[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (17)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = HAZUS

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 3877 KiB  
Article
Integrated System Design for Post-Disaster Management: Multi-Facility, Multi-Period, and Bi-Objective Optimization Approach
by Byung Duk Song, Sungbum Jun and Seokcheon Lee
Systems 2024, 12(3), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030069 - 22 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1540
Abstract
Disaster management requires efficient allocation of essential facilities with consideration of various objectives. During the response and recovery phase of disaster management (RRDM), various types of missions occur in multiple periods, and each of them needs different support from facilities. In this study, [...] Read more.
Disaster management requires efficient allocation of essential facilities with consideration of various objectives. During the response and recovery phase of disaster management (RRDM), various types of missions occur in multiple periods, and each of them needs different support from facilities. In this study, a bi-objective mathematical model was derived to support multi-period RRDM by optimal allocation of required facilities such as drone stations, shelters, emergency medical facilities, and warehouses according to the mission life cycle. Connectivity between facilities was considered to ensure inter-facility complementarity. For efficient derivation of Pareto solutions, a modified epsilon-constraint algorithm for bi-objective optimization was developed. The algorithm was tested with a realistic disaster simulation scenario using HAZUS 4.0 as a demonstration of the benefits of the proposed approach. With the simulation experiments, the proposed approach was expected to provide efficient operational plans and guidelines to decision makers for the bi-objective optimization problem in RRDM systems. In addition, the consideration of inter-facility connectivity can play an important role in the RRDM, especially for robustness and readiness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Risk Management in Public Sector)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Summary of four-phase disaster management cycle. (Graphically modified from Altay and Green [<a href="#B4-systems-12-00069" class="html-bibr">4</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mission life cycles (modified from Balcik and Beamon, 2008).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illustrative example of changes in tasks for facilities (30 tasks and 5 candidate sites over 10 time periods).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Illustration of facilities and tasks for earthquake scenario in San Diego. In the right-side figure, the different circle sizes represent the demand levels of tasks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Pareto curve for earthquake scenario in San Diego.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Allocations of facilities in Pareto solution (<span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>1</sub>—1030.67, <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>2</sub>—78,684).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Allocations of facilities with consideration of connectivity for solution in <a href="#systems-12-00069-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a> (<span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>1</sub>—1145.14, <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>2</sub>—75,121).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Illustration of facility types at time 1 without consideration of connectivity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Illustration of facility types at time 1 with consideration of connectivity.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 70096 KiB  
Article
Influence of the 2020 Seismic Hazard Update on Residential Losses in Greater Montreal, Canada
by Philippe Rosset, Xuejiao Long and Luc Chouinard
GeoHazards 2023, 4(4), 406-420; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards4040023 - 22 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1574
Abstract
Greater Montreal is situated in a region with moderate seismic activity and rests on soft ground deposits from the ancient Champlain Sea, as well as more recent alluvial deposits from the Saint Lawrence River. These deposits have the potential to amplify seismic waves, [...] Read more.
Greater Montreal is situated in a region with moderate seismic activity and rests on soft ground deposits from the ancient Champlain Sea, as well as more recent alluvial deposits from the Saint Lawrence River. These deposits have the potential to amplify seismic waves, as demonstrated by past strong, and recent weak, earthquakes. Studies based on the 2015 National Seismic Hazard Model (SHM5) had estimated losses to residential buildings at 2% of their value for an event with a return period of 2475 years. In 2020, the seismic hazard model was updated (SHM6), resulting in more severe hazards for eastern Canada. This paper aims to quantify the impact of these changes on losses to residential buildings in Greater Montreal. Our exposure database includes population and buildings at the scale of dissemination areas (500–1000 inhabitants). Buildings are classified by occupancy and construction type and grouped into three building code levels based on year of construction. The value of buildings is obtained from property-valuation rolls and the content value is derived from insurance data. Damage and losses are calculated using Hazus software developed for FEMA. Losses are shown to be 53% higher than the SHM5 estimates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Geohazard Characterization, Modeling, and Risk Assessment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Investigated region. Black lines delimit the Regional County Municipalities (RCM) with their associated name. Dashed black line is the limit of the Montreal Metropolitan Community and thin blue lines are the dissemination areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Uniform hazard spectra for the Montreal City Hall as calculated every five years since 2005 in the national seismic hazard model. Calculations are for site class C and the return period of 2475 years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart describing the procedure used to calculate damage and losses using as input the Seismic Hazard Models (SHM-2015 and 2020) corrected for the site condition model. The corresponding section for each step of the calculation is indicated in italics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Site conditions in terms of V<sub>s30</sub> maps grouped by site classes (data from Rosset et al., 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of PGA (in g) for the return period of 2475 years using (<b>top</b>) the SHM5 and (<b>bottom</b>) the SHM6. PGA is calculated (<b>left</b>) by grid for site class C (V<sub>s30</sub> = 450 m/s) and (<b>right</b>) by dissemination area using the V<sub>s30</sub> map in <a href="#geohazards-04-00023-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of residential buildings by type. The surface of the pie charts is proportional to the number of buildings and centered in each dissemination area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Distribution of residential buildings by type in (<b>a</b>) municipalities outside Montreal and (<b>b</b>) in Montreal. The percentage of buildings is labeled above each bar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Residential building value (in million of CAD) and number of buildings by dissemination areas. The surface of the circle is proportional to the number of buildings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fragility curves as used in Hazus for wood-frame houses (W1) for three code levels (pre-, low- and moderate-code levels). The curves are colored for slight, moderate, extensive and complete damage levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Percentage of damage by construction type and levels of damage using the SHM5 (<b>a</b>) and the SHM6 (<b>b</b>). URM is for unreinforced masonry buildings and MH for mobile houses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Distribution of building losses (in thousand CAD) by number of dissemination areas for the return period of 2475 years using the SHM5 and SHM6 models. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis values are the upper limit of each bar. The dots with line are the percentage of DAs for each range of loss values (left <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Distribution of building losses (in million of CAD) by dissemination areas for the return period of 2475 years using the (<b>left</b>) SHM5-2015 and the (<b>right</b>) SHM6-2020 models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Influence of the seismic hazard model update on (<b>left</b>) PGA and on (<b>right</b>) loss (in %).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 9124 KiB  
Article
Seismic Fragility Assessment of SMRFs Equipped with TMD Considering Cyclic Deterioration of Members and Nonlinear Geometry
by Mohammad Reza Hemmati Khollari, Azita Asadi and Hamed Tajammolian
Buildings 2023, 13(6), 1364; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061364 - 23 May 2023
Viewed by 1242
Abstract
This paper presents seismic fragility curves to assess the effect of far-field ground motions on the behavior of high-rise steel moment resisting frame (SMRF) structures equipped with Tuned Mass Damper, considering the cyclic deterioration of members and P-Delta effect in the nonlinear region. [...] Read more.
This paper presents seismic fragility curves to assess the effect of far-field ground motions on the behavior of high-rise steel moment resisting frame (SMRF) structures equipped with Tuned Mass Damper, considering the cyclic deterioration of members and P-Delta effect in the nonlinear region. For this purpose, three 8-, 20-, and 30-story SMRF structures are selected, 44 earthquake record sets are extracted from the FEMA P-695, Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is operated, and four structural damage states are considered through the framework of HAZUS, including slight, moderate, extensive, and complete. Maximum structural inter-story drift and floor acceleration are employed to quantify the damage states, and spectral acceleration is used as the intensity measure. Results show that the Tuned Mass Damper can reduce the probability of damage under earthquake excitation in all damage states for both structural and non-structural elements. The decline varies from 4.0% to 20.0%, depending on the ground motion intensity level, based on engineering demand parameters. Moreover, it is clear that nonlinear properties and component deterioration under cyclic excitation can affect structural response in all damage states, which concerns the obtained curves. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Typical view plan of the archetype structures (adapted with permission from [<a href="#B46-buildings-13-01364" class="html-bibr">46</a>]; Copyright 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Elevation view of the 8-story SMF (adapted with permission from [<a href="#B46-buildings-13-01364" class="html-bibr">46</a>]; Copyright 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illustration of leaning column and TMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>An idealized concentrated hinge centerline model for a typical SMRF (adapted from [<a href="#B52-buildings-13-01364" class="html-bibr">52</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Modified Ibarra–Medina–Krawinkler deterioration material model (adapted from [<a href="#B35-buildings-13-01364" class="html-bibr">35</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Idealized panel zone model (Adapted from Ref. [<a href="#B35-buildings-13-01364" class="html-bibr">35</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of pushover curves with (w) and without (w/o) consideration of the P-Delta effect: (<b>a</b>) 8-story, (<b>b</b>) 20-story, and (<b>c</b>) 30-story structures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>IDA response plot of spectral acceleration versus maximum inter-story drift ratio for 8-story structures with consideration of the P-Delta effect: (<b>a</b>) without (w/o) TMD, (<b>b</b>) with (w) TMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fractiles 16, 50, and 84 of the IDA response of spectral acceleration versus maximum inter-story drift ratio for 8-story structures with (w) and without (w/o) TMD: (<b>a</b>) without consideration of the P-Delta effect, (<b>b</b>) with consideration of the P-Delta effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fractiles 16, 50, and 84 of the IDA response of spectral acceleration versus maximum inter-story drift ratio for 20-story structures with (w) and without (w/o) TMD: (<b>a</b>) without consideration of the P-Delta effect, (<b>b</b>) with consideration of the P-Delta effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Fractiles 16, 50, and 84 of the IDA response of spectral acceleration versus maximum inter-story drift ratio for 30-story structures with (w) and without (w/o) TMD: (<b>a</b>) without consideration of the P-Delta effect (<b>b</b>) with consideration of the P-Delta effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Fragility curves for the structural elements sensitive to the inter-story drift ratio of the investigated 8-story structures considering the P-Delta effect, with (w) and without (w/o) TMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Fragility curves for the structural elements sensitive to the inter-story drift ratio of the investigated 20-story structures considering the P-Delta effect, with (w) and without (w/o) TMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Fragility curves for the structural elements sensitive to the inter-story drift ratio of the investigated 30-story structures considering the P-Delta effect, with (w)and without (w/o) TMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Fragility curves for the non-structural elements sensitive to the floor acceleration of the investigated 8-story structures considering the P-Delta effect, with (w) and without (w/o) TMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Fragility curves for the non-structural elements sensitive to the floor acceleration of the investigated 20-story structures considering the P-Delta effect, with (w) and without (w/o) TMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Fragility curves for the non-structural elements sensitive to the floor acceleration of the investigated 30-story structures considering the P-Delta effect, with (w) and without (w/o) TMD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Moment rotation curve of some beams with (w) and without (w/o) TMD in the structures with consideration of P-Delta effect: (<b>a</b>) 8-story structure, (<b>b</b>) 20-story structure, and (<b>c</b>) 30-story structure.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 17268 KiB  
Article
A Seismic Fragility Assessment Method for Urban Function Spatial Units: A Case Study of Xuzhou City
by Zhitao Fei, Xiaodong Guo, Janes Ouma Odongo, Donghui Ma, Yuanyuan Ren, Jiajia Wu, Wei Wang and Junyi Zhu
Sustainability 2023, 15(10), 8022; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108022 - 15 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1311
Abstract
Cities that experience earthquake disasters face a lot of uncertainties and unsustainability resulting from the fragility of their infrastructure, which should be considered in engineering. This study proposes a seismic fragility assessment framework for urban functional spatial units in order to improve the [...] Read more.
Cities that experience earthquake disasters face a lot of uncertainties and unsustainability resulting from the fragility of their infrastructure, which should be considered in engineering. This study proposes a seismic fragility assessment framework for urban functional spatial units in order to improve the traditional structural fragility assessment criteria that are currently applied in urban planning. First, appropriate spatial units are classified for the study area, the functional categories of the study area are determined using urban Point of Interest (POI) data, and the functional proportion of the spatial units is calculated. Secondly, considering the classification of different seismic fortification levels represented by different construction ages, and considering the possible building forms and HAZUS’s classification system of building structures in order to establish the correlation between building functions and building structures, the methods of a field survey and a questionnaire survey are adopted to match the functions with the most likely building structures. After this, based on the assumption of the lognormal distribution of ground motion intensity, a mixed method is adopted to calculate the mean value μ¯ for the fragility of functional space units. The Monte Carlo method is then used to discretize the data and statistically obtain the standard deviation β¯ for the fragility of functional space units, and the fragility curve is then fitted. A district in Xuzhou City, China, was used as a case study to verify this assessment framework. The results showed that: (1) the fragility of functional space units was greatly affected by the proportion of defense standards in different periods in the unit, which reflected the average level of fragility within the unit. (2) The unit loss index of units built after 2001 with a proportion of less than 50% is basically above the average loss level of the study area. (3) The simulated damage ratio of the assessment results under the three levels, namely frequent earthquake, fortified earthquake and rare earthquake, is consistent with the previously experienced earthquake damage. The paper concludes that it is helpful to design and utilize seismic fragility predicting formulas and technologies at the functional spatial unit level for urban planning, which is meaningful for the formulation of planning strategies, reducing risks to infrastructure and delivering sustainable development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Framework of this paper.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Division of spatial units.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Chronological distribution of units.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>HAZUS Code proportion of units with weak areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Buildings in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Quantity statistics of POI categories of spatial units.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Functional proportion of spatial units (descriptions of abbreviations can be found in <a href="#sustainability-15-08022-t005" class="html-table">Table 5</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fragility comparison between spatial unit 56# and other structures [<a href="#B31-sustainability-15-08022" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-sustainability-15-08022" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-sustainability-15-08022" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-sustainability-15-08022" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fragility comparison between spatial unit 97# and other structures [<a href="#B31-sustainability-15-08022" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-sustainability-15-08022" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-sustainability-15-08022" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-sustainability-15-08022" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Functional spatial unit loss ratio ((<b>a</b>). Construction ratio below 50% after 2001, and (<b>b</b>). Construction ratio 50–90% after 2001).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4302 KiB  
Article
Application and Validation of Flood Damage Curves for Wastewater Treatment Facilities (WWTF), Case Examples in Rhode Island
by Tyler Donahue, Peter Krekorian, Luke Swift, Malcolm L. Spaulding, Chris Baxter and Craig Swanson
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(11), 1671; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111671 - 6 Nov 2022
Viewed by 1541
Abstract
The STORMTOOLS Coastal Environmental Risk Index (CERI) has historically been used to assess the damage to residential and commercial structures from coastal flooding, including the effects of sea level rise (SLR) in RI. In the present study, CERI was extended to address the [...] Read more.
The STORMTOOLS Coastal Environmental Risk Index (CERI) has historically been used to assess the damage to residential and commercial structures from coastal flooding, including the effects of sea level rise (SLR) in RI. In the present study, CERI was extended to address the impact of flooding for 100 yr storm, including the effects of SLR, to the newly renovated Warren, RI wastewater treatment facilities (WWTF), located on the tidal Warren River, using FEMA HAZUS damage curves. The analysis shows that the average damage for 100 yr flooding, across all components of the facility, increases with sea level from 16% (0 ft SLR), 23% (2 ft SLR), 26% (3 ft SLR), to 28% (5 ft SLR). The primary settling and chlorination tanks are at most risk and the aeration and reaction tanks at least risk. In an effort to validate the FEMA HAZUS WWTF damage curves, CERI was applied to predict flood damage during the 3 day, March/April 2010 flooding event (500 yr) to the Cranston, Warwick, and West Warwick WWTF located on the Pawtuxet River, RI. The predictions of the damage to each WWTF from this event were compared to observations of the damage made by the plant operators. The percent damage was estimated by comparing the cost of the damage to the assessed value of the facility. Using the FEMA HAZUS damage curves for the observed level of inundation (7 to 8 ft) predicted that the Warwick and West Warwick facility damage ranged from 15 to 45% with an average value of about 30%. The Cranston WWTF damage was very low (<1%) because of the elevation of the facility. The observed damage for the 2010 flood event was approximately 21% for the Warwick facility and 18% for the West Warwick facility, between the FEMA HAZUS lower and average values. Damage to the Cranston facility was consistent between FEMA HAZUS and observed values at <1%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Coastal Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>STORMTOOLS Coastal Environmental Risk Index (CERI) flow chart [<a href="#B1-jmse-10-01671" class="html-bibr">1</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of Warren WWTF on the Warren River, RI. Location of Warren, RI in Narragansett Bay (<b>left panel</b>, dark red is the Town of Warren and light red the Town of Barrington, to the north, and Town of Bristol, to the south), image of coastal flooding (100 yr) 4 to 16 ft above grade (blue to light yellow) (<b>center panel</b>) and close-up of the Warren WWTF (<b>right panel</b>, see yellow circle in center panel for location) of the WWTF. (The width of the right panel is 550 ft, and the height of 750 ft). The WWTF is located at 41 43′33” N and 71 17′02” W.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Major components of the Warren, RI WWTF. These are color coded to help in presenting the results of the analysis. Grit filter and primary sludge pump are not color coded since they experience only limited damage for short term flooding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Grade elevation, 100 yr surge height, wave crest height, BFE relative to NAVD88 and grade (lower-level left panel) and impact of SLR on BFE from SDE maps with sea level rise (lower, right panel) for 100 yr flooding. The upper-level left panel shows FEMA BFE, relative to NAVD88, and upper right panel shows BFE, relative to NAVD88, based on SDE maps for the facility for no SLR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FEMA HAZUS flood damage curves for WWTF. Values are provided for the average (red) and less than average (blue) and more than average (green) vs. inundation levels [<a href="#B6-jmse-10-01671" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B7-jmse-10-01671" class="html-bibr">7</a>]. The values given by * are taken directly from the FEMA HAZUS damage table for WWTF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Example of vertical locations of Critical Flood Elevation (CFE) for primary clarifier and generators, Warren WWTF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Locations of the West Warwick, Cranston, and Warwick WWTF on the Pawtuxet River, RI. Center map shows the location of the facilities relative to upper Narragansett Bay and the Providence River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Map of peak flood elevation (SWEL-Still Water Elevation, in ft relative to grade elevation) of the West Warwick, Warwick, and Cranston WWTF for the March/April 2010 flood event. The upper panel shows the design flow rates, value of the facility, still water flood elevation, and estimated repair costs provided by the plant operators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Aerial photographs showing the inundation and damage to each component of the West Warwick (<b>a</b>), Warwick (<b>b</b>), and Cranston (<b>c</b>) WWTF. Inundation values are measured relative to CFEs for each component of the facility and damages for average (below and above average) are provided.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Aerial photographs showing the inundation and damage to each component of the West Warwick (<b>a</b>), Warwick (<b>b</b>), and Cranston (<b>c</b>) WWTF. Inundation values are measured relative to CFEs for each component of the facility and damages for average (below and above average) are provided.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Percent damage vs. inundation curves from FEMA HAZUS, including less than average(blue), average(red), and more than average(green) values. Estimates of observed damage for the Warwick, West Warwick, and Cranston WWTF are also shown. Damages to the Warwick facility are also shown using NACCS damage curves [<a href="#B16-jmse-10-01671" class="html-bibr">16</a>] for commercial engineered and non-engineered structures.</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 4931 KiB  
Article
Bridge Network Seismic Risk Assessment Using ShakeMap/HAZUS with Dynamic Traffic Modeling
by Arman Malekloo, Ekin Ozer and Wasim Ramadan
Infrastructures 2022, 7(10), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7100131 - 1 Oct 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3208
Abstract
Bridge infrastructures are critical nodes in a transportation network. In earthquake-prone areas, seismic performance assessment of infrastructure is essential to identify, retrofit, reconstruct, or, if necessary, demolish the infrastructure systems based on optimal decision-making processes. As one of the crucial components of the [...] Read more.
Bridge infrastructures are critical nodes in a transportation network. In earthquake-prone areas, seismic performance assessment of infrastructure is essential to identify, retrofit, reconstruct, or, if necessary, demolish the infrastructure systems based on optimal decision-making processes. As one of the crucial components of the transportation network, any bridge failure would impede the post-earthquake rescue operation. Not only the failure of such high-risk critical components during an extreme event can lead to significant direct damages, but it also affects the transportation road network. The consequences of these secondary effects can easily lead to congestion and long queues if the performance of the transportation system before or after an event was not analyzed. These indirect losses can be more prominent compared to the actual damage to bridges. This paper brings about seismic performance assessment for the Cyprus transportation network from which the decision-making platform can be modeled and implemented. This study employs a seismic hazard analysis based on generated USGS ShakeMap scenarios for the risk assessment of the transportation network. Furthermore, identification of the resiliency and vulnerability of the transportation road network is carried out by utilizing the graph theory concept at the network level. Moreover, link performance measures, i.e., traffic modeling of the study region is simulated in a dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) simulation environment. Finally, for earthquake loss analysis of the bridges, the HAZUS loss estimation tool is used. The results of our investigations for three different earthquake scenarios have shown that seismic retrofitting of bridges is a cost-effective measure to reduce the structural and operational losses in the region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Resilience of Interdependent Urban Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A disaster risk assessment management problem [<a href="#B2-infrastructures-07-00131" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The distribution of 13 seismometers in Cyprus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Active faults from ESHM13 with maximum possible magnitudes and earthquake distribution in Northern Cyprus since 1956.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>2D graph representation of the study region’s real transportation network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Bridge-link transportation network in the western part of Northern Cyprus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Transportation network link capacity distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>9:00 to 18:00 daily traffic demand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>UE convergence after simulating for 25 consecutive days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scenario 1 overall damage state.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison between HWB3 and HWB8 fragility curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of estimates of number of bridges damaged based on ShakeMap and HAZUS hazard analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Total structural loss per bridge class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Scenario 2 transportation network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Change in operational cost overtime for the first three scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Total loss for three different scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Total benefit/cost ratio for all three scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The system architecture of a cloud-based SHM-GIS decision-making system for bridge monitoring applications, modified from [<a href="#B69-infrastructures-07-00131" class="html-bibr">69</a>].</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 7404 KiB  
Article
First Level Pre- and Post-Earthquake Building Seismic Assessment Protocol Based on Dynamic Characteristics Extracted In Situ
by Spyros Damikoukas, Stavros Chatzieleftheriou and Nikos D. Lagaros
Infrastructures 2022, 7(9), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7090115 - 31 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2394
Abstract
The present work is concerned with the introduction of a new first level pre- and post-earthquake seismic assessment protocol for buildings that relies on the use of recorded structural response. As earthquakes represent a constant and unpredictable threat for the building stock around [...] Read more.
The present work is concerned with the introduction of a new first level pre- and post-earthquake seismic assessment protocol for buildings that relies on the use of recorded structural response. As earthquakes represent a constant and unpredictable threat for the building stock around the globe, the protocols already in use for assessing the risk should be revised and should also take into account the information hidden in data recorded in the field. Nowadays, data collection does not require expensive equipment and over-qualified personnel. In this direction, the proposed seismic assessment protocol aims to illustrate the ease of widely adopting Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) equipment (e.g., accelerographs), based on the work that has been carried out over the past years on subjects related to earthquake risk estimation. Building taxonomy and damage estimation, like those found in Hazus®–MH and other hazard assessment tools, can be enriched and modified properly to distinguish and classify the very earthquake-prone buildings from the others, and tag them for further assessment and rehabilitation as seismic codes suggest. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the SMSA methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Unquake accelerograph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Unquake accelerometer placement with BluTack.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Probability of damage state for each of 19 RC buildings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Building 1 street view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A typical detailing of reinforcement on the upper floor of Building 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Average FFT magnitude for each direction in Building 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Building 1: Response estimation by means of the SMSA methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Building 1: Seismic assessment results of the full-scale model after pushover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Building 2 street view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Building 2: Average FFT magnitude for each direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Building 2: Electromagnetic scanning of steel rebar in a beam and concrete specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Building 2: Response estimation by method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Building 2: Seismic assessment results of the full-scale model after pushover.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Experimental vs Empirical 1st Period-Height comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Experimental vs EC8’s expression (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mi>g</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Experimental vs KAN.EPE’s expression (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>K</mi> <mi>g</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>β</mi> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 6959 KiB  
Article
Understanding Flood Risk and Vulnerability of a Place: Estimating Prospective Loss and Damage Using the HAZUS Model
by C. Emdad Haque, Khandakar Hasan Mahmud and David Walker
Geographies 2022, 2(3), 453-475; https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies2030028 - 29 Jul 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2720
Abstract
In the field of flood management, risk and loss estimation is a prerequisite to undertake precautionary measures. Among several available tools, the HAZUS model is one of the most effective ones that can assist in the analysis of different dimensions of natural hazards, [...] Read more.
In the field of flood management, risk and loss estimation is a prerequisite to undertake precautionary measures. Among several available tools, the HAZUS model is one of the most effective ones that can assist in the analysis of different dimensions of natural hazards, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and tsunamis. The flood hazard analysis portion of the model characterizes the spatial variation of flood regimes for a given study area. This research attempts to illustrate how the geoinformatics tool HAZUS can help in estimating overall risk and potential loss and damage due to floods and how this knowledge can guide the decision-making process and enhance community resilience. Examining a case study in the Rural Municipality of St. Andrews in Manitoba, Canada, this study found that both the ‘Quick Look’ and ‘Enhanced Quick Look’ analyses provided robust results. However, for the RM of St. Andrews, which is characterized by differing levels of exposure on the floodplain, and where many new housing starts occur in high-risk flood zones, ‘Enhanced Quick Look’ with spatially explicit building stock is recommended. The case study of the RM of St. Andrews demonstrates that the HAZUS model can predict loss and damage with increasing magnitude of flooding depth. It is thus recognized that the risk and loss estimation tools can be effective means for future flood loss and damage reduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of Geographies in 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Levels of study in HAZUS-MH. Source: Compiled after FEMA 2014 [<a href="#B26-geographies-02-00028" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hazards-of-place model by Susan Cutter. Source: After Cutter, 1996 [<a href="#B27-geographies-02-00028" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Steps for HAZUS flood model (is clip-art royalty free?).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Workflow to create a study region in HAZUS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A step of Quick Look Analysis in HAZUS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A step of Enhanced Quick Look Analysis in HAZUS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Conceptual diagram showing the calculation procedure of the flooded area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sample steps of user-defined depth grid data-based analysis in HAZUS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Quick Look and Enhanced Quick Look Analysis in HAZUS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Potential inundated area using EQL with building stock (2009 flood regime) in Ward-1, RM of St. Andrews. (<b>b</b>) Potential inundated area using EQL with building stock (2009 + 2 m flood regime) in Ward-1, RM of St. Andrews at 2009 flood level + 2 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Potential inundated area using EQL with building stock (2009 flood regime) in Ward-1, RM of St. Andrews. (<b>b</b>) Potential inundated area using EQL with building stock (2009 + 2 m flood regime) in Ward-1, RM of St. Andrews at 2009 flood level + 2 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Estimated potential damage by types of building.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Potential private resident loss using EQL with building stock (2009 flood regime). (<b>b</b>) Potential private resident loss using EQL with building stock (2009 + 2 m flood regime).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Potential private resident loss using EQL with building stock (2009 flood regime). (<b>b</b>) Potential private resident loss using EQL with building stock (2009 + 2 m flood regime).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Damage function showing increasing flood loss (in dollars) with increasing flooding level.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4497 KiB  
Data Descriptor
A Socioeconomic Dataset of the Risk Associated with the 1% and 0.2% Return Period Stillwater Flood Elevation under Sea-Level Rise for the Northern Gulf of Mexico
by Diana Carolina Del Angel, David Yoskowitz, Matthew Vernon Bilskie and Scott C. Hagen
Data 2022, 7(6), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/data7060071 - 26 May 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2482
Abstract
Storm surge flooding can cause significant damage to coastal communities. In addition, coastal communities face an increased risk of coastal hazards due to sea-level rise (SLR). This research developed a dataset to communicate the socioeconomic consequences of flooding within the 1% and 0.2% [...] Read more.
Storm surge flooding can cause significant damage to coastal communities. In addition, coastal communities face an increased risk of coastal hazards due to sea-level rise (SLR). This research developed a dataset to communicate the socioeconomic consequences of flooding within the 1% and 0.2% Annual Exceedance Probability Floodplain (AEP) under four SLR scenarios for the Northern Gulf of Mexico region. Assessment methods primarily used HAZUS-MH software, a GIS-based modeling tool developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the United States, to estimate natural disasters’ physical, economic, and social impacts. This dataset consists of 29 shapefiles containing seven different measures of storm surge inundation impacts under SLR (including building damage, displaced people and shelter needs, road exposure, essential facilities, wastewater treatment plants, bridges, and vehicle damage). The data is publicly available under the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative Information and Data Cooperative (GRIIDC). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Spatial Data Science and Digital Earth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study Site: The Northern Gulf of Mexico Region includes 15 coastal counties across Mississippi, Alabama, and the Florida Panhandle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Hexagon grid used for data summaries. Here is an example of the different geometries of damage/impact data, including Census block polygons, roads represented by lines, and bridges represented by points. The values are summarized to a 10 sq. km hexagon grid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Road exposure data is available in hexagon grid summary and line shape format. Both shapefiles provide road exposure in length (kilometers and miles) and in cost (U.S. dollars).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic showing the workflow for developing the dataset. Parallelograms represent input data, rectangles summarize analysis processes, and trapezoids represent manual processes. The workflow to assess socioeconomic damage and exposure used methods within and outside the HAZUS interface.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 6539 KiB  
Article
A Framework to Model the Wind-Induced Losses in Buildings during Hurricanes
by Bejoy Alduse, Weichiang Pang, Sashi Kanth Tadinada and Shiraj Khan
Wind 2022, 2(1), 87-112; https://doi.org/10.3390/wind2010006 - 8 Feb 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3539
Abstract
Wind-induced loss modeling plays a key role in insurance risk management. Hence, a flexible vulnerability framework is to be developed for residential and commercial buildings. This model predicts the losses induced by hurricane wind pressure, wind-borne debris and wind-driven rain. Twenty-five different key [...] Read more.
Wind-induced loss modeling plays a key role in insurance risk management. Hence, a flexible vulnerability framework is to be developed for residential and commercial buildings. This model predicts the losses induced by hurricane wind pressure, wind-borne debris and wind-driven rain. Twenty-five different key variables of the buildings and environment are used as attributes for the simulations. Model results are validated using the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Models (FPHLM) and HAZUS wind vulnerability functions. New contributions include (1) a Markovian roof-aging model to address decreases in roof performance due to aging, and (2) occupancy-specific interior value models based on FEMA Normative quantities for the systematic evaluation of interior value applicable to archetype buildings. A simple wind debris impact model and wind-driven rain intrusion model is also introduced. The influence of the number of stories, roof aging, and window vulnerability resulting in damage are investigated in this article to ensure consistency of the results. The proposed framework enables insurance loss modelers to make judicious choices of input variables based on partial or detailed knowledge about the building to model losses. Future research should focus on validation and calibration using good-quality insurance claims data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Framework for generating vulnerability functions for archetype buildings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart describing <span class="html-italic">DR</span> simulation [<a href="#B13-wind-02-00006" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B40-wind-02-00006" class="html-bibr">40</a>] for an example building with unique combination of primary and secondary modifiers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Algorithm to obtain the time-dependent condition [<a href="#B63-wind-02-00006" class="html-bibr">63</a>,<a href="#B64-wind-02-00006" class="html-bibr">64</a>,<a href="#B65-wind-02-00006" class="html-bibr">65</a>] of roof using state probabilities and maximum service life of roof.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Mean roof condition for various service life durations. Fifty-year model compared with Coffelt et al. 2008 model (<b>b</b>) capacity reduction factor from the condition state obtained using the proposed model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mean Reduction Factor for capacity with respect to age in years for commercial roof cover with lifespan of 30 years. Distribution across the mean is shown at ages 10, 15 and 20 years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Normalized distribution of (<b>a</b>) interior and (<b>b</b>) exterior value for a three-story commercial office building with 10,000 sq ft footprint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Subdivided zones of a building—each zone is assigned a mean pressure coefficient for a given wind direction. The width of corner zones “a” is determined using ASCE 07-10. Arrows of wind 0° and 45° wind direction are also shown. Angles of attack used in the analysis are 0° through 315° in the increments of 45° moving counterclockwise. The zones are numbered from 1 to 14 for the walls, A to H and 1′ to 6′ for the roof.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Probability of 3.5ft x5 ft unprotected window failure on a 44ftx10ft wall. Validated using the results of Cope, 2004. Also shown are the probability of failure of protected window in small missile and large missile environment. UPW—Unprotected window, PW—Protected Window, SM—Small-Missile Environment and LM—Large-Missile Environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Convergence of simulations as observed from the (<b>a</b>) mean and (<b>b</b>) standard deviation of <span class="html-italic">DR</span> for a commercial building at various wind speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Simulated, sample external wind pressure coefficient (Cpe) contour on a 3D plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Roof Cover (RC) and Roof Sheathing (RS) vulnerability at different wind speeds. Model results show component vulnerability using the proposed model. Results are compared with Cope, 2004.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Model results for mid-rise vs. HAZUS mid-rise vulnerability functions database. 3S—3-story strong, 3W—3-story weak, 5S—5-story strong, 5W—5-story weak. Attributes for the examples are given in <a href="#wind-02-00006-t0A1" class="html-table">Table A1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Influence of number of stories on the DRs in strong concrete office buildings designed for 100 mph winds and average losses for each hurricane category. (<b>a</b>) Vulnerability functions for buildings with 1, 2 and 3 stories (<b>b</b>) average damage ratio for buildings with 1, 2, and 3 stories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of vulnerability functions for single-story strong, concrete and masonry office buildings. (<b>a</b>) Vulnerability functions for concrete and engineered masonry construction types; (<b>b</b>) average damage ratio for concrete and engineered masonry construction types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Model results for 3-story concrete office building with impact-rated windows and non-impact-rated windows. Additional example with no window protection in large debris environment is also presented. Design speed is 130 mph for all buildings. (<b>a</b>) Vulnerability functions (<b>b</b>) average damage ratio for different hurricane categories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Roof aging effects on single story concrete office buildings with single ply membrane roof with a 100 mph design wind speed. Results for a 1-, 10-, 20- and 30-year-old roof are presented in this study. (<b>a</b>) Vulnerability functions for 1-, 10-, 20- and 30-year-old (<b>b</b>) Average loss for different hurricane categories for 1-, 10-, 20- and 30-year-old roof.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison of <span class="html-italic">DR</span> for different floor areas for single-story concrete strong office buildings; (<b>a</b>) vulnerability functions; (<b>b</b>) average loss for different hurricane categories.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 9509 KiB  
Article
A Simplified Method for Rapid Estimation of Emergency Water Supply Needs after Earthquakes
by Joseph Toland and Anne Wein
Water 2021, 13(19), 2635; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192635 - 25 Sep 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2540
Abstract
Researchers are investigating the problem of estimating households with potable water service outages soon after an earthquake. Most of these modeling approaches are computationally intensive, have large proprietary data collection requirements or lack precision, making them unfeasible for rapid assessment, prioritization, and allocation [...] Read more.
Researchers are investigating the problem of estimating households with potable water service outages soon after an earthquake. Most of these modeling approaches are computationally intensive, have large proprietary data collection requirements or lack precision, making them unfeasible for rapid assessment, prioritization, and allocation of emergency water resources in large, complex disasters. This study proposes a new simplified analytical method—performed without proprietary water pipeline data—to estimate water supply needs after earthquakes, and a case study of its application in the HayWired earthquake scenario. In the HayWired scenario—a moment magnitude (Mw) 7.0 Hayward Fault earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area, California (USA)—an analysis of potable water supply in two water utility districts was performed using the University of Colorado Water Network (CUWNet) model. In the case study, application of the simplified method extends these estimates of household water service outage to the nine counties adjacent to the San Francisco Bay, aggregated by a ~250 m2 (nine-arcsecond) grid. The study estimates about 1.38 million households (3.7 million residents) out of 7.6 million residents (2017, ambient, nighttime population) with potable water service outage soon after the earthquake—about an 8% increase from the HayWired scenario estimates. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>San Francisco Bay Area, California (USA) study region, and custom peak ground velocity (PGV) ground-motion data from the HayWired scenario mainshock.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Average break rate per 1 km of pipe for the HayWired mainshock in: (<b>a</b>) SJWC and (<b>b</b>) EBMUD service areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Graph showing Hazus water-pipe serviceability model and other models of water-pipe serviceability. Adapted from [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simplified method to estimate water pipeline break rates and water service outage. <sup>1</sup> Calculated at the ~90 m<sup>2</sup> (three-arcsecond) grid cell in the case study, based on LandScan population data. <sup>2</sup> Calculated at the ~250 m<sup>2</sup> (nine-arcsecond) grid cell in the case study, based on the sensitivity analysis. <sup>3</sup> Average breaks per 1 km of pipe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Interpolated (natural neighbor) average break rate per 1 km of pipe in: (<b>a</b>) SJWC and (<b>b</b>) EBMUD service areas from the CUWNet model results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Merged average break rate per 1 km of pipe in the HayWired Scenario study region. Porter [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>] study regions (red box): EBMUD (upper) and SJWC (lower).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sensitivity analysis comparisons, water service outage: (<b>a</b>) simplified approach, with CUWNet model results (<b>b</b>) CUWNet model with census tracts, no rounding (<b>c</b>) and rounding. <sup>1</sup> Equivalent to Hazus loss estimation at the Census tract scale, with Porter [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>] vulnerability function. <sup>2</sup> The global serviceability results are calculated over the study region and so cannot be shown geographically.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Water service outage calculation from the serviceability index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Estimated households with potable water service outage. <sup>1</sup> Grid cells with less than 1 household (~2.69 residents) have been excluded from display.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of simplified approach in EBMUD service area with CUWNet model [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>] estimates: (<b>a</b>) Average break rates from simplified method; (<b>b</b>) water service outage (%) from simplified method; (<b>c</b>) water service outage (HH) from simplified method; (<b>d</b>) average break rates from CUWNet model [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>]; (<b>e</b>) water service outage (%) calculation from CUWNet model [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>] break rates; (<b>f</b>) water service outage (HH) calculation from CUWNet model [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>] break rates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of simplified approach in SJWC service area with CUWNet model estimates: (<b>a</b>) Average break rates from simplified method; (<b>b</b>) water service outage (%) from simplified method; (<b>c</b>) water service outage (HH) from simplified method; (<b>d</b>) average break rates from CUWNet model [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>] (<b>e</b>) water service outage (%) calculation from CUWNet model [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>] break rates; (<b>f</b>) water service outage (HH) calculation from CUWNet model [<a href="#B1-water-13-02635" class="html-bibr">1</a>] break rates.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 14238 KiB  
Article
Fragility and Vulnerability Analysis of an RC Building with the Application of Nonlinear Analysis
by Radomir Folić and Miloš Čokić
Buildings 2021, 11(9), 390; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090390 - 1 Sep 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4296
Abstract
In this paper, the seismic response of a five-story reinforced concrete (RC) frame system building is analysed through fragility analysis. The structure is designed in accordance with structural Eurocodes EN1990, EN1991, EN1992 and EN1998, as a high-ductility (DCH) system. For the analysis of [...] Read more.
In this paper, the seismic response of a five-story reinforced concrete (RC) frame system building is analysed through fragility analysis. The structure is designed in accordance with structural Eurocodes EN1990, EN1991, EN1992 and EN1998, as a high-ductility (DCH) system. For the analysis of the response of a structural system to earthquake actions, the methods of nonlinear static (NSA) and nonlinear dynamic analyses (NDA) are applied and, based on the obtained results, fragility curves are constructed using statistical methods. A relationship between the intensity measure (IM) and engineering demand parameters (EDPs) is needed in order to estimate a fragility curve. Fragility functions represent a possibility for different states of damage to occur in a certain structural systems at the observed value of the specified IM. Ten accelerograms, used in NDA, are selected and scaled, according to EN1998 provisions, for the chosen elastic response spectrum and referent PGA. Obtained results are used for the statistical analysis and construction of fragility curves. Structural damage state threshold parameters are determined based on the Park and Ang modified damage index methodology and provisions given in FEMA, HAZUS, VISION 2000 and EN codes. Comparative analysis of the structural damage probability for the analysed RC building, calculated using different methodologies to determine damage states, is applied. The fragility analysis results showed the difference between the probabilities of the damage states to occur when different calculation methods are used. This reflects on the assessment of vulnerability curves as well. The obtained results, calculated using different methods, are analysed using comparative analysis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Building plan (<b>left</b>); numerical model (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geometric and reinforcement characteristics of the cross-section properties of the beams (<b>left</b>) and columns (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fundamental periods of vibration of nonlinear model: (<b>a</b>) translational <span class="html-italic">T</span><sub>1<span class="html-italic">,X</span></sub>; (<b>b</b>) translational <span class="html-italic">T</span><sub>1<span class="html-italic">,Y</span></sub>; and (<b>c</b>) rotational T<sub>1,<span class="html-italic">R</span></sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Rayleigh viscous (mass–tangent stiffness) proportional damping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Response spectra used in the analysis (scaled RS<sub>i</sub>, mean RS and mean scaled RS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Material properties of concrete (<b>left</b>) and rebar (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic presentation of plastic hinge on a column element with appropriate section parts and names of the used materials.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic representation of column (<b>left</b>) and <span class="html-italic">L</span> beam (<b>right</b>) auto-discretised sections with appropriate stress–strain properties depending on the material used [<a href="#B40-buildings-11-00390" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>NSA and NDA results (<b>left</b>) and pushover curve bilinear approximation (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Roof displacement (<b>left</b>) and IDR results (<b>right</b>) obtained using NDA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Absorbed hysteretic energy during the earthquakes (<b>left</b>) and the first yield displacement values from THA (<b>right</b>) obtained using NDA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Relationship between inter-story drift and roof displacement values (<b>left</b>) and the DI–PGA relationship (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Relationship between DI and d (<b>left</b>) and DI and IDR (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>IDR values of particular DSs for each of the selected methods of damage assessment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>ln<span class="html-italic">IDR,i</span> values in log–log space and their corresponding PDFs and ED PDF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p><span class="html-italic">IDR,i</span> values in arithmetic space and their corresponding PDFs and ED PDF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Fragility curve for ED according to HAZUS [<a href="#B32-buildings-11-00390" class="html-bibr">32</a>] and its upper and lower confidence interval boundaries.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Fragility curves and probability density functions for the occurrence of different states of damage, according to HAZUS [<a href="#B32-buildings-11-00390" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Fragility curves and probability density functions for the occurrence of different states of damage, according to VISION 2000 [<a href="#B33-buildings-11-00390" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Fragility curves and probability density functions for the occurrence of different states of damage, according to the modified Park and Ang DI [<a href="#B34-buildings-11-00390" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Fragility curves and probability density functions for the occurrence of different states of damage, according to FEMA 356 [<a href="#B31-buildings-11-00390" class="html-bibr">31</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Fragility curves and probability density functions for the occurrence of different states of damage, according to EN1998-3 [<a href="#B35-buildings-11-00390" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-buildings-11-00390" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Vulnerability curves for each damage assessment method, for lower (<b>left</b>) and upper (<b>right</b>) CI bounds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Vulnerability curves for each damage assessment method (<b>left</b>) and their mean damage factor values for PGA = 0.2 g (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Differences between fragility curves calculated using other methods and the ones calculated using the modified DI method, for the damage states SD (<b>left</b>) and MD (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Differences between fragility curves calculated using other methods and the ones calculated using the modified DI method, for the damage states ED (<b>left</b>) and CD (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Differences between vulnerability curves calculated using other methods and the ones calculated using the modified DI method.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2356 KiB  
Article
Earthquake Damage Repair Loss Estimation in New Zealand: What Other Variables Are Essential Based on Experts’ Opinions?
by Ravindu K. A. V. D. Kahandawa, Niluka D. Domingo, Gregory Chawynski and S. R. Uma
Buildings 2021, 11(9), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090385 - 28 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2797
Abstract
Major earthquakes can cause extensive damage to buildings and alter both the natural and built environments. Accurately estimating the financial impact from these events is complex, and the damage is not always visible to the naked eye. PACT, SLAT, and HAZUS are some [...] Read more.
Major earthquakes can cause extensive damage to buildings and alter both the natural and built environments. Accurately estimating the financial impact from these events is complex, and the damage is not always visible to the naked eye. PACT, SLAT, and HAZUS are some of the computer-based tools designed to predict probable damage before an earthquake. However, there are no identifiable models built for post-earthquake use. This paper focuses on verifying the significance and usage of variables that specifically need to be considered for the post-earthquake cost estimation of earthquake damage repair work (CEEDRW). The research was conducted using a questionnaire survey involving 92 participants who have experience in cost estimating earthquake damage repair work in New Zealand. The Weighted Average, Relative Importance Index (RII), and Exploratory Factor Analysis were used to analyse the data. The research verified that eleven major variables that are significant to the CEEDRW and should be incorporated to cost estimation models. Verified variables can be used to develop a post-earthquake repair cost estimation tool and can be used to improve the pre-earthquake loss prediction tools. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Years of experience in estimating the cost of earthquake damage repair work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison between variables that were considered in previous CEEDRW and variables that should be included CEEDRW.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Questionnaire design (sample 1).</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Questionnaire design (sample 2).</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Questionnaire design (sample 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Questionnaire design (sample 4).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4846 KiB  
Article
Comprehensive Flood Risk Assessment for Wastewater Treatment Plants under Extreme Storm Events: A Case Study for New York City, United States
by Qing Sun, Rouzbeh Nazari, Maryam Karimi, MD Golam Rabbani Fahad and Robert W. Peters
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(15), 6694; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156694 - 21 Jul 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3083
Abstract
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the City of New York, United States, are particularly vulnerable to frequent extreme weather events, including storm surges, high-intensity rainfall, and sea level rise, and are also affected by the cascade of these events. The complex structural configuration [...] Read more.
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the City of New York, United States, are particularly vulnerable to frequent extreme weather events, including storm surges, high-intensity rainfall, and sea level rise, and are also affected by the cascade of these events. The complex structural configuration of WWTPs requires very fine-scale flood risk assessment, which current research has not pursued. We propose a robust technique to quantify the risk of inundations for the fourteen WWPTs through an automated sub-basin creation tool; 889 sub-basins were generated and merged with high-resolution building footprint data to create a comprehensive database for flood inundation analysis. The inundation depths and extents for the WWTPs and flood-prone regions were identified from hydrodynamic modeling of storm surge and sea level rise. The economic damage due to flooding for the WWTPs was also quantified using the HAZUS-MH model. Results indicated that the storm surges from various categories of hurricanes have the dominant impacts on flood depths around WWTPs, followed by high-intensity rainfall. Sea level rise was shown to have a relatively minor impact on flood depths. Results from economic damage analysis showed that the WWTPs are subjected to damage ranging from USD 60,000 to 720,000, depending on the size of the WWTP and the extremity of storm surge. The method of analyzing the inundation status of the research object through the sub-basin enables more accurate data to be obtained when calculating the runoff. It allows for a clearer view of the inundation status of the WWTPs when combined with the actual buildings. Using this database, predicting flood conditions of any extreme event or a cascade of extreme events can be conducted quickly and accurately. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The process of dividing NYC into 889 sub-basins and database processing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The map of 889 sub-basins in NYC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Land cover of sub-basin 133 in NYC, (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) inundation maps of SLOSH category 2 hurricane, a rainfall of 10.9 cm/h for 20 min, and sea level rise of 2.44 m (8 ft) in sub-basin 133.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Outline of buildings in Newtown Creek WWTP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Percentage of the submerged length of buildings to the total perimeter of buildings and amount of damage caused by storm surge, high-intensity rainfall, and sea level rise.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Percentage of submerged length caused by three extreme events to 14 WWTPs and (<b>b</b>) amount of damage caused by three extreme events to 14 WWTPs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The inundation map of FEMA MOTF Sandy in sub-basin 133.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of inundation map of Newtown Creek WWTP under a 20 min rainfall event without and with sub-basins.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4954 KiB  
Article
Seismic Fragility Analysis of Tunnels with Different Buried Depths in a Soft Soil
by Xiaorong Hu, Zhiguang Zhou, Hao Chen and Yongqiang Ren
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 892; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030892 - 24 Jan 2020
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 3519
Abstract
Seismic fragility of an engineering structure is the conditional probability that damage of a structure equals or exceeds a limit state under a specified intensity motion. It represents the seismic performance of structures and the correlation between ground motion and structural damage, playing [...] Read more.
Seismic fragility of an engineering structure is the conditional probability that damage of a structure equals or exceeds a limit state under a specified intensity motion. It represents the seismic performance of structures and the correlation between ground motion and structural damage, playing an indispensable role in structural security assessment. A practical evaluation procedure of acquiring the fragility curves of tunnels in a soft soil has been proposed in this paper. Taking a typical metro tunnel in Shanghai as an example, two-dimensional finite element models of soil-tunnel cross-section were established. The nonlinear characteristics of soil layers were considered by the one-dimensional equivalent linear analysis in the equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses (EERA) program. The ground motions were selected based on seismic station records. Comparing the analytical fragility curves with the empirical curves derived from American Lifelines Alliance (ALA) and HAZUS shows that the proposed method is reliable and feasible. Further study about the influence of buried depths on the fragility of the tunnel was performed. The results indicate that the failure probability of the tunnel is not monotonically decreasing with the increase of the buried depth for a given peak ground acceleration (PGA.) Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geo-Hazards and Risk Reduction Approaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General flowchart of the procedure for seismic fragility analysis of tunnels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Tunnel lining dimensions and simplification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variation of shear wave velocities and density of soft soil profile in Shanghai.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example of free site response analysis results with the equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses (EERA) program (Input motion: Northridge-01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The finite element model of soil-tunnel interaction (Buried depth: 10 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Response spectrum of selected motions for fragility analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Example of the maximum internal forces of the lining with different buried depths (Northridge-01 seismic wave).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The maximum internal forces of the lining under different input motions (M: bending moment; N: axial force).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relationship between structural deformation and bending moment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Linear regression analysis between DI and PGA with different buried depths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Fragility curves of the tunnel in soft soils with different buried depths (PGA: peak ground acceleration).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The comparison of analytical fragility curves and empirical fragility curves (D-: buried depth).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop