[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (83)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
64 pages, 1707 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review of Laser Photobiomodulation Dosimetry and Treatment Protocols in the Management of Medications-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws: A Rationalised Consensus for Future Randomised Controlled Clinical Trials
by Reem Hanna, Ioana Cristina Miron, Snehal Dalvi, Praveen Arany, René Jean Bensadoun and Stefano Benedicenti
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(8), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17081011 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 566
Abstract
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a debilitating adverse effect of bisphosphates, antiresorptive therapy or antiangiogenic agents that can potentially increase oxidative stress, leading to progressive osteonecrosis of the jaws. Despite the large number of published systematic reviews, there is a lack [...] Read more.
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a debilitating adverse effect of bisphosphates, antiresorptive therapy or antiangiogenic agents that can potentially increase oxidative stress, leading to progressive osteonecrosis of the jaws. Despite the large number of published systematic reviews, there is a lack of potential MRONJ treatment protocols utilising photobiomodulation (PBM) as a single or adjunct therapy for preventive or therapeutic oncology or non-oncology cohort. Hence, this systematic review aimed to evaluate PBM laser efficacy and its dosimetry as a monotherapy or combined with the standard treatments for preventive or therapeutic approach in MRONJ management. The objectives of the review were as follows: (1) to establish PBM dosimetry and treatment protocols for preventive, therapeutic or combined approaches in MRONJ management; (2) to highlight and bridge the literature gaps in MRONJ diagnostics and management; and (3) to suggest rationalised consensus recommendations for future randomised controlled trials (RCTs) through the available evidence-based literature. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was registered at PROSPERO under the ID CRD42021238175. A multi-database search was performed to identify articles of clinical studies published from their earliest records until 15 December 2023. The data were extracted from the relevant papers and analysed according to the outcomes selected in this review. In total, 12 out of 126 studies met the eligibility criteria. The striking inconsistent conclusions made by the various authors of the included studies were due to the heterogeneity in the methodology, diagnostic criteria and assessment tools, as well as in the reported outcomes, made it impossible to conduct a meta-analysis. PBM as a single or adjunct treatment modality is effective for MRONJ preventive or therapeutic management, but it was inconclusive to establish a standardised and replicable protocol due to the high risk of bias in a majority of the studies, but it was possible to extrapolate the PBM dosimetry of two studies that were close to the WALT recommended parameters. In conclusion, the authors established suggested rationalised consensus recommendations for future well-designed robust RCTs, utilising PBM as a monotherapy or an adjunct in preventive or therapeutic approach of MRONJ in an oncology and non-oncology cohort. This would pave the path for standardised PBM dosimetry and treatment protocols in MRONJ management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>PRISMA diagram for the review search strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Graphical summary of distribution of risk-of-bias judgments in each bias domain for ROBINS-I assessment.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1279 KiB  
Review
Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Oral Microbiome: Clinical Risk Factors, Pathophysiology and Treatment Options
by Sapir Jelin-Uhlig, Markus Weigel, Benjamin Ott, Can Imirzalioglu, Hans-Peter Howaldt, Sebastian Böttger and Torsten Hain
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(15), 8053; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158053 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 392
Abstract
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) represents a serious health condition, impacting the lives of many patients worldwide. The condition challenges clinical care due to its complex etiology and limited therapeutic options. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiological and patient-related factors that promote [...] Read more.
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) represents a serious health condition, impacting the lives of many patients worldwide. The condition challenges clinical care due to its complex etiology and limited therapeutic options. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiological and patient-related factors that promote disease development is essential. Recently, the oral microbiome has been implicated as a potential driver and modulating factor of BRONJ by several studies. Modern genomic sequencing methods have provided a wealth of data on the microbial composition of BRONJ lesions; however, the role of individual species in the process of disease development remains elusive. A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted to identify relevant studies on the microbiome of BRONJ patients using the terms “microbiome”, “osteonecrosis of the jaws”, and “bisphosphonates”. Studies focusing on symptoms, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment options were included. The principal risk factors for BRONJ are tooth extraction, surgical procedures, and the administration of high doses of bisphosphonates. Importantly, the oral microbiome plays a significant role in the progression of the disease. Several studies have identified alterations of microbial composition in BRONJ lesions. However, there is no consensus regarding bacterial species that are associated with BRONJ across studies. The bacterial genera typically found include Actinomyces, Fusobacterium, and Streptococcus. It is postulated that these microbes contribute to the pathogenesis of BRONJ by promoting inflammation and disrupting normal bone remodeling processes. Current therapeutic approaches are disease-stage-specific and the necessity for more effective treatment strategies remains. This review examines the potential causes of and therapeutic approaches to BRONJ, highlighting the link between microbial colonization and BRONJ development. Future research should seek to more thoroughly investigate the interactions between bisphosphonates, the oral microbiome, and the immune system in order to develop targeted therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Advances in Oral Microbiome and Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The pathophysiology of osteonecrosis of the jaw is based on five main factors: immune dysfunction, class-dependent effects of bisphosphonate (BP), bone remodeling, inflammation/infection, and the oral microbiome. The magnified area depicts the most abundant bacteria of the microbial composition commonly found within necrotic bone. The white arrow indicates bacterial migration from soft tissue to the exposed bone ↓ = decreased expression, ↑ = increased expression. Clinical image shows exposed bone with a necrotic lesion located on the left alveolar ridge of the edentulous maxilla (figure created with BioRender).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>BRONJ of the lower jaw following implant placement. (<b>A</b>): exposed bone in the oral cavity; (<b>B</b>): panoramic radiograph showing a bone sequester; (<b>C</b>): intraoperative exposure of the sequester; (<b>D</b>): removed bone sequester.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 264 KiB  
Article
Platelet-Rich Fibrin Treatment Evaluation in Patients with Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Osteoradionecrosis
by Rareș Călin Roman, Mădălina Anca Moldovan, Loredana Sabrina Pop, Sergiu Megieșan and Cosmin Ioan Faur
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(12), 3473; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123473 - 14 Jun 2024
Viewed by 634
Abstract
Background. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are associated with severe disability and continuous pain, both of which are very difficult to control. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) treatment compared to iodoform gauze packing [...] Read more.
Background. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are associated with severe disability and continuous pain, both of which are very difficult to control. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) treatment compared to iodoform gauze packing and the primary suture of oral mucosa in patients with both MRONJ and ORN. Methods. Patients suffering from MRONJ and ORN who were treated in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic of Cluj-Napoca in the last 10 years were selected for this study from the hospital database. Results. PRF treatment proved to be a reliable method to help heal the necrotic bone sites. High-ASA risk patients and immunosuppressed patients are more prone to recurrence and persistent signs and symptoms. Intravenous bisphosphonates produce more intense symptomatology compared to oral administration. The posterior mandible is more difficult to treat compared to other sites. Conclusions. The quality of life of MRONJ and ORN patients may be improved by a protocol that reduces pain and hospitalization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Head and Neck Surgery)
12 pages, 460 KiB  
Brief Report
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Associated with Bisphosphonates Infusion for Treatment of Plasma Cell Myeloma—A Retrospective Observational Study of Northern Portuguese Population
by Sara Sousa Ferreira, José Barbas do Amaral, José Júlio Pacheco, Filomena Salazar and Luís Monteiro
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2679; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092679 - 2 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 670
Abstract
Objectives: To verify medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) frequency among patients with plasma cell myeloma (PCM) that had been treated with bisphosphonates, to identify predisposing factors that could influence the development of osteonecrosis. Methods: This observational retrospective study was performed [...] Read more.
Objectives: To verify medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) frequency among patients with plasma cell myeloma (PCM) that had been treated with bisphosphonates, to identify predisposing factors that could influence the development of osteonecrosis. Methods: This observational retrospective study was performed at the Department of Hematology of Hospital Center of Porto (CHUP), Portugal. Results: The study population (n = 112) had a 15.2% (n = 17) prevalence of osteonecrosis. Clinically, bone exposure was the most frequently observed sign, present in 100% (n = 17) of the patients, followed by inflammation in 82.4% (n = 14), orofacial pain in 70.6% (n = 12), suppuration in 47.1% (n = 8), and intra or extra-oral fistula in 17.6% (n = 3) of the cases. The most frequent triggering local factor was dental extraction (82.4%). There was a dependence between the presence of extractions and the development of MRONJ (p < 0.001) but not with the time elapsed from the initiation of infusions with BPs and dental extractions (p = 0.499). In the sample of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), 13.8% were found to be more likely to develop MRONJ after an extraction. Conclusions: The most common local predisposing factor was dental extraction. No dependence was observed between the development of osteonecrosis and the time elapsed from the beginning of treatment with bisphosphonates infusions to surgical procedures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Clinical signs and symptoms of osteonecrosis.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1395 KiB  
Review
Unveiling Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Rapid Review of Etiology, Drug Holidays, and Treatment Strategies
by Ji-Hyeon Oh and Seong-Gon Kim
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(8), 3314; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083314 - 15 Apr 2024
Viewed by 985
Abstract
This rapid review critically evaluates recent advancements in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) from 2022 to 2023, employing a specific article selection protocol to focus on the latest literature. Initially screening 262 articles and ultimately selecting 22 based on [...] Read more.
This rapid review critically evaluates recent advancements in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) from 2022 to 2023, employing a specific article selection protocol to focus on the latest literature. Initially screening 262 articles and ultimately selecting 22 based on their relevance and uniqueness, the process involved meticulous screening, methodological evaluation, and data extraction by the authors. The findings, organized into epidemiology, treatment effectiveness, and drug holidays, are synthesized following rapid review guidelines. The review addresses the risk of MRONJ associated with tooth extraction in patients undergoing antiresorptive medication therapy, such as bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab (DS), and evaluates the effectiveness of drug holidays in reducing this risk. Recent studies suggest that drug holidays may not effectively mitigate MRONJ risks as previously believed. Furthermore, it highlights that conservative treatment can benefit asymptomatic early-stage MRONJ patients, whereas surgical intervention is more effective for those in advanced stages. Ultimately, this review synthesizes current findings to enhance clinical practice, suggesting that while drug holidays may not significantly reduce MRONJ risks, treatment strategies should be tailored, ranging from conservative approaches in early stages to surgical interventions in advanced stages, thereby guiding evidence-based clinical decisions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Clinical Technology for Oral Health Promotion)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Selected articles for review. Articles were categorized by their topic [<a href="#B8-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B9-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B12-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B13-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B14-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B15-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B16-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B20-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B23-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-applsci-14-03314" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 432 KiB  
Systematic Review
Effect of Antiresorptive Drugs on Osseointegrated Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
by Joyce Tin Wing Li and Yiu Yan Leung
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 2091; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072091 - 3 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1519
Abstract
Background: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of antiresorptive drug therapy on osseointegrated dental implants and the association with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Methods: A systematic search, including a computer search of several databases with specific keywords, a reference [...] Read more.
Background: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of antiresorptive drug therapy on osseointegrated dental implants and the association with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Methods: A systematic search, including a computer search of several databases with specific keywords, a reference search, and a manual search of four key maxillofacial journals were performed. Relevant articles were then evaluated and those that fulfilled the five predetermined criteria were chosen to enter the final review. A total of 445 implants in 135 subjects were included in the eight studies analyzed in the final review. Results: The failure rate of dental implants after antiresorptive medication in the included studies was 23%, with 83% of failures attributed to MRONJ. The average time from antiresorptive drug initiation to MRONJ development was approximately 34 months, ranging from 3 months to 16 years. The majority of MRONJ cases were classified as stage 2, and all sites showed either complete healing or substantial mucosal coverage after treatment. Conclusions: This review highlights the significant impact of antiresorptive drugs on osseo- integrated implants, with MRONJ identified as a leading cause of implant failure. The potential role of peri-implantitis as a trigger for MRONJ is emphasized. Regular monitoring and maintaining good periodontal health, especially within the first three years of antiresorptive drug therapy initiation, are crucial for implant success. Physicians and dentists should provide comprehensive information to patients prescribed with antiresorptive drugs, emphasizing the need for an awareness of the risks of MRONJ in the context of osseointegrated implants. A longer term of follow-up is recommended to identify and manage MRONJ around dental implants in an early manner. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow diagram for article selection (as adopted from the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram [<a href="#B12-jcm-13-02091" class="html-bibr">12</a>]). * Databases searched were PubMed and Embase; ** Record excluded based on irrelevance to the topic of antiresorptive drug to the dental implants.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 2334 KiB  
Article
Impact of Bisphosphonate Therapy on Oral Health in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases: A Comprehensive Study
by Jacek Calik, Katarzyna Calik, Natalia Sauer, Bogucki Zdzisław, Piotr Giedziun, Jacek Mackiewicz, Marek Murawski and Piotr Dzięgiel
Cancers 2024, 16(6), 1124; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061124 - 11 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1193
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of bisphosphonate therapy on the stomatognathic system in 80 patients with cancer of the breast and prostate with bone metastases. Bisphosphonates are integral for managing skeletal complications in these malignancies but are associated with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the [...] Read more.
This study investigates the impact of bisphosphonate therapy on the stomatognathic system in 80 patients with cancer of the breast and prostate with bone metastases. Bisphosphonates are integral for managing skeletal complications in these malignancies but are associated with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), affecting 0.8–18.5% of patients. BRONJ manifests with pain, neuropathy, tissue swelling, mucosal ulceration, tooth mobility, and abscesses, yet its pathogenesis remains elusive, complicating risk prediction. The research employed comprehensive dental and radiological evaluations. Dental status was assessed using DMFT and OHI-S indices, Eichner’s classification, and clinical periodontal measurements like the pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mSBI). A radiological analysis included panoramic X-rays for radiomorphometric measurements and TMJ lateral radiographs. Results indicated a significant decline in oral hygiene in patients with cancer after bisphosphonate therapy, marked by increased DMFT and OHI-S scores. Periodontal health also showed deterioration, with increased PD and CAL readings. The incidence of BRONJ symptoms was noted, although exact figures are not quantified in this abstract. The study also revealed changes in radiomorphometric parameters, suggesting bisphosphonates’ impact on bone density and structure. No substantial alterations were observed in TMJ function, indicating a need for extended observation to understand bisphosphonates’ long-term effects on the stomatognathic system. These findings highlight the importance of continuous dental monitoring and prophylaxis in patients undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. Implementing meticulous oral care protocols is essential for mitigating BRONJ risk and managing the complex oral health challenges in patients with cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Metastasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Age distribution in the study group and control group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Demonstration of the technique for measuring the compact bone thickness of the mandible and the distance between the mental foramen and the lower border of the mandibular compact bone on pantomographic images using the 3D Slicer software version 4.8.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Graphical representation of statistical analysis. (<b>A</b>) Distribution of OHI-S index values in the investigated groups. (<b>B</b>) The proportions of patients within the studied groups classified into four interpretative intervals of the OHI-S index. (<b>C</b>) The distribution of DMFT (Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth) index values in the studied groups. (<b>D</b>) Percentages of patients in the studied groups classified into interpretative intervals of Eichner’s classes. (<b>D</b>) Percentage distribution of patients within the studied groups categorized into three interpretative intervals of the Helkimo Ai index. (<b>E</b>) Percentage distribution of patients within the studied groups categorized into three interpretative intervals of the Helkimo Ai index. (<b>F</b>) Percentages of patients in the studied groups classified into four interpretative intervals of the Helkimo Di index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Percentages of patients in the studied groups classified into four interpretative intervals of the mSBI index. (<b>B</b>) Distribution of mSBI values in the studied groups. (<b>C</b>) Distribution of the mean PD (pocket depth) values in the studied groups. (<b>D</b>) Distribution of the mean CAL (clinical attachment loss) values in the studied groups. (<b>E</b>) Distribution of MCW (mandibular cortical width) values in the studied groups. (<b>F</b>) Percentages of patients in the studied groups classified into three interpretative intervals of the MCI (mandibular cortical index).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Distribution of OHI-S change values in the study groups. (<b>B</b>) Distribution of mSBI change values in the study groups. (<b>C</b>) Distribution of MCW change values in the study groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Correlation results between tooth brushing frequency and age in the experimental group. (<b>B</b>) Correlation results between tooth brushing frequency and age in the control group. (<b>C</b>) Correlation results between changes in OHI-S and mSBI in the control group. (<b>D</b>) Correlation results between changes in OHI-S and mSBI in the experimental group. (<b>E</b>) Correlation results between gender and changes in mSBI in the experimental group. (<b>F</b>) Correlation results between gender and changes in mSBI in the control group. (<b>G</b>) Correlation results between the usage of removable dentures and changes in mSBI in the experimental group. (<b>H</b>) Correlation results between the usage of removable dentures and changes in mSBI in the control group. (<b>I</b>) Correlation results between changes in PD and OHI-S in the control group. (<b>J</b>) Correlation results between changes in PD and OHI-S in the experimental group. (<b>K</b>) Correlation results between changes in CAL and OHI-S in the experimental group. (<b>L</b>) Correlation results between changes in CAL and OHI-S in the control group. Results with asterisks refer to Fisher’s exact test.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 702 KiB  
Review
Bisphosphonates and Their Connection to Dental Procedures: Exploring Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws
by Emily Sunny Lee, Meng-Chen Tsai, Jing-Xuan Lee, Chuki Wong, You-Ning Cheng, An-Chi Liu, You-Fang Liang, Chih-Yuan Fang, Chia-Yu Wu and I-Ta Lee
Cancers 2023, 15(22), 5366; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225366 - 10 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2831
Abstract
Bisphosphonates are widely used to treat osteoporosis and malignant tumors due to their effectiveness in increasing bone density and inhibiting bone resorption. However, their association with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) following invasive dental procedures poses a significant challenge. This review explores [...] Read more.
Bisphosphonates are widely used to treat osteoporosis and malignant tumors due to their effectiveness in increasing bone density and inhibiting bone resorption. However, their association with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) following invasive dental procedures poses a significant challenge. This review explores the functions, mechanisms, and side effects of bisphosphonates, emphasizing their impact on dental procedures. Dental patients receiving bisphosphonate treatment are at higher risk of BRONJ, necessitating dentists’ awareness of these risks. Topical bisphosphonate applications enhance dental implant success, by promoting osseointegration and preventing osteoclast apoptosis, and is effective in periodontal treatment. Yet, systemic administration (intravenous or intraoral) significantly increases the risk of BRONJ following dental procedures, particularly in inflamed conditions. Prevention and management of BRONJ involve maintaining oral health, considering alternative treatments, and careful pre-operative and post-operative follow-ups. Future research could focus on finding bisphosphonate alternatives with fewer side effects or developing combinations that reduce BRONJ risk. This review underscores the need for further exploration of bisphosphonates and their implications in dental procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Cancer: Prevention and Early Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Chemical structure of bisphosphonates. The “R” and “R’” refers to long carbon chains that differ depending on the type of bisphosphonate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An overview of potential factors contributing to the development of BRONJ.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 23130 KiB  
Article
Correlations between Immune Response and Etiopathogenic Factors of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Cancer Patients Treated with Zoledronic Acid
by George Adrian Ciobanu, Laurențiu Mogoantă, Sanda Mihaela Popescu, Mihaela Ionescu, Cristina Maria Munteanu, Ionela Elisabeta Staicu, Răzvan Mercuț, Cristian Corneliu Georgescu, Monica Scrieciu, Daniel Vlad and Adrian Camen
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(18), 14345; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814345 - 20 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1361
Abstract
Impairment of the immune response in MRONJ (medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws) is one of the still unclear etiopathogenic mechanisms of this condition encountered in cancer patients treated with bisphosphonates, with negative effects on the patient’s quality of life. The aim of the [...] Read more.
Impairment of the immune response in MRONJ (medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws) is one of the still unclear etiopathogenic mechanisms of this condition encountered in cancer patients treated with bisphosphonates, with negative effects on the patient’s quality of life. The aim of the present study was to correlate the immune response with etiopathogenic factors via immunohistochemical evaluation of the maxillary tissues in zoledronic acid osteonecrosis. The retrospective study included a group of 51 patients with various types of cancers, diagnosed with stage 2 or 3 MRONJ at zoledronic acid and treated surgically. Immunohistochemical expressions of αSMA, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD79α, CD68, CD204, and tryptase were evaluated. Immunohistochemical markers expressions were statistically analyzed according to the duration of the treatment, the trigger factor, the location of the MRONJ, and the healing status. Analysis of the immune response included T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, and mast cells. The duration of treatment significantly influenced the immunohistochemical expression of most markers (p < 0.05). For an increasing trend in treatment duration, a decreasing trend in marker score was observed, suggesting an inverse correlation. The expression of the markers was different depending on the trigger factor, on MRONJ localization (maxilla/mandible), and the healing status, being more intense in patients cured per primam compared to those who had relapses. The patient’s immune response was negatively influenced by the duration of the treatment, the trigger factor, the location of the lesion in the mandible, and the recurrence of MRONJ. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) CT aspects of patients with MRONJ.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Clinical aspects of patients with MRONJ.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Histopathological aspects of bone and marginal periodontium in MRONJ to zoledronic acid in cancer patients (red arrows). (<b>a</b>) Maxillary bone with an area of necrosis with a moth-eaten appearance and inflamed periodontium. HE, ×100. (<b>b</b>) Necrotic bone and connective tissue with the presence of cell nuclei in the area of necrosis. ×100, trichrome stain. (<b>c</b>) Diffuse inflammatory infiltrate that alters (dissects) the structure; abundant, chronic lympho-plasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate, numerous blood capillaries with turgescent endothelium; HE, ×100. (<b>d</b>) Periodontium with diffuse chronic inflammatory infiltrate, multinucleated giant cells arising from the union of macrophages as a reaction to a foreign body, with numerous newly formed capillaries. HE, ×100.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Immunohistochemical aspects of the marginal periodontium in MRONJ (red arrows). (<b>a</b>) Periodontium with necrotic and denuded superficial epithelium and chorion infiltrated with immune cells; ×200, AE1/AE3. (<b>b</b>) Periodontal fragment with intensely positive epithelial AE1/AE3 immunolabeling, with underlying chorion with abundant inflammatory infiltrate. ×200, AE1/AE3. (<b>c</b>) Periodontal fragment with thin epithelium intense positive AE1/AE3 immunolabeling, and chorion with rich inflammatory and hemorrhagic infiltrate; ×200, AE1-AE3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Expression of CD3, CD4, and CD8 markers in patients with MRONJ (red arrows): (<b>a</b>) periodontium with T lymphocytes, with intensely positive CD3 immunolabeling, and with focal distribution, ×200; (<b>b</b>) mucosal and bone fragment with T lymphocytes, with CD4 immunomarking absent in the focus of bone necrosis but intensely positive in adjacent areas ×200; (<b>c</b>) periodontium with rare T lymphocytes, with intense positive CD8 immunolabeling, and with in-homogeneous distribution, ×200; (<b>d</b>) periodontium with rare T lymphocytes, with intensely positive CD8 immunolabeling in areas with inflammatory infiltrate and absent in areas of neoangiogenesis, ×200.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Expression of CD68, CD204 markers for macrophages in patients with MRONJ (red arrows): (<b>a</b>) muco-osseous fragment with rare macrophages, with moderately positive CD204 immunoexpression, mainly distributed in the areas with inflammatory infiltrate and adjacent to the area of osteonecrosis, ×20; (<b>b</b>) periodontium with rare macrophages, with intensely positive CD68 immunomarking in the inflammatory focus, ×20; (<b>c</b>) periodontium with numerous macrophages with intensely positive CD68 immunoexpression, in the areas with rich inflammatory infiltrate, ×100; (<b>d</b>) periodontium with numerous macrophages of predominantly large sizes, with intensely positive CD68 immunolabeling, ×200.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Expression of CD68, CD204 markers for macrophages in patients with MRONJ (red arrows): (<b>a</b>) muco-osseous fragment with rare macrophages, with moderately positive CD204 immunoexpression, mainly distributed in the areas with inflammatory infiltrate and adjacent to the area of osteonecrosis, ×20; (<b>b</b>) periodontium with rare macrophages, with intensely positive CD68 immunomarking in the inflammatory focus, ×20; (<b>c</b>) periodontium with numerous macrophages with intensely positive CD68 immunoexpression, in the areas with rich inflammatory infiltrate, ×100; (<b>d</b>) periodontium with numerous macrophages of predominantly large sizes, with intensely positive CD68 immunolabeling, ×200.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Expression of the tryptase marker (red arrows): (<b>a</b>) bone fragment with a mosaic appearance, with areas of necrosis in different evolutionary phases and with numerous intensely positive mast cells at the periphery of the osteonecrosis areas, ×20; (<b>b</b>) gingival epithelium with numerous connective papillae and intraepithelial mast cells, with moderate and weakly positive immunolabeling and mast cells in the chorion with intense positive immunolabeling, ×200; (<b>c</b>) periodontium with numerous intensely positive mast cells and with diffuse distribution, ×200; (<b>d</b>) periodontium with inflammatory infiltrate and clustered intensely positive mast cells, ×200.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Expression of the tryptase marker (red arrows): (<b>a</b>) bone fragment with a mosaic appearance, with areas of necrosis in different evolutionary phases and with numerous intensely positive mast cells at the periphery of the osteonecrosis areas, ×20; (<b>b</b>) gingival epithelium with numerous connective papillae and intraepithelial mast cells, with moderate and weakly positive immunolabeling and mast cells in the chorion with intense positive immunolabeling, ×200; (<b>c</b>) periodontium with numerous intensely positive mast cells and with diffuse distribution, ×200; (<b>d</b>) periodontium with inflammatory infiltrate and clustered intensely positive mast cells, ×200.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Evolution of IHC markers’ score in relation to BP treatment duration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Alpha SMA expression according to the trigger factor (red arrows): (<b>a</b>) mucoperiosteal fragment with very few blood vessels, showing intensely positive αSMA immunomarking, ×200; (<b>b</b>) periodontium with abundant inflammatory infiltrate and moderately positive intratissue αSMA immunomarking with diffuse distribution and intense positive immunomarking in the vascular wall, ×200; (<b>c</b>) periodontium with moderately diffuse inflammatory infiltrate, and numerous blood vessels with moderately and intensely positive developing immunolabeling, ×200; (<b>d</b>) periodontium with abundant inflammatory infiltrate and numerous new formed vessels with intense positive immunomarking, ×200.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Alpha SMA expression according to the trigger factor (red arrows): (<b>a</b>) mucoperiosteal fragment with very few blood vessels, showing intensely positive αSMA immunomarking, ×200; (<b>b</b>) periodontium with abundant inflammatory infiltrate and moderately positive intratissue αSMA immunomarking with diffuse distribution and intense positive immunomarking in the vascular wall, ×200; (<b>c</b>) periodontium with moderately diffuse inflammatory infiltrate, and numerous blood vessels with moderately and intensely positive developing immunolabeling, ×200; (<b>d</b>) periodontium with abundant inflammatory infiltrate and numerous new formed vessels with intense positive immunomarking, ×200.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Evolution of IHC markers’ score in relation to the trigger factor and BP treatment duration: (<b>a</b>) extraction; (<b>b</b>) periodontal disease; (<b>c</b>) periapical disease.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Evolution of IHC markers’ score in relation to the trigger factor and BP treatment duration: (<b>a</b>) extraction; (<b>b</b>) periodontal disease; (<b>c</b>) periapical disease.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Expression of CD20 and CD79α markers in patients with MRONJ. B lymphocytes (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and plasma cells (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) (red arrows): (<b>a</b>) periodontium with abundant inflammatory infiltrate with intensely positive immunomarked B lymphocytes with CD20, agglutinated in lymphoid follicles or disseminated ×200; (<b>b</b>) periodontium with abundant inflammatory infiltrate, with a field of B lymphocytes with intense positive CD20 immunomarking, with the inhomogeneous arrangement, ×100; (<b>c</b>) periodontium with moderate inflammatory infiltrate, with a very large number of plasma cells, with intense positive CD79α immunomarking, and with diffuse distribution, ×20; (<b>d</b>) periodontium with inflammatory infiltrate and areas of necrosis and numerous plasma cells with moderately and intensely positive CD79α immunomarking, unevenly distributed, ×10.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 15268 KiB  
Article
Management of a Malpractice Dental Implant Case in a Patient with History of Oral Bisphosphonates Intake: A Case Report and Narrative Review of Recent Findings
by Massimo Carossa, Nicola Scotti, Mario Alovisi, Santo Catapano, Francesco Grande, Massimo Corsalini, Sergio Ruffino and Francesco Pera
Prosthesis 2023, 5(3), 826-839; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5030058 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1878
Abstract
The present article aims to describe the management of a malpractice dental implant case in a patient with a history of oral bisphosphonates (BF) intake (alendronic acid every 15 days for 20 years) and to perform a narrative review of recently published articles [...] Read more.
The present article aims to describe the management of a malpractice dental implant case in a patient with a history of oral bisphosphonates (BF) intake (alendronic acid every 15 days for 20 years) and to perform a narrative review of recently published articles (2019–2023) on the topic. A female patient rehabilitated with 18 nails in the mandible 20 years ago underwent two surgeries; the first one included the explantation of the nails; the second one included the insertion of two implants in the anterior region. At the last follow-up (21 months from the first surgery and 15 months from the second one) no complications nor episodes of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) were highlighted. Furthermore, 12 recent articles on the topic were reported and a narrative review was performed. Based on the narrative analysis, the topic related to dental implants in patients with BF intake seems to remain controversial. Most of the findings highlight how the evidence on both the safety of the treatment and the possibility to foresee the risk of onset based on preoperative factors seem to be scarce. The case described in the present article did not report any complications nor episodes of BRONJ. However, evidence from a single case report is scarce and more clinical trials are required to deepen the knowledge on the topic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Prosthodontics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Images showing the initial clinical condition (July 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Ortopantomography acquired in 2018. (<b>B</b>) Ortopantomography acquired in July 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Clinical image of intraoral neoformation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Left side of the extracted prostheses (<b>B</b>) All the extracted nails with the prostheses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>PRGF insertion into the wound.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Image showing the healing one week after the surgery (September 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Orthopantomography acquired six months from the initial surgery (March 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cone Beam Computed Tomography acquired six months from the initial surgery (March 2022). (<b>A</b>) Left side; (<b>B</b>) right side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Periapical X-ray showing the two anterior implants after the surgery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Images showing the delivery of the implant-supported prostheses (June 2022). (<b>A</b>) Clinical image of the locators connected to the implants; (<b>B</b>) Image of the modified prostheses with the attachment; (<b>C</b>) Clinical image after the prostheses delivering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>OPT X-ray acquired at the last follow-up in June 2023 (12 months after the implant-supported OVD delivery, 15 months from the second surgery and 21 months from the first surgery).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 509 KiB  
Article
Interactive Associations between PPARγ and PPARGC1A and Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients with Osteoporosis
by Jung Sun Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Jeong Yee, Sun Jong Kim, Jee Eun Chung and Hye Sun Gwak
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(7), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16071035 - 21 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1096
Abstract
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a rare but severe adverse effect that can occur as a result of bisphosphonate treatment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between PPARγ and PPARGC1A polymorphisms and the BRONJ development in female osteoporosis patients undergoing [...] Read more.
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a rare but severe adverse effect that can occur as a result of bisphosphonate treatment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between PPARγ and PPARGC1A polymorphisms and the BRONJ development in female osteoporosis patients undergoing bisphosphonate treatment. We prospectively conducted this nested case–control study at the Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital between 2014 and 2018. We assessed five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of PPARγ and six SNPs of PPARGC1A and performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the independent risk factors for developing BRONJ. There were a total of 123 patients included in this study and 56 patients (45.5%) developed BRONJ. In the univariate analysis, PPARGC1A rs2946385 and rs10020457 polymorphisms were significantly associated with BRONJ (p = 0.034, p = 0.020, respectively), although the results were not statistically significant in the multivariable analysis. Patients with the combined genotypes of GG in both PPARγ rs1151999 and PPARGC1A rs2946385 showed a 3.03-fold higher risk of BRONJ compared to individuals with other genotype combinations after adjusting for confounders (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–9.11). Old age (≥70 years) and duration of bisphosphonate use (≥60 months) increased the risk of BRONJ. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predicted probability was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69–0.87, p < 0.001), demonstrating a satisfactory level of discriminatory power. Our study elucidated that PPARγ and PPARGC1A polymorphisms were interactively associated with BRONJ development. These results have potential implications for tailoring personalized treatments for females undergoing bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacogenomics - A Genetic Approach to Drug Therapy and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) for the development of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. The blue line presents the predicted probability of Model II (demographic factors and the combination of <span class="html-italic">PPARγ</span> rs1151999 GG and <span class="html-italic">PPARGC1A</span> rs2946385 GG genotypes), while the green line presents the reference.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2374 KiB  
Article
The Role of Apical Periodontitis Disease in the Development of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: An Animal Study
by Manuel Marques-Ferreira, Ana Margarida Abrantes, Anabela Paula, Mafalda Laranjo, Ana Salomé Pires, Francisco Caramelo, Juan José Segura-Egea, Ana Brito, Lina Carvalho, Maria Filomena Botelho, Eunice Carrilho, Carlos Miguel Marto and Siri Paulo
Dent. J. 2023, 11(7), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11070168 - 12 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1344
Abstract
Background: Microorganisms and their by-products are responsible for establishing pulpal and periapical diseases. Healing is compromised in patients under bisphosphonate therapy, and the presence of periapical infections can potentially lead to the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This work aimed [...] Read more.
Background: Microorganisms and their by-products are responsible for establishing pulpal and periapical diseases. Healing is compromised in patients under bisphosphonate therapy, and the presence of periapical infections can potentially lead to the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This work aimed to evaluate if bisphosphonate therapy is a risk factor for MRONJ development in the presence of periapical lesions. Methods: Two groups of 10 female Wistar rats were used. The experimental group received zoledronate (0.1 mg/kg) intraperitoneally, and the control received a saline solution, three times a week for three weeks. One week after the last injection, apical periodontitis was induced through pulpal exposure in the mandibular first molars. Twenty-one days later, the animals were intravenously injected with 99mTc-HMDP, and the radioactivity uptake by mandibular specimens was counted. In addition, sample radiographs and a histological examination were performed. Results: The bone loss was higher in the control group when compared to the experimental group (p = 0.027). 99mTc-HMDP uptake in the control was reduced compared with the experimental group, although without statistical significance. Conclusions: In the presence of zoledronate therapy, apical periodontitis does not increase the risk of MRONJ development, and periapical lesions have lower bone resorption when compared to the control group. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scintigraphic representative images of the whole rat body (<b>a</b>) and mandible of ZOL group (<b>b</b>) and CT group (<b>c</b>) with ROIs and uptake of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-HMDP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Radiographic, histologic, and nuclear medicine analysis. (Cpm = counts per minute; CT = control group (saline solution); ZOL = zoledronate). Statistical analysis: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Radiographic images that show radiolucency developed at the apex (arrow) and furcation periodontium of the pulp-exposed tooth of the left mandible. The image is representative from an animal of the control group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Histological analysis exhibited an increased periodontal ligament with loss of lamina dura and alveolar bone resorption was considerably enlarged in the saline-solution group (190,515 ± 14,355 pixels). Magnification: 40×. (<b>b</b>) Histologic analysis exhibited an increased periodontal ligament with loss of lamina dura and alveolar bone resorption which was reduced in the ZOL group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Histological analysis in all groups also exhibited periapical lesions with enlargement of the periodontal space and disorganization of the periodontal ligaments, with large number of macrophages present throughout the periodontal ligament (arrow), and no osteonecrosis was observed. Magnification: 400×.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 1303 KiB  
Systematic Review
In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Antiresorptive and Antiangiogenic Compounds on Oral Tissues Contributing to MRONJ: Systematic Review
by Robert H. Guirguis, Leonard P. Tan, Rebecca M. Hicks, Aniqa Hasan, Tina D. Duong, Xia Hu, Jordan Y. S. Hng, Mohammad H. Hadi, Henry C. Owuama, Tamara Matthyssen, Michael McCullough, Federica Canfora, Rita Paolini and Antonio Celentano
Biomolecules 2023, 13(6), 973; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13060973 - 10 Jun 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2098
Abstract
Background: Invasive dental treatment in patients exposed to antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs can cause medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Currently, the exact pathogenesis of this disease is unclear. Methods: In March 2022, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science were [...] Read more.
Background: Invasive dental treatment in patients exposed to antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs can cause medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Currently, the exact pathogenesis of this disease is unclear. Methods: In March 2022, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science were screened to identify eligible in vitro studies investigating the effects of antiresorptive and antiangiogenic compounds on orally derived cells. Results: Fifty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Bisphosphonates were used in 57 studies, denosumab in two, and sunitinib and bevacizumab in one. Zoledronate was the most commonly used nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate. The only non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate studied was clodronate. The most frequently tested tissues were gingival fibroblasts, oral keratinocytes, and alveolar osteoblasts. These drugs caused a decrease in cell proliferation, viability, and migration. Conclusions: Antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs displayed cytotoxic effects in a dose and time-dependent manner. Additional research is required to further elucidate the pathways of MRONJ. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>MRONJ risk assessment based on the Australian Oral and Dental Therapeutic Guidelines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Process undertaken to select studies for the systematic review into the effect of antiangiogenic and antiresorptive drugs on oral-cavity-derived cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Summary of the risk of bias assessment of the 59 included articles based on amended OHAT guidelines.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3137 KiB  
Article
Geranylgeraniol Application in Human Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts for Reversal of the Effect of Bisphosphonates
by Junho Jung, Jung Soo Park, Jeewan Chun, Bilal Al-Nawas, Thomas Ziebart and Yong-Dae Kwon
Life 2023, 13(6), 1353; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061353 - 8 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1470
Abstract
Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates lead to the depletion of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate involved in the mevalonate pathway. The effect of geranylgeraniol (GGOH) on human osteoblast and osteoclast activities suppressed by zoledronate was investigated in this study. The effect of GGOH on human osteoblasts and osteoclasts subjected [...] Read more.
Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates lead to the depletion of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate involved in the mevalonate pathway. The effect of geranylgeraniol (GGOH) on human osteoblast and osteoclast activities suppressed by zoledronate was investigated in this study. The effect of GGOH on human osteoblasts and osteoclasts subjected to treatment with zoledronate was analyzed by assessing cell viability, osteoclast differentiation, resorption ability, gene expression, and protein synthesis. Cell viability suppressed by bisphosphonates in osteoblasts and osteoprogenitor cells was restored with GGOH. Osteoclast differentiation was analyzed by vitronectin receptor immunofluorescence staining, and the addition of GGOH to zoledronate significantly increased osteoclast differentiation compared with zoledronate alone. A trend of reversal of osteoclast resorption by GGOH was observed; however, it was not significant in all groups. The expression of ALP, type 1 collagen, and RUNX2 in osteoblasts was recovered by the addition of GGOH. Only CALCR expression in osteoclasts was significantly recovered by GGOH addition in the zoledronate group. Although the activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts were not entirely restored, the possibility that the topical application of GGOH in MRONJ patients or patients with dental problems and bisphosphonates might lessen the risk of development and recurrence of MRONJ is shown. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Paper in Physiology and Pathology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Cell viability assessed in osteoblasts (<b>a</b>) and osteoclast precursors (<b>b</b>). The values have been normalized relative to the control. Asterisks (*) represent statistical significance for comparisons of the groups with GGOH and without GGOH addition (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and the error bars indicate standard deviations. Clod, clodronate; Aln, alendronate; Zol, zoledronate; GGOH, geranylgeraniol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Vitronectin receptor (VNR) immunofluorescence staining conducted for cells with GGOH (<b>a</b>) and without GGOH addition (<b>b</b>). VNR-positive multinucleated cells (cells with more than two nuclei) were considered osteoclasts. Clod, clodronate; Aln, alendronate; Zol, zoledronate; GGOH, geranylgeraniol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>VNR-positive multinucleated cell counts. The percentage of multinucleated cell (cells with more than two nuclei) was determined with respect to the total cell number. Asterisks (*) represent statistical significance for comparisons of the groups with GGOH and without GGOH addition (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and the error bars indicate standard deviations. Clod, clodronate; Aln, alendronate; Zol, zoledronate; GGOH, geranylgeraniol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Resorption pit assay conducted to analyze the resorption ability of osteoclast and osteoclast differentiation. (<b>b</b>) The resorbed area measured was normalized relative to the control. Asterisks (*) represent statistical significance for comparisons of the groups with GGOH and without GGOH addition (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and the error bars indicate standard deviations. Clod, clodronate; Aln, alendronate; Zol, zoledronate; GGOH, geranylgeraniol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Western blot analysis and (<b>b</b>) qRT-PCR conducted for osteoblasts. The gene expression levels have been normalized relative to the control. Asterisks (*) represent statistical significance for comparisons of the groups with GGOH and without GGOH addition (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and the error bars indicate standard deviations. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; COL1, type 1 collagen; OC, osteocalcin; M-CSF, macrophage colony stimulating factor; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand; Aln, alendronate; Zol, zoledronate; GGOH, geranylgeraniol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>qRT-PCR analysis conducted for osteoclasts. The gene expression levels have been normalized relative to the control. Asterisks (*) represent statistical significance for comparisons of the groups with GGOH and without GGOH addition (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and the error bars indicate standard deviations. RANK, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; CALCR, calcitonin receptor; CSF1R, colony stimulating factor 1 receptor; c-Fos, OSCAR, osteoclast-associated receptor; Aln, alendronate; Zol, zoledronate; GGOH, geranylgeraniol.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 411 KiB  
Article
A Study of Oral Health Parameters and the Properties and Composition of Saliva in Oncological Patients with and without Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Who Take Bisphosphonates
by Hanna Sobczak-Jaskow, Barbara Kochańska and Barbara Drogoszewska
Medicina 2023, 59(6), 1073; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061073 - 2 Jun 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1635
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine how the status of the oral cavity, composition and properties of saliva change in oncological patients with and without Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. Materials and Methods [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine how the status of the oral cavity, composition and properties of saliva change in oncological patients with and without Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective case–control study of 49 oncological patients using bisphosphonates (BPs) was conducted. The study population was divided into two groups—Group I consisted of 29 patients with MRONJ and Group II of 20 patients without MRONJ. The control group consisted of 32 persons without oncological history and without antiresorptive therapy. Standard dental examination included the assessment of the number of teeth remaining, teeth with caries and fillings, Approximal Plaque Index (API) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP). In terms of MRONJ, localization and stage were assessed. Laboratory tests of saliva included determination of pH and concentrations of Ca and PO4 ions, total protein, lactoferrin, lysozyme, sIgA, IgA, cortisol, neopterin, activity of amylase at rest, and stimulated saliva. The buffering capacity and microbiological tests (Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus spp. load) of stimulated saliva were also determined. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the selected oral parameters and saliva of Group I and Group II. Significant differences were found between Group I and the control group. BOP, lysozyme and cortisol concentration were higher, while the number of teeth with fillings, Ca and neopterin concentrations were lower in comparison to the control group. In Group I, a significantly higher percentage of patients with a high colony count (>105) of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. was also found. The significant differences between Group II and the control group concerned the concentrations of lysozyme, Ca ions, sIgA, neopterin and the colony count of Lactobacillus spp. In the Group I patients who received a significantly higher cumulative dose of BP compared to the Group II, a significant positive correlation was found between the received BP dose and the BOP. Most MRONJ foci were stage 2 and were mainly located in the mandible. Conclusions: Among oncological patients with and without MRONJ undergoing BP therapy compared to the control group, there are statistically significant differences in the dental, periodontal and microbiological status and in the composition of the saliva. Particularly noteworthy are the statistically significant differences in the decreased level of Ca ions, the increased level of cortisol and the elements of saliva related to the immune response (lysozyme, sIgA, neopterin). Additionally, a higher cumulative dose of BPs may affect the susceptibility to the development of osteonecrosis of the jaws. Patients undergoing antiresorptive therapy should receive multidisciplinary medical care, including dental care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Sciences and Potential Biomarkers)
Back to TopTop