[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (444)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gait estimation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 1363 KiB  
Article
Absolute and Relative Reliability of Spatiotemporal Gait Characteristics Extracted from an Inertial Measurement Unit among Senior Adults Using a Passive Hip Exoskeleton: A Test–Retest Study
by Cristina-Ioana Pîrșcoveanu, Anderson Souza Oliveira, Jesper Franch and Pascal Madeleine
Sensors 2024, 24(16), 5213; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165213 - 12 Aug 2024
Abstract
Background: Seniors wearing a passive hip exoskeleton (Exo) show increased walking speed and step length but reduced cadence. We assessed the test–retest reliability of seniors’ gait characteristics with Exo. Methods: Twenty seniors walked with and without Exo (noExo) on a 10 m indoor [...] Read more.
Background: Seniors wearing a passive hip exoskeleton (Exo) show increased walking speed and step length but reduced cadence. We assessed the test–retest reliability of seniors’ gait characteristics with Exo. Methods: Twenty seniors walked with and without Exo (noExo) on a 10 m indoor track over two sessions separated by one week. Speed, step length, cadence and step time variability were extracted from one inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed over the L5 vertebra. Relative and absolute reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: The relative reliability of speed, step length, cadence and step time variability ranged from “almost perfect to substantial” for Exo and noExo with ICC values between 0.75 and 0.87 and 0.60 and 0.92, respectively. The SEM and MDC values for speed, step length cadence and step time variability during Exo and noExo were <0.002 and <0.006 m/s, <0.002 and <0.005 m, <0.30 and <0.83 steps/min and <0.38 s and <1.06 s, respectively. Conclusions: The high test–retest reliability of speed, step length and cadence estimated from IMU suggest a robust extraction of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during exoskeleton use. These findings indicate that IMUs can be used to assess the effects of wearing an exoskeleton on seniors, thus offering the possibility of conducting longitudinal studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Movement Biomechanics Applications of Wearable Inertial Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>)—Illustration of experimental design and (<b>B</b>)—vertical acceleration segmentation procedure used to collect and analyze the gait of senior adults, where acc is vertical acceleration, IC is foot initial contact, and W1 is walk forward.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bland-Altman plots for (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) cadence, (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) step length and (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) speed and step time variability (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>) where the left and right panels show the data for participants walking without wearing the exoskeleton (noExo) condition and walking while wearing the exoskeleton (Exo), respectively. The upper and lower limits are illustrated by dashed lines and the bias as a solid full line. Each participant is illustrated as an unique color within the graphs.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4044 KiB  
Article
PerFication: A Person Identifying Technique by Evaluating Gait with 2D LiDAR Data
by Mahmudul Hasan, Md. Kamal Uddin, Ryota Suzuki, Yoshinori Kuno and Yoshinori Kobayashi
Electronics 2024, 13(16), 3137; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13163137 - 8 Aug 2024
Viewed by 369
Abstract
PerFication is a person identification technique that uses a 2D LiDAR sensor in a customized dataset KoLaSu (Kobayashi Laboratory of Saitama University). Video-based recognition systems are highly effective and are now at the forefront of research. However, it experiences bottlenecks. New inventions can [...] Read more.
PerFication is a person identification technique that uses a 2D LiDAR sensor in a customized dataset KoLaSu (Kobayashi Laboratory of Saitama University). Video-based recognition systems are highly effective and are now at the forefront of research. However, it experiences bottlenecks. New inventions can cause embarrassing situations, settings, and momentum. To address the limitations of technology, one must introduce a new technology to enhance it. Using biometric characteristics are highly reliable and valuable methods for identifying individuals. Most approaches depend on close interactions with the subject. A gait is the walking pattern of an individual. Most research on identifying individuals based on their walking patterns is conducted using RGB or RGB-D cameras. Only a limited number of studies utilized LiDAR data. Working with 2D LiDAR imagery for individual tracking and identification is excellent in situations where video monitoring is ineffective, owing to environmental challenges such as disasters, smoke, occlusion, and economic constraints. This study presented an extensive analysis of 2D LiDAR data using a meticulously created dataset and a modified residual neural network. In this paper, an alternative method of person identification is proposed that circumvents the limitations of video cameras in terms of capturing difficulties. An individual is precisely identified by the system through the utilization of ankle-level 2D LiDAR data. Our LiDAR-based detection system offers a unique method for person identification in modern surveillance systems, with a painstaking dataset, remarkable results, and a break from traditional camera setups. We focused on demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and durability of LiDAR sensors by utilizing 2D sensors in our research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PerFication: An overview of 2D LiDAR-based estimation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Person tracking, property estimation, and recognition using LiDAR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Motion history image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Person identification experimental setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>KoLaSU, two persons’ data: MHI on top and posture on bottom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Person identification based on gait.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cross validation: gait performance test with cross-data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Performance analysis of combined data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Modern studies utilizing cutting-edge equipment [<a href="#B32-electronics-13-03137" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-electronics-13-03137" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1266 KiB  
Article
Stratification of Older Adults According to Frailty Status and Falls Using Gait Parameters Explored Using an Inertial System
by Marta Neira Álvarez, Elisabet Huertas-Hoyas, Robert Novak, Ana Elizabeth Sipols, Guillermo García-Villamil-Neira, M. Cristina Rodríguez-Sánchez, Antonio J. Del-Ama, Luisa Ruiz-Ruiz, Sara García De Villa and Antonio R. Jiménez-Ruiz
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(15), 6704; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156704 - 1 Aug 2024
Viewed by 313
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization recommends health initiatives focused on the early detection of frailty and falls. Objectives: 1—To compare clinical characteristics, functional performance and gait parameters (estimated with the G-STRIDE inertial sensor) between different frailty groups in older adults with and without [...] Read more.
Background: The World Health Organization recommends health initiatives focused on the early detection of frailty and falls. Objectives: 1—To compare clinical characteristics, functional performance and gait parameters (estimated with the G-STRIDE inertial sensor) between different frailty groups in older adults with and without falls. 2—To identify variables that stratify participants according to frailty status and falls. 3—To verify the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the model that stratifies participants according to frailty status and falls. Methods: Observational, multicenter case-control study. Participants, adults over 70 years with and without falls were recruited from two outpatient clinics and three nursing homes from September 2021 to March 2022. Clinical variables and gait parameters were gathered using the G-STRIDE inertial sensor. Random Forest regression was applied to stratify participants. Results: 163 participants with a mean age of 82.6 ± 6.2 years, of which 118 (72%) were women, were included. Significant differences were found in all gait parameters (both conventional assessment and G-STRIDE evaluation). A hierarchy of factors contributed to the risk of frailty and falls. The confusion matrix and the performance metrics demonstrated high accuracy in classifying participants. Conclusions: Gait parameters, particularly those assessed by G-STRIDE, are effective in stratifying individuals by frailty status and falls. These findings underscore the importance of gait analysis in early intervention strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>G-STRIDE device attached to a participant’s foot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relative variable importance in Random Forest regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Confusion matrix.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 5687 KiB  
Article
Experimental Comparison between 4D Stereophotogrammetry and Inertial Measurement Unit Systems for Gait Spatiotemporal Parameters and Joint Kinematics
by Sara Meletani, Sofia Scataglini, Marco Mandolini, Lorenzo Scalise and Steven Truijen
Sensors 2024, 24(14), 4669; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144669 - 18 Jul 2024
Viewed by 412
Abstract
(1) Background: Traditional gait assessment methods have limitations like time-consuming procedures, the requirement of skilled personnel, soft tissue artifacts, and high costs. Various 3D time scanning techniques are emerging to overcome these issues. This study compares a 3D temporal scanning system (Move4D) with [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Traditional gait assessment methods have limitations like time-consuming procedures, the requirement of skilled personnel, soft tissue artifacts, and high costs. Various 3D time scanning techniques are emerging to overcome these issues. This study compares a 3D temporal scanning system (Move4D) with an inertial motion capture system (Xsens) to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in assessing gait spatiotemporal parameters and joint kinematics. (2) Methods: This study included 13 healthy people and one hemiplegic patient, and it examined stance time, swing time, cycle time, and stride length. Statistical analysis included paired samples t-test, Bland–Altman plot, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). (3) Results: A high degree of agreement and no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two measurement systems have been found for stance time, swing time, and cycle time. Evaluation of stride length shows a significant difference (p < 0.05) between Xsens and Move4D. The highest root-mean-square error (RMSE) was found in hip flexion/extension (RMSE = 10.99°); (4) Conclusions: The present work demonstrated that the system Move4D can estimate gait spatiotemporal parameters (gait phases duration and cycle time) and joint angles with reliability and accuracy comparable to Xsens. This study allows further innovative research using 4D (3D over time) scanning for quantitative gait assessment in clinical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Xsens sensors placement. Front (<b>left</b>) and back (<b>right</b>) views.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Synchronization of both devices (Xsens) and Move4D in A-Pose.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Foot center velocity with identification of step events [<a href="#B24-sensors-24-04669" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. The first dot minimum represents the time of the initial heel strike. In contrast, the final dot minimum is the final heel strike, so they mark the start at the end of the gait cycle. The absolute dotted maximum instead represents the toe-off.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Hip flexion (+)/extension (−); (<b>b</b>) knee flexion (+)/extension (−); (<b>c</b>) ankle dorsiflexion (+)/plantarflexion (−).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Bland–Altman plots of stance and swing duration differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the first trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. For stance time, the mean difference is −0.025 s, while for swing time, it is −0.003 s.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Bland–Altman plots of stance and swing percentage differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the first trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. The mean difference for the stance percentage is −0.535%, while the swing percentage is 0.535%.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Bland–Altman plots cycle time and stride length differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the first trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. For cycle time, the mean difference is −0.027 s, while for stride length, it is 0.272 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Bland–Altman plots of stance and swing duration differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the second trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. For stance time, the mean difference is −0.006 s, while the mean of swing time is −0.001 s.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>Bland–Altman plots of stance and swing percentage differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the second trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. For the stance percentage, the mean difference is −0.089%, while for the swing percentage is 0.089%.</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>Bland–Altman plots cycle time and stride length differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the second trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. For cycle time, the mean difference is −0.006 s, while for stride length, it is 0.344 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure A7
<p>Bland–Altman plots of stance and swing duration differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the third trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. For stance time, the mean difference is 0.016 s, while for swing time, it is −0.004 s.</p>
Full article ">Figure A8
<p>Bland–Altman plots of stance and swing percentage differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the third trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. For the stance percentage, the mean difference is 0.755%, while for the swing percentage is −0.755%.</p>
Full article ">Figure A9
<p>Bland–Altman plots cycle time and stride length differences between measurements analyzed by Move4D and Xsens for the third trial. The central red line represents the mean difference. In contrast, the upper and lower red lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI, respectively. For cycle time, the mean difference is 0.011 s, while for stride length, it is 0.308 m.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 8371 KiB  
Article
A Novel Method for Identifying Frailty and Quantifying Muscle Strength Using the Six-Minute Walking Test
by Yunjin Zhang, Minoru Morita, Tsunahiko Hirano, Keiko Doi, Xin Han, Kazuto Matsunaga and Zhongwei Jiang
Sensors 2024, 24(14), 4489; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144489 - 11 Jul 2024
Viewed by 443
Abstract
The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is an essential test for evaluating exercise tolerance in many respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Frailty and sarcopenia can cause rapid aging of the cardiovascular system in elderly people. Early detection and evaluation of frailty and sarcopenia are crucial [...] Read more.
The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is an essential test for evaluating exercise tolerance in many respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Frailty and sarcopenia can cause rapid aging of the cardiovascular system in elderly people. Early detection and evaluation of frailty and sarcopenia are crucial for determining the treatment method. We aimed to develop a wearable measuring system for the 6MWT and propose a method for identifying frailty and quantifying walking muscle strength (WMS). In this study, 60 elderly participants were asked to wear accelerometers behind their left and right ankles during the 6MWT. The gait data were collected by a computer or smartphone. We proposed a method for analyzing walking performance using the stride length (SL) and step cadence (SC) instead of gait speed directly. Four regions (Range I–IV) were divided by cutoff values of SC = 2.0 [step/s] and SL = 0.6 [m/step] for a quick view of the frail state. There were 62.5% of frail individuals distributed in Range III and 72.4% of non-frail individuals in Range I. A concept of a WMS score was proposed for estimating WMS quantitatively. We found that 62.5% of frail individuals were scored as WMS1 and 41.4% of the non-frail elderly as WMS4. The average walking distances corresponding to WMS1–4 were 207 m, 370 m, 432 m, and 462 m, respectively. The WMS score may be a useful tool for quantitatively estimating sarcopenia or frailty due to reduced cardiopulmonary function. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Wearable Sensor-Based Gait and Movement Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the wearable accelerometer’s setting position and gait measurement system (Up direction: forward direction of the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Walking direction: forward direction of the <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis. Left direction: forward direction of the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of the 6MWT. The participants started from the cone-shaped barrel on the left and walked along experimental routes A, B, C, and D at their fastest speed for 6 min. There are some marking points between the two cone-shaped barrels with an interval of 1 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A portion of the acceleration data after signal processing. Where A and C are the straight walk parts, and B and D are the U-turn walk parts. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (left-right direction) data intuitively represent the difference between the two walking parts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Analysis results of <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis (up-down direction) acceleration data for straight walking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FFT analysis of the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis SW data (up–down direction). The average step cadence is the frequency value corresponding to the maximum peak.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cutoff values of SL and SC. (<b>a</b>) The ROC curve of SL versus HS (AUC is 0.734, the cutoff value is about 0.6 [m/step]); (<b>b</b>) The ROC curve to SC versus EX (AUC is 0.763, the cutoff value is about 2.0 [step/s]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>SC and SL distribution map. The dashed lines correspond to the threshold of 2.0 [step/s] for SC and 0.6 [m/step] for SL. The red marker is frail, blue marker is pre-frail, and green marker is non-frail, as assessed by the J-CHS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Percentages of the J-CHS assessment results in each of the four ranges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Three-dimensional scatter plot of SC, SL, and 6MWEE. The linear fit demonstrates the strong correlation (r = 0.853).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Correlations between the WMS index with physiological indicators: (<b>a</b>) 6MWD (r = 0.914) and (<b>b</b>) HS (r = 0.574).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The WMS index of the participants was divided into four levels using the sigmoid function: WMS 1 (&lt;0.01), WMS 2 (0.01–0.50), WMS 3 (0.50–0.95), and WMS 4 (&gt;0.95).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Replot of <a href="#sensors-24-04489-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a> using the WMS scale. Marker size denotes muscle strength levels, and color indicates frail status by the J-CHS assessment (red as frail cases, blue as pre-frail cases, and green as non-frail cases).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 10070 KiB  
Article
Wearable Robot Design Optimization Using Closed-Form Human–Robot Dynamic Interaction Model
by Erfan Shahabpoor, Bethany Gray and Andrew Plummer
Sensors 2024, 24(13), 4081; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134081 - 23 Jun 2024
Viewed by 697
Abstract
Wearable robots are emerging as a viable and effective solution for assisting and enabling people who suffer from balance and mobility disorders. Virtual prototyping is a powerful tool to design robots, preventing the costly iterative physical prototyping and testing. Design of wearable robots [...] Read more.
Wearable robots are emerging as a viable and effective solution for assisting and enabling people who suffer from balance and mobility disorders. Virtual prototyping is a powerful tool to design robots, preventing the costly iterative physical prototyping and testing. Design of wearable robots through modelling, however, often involves computationally expensive and error-prone multi-body simulations wrapped in an optimization framework to simulate human–robot–environment interactions. This paper proposes a framework to make the human–robot link segment system statically determinate, allowing for the closed-form inverse dynamics formulation of the link–segment model to be solved directly in order to simulate human–robot dynamic interactions. The paper also uses a technique developed by the authors to estimate the walking ground reactions from reference kinematic data, avoiding the need to measure them. The proposed framework is (a) computationally efficient and (b) transparent and easy to interpret, and (c) eliminates the need for optimization, detailed musculoskeletal modelling and measuring ground reaction forces for normal walking simulations. It is used to optimise the position of hip and ankle joints and the actuator torque–velocity requirements for a seven segments of a lower-limb wearable robot that is attached to the user at the shoes and pelvis. Gait measurements were carried out on six healthy subjects, and the data were used for design optimization and validation. The new technique promises to offer a significant advance in the way in which wearable robots can be designed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wearables)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Test subject instrumentation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>HRI modelling framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Link segment model of the human–robot system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>ID analysis of link segment planar free-body diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Hip joint configurations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> at user’s CoM: gray: configuration (a); black: configuration (b); <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> in configuration (c) is zero.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Position of robot’s ankle with respect to the human foot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Walking GRF(t)s of the right leg mapped to the timing of the gait.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of assistive and biological ankle forces and torques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Robot hip joint torque–velocity requirements for Subject 1. The average is shown in dashed red in (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Robot hip joint torque–velocity requirements for Subject 1. The average is shown in dashed red in (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Knee joint torque–velocity requirements for Subject 1. The average is shown in dashed red in (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3698 KiB  
Article
Ground Reaction Forces and Joint Moments Predict Metabolic Cost in Physical Performance: Harnessing the Power of Artificial Neural Networks
by Arash Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi, Farahnaz Fallahtafti, Prokopios Antonellis, Iraklis I. Pipinos and Sara A. Myers
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 5210; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125210 - 15 Jun 2024
Viewed by 810
Abstract
Understanding metabolic cost through biomechanical data, including ground reaction forces (GRFs) and joint moments, is vital for health, sports, and rehabilitation. The long stabilization time (2–5 min) of indirect calorimetry poses challenges in prolonged tests. This study investigated using artificial neural networks (ANNs) [...] Read more.
Understanding metabolic cost through biomechanical data, including ground reaction forces (GRFs) and joint moments, is vital for health, sports, and rehabilitation. The long stabilization time (2–5 min) of indirect calorimetry poses challenges in prolonged tests. This study investigated using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict metabolic costs from the GRF and joint moment time series. Data from 20 participants collected over 270 walking trials, including the GRF and joint moments, formed a detailed dataset. Two ANN models were crafted, netGRF for the GRF and netMoment for joint moments, and both underwent training, validation, and testing to validate their predictive accuracy for metabolic cost. NetGRF (six hidden layers, two input delays) showed significant correlations: 0.963 (training), 0.927 (validation), 0.883 (testing), p < 0.001. NetMoment (three hidden layers, one input delay) had correlations of 0.920 (training), 0.956 (validation), 0.874 (testing), p < 0.001. The models’ low mean squared errors reflect their precision. Using Partial Dependence Plots, we demonstrated how gait cycle phases affect metabolic cost predictions, pinpointing key phases. Our findings show that the GRF and joint moments data can accurately predict metabolic costs via ANN models, with netGRF being notably consistent. This emphasizes ANNs’ role in biomechanics as a crucial method for estimating metabolic costs, impacting sports science, rehabilitation, assistive technology development, and fostering personalized advancements. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The architecture of the neural network model. This schematic represents the ANN models for predicting metabolic cost from biomechanical data. The upper network illustrates the model using hip, knee, and ankle moments as inputs to predict metabolic cost. The lower network demonstrates the model utilizing vertical (GRF<sub>ver</sub>) and anterior–posterior (GRF<sub>AP</sub>) ground reaction forces as inputs to predict metabolic cost. Both models highlight the data flow from the input through the hidden layers to the output, depicting the ANN’s ability to process complex biomechanical inputs to predict energetic expenditure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comprehensive regression analysis of the net<sub>GRF</sub> model. This figure delineates the regression plots for the net<sub>GRF</sub> model across (<b>a</b>) ‘validation’, (<b>b</b>) ‘test’, (<b>c</b>) ‘training’, and (<b>d</b>) ‘all’ datasets, illustrating the model’s predictive accuracy and generalization capability. The plots compare the predicted metabolic costs against actual values, with each subset providing insights into the model’s performance in different phases of data handling, from learning to generalization on unseen data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comprehensive regression analysis of the net<sub>Moment</sub> model. This figure delineates the regression plots for the net<sub>Moment</sub> model across (<b>a</b>) ‘validation’, (<b>b</b>) ‘test’, (<b>c</b>) ‘training’, and (<b>d</b>) ‘all’ datasets, illustrating the model’s predictive accuracy and generalization capability. The plots compare the predicted metabolic costs against actual values, with each subset providing insights into the model’s performance in different phases of data handling, from learning to generalization on unseen data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Performance of the ANN models for the GRF and joint moments. Panel (<b>a</b>) illustrates the training and validation performance over epochs for the net<sub>GRF</sub> model, while Panel (<b>b</b>) does the same for the net<sub>Moment</sub> model. These plots showcase the models’ learning progress, highlighting moments of optimal learning and potential overfitting through changes in error rates and performance metrics. The green circle highlights optimal learning epochs and signs of overfitting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Error histograms for the GRF and joint moment models. Panel (<b>a</b>) presents the error distribution for net<sub>GRF</sub> model, and Panel (<b>b</b>), for the net<sub>Moment</sub> model, illustrates the variance between predicted and actual metabolic costs. The histograms elucidate the frequency of error magnitudes, aiding in identifying consistent prediction deviations and outlier errors for model refinement. A concentration of errors closer to zero for the net<sub>GRF</sub> model indicates a tighter clustering of predicted values around the actual metabolic costs and, consequently, a higher accuracy. In contrast, there is a broader spread of errors for the net<sub>Moment</sub> model, implying a greater variance in the accuracy of predictions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Analysis of ground reaction force influences on metabolic cost prediction under net<sub>GRF</sub>. (<b>a</b>) Displays the vertical ground reaction force (GRF<sub>Ver</sub>) signals throughout various percentages of the gait cycle, aggregated across all trials (270 in total). (<b>b</b>) Shows the progression of anterior–posterior ground reaction force (GRF<sub>AP</sub>) signals over the gait cycle and across all trials. (<b>c</b>) Presents a detailed view of how each percentage of the gait cycle impacts the Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) between the predicted and actual metabolic costs under net<sub>GRF</sub>. This visualization, the Partial Dependence Plot (PDP), underscores the significance of distinct phases of the gait cycle in the model’s prediction accuracy. Vertical lines represent the standard deviation of the RMSE, indicating variability and confidence at each point in the gait cycle. The constancy of other factors during this analysis suggests these influences are directly attributable to variations in the gait cycle’s ground reaction forces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Analysis of joint moments’ influences on metabolic cost prediction under net<sub>moment</sub>. (<b>a</b>) Depicts the hip joint moment (Hip<sub>M</sub>) variations across different gait cycle percentages, compiled from all trials (270 in total). (<b>b</b>) Illustrates the progression of knee joint moment (Knee<sub>M</sub>) signals throughout the gait cycle, encompassing all trials. (<b>c</b>) Portrays ankle joint moment (Ankle<sub>M</sub>) fluctuations over the gait cycle and aggregates data from all trials. (<b>d</b>) Provides a granular analysis of each gait cycle percentage’s influence on the Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) between the model’s predicted and the actual joint moments under net<sub>moment</sub>. This plot, the Partial Dependence Plot (PDP), highlights the critical phases of the gait cycle that significantly affect the model’s accuracy in predicting joint moments. The vertical lines indicate the standard deviation of the RMSE, offering insights into the variability and reliability of the model’s predictions at each gait cycle percentage. The stability of other variables in this analysis implies that these effects are directly linked to changes in the joint moments during the gait cycle.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8603 KiB  
Article
Novel Methods for Personalized Gait Assistance: Three-Dimensional Trajectory Prediction Based on Regression and LSTM Models
by Pablo Romero-Sorozábal, Gabriel Delgado-Oleas, Annemarie F. Laudanski, Álvaro Gutiérrez and Eduardo Rocon
Biomimetics 2024, 9(6), 352; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9060352 - 12 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 802
Abstract
Enhancing human–robot interaction has been a primary focus in robotic gait assistance, with a thorough understanding of human motion being crucial for personalizing gait assistance. Traditional gait trajectory references from Clinical Gait Analysis (CGA) face limitations due to their inability to account for [...] Read more.
Enhancing human–robot interaction has been a primary focus in robotic gait assistance, with a thorough understanding of human motion being crucial for personalizing gait assistance. Traditional gait trajectory references from Clinical Gait Analysis (CGA) face limitations due to their inability to account for individual variability. Recent advancements in gait pattern generators, integrating regression models and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) techniques, have aimed at providing more personalized and dynamically adaptable solutions. This article introduces a novel approach that expands regression and ANN applications beyond mere angular estimations to include three-dimensional spatial predictions. Unlike previous methods, our approach provides comprehensive spatial trajectories for hip, knee and ankle tailored to individual kinematics, significantly enhancing end-effector rehabilitation robotic devices. Our models achieve state-of-the-art accuracy: overall RMSE of 13.40 mm and a correlation coefficient of 0.92 for the regression model, and RMSE of 12.57 mm and a correlation of 0.99 for the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model. These advancements underscore the potential of these models to offer more personalized gait trajectory assistance, improving human–robot interactions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental setup diagram illustrating the location of markers on the subject’s body and force plates positions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comprehensive Gait Analysis Methodology and Kinematic Data Visualization. (<b>a</b>) Data Segmentation graph depicting how gait cycles are delineated using heel strike events detected by ground reaction forces on the force plate, with step transitions highlighted over time. (<b>b</b>) Segmented kinematics displaying the trajectory of joint positions and velocities compiled from all trials across the subject cohort.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Multidimensional analysis of gait key-points along all joints and axes and example of regression-based key-points estimations: (<b>a</b>) the spread of key-points for the hip, knee, and ankle joints across the X, Y, and Z throughout various gait cycles and velocities for the entire subject group; (<b>b</b>) example of key-point estimation for the ankle trajectory in X, correlating joint position and gait cycle percentage of each key-point with gait speed through regression-based analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparative visualization of measured and reconstructed gait trajectory for a representative subject. The original, measured 3D joint trajectories (solid lines) are presented alongside the estimated trajectories (dashed lines) generated through regression-based models. The spline reconstruction method is applied to the estimated key-points (displayed in black), demonstrating the smooth and close approximation of the reconstructed path to the measured trajectory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic of the LSTM Neural Network to predict 3D positions of the lower joints one step ahead. Sequences of 11 features are received by the input layer, including height, gait velocity, and the positions of all lower extremity joints in the space. The network comprises two LSTM layers, each with 120 hidden units connected by dropout layers with a rate of 0.2 to prevent overfitting by randomly omitting features during training. The final output sequence represents the 3D positions of the nine joints corresponding to the subsequent 100 time-normalized points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of LSTM Predictions for successive gait cycles. This figure illustrates the presented LSTM network’s capability to predict 3D joint trajectories. The known joint positions are delineated as light blue lines, LSTM’s predictions are represented as dashed black lines, and the true future positions are shown as teal lines. The input sequence depicting the last 100 time-normalized data points is determined by the shaded light blue areas. In contrast, the network’s prediction output for the given input is highlighted in the teal areas. The charts across the X-Z and Y-Z planes, alongside the temporal sequences for the X, Y, and Z axes, collectively affirm the model’s fidelity in replicating the intricate, rhythmic motions characteristic of human ambulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>RMSE and Loss learning curves during the LSTM training. Solid lines represent the training set and dashed lines the validation set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Validation of regression and LSTM-based models. Figures in the first row display the true gait trajectories of the training set in solid blue lines alongside the model predictions in dotted dashed black lines in both the sagittal and frontal planes, illustrating the models’ fidelity in spatial trajectory estimation. The second row contains bar graphs representing the correlation coefficients and RMSE metrics for each joint index, providing a quantitative assessment of each model’s performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Comparative analysis of gait prediction error accuracy using regression-based and LSTM-based models under velocity variations. This figure displays box plots illustrating the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) values for both regression-based and LSTM-based models across varying velocities (km/h) for the hip, knee, and ankle joints in the X, Y, and Z axes. Each box plot details the RMSE computed from true and estimated joint trajectories, highlighting the median, quartile ranges (Q1, Q3), and outliers. This visualization aids in evaluating the models’ precision in estimating gait movements under different walking speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Comparative analysis of gait prediction error accuracy using regression-based and LSTM-based models under height variations. This figure displays box plots illustrating the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) values for both regression-based and LSTM-based models across varying heights (cm) for the hip, knee, and ankle joints in the X, Y, and Z axes. Each box plot details the RMSE computed from true and estimated joint trajectories, highlighting the median, quartile ranges (Q1, Q3), and outliers. This visualization aids in evaluating the models’ precision in estimating gait movements under different subject heights.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Comparative analysis of gait prediction correlation accuracy using regression-based and LSTM-based models under velocity variations. This figure displays box plots illustrating the correlation coefficient (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-sans-serif">ρ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>) values for both regression-based and LSTM-based models across varying velocities (km/h) for the hip, knee, and ankle joints in the X, Y, and Z axes. Each box plot details the correlation computed from true and estimated joint trajectories, highlighting the median, quartile ranges (Q1, Q3), and outliers. This visualization aids in evaluating the models’ precision in estimating gait movements under different walking speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Comparative analysis of gait prediction correlation accuracy using regression-based and LSTM-based models under velocity variations. This figure displays box plots illustrating the correlation coefficient (<span class="html-italic">ρ</span>) values for both regression-based and LSTM-based models across varying heights (cm) for the hip, knee, and ankle joints in the X, Y, and Z axes. Each box plot details the correlation computed from true and estimated joint trajectories, highlighting the median, quartile ranges (Q1, Q3), and outliers. This visualization aids in evaluating the models’ precision in estimating gait movements under different subject heights.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 481 KiB  
Article
Lower Limb Muscle Activation in Young Adults Walking in Water and on Land
by Christopher Long, Christopher J. Dakin, Sara A. Harper, Joonsun Park, Aaron Folau, Mark Crandall, Nathan Christensen and Talin Louder
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 5044; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125044 - 10 Jun 2024
Viewed by 902
Abstract
Previous research has shown that exercise interventions requiring increased activation of the tibialis anterior (TA), the primary ankle dorsiflexor, can improve walking performance in individuals with foot drop. Correspondingly, heightened drag forces experienced during walking performed in water may augment TA activation during [...] Read more.
Previous research has shown that exercise interventions requiring increased activation of the tibialis anterior (TA), the primary ankle dorsiflexor, can improve walking performance in individuals with foot drop. Correspondingly, heightened drag forces experienced during walking performed in water may augment TA activation during the swing phase of gait, potentially leading to improved walking gait on land. Therefore, this study aimed to compare surface electromyographic (sEMG) activation in the TA and medial gastrocnemius (GM) during gait performed in water versus on land. Thirty-eight healthy, recreationally active young adults, comprising 18 females and 20 males, participated in the study. Each participant completed 2 min walking trials under five conditions: land 2.5 mph, land 3.5 mph, water 2.5 mph, water 3.5 mph, and water 3.5 mph with added jet resistance. Stride kinematics were collected using 2-dimensional underwater motion capture. TA and GM, muscle activation magnitudes, were quantified using sEMG root-mean-square (RMS) amplitudes for both the swing and stance phases of walking. Additionally, TA and GM co-activation (Co-A) indices were estimated. Two-way within-subjects repeated measures analyses of variance were used to evaluate the main effects of and interactions between the environment and walking speed. Additionally, paired sample t-tests were conducted as a secondary analysis to investigate differences between walking in water at 3.5 mph with and without added jet resistance. Main effects and interactions were observed across various stride kinematics and sEMG measures. Notably, TA sEMG RMS during the swing phase of walking gait performed at 2.5 mph was 15% greater in water than on land (p < 0.001). This effect increased when walking gait was performed at 3.5 mph (94%; p < 0.001) and when jet resistance was added to the 3.5 mph condition (52%; p < 0.001). Furthermore, TA Co-A was increased during the stance phase of gait in water compared to on land (p < 0.001), while GM Co-A was reduced during the swing phase (p < 0.001). The findings of this study offer compelling evidence supporting the efficacy of aquatic treadmill walking as a potential treatment for individuals suffering from foot drop. However, further research is needed to evaluate whether a causal relationship exists between heightened TA activation observed during aquatic treadmill walking and improvements in voluntary dorsiflexion during gait. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Foot Biomechanics and Gait Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Speed × environment interaction on tibialis anterior muscle activation during the swing phase of walking gait.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1246 KiB  
Article
Evaluating the Repeatability of Musculoskeletal Modelling Force Outcomes in Gait among Chronic Stroke Survivors: Implications for Contemporary Clinical Practice
by Georgios Giarmatzis, Styliani Fotiadou, Erasmia Giannakou, Evangelos Karakasis, Konstantinos Vadikolias and Nikolaos Aggelousis
Biomechanics 2024, 4(2), 333-345; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics4020023 - 1 Jun 2024
Viewed by 457
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the consistency of musculoskeletal modelling outcomes during walking in chronic post-stroke patients, focusing on both affected and unaffected sides. Understanding the specific muscle forces involved is crucial for designing targeted rehabilitation strategies to improve balance and mobility after [...] Read more.
This study aims to evaluate the consistency of musculoskeletal modelling outcomes during walking in chronic post-stroke patients, focusing on both affected and unaffected sides. Understanding the specific muscle forces involved is crucial for designing targeted rehabilitation strategies to improve balance and mobility after a stroke. Musculoskeletal modelling provides valuable insights into muscle and joint loading, aiding clinicians in analysing essential biomarkers and enhancing patients’ functional outcomes. However, the repeatability of these modelling outcomes in stroke gait has not been thoroughly explored until now. Twelve post-stroke, hemiparetic survivors were included in the study, which consisted of a gait analysis protocol to capture kinematic and kinetic variables. Two generic full body MSK models—Hamner (Ham) and Rajagopal (Raj)—were used to compute joint angles and muscle forces during walking, with combinations of two muscle force estimation algorithms (Static Optimisation (SO) and Computed Muscle Control (CMC)) and different joint degrees-of-freedoms (DOF). The multiple correlation coefficient (MCCoef) was used to compute repeatability for all forces, grouped based on anatomical function. Regardless of models and DOFs, the mean minimum (0.75) and maximum (0.94) MCCoefs denote moderate-to-excellent repeatability for all muscle groups. The combination of the Ham model and SO provided the most repeatable muscle force estimations of all the muscle groups except for the hip flexors, adductors and internal rotators. DOF configuration did not generally affect muscle force repeatability in the Ham–SO case, although the 311 seemed to relate to the highest values. Lastly, the DOF setting had a significant effect on some muscle groups’ force output, with the highest magnitudes reported for the 321 and 322 of non-paretic and paretic hip adductors and extensors, knee flexors and ankle dorsiflexors and paretic knee flexors. The primary findings of our study can assist users in selecting the most suitable modelling workflow and encourage the widespread adoption of MSK modelling in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effect of Neuromuscular Deficit on Gait)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A six-camera Vicon system, sixteen retro-reflective markers and two ground embedded force plates were used for motion capture. For the Opensim analysis, a static trial was recorded to scale the generic lower limb models. Then, recorded marker trajectories (pink spheres) and GRFs (green arrows) were used to calculate joint angles and muscle forces during gait using SO and CMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Boxplots showing how mean peak muscle forces per group, when calculated using the Hamner model and SO, are affected by DOF configuration, for the paretic (<b>above</b>) and non-paretic side (<b>below</b>). Letters denote statistical significance accordingly: c: significantly different than 321, d: significantly different than 322, e: significantly different than 331, f: significantly different than 332.</p>
Full article ">
0 pages, 1323 KiB  
Article
Association between Physical Function, Mental Function and Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Hye-Jin Park, Ngeemasara Thapa, Seongryu Bae, Ja-Gyeong Yang, Jaewon Choi, Eun-Seon Noh and Hyuntae Park
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3207; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113207 - 29 May 2024
Viewed by 538
Abstract
Background: This study examines the relationship between physical and mental function and frailty, independently and in conjunction with polypharmacy, among older adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of 368 participants aged ≥60 years. The participants were categorized into either robust or [...] Read more.
Background: This study examines the relationship between physical and mental function and frailty, independently and in conjunction with polypharmacy, among older adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of 368 participants aged ≥60 years. The participants were categorized into either robust or frail groups using Fried’s frailty phenotype. Physical functions were assessed using grip strength, gait speed, Timed Up and Go (TUG), the Five Chair Sit to Stand Test (FCSST) and the Six-Minute Walk Test (SMWT). Mental functions were assessed using cognitive function and depression. Cognitive function was measured using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Depression was assessed with the Korean version of the Short Geriatric Depression Scale (SGDS). Results: The mean age of study population was 75.4 years. In this population, we identified 78.8% (n = 290) robust participants and 21.2% (n = 78) frail participants. The study examined frailty status (frail vs. non-frail) and frailty with and without polypharmacy using multivariate logistic regressions, adjusting for age and sex. In the logistic regression model estimating the risk of frailty, after adjustments for age, sex, BMI, and number of medications, individuals with low SMWT showed a significantly increased risk of frailty, with an odds ratio (OR) of 8.66 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 4.55–16.48. Additionally, global cognitive function was associated with a 1.97-fold increase in frailty risk (95% CI: 1.02–3.67). Moreover, in models adjusted for age, sex, and BMI to assess frailty risk linked to polypharmacy, the TUG, SMWT, and SGDS all showed increased risks, with ORs of 3.65 (95% CI: 1.07–12.47), 5.06 (95% CI: 1.40–18.32), and 5.71 (95% CI: 1.79–18.18), respectively. Conclusions: Physical function (SMWT, FCSST, TUG) and mental function (depression, cognition) were associated with frailty. By comprehensively examining these factors, we will gain valuable insights into frailty and enable more precise strategies for intervention and prevention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology & Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of screening and enrollment of study participants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Significant differences in frailty status and/or polypharmacy according to physical, mental, and cognitive function; (<b>a</b>) Six-Minute Walk Test, (<b>b</b>) Timed Up and Go, (<b>c</b>) Five Chair Sit to Stand Test, (<b>d</b>) Short Form of Geriatric Depression Scale, (<b>e</b>) Mini-Mental State Examination. One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the Bonferroni test and a Kruskal–Wallis test with the Mann–Whitney U test were used compare frail with presence of polypharmacy (FP), frail and absence of polypharmacy (FNP), robust with presence of polypharmacy (NFP), and robust and absence of polypharmacy (NFNP). The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 313 KiB  
Article
Atrial Fibrillation and Other Cardiovascular Factors and the Risk of Dementia: An Italian Case–Control Study
by Riccardo Mazzoli, Annalisa Chiari, Marco Vitolo, Caterina Garuti, Giorgia Adani, Giulia Vinceti, Giovanna Zamboni, Manuela Tondelli, Chiara Galli, Manuela Costa, Simone Salemme, Giuseppe Boriani, Marco Vinceti and Tommaso Filippini
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(6), 688; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060688 - 27 May 2024
Viewed by 839
Abstract
Dementia is a major neurologic syndrome characterized by severe cognitive decline, and it has a detrimental impact on overall physical health, leading to conditions such as frailty, changes in gait, and fall risk. Depending on whether symptoms occur before or after the age [...] Read more.
Dementia is a major neurologic syndrome characterized by severe cognitive decline, and it has a detrimental impact on overall physical health, leading to conditions such as frailty, changes in gait, and fall risk. Depending on whether symptoms occur before or after the age of 65, it can be classified as early-onset (EOD) or late-onset (LOD) dementia. The present study is aimed at investigating the role of cardiovascular factors on EOD and LOD risk in an Italian population. Using a case–control study design, EOD and LOD cases were recruited at the Modena Cognitive Neurology Centers in 2016–2019. Controls were recruited among caregivers of all the dementia cases. Information about their demographics, lifestyles, and medical history were collected through a tailored questionnaire. We used the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate the EOD and LOD risk associated with the investigated factors after adjusting for potential confounders. Of the final 146 participants, 58 were diagnosed with EOD, 34 with LOD, and 54 were controls. According to their medical history, atrial fibrillation was associated with increased disease risk (ORs 1.90; 95% CI 0.32–11.28, and 3.64; 95% CI 0.32–41.39 for EOD and LOD, respectively). Dyslipidemia and diabetes showed a positive association with EOD, while the association was negative for LOD. We could not evaluate the association between myocardial infarction and EOD, while increased risk was observed for LOD. No clear association emerged for carotid artery stenosis or valvular heart disease. In this study, despite the limited number of exposed subjects and the high imprecision of the estimates, we found positive associations between cardiovascular disease, particularly dyslipidemia, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation, and EOD. Full article
19 pages, 3122 KiB  
Article
Enhancing Human Key Point Identification: A Comparative Study of the High-Resolution VICON Dataset and COCO Dataset Using BPNET
by Yunju Lee, Bibash Lama, Sunghwan Joo and Jaerock Kwon
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 4351; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114351 - 21 May 2024
Viewed by 537
Abstract
Accurately identifying human key points is crucial for various applications, including activity recognition, pose estimation, and gait analysis. This study introduces a high-resolution dataset formed via the VICON motion capture system and three diverse 2D cameras. It facilitates the training of neural networks [...] Read more.
Accurately identifying human key points is crucial for various applications, including activity recognition, pose estimation, and gait analysis. This study introduces a high-resolution dataset formed via the VICON motion capture system and three diverse 2D cameras. It facilitates the training of neural networks to estimate 2D key joint positions from images and videos. The study involved 25 healthy adults (17 males, 8 females), executing normal gait for 2 to 3 s. The VICON system captured 3D ground truth data, while the three 2D cameras collected images from different perspectives (0°, 45°, and 135°). The dataset was used to train the Body Pose Network (BPNET), a popular neural network model developed by NVIDIA TAO. Additionally, a comparison entails another BPNET model trained on the COCO 2017 dataset, featuring over 118,000 annotated images. Notably, the proposed dataset exhibited a higher level of accuracy (14.5%) than COCO 2017, despite comprising one-fourth of the image count (23,741 annotated image). This substantial reduction in data size translates to improvements in computational efficiency during model training. Furthermore, the unique dataset’s emphasis on gait and precise prediction of key joint positions during normal gait movements distinguish it from existing alternatives. This study has implications ranging from gait-based person identification, and non-invasive concussion detection through sports temporal analysis, to pathologic gait pattern identification. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Sensors for Postural or Gait Stability Assessment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General workflow (the proposed dataset consists of the 2D images captured in different views and 2D key point position acquired from the transformation of VICON recordings, along with the segmentations and bounding box discussed in <a href="#sec3dot1-applsci-14-04351" class="html-sec">Section 3.1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time synchronization and calibration of the VICON system and 2D cameras. (<b>a</b>) VICON Trigger System for time-synchronization. (<b>b</b>) 2D Cameras calibrated using checkerboard to project 3D ground truth data into the image 2D frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The general workflow and experiment setup for the data collection process (<b>a</b>) Data collection using VICON Motion Capture and three 2D cameras; (<b>b</b>) 2D images from different views; (<b>c</b>) 2D ground truth data from VICON system; (<b>d</b>) BPNET is trained with the collected data; and (<b>e</b>) BP inference outputs with 2D joint positions in 2D images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Segmentation and boundary box acquisition from Pixellib.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Inference results from the BPNET trained with the proposed dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison results for individual joints as MPJPE. Two different models trained with the proposed dataset (23,741 images) vs. COCO 2017 (118,287 images) were tested with approximately 2510 images for calculating MPJPE. The abbreviations are as follows: L/A: left ankle, L/K: left knee, L/H: left hip, R/A: right ankle, R/K: right knee, R/H: right hip, L/W: left wrist, L/E: left elbow, L/S: left shoulder, R/W: right wrist, R/E: right elbow, R/S: right shoulder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison results of MPJPE for different views between the proposed test images at 0 degrees vs. COCO test images (both approximately, 830 images). (<b>b</b>) Comparison results of MPJPE for different views between the proposed test images at 45 degrees vs. COCO test images (both approximately, 830 images). (<b>c</b>) Comparison results of MPJPE for different views between the proposed test images at 135 degrees vs. COCO test images (both approximately, 830 images). The abbreviations are as follows: L/A: left ankle, L/K: left knee, L/H: left hip, R/A: right ankle, R/K: right knee, R/H: right hip, L/W: left wrist, L/E: left elbow, L/S: left shoulder, R/W: right wrist, R/E: right elbow, R/S: right shoulder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison results of MPJPE for different views between the proposed test images at 0 degrees vs. COCO test images (both approximately, 830 images). (<b>b</b>) Comparison results of MPJPE for different views between the proposed test images at 45 degrees vs. COCO test images (both approximately, 830 images). (<b>c</b>) Comparison results of MPJPE for different views between the proposed test images at 135 degrees vs. COCO test images (both approximately, 830 images). The abbreviations are as follows: L/A: left ankle, L/K: left knee, L/H: left hip, R/A: right ankle, R/K: right knee, R/H: right hip, L/W: left wrist, L/E: left elbow, L/S: left shoulder, R/W: right wrist, R/E: right elbow, R/S: right shoulder.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 12761 KiB  
Article
Combining Different Wearable Devices to Assess Gait Speed in Real-World Settings
by Michele Zanoletti, Pasquale Bufano, Francesco Bossi, Francesco Di Rienzo, Carlotta Marinai, Gianluca Rho, Carlo Vallati, Nicola Carbonaro, Alberto Greco, Marco Laurino and Alessandro Tognetti
Sensors 2024, 24(10), 3205; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24103205 - 17 May 2024
Viewed by 735
Abstract
Assessing mobility in daily life can provide significant insights into several clinical conditions, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of wearable devices’ performance in gait speed estimation and explore optimal device combinations for everyday [...] Read more.
Assessing mobility in daily life can provide significant insights into several clinical conditions, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of wearable devices’ performance in gait speed estimation and explore optimal device combinations for everyday use. Using data collected from smartphones, smartwatches, and smart shoes, we evaluated the individual capabilities of each device and explored their synergistic effects when combined, thereby accommodating the preferences and possibilities of individuals for wearing different types of devices. Our study involved 20 healthy subjects performing a modified Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) under various conditions. The results revealed only little performance differences among devices, with the combination of smartwatches and smart shoes exhibiting superior estimation accuracy. Particularly, smartwatches captured additional health-related information and demonstrated enhanced accuracy when paired with other devices. Surprisingly, wearing all devices concurrently did not yield optimal results, suggesting a potential redundancy in feature extraction. Feature importance analysis highlighted key variables contributing to gait speed estimation, providing valuable insights for model refinement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable and Mobile Sensors and Data Processing—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Smartphone (<b>left</b>), smartwatch (<b>center</b>), and smart shoe (<b>right</b>). Local reference frames associated with the inertial sensors are reported.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Subject wearing the reference system and the wearable devices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Workflow for gait speed estimation. The blocks within the blue box are repeated for every combination of devices. Meanwhile, the blocks inside the red box, which encompassed the blue box as well, are carried out for each subject in the cross-validation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for the “Watch + Shoes” combination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for the “Watch + Shoes” combination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>6MWD estimation using a correlation plot for the “Watch + Shoes” combination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>6MWD estimation using a Bland-Altman plot for the “Watch + Shoes” combination.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for “Phone” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Phone” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for “Watch” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>GS estimation using a Bland-Altman plot for “Watch” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for “Shoes” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Shoes” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A7
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for the “Phone + Watch” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A8
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Phone + Watch” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A9
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for the “Phone + Shoes” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A10
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Phone + Shoes” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A11
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for “All Devices” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A12
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “All Devices” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A13
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for “Phone” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A14
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Phone” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A15
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for “Watch” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A16
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Watch” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A17
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for “Shoes” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A18
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Shoes” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A19
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for the “Phone + Watch” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A20
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Phone + Watch” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A21
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for the “Phone + Shoes” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A22
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “Phone + Shoes” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A23
<p>GS estimation using a correlation plot for “All Devices” configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure A24
<p>GS estimation using a Bland–Altman plot for “All Devices” configuration.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 8691 KiB  
Article
Pedestrian Pose Recognition Based on Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave Radar with Meta-Learning
by Jiajia Shi, Qiang Zhang, Quan Shi, Liu Chu and Robin Braun
Sensors 2024, 24(9), 2932; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24092932 - 5 May 2024
Viewed by 809
Abstract
With the continuous advancement of autonomous driving and monitoring technologies, there is increasing attention on non-intrusive target monitoring and recognition. This paper proposes an ArcFace SE-attention model-agnostic meta-learning approach (AS-MAML) by integrating attention mechanisms into residual networks for pedestrian gait recognition using frequency-modulated [...] Read more.
With the continuous advancement of autonomous driving and monitoring technologies, there is increasing attention on non-intrusive target monitoring and recognition. This paper proposes an ArcFace SE-attention model-agnostic meta-learning approach (AS-MAML) by integrating attention mechanisms into residual networks for pedestrian gait recognition using frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) millimeter-wave radar through meta-learning. We enhance the feature extraction capability of the base network using channel attention mechanisms and integrate the additive angular margin loss function (ArcFace loss) into the inner loop of MAML to constrain inner loop optimization and improve radar discrimination. Then, this network is used to classify small-sample micro-Doppler images obtained from millimeter-wave radar as the data source for pose recognition. Experimental tests were conducted on pose estimation and image classification tasks. The results demonstrate significant detection and recognition performance, with an accuracy of 94.5%, accompanied by a 95% confidence interval. Additionally, on the open-source dataset DIAT-μRadHAR, which is specially processed to increase classification difficulty, the network achieves a classification accuracy of 85.9%. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Time-related characteristics of the sawtooth modulation signal. The red represents the transmitting signal, and the blue represents the receiving signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Micro-Doppler image of a walking person.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Micro-Doppler images of seven gait postures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>AS-MAML network structure diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>MAML update processing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Experiment scene of data collection. (<b>a</b>) represents the human target, (<b>b</b>) is the AWR1642 radar and DCA1000EVM data acquisition board, (<b>c</b>) is the front of the radar and data acquisition board, and (<b>d</b>) mmwave studio is the control software of PC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Confusion matrix for ablation experiment. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) refer to the four ablation experiment results mentioned in the above text, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>T-SNE visualization results. The clustering effect of (<b>c</b>) AS-MAML is significantly better than that of (<b>a</b>) Res18 and (<b>b</b>) MAML, as the distances between categories are too close, which are circled in red.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic diagram of image enhancement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The training loss function and accuracy curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Confusion matrices for the proposed and compared networks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Micro-Doppler images with three walking speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Confusion matrix for classes with three walking speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Micro-Doppler images of two-person walking and single-person walking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Confusion matrix for two-person and single-person walking.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop