[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (382)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Weibull statistics

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 1074 KiB  
Article
A New Generalization of the Inverse Generalized Weibull Distribution with Different Methods of Estimation and Applications in Medicine and Engineering
by Ibtesam A. Alsaggaf, Sara F. Aloufi and Lamya A. Baharith
Symmetry 2024, 16(8), 1002; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16081002 - 7 Aug 2024
Viewed by 361
Abstract
Limitations inherent to existing statistical distributions in capturing the complexities of real-world data often necessitate the development of novel models. This paper introduces the new exponential generalized inverse generalized Weibull (NEGIGW) distribution. The NEGIGW distribution boasts significant flexibility with symmetrical and asymmetrical shapes, [...] Read more.
Limitations inherent to existing statistical distributions in capturing the complexities of real-world data often necessitate the development of novel models. This paper introduces the new exponential generalized inverse generalized Weibull (NEGIGW) distribution. The NEGIGW distribution boasts significant flexibility with symmetrical and asymmetrical shapes, allowing its hazard rate function to be adapted to many failure patterns observed in various fields such as medicine, biology, and engineering. Some statistical properties of the NEGIGW distribution, such as moments, quantile function, and Renyi entropy, are studied. Three methods are used for parameter estimation, including maximum likelihood, maximum product of spacing, and percentile methods. The performance of the estimation methods is evaluated via Monte Carlo simulations. The NEGIGW distribution excels in its ability to fit real-world data accurately. Five medical and engineering datasets are applied to demonstrate the superior fit of NEGIGW distribution compared to competing models. This compelling evidence suggests that the NEGIGW distribution is promising for lifetime data analysis and reliability assessments across different disciplines. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The NEGIGW density plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The NEGIGW HF’s plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>TTT plots for datasets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The NEGIGW is compared to other distributions for the first data. (<b>Right</b>): CDF for all distributions. (<b>Left</b>): observed and expected frequencies for all distributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The NEGIGW is compared to other distributions for the second data. (<b>Right</b>): CDF for all distributions. (<b>Left</b>): observed and expected frequencies for all distributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The NEGIGW is compared to other distributions for the third data. (<b>Right</b>): CDF for all distributions. (<b>Left</b>): observed and expected frequencies for all distributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The NEGIGW is compared to other distributions for the fourth data. (<b>Right</b>): CDF for all distributions. (<b>Left</b>): observed and expected frequencies for all distributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The NEGIGW is compared to other distributions for the fifth data. (<b>Right</b>): CDF for all distributions. (<b>Left</b>): observed and expected frequencies for all distributions.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 5872 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Tensile Properties and Probabilistic Characteristics of Large-Tow Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites
by Anni Wang, Ruiheng Li and Xiaogang Liu
Polymers 2024, 16(15), 2197; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16152197 - 1 Aug 2024
Viewed by 433
Abstract
Large-tow carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites (CFRP) have great application potential in civil engineering due to their low price, but their basic mechanical properties are still unclear. The tensile properties of large-tow CFRP rods and plates were investigated in this study. First, the tensile [...] Read more.
Large-tow carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites (CFRP) have great application potential in civil engineering due to their low price, but their basic mechanical properties are still unclear. The tensile properties of large-tow CFRP rods and plates were investigated in this study. First, the tensile properties of unidirectional CFRP rods and plates were studied, and the test results of the relevant mechanical properties were statistically analyzed. The tensile strength of the CFRP rod and plate are 2005.97 MPa and 2069.48 MPa. Second, the surface of the test specimens after failure was observed using a scanning electron microscope to analyze the type of failure and damage evolution process. Finally, the probabilistic characteristics of the mechanical properties were analyzed using normal, lognormal, and Weibull distributions for parameter fitting. Quasi-optimality tests were performed, and a probability distribution model was proposed for the mechanical properties of large-tow CFRP rods and plates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fiber Reinforced Polymers: Manufacture, Properties and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Tensile test specimen of CFRP rod.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Tensile test specimen of CFRP plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Typical state of CFRP rod after tensile failure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Tensile stress–strain curve of CFRP rod.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Morphology of CFRP rod after fracture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Typical state of CFRP plate after tensile failure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Stress–strain curve of CFRP plate. (<b>a</b>) Transverse strain. (<b>b</b>) Longitudinal strain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Morphology of CFRP plate after fracture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Probability density distribution curve of tensile strength and modulus of CFRP rods. (<b>a</b>) Tensile strength. (<b>b</b>) Tensile modulus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Cumulative probability distribution curves of tensile strength and modulus of CFRP rod. (<b>a</b>) Tensile strength. (<b>b</b>) Tensile modulus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Probability density distribution curves of tensile strength, modulus, and Poisson’s ratio of CFRP unidirectional plate. (<b>a</b>) Tensile strength. (<b>b</b>) Tensile modulus. (<b>c</b>) Poisson’s ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Cumulative probability distribution curves of tensile strength, modulus, and Poisson’s ratio of CFRP unidirectional plate. (<b>a</b>) Tensile strength. (<b>b</b>) Tensile modulus. (<b>c</b>) Poisson’s ratio.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2186 KiB  
Article
An Approach to Improve Specimen Processing for the Flexural Strength Testing of Zirconia
by Nashib Pandey, Sabrina Karlin, Michael Marc Bornstein and Nadja Rohr
Materials 2024, 17(14), 3479; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143479 - 14 Jul 2024
Viewed by 505
Abstract
Measuring the flexural strength of restorative materials such as zirconia is crucial for providing proper indications for clinical applications and predicting performance. Great variations in specimen preparation for flexural strength measurements exist among laboratories. The aim was to evaluate how the processing method, [...] Read more.
Measuring the flexural strength of restorative materials such as zirconia is crucial for providing proper indications for clinical applications and predicting performance. Great variations in specimen preparation for flexural strength measurements exist among laboratories. The aim was to evaluate how the processing method, surface treatment, and test method of the specimens affect the flexural strength of zirconia. Zirconia specimens (VITA YZ HT) (n = 270) were processed using CAD/CAM or were conventionally milled with three different surface treatments (machined, ground, polished) and were measured with three-point bending (non-chamfered/chamfered) or biaxial flexural strength test. Weibull statistics were conducted. The mean flexural strength values ranged from 612 MPa (conventional, machined, three-point bending non-chamfered) to 1143 MPa (CAD/CAM, polished, biaxial flexural strength). The highest reliability is achieved when specimens are prepared using thoroughly controllable processing with CAD/CAM and subsequently polished. Higher strength values are achieved with the biaxial flexural strength test method because the stress concentration in relation to the effective volume is smaller. Polishing reduces surface microcracks and therefore increases the strength values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanical Properties of Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Test set-up for 3Y-TZP specimen preparation based on the specimen processing method (CAD/CAM vs. conventional), polishing procedure applied (machined, ground, polished), and flexural strength testing method (3-point bending test, biaxial flexural strength). The shape of the flexural strength test boxes represents specimen dimensions of the 3-point bending test of non-chamfered bars and chamfered bars and for the biaxial flexural strength test of circular and rectangular discs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Weibull plots of flexural strength values for zirconia. Specimens were processed either with CAD/CAM or conventional processing and surfaces were subsequently ground (G), machined (M), or polished (P) before applying (<b>a</b>) 3-point bending tests using non-chamfered specimens, (<b>b</b>) 3-point bending tests using chamfered specimens, or (<b>c</b>) biaxial flexural strength tests using circular discs for CAD/CAM and rectangular discs for conventional.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Weibull plots of flexural strength values for zirconia. Specimens were processed either with CAD/CAM or conventional processing and surfaces were subsequently ground (G), machined (M), or polished (P) before applying (<b>a</b>) 3-point bending tests using non-chamfered specimens, (<b>b</b>) 3-point bending tests using chamfered specimens, or (<b>c</b>) biaxial flexural strength tests using circular discs for CAD/CAM and rectangular discs for conventional.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scanning electron microscope images (×500) of surfaces of the specimens after 3-point bending testing. Upper row exhibit CAD/CAM processed specimens, lower row conventional, M: Machined, G: Ground, P: Polished. Additional polishing steps result in smoother surface topographies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scanning electron microscope images (×10,000) of surfaces of specimens after 3-point bending testing. Upper row CAD/CAM, lower row Conventional, M: Machined, G: Ground, P: Polished. Grain growth is visible on all surfaces, while grain boundaries are fused due to the polishing procedure on P.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 839 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Estimated Small Wind Energy Using Different Probability Distributions in a Desert City in Northwestern México
by Juan A. Burgos-Peñaloza, Alejandro A. Lambert-Arista, O. Rafael García-Cueto, Néstor Santillán-Soto, Edgar Valenzuela and David E. Flores-Jiménez
Energies 2024, 17(13), 3323; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133323 - 6 Jul 2024
Viewed by 446
Abstract
In this paper, four probability functions are compared with the purpose of establishing a methodology to improve the accuracy of wind energy estimations in a desert city in Northwestern Mexico. Three time series of wind speed data corresponding to 2017, 2018, and 2019 [...] Read more.
In this paper, four probability functions are compared with the purpose of establishing a methodology to improve the accuracy of wind energy estimations in a desert city in Northwestern Mexico. Three time series of wind speed data corresponding to 2017, 2018, and 2019 were used for statistical modeling. These series were recorded with a sonic anemometer at a sampling frequency of 10 Hz. Analyses based on these data were performed at different stationarity periods (5, 30, 60, and 600 s). The estimation of the parameters characterizing the probability density functions (PDFs) was carried out using different methods; the statistical models were evaluated by the coefficient of determination and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient, and their accuracy was estimated by the measured quadratic error, mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. Weibull, using the energy pattern factor method, and Gamma, using the Method of Moments, were the probability density functions that best described the statistical behavior of wind speed and were better at estimating the generated energy. We conclude that the proposed methodology will increase the confidence of both wind speed estimation and the energy supplied by small-scale wind installations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Shape and scale parameters. (<b>a</b>) Shape parameters for 2017. (<b>b</b>) Scale parameters for 2017. (<b>c</b>) Shape parameters for 2018. (<b>d</b>) Scale parameters for 2018. (<b>e</b>) Shape parameters for 2019. (<b>f</b>) Scale parameters for 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of relative frequencies with the stationarity periods indicated. (<b>a</b>) 5 s for 2017. (<b>b</b>) 600 s for 2017. (<b>c</b>) 5 s for 2018. (<b>d</b>) 600 s for 2018. (<b>e</b>) 5 s for 2019. (<b>f</b>) 600 s for 2019.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 8981 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Temperature on the Performance and Reliability of Li/SOCl2 Batteries
by Yongquan Sun, Xinkun Qin, Lin Li, Youmei Zhang, Jiahai Zhang and Jia Qi
Energies 2024, 17(13), 3063; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133063 - 21 Jun 2024
Viewed by 466
Abstract
The performance and reliability of lithium thionyl chloride (Li/SOCl2) batteries are significantly affected by temperature, but the reliability level and failure mechanisms of Li/SOCl2 batteries remain unclear. In this study, Weibull distribution statistics were used to infer the life expectancy [...] Read more.
The performance and reliability of lithium thionyl chloride (Li/SOCl2) batteries are significantly affected by temperature, but the reliability level and failure mechanisms of Li/SOCl2 batteries remain unclear. In this study, Weibull distribution statistics were used to infer the life expectancy of Li/SOCl2 batteries at different temperatures. Additionally, the battery failure mechanism was analyzed using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). It is found that under the discharge condition of 7.5 kΩ load, the mean time between failures (MTBF) and reliable life of the battery decreased with increasing operating temperature. Under the discharge condition of 750 Ω load, the MTBF of the battery peaked at 60 °C. Furthermore, the influence of temperature on the voltage output characteristics of Li/SOCl2 batteries and the voltage hysteresis were analyzed. Both the battery output voltage and the hysteresis effect increased with rising temperature. This is because high temperature accelerates internal battery reactions, thus altering the formation process of the passivation film on the lithium metal negative electrode. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section D2: Electrochem: Batteries, Fuel Cells, Capacitors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structure of carbon-encased Li/SOCl<sub>2</sub> battery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of voltage detection across load resistor in Li/SOCl<sub>2</sub> battery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram illustrating the principle of battery life testing at different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Battery life testing device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram illustrating the principle of battery load voltage temperature characteristic test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Test plan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Impedance spectrum testing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Battery discharge data at different temperatures. The sequence numbers represent the numbering of battery samples under different stress conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Battery discharge data at different temperatures. The sequence numbers represent the numbering of battery samples under different stress conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Battery life histogram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The relationship between discharge life and temperature for a battery load of 7.5 kΩ.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The relationship between discharge life and temperature for a battery load of 750 Ω.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Battery load output voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Discharge temperature characteristic diagram of 7.5 kΩ load after aging.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>EIS of different temperature loads at 750 Ω discharge in each stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>EIS curve and discharge curve after battery aging.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Discharge curves of aged battery.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5282 KiB  
Article
Mechanical Characteristics of Sandwich Structures with 3D-Printed Bio-Inspired Gyroid Structure Core and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminate Face-Sheet
by Harri Junaedi, Marwa A. Abd El-baky, Mahmoud M. Awd Allah and Tamer A. Sebaey
Polymers 2024, 16(12), 1698; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121698 - 14 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 613
Abstract
The gyroid structure is a bio-inspired structure that was discovered in butterfly wings. The geometric design of the gyroid structure in butterfly wings offers a unique combination of strength and flexibility. This study investigated sandwich panels consisting of a 3D-printed gyroid structure core [...] Read more.
The gyroid structure is a bio-inspired structure that was discovered in butterfly wings. The geometric design of the gyroid structure in butterfly wings offers a unique combination of strength and flexibility. This study investigated sandwich panels consisting of a 3D-printed gyroid structure core and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) facing skin. A filament fused fabrication 3D printer machine was used to print the gyroid cores with three different relative densities, namely 10%, 15%, and 20%. Polylactic acid (PLA) was used as the printing material for the gyroid. The gyroid structure was then sandwiched and joined by an epoxy resin between CFRP laminates. Polyurethane foam (PUF) was filled into the gyroid core to fill the cavity on the core for another set of samples. Flexural and compression tests were performed on the samples to investigate the mechanical behavior of the sandwiches. Moreover, the two-parameter Weibull distribution was used to evaluate the results statistically. As a result, the sandwich-specific facing stress and core shear strength from the three-point bending test of the composites increased with the increase in sandwich density. Core density controls the flexural characteristics of the sandwich. Adding PUF improves the deflection at the maximum stress and the sustained load after fracture of the sandwich. Compression strength, modulus, and energy absorbed by gyroid core sandwiches and their specific properties are higher than the PUF-filled gyroid core sandwiches at equal sandwich density. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Additive Manufacturing of Polymers, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>TPMS structure of gyroid structure. Arrows show the three directions of repeated unit cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Gyroid cubic shape unit cell, (<b>b</b>) design of gyroid structure, and (<b>c</b>) printed gyroid structure at 20% density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Gyroid sandwich and (<b>b</b>) PUF-filled gyroid sandwich at 20% of gyroid core density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Flexural test and (<b>b</b>) compression test of the sample setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Repeatability of the flexural tests of (<b>a</b>) gyroid at 10% density (d10) and (<b>b</b>) PUF-filled gyroid at 10% density (d10P).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Representative force-deflection curves of the sandwiches from three-point bending (<b>a</b>) gyroid core sandwiches and (<b>b</b>) PUF-filled gyroid core sandwiches.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Compression stress–strain curves for (<b>a</b>) gyroid core sandwiches and (<b>b</b>) PUF-filled gyroid core sandwiches.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Fracture samples of (<b>a</b>) 10%, (<b>b</b>) 15%, and (<b>c</b>) 20% of gyroid core sandwiches.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fracture progression of (<b>a</b>) 10%, (<b>b</b>) 15%, and (<b>c</b>) 20% of PUF-filled gyroid core sandwiches.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Compression sample of 20% relative density gyroid core sandwich during test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Facing stress and core shear strength vs. density comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Graphical analysis of the flexural and compression properties.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Graphical analysis of the flexural and compression properties.</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 6067 KiB  
Article
Statistical Parameters Extracted from Radar Sea Clutter Simulated under Different Operational Conditions
by Yung-Cheng Pai and Jean-Fu Kiang
Sensors 2024, 24(12), 3720; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123720 - 7 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1038
Abstract
A complete framework of predicting the attributes of sea clutter under different operational conditions, specified by wind speed, wind direction, grazing angle, and polarization, is proposed for the first time. This framework is composed of empirical spectra to characterize sea-surface profiles under different [...] Read more.
A complete framework of predicting the attributes of sea clutter under different operational conditions, specified by wind speed, wind direction, grazing angle, and polarization, is proposed for the first time. This framework is composed of empirical spectra to characterize sea-surface profiles under different wind speeds, the Monte Carlo method to generate realizations of sea-surface profiles, the physical-optics method to compute the normalized radar cross-sections (NRCSs) from individual sea-surface realizations, and regression of NRCS data (sea clutter) with an empirical probability density function (PDF) characterized by a few statistical parameters. JONSWAP and Hwang ocean-wave spectra are adopted to generate realizations of sea-surface profiles at low and high wind speeds, respectively. The probability density functions of NRCSs are regressed with K and Weibull distributions, each characterized by two parameters. The probability density functions in the outlier regions of weak and strong signals are regressed with a power-law distribution, each characterized by an index. The statistical parameters and power-law indices of the K and Weibull distributions are derived for the first time under different operational conditions. The study reveals succinct information of sea clutter that can be used to improve the radar performance in a wide variety of complicated ocean environments. The proposed framework can be used as a reference or guidelines for designing future measurement tasks to enhance the existing empirical models on ocean-wave spectra, normalized radar cross-sections, and so on. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of proposed framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relation between wind direction (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>) and sea-surface wave direction (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>w</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>) [<a href="#B50-sensors-24-03720" class="html-bibr">50</a>]; <span class="html-italic">x</span> and <span class="html-italic">y</span> axes point east and north, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>JONSWAP amplitude spectrum <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">J</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>k</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mi>w</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> (in dB), with default parameters in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sample snapshots of sea-surface realization <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">J</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>r</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> with JONSWAP spectrum: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Amplitude spectrum reconstructed from realizations of sea-surface profile generated with JONSWAP amplitude spectrum in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>a; <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Hwang amplitude spectrum <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>k</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mi>w</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> (in dB), with default parameters in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 10 m/s; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 12 m/s; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 16 m/s; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 20 m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Samples of sea-surface realization <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi>r</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> with Hwang spectrum: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>20</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic of computing radar backscattered field from sea-surface profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic of a plane wave incident upon a sea-surface profile modeled with triangular patches. (<b>b</b>) Projection of triangle <span class="html-italic">S</span> onto <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>-plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>PDFs of NRCSs at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>9.3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>38</mn> <mo>.</mo> <msup> <mn>7</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>68</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Data of run34683 [<a href="#B62-sensors-24-03720" class="html-bibr">62</a>], <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: regressed with K distribution; <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: simulated NRCS data, <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed with K distribution. (<b>b</b>) <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Data of run34683 [<a href="#B62-sensors-24-03720" class="html-bibr">62</a>], <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: regressed with Weibull distribution; <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: simulated NRCS data, <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed with Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Flowchart for estimating the statistical parameters of a specific probability density function with particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>PDFs of NRCSs at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization, with default parameters listed in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t006" class="html-table">Table 6</a>. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Generated with JONSWAP spectrum, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: generated with Hwang spectrum, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>20</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: Regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution; (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Statistical parameters versus wind speed, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>μ</mi> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <span class="html-italic">v</span> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>); (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution <span class="html-italic">b</span> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <span class="html-italic">c</span> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>). The vertical grey lines indicate that simulation with Hwang spectrum starts at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s, and simulation with JONSWAP spectrum ends at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Weighted linear regression on simulated NRCS at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization in outlier regions. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>20</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: Regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>; <span style="color: #00FF00"><b>—</b></span>: noise floor at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>38</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB. The vertical grey lines indicate that <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>28</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB is threshold of weak signals, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB is threshold of strong signals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Power-law indices of PDF in outlier regions versus wind speed, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum; <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>b</mi> <mrow> <mo>ℓ</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>w</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>b</mi> <mrow> <mo>ℓ</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>s</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>). The vertical grey lines indicate that simulation with Hwang spectrum starts at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s, and simulation with JONSWAP spectrum ends at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>PDFs of NRCSs at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mi>h</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization, with default parameters listed in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t006" class="html-table">Table 6</a>. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>20</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: Regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution; (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Statistical parameters versus wind speed, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mi>h</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>μ</mi> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <span class="html-italic">v</span> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>); (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution, <span class="html-italic">b</span> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <span class="html-italic">c</span> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>). The vertical grey lines indicate that simulation with Hwang spectrum starts at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s, and simulation with JONSWAP spectrum ends at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Weighted linear regression on simulated NRCSs at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mi>h</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization in outlier regions. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s; <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>20</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: Regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>; <span style="color: #00FF00"><b>—</b></span>: noise floor at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>38</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB. The vertical grey lines indicate that <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB is threshold of weak signals, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>37</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB is threshold of strong signals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Power-law indices of PDFs in outlier regions versus wind speed, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mi>h</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum; <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>b</mi> <mrow> <mo>ℓ</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>w</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>b</mi> <mrow> <mo>ℓ</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>s</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>). The vertical grey lines indicate that simulation with Hwang spectrum starts at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s, and simulation with JONSWAP spectrum ends at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>PDFs of NRCSs with default parameters listed in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t006" class="html-table">Table 6</a>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>15</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>15</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>20</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>20</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #00FF00">•</span>: simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>45</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #00FF00">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>45</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: Regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>; <span style="color: #00FF00"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #00FF00">•</span>; <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>; <span style="color: #00FF00"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #00FF00">Δ</span>. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution; (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Statistical parameters versus grazing angle, with default parameters listed in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t006" class="html-table">Table 6</a>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>μ</mi> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <span class="html-italic">v</span> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>); (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution, <span class="html-italic">b</span> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <span class="html-italic">c</span> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>PDFs of NRCSs with default parameters listed in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t006" class="html-table">Table 6</a>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #FF69B4">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <span style="color: #FF69B4">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #09FFFF">•</span>: simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>5</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #09FFFF">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>5</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; •: simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>1</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; Δ: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>g</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>1</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. <span style="color: #FF69B4"><b>—</b></span>: Regressed on <span style="color: #FF69B4">•</span>; <span style="color: #09FFFF"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #09FFFF">•</span>; <b>—</b>: regressed on •; <span style="color: #FF69B4"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF69B4">Δ</span>; <span style="color: #09FFFF"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #09FFFF">Δ</span>; <b>- - - - -</b>: regressed on Δ. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution; (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>PDFs of NRCSs, with default parameters listed in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t006" class="html-table">Table 6</a>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>0</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>0</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>90</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>90</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: Regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>; <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution; (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Statistical parameters versus wind direction, with default parameters listed in <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> and <a href="#sensors-24-03720-t006" class="html-table">Table 6</a>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>10</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> m/s. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum. (<b>a</b>) Regressed with K distribution, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>μ</mi> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <span class="html-italic">v</span> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>); (<b>b</b>) regressed with Weibull distribution, <span class="html-italic">b</span> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <span class="html-italic">c</span> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Weighted linear regression on simulated NRCSs in outlier regions, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization. <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>: Simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>0</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>0</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: simulated with JONSWAP spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>90</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>:simulated with Hwang spectrum at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mn>90</mn> <mo>∘</mo> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>. <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>—</b></span>: Regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>—</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>; <span style="color: #0000FF"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>; <span style="color: #FF0000"><b>- - - - -</b></span>: regressed on <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>; <span style="color: #00FF00"><b>—</b></span>: noise floor at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>38</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB. The vertical grey lines indicate that <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>28</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB is threshold of weak signals, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>σ</mi> <mn>0</mn> <mo>′</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> dB is threshold of strong signals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Power-law indices of PDFs in outlier regions versus wind direction, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> polarization, <span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>: simulated with JONSWAP spectrum; <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>: simulated with Hwang spectrum; <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>b</mi> <mrow> <mo>ℓ</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>w</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #0000FF">•</span>, <span style="color: #0000FF">Δ</span>), <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>b</mi> <mrow> <mo>ℓ</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>s</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> (<span style="color: #FF0000">•</span>, <span style="color: #FF0000">Δ</span>).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 6817 KiB  
Article
Investigation of Variability of Flaw Strength Distributions on Brittle SiC Ceramic
by Jacques Lamon
Ceramics 2024, 7(2), 759-776; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics7020050 - 4 Jun 2024
Viewed by 542
Abstract
The present paper investigates flaw strength distributions established using various flexural tests on batches of SiC bar test specimens, namely four-point bending as well as three-point bending tests with different span lengths. Flaw strength is provided by the elemental stress operating on the [...] Read more.
The present paper investigates flaw strength distributions established using various flexural tests on batches of SiC bar test specimens, namely four-point bending as well as three-point bending tests with different span lengths. Flaw strength is provided by the elemental stress operating on the critical flaw at the fracture of a test specimen. Fracture-inducing flaws and their locations are identified using fractography. A single population of pores was found to dominate the fracture. The construction of diagrams of p-quantile vs. elemental strengths was aimed at assessing the Gaussian nature of flaw strengths. Then, empirical cumulative distributions of strengths were constructed using the normal distribution function. The Weibull distributions of strengths are then compared to the normal reference distributions. The parameters of the Weibull cumulative probability distributions are estimated using maximum likelihood and moment methods. The cumulative distributions of flexural strengths for the different bending tests are predicted from the flaw strength density function using the elemental strength model, and from the cumulative distribution of flexural strength using the Weibull function. Flaw strength distributions that include the weaker flaws that are potentially present in larger test pieces are extrapolated using the p-quantile diagrams. Implications are discussed regarding the pertinence of an intrinsically representative flaw strength distribution, considering failure predictions. Finally, the influence of the characteristics of fracture-inducing flaw populations expressed in terms of flaw strength interval, size, dispersion, heterogeneity, and reproducibility with volume change is examined. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Ceramics, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pores in the fracture surface of a silicon carbide specimen. The scale bar indicates 10 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>p-quantile diagrams obtained for the sets of strength data obtained on the bending tests. The solid lines indicate the regression lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of Weibull (referred to as W) and normal (referred to as N) cumulative distribution functions for the elemental strengths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the Weibull (PDW) and Gauss (PDn) probability density functions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Size effects: predictions of the flexural strengths using the multiaxial elemental strength model equation for the flaw strength parameters derived from the 4pt bending tests. Comparison with the experimental flexural strength distributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Size effects: predictions of the flexural strengths using the Weibull model equation for the statistical parameters derived from the 4pt bending tests. Comparison with the experimental flexural strength distributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Size effects: predictions of the flaw strengths using the Weibull model for the flaw strength parameters derived from 4pt bending tests. Comparison with the experimental flaw strength distributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Merged and extrapolated p-quantile–flaw strength diagrams. Comparison with those obtained from the 3-point and 4-point bending tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Normal CDFs derived from the merged and extrapolated p-quantile–flaw strength diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Gaussian PDFs derived from the merged and extrapolated p-quantile–flaw strength diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Influence of the number of flaw strength data <span class="html-italic">n</span> on the extreme values <span class="html-italic">z<sub>pmax</sub></span> (=−<span class="html-italic">z<sub>pmin</sub></span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Variation in the coefficient of variation (Equation (18)) with m. Comparison with functions 1/m, 1.2/m, and 1.3/m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Influence on <span class="html-italic">n</span> on standard deviation when the flaw strength interval and <span class="html-italic">μ</span> are constant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Influence of <span class="html-italic">n</span> on <span class="html-italic">m</span> when the strength interval and the mean strength are kept constant.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 351 KiB  
Article
Linear Combination of Order Statistics Moments from Log-Extended Exponential Geometric Distribution with Applications to Entropy
by Fatimah E. Almuhayfith, Mahfooz Alam, Hassan S. Bakouch, Sudeep R. Bapat and Olayan Albalawi
Mathematics 2024, 12(11), 1744; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12111744 - 3 Jun 2024
Viewed by 353
Abstract
Moments of order statistics (OSs) characterize the Weibull–geometric and half-logistic families of distributions, of which the extended exponential–geometric (EEG) distribution is a particular case. The EEG distribution is used to create the log-extended exponential–geometric (LEEG) distribution, which is bounded in the unit interval [...] Read more.
Moments of order statistics (OSs) characterize the Weibull–geometric and half-logistic families of distributions, of which the extended exponential–geometric (EEG) distribution is a particular case. The EEG distribution is used to create the log-extended exponential–geometric (LEEG) distribution, which is bounded in the unit interval (0, 1). In addition to the generalized Stirling numbers of the first kind, a few years ago, the polylogarithm function and the Lerch transcendent function were used to determine the moments of order statistics of the LEEG distributions. As an application based on the L-moments, we expand the features of the LEEG distribution in this work. In terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function, this work presents the precise equations and recurrence relations for the single moments of OSs from the LEEG distribution. Along with recurrence relations between the expectations of function of two OSs from the LEEG distribution, it also displays the truncated and conditional distribution of the OSs. Additionally, we use the L-moments to estimate the parameters of the LEEG distribution. We further fit the LEEG distribution on three practical data sets from medical and environmental sciences areas. It is seen that the estimated parameters through L-moments of the OSs give a superior fit. We finally determine the correspondence between the entropies and the OSs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Applied Probability and Statistical Inference)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Behavior of the LEEG distribution at different values of different parameters.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 3797 KiB  
Article
Modeling Wind-Speed Statistics beyond the Weibull Distribution
by Pedro Lencastre, Anis Yazidi and Pedro G. Lind
Energies 2024, 17(11), 2621; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112621 - 29 May 2024
Viewed by 616
Abstract
While it is well known that the Weibull distribution is a good model for wind-speed measurements and can be explained through simple statistical arguments, how such a model holds for shorter time periods is still an open question. In this paper, we present [...] Read more.
While it is well known that the Weibull distribution is a good model for wind-speed measurements and can be explained through simple statistical arguments, how such a model holds for shorter time periods is still an open question. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the accuracy of the Weibull distribution to wind-speed measurements, in comparison with other possible “cousin” distributions. In particular, we show that the Gaussian distribution enables one to predict wind-speed histograms with higher accuracy than the Weibull distribution. Two other good candidates are the Nakagami and the Rice distributions, which can be interpreted as particular cases of the Weibull distribution for particular choices of the shape and scale parameters. These findings hold not only when predicting next-point values of the wind speed but also when predicting the wind energy values. Finally, we discuss such findings in the context of wind power forecasting and monitoring for power-grid assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>Left</b>) Location of the FINO-1 tower at the North Sea, as part of the <span class="html-italic">Alpha Ventus</span> wind park, and (<b>Right</b>) a close-up of the FINO-1 tower where the wind-speed measurements are collected at different heights. In this paper, we consider wind speed measured at 100 m with a sampling frequency of 1 Hz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Wind speed measurements within time windows of different lengths, namely (from bottom to top), <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 600, 1800, 3600, 10,800, 21,600, 86,400, 2,592,000 s. On the right, representative time-series for each one of these time windows is shown, and on the left one sees the corresponding histogram of those wind-speed values (symbols), together with the best fit of a Weibull (orange, Equation (<a href="#FD1-energies-17-02621" class="html-disp-formula">1</a>)) and Gaussian (blue, Equation (<a href="#FD4-energies-17-02621" class="html-disp-formula">4</a>)) distribution. We use a Gaussian kernel for the density estimate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illustration of each one of the two-parameter distributions mentioned in <a href="#sec2dot2-energies-17-02621" class="html-sec">Section 2.2</a> in two representative time windows for (<b>Left</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>600</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> s (10 min) and (<b>Right</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 2,592,000 s (1 month). As we will see, depending on the scale one considers (time-window size), the best model is different.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Assessing turbulence features within time windows of different sizes, <span class="html-italic">T</span>: (<b>a</b>) the mean <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>μ</mi> </semantics></math> of the wind speed, (<b>b</b>) the standard deviation, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math>, of the wind speed, and (<b>c</b>) the turbulent intermittency, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mi>σ</mi> <mi>μ</mi> </mfrac> </mrow> </semantics></math>. While the mean of the wind speed is approximately independent of <span class="html-italic">T</span>, the standard deviation increases with the time-window size. Therefore, the intermittency of wind-speed fields seems to scale linearly with the standard deviation of wind speed (inset).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Assessing the fitness of different models of wind speed measured within a time window of size <span class="html-italic">T</span>. Here we consider three different types of fitness to evaluate the prediction power (see text): (<b>a</b>) How well each model is able to predict the next value of the wind speed, which is measured by the (logarithm of the) next-point-probability, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="script">L</mi> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) How well each distribution model fits the empirical histogram of measurements, which is measured by the Kullback–Leibler divergence, cf. Equation (<a href="#FD8-energies-17-02621" class="html-disp-formula">8</a>). (<b>c</b>) How well each model is able to predict the energy associated with the wind speed, i.e., the square of the wind speed, which is measured by the percentual deviation <math display="inline"><semantics> <mo>Δ</mo> </semantics></math>, cf. Equation (<a href="#FD9-energies-17-02621" class="html-disp-formula">9</a>). Details on what the best models are can be found in the text.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3276 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Shift in Nil-Ductility Transition Reference Temperature for RPV Steels Due to Irradiation Embrittlement Using Probability Distributions and Gamma Process
by Kaikai Tang, Yan Li, Yuebing Li, Weiya Jin and Jiameng Liu
Metals 2024, 14(5), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/met14050580 - 15 May 2024
Viewed by 706
Abstract
Reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels are highly susceptible to irradiation embrittlement due to prolonged exposure to high temperature, high pressure, and intense neutron irradiation. This leads to the shift in nil-ductility transition reference temperature—∆RTNDT. The change in ∆RTNDT follows a [...] Read more.
Reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels are highly susceptible to irradiation embrittlement due to prolonged exposure to high temperature, high pressure, and intense neutron irradiation. This leads to the shift in nil-ductility transition reference temperature—∆RTNDT. The change in ∆RTNDT follows a certain distribution pattern and is impacted by factors including chemical composition, neutron fluence, and irradiation temperature. Existing empirical procedures can estimate ∆RTNDT based on fitting extensive irradiation embrittlement data, but their reliability has not been thoroughly investigated. Probability statistical distributions and the Gamma stochastic process were performed to model material property degradation in RPV steels from a pressurized water reactor due to irradiation embrittlement, with the probability models considered being normal, Weibull, and lognormal distributions. Comparisons with existing empirical procedures showed that the Weibull distribution model and the Gamma stochastic model demonstrate good reliability in predicting ∆RTNDT for RPV steels. This provides a valuable reference for studying irradiation embrittlement in RPV materials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The shift in nil-ductility transition reference temperature (∆RT<sub>NDT</sub>) for different neutron fluences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cluster classification: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">K</span> = 3; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">K</span> = 4; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">K</span> = 5; (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">K</span> = 6; (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">K</span> = 7; (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">K</span> = 8.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relation between the number of clusters and the sum of squared errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The fitting curve between the shift in nil-ductility transition reference temperature (∆RT<sub>NDT</sub>) and neutron fluence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Priority of impact factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The fitting curves and root mean square error (RMSE) diagrams for the three distributions: (<b>a</b>) normal distribution; (<b>b</b>) Weibull distribution; (<b>c</b>) lognormal distribution; (<b>d</b>) RMSE comparison diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The fitting curves of Weibull distribution parameters and normal distribution parameters with neutron fluence: (<b>a</b>) normal distribution parameter <span class="html-italic">μ</span>; (<b>b</b>) normal distribution parameter <span class="html-italic">σ</span><sup>2</sup>; (<b>c</b>) Weibull distribution shape parameter <span class="html-italic">m</span>; (<b>d</b>) Weibull scale parameter <span class="html-italic">η</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The curves of the cumulative probability function (<span class="html-italic">F</span>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>)) for two neutron fluences: (<b>a</b>) 2.46 × 10<sup>19</sup> n·cm<sup>−2</sup>; (<b>b</b>) 4.75 × 10<sup>19</sup> n·cm<sup>−2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>RMSE results of the two distribution models after prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Cumulative probability function (<span class="html-italic">F</span>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>)) for different neutron fluences: (<b>a</b>) 1.75 × 10<sup>19</sup> n·cm<sup>−2</sup>; (<b>b</b>) 2.45 × 10<sup>19</sup> n·cm<sup>−2</sup>; (<b>c</b>) 3.52 × 10<sup>19</sup> n·cm<sup>−2</sup>; (<b>d</b>) 4.61 × 10<sup>19</sup> n·cm<sup>−2</sup>; (<b>e</b>) 5.14 × 10<sup>19</sup> n·cm<sup>−2</sup>; (<b>f</b>) 6.93 × 10<sup>19</sup> n·cm<sup>−2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison between the Gamma process and the Weibull distribution models’ predictions: (<b>a</b>) 5%; (<b>b</b>) 50%; (<b>c</b>) 95%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of values of ∆RT<sub>NDT</sub> predicted by the Weibull distribution model, Gamma process model, and empirical procedures.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 534 KiB  
Article
A New Modification of the Weibull Distribution: Model, Theory, and Analyzing Engineering Data Sets
by Huda M. Alshanbari, Zubair Ahmad, Abd Al-Aziz Hosni El-Bagoury, Omalsad Hamood Odhah and Gadde Srinivasa Rao
Symmetry 2024, 16(5), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050611 - 15 May 2024
Viewed by 632
Abstract
Symmetrical as well as asymmetrical statistical models play a prominent role in describing and predicting the real-world phenomena of nature. Among other fields, these models are very useful for modeling data in the sector of civil engineering. Due to the applicability of the [...] Read more.
Symmetrical as well as asymmetrical statistical models play a prominent role in describing and predicting the real-world phenomena of nature. Among other fields, these models are very useful for modeling data in the sector of civil engineering. Due to the applicability of the statistical models in civil engineering and other related sectors, this paper offers a statistical methodology to improve the distributional flexibility of traditional models. The suggested method/approach is called the extended-X family of distributions. The proposed method has the ability to generate symmetrical and asymmetrical probability distributions. Based on the extended-X family approach, an updated version of the Weibull model, namely, the extended Weibull model, is studied. The proposed model is very flexible and has the ability to capture the symmetrical and asymmetrical shapes of its density function. For the extended-X method, the estimation of parameters, a simulation study, and some mathematical properties are derived. Finally, the practical illustration/usefulness of the suggested model is shown by analyzing two data sets taken from the field of engineering. Both data sets represent the fracture toughness of alumina (Al2O3). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Visual display of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"> <mi>x</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ξ</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and different values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>θ</mi> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A visual display of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> <mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"> <mi>x</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ξ</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"> <mi>x</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ξ</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> of the E-Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A visual display of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"> <mi>x</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ξ</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> of the E-Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A visual display of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mfenced separators="" open="(" close=")"> <mi>x</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ξ</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> of the E-Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A visual display of the simulation results of the E-Weibull distribution for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A visual display of the simulation results of the E-Weibull distribution for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The histogram, TTT-transform, box plot, and violin plot using Data 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The histogram, TTT-transform, box plot, and violin plot using Data 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>In relation to Data 1, the Fitted PDF, DF, SF, QQ, and PP plots of the E-Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>In relation to Data 2, the Fitted PDF, DF, SF, QQ, and PP plots of the E-Weibull distribution.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3802 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Feasibility of the Prediction of the Surface Morphologiesof AWJ-Milled Pockets by Statistical Methods Based on Multiple Roughness Indicators
by Nikolaos E. Karkalos, Muthuramalingam Thangaraj and Panagiotis Karmiris-Obratański
Surfaces 2024, 7(2), 340-357; https://doi.org/10.3390/surfaces7020021 - 10 May 2024
Viewed by 837
Abstract
Improvement of the surface quality of machined parts is essential in order to avoid excessive and costly post-processing. Although non-conventional processes can efficiently carry out the machining of difficult-to-cut materials with high productivity, they may also, for various reasons, be related to increased [...] Read more.
Improvement of the surface quality of machined parts is essential in order to avoid excessive and costly post-processing. Although non-conventional processes can efficiently carry out the machining of difficult-to-cut materials with high productivity, they may also, for various reasons, be related to increased surface roughness. In order to optimize the surface quality of generated surfaces in a reliable way, surface profiles obtained during these processes must be adequately modeled. However, given that most studies have focused on Ra or Rz indicators or are based on the assumption of a normal distribution for the profile heights, relevant models cannot accurately represent the surface characteristics that exist in a real machined surface with a high degree of accuracy. Thus, in the present study, a new modeling approach based on the use of a statistical probability distribution for the surface profile height is proposed. After six different distributions were evaluated on the basis of a three-stage procedure involving different roughness indicators pertaining to the abrasive waterjet (AWJ) milling of pockets, it was found that, although it is not possible to model the nominal values of every roughness parameter simultaneously, in several cases, it is possible to approximate the values of critical indicators such as Ra, Rz, Rsk, Rku and Rp/Rv ratio by Weibull distribution with a sufficient degree of accuracy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Outline of the present work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Indicative surface roughness profile with normal height distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Height distribution of the indicative surface roughness profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Indicative surface roughness profile with the Weibull height distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Height distribution of the indicative surface profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the experimental and predicted (Rsk, Rku) pairs on the topological map.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 5366 KiB  
Article
A Statistical Evaluation Method Based on Fuzzy Failure Data for Multi-State Equipment Reliability
by Jingjing Xu, Qiaobin Yan, Yanhu Pei, Zhifeng Liu, Qiang Cheng, Hongyan Chu and Tao Zhang
Mathematics 2024, 12(9), 1414; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12091414 - 6 May 2024
Viewed by 673
Abstract
For complex equipment, it is easy to over-evaluate the impact of failure on production by estimating the reliability level only through failure probability. To remedy this problem, this paper proposes a statistical evaluation method based on fuzzy failure data considering the multi-state characteristics [...] Read more.
For complex equipment, it is easy to over-evaluate the impact of failure on production by estimating the reliability level only through failure probability. To remedy this problem, this paper proposes a statistical evaluation method based on fuzzy failure data considering the multi-state characteristics of equipment failures. In this method, the new reliability-evaluation scheme is firstly presented based on the traditional statistical analysis method using the Weibull distribution function. For this scheme, the failure-grade index is defined, and a fuzzy-evaluation method is also proposed by comprehensively considering failure severity, failure maintenance, time, and cost; this is then combined with the time between failures to characterize the failure state. Based on the fuzzy failure data, an improved adaptive-failure small-sample-expansion method is proposed based on the classical bootstrap method and the deviation judgment between distributions of the original and newborn samples. Finally, a novel reliability-evaluation model, related to the failure grade and its membership degree, is established to quantify the reliability level of equipment more realistically. Example cases for three methods of the scheme (the failure-grade fuzzy-evaluation method, the sample-expansion method, and the reliability-evaluation modeling method) are presented, respectively, to validate the effectiveness and significance of the proposed reliability-evaluation technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Applications in Industrial Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Traditional equipment-reliability modeling procedure based on distribution functions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>New scheme for the equipment-reliability evaluation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Plot of Failure-grade index and coefficients of factors for machine tool.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Partial plot of failure-grade index and coefficients of factors for machine-tool cooling system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Interval distribution analysis of the failure-grade index. (<b>a</b>) For the machine tool (13 faults). (<b>b</b>) For the machine-tool cooling system (67 faults).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Failure distribution curves of the original data and the newborn data for two systems. (<b>a</b>) For the machine tool. (<b>b</b>) For the machine-tool cooling system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Failure frequency comparisons of the original data and the newborn data of failure-grade index for two systems. (<b>a</b>) For the machine tool. (<b>b</b>) For the machine-tool cooling system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Handling method for small-sample cases after expansion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of reliability curves based on the traditional and novel evaluation methods (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>250</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of reliability curves based on different values of expansion capacity (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>100</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>150</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>200</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>250</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of reliability curves based on different values of failure-grade index when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>250</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Generation way of failure samples with capacity of 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of reliability curves based on different failure samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of reliability curves based on different values of the failure-grade index for sample 1.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3725 KiB  
Article
Study of Rock Damage Constitutive Model Considering Temperature Effect Based on Weibull Distribution
by Tianci Lu, Hao Wu, Shuiming Yin and Xiaoli Xu
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 3766; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093766 - 28 Apr 2024
Viewed by 472
Abstract
The deformation and damage process of rocks is accompanied by crack extension and penetration. The rock strength criterion, as a macroscopic characterization of the rock strength microelement, is the basis for establishing the damage constitutive modeling of rock. Aiming at the problem of [...] Read more.
The deformation and damage process of rocks is accompanied by crack extension and penetration. The rock strength criterion, as a macroscopic characterization of the rock strength microelement, is the basis for establishing the damage constitutive modeling of rock. Aiming at the problem of the Hoek–Brown (H–B) strength criterion having a large strength prediction value under high confining pressure, the H–B strength criterion is corrected by considering the influence of the initial cracks on the development of the rock strength, and its applicability is verified. Based on the damage theory, assuming that the rock strength microelement obeys the Weibull distribution and considering the influence of residual strength, the damage correction coefficient is introduced, and a thermal damage statistical constitutive model that can reflect the whole process of the development of initial cracks inside the rock is established. The degree of penetration up to the damage is established, and the method of determining the parameters of the model is given. The theoretical curves of the established model are compared and analyzed with the curves of a conventional triaxial compression test of rock samples, and the study shows that the statistical constitutive model of the thermal damage of rock, established based on the modified H–B strength criterion, can better simulate the stress–strain relationship of rock under a conventional triaxial test. It also verifies the reasonableness and applicability of the model, which is expected to provide a basis for the exploitation of deep resources and the safety assessment of underground engineering. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Examples of underground engineering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relationship between strength criterion and test strength.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Theoretical and experimental curves under different confining pressures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between residual strength and confining pressure of granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Damage evolution of granite under different confining pressures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relationship between distribution parameters and confining pressures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Relationship between distribution parameters and confining pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Fitting curves for the modified H–B strength criterion at different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Fitting curves for the modified H–B strength criterion at different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Stress–strain curve of granite at high temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Stress–strain curve of granite at high temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Relationship between distribution parameters and temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Damage evolution of granite at different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop