</b>), which importantly contributed to the KOs presented in panels (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>), respectively. Colors and density represent the proportion (%) of a specific gene’s abundance within various genera, with blue indicating lower abundance, and red indicating higher abundance. CT, conventional tillage; NT, no-till; 0–15, 0–15 cm soil depth; 15–30, 15–30 cm soil depth. Crop types: C for corn, S for soybean, and W for wheat.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Functional genes associated with nitrogen (N) metabolism, as predicted by PICRUSt2. Panels (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>,<b>E</b>) illustrate the relative abundance of KEGG orthologs (KOs) significantly influenced by the tillage practices at 0–15 cm soil depth and 15–30 cm soil depth and the current crop, respectively. Different letters (a, b, c) above the bars in panel (<b>E</b>) represent significant differences between the crops at α = 0.05 according to Sidak adjustments. Results for crops sharing the same letter are not significantly different from each other, while those for crops with different letters are significantly different. Panels (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>,<b>F</b>) display heatmaps showing the abundance of bacterial genera that significantly contributed to the KOs affected by the tillage practices at 0–15 cm soil depth (<b>C</b>) and 15–30 cm soil depth (<b>D</b>) and the current crop (<b>F</b>). Stars in the heatmaps indicate significant differences in the abundance of genera between conventional tillage (CT) and no-till (NT) in panels (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>), and higher abundance in wheat compared to corn or soybean in panel (<b>F</b>) (*, <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). Different colors represent the proportion (%) of a specific gene’s abundance within various genera. CT, conventional tillage; NT, no-till; C, corn; S, soybean; W, wheat. Error bars represent standard errors.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1914 KiB  
Article
Climate Change and Its Positive and Negative Impacts on Irrigated Corn Yields in a Region of Colorado (USA)
by Jorge A. Delgado, Robert E. D’Adamo, Alexis H. Villacis, Ardell D. Halvorson, Catherine E. Stewart, Jeffrey Alwang, Stephen J. Del Grosso, Daniel K. Manter and Bradley A. Floyd
Crops 2024, 4(3), 366-378; https://doi.org/10.3390/crops4030026 - 9 Aug 2024
Viewed by 428
Abstract
The future of humanity depends on successfully adapting key cropping systems for food security, such as corn (Zea mays L.), to global climatic changes, including changing air temperatures. We monitored the effects of climate change on harvested yields using long-term research plots [...] Read more.
The future of humanity depends on successfully adapting key cropping systems for food security, such as corn (Zea mays L.), to global climatic changes, including changing air temperatures. We monitored the effects of climate change on harvested yields using long-term research plots that were established in 2001 near Fort Collins, Colorado, and long-term average yields in the region (county). We found that the average temperature for the growing period of the irrigated corn (May to September) has increased at a rate of 0.023 °C yr−1, going from 16.5 °C in 1900 to 19.2 °C in 2019 (p < 0.001), but precipitation did not change (p = 0.897). Average minimum (p < 0.001) temperatures were positive predictors of yields. This response to temperature depended on N fertilizer rates, with the greatest response at intermediate fertilizer rates. Maximum (p < 0.05) temperatures and growing degree days (GDD; p < 0.01) were also positive predictors of yields. We propose that the yield increases with higher temperatures observed here are likely only applicable to irrigated corn and that irrigation is a good climate change mitigation and adaptation practice. However, since pan evaporation significantly increased from 1949 to 2019 (p < 0.001), the region’s dryland corn yields are expected to decrease in the future from heat and water stress associated with increasing temperatures and no increases in precipitation. This study shows that increases in GDD and the minimum temperatures that are contributing to a changing climate in the area are important parameters that are contributing to higher yields in irrigated systems in this region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Changes in average temperature (<b>a</b>), growing degree days (GDD) (<b>b</b>), and total precipitation (<b>c</b>) during the corn growing season from 1900 to 2019 in Fort Collins, Colorado (Data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] station ID #: GHCND:USC00053005). Note: Daily mean temperature (T_mean) was calculated from the daily maximum temperature (T_max) and daily minimum temperature (T_min) as follows: T_mean = (T_max + T_min)/2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>CSU pan evaporation vs. mean daily temperature, May-September, Selected Years, 1949–2019. Weather information collected at NOAA station ID #: GHCND:USC00053005. Note that daily mean temperature (T_mean) was calculated from the daily maximum temperature (T_max) and daily minimum temperature (T_min) as follows: T_mean = (T_max + T_min)/2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average harvested corn yields (15.5% water content) in Larimer County, Colorado versus average minimum temperatures during the corn growing season, May to September, from 1963 to 2019 (data from NOAA station ID # GHCND:USC00053005).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average harvested corn yields (15.5% water content) in Larimer County, Colorado from 1963 to 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Average harvested corn yields (15.5% water content) in Larimer County versus June Stress Degree Days (SDD), from 1991 to 2018 (data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] station ID # GHCND:USC00053005).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4088 KiB  
Article
Combining No-Tillage with Hairy Vetch Return Improves Production and Nitrogen Utilization in Silage Maize
by Zhou Li, Xingrong Sun, Jie Pan, Tao Wang, Yuan Li, Xiuting Li and Shuai Hou
Plants 2024, 13(15), 2084; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152084 - 27 Jul 2024
Viewed by 285
Abstract
The combination of no-till farming and green manure is key to nourishing the soil and increasing crop yields. However, it remains unclear how to enhance the efficiency of green manure under no-till conditions. We conducted a two-factor field trial of silage maize rotated [...] Read more.
The combination of no-till farming and green manure is key to nourishing the soil and increasing crop yields. However, it remains unclear how to enhance the efficiency of green manure under no-till conditions. We conducted a two-factor field trial of silage maize rotated with hairy vetch to test the effects of tillage methods and returning. Factor 1 is the type of tillage, which is divided into conventional ploughing and no-tillage; factor 2 is the different ways of returning hairy vetch as green manure, which were also compared: no return (NM), stubble return (H), mulching (HM), turnover (HR, for CT only), and live coverage (LM, for NT only). Our findings indicate that different methods of returning hairy vetch to the field will improve maize yield and quality. The best results were obtained in CT and NT in HM and LM, respectively. Specifically, HM resulted in the highest dry matter quality and yield, with improvements of 35.4% and 31.9% over NM under CT, respectively. It also demonstrated the best economic and net energy performance. However, other treatments had no significant effect on the beneficial utilization and return of nutrients. The LM improved yields under NT by boosting soil enzyme activity, promoting nitrogen transformation and accumulation, and increasing nitrogen use efficiency for better kernel development. Overall, NTLM is best at utilizing and distributing soil nutrients and increasing silage maize yield. This finding supports the eco-efficient cultivation approach in silage maize production in the region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant–Soil Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>No-tillage and hairy vetch returning methods had an effect on nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen distribution ratio of various organs of silage maize at the end of milk maturity. <b>Note</b>: CTNM: conventional tillage; CTH: conventional tillage hairy vetch; CTHM: conventional tillage + hairy vetch mulch; CTHR: conventional tillage + hairy vetch pressure; NTNM: no-tillage; NTH: no-tillage + hairy vetch; NTHM: no-tillage + hairy vetch; NTLM: no-tillage + hairy vetch living mulch. Different letters indicated significant differences in nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen allocation ratio in the same organ between different treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of no-tillage and hairy vetch returning on pH and organic matter. <b>Note</b>: CTNM: conventional tillage; CTH: conventional tillage hairy vetch; CTHM: conventional tillage + hairy vetch mulch; CTHR: conventional tillage + hairy vetch pressure; NTNM: no-tillage; NTH: no-tillage + hairy vetch; NTHM: no-tillage + hairy vetch; NTLM: no-tillage + hairy vetch living mulch. Different lowercase letters indicate that there are significant differences in pH and organic matter content between different treatments of the same type of soil (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), while different uppercase letters indicate that there are significant differences in pH and organic matter content between different types of soil under the same treatment (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Total nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, and nitrate nitrogen content in rhizosphere soil and non-rhizosphere soil under no-tillage and hairy vetch. <b>Note</b>: CTNM: conventional tillage; CTH: conventional tillage hairy vetch; CTHM: conventional tillage + hairy vetch mulch; CTHR: conventional tillage + hairy vetch pressure; NTNM: no-tillage; NTH: no-tillage + hairy vetch; NTHM: no-tillage + hairy vetch; NTLM: no-tillage + hairy vetch living mulch. Different lowercase letters indicate that the total nitrogen content of the same type of soil is significantly different between different treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and different uppercase letters indicate that the total nitrogen content of different types of soil is significantly different between the same treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of no-tillage and hairy vetch returning methods on urease activity, protease activity sucrose enzyme activity, and acid phosphatase activity in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils. <b>Note</b>: CTNM: conventional tillage; CTH: conventional tillage hairy vetch; CTHM: conventional tillage + hairy vetch mulch; CTHR: conventional tillage + hairy vetch pressure; NTNM: no-tillage; NTH: no-tillage + hairy vetch; NTHM: no-tillage + hairy vetch; NTLM: no-tillage + hairy vetch living mulch. Different lowercase letters indicate that the total nitrogen content of the same type of soil is significantly different between different treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and different uppercase letters indicate that the total nitrogen content of different types of soil is significantly different between the same treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Correlation analysis of yield, quality, nitrogen use efficiency of organs, nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen distribution ratio, soil enzyme activity of silage maize. ***, **, and * indicate that the differences between treatments are 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average monthly temperature and monthly rainfall during the crop growth period October 2022–July 2023.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 76098 KiB  
Article
Derivation of Predictive Layers Using Regional Till Geochemistry Data for Mineral Potential Mapping of the REE Line of Bergslagen, Central Sweden
by Patrick Casey, George Morris and Martiya Sadeghi
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080753 - 26 Jul 2024
Viewed by 340
Abstract
With the increasing need for rare-earth elements (REEs) to reach the goals of the ongoing green energy transition, new and innovative methods are needed to identify new primary resources of these critical metals. This study explores the potential to use a non-biased, uniform [...] Read more.
With the increasing need for rare-earth elements (REEs) to reach the goals of the ongoing green energy transition, new and innovative methods are needed to identify new primary resources of these critical metals. This study explores the potential to use a non-biased, uniform till dataset to generate evidentiary layers that describe these critical factors and geochemical anomalies to aid mineral potential mapping (MPM) for REEs using machine-assisted methods. The till samples used in this study were collected from the “REE Line”, a sub-region within the Bergslagen lithotectonic province, Sweden, where numerous REE mineralizations occur. Multiple approaches were used in this study to isolate geochemical anomalies using multivariate methods, namely principal component analysis (PCA) and K-means clustering. Additional factors for classifying till samples were also tested, including alteration indices. Using known REE occurrences in Bergslagen as validation points, the results demonstrated the usefulness of multivariate methods applied to till geochemistry for predictive bedrock mapping, and to identify potential areas of REE mineralization within the REE line. The results of the alteration indices showed that the till geochemistry demonstrated similar levels of alteration when compared to the underlying bedrock, allowing for a regional alteration map to be generated. These results show that regional-scale till sampling can provide low-cost data for mineral exploration at the regional scale and generate usable evidentiary layers for GIS-based MPM. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Bedrock map of the REE line taken from the SGU 1:1,000,000 map from SGUs database. Coordinates are based on Swedish SWEREFF-99TM system. The red points represent an up-ice coordinate transformation of original sample locations to roughly 16 km NNW based on inferred transport distance. Location the REE line is shown in the inset map of Sweden in a red rectangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The study area with soil depth shown in meters. The thickest sediments are typically associated with fluvial or lacustrine areas. Arrows demonstrate ice-flow direction as measured from orientation of striations in bedrock.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flow chart defining mineral systems from critical processes through mappable proxies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) Biplots of PC scores for PCs 1 through 4 for the ILR transformed all-element data. Individual points represent individual till samples, and colors represent their K-means cluster membership.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Interpolated factor scores from the all-element data. (<b>A</b>). PC1 shows spatial correlation to mafic (high factor scores) and felsic (low factor scores) bedrock. (<b>B</b>). High scores along PC2 demonstrate possible correlations to the more evolved 1.85–1.75 Ga granites and pegmatites. (<b>C</b>). High factor scores show special affinity to the Norberg REE mineralizations. Black arrows indicate ice direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Clusters membership of individual till samples for all-element data plotted over the bedrock map of the REE line. REE mineralizations are shown in red crosses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Biplots of trace-element data after ILR transformation for PCs 1 through 5. (<b>A</b>). PC1–PC2. (<b>B</b>). PC1–PC3. (<b>C</b>). PC1–PC5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) Interpolated results for principal component analysis of the trace-element data. (<b>A</b>). PC1 demonstrates a rough mafic (low scoring) and felsic (high scoring) divide between till samples. (<b>B</b>). Positive PC2 scores demonstrate association with 1.85–1.75 Ga granites and pegmatites. (<b>C</b>). PC5 shows correlation with known REE deposits. Red crosses are known REE mineralizations. Arrows indicate ice direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Clustering results from the trace-element data plotted over the bedrock map of the REE line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Clusters 2, 3, and 6 shown overlain on the interpolated factor scores of PC5 of the trace-element data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Principal components of till samples from each of the three clusters highlighted in <a href="#minerals-14-00753-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a> showing association with mineralization and positive loadings on the fifth principal component of the trace-element data. (<b>A</b>). Cluster 2, (<b>B</b>). Cluster 3. (<b>C</b>). Cluster 6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Interpolated results of the alteration index of till samples within the REE line with known non-REE bearing mineralizations shown as red points (sulfide bearing) or green triangles (Fe-oxide).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3843 KiB  
Article
Wheat Response to Foliar-Applied Phosphorus Is Determined by Soil Phosphorus Buffering
by Raj Malik, Craig Scanlan, Andrew van Burgel and Balwinder Singh
Agronomy 2024, 14(8), 1630; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081630 - 25 Jul 2024
Viewed by 346
Abstract
In no-till cropping systems, banding of phosphorus (P) fertiliser at seeding results in low use efficiency due to chemical reactions in soil. Foliar P has the potential to allow grain producers to respond tactically with P application after sowing when P supply from [...] Read more.
In no-till cropping systems, banding of phosphorus (P) fertiliser at seeding results in low use efficiency due to chemical reactions in soil. Foliar P has the potential to allow grain producers to respond tactically with P application after sowing when P supply from soil and fertiliser is not meeting crop demand. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of foliar P on wheat grain yield, grain quality, biomass yield, P uptake and P use efficiency indices. Nine field experiments were conducted to investigate the response of wheat to foliar P. Three rates of P, 0, 2.5 and 5.0 kg/ha, as phosphoric acid (H3PO4 85%) were applied to wheat at three different growth stages: first tiller emergence (Z21), first node detection (Z31) and flag leaf emergence (Z39). Grain yield responses ranging from 176 kg/ha to 505 kg/ha to foliar-applied P were observed in six out of nine experiments. The percent grain yield response to foliar P was negatively related to the P buffering index (PBI, 0–10 cm soil depth), which is attributed to greater sorption by soil of the foliar P at the higher PBI levels. Mean agronomic efficiency (AE) across the experiments was 111 kg/kg P but reached up to 232 kg/kg P. It was also evident that foliar P has the potential to improve P concentration in shoots and grains and increase P uptake but with no or minimal effect on grain quality. Our results suggest that a combination of tissue testing at the seedling stage and soil P buffering can be used to guide when foliar P application is likely to increase grain yield in wheat. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Foliar Fertilization: Novel Approaches and Field Practices)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Phosphorus concentration in whole shoots of wheat sampled between Z11 and Z21 growth stages (days after sowing). Black points are critical <span class="html-italic">p</span> values published by [<a href="#B18-agronomy-14-01630" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-agronomy-14-01630" class="html-bibr">19</a>]. Yellow points are shoot P concentrations (a total of 23 sampling observations).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Response of wheat grain yield and shoot dry weight (SDW) at anthesis (Z65) to applied foliar P in comparison with Control at nine experimental sites. Dashed line is 1:1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of foliar-applied P rates on wheat grain yields at nine experimental sites. Foliar P treatments were 0 P = control, 2.5 P = 2.5 kg P/ha, 5 P = 5.0 kg P/ha. Treatments within a site with no common letters above were significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of time of foliar P application on wheat grain yield at the 4 sites where an effect of time of application was detected with ANOVA. Time of application was based on Zadoks growth stage: Z21 = first tiller emergence, Z31 = first node detection and Z39 = flag leaf emergence. Treatments within a site with no common letters above were significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationship between percent gain yield increase and phosphorus buffering index (PBI, 0–10 cm soil depth). Percent yield gain was calculated from the mean value of the applied P treatments and the control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relationship between leaf scorching and wheat grain yield, from treatments where foliar P was applied. Leaf scorching was based on a visual assessment at mid-anthesis (Z65). The dashed line is a linear model, excluding the control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of foliar-applied P rates on wheat shoot dry weight (SDW) at mid-anthesis (Z65) at nine experimental sites. Foliar P treatments were 0 P = control, 2.5 P = 2.5 kg P/ha, 5 P = 5.0 kg P/ha. Treatments within a site with no common letters above were significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of foliar-applied P rates and timings on (<b>a</b>) agronomic efficiency (AE) and (<b>b</b>) phosphorus use efficiency (PUE), averaged across the nine experiments. LSD (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) for AE and PUE is 63 kg/kg and 0.17 kg/kg, respectively. Foliar P treatments were 0 P = control, 2.5 P = 2.5 kg P/ha, 5 P = 5.0 kg P/ha. Time of application was based on Zadoks growth stage: Z21 = first tiller emergence, Z31 = first node detection and Z39 = flag leaf emergence.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1135 KiB  
Article
Decision Support System for Mining Machinery Risk Mitigation Driven by Ergonomics and Contextual Theory
by Mirjana Misita, Aleksandar Brkić, Ivan Mihajlović, Goran Đurić, Nada Stanojević, Uglješa Bugarić and Vesna Spasojević Brkić
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(15), 6413; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156413 - 23 Jul 2024
Viewed by 424
Abstract
Despite being very old, the mining industry continues to be one of the major sources of pollution, with more people killed or injured than in all other industries. Prevention of incidents/accidents on machinery in mining pits and the issues of operator safety on [...] Read more.
Despite being very old, the mining industry continues to be one of the major sources of pollution, with more people killed or injured than in all other industries. Prevention of incidents/accidents on machinery in mining pits and the issues of operator safety on mining machinery largely depend on the ergonomic adaptation of the workplace, compliance with safety procedures and policies, and organizational and other influential factors. Evidently, scarce consideration of those factors in the available literature has not given satisfactory results till now. The aim of this paper is to first set up a comprehensive model based on ergonomic factors and contextual theory, which takes into account all the influencing factors on the occurrence of incidents/accidents and represents a complex system of interdependence of influential variables of diverse, mostly stochastic nature, and then design a software solution on the given basis. In this research, based on the extensive data collected, a model was generated using the structural equations modelling methodology, which was then used to design the reasoning logic in the expert system for mitigating the risks of the operation of mining machines. An innovative solution incorporating a mathematical model of the interdependence of influential variables into the stored knowledge base offers a decision support system that provides recommendations for the maintenance of a particular mining machine, depending on the assessment of model factors in a specific decision-making situation at the higher organizational level and ergonomic suitability for the operator at the lower organizational level, and, in that manner, enables the mitigating of risky/unwanted events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Manufacturing Ergonomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A structural equation model that includes ergonomic and contextual factors affecting the risks of mining machinery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>User interface of the DSS for mitigating the risks of the operation of mining machines.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 2302 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Impact of Tillage Methods on Soil Moisture Content and Crop Yield in Hungary
by Maimela Maxwell Modiba, Caleb Melenya Ocansey, Hanaa Tharwat Mohamed Ibrahim, Márta Birkás, Igor Dekemati and Barbara Simon
Agronomy 2024, 14(8), 1606; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081606 - 23 Jul 2024
Viewed by 356
Abstract
A decline in rainfall as a source of agricultural water has affected and will continue to affect sustainable crop production globally including in Hungary. Conservation of the greatest water reservoir is important for the sustainable development of agriculture in Hungary. The objective of [...] Read more.
A decline in rainfall as a source of agricultural water has affected and will continue to affect sustainable crop production globally including in Hungary. Conservation of the greatest water reservoir is important for the sustainable development of agriculture in Hungary. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the different tillage methods on soil moisture content, grain yield, and root weight of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) under rainfed conditions. A field study was conducted at the Józsefmajor Experimental and Training Farm (JM) of the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences near Hatvan. The experiment consisted of six tillage treatments: disking (D, 16 cm), shallow cultivation (SC, 20 cm), no-till (NT), deep cultivation (DC, 25 cm), loosening (L, 45 cm), and plowing (P, 30 cm). Soil moisture content (SMC) was measured monthly, and grain yield and root weight were measured at the end of the cropping period. Our results showed no significant difference in SMC between conservation and conventional tillage methods in 2018. However, in 2021, greater SMC was significantly conserved under NT compared to P. Regarding the sampling date, a significant increase in moisture with time was observed. A significantly lower SMC was observed on 3 June 2019 between L and D. while on the 9 September 2020, SMC significantly differed between P and all the other treatments (D, SC, NT, DC, and L). Interestingly in 2018, SMC was significantly lower at 10–20 cm depth between L and D. Notably the effect of depth on SMC was observed as moisture significantly increased with increasing depth in all tillage treatments. Root weight was greatest at DC (1.54 t ha−1) in 2018 and under L (3.89 t ha−1) in 2021. Similarly, wheat grain yield was greatest at DC (2.48 t ha−1) in 2018, while sunflower yield in 2021 was greatest at L (3.86 t ha−1). It is comprehensible that conservation tillage methods such as L and NT can increase SMC and grain yield. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effective Soil and Water Conservation Practices in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Average monthly measured precipitation from 2018–2021, and multi-year (1981–2021) average monthly rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Study design depicting the long-term experimental at Józsefmajor Experimental and Training Farm: Below the picture is a schematic representation of treatment plots and their four replications (Source: Dekemati et al., 2019a) [<a href="#B18-agronomy-14-01606" class="html-bibr">18</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Wheat grain yield for the 2018 cropping season (D: disking, SC: shallow tine cultivation, NT: no-till, DC: deep tine cultivation, L: loosening, P: plowing). Bars with similar lower-case letters indicate similarities according to ANOVA and the Tukey post-hoc test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Hanging bars indicate the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sunflower seed yield for 2021 cropping season (D—disking, SC—shallow tine cultivation, NT—no-till, DC—deep tine cultivation, L—loosening, P—plowing. Bars with similar lower-case letters indicate similarities according to ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Hanging bars indicate standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Wheat root weight for the 2018 cropping season (D: disking, SC: shallow tine cultivation, NT: no-till, DC: deep tine cultivation, L: loosening, P: plowing). Bars with similar lower-case letters indicate similarities according to ANOVA and the Tukey post-hoc test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Hanging bars indicate the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Sunflower root weight for the 2021 cropping season (D: disking, SC: shallow tine cultivation, NT: no-till, DC: deep tine cultivation, L: loosening, P: plowing). Bars with similar lower-case letters indicate similarities according to ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Hanging bars indicate the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spearman correlation analysis between root weight and crop yield of 2018 cultivated wheat crop (D—disking, SC—shallow tine cultivation, NT—no-till, DC—deep tine cultivation, L—loosening, P—plowing) at significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Correlation analysis between root weight and crop yield of 2021 cultivated sunflower crop (D—disking, SC—shallow tine cultivation, NT—no-till, DC—deep tine cultivation, L—loosening, P—plowing) at significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 5795 KiB  
Article
Interaction Mechanisms between Blades and Maize Root–Soil Composites as Affected by Key Factors: An Experimental Analysis
by Xuanting Liu, Peng Gao, Hongyan Qi, Qifeng Zhang, Mingzhuo Guo and Yunhai Ma
Agriculture 2024, 14(7), 1179; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071179 - 18 Jul 2024
Viewed by 339
Abstract
To design a high-performance stubble-breaking device, studying the interaction mechanisms between blades and root–soil composites is urgent. A simplified experimental method was proposed to investigate the cutting process and the effects of key factors on cutting by conducting cutting experiments on remolded root–soil [...] Read more.
To design a high-performance stubble-breaking device, studying the interaction mechanisms between blades and root–soil composites is urgent. A simplified experimental method was proposed to investigate the cutting process and the effects of key factors on cutting by conducting cutting experiments on remolded root–soil composites and maize root–soil composites. The results showed that the soil support force and root–soil interface force significantly impacted cutting. Higher soil compaction and root–soil interface forces helped avoid root dragging, but higher soil compaction and thicker roots led to greater resistance. The superposition and accumulation effects significantly increased the cutting force, especially when root distribution was denser; as the oblique angle and bevel angle increased, the root-cutting force and dragging distance first decreased and then increased. Compared with orthogonal cutting, the optimal angles were both 45° and reduced the root-cutting force by 60.47% and 15.12% and shortened the dragging distance by 22.33 mm and 8.76 mm, respectively. Increasing the slide-cutting angle and cutting speed helped reduce the root-cutting force and dragging distance; however, it also faced greater pure-cutting force. Consequently, the interaction mechanisms between blades and root–soil composites revealed in this study provide a design and optimization basis for stubble-breaking devices, thus promoting the development of no-till technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental simplification objects: (<b>a</b>) simplification of different types of cutting tools into simple cutting blades, (<b>b</b>) simplification of root clusters into a single root, and (<b>c</b>) simplification of cutting the root–soil composite with the blade.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sample preparation method for remolded root–soil composites: (<b>a</b>) Fill the box with layered, compacted soil; (<b>b</b>) place the root on the surface of the second layer of compacted soil; (<b>c</b>) remove the red plate, install the green plate, and rotate the box 90°; (<b>d</b>) adjust the blade to be perpendicular to the root; (<b>e</b>) the prepared sample is cut by a blade from one side of the soil (for the convenience of display, the side and top plates have been removed). The red and green plates represent the two detachable plates on the box.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Experiment equipment: (<b>a</b>) experimental cutting bench, (<b>b</b>) X-ray computed tomography scanner.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic of cutting the root–soil complex: (<b>a</b>) main view and (<b>b</b>) axis side view; <span class="html-italic">v</span> is the cutting speed, <span class="html-italic">b</span> is the gap between two roots, <span class="html-italic">d</span> is the diameter of the root, <span class="html-italic">L</span> is the length of the root, and <span class="html-italic">α</span> and <span class="html-italic">γ</span> represent the bevel and oblique angles of the root, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The cutting experiment and establishment method of the Cartesian coordinate system on the cross-section of a maize root–soil complex: (<b>a</b>) cutting experiments of maize root–soil composites, (<b>b</b>) real photos (left: top view; right: elevation view), and (<b>c</b>) CT slice images (left: top view; right: elevation view). The red, blue, and green dotted lines represent cutting position I, cutting position II, and cutting position III, with distances of 30 mm, 60 mm, and 90 mm from the stem, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Force–displacement curves of cutting root–soil composites: <span class="html-italic">F</span> is the root-cutting force, <span class="html-italic">s</span> is the root dragging distance, Region I is the initial stage of the curve, Regions II and IV are the rising stage of the curve, Region III is the peak of the curve, Region V is the stage where the root is dragged, and Curve I is the line where the blade cut soil. (<b>b</b>) The shape of the root with diameters of 2.48 mm, 2.5 mm, and 3 mm after being cut from left to right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The effect of varying soil and root parameters on the root-cutting force and dragging distance: variation of (<b>a</b>) soil compaction and (<b>b</b>) root diameter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A root–soil composite with root lengths of 200 mm, 180 mm, and 160 mm was cut from left to right: (<b>a</b>) force–displacement curves of the blade and (<b>b</b>) the shape of roots after being cut.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Force–displacement curves of cutting root–soil composites, and the shape of the root after being cut, with distances of (<b>a</b>) 20 mm, (<b>b</b>) 10 mm, and (<b>c</b>) 5 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The effect of varying cutting parameters on the root-cutting force and dragging distance: variation of (<b>a</b>) blade cutting speed and (<b>b</b>) slide-cutting angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The effect of varying cutting parameters on the root-cutting force and dragging distance: variation of (<b>a</b>) bevel angle and (<b>b</b>) oblique.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Force analysis of the interaction between the blades and roots: (<b>a</b>) bevel angle of 90° and (<b>b</b>) the bevel angle of 45°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Force–displacement curves of blades at different cutting positions on maize stubble.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Real photos and CT slice images of maize root–soil composite cross-section: (<b>a</b>) maize profile shape, (<b>b</b>) CT slices of the profile. The images from left to right are the images of cutting positions I, II, and III, respectively. The yellow-dashed box represents the cutting cross-section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of in situ coordinates, post-cutting coordinates, and force–displacement curves at three cutting sites of roots in different positions.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 3082 KiB  
Systematic Review
Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography for the Diagnosis of Skin Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Shazli Razi, Yen-Hong Kuo, Gaurav Pathak, Priya Agarwal, Arianna Horgan, Prachi Parikh, Farah Deshmukh and Babar K. Rao
Diagnostics 2024, 14(14), 1522; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14141522 - 15 Jul 2024
Viewed by 516
Abstract
A line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) combines confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography into a single, rapid, easy-to-use device. This meta-analysis was performed to determine the reliability of LC-OCT for diagnosing malignant skin tumors. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science databases, and the [...] Read more.
A line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) combines confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography into a single, rapid, easy-to-use device. This meta-analysis was performed to determine the reliability of LC-OCT for diagnosing malignant skin tumors. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science databases, and the Cochrane Library were searched for research studies in the English language from inception till December 2023. To assess quality and the risk of bias, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used. The sensitivity and specificity of each study were calculated. The bivariate summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the linear mixed model. Five studies with 904 reported per lesion analyses in our study; the specificity and sensitivity ranged from 67% to 97% and 72% to 92%, respectively. The pooled specificity and sensitivity were 91% (95% CI: 76–97%) and 86.9% (95% CI: 81.8–90.8%), respectively. The summary sensitivity and specificity from the bivariate approach are 86.9% (95% CI: 81.8–90.8%) and 91.1% (95% CI: 76.7–97.0%), respectively. The area under the curve is 0.914. LC-OCT shows great sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing malignant skin tumors. However, due to the limited number of studies included in our meta-analysis, it is premature to elucidate the true potential of LC-OCT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Visualization Technology in Point-of-Care Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Vertical view of LC-OCT (<b>B</b>) Horizontal or Enface view of LC-OCT. (<b>C</b>) Dermoscopic view of the lesion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow diagram of study selection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Forest plot of pooled sensitivity. (<b>B</b>) Forest plot of pooled specificity (TP = true positive, FP = false positive, FN = false negative, TN = true negative) [<a href="#B2-diagnostics-14-01522" class="html-bibr">2</a>,<a href="#B12-diagnostics-14-01522" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B13-diagnostics-14-01522" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B14-diagnostics-14-01522" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B15-diagnostics-14-01522" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) Curve for Evaluating the Sensitivity and Specificity.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 885 KiB  
Article
Cover Crop Species Selection, Seeding Rate, and Termination Timing Impacts on Semi-Arid Cotton Production
by Clayton David Ray White, Joseph Alan Burke, Katie Lynn Lewis, Will Stewart Keeling, Paul Bradley DeLaune, Ryan Blake Williams and Jack Wayne Keeling
Agronomy 2024, 14(7), 1524; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071524 - 13 Jul 2024
Viewed by 433
Abstract
By improving soil properties, cover crops can reduce wind erosion and sand damage to emerging cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. However, on the Texas High Plains, questions regarding cover crop water use and management factors that affect cotton lint yield are common [...] Read more.
By improving soil properties, cover crops can reduce wind erosion and sand damage to emerging cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. However, on the Texas High Plains, questions regarding cover crop water use and management factors that affect cotton lint yield are common and limit conservation adoption by regional producers. Studies were conducted near Lamesa, TX, USA, in 2017–2020 to evaluate cover crop species selection, seeding rate, and termination timing on cover crop biomass production and cotton yield in conventional and no-tillage systems. The no-till systems included two cover crop species, rye (Secale cereale L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and were compared to a conventional tillage system. The cover crops were planted at two seeding rates, 34 and 68 kg ha−1, and each plot was split into two termination timings: optimum, six to eight weeks prior to the planting of cotton, and late, which was two weeks after the optimum termination. Herbage mass was greater in the rye than the wheat cover crop in three of the four years tested, while the 68 kg ha−1 seeding rate was greater than the low seeding rate in only one of four years for both rye and wheat. The later termination timing produced more herbage mass than the optimum in all four years. Treatments did not affect cotton plant populations and had a variable effect on yield. In general, cover crop biomass production did not reduce lint production compared to the conventional system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Farming Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Temperature and precipitation at the experiment site from December 2016 to December 2020. T<sub>mean</sub>, daily mean temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cover crop herbage mass across evaluated parameters: (<b>a</b>) by year and combined across species; (<b>b</b>) by year and combined across seeding rate; and (<b>c</b>) by year and combined across termination timing. Means within a year followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Fisher’s Protected LSD test at α &lt; 0.05. Years with no letter are not significantly different.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1859 KiB  
Systematic Review
Prevalence and Species Distribution of Neonatal Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Amr Molla and Muayad Albadrani
Diseases 2024, 12(7), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070154 - 12 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 789
Abstract
Background and aim: Candida infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) globally. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to investigate the prevalence of candida among causative organisms of neonatal sepsis and identify the distribution [...] Read more.
Background and aim: Candida infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) globally. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to investigate the prevalence of candida among causative organisms of neonatal sepsis and identify the distribution of candida species infecting Saudi neonates. Methods: We comprehensively searched Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from their inception till November 2023. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, we ultimately included 21 eligible studies. The designs of the included studies were randomized clinical trials, cohorts, case–control, and case reports; the methodological quality was appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, NIH tool for observational studies, and Murad tool for assessing case reports. Results: Our systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data reported in 21 studies in the Saudi populations, which provided data on different types of candidal infections in 2346 neonates. The pooled data of ten retrospective studies enrolling 1823 neonates revealed that candida species resembled 4.2% of the causative organisms of neonatal sepsis among Saudi neonates (95%CI [2.5%; 5.9%], p = 0.000). Additionally, out of a total of 402 candida species that were identified among the included studies, C. albicans prevailed mostly among Saudi neonates, followed by C. parapsilosis, NS candida, and C. tropicalis (50.25%, 21.40%, 12.44%, and 9.45%, respectively). Conclusions: We found that candida species prevailed in 4.2% of 1823 cases of neonatal sepsis; the most common candida species was C. albicans. We could not pool data regarding risk factors or susceptibility of candida species to different treatment modalities due to insufficient data, requiring future large-scale, high-quality studies to be conducted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PRISMA flow chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of males and females in the included patients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Prevalence of candida among causative organisms of neonatal sepsis in Saudi Arabia. Included studies (Alfaleh 2010 [<a href="#B37-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Almatary 2019 [<a href="#B19-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">19</a>], Elbashier 1994 [<a href="#B30-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">30</a>], Elbashier 1998 [<a href="#B31-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">31</a>], Ndlovu 2021 [<a href="#B28-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">28</a>], Ohlsson 1986 [<a href="#B29-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">29</a>], Alharbi 2022 [<a href="#B18-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">18</a>], Al matary 2022 [<a href="#B40-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">40</a>], Al-Mouqdad 2019 [<a href="#B39-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">39</a>], Al-Zahrani 2013 [<a href="#B37-diseases-12-00154" class="html-bibr">37</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of Candida species among Saudi neonates in Saudi Arabia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Different regions in Saudi Arabia with higher incidences of Candida infections.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 2843 KiB  
Article
Theoretical Model of Structural Phase Transitions in Al-Cu Solid Solutions under Dynamic Loading Using Machine Learning
by Natalya Grachyova, Eugenii Fomin and Alexander Mayer
Dynamics 2024, 4(3), 526-553; https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics4030028 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 434
Abstract
The development of dynamic plasticity models with accounting of interplay between several plasticity mechanisms is an urgent problem for the theoretical description of the complex dynamic loading of materials. Here, we consider dynamic plastic relaxation by means of the combined action of dislocations [...] Read more.
The development of dynamic plasticity models with accounting of interplay between several plasticity mechanisms is an urgent problem for the theoretical description of the complex dynamic loading of materials. Here, we consider dynamic plastic relaxation by means of the combined action of dislocations and phase transitions using Al-Cu solid solutions as the model materials and uniaxial compression as the model loading. We propose a simple and robust theoretical model combining molecular dynamics (MD) data, theoretical framework and machine learning (ML) methods. MD simulations of uniaxial compression of Al, Cu and Al-Cu solid solutions reveal a relaxation of shear stresses due to a combination of dislocation plasticity and phase transformations with a complete suppression of the dislocation activity for Cu concentrations in the range of 30–80%. In particular, pure Al reveals an almost complete phase transition from the FCC (face-centered cubic) to the BCC (body-centered cubic) structure at a pressure of about 36 GPa, while pure copper does not reveal it at least till 110 GPa. A theoretical model of stress relaxation is developed, taking into account the dislocation activity and phase transformations, and is applied for the description of the MD results of an Al-Cu solid solution. Arrhenius-type equations are employed to describe the rates of phase transformation. The Bayesian method is applied to identify the model parameters with fitting to MD results as the reference data. Two forward-propagation artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained by MD data for uniaxial compression and tension are used to approximate the single-valued functions being parts of constitutive relation, such as the equation of state (EOS), elastic (shear and bulk) moduli and the nucleation strain distance function describing dislocation nucleation. The developed theoretical model with machine learning can be further used for the simulation of a shock-wave structure in metastable Al-Cu solid solutions, and the developed method can be applied to other metallic systems, including high-entropy alloys. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of crystal loading in MD modeling. The compression direction [100] is shown by arrows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Shear stresses and evolution of phase fractions for pure aluminum (<b>a</b>) and pure copper (<b>b</b>) during compression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dislocation density evolution for (<b>a</b>) pure aluminum and copper and (<b>b</b>) Al-Cu solid solutions during compression at the temperature of 300 K obtained from the MD. The dislocation length in FCC phase was divided by the total volume of the system; therefore, it tends to zero after the phase transition from FCC to BCC and “Other” structures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of MD data on pressure–density curves for (<b>a</b>) aluminum and (<b>b</b>) copper with experimental data [<a href="#B36-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">36</a>] (Dewaele (2004)) and DFT calculations [<a href="#B79-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">79</a>] (DFT Panchenko (2022)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Evolution of phase fractions and shear stresses in a solid solution with 10% Cu in aluminum. The atoms are colored according to the legend in the graph; the atoms forming FCC structure are not shown. Adapted from ref. [<a href="#B80-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">80</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Shear stresses and evolution of phase fractions of solid solutions with Cu concentration of (<b>a</b>) 20%, (<b>b</b>) 30%, (<b>c</b>) 50% and (<b>d</b>) 80%. Adapted from refs. [<a href="#B81-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">81</a>,<a href="#B82-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">82</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Distribution of shear stresses at different temperatures in solid solution with 20% Cu and (<b>b</b>) evolution of crystal structure of solid solution with 10% Cu at different strain rates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The first part of constitutive equation of Al-Cu solid solution in the form of fully connected forward-propagation ANN that calculates the pressure, total energy and bulk modulus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The second part of constitutive equation of Al-Cu solid solution in the form of fully connected forward-propagation ANN that calculates the shear modulus and nucleation strain distance function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The dependence of pressure on density for intermediate values of copper concentrations predicted by the ANN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Temperature dependencies of the bulk modulus for (<b>a</b>) pure copper and (<b>b</b>) pure aluminum predicted by the trained ANN and from experimental data and theoretical calculations: The data of Bridgman (1923), Frederick (1947) and Gruneisen (1910) are taken from [<a href="#B96-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">96</a>]; Chang–Himmel (1966) [<a href="#B95-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">95</a>]; Gerlich–Fisher (1969) [<a href="#B92-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">92</a>]; Kamm–Alers (1964) and Tallon–Wolfenden (1979) [<a href="#B91-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">91</a>,<a href="#B93-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">93</a>]; Sutton (1953) [<a href="#B90-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">90</a>]; Wawra (1978) [<a href="#B98-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">98</a>]; Raju (2002) [<a href="#B97-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">97</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Temperature dependencies of the shear modulus for (<b>a</b>) pure copper and (<b>b</b>) pure aluminum predicted by the trained ANN and from experimental data: Chang–Himmel (1966) [<a href="#B95-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">95</a>]; Overton–Gaffney (1955) [<a href="#B94-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">94</a>]; Tallon–Wolfenden (1979) [<a href="#B93-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">93</a>]; Gerlich–Fisher (1969) [<a href="#B92-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">92</a>]; Kamm–Alers (1964) [<a href="#B91-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">91</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The comparison of density of the Al-Cu alloy with solid solution of copper atoms obtained in this work and the experiment of Senoo–Hayashi (1988) [<a href="#B102-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">102</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Bulk modulus (<b>a</b>) and shear modulus (<b>b</b>) of Al-Cu solid solution for low concentrations of copper atoms in the aluminum matrix predicted by the ANN and compared with the experimental data at room temperature from Senoo–Hayashi (1988) [<a href="#B102-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">102</a>] and ab initio calculations from Ma (2012) [<a href="#B103-dynamics-04-00028" class="html-bibr">103</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Probability distribution in the parameter space in the case of 70% Cu for the following couples of parameters: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mrow> <mn>23</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>−<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mrow> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mrow> <mn>11</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> − <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of the evolution of phase fractions with parameters fitted by Bayesian method with the results of MD calculations for an alloy with 70% Cu, where the sum of FCC and HCP phases is in green, BCC phase is in blue and disordered (OTHER) structure is in grey.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Probability distribution in the parameter space in the case of 10% copper for the following couples of parameters: (<b>a</b>) dislocation formation energy–hardening coefficient, (<b>b</b>) dislocation formation energy–initial yield strength, (<b>c</b>) dislocation friction coefficient–dislocation nucleation parameter and (<b>d</b>) dislocation friction coefficient–parameter of shear stress relaxation due to FCC-to-BCC phase transition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Comparison of (<b>a</b>) shear stresses and (<b>b</b>) pressures from MD simulations with the results from a stress relaxation model with parameters fitted by Bayesian method for a copper concentration of 10% at 300 K.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plastic strain rate and dislocation density and (<b>b</b>) nucleation, dislocation multiplication and annihilation rates during uniaxial compression of Al-Cu solid solution with 10% Cu at 300 K. The dislocation density <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mi>D</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> in FCC phase is multiplied by the phase fraction <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ω</mi> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> in (<b>a</b>) in order to obtain an averaged density through the whole material volume.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 3508 KiB  
Article
Interactive Effect of Cover Crop, Irrigation Regime, and Crop Phenology on Thrips Population Dynamics and Plant Growth Parameters in Upland Cotton
by Raju Sapkota, Megha N. Parajulee and Kenwyn R. Cradock
Agriculture 2024, 14(7), 1128; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071128 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 444
Abstract
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) requires a long growing period for fruit and fiber maturation, making it vulnerable to insect pests, thus affecting the seed cotton yield and fiber quality. Cotton-feeding thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) are one of the major insects impacting cotton yield [...] Read more.
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) requires a long growing period for fruit and fiber maturation, making it vulnerable to insect pests, thus affecting the seed cotton yield and fiber quality. Cotton-feeding thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) are one of the major insects impacting cotton yield throughout the U.S. cotton belt and worldwide. A two-year field research conducted at Texas A&M AgriLife Research farm in west Texas, USA quantified the interactive effect of three cover crops [wheat (Triticum aestivum), rye (Secale cereale), and no cover] and three irrigation regimes [rainfed, deficit irrigation (30%) and full irrigation] on thrips population dynamics across the phenologically susceptible stages of upland cotton and resulting impact on plant growth and yield parameters. Temporal densities of thrips, feeding injury from thrips, cotton growth and reproductive profiles, yield, and fiber quality varied with cover crops and irrigation levels. Thrips densities were conspicuously low due to harsh weather conditions, but the densities decreased with an increase in plant age. Terminated rye and wheat cover versus conventional-tilled, no-cover treatments showed marginal effects on thrips colonization and population dynamics. Similarly, full irrigation treatment supported higher thrips densities compared to rainfed and deficit irrigation treatments. Immature thrips densities increased through the successive sampling periods, indicating increased thrips reproduction following the initial colonization. Thrips feeding injury was significantly greater in no-cover plots in the early seedling stage, but the effect was insignificant across all cover crop treatments in subsequent sampling dates. The results of this study demonstrated increased seedling vigor, plant height, and flower densities in terminated cover crop plots across all irrigation regimes compared to that in no-cover plots. However, the cover crop x irrigation interaction significantly impacted the cotton lint yield, with increased lint yield on cover crop treatments. This study clearly demonstrates the value of cover crops in semi-arid agricultural production systems that are characterized by low rainfall, reduced irrigation capacity, and wind erosion of topsoil. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Protection, Diseases, Pests and Weeds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Temporal change in plant height influenced by irrigation level, cover crop type, and thrips treatment Lubbock, TX, USA, 2022. Values with different lowercase letters within each sampling date are significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temporal change in plant height influenced by irrigation level, cover crop type, and thrips treatment Lubbock, TX, USA, 2023. Values with different lowercase letters within each sampling date are significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>White flowers in cotton were influenced by irrigation level, cover crop type, and thrips treatment in the year 2022. Values with different lowercase letters within each sampling date are significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average seasonal white flower density (total flowers per 1.8 m cotton row) influenced by irrigation level, cover crop type, and thrips augmentation. Bars above the mean values are standard errors. Bars with different letters indicate significant differences between treatments. Lubbock, TX, USA, 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Average daily total flowers per 1.8 m cotton row influenced by irrigation level, cover crop type, and thrips augmentation. Bars above the mean values are standard errors. Values with different letters within each sampling date indicate significant differences between treatments. Lubbock, TX, USA, 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average seasonal white flower density (total flowers per 1.8 m cotton row) influenced by irrigation level, cover crop type, and thrips augmentation. Bars with different letters indicate significant differences between treatments. Lubbock, TX, USA, 2023. Values with different lowercase letters within each main treatment are significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Average (±SEM) lint yield influenced by irrigation level, cover crop, and thrips augmentation, Lubbock, TX, USA, 2022. Values with different lowercase letters within each main treatment are significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Average (±SEM) lint yield influenced by irrigation level, cover crop, and thrips augmentation, Lubbock, TX, USA, 2023. Values with different lowercase letters within each main treatment are significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.1).</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1879 KiB  
Article
Inconsistent Yield Response of Forage Sorghum to Tillage and Row Arrangement
by Christine C. Nieman, Jose G. Franco and Randy L. Raper
Agronomy 2024, 14(7), 1510; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071510 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 331
Abstract
Forage sorghum is an alternative source for biofuel feedstock production and may also provide forage for livestock operations. Introducing biofuel feedstock as a dual-use forage to livestock operations has the potential to increase the adoption of biofuel feedstock production. However, additional technical agronomic [...] Read more.
Forage sorghum is an alternative source for biofuel feedstock production and may also provide forage for livestock operations. Introducing biofuel feedstock as a dual-use forage to livestock operations has the potential to increase the adoption of biofuel feedstock production. However, additional technical agronomic information focusing on tillage, row arrangement, and harvest date for forage sorghum planted into pasturelands intended for dual use is needed. Three tillage treatments, disking and rototilling (RT), chisel plow (CP), and no tillage (NT), and two row arrangement treatments, single-row planting with 76.2 cm rows and twin rows of 17.8 cm on 76.2 cm centers, were tested for effects on forage sorghum yield in a 3-cut system. This study tested two sites in Booneville, AR, from 2010 to 2012. Several interactions with year were detected, likely due to large precipitation differences within and among years. The year greatly affected the yield, with greater (p < 0.05) yields in year 1 compared to years 2 and 3 in both locations. No till resulted in lower yields in some years and harvest dates, though no clear trend was detected among tillage treatments over years. Twin rows generally did not improve yield, except for the third harvest date at one location. No strong trends for tillage or row arrangement effects were observed in this study. Inconsistencies may have resulted from the strong influence of year or interactions of multiple factors, which may challenge producers interested in utilizing forage sorghum for biofuels and livestock feed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Average monthly temperature and (<b>b</b>) total monthly precipitation near Booneville, AR, for 2010, 2011, 2012, and the 30-year average (1990–2020). Weather obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (NOAA; <a href="https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web" target="_blank">https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web</a> accessed on 9 May 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>North Location:</b> (<b>a</b>) Dry matter (DM) yields for forage sorghum planted in twin rows and single rows at harvest date 1 (H1), harvest date 2 (H2), and harvest date 3 (H3) for 2010, 2011, and 2012. Effects of row arrangement × harvest date × year. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 0.53 Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>. (<b>b</b>) Dry matter yields for forage sorghum from H1, H2, and H3 in 2010, 2011, and 2021. Effects of year × harvest date. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 0.54. (<b>c</b>) Dry matter yields for forage sorghum after chisel plow (CP), no-till (NT), or rototilling in 2010, 2011, and 2012. Tillage × year. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 0.63. (<b>d</b>) Total forage sorghum DM yields for CP, NT, and RT for 2010, 2011, and 2012. Tillage × Year <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 1.47. Means without a common letter differ (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>South Location:</b> (<b>a</b>) Dry matter (DM) yields across years for forage sorghum planted in twin-row and single row at harvest date 1 (H1), harvest date 2 (H2), and harvest date 3 (H3). Effects of row arrangement × harvest date. <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.03. SEM = 0.32 Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>. (<b>b</b>) Dry matter yields for forage sorghum after chisel plow (CP), no-till (NT), or rototilling in 2010, 2011, and 2012. Tillage × year. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 0.45. (<b>c</b>) Dry matter yields for forage sorghum planted in twin-row and single row in 2010, 2011, and 2012. Tillage × year. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 0.37. (<b>d</b>) Dry matter yields for forage sorghum from H1, H2, and H3 in 2010, 2011, and 2021. Effects of year × harvest date. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 0.40. Means without a common letter differ (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><b>South Location:</b> (<b>a</b>) Total dry matter (DM) yields for forage sorghum planted after chisel plow (CP), no-till (NT), or rototilling (RT) in 2010, 2011, and 2012. Tillage × year. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 1.35 Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>. (<b>b</b>) Total dry matter (DM) yields for forage sorghum planted in twin-row and single in 2010, 2011, and 2012. Tillage × year. <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SEM = 1.12 Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>. Means without a common letter differ (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop