[go: up one dir, main page]
Next Article in Journal
Protein SUMOylation and Its Functional Role in Nuclear Receptor Control
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Agonist Activity between CB1 and CB2 Receptors with Orthosteric Site Mutations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Receptors
Volume 3
Issue 3
10.3390/receptors3030019
receptors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of the Vitamin D Receptor in the Epidermal Stem Cell Response to Wounding

by
Daniel D. Bikle
San Francisco VA Medical Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
Receptors 2024, 3(3), 397-407; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030019
Submission received: 24 February 2024 / Revised: 30 April 2024 / Accepted: 31 July 2024 / Published: 9 August 2024
Browse Figures
Figure 1
<p><b>The four layers of the epidermis.</b> The basal layer of the epidermis (stratum basale) contains the stem cells and transient amplifying cells from which cells in the upper layers are derived. These cells express the keratins K5 and K14 and markers of proliferation such as β-catenin (CTNNB), cyclin D1, and GLI1. As these cells migrate into the spinous layer, they begin the production of different keratins, namely K1 and K10, as well as precursors and enzymes involved in cornified envelope formation, namely involucrin and transglutaminase-K. Further migration into the stratum granulosum is marked by the expression of filaggrin and loricrin, proteins also contributing to the cornified envelope. These cells also express enzymes involved in lipid production, lipids that are packaged into lamellar bodies and subsequently injected into the intercellular spaces between the stratum granulosum and stratum corneum to waterproof the permeability barrier. Moreover, lamellar bodies also contain antimicrobial peptides such as cathelicidin produced in the stratum granulosum, providing protection against invasive organisms. VDR and CYP27B1 expression is highest in the stratum basale. Also shown in this figure is the asymmetric distribution of two major coregulators of VDR action—Med1, which is expressed primarily in the stratum basale and spinosum, facilitates the VDR’s regulation of proliferation and early stages of differentiation; SRC3, found in highest concentration in the stratum granulosum, facilitates the VDR’s regulation of terminal differentiation.</p> "> Figure 2
<p><b>The hair follicle and its stem cell niches.</b> The hair follicle can be divided into the infundibulum merging into the IFE, the junctional zone in the upper portion of the isthmus which separates the infundibulum and isthmus, the bulge region below the isthmus, and the hair germ adjacent to the dermal papilla in the dermis. The sebaceous gland attaches to the hair shaft in the junctional zone/isthmus. These regions contain different stem cell niches. Several markers of the different stem cell niches are shown. The IFE in this cartoon is marked by Lgr6, which is also expressed in other stem cell niches including the sebaceous gland and isthmus. Lrig1 and Plet1 are markers of stem cells in the isthmus and sebaceous gland. Gli1 is a marker for the stem cells in the upper portion of the bulge, with CD34 and Krt15 also marking the bulge stem cells. Lgr5 marks cells of the lower bulge and hair germ. See the text for a more complete description of these stem cell markers.</p> ">
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chronic skin wounds are estimated to affect 6.5 million patients in the US, at a cost of over USD 25 billion. Efforts to prevent and/or treat such wounds will result in reduced morbidity and economic losses. This project is focused on the role of vitamin D signaling in the epidermis in the control of stem cell (SC) activation and function during the initial response to the wounding of the skin, a response that, if defective, contributes to poor wound healing or cancer. In this review, I first describe the anatomy of the skin, focusing first on the epidermis, describing the different cell layers which in a spatial way also represent the differentiation process of the interfollicular epidermis (IFE) as it undergoes continuous regeneration. I then describe the other components of the skin, particularly the hair follicle (HF), which undergoes a cyclic pattern of regeneration. Adult SCs residing in these regenerative tissues play essential roles in the maintenance of these tissues. However, when the skin is wounded, the progeny of SCs from all regions of the HF and IFE contribute to the healing process by changing their initial cell fate to take on an epithelial genotype/phenotype to heal the wound. Although earlier lineage tracing studies helped to define the contributions SCs from the different niches made to wound healing, scRNAseq studies have demonstrated a considerably more nuanced picture. The role of vitamin D signaling will be introduced by reviewing the unique role played by the epidermal keratinocyte first in producing vitamin D and then in metabolizing it into its active form 1,25(OH)2D. 1,25(OH)2D is the principal ligand for the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a transcription factor that helps to mediate the genomic changes in the stem cells in their response to wounding. In these actions, the VDR is regulated by coregulators, of which the steroid receptor coactivator complexes SRC 2 and 3 and the mediator complex (MED) play essential roles. The VDR generally acts in association with other transcription factors such as p63 and β-catenin that can colocalize with the VDR in the genes it regulates. Although much remains to be understood, the role of the VDR in the stem cell response to wounding is clearly essential and quite different from its classic roles in regulating calcium metabolism, although calcium is essential for the actions of vitamin D signaling in the skin.

1. Introduction

The epidermis and its appendages, the hair follicle and the pilosebaceous unit, are regenerative tissues. Normally, the stem cells (SCs) that sustain these tissues are distinct in both their functions and transcriptome, but with wounding, that changes. These stem cells normally maintain a hair follicle and sebaceous gland, but after wounding, all pitch in to heal the wound. Following the repair, they revert back to their prewound state, albeit with some memory, such that subsequent wounding elicits a faster response. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) plays a major role in enabling this response to wounding. In this review, after first describing the anatomy of the skin, including the location of the different SC niches and the normal differentiation processes for the different components of the epidermis as regulated by vitamin D signaling, I will focus on how the various stem cell niches respond to wounding, with as focus on the role the VDR plays in this response.

2. Anatomy of the Skin

The interfollicular epidermis (IFE) is made up of four layers of keratinocytes differing in their level of differentiation. The basal layer (stratum basale), resting on the basal lamina separating the dermis and epidermis, contains the IFE stem cells (IFE-SCs) [1]. The function of these SCs is to provide the cells for the upper differentiating layers, as well as maintaining the basal IFE-SC population, which they do by proliferating asymmetrically, with one progeny remaining in the basal layer and the other continuing to proliferate as transient amplifying cells (TAC) that continue to differentiate as they migrate up into the upper layers. Their attachment to the basal lamina and adjacent cells is mediated by an asymmetric distribution of integrins on their lateral and basal surfaces [2]. The keratins K5 (58 kDa) and K14 (50 kDa) are the dominant components of the extensive keratin network within these cells [3], and they attach to adjacent cells via desmosomes and adherens junctions. The layer above the basal cells is the spinous layer (stratum spinosum), which changes the production of keratins from K5 and K14 to K1 and K10 [4]. These cells also begin the production of cornified envelope precursors such as involucrin [5]. In addition, the keratinocytes of the spinous layer express the enzyme transglutaminase K, responsible for the ε-(γ-glutamyl)lysine cross-linking of these substrates into the insoluble cornified envelope [6]. The granular layer (stratum granulosum), lying above the spinous layer, is so named because of the appearance of electron-dense keratohyalin granules. These belong to two types [7]. The larger granules contain profilaggrin, which is further processed into filaggrin, thought to be involved in the aggregation of keratin filaments [8], but also providing a source of amino acids following proteolysis to provide a moisturizing factor [9]. Many cases of atopic dermatitis are associated with mutations in filaggrin [9]. The smaller granules contain loricrin, a major component of the cornified envelope [10]. Also within the granular layer are lipid-filled structures called lamellar bodies that fuse with the plasma membrane, secreting their contents into the extracellular space between the stratum corneum and stratum granulosum, where the lipid contributes to the permeability barrier [11]. In addition to the lipids, the lamellar bodies contain antimicrobial peptides such as cathelicidin that provide protection against invasive organisms [12], providing additional defense against the environment. The final stage occurs as the cells of the stratum granulosum move to the cornified layer (stratum corneum), during which they undergo the destruction of their organelles while achieving final maturation of the cornified envelope into an insoluble, highly resistant structure [13]. During the course of IFE formation, a calcium gradient forms with the highest concentration in the stratum granulosum that helps to maintain these levels of differentiation within the epidermis [14]. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) and the enzyme CYP27B1, which produces the principal VDR ligand 1,25(OH)2D, have their highest concentration in the basal layer. As will be discussed, VDR and CYP27B1 are keyparts of the mechanism regulating epidermal differentiation as well as the stem cell response to wounding. Figure 1 presents a cartoon depicting the different layers of the epidermis and some of their characteristics.
The epidermis also includes the pilosebaceous unit comprising the hair follicle (HF) and the sebaceous gland connected to the interfollicular epidermis (IFE) via the infundibulum, plus the eccrine, apoeccrine and apocrine sweat glands [15,16]. The formation of the HF during development involves the interaction between epidermal cells and a mesodermal condensate that becomes the dermal papilla, a critical structure involved in HF cycling. In mice, the mature HF is formed within two weeks. The bulge region, containing SC critical for HF recycling, forms at this time, just below the sebaceous gland. The HF can conceptually be viewed as the permanent upper portion consisting of the infundibulum and isthmus including the bulge, and the lower portion which cycles. Anagen, catagen, and telogen mark the distinct phases of the hair cycle. Anagen is the growth phase characterized by the proliferation of keratinocytes in the bulge and hair germ, with the formation of the fully elongated HF and hair shaft. This is followed by catagen, characterized by apoptosis of the lower portion of the HF below the bulge. This brings the bulge adjacent to the mesodermal dermal papilla. Telogen is a resting phase that ends when signals from the dermal papilla initiate a new anagen by stimulating the bulge cells to become secondary germ cells, where they proliferate and differentiate to regenerate the hair shaft [17,18]. The eccrine and apoeccrine sweat glands form from the downward growth of cells from the IFE into the dermis [19]. Apocrine sweat glands, on the other hand, empty their contents into the pilosebaceous duct [20]. These glands are found opposite to the sebaceous glands in the isthmus region of the HF. Within the sebaceous glands is a pool of proliferative sebocytes which maintain the gland as they differentiate [15], ultimately secreting their contents into the hair shaft via the sebaceous duct [21]. Figure 2 shows a cartoon of the HF and location of the stem cell niches in the HF.
Underlying the epidermis is the dermis. This can be considered as two not well demarcated layers. The papillary layer next to the epidermis consists of loose connective tissue through which course a network of capillaries that service the epidermis, whereas the lower reticular layer comprises a denser network of elastin and collagen fibers giving the skin its elasticity and strength [16]. Fibroblasts within the papillary layer form the dermal papillae critical for HF cycling, as well as the erector pili muscle [22]. Below the dermis (hypodermis) is the fat layer. The cells within this layer are remarkably active, producing a number of adipokines and cytokines that help to initiate the proliferation and migration of stem cells during wound repair [23,24].

3. Stem Cell Niches in the Epidermis

In a recent review, Oak and Cotsarelis [25] compiled a table of stem cell markers for the IFE, infundibulum, isthmus, bulge, sebaceous gland, and secondary hair germ. Markers for IFE-SCs include the keratins K5 and K14, the integrins β1 and α6, and the surface marker Lgr6. Lrig1 marks the SCs of the infundibulum. Lgr6 and Lrig1, as well as the transcription factor Gli1, mark the isthmus. The bulge SCs express the keratins K15 and K19, the surface markers CD34 and CD200, and a number of transcription factors such as Gli1, SOX9, Lhx2, TCF3, TCF4, and NFATc1. The label-retaining cells (LRC) of the bulge, thought to be the true SCs, are CD34+/Lgr5−, whereas the CD34+/Lgr5+ are the proliferative cells in the hair germ [26]. Sebaceous gland SCs express Lgr6, Lrig1, and the transcription factor Blimp 1. The secondary hair germ SCs express many of the same markers as those of the bulge, including K15, K19, CD200, Lgr5, and the transcription factors Gli1 and Lef1. The utilization of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) has demonstrated that within these niches, substantial heterogeneity exists [27,28,29], which will be discussed further in the next section.

4. The Response of Stem Cells to Wounding

When the skin is wounded, the progeny of SCs from all regions of the HF and IFE contribute to repair, at least initially [30,31]. Lineage tracing studies demonstrated that cells from the bulge contribute about 25% of the newly formed epidermis [32]. However, these cells do not persist. Other studies, including those from our lab, showed that SCs from other SC niches in the HF also contributed to epidermal regeneration, and tended to remain longer [33,34]. The main point is that upon wounding, all stem cells in the IFE and HF redirect their function to closing the wound in a process involving changes in transcription to adopt an epidermal genotype described as lineage infidelity [35]. The study by Ge et al. [35] used ATAC to identify changes in chromosome accessibility during the response to wounding that enabled HFSCs of the bulge to acquire an epidermal phenotype and migrate to the wound to help reform the epidermis. They focused on two transcription factors, Klf5 and SOX9, that were unique to the IFE and HFSC niches, respectively. HFSCs that migrated to the wound gained expression of Klf5, with gradual loss of SOX9 with re-epithelialization. HFSCs initially comprise 26% of the wound epithelium on day 8 post wound, but that number is reduced to 3.5% by day 20 [32]. On the other hand, Lgr6 cells from the isthmus last much longer in the epithelium, though not indefinitely [36]. That said, SCs from the HF are not required for re-epithelialization, as healing takes place in mice lacking HF [37] or in the hairless epidermis, such as the paw.
More recent scRNAseq studies of the skin during the healing process have demonstrated a considerably more nuanced picture. In particular, 15 clusters in unwounded skin and 14 clusters after wounding have been identified by Haensel et al. [38], including 4 basal cell subclusters, 2 spinous subclusters, and 4 HF subclusters. Of the basal cell subclusters, one was marked by SC genes including Col 17a and ΔNp63, indicative of early proliferation, a second with early response gene markers such as fos, jun, and Id1, and a third cluster with growth arrest genes such as Cdkn1a, Irf6, Ovo1, and Sfn. In the wounded skin, the growth arrest cluster-type genes were predominant in the leading edge of the re-epithelialization process where differentiation into the upper layers of the epidermis begins, whereas Col17a1 and ΔNp63 were found in the proliferation zone behind the leading edge. As noted above, the SCs from the bulge change from expressing markers of the bulge SCs such as CD34 as they migrate into the epidermis during wound healing [38] and begin expressing the markers of the IFE-SCs. In confirmation of the lineage tracing studies mentioned above, Joost et al. [39] labeled the infundibulum SCs and bulge SCs with Lgr6 and Lgr5, respectively, and noted the more rapid movement of the Lgr6+ cells into the wound than the Lgr5+ cells, but in both cases, the cells started expressing the IFE transcriptome as they migrated into the wound.

5. Vitamin D Metabolism in the Skin

Vitamin D is produced in the skin with the photo/thermal conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol (7-DHC) to previtamin D, which is then isomerized to vitamin D. This step is well known. Less well known is the production of 7-DHC, a step in the Kandutsch–Russell pathway for cholesterol synthesis. 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR7) converts 7-DHC to cholesterol, so its activity dictates how much 7-DHC is available for vitamin D production [40]. There is another pathway for cholesterol synthesis. Most tissues express the Bloch pathway, which does not go through 7-DHC. Thus, these tissues cannot form vitamin D, even if exposed to sunlight. Keratinocytes are further capable of producing 1,25(OH)2D as they express one of the 25-hydroxylases (CYP27A1) [41] and CYP27B1 [42], the 25OHD 1 hydroxylase that produces 1,25(OH)2D. Moreover, keratinocytes express CYP11A1 (the side chain cleavage enzyme critical for steroidogenesis), which can convert vitamin D to 20(OH)D and other vitamin D metabolites [43] with biologic activity overlapping the roles of 1,25(OH)2D [44]. The expression and activity of CYP27B1 in keratinocytes are linked to differentiation, decreasing as the keratinocytes differentiate. Moreover, the hormonal regulation of CYP27B1 activity in keratinocytes differs from that in renal cells. Both tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interferon-gamma (IFNγ) bind to their receptors on keratinocytes [45,46] and stimulate 1,25(OH)2D production [47,48]. These cytokines do not regulate CYP27B1 in the kidney. On the other hand, parathyroid hormone via its stimulation of cyclic AMP production increases the CYP27B1 activity in renal cells, but not in keratinocytes [49]. Although 1,25(OH)2D regulates its own production in both keratinocytes and renal cells, the mechanisms are different. In renal cells, this is achieved at the genomic level, whereas in keratinocytes, this occurs via the induction of CYP24A1, the enzyme that catabolizes 1,25(OH)2D [50]. These differences in the regulation of 1,25(OH)2D production in different cells provide one mechanism for cell specificity. The differential regulation of VDR function, discussed next, is a second mechanism.

6. The Vitamin D Receptor (VDR)

The VDR is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. It was initially identified in the intestine, where it mediates the actions of 1,25(OH)2D on intestinal calcium and phosphate transport [51]. However, the VDR is expressed in most, if not all, tissues in the body, including those of the skin, where it is found at its highest concentrations in the basal cells of the epithelium and stem cell niches of the HF [52]. As we [53] recently reviewed, the human VDR contains 427 amino acid residues. Following a short N terminal region is the DNA binding domain (DBD), comprising two zinc fingers held in a tetrahedral configuration by four cysteine residues. A hinge region then separates the DBD from the ligand binding domain (LBD). The hinge region is critical for the binding of the VDR/RXR heterodimer, essential for the binding of the VDR to its DNA binding sites. Most of these sites involve two stretches of six reasonably well-conserved nucleotides separated by three nonspecific nucleotides (a DR6), but other configurations are also known. Variations in these sequences can alter the configuration of the heterodimer affecting the ligand and the coactivator binding, providing both cell and gene specificity. The LBD comprises 12 α-helices (H1–12). After ligand binding, the C terminal H12 closes over the ligand, forming a binding pocket, and along with H3 and H4, it provides an interface to which coactivators with LXXLL motifs can bind, the AF2 domain. In the epidermis, the major coactivators are the steroid receptor coactivator (SRC) complexes 2 and 3 and the mediator complex [54] (Figure 1). The mediator complex is found primarily in the basal cells and enables the VDR to regulate proliferation and the early stages of differentiation [55]. The mediator complex marks super enhancer regions of the genes involved in cell fate determination [56], critical for the stem cell response to wounding, where the VDR, in association with other transcription factors, exerts its transcriptional effects on stem cell fate [34]. The SRC complexes are expressed in the more differentiated cells of the epidermis and enable VDR to regulate the terminal stages of differentiation [57].

7. VDR Mediation of the Wounding Response

Wound healing is a multistage process, with inflammation and activation of the innate immune system triggering the activation and proliferation of stem cells that ultimately close the wound [31]. Mice lacking the VDR, the calcium receptor, or the capacity for 1,25(OH)2D production are limited in these early responses, including a reduction in stem cells with reduced β-catenin signaling and failure of these cells to form E-cadherin/catenin complexes, important both for the migration of the stem cells and the re-epithelialization of the wound [52,58,59], as discussed below. Furthermore, TGF signaling is impaired in VDR-null mice, associated with a reduction in macrophage recruitment and granulation tissue formation, impacting the dermal component of the wound [60].
As noted earlier, we and others have shown that IFE and HFSCs express high levels of the VDR [52,61]. The critical role of the VDR in HF stem cells is demonstrated by the failure of hair follicles in mice lacking the VDR (VDRKO) to reinitiate anagen after the first developmental cycle [62], leading to alopecia. As shown initially by Cianferotti et al. [63], this action of the VDR does not require its ligand 1,25(OH)2D. A similar phenomenon likely accounts for the reduction in the response of these SCs to re-epithelialize a wound. Several mechanisms have been proposed for this failure of the SCs to respond in VDRKO mice. One mechanism involves the loss of proliferative potential in HFSCs lacking the VDR [63], which our studies with epidermal-specific VDRKO mice confirm [52]. A second explanation proposes that the progeny of HFSCs lacking VDR fail to migrate out of their niches, delaying the wounding response, suggesting a loss of activation and/or migration of the progeny [64]. Our data support this concept as well [52]. Thus, the delay in the wounding response in VDRKO mice appears to be due to decreased activation/proliferation of the SCs plus reduced migration to the wound site, which then are blunted in their ability to differentiate and so to re-establish an intact epithelium. A critical event in mediating a number of these events is the formation of the E-cadherin (Cdh1)/catenin (Ctnn) complex, which is blocked in VDRKO keratinocytes. This complex maintains SCs in their niches [65], regulates the extent to which SC division is symmetrical (maintaining SC numbers) or asymmetrical (initiating differentiation) [66], and enables the migration of keratinocytes as a sheet to re-epithelialize the wound [67]. This complex also performs a key signaling function for calcium and vitamin D in stimulating differentiation of the regenerating epidermis [68].
The VDR does not act alone in promoting the wounding response. As already alluded to, calcium is an important partner, as dietary calcium deficiency or lack of the calcium sensing receptor can likewise retard the wounding process [61]. Other transcription factors can influence VDR activity. As noted previously, the RXR is a frequent partner with the VDR, regulating genomic actions. A second transcription factor, p63, induces the VDR by directly binding to the VDR promoter [69]. Like Vdr, the deletion of p63 blocks epidermal differentiation [70]. In our analysis of human keratinocytes, we [34] identified colocalization of the VDR and p63 in 99 sites in the absence of 1,25(OH)2D, increasing to 799 sites after 1,25(OH)2D administration. The top Gene Ontology (GO) biologic processes for genes with the colocalization of p63 and VDR binding sites in their promoter regions included the regulation of wound healing, the regulation of SC differentiation, adherens junction organization, DNA replication, and the response to calcium [34]. Although most p63 binding sites are not of known relevance to keratinocyte differentiation, among those that are, the VDR is one of the partnering transcription factors [71], and these sites are enriched in super enhancers considered important for SC fate determination [56]. p63 has several isoforms due to alternative splicing—the full-length Tap63, containing all 14 exons, and ΔNp63, lacking the first 3 exons [72]. Both bind to the same DNA element, but it is the ΔNp63 isoform that is most highly expressed in the basal layer of the epidermis and is critical for keratinocyte differentiation [73]. ΔNp63 and the VDR are expressed in the same regions of the HF [74], and as noted in the scRNA seq studies discussed earlier, it is expressed in the basal proliferating SC cluster along with Col17a [38]. When ΔNp63 is knocked down in these cells, wound healing is impaired [74]. Moreover, human keratinocytes lacking ΔNp63 have a blunted response to 1,25(OH)2D [34].
Beta-catenin is likely also to have a major role in cooperating with the VDR in the wounding response. Stem cell activation is associated with increased β-catenin signaling [75], and this increased signaling is dependent on the presence of the VDR [76,77]. Beta-catenin binds to the VDR in its AF2 domain like other coactivators, likely increasing its transcriptional activity [78]. Palmer et al. [79] identified putative response elements for the VDR and β-catenin in a number of genes, including those of the hedgehog pathway, which likely have a role in the response to wounding. Moreover, we [34] identified a β-catenin response element (TCF4) in close association with both p63 and VDR response elements in the Fos gene, suggesting that β-catenin and p63 may collaborate with the VDR in controlling cell fate genes directing stem cell response to wounding.

8. Summary and Conclusions

In this review of the role of the VDR in the stem cell response to wounding, I have presented the concept that the epidermis is a dynamic structure continuously undergoing regeneration, whether this is ongoing, as in the epithelium and pilosebaceous unit, or cyclic, as in the lower portion of the HF. Critical for this regeneration are the stem cells that occupy different niches in the basal layer of the IFE and HF. Each niche has its own instructions for the regeneration of the tissue for which it is responsible. But when the skin is wounded, these distinct stem cells change fates and move into the wound to regenerate the epithelium, adopting the transcriptome of the epithelial cell. This change in cell fate, labeled as genomic infidelity, is reversible to a large if not complete extent when the wound is closed, as some residual memory appears to remain. Vitamin D signaling plays an important role in this process. First of all, the keratinocyte, the major cell in the epidermis, has the machinery to make 1,25(OH)2D, the principal VDR ligand, without outside substrates. The keratinocyte expresses the VDR at the highest concentration in these stem cell niches. The VDR is central to vitamin D signaling, but not all actions of VDR require 1,25(OH)2D, including hair follicle cycling [63]. Moreover, the VDR does not act alone. The mediator complex has a major influence in regulating the proliferative and early differentiating actions of the VDR, whereas SRC complexes enable the subsequent actions on terminal differentiation. p63 and β-catenin also enable at least some of the actions of the VDR, principally in the early stages of proliferation and differentiation. Thus, the VDR, facilitated by its coregulators and associated transcription factors, enables the stem cells to heal the wound and regenerate the epidermis.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs I01 BX003814-01.

Acknowledgments

Although a number of individuals contributed to the data reviewed here, special thanks go to Yuko Oda, who has performed most of the experiments regarding the role of the VDR in stem cells’ response to wounding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kretzschmar, K.; Watt, F.M. Markers of epidermal stem cell subpopulations in adult mammalian skin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a013631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guo, M.; Kim, L.T.; Akiyama, S.K.; Gralnick, H.R.; Yamada, K.M.; Grinnell, F. Altered processing of integrin receptors during keratinocyte activation. Exp. Cell Res. 1991, 195, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moll, R.; Franke, W.W.; Schiller, D.L.; Geiger, B.; Krepler, R. The catalog of human cytokeratins: Patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell 1982, 31, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Eichner, R.; Sun, T.T.; Aebi, U. The role of keratin subfamilies and keratin pairs in the formation of human epidermal intermediate filaments. J. Cell Biol. 1986, 102, 1767–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Warhol, M.J.; Roth, J.; Lucocq, J.M.; Pinkus, G.S.; Rice, R.H. Immuno-ultrastructural localization of involucrin in squamous epithelium and cultured keratinocytes. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1985, 33, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Thacher, S.M.; Coe, E.L.; Rice, R.H. Retinoid suppression of transglutaminase activity and envelope competence in cultured human epidermal carcinoma cells. Hydrocortisone is a potent antagonist or retinyl acetate but not retinoic acid. Differentiation 1985, 29, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Steven, A.C.; Bisher, M.E.; Roop, D.R.; Steinert, P.M. Biosynthetic pathways of filaggrin and loricrin--two major proteins expressed by terminally differentiated epidermal keratinocytes. J. Struct. Biol. 1990, 104, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dale, B.A.; Resing, K.A.; Lonsdale-Eccles, J.D. Filaggrin: A keratin filament associated protein. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1985, 455, 330–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Levin, J.; Friedlander, S.F.; Del Rosso, J.Q. Atopic dermatitis and the stratum corneum: Part 2: Other structural and functional characteristics of the stratum corneum barrier in atopic skin. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 2013, 6, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Mehrel, T.; Hohl, D.; Rothnagel, J.A.; Longley, M.A.; Bundman, D.; Cheng, C.; Lichti, U.; Bisher, M.E.; Steven, A.C.; Steinert, P.M.; et al. Identification of a major keratinocyte cell envelope protein, loricrin. Cell 1990, 61, 1103–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Feingold, K.; Elias, P. The important role of lipids in the epidermis and their role in the formation and maintenance of the cutaneous barrier. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1841, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aberg, K.M.; Man, M.Q.; Gallo, R.L.; Ganz, T.; Crumrine, D.; Brown, B.E.; Choi, E.H.; Kim, D.K.; Schroder, J.M.; Feingold, K.R.; et al. Co-regulation and interdependence of the mammalian epidermal permeability and antimicrobial barriers. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hohl, D. Cornified cell envelope. Dermatology 1990, 180, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Menon, G.K.; Grayson, S.; Elias, P.M. Ionic calcium reservoirs in mammalian epidermis: Ultrastructural localization by ion-capture cytochemistry. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1985, 84, 508–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Blanpain, C.; Fuchs, E. Epidermal stem cells of the skin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22, 339–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Deniz, A.A.H.; Abdik, E.A.; Abdik, H.; Aydin, S.; Sahin, F.; Tasli, P.N. Zooming in across the Skin: A Macro-to-Molecular Panorama. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1247, 157–200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Hsu, Y.C.; Li, L.; Fuchs, E. Emerging interactions between skin stem cells and their niches. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Myung, P.; Ito, M. Dissecting the bulge in hair regeneration. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Diao, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, S.; Chang, M.; Wang, X.; Guo, B.; Yu, Q.; Yan, F.; Su, Y.; Wang, Y. Sweat gland organoids contribute to cutaneous wound healing and sweat gland regeneration. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Briggman, J.V.; Bank, H.L.; Bigelow, J.B.; Graves, J.S.; Spicer, S.S. Structure of the tight junctions of the human eccrine sweat gland. Am. J. Anat. 1981, 162, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Schneider, M.R.; Zouboulis, C.C. Primary sebocytes and sebaceous gland cell lines for studying sebaceous lipogenesis and sebaceous gland diseases. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dekoninck, S.; Blanpain, C. Stem cell dynamics, migration and plasticity during wound healing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Schmidt, B.A.; Horsley, V. Intradermal adipocytes mediate fibroblast recruitment during skin wound healing. Development 2013, 140, 1517–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gaur, M.; Dobke, M.; Lunyak, V.V. Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Adipose Tissue in Clinical Applications for Dermatological Indications and Skin Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Oak, A.S.W.; Cotsarelis, G. Wound-Induced Hair Neogenesis: A Portal to the Development of New Therapies for Hair Loss and Wound Regeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2023, 15, a041239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mistriotis, P.; Andreadis, S.T. Hair follicle: A novel source of multipotent stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2013, 19, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cheng, J.B.; Sedgewick, A.J.; Finnegan, A.I.; Harirchian, P.; Lee, J.; Kwon, S.; Fassett, M.S.; Golovato, J.; Gray, M.; Ghadially, R.; et al. Transcriptional Programming of Normal and Inflamed Human Epidermis at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 871–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Joost, S.; Annusver, K.; Jacob, T.; Sun, X.; Dalessandri, T.; Sivan, U.; Sequeira, I.; Sandberg, R.; Kasper, M. The Molecular Anatomy of Mouse Skin during Hair Growth and Rest. Cell Stem Cell 2020, 26, 441–457.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Polito, M.P.; Marini, G.; Palamenghi, M.; Enzo, E. Decoding the Human Epidermal Complexity at Single-Cell Resolution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mascre, G.; Dekoninck, S.; Drogat, B.; Youssef, K.K.; Brohee, S.; Sotiropoulou, P.A.; Simons, B.D.; Blanpain, C. Distinct contribution of stem and progenitor cells to epidermal maintenance. Nature 2012, 489, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Plikus, M.V.; Gay, D.L.; Treffeisen, E.; Wang, A.; Supapannachart, R.J.; Cotsarelis, G. Epithelial stem cells and implications for wound repair. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 23, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ito, M.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Nguyen, J.; Liang, F.; Morris, R.J.; Cotsarelis, G. Stem cells in the hair follicle bulge contribute to wound repair but not to homeostasis of the epidermis. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 1351–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Levy, V.; Lindon, C.; Zheng, Y.; Harfe, B.D.; Morgan, B.A. Epidermal stem cells arise from the hair follicle after wounding. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 1358–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Oda, Y.; Wong, C.T.; Oh, D.H.; Meyer, M.B.; Pike, J.W.; Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D receptor cross-talk with p63 signaling promotes epidermal cell fate. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2023, 232, 106352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ge, Y.; Gomez, N.C.; Adam, R.C.; Nikolova, M.; Yang, H.; Verma, A.; Lu, C.P.; Polak, L.; Yuan, S.; Elemento, O.; et al. Stem Cell Lineage Infidelity Drives Wound Repair and Cancer. Cell 2017, 169, 636–650.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Snippert, H.J.; Haegebarth, A.; Kasper, M.; Jaks, V.; van Es, J.H.; Barker, N.; van de Wetering, M.; van den Born, M.; Begthel, H.; Vries, R.G.; et al. Lgr6 marks stem cells in the hair follicle that generate all cell lineages of the skin. Science 2010, 327, 1385–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Langton, A.K.; Herrick, S.E.; Headon, D.J. An extended epidermal response heals cutaneous wounds in the absence of a hair follicle stem cell contribution. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 1311–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Haensel, D.; Jin, S.; Sun, P.; Cinco, R.; Dragan, M.; Nguyen, Q.; Cang, Z.; Gong, Y.; Vu, R.; MacLean, A.L.; et al. Defining Epidermal Basal Cell States during Skin Homeostasis and Wound Healing Using Single-Cell Transcriptomics. Cell Rep. 2020, 30, 3932–3947.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Joost, S.; Jacob, T.; Sun, X.; Annusver, K.; La Manno, G.; Sur, I.; Kasper, M. Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Traced Epidermal and Hair Follicle Stem Cells Reveals Rapid Adaptations during Wound Healing. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 585–597.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Prabhu, A.V.; Luu, W.; Li, D.; Sharpe, L.J.; Brown, A.J. DHCR7: A vital enzyme switch between cholesterol and vitamin D production. Prog. Lipid Res. 2016, 64, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lehmann, B.; Tiebel, O.; Meurer, M. Expression of vitamin D3 25-hydroxylase (CYP27) mRNA after induction by vitamin D3 or UVB radiation in keratinocytes of human skin equivalents—A preliminary study. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1999, 291, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bikle, D.D.; Nemanic, M.K.; Whitney, J.O.; Elias, P.W. Neonatal human foreskin keratinocytes produce 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Biochemistry 1986, 25, 1545–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Slominski, A.; Kim, T.-K.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Janjetovic, Z.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Kusniatsova, E.I.; Semak, I.; Postlethwaite, A.; Miller, D.D.; et al. Novel vitamin D photoproducts and their precursors in the skin. Dermatoendocrinology 2013, 5, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.K.; Janjetovic, Z.; Brozyna, A.A.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Xu, H.; Sutter, T.R.; Tuckey, R.C.; Jetten, A.M.; Crossman, D.K. Differential and Overlapping Effects of 20,23(OH)2D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 on Gene Expression in Human Epidermal Keratinocytes: Identification of AhR as an Alternative Receptor for 20,23(OH)2D3. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Morhenn, V.B.; Wood, G.S. Gamma interferon-induced expression of class II major histocompatibility complex antigens by human keratinocytes. Effects of conditions of culture. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1988, 548, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pillai, S.; Bikle, D.D.; Eessalu, T.E.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Elias, P.M. Binding and biological effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha on cultured human neonatal foreskin keratinocytes. J. Clin. Investig. 1989, 83, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bikle, D.D.; Pillai, S.; Gee, E.; Hincenbergs, M. Regulation of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production in human keratinocytes by interferon-gamma. Endocrinology 1989, 124, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bikle, D.D.; Pillai, S.; Gee, E.; Hincenbergs, M. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha regulation of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production by human keratinocytes. Endocrinology 1991, 129, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bikle, D.D.; Nemanic, M.K.; Gee, E.; Elias, P. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 production by human keratinocytes. Kinetics and regulation. J. Clin. Investig. 1986, 78, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xie, Z.; Munson, S.J.; Huang, N.; Portale, A.A.; Miller, W.L.; Bikle, D.D. The mechanism of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) autoregulation in keratinocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 36987–36990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Fleet, J.C. Vitamin D-Mediated Regulation of Intestinal Calcium Absorption. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Oda, Y.; Hu, L.; Nguyen, T.; Fong, C.; Zhang, J.; Guo, P.; Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D Receptor Is Required for Proliferation, Migration, and Differentiation of Epidermal Stem Cells and Progeny during Cutaneous Wound Repair. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 2423–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bikle, D.; Christakos, S. New aspects of vitamin D metabolism and action-addressing the skin as source and target. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 234–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Oda, Y.; Sihlbom, C.; Chalkley, R.J.; Huang, L.; Rachez, C.; Chang, C.P.; Burlingame, A.L.; Freedman, L.P.; Bikle, D.D. Two distinct coactivators, DRIP/mediator and SRC/p160, are differentially involved in vitamin D receptor transactivation during keratinocyte differentiation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2003, 17, 2329–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Oda, Y.; Chalkley, R.J.; Burlingame, A.L.; Bikle, D.D. The transcriptional coactivator DRIP/mediator complex is involved in vitamin D receptor function and regulates keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 2377–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zamudio, A.V.; Dall’agnese, A.; Henninger, J.E.; Manteiga, J.C.; Afeyan, L.K.; Hannett, N.M.; Coffey, E.L.; Li, C.H.; Oksuz, O.; Sabari, B.R.; et al. Mediator Condensates Localize Signaling Factors to Key Cell Identity Genes. Mol. Cell. 2019, 76, 753–766.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Oda, Y.; Ishikawa, M.H.; Hawker, N.P.; Yun, Q.C.; Bikle, D.D. Differential role of two VDR coactivators, DRIP205 and SRC-3, in keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 103, 776–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tu, C.L.; Crumrine, D.A.; Man, M.Q.; Chang, W.; Elalieh, H.; You, M.; Elias, P.M.; Bikle, D.D. Ablation of the calcium-sensing receptor in keratinocytes impairs epidermal differentiation and barrier function. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 2350–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Schauber, J.; Dorschner, R.A.; Coda, A.B.; Büchau, A.S.; Liu, P.T.; Kiken, D.; Helfrich, Y.R.; Kang, S.; Elalieh, H.Z.; Steinmeyer, A.; et al. Injury enhances TLR2 function and antimicrobial peptide expression through a vitamin D-dependent mechanism. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Luderer, H.F.; Nazarian, R.M.; Zhu, E.D.; Demay, M.B. Ligand-dependent actions of the vitamin D receptor are required for activation of TGF-beta signaling during the inflammatory response to cutaneous injury. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Oda, Y.; Hu, L.; Nguyen, T.; Fong, C.; Tu, C.L.; Bikle, D.D. Combined Deletion of the Vitamin D Receptor and Calcium-Sensing Receptor Delays Wound Re-epithelialization. Endocrinology 2017, 158, 1929–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, Y.C.; Pirro, A.E.; Amling, M.; Delling, G.; Baron, R.; Bronson, R.; Demay, M.B. Targeted ablation of the vitamin D receptor: An animal model of vitamin D-dependent rickets type II with alopecia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 9831–9835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cianferotti, L.; Cox, M.; Skorija, K.; Demay, M.B. Vitamin D receptor is essential for normal keratinocyte stem cell function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 9428–9433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Palmer, H.G.; Martinez, D.; Carmeliet, G.; Watt, F.M. The vitamin D receptor is required for mouse hair cycle progression but not for maintenance of the epidermal stem cell compartment. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2113–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, S.; Lewallen, M.; Xie, T. Adhesion in the stem cell niche: Biological roles and regulation. Development 2013, 140, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lechler, T.; Fuchs, E. Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin. Nature 2005, 437, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, L.; Hartley, R.; Reiss, B.; Sun, Y.; Pu, J.; Wu, D.; Lin, F.; Hoang, T.; Yamada, S.; Jiang, J.; et al. E-cadherin plays an essential role in collective directional migration of large epithelial sheets. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 2779–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bikle, D.D.; Xie, Z.; Tu, C.L. Calcium regulation of keratinocyte differentiation. Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 7, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kommagani, R.; Caserta, T.M.; Kadakia, M.P. Identification of vitamin D receptor as a target of p63. Oncogene 2006, 25, 3745–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Truong, A.B.; Kretz, M.; Ridky, T.W.; Kimmel, R.; Khavari, P.A. p63 regulates proliferation and differentiation of developmentally mature keratinocytes. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 3185–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Kouwenhoven, E.N.; Oti, M.; Niehues, H.; van Heeringen, S.J.; Schalkwijk, J.; Stunnenberg, H.G.; van Bokhoven, H.; Zhou, H. Transcription factor p63 bookmarks and regulates dynamic enhancers during epidermal differentiation. EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 863–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fisher, M.L.; Balinth, S.; Mills, A.A. p63-related signaling at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2020, 133, jcs228015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Koster, M.I.; Roop, D.R. Mechanisms regulating epithelial stratification. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23, 93–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Botchkarev, V.A.; Flores, E.R. p53/p63/p73 in the epidermis in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a015248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Watt, F.M.; Collins, C.A. Role of beta-catenin in epidermal stem cell expansion, lineage selection, and cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2008, 73, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Oda, Y.; Tu, C.L.; Menendez, A.; Nguyen, T.; Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D and calcium regulation of epidermal wound healing. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 164, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lisse, T.S.; Saini, V.; Zhao, H.; Luderer, H.F.; Gori, F.; Demay, M.B. The vitamin D receptor is required for activation of cWnt and hedgehog signaling in keratinocytes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014, 28, 1698–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Shah, S.; Islam, M.N.; Dakshanamurthy, S.; Rizvi, I.; Rao, M.; Herrell, R.; Zinser, G.; Valrance, M.; Aranda, A.; Moras, D.; et al. The molecular basis of vitamin D receptor and beta-catenin crossregulation. Mol. Cell 2006, 21, 799–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Palmer, H.G.; Anjos-Afonso, F.; Carmeliet, G.; Takeda, H.; Watt, F.M. The vitamin D receptor is a Wnt effector that controls hair follicle differentiation and specifies tumor type in adult epidermis. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Receptors 03 00019 g001
Figure 1. The four layers of the epidermis. The basal layer of the epidermis (stratum basale) contains the stem cells and transient amplifying cells from which cells in the upper layers are derived. These cells express the keratins K5 and K14 and markers of proliferation such as β-catenin (CTNNB), cyclin D1, and GLI1. As these cells migrate into the spinous layer, they begin the production of different keratins, namely K1 and K10, as well as precursors and enzymes involved in cornified envelope formation, namely involucrin and transglutaminase-K. Further migration into the stratum granulosum is marked by the expression of filaggrin and loricrin, proteins also contributing to the cornified envelope. These cells also express enzymes involved in lipid production, lipids that are packaged into lamellar bodies and subsequently injected into the intercellular spaces between the stratum granulosum and stratum corneum to waterproof the permeability barrier. Moreover, lamellar bodies also contain antimicrobial peptides such as cathelicidin produced in the stratum granulosum, providing protection against invasive organisms. VDR and CYP27B1 expression is highest in the stratum basale. Also shown in this figure is the asymmetric distribution of two major coregulators of VDR action—Med1, which is expressed primarily in the stratum basale and spinosum, facilitates the VDR’s regulation of proliferation and early stages of differentiation; SRC3, found in highest concentration in the stratum granulosum, facilitates the VDR’s regulation of terminal differentiation.
Figure 1. The four layers of the epidermis. The basal layer of the epidermis (stratum basale) contains the stem cells and transient amplifying cells from which cells in the upper layers are derived. These cells express the keratins K5 and K14 and markers of proliferation such as β-catenin (CTNNB), cyclin D1, and GLI1. As these cells migrate into the spinous layer, they begin the production of different keratins, namely K1 and K10, as well as precursors and enzymes involved in cornified envelope formation, namely involucrin and transglutaminase-K. Further migration into the stratum granulosum is marked by the expression of filaggrin and loricrin, proteins also contributing to the cornified envelope. These cells also express enzymes involved in lipid production, lipids that are packaged into lamellar bodies and subsequently injected into the intercellular spaces between the stratum granulosum and stratum corneum to waterproof the permeability barrier. Moreover, lamellar bodies also contain antimicrobial peptides such as cathelicidin produced in the stratum granulosum, providing protection against invasive organisms. VDR and CYP27B1 expression is highest in the stratum basale. Also shown in this figure is the asymmetric distribution of two major coregulators of VDR action—Med1, which is expressed primarily in the stratum basale and spinosum, facilitates the VDR’s regulation of proliferation and early stages of differentiation; SRC3, found in highest concentration in the stratum granulosum, facilitates the VDR’s regulation of terminal differentiation.
Receptors 03 00019 g001
Receptors 03 00019 g002
Figure 2. The hair follicle and its stem cell niches. The hair follicle can be divided into the infundibulum merging into the IFE, the junctional zone in the upper portion of the isthmus which separates the infundibulum and isthmus, the bulge region below the isthmus, and the hair germ adjacent to the dermal papilla in the dermis. The sebaceous gland attaches to the hair shaft in the junctional zone/isthmus. These regions contain different stem cell niches. Several markers of the different stem cell niches are shown. The IFE in this cartoon is marked by Lgr6, which is also expressed in other stem cell niches including the sebaceous gland and isthmus. Lrig1 and Plet1 are markers of stem cells in the isthmus and sebaceous gland. Gli1 is a marker for the stem cells in the upper portion of the bulge, with CD34 and Krt15 also marking the bulge stem cells. Lgr5 marks cells of the lower bulge and hair germ. See the text for a more complete description of these stem cell markers.
Figure 2. The hair follicle and its stem cell niches. The hair follicle can be divided into the infundibulum merging into the IFE, the junctional zone in the upper portion of the isthmus which separates the infundibulum and isthmus, the bulge region below the isthmus, and the hair germ adjacent to the dermal papilla in the dermis. The sebaceous gland attaches to the hair shaft in the junctional zone/isthmus. These regions contain different stem cell niches. Several markers of the different stem cell niches are shown. The IFE in this cartoon is marked by Lgr6, which is also expressed in other stem cell niches including the sebaceous gland and isthmus. Lrig1 and Plet1 are markers of stem cells in the isthmus and sebaceous gland. Gli1 is a marker for the stem cells in the upper portion of the bulge, with CD34 and Krt15 also marking the bulge stem cells. Lgr5 marks cells of the lower bulge and hair germ. See the text for a more complete description of these stem cell markers.
Receptors 03 00019 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bikle, D.D. The Role of the Vitamin D Receptor in the Epidermal Stem Cell Response to Wounding. Receptors 2024, 3, 397-407. https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030019

AMA Style

Bikle DD. The Role of the Vitamin D Receptor in the Epidermal Stem Cell Response to Wounding. Receptors. 2024; 3(3):397-407. https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bikle, Daniel D. 2024. "The Role of the Vitamin D Receptor in the Epidermal Stem Cell Response to Wounding" Receptors 3, no. 3: 397-407. https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop