[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = AtNPR4

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 4496 KiB  
Article
FaNPR3 Members of the NPR1-like Gene Family Negatively Modulate Strawberry Fruit Resistance against Colletotrichum acutatum
by Victoria Súnico, José Javier Higuera, Francisco Amil-Ruiz, Isabel Arjona-Girona, Carlos J. López-Herrera, Juan Muñoz-Blanco, Ana María Maldonado-Alconada and José L. Caballero
Plants 2024, 13(16), 2261; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162261 - 14 Aug 2024
Viewed by 495
Abstract
Strawberry fruit is highly appreciated worldwide for its organoleptic and healthy properties. However, this plant is attacked by many pathogenic fungi, which significantly affect fruit production and quality at pre- and post-harvest stages, making chemical applications the most effective but undesirable strategy to [...] Read more.
Strawberry fruit is highly appreciated worldwide for its organoleptic and healthy properties. However, this plant is attacked by many pathogenic fungi, which significantly affect fruit production and quality at pre- and post-harvest stages, making chemical applications the most effective but undesirable strategy to control diseases that has been found so far. Alternatively, genetic manipulation, employing plant key genes involved in defense, such as members of the NPR-like gene family, has been successful in many crops to improve resistance. The identification and use of the endogenous counterpart genes in the plant of interest (as it is the case of strawberry) is desirable as it would increase the favorable outcome and requires prior knowledge of their defense-related function. Using RNAi technology in strawberry, transient silencing of Fragaria ananassa NPR3 members in fruit significantly reduced tissue damage after Colletotrichum acutatum infection, whereas the ectopic expression of either FaNPR3.1 or FaNPR3.2 did not have an apparent effect. Furthermore, the ectopic expression of FaNPR3.2 in Arabidopsis thaliana double-mutant npr3npr4 reverted the disease resistance phenotype to Pseudomonas syringe to wild-type levels. Therefore, the results revealed that members of the strawberry FaNPR3 clade negatively regulate the defense response to pathogens, as do their Arabidopsis AtNPR3/AtNPR4 orthologs. Also, evidence was found showing that FaNPR3 members act in strawberry (F. ananassa) as positive regulators of WRKY genes, FaWRKY19 and FaWRKY24; additionally, in Arabidopsis, FaNPR3.2 negatively regulates its orthologous genes AtNPR3/AtNPR4. We report for the first time the functional characterization of FaNPR3 members in F. ananassa, which provides a relevant molecular basis for the improvement of resistance in this species through new breeding technologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics, Genomics and Biotechnology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Expression pattern of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3</span> genes in strawberry fruit after agroinfiltration with pFRN::FaNPR3<span class="html-italic">all</span>.RNAi construct. (<b>A</b>) Gene expression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.1</span>. (<b>B</b>) Gene expression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.2</span>. (<b>C</b>) Gene expression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.3</span>. qRT-PCR analysis was accomplished in agroinfiltrated strawberry fruit before (0 and 2 days) and after (3, 5, and 7 days) <span class="html-italic">C. acutatum</span> inoculation (<span class="html-italic">Ca</span>). The time scale refers to days after agroinfiltration (dai). For all the genes, the arrow and horizontal line indicate the time of <span class="html-italic">Ca</span> inoculation. The black and grey columns show pFRN (control) and pFRN::FaNPR3<span class="html-italic">all</span>.RNAi (silencing) agroinfiltrations, respectively. Data from all time points are referred to data in time zero, represented as 1 (white column). Bars, mean ± standard error. Note the different scales in the relative-expression-level axis. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA. Letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>  &lt;  0.05) in HSD Tukey’s post hoc test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Expression pattern of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3</span> genes in strawberry fruit after agroinfiltration with pB7GWIWG2::FaNPR32.RNAi. (<b>A</b>) Gene expression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.1</span>. (<b>B</b>) Gene expression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.2</span>. (<b>C</b>) Gene expression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.3</span>. qRT-PCR analysis was accomplished in agroinfiltrated strawberry fruit before (0 and 2 days) and after (3, 5, and 7 days) <span class="html-italic">C. acutatum</span> inoculation (<span class="html-italic">Ca</span>). The time scale refers to days after agroinfiltration (dai). For all the genes, the arrow and the horizontal line indicate the time of <span class="html-italic">Ca</span> inoculation. The black and grey columns show pB7GWIWG2 and pB7GWIWG2::FaNPR32.RNAi agroinfiltrations, respectively. Data from all time points are referred to data in time zero, represented as 1 (white column). Bars, mean ± standard error. Note the different scales in the relative-expression-level axis. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA. Letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>  &lt;  0.05) in HSD Tukey’s post hoc test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Silencing effect of pFRN::FaNPR3<span class="html-italic">all</span>.RNAi and ectopic overexpression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.1</span> in strawberry fruit after <span class="html-italic">C. acutatum</span> infection. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Upper panels: external surface disease symptoms on the two agroinfiltrated opposite halves of the same fruit, after silencing and overexpression, respectively. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Lower panels: internal tissue damage of the same fruit shown in the corresponding upper panels. pFRN::FaNPR3<span class="html-italic">all</span>.RNAi and pFRN, silencing construct and its corresponding empty vector, as control. pK7::FaNPR31.OE and pK7, overexpression construct and its corresponding empty vector, as control. A relevant fruit is shown for each condition, as an example. (<b>C</b>) Statistical analysis of internal tissue damage ratio of the two opposite halves of the same fruit, according to the 1 to 5 severity scale; striped and plain blue bars, pFRN/pFRN and pFRN/pFRN::FaNPR31-RNAi agroinfiltrated values, respectively; striped and plain red bars, pK7/pK7 and pK7/pK7::FaNPR31-OE agroinfiltrated values, respectively. Data correspond to mean ± SD. Within each bar, means with different letters are significantly different by LSD test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. A ratio value of 1 indicates no differences between the opposite halves of the same fruit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Silencing effect of pB7GWIWG2::FaNPR32.RNAi and ectopic overexpression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.2</span> in strawberry fruit after <span class="html-italic">C. acutatum</span> infection. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Upper panels: external surface disease symptoms on the two agroinfiltrated opposite halves of the same fruit, after silencing and overexpression, respectively. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Lower panels: internal tissue damage of the same fruit shown in the corresponding upper panels. pB7GWIWG2::FaNPR32.RNAi and pB7GWIWG2, silencing construct and its corresponding empty vector, as control. pB7WG2::FaNPR32.OE and pB7WG2, overexpression construct and its corresponding empty vector, as control. A relevant fruit is shown for each condition, as an example. (<b>C</b>) Statistical analysis of internal tissue damage ratio of the two opposite halves of the same fruit, according to the 1 to 5 severity scale; striped and plain blue bars, pB7GWIWG2/pB7GWIWG2 and pB7GWIWG2/pB7GWIWG2::FaNPR32-RNAi agroinfiltrated values, respectively; striped and plain red bars, pB7WG2/pB7WG2 and pB7WG2/pB7WG2::FaNPR32-OE agroinfiltrated values, respectively. Data correspond to mean ± SD. Within each bar, means with different letters are significantly different by LSD test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. A ratio value of 1 indicates no differences between opposite halves of the same fruit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Silencing effect of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3</span> members on the expression of <span class="html-italic">FaWRKY19</span> and <span class="html-italic">FaWRKY24</span> genes in strawberry fruit after <span class="html-italic">C. acutatum</span> infection. (<b>A</b>) Silencing effect of pFRN::FaNPR3<span class="html-italic">all</span>.RNAi. (<b>B</b>) Silencing effect pB7GWIWG2::FaNPR32.RNAi. Black columns, the expression of <span class="html-italic">FaWRKY19</span> and <span class="html-italic">FaWRKY24</span> genes in half fruit agroinfiltrated with pFRN (<b>A</b>) or pB7GWIWG2 (<b>B</b>) control vectors. Grey columns, the expression of <span class="html-italic">FaWRKY19</span> and <span class="html-italic">FaWRKY24</span> genes in half fruit agroinfiltrated with pFRN::FaNPR3<span class="html-italic">all</span>.RNAi (<b>A</b>) or pB7GWIWG2::FaNPR32.RNAi (<b>B</b>). qRT-PCR analysis was accomplished in agroinfiltrated strawberry fruit before (0 and 2 days) and after (3, 5, and 7 days) <span class="html-italic">C. acutatum</span> inoculation (<span class="html-italic">Ca</span>). The time scale refers to days after agroinfiltration (dai). Arrow and horizontal line indicate the time of <span class="html-italic">Ca</span> inoculation. Data from all time points are referred to data in time zero, represented as 1 (white column). Bars, mean ± standard error. Note the different scales in the relative-expression-level axis. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA. Letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>  &lt;  0.05) in HSD Tukey’s post hoc test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Characterization of Arabidopsis lines. (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.2</span> expression in Arabidopsis WT-, <span class="html-italic">npr3npr4</span> mutant-, and <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.2</span>-overexpressing lines <span class="html-italic">npr3npr4</span>::FaNPR32 and WT::FaNPR32 (black, grey, white and striped bars, respectively). Transcript accumulation was monitored by qRT-PCR in non-infected plants as described in the <a href="#sec4-plants-13-02261" class="html-sec">Section 4</a>. Expression levels were normalized with respect to the internal control <span class="html-italic">ACTIN2</span> and displayed relatively to the threshold value of the wild-type (no expression of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.2</span>) that was given a value of 1 for convenience. Note that no amplification of <span class="html-italic">FaNPR3.2</span> strawberry gene is detected in neither WT nor double mutant <span class="html-italic">npr3npr4</span> using the specific primers (<a href="#app1-plants-13-02261" class="html-app">Supplementary Materials Table S1</a>). Bars represent the mean levels of transcript quantified from three independent biological experiments (±SD). (<b>B</b>–<b>D</b>) Disease resistance phenotype of Arabidopsis lines upon <span class="html-italic">Pst</span> inoculation. (<b>B</b>) Symptoms development on leaves 3, 5, and 7 days post-inoculation (dpi) (10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>−1</sup>); (<b>C</b>) trypan blue staining for the detection of cell death 1 dpi (10<sup>5</sup> CFU mL<sup>−1</sup>); (<b>D</b>) in planta bacterial growth monitored 3, 5, and 7 days post-inoculation (10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>−1</sup>). CFU, colony-forming units. Statistically significant differences are labelled by letters (one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). <span class="html-italic">Pst</span> was pressure infiltrated into fully expanded mature leaves of 4–5-week-old Arabidopsis plants. As control, leaves were infiltrated with 10 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>. The whole experiment was performed three times with similar results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Expression of the defense-related genes <span class="html-italic">PR1</span>, <span class="html-italic">PR2</span>, and <span class="html-italic">PR5</span> in Arabidopsis lines. Relative expression level was monitored by qRT-PCR in control (<b>A</b>) and infected plants 1 and 2 days post-inoculation (dpi) with <span class="html-italic">Pst</span> (10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>−1</sup>) (<b>B</b>), in WT, WT::FaNPR32, double mutant <span class="html-italic">npr3npr4</span>, and <span class="html-italic">npr3npr4</span>::FaNPR32 (black, grey, white and striped bars, respectively). Expression levels were normalized with respect to the internal control <span class="html-italic">ACTIN2</span> and displayed relative to the expression in mock-treated wild-type samples (<b>A</b>) or to the expression in mock-treated samples of each line (<b>B</b>) that were given a value of 1. Bars refer to mean ± standard error. Note the different scales in the relative-expression-level axis. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA. Letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>  &lt;  0.05) in HSD Tukey’s post hoc test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Expression of the endogenous <span class="html-italic">AtNPR1</span>, <span class="html-italic">AtNPR3</span>, and <span class="html-italic">AtNPR4</span> genes in Arabidopsis. Relative expression level was monitored by qRT-PCR in control (<b>A</b>) and infected plants 1 and 2 days post-inoculation (dpi) with <span class="html-italic">Pst</span> (10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>−1</sup>) (<b>B</b>), in WT, WT::FaNPR32, double mutant <span class="html-italic">npr3npr4</span>, and <span class="html-italic">npr3npr4</span>::FaNPR32 (black, grey, white and striped bars, respectively). Expression levels were normalized with respect to the internal control <span class="html-italic">ACTIN2</span> and displayed relative to the expression in mock-treated wild-type samples (<b>A</b>) or to the expression in mock-treated samples of each line (<b>B</b>) that were given a value of 1. Bars refer to mean ± standard error. Note the different scales in the relative-expression-level axis. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA. Letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>  &lt;  0.05) in HSD Tukey’s post hoc test. Note that the absence of transcript for <span class="html-italic">AtNPR3</span> and <span class="html-italic">AtNPR4</span> in the overexpressing lines in the double mutant <span class="html-italic">npr3npr4</span> background. It proves that Arabidopsis primers do not amplify strawberry orthologous genes.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 10072 KiB  
Article
Unraveling NPR-like Family Genes in Fragaria spp. Facilitated to Identify Putative NPR1 and NPR3/4 Orthologues Participating in Strawberry-Colletotrichum fructicola Interaction
by Yun Bai, Ziyi Li, Jiajun Zhu, Siyu Chen, Chao Dong, Qinghua Gao and Ke Duan
Plants 2022, 11(12), 1589; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11121589 - 16 Jun 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2156
Abstract
The salicylic acid receptor NPR1 (nonexpressor of pathogenesis-related genes) and its paralogues NPR3 and NPR4 are master regulators of plant immunity. Commercial strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is a highly valued crop vulnerable to various pathogens. Historic confusions regarding the identity of [...] Read more.
The salicylic acid receptor NPR1 (nonexpressor of pathogenesis-related genes) and its paralogues NPR3 and NPR4 are master regulators of plant immunity. Commercial strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is a highly valued crop vulnerable to various pathogens. Historic confusions regarding the identity of NPR-like genes have hindered research in strawberry resistance. In this study, the comprehensive identification and phylogenic analysis unraveled this family, harboring 6, 6, 5, and 23 members in F. vesca, F. viridis, F. iinumae, and F. × ananassa, respectively. These genes were clustered into three clades, with each diploid member matching three to five homoalleles in F. × ananassa. Despite the high conservation in terms of gene structure, protein module, and functional residues/motifs/domains, substantial divergence was observed, hinting strawberry NPR proteins probably function in ways somewhat different from Arabidopsis. RT-PCR and RNAseq analysis evidenced the transcriptional responses of FveNPR1 and FxaNPR1a to Colletotrichum fructicola. Extended expression analysis for strawberry NPR-likes helped to us understand how strawberry orchestrate the NPRs-centered defense system against C. fructicola. The cThe current work supports that FveNPR1 and FxaNPR1a, as well as FveNPR31 and FxaNPR31a-c, were putative functional orthologues of AtNPR1 and AtNPR3/4, respectively. These findings set a solid basis for the molecular dissection of biological functions of strawberry NPR-like genes for improving disease resistance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The phylogenetic relationships of NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES 1 (NPR1)-like proteins from <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</span>, five diploid strawberries, and the octoploid strawberry. The tree was clustered into three clades (I, II, and III) shaded with different colors. The length of branches indicates the relative phylogenetic relationship, and the bootstrap values near branches for confidence. Geometries with different shapes and colors are used to symbolize different NPR members, with a star for <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis</span>, and cycles in red, yellow, green, purple, pink, and gray for <span class="html-italic">Fragaria vesca</span>, <span class="html-italic">F. iinumae</span>, <span class="html-italic">F. viridis</span>, <span class="html-italic">F. nipponica</span>, <span class="html-italic">F. nilgerrensis</span>, and <span class="html-italic">F.</span> × <span class="html-italic">ananassa</span>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The comparative organization of exons and introns in 48 strawberry <span class="html-italic">NPR1</span>-like genes and 6 <span class="html-italic">AtNPRs</span>. The structure was produced with the gene structure display server (GSDS) at <a href="http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/Chinese.php" target="_blank">http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/Chinese.php</a> (accessed on 27 February 2022). The blue and the yellow rectangles represent the un-translated regions (UTR) and the coding sequences (CDS), respectively. The neighbor-joining tree of the <span class="html-italic">NPR1</span>-like genes was generated with MUSCLE clustering by MEGA7.0 for CDS nucleotide sequences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The comparative protein domain module of six AtNPRs and 48 strawberry NPR1-like sequences. The deduced protein sequences in clade I (<b>A</b>), clade II (<b>B</b>), and clade III (<b>C</b>). The locations of the conserved BTB/POZ domain, the Ankyrin repeats (Ank_2 or Ank_5), and the NPR1/NIM-like defense protein C-terminal region (NPR1_like_C) were revealed via using the web CD Search Tool at NCBI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The chromosomal distributions of <span class="html-italic">NPR1</span>-like genes in <span class="html-italic">Fragaria vesca</span> (<b>A</b>) and <span class="html-italic">F.</span> × <span class="html-italic">ananassa</span> (<b>B</b>). The identity of each chromosome (of certain sub-genome) is shown at the top. The scale ruler at the left side indicates the physical distance of chromosomes in megabases (Mb). The location site and the transcriptional direction for each strawberry <span class="html-italic">NPR1</span>-like locus are marked as triangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The predicted cis-elements in the promoter regions of <span class="html-italic">NPR</span>-like genes in <span class="html-italic">Fragaria vesca</span> and <span class="html-italic">F.</span> × <span class="html-italic">ananassa</span>. The promoter sequences (−2500 bp upstream of the starting code ATG) of 48 strawberry <span class="html-italic">NPR</span>-like genes were analyzed by PlantCare. The geometries in different colors and shapes indicate elements involved in different processes, with cycles for hormone-responsive, filled rectangles for stress-responsive, and rectangles with gradient color for the others.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The expression responses of strawberry <span class="html-italic">NPR</span>-like genes upon <span class="html-italic">Colletotrichum fructicola</span> invasion in diploid ‘Hawaii4’ and octoploid cultivars ‘Camarosa’ and ‘Benihoppe’. (<b>A</b>) The typical symptoms induced by <span class="html-italic">C. fructicola</span> on wounded detached strawberry leaf blades at 25 °C were photographed at 4 and 5 dpi. The left and right side of each leaf blade (adaxial side up) was inoculated with two 10-μL droplets of sterile water with 0.01% (<span class="html-italic">v</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>) Tween 20 (Mock, M) and conidia suspension (2 × 10<sup>6</sup> per mL, <span class="html-italic">C. f</span>), respectively. Scale bar, 1 cm. (<b>B</b>) The semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of strawberry <span class="html-italic">NPR</span>-like genes. The third, fourth, and fifth compound leaves of sprayed inoculated plants (<span class="html-italic">C. f</span>) or mock-treated (M) were harvested at different hours post inoculation (hpi). The PCR cycle numbers are 40 and 28 for <span class="html-italic">NPR1</span>-likes and the internal control <span class="html-italic">EF1α</span>, respectively. In amplification for <span class="html-italic">FveNPR31</span>, <span class="html-italic">-32a</span>, <span class="html-italic">-32b</span>, and <span class="html-italic">-33</span>, 0.2-μL original cDNAs was used as a template, while for <span class="html-italic">NPR1</span> and <span class="html-italic">-5</span> in both diploid and octoploid strawberry, 1-μL original cDNAs was used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A quantitative RT-PCR analysis of strawberry <span class="html-italic">NPR3</span>-like genes upon <span class="html-italic">C. fructicola</span> invasion in diploid ‘Hawaii4’ and octoploid ‘Benihoppe’. The same RNA samples in <a href="#plants-11-01589-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a> were analyzed. The same primer pairs for all <span class="html-italic">NPR3</span>-like genes except for <span class="html-italic">NPR32b</span> were used in <span class="html-italic">F. vesca</span> ‘Hawaii4’ and <span class="html-italic">F.</span> × <span class="html-italic">ananassa</span> ‘Benihoppe’. <span class="html-italic">FvePR10a</span> (FvH4_4g19120) was used as a marker gene of SA-depending defense signaling pathway. The primers and corresponding target alleles amplified were shown in <a href="#app1-plants-11-01589" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S6</a>. The gene name followed with ‘-s’ indicates multiple alleles detected in ‘Benihoppe’. The relative transcript levels of <span class="html-italic">NPR3</span>-like genes were normalized with two reference genes <span class="html-italic">EF1α</span> and <span class="html-italic">GAPDH2</span> [<a href="#B49-plants-11-01589" class="html-bibr">49</a>] and reported as the mean of three biological replicates ± SE. The asterisks indicate significant differences based on a Student <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test analysis (*, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The protein–protein interaction networks proposed for the strawberry FveNPR1-like proteins in STRING (<a href="https://cn.string-db.org" target="_blank">https://cn.string-db.org</a>, accessed on 26 February 2022). The edges in different colors represent the predicted interaction relationships according to different methods. The detailed information for all potential partners is shown in <a href="#plants-11-01589-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a> and <a href="#app1-plants-11-01589" class="html-app">Figure S3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>RNA-seq data showing the differential expression of genes coding proteins potentially directly or indirectly interacting with NPR1-like proteins (<b>A</b>) and the other known members in SA signaling (<b>B</b>) in strawberry during the <span class="html-italic">C. fructicola</span> invasion. The heatmap was generated using RPKM (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) values normalized via Log2-transformation for each transcript in a moderate susceptible strawberry cv. ‘Jiuxiang’ mock-treated or infected by <span class="html-italic">C. fructicola</span> at 24, 72, or 96 hpi. The black star symbols indicate NPR family members. Strawberry materials and <span class="html-italic">C. fructicola</span> inoculation conditions for RNA-seq data generation have been reported previously [<a href="#B35-plants-11-01589" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>A hypothetical model depicting the transcriptional events related to NPR1- and NPR31-mediated defenses in susceptible strawberry upon invasion with a hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen <span class="html-italic">Colletotrichum fructicola</span>. (<b>A</b>) At 6 hpi early stage, the strawberry cell accumulates a relatively low or basal level of SA (red cycles). There is no monomeric NPR1 protein (ellipse), and it exists in cytoplasm as a large oligomer or forming heterodimer with the negative regulator NPR31. In the nucleus, the transcription of NPR1 is suppressed, while NPR31 transcription has been restored to a steady state after a transient induction. Simultaneously, the expression of pathogenesis-related gene <span class="html-italic">PR1</span>, as well as SA synthesis genes <span class="html-italic">ICS</span> and <span class="html-italic">PAL</span>, show a similar dynamic pattern to that of <span class="html-italic">NPR31</span>. All events indicate a fast quenching of SA-dependent resistance, resulting in effector (small brown shapes)-triggered susceptibility (ETS). (<b>B</b>) At the 96 hpi late necrotrophic stage, the strawberry cell contains elevated SA due to the increased expression of PAL1/2. SA-dependent resistance is partially activated after NPR1 binds SA. Enhanced NPR31 negatively regulates SA-related immunity. Meanwhile, SA-dependent resistance is antagonized by the disinhibition of MeJA-mediated defense and the activation of ethylene-related defense, which is beneficial for strawberry defending the pathogen with a necrotrophic life at 96 hpi. There exists monomeric NPR1 and NPR31 in the nucleus, which directly target TGA transcriptional factors to regulate the expression of <span class="html-italic">PR</span> genes. Members are in red characters for up-regulated and in blue for down-regulated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>A hypothetical model depicting the transcriptional events related to NPR1- and NPR31-mediated defenses in susceptible strawberry upon invasion with a hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen <span class="html-italic">Colletotrichum fructicola</span>. (<b>A</b>) At 6 hpi early stage, the strawberry cell accumulates a relatively low or basal level of SA (red cycles). There is no monomeric NPR1 protein (ellipse), and it exists in cytoplasm as a large oligomer or forming heterodimer with the negative regulator NPR31. In the nucleus, the transcription of NPR1 is suppressed, while NPR31 transcription has been restored to a steady state after a transient induction. Simultaneously, the expression of pathogenesis-related gene <span class="html-italic">PR1</span>, as well as SA synthesis genes <span class="html-italic">ICS</span> and <span class="html-italic">PAL</span>, show a similar dynamic pattern to that of <span class="html-italic">NPR31</span>. All events indicate a fast quenching of SA-dependent resistance, resulting in effector (small brown shapes)-triggered susceptibility (ETS). (<b>B</b>) At the 96 hpi late necrotrophic stage, the strawberry cell contains elevated SA due to the increased expression of PAL1/2. SA-dependent resistance is partially activated after NPR1 binds SA. Enhanced NPR31 negatively regulates SA-related immunity. Meanwhile, SA-dependent resistance is antagonized by the disinhibition of MeJA-mediated defense and the activation of ethylene-related defense, which is beneficial for strawberry defending the pathogen with a necrotrophic life at 96 hpi. There exists monomeric NPR1 and NPR31 in the nucleus, which directly target TGA transcriptional factors to regulate the expression of <span class="html-italic">PR</span> genes. Members are in red characters for up-regulated and in blue for down-regulated.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2909 KiB  
Article
N-Methyltransferase CaASHH3 Acts as a Positive Regulator of Immunity against Bacterial Pathogens in Pepper
by Ansar Hussain, Liu Kaisheng, Ali Noman, Muhammad Furqan Ashraf, Mohammed Albaqami, Muhammad Ifnan Khan, Zhiqin Liu and Shuilin He
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(12), 6492; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126492 - 10 Jun 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2118
Abstract
Proteins with conserved SET domain play a critical role in plant immunity. However, the means of organization and functions of these proteins are unclear, particularly in non-model plants such as pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Herein, we functionally characterized CaASHH3, a member [...] Read more.
Proteins with conserved SET domain play a critical role in plant immunity. However, the means of organization and functions of these proteins are unclear, particularly in non-model plants such as pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Herein, we functionally characterized CaASHH3, a member of class II (the ASH1 homologs H3K36) proteins in pepper immunity against Ralstonia solanacearum and Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000). The CaASHH3 was localized in the nucleus, and its transcript levels were significantly enhanced by R. solanacearum inoculation (RSI) and exogenous application of salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), ethephon (ETH), and abscisic acid (ABA). Knockdown of CaASHH3 by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) compromised peppers’ resistance to RSI. Furthermore, silencing of CaASHH3 impaired hypersensitive-response (HR)-like cell death response due to RSI and downregulated defense-associated marker genes, including CaPR1, CaNPR1, and CaABR1. The CaASHH3 protein was revealed to affect the promoters of CaNPR1, CaPR1, and CaHSP24. Transiently over-expression of CaASHH3 in pepper leaves elicited HR-like cell death and upregulated immunity-related marker genes. To further study the role of CaASHH3 in plant defense in vivo, CaASHH3 transgenic plants were generated in Arabidopsis. Overexpression of CaASHH3 in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana enhanced innate immunity against Pst DC3000. Furthermore, CaASHH3 over-expressing transgenic A. thaliana plants exhibited upregulated transcriptional levels of immunity-associated marker genes, such as AtNPR1, AtPR1, and AtPR2. These results collectively confirm the role of CaASHH3 as a positive regulator of plant cell death and pepper immunity against bacterial pathogens, which is regulated by signaling synergistically mediated by SA, JA, ET, and ABA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Disease Resistance 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Multiple sequence alignment of sequences of proteins related to <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>. Comparison of deduced amino acid sequence of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> with related proteins of <span class="html-italic">Solanum lycopersicum SlASHH3</span> (XP004228631.1), <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana sylvestris NsASHH3</span> (XP009773063.1), <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana tabacum NtASHH3</span> (XP016443214.1), <span class="html-italic">Ipomoea nil InASHH3</span> (XP019152077.1), and <span class="html-italic">Citrus sinensis CsASHH3</span> (XP006478510.1). Green shading indicates 50–75% similarity, red shading denotes 75–100% similarity, and black shading represents 100% similarity. Alignment was carried out by DNAMAN5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Real-time qRT-PCR analysis for relative transcript levels of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> in pepper leaves subjected to <span class="html-italic">Ralstonia solanacearum</span> and exogenous application of phytohormones. (<b>A</b>) qRT-PCR analysis of relative transcriptional expression levels of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> in pepper leaves at various time intervals after treatment with virulent <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span> strain ‘FJC100301’. (<b>B</b>–<b>E</b>) qRT-PCR analysis of relative transcriptional expression levels of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> at various time intervals after treatment with 1 mM SA (<b>B</b>), 100 µM MeJA (<b>C</b>), 100 µM ETH (<b>D</b>), and 100 µM ABA (<b>E</b>). The relative transcriptional expression levels in <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span>-treated and phytohormone-treated leaves were compared with mock plants (which normalized to a relative transcriptional expression level of 1). Error bars indicate the standard error. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means from four biological replicates based on Fisher’s protected LSD test: uppercase letters represent <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; lower case letters represent <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The localization of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> in the nucleus. Bars = 50 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> silencing impaired the pepper plants’ resistance to <span class="html-italic">Ralstonia solanacearum</span> inoculation. (<b>A</b>) Real-time qRT-PCR analysis of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> transcript accumulation in <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-silenced (TRV:<span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>) and unsilenced plants (TRV:00) inoculated with <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span>. (<b>B</b>) Phenotypic effect of <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span> treatment on <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-silenced and unsilenced plants at 7 dpi. (<b>C</b>) Comparison of growth of <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span> in <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-silenced and unsilenced plants inoculated with <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span> at 0 and 3 dpi. (<b>D</b>) DAB and trypan blue staining in <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span>-infected <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-silenced and unsilenced leaves at 2 dpi. Scale bar = 50 µm. (<b>E</b>) Assessment of cell death in <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span>-infected, <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-silenced and unsilenced leaves under fluorescent modulation meter. (<b>F</b>) Measurement of electrolyte leakage as ion conductivity to check the cell death responses in leaf discs of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-silenced and unsilenced plants at 24 and 48 hpi and without inoculation of <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span>. (<b>G</b>) qRT-PCR expression of transcript levels of defense-associated marker genes in <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-silenced and unsilenced plants after inoculation and without inoculation of <span class="html-italic">R. solanacearum</span> at 24 hpi, respectively. The relative transcriptional expression levels of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> in mock-treated unsilenced plants were normalized to 1. Error bars indicate the standard error. Data represent the means ± SE from four biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between means, as determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test: lowercase letters represent <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The HR-like cell death and transcriptional expression of immunity-associated marker genes induced by transient over-expression of 35S:<span class="html-italic">CaASHH3.</span> (<b>A</b>) The successful over-expression of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-flag in pepper leaves as detected by Western blotting. (<b>B</b>) HR-like cell death triggered by transient over-expression of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-flag detected by phenotype, DAB, and trypan blue staining at 2 dpi. Scale bar = 50 µm. (<b>C</b>) HR-like cell death caused by transient over-expression of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-flag under fluorescent modulation meter. (<b>D</b>) Measurement of ion conductivity (electrolyte leakage) to evaluate the cell death response in leaf discs of peppers after over-expression of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-flag at 24 and 48 h, respectively. (<b>E</b>) qRT-PCR analysis of the transcriptional expression levels of immunity-associated marker genes in <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-flag-expressed pepper leaves at 24 hpi. The relative transcriptional expression levels of empty-vector-treated control plants were normalized to 1. Error bars indicate the standard error of means. Data represent the means ± SE from four biological replicates. The different letters above the bars shows significant differences between means, as determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test: uppercase letters represent <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>ChIP-PCR analysis indicating the interaction of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> and promoters of defense-related marker genes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Enhanced resistance of <span class="html-italic">CaASSH3</span>-OX over-expressing transgenic <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis</span> plants to <span class="html-italic">Pseudomonas Syringae</span> pv <span class="html-italic">tomato</span> (<span class="html-italic">Pst</span>) DC3000 infection. (<b>A</b>) Extraction of genomic DNA and PCR analysis of <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span> insertion in wild-type and <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-OX transgenic lines. (<b>B</b>) Disease symptoms of wild-type or <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-OX over-expressing transgenic plants inoculated with virulent <span class="html-italic">Pseudomonas syringae</span> pv <span class="html-italic">tomato</span> (<span class="html-italic">Pst</span>) DC3000 strains. Leaves of 4-week-old <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-OX transgenic and wild-type <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis</span> plants were infiltrated by needless syringe with a suspension (10<sup>5</sup> cfu mL<sup>−1</sup>) of virulent <span class="html-italic">Pst</span> DC3000. Disease symptoms were photographed at 3 dpi. (<b>C</b>) Bacterial growth in leaves of wild-type and <span class="html-italic">CaASHH3</span>-OX transgenic lines was investigated at 0 and 3 days after inoculation with virulent <span class="html-italic">P. syringae</span> pv <span class="html-italic">tomato</span> DC3000 (10<sup>5</sup> cfu mL<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>D</b>) Quantification of electrolyte leakage from leaf tissues of <span class="html-italic">CaASSH3</span>-OX transgenic and wild-type plants inoculated with virulent bacterial pathogen <span class="html-italic">Pst</span> DC3000. Samples were harvested at 0, 12, and 24 h post-inoculation. (<b>E</b>) Real-time quantitative PCR of defense-related genes in leaves of wild-type and <span class="html-italic">CaASSH3</span>-OX transgenic plants after inoculation with virulent <span class="html-italic">P. syringae</span> pv <span class="html-italic">tomato</span> DC 3000 (10<sup>5</sup> cfu mL<sup>−1</sup>) at 24 h (hours) time interval. The relative transcriptional expressions levesl of mock-treated plants were normalized to 1. Error bars indicate the standard error. Data represent the means ± SE from four biological replicates. Different alphabetical letters indicate significant differences between means, as determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test: lower case letters represent <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 3068 KiB  
Article
CaSBP11 Participates in the Defense Response of Pepper to Phytophthora capsici through Regulating the Expression of Defense-Related Genes
by Huai-Xia Zhang, Xiao-Hui Feng, Jing-Hao Jin, Abid Khan, Wei-Li Guo, Xiao-Hua Du and Zhen-Hui Gong
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(23), 9065; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239065 - 28 Nov 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2115
Abstract
Squamosa promoter binding protein (SBP)-box genes are plant-specific transcription factors involved in plant growth and development, morphogenesis and biotic and abiotic stress responses. However, these genes have been understudied in pepper, especially with respect to defense responses to Phytophthora capsici infection. CaSBP11 is [...] Read more.
Squamosa promoter binding protein (SBP)-box genes are plant-specific transcription factors involved in plant growth and development, morphogenesis and biotic and abiotic stress responses. However, these genes have been understudied in pepper, especially with respect to defense responses to Phytophthora capsici infection. CaSBP11 is a SBP-box family gene in pepper that was identified in our previous research. Silencing CaSBP11 enhanced the defense response of pepper plants to Phytophthora capsici. Without treatment, the expression of defense-related genes (CaBPR1, CaPO1, CaSAR8.2 and CaDEF1) increased in CaSBP11-silenced plants. However, the expression levels of these genes were inhibited under transient CaSBP11 expression. CaSBP11 overexpression in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana decreased defense responses, while in Arabidopsis, it induced or inhibited the expression of genes in the salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signaling pathways. CaSBP11 overexpression in sid2-2 mutants induced AtNPR1, AtNPR3, AtNPR4, AtPAD4, AtEDS1, AtEDS5, AtMPK4 and AtNDR1 expression, while AtSARD1 and AtTGA6 expression was inhibited. CaSBP11 overexpression in coi1-21 and coi1-22 mutants, respectively, inhibited AtPDF1.2 expression and induced AtPR1 expression. These results indicate CaSBP11 has a negative regulatory effect on defense responses to Phytophthora capsici. Moreover, it may participate in the defense response of pepper to Phytophthora capsici by regulating defense-related genes and the salicylic and jasmonic acid-mediated disease resistance signaling pathways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Subcellular localization of the CaSBP11 protein. <span class="html-italic">Agrobacterium tumefaciens</span> strain GV3101 was used to transiently express the CaMV35S:CaSBP11:GFP and CaMV35S:GFP (used as a control) in <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span> leaves. The fluorescence was visualized using a laser scanning confocal microscope under bright and fluorescent fields. The photographs were taken in a dark field for green fluorescence and under bright light for the morphology of the cell. Merged is a superimposed picture of bright field and dark field. Bars in this picture are 50 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Disease resistance identification of the detached leaves of CaSBP11 silencing in pepper. (<b>A</b>) Phenotypes of detached leaves of CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants without inoculation with <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> three days. (<b>B</b>) Phenotypes of detached leaves of CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants after inoculation with compatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> three days. (<b>C</b>) Phenotypes of detached leaves of CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants after inoculation with incompatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> three days. (<b>D</b>) Percentage of lesions area to the leaf of CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants after inoculation with compatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> three days. Data were collected from twelve leaves of CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants, respectively. (<b>E</b>) Percentage of lesions area to the leaf of CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants after inoculation with incompatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> three days. Data were collected from fourteen leaves of CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants, respectively. The diameter of the plug in (<b>B</b>) and (<b>C</b>) is 4mm. The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). ** represents a significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.01. Mean values and SDs are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Phenotypes and disease index percentage of the CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants after inoculation with compatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> (HX-9) sixteen days. (<b>A</b>) Phenotypes of the silenced and negative control plants after inoculation with the strain of <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> (HX-9) sixteen days. The diameter of the pot in (A) is 7cm. (<b>B</b>) Disease index percentage of the CaSBP-silenced and negative control plants after being inoculated with the strain of <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> (HX-9) sixteen days. The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). * represents significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.05. Mean values and SDs for at least three replicates are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The expression of defense-related genes after inoculation with compatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> (HX-9) in <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span>-silenced and negative control plants. In this experiment, roots from <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span>-silenced and negative control plants were collected at 0 days (collected at the time of inoculation) and 2 days, for the detection of defense-related genes. The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). * and ** represent significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.01 respectively. Mean values and SDs for three replicates are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The expression of defense-related genes after inoculation with incompatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> (PC) in CaSBP11-silenced and negative control plants. In this experiment, roots from <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span>-silenced and negative control plants were collected at 0 days (collected at the time of inoculation) and 2 days, for the detection of defense-related genes. The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). * and ** represent significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.01 respectively. Mean values and SDs for three replicates are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Transient expression of <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span> in pepper. Leaves were collected at 2 days after <span class="html-italic">Agrobacterium</span> (carrying the pVBG2307:CaSBP11:GFP and pVBG2307:GFP) infection and used for the detection of gene expression. pVBG2307:CaSBP11:GFP represents the <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span> transient expression plants and pVBG2307:GFP represents control plants. The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). * and ** represent significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.01 respectively. Mean values and SDs for three replicates are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Disease resistance identification of <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span> transgenic lines (Lines 9 and 10) in <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span>. (<b>A</b>) Phenotypes of the detached leaves of transgenic and WT plants after inoculation with compatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> two days. The diameter of the plug in (<b>A</b>) is 4mm. (<b>B</b>) The average diseased areas of the detached leaves of transgenic and WT plants after inoculation with compatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> two days. (<b>C</b>) Phenotypes of transgenic and WT plants after inoculation with compatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span> six days. The diameter of the plot in (<b>C</b>) is 7 cm. (<b>D</b>) The expression level of <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span> in transgenic and WT plants. (<b>E</b>) The expression of defense-related genes in transgenic and WT plants after inoculation with compatible <span class="html-italic">P. capsici</span>. Leaves of the <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span> transgenic and WT plants were collected at 0 days (collected at the time of inoculation) and 3 days, for the detection of defense-related genes. The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). Different small letters (a, ab, b, bc, c, cd, d) represent significant differences as determined by the LSD test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Mean values and SDs for at least three replicates are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Expression of genes related to the salicylic acid signaling pathways in the <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span> transgenic lines of <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis</span>. The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). Different small letters (a, ab, b, c) represent significant differences as determined by the LSD test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Mean values and SDs for three replicates are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Expression of salicylic acid signaling pathway-related genes in <span class="html-italic">NahG</span>-overexpressing lines (NahG-6, NahG-8 and NahG-11), <span class="html-italic">NahG</span> and <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span> hybrid lines (NahG/CaSBP11-8 and NahG/CaSBP11-16), sid2-2 lines and <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span>-overexpressing in <span class="html-italic">sid2-2</span> lines (sid2-2/CaSBP11-2 and sid2-2/CaSBP11-3). The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). Different small letters (a, b, c, cd, d, de, e) represent significant differences as determined by the LSD test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Mean values and SDs for three replicates are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Expression levels of genes related to the jasmonic acid signal pathway in <span class="html-italic">coi1-21</span> and <span class="html-italic">coi1-22</span> lines and CaSBP11-overexpressingin <span class="html-italic">coi1-21</span> (coi1-21/CaSBP11-7 and coi1-21/CaSBP11-9) and <span class="html-italic">coi1-22</span> (coi1-22/CaSBP11). The means were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD). Different small letters (a, b, c) represent significant differences as determined by the LSD test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Mean values and SDs for three replicates are shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Proposed model for <span class="html-italic">CaSBP11</span> participating in plant defense response. Arrows indicate positive regulation, while those without arrows indicate negative regulation. The genes that are not marked Ca are expected to exist in pepper as homologues of those in <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis</span>. <span class="html-italic">CaPO1</span>: Pepper peroxidase-like gene; <span class="html-italic">CaBPR1</span>: Pepper pathogenesis-related (PR)-1 protein; <span class="html-italic">CaDEF1:</span> Pepper defensin gene; <span class="html-italic">CaSAR8.2</span>: Systemic acquired resistance gene; <span class="html-italic">EDS1</span>: alpha/beta-Hydrolases superfamily protein; <span class="html-italic">PAD4</span>: Phytoalexin deficient 4; <span class="html-italic">TGA4</span>: TGACG motif-binding factor 4; <span class="html-italic">SARD1</span>: systemic acquired resistance deficient 1; <span class="html-italic">SID2-2</span>: Salicylic acid induction deficient 2; <span class="html-italic">EDS5</span>: MATE efflux family protein; <span class="html-italic">NPR1</span>: non-expressor of PR genes 1; <span class="html-italic">NPR3</span>: NPR1-like protein 3; <span class="html-italic">NPR4</span>:NPR1-like protein 4; <span class="html-italic">PR</span>: Pathogenesis-related gene.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3549 KiB  
Article
Potential Mechanisms of AtNPR1 Mediated Resistance against Huanglongbing (HLB) in Citrus
by Wenming Qiu, Juliana Soares, Zhiqian Pang, Yixiao Huang, Zhonghai Sun, Nian Wang, Jude Grosser and Manjul Dutt
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(6), 2009; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062009 - 16 Mar 2020
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 4380
Abstract
Huanglongbing (HLB), a bacterial disease caused by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), is a major threat to the citrus industry. In a previous study conducted by our laboratory, several citrus transgenic trees expressing the Arabidopsis thaliana NPR1 (AtNPR1) gene remained [...] Read more.
Huanglongbing (HLB), a bacterial disease caused by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), is a major threat to the citrus industry. In a previous study conducted by our laboratory, several citrus transgenic trees expressing the Arabidopsis thaliana NPR1 (AtNPR1) gene remained HLB-free when grown in a field site under high HLB disease pressure. To determine the molecular mechanisms behind AtNPR1-mediated tolerance to HLB, a transcriptome analysis was performed using AtNPR1 overexpressing transgenic trees and non-transgenic trees as control, from which we identified 57 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Data mining revealed the enhanced transcription of genes encoding pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), transcription factors, leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases (LRR-RKs), and putative ankyrin repeat-containing proteins. These proteins were highly upregulated in the AtNPR1 transgenic line compared to the control plant. Furthermore, analysis of protein–protein interactions indicated that AtNPR1 interacts with CsNPR3 and CsTGA5 in the nucleus. Our results suggest that AtNPR1 positively regulates the innate defense mechanisms in citrus thereby boosting resistance and effectively protecting the plant against HLB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>RNAseq analysis (<b>A</b>) Correlation between RNA-Seq samples. NPR1_1/2/3 represent three replicates of the NPR1 overexpressing line (NPR1-2), Val_1/2/3 represent three replicates of the control non-transgenic ‘Valencia’ line, heat maps of the correlation coefficient between samples, R<sup>2</sup> means the square of the Pearson coefficient; (<b>B</b>) Venn diagram of expressed genes in transgenic NPR1 overexpressing line (NPR1-2) and control non-transgenic ‘Valencia’ line. FPKM &gt; 1 is the expression threshold, NPR1 and Val represent the <span class="html-italic">AtNPR1</span>-transgenic line (NPR1-2) and non-transgenic ‘Valencia’ line, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (<b>A</b>) DEGs between the transgenic NPR1 overexpressing line (NPR1-2) and control non-transgenic ‘Valencia’ line; (<b>B</b>) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment scatter plot of DEGs. The y-axis shows the name of the pathway and the x-axis shows the Rich factor. Dot size represents the number of different genes and the color indicates the q-value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) The GO enrichment terms of (A) upregulated (B) and downregulated DEGs. In the x-axis the number of DEGs is represented, and in the y-axis the GO terms enriched. Different colors are used to distinct biological process, cellular components, and molecular function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>qRT-PCR verification for expression pattern of selected DEGs. The expression levels of DEG candidates in NPR1-2 transgenic line compared to Val control determined by qRT-PCR (2<sup>-ΔΔCt</sup>). Different letters (a, b) represent a significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test and error bars represent SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>qRT-PCR for RNAseq data validation of genes involved with plant defense responses. Comparison between NPR1-2 transgenic and non-transgenic plants of genes involved in the (<b>A</b>) NPR1-SA dependent pathway, including CsNPR1, CsNPR3, and CsSABP2 along with pathogenesis related proteins, CsPR1 and CsPR2; and (<b>B</b>) transcription factors. Different letters (a, b) represent a significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test and error bars represent SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H) interaction assays of AtNPR1 with CsNPR3 and CsTGA5. DDO (double dropout medium): SD/-Trp and -Leu, QDO (quadruple dropout medium)/X/A: SD/-Leu/-Trp/-Ade/-His + X-α-Gal and Aureobasidin A. The empty BD (B0) and AD (A0) vectors were used as negative controls. Standard positive control (pGBKT7-53 and pGADT7-T; Clontech) and standard negative control (pGBKT7-Lam and pGADT7-T) were included. The scale bar at the bottom of the figure denotes 1 cm length.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Confocal micrographs showing results of bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays (BiFC) assays to determine interactions between AtNPR1 with CsNPR3 and CsTGA5 proteins. (<b>A</b>–AB) show micrographs of YFP (BiFC), nuclear marker (Nucleus), transmission white light (Bright field) and the resultant overlay, respectively. The upper set of panels are showing positive interaction and the bottom set of pictures are showing the negative controls. (<b>A</b>–<b>H</b>) show the AtNPR1 and CsNPR3 positive interaction. (<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>) is a zoom up containing nuclei details. In (<b>I</b>–<b>P</b>) the positive interaction between AtNPR1 and CsTGA5 is demonstrated and (<b>M</b>–<b>P</b>) is a zoom up showing nuclei. White arrows indicate nuclear interaction. (<b>Q</b>–<b>AB</b>) pictures show the negative controls. All the constructs were transiently co-expressed in <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana benthamiana</span> RFP-H-2B plants. The scale bars represent 35 µM in length and for the magnified images each bar represent 5 µM in length.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop