[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = VoWiFi

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 2813 KiB  
Article
Adaptive QoS-Aware Multi-Metrics Gateway Selection Scheme for Heterogenous Vehicular Network
by Mahmoud Alawi, Raed Alsaqour, Maha Abdelhaq, Reem Alkanhel, Baraa Sharef, Elankovan Sundararajan and Mahamod Ismail
Systems 2022, 10(5), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050142 - 7 Sep 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1824
Abstract
A heterogeneous vehicular network (HetVNET) is a promising network architecture that combines multiple network technologies such as IEEE 802.11p, dedicated short-range communication (DSRC), and third/fourth generation cellular networks (3G/4G). In this network area, vehicle users can use wireless fidelity access points (Wi-Fi APs) [...] Read more.
A heterogeneous vehicular network (HetVNET) is a promising network architecture that combines multiple network technologies such as IEEE 802.11p, dedicated short-range communication (DSRC), and third/fourth generation cellular networks (3G/4G). In this network area, vehicle users can use wireless fidelity access points (Wi-Fi APs) to offload 4G long-term evolution (4G-LTE) networks. However, when using Wi-Fi APs, the vehicles must organize themselves and select an appropriate mobile gateway (MGW) to communicate to the cellular infrastructure. Researchers are facing the problem of selecting the best MGW vehicle to aggregate vehicle traffic and reduce LTE load in HetVNETs when the Wi-Fi APs are unavailable for offloading. The selection process utilizes extra network overhead and complexity due to the frequent formation of clusters in this highly dynamic environment. In this study, we proposed a non-cluster adaptive QoS-aware gateway selection (AQAGS) scheme that autonomously picks a limited number of vehicles to act as LTE gateways based on the LTE network’s load status and vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) application’s QoS requirements. The present AQAGS scheme focuses on highway scenarios. The proposed scheme was evaluated using simulation of Urban mobility (SUMO) and network simulator version 2 (NS2) simulators and benchmarked with the clustered and non-clustered schemes. A comparison was made based on the end-to-end delay, throughput, control packet overhead (CPO), and packet delivery ratio (PDR) performance metrics over Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) and File Transfer Protocol (FTP) applications. Using VoIP, the AQAGS scheme achieved a 26.7% higher PDR compared with the other schemes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Systems Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The system model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The AQAGS scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An overloaded gateway vehicle condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distance between the IV and NV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The link lifetime computation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Evaluation of fixed vehicle applications (FTP vs. VoIP) vs. the number of vehicles: (<b>a</b>) the number of vehicles vs. the PDR; (<b>b</b>) the number of vehicles vs. the throughput.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Evaluation of fixed vehicle applications (FTP vs. VoIP) vs. the number of vehicles: (<b>a</b>) the number of vehicles vs. average delay; (<b>b</b>) the number of vehicles vs. the CPO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Evaluation of mixed application types (FTP vs. VoIP) vs. the number of vehicles: (<b>a</b>) the number of vehicles vs. the PDR; (<b>b</b>) the number of vehicles vs. the throughput.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Evaluation of mixed application types (FTP vs. VoIP) vs. the number of vehicles: (<b>a</b>) the number of vehicles vs. the average delay; (<b>b</b>) the number of vehicles vs. the CPO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Evaluation of mixed application types (FTP vs. VoIP) vs. vehicle speed: (<b>a</b>) The vehicle speed vs. the PDR; (<b>b</b>) the vehicle speed vs. the throughput.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Evaluation of mixed application types (FTP vs. VoIP) vs. vehicle speed: (<b>a</b>) the vehicle speed vs. the average delay; (<b>b</b>) the vehicle speed vs. the CPO.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 1681 KiB  
Article
Estimating PQoS of Video Streaming on Wi-Fi Networks Using Machine Learning
by Maghsoud Morshedi and Josef Noll
Sensors 2021, 21(2), 621; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020621 - 17 Jan 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3079
Abstract
Video on demand (VoD) services such as YouTube have generated considerable volumes of Internet traffic in homes and buildings in recent years. While Internet service providers deploy fiber and recent wireless technologies such as 802.11ax to support high bandwidth requirement, the best-effort nature [...] Read more.
Video on demand (VoD) services such as YouTube have generated considerable volumes of Internet traffic in homes and buildings in recent years. While Internet service providers deploy fiber and recent wireless technologies such as 802.11ax to support high bandwidth requirement, the best-effort nature of 802.11 networks and variable wireless medium conditions hinder users from experiencing maximum quality during video streaming. Hence, Internet service providers (ISPs) have an interest in monitoring the perceived quality of service (PQoS) in customer premises in order to avoid customer dissatisfaction and churn. Since existing approaches for estimating PQoS or quality of experience (QoE) requires external measurement of generic network performance parameters, this paper presents a novel approach to estimate the PQoS of video streaming using only 802.11 specific network performance parameters collected from wireless access points. This study produced datasets comprising 802.11n/ac/ax specific network performance parameters labelled with PQoS in the form of mean opinion scores (MOS) to train machine learning algorithms. As a result, we achieved as many as 93–99% classification accuracy in estimating PQoS by monitoring only 802.11 parameters on off-the-shelf Wi-Fi access points. Furthermore, the 802.11 parameters used in the machine learning model were analyzed to identify the cause of quality degradation detected on the Wi-Fi networks. Finally, ISPs can utilize the results of this study to provide predictable and measurable wireless quality by implementing non-intrusive monitoring of customers’ perceived quality. In addition, this approach reduces customers’ privacy concerns while reducing the operational cost of analytics for ISPs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The experiment setup (<b>a</b>) when all clients were close to Wi-Fi AP and (<b>b</b>) when clients were placed in different rooms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The timeline for streaming a YouTube video for each client during the experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Percentage (%) of correctly classified labels by each of seven ML algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CPU time in milliseconds required for the testing phase of 30% of datasets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Output model for Logistic Model Tree (LMT) trained with 5ax dataset and logistic function for calculation of class 1 in LM1 as an example of logistic functions produced by the model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Number of received MPDU that used STBC in order to increase reliability.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 993 KiB  
Article
Energy-Efficient UAVs Deployment for QoS-Guaranteed VoWiFi Service
by Vicente Mayor, Rafael Estepa, Antonio Estepa and Germán Madinabeitia
Sensors 2020, 20(16), 4455; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164455 - 10 Aug 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3408
Abstract
This paper formulates a new problem for the optimal placement of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) geared towards wireless coverage provision for Voice over WiFi (VoWiFi) service to a set of ground users confined in an open area. Our objective function is constrained by [...] Read more.
This paper formulates a new problem for the optimal placement of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) geared towards wireless coverage provision for Voice over WiFi (VoWiFi) service to a set of ground users confined in an open area. Our objective function is constrained by coverage and by VoIP speech quality and minimizes the ratio between the number of UAVs deployed and energy efficiency in UAVs, hence providing the layout that requires fewer UAVs per hour of service. Solutions provide the number and position of UAVs to be deployed, and are found using well-known heuristic search methods such as genetic algorithms (used for the initial deployment of UAVs), or particle swarm optimization (used for the periodical update of the positions). We examine two communication services: (a) one bidirectional VoWiFi channel per user; (b) single broadcast VoWiFi channel for announcements. For these services, we study the results obtained for an increasing number of users confined in a small area of 100 m2 as well as in a large area of 10,000 m2. Results show that the drone turnover rate is related to both users’ sparsity and the number of users served by each UAV. For the unicast service, the ratio of UAVs per hour of service tends to increase with user sparsity and the power of radio communication represents 14–16% of the total UAV energy consumption depending on ground user density. In large areas, solutions tend to locate UAVs at higher altitudes seeking increased coverage, which increases energy consumption due to hovering. However, in the VoWiFi broadcast communication service, the traffic is scarce, and solutions are mostly constrained only by coverage. This results in fewer UAVs deployed, less total power consumption (between 20% and 75%), and less sensitivity to the number of served users. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>UAV-based VoWiFi network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Communication system for each drone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>UAVs placement scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example solution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Dynamic scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Resolution time (<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>solve</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Results for the individual VoIP channels experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Results for the broadcast VoIP channels experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison against other approaches.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>2D regions for initial population creation (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop