[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (125)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gabapentin

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 5273 KiB  
Review
Gabapentin-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency: The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Stress Misresponse and Risk of Infection: A Case Report and Literature Review
by Evmorfia Pechlivanidou, Alexandros Chatzikyriakos, Maria Anna Zisi, Nikolaos Paraskevopoulos, Semeli Kaltsa, Orestis K. Konstantas, Panteleimon Zogakis, Aikaterini Catsouli, Nick Sekouris and Rodanthi E. Margariti
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(9), 1174; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17091174 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 346
Abstract
This literature review, in light of the presented case report, explores the complex interplay between gabapentin (GBP), a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analog, and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis in patients undergoing major surgical procedures. It specifically investigates the potential impact of GBP on cortisol [...] Read more.
This literature review, in light of the presented case report, explores the complex interplay between gabapentin (GBP), a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analog, and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis in patients undergoing major surgical procedures. It specifically investigates the potential impact of GBP on cortisol levels, stress responses, and infection risk, illustrated by a detailed clinical case. This review combines a comprehensive literature search with a case report of a 17-year-old male with osteosarcoma who experienced transient adrenal insufficiency and infections while receiving GBP. The case is analyzed in the context of the existing literature on GBP and the HPA axis. The findings highlight the intricate relationship between GBP use, adrenal insufficiency, and infection susceptibility. It underscores the need for further research and clinical vigilance when prescribing GBP to patients with underlying medical conditions, particularly in the context of major surgical procedures. The review underscores the need for further research and clinical vigilance when prescribing GBP, particularly in perioperative settings. In conclusion, GBP’s effects on the HPA axis and immune responses are complex and multifaceted. Clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing GBP, especially for patients with underlying conditions undergoing major surgery. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of GBP’s influence on cortisol levels and stress responses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Medicaments related to the case: Their administration (mgrs) through calendar time. (*: Dates when low morning cortisol levels were estimated, indicating HPA axes suppression).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Inflammation-related biomarkers: Their administration (mg/L for CRP and mm ESR) through calendar time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Wound infection clinical image after megaprostesis implantation. <span class="html-italic">Staphylococcus xylosus</span> was isolated after debridement’s intraoperative cultures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mechanistic Pathways of Gabapentin-Induced Cortisol Suppression and Related Disease Risks.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 270 KiB  
Article
Benzodiazepine Adverse Reaction Cases Age 50 and Older Reported to the U.S. Poison Centers: Healthcare Use and Major Medical Effects
by Bryan Y. Choi, Namkee G. Choi, C. Nathan Marti and S. David Baker
Pharmacoepidemiology 2024, 3(3), 285-296; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma3030019 - 31 Aug 2024
Viewed by 269
Abstract
Background: Despite widespread consensus on the need to reduce benzodiazepine (BZD) use in older adults, prescription rates in the U.S. have paradoxically increased over the past few decades. Objective: We examined (1) the characteristics of the BZD adverse reaction cases in patients aged [...] Read more.
Background: Despite widespread consensus on the need to reduce benzodiazepine (BZD) use in older adults, prescription rates in the U.S. have paradoxically increased over the past few decades. Objective: We examined (1) the characteristics of the BZD adverse reaction cases in patients aged 50 and older that were admitted to a healthcare facility (HCF) and experienced major effects/death, and (2) the associations between the concomitant use of opioids and/or antidepressants and HCF admission and major effects/death among BZD cases. Methods: We used the 2015–2022 National Poison Data System (NPDS), which contained data from 55 America’s Poison Centers. We fitted two multivariable logistic regression models to examine the associations between the co-use of opioids and/or antidepressants and HCF admission and major effects/death. Results: Of the BZD cases that were examined (N = 1979), 14.9% or 295 cases were admitted to healthcare facilities, and 8.5% of those who were followed up (77 out of 893 cases) experienced major effects or death. The number of co-used substances, co-use of opioids and antidepressants, atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, and Gabapentin were associated with greater odds of healthcare admission. Co-use of opioids and healthcare admission were associated with greater odds of major effects/death. Conclusions: Adverse reactions and healthcare admissions are likely to be prevented when healthcare providers limit and carefully monitor BZD prescribing, especially for those who are on other medications, including prescription opioids and antidepressants. Full article
22 pages, 2538 KiB  
Article
Cannabis sativa L. Extract Alleviates Neuropathic Pain and Modulates CB1 and CB2 Receptor Expression in Rat
by Joanna Bartkowiak-Wieczorek, Agnieszka Bienert, Kamila Czora-Poczwardowska, Radosław Kujawski, Michał Szulc, Przemysław Mikołajczak, Anna-Maria Wizner, Małgorzata Jamka, Marcin Hołysz, Karolina Wielgus, Ryszard Słomski and Edyta Mądry
Biomolecules 2024, 14(9), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14091065 - 26 Aug 2024
Viewed by 959
Abstract
Introduction: Cannabis sativa L. (CSL) extract has pain-relieving potential due to its cannabinoid content, so the effects of two CSL extracts on alleviating neuropathic pain were investigated in vivo. Methods and groups: Male Wistar rats (n = 130) were divided into groups and [...] Read more.
Introduction: Cannabis sativa L. (CSL) extract has pain-relieving potential due to its cannabinoid content, so the effects of two CSL extracts on alleviating neuropathic pain were investigated in vivo. Methods and groups: Male Wistar rats (n = 130) were divided into groups and received vincristine (0.1 mg/kg) and gabapentin (60 mg/kg) to induce and relieve neuropathic pain or CSL extracts (D and B). The mRNA and protein expression of the cannabinoid receptors type 1 and 2 (CB1R, CB2R) were evaluated in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and lymphocytes. Behavioural tests (Tail-Flick and von Frey) were performed on all animals. Results: VK-induced neuropathic pain was accompanied by decreased CB1R protein level and CB2R mRNA expression in the cortex. Gabapentin relieved pain and increased CB1R protein levels in the hippocampus compared to the vincristine group. Hippocampus CB1R protein expression increased with the administration of extract D (10 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg) and extract B (7.5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg) compared to VK group. In the cerebral cortex CSL decreased CB1R protein expression (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg of extract B) and mRNA level (5 mg/kg, 7.5 mg/kg of extract B; 20 mg/kg of extract D) compared to the VK-group.CB2R protein expression increased in the hippocampus after treatment with extract B (7.5 mg/kg) compared to the VK-group. In the cerebral cortex extract B (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg) increased CB2R protein expression compared to VK-group. Conclusion: Alterations in cannabinoid receptor expression do not fully account for the observed behavioural changes in rats. Therefore, additional signalling pathways may contribute to the initiation and transmission of neuropathic pain. The Cannabis extracts tested demonstrated antinociceptive effects comparable to gabapentin, highlighting the antinociceptive properties of Cannabis extracts for human use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Value of Natural Compounds as Therapeutic Agents: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental scheme of neuropathic pain induction and treatment in rats.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes in pain response in the tail-flick and von Frey tests in animals after administration of vincristine compared to the control group (NaCl). * statistically significant differences compared to the control group (NaCl; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Changes in the pain response in the tail flick test and von Frey test in animals after combined administration of vincristine and gabapentin compared to the group of animals receiving vincristine alone. * statistically significant differences compared to VK (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05); ^—statistically significant differences for the respective group compared to t = 0 (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in the pain response in the tail-flick test in animals after administration of vincristine and extract D, as well as vincristine and extract B, at different doses (5–40 mg/kg, p.o.) relative to the group receiving vincristine. * statistically significant differences compared to VK (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05); ^—statistically significant differences for the respective group compared to t = 0 (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05); VK—Vincristine—0.1 mg/kg of body weight, intraperitoneal administration; Extract D—<span class="html-italic">Cannabis sativa</span> L. extract, <span class="html-italic">variety Dora</span>; the dose expressed as synthetic Cannabidiol, oral administration Extract B—<span class="html-italic">Cannabis sativa</span> L. extract, <span class="html-italic">variety Tygra</span>; the dose expressed as synthetic Cannabidiol, oral administration i.p.—intraperitoneal; p.o.—per os.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in the pain response in the von Frey test in animals after administration of vincristine and extract D, as well as vincristine and extract B, at different doses (5–40 mg/kg, p.o.) relative to the group receiving vincristine. * statistically significant differences compared to VK (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05); ^—statistically significant differences for the respective group compared to t = 0 (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05); VK—Vincristine—0.1 mg/kg of body weight, intraperitoneal administration; Extract D—<span class="html-italic">Cannabis sativa</span> L. extract, <span class="html-italic">variety Dora</span>; the dose expressed as synthetic Cannabidiol, oral administration Extract B—<span class="html-italic">Cannabis sativa</span> L. extract, <span class="html-italic">variety Tygra</span>; the dose expressed as synthetic Cannabidiol, oral administration i.p.—intraperitoneal; p.o.—per os.</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 222 KiB  
Article
Abdominal Pain and Chronic Opiate Use in Patients with Gastroparesis
by Abraham Ifrah, John Ebeid and Henry P. Parkman
Gastrointest. Disord. 2024, 6(3), 765-773; https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6030052 - 16 Aug 2024
Viewed by 451
Abstract
Introduction: Although opiate narcotics may worsen gastroparesis(GP), patients can take these for abdominal pain (AP) or other chronic pain syndromes. This study aims to evaluate medications patients with gastroparesis use for AP and compare patients who use opiate analgesics for AP to those [...] Read more.
Introduction: Although opiate narcotics may worsen gastroparesis(GP), patients can take these for abdominal pain (AP) or other chronic pain syndromes. This study aims to evaluate medications patients with gastroparesis use for AP and compare patients who use opiate analgesics for AP to those using opiate analgesics for non-abdominal pain. Methods: Patients at a tertiary academic center gastroenterology clinic completed the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders–Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) and Quality of Life Short-Form 8 (QOL SF-8) surveys between 10/2021 and 03/2023. Patients recorded gastroparesis treatments, pain treatments and indication, and any hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) visits within 3 months of a clinic visit. Results: A total of 53 patients were enrolled: 72% reported having AP. Patients were using the following medications for AP: 25% heating pad, ice or hot showers, 20.8% acetaminophen, 14.6% hyoscyamine, 13% opiate use, 13% marijuana use, 10.4% dicyclomine, 8.3% Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 4% benzodiazepine, and 2.1% gabapentin. The reported reasons for using opiates were 58% AP, 16.6% chronic back pain, 16.6% Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) and fibromyalgia, and 8.3% osteoarthritis. All opiate users reported daily scheduled use. AP severity scores (4.1 vs. 2.8; p = 0.041), morphine equivalent usage (77 ± 44 vs. 32 ± 28; p = 0.037), and the number of ER visits (1.0 vs. 0 over 3 months) were higher in patients using opiates for AP than those using opiates for non-abdominal pain. Conclusions: In this series, 72% of patients with gastroparesis had abdominal pain, and 13% of patients were taking opiates. Patients who used opiate analgesics for abdominal pain had a higher average abdominal pain severity score and used a higher amount of opiate analgesia than patients using opiates for musculoskeletal pain. Abdominal pain in patients with gastroparesis can be harder to control with opiate analgesia compared to non-abdominal pain, supporting the concept of avoiding chronic opiate usage for abdominal pain in gastroparesis. Full article
9 pages, 815 KiB  
Article
Preclinical Evaluation of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitor AMHDU against Neuropathic Pain
by Denis Babkov, Natalya Eliseeva, Kristina Adzhienko, Viktoria Bagmetova, Dmitry Danilov, Cynthia B. McReynolds, Christophe Morisseau, Bruce D. Hammock and Vladimir Burmistrov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(16), 8841; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168841 - 14 Aug 2024
Viewed by 597
Abstract
Inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) is a promising therapeutic strategy for treating neuropathic pain. These inhibitors effectively reduce diabetic neuropathic pain and inflammation induced by Freund’s adjuvant which makes them a suitable alternative to traditional opioids. This study showcased the notable analgesic [...] Read more.
Inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) is a promising therapeutic strategy for treating neuropathic pain. These inhibitors effectively reduce diabetic neuropathic pain and inflammation induced by Freund’s adjuvant which makes them a suitable alternative to traditional opioids. This study showcased the notable analgesic effects of compound AMHDU (1,1′-(hexane-1,6-diyl)bis(3-((adamantan-1-yl)methyl)urea)) in both inflammatory and diabetic neuropathy models. While lacking anti-inflammatory properties in a paw edema model, AMHDU is comparable to celecoxib as an analgesic in 30 mg/kg dose administrated by intraperitoneal injection. In a diabetic tactile allodynia model, AMHDU showed a prominent analgesic activity in 10 mg/kg intraperitoneal dose (p < 0.05). The effect is comparable to that of gabapentin, but without the risk of dependence due to a different mechanism of action. Low acute oral toxicity (>2000 mg/kg) and a high therapeutic index makes AMHDU a promising candidate for further structure optimization and preclinical evaluation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity of <b>AMHDU</b> in rat paw edema model (n = 6). Statistical significance is reported vs. vehicle group: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, ns <span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05 (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>AMHDU</b> ameliorates tactile hyperalgesia in STZ-rat neuropathic pain model (n = 6). Statistical significance is reported vs. 0 h. matched values for each group: (Friedman test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Plasma concentration of mice administered 1 mg/kg of compound <b>AMHDU</b> by intraperitoneal injection. Data represent mean plus standard error of n = 4 male mice.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 16779 KiB  
Review
Navigating Preclinical Models and Medications for Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review
by Abdulmajeed M. Jali, David Banji, Otilia J. F. Banji, Khalid Y. Hurubi, Faisal Y. Tawhari, Atheer A. Alameer, Atyaf S. Dohal and Raha A. Zanqoti
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(8), 1010; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17081010 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 591
Abstract
Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a multifaceted disorder characterised by peripheral nerve damage, manifesting in symptoms like pain, weakness, and autonomic dysfunction. This review assesses preclinical models in PN research, evaluating their relevance to human disease and their role in therapeutic development. The Streptozotocin [...] Read more.
Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a multifaceted disorder characterised by peripheral nerve damage, manifesting in symptoms like pain, weakness, and autonomic dysfunction. This review assesses preclinical models in PN research, evaluating their relevance to human disease and their role in therapeutic development. The Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rat model is widely used to simulate diabetic neuropathy but has limitations in faithfully replicating disease onset and progression. Cisplatin-induced PN models are suitable for studying chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and closely resemble human pathology. However, they may not fully replicate the spectrum of sensory and motor deficits. Paclitaxel-induced models also contribute to understanding CIPN mechanisms and testing neuroprotective agents. Surgical or trauma-induced models offer insights into nerve regeneration and repair strategies. Medications such as gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine, and fluoxetine have demonstrated promise in these models, enhancing our understanding of their therapeutic efficacy. Despite progress, developing models that accurately mirror human PN remains imperative due to its complex nature. Continuous refinement and innovative approaches are critical for effective drug discovery. This review underscores the strengths and limitations of current models and advocates for an integrated approach to address the complexities of PN better and optimise treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacotherapy of Neuropathic Pain)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The causes and risk factors of peripheral neuropathy in diabetic patients. It starts with the central node titled “Peripheral Neuropathy in Diabetics”. It branches into several categories. Type of Diabetes: Outlines Diabetes Type 1 and Type 2, highlighting issues related to blood sugar management, including poor control and frequent spikes. Duration of Diabetes: Indicates that a longer duration of diabetes increases the risk of developing neuropathy. Lifestyle Factors: Lists smoking and high alcohol intake as contributory lifestyle risks. Metabolic Factors include high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and obesity. Genetic Factors: Mentions a family history of neuropathy as a genetic risk. Neurovascular Damage: Covers damage to blood vessels that supply nerves. Medications: Side effects from specific drugs that can lead to neuropathy. Physical and Mechanical Injury: Includes nerve trauma due to injury or surgery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Peripheral neuropathy manifestations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram illustrating the process and significance of behavioural tests for pain perception in STZ-treated rats.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram illustrating the process of using the Hargreaves Apparatus, also known as the Paw-Flick Test, to assess heat hyperalgesia in rodents. The flowchart begins with placing the rodent in the apparatus and proceeds through the steps of the test, including focusing the radiant heat on the rodent’s paw, triggering the withdrawal reflex, measuring the latency period, and recording the withdrawal latency. The results are then interpreted, with shorter withdrawal latencies indicating increased sensitivity to heat, which is a sign of hyperalgesia. The process ends after the interpretation of results, determining the presence and extent of hyperalgesia in the test subject.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>This mind map provides a structured overview of the critical components of studying diabetic neuropathy induced by streptozotocin (STZ) in rats. The model focuses on the assessment of mechanical allodynia. The central idea revolves around the advantages of using an electronic von Frey algometer over traditional methods, emphasizing its precision, accuracy, and ability to provide quantifiable measurements. The mind map breaks down the importance of assessing mechanical allodynia, the benefits of the electronic method, the experimental setup involving a pressure transducer and computerized data collection, and the implications for research, such as standardized testing conditions and valuable insights into potential therapeutic interventions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagram illustrating the various outcome measures used to evaluate neuropathy in rodent models of PIPN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Diagram illustrating the testing procedures for cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A diagram demonstrating the procedures and methodologies associated with the utilization of surgery-induced and trauma-induced models of peripheral neuropathy in diabetic animals.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 15150 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Impact of Gabapentinoids on Pain-Related Outcomes after Knee and Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
by Dmitriy Viderman, Mina Aubakirova, Azamat Salamat, Dastan Kaldybayev, Nurzhamal Sadir, Ramil Tankacheyev and Yerkin G. Abdildin
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4205; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144205 - 18 Jul 2024
Viewed by 820
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pain remains a significant challenge after knee and hip surgeries, two of the most frequently performed procedures, preventing patients from seeking timely surgical help. Gabapentinoids, gabapentin, and pregabalin, have been gaining attention in postoperative pain management. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis [...] Read more.
Background: Postoperative pain remains a significant challenge after knee and hip surgeries, two of the most frequently performed procedures, preventing patients from seeking timely surgical help. Gabapentinoids, gabapentin, and pregabalin, have been gaining attention in postoperative pain management. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentinoids in pain management after knee and hip surgery. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before January 2023. Results: Fifteen articles reporting 1320 patients were analyzed. Cumulative pain intensity at rest and on movement was lower in the experimental group with the mean difference (MD) = −0.30 [−0.55,−0.05], p-value = 0.02, and MD = −0.41 [−0.68,−0.13], p-value = 0.004, respectively. However, the difference was not clinically meaningful and lacked statistical significance at each time period. The gabapentinoid group required less opioid consumption in morphine equivalents (MD = −6.42 [−9.07, −3.78] mg, p-value < 0.001). There was a lower incidence of postoperative nausea in the experimental group with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.69 [0.55, 0.86], p-value < 0.001. A subgroup analysis showed that gabapentinoids reduced pain on movement on postoperative day two after total knee arthroplasty but not hip arthroplasty. There was insufficient data to examine the efficacy of gabapentinoids in the reduction of chronic postoperative pain in knee/hip surgery. Conclusions: Thus, gabapentinoids were associated with a reduction in postoperative pain intensity at rest and on movement, morphine consumption, and the incidence of postoperative nausea in the early postoperative period following knee and hip surgeries. However, pain reduction was not clinically relevant. Sedation has not been evaluated in this work and, if performed, this may have influenced the conclusions. An important limitation of this study is that different gabapentinoids, their administration times and dosages, as well as varying intraoperative management protocols, were pooled together. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Regional Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PRISMA diagram. The study selection process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pain intensity at rest [<a href="#B5-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B9-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B20-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B23-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pain intensity score on movement [<a href="#B9-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B20-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B23-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Postoperative opioid consumption in morphine equivalents (mg) [<a href="#B9-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B20-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B23-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B32-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Postoperative nausea (n) [<a href="#B5-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B23-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Postoperative vomiting (n) [<a href="#B5-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B21-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B23-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B31-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Postoperative pain at rest for THA and TKA on (<b>A</b>) POD 1 (upper) and (<b>B</b>) POD 2 (lower) [<a href="#B9-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B20-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B22-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B26-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Postoperative pain at rest for THA and TKA on (<b>A</b>) POD 1 (upper) and (<b>B</b>) POD 2 (lower) [<a href="#B9-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B20-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B22-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B26-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Postoperative pain on movement for THA and TKA on (<b>A</b>) POD 1 (upper) and (<b>B</b>) POD 2 (lower) [<a href="#B9-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B20-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B22-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B24-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jcm-13-04205" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 6752 KiB  
Systematic Review
Effectiveness of Duloxetine versus Other Therapeutic Modalities in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Juan José Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Michelle López-Chaparro, Marisol Barahona-Vásquez, Javiera Campos-Valdes, Javiera Cordero Gonzalez, Pablo Nova-Baeza, Mathias Orellana-Donoso, Alejandra Suazo-Santibañez, Gustavo Oyanedel-Amaro and Héctor Gutiérrez Espinoza
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(7), 856; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070856 - 28 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1074
Abstract
Objectives: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a chronic complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) with symptoms like intense pain and impaired quality of life. This condition has no treatment; instead, the pain is managed with various antidepressants, including duloxetine. The aim of this study [...] Read more.
Objectives: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a chronic complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) with symptoms like intense pain and impaired quality of life. This condition has no treatment; instead, the pain is managed with various antidepressants, including duloxetine. The aim of this study is to analyze the evidence on the efficacy of duloxetine in the management of DPN. Methods: A systematic search in different databases was conducted using the keywords “diabetic neuropathy”, “duloxetine therapy”, “neuropathic pain”, and “Diabetes Mellitus”. Finally, eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results: All articles comparing duloxetine at different doses vs. a placebo reported significant differences in favor of duloxetine on pain scales like 24 h Average Pain Severity (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −1.06, confidence interval [CI] = −1.09 to −1.03, and p < 0.00001) and BPI Severity (SMD = −0.70, CI = −0.72 to −0.68, and p < 0.00001), among others. A total of 75% of the meta-analyses of studies comparing duloxetine at different doses showed a tendency in favor of the 120 mg/d dose. There were significant differences in favor of duloxetine when compared to routine care on the Euro Quality of Life (SMD = −0.04, CI = −0.04 to −0.03, and p < 0.00001) and SF-36 Survey (SMD = −5.86, CI = −6.28 to −5.44, and p < 0.00001) scales. There were no significant differences on the visual analog scale (VAS) when comparing duloxetine and gabapentin. Conclusions: Duloxetine appears to be effective in the management of DPN in different pain, symptom improvement, and quality of life scales. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Risk of bias summary [<a href="#B23-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on 24 h Average Pain Severity Score [<a href="#B23-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared to a placebo on 24 h Average Pain Severity Score [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Forest plot of the effect of both doses of duloxetine (60 mg/d and 120 mg/d) compared with each other on 24 h Average Pain Severity Score [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on BPI Severity [<a href="#B23-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on BPI Severity [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Forest plot of the effect of both doses of duloxetine (60 mg/d and 120 mg/d) compared with each other on BPI Severity [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on BPI Interference [<a href="#B23-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on BPI Interference [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Forest plot of the effect of both doses of duloxetine (60 mg/d and 120 mg/d) compared with each other on BPI Interference [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on CGI Severity [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on CGI Severity [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Forest plot of the effect of both doses of duloxetine (60 mg/d and 120 mg/d) compared with each other on CGI Severity [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on PGI Improvement [<a href="#B23-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on PGI Improvement [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Forest plot of the effect of both doses of duloxetine (60 mg/d and 120 mg/d) compared with each other on PGI Improvement [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on SF-MPQ Total Score [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on SF-MPQ Total Score [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Forest plot of the effect of both doses of duloxetine (60 mg/d and 120 mg/d) compared with each other on SF-MPQ Total Score [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Forest plot of the effect of both doses of duloxetine (60 mg/d and 120 mg/d) compared with each other on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared to routine care on the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire [<a href="#B28-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B30-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on SF-36 Survey Bodily Pain [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with a placebo on SF-36 Survey Bodily Pain [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Forest plot of the effect of both doses of duloxetine (60 mg/d and 120 mg/d) compared with each other on SF-36 Survey Bodily Pain [<a href="#B24-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B29-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 120 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared to routine care on SF-36 Survey Bodily Pain [<a href="#B28-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B30-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Forest plot of the effect of a 60 mg/d dose of duloxetine compared with doses of 300 to 900 mg/d of gabapentin on VAS [<a href="#B25-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-pharmaceuticals-17-00856" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 870 KiB  
Review
Sex-Gender Differences Are Completely Neglected in Treatments for Neuropathic Pain
by Francesco Salis, Salvatore Sardo, Gabriele Finco, Gian Luigi Gessa, Flavia Franconi and Roberta Agabio
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(7), 838; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070838 - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1317
Abstract
As sex-gender differences have been described in the responses of patients to certain medications, we hypothesized that the responses to medications recommended for neuropathic pain may differ between men and women. We conducted a literature review to identify articles reporting potential sex-gender differences [...] Read more.
As sex-gender differences have been described in the responses of patients to certain medications, we hypothesized that the responses to medications recommended for neuropathic pain may differ between men and women. We conducted a literature review to identify articles reporting potential sex-gender differences in the efficacy and safety of these medications. Only a limited number of studies investigated potential sex-gender differences. Our results show that women seem to achieve higher blood concentrations than men during treatment with amitriptyline, nortriptyline, duloxetine, venlafaxine, and pregabalin. Compared to men, higher rates of women develop side effects during treatment with gabapentin, lidocaine, and tramadol. Globally, the sex-gender differences would suggest initially administering smaller doses of these medications to women with neuropathic pain compared to those administered to men. However, most of these differences have been revealed by studies focused on the treatment of other diseases (e.g., depression). Studies focused on neuropathic pain have overlooked potential sex-gender differences in patient responses to medications. Despite the fact that up to 60% of patients with neuropathic pain fail to achieve an adequate response to medications, the potential role of sex-gender differences in the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy has not adequately been investigated. Targeted studies should be implemented to facilitate personalized treatments for neuropathic pain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sex Differences in Pharmaceutical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Search flow diagram.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2335 KiB  
Article
Use of Gabapentin or Alprazolam in Cats during Postoperative, Short-Term Hospitalization
by Virginia Papageorgiou, Charalampos Ververidis, Mathios E. Mylonakis, Ioannis Savvas and George Kazakos
Animals 2024, 14(13), 1840; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14131840 - 21 Jun 2024
Viewed by 952
Abstract
This prospective, randomized study aimed to assess the anxiolytic efficacy of gabapentin or alprazolam in cats during short-term postoperative hospitalization. Sixty cats were randomly assigned to three groups (gabapentin-treated [100 mg per cat], alprazolam-treated [0.125 mg per cat], or placebo-treated), with treatments administered [...] Read more.
This prospective, randomized study aimed to assess the anxiolytic efficacy of gabapentin or alprazolam in cats during short-term postoperative hospitalization. Sixty cats were randomly assigned to three groups (gabapentin-treated [100 mg per cat], alprazolam-treated [0.125 mg per cat], or placebo-treated), with treatments administered twice daily for two days. Stress levels were evaluated using Cat Stress Scores, serum cortisol, and glucose concentrations. Pain scores, food consumption, and adverse effects such as sedation were also monitored. Fifty-five cats completed the study. Both medications demonstrated similar reductions in stress levels. Cats receiving gabapentin had lower pain scores, while those receiving alprazolam exhibited significantly increased food intake on the first postoperative day. However, both medications resulted in comparable levels of sedation. In the context of postoperative hospitalization, pharmacological intervention with anxiolytics could be effective in reducing stress levels. Despite potential side effects, gabapentin and alprazolam may contribute to an improved quality of short-term hospitalization for cats. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaesthesia and Analgesia in Companion Animals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Timetable of the major events from the admission of cats to the clinic to the end of the experimental study (5 days).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Stress scores were measured in cats from Groups P, G, and A. Assessments were conducted preoperatively, 8 h postoperatively, and 44 h postoperatively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cortisol concentrations were measured in cats from Groups P, G, and A. Measurements were taken preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and 44 h postoperatively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Glucose concentrations were measured in cats from Groups P, G, and A. Measurements were taken immediately after surgery and 44 h postoperatively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Food consumption was measured in cats from Groups P, G, and A. Measurements were taken on the first preoperative day of hospitalization, 8 h postoperatively, and on the first postoperative day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pain scores and sedation scores were measured in cats from Groups P, G, and A. Measurements were taken 8 h postoperatively and on the second postoperative day.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 756 KiB  
Article
Effectiveness of Gabapentin as a Benzodiazepine-Sparing Agent in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome
by Hamza Alzghoul, Mohammed I. Al-Said, Omar Obeidat, Hashim Al-Ani, Mohammad Tarawneh, Robyn Meadows, Houssein Youness, Raju Reddy, Mohammad Al-Jafari, Bashar N. Alzghoul and Akram Khan
Medicina 2024, 60(6), 1004; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60061004 - 19 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1137
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Gabapentin has shown promise as a potential agent for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of gabapentin as a benzodiazepine-sparing agent in patients undergoing alcohol withdrawal treatment in all the hospitals of a large [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Gabapentin has shown promise as a potential agent for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of gabapentin as a benzodiazepine-sparing agent in patients undergoing alcohol withdrawal treatment in all the hospitals of a large tertiary healthcare system. Materials and Methods: Medical records of patients admitted to the hospital for alcohol withdrawal management between 1 January 2020 and 31 August 2022 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two cohorts: benzodiazepine-only treatment who received benzodiazepines as the primary pharmacotherapy and gabapentin adjunctive treatment who received gabapentin in addition to benzodiazepines. The outcomes assessed included the total benzodiazepine dosage administered during the treatment and the length of hospital stay. The statistical models were calibrated to account for various factors. Results: A total of 4364 patients were included in the final analysis. Among these, 79 patients (1.8%) received gabapentin in addition to benzodiazepines, and 4285 patients (98.2%) received benzodiazepines only. Patients administered gabapentin required significantly lower average cumulative benzodiazepine dosages, approximately 17.9% less, compared to those not receiving gabapentin (median 2 mg vs. 4 mg of lorazepam equivalent dose (p < 0.01)). However, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that using gabapentin with benzodiazepine was associated with a reduction in the cumulative benzodiazepine dosage for alcohol withdrawal. Considering gabapentin as an adjunctive therapy holds promise for patients with comorbidities who could benefit from reducing benzodiazepine dose. This strategy warrants further investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care/ Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Data excluded from this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>CIWA score change between day 0, day 2, and day 5 for benzodiazepine-only group (<span class="html-italic">N</span> = 333) compared to gabapentin plus benzodiazepine group (<span class="html-italic">N</span> = 7). BENZ: benzodiazepines group. GPN: gabapentin plus benzodiazepines group.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 254 KiB  
Article
Effects of Gabapentin on the Treatment of Behavioral Disorders in Dogs: A Retrospective Evaluation
by Taylor Kirby-Madden, Caitlin T. Waring and Meghan Herron
Animals 2024, 14(10), 1462; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101462 - 14 May 2024
Viewed by 2861
Abstract
The use of gabapentin in treating dogs with behavioral disorders is not well described. To characterize behavioral effects of gabapentin, this study surveyed 50 owners whose dogs were prescribed gabapentin at a veterinary behavior-focused practice over a five-year period. Most owners (72%) reported [...] Read more.
The use of gabapentin in treating dogs with behavioral disorders is not well described. To characterize behavioral effects of gabapentin, this study surveyed 50 owners whose dogs were prescribed gabapentin at a veterinary behavior-focused practice over a five-year period. Most owners (72%) reported that gabapentin was moderately or very effective at improving their dog’s behavior. The majority of owners reported at least one side effect (70%), with sedation being the most common. Sedation was more likely to be seen at doses higher than 30 mg/kg. Specific dose ranges (mg/kg) did not correlate with any other reports of side effects nor effectiveness. Dogs with a diagnosis of conflict-related aggression were more likely to have owners report that gabapentin was effective at improving behavior compared to dogs with other behavioral diagnoses (p = 0.04), while dogs diagnosed with aggression secondary to high arousal were less likely to have owners report that gabapentin was effective (p = 0.01). Overall, reports of effect varied widely and, with the exception of sedation, did not correlate with specific mg/kg dose ranges. Results suggest that some dogs may be more sensitive or resistant to adverse and/or therapeutic effects than others and multiple dosage trials may be needed before finding the best fit. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Clinical Studies)
16 pages, 1697 KiB  
Review
Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of Gabapentin with a Focus on Topical Formulations to Treat Ocular Surface Diseases
by Dario Rusciano
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(5), 623; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17050623 - 11 May 2024
Viewed by 1418
Abstract
Gabapentin (GBP) was originally developed as a potential agonist for Gamma-Amino-Butyric-Acid (GABA) receptors, aiming to inhibit the activation of pain-signaling neurons. Contrary to initial expectations, it does not bind to GABA receptors. Instead, it exhibits several distinct pharmacological activities, including: (1) binding to [...] Read more.
Gabapentin (GBP) was originally developed as a potential agonist for Gamma-Amino-Butyric-Acid (GABA) receptors, aiming to inhibit the activation of pain-signaling neurons. Contrary to initial expectations, it does not bind to GABA receptors. Instead, it exhibits several distinct pharmacological activities, including: (1) binding to the alpha-2-delta protein subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels in the central nervous system, thereby blocking the excitatory influx of calcium; (2) reducing the expression and phosphorylation of CaMKII via modulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation; (3) inhibiting glutamate release and interfering with the activation of NMDA receptors; (4) enhancing GABA synthesis; (5) increasing cell-surface expression of δGABA_A receptors, contributing to its antinociceptive, anticonvulsant, and anxiolytic-like effects. Additionally, GBP displays (6) inhibition of NF-kB activation and subsequent production of inflammatory cytokines, and (7) stimulation of the purinergic adenosine A1 receptor, which supports its anti-inflammatory and wound-healing properties. Initially approved for treating seizures and postherpetic neuralgia, GBP is now broadly used for various conditions, including psychiatric disorders, acute and chronic neuropathic pain, and sleep disturbances. Recently, as an eye drop formulation, it has also been explored as a therapeutic option for ocular surface discomfort in conditions such as dry eye, neurotrophic keratitis, corneal ulcers, and neuropathic ocular pain. This review aims to summarize the evidence supporting the molecular effects of GBP, with a special emphasis on its applications in ocular surface diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ophthalmic Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><b>Mechanisms of Gabapentin Antalgic Action: GABA Synthesis and Glutamatergic Inhibition</b> (<b>A</b>) The pathways leading to GABA synthesis and degradation. (<b>B</b>) The analgesic effect of gabapentin depends on the inhibition of excitatory glutamatergic neurons, occurring through mechanisms that do not involve GABA receptors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Gabapentinoids in Pharmacology</b>: Structurally related to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), Gabapentin does not appear to interact with GABA receptors or influence its synaptic reuptake [<a href="#B8-pharmaceuticals-17-00623" class="html-bibr">8</a>]. Pregabalin is an alternative pharmaceutical form of gabapentin, showing very similar properties [<a href="#B9-pharmaceuticals-17-00623" class="html-bibr">9</a>]. Gabapentin and pregabalin are collectively indicated as gabapentinoids. The chemical additions to GABA to obtain pregabalin or gabapentin are colored orange-red.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>Hypothetical mechanism of GBP effects on CaVα2-δ channels.</b> GBP (red dots) takes advantage of the endogenous L-leucine (light-green dots) transporter to enter the cell, and competitively binds the α2 subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channel, blocking its transport to the cell membrane, thus reducing calcium influx into the cell, and its activation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><b>Pharmacological activities of gabapentin.</b> The interactions of gabapentin occur at both pre- and post-synaptic terminals of neurons and involve various mechanisms leading to analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and wound-healing effects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><b>Ophthalmic application of gabapentin.</b> Gabapentin has demonstrated efficacy in managing ocular pain associated with dry eye and/or corneal ulcers. Additionally, its secretagogue activity aids in preserving ocular surface hydration. Its neuroprotective properties may contribute to the survival of retinal ganglion cells in conditions such as glaucoma or retinal dystrophies.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 323 KiB  
Review
Mechanisms and Preventative Strategies for Persistent Pain following Knee and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery: A Narrative Review
by Jasper Murphy, Sery Pak, Lana Shteynman, Ian Winkeler, Zhaosheng Jin, Martin Kaczocha and Sergio D. Bergese
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(9), 4722; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094722 - 26 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1682
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a prevalent complication of joint replacement surgery which has the potential to decrease patient satisfaction, increase financial burden, and lead to long-term disability. The identification of risk factors [...] Read more.
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a prevalent complication of joint replacement surgery which has the potential to decrease patient satisfaction, increase financial burden, and lead to long-term disability. The identification of risk factors for CPSP following TKA and THA is challenging but essential for targeted preventative therapy. Recent meta-analyses and individual studies highlight associations between elevated state anxiety, depression scores, preoperative pain, diabetes, sleep disturbances, and various other factors with an increased risk of CPSP, with differences observed in prevalence between TKA and THA. While the etiology of CPSP is not fully understood, several factors such as chronic inflammation and preoperative central sensitization have been identified. Other potential mechanisms include genetic factors (e.g., catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 6 (KCNJ6) genes), lipid markers, and psychological risk factors (anxiety and depression). With regards to therapeutics and prevention, multimodal pharmacological analgesia, emphasizing nonopioid analgesics like acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has gained prominence over epidural analgesia. Nerve blocks and local infiltrative anesthesia have shown mixed results in preventing CPSP. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist, exhibits antihyperalgesic properties, but its efficacy in reducing CPSP is inconclusive. Lidocaine, an amide-type local anesthetic, shows tentative positive effects on CPSP. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have mixed results, while gabapentinoids, like gabapentin and pregabalin, present hopeful data but require further research, especially in the context of TKA and THA, to justify their use for CPSP prevention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Pain and Analgesia)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">
17 pages, 911 KiB  
Systematic Review
Advancing Postoperative Pain Management in Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
by Angelo Michele Inchingolo, Gianna Dipalma, Alessio Danilo Inchingolo, Irene Palumbo, Mariafrancesca Guglielmo, Roberta Morolla, Antonio Mancini and Francesco Inchingolo
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(4), 542; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17040542 - 22 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1453
Abstract
The goal of this review is to shed light on the management of orofacial discomfort after a cancer diagnosis in the head and neck region. A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies on postoperative pain control [...] Read more.
The goal of this review is to shed light on the management of orofacial discomfort after a cancer diagnosis in the head and neck region. A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies on postoperative pain control in oral cancer. The review included open-access research, investigations into pain management, randomized clinical trials, retrospective studies, case-control studies, prospective studies, English-written studies, and full-text publications. Exclusion criteria included animal studies; in vitro studies; off-topic studies; reviews, case reports, letters, or comments; and non-English language. Three reviewers independently accessed databases and assigned a quality rating to the chosen articles. The review explores postoperative pain management in oral cancer patients; highlighting persistent opioid use; the efficacy of adjuvant drugs, such as gabapentin; and a multimodal approach. It emphasizes the need for personalized pain management, recognizing individual pain perception and tailoring interventions. Integrating pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies is crucial for comprehensive pain management. The review also serves as a guide for future research, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies and diverse participant populations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pain Management Spectrum for Oral Cancer Patients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>PRISMA flow diagram and database search indicators.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop