[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (325)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = lithium-ion battery pack

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 8356 KiB  
Article
Detection of Impedance Inhomogeneity in Lithium-Ion Battery Packs Based on Local Outlier Factor
by Lijun Zhu, Jian Wang, Yutao Wang, Bin Pan and Lujun Wang
Energies 2024, 17(20), 5123; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205123 (registering DOI) - 15 Oct 2024
Viewed by 265
Abstract
The inhomogeneity between cells is the main cause of failure and thermal runaway in Lithium-ion battery packs. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) is a non-destructive testing technique that can map the complex reaction processes inside the battery. It can detect and characterise battery anomalies [...] Read more.
The inhomogeneity between cells is the main cause of failure and thermal runaway in Lithium-ion battery packs. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) is a non-destructive testing technique that can map the complex reaction processes inside the battery. It can detect and characterise battery anomalies and inconsistencies. This study proposes a method for detecting impedance inconsistencies in Lithium-ion batteries. The method involves conducting a battery EIS test and Distribution of Relaxation Times (DRT) analysis to extract characteristic frequency points in the full frequency band. These points are less affected by the State of Charge (SOC) and have a strong correlation with temperature, charge/discharge rate, and cycles. An anomaly detection characteristic impedance frequency of 136.2644 Hz was determined for a cell in a Lithium-ion battery pack. Single-frequency point impedance acquisition solves the problem of lengthy measurements and identification of anomalies throughout the frequency band. The experiment demonstrates a significant reduction in impedance measurement time, from 1.05 h to just 54 s. The LOF was used to identify anomalies in the EIS data at this characteristic frequency. The detection results were consistent with the actual conditions of the battery pack in the laboratory, which verifies the feasibility of this detection method. The LOF algorithm was chosen due to its superior performance in terms of FAR (False Alarm Rate), MAR (Missing Alarm Rate), and its fast anomaly identification time of only 0.1518 ms. The method does not involve complex mathematical models or parameter identification. This helps to achieve efficient anomaly identification and timely warning of single cells in the battery pack. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section D2: Electrochem: Batteries, Fuel Cells, Capacitors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Framework of the methodology employed within this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow and results plots of the pretreatment experiment. (<b>a</b>) The capacity error of 20 cells. (<b>b</b>) EIS plot of 20 cells in 2D view. (<b>c</b>) EIS plot of 20 cells in 3D view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Flow and results plots of the pretreatment experiment. (<b>a</b>) The capacity error of 20 cells. (<b>b</b>) EIS plot of 20 cells in 2D view. (<b>c</b>) EIS plot of 20 cells in 3D view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic representation of the experimental workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of different parsing methods for EIS test data. (<b>a</b>) Nyquist plot of the impedance spectra. (<b>b</b>) ECM of EIS. (<b>c</b>) The DRT result of EIS. The pentagon represents the identified characteristic frequencies. P<sub>1</sub>~P<sub>4</sub> indicate the contact Lithium-ion, growth of SEI, charge transfer, and diffusion processes, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Nyquist plots of the cell at different experiment conditions. (<b>a</b>) Different rate. (<b>b</b>) Different cycles. (<b>c</b>) Different SOC states. (<b>d</b>) Different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>DRT plots of the cell at different experimental conditions. (<b>a</b>) Different temperatures. (<b>b</b>) Different cycles. (<b>c</b>) Different charge/discharge rates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>DRT plots of the cell at different experiment temperatures. (<b>a</b>) −15 °C; (<b>b</b>) −5 °C; (<b>c</b>) 5 °C; (<b>d</b>) 15 °C; (<b>e</b>) 25 °C; (<b>f</b>) 35 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>DRT plots of the cell at different experiment temperatures. (<b>a</b>) −15 °C; (<b>b</b>) −5 °C; (<b>c</b>) 5 °C; (<b>d</b>) 15 °C; (<b>e</b>) 25 °C; (<b>f</b>) 35 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Violin plots of impedance date at F<sub>13</sub>–F<sub>1</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Result of outlier value detection by five algorithms.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 6199 KiB  
Article
In Operando Health Monitoring for Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Propulsion Using Deep Learning
by Jaya Vikeswara Rao Vajja, Alexey Serov, Meghana Sudarshan, Mahavir Singh and Vikas Tomar
Batteries 2024, 10(10), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10100355 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 516
Abstract
Battery management systems (BMSs) play a vital role in understanding battery performance under extreme conditions such as high C-rate testing, where rapid charge or discharge is applied to batteries. This study presents a novel BMS tailored for continuous monitoring, transmission, and storage of [...] Read more.
Battery management systems (BMSs) play a vital role in understanding battery performance under extreme conditions such as high C-rate testing, where rapid charge or discharge is applied to batteries. This study presents a novel BMS tailored for continuous monitoring, transmission, and storage of essential parameters such as voltage, current, and temperature in an NCA 18650 4S lithium-ion battery (LIB) pack during high C-rate testing. By incorporating deep learning, our BMS monitors external battery parameters and predicts LIB’s health in terms of discharge capacity. Two experiments were conducted: a static experiment to validate the functionality of BMS, and an in operando experiment on an electrically propelled vehicle to assess real-world performance under high C-rate abuse testing with vibration. It was found that the external surface temperatures peaked at 55 °C during in operando flight, which was higher than that during static testing. During testing, the deep learning capacity estimation algorithm detected a mean capacity deviation of 0.04 Ah, showing an accurate state of health (SOH) by predicting the capacity of the battery. Our BMS demonstrated effective data collection and predictive capabilities, mirroring real-world conditions during abuse testing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A detailed schematic of the BMS sensor network, illustrating the integration of current, voltage, and temperature sensors with a microcontroller and communication module for real-time monitoring and data transmission.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A drone with the BMS on top stores the voltage, temperature, and current. Current was also used to calculate the SOC of the battery, which helps to predict the discharge capacity by using CD-Net.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Overview of the experimental setup designed in-house: (<b>a</b>) top view of BMS with all the sensors used in these experiments, (<b>b</b>) schematic representation of BMS and quadcopter connectivity with batteries, (<b>c</b>) in operando experimental setup of quadcopter along with batteries and BMS, and (<b>d</b>) 18650 NCA batteries used in batteries where RTD is placed in the middle of the surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A comparison of voltage readings collected from both BMS and BAn. (<b>a</b>) Voltage data for 42 cycles, highlighting the deviations between 0.2 V and 0.4 V. This indicates a close match between the BMS and BAn data. (<b>b</b>) The first cycle data, illustrating the discharging and charging profiles. Random deviations in voltage are shown compared to the BAn readings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Current data comparison between BAn and BMS across multiple cycles; (<b>a</b>) current data over 42 cycles for both BAn and BMS, showing consistent overall trends; (<b>b</b>) deviations between BAn and BMS, ranging from −3 A to +3 A, mainly during phase transitions from constant current to constant voltage or rest; (<b>c</b>) initial cycle comparison, showing a close match between BAn and BMS; (<b>d</b>) deviations during the initial cycle, with the highest deviations occurring during phase shifts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Current data comparison between BAn and BMS across multiple cycles; (<b>a</b>) current data over 42 cycles for both BAn and BMS, showing consistent overall trends; (<b>b</b>) deviations between BAn and BMS, ranging from −3 A to +3 A, mainly during phase transitions from constant current to constant voltage or rest; (<b>c</b>) initial cycle comparison, showing a close match between BAn and BMS; (<b>d</b>) deviations during the initial cycle, with the highest deviations occurring during phase shifts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Surface temperature data for a 4-cell NCA battery pack, with ambient temperature (TA) logged by BMS. (<b>a</b>) Data of 42 cycles performed on the ground. A repeated pattern is observed, with T4 reaching the highest temperature of 38 °C. (<b>b</b>) The third complete cycle performed on the ground. Temperature peaks are observed at the end of the constant current phases for both charging and discharging.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Current and voltage data collected by BMS during random flight patterns of the drone. (<b>a</b>) The current and voltage over 20 cycles performed by the drone. The battery pack provides variable discharge current necessary for flight. (<b>b</b>) One discharge cycle during flight (the first of 20 cycles). During this cycle, the current discharges at higher C-rates in real-time, while the voltage drops from 16.8 V to 10 V. Note that each discharge cycle lasts less than an hour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Surface temperature data collected by BMS during random flight patterns of the drone, incorporating ambient temperature (TA) using a 4-cell LIB pack. (<b>a</b>) A consistent pattern across 20 cycles performed by the drone. TA dips during flight, and each cell exhibits varying temperatures. (<b>b</b>) One discharge cycle while flying. It shows an increase in temperature over time, with the discharge cycle lasting less than an hour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Surface temperature data collected by BMS during random flight patterns of the drone, incorporating ambient temperature (TA) using a 4-cell LIB pack. (<b>a</b>) A consistent pattern across 20 cycles performed by the drone. TA dips during flight, and each cell exhibits varying temperatures. (<b>b</b>) One discharge cycle while flying. It shows an increase in temperature over time, with the discharge cycle lasting less than an hour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Capacity predictions made by the CD-Net model using data collected from BMS. (<b>a</b>) Predictions based on on-ground experiments. The model demonstrates accurate capacity predictions over multiple cycles. (<b>b</b>) Predictions while flying on a drone. Capacity becomes unstable after 4 cycles, yet the model still provides improved predictions compared to previous methods.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 3414 KiB  
Review
A Review of Parameter Identification and State of Power Estimation Methods for Lithium-Ion Batteries
by Changlong Ma, Chao Wu, Luoya Wang, Xueyang Chen, Lili Liu, Yuping Wu and Jilei Ye
Processes 2024, 12(10), 2166; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102166 - 4 Oct 2024
Viewed by 646
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries are widely applied in the form of new energy electric vehicles and large-scale battery energy storage systems to improve the cleanliness and greenness of energy supply systems. Accurately estimating the state of power (SOP) of lithium-ion batteries ensures long-term, efficient, safe [...] Read more.
Lithium-ion batteries are widely applied in the form of new energy electric vehicles and large-scale battery energy storage systems to improve the cleanliness and greenness of energy supply systems. Accurately estimating the state of power (SOP) of lithium-ion batteries ensures long-term, efficient, safe and reliable battery operation. Considering the influence of the parameter identification accuracy on the results of state of power estimation, this paper presents a systematic review of model parameter identification and state of power estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries. The parameter identification methods include the voltage response curve analysis method, the least squares method and so on. On this basis, the methods used for modeling and estimating the SOP of battery cells and battery packs are classified and elaborated, focusing on summarizing the research progress observed regarding the joint estimation method for multiple states of battery cells. In conclusion, future methods for estimating the SOP of lithium-ion batteries and their improvement targets are envisioned based on the application requirements for the safe management of lithium-ion batteries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Battery Energy Storage in Renewable Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Classification of SOP estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Voltage/current response curve: (<b>a</b>) current response curve; (<b>b</b>) voltage response curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>1-RC equivalent circuit model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Battery cell models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic representation of the principles of different machine learning methods: (<b>a</b>) BP neural network; (<b>b</b>) ANFIS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Joint SOC and SOP estimation framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Interrelationship between SOH, SOC and SOP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Battery pack SOP estimation methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Battery pack inconsistency schematic: (<b>a</b>) Maximum discharge capacity; (<b>b</b>) Maximum charge capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic representation of the three types of inconsistency.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 4561 KiB  
Article
Optimizing EV Powertrain Performance and Sustainability through Constraint Prioritization in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Semi-Active Bidirectional DC-DC Converter with HESS
by P. S. Praveena Krishna, Jayalakshmi N. Sabhahit, Vidya S. Rao, Amit Saraswat, Hannah Chaplin Laugaland and Pramod Bhat Nempu
Sustainability 2024, 16(18), 8123; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188123 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 676
Abstract
The global transportation sector is rapidly shifting towards electrification, aiming to create more sustainable environments. As a result, there is a significant focus on optimizing performance and increasing the lifespan of batteries in electric vehicles (EVs). To achieve this, the battery pack must [...] Read more.
The global transportation sector is rapidly shifting towards electrification, aiming to create more sustainable environments. As a result, there is a significant focus on optimizing performance and increasing the lifespan of batteries in electric vehicles (EVs). To achieve this, the battery pack must operate with constant current charging and discharging modes of operation. Further, in an EV powertrain, maintaining a constant DC link voltage at the input stage of the inverter is crucial for driving the motor load. To satisfy these two conditions simultaneously during the energy transfer, a hybrid energy storage system (HESS) consisting of a lithium–ion battery and a supercapacitor (SC) connected to the semi-active topology of the bidirectional DC–DC converter (SAT-BDC) in this research work. However, generating the duty cycle for the switches to regulate the operation of SAT-BDC is complex due to the simultaneous interaction of the two mentioned constraints: regulating the DC link voltage by tracking the reference and maintaining the battery current at a constant value. Therefore, this research aims to efficiently resolve the issue by incorporating a highly flexible nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) to control the switches of SAT-BDC. Furthermore, the converter system design is tested for operational performance using MATLAB 2022B with the battery current and the DC link voltage with different priorities. In the NMPC approach, these constraints are carefully evaluated with varying prioritizations, representing a crucial trade-off in optimizing EV powertrain operation. The results demonstrate that battery current prioritization yields better performance than DC link voltage prioritization, extending the lifespan and efficiency of batteries. Thus, this research work further aligns with the conceptual realization of the sustainability goals by minimizing the environmental impact associated with battery production and disposal. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Ragone plot to demonstrate the importance of lithium–ion battery/SC HESS. Red dashed box shows that it is the HESS which is selected for the research work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The different battery/SC configuration approaches for EV powertrain (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Electrical equivalent cell model of lithium–ion battery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Structure; (<b>b</b>) Electrical equivalent of the model of the supercapacitor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Generated variable current sequence at the DC link.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Semi-active topology of bidirectional DC–DC converter for HESS operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic representation of the proposed system configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Optimal open-loop solution with initial conditions A, B, and C, and corresponding waveforms (<b>a</b>) current waveforms; (<b>b</b>) output DC-link voltage waveforms; (<b>c</b>) duty cycle; and (<b>d</b>) Epsilon, the slack variable.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Optimal closed-loop operation with the lithium–ion battery without supercapacitor integration: (<b>a</b>) Current waveforms and (<b>b</b>) output DC-link voltage waveforms; (<b>c</b>) duty cycle of SAT-BDC switches; and (<b>d</b>) Epsilon, the slack variable.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Closed-loop operation of SAT-BDC with HESS with the integration of supercapacitor: (<b>a)</b> Current waveforms obtained; (<b>b</b>) DC-link voltage waveform; (<b>c</b>) obtained duty cycle of the SAT-BDC switches; and (<b>d</b>) Slack variable and its variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Closed-loop operation of SAT-BDC with HESS using voltage prioritization throughout the time horizon: (<b>a</b>) Inductor current and variable output current waveforms; (<b>b</b>) DC-link voltage waveform tracking reference; (<b>c</b>) duty cycle for SAT-BDC switch control; (<b>d</b>) Slack variable and its variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Closed-loop operation of SAT-BDC with HESS using current prioritization: (<b>a</b>) Inductor current and variable output current waveforms; (<b>b</b>) DC-link voltage waveform tracking reference; (<b>c</b>) duty cycle for SAT-BDC switch control; (<b>d</b>) Slack variable and its variation.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 1436 KiB  
Article
Extending the BESS Lifetime: A Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Q Network Framework for a Parallel-Series Connected Battery Pack
by Nhat Quang Doan, Syed Maaz Shahid, Tho Minh Duong, Sung-Jin Choi and Sungoh Kwon
Energies 2024, 17(18), 4604; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184604 - 13 Sep 2024
Viewed by 595
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a battery management algorithm to maximize the lifetime of a parallel-series connected battery pack with heterogeneous states of health in a battery energy storage system. The growth of retired lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles increases the applications for [...] Read more.
In this paper, we propose a battery management algorithm to maximize the lifetime of a parallel-series connected battery pack with heterogeneous states of health in a battery energy storage system. The growth of retired lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles increases the applications for battery energy storage systems, which typically group multiple individual batteries with heterogeneous states of health in parallel and series to achieve the required voltage and capacity. However, previous work has primarily focused on either parallel or series connections of batteries due to the complexity of managing diverse battery states, such as state of charge and state of health. To address the scheduling in parallel-series connections, we propose a cooperative multi-agent deep Q network framework that leverages multi-agent deep reinforcement learning to observe multiple states within the battery energy storage system and optimize the scheduling of cells and modules in a parallel-series connected battery pack. Our approach not only balances the states of health across the cells and modules but also enhances the overall lifetime of the battery pack. Through simulation, we demonstrate that our algorithm extends the battery pack’s lifetime by up to 16.27% compared to previous work and exhibits robustness in adapting to various power demand conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section D2: Electrochem: Batteries, Fuel Cells, Capacitors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Full life cycle of lithium-ion batteries.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Connections in a battery pack: (<b>a</b>) series-parallel (S-P), and (<b>b</b>) parallel-series (P-S).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An example of a parallel-series connected BESS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Battery cell model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The training process in the cooperative multi-agent deep Q network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SOH balancing with different methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Extending lifetime of the battery pack with (<b>a</b>) SOH reduction per time slot, and (<b>b</b>) maximum lifetime of the battery pack until reaching 60% of SOH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Standard deviation of SOCs among modules.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Energy demand profiles with (<b>a</b>) Scenario 1, and (<b>b</b>) Scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Performance of the scheduling algorithms under dynamic power demand in Scenario 1: (<b>a</b>) standard deviations in SOHs among the modules and (<b>b</b>) operation times of the battery pack until the SOH reached 60%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Performance of the scheduling algorithms under dynamic power demand in Scenario 2: (<b>a</b>) standard deviation in SOHs among the modules and (<b>b</b>) operation time of the battery pack until the SOH reached 60%.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 16650 KiB  
Article
Hierarchical Structure-Based Wireless Active Balancing System for Power Batteries
by Jia Xie, Huipin Lin, Jifeng Qu, Luhong Shi, Zuhong Chen, Sheng Chen and Yong Zheng
Energies 2024, 17(18), 4602; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184602 - 13 Sep 2024
Viewed by 483
Abstract
This paper conducts an in-depth study of a wireless, hierarchical structure-based active balancing system for power batteries, aimed at addressing the rapid advancements in battery technology within the electric vehicle industry. The system is designed to enhance energy density and the reliability of [...] Read more.
This paper conducts an in-depth study of a wireless, hierarchical structure-based active balancing system for power batteries, aimed at addressing the rapid advancements in battery technology within the electric vehicle industry. The system is designed to enhance energy density and the reliability of the battery system, developing a balancing system capable of managing cells with significant disparities in characteristics, which is crucial for extending the lifespan of lithium-ion battery packs. The proposed system integrates wireless self-networking technology into the battery management system and adopts a more efficient active balancing approach, replacing traditional passive energy-consuming methods. In its design, inter-group balancing at the upper layer is achieved through a soft-switching LLC resonant converter, while intra-group balancing among individual cells at the lower layer is managed by an active balancing control IC and a bidirectional buck–boost converter. This configuration not only ensures precise control but also significantly enhances the speed and efficiency of balancing, effectively addressing the heat issues caused by energy dissipation. Key technologies involved include lithium-ion batteries, battery management systems, battery balancing systems, LLC resonant converters, and wireless self-networking technology. Tests have shown that this system not only reduces energy consumption but also significantly improves energy transfer efficiency and the overall balance of the battery pack, thereby extending battery life and optimizing vehicle performance, ensuring a safer and more reliable operation of electric vehicle battery systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Switching waveforms of ZVS and ZCS in resonant converters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Full-bridge structure (<b>a</b>) vs. half-bridge structure (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Full-bridge rectification (<b>a</b>) vs. full-wave rectification structure (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Top-level LLC equalization structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Full-bridge LLC converter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Initial resonant current in the resonant tank.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Three operating states of the converters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Timing diagram for key mode analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic diagram of mode 1 current transformer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic diagram of mode 2 current transformer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Schematic diagram of mode 3 current transformer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Flowchart of LLC parameter design process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>State transition diagram of the LLC equalizer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Interrupt execution flow. (<b>a</b>) 20 μs interrupt execution flow. (<b>b</b>) 5 ms interrupt execution flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Hierarchical equalization system scheduling flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Star network topology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Mesh network topology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Top-level central wireless node operational flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Physical circuit image of LLC equalization converter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>LLC equalization digital control board.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Actual resonant frequency in quasi-resonant state testing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Key waveforms at 10% load. (<b>a</b>) Resonant tank waveform. (<b>b</b>) Secondary-side diode waveforms. (<b>c</b>) Gate drive and drain–source waveforms of switch S₂. (<b>d</b>) Gate drive and drain–source waveforms of switch S₄.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22 Cont.
<p>Key waveforms at 10% load. (<b>a</b>) Resonant tank waveform. (<b>b</b>) Secondary-side diode waveforms. (<b>c</b>) Gate drive and drain–source waveforms of switch S₂. (<b>d</b>) Gate drive and drain–source waveforms of switch S₄.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Key waveforms at 50% load. (<b>a</b>) Resonant tank waveform. (<b>b</b>) Diode waveforms. (<b>c</b>) Gate drive and drain–source waveforms of switch S₂. (<b>d</b>) Gate drive and drain–source waveforms of switch S₄.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Key waveforms at 100% load. (<b>a</b>) Resonant tank waveform. (<b>b</b>) Diode waveforms. (<b>c</b>) Gate drive and drain–source waveforms of switch S₂. (<b>d</b>) Gate drive and drain–source waveforms of switch S₄.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Efficiency curve of the converter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>State of charge (SOC) variation in static equalization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>State of charge (SOC) variation process in charging equalization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Physical image of intra-module ETA3000 equalization interposer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Schematic diagram of equalization interposer insertion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Curve of intra-module static equalization at lower level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>Curve of intra-module charging equalization at lower level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 32
<p>Charging equalization current curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 33
<p>Balancing efficiency comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 34
<p>Energy consumption comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 35
<p>Cooling power requirement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 36
<p>System reliability comparison.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 6201 KiB  
Article
Heat Transfer Modeling and Optimal Thermal Management of Electric Vehicle Battery Systems
by Ahmed Mahmood, Timothy Cockerill, Greg de Boer, Jochen Voss and Harvey Thompson
Energies 2024, 17(18), 4575; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184575 - 12 Sep 2024
Viewed by 987
Abstract
Lithium ion (Li-ion) battery packs have become the most popular option for powering electric vehicles (EVs). However, they have certain drawbacks, such as high temperatures and potential safety concerns as a result of chemical reactions that occur during their charging and discharging processes. [...] Read more.
Lithium ion (Li-ion) battery packs have become the most popular option for powering electric vehicles (EVs). However, they have certain drawbacks, such as high temperatures and potential safety concerns as a result of chemical reactions that occur during their charging and discharging processes. These can cause thermal runaway and sudden deterioration, and therefore, efficient thermal management systems are essential to boost battery life span and overall performance. An electrochemical-thermal (ECT) model for Li-ion batteries and a conjugate heat transfer model for three-dimensional (3D) fluid flow and heat transfer are developed using COMSOL Multiphysics®. These are used within a novel computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-enabled multi-objective optimization approach, which is used to explore the effect of the mini-channel cold plates’ geometrical parameters on key performance metrics (battery maximum temperature (Tmax), pressure drop (P), and temperature standard deviation (Tσ)). The performance of two machine learning (ML) surrogate methods, radial basis functions (RBFs) and Gaussian process (GP), is compared. The results indicate that the GP ML approach is the most effective. Global minima for the maximum temperature, temperature standard deviation, and pressure drop (Tmax, Tσ, and P, respectively) are identified using single objective optimization. The third version of the generalized differential evaluation (GDE3) algorithm is then used along with the GP surrogate models to perform multi-objective design optimization (MODO). Pareto fronts are generated to demonstrate the potential trade-offs between Tmax, Tσ, and P. The obtained optimization results show that the maximum temperature dropped from 36.38 to 35.98 °C, the pressure drop dramatically decreased from 782.82 to 487.16 Pa, and the temperature standard deviation decreased from 2.14 to 2.12 K; the corresponding optimum design parameters are the channel width of 8 mm and the horizontal spacing near the cold plate margin of 5 mm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for Heat Transfer Modeling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic diagram of a single unit cell (units: mm); (<b>b</b>) the unit cell cross-sectional view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The proposed schematics of the BTMS: (<b>a</b>) internal configuration of the battery module; (<b>b</b>) half of the domain of a single minichannel cold plate (units: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematics of the BTMS based on case 1 of Liu et al.’s [<a href="#B64-energies-17-04575" class="html-bibr">64</a>] work using the polynomial heat generation method: (<b>a</b>) battery module; (<b>b</b>) bottom view; (<b>c</b>) half of the domain of a single battery unit and a serpentine minichannel cold plate (units: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the numerical results obtained for the maximum battery temperature with Liu et al. [<a href="#B64-energies-17-04575" class="html-bibr">64</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of discharge voltage profiles between the present observations and the experimental and numerical observations of Mevawalla et al. [<a href="#B43-energies-17-04575" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of average battery surface temperature between the present observations and the experimental and numerical observations of Mevawalla et al. [<a href="#B43-energies-17-04575" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The MSE tuning curves for the β hyper parameter: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) ∆<span class="html-italic">P</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Surrogate models of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, using the two ML approaches.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Pareto curve of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">v</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mo> </mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, obtained using the GP ML approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Pareto curve of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">v</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mo> </mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, obtained using the GP ML approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Pareto curve of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">v</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> <mo>.</mo> <mo> </mo> <mo>∆</mo> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, obtained using the GP ML approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>3D Pareto-optimal surface to analyze trade-offs between <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 10082 KiB  
Article
Numerical Investigation of the Thermal Performance of Air-Cooling System for a Lithium-Ion Battery Module Combined with Epoxy Resin Boards
by Da Lin, Peng Peng, Yiwei Wang, Yishu Qiu, Wanyi Wu and Fangming Jiang
Batteries 2024, 10(9), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10090318 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 674
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have the lead as the most used power source for electric vehicles and grid storage systems, and a battery thermal management system (BTMS) can ensure the efficient and safe operation of lithium-ion batteries. Epoxy resin board (ERB) offers a wide [...] Read more.
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have the lead as the most used power source for electric vehicles and grid storage systems, and a battery thermal management system (BTMS) can ensure the efficient and safe operation of lithium-ion batteries. Epoxy resin board (ERB) offers a wide range of applications in LIBs due to its significant advantages such as high dielectric strength, electrical insulation, good mechanical strength, and stiffness. This study proposes an air-cooled battery module comprised of sixteen prismatic batteries incorporating an ERB layer between the batteries. To compare the performance of the ERB-based air-cooling system, two other air-cooling structures are also assessed in this study. Three-dimensional numerical models for the three cases are established in this paper, and the heat dissipation processes of the battery module under varying discharge rates (1C, 2C, and 5C) are simulated and analyzed to comprehensively evaluate the performance of the different cooling systems. Comparative simulations reveal that incorporating ERB into the battery assembly significantly reduces battery surface temperatures and promotes temperature uniformity across individual batteries and the entire pack at various discharge rates. Notably, under 5C discharge conditions, the ERB-based thermal management system achieves a maximum battery surface temperature increase of 16 °C and a maximum temperature difference of 8 °C between batteries. Additionally, this paper also analyzes the impact of battery arrangement on air-cooling system performance. Therefore, further optimization of the structural design or the integration of supplementary cooling media might be necessary for such demanding conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of (<b>a</b>) battery (<b>b</b>)ERB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram of the air-cooling battery module. (<b>a</b>) air/ERB module (Case 1), (<b>b</b>) air module with spacing between batteries (Case 2), (<b>c</b>) air module without spacing between batteries (Case 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Diagram of the air-cooling battery module. (<b>a</b>) air/ERB module (Case 1), (<b>b</b>) air module with spacing between batteries (Case 2), (<b>c</b>) air module without spacing between batteries (Case 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Characterization of flow field distributions in the three cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Characterization of flow field distributions in the three cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Characterization of temperature field distributions at different discharge rates for the three cases studied: (<b>a</b>) Case 1, (<b>b</b>) Case 2, and (<b>c</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Average surface temperature evolution of 16 individual batteries for the three cases studied: (<b>a</b>) Case 1, (<b>b</b>) Case 2, and (<b>c</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the surface maximum temperature difference of 16 single batteries for the three cases studied: (<b>a</b>) Case 1, (<b>b</b>) Case 2, and (<b>c</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Comparison of the surface maximum temperature difference of 16 single batteries for the three cases studied: (<b>a</b>) Case 1, (<b>b</b>) Case 2, and (<b>c</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Temperature characterization of batteries module for the three cases studied: (<b>a</b>) Case 1, (<b>b</b>) Case 2, and (<b>c</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagram of the air-cooling battery module (Case 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Characterization of flow field and temperature field distributions for Case 4: (<b>a</b>) Flow field, (<b>b</b>) Temperature field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Characterization of flow field and temperature field distributions for Case 4: (<b>a</b>) Flow field, (<b>b</b>) Temperature field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Characterization of temperature for Case 4: (<b>a</b>) Average surface temperature evolution of 16 individual batteries, (<b>b</b>) Surface maximum temperature difference of 16 single batteries, and (<b>c</b>) Temperature characterization of battery module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Characterization of temperature for Case 4: (<b>a</b>) Average surface temperature evolution of 16 individual batteries, (<b>b</b>) Surface maximum temperature difference of 16 single batteries, and (<b>c</b>) Temperature characterization of battery module.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 5023 KiB  
Article
Carbon Nanotube–Carbon Nanocoil Hybrid Film Decorated by Amorphous Silicon as Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries
by Huan Chen, Chen Wang, Zeng Fan, Chuanhui Cheng, Liang Hao and Lujun Pan
J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8(9), 350; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090350 - 6 Sep 2024
Viewed by 506
Abstract
Silicon (Si) as the anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has attracted much attention due to its high theoretical specific capacity (4200 mAh/g). However, the specific capacity and cycle stability of the LIBs are reduced due to the pulverization caused by the expansion [...] Read more.
Silicon (Si) as the anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has attracted much attention due to its high theoretical specific capacity (4200 mAh/g). However, the specific capacity and cycle stability of the LIBs are reduced due to the pulverization caused by the expansion of Si coated on Cu (copper) foil during cycles. In order to solve this problem, researchers have used an ultra-thin Si deposition layer as the electrode, which improves cyclic stability and obtains high initial coulomb efficiency of LIBs. However, suitable substrate selection is crucial to fabricate an ultrathin Si deposition layer electrode with excellent performance, and a substrate with a three-dimensional porous structure is desirable to ensure the deposition of an ultrathin Si layer on the whole surface of the substrate. In this paper, the Si thin layer has been deposited on a binder-free hybrid film of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon nanocoils (CNCs) by magnetron sputtering. Compared with densely packed CNT film and flat Cu foil, the loose and porous film provides a large surface area and space for Si deposition, and Si can be deposited not only on the surface but also in the interior part of the film. The film provides a large number of channels for the diffusion and transmission of Li+, resulting in the rapid diffusion rate of Li+, which improves the effective lithium storage utilization of Si. Furthermore, the CNC itself is super elastic, and film provides an elastic skeleton for the Si deposition layer, which eases its volume expansion during charge and discharge processes. Electrochemical tests have showed that the Si/CNT–CNC film electrode has excellent performance as anode for LIBs. After 200 cycles, the Si/CNT–CNC film electrode still had possessed a specific capacity of 2500 mAh/g, a capacity retention of 92.8% and a coulomb efficiency of 99%. This paper provides an effective way to fabricate high performance Si-nanocarbon composite electrodes for LIBs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Hybrid Composites)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The surface morphology of different CCs before and after sputtering and the interfacial morphology and contact between different CCs and Si after sputtering at 75 W. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Si/CNT film-75 W electrode. (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) Si/CNT–CNC film-75 W electrode. (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>) Si/Cu-75 W electrode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The EDS of surface and cross-section of Si/CNT–CNC film and Si/CNT film. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Surface and cross-section distribution of elements in Si/CNT–CNC film. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Surface and cross-section distribution of elements in CNT film.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The electrochemical performance of Si/CNT film, Si/CNT–CNC film and Si/Cu electrodes as anodes. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) CV curves at the first two cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) EIS data fitting and equivalent circuit model building. (<b>b</b>) Calculation results of the Li<sup>+</sup> diffusion coefficient. (<b>c</b>) Cyclic stability of Si/CNT film, Si/CNT–CNC film and Si/Cu electrodes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic illustration of the Li<sup>+</sup> embedded three different electrodes. (<b>a</b>) Si/CNT–CNC film electrode. (<b>b</b>) Si/CNT film electrode. (<b>c</b>) Si/Cu electrode.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 17443 KiB  
Article
Numerical Investigation on the Thermal Performance of a Battery Pack by Adding Ribs in Cooling Channels
by Jiadian Wang, Dongyang Lv, Haonan Sha, Chenguang Lai, Junxiong Zeng, Tieyu Gao, Hao Yang, Hang Wu and Yanjun Jiang
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4451; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174451 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 481
Abstract
The thermal performance of a lithium-ion battery pack for an electric vehicle by adding straight rib turbulators in battery cooling plate channels has been numerically investigated in this paper and the numerical model of the battery pack has been validated by experimental data, [...] Read more.
The thermal performance of a lithium-ion battery pack for an electric vehicle by adding straight rib turbulators in battery cooling plate channels has been numerically investigated in this paper and the numerical model of the battery pack has been validated by experimental data, which exhibits a satisfactory prediction accuracy. The effects of rib shapes, rib angles, rib spacings, and irregular gradient rib arrangement configurations on the flow and heat transfer behaviors of battery pack cooling plates have been thoroughly explored and analyzed in this paper. In addition, the thermal performance of the ribbed battery cooling plates was examined at actual high-speed climbing and low-temperature heating operating conditions. The results indicate that compared to the original smooth cooling plate, the square-ribbed battery cooling plate with a 60° angle and 5 mm spacing reduced the maximum battery temperature by 0.3 °C, but increased the cross-sectional temperature difference by 0.357 °C. To address this issue, a gradient rib arrangement was proposed, which slightly reduced the maximum battery temperature and lowered the cross-sectional temperature difference by 0.445 °C, significantly improving temperature uniformity. The thermal performance of the battery thermal management system with this gradient rib configuration meets the requirements for typical electric vehicle operating conditions, such as high-speed climbing and low-temperature heating conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geometric model of battery module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of (<b>a</b>) straight rib arrangement inside cooling channel, (<b>b</b>) rib shapes, (<b>c</b>) rib angles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Battery characteristics’ curve: (<b>a</b>) open-circuit voltage variation with SOC, (<b>b</b>) internal resistance variation with SOC at different ambient temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The battery pack: (<b>a</b>) overall mesh, (<b>b</b>) local mesh.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Grid independence test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of numeral results with experimental data [<a href="#B39-energies-17-04451" class="html-bibr">39</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Influence of different rib shapes on heat transfer performance: (<b>a</b>) Nusselt number, (<b>b</b>) friction factor, (<b>c</b>) thermal performance factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Temperature contour plots of the mid-section of the battery under different straight rib cross-sectional shapes: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) triangular, (<b>c</b>) semicircular, (<b>d</b>) rectangular.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Temperature contour plots of the battery module under different straight rib cross-sectional shapes: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) triangular, (<b>c</b>) semicircular, (<b>d</b>) rectangular.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Cross-sectional velocity distribution contour plots for different rib shapes: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) triangular, (<b>c</b>) semicircular, (<b>d</b>) rectangular.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Influence of different rib angles on heat transfer performance: (<b>a</b>) Nusselt number, (<b>b</b>) friction factor, and (<b>c</b>) thermal performance factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Temperature contour plots of the battery cross-section at different rib angles: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) θ = 30°, (<b>c</b>) θ = 45°, (<b>d</b>) θ = 60°, (<b>e</b>) θ = 75°, (<b>f</b>) θ = 90°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Temperature contour plots of the battery module at different rib angles: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) θ = 30°, (<b>c</b>) θ = 45°, (<b>d</b>) θ = 60°, (<b>e</b>) θ = 75°, (<b>f</b>) θ = 90°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Cross-sectional velocity distribution contour plots: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) θ = 30°, (<b>c</b>) θ = 45°, (<b>d</b>) θ = 60°, (<b>e</b>) θ = 75°, (<b>f</b>) θ = 90°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Influence of different rib spacings on heat transfer performance: (<b>a</b>) Nusselt number, (<b>b</b>) friction factor, and (<b>c</b>) thermal performance factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Temperature contour plots of the battery cross-section for different rib spacings: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) D = 3 mm, (<b>c</b>) D = 5 mm, (<b>d</b>) D = 10 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Temperature contour plots of the battery module for different rib spacings: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) D = 3 mm, (<b>c</b>) D = 5 mm, (<b>d</b>) D = 10 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Cross-sectional velocity contour plots: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) D = 3 mm, (<b>c</b>) D = 5 mm, (<b>d</b>) D = 10 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Schematic diagram of gradient rib arrangement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Simulation results for different configurations: (<b>a</b>) maximum temperature, (<b>b</b>) temperature difference, (<b>c</b>) pressure drop.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Battery module temperature contour plots: (<b>a</b>) structure a, (<b>b</b>) structure b, (<b>c</b>) structure c.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Cross-sectional temperature contour plots of the battery cell: (<b>a</b>) structure a, (<b>b</b>) structure b, (<b>c</b>) structure c.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Simulation comparison results: (<b>a</b>) maximum temperature of battery module, (<b>b</b>) cross-sectional temperature difference within battery cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Temperature contour plots of the battery module: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) gradient ribbed channel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Cross-sectional temperature contour plots of the battery cell: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) gradient ribbed channel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Temperature difference variation curves over time for the gradient ribbed channel and smooth channel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Temperature contour plots of the battery module: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) improved structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Temperature contour plots of the battery cell cross-section: (<b>a</b>) smooth channel, (<b>b</b>) gradient ribbed channel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>The variation curves of battery temperature difference over time at different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3986 KiB  
Article
An Ionization-Based Aerosol Sensor and Its Performance Study
by Yong Zhang, Chunqi Wang, Liang Xie, Yuqi Peng and Ruizhe Wang
Sensors 2024, 24(17), 5600; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175600 - 29 Aug 2024
Viewed by 374
Abstract
In recent years, with the rapid development of new energy vehicles, the safety issues of lithium-ion batteries have attracted attentions from all sectors of society. Research has found that during the thermal runaway process of lithium-ion batteries, aerosol emissions usually occur earlier than [...] Read more.
In recent years, with the rapid development of new energy vehicles, the safety issues of lithium-ion batteries have attracted attentions from all sectors of society. Research has found that during the thermal runaway process of lithium-ion batteries, aerosol emissions usually occur earlier than other gases. Accurate and timely measurement of these aerosol concentrations can help to warn the power battery pack fires. However, existing aerosol sensors are unable to meet the requirements of real-time monitoring and high precision. This article proposes an ionization mechanism based aerosol sensor that works at principles of field emission, field charging and gas discharge, and investigates its static and dynamic response characteristics. The sensor is manufactured and assembled using Microelectro Mechanical Systems processing technology. The sensor exhibits superior performances in terms of range, sensitivity, nonlinearity, repeatability, response time, and other aspects. The study provides a new solution for current aerosol detection with great potential for application. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The fabrication process of the sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of the aerosol sensor, (<b>a</b>) The four sided micro-column based on three electrode structures and (<b>b</b>) the physical photo of the sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dimension of the electrodes (mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The detection principle of the aerosol sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of the experimental system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Characteristic curves of <span class="html-italic">I</span><sub>c</sub> versus pulse frequency under different duty cycles: (<b>a</b>) 10%; (<b>b</b>) 20%; (<b>c</b>) 30%; (<b>d</b>) 40%; (<b>e</b>) 50%; (<b>f</b>) 60%; (<b>g</b>) 70%; (<b>h</b>) 80%; and (<b>i</b>) 90%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Characteristic curves of Ic vesus duty cycle under 80 kHz condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Response of the sensor to aerosols, (<b>a</b>) Collecting current versus concentration of aerosol and (<b>b</b>) Nonlinear fitting output result of the sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Dynamic response curve of 2.5 μm aerosol: (<b>a</b>) 1000 μg/m<sup>3</sup>; (<b>b</b>) 3000 μg/m<sup>3</sup>; (<b>c</b>) 6000 μg/m<sup>3</sup>.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8904 KiB  
Article
A Y-Type Air-Cooled Battery Thermal Management System with a Short Airflow Path for Temperature Uniformity
by Xiangyang Li, Jing Liu and Xiaomin Li
Batteries 2024, 10(9), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10090302 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 499
Abstract
A Y-type air-cooled structure has been proposed to improve the heat dissipation efficiency and temperature uniformity of battery thermal management systems (BTMSs) by reducing the flow path of air. By combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, the influence of the depths of the [...] Read more.
A Y-type air-cooled structure has been proposed to improve the heat dissipation efficiency and temperature uniformity of battery thermal management systems (BTMSs) by reducing the flow path of air. By combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, the influence of the depths of the distribution and convergence plenums on the airflow velocity through battery cells was analyzed to improve heat dissipation efficiency. Adjusting the width of the first and ninth cooling channels can change the air velocity of these two channels, thereby improving the temperature uniformity of the BTMS. Further discussion was conducted regarding the influences of inlet and outlet depths. When the inlet width and outlet width were 20 mm, the maximum temperature and maximum temperature difference of the Y-type BTMS were 39.84 °C and 0.066 °C at a discharge rate of 2.5 °C, respectively; these temperatures were 1.537 °C (3.68%) and 0.059 °C (47.2%) lower than those of the T-type model. Meanwhile, the energy consumption of the sample also decreased by 13.1%. The results indicate that the heat dissipation performance of the proposed Y-type BTMS was improved, achieving excellent temperature uniformity, and the energy consumption was also reduced. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in the Thermal Safety of Lithium-Ion Batteries)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Structural design of BTMSs. (<b>a</b>) Z-type; (<b>b</b>) U-type; (<b>c</b>) T-type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Three-dimensional model of Y-type air-cooled BTMS and battery cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Half of the 3D mesh model of the battery pack cut in cross-section normal to the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison between the simulation results of a T-type air-cooled BTMS battery pack in this paper and the results given in reference [<a href="#B14-batteries-10-00302" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. Copyright (2024), with permission from Elsevier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Right and top views of a Y-type air-cooled BTMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The impact of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, where <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> are equal and range from 2.5 mm to 20 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>max</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> of the system and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>max</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> at the cross-sectional position of the system in the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The velocity cloud map located in the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis cross-section, where <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> are equal. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.5 mm; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 3 mm; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 5 mm; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 5.5 mm; (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 6 mm; (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 7 mm; (<b>g</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 10 mm; (<b>h</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 20 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>The velocity cloud map located in the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis cross-section, where <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> are equal. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.5 mm; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 3 mm; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 5 mm; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 5.5 mm; (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 6 mm; (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 7 mm; (<b>g</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 10 mm; (<b>h</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 20 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The heat dissipation performance of Y-type BTMS when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> are not equal; the sum of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is set to 11 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The system’s heat dissipation performance when the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> was kept at 8.0 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The air flow velocity in the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis cross-section, where <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is 8.0 mm. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 1.5 mm; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.0 mm; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.5 mm; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 3.0 mm; (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 3.5 mm; (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 4.0 mm; (<b>g</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 4.5 mm; (<b>h</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 5.0 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>The air flow velocity in the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis cross-section, where <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is 8.0 mm. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 1.5 mm; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.0 mm; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.5 mm; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 3.0 mm; (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 3.5 mm; (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 4.0 mm; (<b>g</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 4.5 mm; (<b>h</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 5.0 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The effect of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>max</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>max</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> at the cross-section in the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is 8.0 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The influence of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on the temperature of the battery pack.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The system flow velocity cloud map with changes in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, with the cross-section taken from the middle section of the battery pack in the <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis direction. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 1.7 mm; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 1.9 mm; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.1 mm; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.2 mm; (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.3 mm; (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.5 mm; (<b>g</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.7 mm; (<b>h</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 3.0 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>The system flow velocity cloud map with changes in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, with the cross-section taken from the middle section of the battery pack in the <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis direction. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 1.7 mm; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 1.9 mm; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.1 mm; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.2 mm; (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.3 mm; (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.5 mm; (<b>g</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 2.7 mm; (<b>h</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 3.0 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The maximum flow velocities of cooling channel 1 and all cooling channels when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> change, with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>9</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> ranging from 1.7 mm to 3.0 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The impact of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on system performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The effect of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on system performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> of battery cell 4 at different discharge rates. The ambient temperature is 25 °C.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 22076 KiB  
Article
Thermal–Electrical–Mechanical Coupled Finite Element Models for Battery Electric Vehicle
by Chenxi Ling, Leyu Wang, Cing-Dao Kan and Chi Yang
Machines 2024, 12(9), 596; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines12090596 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 743
Abstract
The safety of lithium-ion batteries is critical to the safety of battery electric vehicles (BEVs). The purpose of this work is to develop a method to predict battery thermal runaway in full electric vehicle crash simulation. The thermal–electrical–mechanical-coupled finite element analysis is used [...] Read more.
The safety of lithium-ion batteries is critical to the safety of battery electric vehicles (BEVs). The purpose of this work is to develop a method to predict battery thermal runaway in full electric vehicle crash simulation. The thermal–electrical–mechanical-coupled finite element analysis is used to model an individual lithium-ion battery cell, a battery module, a battery pack, and a battery electric vehicle with 24 battery modules in a live circuit connection. The lithium-ion battery is modeled using a representative approach, with each internal battery component individually modeled to represent its geometric shape and realistic thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties. A resistance heating solver and Randles circuit model built with a generalized voltage source are used to simulate the electrical behavior of the battery. The thermal simulation of the battery considers the heat capacity and thermal conductivity of different cell components, as well as heat conduction, radiation, and convection at their interfaces. The mechanical property of battery cell and battery module models is validated using spherical punch tests. The electrical property of the battery cell and battery module models is verified against CircuitLab simulation in an external short-circuit test. The simulation results for the battery module’s internal resistance are consistent with both experimental data and literature values. The multi-physics coupling phenomenon is demonstrated with a cylindrical compression simulation on the battery module. The multi-physics BEV model with 24 live battery modules is used to simulate the external short-circuit test and the side pole impact test. The simulation run time is less than 24 h. The results demonstrated the feasibility of using a representative battery model and multi-physics analysis to predict battery thermal runaway in full electric vehicle crash analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vehicle Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Thermal runaway of lithium-ion battery in electric vehicle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Vehicle crash safety FE models developed by the CCSA team [<a href="#B55-machines-12-00596" class="html-bibr">55</a>]. The models with * were created by others and improved by CCSA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Multi-physics FE models (indicated by squares) and simulation cases (indicated by rounded squares) developed in this work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representative finite element model of Leaf battery cell (<b>top left</b>); representative separator is modeled with “Wrinkles” (<b>top right</b>). Model detail and place to define electric potential difference (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Electric current at ampere meter “AM1” between LS-DYNA (solid line) and CircuitLab (dash line) (<b>left</b>). Randles circuit model in CircuitLab in external short circuit (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Nissan Leaf cell spherical punch test [<a href="#B61-machines-12-00596" class="html-bibr">61</a>] vs. simulation result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sample thermal–mechanical contact card for heat transfer in air. Kair = 0.024 W/m as shown in the red box. This card is used to define thermal contact outside the battery cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sample thermal–mechanical contact card for heat transfer in water. Kwater = 0.58 W/m as shown in the red box. This card is used to define thermal contact within the battery cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>A thermal–mechanical–electrical-coupled representative FE model for Nissan Leaf module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Two different battery cells connected in serial. CircuitLab simulation diagram (<b>top</b>); time history of current at meter “AM1” of LS-DYNA and CircuitLab (<b>bottom left</b>); LS-DYNA simulation current density contour (<b>bottom right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Two different battery cells in parallel. Current density (<b>top left</b>); CircuitLab simulation diagram (<b>top right</b>); current at the “AM1” between LS-DYNA and CircuitLab (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Randles circuit in CircuitLab (<b>top</b>) and electrical calibration (<b>bottom</b>). External short is formed at 5 × 10<sup>−4</sup> s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Battery module current density distribution (<b>left</b>) and temperature distribution of the cathode layer in external short-circuit test (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Experiment setup [<a href="#B26-machines-12-00596" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B61-machines-12-00596" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B68-machines-12-00596" class="html-bibr">68</a>] (<b>top left</b>), simulation model (<b>top middle</b>), and force vs. displacement (<b>bottom</b>) in spherical indentation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Temperature contour of battery module simulation: anode aluminum current collector sheet (<b>A</b>), anode graphite coating (<b>B</b>), separator (<b>C</b>), cathode lithium material coating (<b>D</b>). Cathode copper current collector sheet (<b>E</b>). Plastic cell wrapper (<b>F</b>). Soft cushion (<b>G</b>). Module case cover (<b>H</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Temperature rise caused by side pole impact on a battery module with 4 cells. Exterior temperature (<b>left</b>). Interior in critical area (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Battery module coarse model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Temperature in the side pole impact (<b>top</b>). Joule heating power in the side pole impact (<b>top right</b>). Joule heating power in impact area (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>EV top view (<b>upper left</b>); front view (<b>upper right</b>); battery pack location (<b>lower left</b>); EV ISO view (<b>lower right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>EV battery pack electric potential (<b>left</b>); current density of battery pack (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>The temperature contour (bottom) for a normal discharging battery pack in EV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Voltage (<b>top left</b>), current density (<b>top right</b>), and temperature (<b>bottom</b>) of battery pack in external short.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Maximum temperature for different parts of battery cell in external short circuit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>A generic EV model (<b>left</b>) with 24 active cells (<b>right</b>) in a fully coupled electric–thermal–mechanical.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Bottom view of EV pole impact at 20 mph: deformation at t = 0.05 s (<b>top left</b>). Deformation at t = 0.12 s (<b>top right</b>). Cathode layers temperature in Kelvin at t = 0.05 s (<b>bottom left</b>). Cathode layers temperature in Kelvin at t = 0.12 s (<b>bottom right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Maximum temperature (<b>top</b>) and maximum plastic strain (<b>bottom</b>) at the cathode layer of EV cells in pole impact simulation. Dashed line represents the cell far away from the impact area. Solid line represents the cell close to the impact area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Temperature distribution at maximum intrusion moment in pole impact at 25 mph impact speed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Maximum temperature (<b>top</b>) and maximum plastic strain (<b>bottom</b>) at the cathode layer of EV cells under pole impact. Dashed line represents the cell far away from the impact area. Solid line represents the cell close to the impact area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Plastic strain at the cathode layer indicates permanent damage to the cell: pole impact speed at 20 mph (<b>left</b>). Pole impact speed at 25 mph (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Plastic strain contour of cell porch bag at impact speed: 20 mph (<b>left</b>); 25 mph (<b>middle</b>); 30 mph (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>Maximum plastic strain of cell porch bag at impact speed: 20 mph (gray); 25 mph (orange); 30 mph (blue).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 6063 KiB  
Article
Anomaly Detection for Charging Voltage Profiles in Battery Cells in an Energy Storage Station Based on Robust Principal Component Analysis
by Jiaqi Yu, Yanjie Guo and Wenjie Zhang
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(17), 7552; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177552 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 615
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries, with their high energy density, long cycle life, and non-polluting advantages, are widely used in energy storage stations. Connecting lithium batteries in series to form a battery pack can achieve the required capacity and voltage. However, as the batteries are used [...] Read more.
Lithium-ion batteries, with their high energy density, long cycle life, and non-polluting advantages, are widely used in energy storage stations. Connecting lithium batteries in series to form a battery pack can achieve the required capacity and voltage. However, as the batteries are used for extended periods, some individual cells in the battery pack may experience abnormal failures, affecting the performance and safety of the battery pack. At the same time, as batteries operate in complex environments, the data collected by sensors are susceptible to random noise and drift interference, which can affect the accuracy of anomaly detection in individual battery cells. In order to solve this problem, this article proposes an anomaly detection method for battery cells based on Robust Principal Component Analysis (RPCA), taking the historical operation and maintenance data of a large-scale battery pack from an energy storage station as the research subject. Firstly, theRPCA is used to denoise the observed voltage data of the battery cells to an extreme degree, obtaining a baseline charging state curve for a cell consistency assessment. This also solves the problem of sensor outputs being affected by random noise. To further detect and identify abnormal battery cells, the RPCA is used to extract outlier components. Based on the Average Deviation-3σ principle and by utilizing Gaussian distribution probability characteristics, battery cells are conducted to screen, and the serial numbers of the anomaly cells are obtained. Finally, the effectiveness and accuracy of this anomaly detection method for battery cells are compared and verified through different statistical distributions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The collection process of the voltages and currents of battery cells in an energy storage station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>June 30. (<b>a</b>) The voltage of the battery pack. (<b>b</b>) The current of the battery pack.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Charging curves of 238 series-connected battery cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Process of anomaly detection for battery cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The observed data matrix <b><span class="html-italic">D</span></b> is decomposed through RPCA. The non-zero elements (red squares) represent noise or outliers in different groups of data (orange, blue and green squares), while the zero values (white squares) indicate parts of the data that are unaffected by noise or outliers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Charging curves of battery cells after extreme denoising.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The charging curves of battery cells composed of outliers and a small amount of noise.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Anomaly detection results of battery cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>July 1. (<b>a</b>) The voltage of the battery cells. (<b>b</b>) Step 1. (<b>c</b>) Step 2. (<b>d</b>) Step 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>June 30. (<b>a</b>) The distribution of average deviation. (<b>b</b>) The distribution of variance. (<b>c</b>) The distribution of range. (<b>d</b>) The distribution of Euclidean distance. (<b>e</b>) The distribution of signal energy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>June 30. (<b>a</b>) The distribution of average deviation. (<b>b</b>) The distribution of variance. (<b>c</b>) The distribution of range. (<b>d</b>) The distribution of Euclidean distance. (<b>e</b>) The distribution of signal energy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The “barrel effect” of series-connected lithium-ion battery packs.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 9440 KiB  
Article
Investigation on Thermal Runaway Hazards of Cylindrical and Pouch Lithium-Ion Batteries under Low Pressure of Cruise Altitude for Civil Aircraft
by Qiang Sun, Hangxin Liu, Zhi Wang, Yawei Meng, Chun Xu, Yanxing Wen and Qiyao Wu
Batteries 2024, 10(9), 298; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10090298 - 24 Aug 2024
Viewed by 659
Abstract
Thermal runaway characteristics and hazards of lithium-ion batteries under low ambient pressure in-flight conditions are studied in a dynamic pressure chamber. The influence of ambient pressures (95 kPa and 20 kPa) and packaging forms (cylindrical and pouch commercial batteries) were especially investigated. The [...] Read more.
Thermal runaway characteristics and hazards of lithium-ion batteries under low ambient pressure in-flight conditions are studied in a dynamic pressure chamber. The influence of ambient pressures (95 kPa and 20 kPa) and packaging forms (cylindrical and pouch commercial batteries) were especially investigated. The results show that the values of heat release, temperature, and CO2 concentration decrease with the reduction in pressure from 95 kPa to 20 kPa, while the total hydrocarbon and CO  increase. Without violent fire, explosion, and huge jet flames, the thermal hazards of TR fire under 20 kPa are lower, but the amount of toxic/flammable gas emissions increases greatly. The amount of CO and hydrocarbons varies inversely with the thermal hazards of fire. Under low-pressure environments of cruise altitude, the thermal hazards of TR fire for pouch cells and the toxic/potentially explosive hazards of gas emissions of cylindrical cells need more attention. The performance of TR hazards for two packaging types of battery is also different. Pouch cells have higher thermal hazards of fire and lower combustible/toxic emitted gases than cylindrical cells. The thermal runaway intensity of individual cells decreases under lower ambient pressure, but the burning intensity increases dramatically when thermal runaway occurs in a battery pack. The open time of a safety valve (rupture of the bag) is shortened, but the trigger time for a thermal runaway varies for different formats of batteries under 20 kPa. Those results may be helpful for the safety warning and hazard protection design of Li batteries under low-pressure conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Lithium-Ion Battery Safety and Fire)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Lithium-ion battery safety incidents in the global aviation sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fresh battery sample diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagrammatic diagram of experimental platform and setup: (<b>a</b>) experimental platform, (<b>b</b>) experimental setup in dynamic cabin, and (<b>c</b>) dynamic pressure cabin and test systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Thermal runaway phenomenon of cylindrical LIBs under 95 kPa and 20 kPa, (<b>b</b>) Schematic diagram of Thermal runaway processes of cylindrical LIBs under 95 kPa and 20 kPa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Typical phenomena of LIBs after thermal runaway: (<b>a</b>) group A—single cell in 95 kPa, (<b>b</b>) group A—single cell in 20 kPa, (<b>c</b>) group B—multiple cells in 95 kPa, (<b>d</b>) group B—multiple cells in 20 kPa, (<b>e</b>) 10 Ah pouch cell under 95 kPa, (<b>f</b>) 15 Ah pouch cell under 95 kPa, (<b>g</b>) 10 Ah pouch cell under 20 kPa, and (<b>h</b>) 15 Ah pouch cell under 20 kPa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Thermal runaway phenomenon of pouch LIBs under 95 kPa and 20 kPa, (<b>b</b>) Schematic diagram of Typical thermal runaway process of pouch LIBs under 95 kPa and 20 kPa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The average values of time for different stages during the TR process: (<b>a</b>) cylindrical cells and (<b>b</b>) pouch cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Typical curves and average values: (<b>a</b>) HRR; (<b>b</b>) battery surface temperatures; (<b>c</b>) thermal runaway fire temperatures; and (<b>d</b>) thermal runaway smoke temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The average values of THR versus the number of cylindrical cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) The average values of THR and peak HRR, and (<b>b</b>) the average peak values of temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) The typical curves of light transmittance, (<b>b</b>) the mass concentration of oxygen in volume, (<b>c</b>) the average peak values of minimum light transmittance and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) The percentage volume concentration of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and (<b>d</b>) the average peak values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) The typical curves of THC, and (<b>b</b>) the average peak values of THC and CO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Average peak values of THC (<b>a</b>) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) versus average peak HRR for different LIBs under 95 kPa and 20 kPa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The distribution of average peak value per capacity for the TR tests of 18650 and pouch LIBs under 95 kPa and 20 kPa: (<b>a</b>) 18650 LIBs under 95 kPa and 20 kPa, (<b>b</b>) 10 Ah and 15 Ah pouch LIBs under 95 kPa and 20 kPa, (<b>c</b>) 18650 and pouch LIBs under 95 kPa, and (<b>d</b>) 18650 and pouch LIBs under 20 kPa.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop