[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = WaterNetGen

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
4 pages, 3058 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
A Hybrid Modelling for Both Pressure-Dependent and Volume-Based Demand in Pressure-Driven Analysis
by João Muranho, Joaquim Sousa, Ana Ferreira, Alfeu Sá-Marques and Abel Gomes
Eng. Proc. 2024, 69(1), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069126 - 12 Sep 2024
Viewed by 61
Abstract
Water distribution network (WDN) simulation models are usually classified as demand-driven or pressure-driven, depending on whether the demands are independent of or dependent on network pressures, respectively. In real-world networks, both types of demands coexist in the same building. This paper presents a [...] Read more.
Water distribution network (WDN) simulation models are usually classified as demand-driven or pressure-driven, depending on whether the demands are independent of or dependent on network pressures, respectively. In real-world networks, both types of demands coexist in the same building. This paper presents a hybrid modelling approach that combines volume-based and pressure-dependent demands in the same model, allowing for different pressure–demand relationships. This hybrid modelling approach is intended to produce more realistic results when modelling WDNs, and it was implemented in WaterNetGen, an EPANET extension. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Synthetic network with 500 junctions, 2 reservoirs and 624 pipes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Network map with negative pressures due to a pipe repair (pipe <span class="html-italic">P468</span>)—DDA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Network map illustrating the demand distribution due to insufficient pressure-PDA. Dark blue nodes have zero demand satisfied.</p>
Full article ">
7 pages, 2448 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Optimal Water Quality Simulation of the Proposed Water Distribution System for the University of Kashmir Using EPANET 2.2 and Leakage Modelling of the Network Using EPANET Extension—WaterNetGen
by Mominah Ajaz and Danish Ahmad
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 25(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-7-14251 - 16 Mar 2023
Viewed by 1319
Abstract
Water quality is the most important parameter of portable water. Therefore, water quality simulation is of the utmost importance, along with carrying out the hydraulic analysis of a water distribution network. In the current study, it has been attempted to carry out the [...] Read more.
Water quality is the most important parameter of portable water. Therefore, water quality simulation is of the utmost importance, along with carrying out the hydraulic analysis of a water distribution network. In the current study, it has been attempted to carry out the water quality simulation of the proposed distribution network for the University of Kashmir using EPANET 2.2 software. The study also aims to obtain the optimal performance of the designed network in terms of water quality parameters. Furthermore, the leakage modelling for the network has been carried out using the EPANET extension—WaterNetGen. It was found that important water quality parameters, like residual chlorine at nodes and water age, were within the standard ranges throughout the simulation period. The minimum concentration of chlorine up to the 11th hour of the simulation was 0.2 mg/L, and the maximum age of water in the storage tank was 12.5 h throughout the simulation period. The total leakage discharge obtained was negligible, equal to 0.1% and 0.15% of the design discharge for WDS part I and part II, respectively. The objective function of maximum efficiency of performance, with respect to water quality of the proposed network, was achieved. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 7th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<bold>a</bold>) Contour plot of chlorine concentration at nodes at 9:00 am for WDS part I; (<bold>b</bold>) contour plot of chlorine concentration at nodes at 9:00 am for WDS part II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<bold>a</bold>) Time series plot of chlorine (mg/L) at the storage tank and peak demand nodes for WDS I; (<bold>b</bold>) time series plot of chlorine (mg/L) at the storage tank and peak demand nodes for WDS II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>(<bold>a</bold>) Time series plot of chlorine (mg/L) at the storage tank and peak demand nodes for WDS I; (<bold>b</bold>) time series plot of chlorine (mg/L) at the storage tank and peak demand nodes for WDS II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<bold>a</bold>) Pie chart for chlorine decay, WDS part I; (<bold>b</bold>) pie chart for chlorine decay, WDS part II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<bold>a</bold>) Age of water in the storage tank, WDS part I; (<bold>b</bold>) age of water in the storage tank, WDS part II.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3257 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Atmospheric Correction Algorithms Applied to OLCI Sentinel-3 Data of Chesapeake Bay Waters
by Anna E. Windle, Hayley Evers-King, Benjamin R. Loveday, Michael Ondrusek and Greg M. Silsbe
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(8), 1881; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14081881 - 14 Apr 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 3551
Abstract
Satellite remote sensing permits large-scale monitoring of coastal waters through synoptic measurements of water-leaving radiance that can be scaled to relevant water quality metrics and in turn help inform local and regional responses to a variety of stressors. As both the incident and [...] Read more.
Satellite remote sensing permits large-scale monitoring of coastal waters through synoptic measurements of water-leaving radiance that can be scaled to relevant water quality metrics and in turn help inform local and regional responses to a variety of stressors. As both the incident and water-leaving radiance are affected by interactions with the intervening atmosphere, the efficacy of atmospheric correction algorithms is essential to derive accurate water-leaving radiometry. Modern ocean color satellite sensors such as the Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) onboard the Copernicus Sentinel-3A and -3B satellites are providing unprecedented operational data at the higher spatial, spectral, and temporal resolution that is necessary to resolve optically complex coastal water quality. Validating these satellite-based radiance measurements with vicarious in situ radiometry, especially in optically complex coastal waters, is a critical step in not only evaluating atmospheric correction algorithm performance but ultimately providing accurate water quality metrics for stakeholders. In this study, a regional in situ dataset from the Chesapeake Bay was used to evaluate the performance of four atmospheric correction algorithms applied to OLCI Level-1 data. Images of the Chesapeake Bay are processed through a neural-net based algorithm (C2RCC), a spectral optimization-based algorithm (POLYMER), an iterative two-band bio-optical-based algorithm (L2gen), and compared to the standard Level-2 OLCI data (BAC). Performance was evaluated through a matchup analysis to in situ remote sensing reflectance data. Statistical metrics demonstrated that C2RCC had the best performance, particularly in the longer wavelengths (>560 nm) and POLYMER contained the most clear day coverage (fewest flagged data). This study provides a framework with associated uncertainties and recommendations to utilize OLCI ocean color data to monitor the water quality and biogeochemical dynamics in Chesapeake Bay. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Study region of Chesapeake Bay, United States depicting R<sub>rs</sub> at 865 nm (NIR wavelength) captured on 23 March 2019 processed by the C2RCC atmospheric correction algorithm. In situ observation locations as collected by hyperspectral TriOS (circles) and HyperPro (triangles) radiometers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Processing and flagging workflow of four different atmospheric correction processors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>In situ R<sub>rs</sub> spectra collected with above-water hyperspectral TriOS radiometers (blue) and free-falling HyperPro radiometers (red) at 172 stations in the Upper and Middle Chesapeake Bay and Choptank River tributary between April 2016 and April 2020. The bold spectra represent the median R<sub>rs</sub> spectra for each in situ collection method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Median satellite-derived R<sub>rs</sub> processed by each atmospheric correction algorithm and in situ R<sub>rs</sub> spectra (black) across all matchups. Error bars represent standard error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plots of in situ R<sub>rs</sub> vs. satellite-derived R<sub>rs</sub> for OLCI wavelengths ranging from 400 to 779 nm. The black line represents the 1:1 line and colored lines are linear regression fits for each atmospheric correction processor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Taylor diagrams of atmospherically corrected R<sub>rs</sub> in comparison to in situ R<sub>rs</sub>. Each panel shows separately the results for nine OLCI wavelengths ranging from 443 to 754 nm. Standard deviation is illustrated as the radial distance from the origin, correlation coefficients are shown on the arc of the coordinate plot with points closest to the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis containing the highest correlation, and RMSE is indicated by the concentric dashed lines emanating from the origin where points farthest from the observed value have high RMSE error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Number of clear (unflagged) pixels summed for 2020 for each atmospheric correction algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Seasonal climatologies of R<sub>rs</sub> at 665 nm for the year 2020 derived by each atmospheric correction algorithm.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 940 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Leakage Calibration in Water Distribution Networks with Pressure-Driven Analysis: A Real Case Study
by Joaquim Sousa, Nuno Martinho, João Muranho and Alfeu Sá Marques
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2020, 2(1), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002059 - 6 Sep 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1615
Abstract
Leakage in water distribution networks (WDN) is still a major concern for water companies. In recent years, the scientific community has dedicated some effort to the leakage calibration issue to obtain accurate models. But leakage modelling implies the use of a pressure-driven approach [...] Read more.
Leakage in water distribution networks (WDN) is still a major concern for water companies. In recent years, the scientific community has dedicated some effort to the leakage calibration issue to obtain accurate models. But leakage modelling implies the use of a pressure-driven approach as well as specific data to define the pressure/leakage relationship. This paper presents the calibration process of a real case study WDN model. The process started with pressure step tests, the model was built in WaterNetGen and the leakage calibration process was performed by a simulated annealing algorithm. As illustrated, after calibration the model was able to produce accurate results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>District Metered Area (DMA) Loureira water distribution networks (WDN) with the pressure reduction valve (PRV) and the pressure monitoring points (P3, P4 and P5).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pressure/leakage relationship for DMA Loureira.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Demand pattern for DMA Loureira.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flow and pressure measurements for DMA Loureira.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>WDN model for DMA Loureira.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Calibration reports (flow and pressure) for DMA Loureira.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Probable leaky pipes in DMA Loureira.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 804 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Pressure-Driven Simulation of Water Distribution Networks: Searching for Numerical Stability
by João Muranho, Ana Ferreira, Joaquim Sousa, Abel Gomes and Alfeu Sá Marques
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2020, 2(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002048 - 4 Sep 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2154
Abstract
EPANET uses a demand-driven approach to compute pressures and flows in the water distribution system. The demand-driven approach (DDA) assumes that the required demand is always fully satisfied no matter the existing pressure. In scenarios of pressure-deficient conditions the DDA results are not [...] Read more.
EPANET uses a demand-driven approach to compute pressures and flows in the water distribution system. The demand-driven approach (DDA) assumes that the required demand is always fully satisfied no matter the existing pressure. In scenarios of pressure-deficient conditions the DDA results are not accurate, and a pressure-driven approach (PDA) is needed. Frequently, the PDA is accomplished by using equations that compute the available demand/leakage as a function of the current pressure. However, embedding such equations into the solver introduces convergence problems. This paper details the actions taken in WaterNetGen—an EPANET extension—to bring numerical stability to the pressure-driven solver, namely, by smoothing the pressure–demand/leakage relationship and the pump curve. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Iterative computation of heads and flows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Wolf–Cordera Ranch network [<a href="#B5-environsciproc-02-00048" class="html-bibr">5</a>] and its sparse matrix.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Demand satisfaction ratio curves for different exponent (<span class="html-italic">α</span>) values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Smoothing the demand satisfaction ratio curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Demand satisfaction ratio curve derivatives: original (yellow) and smoothed (red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The C-Town network has one reservoir, seven tanks, eleven pumps, one control valve, one check valve, 432 pipes and 388 junctions.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 986 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
The New Set Up of Local Performance Indices into WaterNetGen and Application to Santarém’s Network
by Marco Amos Bonora, Fabio Caldarola, Mario Maiolo, Joao Muranho and Joaquim Sousa
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2020, 2(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002018 - 13 Aug 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1316
Abstract
A new set of local performance indices has recently been introduced within a mathematical framework specifically designed to promote a local–global analysis of water networks. Successively, some local indices were also set up and implemented on WaterNetGen to better exploit their potential. In [...] Read more.
A new set of local performance indices has recently been introduced within a mathematical framework specifically designed to promote a local–global analysis of water networks. Successively, some local indices were also set up and implemented on WaterNetGen to better exploit their potential. In this paper, after a very brief overview of tools and main notations, Santarém’s (Portugal) water distribution network (WDN) is examined, applying to it the mentioned set of local indices, as a new real case study. The paper also focuses on the Hypotesis required to assess these indices in a pressure driven analysis (PDA) approach, analyzing and discussing the results obtained from such a simulation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Part of the water distribution network (WDN) supplying the old town and the DMAs supplied by this network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>DMA demand along the 24 h period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The DMAs and old town consumption along the 24 h period (both DDA and PDA results).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Resilience indices of Todini [<a href="#B8-environsciproc-02-00018" class="html-bibr">8</a>] and Di Nardo et al. [<a href="#B9-environsciproc-02-00018" class="html-bibr">9</a>] along the 24 h of simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Graphical views of local surplus indices. PDA analysis, comparison of the results obtained along the peak condition. (<b>a</b>) Local pressure head surplus index, at 10:00. (<b>b</b>) Local pressure head surplus index, at 12:00. (<b>c</b>) Local discharge surplus index, at 10:00. (<b>d</b>) Local discharge surplus index, at 12:00.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3797 KiB  
Article
A New Set of Local Indices Applied to a Water Network through Demand and Pressure Driven Analysis (DDA and PDA)
by Marco Amos Bonora, Fabio Caldarola and Mario Maiolo
Water 2020, 12(8), 2210; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082210 - 6 Aug 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2376
Abstract
In the analysis of drinking Water Distribution Networks (WDNs), performance indices are widely used tools for obtaining synthetic information about the WDN operating regime (pressures and flows). This paper presents applications of a series of local surplus indices that act in a new [...] Read more.
In the analysis of drinking Water Distribution Networks (WDNs), performance indices are widely used tools for obtaining synthetic information about the WDN operating regime (pressures and flows). This paper presents applications of a series of local surplus indices that act in a new mathematical framework. This framework allows reworking many well-known performance and energetic indices and simultaneously allowing analysis of specific aspects of the WDN. The analyses are carried out using different resolutive hydraulic approaches: the Demand-Driven Analysis (DDA) and the Pressure-Driven Analysis (PDA), typical of software such as EPANET and WaterNetGen. The authors analyse the hypotheses necessary for the application of these models, and how these influence the results of both the hydraulic modeling and the resilience indices assessment. In particular, two resilience indices are reformulated through the new local surplus indices and all of them are then simulated in different conditions for a water network known in literature as the Kang and Lansey WDN. The solving model assumption effects are deepen, reporting graphical and numerical results for different consumption scenarios and the different hydraulic approaches used. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management, Policy and Governance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A scheme of the KL network. The WDN is supplied by the reservoir located at the top left. The color scale shows the relative elevation. Main pipes are represented by thicker lines. (<b>a</b>) Plan view. (<b>b</b>) 3d view, with a vertical scale that has a 50 magnifying factor, to better show the elevation variability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>WDN hydraulic simulation result. Pressure regime with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.75</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Resilience indices as a function of the peak coefficient <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>. The indices were calculated for the peak coefficients listed in <a href="#water-12-02210-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>, and then the lines are obtained by an interpolation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Graphs containing the local pressure head surplus index, for the peak coefficient <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.75</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) DDA simulation result. (<b>b</b>) PDA simulation result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of the graphs containing the local discharge surplus index obtained by PDA simulation for different peak coefficients. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.75</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Graphs containing the local pressure head surplus index, for peak coefficient <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) DDA simulation result. (<b>b</b>) PDA simulation result. For a peak coefficient equal to 2, the only node in pressure deficit is the number 1038.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Graphs containing the local pressure head surplus index, for a peak coefficient <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.25</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) DDA simulation result. (<b>b</b>) PDA simulation result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of the graphs containing the local discharge surplus index obtained by PDA simulation for different peak coefficients. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.25</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Graphs containing the local pressure head surplus index, for a peak coefficient <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) DDA simulation result. (<b>b</b>) PDA simulation result.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop