[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (65)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = eclogites

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 4575 KiB  
Article
Zircons from Eclogite-Associated Rocks of the Marun–Keu Complex, the Polar Urals: Trace Elements and U–Pb Dating
by Laysan Salimgaraeva, Aleksey Berezin, Sergey Sergeev, Nikolai Gubanov, Ekaterina Stetskaya and Sergey Skublov
Geosciences 2024, 14(8), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14080206 - 2 Aug 2024
Viewed by 643
Abstract
The Marun–Keu complex plays a significant role in our understanding of the geological evolution of the Ural orogen; however, it remains poorly understood. This study aims to provide insights into the complex’s age, protolith composition, rock formation conditions, and its position in the [...] Read more.
The Marun–Keu complex plays a significant role in our understanding of the geological evolution of the Ural orogen; however, it remains poorly understood. This study aims to provide insights into the complex’s age, protolith composition, rock formation conditions, and its position in the geological history. The zircons from the host granitic gneiss are characterized by magmatic cores with an age of 473 Ma and metamorphic rims with an age of approximately 370 Ma. We suggest that the metamorphic rims were formed during eclogite metamorphism and that the metagranitoids hosting the eclogites experienced eclogite metamorphism simultaneously with the basic and ultrabasic rocks that are common in this area. Heterogeneous zircons were also isolated from the selvage of a pegmatite vein, in which four domains are distinguished, two to three of which can be identified within single grains, as follows: (1) igneous cores with an age of approximately 470 Ma and the geochemical characteristics of zircon crystallized in basic rocks; (2) zircons recrystallized during eclogite metamorphism with geochemical characteristics intermediate between those of the magmatic cores and true eclogitic zircon; (3) pegmatitic zircon, exhibiting the most sharply differentiated REE spectra of all four domains, characterized by a prominent positive Ce anomaly and a weakly expressed negative Eu anomaly; and (4) eclogitic zircon, observed in the form of veins and rims, superimposed in relation to the other three domains. The age of the latter three domains is within the error range and is estimated to be approximately 370 Ma. This indicates that the processes of eclogite metamorphism and the formation of pegmatites occurred at approximately the same time in the studied area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Geochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic scheme of the Urals after [<a href="#B3-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">3</a>]. MUF—Main Uralian Fault. 1—the Cis-Ural foredeep; 2—the Central Ural megazone; 3—the East Ural megazone; 4—the West Ural megazone; 5—the Tagil–Magnitogorsk megazone; 6—the Trans-Ural megazone. (<b>b</b>) The inset shows the overall geographic location of the Marun–Keu complex. (<b>c</b>) Geological map of the Marun–Keu complex [<a href="#B5-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">5</a>]. Key: 1—Quaternary; 2—Ordovician (?); 3—greenschists of the Nyarovey formation; 4—Marun–Keu series: gneisses, eclogites; 5—gneisses, granite gneisses; 6—granites with fluorite; 7—meta-rhyolites; 8—diorites, 9—gabbroids; 10—ultramafic rocks (Syum–Keu complex); 11—predominately eclogites; 12—glaucophane-hosted rocks; 13—quartz–graphite schists; 14—faults.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic sampling map. (<b>b</b>) General view of the peak 1040 area. (<b>c</b>) Selvage of a pegmatite vein at the contact with its host peridotites; white circle with sample number indicates the location from which sample 2209 was collected. (<b>d</b>) Contact between granitic gneisses and peridotites, cross-cut by a 1.5 m-wide pegmatite vein; white circle with sample number indicates the location from which sample 2218 was collected. The pegmatite vein was previously excavated for exploration purposes. (<b>e</b>) Migmatization zone in granitic gneisses indicated by a blue dashed line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microphotographs of thin section of granitic gneiss (sample 2218): (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) transmitted polarized light; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) birefringence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) CL images of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218). Colored circles indicate the SIMS analytical spots, the numbers of which correspond to those in <a href="#app1-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-app">Table S2</a> and <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. Blue circles indicate magmatic cores, while green circles indicate metamorphic rims. (<b>b</b>) BSE images of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218) with labeled mineral inclusions. <span class="html-italic">Png</span>—<span class="html-italic">phengite</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) CL images of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). The colored circles indicate the SIMS analytical spots, the numbers of which correspond to those in <a href="#app1-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-app">Table S3</a> and <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>. Blue circles indicate magmatic cores (first domain), green circles indicate recrystallized cores (second domain), navy blue circles indicate pegmatite zircon (third domain), and yellow circles indicate eclogite rims and veinlets (fourth domain). (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) BSE images of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209) with labeled mineral inclusions. <span class="html-italic">Png</span>—<span class="html-italic">phengite</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Trace element compositions of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218). (<b>a</b>) REE distribution patterns normalized to CI chondrite [<a href="#B33-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Co-variation diagrams of element pairs. The position of the analytical spots in different zircon domains is shown in <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a> by circles of the corresponding colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trace element compositions of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). (<b>a</b>) REE distribution patterns normalized to CI chondrite [<a href="#B33-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Co-variation diagrams of element pairs. The position of the analytical spots in different zircon domains is shown in <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a> by circles of the corresponding colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Geochemical discriminant diagrams for zircon after [<a href="#B35-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. Blue markers indicate the positions of zircon cores from the selvage of the pegmatite vein (sample 2209).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Concordia plot for zircons (<b>a</b>) from granitic gneiss (sample 2218) and (<b>b</b>) from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). Error ellipses are at 2σ confidence. The blue ellipses represent the concordia age and error. Decay constant errors are included.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4734 KiB  
Article
Zircon Internal Deformation and Its Effect on U-Pb Geochronology: A Case Study from the Himalayan High-Pressure Eclogites
by Hafiz U. Rehman
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 742; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080742 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 667
Abstract
Zircon, with a chemical formula of ZrSiO4, is a widely used mineral for determining the crystallization age of igneous rocks. It is also used to constrain the timing of metamorphic events from its overgrowth or recrystallized domains. Furthermore, detrital zircon grains [...] Read more.
Zircon, with a chemical formula of ZrSiO4, is a widely used mineral for determining the crystallization age of igneous rocks. It is also used to constrain the timing of metamorphic events from its overgrowth or recrystallized domains. Furthermore, detrital zircon grains can provide information on the sedimentary provenance. Due to the trace amounts of uranium (parent) which decays into its daughter element (Pb), it is a prime geochronometer for the majority of magmatic and metamorphic rocks. With high-precision analytical instruments, such as TIMS, SIMS, and LA-ICP-MS, huge amounts of geochronological and trace element data from zircon have been generated around the globe to date. Target domains within zircon grains are analyzed to extract geochemical and geochronological records using spatially resolved techniques such as ion probes or laser ablation coupled with mass spectrometry. Before any such analysis, the zircon grains are examined for internal structures, growth zoning, and the presence of tiny inclusions. However, many researchers analyze multiple domains within single zircon grains for U-Pb isotope analysis with little regard for their internal structures, particularly crystallographic orientations. Hence, they may obtain mixed ages with variable discordance, leading to imprecise interpretation especially when the growth domains are not well-identified. Particularly, zircon grains that contain multi-growth domains or have local internal deformations within a single grain may not produce geologically meaningful age results if the analyses are conducted on mixed domains. This study presents a brief review on zircon geochronology, how to identify and visualize micro-deformations in metamorphic zircons through the EBSD analysis, and the effects of micro-deformation on age results. Examples from a case study conducted on zircons hosted in the Himalayan high-pressure eclogites are presented that show intra-grain plastically deformed domains and their effects on the corresponding age results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Simplified geological map (modified from [<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">33</a>]) of the study area showing a sketch of the Himalaya (<b>a</b>), a simplified geological map of the Indian and Asian plates with the Kohistan-Ladakh Island arc (<b>b</b>), and a geological map showing the occurrence of Himalayan high-pressure (HP) and ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) eclogites, Kaghan Valley, north Pakistan (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Four examples showing a deviation of U-Pb age data from the Concordia lines reported from magmatic and metamorphic zircon grains. The plots shown in (<b>a</b>) and (<b>b</b>) display Wetherill Concordia plots and those shown in (<b>c</b>) and (<b>d</b>) display Terra-Wasserburg plots. In all the four examples, the U-Pb isotope analyses show large scatter and numerous analyses plot away from the Concordia lines, indicating Pb-loss, analyses conducted on mixed or complex domains, or ages reset due to secondary events. Data source for plot (<b>a</b>) is from Figure 7 in [<a href="#B34-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">34</a>], for plot (<b>b</b>) from Figure 3 in [<a href="#B35-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">35</a>], for plot (<b>c</b>) from Figure 5 in [<a href="#B36-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">36</a>], and for plot (<b>d</b>) from Figure 3.3 in [<a href="#B37-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircon grains from the Himalayan Group I eclogites displaying irregular morphologies, healed cracks, and diffused boundaries. These grains were analyzed by LA-ICP-MS [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">31</a>] and the age data for each analyzed spot is shown. The majority of the analysis displays Permian (260~270 Ma) protolith ages; however, the relatively younger age values likely resulted due to Pb-loss or internal deformation. The scale bar under each grain is 50 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircon grains from the Himalayan Group II eclogites displaying metamorphic features (fir tree zoning). These grains were analyzed with HR-SIMS [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">30</a>] and a few grains with lower contents of U and Pb were additionally analyzed with LA-ICP-MS [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. Two zircon grains from this group were analyzed using EBSD but there was no internal deformation. Age-data represents the Eocene eclogite facies event in the Himalayan region. The scale bar under each grain is 50 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Representative zircon grains from the Himalayan Group I eclogites that show internal deformation and its effect on age data. Gray-scale images (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and EBSD phase maps with crystallographic misorientations (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) of the same grains are shown. Gray-scale images are generated from the band contrast map data acquired at the time of EBSD analysis using MTEX (v.5.7.0.), a MATLAB toolbox. Scale bars along the vertical axes in (<b>a</b>) and (<b>c</b>) represent the degree of black and white tone on a scale of 20 to 200. The relatively larger holes in the gray-scale images display the pits formed due to HR-SIMS U-Pb analysis. Small circles on grains in (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) with digits are the NanoSIMS analysis. Domains displaying color variation (from blue to green to yellow) in the zircon grains indicate local deformation at the grain scale, evidenced from the difference in their crystallographic orientation with respect to the undeformed domain (blue). The U-Pb age values from the deformed domains were likely affected by deformation. The scale bars along the vertical axes (in (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>)) show misorientation in degrees within the grain and with the surrounding phases. The investigated zircon grains showed internal misorientation up to 3 degrees. Age values for the analyzed spots are: Spot#7: 50 ± 21 Ma, 8: 182 ± 45 Ma, 9: 113 ± 28 Ma, 10: 95 ± 24 Ma, 35: 138 ± 25 Ma, 36: 145 ± 31 Ma, 37: 96 ± 35 Ma, 38: 61 ± 21 Ma, 39: 113 ± 30 Ma, 40: 94 ± 18 Ma, 41: 47 ± 27 Ma. For the second grain the age data for the analyzed spots are: 11: 120 ± 35 Ma, 12: 162 ± 46 Ma, 13: 180 ± 44 Ma. Age data are the same as reported in [<a href="#B32-minerals-14-00742" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cathodoluminescence image (<b>a</b>), gray-scale image obtained from FE-SEM attached to the EBSD instrument (<b>b</b>), the EBSD orientation map (<b>c</b>), and image quality map displayed on the gray-scale image, displaying the internal misorientation (<b>d</b>). The color difference shows internal misorientation within the grain. The white line across the grain is for reference to draw the misorientation histogram shown in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>a. The legend on the right side shows the details of analyzed points in the zircon grain and boundary rotation angles. The scale bar under the zircon grain is 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cathodoluminescence image (<b>a</b>), gray-scale image obtained from FE-SEM attached to the EBSD instrument (<b>b</b>), the EBSD orientation map (<b>c</b>), and image quality map displayed on the gray-scale image, displaying the internal misorientation (<b>d</b>). The white line across the grain is used for the misorientation histogram in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>b. Other details are the same as given in the caption of <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. The scale bar under the zircon grain is 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cathodoluminescence image (<b>a</b>), gray-scale image obtained from FE-SEM attached to the EBSD instrument (<b>b</b>), the EBSD orientation map (<b>c</b>), and image quality map displayed on the gray-scale image, displaying the internal misorientation (<b>d</b>). The white line across the grain is used for the misorientation histogram in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>c. Other details are the same as given in the caption of <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. The scale bar under the zircon grain is 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cathodoluminescence image (<b>a</b>), gray-scale image (<b>b</b>), the crystallographic orientation map (<b>c</b>), and image quality map displayed on the gray-scale image (<b>d</b>). The white line across the grain is used for the misorientation histogram in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>d. Other details are the same as given in the caption of <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. The scale bar under the zircon grain is 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Histograms displaying the misorientation angles in degrees (horizontal axes) against the number fractions (vertical axes) in the studied zircon grains (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>). The histograms in (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) are plotted along the line shown on the zircon grains presented in <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>, <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>, <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a> and <a href="#minerals-14-00742-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>, respectively. Scale bars under the zircon grains shown in (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) are 100 μm whereas in (<b>c</b>) it is 90 μm.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 8354 KiB  
Article
The Discovery of the New UHP Eclogite from the East Kunlun, Northwestern China, and Its Tectonic Significance
by Feng Chang, Guibin Zhang and Lu Xiong
Minerals 2024, 14(6), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060582 - 31 May 2024
Viewed by 631
Abstract
The East Kunlun Orogenic Belt (EKOB), northwestern China, recording long-term and multiple accretionary and collisional events of the Tethyan Ocean, belongs to a high-pressure to ultra-high-pressure (HP-UHP) metamorphic belt that underwent complex metamorphic overprinting in the early Paleozoic. In this contribution, we carry [...] Read more.
The East Kunlun Orogenic Belt (EKOB), northwestern China, recording long-term and multiple accretionary and collisional events of the Tethyan Ocean, belongs to a high-pressure to ultra-high-pressure (HP-UHP) metamorphic belt that underwent complex metamorphic overprinting in the early Paleozoic. In this contribution, we carry out an integrated study, including field investigations, petrographic observations, whole-rock analyses, zircon U-Pb dating, and P-T condition modeling using THERMOCALC in the NCKFMASHTO system for the eclogites, especially for the newly discovered UHP eclogite in the eastern part of EKOB. The eclogites exhibit geochemistry ranging from normal mid-ocean ridge basalt (N-MORB) to enriched mid-ocean ridge basalt (E-MORB). Zircons from the eclogites yield metamorphic ages of 416–413 Ma, indicating the eclogite facies metamorphism. Coesite inclusions in garnet and omphacite and quartz exsolution in omphacite and pseudosection calculation suggest that some eclogites experienced UHP eclogite facies metamorphism. The eclogites from the eastern part of EKOB record peak conditions of 29–33 kbar/705–760 °C, first retrograde conditions of 10 kbar at 9.5–12.5 kbar/610–680 °C, and second retrograde conditions at ~6 kbar/<600 °C. New evidence of the early Paleozoic UHP metamorphism in East Kunlun is identified in our study. Thus, we suggest that these eclogites were produced by the oceanic crust subducting to the depth of 100 km and exhumation. The presence of East Gouli and Gazhima eclogites in this study and other eclogites (430–414 Ma) in East Kunlun record the final closure of the local branch ocean of the Proto-Tethys and the evolution from subduction to collision. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbeam Analysis Characterization in Petrogenesis and Ore Deposit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological and tectonic setting. (<b>a</b>) Overview map showing the location of Kunlun within the Chinese Central Orogenic Belt (modified from Dong et al. [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">27</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Simplified tectonic map of Kunlun showing major tectonic divisions, ophiolitic mélanges, and sampling locations. HGF: Hongliuquan–Golmud hidden Fault; QXM: Qimantag–Xiangride ophiolitic mélange; AKM: Aqikekulehu–Kunzhong ophiolitic mélange; and MBAM: Muztag–Buqingshan–Animaqen ophiolitic mélange. (<b>c</b>) Geological map and sampling sites of our study area (modified from Qi et al. [<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">18</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Outcrop photographs of eclogite in eastern part of East Kunlun Orogenic belt (EKOB). (<b>a</b>) Porphyritic lamellar blastoblastic structure of gneiss; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) East Gouli eclogite (E-Gouli); and (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Gazhima eclogite (LMG).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Petrography of eclogites in eastern part of EKOB. Photomicrograph of gneiss (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), E-Gouli eclogite (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>), and LMG eclgite from Gazhima position (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>). The pseudomorph of coesite, radial cracks, and polycrystalline quartz included by omphacite grain from LMG eclogite samples is identified. Local enlarged Backscattered Electron (BSE) images of the symplectite are presented in <a href="#minerals-14-00582-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>g,h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Triangular diagram summarizing garnet compositions. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) Compositional data show profiles across garnet porphyroblasts in east Gouli (E-Gouli-06) and Gazhima (LMG-08), respectively. X<sub>Fe</sub> = Fe<sup>2+</sup>/(Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Mn + Mg + Ca). X<sub>Ca</sub>, X<sub>Mg</sub>, and X<sub>Mn</sub> defined accordingly. (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) Ternary classification diagrams for pyroxene in eclogite after [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">47</a>]. (<b>f</b>) An-Ab-Or triangular diagram [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">48</a>] showing compositions of plagioclase in E-Gouli-06 and LMG-08 eclogite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Classification diagrams of eclogite in the eastern section of EKOB. (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub>-Na<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O diagram; (<b>b</b>) Nb/Y-Zr/Ti diagram (Pearce, 2014); (<b>c</b>) Ti-V diagram (Shervais, [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">52</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) series classification diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (<b>a</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element patterns (<b>b</b>) for ecgolites from Gazhima (LMG) and East Gouli (E-Gouli), eastern part of EKOB. Chondrite, primitive mantle, N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB values are from Sun and McDonough (1989).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircons from (<b>a</b>) East Gouli eclogite (E-Gouli-08) and (<b>b</b>) Gazhima eclogite (LMG-06), east part of East Kunlun Orogenic Belt, China. The circles are the ablation sites of 32 μm laser spot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>U-Pb concordia diagrams (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>), weighted average of mean ages (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) and chondrite-normalized REE patterns (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) of from E-Gouli-08 eclogite (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and LMG-06 eclogite (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>). MSWD: mean square weighted deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Observations under the scale of rock slice (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and Raman spectra for (<b>c</b>) garnet included by in situ zircon from LMG eclogite, East Kunlun.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Phase relationships (<b>a</b>) and resulting P–T pseudosection (<b>b</b>) simulated in NCKFMASHTOMn system for Gazhima eclogite (LMG-06). Omphacitic pyroxene with jadeite component &gt; 20% is marked as omphacite (omp).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Omphacite grain distributing in matrix (<b>a</b>) and quartz exsolution needles in omphacite (plane polarized image, (<b>b</b>)) from LMG eclogite, East Kunlun.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>P-T paths of our sample and nearby eclogites) from the eastern part of EKOB. Published P-T paths: 1-eclogite from [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">43</a>]; 2-eclogite from [<a href="#B24-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">24</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams. (<b>a</b>) Zr vs. Zr/Y diagram (Pearce and Norry, 1979, [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">71</a>]); (<b>b</b>) Ce/Yb vs. Ta/Yb plot (Pearce, 1982; [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">72</a>]); (<b>c</b>) Hf-Th-Nb plot (Cabanis and Lecole, 1989; [<a href="#B73-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">73</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) Nb-Zr-Y plot (Meschede, 1986; [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00582" class="html-bibr">74</a>]) of eclogites from eastern part of East Kunlun Orogenic Belt (EKOB). CA—calc-alkaline; SH—shoshonitic; TH—tholeiitic; VAB—Volcanic Arc Basalt; and WPB—Within plate basalt.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic diagram showing the tectonic evolution of the eastern eclogites from East Kunlun Orogenic Belt (EKOB).The evolution model contains two stage of (<b>a</b>) oceanic subduction and (<b>b</b>) merging of the Qaidam and Kunlun blocks.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 6175 KiB  
Article
Metabasites from the Central East Kunlun Orogenic Belt Inform a New Suture Model for Subduction and Collision in the Early Paleozoic Proto-Tethys Ocean
by Feng Chang, Guibin Zhang, Lu Xiong, Shuaiqi Liu, Shuzhen Wang and Yixuan Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(5), 449; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14050449 - 24 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 920
Abstract
The discovery of eclogite outcrops in the East Kunlun Orogen Belt (EKOB) has confirmed the existence of an Early Paleozoic HP-UHP metamorphic belt. However, the protoliths and metamorphic histories of widespread metabasites remain poorly constrained. We collected three types of metabasites from the [...] Read more.
The discovery of eclogite outcrops in the East Kunlun Orogen Belt (EKOB) has confirmed the existence of an Early Paleozoic HP-UHP metamorphic belt. However, the protoliths and metamorphic histories of widespread metabasites remain poorly constrained. We collected three types of metabasites from the central part of EKOB. We present an integrated study of petrography, whole-rock geochemistry, Sr-Nd isotopes, estimated P–T conditions, and zircon U-Pb isotope ages. The results show that amphibolites and retrograde eclogites have clockwise P–T paths with peak conditions of, respectively, 11–12 kbar and 675–695 °C, and 21.5–22.2 kbar and 715–750 °C. Zircon dating of metabasites from Dagele yields Late Ordovician (~449 Ma) to Early Silurian (~440 Ma) protolith ages and Early Devonian (~414 Ma) amphibolite facies metamorphic ages. Retrograde eclogites from east Nuomuhong have a protolith age of ~902 Ma and metamorphic ages of ~418 Ma, consistent with other eclogites from East Kunlun. Our data suggest that the protoliths of Dagele metabasites represent arc-type magmatism during the subduction of a small back-arc oceanic basin. Instead, the protoliths of retrograde eclogites are Neoproterozoic tholeiitic basalts emplaced into continental crust and subsequently deeply subducted. We develop a new model for Early Paleozoic subduction and collision in the East Kunlun region, emphasizing the role of ‘dominant’ and ‘secondary’ suture boundaries. This model helps explain the ages and metamorphic histories of the metabasites studied here and offers new perspectives on the evolution of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological and tectonic setting. (<b>a</b>) Overview map showing the location of Kunlun within the Chinese Central Orogenic Belt (modified from Dong et al. [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">16</a>]). (<b>b</b>) A simplified tectonic map of Kunlun showing major tectonic divisions, ophiolitic mélanges, and sampling locations (modified from Dong et al. [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">16</a>]). HGF—Hongliuquan–Golmud Fault; QXM—Qimantag–Xiangride ophiolitic mélange; AKM—Aqikekulehu–Kunzhong ophiolitic mélange; MBAM—Muztag–Buqingshan–Animaqen ophiolitic mélange; DGL—Dagele area shown in part (<b>c</b>); NMH—Nuomuhong area shown in part (<b>d</b>). (<b>c</b>) Geological map and sampling site in Dagele (modified from Feng et al. [<a href="#B17-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">17</a>] and Li et al. [<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">18</a>]); (<b>d</b>) Geological map and sampling site in east Nuomuhong (modified from He et al. [<a href="#B19-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">19</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photographs of metabasites from Dagele (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and east Nuomuhong (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>). (<b>a</b>) Garnet amphibolite and amphibolite are xenoliths within the host gneiss. (<b>b</b>) Typical amphibolite. (<b>c</b>) Porphyroblastic texture on a weathered surface of garnet amphibolite. (<b>d</b>) Retrograde eclogite within felsic gneiss. (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Typical retrograde eclogite. (<b>g</b>) Granoblastic texture on a fresh surface of felsic gneiss.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Petrology of metabasites. (<b>a</b>) SEM-backscatter image (SEM-BSE) and (<b>b</b>) photomicrograph of garnet porphyroblast in the matrix of amphibole, plagioclase, quartz, and rutile in garnet amphibolite (20DGL97). Part b combines crossed- and plane-polarized light. (<b>c</b>) Photomicrograph of matrix rutile showing partial replacement by ilmenite (20DGL97). (<b>d</b>) Photomicrograph of felsic gneiss composed of quartz, feldspar, garnet, and biotite. Photomicrographs in plane-polarized (<b>e</b>) and crossed-polarized (<b>f</b>) light of amphibolites composed of amphibole with minor chlorite and plagioclase. (<b>g</b>) SEM-BSE image of retrograde eclogite (20NMH81) showing transition from clinopyroxene + plagioclase2 symplectite to the corona of orthopyroxene + plagioclase3 + amphibole3. Combined crossed- and plane-polarized light photomicrograph (<b>h</b>) and SEM-BSE image (<b>i</b>) of garnet porphyroblast in retrograde eclogite with inclusions of amphibole (Amp1) and epidote, surrounded by a matrix of omphacite2 and clinopyroxene + Pl2 symplectite (20NMH81).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Triangular diagram summarizing garnet compositions. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) Compositional data show profiles across garnet porphyroblasts in garnet amphibolite (DGL97) and retrograde eclogite (NMH81), respectively. <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Fe</sub> = Fe<sup>2+</sup>/(Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Mn + Mg + Ca). <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Ca</sub>, <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Mg</sub> and <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Mn</sub> are defined accordingly. (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) Ternary classification diagrams for pyroxene in retrograde eclogite after [<a href="#B21-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">22</a>] (<b>f</b>) An-Ab-Or triangular diagram [<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">23</a>] showing compositions of plagioclase in retrograde eclogite, garnet amphibolite, and amphibolite (DGL99); (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) Compositional variations in amphiboles on plots of Mg/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup>) vs. Si, after [<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">18</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Classification of studied metabasites. (<b>a</b>) Classification of volcanic rocks based on total alkalis (K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub>. (<b>b</b>) AFM diagram for metabasites. (<b>c</b>) Nb/Y vs. Zr/Ti for metabasites. (<b>d</b>) Th vs. Co diagram to determine the protoliths of metabasites (Hastie et al. [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">29</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and primitive mantle-normalized trace element patterns for metabasites from (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Dagele and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) eastern Nuomuhong. Fields for eclogites and gabbros from Dagele area shown in figures are cited from the literature Du et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">12</a>]. Chondrite and primitive mantle values are from Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sr-Nd isotope data for metabasites from Dagele [εNd(t) and <span class="html-italic">I</span><sub>Sr</sub> calculated at 430 Ma] and east Nuomuhong [εNd(t) and <span class="html-italic">I</span><sub>Sr</sub> calculated at 900 Ma]. (<b>a</b>) εNd(t) vs. <span class="html-italic">I</span><sub>Sr</sub>. (<b>b</b>) εNd(t) vs. <sup>147</sup>Sm/<sup>144</sup>Nd. (<b>c</b>) εNd(t) vs. MgO. (<b>d</b>) <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr vs. <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd, modified by Hofmann [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">31</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Phase relationships (<b>a</b>) and resulting P–T pseudosection (<b>b</b>) for Dagele sample 20DGL97 in the system NCKFMASHTOMn. Omphacitic pyroxene with a jadeite component &gt; 20% is marked as omphacite (Omp).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Phase relationships (<b>a</b>) and resulting P–T pseudosection (<b>b</b>) for east Nuomuhong sample 20NMH81 in the system NCKFMASHTOMn. Omphacitic pyroxene with a jadeite component &gt; 20% is marked as omphacite (Omp). The isopleth notation used is cg = <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Grs</sub> = Ca/(Ca + Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Mn + Mg), An = Ca/(Na + Ca + K), x(opx) = Fe<sup>2+</sup>/(Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Mg), y(opx) = Al in M1 site of orthopyroxene, t(am) = Ti content in amphibole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images (<b>left</b> column), U-Pb concordia diagrams (<b>middle</b>) and chondrite-normalized REE patterns (<b>right</b>) of representative zircons from (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Dagele amphibolites (20DGL99), (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) Dagele garnet amphibolites (20DGL97), and (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) east Nuomuhong retrograde eclogites (20NMH84). MSWD—mean square weighted deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Sm/Yb vs. La/Sm, (<b>b</b>) Sm vs. Sm/Yb, (<b>c</b>) Ce/Y vs. Zr/Nb, and (<b>d</b>) Ti/Yb vs. Nb/Yb for metabasites. Parts a–c show modeling results for partial melting in the garnet and spinel lherzolite stability fields. The N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB data are from [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. OIB—ocean island basalt; N-MORB—normal mid-oceanic ridge basalt; E-MORB—enriched mid-oceanic ridge basalt; PM—primitive mantle, and DMM—depleted MORB mantle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Th vs. Ba/Th (<b>b</b>) Sr/Th vs. Th/Ce (Turner et al. [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">57</a>]). Elevated Th/Ce is indicative of contributions from a sediment component but also a feature of the orthopyroxene in the xenoliths inferred to have been formed by metasomatism of pre-existing olivine by a wet, siliceous melt (Turner et al. [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">57</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Compositional variations of metabasite types on Th<sub>N</sub> vs. Nb<sub>N</sub> diagram. (<b>b</b>) Tectonic interpretation of metabasites based on Th<sub>N</sub> vs. Nb<sub>N</sub> systematics (modified by Saccani, E. [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">58</a>]). Abbreviations: BABB—back-arc basin basalt; IAT—low-Ti, island arc tholeiite; CAB—calc-alkaline basalt; MTB—medium-Ti basalt; D-MORB—depleted-type basalt; SSZ-E—supra-subduction zone enrichment; AB—alkaline ocean-island basalt; G-MORB—garnet-influenced MORB; AFC—assimilation-fractional crystallization; OCTZ: ocean–continent transition zone. Backarc A indicates backarc basin basalts (BABB) characterized by input of subduction or crustal components (e.g., immature intra-oceanic or ensialic backarcs), whereas Backarc B indicates BABBs showing no input of subduction or crustal components (e.g., mature intra-oceanic backarcs). In both panels, Nb and Th are normalized to the N-MORB composition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>P–T paths of our samples and other metabasites (eclogites, granulites, amphibolites) from the EKOB. Published P–T paths: 1—eclogite from [<a href="#B8-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">8</a>]; 2, 3—eclogite from [<a href="#B7-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">7</a>]; 4—Qingshuiquan granulite from [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">60</a>]; 5—Qingshuiquan granulite from [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">61</a>]; 6—Qingshuiquan granulite from [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">62</a>]; 7—Wulonggou HP granulite from [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">45</a>]; 8—Adatan garnet amphibolite in Qiman Tagh from [<a href="#B63-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">63</a>]; 9—Langmuri garnet amphibolite from [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">64</a>]. Metamorphic facies after [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">65</a>]. Abbreviations from [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00449" class="html-bibr">66</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Inferred tectonic evolution of the Proto-Tethys Ocean and East Kunlun Orogenic Belt during the Early Palaeozoic. Aqkkl—Aqikekule, QSq-TT-WT—Quishuiquan–Tatuo–Wutuo; QMTg—Qiman-Tagh; H-Sh—Heishan; ChG—Changgou; YZQ—Yaziquan; ADT—Adatan; WQ—Wenquan; DGL—Dagele; NMH—Nuomuhong; KHT—Kehete; XRD—Xiangride; XRHM—Xiarihamu. Metabasites include retrograde eclogite, garnet amphibolite, and amphibolite.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1713 KiB  
Article
Stability of CO2 Fluid in Eclogitic Mantle Lithosphere: Thermodynamic Calculations
by Yulia G. Vinogradova and Anton Shatskiy
Minerals 2024, 14(4), 403; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040403 - 15 Apr 2024
Viewed by 864
Abstract
Findings of solid and liquefied CO2 in diamonds from kimberlites and placers have indicated its presence in the form of a fluid phase in the Earth’s mantle at depths of 150–250 km. However, this is inconsistent with the results of experiments and [...] Read more.
Findings of solid and liquefied CO2 in diamonds from kimberlites and placers have indicated its presence in the form of a fluid phase in the Earth’s mantle at depths of 150–250 km. However, this is inconsistent with the results of experiments and existing thermodynamic calculations. To clarify this, we carried out thermodynamic modeling of garnet–CO2 and bimineral eclogite–CO2 systems using the Perple_X v. 7.1.3 software package, which establishes the most thermodynamically favorable assemblages for a given bulk composition of the system, unlike previous calculations, for which the phase relationships were simply assumed. The key difference between our results and previously known data is the presence of a region of partial carbonation. In this region, the garnet and clinopyroxene of the new compositions, CO2 fluid, carbonates, kyanite, and coesite are in equilibrium. The calculations revealed that unlike endmember systems (pyrope–CO2 and diopside–CO2) in the eclogite–CO2 system, the carbonation and decarbonation lines do not coincide, and the Grt+Cpx+CO2 and Carb+Ky+Coe+Cpx fields are separated by the Grt+Cpx+CO2+Carb+Ky+Coe region, which extends to pressures exceeding 4.3–6.0 GPa at 1050–1200 °C. This should extend the CO2 stability field in the eclogitic mantle to lower temperatures. Yet, owing to the short CO2 supply in the real mantle, the CO2 fluid should be completely spent on the carbonation of eclogite just below the eclogite + CO2 field. Thus, according to the obtained results, the CO2 fluid is stable in the eclogitic mantle in the diamond stability field at temperatures exceeding 1250 °C and pressures of 5–6 GPa. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p><span class="html-italic">T-X</span> diagrams for the pyrope–grossular–CO<sub>2</sub> system at 3 GPa (<b>a</b>), 4.5 GPa (<b>b</b>), and 6 GPa (<b>c</b>). Fields containing CO<sub>2</sub> fluid are highlighted in gray. The garnet–CO<sub>2</sub> fields are highlighted in dark gray. Ca# = Ca/(Ca + Mg) × 100 atomic ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><span class="html-italic">P-T</span> diagrams illustrating phase relations in the Prp–Grs–CO<sub>2</sub> system for Ca#: 20 (<b>a</b>), 40 (<b>b</b>), 50 (<b>c</b>), 60 (<b>d</b>), and 80 (<b>e</b>). The last diagram (<b>f</b>) compares phase boundaries at different bulk Ca#. The garnet–CO<sub>2</sub> fields are highlighted in dark grey and orange. Fields of partial carbonation are shaded in light gray.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram of the composition of garnets from eclogites [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00403" class="html-bibr">47</a>]. The grey area shows the field of garnets from eclogite xmenoliths from Udachnaya kimberlite pipe (Yakutia, Russia). The eclogitic garnets of Groups A, B, and C according to the classification of Taylor and Neal (Taylor and Neal, 1989). The black solid line shows the cross-section taken to calculate the <span class="html-italic">T-X</span> diagrams. The red triangle is the starting composition of Prp<sub>50</sub>Grs<sub>25</sub>Alm<sub>25</sub> garnet. The dotted lines with the arrow show the change in the composition of garnet in the field of partial carbonation with decreasing temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Phase relations in the Prp–Grs<sub>50</sub>Alm<sub>50</sub>+3CO<sub>2</sub> system. <span class="html-italic">T-X</span> diagrams at 3 GPa (<b>a</b>), 4.5 GPa (<b>b</b>), and 6 GPa (<b>c</b>). <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> diagram for the Prp<sub>50</sub>Grs<sub>25</sub>Alm<sub>25</sub>+3CO<sub>2</sub> bulk composition (<b>d</b>). The dotted lines show the equilibrium lines for the reactions of end-member phase components with CO<sub>2</sub>. The orange line is the decarbonation reaction. The blue line is the partial decarbonation reaction. The garnet–CO<sub>2</sub> fields are highlighted in dark grey. Fields of partial carbonation are shaded in light gray. Unfilled areas are complete carbonation fields.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Phase relations in the Prp<sub>50</sub>Grs<sub>25</sub>Alm<sub>25</sub>+Di<sub>70</sub>Jd<sub>30</sub>+5CO<sub>2</sub> system. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> diagram. The dotted lines show the equilibrium lines for the reactions of end-member phase components with CO<sub>2</sub>. The orange line is the partial carbonation line of Prp–Grs<sub>50</sub>Alm<sub>50</sub> garnet. The blue line is the carbonation line of Prp–Grs<sub>50</sub>Alm<sub>50</sub> garnet. Fields of partial carbonation of garnet are highlighted in gray. The eclogite–CO<sub>2</sub> field is highlighted in dark gray. (<b>b</b>) Mole fractions of garnet (dash-dotted line) and clinopyroxene (solid line) as a function of temperature at 4.5 GPa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Calculated garnet (<b>a</b>) and clinopyroxene (<b>b</b>) compositions in the Prp<sub>50</sub>Grs<sub>25</sub>Alm<sub>25</sub>+Di<sub>70</sub>Jd<sub>30</sub>+5CO<sub>2</sub> system at 3, 4.5, and 6 GPa compared with the eclogitic garnet and clinopyroxene of Group A, B, and C, according to the classifications of Coleman et al. [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00403" class="html-bibr">49</a>] and Taylor and Neal [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00403" class="html-bibr">48</a>], respectively. The ranges of eclogitic garnet compositions (light-grey area) and omphacite (light-grey area) correspond to those of Taylor et al. [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00403" class="html-bibr">47</a>]. The dotted and solid lines with the arrow show the change in the composition of garnet (<b>a</b>) and clinopyroxene (<b>b</b>) in the field of partial carbonation and the eclogite–CO<sub>2</sub> field, respectively, with decreasing temperature. The red triangles are initial compositions of garnet and clinopyroxene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Phase relationships in the system of eclogite–CO<sub>2</sub> according to thermodynamic calculations. The <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> fields of CO<sub>2</sub> fluid stability in the eclogitic suite and partial carbonation of eclogite are shown in grey and pink, respectively. The green line is the solidus of the system of eclogite–CO<sub>2</sub> taken from Yaxley and Brey [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00403" class="html-bibr">5</a>]. Gr/Dia—graphite-to-diamond transition [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00403" class="html-bibr">50</a>]. Dash-dotted lines—continental geotherms (37, 40, and 43 mW/m<sup>2</sup>) after Hasterok and Chapman [<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00403" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. Mantle adiabat (light grey) is taken from [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00403" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. The dotted line delimits the <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> range of lithospheric diamond formation.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 14903 KiB  
Article
Deformation Pattern of Well-Preserved High-Pressure Rocks (SE Syros, Cyclades)
by Nikolaos Gerogiannis, Eirini Aravadinou and Paraskevas Xypolias
Geosciences 2024, 14(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14010011 - 29 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1594
Abstract
New, detailed geological/structural mapping and field-based structural analysis were carried out to investigate the deformation pattern of well-preserved high-pressure rocks of the Blueschist Unit exposed in SE Syros (Cyclades, Greece). Geological mapping revealed the occurrence of extensive alternations between different rock groups, as [...] Read more.
New, detailed geological/structural mapping and field-based structural analysis were carried out to investigate the deformation pattern of well-preserved high-pressure rocks of the Blueschist Unit exposed in SE Syros (Cyclades, Greece). Geological mapping revealed the occurrence of extensive alternations between different rock groups, as well as interfingering patterns in map-scale that are possibly the result of folding. The earlier ductile deformation phase recognized in the mapped area is associated with the development of a penetrative foliation, which was formed at eclogite/blueschist-facies conditions under peak metamorphism. The subsequent main deformation phase occurred under blueschist facies conditions synchronous with the early stages of exhumation of the high-pressure rocks. This phase is mainly associated with the formation of WNW-trending folds and a pervasive axial planar foliation linked with ESE-directed shearing. The main deformation ceased under blueschist-facies conditions, and exhumation of the rocks to greenschist-facies conditions took place under very weak and localized deformation. Greenschist retrogression observed in the southwestern part of the mapped area seems to be controlled by fluids, rather than by intense deformation and formation of major syn-greenschist shear zones. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Structural Geology and Tectonics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geological/structural map of the south Syros area showing the major lithologies and structures (after [<a href="#B2-geosciences-14-00011" class="html-bibr">2</a>,<a href="#B9-geosciences-14-00011" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B11-geosciences-14-00011" class="html-bibr">11</a>]). The red dashed box indicates the location of the map in <a href="#geosciences-14-00011-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>. Inset shows a simplified geological map of the Hellenides, showing the position of Syros Island within the Cycladic Massif (blue color). (<b>b</b>) Suggested tectono-stratigraphic columns for Syros Island (according to [<a href="#B9-geosciences-14-00011" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B13-geosciences-14-00011" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B19-geosciences-14-00011" class="html-bibr">19</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The new geological/structural map of SE Syros showing the major rock groups and the orientation of map-scale fold axes of the main deformation phase recognized in the study area. The location of the map is given in <a href="#geosciences-14-00011-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>. Lettered sections A1–A′1, A2–A′2, B–B′, C1–C′1, C2–C′2, D–D′, and E–E′ refer to the composite cross-sections in <a href="#geosciences-14-00011-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Composite cross-sections (A1–A′2, B–B′, C1–C′2, D–D′, and E–E′) depicting the internal structural architecture and the main deformation structures of the Blueschist Unit in SE Syros. Locations of the individual cross-sections are shown in <a href="#geosciences-14-00011-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Panoramic view showing major D<sub>m</sub>-related structures and fabrics that deform the contacts between (<b>a</b>) the calcite marble and mica schist rock groups and (<b>b</b>) the calcite marble and HP metabasite rock groups; in both photographs, the field of view is 0.5 km wide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>l</b>) Photographs of D<sub>m</sub> structural fabrics recognized within each rock type and their relationship with the earlier D<sub>e</sub> structures. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) S<sub>e</sub> foliation is deformed by close-to-isoclinal F<sub>m</sub> folds within marbles. (<b>d</b>) F<sub>m</sub> folds define the contact between marble and eclogite. (<b>e</b>) Marble displaying columnar calcite grains oriented at high angles both to S<sub>e/m</sub> foliation and the axial plane of the isoclinal F<sub>m</sub> fold. (<b>f</b>,<b>g</b>) Isoclinal F<sub>m</sub> folds deforming the S<sub>e</sub> foliation within meta-tuffitic schists; eclogite defining the S<sub>e</sub> foliation is folded by F<sub>m</sub> isoclinal folds (<b>f</b>). Green arrows in (<b>f</b>) indicate boudinage of the isoclinally folded eclogite. (<b>h</b>,<b>i</b>) F<sub>m</sub> folds deforming the early S<sub>e</sub> foliation within eclogite (<b>h</b>) and glaucophanite (<b>i</b>). (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>) F<sub>m</sub> folds and axial planar S<sub>m</sub> foliation within greenschist (<b>j</b>), epidotite (<b>k</b>), and greenschist with bands of quartzofeldspathic schist and felsic gneiss (<b>l</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Stereoplots (lower-hemisphere, equal-area projections) of structural data of the main deformation phase (D<sub>m</sub>) recognized in SE Syros, showing (<b>a</b>) F<sub>m</sub> fold axis, (<b>b</b>) pole to F<sub>m</sub> fold axial, (<b>c</b>) pole to S<sub>m</sub> foliation and (<b>d</b>) L<sub>m</sub> lineation; m.u.d., multiples of uniform distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trajectory maps of the main (<b>a</b>) foliation and (<b>b</b>) lineation recognized within the Blueschist and the Uppermost Unit in SE Syros; the colors corresponding to the different rock groups are shown on the map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Representative photomicrograph of an albite-bearing schist of the greenschist group located near the contact with the calcite marbles and HP metabasites. Note that S<sub>m</sub> foliation and L<sub>m</sub> lineation are defined by blue amphibole needles. (<b>b</b>) Photograph showing the ductile-related contact between the greenschists and calcite marbles in the Achladi cape. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Columnar calcite grains at a high angle to the S<sub>m</sub> foliation located within the calcite marbles at the contact with the rocks of the greenschist group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Representative photographs of D<sub>m</sub> kinematic indicators. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) C- and C′-type shear bands showing consistent top-to-the-ESE shear sense. White arrows indicate the sense of shear.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Block diagrams illustrating two proposed scenarios for the Eocene–early Miocene tectono-metamorphic evolution of the Blueschist Unit exposed in SE Syros. Two alternatives indicating (<b>a</b>) pre-D<sub>m</sub> tectonostratigraphic succession close to peak conditions and the (<b>b</b>) development of Fm folds during the D<sub>m</sub> phase under blueschist-facies conditions during the early stages of exhumation. (<b>c</b>) Progressive Dm deformation under blueschist-facies conditions produced a penetrative S<sub>m</sub> foliation and an L<sub>m</sub> lineation associated with ESE-directed shearing. (<b>d</b>) Cessation of D<sub>m</sub> deformation under blueschist-facies conditions and main exhumation of the rocks to greenschist-facies conditions under very weak and localized deformation. Greenschist retrogression observed in the lower structural levels of the succession was likely controlled by fluids, without significant deformation. P-T diagram (after [<a href="#B28-geosciences-14-00011" class="html-bibr">28</a>]) showing the potential conditions of each recorded deformation phase within the Blueschist Unit in SE Syros.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 20304 KiB  
Review
Metamorphic Remnants of the Variscan Orogeny across the Alps and Their Tectonic Significance
by Manuel Roda, Maria Iole Spalla, Marco Filippi, Jean-Marc Lardeaux, Gisella Rebay, Alessandro Regorda, Davide Zanoni, Michele Zucali and Guido Gosso
Geosciences 2023, 13(10), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13100300 - 6 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2060
Abstract
Lithospheric slices preserving pre-Alpine metamorphic imprints are widely described in the Alps. The Variscan parageneses recorded in continental, oceanic, and mantle rocks suggest a heterogeneous metamorphic evolution across the Alpine domains. In this contribution, we collect quantitative metamorphic imprints and ages of samples [...] Read more.
Lithospheric slices preserving pre-Alpine metamorphic imprints are widely described in the Alps. The Variscan parageneses recorded in continental, oceanic, and mantle rocks suggest a heterogeneous metamorphic evolution across the Alpine domains. In this contribution, we collect quantitative metamorphic imprints and ages of samples that document Variscan tectonometamorphic evolution from 420 to 290 Ma. Based on age distribution and metamorphic imprint, three main stages can be identified for the Variscan evolution of the Alpine region: Devonian (early Variscan), late Devonian–late Carboniferous (middle Variscan), and late Carboniferous–early Permian (late Variscan). The dominant metamorphic imprint during Devonian times was recorded under eclogite and HP granulite facies conditions in the Helvetic–Dauphinois–Provençal, Penninic, and eastern Austroalpine domains and under Ep-amphibolite facies conditions in the Southalpine domain. These metamorphic conditions correspond to a mean Franciscan-type metamorphic field gradient. During the late Devonian–late Carboniferous period, in the Helvetic–Dauphinois–Provençal and central Austroalpine domains, the dominant metamorphic imprint developed under eclogite and HP granulite facies conditions with a Franciscan field gradient. Amphibolite facies conditions dominated in the Penninic and Southalpine domains and corresponded to a Barrovian-type metamorphic field gradient. At the Carboniferous–Permian transition, the metamorphic imprints mainly developed under amphibolite-LP granulite facies conditions in all domains of the Alps, corresponding to a mean metamorphic field gradient at the transition between Barrovian and Abukuma (Buchan) types. This distribution of the metamorphic imprints suggests a pre-Alpine burial of oceanic and continental crust underneath a continental upper plate, in a scenario of single or multiple oceanic subductions preceding the continental collision. Both scenarios are discussed and revised considering the consistency of collected data and a comparison with numerical models. Finally, the distribution of Devonian to Triassic geothermal gradients agrees with a sequence of events that starts with subduction, continues with continental collision, and ends with the continental thinning announcing the Jurassic oceanization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Structural Geology and Tectonics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Simplified tectonic sketch of the Variscan belt (modified after [<a href="#B15-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B35-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">35</a>]). Grey areas contour the Variscan massifs and green areas contour the Pyrenees, Betic Cordillera, and the Alps. Grey and black lines show Variscan and Alpine fronts, respectively. Blue lines show Variscan sutures and red lines show main Variscan faults. A—Alps; Arm—Armorican Massif; BC—Betic Cordillera; BCBF—Bristol Channel–Bray Fault; BF—Black Forest; BM—Bohemian Massif; CZ—Cantabrian Zone; CIZ—Central Iberian Zone; Co—Corsica; FCM—French Central Massif; GTMZ—Galicia-Trás-os-Montes Zone; MT—Maures-Tanneron Massif; OMZ—Ossa Morena Zone; Py—Pyrenees; Sa—Sardinia; RM—Rhenish Massif; Si—Sicilian-Apulian basements; SPZ—South Portuguese Zone; VM—Vosges Massif. Coordinate system WGS 84, UTM Zone 32N.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Variscan protolith and rock types. (<b>b</b>) Variscan metamorphic imprints. See tectonic unit, location, and reference coding in <a href="#app1-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Examples of Variscan rocks from the different Alpine domains. (<b>a</b>) Chloritoid, biotite, white mica, and garnet-bearing metapelites from Southalpine basement (eastern Orobic Alps, Upper Val Camonica) indicating an epidote-amphibolite facies metamorphic imprint. SPO of chloritoid marks S1 foliation. Plane-polarized light; long side of the photograph = 1 cm. (<b>b</b>) Garnet, white mica, kyanite, staurolite, and biotite-bearing metapelites from upper Como Lake, Southalpine basement, indicating amphibolite facies conditions during S2 development. Plane-polarized light; long side of photograph = 3.5 mm. (<b>c</b>) Garnet, scapolite, diopside, and plagioclase syn-D1 granulitic assemblage in metabasites from Austroalpine domain of central Alps (Languard-Campo nappe). Alpine garnet coronas rim granulitic Variscan minerals. Crossed polars; long side of photograph = 0.1 mm. (<b>d</b>) Olivine, garnet, and biotite in garnet peridotites of Nonsberg–Ulten Zone. Plane-polarized light; long side of photograph = 2.2 mm. (<b>e</b>) Garnet, omphacite, and amphibole in eclogite lenses enclosed in the paragneisses of the Savona Massif. (<b>f</b>) Partly re-equilibrated garnet, omphacite, zoisite, and rutile eclogite facies assemblage from Savona Massif. Late kelyphitic amphibole developed at garnet rims. Plane-polarized light; long side of photograph = 1.7 mm (<b>g</b>) Eclogite boudin in migmatitic paragneisses of the Argentera Massif with cm sized garnets. (<b>h</b>) Retrogressed eclogites with garnet, zoned amphibole, and relict omphacite replaced by diopside–plagioclase symplectite, from the Argetera Massif. Plane-polarized light; long side of photograph = 5 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Devonian metamorphic imprints and geochronological and geological ages. (<b>b</b>) PT data of Devonian samples and relative metamorphic facies (modified after [<a href="#B43-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B204-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">204</a>,<a href="#B205-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">205</a>]). (<b>c</b>) PT data of Devonian samples and relative metamorphic field gradients (modified after [<a href="#B35-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B204-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">204</a>]). See reference coding in <a href="#app1-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-app">Appendix A</a> and codes information in <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>, <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a> and <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Late Devonian–late Carboniferous metamorphic imprint and age types (geochronological and geological age). (<b>b</b>) PT data of Late Devonian–late Carboniferous samples and relative metamorphic facies (modified after [<a href="#B43-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B204-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">204</a>,<a href="#B205-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">205</a>]). (<b>c</b>) PT data of Late Devonian–late Carboniferous samples and relative metamorphic field gradients (modified after [<a href="#B35-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B204-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">204</a>]). See reference coding in <a href="#app1-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-app">Appendix A</a> and codes information in <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>, <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a> and <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Late Carboniferous–early Permian metamorphic imprint and age types (geochronological and geological age). (<b>b</b>) PT data of Late Carboniferous–early Permian samples and relative metamorphic facies (modified after [<a href="#B43-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B204-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">204</a>,<a href="#B205-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">205</a>]). (<b>c</b>) PT data of Late Carboniferous–early Permian samples and relative metamorphic field gradients (modified after [<a href="#B35-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B204-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">204</a>]). See reference coding in <a href="#app1-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-app">Appendix A</a> and codes information in <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>, <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a> and <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Age vs. geothermal gradient of Variscan rocks in the different domains of the Alps extrapolated from PT conditions, using a reference density of 2900 kg/m<math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </semantics></math> (see <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>). Blue, yellow, and red areas refer to Franciscan, Barrovian, and Abukuma field gradients, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>PT estimates of Variscan rocks characterized by Franciscan field gradients. The blue area is the interpolation of PT estimates from worldwide exhumed blueschists and eclogites after [<a href="#B216-geosciences-13-00300" class="html-bibr">216</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Franciscan (<b>a</b>), Barrovian (<b>b</b>), and Abukuma (<b>c</b>) field gradients calculated for the collected samples as a function of age (blue: Devonian; green: late Devonian–late Carboniferous; yellow: late Carboniferous–early Permian) and location along the Alpine chain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Geothermal gradients obtained from Devonian to Triassic PT conditions of Variscan rocks in the Alps, using a reference density of 2900 kg/m<math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>. Blue and red lines represent the best interpolation curve for all data and radiometric data only excluding outliers, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Alpine domains, tectonic units and zone, and (<b>B</b>) reference coding of collected samples of <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>, <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>, <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a> and <a href="#geosciences-13-00300-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 14099 KiB  
Article
Paleozoic Tectonothermal Evolution in the West Qinling Orogen, Central China: Petrological and Chronological Evidence from Garnet Amphibolites
by Qi Guo, Xiaohong Mao, Jianxin Zhang and Yawei Wu
Minerals 2023, 13(9), 1183; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13091183 - 8 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1127
Abstract
The Qinling Complex is located in the core of the northern Qinling Orogen and plays a key role in understanding the tectonic evolution of the Qinling Orogen, but its metamorphic evolution remains controversial. The combined investigation of petrographic observation, zircon U-Pb dating, and [...] Read more.
The Qinling Complex is located in the core of the northern Qinling Orogen and plays a key role in understanding the tectonic evolution of the Qinling Orogen, but its metamorphic evolution remains controversial. The combined investigation of petrographic observation, zircon U-Pb dating, and phase equilibria modeling for garnet amphibolites from the Tianshui area in the West Qinling Orogen is reported in this study. The results show that the garnet amphibolites record a clockwise P-T path characterized by a pre-TMax decompression heating stage, a temperature peak at P-T conditions of 0.84–0.99 GPa and 869–886 °C, followed by a decompression cooling stage. Zircon U-Pb dating yields four age populations of ~479 ± 4 Ma, ~451 ± 8 Ma, ~411 ± 4 Ma, and ~377 ± 6 Ma. The 479–450 Ma reflects the timing of the pre-TMax high–medium pressure upper amphibolite-facies metamorphism. The metamorphism at peak temperature condition occurred at c.411 Ma and was followed by decompression cooling to c.377 Ma. The Ordovician high–medium pressure metamorphism is related to the continental collision, which is slightly later than the HP–UHP eclogite-facies metamorphism in the East Qinling Orogen. The HT granulite-facies metamorphism at peak temperature condition took place at reduced pressures, suggesting thinning of the collision-thickened orogenic crust. Therefore, the northern West Qinling Orogen experienced a tectonothermal evolution from initial crust thickening to thinning during the Paleozoic collisional orogeny. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linking Metamorphism with Orogenesis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic location of the Qinling Orogen. (<b>b</b>) Simplified tectonic map of the Qinling orogen showing the location of the study area (modified after Dong et al. [<a href="#B15-minerals-13-01183" class="html-bibr">15</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Corridor-like geological sketch of the northern West Qinling Orogen (modified after Mao et al. [<a href="#B37-minerals-13-01183" class="html-bibr">37</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photographs showing field occurrences of garnet amphibolites. (<b>a</b>) The boundary between garnet amphibolite and paragneiss. (<b>b</b>) The leucosomes occur as veins or boudins within magmatic paragneiss.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photomicrographs image, TIMA mineral scanning map, and back-scattered image (BSE image) of the garnet amphibolites from the Tianshui area. (<b>a</b>) Amphibole, which is partly replaced by epidote + chlorite, occurs as corona surrounding relict garnet and plagioclase is completely replaced by prehnite + sericite assemblage. (<b>b</b>) Chlorite occurs as biotite pseudomorph in corona surrounding garnet. (<b>c</b>) Garnet rim is replaced by a corona of amphibole + prehnite + sericite + ilmenite + K-feldspar + quartz. (<b>d</b>) Fine-grained rutile is included in ilmenite. (<b>e</b>) Rutile and biotite are included in ilmenite. (<b>f</b>) Titanite, amphibole, and multi-inclusion occur in the core of garnet. (<b>g</b>) Plagioclase is included in quartz, which is included in the mantle of garnet. (<b>h</b>) K-feldspar occurs as inclusion within the core–mantle transition of relict garnet and as cuspate film intergrown with quartz. (<b>i</b>) Clinopyroxene occurs in matrix and intergrown with amphibole; the garnet disappears in this texture domain. (<b>j</b>) Clinopyroxene occurs in corona and is replaced by amphibole. (<b>k</b>) Clinopyroxene occurs as inclusion within amphibole and amphibole is partly replaced by epidote + chlorite on the rim. (<b>l</b>) Garnet and clinopyroxene occur as relict grains in reaction texture and are almost replaced by amphibole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representative composition zoning profiles of garnet from garnet amphibolites. (<b>a</b>) Garnet occurs in sample QL22-7-7.1. (<b>b</b>) Garnet occurs in sample AQ14-19-8.2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Diagram for composition zoning of the representative amphibole. (<b>b</b>) Ti (p.f.u.) versus Mg<sup>#</sup>(=Mg/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup>)) diagrams for the amphibole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagram for classification of amphibole from garnet amphibolites [<a href="#B50-minerals-13-01183" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Diagram for classification of mineral. (<b>a</b>) Diagram for classification of clinopyroxene. (<b>b</b>) Ab-An-Or diagram of plagioclase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> pseudosection calculated in the system NCKFMASHTO. (<b>b</b>) Estimated <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> path for garnet amphibolite sample (QL22-7-7.1). The pseudosection is contoured with isopleths of <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Mg</sub> = Mg/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup>) in clinopyroxene, <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Ti</sub> = (Ti/2) in amphibole, <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Prp</sub> (=Mg/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Ca)), and <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Grs</sub> (=Ca/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Ca)) in garnet. The colored full thick lines represent the position of the appearance or disappearance of minerals: the red full thick line represents the position of the solidus; the colored dash lines represent mineral compositional isopleths; the purple thick line with arrow represents the inferred <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> path.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> pseudosection calculated in the system NCKFMASHTO. (<b>b</b>) Estimated <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> path for garnet amphibolite (sample AQ14-19-8.2). The pseudosection is contoured with isopleths of <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>An</sub>= Ca/(Ca + Na + K) in plagioclase, <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Ti</sub> = (Ti/2) in amphibole, <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Prp</sub>(=Mg/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Ca)) and <span class="html-italic">X</span><sub>Grs</sub>(=Ca/(Mg + Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Ca)) in garnet. The colored full thick lines represent the position of the appearance or disappearance of minerals; the red full thick line represents the position of the solidus; the colored dash lines represent mineral compositional isopleths; the purple thick line with arrow represents the inferred <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> path.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Representative cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons from a garnet amphibolite, showing the analyzed spot and relevant ages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) U-Pb concordia diagram of zircon with the statistical histogram of relevant age. (<b>b</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of zircons. (Chondrite normalization uses values from Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B54-minerals-13-01183" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> path deduced for high-grade metamorphic rocks from the northern West Qinling Orogen. The <span class="html-italic">P-T</span> paths are labeled as follows: (1) garnet-sillimanite-biotite gneiss from the Beidao area [<a href="#B32-minerals-13-01183" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (2) paragneiss from the Huamiao area [<a href="#B31-minerals-13-01183" class="html-bibr">31</a>]; (3) garnet amphibolite of sample QL22-7-7.1 in this study; (4) garnet amphibolite of sample AQ14-19-8.2 in this study. Metamorphic facies boundaries are from Wei et al. [<a href="#B56-minerals-13-01183" class="html-bibr">56</a>]. Abbreviations: GR = granulite; AM = amphibolite; HGR = high-pressure granulite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) ∑HREE vs. age, (<b>b</b>) Y vs. age, and (<b>c</b>) δEu vs. age of zircons.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 8316 KiB  
Article
The Peritectic Reaction of Olivine as the Mechanism of the Ultrabasic–Basic Evolution of the Diamond-Forming Silicate-Carbonate-(C-O-H) System: Experiments at 6.0 GPa
by Yuriy A. Litvin, Anastasiya V. Kuzyura and Anna V. Spivak
Minerals 2023, 13(8), 1040; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081040 - 4 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1016
Abstract
Melting phase relations of the diamond-forming olivine (Ol)–jadeite (Jd)–diopside (Di)–(Mg, Fe, Ca, Na)-carbonates (Carb)–(C-O-H-fluid) system are studied in experiments at 6.0 GPa in the polythermal Ol74Carb18.5(C-O-H)7.5-Omp74Carb18.5(C-O-H)7.5 section, where Ol = Fo80 [...] Read more.
Melting phase relations of the diamond-forming olivine (Ol)–jadeite (Jd)–diopside (Di)–(Mg, Fe, Ca, Na)-carbonates (Carb)–(C-O-H-fluid) system are studied in experiments at 6.0 GPa in the polythermal Ol74Carb18.5(C-O-H)7.5-Omp74Carb18.5(C-O-H)7.5 section, where Ol = Fo80Fa20, Omp (omphacite) = Jd62Di38 and Carb = (MgCO3)25(FeCO3)25(CaCO3)25(Na2CO3)25. The peritectic reaction of olivine and jadeite-bearing melts with formation of garnet has been determined as a physico-chemical mechanism of the ultrabasic–basic evolution of the diamond-forming system. During the process, the CO2 component of the supercritical C-O-H-fluid can react with silicate components to form additional carbonates of Mg, Fe, Ca and Na. The solidus temperature of the diamond-forming system is lowered to 1000–1020 °C by the joint effect of the H2O fluid and its carbonate constituents. The experimentally recognized peritectic mechanism of the ultrabasic–basic evolution of the diamond-forming system explains the origin of associated paragenetic inclusions of peridotite and eclogite minerals in diamonds, as well as the xenoliths of diamond-bearing peridotites and eclogites of kimberlitic deposits of diamond. Diamond-forming systems have formed with the use of material from upper mantle native peridotite rocks. In this case, the capacity of the rocks to initiate the peritectic reaction of olivine was transmitted with silicate components to diamond-forming systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Melting phase relations in a peridotite–eclogite system Ol-Cpx/Omp-Crn-Coe of the upper mantle. (<b>a</b>) presents the complex coordinate framework of peridotite–eclogite compositions and its simplexes: (A) peridotite-pyroxenite Ol-Opx-Cpx-Grt, (B) olivine-corrundum eclogite Ol-Crn-Cpx-Grt, (C) corundum-kyanite eclogite Crn-Ky-Omp-Grt, (D) kyanite-coesite eclogite Ky-Coe-Omp-Grt, (E) coesite-orthopyroxene eclogite Coe-Opx-Omp-Grt. The Opx-Cpx/Omp-Crn plane presents the boundary between ultrabasic Ol-Opx-Cpx/Omp-Crn and basic Coe/Omp-Opx-Cpx/Omp-Crn volumes. (<b>b</b>) presents the complex liquidus structure of ultrabasic–basic system peridotite-eclogite Ol-Cpx-Crn-Coe, projected from the point Cpx/Omp onto divariant section Ol,Cpx-Crn,Cpx/Omp-Coe,Omp. Peritectic points for Opx are marked as P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>2</sub> and eutectic points as E<sub>1</sub>, E<sub>2</sub> and E<sub>3</sub>. Ultrabasic univariant cotectics: 1—Ol,Cpx,Grt,L; 2—Opx,Cpx,Grt,L; 3—Ol,Cpx,Grt,L; 4—Ol,Cpx,Grt,L; 5—Crn,Cpx,Grt,L; 6—Cpx,Grt,Crn, L. Basic univariant cotectics: 7—Omp,Grt,Crn,L; 8—Crn,Omp,Ky, L; 9—Omp,Ky,Grt,L; 10—Omp,Ky,Grt,L; 11—Ky,Omp,Coe,L; 12—Coe,Omp,Grt,L; 13—Coe,Omp,Grt,L; 14—Coe,Opx,Omp,L; 15—Opx,Omp,Grt,L. Symbols: L, melt; Ol, olivine; Opx, orthopyroxene; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Omp, omphacite; Grt, garnet; Coe, coesite, Crn, corundum, Ky, kyanite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Melting phase relations in ultrabasic–basic Ol-Jd-Di system for its Ol (=Fo<sub>80</sub>Fa<sub>20</sub>)–Omp (=Di<sub>38</sub>Jd<sub>62</sub>) polythermal section at 6.0 GPa [<a href="#B20-minerals-13-01040" class="html-bibr">20</a>]. Symbols: P, peritectic point; L, melt; Ol, olivine; Fo, forsterite; Fa, fayalite; Omp, omphacite; Jd, jadeite; Di, diopside; Grt, garnet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Peritectic liquidus in the ultrabasic–basic Ol–Jd–Di system [<a href="#B20-minerals-13-01040" class="html-bibr">20</a>]. The location of the Ol-Omp polythermal section is shown by a dotted line. Symbols: P, peritectic point; L, melt; Ol, olivine; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Omp, omphacite; Jd, jadeite; Di, diopside; Grt, garnet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Melting relations of the Ol<sub>95</sub>(C-O-H)<sub>05</sub>–Omp<sub>95</sub>(C-O-H)<sub>05</sub> polythermal section in the ultrabasic–basic Ol-Jd–Di–(C-O-H-fluid) system at 6.0 GPa [<a href="#B22-minerals-13-01040" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. Symbols: P, peritectic point; L, melt; Ol, olivine (=Fo<sub>80</sub>Fa<sub>20</sub>); Omp, omphacite (=Di<sub>38</sub>Jd<sub>62</sub>); Cpx, clinopyroxene; Grt, garnet; Carb, carbonate mix (MgCO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>25</sub>(FeCO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>25</sub>(CaCO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>25</sub>(Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>25</sub>; H<sub>2</sub>O*, supercritical water.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Structure of equilibrium peritectic liquidus of the ultrabasic–basic Ol–Jd–Di–(C-O-H-fluid) system [<a href="#B22-minerals-13-01040" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. The location of the Ol<sub>95</sub>(C-O-H)<sub>05</sub>–Omp<sub>95</sub>(C-O-H)<sub>05</sub> polythermal section is shown by a dotted line. Symbols: P, peritectic point; L, melt; Ol, olivine; Omp, omphacite; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Grt, garnet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A schematic drawing of the assembly design for experiments of the anvil-with-hall (toroidal) apparatus: (1) container (lithographic limestone); (2) capsule insulation (a mixture of MgO and hexagonal BN); (3, 4) starting sample in the Pt capsule; (5); tubular heater (graphite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Temperature–composition phase relations of the H<sub>2</sub>O-CO<sub>2</sub> system at a pressure of 6 GPa [<a href="#B25-minerals-13-01040" class="html-bibr">25</a>] with solid phase <span class="html-italic">β</span>-H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> [<a href="#B26-minerals-13-01040" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Melting relations of the ultrabasic–basic diamond-forming Ol-Jd–Di–Carb–(C-O-H-fluid) system in its Ol<sub>74</sub>Carb<sub>18.5</sub>(C-O-H)<sub>7.5</sub>–Omp<sub>74</sub>Carb<sub>18.5</sub>(C-O-H)<sub>7.5</sub> polythermal section at 6.0 GPa. Symbols: P, peritectic point, L, melt; Ol, olivine; Fo, forsterite; Fa, fayalite; Omp, omphacite; Grt, garnet; Carb, carbonates; H<sub>2</sub>O*, supercritical water. Numbered points correspond to experimental compositions (in the table).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SEM images of the sample of the ultrabasic (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and basic (<b>c</b>–<b>f</b>) compositions. Symbols: L, melt; Ol, olivine; Omp, omphacite; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Grt, garnet; Carb, carbonates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The peritectic point of the ultrabasic–basic diamond-forming Ol–Jd–Di–Carb-(C-O-H-fluid) system. The position of the polythermal section Ol<sub>74</sub>Carb<sub>18.5</sub>(C-O-H)<sub>7.5</sub>–Omp<sub>74</sub>Carb<sub>18.5</sub>(C-O-H)<sub>7.5</sub> is shown by the dotted line. Numbered black points are experimental compositions (see the table). Symbols: P, peritectic point; L, melt; Ol, olivine; Omp, omphacite; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Grt, garnet; Carb, carbonate mix.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>SEM images of the results of hydrothermal activity under subsolidus conditions of the diamond-forming Ol–Jd–Di–Carb-(C-O-H-fluid) system at 6.0 GPa: (<b>a</b>) geode-like structures; (<b>b</b>) inclusion of nesquehonite CaCO<sub>3</sub>·3H<sub>2</sub>O in garnet. Symbols: Omp, omphacite; Grt, garnet; Carb, carbonates; Mgs, magnesite; Arg, aragonite; Nes, nesquehonite.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 17113 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis of Early Cretaceous Granitoids in the Qingdao Area, Jiaodong Peninsula: Constraints from Zircon U–Pb Ages, Geochemistry and Sr–Nd–Hf Isotopes
by Yi Ding, Xuejiao Bu, Hong Zhao, Shihua Zhong and Ming Liu
Minerals 2023, 13(7), 963; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070963 - 20 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1157
Abstract
The Jiaodong Peninsula is located on the junction of the North China Craton (NCC) and South China Block (SCB), where Mesozoic igneous rocks are widespread. However, the petrogenesis and tectonic settings for these Mesozoic igneous rocks are still controversial. In this study, we [...] Read more.
The Jiaodong Peninsula is located on the junction of the North China Craton (NCC) and South China Block (SCB), where Mesozoic igneous rocks are widespread. However, the petrogenesis and tectonic settings for these Mesozoic igneous rocks are still controversial. In this study, we present detailed geochronological and geochemical analyses of quartz monzonite, monzogranite, syenogranite, and alkali feldspar granite in the Qingdao area, east of the Jiaodong Peninsula, to constrain their petrogenesis and tectonic setting. Zircon U–Pb dating shows that they mainly formed in the Early Cretaceous (120.5–113.1 Ma). Quartz monzonite exhibits adakitic geochemical features (e.g., low Y and high Sr/Y). Combined with its Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic features, we suggest that quartz monzonite may have been produced by the partial melting of phengite-bearing eclogites at the base of the thickened continental crust of the NCC. In contrast, monzogranite and syenogranite exhibit I-type granite affinities, whereas alkali feldspar granite exhibits features consistent with A-type granite. The strongly negative εHf(t) and εNd(t) values of the I-type rocks indicate that they were most likely produced through partial melting of granitic gneisses from the NCC, whereas A-type magmas may be formed through fractional crystallization from the non-adakitic granitic magma. Combined with previous studies, we suggest that these granitoids were formed in a lithospheric extensional setting via the rollback of the subducted Paleo-Pacific slab, which resulted in the reworking of the deep crust beneath the Sulu ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic belt. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Isotope Geochemical Analysis Technology and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic framework of the Jiaodong Peninsula. (<b>b</b>) Geological map and sampling location of the Qingdao granitoids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photomicrographs showing minerals and textures of the granitoids in the Qingdao area. (<b>a</b>) Quartz monzonite (sample QD008-1). (<b>b</b>) Monzogranite (sample QD002-3). (<b>c</b>) Syenogranite (sample QD016-1). (<b>d</b>) Alkali feldspar granite (sample QD005-3). Abbreviations: Qtz-quartz; Kfs—K-feldspar; Pl—plagioclase; Ser—sericite; Bt—biotite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CL images of typical zircons from the Qingdao granitoids. The numbers adjacent to circles refer to the zircon <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages (Ma) and ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Concordia diagram of zircon U–Pb dating results for the Qingdao granitoids. The ages in the diagram refer to the weighted mean <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages (Ma).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagrams for the Qingdao granitoids (modified after [<a href="#B20-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">20</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total alkalis vs. Silica (modified after [<a href="#B21-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">21</a>]) and (<b>b</b>) A/NK vs. A/CNK (modified after [<a href="#B22-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">22</a>]) diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>REE and trace element diagrams for the granitoids in the Qingdao area. (<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE diagrams for all studied samples. (<b>b</b>–<b>e</b>) Individual chondrite-normalized REE diagrams for quartz monzonite, monzogranite, syeogranite and alkali feldspar granite samples, respectively. (<b>f</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams for all studied samples. (<b>g</b>–<b>j</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams for quartz monzonite, monzogranite, syeogranite and alkali feldspar granite samples, respectively. The chondrite REE and primitive mantle normalization values are from [<a href="#B24-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">24</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variation diagrams of (<b>a</b>) 10,000 × Ga/Al vs. FeO<sup>T</sup>/MgO and (<b>b</b>) Zr + Ce + Nb + Y vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO for the Qingdao granitoids (modified after [<a href="#B31-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. FG: Fractionated granites; OGT: Unfractionated I-, S-, and M-type granites).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sr/Y vs. Y diagram for the Qingdao granitoids. The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>]. The solid line indicates the Adakite range, and the dotted line indicates the ADR range. The black lines are from [<a href="#B35-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. The blue lines are from [<a href="#B34-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">34</a>], and the orange lines are from [<a href="#B32-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Plots of trace elements vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> for the Qingdao granitoids. The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>I</sub> vs. ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) for the Qingdao granitoids (modified after [<a href="#B30-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">30</a>]). The ages for quartz monzogranite and monzogranite are 120.5 Ma and 119.4 Ma, respectively, which are used to calculate the (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>I</sub> and ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t). The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of major and trace elements vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> for the Qingdao granitoids. The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Ba vs. Sr plot (modified after [<a href="#B52-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. Pl: plagioclase; Kfs: K-feldspar; Bt: biotite; Hbl: hornblende).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Zircon Hf isotope diagrams. (<b>a</b>) Variations of Hf isotopic data with time for depleted mantle and crust. (<b>b</b>) Inserted diagram in a showing the zircon Hf isotopic features for granitoids from the Qingdao area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Yb/Ta vs. Y/Nb and (<b>b</b>) Y/Nb vs. Ce/Nb diagrams for A-type granite (modified after [<a href="#B57-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">57</a>]. OIB = ocean island basalt; IAB = island arc basalt).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Correlograms for trace elements ratios of the Qingdao granitoids. The literature data sources are from [<a href="#B11-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-13-00963" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Tectonic model for the generation and emplacement of the Qingdao granitoids.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 11291 KiB  
Article
Experimental Modeling of Decarbonation Reactions, Resulting in the Formation of CO2 Fluid and Garnets of Model Carbonated Eclogites under Lithospheric Mantle P,T-Parameters
by Yuliya V. Bataleva, Ivan D. Novoselov, Aleksei N. Kruk, Olga V. Furman and Yuri N. Palyanov
Minerals 2023, 13(7), 859; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070859 - 25 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1761
Abstract
First experimental modeling of decarbonation reactions resulting in the formation of CO2-fluid and Mg, Fe, Ca, and Mn garnets, with composition corresponding to the garnets of carbonated eclogites of types I and II (ECI and ECII), was carried out at a [...] Read more.
First experimental modeling of decarbonation reactions resulting in the formation of CO2-fluid and Mg, Fe, Ca, and Mn garnets, with composition corresponding to the garnets of carbonated eclogites of types I and II (ECI and ECII), was carried out at a wide range of lithospheric mantle pressures and temperatures. Experimental studies were performed on a multi-anvil high-pressure apparatus of a “split sphere” type (BARS), in (Mg, Fe, Ca, Mn)CO3-Al2O3-SiO2 systems (with compositional variations according to those in ECI and ECII), in the pressure interval of 3.0–7.5 GPa and temperatures of 1050–1450 °C (t = 10–60 h). A specially designed high-pressure cell with a hematite buffering container—preventing the diffusion of hydrogen into the platinum capsule—was used, in order to control the fluid composition. Using the mass spectrometry method, it was proven that in all experiments, the fluid composition was pure CO2. The resulting ECI garnet compositions were Prp48Alm35Grs15Sps02–Prp44Alm40Grs14Sps02, and compositions of the ECII garnet were Prp57Alm34Grs08Sps01–Prp68Alm23Grs08Sps01. We established that the composition of the synthesized garnets corresponds strongly to natural garnets of carbonated eclogites of types I and II, as well as to garnets from xenoliths of diamondiferous eclogites from the Robert Victor kimberlite pipe; according to the Raman characteristics, the best match was found with garnets from inclusions in diamonds of eclogitic paragenesis. In this study, we demonstrated that the lower temperature boundary of the stability of natural garnets from carbonated eclogites in the presence of a CO2 fluid is 1000 (±20) °C at depths of ~90 km, 1150–1250 (±20) °C at 190 km, and 1400 (±20) °C at depths of about 225 km. The results make a significant contribution to the reconstruction of the fluid regime and processes of CO2/carbonate-related mantle metasomatism in the lithospheric mantle. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimentally determined pressure-temperature boundaries of melting and decomposition regarding both Mg, Ca, and Fe carbonates (<b>a</b>) and decarbonation reaction curves (<b>b</b>): 1, 2–after [<a href="#B31-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; 3–after [<a href="#B33-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">33</a>]; 4, 5–after [<a href="#B34-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">34</a>]; 6–after [<a href="#B35-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">35</a>]; 7–after [<a href="#B36-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">36</a>]; 8–after [<a href="#B37-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B38-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">38</a>,<a href="#B39-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; 9–after [<a href="#B40-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">40</a>,<a href="#B41-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">41</a>]; 10–after [<a href="#B42-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">42</a>]; Sd—siderite, Liq sd—liquid FeCO<sub>3</sub>, Mt—magnetite, Gr—graphite, Mgs—magnesite, Per—periclase, Liq mgs—liquid MgCO<sub>3</sub>, Cc—calcite, Liq cc—liquid CaCO<sub>3</sub>, Co—coesite, Dol—dolomite, Di—diopside, Opx—orthopyroxene, Fo—forsterite, Ky—kyanite, Prp—pyrope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>P,T-diagram with the results of our previous experimental studies [<a href="#B65-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">65</a>,<a href="#B66-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">66</a>,<a href="#B67-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">67</a>] and the positions of decarbonation curves, resulting in the formation of CO<sub>2</sub> fluid and garnets of various compositions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Raman spectra of initial carbonates-natural Mg-siderite (Fe<sub>0.610</sub>Mg<sub>0.357</sub>Mn<sub>0.010</sub>Ca<sub>0.024</sub>)CO<sub>3</sub> (<b>a</b>), magnesite Mg<sub>0.932</sub>Ca<sub>0.060</sub>Fe<sub>0.008</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (<b>b</b>), calcite (Ca<sub>0.996</sub>Mn<sub>0.003</sub>Fe<sub>0.001</sub>)CO<sub>3</sub> (<b>c</b>), and rhodochrosite (Mn<sub>0.918</sub>Fe<sub>0.011</sub>Mg<sub>0.008</sub>Ca<sub>0.063</sub>)CO<sub>3</sub> (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>T-ƒO<sub>2</sub> diagram with buffer equilibria lines [<a href="#B91-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">91</a>,<a href="#B92-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">92</a>,<a href="#B93-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">93</a>] and the decarbonation reaction [<a href="#B85-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">85</a>]. Magnetite-hematite (MH), fayalite-magnetite-quartz (FMQ), iron-wüstite (IW), CCO—buffer equilibria; Ms—magnesite, Coe—coesite, Crn—corundum, Prp—pyrope, Mgt—magnetite, Dm—diamond.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>P,T-diagrams showing the formation of Grt + CO<sub>2</sub> from the breakdown of Carb + Ox ± Ky based on experimental results: (<b>a</b>) model ECI system, garnet compositions Prp<sub>48</sub>Alm<sub>35</sub>Grs<sub>15</sub>Sps<sub>02</sub>–Prp<sub>44</sub>Alm<sub>40</sub>Grs<sub>14</sub>Sps<sub>02</sub>, (<b>b</b>) model ECII system, garnet compositions Prp<sub>57</sub>Alm<sub>34</sub>Grs<sub>08</sub>Sps<sub>01</sub>–Prp<sub>68</sub>Alm<sub>23</sub>Grs<sub>08</sub>Sps<sub>01</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SEM-micrographs (BSE regime) of polished sample fragments, after experiments in the ECI system: (<b>a</b>) zoned aggregates of kyanite and garnet as well as CO<sub>2</sub>-fluid cavities in the carbonate + coesite matrix (N 2122-I, 3.0 GPa, 1150 °C); (<b>b</b>) polycrystalline aggregate of magnesiosiderite, ferromagnesite, coesite, and kyanite (N 2117-I, 6.3 GPa, 1100 °C); (<b>c</b>) zoned aggregates of kyanite and garnet, CO<sub>2</sub>-fluid cavities, as well as minor ferromagnesite and coesite crystals (N 2115-I, 6.3 GPa, 1300 °C); (<b>d</b>) section of Pt-capsule with a sample and fluid cavities therein (N 2113-II, 6.3 GPa, 1400 °C); (<b>e</b>) polycrystalline aggregate of garnet, kyanite, carbonate, and coesite as well as CO<sub>2</sub>-fluid cavities therein (N 2113-I, 6.3 GPa, 1400 °C); (<b>f</b>) garnet crystals in the polycrystalline aggregate of kyanite, coesite, and carbonate (N 2144-I, 7.5 GPa, 1450 °C); Carb—carbonate (magnesiosiderite or ferromagnesite), Coe—coesite, Ky—kyanite, Grt—garnet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Triangle diagrams of the chemical compositions of (<b>a</b>) garnets, and (<b>b</b>) carbonates, synthesized in the S-ECI system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Raman spectra of the synthesized pyrope-almandine-grossular garnets: (<b>a</b>) S-ECI: 1-N 2122-I, 3.0 GPa, 1150 °C, 2-N 2115-I, 6.3 GPa, 1300 °C, 3-N 2144-I, 7.5 GPa, 1450 °C; (<b>b</b>) S-ECII: 1-N 2122-II, 3.0 GPa, 1150 °C, 2–N 2113-II, 6.3 GPa, 1400 °C, 3-N 2140-II, 7.5 GPa, 1450 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SEM-micrographs (BSE regime) of polished sample fragments, after experiments in the ECII system: (<b>a</b>) polycrystalline aggregate of carbonates (magnesiosiderite and ferromagnesite), coesite, and kyanite (N 1738-II, 3.0 GPa, 1050 °C); (<b>b</b>) zoned aggregates of kyanite and garnet in a carbonate+coesite polycrystalline matrix (N 2122-II, 3.0 GPa, 1150 °C); (<b>c</b>) polycrystalline aggregate of magnesiosiderite, coesite, and kyanite (N 2119-II, 6.3 GPa, 1200 °C); (<b>d</b>) zoned aggregates of kyanite and garnet as well as CO<sub>2</sub>-fluid cavities in a ferromagnesite+coesite polycrystalline matrix (N 2115-II, 6.3 GPa, 1300 °C); (<b>e</b>) section of Pt-capsule with a sample and fluid cavities therein (N 2113-II, 6.3 GPa, 1400 °C); (<b>f</b>) zoned aggregates of kyanite and garnet as well as CO<sub>2</sub>-fluid cavities in a carbonate+coesite matrix (N 2113-II, 6.3 GPa, 1400 °C); (<b>g</b>) section of Pt-capsule with a sample (N 2135-II, 7.5 GPa, 1250 °C); (<b>h</b>) polycrystalline aggregate of kyanite with minor quantities of coesite and magnesiosiderite (N 2135-II, 7.5 GPa, 1250 °C); (<b>i</b>) zoned aggregates of kyanite and garnet as well as CO<sub>2</sub>-fluid cavities (N 2140-II, 7.5 GPa, 1450 °C); Carb—carbonate (magnesiosiderite or ferromagnesite), Coe—coesite, Ky—kyanite, Grt—garnet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Triangle diagrams of the chemical compositions of garnets (<b>a</b>) and carbonates (<b>b</b>), synthesized in the S-ECII system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Triangle diagrams of (<b>a</b>) the chemical compositions of natural garnets from carbonated eclogites of type I and II [<a href="#B79-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">79</a>], in comparison with synthetic garnets from this study, and (<b>b</b>) garnets of natural diamondiferous eclogites of Robert Victor kimberlite mine [<a href="#B77-minerals-13-00859" class="html-bibr">77</a>], in comparison with synthetic garnets from this study.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3742 KiB  
Article
Detrital Zircon Geochronology of the Volyn-Orsha Sedimentary Basin in Western Ukraine: Implications for the Meso-Neoproterozoic History of Baltica and Possible Link to Amazonia and the Grenvillian—Sveconorwegian—Sunsas Orogenic Belts
by Leonid Shumlyanskyy, Andrey Bekker, Iryna Tarasko, Ion Francovschi, Simon A. Wilde and Viktor Melnychuk
Geosciences 2023, 13(5), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13050152 - 22 May 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1683
Abstract
We used LA-ICP-MS U-Pb data for detrital zircon to constrain the Maximum Depositional Age (MDA) and provenance of clastic sedimentary rocks of the Volyn-Orsha sedimentary basin, which filled an elongated (~625 × 250 km) depression in SW Baltica and attained ~900 m in [...] Read more.
We used LA-ICP-MS U-Pb data for detrital zircon to constrain the Maximum Depositional Age (MDA) and provenance of clastic sedimentary rocks of the Volyn-Orsha sedimentary basin, which filled an elongated (~625 × 250 km) depression in SW Baltica and attained ~900 m in thickness. Eighty-six zircons out of one hundred and three yielded concordant dates, with most of them (86%) falling in the time interval between 1655 ± 3 and 1044 ± 16 Ma and clustering in two peaks at ca. 1630 and 1230 Ma. The remaining zircons yielded dates older than 1800 Ma. The MDA is defined by a tight group of three zircons with a weighted mean age of 1079 ± 8 Ma. This age corresponds to the time of a ~90° clockwise rotation of Baltica and the formation of the Grenvillian—Sveconorwegian—Sunsas orogenic belts. Subsidence was facilitated by the presence of eclogites derived from subducted oceanic crust. The sediments of the Orsha sub-basin in the northeastern part of the basin were derived from the local crystalline basement, whereas the sediments in the Volyn sub-basin, extending to the margin of Baltica, were transported from the orogen between Laurentia, Baltica and Amazonia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Palaeontology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Meso- and Neoproterozoic sedimentary basins in Baltica, modified after [<a href="#B11-geosciences-13-00152" class="html-bibr">11</a>]. The Volyn-Middle Russia System, together with the Pachelma aulacogen, generally follows the Paleoproterozoic suture zones separating the main Archean and early Paleoproterozoic crustal blocks composing Baltica.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Lithostratigraphic column of the pre-Cretaceous section of drill-core #70, Volyn sub-basin of the Volyn-Orsha basin, showing the stratigraphic position of the analysed sandstone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The detrital zircon age spectra (KDE plots) for the sediments filling the Volyn and Orsha sub-basins. Arrangement of the plots on the diagram broadly corresponds to their position in the sedimentary succession. Zircon U-Pb data for the Orsha sub-basin is from [<a href="#B35-geosciences-13-00152" class="html-bibr">35</a>], and for sample 56/90-95 is from [<a href="#B8-geosciences-13-00152" class="html-bibr">8</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Position of Baltica within the Meso-Neoproterozoic supercontinent Rodinia (modified after [<a href="#B70-geosciences-13-00152" class="html-bibr">70</a>]). The possible routes of detrital material for the Volyn and Orsha sub-basins are shown. As can be seen, detrital material infilling the Orsha sub-basin was mostly derived from the local crystalline basement. In contrast, the detrital material deposited in the Volyn sub-basin was transported from distant areas, possibly from the Sveconorwegian orogen in NW Baltica or the Sunsas orogen in Amazonia. SL stands for the São Luis block, La—for the Laurentia continent, Ro—for the Rockall plateau, Ch—for the Chortis block, and Oa—for the Oaxaquia block.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 3979 KiB  
Article
In Situ High-Pressure Raman Spectroscopic, Single-Crystal X-ray Diffraction, and FTIR Investigations of Rutile and TiO2II
by Xiaofeng Lu, Shuchang Gao, Peiyan Wu, Ziyu Zhang, Li Zhang, Xiaoguang Li and Xueqing Qin
Minerals 2023, 13(5), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050703 - 21 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1836
Abstract
In ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphic rocks, rutile is an important accessory mineral. Its high-pressure polymorph TiO2II can be a significant indicator of pressure in the diamond stability field. In the present study, in situ high-pressure Raman spectroscopic measurements of natural rutile in [...] Read more.
In ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphic rocks, rutile is an important accessory mineral. Its high-pressure polymorph TiO2II can be a significant indicator of pressure in the diamond stability field. In the present study, in situ high-pressure Raman spectroscopic measurements of natural rutile in UHP eclogite from the main hole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling Project (CCSD) have been conducted up to ~16 GPa. Rutile and recovered TiO2II have also been analyzed via single-crystal X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. The results indicate that (1) the phase transition from rutile to baddeleyite-type TiO2 terminates at about 16 GPa under compression at ambient temperature; (2) the metastable TiO2II in the exhumated UHP rocks formed during deep continental subduction can be characterized by a highly distorted octahedral site in the crystal structure. X-ray powder diffraction analyses (with Cu Kα radiation) at ambient conditions are sufficient for identifying the lamellae of TiO2II within natural rutile based on the angles (2θ) of two strong peaks at 25.5° and 31.5°; (3) rutile and recovered TiO2II in the continental slabs can contain certain amounts of water during deep subduction and exhumation. The estimated water contents of rutile in the present study range from 1590 to 1780 ppm of H2O by weight. In the crystal structure of TiO2II, hydrogen can be incorporated close to the long O-O edges (>2.5143 Å) of the TiO6 octahedra. Further studies on the pressure–temperature stability of hydroxyls in rutile and TiO2II may help to understand the transportation and release of water in subducted continental slabs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Projection of crystal structures (consisting of TiO<sub>6</sub> octahedra) of rutile and TiO<sub>2</sub>II based on the single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Micro-photographs of eclogite (no. B132R114P1a) from the main hole of the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling Project. Abbreviations: Rt = rutile, Phn = Phengite, Grt = Garnet, Omp = Omphacite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photomicrographs of natural rutile and recovered TiO<sub>2</sub>II in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The calculated X-ray powder diffraction patterns for Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å) of rutile and TiO<sub>2</sub>II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The Raman spectrum of rutile in the wavenumber range of 100 to 1200 cm<sup>−1</sup> under ambient conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Representative Raman spectra of rutile with varying pressure under (<b>a</b>) compression and (<b>b</b>) decompression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variations in band frequencies in the Raman spectra with varying pressure under (<b>a</b>) compression and (<b>b</b>) decompression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Structural representations and geometry parameters of octahedral sites in rutile and TiO<sub>2</sub>II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Representative mid-infrared absorption spectra of (<b>a</b>) natural rutile and (<b>b</b>) recovered TiO<sub>2</sub>II under ambient conditions. The spectrum of rutile was normalized to 30 μm thickness but was vertically offset.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 8821 KiB  
Article
Igneous Records of Mongolia–Okhotsk Ocean Subduction: Evidence from Granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains
by Jixu Liu, Cui Liu, Jinfu Deng, Zhaohua Luo, Guoqi He and Qing Liu
Minerals 2023, 13(4), 493; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13040493 - 30 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1637
Abstract
Large-scale Mesozoic granitoids are exposed in the Greater Khingan Mountains. Their relationship with the Mongolia–Okhotsk and the Paleo-Pacific Ocean is still under discussion and a matter of debate. In this study, field observations were made and a total of 18 granitoids exposed in [...] Read more.
Large-scale Mesozoic granitoids are exposed in the Greater Khingan Mountains. Their relationship with the Mongolia–Okhotsk and the Paleo-Pacific Ocean is still under discussion and a matter of debate. In this study, field observations were made and a total of 18 granitoids exposed in the vicinity of the Heihe–Baishilazi area in the northern part of the Greater Khingan Mountains were sampled for petrological, geochronological, and geochemical research. In addition, to complement this study, 90 granitic samples from the Xinghua, Dajinshan, Yili, Chabaqi, and Sankuanggou areas in the Greater Khingan Mountains were compiled in order to reveal rock assemblages, magma sources, and then inquire into the tectonic background. Zircon LA–ICP–MS U–Pb dating indicates that two samples from the Heihe area were formed in the Early Jurassic period (194.2 ± 1.4 Ma and 183.1 ± 1.3 Ma), and the εHf(t) values and TDM2 of the zircons were mainly +5.8 to +10.7 and 528 Ma to 834 Ma, respectively, with a large variation range. The intrusive rocks from the Greater Khingan Mountains (108 in total) belonging to the T1T2G1G2 assemblage contained tonalites (T1), trondhjemites (T2), granodiorites (G1), and granites (G2). These granitoids are presented as subalkaline series in a plot of total alkali versus SiO2 (TAS diagram), medium-K calc-alkaline and high-K calc-alkaline series on SiO2 versus K2O diagram, with metaluminous to peraluminous characteristics on an A/CNK versus A/NK diagram. These are shown as a MA (magnesium andesite) series and LMA (lower (or non) magnesium andesite) series on a SiO2 versus MgO diagram, which can be further divided into the higher-pressure TTG subtype of the MA (corresponding to high-SiO2 adakite (HSA)) series and the lower-pressure TTG subtype of LMA (corresponding to typical calc-alkaline suprasubduction zone rocks). In addition, granitoids were enriched in light rare earth elements (LREEs) and large ion lithophile elements (LILEs) and depleted in heavy rare earth elements (HREEs) and high-field-strength elements (HFSEs), corroborating a suprasubduction zone environment. Regional correlations as well as geochemical characteristics indicate that the rocks from the Greater Khingan Mountains formed in a subduction zone environment during the Early Jurassic; primary magma had presumably originated from the melting of young and hot oceanic crust under eclogite to amphibolite facies conditions. According to the spatial variation in rock assemblages (T1T2G1 to G1G2 and G2), we speculate that the northeastern Heihe, Baishilazi, and Xinghua areas as well as the westward Dajinshan area were adjacent to the ocean and formed an outer subduction zone, whereas the southwestward Sankuanggou, Yili, and Chabaqi areas were adjacent to the continent, forming an inner subduction zone. The distribution sites of the inner and outer subduction zones indicate southward and southwestward ocean subduction. Therefore, we propose a direct connection with southward subduction of the Mongolia–Okhotsk Ocean. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Granitic Intrusion and Related Mineralization in Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Simplified tectonic diagram showing the main units of central and eastern Asia (modified after [<a href="#B20-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">20</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic sketch map of NE China [<a href="#B3-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">3</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Geological sketch map of NE China (modified after [<a href="#B23-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">23</a>]). TTG—tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite; GG—granodiorite–granite; G—granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photographs of the granitoids: (<b>a</b>) quartz monzonite, (<b>b</b>) quartz monzonite, (<b>c</b>) porphyritic granite, (<b>d</b>) syenogranite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photomicrographs of granitoids: (<b>a</b>) quartz monzonite, (<b>b</b>) quartz monzonite, (<b>c</b>) porphyritic granite, and (<b>d</b>) syenogranite. Q, quartz; Or, orthoclase; Pl, plagioclase; Bi, biotite; Hb, hornblende; Mic, microcline (cross-polarized light).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of the selected zircons for analysis from the Early Jurassic granitoids examined in the Greater Khingan Mountains (red circles indicate U–Pb dating points; yellow circles indicate Lu–Hf isotope points). (<b>a</b>) sample HEIH2018726-8, (<b>b</b>) sample HEIH2018726-6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zircon U–Pb concordia diagrams for the Early Jurassic granitoids examined in the Greater Khingan Mountains. (<b>a</b>) sample HEIH2018726-8, (<b>b</b>) sample HEIH2018726-6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plot of the total alkali versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (TAS diagram) for granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B41-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">41</a>]; the boundary line between the alkaline and subalkaline series is from [<a href="#B42-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">42</a>]; (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub>–K<sub>2</sub>O diagram for granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B43-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">43</a>]; (<b>c</b>) A/CNK–A/NK diagram for granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B44-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">44</a>]; (<b>d</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub>–(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O − CaO) diagram for granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B45-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">45</a>]. (data of hollow circles and crosses are from [<a href="#B6-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B8-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B10-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">34</a>]).A, alkaline series; AC, alkali–calcic series; CA, calc–alkaline series; C, calcic series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plot of the total alkali versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (TAS diagram) for granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B41-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">41</a>]; the boundary line between the alkaline and subalkaline series is from [<a href="#B42-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">42</a>]; (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub>–K<sub>2</sub>O diagram for granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B43-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">43</a>]; (<b>c</b>) A/CNK–A/NK diagram for granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B44-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">44</a>]; (<b>d</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub>–(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O − CaO) diagram for granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B45-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">45</a>]. (data of hollow circles and crosses are from [<a href="#B6-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B8-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B10-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">34</a>]).A, alkaline series; AC, alkali–calcic series; CA, calc–alkaline series; C, calcic series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Primitive mantle normalized trace elements spider diagram (<b>a</b>) and chondrite-normalized REE pattern diagram (<b>b</b>) for Early Jurassic granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains. Data of solid lines are from [<a href="#B6-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B8-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B10-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B27-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">34</a>].Chondrite and primitive mantle values were from [<a href="#B49-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">49</a>] and [<a href="#B50-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">50</a>], respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Zircon U–Pb age distribution histogram for the Early Jurassic granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>CIPW norm mineral classification diagram for Early Jurassic granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B57-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">57</a>] (legends are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-00493-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plot of SiO<sub>2</sub> versus MgO for the Early Jurassic granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B58-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">58</a>] (vertical dashed line indicates the boundary between basalt and andesite; the legends are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-00493-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plot of Sr/Y versus Y (<b>a</b>) and (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> versus Yb<sub>N</sub> (<b>b</b>) for the Early Jurassic granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains (modified following [<a href="#B59-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">59</a>,<a href="#B60-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">61</a>] and [<a href="#B47-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B62-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">62</a>]; the legends are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-00493-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Cold mantle–hot crust model [<a href="#B58-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">58</a>,<a href="#B66-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">66</a>]. DG, dehydration front; DE, solutions enter the mantle along the DE; M, magma from subducted crust; H, additional magma from crustal rock; B, batholiths; V, volcanoes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Correlations between the Hf isotopic compositions and ages of zircons from the Early Jurassic granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B69-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">69</a>]. XMOB, XingMeng Orogenic Belt; YFTB, Yanshan Fold and Thrust Belt.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Plot of FeO*/MgO versus SiO<sub>2</sub> for the Early Jurassic granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B71-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">71</a>]. LF–CA, lower iron calc-alkaline series; CA, calc-alkaline series; TH, tholeiitic series. (the legends are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-00493-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Tectonic classification diagrams of the Early Jurassic granitoids in the Greater Khingan Mountains [<a href="#B72-minerals-13-00493" class="html-bibr">72</a>]. (<b>a</b>) (Y + Nb), Rb diagram; (<b>b</b>) (Yb + Ta), Rb diagram; (<b>c</b>) Yb–Ta diagram; (<b>d</b>) Y–Nb diagram. Syn–COLG, syn–collisional granites; VAG, volcanic arc granites; ORG, oceanic ridge granites; WPG, within-plate granites (the legends are the same as in <a href="#minerals-13-00493-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>).</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 12193 KiB  
Article
The Dynamics of Transformation of Lithospheric Mantle Rocks Beneath the Siberian Craton
by Yury Perepechko, Victor Sharapov, Anatoly Tomilenko, Konstantin Chudnenko, Konstantin Sorokin and Igor Ashchepkov
Minerals 2023, 13(3), 423; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13030423 - 16 Mar 2023
Viewed by 1420
Abstract
The problem of heat–mass transfer in the permeable areas above the asthenosphere zones was numerically studied based on an examination of the inclusion content in the minerals (olivine and clinopyroxenes) of igneous and metamorphic rocks of the lithospheric mantle and the Earth’s crust; [...] Read more.
The problem of heat–mass transfer in the permeable areas above the asthenosphere zones was numerically studied based on an examination of the inclusion content in the minerals (olivine and clinopyroxenes) of igneous and metamorphic rocks of the lithospheric mantle and the Earth’s crust; evaluations of thermodynamic conditions of the inclusion formation; and experimental modeling of the influence of hot reduced gases on rocks in the mantle beneath the Siberian craton. The flow of fluids of a certain composition from the upper-mantle magma chambers leads to the formation of zonal metasomatic columns in the ultrabasic mantle lithosphere in the permeable zones of deep faults (starting from the lithosphere base at 6–7 GPa). When petrogenic components enter from the magma pocket, depleted ultrabasic lithospheric mantle rocks change to substrates, which can be considered as the deep counterparts of crustal rodingites. Other fluid compositions result in strong calcination and pronounced salinization of the metasomatized substrates or an increase in the garnet content of the primary ultrabasic matrix. A region of alkaline rocks forms above these areas, which changes to pyroxenes, amphiboles, and biotites. The heat–mass transfer modeling for the two-velocity hydrodynamic model shows that gas–fluid and melt percolation lead to an increase in the thermal front velocity under convective heating and a pressure drop in flow. It is also shown that grospidites are considered to be eclogites, are found in the permeable zones of the lithospheric mantle columns serving as conduits for the melt/fluids and represent the products of the carbonated metasomatic columns. The carbonization caused by proto-kimberlite melts may essentially decrease the diamond grade of kimberlites due to carbon oxidation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Proportions of the bulk CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O contents in olivines (Ol<sub>x</sub>) and garnets (Ga<sub>x</sub>) from the xenoliths of mantle ultrabasic rocks and ‘eclogites’ (Udachnaya–Vostochnaya, Mir, Obnazhenaya (Yakutia), and Victor Roberts (South Africa) diamond pipes). Ol<sub>k</sub>—magmatic olivines from kimberlites of the Udachnaya–Vostochnaya pipe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Structural scheme of an over-asthenosphere permeable zone (‘fault’) of depth L<sub>1</sub> and width L<sub>2</sub>, with intersecting layered lithosphere of permeability k and porosity m (for separate layers); initial temperature and pressure distributions are T<sub>0</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, respectively; and lateral heat loss by magmatogenic fluid flow is α<sub>2</sub>. (<b>b</b>) Scheme of the reactors’ distribution along the permeable zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The formation of a two-zone structure: the appearance of a lower zone, where there is a local redistribution of ‘slowly mobile’ petrogenic components (Ca and Mg); somewhat larger displacements of Ti, Si, and Fe; a significant redistribution of Na; and complete depletion of rocks in terms of Mn, K, and P, and the development of an upper zone with potassium enrichment in metasomatized rocks. Amph-K is monoclinic potassium amphibole; Kfs is potassium feldspar; Cpx-Jad is monoclinic pyroxene with a high content of jadeite ‘molecule’; Tad is the adiabatic temperature; T sol is the solidus temperature for the ‘TQ’ substrate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mole content ratios of petrogenic components for the average compositions of harzburgite, websterite, and tholeiite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distributions of elements in the permeable zone along the profile of ‘harzburgite’ lithospheric mantle after the influence of fluids: t = 50,000 thousand years, Kp = 10<sup>−15</sup> m<sup>2</sup>–10<sup>−13</sup> m<sup>2</sup>, and m = 0.01–0.03. Element distributions: (<b>a</b>) Si; (<b>b</b>) Mg; and (<b>c</b>) Si.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Distributions of elements in the permeable zone along the profile of ‘harzburgite’ lithospheric mantle after the influence of fluids: t = 50,000 thousand years, Kp = 10<sup>−15</sup> m<sup>2</sup>–10<sup>−13</sup> m<sup>2</sup>, and m = 0.01–0.03. Element distributions: (<b>a</b>) Si; (<b>b</b>) Mg; and (<b>c</b>) Si.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zoning of petrogenic components’ distribution (zones I, II, III, and IV) along the metasomatic column after the influence of fluid composition: Si(0.8), Al(0.3), Ti(0.01), Fe(0.2), Ca(0.3), Na(0.04), K(0.02), Cl(0.5), F(0.1), C(1), H(2), and O(3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ratios for calcinations and wehrlitization zones versus Si and Ca contents in magma fluid. (<b>b</b>) The boundary of calcination zone of harzburgite matrix versus Si and Ca contents in magma fluid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ratios for calcinations and wehrlitization zones versus Si and Ca contents in magma fluid. (<b>b</b>) The boundary of calcination zone of harzburgite matrix versus Si and Ca contents in magma fluid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Composition of metasomatic mineral associations in zone I (<a href="#minerals-13-00423-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>) versus pO<sub>2</sub> in magma fluid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>An example of intensive sublimation (dissolving) of petrogenic components in zone I (<a href="#minerals-13-00423-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>) under the influence of magma fluids with low contents of petrogenic components; in this example, the fluid composition is C(1), H(2), O(3), Cl(0.5), F(0.1), Si(0.01), Al(0.01), Fe(0.01), and Ca(0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Quantities of gases transporting petrogenic components versus pO<sub>2</sub> value; the ratios are given by the C/H/O modules in magma fluids containing Si(0.1), Al(0.1), Fe(0.1), Ca(0.1), Cl(0.5), and F(0.1) in reactor R<sub>0</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Distribution of garnets along the profile of a metasomatic column versus the composition of influencing fluid: (<b>a</b>) fluid composition is Si(0.6), Al(0.5), Ti(0.01), Fe(0.2), Ca(0.5), Na(0.04), K(0.01), Cl(0.8), F(0.2), C(1), H(2), and O(3), and (<b>b</b>) fluid composition is Si(0.4), Al(0.4), Ti(0.01), Fe(0.2), Ca(0.2), Na(0.04), K(0.01), Cl(0.5), F(0.1), C(1), H(2), and O(3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Distribution of garnets along the profile of a metasomatic column versus the composition of influencing fluid: (<b>a</b>) fluid composition is Si(0.6), Al(0.5), Ti(0.01), Fe(0.2), Ca(0.5), Na(0.04), K(0.01), Cl(0.8), F(0.2), C(1), H(2), and O(3), and (<b>b</b>) fluid composition is Si(0.4), Al(0.4), Ti(0.01), Fe(0.2), Ca(0.2), Na(0.04), K(0.01), Cl(0.5), F(0.1), C(1), H(2), and O(3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Formation of separate zones of wehrlitization, with kyanite and without kainite: zone I: formation of rodingite with grossular, kyanite, and quartz with a low content of orthopyroxene; zone II: practically monomineral zone of diopside; and zone III: quasi-homogeneously wehrlitizated ultrabasic rock changed by the zone of graphitisized dunite and the by the zone of metasomatic ultrabasite with low contents of kyanite and corundum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>An example of the dynamics of formation of zone I: calcitized rodingite without diopside, under the influence of the fluid composition with Si(0.5), Al(0.1), Ti(0.01), Fe(0.1), Ca(0.5), Na(0.04), K(0.02), Cl(0.1), F(0.3), C(1), H(2), and O(3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Mineralogical zoning in a metasomatic column (harzburgite matrix) under the influence of fluid composition with Si(0.8), Al(0.4), Ti(0.01), Fe(0.1), Ca(0.2), Na(0.03), K(0.02), Cl(0.5), F(0.1), C(1), H(2), and O(3). Structural parameters of the permeable zone: K<sub>p</sub> = 10<sup>−16</sup> m<sup>2</sup>–10<sup>−13</sup> m<sup>2</sup> , m = 0.01–0.03, and influence time t = 100 thousand years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Garnet contents and compositions along the vertical profile of the permeable zone in the lithospheric mantle, as calculated for two profiles with various depths (superposition of two graphs): (1) lithosphere thickness is 150 km; T and P have linear stationary distributions, from 1300 °C and 40 kbar at the lower boundary of the system, up to zero values on the plate surface; and index ‘40′ designates the minal contents in garnets; (2) the same conditions as in (1), with the lithosphere thickness of 100 km; T = 1300 °C and P = 30 kbar at the lower boundary; index ‘30′ designates the minal contents in garnets; fluid composition: Si(0.8), Al(0.4), Ti(0.01), Fe(0.1), Ca(0.2), Na(0.03), K(0.02), Cl(0.5), F(0.1), C(1), H(2), and O(3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Reconstructions of the upper mantle sections beneath the Devonian kimberlite pipes in Central Yakutia, Daldyn, Alalkit, Malo-Botuobinsky fields, Siberia, and Roberts Victor, South Africa. Pressure and temperature estimates: for garnet: 1. T(°C) [<a href="#B97-minerals-13-00423" class="html-bibr">97</a>], P(GPa) [<a href="#B84-minerals-13-00423" class="html-bibr">84</a>]; 2. the same for diamond inclusions; for ilmenite—3. T(°C) [<a href="#B98-minerals-13-00423" class="html-bibr">98</a>], P(GPa) [<a href="#B85-minerals-13-00423" class="html-bibr">85</a>]. Zarnitsa (<b>a</b>), Aykhal (<b>b</b>). Udachnaya (<b>c</b>). Mir (<b>d</b>), Roberts Victor (<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16 Cont.
<p>Reconstructions of the upper mantle sections beneath the Devonian kimberlite pipes in Central Yakutia, Daldyn, Alalkit, Malo-Botuobinsky fields, Siberia, and Roberts Victor, South Africa. Pressure and temperature estimates: for garnet: 1. T(°C) [<a href="#B97-minerals-13-00423" class="html-bibr">97</a>], P(GPa) [<a href="#B84-minerals-13-00423" class="html-bibr">84</a>]; 2. the same for diamond inclusions; for ilmenite—3. T(°C) [<a href="#B98-minerals-13-00423" class="html-bibr">98</a>], P(GPa) [<a href="#B85-minerals-13-00423" class="html-bibr">85</a>]. Zarnitsa (<b>a</b>), Aykhal (<b>b</b>). Udachnaya (<b>c</b>). Mir (<b>d</b>), Roberts Victor (<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop