[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (36)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = BRONJ

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1279 KiB  
Review
Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Oral Microbiome: Clinical Risk Factors, Pathophysiology and Treatment Options
by Sapir Jelin-Uhlig, Markus Weigel, Benjamin Ott, Can Imirzalioglu, Hans-Peter Howaldt, Sebastian Böttger and Torsten Hain
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(15), 8053; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158053 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 392
Abstract
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) represents a serious health condition, impacting the lives of many patients worldwide. The condition challenges clinical care due to its complex etiology and limited therapeutic options. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiological and patient-related factors that promote [...] Read more.
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) represents a serious health condition, impacting the lives of many patients worldwide. The condition challenges clinical care due to its complex etiology and limited therapeutic options. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiological and patient-related factors that promote disease development is essential. Recently, the oral microbiome has been implicated as a potential driver and modulating factor of BRONJ by several studies. Modern genomic sequencing methods have provided a wealth of data on the microbial composition of BRONJ lesions; however, the role of individual species in the process of disease development remains elusive. A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted to identify relevant studies on the microbiome of BRONJ patients using the terms “microbiome”, “osteonecrosis of the jaws”, and “bisphosphonates”. Studies focusing on symptoms, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment options were included. The principal risk factors for BRONJ are tooth extraction, surgical procedures, and the administration of high doses of bisphosphonates. Importantly, the oral microbiome plays a significant role in the progression of the disease. Several studies have identified alterations of microbial composition in BRONJ lesions. However, there is no consensus regarding bacterial species that are associated with BRONJ across studies. The bacterial genera typically found include Actinomyces, Fusobacterium, and Streptococcus. It is postulated that these microbes contribute to the pathogenesis of BRONJ by promoting inflammation and disrupting normal bone remodeling processes. Current therapeutic approaches are disease-stage-specific and the necessity for more effective treatment strategies remains. This review examines the potential causes of and therapeutic approaches to BRONJ, highlighting the link between microbial colonization and BRONJ development. Future research should seek to more thoroughly investigate the interactions between bisphosphonates, the oral microbiome, and the immune system in order to develop targeted therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Advances in Oral Microbiome and Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The pathophysiology of osteonecrosis of the jaw is based on five main factors: immune dysfunction, class-dependent effects of bisphosphonate (BP), bone remodeling, inflammation/infection, and the oral microbiome. The magnified area depicts the most abundant bacteria of the microbial composition commonly found within necrotic bone. The white arrow indicates bacterial migration from soft tissue to the exposed bone ↓ = decreased expression, ↑ = increased expression. Clinical image shows exposed bone with a necrotic lesion located on the left alveolar ridge of the edentulous maxilla (figure created with BioRender).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>BRONJ of the lower jaw following implant placement. (<b>A</b>): exposed bone in the oral cavity; (<b>B</b>): panoramic radiograph showing a bone sequester; (<b>C</b>): intraoperative exposure of the sequester; (<b>D</b>): removed bone sequester.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 2334 KiB  
Article
Impact of Bisphosphonate Therapy on Oral Health in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases: A Comprehensive Study
by Jacek Calik, Katarzyna Calik, Natalia Sauer, Bogucki Zdzisław, Piotr Giedziun, Jacek Mackiewicz, Marek Murawski and Piotr Dzięgiel
Cancers 2024, 16(6), 1124; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061124 - 11 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1193
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of bisphosphonate therapy on the stomatognathic system in 80 patients with cancer of the breast and prostate with bone metastases. Bisphosphonates are integral for managing skeletal complications in these malignancies but are associated with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the [...] Read more.
This study investigates the impact of bisphosphonate therapy on the stomatognathic system in 80 patients with cancer of the breast and prostate with bone metastases. Bisphosphonates are integral for managing skeletal complications in these malignancies but are associated with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), affecting 0.8–18.5% of patients. BRONJ manifests with pain, neuropathy, tissue swelling, mucosal ulceration, tooth mobility, and abscesses, yet its pathogenesis remains elusive, complicating risk prediction. The research employed comprehensive dental and radiological evaluations. Dental status was assessed using DMFT and OHI-S indices, Eichner’s classification, and clinical periodontal measurements like the pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mSBI). A radiological analysis included panoramic X-rays for radiomorphometric measurements and TMJ lateral radiographs. Results indicated a significant decline in oral hygiene in patients with cancer after bisphosphonate therapy, marked by increased DMFT and OHI-S scores. Periodontal health also showed deterioration, with increased PD and CAL readings. The incidence of BRONJ symptoms was noted, although exact figures are not quantified in this abstract. The study also revealed changes in radiomorphometric parameters, suggesting bisphosphonates’ impact on bone density and structure. No substantial alterations were observed in TMJ function, indicating a need for extended observation to understand bisphosphonates’ long-term effects on the stomatognathic system. These findings highlight the importance of continuous dental monitoring and prophylaxis in patients undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. Implementing meticulous oral care protocols is essential for mitigating BRONJ risk and managing the complex oral health challenges in patients with cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Metastasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Age distribution in the study group and control group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Demonstration of the technique for measuring the compact bone thickness of the mandible and the distance between the mental foramen and the lower border of the mandibular compact bone on pantomographic images using the 3D Slicer software version 4.8.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Graphical representation of statistical analysis. (<b>A</b>) Distribution of OHI-S index values in the investigated groups. (<b>B</b>) The proportions of patients within the studied groups classified into four interpretative intervals of the OHI-S index. (<b>C</b>) The distribution of DMFT (Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth) index values in the studied groups. (<b>D</b>) Percentages of patients in the studied groups classified into interpretative intervals of Eichner’s classes. (<b>D</b>) Percentage distribution of patients within the studied groups categorized into three interpretative intervals of the Helkimo Ai index. (<b>E</b>) Percentage distribution of patients within the studied groups categorized into three interpretative intervals of the Helkimo Ai index. (<b>F</b>) Percentages of patients in the studied groups classified into four interpretative intervals of the Helkimo Di index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Percentages of patients in the studied groups classified into four interpretative intervals of the mSBI index. (<b>B</b>) Distribution of mSBI values in the studied groups. (<b>C</b>) Distribution of the mean PD (pocket depth) values in the studied groups. (<b>D</b>) Distribution of the mean CAL (clinical attachment loss) values in the studied groups. (<b>E</b>) Distribution of MCW (mandibular cortical width) values in the studied groups. (<b>F</b>) Percentages of patients in the studied groups classified into three interpretative intervals of the MCI (mandibular cortical index).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Distribution of OHI-S change values in the study groups. (<b>B</b>) Distribution of mSBI change values in the study groups. (<b>C</b>) Distribution of MCW change values in the study groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Correlation results between tooth brushing frequency and age in the experimental group. (<b>B</b>) Correlation results between tooth brushing frequency and age in the control group. (<b>C</b>) Correlation results between changes in OHI-S and mSBI in the control group. (<b>D</b>) Correlation results between changes in OHI-S and mSBI in the experimental group. (<b>E</b>) Correlation results between gender and changes in mSBI in the experimental group. (<b>F</b>) Correlation results between gender and changes in mSBI in the control group. (<b>G</b>) Correlation results between the usage of removable dentures and changes in mSBI in the experimental group. (<b>H</b>) Correlation results between the usage of removable dentures and changes in mSBI in the control group. (<b>I</b>) Correlation results between changes in PD and OHI-S in the control group. (<b>J</b>) Correlation results between changes in PD and OHI-S in the experimental group. (<b>K</b>) Correlation results between changes in CAL and OHI-S in the experimental group. (<b>L</b>) Correlation results between changes in CAL and OHI-S in the control group. Results with asterisks refer to Fisher’s exact test.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5211 KiB  
Article
Biomimetic Collagen Membranes as Drug Carriers of Geranylgeraniol to Counteract the Effect of Zoledronate
by Francisco Javier Manzano-Moreno, Elvira de Luna-Bertos, Manuel Toledano-Osorio, Paula Urbano-Arroyo, Concepción Ruiz, Manuel Toledano and Raquel Osorio
Biomimetics 2024, 9(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9010004 - 22 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1560
Abstract
To counteract the effect of zoledronate and decrease the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) development in patients undergoing guided bone regeneration surgery, the use of geranylgeraniol (GGOH) has been proposed. Collagen membranes may act as biomimetical drug carriers. The objective of [...] Read more.
To counteract the effect of zoledronate and decrease the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) development in patients undergoing guided bone regeneration surgery, the use of geranylgeraniol (GGOH) has been proposed. Collagen membranes may act as biomimetical drug carriers. The objective of this study was to determine the capacity of collagen-based membranes doped with GGOH to revert the negative impact of zoledronate on the growth and differentiation of human osteoblasts. MG-63 cells were cultured on collagen membranes. Two groups were established: (1) undoped membranes and (2) membranes doped with geranylgeraniol. Osteoblasts were cultured with or without zoledronate (50 μM). Cell proliferation was evaluated at 48 h using the MTT colorimetric method. Differentiation was tested by staining mineralization nodules with alizarin red and by gene expression analysis of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 7, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 7 (BMP-2 and BMP-7), type I collagen (Col-I), osterix (OSX), osteocalcin (OSC), osteoprotegerin (OPG), receptor for RANK (RANKL), runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx-2), TGF-β1 and TGF-β receptors (TGF-βR1, TGF-βR2, and TGF-βR3), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with real-time PCR. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis and post hoc Bonferroni tests were applied (p < 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations were also performed. Treatment of osteoblasts with 50 μM zoledronate produced a significant decrease in cell proliferation, mineralization capacity, and gene expression of several differentiation markers if compared to the control (p < 0.001). When osteoblasts were treated with zoledronate and cultured on GGOH-doped membranes, these variables were, in general, similar to the control group (p > 0.05). GGOH applied on collagen membranes is able to reverse the negative impact of zoledronate on the proliferation, differentiation, and gene expression of different osteoblasts’ markers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Osteoblast proliferation after 48 h of culture onto the different doped membranes. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation. Significant differences are indicated by different letters after multiple comparisons (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Gene expression analysis of TGF-β1, TGF-βR1, TGF-βR2 and TGF-βR3 by real-time PCR for osteoblasts seeded onto the different experimental membranes after 48 h of culture. Mean and standard deviation of ng mRNA/ngHK is presented for each experimental group. Significant differences are indicated by different letters, after multiple comparisons (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Gene expression analysis of RANKL, OPG and OPG/RANKL by real-time PCR for osteoblasts seeded onto the different experimental membranes after 48 h of culture. Mean and standard deviation of ng mRNA/ngHK is presented for each experimental group. Significant differences are indicated by different letters, after multiple comparisons (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Gene expression analysis of OSX, COL-I, ALP, RUNX-2, and OSC by real-time PCR for osteoblasts seeded onto the different experimental membranes after 48 h of culture. Mean and standard deviation of ng mRNA/ngHK is presented for each experimental group. Significant differences are indicated by different letters, after multiple comparisons (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Gene expression analysis of BMP-2, BMP-7, and VEGF by real-time PCR for osteoblasts seeded onto the different experimental membranes after 48 h of culture. Mean and standard deviation of ng mRNA/ngHK is presented. Significant differences are indicated by different letters after multiple comparisons (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mean and standard deviation of absorbance obtained after culture of the osteoblasts onto the different doped membranes for 15 and 21 days using the Alizarin Red S method. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant difference after one-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparisons (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>FESEM images of: (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) osteoblasts cultured onto collagen membranes, (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) osteoblasts seeded onto GGOH-doped membranes, (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) zoledronate-treated osteoblasts cultured onto collagen membranes, and (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>) zoledronate-treated osteoblasts seeded onto GGOH-doped membranes. Images were taken at 3 kV and distances were between 3.7 and 4.1 mm. Magnifications at images are 300× and 1500×.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 702 KiB  
Review
Bisphosphonates and Their Connection to Dental Procedures: Exploring Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws
by Emily Sunny Lee, Meng-Chen Tsai, Jing-Xuan Lee, Chuki Wong, You-Ning Cheng, An-Chi Liu, You-Fang Liang, Chih-Yuan Fang, Chia-Yu Wu and I-Ta Lee
Cancers 2023, 15(22), 5366; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225366 - 10 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2831
Abstract
Bisphosphonates are widely used to treat osteoporosis and malignant tumors due to their effectiveness in increasing bone density and inhibiting bone resorption. However, their association with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) following invasive dental procedures poses a significant challenge. This review explores [...] Read more.
Bisphosphonates are widely used to treat osteoporosis and malignant tumors due to their effectiveness in increasing bone density and inhibiting bone resorption. However, their association with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) following invasive dental procedures poses a significant challenge. This review explores the functions, mechanisms, and side effects of bisphosphonates, emphasizing their impact on dental procedures. Dental patients receiving bisphosphonate treatment are at higher risk of BRONJ, necessitating dentists’ awareness of these risks. Topical bisphosphonate applications enhance dental implant success, by promoting osseointegration and preventing osteoclast apoptosis, and is effective in periodontal treatment. Yet, systemic administration (intravenous or intraoral) significantly increases the risk of BRONJ following dental procedures, particularly in inflamed conditions. Prevention and management of BRONJ involve maintaining oral health, considering alternative treatments, and careful pre-operative and post-operative follow-ups. Future research could focus on finding bisphosphonate alternatives with fewer side effects or developing combinations that reduce BRONJ risk. This review underscores the need for further exploration of bisphosphonates and their implications in dental procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Cancer: Prevention and Early Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Chemical structure of bisphosphonates. The “R” and “R’” refers to long carbon chains that differ depending on the type of bisphosphonate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An overview of potential factors contributing to the development of BRONJ.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 15268 KiB  
Article
Management of a Malpractice Dental Implant Case in a Patient with History of Oral Bisphosphonates Intake: A Case Report and Narrative Review of Recent Findings
by Massimo Carossa, Nicola Scotti, Mario Alovisi, Santo Catapano, Francesco Grande, Massimo Corsalini, Sergio Ruffino and Francesco Pera
Prosthesis 2023, 5(3), 826-839; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5030058 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1878
Abstract
The present article aims to describe the management of a malpractice dental implant case in a patient with a history of oral bisphosphonates (BF) intake (alendronic acid every 15 days for 20 years) and to perform a narrative review of recently published articles [...] Read more.
The present article aims to describe the management of a malpractice dental implant case in a patient with a history of oral bisphosphonates (BF) intake (alendronic acid every 15 days for 20 years) and to perform a narrative review of recently published articles (2019–2023) on the topic. A female patient rehabilitated with 18 nails in the mandible 20 years ago underwent two surgeries; the first one included the explantation of the nails; the second one included the insertion of two implants in the anterior region. At the last follow-up (21 months from the first surgery and 15 months from the second one) no complications nor episodes of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) were highlighted. Furthermore, 12 recent articles on the topic were reported and a narrative review was performed. Based on the narrative analysis, the topic related to dental implants in patients with BF intake seems to remain controversial. Most of the findings highlight how the evidence on both the safety of the treatment and the possibility to foresee the risk of onset based on preoperative factors seem to be scarce. The case described in the present article did not report any complications nor episodes of BRONJ. However, evidence from a single case report is scarce and more clinical trials are required to deepen the knowledge on the topic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Prosthodontics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Images showing the initial clinical condition (July 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Ortopantomography acquired in 2018. (<b>B</b>) Ortopantomography acquired in July 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Clinical image of intraoral neoformation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Left side of the extracted prostheses (<b>B</b>) All the extracted nails with the prostheses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>PRGF insertion into the wound.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Image showing the healing one week after the surgery (September 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Orthopantomography acquired six months from the initial surgery (March 2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cone Beam Computed Tomography acquired six months from the initial surgery (March 2022). (<b>A</b>) Left side; (<b>B</b>) right side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Periapical X-ray showing the two anterior implants after the surgery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Images showing the delivery of the implant-supported prostheses (June 2022). (<b>A</b>) Clinical image of the locators connected to the implants; (<b>B</b>) Image of the modified prostheses with the attachment; (<b>C</b>) Clinical image after the prostheses delivering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>OPT X-ray acquired at the last follow-up in June 2023 (12 months after the implant-supported OVD delivery, 15 months from the second surgery and 21 months from the first surgery).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 509 KiB  
Article
Interactive Associations between PPARγ and PPARGC1A and Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients with Osteoporosis
by Jung Sun Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Jeong Yee, Sun Jong Kim, Jee Eun Chung and Hye Sun Gwak
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(7), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16071035 - 21 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1096
Abstract
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a rare but severe adverse effect that can occur as a result of bisphosphonate treatment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between PPARγ and PPARGC1A polymorphisms and the BRONJ development in female osteoporosis patients undergoing [...] Read more.
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a rare but severe adverse effect that can occur as a result of bisphosphonate treatment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between PPARγ and PPARGC1A polymorphisms and the BRONJ development in female osteoporosis patients undergoing bisphosphonate treatment. We prospectively conducted this nested case–control study at the Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital between 2014 and 2018. We assessed five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of PPARγ and six SNPs of PPARGC1A and performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the independent risk factors for developing BRONJ. There were a total of 123 patients included in this study and 56 patients (45.5%) developed BRONJ. In the univariate analysis, PPARGC1A rs2946385 and rs10020457 polymorphisms were significantly associated with BRONJ (p = 0.034, p = 0.020, respectively), although the results were not statistically significant in the multivariable analysis. Patients with the combined genotypes of GG in both PPARγ rs1151999 and PPARGC1A rs2946385 showed a 3.03-fold higher risk of BRONJ compared to individuals with other genotype combinations after adjusting for confounders (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–9.11). Old age (≥70 years) and duration of bisphosphonate use (≥60 months) increased the risk of BRONJ. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predicted probability was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69–0.87, p < 0.001), demonstrating a satisfactory level of discriminatory power. Our study elucidated that PPARγ and PPARGC1A polymorphisms were interactively associated with BRONJ development. These results have potential implications for tailoring personalized treatments for females undergoing bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacogenomics - A Genetic Approach to Drug Therapy and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) for the development of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. The blue line presents the predicted probability of Model II (demographic factors and the combination of <span class="html-italic">PPARγ</span> rs1151999 GG and <span class="html-italic">PPARGC1A</span> rs2946385 GG genotypes), while the green line presents the reference.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3372 KiB  
Article
Outcomes of a Pharmacological Protocol with Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol for the Management of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ): A Randomized Study on 202 Osteoporosis Patients
by Gianluca Colapinto, Funda Goker, Riccardo Nocini, Massimo Albanese, Pier Francesco Nocini, Salvatore Sembronio, Francesca Argenta, Massimo Robiony and Massimo Del Fabbro
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(14), 4662; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144662 - 13 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2690
Abstract
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a challenging situation in clinics. Previous studies have shown that pentoxifylline combined with tocopherol proved to be beneficial in patients with osteoradionecrosis, due to their antioxidant and antifibrotic properties. The aim of this randomized study was [...] Read more.
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a challenging situation in clinics. Previous studies have shown that pentoxifylline combined with tocopherol proved to be beneficial in patients with osteoradionecrosis, due to their antioxidant and antifibrotic properties. The aim of this randomized study was to evaluate the effect of pentoxifylline and tocopherol in patients that had developed MRONJ after tooth extractions. The study population consisted of 202 Stage I MRONJ female patients with an average age of 66.4 ± 8.3 years, who were divided into two groups. The test group (n = 108) received a pharmacological protocol with pentoxifylline and tocopherol (2 months pre-operatively and 6 months post-operatively). The control group (n = 94) had sequestrectomy operations without any pharmacological preparation. The main outcomes were clinical healing of the mucosa after 1 month, and clinical and radiographic healing of the bone lesion at 6 months. In the test group all patients had mucosal healing and there was only one relapse within 6 months. In the control group, in 17% of the patients the mucosa did not heal, 71% of the patients relapsed within two months, and 7% developed infectious complications (such as abscess or phlegmon). After 6 months, the control group patients with persisting issues were prescribed pentoxifylline and tocopherol, as in the test group. At a subsequent follow-up, all those patients healed completely. Patients were monitored for a period of 7.8 ± 0.3 years, during which no relapse or additional problems were reported. As a conclusion, pentoxifylline and tocopherol protocol seems to be beneficial in the management of MRONJ patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Challenges in Oral Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pre-operative intra-oral view from a MRONJ patient with bilateral defect. (<b>A</b>) left side; (<b>B</b>) right side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Pre-operative orthopantomography of the same MRONJ patient showing bilateral defect; (<b>A</b>) shows the panoramic view; (<b>B</b>) shows more detail of the right side of the mandible.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pre-operative CBCT of the MRONJ patient, showing a reduction in the medullar space.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) Intra-operative view showing operation steps and resected osteonecrotic tissue from the right side of the mandible. After pharmacological preparation with pentoxifylline and tocopherol, the cleavage plane created by the reactive granulation tissue can be clearly seen which tends to separate the necrotic tissue from the healthy bone. Sequestrectomy was made using an osteotome to obtain the necrotic specimen. After the debridement, the bottom of the surgical area was bleeding properly, which creates a favorable environment for healing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) Intra-operative view showing sequestrectomy operation and resected osteonecrotic tissue from the left side of the mandible.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Post-operative intra-oral view at 2 week follow-up. Mucosal healing without bone exposure can be seen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Post-operative intra-oral and radiographic view at 6 month follow-up showing healed soft (<b>A</b>) and hard (<b>B</b>) tissues.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 280 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Different Antibiotic Regimes for Preventive Tooth Extractions in Patients with Antiresorptive Intake—A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Oliver Ristow, Thomas Rückschloß, Gregor Schnug, Julius Moratin, Moritz Bleymehl, Sven Zittel, Maximilian Pilz, Caroline Sekundo, Christian Mertens, Michael Engel, Jürgen Hoffmann and Maximilian Smielowski
Antibiotics 2023, 12(6), 997; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12060997 - 1 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1286
Abstract
In the present study, the impacts on success rates between three different antibiotic regimes in patients receiving preventive tooth extraction during/after antiresorptive treatment were compared. For the retrospective analysis, we enrolled patients who had undergone tooth extraction from 2009 to 2019 according to [...] Read more.
In the present study, the impacts on success rates between three different antibiotic regimes in patients receiving preventive tooth extraction during/after antiresorptive treatment were compared. For the retrospective analysis, we enrolled patients who had undergone tooth extraction from 2009 to 2019 according to the specified preventive conditions under antiresorptive therapy. Three antibiotic regimens were distinguished: (Group 1) intravenous for 7 days, (Group 2) oral for 14 days, and (Group 3) oral for 7 days of application. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw at 12 weeks after surgery. A total of 760 patients and 1143 extraction regions were evaluated (Group 1 n = 719; Group 2 n = 126; Group 3 n = 298). The primary endpoint showed no significant difference in the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw between the groups studied (Group 1 n = 50/669 (7%); Group 2 n = 9/117 (7%); Group 3 n = 17/281 (6%); p = 0.746). Overall, the success rate was 93% after intervention when preventive measures were followed. With the same success rate, a reduced, oral administration of antibiotics seems to be sufficient regarding the possible spectrum of side effects, the development of resistance and the health economic point of view. Full article
20 pages, 4337 KiB  
Article
Chronic Periodontal Infection and Not Iatrogenic Interference Is the Trigger of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Insights from a Large Animal Study (PerioBRONJ Pig Model)
by Matthias Troeltzsch, Stephan Zeiter, Daniel Arens, Dirk Nehrbass, Florian A. Probst, Paris Liokatis, Michael Ehrenfeld and Sven Otto
Medicina 2023, 59(5), 1000; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59051000 - 22 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2108
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Antiresorptive drugs are widely used in osteology and oncology. An important adverse effect of these drugs is medication-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). There is scientific uncertainty about the underlying pathomechanism of MRONJ. A promising theory suspects infectious stimuli [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Antiresorptive drugs are widely used in osteology and oncology. An important adverse effect of these drugs is medication-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). There is scientific uncertainty about the underlying pathomechanism of MRONJ. A promising theory suspects infectious stimuli and local acidification with adverse effects on osteoclastic activity as crucial steps of MRONJ etiology. Clinical evidence showing a direct association between MRONJ and oral infections, such as periodontitis, without preceding surgical interventions is limited. Large animal models investigating the relationship between periodontitis and MRONJ have not been implemented. It is unclear whether the presence of infectious processes without surgical manipulation can trigger MRONJ. The following research question was formulated: is there a link between chronic oral infectious processes (periodontitis) and the occurrence of MRONJ in the absence of oral surgical procedures? Materials and Methods: A minipig large animal model for bisphosphonate-related ONJ (BRONJ) using 16 Göttingen minipigs divided into 2 groups (intervention/control) was designed and implemented. The intervention group included animals receiving i.v. bisphosphonates (zoledronate, n = 8, 0.05 mg/kg/week: ZOL group). The control group received no antiresorptive drug (n = 8: NON-ZOL group). Periodontitis lesions were induced by established procedures after 3 months of pretreatment (for the maxilla: the creation of an artificial gingival crevice and placement of a periodontal silk suture; for the mandible: the placement of a periodontal silk suture only). The outcomes were evaluated clinically and radiologically for 3 months postoperatively. After euthanasia a detailed histological evaluation was performed. Results: Periodontitis lesions could be induced successfully in all animals (both ZOL and NON-ZOL animals). MRONJ lesions of various stages developed around all periodontitis induction sites in the ZOL animals. The presence of MRONJ and periodontitis was proven clinically, radiologically and histologically. Conclusions: The results of this study provide further evidence that the infectious processes without prior dentoalveolar surgical interventions can trigger MRONJ. Therefore, iatrogenic disruption of the oral mucosa cannot be the decisive step in the pathogenesis of MRONJ. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>): Intraoperative view of the first maxillary molar with an iatrogenically induced anterior periodontal crevice (defect: star) and periodontal silk suture in place (arrow). (<b>B</b>): Silk suture in place around the first mandibular minipig molar achieved by only minimal flap elevation. (<b>C</b>): Image showing the first maxillary molar in a NON-ZOL pig after 6 weeks of periodontitis induction; the retraction and redness of the gingiva can be observed. (<b>D</b>): Image of a mandibular molar in a NON-ZOL minipig after 6 weeks of periodontitis induction; the excessive accumulation of plaque can be observed as a sign of pocket secretion (arrows).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>CT scan obtained directly after the surgery showing the artificial vertical periodontal defect (<b>yellow arrow</b>: maxilla) and the groove in the first mandibular molar (<b>red arrow</b>: mandible).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scout scan of the ROI showing upper and lower jaw in complete overview (<b>top</b>: left hemi-maxilla; <b>bottom</b>: left hemi-mandibula).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Digital microphotographs of GE-stained slides (green (<b>A</b>): maxilla; red (<b>B</b>): mandibula) showing the areas assessed by histopathological analysis. The yellow circle highlights the area of interest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Images of ZOL group animals with periodontal intrabony defects at baseline ((<b>A</b>): maxillary fist molar; (<b>B</b>): mandibular first molar). Black arrows indicating sites of periodontal defects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Coronal CT sections showing progressive bone loss at the periodontitis induction site (maxilla, directly postoperative: the red arrow marks the CEJ groove; the yellow arrow marks the vertical bone loss).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Coronal CT sections of the identical intraoral site (left mandibular first molar) immediately after CEJ groove creation and silk suture placement (left image, (<b>A</b>) yellow arrow marks the crestal bone at baseline) and at the first follow-up appointment 6 weeks later (February 2018, right image, (<b>B</b>) red arrow marks the crestal bone after periodontitis induction). The vertical bone loss can be observed which proves the successful induction of periodontitis. At the maxillary site radiologic signs of advanced-stage MRONJ (sequestrum of the facial bony sinus wall and chronic sinus mucosal swelling) are present.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>): Image of maxillary molars in a ZOL minipig showing inflammatory signs of the gingiva, excessive gingival retraction and intrabony defect formation both on the mesial aspect (iatrogenically induced) and the distal aspect (newly formed: arrows); the periodontal pockets showed pus excretion (MRONJ stage 2). (<b>B</b>): Image of mandibular molars in a ZOL minipig showing inflammatory signs of the gingiva, excessive plaque accumulation (sign of periodontitis: arrow); the bony surface could be probed on the distal aspect of the molar (MRONJ stage 1: star).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mandibular spontaneous MRONJ development. (<b>A</b>) The lesions were primarily detected on scheduled CT scans because of the massive periosteal callus formation, as a sign of chronic bony inflammation and increased turnover. (<b>B</b>) Clinically, a massive vertical bony defect on the distal aspect of the first mandibular molar could be observed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Suture material, food material, gingivitis and periodontitis. Note the presence of (mesially cut) suture material (red circles) and bacterially contaminated food material (yellow arrows), as well as the chronically inflamed gingiva of differing severity grades: (<b>A</b>) minimal, (<b>B</b>) slight, (<b>C</b>) moderate and (<b>D</b>) severe. Moreover, the gingiva is recessed below the enamel–dentin border leading to inflammation of the dental cement and of the periodontal ligament (periodontitis). In all four samples, the basal membrane is continuous (=no ulceration). GE-stained slide, magnification: (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) scale bar 500 μm (objective 4×).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Gingival ulceration and orally denuded bone (all affected sites in this study). Note the discontinuity of the mucosa (ulceration) combined with orally denuded bone (yellow triangle) leading to an entry point for oral flora. Mandible (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>); maxilla (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>); all of Group 1 (ZOL-treated), GE-stained slide, magnification: (<b>A</b>–<b>E</b>) scale bar 1 mm (objective 2×)), scale bar 2 mm (objective 2×, image stitched); the silk suture is still in place (red circle).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Osteomyelitis and bacterial infection, the yellow box marks the area of magnification. (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) area remote from ulceration; (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) area near ulceration. Note the presence of karyorrhectic granulocytic cells and cell debris (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>), or additional lymphoplasmacytic cells (mixed inflammation). Inflammation with coccoid bacteria could be seen in both samples (<b>C</b>,<b>F</b>). Samples of Group 1 [ZOL-treated], GE-stained slide, magnification: (<b>A</b>,<b>D</b>) 100 μm (objective 20×), (<b>B</b>,<b>E</b>) scale bar 50 μm (objective 40×), (<b>C</b>,<b>F</b>) scale bar 20 μm (objective 100× oil).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Osteonecrosis of the bone stock (superficial near the ulceration; the yellow box marks the area of magnification). Note the empty osteocytic lacunae defining dead bone tissue. Group 1 (ZOL-treated), GE-stained slide, magnification: (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) 200 μm (objective 10×), (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>) scale bar 100 μm (objective 20×).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Proliferation of trabecular bone, the yellow box marks the area of magnification. (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>): Note the new formation of bone near areas of osteomyelitis, and a low amount of bone at the inflamed and infected alveolar bone area. (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>): In contrast to the usually more compact bone of the alveolar bone stock, this bone is of the trabecular type and exhibits high remodeling activity with both osteoblasts and osteoclasts on its surface. Group 1 (ZOL-treated), GE-stained slide, magnification: (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) scale bar 1 mm (objective 2×), (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>) 200 μm (objective 10×).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Oxytetracycline-labelling at interdental areas with orally denuded, osteonecrotic bone. Note the decrease or complete loss ((<b>A</b>), yellow circle) of OT-labelling at areas of orally denuded and osteonecrotic bone. Mandibula (<b>A</b>); maxilla (<b>B</b>) G. All of Group 1 (ZOL-treated), OT-labelled slide, epiFL illumination, magnification: A–H scale bar 500 μm (objective 10×, image stitched).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Corresponding sagittal CT scans. The red arrows mark the position of the alveolar bone after 6 weeks of follow-up, with clear clinical but no radiological signs of periodontitis and MRONJ at a mandibular site. The yellow arrow shows the dramatic vertical bone loss that occurred between week 6 and 12 of the experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Image of maxillary molars in a ZOL minipig showing inflammatory signs of the gingiva, excessive gingival retraction and exposed bone; the symptomatology was accompanied by malodor. The CT scan shows sinus involvement and sequestrum formation (yellow arrow, MRONJ stage 3).</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4784 KiB  
Communication
Identification of Potential Biomarkers and Small Molecule Drugs for Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ): An Integrated Bioinformatics Study Using Big Data
by Kumarendran Balachandran, Roszalina Ramli, Saiful Anuar Karsani and Mariati Abdul Rahman
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 8635; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108635 - 11 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1917
Abstract
This study aimed to identify potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), a rare but serious side effect of bisphosphonate therapy. This study analyzed a microarray dataset (GSE7116) of multiple myeloma patients with BRONJ (n = 11) [...] Read more.
This study aimed to identify potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), a rare but serious side effect of bisphosphonate therapy. This study analyzed a microarray dataset (GSE7116) of multiple myeloma patients with BRONJ (n = 11) and controls (n = 10), and performed gene ontology, a pathway enrichment analysis, and a protein–protein interaction network analysis. A total of 1481 differentially expressed genes were identified, including 381 upregulated and 1100 downregulated genes, with enriched functions and pathways related to apoptosis, RNA splicing, signaling pathways, and lipid metabolism. Seven hub genes (FN1, TNF, JUN, STAT3, ACTB, GAPDH, and PTPRC) were also identified using the cytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape. This study further screened small-molecule drugs using CMap and verified the results using molecular docking methods. This study identified 3-(5-(4-(Cyclopentyloxy)-2-hydroxybenzoyl)-2-((3-hydroxybenzo[d]isoxazol-6-yl) methoxy) phenyl) propanoic acid as a potential drug treatment and prognostic marker for BRONJ. The findings of this study provide reliable molecular insight for biomarker validation and potential drug development for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of BRONJ. Further research is needed to validate these findings and develop an effective biomarker for BRONJ. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Identification of DEGs data from GEO dataset GSE7116. Volcano plot representing differential gene expression analysis between condition A and condition B. Genes that are significantly up-regulated (log2 fold change &gt;1, adjusted <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt;0.05) are shown in red, while genes that are significantly down-regulated (log2 fold change &lt; −1, adjusted <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05) are shown in blue. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis represents the log2 fold change in gene expression between BRONJ vs. control, while the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis represents the negative logarithm of the adjusted <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value (significance level) for each gene. Genes with high significance and large fold changes are located towards the top and sides of the plot, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>GO and KEGG analysis of the DEGs according to (<b>A</b>) biological process, (<b>B</b>) cellular components, (<b>C</b>) molecular functions, and (<b>D</b>) KEGG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Displays a network analysis of the top 150 proteins based on their network parameters: (<b>A</b>) MCC, (<b>B</b>) MNC, (<b>C</b>) Closeness, (<b>D</b>) Betweenness, and (<b>E</b>) Degree, as well as a Venn diagram for hub genes. The nodes in the network represent proteins, and the edges represent their interactions. Panel (<b>F</b>) shows a Venn diagram of the hub genes, with the number of proteins in each intersection indicated. This figure provides insight into the identification of key proteins that may be involved in the network’s function and highlights their importance based on different network parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Displays a network analysis of hub genes, their degree, and co-expression. (<b>A</b>) shows the hub genes in the network. The nodes in the network represent genes/proteins, and the edges represent their interactions. (<b>B</b>) shows a bar chart of the degree of hub genes, which is the number of nodes and edges they interact with. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis shows the number of interactions, and the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis shows the hub genes. (<b>C</b>) shows the co-expression of hub genes, which is the level of similarity in expression patterns between genes. This figure provides insight into the key genes that may be involved in the network’s function, their degree of interaction, and their co-expression patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Chemical structures of six compounds: (<b>A</b>) 1,4-dihydronicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, (<b>B</b>) Tanshinone IIA, (<b>C</b>) Glycitein, (<b>D</b>) Napa-bucasin, (<b>E</b>) 3-(5-(4-(Cyclopentyloxy)-2-hydroxybenzoyl)-2-((3-hydroxybenzo[d]isoxazol-6-yl) methoxy) phenyl) propanoic acid, and (<b>F</b>) Alantolactone. The stereochemistry of the compounds is shown using wedges and dashes to indicate the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms in space. Chiral centers are indicated by R or S configurations, and the stereochemistry of specific positions in the molecule is indicated by dashed or solid wedges. The figure also highlights the active site of each molecule, which is an important feature for its function, and this can vary depending on the specific molecule and its interactions with other molecules.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Heat map displaying the binding affinities (ΔG) of drugs against a panel of genes. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis shows the genes analyzed, while the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis displays the drug molecules tested. The color scale represents the affinity range from −4.00 to −11.00 kcal/mol, where blue indicates higher affinity (more negative ΔG values), and red indicates lower affinity (less negative ΔG values). The binding affinities were calculated using molecular docking. (72724: Alantolactone, 439153: 1,4-dihydronicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, 5317750: Glycitein, 10331844: Napabucasin, 23626877: 3-(5-(4-(Cyclopentyloxy)-2-hydroxybenzoyl)-2-((3-hydroxybenzo[d]isoxazol-6-yl) methoxy) phenyl) propanoic acid, 164676: Tanshinone IIA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Docking of small molecule drugs with targets. The active site of protein is shown. Hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions between the drugs and protein X are depicted by orange and green dotted lines, respectively. Several important binding interactions are labeled. The molecular docking analysis was performed using AutoDock Vina.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The IL-6 activated by inflammatory triggers initiates the pathway by phosphorylation of STAT3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>General overview of the research pipeline.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2717 KiB  
Review
Location and Gender Differences in Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Patients Treated with Antiresorptive and Antineoplastic Drugs Undergoing Dentoalveolar Surgical, Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
by Mario Dioguardi, Francesca Spirito, Mario Alovisi, Riccardo Aiuto, Daniele Garcovich, Vito Crincoli, Andrea Ballini, Giorgia Apollonia Caloro and Lorenzo Lo Muzio
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(9), 3299; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093299 - 5 May 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1537
Abstract
In the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and more generally of neoplastic and metabolic pathologies affecting bone tissues, antiresorption drugs such as bisphosphonates and monoclonal antibody are used. Bisphosphonates have been linked to cases of osteonecrosis of the jaws since 2003 by Marx, [...] Read more.
In the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and more generally of neoplastic and metabolic pathologies affecting bone tissues, antiresorption drugs such as bisphosphonates and monoclonal antibody are used. Bisphosphonates have been linked to cases of osteonecrosis of the jaws since 2003 by Marx, with more and more evidence over the next two decades; together with bisphosphonate drugs, cases relating to the use of monoclonal drugs have been subsequently added. Among the main independent risk factors, we have extraction procedures in oral surgery that can affect both the mandible and the maxilla and the anterior or posterior sectors. The incidence of MRONJ treated with oral bisphosphonates ranges from 0.5% to 3% according to studies; this incidence would appear to be higher in patients treated with antiresorptive agents with neoplastic diseases. Many pathologies including those in which antiresorptive drugs are used show differences in prevalence in relation to sex; similarly, there could be differences in the incidence of cases of osteonecrosis based on gender in patients undergoing dentoalveolar surgery. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and trial sequential analysis was to identify and quantify whether there is a proportionally greater risk of MRONJ in male or female subjects and whether there is evidence of greater involvement of osteonecrosis at several extraction sites, differentiating them into mandibular or maxilla and in the anterior or posterior sector. The revision protocol followed the indications of the Cochrane Handbook, and were recorded in Prospero, while the drafting of the manuscript was based on PRISMA. The results of the systematic review, after the study identification and selection process, included a total of 24 studies. The results of the meta-analysis reports: odds ratio (random effects model): 1.476 (0.684, 3.184) between male and female; odds ratio (random effects model): 1.390 (0.801, 2.412) between mandible and maxillary, and an odds ratio value of 0.730 (0.250, 2.137) between the anterior and posterior extraction sites. In conclusion, we can see that there was a trend in the onset of MRONJ as a complication of dentoalveolar surgical procedures, which proportionally mostly involved the male sex and the posterior mandibular sectors, however, this trend must be further confirmed by additional studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The entire selection and screening procedures are described in the PRISMA flowchart; tables with the orange lines are the searches performed subsequently (on 16 April 2022), with the addition of new keywords on PubMed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Binary random effects model metric; odds ratio: 1.390; C.I. (Confidence Interval): (lower bound) 0.801 (upper bound) 2.412; <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value 0.241; Q = Q statistic (measure of weighted squared deviations); df = degrees of freedom; I2 (I^2) = Higgins heterogeneity index, I2 &lt; 50%, heterogeneity low; P = <span class="html-italic">p</span> value; heterogeneity (Het.): tau^2: 0.315; Q (df = 13) 20.178, Het. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value: 0.091, I^2: 35.574; Results (log scale): 0.329 (−0.221, 0.880), Standard error (SE): 0.281; Weights: Jeong: 10.945%, Lain and Ajwani: 16.231%, Hasegawa: 18.572%, Ferlito: 1.814%, Lazarovici: 12.918%, Lodi: 1.760%, Mozzati 2013: 1.829%, Mozzati 2012: 3.154%, Scoletta 2013: 2.887%, Scoletta 2011: 3.140%, Vescovi: 5.024%, Kang: 2.646%, Kawakita: 8.692%, Bodem: 10.390%. Correction factor = 0.5 (applied only to values of 0). The graph of each study shows the first author and the date of publication as well as the measurement of the number of MRONJs on the total and the relative OdRa with the confidence intervals reported. The final value with the relative confidence intervals is expressed in bold. Jeong et al., 2017 [<a href="#B36-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Lain and Ajwani, 2016 [<a href="#B37-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Hasegawa et al., 2017 [<a href="#B22-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">22</a>], Ferlito et al., 2011 [<a href="#B38-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">38</a>], Lazarovici et al., 2010 [<a href="#B40-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">40</a>], Lodi et al., 2010 [<a href="#B41-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">41</a>], Mozzati et al., 2013 [<a href="#B43-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">43</a>], Mozzati et al., 2012 [<a href="#B44-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">44</a>], Scoletta et al., 2013 [<a href="#B48-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">48</a>], Scoletta et al., 2011 [<a href="#B49-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">49</a>], Vescovi et al., 2013 [<a href="#B50-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">50</a>], Kang et al., 2020 [<a href="#B52-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">52</a>], Kawakita et al., 2017 [<a href="#B53-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">53</a>], Bodem et al., 2015 [<a href="#B55-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Forest plot analysis subgroup; subgroup OR: 6 studies, OdRa: 1.718 (0.889, 3.317), SE: 0.336, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-Val: 0.107, z-Val: 1.611, Q (df): 8.371 (5), Het. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-Val: 0.137, I^2: 40.27%; Subgroup IV: 6 studies, OdRa: 1.325 (0.367, 4.77), SE: 0.654, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-Val: 0.667, z-Val: 0.430, Q (df): 6.774 (5), Het. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-Val: 0.238, I^2: 26.19%; Subgroup OR IV: 2 studies, OdRa: 0.774 (0.157, 3.807), SE: 0.813, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-Val: 0.752, z-Val: −0.316, Q (df): 1.362 (1), Het. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-Val: 0.243, I^2: 26.57%. Jeong et al., 2017 [<a href="#B36-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Lain and Ajwani, 2016 [<a href="#B37-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Hasegawa et al., 2017 [<a href="#B22-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">22</a>], Ferlito et al., 2011 [<a href="#B38-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">38</a>], Lazarovici et al., 2010 [<a href="#B40-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">40</a>], Lodi et al., 2010 [<a href="#B41-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">41</a>], Mozzati et al., 2013 [<a href="#B43-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">43</a>], Mozzati et al., 2012 [<a href="#B44-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">44</a>], Scoletta et al., 2013 [<a href="#B48-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">48</a>], Scoletta et al., 2011 [<a href="#B49-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">49</a>], Vescovi et al., 2013 [<a href="#B50-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">50</a>], Kang et al., 2020 [<a href="#B52-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">52</a>], Kawakita et al., 2017 [<a href="#B53-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">53</a>], Bodem et al., 2015 [<a href="#B55-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Binary random effects model: OdRa: 0.730 (0.250, 2.137), <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value: 0.566, tau^2: 0.996, Q (df = 4): 15.165, Het. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value: 0.004, I^2: 73.624. Results (log scale) −0.314 (−1.388, 0.760) SE: 0.548. weights: Jeong: 23.420%, Lain and Aiwani: 23.784%, Hasegawa: 24.489%, Lazarovici: 22.588%, Lodi: 5.718%. Jeong et al., 2017 [<a href="#B36-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Lain and Ajwani, 2016 [<a href="#B37-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Hasegawa et al., 2017 [<a href="#B22-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">22</a>], Lazarovici et al., 2010 [<a href="#B40-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">40</a>], Lodi et al., 2010 [<a href="#B41-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Binary random effects model: OdRa: 1.476 (0.684, 3.184), <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value: 0.321, tau^2: 0.692, Q (df = 13): 21.049, Het. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value: 0.072, I^2: 38.239. Results (log scale) 0.389 (−0.380, 1.158) SE: 0.392; Weights: Jeong: 5.444%, Lain and Ajwani: 15.968%, Hasegawa: 16.599%, Hutcheson et al.: 7.585%, Migliorati: 4.414%, Mozzati 2013: 3.250%, O’Connell: 2.849%, Saia: 9.539%, Scoletta 2013: 4.480%, Scoletta 2011: 7.590%, Vescovi: 7.785%, Kang: 4.549%, Kawakita: 5.398%, Kunchur: 4.550%. Jeong et al., 2017 [<a href="#B36-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Lain and Ajwani, 2016 [<a href="#B37-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Hasegawa et al., 2017 [<a href="#B22-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">22</a>], Hutcheson et al., 2014 [<a href="#B39-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">39</a>], Migliorati et al., 2013 [<a href="#B42-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">42</a>], Mozzati et al., 2013 [<a href="#B43-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">43</a>], O’Connell et al., 2012 [<a href="#B46-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">46</a>], Saia et al., 2010 [<a href="#B47-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">47</a>], Scoletta et al., 2013 [<a href="#B48-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">48</a>], Scoletta et al., 2011 [<a href="#B49-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">49</a>], Vescovi et al., 2013 [<a href="#B50-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">50</a>] Kang et al., 2020 [<a href="#B52-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">52</a>], Kawakita et al., 2017 [<a href="#B53-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">53</a>], Kunchur et al., 2009 [<a href="#B21-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Funnel plot and forest plot (RevManger 5.4): OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error. Graphically, there are no sources of heterogeneity. The odds ratio value mirrors <a href="#jcm-12-03299-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>, a correction factor d of 1 was applied to studies with mandibular and maxillary MRONJ events equal to 0. Jeong et al., 2017 [<a href="#B36-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Lain and Ajwani, 2016 [<a href="#B37-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Hasegawa et al., 2017 [<a href="#B22-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">22</a>], Ferlito et al., 2011 [<a href="#B38-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">38</a>], Lazarovici et al., 2010 [<a href="#B40-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">40</a>], Lodi et al., 2010 [<a href="#B41-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">41</a>], Mozzati et al., 2013 [<a href="#B43-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">43</a>], Mozzati et al., 2012 [<a href="#B44-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">44</a>], Scoletta et al., 2013 [<a href="#B48-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">48</a>], Scoletta et al., 2011 [<a href="#B49-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">49</a>], Vescovi et al., 2013 [<a href="#B50-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">50</a>], Kang et al., 2020 [<a href="#B52-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">52</a>], Kawakita et al., 2017 [<a href="#B53-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">53</a>], Bodem et al., 2015 [<a href="#B55-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>TSA: Red lines represent the sequential trial monitoring limits and futility limits. The solid blue line is the cumulative Z-curve that requires the information dimension to demonstrate or reject a 20% relative increase in benefit at the maxillary versus mandibular extraction site (5% alpha and 80% beta), whose results included 13,543 patients (vertical red line). The cumulative Z-curve not crossing the Z line (horizontal red line), Z = 1.96, indicates an absence of evidence because the meta-analysis included fewer patients than the required information size, which is a false negative result. Jeong et al., 2017 [<a href="#B36-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Lain and Ajwani, 2016 [<a href="#B37-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Hasegawa et al., 2017 [<a href="#B22-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">22</a>], Ferlito et al., 2011 [<a href="#B38-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">38</a>], Lazarovici et al., 2010 [<a href="#B40-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">40</a>], Lodi et al., 2010 [<a href="#B41-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">41</a>], Mozzati et al., 2013 [<a href="#B43-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">43</a>], Mozzati et al., 2012 [<a href="#B44-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">44</a>], Scoletta et al., 2013 [<a href="#B48-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">48</a>], Scoletta et al., 2011 [<a href="#B49-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">49</a>], Vescovi et al., 2013 [<a href="#B50-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">50</a>], Kang et al., 2020 [<a href="#B52-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">52</a>], Kawakita et al., 2017 [<a href="#B53-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">53</a>], Bodem et al., 2015 [<a href="#B55-jcm-12-03299" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">
37 pages, 4988 KiB  
Systematic Review
MRONJ Treatment Strategies: A Systematic Review and Two Case Reports
by Angelo Michele Inchingolo, Giuseppina Malcangi, Irene Ferrara, Assunta Patano, Fabio Viapiano, Anna Netti, Daniela Azzollini, Anna Maria Ciocia, Elisabetta de Ruvo, Merigrazia Campanelli, Pasquale Avantario, Antonio Mancini, Francesco Inchingolo, Ciro Gargiulo Isacco, Alberto Corriero, Alessio Danilo Inchingolo and Gianna Dipalma
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(7), 4370; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074370 - 29 Mar 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4945
Abstract
MRONJ is a serious drug-related side effect that is most common in people using antiresorptive and/or angiogenic medications. Therapy options for this condition include conservative treatments, surgical procedures with varied degrees of invasiveness, and adjuvant therapies. The aim of the present study is [...] Read more.
MRONJ is a serious drug-related side effect that is most common in people using antiresorptive and/or angiogenic medications. Therapy options for this condition include conservative treatments, surgical procedures with varied degrees of invasiveness, and adjuvant therapies. The aim of the present study is to identify the most successful and promising therapy alternatives available to clinicians. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for works on our topic published between 8 January 2006 and 8 January 2023. The search was restricted to randomized clinical trials, retrospective studies, clinical studies, and case series involving human subjects with at least five cases and no age restriction on participants. A total of 2657 was found. After the selection process, the review included 32 publications for qualitative analysis. Although conservative treatments (pharmacological, laser, and minimally invasive surgery) are effective in the early stages of MRONJs or as a supplement to traditional surgical resection therapy, most studies emphasize the importance of surgical treatment for the resolution or downstaging of advanced lesions. Fluorescence-guided surgery, PRP, PRF, CGF, piezosurgery, VEGF, hyaluronic acid, and ozone therapy all show significant potential for improving treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Role of the bone remodeling unit (BMU) in bone remodeling process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Chemical formula of pyrophosphate to BPs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chemical structure of BPs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Chemical structure of the molecule of zoledronic acid (zoledronate).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of DB and BP on bone resorption.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mechanism of action of BPs on the bone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Literature search Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Initial lesion showed in OPT pointed by the circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>CBCT of the initial lesion pointed by the circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>A</b>) Surgical site after incision; (<b>B</b>) Delimitation with piezo surgery; (<b>C</b>) Bone plug removed with piezo surgery only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>A</b>) PRF preparation; (<b>B</b>) PRF autologous membrane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>A</b>) Surgical site after 7 days; (<b>B</b>) Complete healing after 14 days since surgery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>OPT of initial lesion pointed by the circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>A</b>) Piezo surgery intervention with OT7 Mectron<sup>®</sup> tip; (<b>B</b>) Delimitation of necrotic area; (<b>C</b>) Removal of necrotic bone plug; (<b>D</b>) Rounding of lesion margins with PL3 Mectron<sup>®</sup> tip.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>A</b>) Control of surgical site after 7 days; (<b>B</b>) Control of surgical site after 14 days (fully healed).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2229 KiB  
Conference Report
ONJ (MRONJ) Update 2021—Osteonecrosis of Jaw Related to Bisphosphonates and Other Drugs—Prevention, Diagnosis, Pharmacovigilance, Treatment: A 2021 Web Event
by Vittorio Fusco, Giuseppina Campisi, Paola Carcieri, Franca Fagioli, Oscar Bertetto, Michele Davide Mignogna and Alberto Bedogni
Oral 2022, 2(2), 137-147; https://doi.org/10.3390/oral2020014 - 11 Apr 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4122
Abstract
On the 8th and 9th of May 2021, an online conference was organized to connect Italian physicians, dentists and oral care specialists, students, nurses, psychologists, dental hygiene experts, and other professionals to discuss controversial issues about Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of Jaw (MRONJ). The first [...] Read more.
On the 8th and 9th of May 2021, an online conference was organized to connect Italian physicians, dentists and oral care specialists, students, nurses, psychologists, dental hygiene experts, and other professionals to discuss controversial issues about Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of Jaw (MRONJ). The first section evaluated differences between Italian recommendations, released on 2020 by Italian Societies of Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO) and Maxillofacial Surgery (SICMF), and other international practice guidelines or documents. A first round table gathered expert opinions about MRONJ definitions and staging systems. Another round table was dedicated to opinion of drug prescribers (oncologists, hematologists, rheumatologists, and other physicians treating osteoporosis). Educational sessions illustrated the main differences between previous (2013) and more recent (2020) Italian recommendations. A large space was dedicated to the presentation of scientific contributions from centers in Italy, divided in specific sessions (epidemiology; case series; special case reports; prevention experiences; MRONJ treatment). Conclusions: in an innovative web conference, talks and scientific reports underlined importance of adequate imaging study of bone in definition and staging of MRONJ cases, the role of surgery in treatment of the disease, and the value of oral hygiene in the prevention. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Stage 1 according to SICMF-SIPMO staging system: Focal MRONJ. (<b>a</b>) non-exposed MRONJ following simple tooth extraction; alveolar socket filled up with inflammatory tissue without frank bone exposure (black arrow). (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) CT scan axial view showing increased bone density (trabecular thickening and focal osteosclerosis) surrounding the post-extraction socket (white arrow); in the coronal view the increased bone density signal is limited to the alveolar bone region, above the inferior alveolar nerve canal (yellow arrow).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Stage 2 according to SICMF-SIPMO staging system: Diffuse MRONJ. (<b>a</b>) Non-exposed MRONJ following simple tooth extraction; the alveolar socket is filled up with inflammatory tissue (white arrow); the bone can be probed through the fistula. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) CT scan axial view showing increased bone density (diffuse bone condensation and osteosclerosis) of the left mandibular body with sequester formation and periosteal reaction (white arrow); in the coronal view, the increased bone density signal is extended to the basal bone, with the loss of cortical and trabecular bone differentiation (yellow arrow).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Stage 3 according to SICMF-SIPMO staging system: complicated MRONJ. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Probing bone fistula and suppuration without frank bone exposure of the mandible in the oral cavity (white arrow); extraoral cutaneous fistula of the submental region (yellow arrow). (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) CT scan axial view showing increased bone density (diffuse bone condensation and osteosclerosis) of the entire mandibular arch with massive sequester formation (white arrow); in the coronal view, pathologic fracture of the mandibular symphysis is clearly visible (yellow arrow).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 13635 KiB  
Article
Fat Graft in Surgical Treatment of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ)
by Davide De Cicco, Gianpaolo Tartaro, Giuseppe Colella, Giovanni Dell’Aversana Orabona, Mario Santagata, Ivo Ferrieri, Antonio Troiano, Samuel Staglianò, Andrea Salvatore Volgare and Salvatore D’Amato
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11195; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311195 - 25 Nov 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1769
Abstract
Background: Although the published literature has grown exponentially during the last few decades, managing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) remains challenging. Since the first description of adipose-derived stem cells, cell therapy showed promising perspectives in surgical treatment of MRONJ. In this study, [...] Read more.
Background: Although the published literature has grown exponentially during the last few decades, managing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) remains challenging. Since the first description of adipose-derived stem cells, cell therapy showed promising perspectives in surgical treatment of MRONJ. In this study, the beneficial effect of fat graft in surgical treatment of stage 2 and 3 MRONJ patients was assessed. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the evolution pattern of the disease was conducted comparing the outcomes of MRONJ patients who underwent sequestrectomy followed by fat graft (n = 9) and those who received sequestrectomy alone (n = 12). Results: Improvement of the disease stage was observed in 77.8% vs. 22.2% cases in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.030); disease stability was documented in 11.1% vs. 25.0% cases in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.603); worsening of MRONJ stage was observed in 11.1% vs. 50.0% cases in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.159). Conclusions: Despite the small sample size, this study suggests that fat graft may represent a promising low-risk and cost-efficient adjunctive therapy in the surgical treatment of MRONJ patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fat harvesting technique. The adipose tissue is aspirated under moderate manual negative pressure, using a 60 mL syringe connected to a 3 mm cannula.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The harvested fat is drained by gravity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>After the fat is transferred to a 5 mL syringe, it is injected through the sutured mucosal margins of the surgical wound until the underlying space is filled.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Radiological examination of a treated patient: (<b>a</b>) baseline CT taken before surgery; (<b>b</b>) postoperative panoramic X-ray, taken 7 days after surgery; (<b>c</b>) postoperative panoramic X-ray taken 6 months after surgery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Clinical examination of a treated patient: (<b>a</b>) a fistula is present on the alveolar crest, through which the bone could be probed; (<b>b</b>) clinical control 7 days after surgery; (<b>c</b>) 6 months follow-up demonstrating the perfect healing of the musical lining.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 43018 KiB  
Article
Mandibular Reconstruction with Bridging Customized Plate after Ablative Surgery for ONJ: A Multi-Centric Case Series
by Salvatore Battaglia, Francesco Ricotta, Salvatore Crimi, Rosalia Mineo, Fabio Michelon, Achille Tarsitano, Claudio Marchetti and Alberto Bianchi
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(22), 11069; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112211069 - 22 Nov 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2036
Abstract
Purpose: Computer-aided methods for mandibular reconstruction have improved both functional and morphological results in patients who underwent segmental mandibular resection. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the overlaying of virtual planning in terms of measures of the Computer Assisted Design/Computer Assisted [...] Read more.
Purpose: Computer-aided methods for mandibular reconstruction have improved both functional and morphological results in patients who underwent segmental mandibular resection. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the overlaying of virtual planning in terms of measures of the Computer Assisted Design/Computer Assisted Manufacturing CAD/CAM plate for mandibular reconstruction in patients who are ineligible for the insertion of reconstructing the titanium plate supported by fibular free flap, due to their poor health status, or in the presence of specific contraindications to autologous bone flap harvest. Materials and methods: The retrospective study performed analyzed the results of nine patients. The patients were treated at the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of Policlinico S. Orsola of Bologna, Italy, and Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy, from April 2016 to June 2021. Superimposition between planning and post operative Computed Tomography CT scan was performed to assess the accuracy. Results: All reconstructive procedures were carried out successfully. No microsurgery-related complications occurred. In two cases, we had plate misplacement, and in one case, plate exposure that led to plate removal. The average accuracy of the series assessed after CT superimposition, as previously described, was 0.95 mm. Conclusions: Considering that microvascular bone transfer is a high-risk procedure in BRONJ patients, we can conclude that the positioning of a customized bridging mandibular prosthesis (CBMP), whether or not it is associated with a microvascular soft tissue transfer, is a safe technique in terms of surgical outcome and feasibility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioengineering Tools Applied to Medical and Surgical Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>3D model of the patient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Virtual resection planning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Virtual reconstruction. A grid is created in the body portion of the plate to anchor the oral pelvi muscles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Superimposition of planning and post-operative CT scan obtaining a color map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Fixation of the reconstructive plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Superimposition and color map of accuracy. Green color represents best accuracy level. In green is displayed the best accuracy between planning and result, in red the worst accuracy obtained.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop