[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (899)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = LULC change

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 17884 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Carbon Stock and Sequestration Dynamics in Response to Land Use and Land Cover Changes in a Tropical Landscape
by Dipankar Bera, Nilanjana Das Chatterjee, Santanu Dinda, Subrata Ghosh, Vivek Dhiman, Bashar Bashir, Beata Calka and Mohamed Zhran
Land 2024, 13(10), 1689; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101689 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 319
Abstract
Quantitative analysis of LULC changes and their effects on carbon stock and sequestration is important for mitigating climate change. Therefore, this study examines carbon stock and sequestration in relation to LULC changes using the Land Change Modeler (LCM) and Ecosystem Services Modeler (ESM) [...] Read more.
Quantitative analysis of LULC changes and their effects on carbon stock and sequestration is important for mitigating climate change. Therefore, this study examines carbon stock and sequestration in relation to LULC changes using the Land Change Modeler (LCM) and Ecosystem Services Modeler (ESM) in tropical dry deciduous forests of West Bengal, India. The LULC for 2006, 2014, and 2021 were classified using Google Earth Engine (GEE), while LULC changes and predictions were analyzed using LCM. Carbon stock and sequestration for present and future scenarios were estimated using ESM. The highest carbon was stored in forest land (124.167 Mg/ha), and storage outside the forest declined to 13.541 Mg/ha for agricultural land and 0–8.123 Mg/ha for other lands. Carbon stock and economic value decreased from 2006 to 2021, and are likely to decrease further in the future. Forest land is likely to contribute to 94% of future carbon loss in the study region, primarily due to its conversion into agricultural land. The implementation of multiple-species plantations, securing tenure rights, proper management practices, and the strengthening of forest-related policies can enhance carbon stock and sequestration. These spatial-temporal insights will aid in management strategies, and the methodology can be applied to broader contexts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodological flow chart for LULC prediction. LULC: land use land cover; MLP-NN: Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Static variables: assuming that these variables remain constant over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dynamic variables: assuming that these variables change over time. (<b>A</b>) Distance from forest land (meters); (<b>B</b>) distance from agriculture land (meters); (<b>C</b>) distance from water body (meters); (<b>D</b>) distance from built-up land (meters); (<b>E</b>) distance from barren land (meters); (<b>F</b>) population (number/sq.m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Constrained areas that are not expected to change in the future.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Classified and predicted LULC maps for the year 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Classified LULC maps for the years 2006, 2014, and 2021, and predicted LULC map for the year 2030.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Dominant transitions or changes from 2006 to 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Carbon stock and sequestration in Mg/ha. (<b>A</b>) Carbon stock 2006; (<b>B</b>) carbon stock 2021; (<b>C</b>) carbon stock 2030; (<b>D</b>) carbon sequestration from 2006 to 2021; (<b>E</b>) carbon sequestration from 2021 to 2030. FL: forest land; AL: agricultural land; BUL: built-up land; BL: barren land; WB: water body.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 57658 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Landscape Ecological Risk and Its Driving Factors for the Ebinur Lake Basin from 1985 to 2022
by Ayinigaer Adili, Biao Wu, Jiayu Chen, Na Wu, Yongxiao Ge and Jilili Abuduwaili
Land 2024, 13(10), 1572; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101572 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 443
Abstract
The Ebinur Lake Basin (ELB), which is a typical watershed in an arid region, has an extremely delicate natural ecosystem. Rapid urbanisation and economic growth have triggered substantial ecological and environmental transformations in this key economic hub of Xinjiang. However, a comprehensive and [...] Read more.
The Ebinur Lake Basin (ELB), which is a typical watershed in an arid region, has an extremely delicate natural ecosystem. Rapid urbanisation and economic growth have triggered substantial ecological and environmental transformations in this key economic hub of Xinjiang. However, a comprehensive and systematic knowledge of the evolving ecological conditions in the ELB remains limited. Therefore, this study modelled the landscape ecological risk index (LERI) using land use/land cover (LULC) data from 1985 to 2022 and assessed the drivers of landscape ecological risk (LER) using a geographical detector model (GDM). The findings revealed that (1) from 1985 to 2022, the construction land, cropland, and forestland areas in the ELB increased, whereas those of water bodies, grasslands, and barren land decreased. (2) Between 1985 and 2022, LER in the ELB showed a downward trend. Spatially, LER was predominantly characterised by lower and lowest risk levels. The higher and highest risk status has been around Ebinur lake and has continued to improve each year. (3) Climatic factors, particularly temperature and precipitation, were identified as the most significant drivers of the LER change from 1985 to 2022. The findings provide crucial scientific knowledge for advancing sustainable development and maintaining ecological security in the ELB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Landscape Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Ebinur Lake Basin geographical location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Framework of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of landscape-type changes in the Ebinur Lake Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>LULC dynamics in the Ebinur Lake Basin from 1985 to 2022. (<b>a</b>) Sankey diagram of LULC types, (<b>b</b>) bar chart of landscape-type areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Change map of LULC in the Ebinur Lake Basin, 1985–2022 (Note: 12 is cropland–forestland, 13 is cropland–grassland, 14 is cropland–water, 15 is cropland–barren land, 16 is cropland–construction land, 21 is forestland–cropland, 23 is forestland–grassland, 24 is forestland–water, 26 is forestland–construction land, 31 is grassland–cropland, 32 is grassland–forestland, 34 is grassland–water body, 35 is grassland–barren land, 36 is grassland–construction land, 41 is water body–cropland, 42 is water body–forestland, 43 is water body–grassland, 45 is water body–barren land, 46 is water body–construction land, 51 is barren land–cropland, 52 is barren land–forestland, 53 is barren land–grassland, 54 is barren land–water body, 56 is barren land–construction land, 61 is construction land–cropland, 63 is construction land–grassland, 64 is construction land–water body, 65 is construction land–barren land).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variation in landscape indices from 1985 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The spatial distributions of LER in the Ebinur Lake Basin from 1985 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes in LER in the Ebinur Lake Basin from 1985 to 2022. (<b>a</b>) Sankey diagram of LER levels, (<b>b</b>) bar chart of different LER levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution of LER transfers from 1985 to 2022 in the Ebinur Lake Basin (Note: 2 is an extremely ecologically deteriorated area, 1 is an ecologically deteriorated area, 0 is an ecologically stable area, −1 is an ecologically improved area, and −2 is an extremely ecologically improved area).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Global Moran’s I scatter plots of LER in the Ebinur Lake Basin from 1985 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The LISA maps in the Ebinur Lake Basin from 1985 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The results of interaction detector (X1 is the DEM; X2 is the slope; X3 is the NDVI; X4 is the distance to the waterway; X5 is the distance to the railway; X6 is the distance to the roadway; X7 is the precipitation; X8 is the temperature; X9 is the population; X10 is the artificial nightlight).</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 13823 KiB  
Article
Application of Remote Sensing and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Wildfire Occurrence Mapping in the Mountainous Region of Southwest China
by Jia Liu, Yukuan Wang, Yafeng Lu, Pengguo Zhao, Shunjiu Wang, Yu Sun and Yu Luo
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3602; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193602 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 922
Abstract
The ecosystems in the mountainous region of Southwest China are exceptionally fragile and constitute one of the global hotspots for wildfire occurrences. Understanding the complex interactions between wildfires and their environmental and anthropogenic factors is crucial for effective wildfire modeling and management. Despite [...] Read more.
The ecosystems in the mountainous region of Southwest China are exceptionally fragile and constitute one of the global hotspots for wildfire occurrences. Understanding the complex interactions between wildfires and their environmental and anthropogenic factors is crucial for effective wildfire modeling and management. Despite significant advancements in wildfire modeling using machine learning (ML) methods, their limited explainability remains a barrier to utilizing them for in-depth wildfire analysis. This paper employs Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models along with the MODIS global fire atlas dataset (2004–2020) to study the influence of meteorological, topographic, vegetation, and human factors on wildfire occurrences in the mountainous region of Southwest China. It also utilizes Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values, a method within explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), to demonstrate the influence of key controlling factors on the frequency of fire occurrences. The results indicate that wildfires in this region are primarily influenced by meteorological conditions, particularly sunshine duration, relative humidity (seasonal and daily), seasonal precipitation, and daily land surface temperature. Among local variables, altitude, proximity to roads, railways, residential areas, and population density are significant factors. All models demonstrate strong predictive capabilities with AUC values over 0.8 and prediction accuracies ranging from 76.0% to 95.0%. XGBoost outperforms LR and RF in predictive accuracy across all factor groups (climatic, local, and combinations thereof). The inclusion of topographic factors and human activities enhances model optimization to some extent. SHAP results reveal critical features that significantly influence wildfire occurrences, and the thresholds of positive or negative changes, highlighting that relative humidity, rain-free days, and land use land cover changes (LULC) are primary contributors to frequent wildfires in this region. Based on regional differences in wildfire drivers, a wildfire-risk zoning map for the mountainous region of Southwest China is created. Areas identified as high risk are predominantly located in the Northwestern and Southern parts of the study area, particularly in Yanyuan and Miyi, while areas assessed as low risk are mainly distributed in the Northeastern region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the research region and the distribution of MODIS active fire incidents from 2004 to 2020. Maps at a national scale represent the kernel density of local wildfires for the same time frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Hierarchical importance of climatic variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hierarchical importance of local factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The SHAP summary plot ranks the top 20 variables affecting model predictions by their mean absolute SHAP values, shown on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis. Subfigure (<b>a</b>) showcases the importance of these features, while subfigure (<b>b</b>) illustrates their positive or negative effects on wildfire predictions through scatter points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The SHAP dependence plots (<b>a</b>) between SHAP values and Da_minRH, with a fitted trend line (red line); (<b>b</b>) between SHAP values and Norainday_avg, with a fitted trend line (red line); (<b>c</b>) between SHAP values and Da_minRH, showing the interaction with Tmax_avg (color scale); (<b>d</b>) between SHAP values and Norainday_avg, showing the interaction with Tmax_avg (color scale). Da_minRH, daily minimum relative humidity; Noraindy_avg, average number of rainless days of fire season.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SHAP interaction plot (<b>a</b>) and heatmap analysis (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>SHAP interaction plot (<b>a</b>) and heatmap analysis (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Fire-occurrence probability: analysis using LR, RF, and XGB based on meteorological factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Fire-occurrence probability: analysis using LR, RF, and XGB based on local factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fire-occurrence probability: combined meteorological and local factors analysis with LR, RF, and XGB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>ROC curves of the success rate of three models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of error metrics for different models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Risk-assessment mapping results of XGB model.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4537 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Carbon Storage in Rapidly Urbanizing Shenzhen, China: Insights and Predictions
by Chunxiao Wang, Mingqian Li, Xuefei Wang, Mengting Deng, Yulian Wu and Wuyang Hong
Land 2024, 13(10), 1566; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101566 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 388
Abstract
Rapid urbanization in developing countries leads to significant land-use and land-cover change (LULCC), which contributes to increased carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and the degradation of carbon storage. Studying spatio-temporal changes in carbon storage is crucial for guiding sustainable urban development toward [...] Read more.
Rapid urbanization in developing countries leads to significant land-use and land-cover change (LULCC), which contributes to increased carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and the degradation of carbon storage. Studying spatio-temporal changes in carbon storage is crucial for guiding sustainable urban development toward carbon neutrality. This study integrates machine-learning random forest algorithm, CA–Markov, and InVEST models to predict carbon storage distribution in Shenzhen, China, under various scenarios. The findings indicate that, over the past two decades, Shenzhen has experienced significant land-use changes. The transformation from high- to low-carbon-density land uses, particularly the conversion of forestland to construction land, is the primary cause of carbon storage loss. Forestland is mainly influenced by natural factors, such as digital elevation model (DEM) and precipitation, while other land-use and land-cover (LULC) types are predominantly affected by socio-economic and demographic factors. By 2030, carbon storage is projected to vary significantly across different development scenarios, with the greatest decline expected under the natural development scenario (NDS) and the least under the ecological priority scenario (EPS). The RF-CA–Markov model outperforms the traditional CA–Markov model in accurately simulating land use, particularly for small and scattered land-use types. Our conclusions can inform future low-carbon city development and land-use optimization. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of Shenzhen, with elevation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of the RF-CA–Markov model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sankey diagram of land-use area transfer in Shenzhen. Land-use area transfer from 2000 to 2010 (<b>a</b>). Land-use area transfer from 2010 to 2020 (<b>b</b>). Land-use area transfer in Shenzhen from 2000 to 2020 (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Visualization of driving factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Contributions of various driving factors to each type of land use.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatio-temporal characteristics of historical carbon storage (2000–2020). The historical spatial distributions of carbon storage (<b>a</b>) and the historical spatial changes of carbon storage (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sankey diagram of land-use area transitions in Shenzhen under multi-scenarios (2020–2030). Land-use area transfer in the NDS (<b>a</b>). Land-use area transfer in the EPS (<b>b</b>). Land-use area transfer in the CDS (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Carbon storage prediction under multi-scenarios (2020–2030). Spatial distributions of carbon storage in multi-scenarios (<b>a</b>) and spatial changes of carbon storage in multi-scenarios (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison between the 2020 actual land use (<b>a</b>), 2020 simulated land use by RF-CA-Markov (<b>b</b>), and 2020 simulated land use by MCE-CA-Markov (<b>c</b>). The RF-CA–Markov has a better performance in regard to improving the accuracy of land-use simulations, especially for small and scattered land-use types. (<b>a1</b>–<b>c2</b>) represent regions of detailed magnification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The change of carbon storage of land use in Shenzhen under a multi-scenario simulation in 2030. Changes in carbon storage quantities across different land-use types (<b>a</b>) and changes in the proportion of carbon storage across different land-use types (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 36997 KiB  
Article
Enhanced Monitoring of Sub-Seasonal Land Use Dynamics in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta through Quantile Mapping and Harmonic Regression
by Nick Kupfer, Tuan Quoc Vo, Felix Bachofer, Juliane Huth, Harry Vereecken, Lutz Weihermüller and Carsten Montzka
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3569; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193569 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 746
Abstract
In response to economic and environmental challenges like sea-level rise, salinity intrusion, groundwater extraction, sand mining, and sinking delta phenomena, the demand for solutions to adapt to changing conditions in riverine environments has increased significantly. High-quality analyses of land use and land cover [...] Read more.
In response to economic and environmental challenges like sea-level rise, salinity intrusion, groundwater extraction, sand mining, and sinking delta phenomena, the demand for solutions to adapt to changing conditions in riverine environments has increased significantly. High-quality analyses of land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics play a critical role in addressing these challenges. This study introduces a novel high-spatial resolution satellite-based approach to identify sub-seasonal LULC dynamics in the Mekong River Delta (MRD), employing a three-year (2021–2023) Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellite data time series. The primary obstacle is discerning detailed vegetation dynamics, particularly the seasonality of rice crops, answered through quantile mapping, harmonic regression with Fourier transform, and phenological metrics as inputs to a random forest machine learning classifier. Due to the substantial data volume, Google’s cloud computing platform Earth Engine was utilized for the analysis. Furthermore, the study evaluated the relative significance of various input features. The overall accuracy of the classification is 82.6% with a kappa statistic of 0.81, determined using comprehensive reference data collected in Vietnam. While the purely pixel-based approach has limitations, it proves to be a viable method for high-spatial resolution satellite image time series classification of the MRD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The Mekong River Delta (marked green in the overview) in Vietnam (red), its provincial division, and the location of collected reference data points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow of the LULC analysis with data collection, input features used for classification, and final uncertainty analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Harmonic curve representative of the first harmonic term and (<b>b</b>) curves for the first, second, and third harmonic terms (after [<a href="#B84-remotesensing-16-03569" class="html-bibr">84</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>LULC classification based on Sentinel-2 and -1 time series (2021–2023) of the Mekong River Delta with detailed sub-figures of An Giang/Dong Thap (<b>left</b>) and Ben Tre/Tra Vinh (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>LULC distribution of the Mekong River Delta 2021–2023. The three small boxes belong to the minor classes <span class="html-italic">Pineapple/Coconut mixed</span> (0.4%), <span class="html-italic">Water Melon</span> (0.1%), and <span class="html-italic">Casuarina Forest</span> (0.1%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>F1 score for the 18 classes of the time series analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Exemplary illustrations of vegetation metrics that support the differentiation of different land use types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Time−dependent spectral progression of two exemplary rice and aquaculture classes derived from NDVI signals including harmonic fitting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Time−dependent spectral progression of two exemplary rice and aquaculture classes derived from NDVI signals including harmonic fitting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Pair-wise Pearson correlation matrix of each training image. “Bx_py” refers to the calculated quantile band (Band x; quantile y). “HMx_y” refers to the calculated harmonic regression (Harmonic Model term x; Band y).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Validation error matrix showing the user’s, producer’s and overall accuracy of the classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Analysis of the accuracy deviation for the user’s accuracy.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Analysis of the accuracy deviation for the producer’s accuracy.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3396 KiB  
Article
Urban Flood Vulnerability Assessment in Freetown, Sierra Leone: AHP Approach
by Abdulai Osman Koroma, Mohamed Saber and Cherifa Abdelbaki
Hydrology 2024, 11(10), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11100158 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 813
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive flood vulnerability assessment for Freetown, Sierra Leone, spanning the period from 2001 to 2022. The objective of this research was to assess the temporal and spatial changes in the flood vulnerability using Geographic Information System (GIS) tools and [...] Read more.
This study presents a comprehensive flood vulnerability assessment for Freetown, Sierra Leone, spanning the period from 2001 to 2022. The objective of this research was to assess the temporal and spatial changes in the flood vulnerability using Geographic Information System (GIS) tools and AHP-based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis. This study identified the flood-vulnerable zones (FVZs) by integrating critical factors such as the rainfall, NDVI, elevation, slope, drainage density, TWI, distance to road, distance to river, and LULC. The analysis reveals that approximately 60% of the study area is classified as having medium to high vulnerability, with a significant 20% increase in the flood risk observed over the past two decades. In 2001, very-high-vulnerability zones covered about 68.84 km2 (10% of the total area), with high-vulnerability areas encompassing 137.68 km2 (20%). By 2020, very-high-vulnerability zones remained constant at 68.84 km2 (10%), while high-vulnerability areas decreased to 103.26 km2 (15%), and medium-vulnerability zones expanded from 206.51 km2 (30%) in 2001 to 240.93 km2 (35%). The AHP model-derived weights reflect the varied significance of the flood-inducing factors, with rainfall (0.27) being the most critical and elevation (0.04) being the least. A consistency ratio (CR) of 0.068 (< 0.1) confirms the reliability of these weights. The spatial–temporal analysis highlights the east and southeast regions of Freetown as consistently vulnerable over the years, while infrastructure improvements in other areas have contributed to a general decrease in very-high-vulnerability zones. This research highlights the urgent need for resilient urban planning and targeted interventions to mitigate future flood impacts, offering clear insights into the natural and human-induced drivers of the flood risk for effective hazard mitigation and sustainable urban development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of Freetown; (<b>b</b>) map of Africa; (<b>c</b>) map of Africa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart showing dataset integration of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of annual rainfall for Freetown 2001; (<b>b</b>) map of annual rainfall for Freetown 2010; (<b>c</b>) annual rainfall for Freetown 2020 (source: Esri ArcGIS 10.8).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Slope map of Freetown (source: Esri ArcGIS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) LULC map of Freetown 2001; (<b>b</b>) LULC map of Freetown 2010; (<b>c</b>) LULC map of Freetown 2020 (source: Esri ArcGIS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Drainage density map of Freetown; (<b>b</b>) distance-from-road map of Freetown (source: Esri ArcGIS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) TWI map of Freetown; (<b>b</b>) distance-from-river map of Freetown (source: Esri ArcGIS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) NDVI map of Freetown; (<b>b</b>) elevation map of Freetown (source: Esri ArcGIS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Flood vulnerability map 2001; (<b>b</b>) flood vulnerability map 2010; (<b>c</b>) flood vulnerability map 2020 (source: Esri ArcGIS).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3805 KiB  
Article
Navigating Urban Sustainability: Urban Planning and the Predictive Analysis of Busan’s Green Area Dynamics Using the CA-ANN Model
by Minkyu Park, Jaekyung Lee and Jongho Won
Forests 2024, 15(10), 1681; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101681 - 24 Sep 2024
Viewed by 759
Abstract
While numerous studies have employed deep learning and high-resolution remote sensing to predict future land use and land cover (LULC) changes, no study has integrated these predictive tools with the current urban planning context to find a potential issues for sustainability. This study [...] Read more.
While numerous studies have employed deep learning and high-resolution remote sensing to predict future land use and land cover (LULC) changes, no study has integrated these predictive tools with the current urban planning context to find a potential issues for sustainability. This study addresses this gap by examining the planning context of Busan Metropolitan City (BMC) and analyzing the paradoxical objectives within the city’s 2040 Master Plan and the subordinate 2030 Busan Master Plan for Parks and Greenbelts. Although the plans advocate for increased green areas to enhance urban sustainability and social wellbeing, they simultaneously support policies that may lead to a reduction in these areas due to urban development. Using the CA-ANN model in the MOLUSCE plugin, a deep learning-based LULC change analysis, we forecast further urban expansion and continued shrinkage of natural green areas. During 1980–2010, Busan Metropolitan City (BMC) underwent high-speed urban expansion, wherein the urbanized areas almost doubled and agricultural lands and green areas, including forests and grassland, reduced considerably. Forecasts for the years 2010–2040 show continued further expansion of urban areas at the expense of areas for agriculture and green areas, including forest and grasslands. Given the master plans, these highlight a critical tension between urban growth and sustainability. Despite the push for more green spaces, the replacement of natural landscapes with artificial parks and green areas may threaten long-term sustainability. In view of these apparently conflicting goals, the urban planning framework for BMC would have to take up increasingly stronger conservation policies and adaptive planning practices that consider environmental preservation on a par with economic development in the light of the planning context and trajectory of urbanization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Forestry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Relationship between the 2040 Master Plan for Busan Metropolitan City and the 2030 Busan Master Plan for Parks and Greenbelts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Predicted and actual LULC images for the years 2000 and 2010.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Urban expansion from the past.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Predicted expansion of urban areas and reduction in urban green areas by 2040.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 15190 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Variation and Prediction of Carbon Storage in Terrestrial Ecosystems at Multiple Development Stages in Beijing City Based on the Plus and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs Models
by Peian Wang, Chen Liu and Linlin Dai
Land 2024, 13(9), 1544; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091544 - 23 Sep 2024
Viewed by 455
Abstract
Terrestrial ecosystems play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, and their carbon sequestration capacity is vital for mitigating the impacts of climate change. Changes in land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics significantly alter this capacity. This study scrutinizes the LULC [...] Read more.
Terrestrial ecosystems play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, and their carbon sequestration capacity is vital for mitigating the impacts of climate change. Changes in land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics significantly alter this capacity. This study scrutinizes the LULC evolution within the Beijing metropolitan region from 1992 to 2022, evaluating its implications for ecosystem carbon storage. It also employs the Patch-Generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model to simulate LULC patterns under four scenarios for 2035: an Uncontrolled Scenario (UCS), a Natural Evolution Scenario (NES), a Strict Control Scenario (SCS), and a Reforestation and Wetland Expansion Scenario (RWES). The InVEST model is concurrently used to assess and forecast ecosystem carbon storage under each scenario. Key insights from the study are as follows: (1) from 1992 to 2022, Beijing’s LULC exhibited a phased developmental trajectory, marked by an expansion of urban and forested areas at the expense of agricultural land; (2) concurrently, the region’s ecosystem carbon storage displayed a fluctuating trend, peaking initially before declining, with higher storage in the northwest and lower in the central urban zones; (3) by 2035, ecosystem carbon storage is projected to decrease by 1.41 Megatons under the UCS, decrease by 0.097 Megatons under the NES, increase by 1.70 Megatons under the SCS, and increase by 11.97 Megatons under the RWES; and (4) the study underscores the efficacy of policies curtailing construction land expansion in Beijing, advocating for sustained urban growth constraints and intensified afforestation initiatives. This research reveals significant changes in urban land use types and the mechanisms propelling these shifts, offering a scientific basis for comprehending LULC transformations in Beijing and their ramifications for ecosystem carbon storage. It further provides policymakers with substantial insights for the development of strategic environmental and urban planning initiatives. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of Beijing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The technology roadmap of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The spatial distribution of Beijing’s LULC types in representative years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial changes in carbon storage in Beijing from 1992 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Prediction of carbon storage in Beijing by 2035 under 4 scenarios (MT).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Prediction of the spatial distribution of carbon storage under 4 scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of carbon storage in 2035 and 2017 under 4 scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial change of carbon storage in Beijing in 2035 under Strict Control Scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The contribution of driving factors to the expansion of construction land.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Expansion potential of construction land (calculated based on development trends from 2011 to 2017, Uncontrolled Scenario); (<b>b</b>) Expansion potential of construction land (calculated based on development trends from 2017 to 2020, other scenarios).</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 8146 KiB  
Article
Thermal Behaviour of Different Land Uses and Covers in the Urban Environment of the Spanish Mediterranean Based on Landsat Land Surface Temperature
by Enrique Montón Chiva and José Quereda Sala
Urban Sci. 2024, 8(3), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8030147 - 23 Sep 2024
Viewed by 613
Abstract
Previous research has found higher temperature trends at urban observatories. This study examines in depth the features of the urban environment, the thermal behaviour of land use and land cover, and the changes that have taken place in five urban areas of the [...] Read more.
Previous research has found higher temperature trends at urban observatories. This study examines in depth the features of the urban environment, the thermal behaviour of land use and land cover, and the changes that have taken place in five urban areas of the Spanish Mediterranean. The CORINE Land Cover database was used to delimit the primary land use land cover (LULC) and its changes between 1990 and 2018. Once this had been established, land surface temperatures (LSTs) between 1985 and 2023 were retrieved from the Landsat database available on the Climate Engine website. There has been a significant advance in artificial land uses, which have become the main uses in the urban areas in Valencia and Alicante. An analysis of the primary land cover showed the greatest thermal increase in artificial surfaces, especially in the industrial, commercial, and transport units that are common on their outskirts, without exception in any urban area. The results are less clear for urban fabrics and agricultural areas due to their diversity and complexity. The density of vegetation is a key factor in the magnitude of the UHI, which is higher in the urban areas with more vegetated agriculture areas, therefore showing lower LST than both industrial units and urban fabrics. Another important conclusion is the role of breezes in limiting or eliminating the strength of the UHI. Sea breezes help to explain the monthly variation of UHIs. Both bodies of water and areas of dense tree vegetation provided the lowest LST, a fact of special interest for mitigating the effects of heat waves in increasingly large urban areas. This study also concludes the different effect of each LULC on the temperatures recorded by urban observatories and enables better decision-making when setting up weather stations for a more detailed time study of the urban heat island (UHI). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the urban areas surveyed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Growth of urban centres above 100,000 inhabitants and location of State Meteorological Agency (AEMET in Spanish) weather observatories. Source: [<a href="#B52-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">52</a>,<a href="#B53-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">53</a>,<a href="#B54-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LULC distribution in Castellon’s urban area between 1990 (<b>left</b>) and 2018 (<b>right</b>), with historical (black point) and working (grey point) observatories. Source: “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information;</span> &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>LULC distribution in Valencia’s urban area between 1990 (<b>left</b>) and 2018 (<b>right</b>), with historical (black point) and working (grey point) observatories. Source: “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>LULC distribution in Alicante’s urban area between 1990 (<b>left</b>) and 2018 (<b>right</b>), with historical (black point) and working (grey point) observatories. Source: “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>LULC distribution in Elche’s urban area between 1990 (<b>left</b>) and 2018 (<b>right</b>), with historical (black point) and working (grey point) observatories. Source: “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>LULC distribution in Murcia’s urban area between 1990 (<b>left</b>) and 2018 (<b>right</b>), with historical (black point) and working (grey point) observatories. Source: “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Annual evolution of LST by urban area for constant uses. Source: [<a href="#B60-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B74-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">74</a>]. “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Monthly evolution of LST by urban area for constant uses. Source: [<a href="#B60-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B74-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">74</a>]. “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Monthly evolution of UHIs by urban area for constant uses. Ind_hga: industrial, commercial, and transport units minus heterogeneous agricultural areas. Ind_pcrop: industrial, commercial, and transport units minus permanent crops. Ind_scrub: industrial, commercial, and transport units minus scrub and/or herbaceous vegetation associations. Urb_hga: urban fabric minus heterogeneous agricultural areas. Urb_pcrop: urban fabric minus permanent crops. Urb_scrub: urban fabric minus scrub and/or herbaceous vegetation associations. Source: [<a href="#B60-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B70-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">70</a>]. “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Monthly evolution of NDVI by urban area for the most important non-urban uses. hga: heterogeneous agricultural areas. pcrop: permanent crops. scrub: scrub and/or herbaceous vegetation associations. Source: [<a href="#B60-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B70-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">70</a>]. “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>LST evolution (°C), in black lines, and trends (°C/year), in blue lines, since 2000 by urban area for constant uses. Source: [<a href="#B60-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B74-urbansci-08-00147" class="html-bibr">74</a>]. “<span class="html-italic">Generated using European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information</span>; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/5c1f2e03-fcba-47b1-afeb-bc05a47bada0</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2909/71c95a07-e296-44fc-b22b-415f42acfdf0</a>&gt;”.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 12845 KiB  
Article
Impact of Typical Land Use Expansion Induced by Ecological Restoration and Protection Projects on Landscape Patterns
by Xuyang Kou, Jinqi Zhao and Weiguo Sang
Land 2024, 13(9), 1513; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091513 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 566
Abstract
Land use and land cover (LULC) changes driven by ecological restoration and protection projects play a pivotal role in reshaping landscape patterns. However, the specific impacts of these projects on landscape structure remain understudied. In this research, we applied geographically weighted regression (GWR) [...] Read more.
Land use and land cover (LULC) changes driven by ecological restoration and protection projects play a pivotal role in reshaping landscape patterns. However, the specific impacts of these projects on landscape structure remain understudied. In this research, we applied geographically weighted regression (GWR) to analyze the spatial relationships between typical land use expansion and landscape pattern characteristics in the Lesser Khingan Mountains–Sanjiang Plain region between 2017 and 2022. Our results indicate three key findings: (1) Significant spatial heterogeneity exists in the relationship between landscape patterns and land use expansion, which varies across geographic locations; (2) Ecological restoration projects generally reduce fragmentation, dominance, and heterogeneity while enhancing connectivity, particularly in forest and farmland regions. However, excessive land use expansion in certain areas may reverse these positive effects; (3) Landscape complexity increases in high-altitude mountainous regions due to land use expansion but decreases in plains, particularly in forest-to-farmland conversions. These findings provide new insights into how landscape patterns respond to ecological restoration efforts and offer actionable guidance for improving future land use planning and policy decisions. Our study highlights the need to consider local geomorphological factors when designing ecological projects, ensuring that restoration efforts align with regional landscape dynamics to maintain landscape integrity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scope and geographical location of the Lesser Khingan Mountains–Sanjiang Plain area, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sankey map of land use transfer in the study area during 2017–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dynamic transfer map of land use types and the mutual expansion map of Cropland and Trees land use in the research area from 2017 to 2022: (<b>a</b>) Distribution map of the mutual expansion of land use types. (<b>b</b>) Distribution map of typical land use types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution of the Agricultural–Forest Land Expansion Index from 2017 to 2022. (<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of the FAEI at different levels in the study area; (<b>b</b>) Spatial distribution of the AFEI at different levels in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Results of landscape metrics at the landscape level in the study area from 2017 to 2022. (<b>a</b>) Trends in fragmentation; (<b>b</b>) Trends in connectivity; (<b>c</b>) Trends in complexity; (<b>d</b>) Trends in heterogeneity; (<b>e</b>) Trends in dominance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>LISA aggregation of the land use expansion indices in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Correlation analysis between land use and landscape metrics (“*” indicates significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; “**” indicates high significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Regression error probability distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial pattern of the correlation coefficient between the FAEI and the AFEI and the landscape indices in the study area.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1466 KiB  
Review
Research Progress in Spatiotemporal Dynamic Simulation of LUCC
by Wenhao Wan, Yongzhong Tian, Jinglian Tian, Chengxi Yuan, Yan Cao and Kangning Liu
Sustainability 2024, 16(18), 8135; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188135 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 607
Abstract
Land Use and Land Cover Change (LUCC) represents the interaction between human societies and the natural environment. Studies of LUCC simulation allow for the analysis of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) patterns in a given region. Moreover, these studies enable the simulation [...] Read more.
Land Use and Land Cover Change (LUCC) represents the interaction between human societies and the natural environment. Studies of LUCC simulation allow for the analysis of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) patterns in a given region. Moreover, these studies enable the simulation of complex future LUCC scenarios by integrating multiple factors. Such studies can provide effective means for optimizing and making decisions about the future patterns of a region. This review conducted a literature search on geographic models and simulations in the Web of Science database. From the literature, we summarized the basic steps of spatiotemporal dynamic simulation of LUCC. The focus was on the current major models, analyzing their characteristics and limitations, and discussing their expanded applications in land use. This review reveals that current research still faces challenges such as data uncertainty, necessitating the advancement of more diverse data and new technologies. Future research can enhance the precision and applicability of studies by improving models and methods, integrating big data and multi-scale data, and employing multi-model coupling and various algorithmic experiments for comparison. This would support the advancement of land use spatiotemporal dynamic simulation research to higher levels. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Article selection procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Number of English/Chinese articles published in 1994–2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Basic steps of spatiotemporal dynamic simulation of LUCC. SD: System Dynamics. GDP: gross domestic product. SVM: Support Vector Machine. GWR: geographically weighted regression. MGWR: multiple geographically weighted regression. CA: Cellular Automaton. FLUS: Future Land Use Simulation. PLUS: Patch-generating Land Use Simulation.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 14147 KiB  
Article
Evolution Process and Land Use/Land Cover Response of Urban–Rural Space in Wuhan under Polycentric Structure
by Jisheng Yan and Jing Ye
Land 2024, 13(9), 1502; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091502 - 16 Sep 2024
Viewed by 450
Abstract
Polycentric development facilitates urban–rural spatial reshaping and land use/land cover (LULC) protection. Previous studies have predominantly focused on urban areas, with spatial delineation methods biased towards the macro-level, lacking a holistic perspective that situates them within the urban–rural spatial framework. This study proposes [...] Read more.
Polycentric development facilitates urban–rural spatial reshaping and land use/land cover (LULC) protection. Previous studies have predominantly focused on urban areas, with spatial delineation methods biased towards the macro-level, lacking a holistic perspective that situates them within the urban–rural spatial framework. This study proposes a spatial delineation framework that is applicable to the polycentric structure, taking into account the social, economic, and natural characteristics of urbanization. It employs semivariance analysis and spatial continuous wavelet transform (SCWT) to analyze the effects of polycentric development on the urban–rural space of Wuhan from 2012 to 2021 and applies a land use transition matrix, landscape indices, and bivariate spatial autocorrelation to quantify the responses and differences of LULC within urban–rural space. The results indicate that 600m×600m is the best scale for exhibiting the multidimensional characterization of urbanization. The polycentric structure alleviates the compact development of the central city, and it drives rapid expansion at the urban–rural fringe, exacerbating the spatial heterogeneity in LULC change pattern, spatial configuration, and urbanization response within urban–rural spaces. The overall effects of urbanization on LULC are relatively weak along the urban–rural gradient, experiencing a transition from positive to negative and back to positive. This study employs a novel spatial delineation framework to depict the polycentric transformation of metropolitan areas and provides valuable insights for regional planning and ecological conservation in the urban–rural fringe. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rural–Urban Gradients: Landscape and Nature Conservation II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow of the methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Urbanization attributes at different sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Using mutation detection to divide urban–rural space. (<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of the corrected mutation point groups. (<b>b</b>) Variance curve of SCWT coefficients at different scales.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Urban–rural spatial distribution in Wuhan from 2012 to 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Polycentric expansion process in Wuhan from 2012 to 2021. (<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of urban–rural fringe in different urban districts. (<b>b</b>) Directional expansion of urban area and urban–rural fringe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatiotemporal dynamics of LULC in urban–rural space. (<b>a</b>) Transform of LULC in urban–rural space. (<b>b</b>) Spatial configuration of LULC in urban–rural space. The unit of transfer area for LULC is km<sup>2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effects and distributions of urbanization on the ecological risk of LULC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison with other spatial division methods in polycentric structure. (<b>a</b>) Extraction results by the clustering method. (<b>b</b>) Extraction results by the threshold method. (<b>c</b>) The overlay comparison for the clustering model. Boxes 1 and 2 display enlarged areas from the remote sensing images. (<b>d</b>) The overlay comparison for the threshold model. Boxes 3 and 4 display enlarged areas from the remote sensing images. (<b>e</b>) Local remote sensing image. Subfigures (<b>e-1</b>–<b>e-4</b>) correspond to the remote sensing images associated with these boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Urban–rural spatial evolution in Wuhan from 2012 to 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Change and response curves of LULC along the urban–rural gradient. The curves indicate the change trends and magnitudes of LULC; the arrows indicate the temporal change of LULC. Yellow, blue, and green represent PLAND, PD, and AI, respectively; upward and downward arrows signify that the trend continues, with values increasing or decreasing.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6903 KiB  
Article
Sensitivity Analysis and Parameterization of Gridded and Lumped Models Representation for Heterogeneous Land Use and Land Cover
by Prakash Pudasaini, Thaine H. Assumpção, Andreja Jonoski and Ioana Popescu
Water 2024, 16(18), 2608; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182608 - 14 Sep 2024
Viewed by 422
Abstract
Hydrological processes can be highly influenced by changes in land use land cover (LULC), which can make hydrological modelling also very sensitive to land cover characterization. Therefore, obtaining up-to-date LULC data is a crucial process in hydrological modelling, and as such, different sources [...] Read more.
Hydrological processes can be highly influenced by changes in land use land cover (LULC), which can make hydrological modelling also very sensitive to land cover characterization. Therefore, obtaining up-to-date LULC data is a crucial process in hydrological modelling, and as such, different sources of LULC data raises questions on their quality and applicability. This is especially true with new data sources, such as citizen science-based land cover maps. Therefore, this research aims to explore the influence of LULC data sources on hydrological models via their parameterization and by performing sensitivity analyses. Kiffissos catchment, in Greece, a poorly gauged and highly urbanized basin including the city of Athens, is the case study area. In total, 12 continuous hydrological models were developed by mainly varying their structure and parametrization (lumped and gridded) and using three LULC datasets: coordination of information on the environment (CORINE), Urban Atlas and Scent (citizen-based). It was found that excess precipitation is negligibly contributed to by soil saturation and is dominated by the runoff over impervious areas. Therefore, imperviousness was the main parameter influencing both sensitivity to land cover and parameterization. Lastly, although the parametrization as lumped and gridded models affected the representation of hydrological processes in pervious areas, it was not relevant in terms of excess precipitation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of (<b>A</b>) Greece, (<b>B</b>) Kifissos catchment with delineated study area (bottom left) and (<b>C</b>) study area with 21 sub-basins and observed discharge stations (right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Land use land cover maps for (<b>A</b>) CORINE, (<b>B</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>C</b>) Scent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Calibration of basic lumped and gridded models and (<b>B</b>) validation of lumped and gridded models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of all variables for W08: (<b>A</b>) ET canopy, canopy storage, ET potential, ET surface and surface storage; (<b>B</b>) total precipitation, excess canopy, infiltration and excess precipitation; and (<b>C</b>) soil percolation and available moisture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Canopy storage, (<b>B</b>) excess canopy and infiltration and (<b>C</b>) evapotranspiration for W03, W08 and W20 of M0LC:CALC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Soil percolation, (<b>B</b>) saturated fraction for W08, W03 and W20 and total and excess precipitation for (<b>C</b>) W08, (<b>D</b>) W03 and (<b>E</b>) W20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Precipitation distribution pattern for (<b>A</b>) total, (<b>B</b>) excess, (<b>C</b>) excess precipitation due to imperviousness, (<b>D</b>) excess precipitation due to soil saturation and (<b>E</b>) precipitation and imperviousness for all 21 sub-basins in percentage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variables for CORINE, Urban Atlas and Scent models for W08 M0LC:CALC, M0LE:CALC and M0LS:CALC: (<b>A</b>) evapotranspiration, (<b>B</b>) excess precipitation, (<b>C</b>) saturated fraction and (<b>D</b>) total precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Lumped vs gridded evapotranspiration for sub-catchment W08 for (<b>A</b>) CORINE, (<b>B</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>C</b>) Scent and saturated fraction for (<b>D</b>) CORINE, (<b>E</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>F</b>) Scent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Excess precipitation for W08 for (<b>A</b>) CORINE, (<b>B</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>C</b>) Scent and (<b>D</b>) total precipitation and imperviousness percentage for W08 for (<b>E</b>) CORINE, (<b>F</b>) Urban Atlas and (<b>G</b>) Scent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Precipitation vs surface runoff for M0LC_CALC: (<b>A</b>) W08, (<b>B</b>) W03 and (<b>C</b>) W20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Lumped and gridded models flow for J09, (<b>A</b>) lumped vs observed and (<b>B</b>) gridded vs observed, and J08, (<b>C</b>) lumped vs observed and (<b>D</b>) gridded vs observed.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 7297 KiB  
Article
Spatial–Temporal Dynamics of Land Use and Cover in Mata da Pimenteira State Park Based on MapBiomas Brasil Data: Perspectives and Social Impacts
by Júlio Cesar Gomes da Cruz, Alexandre Maniçoba da Rosa Ferraz Jardim, Anderson Santos da Silva, Marcos Vinícius da Silva, Jhon Lennon Bezerra da Silva, Rodrigo Ferraz Jardim Marques, Elisiane Alba, Antônio Henrique Cardoso do Nascimento, Araci Farias Silva, Elania Freire da Silva and Alan Cézar Bezerra
AgriEngineering 2024, 6(3), 3327-3344; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6030190 - 13 Sep 2024
Viewed by 496
Abstract
Caatinga is a typical Brazilian biome facing severe threats despite its ecological and socio-economic importance. Conservation strategies are essential in protecting ecosystems and ensuring natural resource sustainability. Mata da Pimenteira State Park (PEMP), launched in 2012, is an example of such a strategy. [...] Read more.
Caatinga is a typical Brazilian biome facing severe threats despite its ecological and socio-economic importance. Conservation strategies are essential in protecting ecosystems and ensuring natural resource sustainability. Mata da Pimenteira State Park (PEMP), launched in 2012, is an example of such a strategy. The current study aims to use orbital remote sensing techniques to assess human impacts on changes in land use and land cover (LULC) after the establishment of PEMP in the semi-arid region known as Caatinga, in Pernambuco State. The effects of this unit on vegetation preservation were specifically analyzed based on using data from the MapBiomas Brasil project to assess trends in LULC, both in and around PEMP, from 2002 to 2020. Man–Kendall and Pettitt statistical tests were applied to identify significant changes, such as converting forest areas into pastures and agricultural plantations. Trends of the loss and gain of LULC were observed over the years, such as forest areas’ conversion into pasture and vice versa, mainly before and after PEMP implementation. These findings highlight the importance of developing conservation measures and planning to help protecting the Caatinga, which is a vital biome in Brazil. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The study site’s spatial location highlights Mata da Pimenteira State Park (PEMP) and the buffer zone (BZ) in Serra Talhada, Pernambuco State, Brazil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Zoning of Mata da Pimenteira State Park (PEMP) and its respective buffer zone (BZ), according to the management plan established in 2013.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart for methodology adopted. Each step indicates the data processing and analyses applied.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial dynamics of land use and land cover (LULC) in Mata da Pimenteira State Park (PEMP) and in its buffer zone (BZ) in 2002, 2008, 2014, and 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial–temporal evolution of land use and cover in Mata da Pimenteira State Park (PEMP) and in its respective buffer zone (BZ), comparing different temporal compositions from 2002–2011, 2011–2020, and 2002–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Behaviors of the areas of different land-use and -cover classes comprising PEMP’s buffer zone (BZ) and PEMP’s area in the 19-year time series, from 2002 to 2020, with distinct <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis scales corresponding to a coverage area (ha) for each class to enhance data visualization. The dashed line in the graphs indicates the separation of periods with different averages according to the Pettitt test. Buffer zone: (<b>A</b>) Class 1—forest; (<b>B</b>) Class 2—non-forest natural formation; (<b>C</b>) Class 3—pasture; (<b>D</b>) Class 4—agriculture; (<b>E</b>) Class 6—mosaic of uses; (<b>F</b>) Class 7—unvegetated area; (<b>G</b>) Class 8—water surface. Mata da Pimenteira State Park: (<b>H</b>) Class 1—forest; (<b>I</b>) Class 3—pasture; (<b>J</b>) Class 6—mosaic of uses; (<b>K</b>) Class 7—unvegetated area.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 5409 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Ecosystem Water Yield Services and Responses to Future Land Use Scenarios in Henan Province, China
by Shuxue Wang, Tianyi Cai, Qian Wen, Chaohui Yin, Jing Han and Zhichao Zhang
Water 2024, 16(17), 2544; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16172544 - 9 Sep 2024
Viewed by 585
Abstract
Water yield (WY) service is the cornerstone of ecosystem functionality. Predicting and assessing the impact of land use/land cover (LULC) changes on WY is imperative for a nation’s food security, regional economic development, and ecological environmental protection. This study aimed to evaluate the [...] Read more.
Water yield (WY) service is the cornerstone of ecosystem functionality. Predicting and assessing the impact of land use/land cover (LULC) changes on WY is imperative for a nation’s food security, regional economic development, and ecological environmental protection. This study aimed to evaluate the water yield (WY) service in Henan Province, China, using high-resolution (30 m) remote sensing land use monitoring data from four study years: 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020. It also utilized the PLUS model to predict the characteristics of LULC evolution and the future trends of WY service under four different development scenarios (for 2030 and 2050). The study’s results indicated the following: (1) From 1990 to 2020, the Henan Province’s WY first increased and then decreased, ranging from 398.56 × 108 m3 to 482.95 × 108 m3. The southern and southeastern parts of Henan Province were high-value WY areas, while most of its other regions were deemed low-value WY areas. (2) The different land use types were ranked in terms of their WY capacity, from strongest to weakest, as follows: unused land, cultivated land, grassland, construction land, woodland, and water. (3) The four abovementioned scenarios were ranked, from highest to lowest, based on the Henan’s total WY (in 2050) in each of them: high-quality development scenario (HDS), business-as-usual scenario (BAU), cultivated land protection scenario (CPS), and ecological protection scenario (ES). This study contributes to the advancement of ecosystem services research. Its results can provide scientific support for water resource management, sustainable regional development, and comprehensive land-use planning in Henan Province. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prediction and Assessment of Hydrological Processes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location of the study area; (<b>b</b>) study area elevation map; (<b>c</b>) climatic conditions in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technical roadmap of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Drivers of LULC change simulation in Henan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The 2020 real map of LULC in Henan Province; (<b>b</b>) 2020 simulation of LULC in Henan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial pattern of inter-annual difference in WY in Henan Province from 1990 to 2020. (<b>a</b>) 1990–2000, (<b>b</b>) 2000–2010, (<b>c</b>) 2010–2020, (<b>d</b>) 1990–2020. (Note: The data in the figures represent the water yield of the ending year minus the starting year; for example, 1990–2000 is WY2000–WY1990).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution pattern of WY in Henan Province from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Vertical gradient changes in LULC and WY depth in Henan Province in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution pattern of hotspots of WY in Henan Province from 1990 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Changes in WY depth and total WY of different land use types from 1990 to 2020 in Henan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of LULC for 2030 and 2050 under different scenarios: BAU, CPS, ES, and HDS in Henan Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spatial distribution pattern of WY depth in Henan Province in 2030 and 2050.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Spatial distribution of WY hotspots in Henan Province for 2030 and 2050.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Changes in WY depth in the four major watersheds in Henan Province (1990–2020).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop