[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (35)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Markov-switching GARCH

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 806 KiB  
Article
Financial and Oil Market’s Co-Movements by a Regime-Switching Copula
by Manel Soury
Econometrics 2024, 12(2), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics12020014 - 24 May 2024
Viewed by 611
Abstract
Over the years, oil prices and financial stock markets have always had a complex relationship. This paper analyzes the interactions and co-movements between the oil market (WTI crude oil) and two major stock markets in Europe and the US (the Euro Stoxx 50 [...] Read more.
Over the years, oil prices and financial stock markets have always had a complex relationship. This paper analyzes the interactions and co-movements between the oil market (WTI crude oil) and two major stock markets in Europe and the US (the Euro Stoxx 50 and the SP500) for the period from 1990 to 2023. For that, I use both the time-varying and the Markov copula models. The latter one represents an extension of the former one, where the constant term of the dynamic dependence parameter is driven by a hidden two-state first-order Markov chain. It is also called the dynamic regime-switching (RS) copula model. To estimate the model, I use the inference function for margins (IFM) method together with Kim’s filter for the Markov switching process. The marginals of the returns are modeled by the GARCH and GAS models. Empirical results show that the RS copula model seems adequate to measure and evaluate the time-varying and non-linear dependence structure. Two persistent regimes of high and low dependency have been detected. There was a jump in the co-movements of both pairs during high regimes associated with instability and crises. In addition, the extreme dependence between crude oil and US/European stock markets is time-varying but also asymmetric, as indicated by the SJC copula. The correlation in the lower tail is higher than that in the upper. Hence, oil and stock returns are more closely joined and tend to co-move more closely together in bullish periods than in bearish periods. Finally, the dependence between WTI crude oil and the SP500 stock index seems to be more affected by exogenous shocks and instability than the oil and European stock markets. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Lower and upper tail dependencies between Eurostoxx50–WTIoil returns. (<b>A</b>) Lower tail by time-varying SJC copula. (<b>B</b>) Lower tail given by regime-switching (RS) SJC copula. (<b>C</b>) Upper tail by the dynamic SJC copula. (<b>D</b>) Upper tail by RS SJC copula.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Lower and upper tail dependencies between SP500–WTIoil returns. (<b>A</b>) Lower tail by the dynamic SJC copula. (<b>B</b>) Lower tail by regime-switching (RS) SJC copula. (<b>C</b>) Upper tail by the dynamic SJC copula. (<b>D</b>) Upper tail by RS SJC copula.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dependence dynamics between SP500–WTIoil returns. (<b>A</b>) Dependence by the dynamic Normal copula. (<b>B</b>) Dependence by the regime-switching (RS) Normal copula. (<b>C</b>) Filtered probabilities in the low regime. (<b>D</b>) Filtered probabilities for the high regime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dependence dynamics between Eurostoxx50–WTIoil returns. (<b>A</b>) Dependence by the dynamic Normal copula. (<b>B</b>) Dependence by the regime-switching (RS) Normal copula. (<b>C</b>) Filtered probabilities in the low regime. (<b>D</b>) Filtered probabilities for the high regime.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 323 KiB  
Article
Number of Volatility Regimes in the Muscat Securities Market Index in Oman Using Markov-Switching GARCH Models
by Brahim Benaid, Iman Al Hasani and Mhamed Eddahbi
Symmetry 2024, 16(5), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050569 - 6 May 2024
Viewed by 740
Abstract
The predominant approach for studying volatility is through various GARCH specifications, which are widely utilized in model-based analyses. This study focuses on assessing the predictive performance of specific GARCH models, particularly the Markov-Switching GARCH (MS-GARCH). The primary objective is to determine the optimal [...] Read more.
The predominant approach for studying volatility is through various GARCH specifications, which are widely utilized in model-based analyses. This study focuses on assessing the predictive performance of specific GARCH models, particularly the Markov-Switching GARCH (MS-GARCH). The primary objective is to determine the optimal number of regimes within the MS-GARCH framework that effectively captures the conditional variance of the Muscat Securities Market Index (MSMI). To achieve this, we employ the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to compare different MS-GARCH models, estimated via Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE). Our findings indicate that the chosen models consistently exhibit at least two regimes across various GARCH specifications. Furthermore, a validation using the Value at Risk (VaR) confirms the accuracy of volatility forecasts generated by the selected models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of the evolution of the close price index for MSM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of the evolution of logarithmic return (%) for the MSM index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Smoothed probability for the state 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Smoothed probability for the state 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Analysis of Value at Risk for the stock market index using the MS−GARCH model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Historical volatility versus MS-GARCH estimated volatility.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>One−ahead forecast for annualized volatility using MS−GARCH models.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 1412 KiB  
Article
Monetary Policy Spillovers and Inter-Market Dynamics Perspective of Preferred Habitat Model
by Abdul Wahid and Oskar Kowalewski
Economies 2024, 12(5), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12050098 - 24 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1101
Abstract
This study advances the understanding of the Preferred Habitat Model’s capacity to shed light on the inter-market transfer of mean returns and the diffusion of price volatility in Pakistani investment markets. It examines the extent to which returns in one market exert a [...] Read more.
This study advances the understanding of the Preferred Habitat Model’s capacity to shed light on the inter-market transfer of mean returns and the diffusion of price volatility in Pakistani investment markets. It examines the extent to which returns in one market exert a systematic influence on returns across others under the potential sway of interest rate policy shifts, USD exchange rate volatility, and domestic inflation trends. Employing a methodological arsenal that includes the GARCH process, enhanced by Dynamic Conditional Correlations (DCC), as well as the Markov Switching Model, this research assesses the propagation of mean returns and volatility across markets. The analysis uncovers significant linkages between monetary policy and stock market indices, underscoring the profound impact of monetary policy on cross-market performance transmission. These insights are pivotal for regulators overseeing the nuanced interaction between monetary policy and market performance. They are crucial for local and international investors interested in developing economies, especially in Pakistan’s markets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Macroeconomics, Monetary Economics, and Financial Markets)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Returns of Stock Market, Mercantile and Financial Market Source: <a href="https://www.psx.com.pk/psx/resources" target="_blank">https://www.psx.com.pk/psx/resources</a> (accessed on 10 June 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Volatility transmission effects of policy rate on real estate, mercantile, and the stock market.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 4012 KiB  
Article
Quantifying the Impact of Risk on Market Volatility and Price: Evidence from the Wholesale Electricity Market in Portugal
by Negin Entezari and José Alberto Fuinhas
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 2691; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072691 - 25 Mar 2024
Viewed by 792
Abstract
This research aims to identify suitable procedures for determining the size of risks to predict the tendency of electricity prices to return to their historical average or mean over time. The goal is to quantify the sensitivity of electricity prices to different types [...] Read more.
This research aims to identify suitable procedures for determining the size of risks to predict the tendency of electricity prices to return to their historical average or mean over time. The goal is to quantify the sensitivity of electricity prices to different types of shocks to mitigate price volatility risks that affect Portugal’s energy market. Hourly data from the beginning of January 2016 to December 2021 were used for the analysis. The symmetric and asymmetric GARCH model volatility, as a function of past information, help to eliminate excessive peaks in data fluctuations. The asymmetric model includes additional parameters to separately obtain the impact of positive and negative shocks on volatility. The MSGARCH model is estimated to be in two states, allowing for transitions between low- and high-volatility states. This approach effectively represents the significant impact of shocks in a high-volatility state, indicating an acknowledgment of the lasting effects of extreme events on financial markets. Furthermore, the MSGARCH model is designed to obtain the persistence of shocks during periods of elevated volatility. Accurate price forecasting aids power producers in anticipating potential price trends and allows them to adjust their operations by considering the overall stability and efficiency of the electricity market. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Non-logarithmic (not stationary). (<b>b</b>) Logarithmic (stationary) hourly electricity prices (1 January 2016–30 December 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Correlation chart for hourly electricity prices. (<b>a</b>) Autocorrelation function (ACF); (<b>b</b>) Partial autocorrelation function (PACF) hourly electricity prices (1 January 2016–30 December 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fluctuation in electricity price and capturing the temporal dependencies and trends in data by ARIMA model estimation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Volatility responds differently to positive and negative shocks in TGARCH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Rapid elimination of shocks to variance ensures the stability of the process over time, by asymmetric EGARCH estimation, making it suitable for the magnitude of fluctuations for long-term forecasting and risk management purposes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The negative impacts of risk volatility when employing GARCHM. Negative fluctuations can result from sudden decreases in business investment, global economic downturns, or market uncertainty. Such events can trigger a rapid price decline as investors respond to increased risks and uncertainties [<a href="#B41-sustainability-16-02691" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Markov switch GARCH estimation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Predicted probability of being in a given state.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Account of GARCH influence on price variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Quantile–Quantile plot models for logarithmic and non-logarithmic electricity prices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Hourly power price periodogram.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 761 KiB  
Article
Chaos, Fractionality, Nonlinear Contagion, and Causality Dynamics of the Metaverse, Energy Consumption, and Environmental Pollution: Markov-Switching Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Copula and Causality Methods
by Melike Bildirici, Özgür Ömer Ersin and Blend Ibrahim
Fractal Fract. 2024, 8(2), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8020114 - 14 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1371
Abstract
Metaverse (MV) technology introduces new tools for users each day. MV companies have a significant share in the total stock markets today, and their size is increasing. However, MV technologies are questioned as to whether they contribute to environmental pollution with their increasing [...] Read more.
Metaverse (MV) technology introduces new tools for users each day. MV companies have a significant share in the total stock markets today, and their size is increasing. However, MV technologies are questioned as to whether they contribute to environmental pollution with their increasing energy consumption (EC). This study explores complex nonlinear contagion with tail dependence and causality between MV stocks, EC, and environmental pollution proxied with carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) with a decade-long daily dataset covering 18 May 2012–16 March 2023. The Mandelbrot–Wallis and Lo’s rescaled range (R/S) tests confirm long-term dependence and fractionality, and the largest Lyapunov exponents, Shannon and Havrda, Charvât, and Tsallis (HCT) entropy tests followed by the Kolmogorov–Sinai (KS) complexity measure confirm chaos, entropy, and complexity. The Brock, Dechert, and Scheinkman (BDS) test of independence test confirms nonlinearity, and White‘s test of heteroskedasticity of nonlinear forms and Engle’s autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity test confirm heteroskedasticity, in addition to fractionality and chaos. In modeling, the marginal distributions are modeled with Markov-Switching Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Copula (MS-GARCH–Copula) processes with two regimes for low and high volatility and asymmetric tail dependence between MV, EC, and CO2 in all regimes. The findings indicate relatively higher contagion with larger copula parameters in high-volatility regimes. Nonlinear causality is modeled under regime-switching heteroskedasticity, and the results indicate unidirectional causality from MV to EC, from MV to CO2, and from EC to CO2, in addition to bidirectional causality among MV and EC, which amplifies the effects on air pollution. The findings of this paper offer vital insights into the MV, EC, and CO2 nexus under chaos, fractionality, and nonlinearity. Important policy recommendations are generated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Recent Trends in Nonlinear, Chaotic and Complex Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A summary of the conclusions and empirical results. <b>Note.</b> *** indicates statistical significance at the 1% significance level. The findings of our study, combined with the existing literature, have enabled us to generate a comprehensive set of policy recommendations. The trajectory of the metaverse phenomenon will play a pivotal role in mitigating its environmental impacts. Analogous to the pervasive rise of the internet, e-commerce, and digital devices over the past two to three decades, the metaverse harbors the potential for substantial environmental repercussions unless its energy policies undergo careful reevaluation. As the metaverse gains broader societal accessibility, akin to the ubiquitous presence of the internet and smart devices in contemporary lives, the escalating energy demands associated with metaverse activities will inevitably lead to heightened emissions. To curtail the pace and magnitude of these adverse effects, implementation of intelligent automation technologies to enhance energy efficiency, prioritizing the adoption of renewable energy sources to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate GHG, e-waste management, and encouragement of recycling in metaverse companies and the metaverse community is of vital importance. In addition, emphasizing the use of eco-friendly materials and efficient recycling methods is important, including recovering resources from used equipment, for example, batteries.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 1752 KiB  
Article
An EM/MCMC Markov-Switching GARCH Behavioral Algorithm for Random-Length Lumber Futures Trading
by Oscar V. De la Torre-Torres, José Álvarez-García and María de la Cruz del Río-Rama
Mathematics 2024, 12(3), 485; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12030485 - 2 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1192
Abstract
This paper tests using two-regime Markov-switching models with asymmetric, time-varying exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (MS-EGARCH) variances in random-length lumber futures trading. By assuming a two-regime context (a low s=1 and high s=2 volatility), a trading algorithm was simulated [...] Read more.
This paper tests using two-regime Markov-switching models with asymmetric, time-varying exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (MS-EGARCH) variances in random-length lumber futures trading. By assuming a two-regime context (a low s=1 and high s=2 volatility), a trading algorithm was simulated with the following trading rule: invest in lumber futures if the probability of being in the high-volatility regime s=2 is lower or equal to 50%, or invest in the 3-month U.S. Treasury bills (TBills) otherwise. The rationale tested in this paper was that using a two-regime Markov-switching (MS) algorithm leads to an overperformance against a buy-and-hold strategy in lumber futures. To extend the current literature in MS trading algorithms, two location parameter scenarios were simulated. The first uses an unconditional mean or expected value (no factors), and the second incorporates market and behavioral factors. With weekly simulations form 2 January 1994 to 28 July 2023, the results suggest that using MS-EGARCH models in a no-factors scenario is appropriate for active lumber futures trading with an accumulated return of 158.33%. Also, the results suggest that it is not useful to add market and behavioral factors in the MS-GARCH estimation because it leads to a lower performance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The historical performance of the simulated portfolios in a no-factors scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The timing and detail of the historical performance of the MS-EGARCH simulated portfolio in a no-factors scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The historical performance of the simulated portfolios in the market and behavioral factors scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The timing and detail of the historical performance of the Student’s t MS simulated portfolio in the market and behavioral factors scenario.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 555 KiB  
Article
Nonlinear Modeling of Mortality Data and Its Implications for Longevity Bond Pricing
by Huijing Li, Rui Zhou and Min Ji
Risks 2023, 11(12), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11120207 - 28 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1448
Abstract
Human mortality has been improving faster than expected over the past few decades. This unprecedented improvement has caused significant financial stress to pension plan sponsors and annuity providers. The widely recognized Lee–Carter model often assumes linearity in its period effect as an integral [...] Read more.
Human mortality has been improving faster than expected over the past few decades. This unprecedented improvement has caused significant financial stress to pension plan sponsors and annuity providers. The widely recognized Lee–Carter model often assumes linearity in its period effect as an integral part of the model. Nevertheless, deviation from linearity has been observed in historical mortality data. In this paper, we investigate the applicability of four nonlinear time-series models: threshold autoregressive model, Markov switching model, structural change model, and generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity model for mortality data. By analyzing the mortality data from England and Wales and Italy spanning the years 1900 to 2019, we compare the goodness of fit and forecasting performance of the four nonlinear models. We then demonstrate the implications of nonlinearity in mortality modeling on the pricing of longevity bonds as a practical illustration of our findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Average mortality rates across ages 20–95 for the EW population.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Parameter estimates for the Lee–Carter model based on EW mortality in 1900–2011.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Parameter estimates for the Lee–Carter model based on EW mortality in 1900–2011.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Residuals from the linear AR(1) model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The estimated threshold value for the TAR model with two regimes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><b>Top panel</b>: Smoothed probabilities of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> being in regime 1. <b>Bottom panel</b>: Values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, with the periods of the first regime shaded in gray.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Squared residuals from the fitted AR(1) model for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ACF and PACF plots of the squared residuals from the fitted AR(1) model for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>QQ plots of residuals from various estimated models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mean forecasts of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> using five different models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The 95% confidence intervals of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> using five different models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Mean mortality forecasts for various ages using the four models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Mean squared errors for various forecast periods using the five models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Cash flow of a longevity bond transaction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Supply and demand curves based on the MS model.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 676 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Econometric Modeling of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Volatility of the Financial Markets
by Abdessamad Ouchen
Eng. Proc. 2023, 39(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023039014 - 28 Jun 2023
Viewed by 739
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify econometric models likely to highlight the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial markets. The Markov-switching “GARCH and EGARCH” models are suitable for analyzing and forecasting the series of daily returns of the major [...] Read more.
The purpose of this paper is to identify econometric models likely to highlight the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial markets. The Markov-switching “GARCH and EGARCH” models are suitable for analyzing and forecasting the series of daily returns of the major global stock indices (i.e., SSE, S&P500, FTSE100, DAX, CAC40, and NIKKEI225) during the pre-COVID-19 period, from 1 June to 30 November 2019, and the post-COVID-19 period, from 31 December 2019, to 1 June 2020. The Markov-switching “GARCH and EGARCH” models allow good modeling of the conditional variance. The estimated conditional variance values by these models highlight the increase in volatility for the stock markets in our sample, during the post-COVID-19 period compared to that pre-COVID-19, with a peak in volatility in “early January 2020” for the Chinese stock market and in “March 2020” for the other five stock markets (i.e., New York, Paris, Frankfurt, London, and Tokyo). The stock exchange of Frankfurt has shown great resilience compared to other international stock exchanges (i.e., the stock exchanges in Paris, London, and New York). The modeling of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial markets by the Markov-switching “GARCH and EGARCH” models makes it possible to simultaneously take into consideration the nonlinearity at the level of the mean and the variance, and to obtain the results of the transition probabilities, the unconditional probabilities and the conditional anticipated durations during the pre-COVID-19 period and the post-COVID-19 period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 9th International Conference on Time Series and Forecasting)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Conditional volatility during the pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 period. (<b>A</b>) Pre-COVID-19 period from 1 June to 30 November 2019. (<b>B</b>) Post-COVID-19 period from 31 December 2019 to 1 June 2020.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 440 KiB  
Article
Modeling Long Memory and Regime Switching with an MRS-FIEGARCH Model: A Simulation Study
by Caixia Zhang and Yanlin Shi
Axioms 2023, 12(5), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12050446 - 30 Apr 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1359
Abstract
Recent research suggests that long memory can be caused by regime switching and is easily confused with it. However, if the causes of confusion were properly controlled, they could be distinguished. Motivated by this idea, our study aims to distinguish between the long [...] Read more.
Recent research suggests that long memory can be caused by regime switching and is easily confused with it. However, if the causes of confusion were properly controlled, they could be distinguished. Motivated by this idea, our study aims to distinguish between the long memory and regime switching of financial volatility. We firstly modeled the long memory and regime switching of volatility using the Fractionally Integrated Exponential GARCH (FIEGARCH) and Markov Regime-Switching EGARCH (MRS-EGARCH) frameworks, respectively, and performed a simulation study on their finite-sample properties when innovations followed a non-normal distribution. Subsequently, we demonstrated the confusion between the FIEGARCH and MRS-EGARCH processes using simulations. A recent study theoretically proved that the time-varying smoothing probability series can induce the presence of significant long memory in the regime-switching process. To control for its effect, the two-stage two-state FIEGARCH and MRS-FIEGARCH frameworks are proposed. The Monte Carlo studies showed that both frameworks can effectively distinguish between the pure FIEGARCH and pure MRS-EGARCH processes. When the MRS-FIEGARCH model was further employed to fit series generated with the MRS-FIEGARCH process, it outperformed the ordinary FIEGARCH model. Finally, an empirical study of NASDAQ index return was conducted to demonstrate that our MRS-FIEGARCH model can provide potentially more reliable long-memory estimates, identify the volatility states and outperform both the FIEGARCH and MRS-EGARCH models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Financial Mathematics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Return and smoothing probability of calm state of NASDAQ index.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 768 KiB  
Review
On Asymmetric Correlations and Their Applications in Financial Markets
by Linyu Cao, Ruili Sun, Tiefeng Ma and Conan Liu
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2023, 16(3), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16030187 - 9 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2183
Abstract
Progress on asymmetric correlations of asset returns has recently advanced considerably. Asymmetric correlations can cause problems in hedging effectiveness and overstate the value of diversification. Furthermore, considering the asymmetric correlations in portfolio construction significantly enhances performance. The purpose of this paper is to [...] Read more.
Progress on asymmetric correlations of asset returns has recently advanced considerably. Asymmetric correlations can cause problems in hedging effectiveness and overstate the value of diversification. Furthermore, considering the asymmetric correlations in portfolio construction significantly enhances performance. The purpose of this paper is to trace developments and identify areas that require further research. We examine three aspects of asymmetric correlations: first, the existence of asymmetric correlations between asset returns and their significance tests; second, the test on the existence of asymmetric correlations between different markets and financial assets; and third, the root cause analysis of asymmetric correlations. In the first part, the contents of extreme value theory, the H statistic and a model-free test are covered. In the second part, commonly used models such as copula and GARCH are included. In addition to the GARCH and copula formulations, many other methods are included, such as regime switching, the Markov switching model, and the multifractal asymmetric detrend cross-correlation analysis method. In addition, we compare the advantages and differences between the models. In the third part, the causes of asymmetry are discussed, for example, higher common fundamental risk, correlation of individual fundamental risk, and so on. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Data Analytics and Statistical Learning)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Asymmetric correlations.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4092 KiB  
Article
The Bitcoin Halving Cycle Volatility Dynamics and Safe Haven-Hedge Properties: A MSGARCH Approach
by Jireh Yi-Le Chan, Seuk Wai Phoong, Seuk Yen Phoong, Wai Khuen Cheng and Yen-Lin Chen
Mathematics 2023, 11(3), 698; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030698 - 30 Jan 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 11785
Abstract
This paper introduces a unique perspective towards Bitcoin safe haven and hedge properties through the Bitcoin halving cycle. The Bitcoin halving cycle suggests that Bitcoin price movement follows specific sequences, and Bitcoin price movement is independent of other assets. This has significant implications [...] Read more.
This paper introduces a unique perspective towards Bitcoin safe haven and hedge properties through the Bitcoin halving cycle. The Bitcoin halving cycle suggests that Bitcoin price movement follows specific sequences, and Bitcoin price movement is independent of other assets. This has significant implications for Bitcoin properties, encompassing its risk profile, volatility dynamics, safe haven properties, and hedge properties. Bitcoin’s institutional and industrial adoption gained traction in 2021, while recent studies suggest that gold lost its safe haven properties against the S&P500 in 2021 amid signs of funds flowing out of gold into Bitcoin. Amid multiple forces at play (COVID-19, halving cycle, institutional adoption), the potential existence of regime changes should be considered when examining volatility dynamics. Therefore, the objective of this study is twofold. The first objective is to examine gold and Bitcoin safe haven and hedge properties against three US stock indices before and after the stock market selloff in March 2020. The second objective is to examine the potential regime changes and the symmetric properties of the Bitcoin volatility profile during the halving cycle. The Markov Switching GARCH model was used in this study to elucidate regime changes in the GARCH volatility dynamics of Bitcoin and its halving cycle. Results show that gold did not exhibit safe haven and hedge properties against three US stock indices after the COVID-19 outbreak, while Bitcoin did not exhibit safe haven or hedge properties against the US stock market indices before or after the COVID-19 pandemic market crash. Furthermore, this study also found that the regime changes are associated with low and high volatility periods rather than specific stages of a Bitcoin halving cycle and are asymmetric. Bitcoin may yet exhibit safe haven and hedge properties as, at the time of writing, these properties may manifest through sustained adoption growth. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Bitcoin Halving Cycle. <a href="#mathematics-11-00698-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> represents a log-scale weekly candlestick chart of the Bitcoin price and illustrates the consistent occurrence of the 3 distinct phases (bull market, bear market, recovery phase) during each cycle. The green box represents the bull market, the red box represents the bear market, and the blue box represents the recovery phase. The first halving cycle occurred on 28 November 2012. The second halving cycle occurred on 9 July 2016. The third halving cycle occurred on 11 May 2020. The start of each halving cycle is indicated by a vertical line marking the date of the beginning of the respective weeks, as <a href="#mathematics-11-00698-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> is a weekly chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The first 4 sequences of the 2014 bear market during the Bitcoin 2012–2016 halving cycle. The Bitcoin price reached a historical all-time high of <span>$</span>1160. A double top reversal pattern first occurred and indicated a potential reversal, followed by a 50% crash to <span>$</span>550. The Bitcoin price recovered back to 20% away from the historical all-time high (<span>$</span>1000) before making a 70% crash away from the historical all-time high (<span>$</span>340).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The 5th sequence of the 2014 bear market during the Bitcoin 2012–2016 halving cycle. The Bitcoin price finally bottomed at <span>$</span>200 (85% away from the historical all-time high) before entering the recovery phase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The first 4 sequences of the 2017 bear market during the Bitcoin 2016–2020 halving cycle. During this cycle, the Bitcoin price reached a new all-time high of <span>$</span>20,000 before entering the bear market. <a href="#mathematics-11-00698-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a> highlights 4 out of 5 primary sequences of events that are similar to <a href="#mathematics-11-00698-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>. A reversal pattern was first indicated at the new all-time high of <span>$</span>20,000. Then, Bitcoin suffered an approximately 50% crash to <span>$</span>11,000. The Bitcoin price recovered back to approximately 20% away from the historical all-time high (<span>$</span>17,000) before making a 70% crash away from the historical all-time high down to <span>$</span>6000.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The 5th sequence of the 2017 bear market during the Bitcoin 2016–2020 halving cycle. Similar to <a href="#mathematics-11-00698-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>, the Bitcoin price ended the bear market by bottoming at <span>$</span>3100 (approximately 85% away from the historical all-time high) before entering the recovery phase again.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Smoothed Probabilities for two-regime GJR model.</p>
Full article ">
50 pages, 9367 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Contagion Effect from Developed to Emerging CEE Financial Markets
by Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu, Eduard Mihai Manta, Razvan Gabriel Hapau, Mihaela Gruiescu and Oana Mihaela Vacaru (Boita)
Mathematics 2023, 11(3), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030666 - 29 Jan 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 6085
Abstract
The paper aims to analyze the contagion effect coming from the developed stock markets of the US and Germany to the emerging CEE stock markets of Romania, Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland using daily data for the period April 2005–April 2021. The paper [...] Read more.
The paper aims to analyze the contagion effect coming from the developed stock markets of the US and Germany to the emerging CEE stock markets of Romania, Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland using daily data for the period April 2005–April 2021. The paper also captures the level of integration of these emerging stock markets by analyzing the volatility spillover phenomenon. The quantification of the contagion effect coming from the developed to the emerging stock markets consisted of an empirical analysis based on the DCC-GARCH (Dynamic Conditional Correlation) model. Through this multivariate model, the time-varying conditional correlations were analyzed, both in periods of normal economic development and in times of economic instability, when there was a significant increase in the correlation coefficients between developed and emerging stock market indices. Furthermore, the level of connectedness between these markets has been analyzed using the volatility spillover index developed by Diebold and Yilmaz. The empirical results surprised the high level of integration of the analyzed stock markets in Central and Eastern Europe, with the intensity of volatility transmission between these markets increasing significantly during times of crisis. All stock market indices analyzed show periods during which they transmit net volatility and periods during which they receive net volatility, indicating a bidirectional volatility spillover phenomenon. Mostly, the BET, PX, and WIG indices are net transmitters of volatilities, whereas the BUX index is net recipient, except during the COVID-19 crisis, when it transmitted net volatility to the other three indices. Finally, using a Markov switching-regime VAR approach with two regimes, we explored the contagion effect between emerging CEE and developed stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic. The empirical results proved a shift around the outbreak of the health crisis, after which the high volatility regime dominates the CEE markets. The contagion effects from developed stock markets to emerging CEE markets significantly increased during the first stage of the health crisis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Probability and Statistics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The evolution of the stock market indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The evolution of the conditional correlation coefficients between the CEEC indices and the S&amp;P500 index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The evolution of the conditional correlation coefficients between the CEEC indices and the DAX index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The evolution of the conditional correlation coefficients between the CEEC indices and the DAX index without any delay.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Rolling window estimation of total spillover index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Rolling window estimation of net volatility spillover (the difference between “Contribution to Others” and “Contribution from Others”). (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represents the effects of net volatility spillover for the stock market index of Romania(BET), Hungary(BUX),Czech Republic(PX), Poland(WIG).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Rolling window estimation of net pairwise spillover (the difference between the volatility transmitted from index <span class="html-italic">i</span> to index <span class="html-italic">j</span> and the volatility transmitted from index <span class="html-italic">j</span> to index <span class="html-italic">i</span>). (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represents the relationships between all 6 pairs of stock indexes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Regime smoothed probabilities.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Main Characteristics of the CEEC and German Stock Exchange Markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>The Evolution of the Considered Stock Market Indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>The Daily Returns on the Stock Market Indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>The Estimated Conditional Correlation Coefficients between the Four CEEC Stock Markets and Those in Germany and the US Along with the Conditional Volatilities.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>The Evolution of the VIX and CISS Index.</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>The Relationship between the Conditional Correlation Coefficients and the Conditional Volatilities—Rolling Stepwise Regression (Correlation with the S&amp;P500 Index).</p>
Full article ">Figure A7
<p>Directional Volatility Spillovers Transmitted by Each Stock Market Index to All the Other Three Indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure A8
<p>Directional Volatility Spillovers Received by Each Stock Market Index from All the Other Three Indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure A9
<p>Impulse Responses of CEE Stock Markets to a Shock in the US Stock Markets in Both Regimes.</p>
Full article ">Figure A9 Cont.
<p>Impulse Responses of CEE Stock Markets to a Shock in the US Stock Markets in Both Regimes.</p>
Full article ">Figure A10
<p>Impulse Responses of CEE Stock Markets to a Shock in the German Stock Markets in Both Regimes.</p>
Full article ">Figure A10 Cont.
<p>Impulse Responses of CEE Stock Markets to a Shock in the German Stock Markets in Both Regimes.</p>
Full article ">Figure A11
<p>Variance Decomposition Analysis in Both Regimes.</p>
Full article ">Figure A11 Cont.
<p>Variance Decomposition Analysis in Both Regimes.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6421 KiB  
Article
Predicting Volatility Based on Interval Regression Models
by Hui Qu and Mengying He
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(12), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120564 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2674
Abstract
Considering the inferior volatility tracking capability of the point-data-based models, we propose using the more informative price interval data and building interval regression models for volatility forecasting. To characterize the heterogeneity of the market and the nonlinearity of volatility, we incorporated the heterogeneous [...] Read more.
Considering the inferior volatility tracking capability of the point-data-based models, we propose using the more informative price interval data and building interval regression models for volatility forecasting. To characterize the heterogeneity of the market and the nonlinearity of volatility, we incorporated the heterogeneous autoregressive structure and the Markov regime switching structure in the benchmark interval regression model, respectively, and thus propose three extended models. Our empirical examination on S&P 500 index shows that: (1) the proposed interval regression models significantly improve the volatility prediction accuracy compared to the point-data-based GARCH model. (2) Incorporating the heterogeneous structure significantly improves the volatility prediction accuracy, and the corresponding models significantly outperform the range-based ECARR model. (3) Incorporating the Markov regime switching structure improves the prediction performance, and the improvement is significant when the heterogeneous structure is characterized. The above results are robust under different market conditions, including the extremely volatile periods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Markets, Financial Volatility and Beyond, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Smoothed regime probabilities of the CRM-MRS model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Smoothed regime probabilities of the CRM-H-MRS model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Smoothed regime probabilities of the PM-MRS model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Smoothed regime probabilities of the PM-H-MRS model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Volatility regimes detected by the NPCPM in the out-of-sample period from 4 January 2010 to 30 December 2020 (S&amp;P 500).</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 2034 KiB  
Article
Risk Management of Fuel Hedging Strategy Based on CVaR and Markov Switching GARCH in Airline Company
by Shuang Lin, Minke Wang, Zhihong Cheng, Fan He, Jiuhao Chen, Chuanhui Liao and Shengda Zhang
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15264; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215264 - 17 Nov 2022
Viewed by 1531
Abstract
Using a hedging strategy to stabilize fuel price is very important for airline companies in order to reduce the cost of their main business. In this paper, we construct models for managing the risk of the hedging strategy. First, we use conditional value [...] Read more.
Using a hedging strategy to stabilize fuel price is very important for airline companies in order to reduce the cost of their main business. In this paper, we construct models for managing the risk of the hedging strategy. First, we use conditional value at risk (CVaR) to measure the risk of an airline company’s hedging strategy. Compared with the value at risk (VaR), CVaR satisfies subadditivity, positive homogeneity, monotonicity, and transfer invariance. Therefore, CVaR is a consistent method of risk measurement. Second, time-varying state transition probability is introduced into our model in order to build a Markov Switching-GARCH (MS-GARCH). MS-GARCH takes dynamic changes of market state into account, a feature which has obvious advantages over the traditional constant state model. Additionally, we use a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm to estimate the parameters of MS-GARCH based on Gibbs sampling. We use fuel oil futures data from the Shanghai Futures Stock Exchange to implement and evaluate our model. In this paper, we empirically estimate the risk of airlines’ hedging strategy and draw the conclusion that our model is obviously effective in terms of the risk management of hedging, a use which has a certain guiding significance for reality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Risk Management and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Path Dependency Describe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pseudo code of MCMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Raw Data Plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Difference log data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>MCMC result.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 349 KiB  
Article
Nonlinear Contagion and Causality Nexus between Oil, Gold, VIX Investor Sentiment, Exchange Rate and Stock Market Returns: The MS-GARCH Copula Causality Method
by Melike E. Bildirici, Memet Salman and Özgür Ömer Ersin
Mathematics 2022, 10(21), 4035; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214035 - 31 Oct 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2283
Abstract
The fluctuations in oil have strong implications on many financial assets not to mention its relationship with gold prices, exchange rates, stock markets, and investor sentiment. Recent evidence suggests nonlinear contagion among the factors stated above with bivariate or trivariate settings and a [...] Read more.
The fluctuations in oil have strong implications on many financial assets not to mention its relationship with gold prices, exchange rates, stock markets, and investor sentiment. Recent evidence suggests nonlinear contagion among the factors stated above with bivariate or trivariate settings and a throughout investigation of contagion and causality links by taking especially nonlinearity into consideration deserves special importance for the relevant literature. For this purpose, the paper explores the Markov switching generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity copula (MS-GARCH—copula) and MS-GARCH-copula-causality method and its statistical properties. The methods incorporate regime switching and causality analyses in addition to modeling nonlinearity in conditional volatility. For a sample covering daily observations for 4 January 2000–13 March 2020, the empirical findings revealed that: i. the incorporation of MS type nonlinearity to copula analysis provides important information, ii. the new method helps in the determination of regime-dependent tail dependence among oil, VIX, gold, exchange rates, and BIST stock market returns, in addition to determining the direction of causality in those regimes, iii. important policy implications are derived with the proposed methods given the distinction between high and low volatility regimes leads to different solutions on the direction of causality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Statistical Methods in Economics)
Back to TopTop