[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (34)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = deaf and hard of hearing children

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 1688 KiB  
Article
A Virtual Reality Platform for Evaluating Deficits in Executive Functions in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children—Relation to Daily Function and to Quality of Life
by Shaima Hamed-Daher, Naomi Josman, Evelyne Klinger and Batya Engel-Yeger
Children 2024, 11(9), 1123; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091123 - 13 Sep 2024
Viewed by 876
Abstract
Background: Childhood hearing loss is a common chronic condition that may have a broad impact on children’s communication and motor and cognitive development, resulting in functional challenges and decreased quality of life (QoL). Objectives: This pilot study aimed to compare executive functions (EFs) [...] Read more.
Background: Childhood hearing loss is a common chronic condition that may have a broad impact on children’s communication and motor and cognitive development, resulting in functional challenges and decreased quality of life (QoL). Objectives: This pilot study aimed to compare executive functions (EFs) as expressed in daily life and QoL between deaf and hard-of-hearing (D/HH) children and children with typical hearing. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between EFs and QoL in D/HH children. Methods: The participants were 76 children aged 7–11 yr: 38 D/HH and 38 with typical hearing. Parents completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), while the child performed a shopping task in the virtual action planning supermarket (VAP-S) to reflect the use of EFs in daily activity. Results: D/HH children showed significantly poorer EFs (as measured by BRIEF and VAP-S) and reduced QoL. Difficulties in EFs were correlated with lower QoL. BRIEF scores were significant predictors of QoL domains. Conclusions: Difficulties in EFs may characterize children with D/HH and reduce their QoL. Therefore, EFs should be screened and treated. VAP-S and BRIEF are feasible tools for evaluating EFs that reflect children’s challenges due to EF difficulties in real-life contexts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Picture showing the trajectory (path) of a participant during performance of the VAP-S. The departure of the path is indicated with the letter D. White dots correspond to the participant’s recorded positions. The orange squares represent the places where products appear on the shopping list. The purple dots represent participants’ stops. The blue dots represent collisions made by the participant. The green squares represent checkout counters with a cashier present. The red squares represent checkout counters without a cashier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Trajectory (successive white dots) of participants during VAP-S performance. The departure of the path is indicated with the letter D. The orange squares represent the products, blue dots represent the collisions, and purple dots represent the stops. (<b>a</b>) Trajectory of a typical hearing child; (<b>b</b>) trajectory of a D/HH child. The green squares represent checkout counters with a cashier present. The red squares represent checkout counters without a cashier.</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 872 KiB  
Article
Postural Stability of Adolescents with Late Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Aids: A Non-Randomized Trial
by Anna Zwierzchowska, Eliza Gaweł, Agata Krużyńska, Kajetan J. Słomka, Aleksandra Żebrowska and Grzegorz Juras
Audiol. Res. 2024, 14(4), 572-580; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres14040048 - 25 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1058
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the neuromuscular control of adolescents with late unilateral cochlear implantation and compare them to adolescents with hearing aids (HAs) while performing a balance task on a platform with the conditions of an activated hearing [...] Read more.
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the neuromuscular control of adolescents with late unilateral cochlear implantation and compare them to adolescents with hearing aids (HAs) while performing a balance task on a platform with the conditions of an activated hearing device (cochlear implant (CI)/HAs) with eyes opened/closed (EO/EC). Methods: Forty-eight adolescents with hearing loss participated in the study and were divided into SG (unilateral CI and HA) and CG (bilateral HA). The evaluation of the postural stability was performed with a force plate during two repeating testing trials with EO/EC. Results: SG was characterized by greater values of vCOP compared to CG (EO), while, in CG, greater values of vCOP were noted in the second trial. The type of hearing device was found to be related to the values of area (EO) (p < 0.001), which were always greater in SG, regardless of the visual perception. Conclusions: Late unilateral CI may impact the activation of different models of the auditory compensatory mechanism than HA, which is related to neuromuscular control. The values of vCOP can be predicted by age in late-CI individuals. Visual perception seems not to be related to the values of the area, which can be impacted both by CI and HA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of the non-randomized trial design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Differentiation of vCOP (velocity of the center of foot pressure, adjusted) (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) in the SG (study group) and CG (control group) under the conditions of EO × CI/HA activated (eyes open with cochlear implant/hearing aid activated) and EC × CI/HA activated (eyes closed with cochlear implant/hearing aid activated). Higher vCOP values indicate greater speeds of center of pressure movement, which may suggest reduced postural stability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Differentiation of the area (adjusted) (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) in the SG (study group) and CG (control group) under the conditions of EO × CI/HA activated (eyes open with cochlear implant/hearing aid activated) and EC × CI/HA activated (eyes closed with cochlear implant/hearing aid activated).</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 237 KiB  
Commentary
Early Childhood Development Is Not Enough: In Defense of Children with Developmental Delays and Disabilities and Their Right to Family-Centered Early Childhood Intervention (In the Global South)
by Claudine Störbeck
Children 2024, 11(5), 606; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11050606 - 18 May 2024
Viewed by 1524
Abstract
The international recognition of the critical importance of the early childhood phase has been firmly established through decades of rigorous research, evidence-based practices, and undeniable evidence of the returns on investment made during this formative period. Consequently, early childhood development has emerged as [...] Read more.
The international recognition of the critical importance of the early childhood phase has been firmly established through decades of rigorous research, evidence-based practices, and undeniable evidence of the returns on investment made during this formative period. Consequently, early childhood development has emerged as a top priority on both national and international agendas. This momentum reached a pinnacle in 2015 with the unanimous adoption of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United Nations, which placed a particular emphasis on children under the age of five within the education-focused SDG 4, notably target 4.2, centered on ensuring that all girls and boys are ready for primary education through the provision of accessible “quality early childhood development, care and pre-primary education”. However, the Global South reflects the glaring omission of addressing the needs of children at risk of poor development due to disabilities. This paper underscores the imperative for specialized early childhood intervention tailored to young children with disabilities and their families, commencing as early as possible following birth. It advocates for Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) as a service distinct from general Early Childhood Development (ECD), emphasizing the crucial role of families as active partners from the outset. Furthermore, the paper strengthens the case for Family-Centered Early Childhood Intervention (Fc-ECI) through the integration of evidence-based practices and an in-depth description of one such program in South Africa with specific reference to deaf and hard-of-hearing infants and their families. This model will be guided by core concepts outlined in WHO and UNICEF Early Childhood Intervention frameworks. Through this exploration, the paper aims to shed light on the urgent need for inclusive approaches to early childhood development, particularly for children with disabilities, and to advocate for the adoption of Family-Centered Early Childhood Intervention as a cornerstone of global efforts to ensure the holistic well-being and development of all children. Full article
28 pages, 582 KiB  
Systematic Review
Cochlear Implantation in Children with Additional Disabilities: A Systematic Review
by Valeria Caragli, Daniele Monzani, Elisabetta Genovese, Silvia Palma and Antonio M. Persico
Children 2023, 10(10), 1653; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101653 - 5 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2433
Abstract
This study examines the last 10 years of medical literature on the benefits of cochlear implantation in children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional disabilities. The most recent literature concerning cochlear implants (CIs) in DHH children with additional disabilities [...] Read more.
This study examines the last 10 years of medical literature on the benefits of cochlear implantation in children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional disabilities. The most recent literature concerning cochlear implants (CIs) in DHH children with additional disabilities was systematically explored through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from January 2012 to July 2023. Our two-stage search strategy selected a total of 61 articles concerning CI implantation in children with several forms of additional disabilities: autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, motor disorders, developmental delay, genetic syndromes, and intellectual disability. Overall, many children with additional disabilities benefit from CIs by acquiring greater environmental sound awareness. This, in turn, improves non-verbal communication and adaptive skills, with greater possibilities to relate to others and to be connected with the environment. Instead, despite some improvement, expressive language tends to develop more slowly and to a lesser extent compared to children affected by hearing loss only. Further studies are needed to better appreciate the specificities of each single disability and to personalize interventions, not restricting the analysis to auditory and language skills, but rather applying or developing cross-culturally validated instruments able to reliably assess the developmental trajectory and the quality of life of DHH children with additional disabilities before and after CI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Neurology & Neurodevelopmental Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of the systematic review process. CI, cochlear implant; HA, hearing aid.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 313 KiB  
Article
Identifying Developmental Language Disorder in Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants: A Case Study of Three Children
by Gemma Hardman, Rosalind Herman, Fiona Elizabeth Kyle, Susan Ebbels and Gary Morgan
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5755; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175755 - 4 Sep 2023
Viewed by 2607
Abstract
(1) Background: While spoken language learning delays are assumed for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children after cochlear implant (CI), many catch up with their hearing peers. Some DHH children with CIs, however, show persistent delays in language, despite protective factors being [...] Read more.
(1) Background: While spoken language learning delays are assumed for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children after cochlear implant (CI), many catch up with their hearing peers. Some DHH children with CIs, however, show persistent delays in language, despite protective factors being in place. This suggests a developmental language disorder (DLD). However, at present there is little consensus on how to diagnose DLD in DHH children. (2) Methods: Given the lack of consensus in this area, a set of case studies provides an appropriate first step. The goal of this paper is to show the plausibility of a DLD diagnosis, following careful analysis of protective and risk factors. A retrospective case study review was conducted for three children. Their long-term language outcomes up to four years after CI were considered in the context of access to sound, speech sound discrimination, social skills and non-verbal cognition. (3) Results: It was possible to posit DLD in one child who had experienced good access to sound, alongside good speech discrimination abilities and social development, and normal non-verbal cognition, but who presented with severe language learning difficulties. (4) Conclusions: Finding markers for DLD in DHH children is important for diagnosis and intervention. The implications for clinical practice are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Pediatrics)
14 pages, 294 KiB  
Article
Perspectives on Identity and d/Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students
by Elaine R. Smolen and Peter V. Paul
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(8), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080782 - 1 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2279
Abstract
The present narrative synthesis summarizes perspectives on the development of identity, or a sense of self, and the intersectionality of salient factors related to individuals who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing. Prior research indicates that identity encompasses the stories of an individual’s [...] Read more.
The present narrative synthesis summarizes perspectives on the development of identity, or a sense of self, and the intersectionality of salient factors related to individuals who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing. Prior research indicates that identity encompasses the stories of an individual’s experiences and relationships; identity development may not be static but rather dynamic and ongoing throughout an individual’s lifetime. After this general background, the article focuses on identity and deafness, particularly for children in K-12 educational settings. There are a multitude of factors—physiological (e.g., hearing acuity, appearance, gender), psychological (e.g., memory, intelligence, affective behaviors), and social (e.g., education, home or immigrated environment, ethnicity, group membership)—that contribute to the development of identity. This discussion is based on a synthesis of a variety of published sources; however, as much as possible, the focus is on empirical research conducted with children and young adults who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing. Results of the narrative synthesis suggest several topics around which the extant research coalesce: traditional and evolving views of d/Dhh identity, d/Dhh identity as fluid, identity development through relationships, identity and children with cochlear implants and those who are hard of hearing, the role of educational experiences, and intersectional identity development. The article concludes with a summary and recommendations for further investigation. Full article
15 pages, 273 KiB  
Article
Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students with Disabilities: An Evolving Landscape
by Sandy K. Bowen and Kristi M. Probst
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(7), 752; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070752 - 21 Jul 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5405
Abstract
The population of students who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (d/Dhh) with a disability have unique educational needs. Various terms have been used to describe this population, including “deaf plus”, “deaf with additional disabilities”, and most recently, “deaf with disabilities (DWD)”. Currently, [...] Read more.
The population of students who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (d/Dhh) with a disability have unique educational needs. Various terms have been used to describe this population, including “deaf plus”, “deaf with additional disabilities”, and most recently, “deaf with disabilities (DWD)”. Currently, there is no agreement on the percentage of DWD students in PreK-21 settings but is considered to comprise at least 40–50%. An individual who is DWD has a hearing loss and one or more disabilities, including (but not limited to) visual impairment or blindness, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual or developmental disabilities, specific learning disabilities, health impairments, etc. The critical consideration is that the interaction between hearing loss and the disability(ies) is not simply additive but rather multiplicative, impacting communication, cognition, social development, and behavior. Furthermore, the presence of hearing loss may decrease accurate identification of other disabilities and vice versa. Although the incidence of students who are DWD is quite high, there is inadequate research as these students are often excluded from studies focused on children who are d/Dhh. This article explores what we currently know about DWD students, and the knowledge and skills needed by teachers in the 21st century to meet the needs of these students and their families. Full article
13 pages, 2970 KiB  
Article
Socio-Emotional Experiences and Wellbeing of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Their Parents before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Alanna N. Gillespie, Libby Smith, Daisy A. Shepherd, Jessica Xu, Rija Khanal and Valerie Sung
Children 2023, 10(7), 1147; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10071147 - 30 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2099
Abstract
Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children in Victoria, Australia, were exposed to strict public health restrictions, including sustained lockdowns, during the COVID-19 pandemic. DHH children have higher health and socio-emotional needs than their hearing peers. We aimed to (1) describe the socio-emotional [...] Read more.
Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children in Victoria, Australia, were exposed to strict public health restrictions, including sustained lockdowns, during the COVID-19 pandemic. DHH children have higher health and socio-emotional needs than their hearing peers. We aimed to (1) describe the socio-emotional experiences of DHH children and their parents and (2) compare child and parent socio-emotional wellbeing, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Between May and September 2020, 497 (62%) parents of DHH children from the Victorian Childhood Hearing Longitudinal Databank completed an online survey. Measures were drawn from the CoRonavIruS Health Impact Survey (CRISIS) v3.0. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics to compare outcomes before and during the pandemic. Parents reported their children to have more negative socio-emotional wellbeing (mean emotions/worries score, EWS, changed from 0.76 pre-pandemic to 1.10 during the pandemic, mean difference 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.39), regardless of the type or severity of hearing loss. Parents also had more negative socio-emotional wellbeing (mean EWS changed from 1.05 pre-pandemic to 1.43 during the pandemic, mean difference 0.38, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.44). Negative socio-emotional experiences co-occurred with large social changes during the pandemic. Additional services should support the socio-emotional wellbeing of DHH children during significant adverse childhood experiences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Socio-Emotional Development from Childhood to Adulthood)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of parent responses to survey questions about (<b>a</b>) learning from home, (<b>b</b>) financial difficulties, and (<b>c</b>) parent difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Child daily activities ((<b>a</b>) sleep, (<b>b</b>) exercise, and (<b>c</b>) screen time) prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Difference in (<b>a</b>) child and (<b>b</b>) parent socio-emotional wellbeing scores during compared to before the pandemic, measured using the eight-item CRISIS emotions/worries scale, with a shift to the right indicating poorer wellbeing, i.e., a higher level of emotions/worries during the pandemic. HL: hearing loss; SNHL: sensorineural hearing loss.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 287 KiB  
Article
Parenting Stress in Mothers of Children with Permanent Hearing Impairment
by Grazia Isabella Continisio, Domenico D’Errico, Silvia Toscano, Nelson Mauro Maldonato, Raffaella De Falco, Francesco Nunziata, Angelica Rodio, Antonio Casarella, Valeria Del Vecchio, Anna Rita Fetoni and Rita Malesci
Children 2023, 10(3), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10030517 - 6 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3579
Abstract
Permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) represents the most frequent sensory pathology at birth. PCHI has a relevant psychological impact on the life of both the affected children and their families. Thus, the aim of this work is to explore the degree of parental [...] Read more.
Permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) represents the most frequent sensory pathology at birth. PCHI has a relevant psychological impact on the life of both the affected children and their families. Thus, the aim of this work is to explore the degree of parental distress felt by mothers of a deaf or hard-of-hearing child, to determine if this stress is associated with variables related to the children’s health (e.g., the severity of hearing loss, presence of other conditions, difficulty with treatment options, difficulty with rehabilitation) or family characteristics such as socio-economic and educational status. The study used the Parenting Stress Index–Short Form (PSI-SF) questionnaire administered to mothers. The results were analyzed in relation to variables such as parents’ education level, number of children, severity of hearing loss, presence of other chronic conditions, presence of cognitive delay, familiarity with hearing loss, time of diagnosis, use of prosthetics, and start in a rehabilitation program. The data indicate a correlation between maternal stress levels and low-educational levels, as well as the presence of congenital infections and cognitive delay. These results highlight the need for a comprehensive physical and psychological approach for hearing-impaired children, as stress factors can affect the adherence to effective rehabilitation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Otolaryngology)
11 pages, 244 KiB  
Article
Parent-to-Parent Advice: What Can We Learn by Listening to Parents of Deaf Children
by Linsay Flowers, Louise Duchesne and Charles Gaucher
Societies 2022, 12(6), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060152 - 2 Nov 2022
Viewed by 2872
Abstract
Parent-to-parent support is an important component of early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programs for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children. In this study, we asked parents of DHH children what advice they would give to new parents in their situation. Seventy-one [...] Read more.
Parent-to-parent support is an important component of early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programs for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children. In this study, we asked parents of DHH children what advice they would give to new parents in their situation. Seventy-one hearing parents of DDH children living in Canada, Switzerland, France, and Belgium participated in interviews that included the following question: “What advice you would give to parents who just learned that their child is deaf?”. We performed a thematic analysis and developed three overarching themes, revolving around the importance of trust, the need for reassurance, and finally, the quest for help. The findings allow to better understand how parental expertise can be used to improve early intervention services for DHH children. Full article
18 pages, 345 KiB  
Article
Inclusion and Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students: Finding Asylum in the LRE
by Julia A. Silvestri and Maria C. Hartman
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(11), 773; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110773 - 31 Oct 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 7270
Abstract
The movement towards inclusive public education for deaf and hard of hearing children (DHH) has steadily gathered momentum during the last fifty years. Both within the United States and abroad, inclusive public education has been facilitated through legislative action with varied results. Varied [...] Read more.
The movement towards inclusive public education for deaf and hard of hearing children (DHH) has steadily gathered momentum during the last fifty years. Both within the United States and abroad, inclusive public education has been facilitated through legislative action with varied results. Varied interpretation of inclusion policy, notably the “Least Restrictive Environment” (LRE) clause of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in the United States, an emphasis on assimilation, and a default preference for auditory-oral communication have often resulted in isolating and inaccessible experiences for DHH students in the mainstream. The purpose of this article is to review theory and research on effective practices in inclusion for DHH students. The research is summarized with respect to accessibility, social-emotional considerations, and language policy. It is often asserted that communication access and cultural identity are major factors that impact the successful inclusion of these students with bicultural identity related to greater wellbeing. Deaf schools may be the LRE placement option for some students and source of resource and support for DHH students and educators in all settings. The authors suggest that a shift towards a more inclusive experience in mainstream settings is emerging through the use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL), classroom technology, and culturally responsive education that integrates sign language and Deaf culture to foster bicultural identities. Strategies for effective inclusion include co-enrollment, deaf awareness programming, and consistent policy that equalizes the status of sign languages. Future research is recommended in effective practices in auditory and visual accommodations, integration of technology in K-12 classrooms, and the relation of policy to practice in inclusive education for DHH students. Full article
12 pages, 3017 KiB  
Article
Early Identification of Hearing Loss and Language Development at 32 Months of Age
by Anne B. Harris, Elizabeth Seeliger, Christi Hess, Allison L. Sedey, Kayla Kristensen, Yen Lee and Winnie Chung
J. Otorhinolaryngol. Hear. Balance Med. 2022, 3(4), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm3040008 - 24 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2792
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between the early identification of hearing loss and language outcomes for deaf/hard of hearing (D/HH) children, with bilateral or unilateral hearing loss and with or without additional disabilities. It was hypothesized that hearing loss identified by 3 months [...] Read more.
This study examines the relationship between the early identification of hearing loss and language outcomes for deaf/hard of hearing (D/HH) children, with bilateral or unilateral hearing loss and with or without additional disabilities. It was hypothesized that hearing loss identified by 3 months of age would be associated with better language outcomes. Using a prospective, longitudinal design, 86 families completed developmental instruments at two time points: at an average age of 14.8 months and an average age of 32.1 months. Multiple regression examined how hearing loss identified by 3 months of age contributed to later language outcomes while controlling for developmental level at the first time point. Hearing loss identified by 3 months of age was positively associated with better language outcomes for D/HH children at 32 months of age; however, D/HH children still exhibited language delays, compared to normative scores for same-aged hearing peers for reported measures. Language outcomes of children with unilateral hearing loss were not better than those of children with mild-to-moderate bilateral hearing loss. Children with additional disabilities and more severe bilateral hearing loss had lower language scores than those without. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Predicted mean developmental quotients around 32 months of age when hearing loss was identified before and after 3 months of age. The number 1 represents the developmental quotient at Phase 1 when children were around 15 months of age, considered to be their starting point. The number 2 represents the developmental quotient at Phase 2 when children were around 32 months of age.Solid (blue) lines show the predicted mean when hearing loss was identified by three months of age, and the dashed (red) lines depict the predicted mean when hearing loss was identified after three months of age. The shaded area shows the range &lt; 80 for quotients indicative of developmental delay.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 303 KiB  
Article
Being Deaf in Mainstream Schools: The Effect of a Hearing Loss in Children’s Playground Behaviors
by Brenda M. S. Da Silva, Carolien Rieffe, Johan H. M. Frijns, Herédio Sousa, Luísa Monteiro and Guida Veiga
Children 2022, 9(7), 1091; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9071091 - 21 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3214
Abstract
Naturalistic playground observations are a rich source of information when studying the social interactions of preschool children. On the playground, children can interact with their peers, explore different places and activities, and engage in different types of play. For deaf and hard of [...] Read more.
Naturalistic playground observations are a rich source of information when studying the social interactions of preschool children. On the playground, children can interact with their peers, explore different places and activities, and engage in different types of play. For deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children, interactions at a playground can be more difficult because of the large number of auditory stimuli surrounding them. Constraints in the access to the social world on the playground might hamper DHH children’s interactions with their typically hearing (TH) peers, activities, and play. This pilot study aimed to examine the playground behaviors of preschool DHH children across three aspects: social levels, type of activities, and play choices. For this purpose, 12 preschool DHH children were observed during recess time, and their behaviors were coded and compared to their 85 TH peers. The preliminary findings indicate that DHH children spend less time in social interactions compared to their TH peers and that they still face difficulties when socially engaging with their TH peers. These findings suggest that interventions should focus on three aspects: the physical environment awareness of TH peers about communicating with DHH children, and the use of exercise play to facilitate social interactions between DHH children and their TH peers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Child Psychomotricity: Development, Assessment, and Intervention)
9 pages, 266 KiB  
Article
NeonaTal Assisted TelerehAbilitation (T.A.T.A. Web App) for Hearing-Impaired Children: A Family-Centered Care Model for Early Intervention in Congenital Hearing Loss
by Emma Landolfi, Grazia Isabella Continisio, Valeria Del Vecchio, Nicola Serra, Ernesto Burattini, Massimiliano Conson, Elio Marciano, Carla Laria, Annamaria Franzè, Antonio Caso, Anna Rita Fetoni and Rita Malesci
Audiol. Res. 2022, 12(2), 182-190; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres12020021 - 28 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2701
Abstract
Background: An early hearing detection and intervention program (EHDI) is the first step for the habilitation of children with permanent hearing impairment (PHI). Actually, early intervention programs have increasingly shifted toward family involvement, emphasizing that the child’s family should take an active role [...] Read more.
Background: An early hearing detection and intervention program (EHDI) is the first step for the habilitation of children with permanent hearing impairment (PHI). Actually, early intervention programs have increasingly shifted toward family involvement, emphasizing that the child’s family should take an active role in the habilitation process. Therefore, familiar empowerment is the best way to improve a child’s emerging abilities. The aim of this study was to investigate parental self-efficacy beliefs and involvement as well as the language skills of deaf or hard of hearing DHH children who were habilitated with hearing aids and followed using the T.A.T.A web app (NeonaTal Assisted TelerehAbilitation), an example of asynchronous telepractice. Methods: The study describes the early stages of the habilitation program of 15 PHI children followed through the T.A.T.A. web app, which empowers families through a weekly questionnaire submitted during the first 270 to 360 days of their child’s life, for 14 weeks. The family involvement rate scale (FIRS) was used to evaluate parental compliance, and all children received in-person visits at the beginning and at the end of the training period. Results: The children showed greater auditory perceptual skills at the end of the training period on the basis of both the Infant Listening Progress Profile (ILiP) score and the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and FIRS scales. In other words, the auditory skills improved with age as well as with parental participation. Conclusions: The T.A.T.A. web app promotes a proactive management and a tailored habilitation through an active familiar involvement, easily achieved in clinical routine and in emergency settings without additional costs. Full article
16 pages, 1863 KiB  
Article
Factors Associated with Early Intervention Intensity for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
by Jareen Meinzen-Derr, Meredith E. Tabangin, Mekibib Altaye, Jennifer Ehrhardt and Susan Wiley
Children 2022, 9(2), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020224 - 8 Feb 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2338
Abstract
We quantified the intensity of early intervention (EI) services allocated to 1262 children who were deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) within a state program and identified factors associated with intervention intensity. Child specific data were collected on children born between 2008 and [...] Read more.
We quantified the intensity of early intervention (EI) services allocated to 1262 children who were deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) within a state program and identified factors associated with intervention intensity. Child specific data were collected on children born between 2008 and 2014. Data from Individualized Family Service Plans of children enrolled in Part C EI programming were evaluated for the type and duration of services during their EI enrollment. Associations between EI intensity and child/family variables were examined. Median age of EI enrollment was 5.3 months. The most frequently received services included primary service coordination, specialized DHH service, special instruction, language therapy, and family training; 60% of children received 4 or more different EI services. The median service intensity was 138.1 min per month across all EI years. The factors associated with higher EI intensity included severe hearing loss, bilateral hearing loss and presence of a disability. Children enrolled in EI at later ages received higher intensity of specialized DHH services, suggesting a need to “catch up” due to late acquisition of services. Evaluating EI service intensity broadens our understanding of effective components of state-based programs that support the developmental needs of children who are DHH. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Global Pediatric Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Percent of DHH infants and children assigned to types of early intervention services overall and by early intervention year. Services include: Service coord = coordination, Spec Inst = special instruction, DHH Service = specialized DHH services, Spec Inst = specialized instruction, Lang therapy = speech-language therapy services, Family = family training and counseling, PT = physical therapy, OT = occupational therapy, Audiol = audiology, and Parent educ = parent education.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Median cumulative hours of early intervention service for the duration of early intervention, by common service types among children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Error bars represent the 25th and 75th percentiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Median intensity as minutes per month of early intervention services per child by service type, for the duration a child was enrolled in early intervention. Error bars represent the 25th and 75th percentiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Adjusted average intensity (minutes per month) of all common early intervention service types for first enrollment year. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Abbreviations: EI = early intervention, m = months, AA = African American, and PI = Pacific Islander.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Adjusted average intensity (minutes per month) of all common early intervention service types for all 3 years combined. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Error bar for unknown race extends to 234 minutes. Abbreviations: EI = early intervention, m = months, AA = African American, and PI = Pacific Islander.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Adjusted average intensity (minutes per month) for specialized DHH services only for the first enrollment year and all years combined. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Abbreviations: m = months, Uni = unilateral, Bi = bilateral, M/M = mild or moderate, and S/P = severe or profound.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop