[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = NSTF

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 4873 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Impervious Surface Expansion in the Qinhuai River Basin, China, 1988–2017
by Shanshan Wang, Yingxia Pu, Shengfeng Li, Runjie Li and Maohua Li
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(22), 4494; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224494 - 9 Nov 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1986
Abstract
Impervious surfaces are key indicators for urbanization monitoring and watershed degradation assessment over space and time. However, most empirical studies only extracted impervious surface from spatial, temporal or spectral perspectives, paying less attention to integrating multiple dimensions in acquiring continuous changes in impervious [...] Read more.
Impervious surfaces are key indicators for urbanization monitoring and watershed degradation assessment over space and time. However, most empirical studies only extracted impervious surface from spatial, temporal or spectral perspectives, paying less attention to integrating multiple dimensions in acquiring continuous changes in impervious surfaces. In this study, we proposed a neighborhood-based spatio-temporal filter (NSTF) to obtain the continuous change information of impervious surfaces from multi-temporal Landsat images in the Qinhuai River Basin (QRB), Jiangsu, China from 1988–2017, based on the results from semi-automatic decision tree classification. Moreover, we used the expansion intensity index (EII) and the landscape extension index (LEI) to further characterize the spatio-temporal characteristics of impervious surfaces on different spatial scales. The preliminary results showed that the overall accuracies of the final classification were about 95%, with the kappa coefficients ranging between 0.9 and 0.96. The QRB underwent rapid urbanization with the percentage of the impervious surfaces increasing from 2.72% in 1988 to 25.6% in 2017. Since 2006, the center of urbanization expansion was shaped from the urban built-up areas of Nanjing and Jiangning to non-urban built-up areas of the Jiangning, Lishui, and Jurong districts. The edge expansion occupied 73% on average among the different landscape expansion types, greatly beyond outlying (12%) and infilling (15%). The window size in the NSTF has a direct impact on the subsequent analysis. Our research could provide decision-making references for future urban planning and development in the similar basins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Geospatial Data Analysis for Change Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area with elevation, water system, and administrative divisions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The flow chart of the semi-automatic decision tree classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of a spatial filtering: (<b>a</b>) Value of feature <span class="html-italic">f</span>, 1 is a pervious surface class and 3 is an impervious surface class; (<b>b</b>) indicator variable; (<b>c</b>) local spatial autocorrelation statistic; (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) logical operation; (<b>f</b>) XOR operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of temporal filtering. (<b>a</b>) Temporal filtering for pixels in the middle of the study period; (<b>b</b>) temporal filtering for pixels at the beginning or end of the study period. In both cases, 1 stands for a pervious surface class, while 3 stands for an impervious surface class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of spectral filtering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Impervious surface expansion in the QRB within different years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distribution of impervious surfaces with three landscape expansion types in the QRB during different periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes in three landscape expansion types of impervious surface areas between 1988–2006 and 2006–2017 in the urban and non-urban built-up areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Accuracy assessment of each year’s results from initial classification, spatio-temporal refinement method and the NSTF: (<b>a</b>) overall accuracy, (<b>b</b>) kappa, (<b>c</b>) omission error, and (<b>d</b>) commission error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Impervious surfaces in the urban built-up area of Nanjing and three districts (1988–2017): (<b>a</b>) area, (<b>b</b>) coverage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Impervious surface growth within road buffers.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 9971 KiB  
Article
Gap-Filling of MODIS Fractional Snow Cover Products via Non-Local Spatio-Temporal Filtering Based on Machine Learning Techniques
by Jinliang Hou, Chunlin Huang, Ying Zhang, Jifu Guo and Juan Gu
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(1), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11010090 - 7 Jan 2019
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 5347
Abstract
Cloud obscuration leaves significant gaps in MODIS snow cover products. In this study, an innovative gap-filling method based on the concept of non-local spatio-temporal filtering (NSTF) is proposed to reconstruct the cloud gaps in MODIS fractional snow cover (SCF) products. The ground information [...] Read more.
Cloud obscuration leaves significant gaps in MODIS snow cover products. In this study, an innovative gap-filling method based on the concept of non-local spatio-temporal filtering (NSTF) is proposed to reconstruct the cloud gaps in MODIS fractional snow cover (SCF) products. The ground information of a gap pixel was estimated by using the appropriate similar pixels in the remaining known part of an image via an automatic machine learning technique. We take the MODIS SCF product cloud gap filling data from 2001 to 2016 in Northern Xinjiang, China as an example. The results demonstrate that the methodology can generate almost continuous spatio-temporal, daily MODIS SCF images, and it leaves only 0.52% of cloud gaps long-term, on average. The validation results based on “cloud assumption” exhibit high accuracy, with a higher R 2 exceeding 0.8, a lower RMSE of 0.1, an overestimated error of 1.13%, an underestimated error of 1.4%, and a spatial efficiency (SPAEF) of 0.78. The validation based on 50 in situ snow depth observations demonstrates the superiority of the methodology in terms of accuracy and consistency. The overall accuracy is 93.72%. The average omission and commission error have increased approximately 1.16 and 0.53% compared with the original MODIS SCF products under a clear sky term. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Topographic relief and the location of meteorological observation stations in Northern Xinjiang, Northwest China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Similar pixels in two different scenes: (<b>a</b>) 30 January 2003 and (<b>b</b>) 18 February 2003.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic of the MODIS fractional snow cover (SCF) products gap-filling procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sketch map of the similar pixels. (<b>a</b>) Target image <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>T</mi> </semantics></math>, in which <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>P</mi> </semantics></math> is a cloud pixel, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi>P</mi> <mo>″</mo> </msup> </semantics></math> (gray-marked pixel) is the spatial non-cloud pixel of first order adjacency to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>P</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is a candidate similar pixel of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>P</mi> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) Reference image <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>R</mi> </semantics></math>, in which <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi>P</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </semantics></math> is non-cloud pixel in the same position relative to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>P</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>B</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msup> <mi>P</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> is a <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mo>×</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> non-cloud block (red box) centered at <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi>P</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <msup> <mi>P</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is a candidate similar pixels of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi>P</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cloud cover duration maps of the standard (<b>a</b>) MOD: MOD10A1 and (<b>b</b>) MYD: MYD10A1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Annual average cloud coverage of MODIS Terra SCF product in different elevation zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mean cloud coverage remaining in different elevation zones after the execution of each gap-filling step. (<b>a</b>) 2004 and (<b>b</b>) the average of 16 years. MOD: MOD10A1; MYD: MYD10A1; MOYD: daily combinated MOD and MYD product; ATF: adjacent temporal filtering; NSTF: non-local spatio-temporal filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cloud coverage of the original MODIS SCF images after the execution of each gap-filling step. The results from four days (1 January 2001, 1 January 2005, 1 January 2009, and 1 January 2013) are displayed from top to bottom. The columns, from left to right, represent MOD, MYD, and the three consecutive applications of MOYD, ATF and NSTF, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of cloud cover in each month for Terra MOD10A1 in 2004. The red, green, and blue points represent the cloud coverage of the closest images to P25, P50, and P75, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Gap-filling procedure for January 2004. (<b>a</b>) Selected “cloud-free” true MODIS SCF image. (<b>b1</b>, <b>c1</b>, <b>d1</b>) Extracted mask images with cloud conditions of P25, P50, and P75. (<b>b2</b>, <b>c2</b>, <b>d2</b>) The corresponding artificially cloud-filled images. The third to fifth rows represent the consecutive applications of MOYD, ATF, and NSTF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Performance evaluation results of validation based on “cloud assumption”. (<b>a</b>) Cloud coverage of selected “cloud-free” MODIS Terra SCF images (CT), additional cloud cover introduced by mask images (CA), and artificially cloud-filled images (CM). (<b>b</b>–<b>f</b>) Cloud removal efficiency, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>M</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>O</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>U</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> of MODY, ATF, NSTF, and final images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Spatial pattern validation results for the spatial efficiency (SPAEF) of MODY, adjacent temporal filtering (ATF), non-local spatio-temporal filtering (NSTF), and final images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Validation results based on in situ SD observations in different elevation zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Monthly/annual variation of four validation indices based on different SD threshold values (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>) and SCF threshold value (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>). Validation strategies 1–6 represent threshold value combinations of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Monthly/annual variation of four validation indices for the proposed method and the existing cubic spline temporal interpolation approach (spline).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop