[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (2,669)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = biogas

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 3016 KiB  
Article
Increasing Fertilization Efficiency of Biomass Ash by the Synergistically Acting Digestate and Extract from Water Plants Sequestering CO2 in Sorghum Crops
by Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda, Regina Janas and Mieczysław Grzesik
Molecules 2024, 29(18), 4397; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184397 (registering DOI) - 16 Sep 2024
Abstract
The utilization of biomass ash in sustainable agriculture and increasing its fertilizing efficiency by biological agents, potentially sequestering CO2, have become important issues for the global economy. The aim of this paper was to investigate the effects of ash from sorghum [...] Read more.
The utilization of biomass ash in sustainable agriculture and increasing its fertilizing efficiency by biological agents, potentially sequestering CO2, have become important issues for the global economy. The aim of this paper was to investigate the effects of ash from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) biomass, a biogas plant digestate, and a Spirodela polyrhiza extract, acting alone or synergistically, on soil fertility and the development, health and physiological properties of sorghum plants. The results show novel information concerning differences in the composition and impact of ash, depending on its origin, soil properties and sorghum plant development. Sorghum ash was more effective than that from Jerusalem artichoke. Ash used alone and preferably acting synergistically with the digestate and Spirodela polyrhiza extract greatly increased soil fertility and the growth, biomass yield and health of sorghum plants. These improvements were associated with an increased chlorophyll content in leaves, better gas exchange (photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance), greater enzyme activity (acid and alkaline phosphatase, RNase, and total dehydrogenase), and a higher biomass energy value. The developed treatments improved environmental conditions by replacing synthetic fertilizers, increasing the sequestration of CO2, solving the ash storage problem, reducing the need for pesticides, and enabling a closed circulation of nutrients between plant and soil, maintaining high soil fertility. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Growth kinetics (<b>A</b>) and final height (<b>B</b>) of sorghum plants fertilized with sorghum ash, in doses of 48 q ha<sup>−1</sup> (aS 48), applied to the soil alone or together with the biogas plant digestate (D; 30 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup>) and/or with the <span class="html-italic">Spirodela polyrhiza</span> extract (Sp; 7 L ha<sup>−1</sup>) as foliar spray. The LSD was calculated at the significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05. Means with the same letters are not significantly different, according to Newman–Keuls multiple range test at an alpha level of 0.05. Error bars show mean ± SD of three independent replicates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Growth kinetics (<b>A</b>) and final height (<b>B</b>) of sorghum plants fertilized with Jerusalem artichoke ash, in doses of 48 q ha<sup>−1</sup> (aJ 48), applied to the soil alone or together with the biogas plant digestate (D, 30 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup>) and/or with the <span class="html-italic">Spirodela polyrhiza</span> extract (Sp; 7 L ha<sup>−1</sup>) as foliar spray. The LSD was calculated at the significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05. Means with the same letters are not significantly different, according to Newman–Keuls multiple range test at an α level of 0.05. Error bars show mean ± SD of three independent replicates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fresh (<b>A</b>) and dry (<b>B</b>) weight (per one plant) of sorghum plants fertilized with sorghum ash, in doses of 48 q ha<sup>−1</sup> (aS 48), applied to the soil alone or together with the biogas plant digestate (D; 30 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup>) and/or with the <span class="html-italic">Spirodela polyrhiza</span> extract (Sp; 7 L ha<sup>−1</sup>) as foliar spray. The LSD was calculated at the significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05. Means with the same letters are not significantly different, according to Newman–Keuls multiple range test at an α level of 0.05. Error bars show mean ± SD of three independent replicates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fresh (<b>A</b>) and dry (<b>B</b>) weight (per one plant) of sorghum plants fertilized with Jerusalem artichoke ash, in doses of 48 q ha<sup>−1</sup> (aJ 48), applied alone or together with the biogas plant digestate (D; 30 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup>) and/or with the <span class="html-italic">Spirodela polyrhiza</span> extract (Sp; 7 L ha<sup>−1</sup>) as foliar spray. The LSD was calculated at the significance level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.05. Means with the same letters are not significantly different, according to Newman–Keuls multiple range test at an α level of 0.05. Error bars show mean ± SD of three independent replicates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Closed circulation of elements and increased soil fertility and productivity of sorghum plants grown in a closed system, achieved by the synergistic effect of biomass ash, digestate and <span class="html-italic">Spirodela polyrhiza</span> extract, which, by additionally sequestering CO<sub>2</sub> and reducing chemical fertilization and pesticide needs, improve the quality of the environment.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 814 KiB  
Review
Impacts of Polyvinyl Alcohol and Chitosan-Modified Biochar on the Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Valuable Resource Recovery
by Ping Fa Chiang, Teng Ling Zhang, Ndungutse Jean Maurice, Mugabekazi Joie Claire, Bigirimana Gentil, Abdul Ghaffar Memon and Abdulmoseen Segun Giwa
Processes 2024, 12(9), 1987; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091987 - 14 Sep 2024
Viewed by 298
Abstract
The accumulation of organic dyes and heavy metals (HMs) in sewage sludge (SS) after wastewater treatment is a significant problem due to the non-degradable nature of these pollutants. Moreover, the simultaneous removal of HMs and dyes in the complex process of SS treatment, [...] Read more.
The accumulation of organic dyes and heavy metals (HMs) in sewage sludge (SS) after wastewater treatment is a significant problem due to the non-degradable nature of these pollutants. Moreover, the simultaneous removal of HMs and dyes in the complex process of SS treatment, such as anaerobic digestion (AD), has become attractive. HMs and dyes present in SS can have a detrimental effect on anaerobic digesters. These pollutants not only inhibit the production of methane, which is crucial for biogas generation, but also affect the stability of AD treatment, which can result in failure or inadequate performance of the AD process. This review highlights a novel method of removing HMs and dyes from the AD process of SS through the use of biochar modified with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and chitosan (CTS). The applications of conventional biochar have been limited due to poor adsorption capacity. However, modification using PVA/CTS composites enhances properties such as surface functional groups, adsorption capacity, porosity, surface area selectivity, and stability. Furthermore, this modified version can function as an additive in AD of SS treatment to boost biogas production, which is a viable source for heat generation or electricity supply. In addition, the digestates can be further processed through plasma pyrolysis for the removal of HMs and dyes bound to the modified biochar. Plasma pyrolysis generates two major products: syngas and slag. The syngas produced can then be used as a source of hydrogen, heat, and electricity, while the slag can potentially be reused as an AD additive or as a biofertilizer in the agricultural sector. Additionally, this study addresses the challenges associated with this integration and biochar modifications, and offers an outlook on understanding the interactions between the modified biochar properties, microbial dynamics, and the presence of micropollutants to ensure the economic viability and scalability of this technology. This comprehensive review provides insights into the potential of PVA/CTS-modified biochar as an effective additive in AD systems, offering a sustainable approach to SS treatment and valuable resource recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Anaerobic Digestion Processes, 2nd Edition)
19 pages, 3844 KiB  
Article
From Field to Model: Determining EROSION 3D Model Parameters for the Emerging Biomass Plant Silphium perfoliatum L. to Predict Effects on Water Erosion Processes
by Tobias Koch, Peter Aartsma, Detlef Deumlich, Peter Chifflard and Kerstin Panten
Agronomy 2024, 14(9), 2097; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092097 - 14 Sep 2024
Viewed by 204
Abstract
The agricultural production of maize (Zea mays L.) increases the risk of water erosion. Perennial crops like cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) offer a sustainable alternative to produce biomass for biogas plants. The assessment of soil conservation measures requires calibrated soil [...] Read more.
The agricultural production of maize (Zea mays L.) increases the risk of water erosion. Perennial crops like cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) offer a sustainable alternative to produce biomass for biogas plants. The assessment of soil conservation measures requires calibrated soil erosion models that spatially identify soil erosion processes. These support decision-making by farmers and policymakers. Input parameters for the physically based soil erosion model EROSION 3D for cup plant cultivation were established in a field study. Rainfall simulation experiments were conducted to determine the model input parameter’s skinfactor and surface roughness. The results showed a reduction of soil erosion and higher infiltration rates for cup plant resulting in higher skinfactors of 11.5 in June and 0.75 post-harvest (cup plant) compared to 1.2 in June and 0.21 post-harvest (maize). With the extended parameter catalogue of EROSION 3D for cup plant cultivation model simulations were conducted for a rainfall event in June (64 mm). The sediment budget would have been reduced by 92.6% through the growth of cup plant in comparison to conventionally grown maize. Perennial cup plant can, therefore, contribute to achieving the targets outlined in the European Green Deal by reducing soil erosion and enhancing soil health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agroecology Innovation: Achieving System Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview map: (<b>1</b>) aerial view of the experimental field. (<b>2a</b>) Placement of the soil erosion measurement system (SEMS) within a plot. (<b>2b</b>) Flume system of SEMS with inflow metal sheet overlaying the flume. (<b>2c</b>) Profile view of inflow metal sheet inserted in the soil (<b>3</b>). Geographical location of the experimental field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil cover conditions during rainfall simulation experiment. (<b>a</b>) Cup plant in June; (<b>b</b>) Maize plot in June; (<b>c</b>) cup plant after harvest in September, blue color comes from measurement of runoff velocity with brilliant blue tracer; (<b>d</b>) Maize plot after harvest in September. Stubble of all treatments were mulched post-harvest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calculated and measured infiltration rates, rainfall intensity, and suspended sediment concentration in rainfall experiments. In September 2022, the stubble of all treatments were mulched post-harvest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Modeled heavy rainfall event in June 2022 (E1) with 64 mm rainfall in 260 min for all treatments of the experiment and depicted observed erosion effects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Model application. (<b>A</b>) Location of fields for case study. (<b>B</b>) Placement of buffer strips along surface waters for scenarios 4 and 5. (<b>C</b>) Sediment budget per pixel cell (t/ha) as simulated for the worst-case scenario (conventional maize cultivation). (<b>D</b>) Sediment budget per pixel cell (t/ha) as simulated for scenario 3 (cup plant cultivated on 100% of the case study area). A recorded rainfall event in June 2022 (Event 1, <a href="#agronomy-14-02097-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>) with a total of 64 mm rainfall in 260 min was used for model simulation.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3132 KiB  
Article
Estimating Sludge Deposition on the Heat Exchanger in the Digester of a Biogas Plant
by Tomasz Janusz Teleszewski and Leszek Hożejowski
Sustainability 2024, 16(18), 7981; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187981 - 12 Sep 2024
Viewed by 287
Abstract
The presented research addresses a problem occurring in a biogas plant, which we know plays an important role in sustainable development. The sludge deposited on the walls of the digester’s heat exchanger impairs heat transfer to the substrate. It leads to a temperature [...] Read more.
The presented research addresses a problem occurring in a biogas plant, which we know plays an important role in sustainable development. The sludge deposited on the walls of the digester’s heat exchanger impairs heat transfer to the substrate. It leads to a temperature drop inside the biogas plant and threatens its correct operation. The thickness of the sludge layer cannot be directly measured when the plant is operating. Therefore, the aim of this work was to develop and then validate a method for estimating, based on the operating parameters of the exchanger, the thickness of the sludge layer and to give theoretical foundations for designing an automatic sludge monitoring system. Two mathematical models (and methods) were developed: one- and two-dimensional. The former model was solved analytically while the latter by the Trefftz method. The numerical results from these two approaches showed very good agreement with each other and with the actual measurement taken directly after removing the substrate from the fermentation chamber. According to the calculation results, the growth of the sludge layer was linear with time, and its rate was 0.0064 mm per day. Finally, a schematic diagram of an intended sludge monitoring system was proposed. It could optimize biogas plant operation and thus become a step towards more sustainable energy production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable and Renewable Thermal Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General view of the biogas plant fermentation chamber.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram of the digester with a photo of a fragment of the heat exchanger before and after cleaning the heat exchanger walls.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Boxplot of the measured sludge thickness on the outer walls of the heat exchanger.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram of the heat exchanger adopted for the model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Calculated thickness of the sludge layer on the heat exchanger walls in the winter months of 2017–2020 with added start and end points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Dependence of the overall heat transfer coefficient on the thickness of the deposits on the walls of the heat exchanger (based on the 2D model).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Dependence of the thermal power of a single heat exchanger loop and the temperature at the outlet of the heat exchanger as a function of the sludge thickness.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic diagram of sludge monitoring on the heat exchanger in a digester: 1—flow meter, 2—substrate temperature sensor inside the digester, 3—heating medium temperature sensor on the supply pipe of the heat exchanger, 4—heating medium temperature sensor on the return from the heat exchanger, 5—heat exchanger operation monitor, 6—supply pipe, 7—return pipe, 8—fermentation chamber wall.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4747 KiB  
Article
Effect of Monensin Supplementation in the Bovine Diet on the Composition and Anaerobic Digestion of Manure with and without Screening
by Brenda Kelly Viana Leite, Ana Carolina Amorim Orrico, Marco Antônio Previdelli Orrico Junior, Rusbel Raul Aspilcueta Borquis, Érika Cecília Pereira da Costa, Isabella da Silva Menezes, Juliana Dias de Oliveira and Isabelly Alencar Macena
Fermentation 2024, 10(9), 474; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10090474 - 12 Sep 2024
Viewed by 271
Abstract
The incorporation of monensin into cattle diets can significantly alter the physicochemical properties of excreted manure, potentially affecting waste management and treatment systems given the persistence of substantial concentrations of ionophores in the effluent. This study assessed the impact of monensin on the [...] Read more.
The incorporation of monensin into cattle diets can significantly alter the physicochemical properties of excreted manure, potentially affecting waste management and treatment systems given the persistence of substantial concentrations of ionophores in the effluent. This study assessed the impact of monensin on the compositional characteristics of cattle manure and its implications for anaerobic digestion efficiency, with and without the separation of manure fractions across two hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Manure samples were collected from cattle fed with doses of monensin at 0, 1.8, 3.6, 5.4, and 7.2 mg per kg of dry matter intake. The HRTs investigated were 20 days (HRT20) and 30 days (HRT30). Increasing monensin inclusion in the diets resulted in a notable decrease in the quantities of total solids (TSs), volatile solids (VSs), and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) per animal per day, accompanied by an increase in lignin content and mass. Fraction separation during anaerobic digestion enhances the reduction of TSs, VSs, and NDF, thereby optimizing biogas and methane production potentials and elevating methane concentrations. The presence of monensin correlated with the reduced degradation of organic components during the anaerobic digestion process. To maximize the efficiency of the anaerobic digestion of manure from cattle diets supplemented with monensin, a 30-day HRT combined with fraction separation is recommended. This approach can enhance biogas yield and methane content, thereby improving the sustainability and efficacy of waste treatment processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biogas and Biochemical Production from Anaerobic Digestion)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Masses (kg) of (<b>a</b>) total solids (TSs), (<b>b</b>) volatile solids (VSs), (<b>c</b>) neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and (<b>d</b>) lignin produced by cattle fed a diet supplemented with monensin. The shadow area corresponds to the confidence interval (95%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Reduction of total solids (TSs, %) and (<b>b</b>) volatile solids (VSs, %) in the anaerobic digestion of waste produced by cattle fed a diet supplemented with monensin and a 20-day hydraulic retention time. SC: screened, US: unscreened. The shadow area corresponds to the confidence interval (95%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Reduction of volatile solids (VSs, %) and (<b>b</b>) total solids (TSs, %) during the anaerobic digestion of waste produced by cattle supplemented with doses of monensin and a 30-day hydraulic retention time. SC: screened, US: unscreened. The shadow area corresponds to the confidence interval (95%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Reduction of neutral detergent fiber (NDF, %) in the (<b>a</b>) 20-day hydraulic retention time and (<b>b</b>) 30-day hydraulic retention time during the anaerobic digestion of waste produced by cattle supplemented with doses of monensin. SC: screened, US: unscreened. The shadow area corresponds to the confidence interval (95%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Potential of biogas production (L/kg of TSs added); (<b>b</b>) methane concentration (%); (<b>c</b>) potential of methane production (L/kg of TSs added) during anaerobic digestion of substrates produced from cattle manure with monensin in the diet and a 20-day hydraulic retention time. SC: screened, US: unscreened. The shadow area corresponds to the confidence interval (95%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Potential of biogas production (L/kg of TSs added); (<b>b</b>) methane concentration (%); (<b>c</b>) potential of methane production (L/kg of TSs added) during anaerobic digestion of substrates produced from cattle manure with monensin in the diet and a 30-day hydraulic retention time. SC: screened, US: unscreened. The shadow area corresponds to the confidence interval (95%).</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1612 KiB  
Article
Influence of Biomass Amendments on Soil CO2 Concentration and Carbon Emission Flux in a Subtropical Karst Ecosystem
by Zeyan Wu, Weiqun Luo, Zhongcheng Jiang and Zhaoxin Hu
Sustainability 2024, 16(18), 7883; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187883 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 330
Abstract
Soil in karst areas is rare and precious, and karst carbon sinks play an important role in the global carbon cycle. Therefore, the purpose of karst soil improvement is to improve soil productivity and a carbon sink effect. Biomass amendment experiments in this [...] Read more.
Soil in karst areas is rare and precious, and karst carbon sinks play an important role in the global carbon cycle. Therefore, the purpose of karst soil improvement is to improve soil productivity and a carbon sink effect. Biomass amendment experiments in this study included three schemes: filter mud (FM), filter mud + straw + biogas slurry (FSB), and filter mud + straw + cow manure (FSC). The characteristics of soil CO2 production, transport, and the effect on soil respiration carbon emissions in two years were compared and analyzed. The results were as follows: 1. The rate, amount, and depth of CO2 concentration were affected by the combinations with biogas slurry (easy to leach) or cow manure (difficult to decompose). 2. The diurnal variation curves of soil respiration in the FSB- and FSC-improved soils lagged behind those in the control soil for three hours. While the curves of FM-improved soil and the control soil were nearly the same. 3. Soil–air carbon emissions increased by 35.2 tCO2/(km2·a−1) under the FM scheme, decreased by 212.9 tCO2/(km2·a−1) under the FSB scheme, and increased by 279.5 tCO2/(km2·a−1) under the FSC scheme. The results were related to weather CO2 accumulation in the deep or surface layers under different schemes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effect of external organic matter additions on the dispersion of soil CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Data observed at all soil depths (10 cm, 20 cm, 30 cm, and 40 cm) from April 2014 to December 2015 were included. The external organic matter additions in the FM, FSB, and FSC schemes were filter mud, filter mud + straw + biogas slurry, and filter mud + straw + cow manure, respectively. The box plot statistics include the upper quartile (Q1), median, mean, lower quartile (Q3), maximum, and minimum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The diurnal curves of the improved and controlled soil respiration rates. The FM, FSB, and FSC schemes were filter mud, filter mud + straw + biogas slurry, and filter mud + straw + cow manure, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in the improved soil after adding biomass compared with those in the control soils. The FM, FSB, and FSC schemes were filter mud, filter mud + straw + biogas slurry, and filter mud + straw + cow manure, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The annual carbon emissions of soil respiration in the improved and control soils. The FM, FSB, and FSC schemes were filter mud, filter mud + straw + biogas slurry, and filter mud + straw + cow manure, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 2484 KiB  
Article
Potential for Biogas Production from Water Hyacinth and Banana Peels: A Case Study of Substrates Harvested from Lomé, Togo
by Djangbadjoa Gbiete, Jan Sprafke, Damgou Mani Kongnine, Satyanarayana Narra, Pali Kpelou, Essowè Mouzou and Komi Agboka
Fuels 2024, 5(3), 494-507; https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels5030027 - 9 Sep 2024
Viewed by 769
Abstract
Climate change and the growing demand for energy have prompted research on alternative eco-friendly energy sources. This study focused on the potential for biogas production from water hyacinth and banana peel waste through physicochemical characterization and batch anaerobic digestion tests. The water hyacinth [...] Read more.
Climate change and the growing demand for energy have prompted research on alternative eco-friendly energy sources. This study focused on the potential for biogas production from water hyacinth and banana peel waste through physicochemical characterization and batch anaerobic digestion tests. The water hyacinth and banana peel samples were dried, ground, and subjected to elemental, proximate, and fiber content analyses. Subsequently, banana peel waste, water hyacinth stems, and leaves were used for batch anaerobic digestion tests in 500 mL glass flask bottles for 21 days under mesophilic conditions in n = 3 trials. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunnett’s tests were performed to identify the significance of the differences in biogas yield among the samples. The analyses of the elemental, proximate, and fiber contents of water hyacinth and banana peels revealed that they possess a suitable chemical composition and essential nutrients for the production of high-yield biogas. The biogas yields from water hyacinth leaves, stems, and banana peels were 280.15, 324.79, and 334.82 mL/g VS, respectively. These findings indicate that water hyacinth and banana peel waste have significant potential for biogas production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Conversion to Biofuels)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Water hyacinth plants covering a lake in Lomé.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bottles containing the substrates placed in a temperature-regulated water bath (Julabo TW20).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mass distribution of water hyacinth biomass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cumulative biogas yield over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cumulative weekly biogas yield from water hyacinth leaves, stems, and banana peels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cumulative biogas yield by sample with mean points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Utilization pathways of the product and by-products from anaerobic digestion.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 1161 KiB  
Review
Additives Improving the Efficiency of Biogas Production as an Alternative Energy Source—A Review
by Agnieszka A. Pilarska, Krzysztof Pilarski, Tomasz Kulupa, Adrianna Kubiak, Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka, Alicja Niewiadomska and Jacek Dach
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4506; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174506 - 8 Sep 2024
Viewed by 658
Abstract
Additives for anaerobic digestion (AD) can play a significant role in optimizing the process by increasing biogas production, stabilizing the system, and improving digestate quality. The role of additives largely boils down to, among others, enhancing direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) between microbial [...] Read more.
Additives for anaerobic digestion (AD) can play a significant role in optimizing the process by increasing biogas production, stabilizing the system, and improving digestate quality. The role of additives largely boils down to, among others, enhancing direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) between microbial communities, resulting in improved syntrophic interactions, adsorption of toxic substances that may inhibit microbial activity, improving microbial activity, and increasing process stability and accelerating the decomposition of complex organic materials, thereby increasing the rate of hydrolysis. Through the aforementioned action, additives can significantly affect AD performance. The function of these materials varies, from enhancing microbial activity to maintaining optimal conditions and protecting the system from inhibitors. The choice of additives should be carefully tailored to the specific needs and conditions of the digester to maximize benefits and ensure sustainability. In light of these considerations, this paper characterizes the most commonly used additives and their combinations based on a comprehensive review of recent scientific publications, including a report on the results of conducted studies. The publication features chapters that describe carbon-based conductive materials, metal oxide nanomaterials, trace metal, and biological additives, including enzymes and microorganisms. It concludes with the chapters summarising reports on various additives and discussing their functional properties, as well as advantages and disadvantages. The presented review is a substantive and concise analysis of the latest knowledge on additives for the AD process. The application of additives in AD is characterized by great potential; hence, the subject matter is very current and future-oriented. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Functions of selected carbon-based materials in AD process (authors’ own scheme).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram of DIET mechanism: (<b>a</b>) DIET via conductive pili; (<b>b</b>) DIET via C-type cytochrome; (<b>c</b>) DIET via conductive materials, adapted with permission from [<a href="#B64-energies-17-04506" class="html-bibr">64</a>].</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 9073 KiB  
Article
The Valorization of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes Using an Anaerobic Fixed Biofilm Reactor: A Case of Discarded Tomatoes from a Traditional Market
by Andrea Alvarado-Vallejo, Oscar Marín-Peña, Erik Samuel Rosas-Mendoza, Juan Manuel Méndez-Contreras and Alejandro Alvarado-Lassman
Processes 2024, 12(9), 1923; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091923 - 6 Sep 2024
Viewed by 707
Abstract
Tomato waste, characterized by high organic matter and moisture content, offers a promising substrate for anaerobic digestion, though rapid acidification can inhibit methanogenic activity. This study investigated the performance of a 10.25 L anaerobic fixed biofilm reactor for biogas production using liquid tomato [...] Read more.
Tomato waste, characterized by high organic matter and moisture content, offers a promising substrate for anaerobic digestion, though rapid acidification can inhibit methanogenic activity. This study investigated the performance of a 10.25 L anaerobic fixed biofilm reactor for biogas production using liquid tomato waste, processed through grinding and filtration, at high organic loading rates, without external pH control or co-digestion. Four scouring pads were vertically installed as a fixed bed within a fiberglass structure. Reactor performance and buffering capacity were assessed over three stages with progressively increasing organic loading rates (3.2, 4.35, and 6.26 gCOD/L·d). Methane yields of 0.419 LCH4/gCOD and 0.563 LCH4/g VS were achieved during the kinetic study following stabilization. Biogas production rates reached 1586 mL/h, 1804 mL/h, and 4117 mL/h across the three stages, with methane contents of 69%, 65%, and 72.3%, respectively. Partial alkalinity fluctuated, starting above 1500 mg CaCO3/L in Stage 1, dropping below 500 mg CaCO3/L in Stage 2, and surpassing 3000 mg CaCO3/L in Stage 3. Despite periods of forced acidification, the system demonstrated significant resilience and high buffering capacity, maintaining stability through hydraulic retention time adjustments without the need for external pH regulation. The key stability indicators identified include partial alkalinity, effluent chemical oxygen demand, pH, and one-day cumulative biogas. This study highlights the effectiveness of anaerobic fixed biofilm reactors in treating tomato waste and similar fruit and vegetable residues for sustainable biogas production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass to Renewable Energy Processes, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A flow diagram of the process for obtaining the liquid fraction of tomato residue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>This figure illustrates the tomato residue in its different forms throughout the liquid fraction extraction process. (<b>a</b>) shows the tomato residue freshly collected from the traditional market, exhibiting high moisture content due to its natural characteristics. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) depict the tomato residue after the solid–liquid separation phase. (<b>b</b>) highlights the solid fraction, primarily composed of tomato skin and seeds, while (<b>c</b>) presents the liquid fraction (TWLF1) after filtration, which served as the substrate for treatment in the anaerobic reactor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of anaerobic fixed biofilm reactor (ABFR).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Initial kinetics with 500 mL of TWLF1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Biogas production rate with semi-continuous feed of 500 mL of TWLF1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Biogas production rate with semi-continuous feed of 700 mL of TWLF1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Biogas production rate with semi-continuous feed of 900 mL of TWLF1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Alkalinity trends across different operational stages in the AFBR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effluent monitoring of COD, VSs, and TSs during varying organic load stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Monitoring of pH and cumulative biogas production across operational stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>One-day cumulative biogas production and biogas production rate across all three operational stages.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3975 KiB  
Article
Treatment of Anaerobic Digester Liquids via Membrane Biofilm Reactors: Simultaneous Aerobic Methanotrophy and Nitrogen Removal
by Egidio F. Tentori, Nan Wang, Caroline J. Devin and Ruth E. Richardson
Microorganisms 2024, 12(9), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12091841 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 422
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion (AD) produces useful biogas and waste streams with high levels of dissolved methane (CH4) and ammonium (NH4+), among other nutrients. Membrane biofilm reactors (MBfRs), which support dissolved methane oxidation in the same reactor as simultaneous nitrification [...] Read more.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) produces useful biogas and waste streams with high levels of dissolved methane (CH4) and ammonium (NH4+), among other nutrients. Membrane biofilm reactors (MBfRs), which support dissolved methane oxidation in the same reactor as simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (ME-SND), are a potential bubble-less treatment method. Here, we demonstrate ME-SND taking place in single-stage, AD digestate liquid-fed MBfRs, where oxygen (O2) and supplemental CH4 were delivered via pressurized membranes. The effects of two O2 pressures, leading to different O2 fluxes, on CH4 and N removal were examined. MBfRs achieved up to 98% and 67% CH4 and N removal efficiencies, respectively. The maximum N removal rates ranged from 57 to 94 mg N L−1 d−1, with higher overall rates observed in reactors with lower O2 pressures. The higher-O2-flux condition showed NO2 as a partial nitrification endpoint, with a lower total N removal rate due to low N2 gas production compared to lower-O2-pressure reactors, which favored complete nitrification and denitrification. Membrane biofilm 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing showed an abundance of aerobic methanotrophs (especially Methylobacter, Methylomonas, and Methylotenera) and enrichment of nitrifiers (especially Nitrosomonas and Nitrospira) and anammox bacteria (especially Ca. Annamoxoglobus and Ca. Brocadia) in high-O2 and low-O2 reactors, respectively. Supplementation of the influent with nitrite supported evidence that anammox bacteria in the low-O2 condition were nitrite-limited. This work highlights coupling of aerobic methanotrophy and nitrogen removal in AD digestate-fed reactors, demonstrating the potential application of ME-SND in MBfRs for the treatment of AD’s residual liquids and wastewater. Sensor-based tuning of membrane O2 pressure holds promise for the optimization of bubble-less treatment of excess CH4 and NH4+ in wastewater. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biofilm)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Membrane biofilm reactor setup; (<b>B</b>) operational periods and membrane conditions. Operational periods are denoted in roman numerals (I–VII). Short-term NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> spike test date, day 180 (dashed line), indicated with an asterisk (*). On day 58, the flow rate increased, decreasing the HRT from 4.3 to 2.3 days. On day 193 (dotted line), the reactor feed tank was amended with 5 mM NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>. O<sub>2</sub> membrane pressures were turned on 2.5 days after startup, and the control reactor received no membrane O<sub>2</sub>. Pressures are denoted in psi (gauge).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>MBfRs’ dissolved CH<sub>4</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, COD, and TSS: (<b>A</b>) dissolved CH<sub>4</sub> and membrane pressure; (<b>B</b>) dissolved O<sub>2</sub> and membrane pressure; (<b>C</b>) COD; (<b>D</b>) TSS. Operational periods are denoted in roman numerals (I–VII). Upward (↑) and downward (↓) arrows indicate an increase or decrease in CH<sub>4</sub> pressure, respectively. Vertical dashed black lines: operational periods; gray lines: batch period with NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> addition. Error bars represent standard deviations from duplicate reactor measurements for each condition. See <a href="#microorganisms-12-01841-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> and <a href="#microorganisms-12-01841-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#app1-microorganisms-12-01841" class="html-app">Table S3</a> for details on operational periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dissolved nitrogen species and nitrogen removal performance of AD supernatant-fed MBfRs: (<b>A</b>) NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N; (<b>B</b>) NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N; (<b>C</b>) dissolved N<sub>2</sub>-N; (<b>D</b>) NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N; (<b>E</b>) total inorganic nitrogen (N<sub>Tot</sub> = NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N + NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N + NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N) influent loading and removal rates; (<b>F</b>) N<sub>Tot</sub> removal efficiency; (<b>G</b>) N<sub>Tot</sub> removal rates by period. Operational periods are denoted in roman numerals (I–VII). Upward (↑) and downward (↓) arrows indicate an increase or decrease in CH<sub>4</sub> pressure, respectively. For (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), vertical dashed black lines = operational periods; gray lines = batch activity periods; error bars = standard deviations from duplicate reactor measurements. For (<b>G</b>), error bars = 95% confidence intervals; medians = solid lines; means = dashed lines. See <a href="#microorganisms-12-01841-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> and <a href="#microorganisms-12-01841-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#app1-microorganisms-12-01841" class="html-app">Table S3</a> for details on operational periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>PCoA showing membrane biofilm microbial community samples. Bray–Curtis dissimilarity measurements. Circles denote sample clustering. R4-CH<sub>4</sub> not included due to low number of reads.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Genus-level taxonomic composition of AD and membrane biofilm samples of genera involved in CH<sub>4</sub> and N cycling. R4-CH<sub>4</sub> not included due to low number of reads.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simplified schematic of CH<sub>4</sub>- and N-cycling microbial groups in O<sub>2</sub> membrane biofilms: (<b>A</b>) high-O<sub>2</sub> biofilms and (<b>B</b>) low-O<sub>2</sub> biofilms. Observed and potential N-cycle products shown. Membrane pressures are denoted in psi (gauge). Methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB); ammonium-oxidizing bacteria (AOB); nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB); putative denitrifying bacteria (DNB).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3698 KiB  
Article
Simultaneous Production of Biogas and Electricity from Anaerobic Digestion of Pine Needles: Sustainable Energy and Waste Management
by Deepak Sharma, Rishi Mahajan, Vikas Baghel, Saurabh Bansal, Vishal Ahuja and Gunjan Goel
BioTech 2024, 13(3), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech13030035 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 624
Abstract
Power scarcity and pollution can be overcome with the use of green energy forms like ethanol, biogas, electricity, hydrogen, etc., especially energy produced from renewable and industrial feedstocks. In hilly areas, pine needles are the most abundant biomass that has a low possibility [...] Read more.
Power scarcity and pollution can be overcome with the use of green energy forms like ethanol, biogas, electricity, hydrogen, etc., especially energy produced from renewable and industrial feedstocks. In hilly areas, pine needles are the most abundant biomass that has a low possibility of valorization due to high lignin content. On the other hand, anaerobic digestion (AD) of lignin and animal waste has low biogas yield due to poor conductivity. This study focuses on the simultaneous production of biogas and electricity through the co-digestion of cow dung and pine needles. The digester was initially established and stabilized in the lab to ensure a continuous supply of inoculum throughout the experiment. The optimization process involved the determination of an ideal cow dung-to-water ratio and selecting the appropriate conductive material that can enhance the energy generation from the feedstock. Afterward, both batch and continuous anaerobic digestion experiments were conducted. The results revealed that the addition of powdered graphite (5 mM), activated charcoal (15 mM), and biochar (25 mM) exhibited maximum voltage of 0.71 ± 0.013 V, 0.56 ± 0.013 V, and 0.49 ± 0.011 V on the 30th, 25th and 20th day of AD, respectively. The batch experiment showed that 5 mM graphite powder enhanced electron transfer in the AD process and generated a voltage of 0.77 ± 0.014 V on the 30th day, indicating an increase of ~1.5-fold as compared to the control (0.56 ± 0.019 V). The results from the continuous AD process showed that the digester with cow dung, pine needle, and a conductive material in combination exhibited the maximum voltage of 0.76 ± 0.012 V on the 21st day of AD, while the digester with cow dung only exhibited a maximum voltage of 0.62 ± 0.015 V on the 22nd day of AD, representing a 1.3-fold increase over the control. Furthermore, the current work used discarded plastic items and electrodes from spent batteries to emphasize waste management and aid in attaining sustainable energy and development goals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Biotechnology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Digester stability in terms of water displacement by biogas and methane production.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) The effect of various pine needle concentrations on the AD process, and (<b>b</b>) the optimization of various cow dung-to-water ratios for feeding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The effect of varying concentrations of conductive materials, namely (<b>a</b>) graphite powder, (<b>b</b>) activated charcoal powder, and (<b>c</b>) biochar powder, on the AD of pine needles to produce current.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The effect of graphite powder (5 mM) on the batch AD process of pine needles and the generation of (<b>a</b>) voltage and (<b>b</b>) biogas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effect of graphite powder (5 mM) on the continuous AD process of pine needles and the generation of (<b>a</b>) voltage and (<b>b</b>) biogas.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 4110 KiB  
Article
Laboratory Evaluation of Geosynthetic Interface Friction under Low Stress
by Paolo Carrubba
Polymers 2024, 16(17), 2519; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16172519 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 316
Abstract
In landfill cover, geosynthetic packages are often used to fulfil different and simultaneous functions: drainage, waterproofing, separation, reinforcement, and soil protection. In this regard, various types of geosynthetics are combined in succession to allow for water and biogas drainage and to waterproof, reinforce, [...] Read more.
In landfill cover, geosynthetic packages are often used to fulfil different and simultaneous functions: drainage, waterproofing, separation, reinforcement, and soil protection. In this regard, various types of geosynthetics are combined in succession to allow for water and biogas drainage and to waterproof, reinforce, and provide protection from erosion over the useful lifetime, ranging over many decades if we consider the long phases of disposal, closure, and quiescence of the landfill itself. The creation of the composite cover barrier requires the evaluation of various interfaces’ frictional strength under low contact stresses, both in static and seismic cases. The main purpose of this study is to summarize the results of past laboratory tests carried out on different geosynthetic–geosynthetic and geosynthetic–soil–geosynthetic interfaces using experimental instrumentation developed at the geotechnical laboratory of the University of Padua, which allows for the characterization of the interface geosynthetic friction at low contact stresses. The main aspects highlighted are the kinematic mode of failure, the wearing of the contact surfaces, the presence or absence of interstitial fluid, and, finally, the density level of the granular soil in contact with the geosynthetics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of a geosynthetic succession in a sloping landfill cover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Definition of tangent (φ<sub>tan</sub> and α) and secant (φ<sub>sec</sub>) strength parameters from the results of direct shear tests at low contact stress.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Direct shear device at constant loading speed. The device was made at the geotechnical laboratory of the University of Padua for the study of interfaces subjected to low normal stress: (<b>a</b>) top view; (<b>b</b>) operational scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of a direct shear test at constant loading speed for an interface between a smooth geomembrane and a drainage geocomposite [<a href="#B5-polymers-16-02519" class="html-bibr">5</a>]: (<b>a</b>) evolution of the horizontal force and box displacements over time; (<b>b</b>) angle of mobilized friction and velocity of the box as a function of the displacement of the box itself.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Inclined plane equipment available at the geotechnical laboratory of the University of Padua.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Two different HDPE geomembranes in contact with a nonwoven geotextile under dry conditions [<a href="#B12-polymers-16-02519" class="html-bibr">12</a>]: (<b>a</b>) the interface with the GMB<sub>text</sub>-GC D shows a sudden sliding behaviour; (<b>b</b>) the GMB<sub>smooth</sub>-GCD interface shows a gradual sliding behaviour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Complete procedure for measuring all the geosynthetic interface strengths with the inclined plane test: (<b>a</b>) friction angle at detachment, φ<sub>0</sub>; (<b>b</b>) standard friction angle, φ<sub>stand</sub>; and (<b>c</b>) force method for measuring the limit angle, φ<sub>lim</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Dynamic friction expressed as a function of the relative sliding velocity for two different HDPE geomembranes in contact with nonwoven geotextiles [<a href="#B19-polymers-16-02519" class="html-bibr">19</a>]: (<b>a</b>) interface with sudden sliding behaviour; (<b>b</b>) interface with gradual sliding behaviour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Inclined plane mounted on a vibrating table, available at the geotechnical laboratory of the University of Padua: (<b>a</b>) lateral view; (<b>b</b>) operational scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Friction variation for a GCD-GCL interface between a drainage geocomposite and the woven side of a geocomposite clay liner [<a href="#B22-polymers-16-02519" class="html-bibr">22</a>]: (<b>a</b>) ranges of φ<sub>0</sub> values versus cumulative displacements for both dry and wet conditions; (<b>b</b>) ranges of φ<sub>stand</sub> and φ<sub>lim</sub> values versus cumulative displacements for both dry and wet conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Hybrid interface: friction angle as a function of wet soil density and water content [<a href="#B30-polymers-16-02519" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. (<b>a</b>) GGR-GCD interface; (<b>b</b>) GMT-GCD interface.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 1323 KiB  
Review
Thermal Disintegration of Waste-Activated Sludge
by Katarzyna Bułkowska and Magdalena Zielińska
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4447; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174447 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 467
Abstract
The effective management of waste-activated sludge (WAS) presents a significant challenge for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), primarily due to the sludge’s high content of organic matter, pathogens, and hazardous substances such as heavy metals. As urban populations and industrial activities expand, the increasing [...] Read more.
The effective management of waste-activated sludge (WAS) presents a significant challenge for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), primarily due to the sludge’s high content of organic matter, pathogens, and hazardous substances such as heavy metals. As urban populations and industrial activities expand, the increasing volume of WAS has intensified the need for sustainable treatment solutions. Conventional approaches, such as landfilling and anaerobic digestion, are frequently ineffective and resource-intensive, particularly when dealing with the protective extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that render WAS resistant to biodegradation. Thermal pretreatment methods have gained attention due to their ability to enhance the biodegradability of sludge, improve dewaterability, and facilitate resource recovery. These processes function by breaking down complex organic structures within the sludge, thereby increasing its accessibility for subsequent treatments such as anaerobic digestion. The integration of thermal treatment with chemical methods can further optimize the management process, resulting in higher biogas yields, reduced pathogen content, and lower environmental risks. While thermal disintegration is energy-intensive, advancements in energy recovery and process optimization have made it a more viable and environmentally friendly option. This approach offers a pathway to more sustainable and efficient sludge management practices, which align with the goals of reducing waste and complying with stricter environmental regulations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A: Sustainable Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Integration of thermal disintegration into the WAS management process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of thermal disintegration of WAS.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 674 KiB  
Article
Biogas Potential of Food Waste-Recycling Wastewater after Oil–Water Separation
by Gyuseong Han, Juhee Shin, Myoung-Eun Lee and Seung Gu Shin
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4428; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174428 - 4 Sep 2024
Viewed by 372
Abstract
This study explores the potential of food waste-recycling wastewater (FRW) for biogas production, emphasizing oil–water separation before anaerobic digestion. Three FRW samples were analyzed: non-treated (FRW), water–oil separated (FRW_sep), and mixed with domestic sewage (FRW_mix). Physicochemical characterization showed a 26% reduction in crude [...] Read more.
This study explores the potential of food waste-recycling wastewater (FRW) for biogas production, emphasizing oil–water separation before anaerobic digestion. Three FRW samples were analyzed: non-treated (FRW), water–oil separated (FRW_sep), and mixed with domestic sewage (FRW_mix). Physicochemical characterization showed a 26% reduction in crude lipid content after oil–water separation. The biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests revealed similar methane yields for FRW_sep and FRW_mix compared to non-treated FRW. Microbial analysis identified Firmicutes and Methanoculleus as active populations. Energy balance suggests that combining biodiesel and biogas production can enhance net energy recovery. This research indicates that oil–water separation in FRW treatment can optimize anaerobic digestion, contributing to sustainable waste management and renewable energy generation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass and Bio-Energy—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Analysis of the organic substances in differently treated FRW samples: (<b>a</b>) TS, VS, and COD values; (<b>b</b>) carbohydrate, protein, and lipid contents.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Accumulated biogas production from the BMP assay. Data points represent the mean of the duplicate biogas production results, and the error bars represent standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 3135 KiB  
Review
The Role of Catalysts in Life Cycle Assessment Applied to Biogas Reforming
by Sergio Nogales-Delgado and Juan Félix González González
Catalysts 2024, 14(9), 592; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14090592 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 396
Abstract
The real implementation of biogas reforming at an industrial scale to obtain interesting products (like hydrogen or syngas) is a developing research field where multidisciplinary teams are continuously adding improvements and innovative technologies. These works can contribute to the proliferation of green technologies [...] Read more.
The real implementation of biogas reforming at an industrial scale to obtain interesting products (like hydrogen or syngas) is a developing research field where multidisciplinary teams are continuously adding improvements and innovative technologies. These works can contribute to the proliferation of green technologies where the circular economy and sustainability are key points. To assess the sustainability of these processes, there are different tools like life cycle assessment (LCA), which involves a complete procedure where even small details count to consider a certain technology sustainable or not. The aim of this work was to review works where LCA is applied to different aspects of biogas reforming, focusing on the role of catalysts, which are essential to improve the efficiency of a certain process but can also contribute to its environmental impact. In conclusion, catalysts have an influence on LCA through the improvement of catalytic performance and the impact of their production, whereas other aspects related to biogas or methane reforming could equally affect their catalytic durability or reusability, with a subsequent effect on LCA. Further research about this subject is required, as this is a continuously changing technology with plenty of possibilities, in order to homogenize this research field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Different hydrogen production processes and their classification by colors, according to the main source (in pink inner circle) and technique or energy source (in blue external circle). Outside the circle, the main emissions or wastes related to each process are indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Main components included in atom economy. The aim is to reduce undesired products through high selectivity for desired products or optimization and further management by using novel technologies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Life cycle assessment and its main connections with the Sustainable Development Goals [<a href="#B11-catalysts-14-00592" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Main steps observed for biogas reforming “from cradle to grave”, with possible boundaries for LCA: (1) global LCA; (2) anaerobic digestion; (3) biogas reforming; (4) hydrogen purification; (5) and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Published work evolution and research field distribution about LCA (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>, respectively) and biogas reforming (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>, respectively) between 1998 and 2023. Source: [<a href="#B55-catalysts-14-00592" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Anaerobic digestion: main stages and products, including the most determining ones in LCA applied to biogas reforming.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simplified boundary for biogas reforming, including inputs, the process, and outputs (with wastes).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Influence of catalysts on LCA applied to biogas reforming: direct influence, with its positive effect (red area) and indirect influence, regarding its intrinsic nature green area). A balance between the positive and negative impacts of these two aspects will determine global LCA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Main deactivation processes of catalysts during biogas or methane reforming: (<b>a</b>) sintering (blue lines); (<b>b</b>) coke deposition (red lines); and (<b>c</b>) poisoning with H<sub>2</sub>S (yellow lines). For each deactivation process, the previous state is represented by (I), with available active sites and pores, whereas the deactivated state is included in (II), with blocked active sites and pores.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop