[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (266)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gully erosion

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 3827 KiB  
Article
Machine Learning Models for the Spatial Prediction of Gully Erosion Susceptibility in the Piraí Drainage Basin, Paraíba Do Sul Middle Valley, Southeast Brazil
by Jorge da Paixão Marques Filho, Antônio José Teixeira Guerra, Carla Bernadete Madureira Cruz, Maria do Carmo Oliveira Jorge and Colin A. Booth
Land 2024, 13(10), 1665; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101665 - 13 Oct 2024
Viewed by 524
Abstract
Soil erosion is a global issue—with gully erosion recognized as one of the most important forms of land degradation. The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the outcomes of four machine learning models, Classification and Regression (CART), eXtreme Gradient Boosting [...] Read more.
Soil erosion is a global issue—with gully erosion recognized as one of the most important forms of land degradation. The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the outcomes of four machine learning models, Classification and Regression (CART), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), used for mapping susceptibility to soil gully erosion. The controlling factors of gully erosion in the Piraí Drainage Basin, Paraíba do Sul Middle Valley were analysed by image interpretation in Google Earth and gully erosion samples (n = 159) were used for modelling and spatial prediction. The XGBoost and RF models achieved identical results for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC = 88.50%), followed by the SVM and CART models, respectively (AUROC = 86.17%; AUROC = 85.11%). In all models analysed, the importance of the main controlling factors predominated among Lineaments, Land Use and Cover, Slope, Elevation and Rainfall, highlighting the need to understand the landscape. The XGBoost model, considering a smaller number of false negatives in spatial prediction, was considered the most appropriate, compared to the Random Forest model. It is noteworthy that the XGBoost model made it possible to validate the hypothesis of the study area, for susceptibility to gully erosion and identifying that 9.47% of the Piraí Drainage Basin is susceptible to gully erosion. Furthermore, replicable methodologies are evidenced by their rapid applicability at different scales. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Extreme Weather on Land Degradation and Conservation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area localization and gully erosion sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photos illustrating the occurrence of gully erosion in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison between CART: classification and regression tree model; XGBoost: extreme gradient boosting model; RF: random forest model and SVM: support vector machine model using receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Variables’ importance for classification and regression tree model, respectively: lineaments = lineaments; lulc = land use and cover; slope = slope; elevation = elevation; rainfall = rainfall; spi = stream power index; twi = topographic wetness index; lithology = lithology; profilecurv = profile curvature; plancurv = plan curvature; distanceroads = distance to roads; sca = specific contributing area; distancerivers = distance to rivers; soils = soils. (<b>B</b>) Variables importance for eXtreme gradient boosting model; (<b>C</b>) Variables importance for random forest model and (<b>D</b>) Variables importance for support vector machine model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Different spatial patterns of susceptibility to gully erosion, according to each machine learning model, respectively. CART = classification and regression tree; XGBoost = extreme gradient boosting; RF = random forest and SVM = support vector machine.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 17915 KiB  
Article
The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Soil Conservation and Its Influencing Factors in the Ten Tributaries of the Upper Yellow River, China
by Xianglong Hou, Hui Yang and Jiansheng Cao
Water 2024, 16(20), 2888; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202888 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 451
Abstract
Soil erosion is a global environmental problem, and soil conservation is the prevention of soil loss from erosion. The Ten Kongduis (kongdui is the translation of “short-term flood gullies” in Mongolian) are ten tributaries in the upper Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow [...] Read more.
Soil erosion is a global environmental problem, and soil conservation is the prevention of soil loss from erosion. The Ten Kongduis (kongdui is the translation of “short-term flood gullies” in Mongolian) are ten tributaries in the upper Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River Basin. The study of the spatial and temporal variability in soil conservation in the Ten Kongduis is of extraordinary scientific significance both in terms of the discipline and for the ecological and environmental management of the region. With the InVEST model, the characteristics of the spatial and temporal variations in soil conservation service in the Ten Kongduis since 2000 and how rainfall and land use have influenced soil conservation were analyzed. The results show that both avoided erosion and avoided export varied considerably between years. The minimum values of avoided erosion and avoided export were both in 2015, with values of 17.59 × 106 t and 0.92 × 106 t, respectively. The maximum value of avoided erosion was 57.03 × 106 t in 2020 and that of avoided export was 4.08 × 106 t in 2000. Spatially, avoided export was primarily found in the upper reaches of the east–central portion of the study area, and avoided erosion, with values of >40 t·(ha·yr)−1, was in the upper east–central portion of the study area, followed by the upper west–central portion. The difference between upstream and downstream was larger in the western part of the study area. The effect of rainfall was dominant and positive in both avoided erosion and avoided export. The relationships between the rain erosivity factor and the values of avoided erosion and avoided export were significantly positive. Where more erosion occurs, more erosion is retained. Soil that has been eroded away from slopes under vegetation or other water conservation measures may not necessarily be transported to the stream channel in the current year. These conclusions will help us to have a clearer understanding of where sediments are generated and transported and provide a scientific basis for soil and water conservation and ecosystem safety management of watersheds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Measurements and Modeling in Soil Erosion: State of the Art)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the Ten Kongduis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Rain erosivity factors of the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Rain erosivity factors of the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LULC in the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>LULC in the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Avoided export in the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Avoided export in the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Avoided export in the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Avoided erosion in the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Avoided erosion in the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Avoided erosion in the Ten Kongduis from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3376 KiB  
Article
Estimation of the Potential for Soil and Water Conservation Measures in a Typical Basin of the Loess Plateau, China
by Beilei Liu, Peng Li, Zhanbin Li, Jianye Ma, Zeyu Zhang and Bo Wang
Water 2024, 16(19), 2868; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192868 - 9 Oct 2024
Viewed by 465
Abstract
Abstract: In the context of the large-scale management of the Loess Plateau and efforts to reduce water and sediment in the Yellow River, this study focuses on a typical watershed within the Loess Plateau. The potential for vegetation restoration in the Kuye River [...] Read more.
Abstract: In the context of the large-scale management of the Loess Plateau and efforts to reduce water and sediment in the Yellow River, this study focuses on a typical watershed within the Loess Plateau. The potential for vegetation restoration in the Kuye River Basin is estimated based on the assumption that vegetation cover should be relatively uniform under similar habitat conditions. The potential for terrace restoration is assessed through an analysis of topographic features and soil layer thickness, while the potential for silt dam construction is evaluated by considering various hydrological and geomorphological factors. Based on these assessments, the overall potential for soil erosion control in the watershed is synthesized, providing a comprehensive understanding of target areas for ecological restoration within the Kuye River Basin. The study demonstrates that the areas with the greatest potential for vegetation restoration in the Kuye River Basin are concentrated in the upper and middle reaches of the basin, which are in closer proximity to the river. The total potential for terracing is 1013.85 km2, which is primarily distributed across the river terraces, farmlands, and gentle slopes on both sides of the riverbanks. Additionally, the potential for the construction of check dams is 14,390 units. The target areas for terracing measures in the Kuye River Basin are primarily situated in the middle and lower reaches of the basin, which are in closer proximity to the river. Conversely, the target areas for forest, grass, and check dams, as well as other small watershed integrated management measures, are predominantly located in the hill and gully areas on the eastern and southern sides of the basin. The implementation of the gradual ecological construction of the watershed, based on the aforementioned objectives, will facilitate the protection, improvement, and rational utilization of soil, water, and other natural resources within the watershed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic location of the Kuye River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the overall methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of soil erosion factors in the Kuye River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Map of the current status of the NDVI and its restoration potential in the Kuye River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Index of revegetation potential of the Kuye River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Classification of potential for terracing in the Kuye River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Soil erosion modulus in the Kuye River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of the key check dam control area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Soil and water conservation measures’ construction target area of the Kuye River Basin.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 30203 KiB  
Article
Laboratory Model Tests on the Deformation and Failure of Terraced Loess Slopes Induced by Extreme Rainfall
by Jun Jia, Xiangjun Pei, Xiaopeng Guo, Shenghua Cui, Pingping Sun, Haoran Fan, Xiaochao Zhang and Qi Gu
Land 2024, 13(10), 1631; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101631 - 8 Oct 2024
Viewed by 360
Abstract
Heavy rainfall is the main factor inducing the failure of loess slopes. However, the failure mechanism and mode of terraced loess slopes under heavy rainfall have not been well investigated and understood. This paper presents the experimental study on the deformation and failure [...] Read more.
Heavy rainfall is the main factor inducing the failure of loess slopes. However, the failure mechanism and mode of terraced loess slopes under heavy rainfall have not been well investigated and understood. This paper presents the experimental study on the deformation and failure of terraced loess slopes with different gradients under extreme rainfall conditions. The deformation and failure processes of the slope and the migration of the wetting front within the slope during rainfall were captured by the digital cameras installed on the top and side of the test box. In addition, the mechanical and hydrological responses of the slope, including earth pressure, water content, pore water pressure, and matric suction, were monitored and analyzed under rainfall infiltration and erosion. The experimental study shows that the deformation and failure of terraced loess slopes under heavy rainfall conditions exhibit the characteristic of progressive erosion damage. In general, the steeper the slope, the more severe the deformation and failure, and the shorter the time required for erosion failure. The data obtained from sensors embedded in the slope can reflect the mechanical and hydraulic characteristics of the slope in response to rainfall. The earth pressure and pore water pressure in the slope exhibit a fluctuating pattern with continued rainfall. The failure mode of terraced loess slopes under extreme rainfall can be summarized into five stages: erosion of slope surface and formation of small gullies and cracks, expansion of gullies and cracks along the slope surface, widening and deepening of gullies, local collapse and flow-slip of the slope, and large-scale collapse of the slope. The findings can provide preliminary data references for researchers to better understand the failure characteristics of terraced loess slopes under extreme rainfall and to further validate the results of numerical simulations and analytical solutions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Arrangement of the model test apparatus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Arrangement of the model test apparatus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Particle size distribution of the loess.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Soil-water retention behavior of the tested loess.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic view of laboratory test slope model (taking the slope with a gradient of 60 degrees as an example, units are in mm) with the designated layout of the sensors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Model construction, (<b>b</b>) sensor installation, and (<b>c</b>) excavation and rainfall processes of the terraced loess slope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>View of failure evolution of terraced loess slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees (Note: red arrows marking the main deformation locations in comparison to the previous image).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>View of failure evolution of terraced loess slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees (Note: red arrows marking the main deformation locations in comparison to the previous image).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>View of failure evolution of terraced loess slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees (Note: red arrows marking the main deformation locations in comparison to the previous image).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Wetting front migration of the slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees (Note: red arrows marking the initial infiltration location; red dashed line referring to the wetting front).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Wetting front migration of the slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees (Note: red arrows marking the initial infiltration location; red dashed line referring to the wetting front).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variation of earth pressure in the slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Variation of volumetric water content in the slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Variation of pore water pressure in the slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Variation of matric suction in the slope during rainfall: (<b>a</b>) slope with 45 degrees, (<b>b</b>) slope with 60 degrees and (<b>c</b>) slope with 75 degrees.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Schematic diagram of failure mode of terraced loess slope under extreme rainfall.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 7206 KiB  
Article
A Multi-Scale Content-Structure Feature Extraction Network Applied to Gully Extraction
by Feiyang Dong, Jizhong Jin, Lei Li, Heyang Li and Yucheng Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3562; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193562 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 374
Abstract
Black soil is a precious soil resource, yet it is severely affected by gully erosion, which is one of the most serious manifestations of land degradation. The determination of the location and shape of gullies is crucial for the work of gully erosion [...] Read more.
Black soil is a precious soil resource, yet it is severely affected by gully erosion, which is one of the most serious manifestations of land degradation. The determination of the location and shape of gullies is crucial for the work of gully erosion control. Traditional field measurement methods consume a large amount of human resources, so it is of great significance to use artificial intelligence techniques to automatically extract gullies from satellite remote sensing images. This study obtained the gully distribution map of the southwestern region of the Dahe Bay Farm in Inner Mongolia through field investigation and measurement and created a gully remote sensing dataset. We designed a multi-scale content structure feature extraction network to analyze remote sensing images and achieve automatic gully extraction. The multi-layer information obtained through the resnet34 network is input into the multi-scale structure extraction module and the multi-scale content extraction module designed by us, respectively, obtained richer intrinsic information about the image. We designed a structure content fusion network to further fuse structural features and content features and improve the depth of the model’s understanding of the image. Finally, we designed a muti-scale feature fusion module to further fuse low-level and high-level information, enhance the comprehensive understanding of the model, and improve the ability to extract gullies. The experimental results show that the multi-scale content structure feature extraction network can effectively avoid the interference of complex backgrounds in satellite remote sensing images. Compared with the classic semantic segmentation models, DeepLabV3+, PSPNet, and UNet, our model achieved the best results in several evaluation metrics, the F1 score, recall rate, and intersection over union (IoU), with an F1 score of 0.745, a recall of 0.777, and an IoU of 0.586. These results proved that our method is a highly automated and reliable method for extracting gullies from satellite remote sensing images, which simplifies the process of gully extraction and provides us with an accurate guide to locate the location of gullies, analyze the shape of gullies, and then provide accurate guidance for gully management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The geographic location of our study area in the Dahe Bay Farm of Inner Mongolia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>We conducted a field investigation in the Dahe Bay Farm to determine the specific location of the gullies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>We used the Labelme annotation tool to label the gullies in the dataset and build the dataset of Dahe Bay gullies in Inner Mongolia. The red lines in the figure represent the boundary of the gully, and the red points represent the anchor point of the gully boundary.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Overview of the research method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The architecture of the ResNet34 network adopted by this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Multi-scale structure feature extraction module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Multi-scale content feature extraction module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Structure feature extraction block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Structure-content feature fusion network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Muti-scale feature fusion module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Gully extraction F1 score by four models. The blue, green, red, and orange lines represent DeepLabV3+, PSPNet, UNet, and our model, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Gully extraction recall by four models. The blue, green, red, and orange lines represent DeepLabV3+, PSPNet, UNet, and our model, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Gully extraction IoU by four models. The blue, green, red, and orange lines represent DeepLabV3+, PSPNet, UNet, and our model, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Intuitive comparison of the prediction results of the four models on the gully dataset of Dahe Bay Farm in Inner Mongolia with the original image on the far left followed by the ground truth and the prediction results of the four models. (<b>a</b>–<b>j</b>) represent images we randomly selected from the databset.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 23117 KiB  
Article
Is It Reliable to Extract Gully Morphology Parameters Based on High-Resolution Stereo Images? A Case of Gully in a “Soil-Rock Dual Structure Area”
by Tingting Yan, Weijun Zhao, Fujin Xu, Shengxiang Shi, Wei Qin, Guanghe Zhang and Ningning Fang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(18), 3500; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183500 - 21 Sep 2024
Viewed by 426
Abstract
The gully morphology parameter is an important quantitative index for monitoring gully erosion development. Its extraction method and accuracy evaluation in the “soil-rock dual structure area” are of great significance to the evaluation of gully erosion in this type of area. In this [...] Read more.
The gully morphology parameter is an important quantitative index for monitoring gully erosion development. Its extraction method and accuracy evaluation in the “soil-rock dual structure area” are of great significance to the evaluation of gully erosion in this type of area. In this study, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) tilt photography data were used to evaluate the accuracy of extracting gully morphology parameters from high-resolution remote sensing stereoscopic images. The images data (0.03 m) were taken as the reference in Zhangmazhuang and Jinzhongyu small river valleys in Yishui County, Shandong Province, China. The accuracy of gully morphology parameters were extracted from simultaneous high-resolution remote sensing stereo images data (0.5 m) was evaluated, and the parameter correction model was constructed. The results showed that (1) the average relative errors of circumference (P), area (A), linear length of bottom (L1), and curve length of bottom (L2) are mainly concentrated within 10%, and the average relative errors of top width (TW) are mainly within 20%. (2) The average relative error of three-dimensional (3D) parameters such as gully volume (V) and gully depth (D) is mainly less than 50%. (3) The larger the size of the gully, the smaller the 3D parameters extracted by visual interpreters, especially the absolute value of the mean relative error (Rmean) of V and D. (4) A relationship model was built between the V and D values obtained by the two methods. When V and D were extracted from high-resolution remote sensing stereo images, the relationship model was used to correct the measured parameter values. These findings showed that high-resolution remote sensing stereo images represents an efficient and convenient data source for monitoring gully erosion in a small watershed in a “soil-rock dual structure area”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Soil Erosion in Forest Area)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the study area. Note: Figure (<b>a</b>) is the DEM map of Yishui County; Figure (<b>b</b>) is the enlarged map of the study area and gully distribution; the two maps on the right are the zoning maps of China and Shandong Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technical flow chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The width and depth cutaway view. Note: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) represent different extraction methods of gully morphology parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relative error of gully morphology parameters extracted from high-resolution remote sensing stereo images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><span class="html-italic">R<sub>mean</sub></span> classification results of gully morphology parameter error were extracted from high-resolution remote sensing stereo images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The maximum relative error (<span class="html-italic">T<sub>max</sub></span>) of gully morphological parameters extracted across various visual interpreters. P denotes the perimeter; A, area; L1, gully bottom straight line length; L2, gully bottom curved line length; V, volume; W, width; D, depth; W/D, width-to-depth ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Interior details of the gully head (UAV image; resolution: 0.03 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Internal details of the gully head (high-resolution remote sensing stereo image; resolution: 0.5 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The relationship between the 3D morphology parameters of the gully, and the error <span class="html-italic">R<sub>mean</sub></span> was extracted based on high-resolution remote sensing stereo image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>The relationship between the 3D morphology parameters of the gully, and the error <span class="html-italic">R<sub>mean</sub></span> was extracted based on high-resolution remote sensing stereo image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Three-dimensional morphology parameter regression analysis of gully extracted using the two methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Three-dimensional morphology parameter regression analysis of gully extracted using the two methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Deviation of the gully tail by different visual interpreters.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2828 KiB  
Article
Short-Term Artificial Revegetation with Herbaceous Species Can Prevent Soil Degradation in a Black Soil Erosion Gully of Northeast China
by Jielin Liu, Yong Zhu, Jianye Li, Xiaolei Kong, Qiang Zhang, Xueshan Wang, Daqing Peng and Xingyi Zhang
Land 2024, 13(9), 1486; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091486 - 13 Sep 2024
Viewed by 425
Abstract
Understanding the effects of short-term artificial revegetation on preventing soil degradation in erosion gullies of black soil areas is essential to choosing the most suitable species of vegetation for controlling the development of erosion gullies. A field experiment with short-term artificial revegetation with [...] Read more.
Understanding the effects of short-term artificial revegetation on preventing soil degradation in erosion gullies of black soil areas is essential to choosing the most suitable species of vegetation for controlling the development of erosion gullies. A field experiment with short-term artificial revegetation with herbaceous species (Medicago sativa L., Glycyrrhiza pallidiflora Maxim., Elytrigia repens (L.) Desv. ex Nevski, Rheum palmatum L., Asparagus officinalis L., Trifolium repens L., Bromus inermis Leyss., Elymus dahuricus Turcz.) and a runoff scouring test were conducted in a typical erosion gully in a black soil area. Soil erosion, physicochemical characteristics, and shoot/root characteristics were measured to evaluate the effects of short-term artificial revegetation. Short-term artificial revegetation significantly decreased (p < 0.05) sediment yield by 91.1% ± 7.2% compared with that of bare soil. Soil total nitrogen (TN), total potassium (TP), available phosphorus (AP), cation exchange capacity (CEC), water-stable aggregates > 0.25 mm (WR0.25), and aggregate mean weight diameter (MWD) and mean geometric diameter (GWD) were significantly correlated with vegetated treatments, indicating they were factors sensitive to short-term artificial revegetation. Except for total potassium (TK), the other soil characteristics decreased in vegetated treatments. In addition to increasing TK, vegetated treatments also increased soil available nitrogen (AN)/TN ratios in the short term. The overall effects of different herbaceous species on soil and water conservation, soil quality, and vegetation growth were evaluated, and Trifolium repens L. is the most suitable for preventing soil degradation in an erosion gully. The results of this study will provide a reference for the restoration and protection of the ecological environment in black soil areas with gully erosion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Land Degradation Processes and Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study site in Baiquan County, Heilongjiang Province, China, with the color image showing the erosion gully examined in the study. Note: (<b>a</b>) is the location of the study site, (<b>b</b>) is the aerial view of the experimental gully slope before artificial revegetation, and (<b>c</b>) is the aerial view of the experimental gully slope after artificial revegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Shoot and root characteristics ((<b>A</b>) shoot dry weight; (<b>B</b>) specific root length; (<b>C</b>) root shoot ratio; (<b>D</b>) root length density; (<b>E</b>) root surface area density; (<b>F</b>) root volume) of eight herbaceous species used in vegetation restoration of a gully slope. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Correlation matrix for vegetation treatments and related soil characteristics. The color of each square is proportional to the value of Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Red indicates a positive correlation (dark green, <span class="html-italic">r</span> = 1); blue indicates a negative correlation (dark red, <span class="html-italic">r</span> = 1). * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001. Abbreviations: SY, sediment yield; SR, surface runoff; ER, erosion rate; TN, soil total nitrogen; SOC, soil organic carbon; BD, soil bulk density; SWC, soil water content; FC, field capacity; SP, soil porosity; TK, soil total potassium; AP, soil available phosphorus; AN, soil available N; CEC, cation exchange capacity; WR<sub>0.25</sub>, water-stable aggregates (&gt;0.25 mm); MWD, aggregate mean weight diameter; GWD, aggregate mean geometric diameter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sediment yield, surface runoff, and vegetation coverage with different species of herbaceous vegetation. Values are mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Soil aggregate fractions with different herbaceous species on an erosion gully slope. (<b>A</b>) 0–5 cm soil depth; (<b>B</b>) 5–10 cm soil depth.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 10464 KiB  
Article
Study on the Evolution Characteristics of Dam Failure Due to Flood Overtopping of Tailings Ponds
by Zhijie Duan, Jinglong Chen, Jing Xie, Quanming Li, Hong Zhang and Cheng Chen
Water 2024, 16(17), 2406; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16172406 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 730
Abstract
There has been a frequent occurrence of tailing dam failures in recent years, leading to severe repercussions. Flood overtopping is an important element contributing to these failures. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of studies about the evolutionary mechanisms of dam breaches resulting from [...] Read more.
There has been a frequent occurrence of tailing dam failures in recent years, leading to severe repercussions. Flood overtopping is an important element contributing to these failures. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of studies about the evolutionary mechanisms of dam breaches resulting from flood overtopping. In order to fill this knowledge vacuum, this study focused on the evolutionary characteristics and triggering mechanisms of overtopping failures, utilizing the Heshangyu tailings pond as a prototype. The process of overtopping breach evolution was revealed by the conduction of small-scale model testing. A scaled-down replica of the tailings pond was constructed at a ratio of 1:150, and a controlled experiment was conducted to simulate a breach in the dam caused by water overflowing. Based on the results, the following conclusions were drawn: (1) The rise in water level in the pond caused the tailings to become saturated, leading to liquefaction flow and local slope sliding at the initial dam. If the sediment-carrying capacity of the overflowing water exceeded the shear strength of the tailings, water erosion would accelerate landslides on the slope, generating a sand-laden water flow. (2) The breach was primarily influenced by water erosion, which subsequently resulted in both laterally widened and longitudinally deepened breach. As the breach expanded, the sand-carrying capacity of the water flow increased, leading to a faster rate of failure. The breach process of overtopping can be categorized into four distinct stages: gully formation stage, lateral broadening stage of gully, cracks and collapse on the slope surface, and stable stage of collapse. (3) The tailings from the outflow spread downstream in a radial pattern, forming an alluvial fan. Additionally, the depth of the deposited mud first increased and subsequently declined as the distance from the breach grew. The findings of this research provide an important basis for the prevention and control of tailings dam breach disasters due to overtopping. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Site location of the Heshangyu tailing pond: (<b>a</b>) Site location; (<b>b</b>) Satellite image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of physical test system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photo of the model flume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Physical model section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Grain gradation curve of the tailings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Water injection device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variation curve of the water level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Change curve of water level in the three observation tubes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Curve of seepage line with time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Change curve of pore water pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Change curve of soil pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Water seeped out of the initial dam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Deformation of slope surface: (<b>a</b>) Dam foundation swamping; (<b>b</b>) Sliding of dam foundation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Test process of overtopping dam breach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Side view after dam break.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Change curve of mud depth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Diagram of the scarp theory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Gully on dam surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Gradual widening of gully.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Crack occurrence and collapse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Collapse of the entire dam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Liquefaction of dam foundation from the top view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Liquefaction and flow slip at dam foundation. (<b>a</b>) Initial liquefaction area; (<b>b</b>) Fluid-slip development in liquefaction area; (<b>c</b>) Fluid-slip failure area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Schematic diagram of steep ridge formation. (<b>a</b>) The scarp appeared; (<b>b</b>) Multi-stage scarp appeared; (<b>c</b>) Multi-stage scarp widened.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Diagram of dam break evolution process.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 6109 KiB  
Article
Mapping Benggang Erosion Susceptibility: An Analysis of Environmental Influencing Factors Based on the Maxent Model
by Haidong Ou, Xiaolin Mu, Zaijian Yuan, Xiankun Yang, Yishan Liao, Kim Loi Nguyen and Samran Sombatpanit
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7328; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177328 - 26 Aug 2024
Viewed by 636
Abstract
Benggang erosion is one of the most severe geomorphological hazards occurring on deeply weathered crusts in the hilly regions of southern China. Unraveling the susceptibility and pinpointing the risk areas of Benggang erosion are essential for developing effective prevention and management strategies. This [...] Read more.
Benggang erosion is one of the most severe geomorphological hazards occurring on deeply weathered crusts in the hilly regions of southern China. Unraveling the susceptibility and pinpointing the risk areas of Benggang erosion are essential for developing effective prevention and management strategies. This study introduced the Maxent model to investigate Benggang erosion susceptibility (BES) and compared the evaluation results with the widely used Random Forest (RF) model. The findings are as follows: (1) the incidence of Benggang erosion is rising initially with an increase in elevation, slope, topographic wetness index, rainfall erosivity, and fractional vegetation cover, followed by a subsequent decline, highlighting its distinct characteristics compared to typical types of gully erosion; (2) the AUC values from the ROC curves for the Maxent and RF models are 0.885 and 0.927, respectively. Both models converge on elevation, fractional vegetation cover, rainfall erosivity, Lithology, and topographic wetness index as the most impactful variables; (3) both models adeptly identified regions prone to potential Benggang erosion. However, the Maxent model demonstrated superior spatial correlation in its susceptibility assessment, contrasting with the RF model, which tended to overestimate the BES in certain regions; (4) the Maxent model’s advantages include no need for absence samples, direct handling of categorical data, and more convincing results, suggesting its potential for widespread application in the BES assessment. This research contributes empirical evidence to study the Benggang erosion developing conditions in the hilly regions of southern China and provides an important consideration for the sustainability of the regional ecological environment and human society. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Landslide Hazards and Soil Erosion)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Unmanned aerial vehicle photographs of Benggangs in North Huacheng Town (taken in June 2018).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Land-cover types and the distribution of Benggang points in North Huacheng Town; (<b>b</b>) the position of Guangdong Province in China; (<b>c</b>) the position of Meizhou City in Guangdong Province; (<b>d</b>) the position of North Huacheng Town in Meizhou City.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of values for 10 environment variables, in order: (<b>a</b>) Elevation; (<b>b</b>) Slope; (<b>c</b>) Aspect; (<b>d</b>) Roughness; (<b>e</b>) TWI; (<b>f</b>) Catchment area; (<b>g</b>) R factor; (<b>h</b>) FVC; (<b>i</b>) Lithology; (<b>j</b>) P factor. In Figure (<b>c</b>), aspect is assigned A1−8 in the order of north to northwest. Lithology is assigned L1−6 from top to bottom in Figure (<b>i</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Research process of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>ROC curve of Maxent model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The (<b>left</b>) figure shows the Benggang and non-Benggang points, and the (<b>right</b>) figure shows the ROC curve of the RF model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Response curve between each environment variable and Benggang probability based on the Maxent model, in order: (<b>a</b>) Elevation; (<b>b</b>) Slope; (<b>c</b>) Aspect; (<b>d</b>) Roughness; (<b>e</b>) TWI; (<b>f</b>) Catchment area; (<b>g</b>) R factor; (<b>h</b>) FVC; (<b>i</b>) Lithology; (<b>j</b>) P factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Statistics of the number of Benggangs at different elevations and slope intervals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Grade distribution of Benggang erosion susceptibility in the (<b>a</b>) Maxent model and (<b>b</b>) RF model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The dense distribution areas of high Benggang erosion susceptibility: where Figure (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) from Maxent, Figure (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) from Map World Image, and Figure (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) from RF model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Cluster/outlier distribution of the (<b>a</b>) Maxent model and (<b>b</b>) RF model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Typical regions of high Benggang susceptibility.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Constructing flexible vegetation barriers (mainly Dendrocalamus barbatus) on the colluvial deposits of arc-shaped Benggangs (photographed in July 2021).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 77346 KiB  
Article
Soil Erosion Characteristics of the Agricultural Terrace Induced by Heavy Rainfalls on Chinese Loess Plateau: A Case Study
by Hongliang Kang, Wenlong Wang, Liangna Li, Lei Han and Sihan Wei
Agronomy 2024, 14(8), 1840; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081840 - 20 Aug 2024
Viewed by 551
Abstract
Terrace erosion has become increasingly pronounced due to the rising incidence of heavy rainfalls resulting from global climate change; however, the processes and mechanisms governing erosion of loess terraces during such events remain poorly understood. A field investigation was performed following a heavy [...] Read more.
Terrace erosion has become increasingly pronounced due to the rising incidence of heavy rainfalls resulting from global climate change; however, the processes and mechanisms governing erosion of loess terraces during such events remain poorly understood. A field investigation was performed following a heavy rainfall event in the Tangjiahe Basin to examine the soil erosion characteristics of loess terraces subjected to heavy rainfall events. The results show that various types of erosion occurred on the terraced fields, including rill, gully, and scour hole in water erosion, and sink hole, collapse, and shallow landslide in gravity erosion. Rill erosion and shallow landslide erosion exhibited the highest frequency of occurrence on the new and old terraces, respectively. The erosion moduli of the gully, scour hole, and sink hole on the new terraces were 171.0%, 119.5%, and 308.7% greater than those on the old terraces, respectively. In contrast, lower moduli of collapse and landslide were observed on the new terraces in comparison to the old terraces, reflecting reductions of 34.2% and 23.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the modulus of water erosion (32,102 t/km2) was 4.5 times that of gravity erosion on the new terraces. Conversely, on the old terrace, the modulus of gravity erosion (8804.1 t/km2) exceeded that of water erosion by 14.5%. Gully erosion and collapse dominated the erosion processes, contributing 67.8% and 9.4% to soil erosion on the new terraces and 38.7% and 34.0%, respectively, on the old terraces. In the study area, the new terraces experienced significantly greater erosion (39,252 t/km2) compared to the old terraces (16,491 t/km2). Plastic film mulching, loose and bare ridges and walls, inclined terrace platforms, and high terrace walls, as well as the developing flow paths, might be the key factors promoting the severe erosion of the terraces during heavy rainfall. Improvements in terrace design, construction technologies, temporary protective measures, agricultural techniques, and management strategies could enhance the prevention of soil erosion on terraces during heavy rainfall events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Soil and Plant Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The Chinese Loess Plateau and location of Xiji County, (<b>b</b>) Xiji County and location of Tangjiahe Basin, and (<b>c</b>) the investigated watersheds in Tangjiehe Basin and locations of the samples of terraces and rainfall stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The typical structures of the (<b>a</b>) new terrace and (<b>b</b>) old terrace.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Field investigation. Measurements of the morphologies of (<b>a</b>) rills, (<b>b</b>) gully, (<b>c</b>) scour hole, and (<b>d</b>) collapse. (Taken by Wenlong Wang).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Water erosion types on the terrace included (<b>a</b>) rill, (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) gully, and (<b>d</b>) scour hole. (Taken by Hongliang Kang).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Occurrence frequencies of different erosion types on the new and old terraces. Note: Gully* represents the gullies approximately parallel to the terrace ridge, and Gully# represents the gullies approximately perpendicular to the terrace ridge. The same as below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Gravity erosion types on the terrace included (<b>a</b>) collapse, (<b>b</b>) sink hole, and (<b>c</b>) landslide. (Taken by Hongliang Kang).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Erosion morphology of (<b>a</b>) rills, (<b>b</b>) gullies approximately parallel to the terrace ridge, (<b>c</b>) gullies approximately perpendicular to the terrace ridge, and (<b>d</b>) scour holes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Erosion morphology of (<b>a</b>) collapses, (<b>b</b>) sink holes, and (<b>c</b>) landslides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Soil erosion moduli of different erosion types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Erosion proportions of each erosion type on the (<b>a</b>) new and (<b>b</b>) old terraces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Erosion moduli on different terraces, average erosion modulus in the study area, and average water and gravity erosion moduli in the study area. Note: The red line represents the critical water erosion modulus (15,000 t km<sup>−2</sup>) in a year on the Loess Plateau exceeding which the water erosion was defined as erosion in severe grade [<a href="#B34-agronomy-14-01840" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plastic film mulching on the terrace platform and (<b>b</b>) the internal details of the film mulching. (Taken by Hongliang Kang). Note: The blue double arrow lines in (<b>b</b>) represent the breadths of the plastic films, and the yellow double arrow lines represent the distance between the two adjacent plastic films.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Mechanized terrace construction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The developing flow and sediment delivery paths. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) The stormflow broke the terrace ridges and flowed onto the lower step of the terraced field. (<b>c</b>) The stormflow flowed parallel to the terrace ridge and then further concentrated onto production roads. (<b>d</b>) Deep gully on an unpaved road (Taken by Hongliang Kang).</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 9918 KiB  
Article
Morphological Characteristics and Development Rate of Gullies in Three Main Agro-Geomorphological Regions of Northeast China
by Zhengyu Wang, Mingchang Shi, Mingming Guo, Xingyi Zhang, Xin Liu and Zhuoxin Chen
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(16), 2905; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162905 - 8 Aug 2024
Viewed by 734
Abstract
Gully erosion poses a significant global concern due to its role in land degradation and soil erosion, particularly pronounced in Northeast China’s diverse agro-geomorphic regions. However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on gully characteristics, development rates, and the topographic threshold of [...] Read more.
Gully erosion poses a significant global concern due to its role in land degradation and soil erosion, particularly pronounced in Northeast China’s diverse agro-geomorphic regions. However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on gully characteristics, development rates, and the topographic threshold of gully formation in these areas. To address this gap, we selected three different agro-geomorphic watersheds, named HL (Hailun), ML (Muling), and YKS (Yakeshi), with areas of 30.88 km2, 31.53 km2, and 21.98 km2, respectively. Utilizing high-resolution (2.1 m, 2 m) remote sensing imagery (ZY-3, GF-1), we analyzed morphological parameters (length, width, area, perimeter, etc.) and land use changes for all permanent gullies between 2013 and 2023. Approximately 30% of gullies were selected for detailed study of the upstream drainage area and gully head slopes to establish the topographic threshold for gully formation (S = a·A−b). In HL, ML, and YKS, average gully lengths were 526.22 m, 208.64 m, and 614.20 m, respectively, with corresponding widths of 13.28 m, 8.45 m, and 9.32 m. The gully number densities in the three areas were 3.14, 25.18, and 0.82/km2, respectively, with a gully density of 1.65, 5.25, and 0.50 km km−2, and 3%, 5%, and 1% of the land has disappeared due to gully erosion, respectively. YKS exhibited the highest gully head retreat rate at 17.50 m yr−1, significantly surpassing HL (12.24 m yr−1) and ML (7.11 m yr−1). Areal erosion rates were highest in HL (277.79 m2 yr−1) and lowest in YKS (105.22 m2 yr−1), with ML intermediate at 243.36 m2 yr−1. However, there was no significant difference in gully expansion rate (0.37–0.42 m yr−1) among the three areas (p > 0.05). Differences in gully development dynamics among the three regions were influenced by land use, slope, and topographic factors. The topographic threshold (S = a·A−b) for gully formation varied: HL emphasized drainage area (a = 0.052, b = 0.52), YKS highlighted soil resistance (a = 0.12, b = 0.36), and the parameters a and b of ML fell within the range between these of HL and YKS (a = 0.044, b = 0.27). This study has enriched the scope and database of global gully erosion research, providing a scientific basis for gully erosion prevention and control planning in Northeast China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Erosion Estimation Based on Remote Sensing Data)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Location of study area. Note: Subfigure (<b>a</b>) is the HL study area, subfigure (<b>b</b>) is the ML study area and subfigure (<b>c</b>) is the YKS study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes in gully morphology in two periods and construction of S = a·A<sup>−b</sup> model. Note: The orange line represents the gully in 2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flow chart of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The distribution of gully morphological parameters. Note: Red curves represent the cumulative percentage of gullies. Note: Subfigure (<b>a</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>k</b>) show the gully length in HL, ML and YKS, Subfigure (<b>b</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>l</b>) show the gully width in HL, ML and YKS, Subfigure (<b>c</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>m</b>) show the gully perimeter in HL, ML and YKS, Subfigure (<b>d</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>n</b>) show the gully area in HL, ML and YKS, Subfigure (<b>e</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>o</b>) show the SI in HL, ML and YKS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>S-A model for the three study areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Differential rates of gully erosion in the three study areas: rate of headcut retreat (<b>a</b>), rate of gully area erosion (<b>b</b>), and rate of gully bank expansion (<b>c</b>). Different lowercase letters represent significant (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) differences in gully erosion rates between regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Land use change in HL, ML, and YKS study area from 2013 to 2023. Note: Subfigure (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) show the 2013 HL land use, 2023 HL land use and land use change in HL, Subfigure (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) show the 2013 ML land use, 2023 ML land use and land use change in ML, Subfigure (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) show the 2013 YKS land use, 2023 YKS land use and land use change in YKS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Differences in gully head retreat rate (<b>a</b>), gully expansion rate (<b>b</b>), and areal gully erosion rate (<b>c</b>) among different land uses and study areas. Note: Different capital letters represent significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) in gully erosion rate among different study areas for same land use. Different small letters represent significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) among different land uses in a given study area. DFL is dry farmland, GL is grassland, WL is woodland.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Differences in gully head retreat rate (<b>a</b>), gully expansion rate (<b>b</b>) and areal gully erosion rate (<b>c</b>) among different slope classes and study areas. Note: Different capital letters represent significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) in gully erosion rate among different study areas for same slope class, and different small letters represent significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) among different slope classes in a given study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Differences in gully head retreat rate (<b>a</b>), gully expansion rate (<b>b</b>) and areal gully erosion rate (<b>c</b>) among different slope aspects and study areas. Note: Different capital letters represent significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) in gully erosion rate among different study areas for the same slope aspect, and different small letters represent significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) among different slope aspects in a given study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Modeling of gully criticality in different study areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Ten years (2013–2023) annual average temperature of three study areas (HL, ML, and YKS).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 19235 KiB  
Article
Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms for the Development of Gully Erosion Susceptibility Maps: Evidence from the Chotanagpur Plateau Region, India
by Md Hasanuzzaman, Pravat Kumar Shit, Saeed Alqadhi, Hussein Almohamad, Fahdah Falah ben Hasher, Hazem Ghassan Abdo and Javed Mallick
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6569; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156569 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 847
Abstract
Gully erosion is a serious environmental threat, compromising soil health, damaging agricultural lands, and destroying vital infrastructure. Pinpointing regions prone to gully erosion demands careful selection of an appropriate machine learning algorithm. This choice is crucial, as the complex interplay of various environmental [...] Read more.
Gully erosion is a serious environmental threat, compromising soil health, damaging agricultural lands, and destroying vital infrastructure. Pinpointing regions prone to gully erosion demands careful selection of an appropriate machine learning algorithm. This choice is crucial, as the complex interplay of various environmental factors contributing to gully formation requires a nuanced analytical approach. To develop the most accurate Gully Erosion Susceptibility Map (GESM) for India’s Raiboni River basin, researchers harnessed the power of two cutting-edge machine learning algorithm: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Random Forest (RF). For a comprehensive analysis, this study integrated 24 potential control factors. We meticulously investigated a dataset of 200 samples, ensuring an even balance between non-gullied and gullied locations. To assess multicollinearity among the 24 variables, we employed two techniques: the Information Gain Ratio (IGR) test and Variance Inflation Factors (VIF). Elevation, land use, river proximity, and rainfall most influenced the basin’s GESM. Rigorous tests validated XGBoost and RF model performance. XGBoost surpassed RF (ROC 86% vs. 83.1%). Quantile classification yielded a GESM with five levels: very high to very low. Our findings reveal that roughly 12% of the basin area is severely affected by gully erosion. These findings underscore the critical need for targeted interventions in these highly susceptible areas. Furthermore, our analysis of gully characteristics unveiled a predominance of V-shaped gullies, likely in an active developmental stage, supported by an average Shape Index (SI) value of 0.26 and a mean Erosivness Index (EI) of 0.33. This research demonstrates the potential of machine learning to pinpoint areas susceptible to gully erosion. By providing these valuable insights, policymakers can make informed decisions regarding sustainable land management practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area. (<b>a</b>) Location of India, (<b>b</b>) location of West Bengal, (<b>c</b>) location of testing and training dataset in the Rainoni River basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow diagram of the present study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of twenty-four key factors used in this research: (<b>a</b>) elevation, (<b>b</b>) slope, (<b>c</b>) slope length, (<b>d</b>) slope aspect, (<b>e</b>) curvature, (<b>f</b>) drainage density, (<b>g</b>) distance from the river, (<b>h</b>) distance from lineament, (<b>i</b>) TWI, (<b>j</b>) distance from the road, (<b>k</b>) NDVI, (<b>l</b>) rainfall, (<b>m</b>) lithology, (<b>n</b>) geomorphology, (<b>o</b>) LULC, (<b>p</b>) soil organic density, (<b>q</b>) bulk density, (<b>r</b>) clay content, (<b>s</b>) coarse fragments, (<b>t</b>) sand, (<b>u</b>) silt, (<b>v</b>) carbon exchange capacity, (<b>w</b>) nitrogen, and (<b>x</b>) soil organic carbon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Parameters describing the cross-sectional morphology of the gully (note: width of the one-fourth depth (WQD), width of the half depth (WHD), total width (WT), depth of the half right side (DRH), depth of the half left side (DLH), average depth (D) (source: based on Deng et al. [<a href="#B42-sustainability-16-06569" class="html-bibr">42</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Final gully erosion susceptibility maps using: (<b>a</b>) the RF and (<b>b</b>) XGBoost models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Evaluation of the accuracy of the XGBoost and RF models using ROC analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Photographs captured of the gullies during the subsequent field investigations: (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) during the gully geometrical parameters survey; (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) rock exposure areas caused by deforestation and human activity (REABDHA); (<b>f</b>) agriculture practices in the gully; and (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) fallow lands (FL).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The gully-dominant area of the Raiboni River Basin and the selected gully for measuring geometric parameters.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5495 KiB  
Article
Effect of W-OH Material on Water/Fertilizer Retention and Plant Growth in the Pisha Sandstone Area of China
by Zhishui Liang, Yue Sun, Xiuwen Fang, Bo Pan, Yuan Xiao, Haiying Gao and Zhiren Wu
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6369; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156369 - 25 Jul 2024
Viewed by 703
Abstract
The Pisha sandstone area in the Yellow River Basin is one of the regions with the most severe soil erosion in China and globally, and its erosion is particularly challenging to control. W-OH, a hydrophilic polyurethane material, possesses controllable degradation properties. It can [...] Read more.
The Pisha sandstone area in the Yellow River Basin is one of the regions with the most severe soil erosion in China and globally, and its erosion is particularly challenging to control. W-OH, a hydrophilic polyurethane material, possesses controllable degradation properties. It can react with water to achieve soil stabilization and erosion resistance during the curing process. The material has been successfully utilized in erosion control in Pisha sandstone areas. This study aims to investigate the impact of W-OH material on water/fertilizer retention and plant growth through experiments on soil hardness, permeability, soil evaporation, soil column leaching, pot tests, and a small-scale demonstration in practical engineering applications. The results indicate that different concentrations of W-OH solution can effectively permeate Pisha sandstone, solidifying the particles to create a flexible and porous consolidation layer on the surface with a specific depth. As the W-OH concentration (3%, 4%, and 5%) increases, the harnesses of the consolidation layer also increase but remain below 1.5 kPa, which does not impede plant root growth. The soil evaporation rate decreased by approximately 45.2%, 45.8%, and 50.3% compared to the control group. The reduction rates of cumulative total nitrogen (TN) content are around 43.57%, 48.14%, and 63.99%, and, for cumulative total phosphorus (TP), are approximately 27.96%, 45.70%, and 61.17% under the 3%, 4%, and 5% concentrations of W-OH solution, respectively. In the pot tests, concentrations of W-OH solution below 5% are suitable for germination and growth of monocotyledons, while the optimal concentration for dicotyledons is around 3%. In the demonstration, the vegetation coverage of the treated gully increases by approximately 11.35%. This research offers a promising and effective approach to enhance ecological restoration in Pisha sandstone areas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Erlaohu Gully watershed and its monitoring point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of the surface hardness test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simulated soil columns in the leaching test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The spraying equipment system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of different W-OH concentrations on permeation depth in Pisha sandstone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The variation in the deformation index under different W-OH concentrations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The moisture content in different samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Total N content changed with time in leaching water samples. (<b>a</b>) TN and (<b>b</b>) cumulative TN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Total TP content changes with time in leaching water samples: (<b>a</b>) TP and (<b>b</b>) cumulative TP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The germination amount of the different seeds: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Astragalus adsurgens Pall</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Medicago sativa</span> L., (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">Buchloe dactyloides</span>, and (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">Lolium perenne</span> L.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>The germination amount of the different seeds: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Astragalus adsurgens Pall</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Medicago sativa</span> L., (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">Buchloe dactyloides</span>, and (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">Lolium perenne</span> L.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison before and after the treatment. (<b>a</b>) Topical Pisha sandstone slope, (<b>b</b>) the Erlaohu Gully, (<b>c</b>) treated Pisha sandstone slope after 6 months, and (<b>d</b>) vegetation coverage of Erlaohu Gully after 2 years of treatment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The structure of the original Pisha sandstone particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The structure of the Pisha sandstone and the consolidation body by W-OH. (<b>a</b>) Original weathered Pisha sandstone particles, (<b>b</b>) consolidation body, (<b>c</b>) cementation pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The structure of the curing body at 15× magnification. (<b>a</b>) Surface and (<b>b</b>) cross-section.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 8758 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Susceptibility of the Xiangka Debris Flow Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method, and Cloud Model
by Yan Li, Jianguo Wang, Keping Ju, Shengyun Wei, Zhinan Wang and Jian Hu
Sustainability 2024, 16(13), 5392; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135392 - 25 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1003
Abstract
The seasonal Xiangka debris flow, breaking out frequently in Xinghai County, Qinghai Province, poses a serious threat to resident safety, has significant potential economic impacts, and inflicts severe damage on the geological environment, vegetation, and land resources in the area. Therefore, a susceptibility [...] Read more.
The seasonal Xiangka debris flow, breaking out frequently in Xinghai County, Qinghai Province, poses a serious threat to resident safety, has significant potential economic impacts, and inflicts severe damage on the geological environment, vegetation, and land resources in the area. Therefore, a susceptibility assessment is crucial. Utilizing data from field investigations, meteorology, and remote sensing, this study devised an assessment system using 10 evaluation factors with pronounced regional characteristics as susceptibility indices. Based on data processing using ArcGIS 10.7 and MATLAB R2016B, this study assessed the susceptibility of the Xiangka debris flow using AHP, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and a cloud model. The analysis results show that, based on AHP, the primary index affecting the occurrence of Xiangka debris flow is mainly source factor (0.447). The secondary indices are mainly the length ratio of the mud sand supply section (0.219), fractional vegetation cover (FVC, 0.208), and watershed area (0.192). Combined with the actual characteristics, it can be seen that the formation conditions of the Xiangka debris flow primarily encompass the following: sources such as slope erosion and accumulation at gully exits, challenging topography and terrain conducive to the accumulation of water and solid materials, and water source aspects like surface runoff from intense rainfall. Based on the fuzzy mathematical method—fuzzy coordinate method—cloud model, it is concluded that the degree of susceptibility is mild-to-moderate. The combination of these methods provides a new idea for the evaluation of debris flow susceptibility. This study can provide a theoretical basis for the layout of treatment engineering and geological disaster prevention in this area and promote the sustainable development of the ecological environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hazards and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Topographic map of Xinghai County. (<b>b</b>) Topographic map of Ziketan Town. (<b>c</b>) Diagram of Xiangka debris flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technology roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Evaluation index system for the susceptibility of the Xiangka debris flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram showing the classification of debris flow susceptibility evaluation factors. (<b>a</b>) DEM. (<b>b</b>) Average slope. (<b>c</b>) NDVI. (<b>d</b>) 24 h maximum rainfall. (<b>e</b>) Land use type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A comment set model for evaluating the susceptibility of the Xiangka debris flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Fuzzy coordinate system and calculation results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of the cloud model and the comment set model of the evaluation results for the susceptibility of the Xiangka debris flow.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4174 KiB  
Article
Gully Erosion Development in Drainage Basins: A New Morphometric Approach
by Ugo Ciccolini, Margherita Bufalini, Marco Materazzi and Francesco Dramis
Land 2024, 13(6), 792; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060792 - 4 Jun 2024
Viewed by 758
Abstract
The formation and evolution of management gullies is a highly intense process of soil erosion often overlooked in policies and river basin strategies. Despite the worldwide spread of the phenomenon, our ability to assess and simulate gullying and its impacts remains limited; therefore, [...] Read more.
The formation and evolution of management gullies is a highly intense process of soil erosion often overlooked in policies and river basin strategies. Despite the worldwide spread of the phenomenon, our ability to assess and simulate gullying and its impacts remains limited; therefore, predicting the development and evolution of these river reaches represents a significant challenge, especially in areas where the loss of productive soil or the hazards linked to landslides or floods represent critical factors. Our study demonstrates how an exclusively morphometric approach, based on the construction of the hypsometric curve and applied to small hydrographic basins that are lithologically homogeneous and hierarchized according to the Strahler classification method, is able to predict the triggering height of the gullies; this height corresponds to the mean elevation of the basin and the inflection point of the hypsometric curve itself, confirming the hypothesis that this point coincides with the point at which a sudden change in surface runoff energy occurs, The study also shows that the portion of the basin necessary to trigger these intense erosive processes is always within a small range, regardless of the size and morphology (slope) of the basin itself. Such an approach, which is quick and relatively easy to apply, could help develop hydrogeological hazard mitigation practices in land planning projects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geological sketch of the Italian area with the location of the basins investigated; (<b>b</b>) typical gullies visible from satellite image (top, source Google Earth) and the ground (bottom).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geological sketch of the US area with the location of the basins investigated; (<b>b</b>) typical gullies visible from satellite image (top, source Google Earth) and the ground (bottom).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a,b</b>) stream order definition in the basins “b_3 USA” and “b_6 ITA”, respectively, using a 10 m resolution DTM; (<b>c</b>) stream order definition in the basin “b_6 ITA” using a 1 m resolution DTM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Example of a frequency distribution histogram construction.(<b>b</b>) Example of basin with the points of intersection between the vector file of the hydrographic network and the vector file of the contour lines extracted from the DTM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example of a hypsometric curve with the indication of value and location of the relative oblique inflection points (OIPs).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Two examples of flow contribution curves: the highest elevation with the relative highest number of 3rd-order reaches is highlighted in each graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a,b</b>) mapping of gullies from aerial photointerpretation in the basins “b_3 USA” and “b_2 ITA”, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Pearson’s “r” correlation coefficient; (<b>b</b>) Pearson’s “<span class="html-italic">p</span>” value; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) standard deviation σ calculated among the “heights” evaluated with different methods in the Italian and the US basins, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) Satellite images of the basins with a standard deviation greater than 15 (for the explanation, see the text).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop