[go: up one dir, main page]

Next Issue
Volume 7, March
Previous Issue
Volume 6, September
 
 

Quaternary, Volume 6, Issue 4 (December 2023) – 10 articles

Cover Story (view full-size image): The record of Vulpes is utterly scarce, especially in Asia. The Early Pleistocene Asian form Vulpes chikushanensis is known from very few localities, and its taxonomy has been questioned. The specimens from the site of Bajiazui (1.8–1.2 Ma, Qingyang, Gansu) add valuable information to this problematic taxon, possibly related to Vulpes corsac. Revising the Asian fossil record of Vulpes is crucial in our attempt to understand and reconstruct the evolution of the carnivoran guild during the late Early Pleistocene (1.8–0.8 Ma). Although fragmentary, the fox remains from Bajiazui, adding a valuable piece to our knowledge of V. chikushanensis, a species possibly strongly related to the extant V. corsacView this paper
  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 24609 KiB  
Article
The Latest Occurrence of Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis (Rhinocerotidae) in Europe: The Skeletons from the Cova del Rinoceront Site (Castelldefels, Barcelona)
by David García-Fernández, Esperanza Cerdeño, Montserrat Sanz and Joan Daura
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040060 - 14 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2157
Abstract
New rhino remains recovered from Cova del Rinoceront (Castelldefels, Barcelona) confirm the presence of Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis (Toula, 1902) at the site and the taxon’s persistence until the late Middle–early Upper Pleistocene in Europe, that is, its latest documented occurrence. The three individuals recovered [...] Read more.
New rhino remains recovered from Cova del Rinoceront (Castelldefels, Barcelona) confirm the presence of Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis (Toula, 1902) at the site and the taxon’s persistence until the late Middle–early Upper Pleistocene in Europe, that is, its latest documented occurrence. The three individuals recovered from the site are compared with specimens of other Pleistocene species, including those of S. hemitoechus, S. kirchbergensis and Coelodonta antiquitatis, but their anatomical characteristics (a long skull, moderate occipital elevation, partial nasal septum, and slender zygomatic arch) do not coincide with the latter’s documented features. Certain similarities are found with the most frequently occurring rhinocerotid at that time in the Iberian Peninsula, S. hemitoechus, but the cranial features of the latter differ. The anatomical characteristics of the Cova del Rinoceront individuals coincide most closely with those of S. hundsheimensis (i.e., a high occipital face, with rounded proximolateral angles and oblique lateral borders, as well as the frontoparietal angle, and facial development). Despite the marked overlaps in the general measurements of S. hundsheimensis and S. hemitoechus, many (cranial and postcranial) dimensions of the Cova del Rinoceront individuals coincide more closely with those of the former, although some bone proportions are more similar to those of the latter specimens. Therefore, S. kirchbergensis and C. antiquitatis can be discarded as they tend to be larger, more robust species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quaternary Mammals: State of the Art and New Discoveries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>1</b>–<b>3</b>) Geographic location of the Cova del Rinoceront site in northeastern Spain (maps extracted from OpenStreetMap (CC BY-SA), OpenStreetMap© licensed under ODdL 1.0 by the OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF), ©OpenStreetMap contributors (<a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/</a>, accessed on 24 June 2023)); (<b>4</b>) stratigraphic sequence of differentiated layers; (<b>5</b>,<b>6</b>) details of the recovered rhinoceros individuals (# 8216, # 8096, and # 8661).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><span class="html-italic">Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis</span> from Cova del Rinoceront. (<b>1</b>) Individual # 8661, skull and mandible in anatomical position, left lateral view; (<b>2</b>) individual # 8096, posterior part of skull, right lateral view; (<b>3</b>) individual # 8216, skull and mandible in anatomical position, right lateral view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis</span> from Cova del Rinoceront. (<b>1</b>) Right DP4 separated from skull # 8661, occlusal view; (<b>2</b>) right series P2˗M1 of the skull # 8661, with permanent P4 ready to erupt, occlusal view; (<b>3</b>) left series P/p2-M/m2 (with upper DP4 still in place) of skull #8661, labial view; (<b>4</b>) right P4 of individual # 8096, occlusal view; (<b>5</b>) left M2 of individual # 8096, occlusal view; (<b>6</b>) left M3 of individual # 8096, mesial and occlusal views; (<b>7</b>) individual # 8096, left mandibular fragment with p3˗m2 (p4˗m1 broken), (<b>7a</b>) detail of labial face of m2 with horizontal grooves in the trigonid, and separated p2 (<b>8</b>) occlusal, lingual, and labial views.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><span class="html-italic">Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis</span> from Cova del Rinoceront, individual # 8096. (<b>1</b>) Right humerus, proximal, anterior, posterior, and distal views; (<b>2</b>) right femur, proximal, anterior, posterior, and distal views; (<b>3</b>) right ulna and radius in anatomical position, though somewhat displaced, anterior, posterior, and medial views; (<b>4</b>) right tibia and fibula in anatomical position, anterior, distal, proximal, and posterior views.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><span class="html-italic">Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis</span> from Cova del Rinoceront, individual # 8096. (<b>1</b>) Left scaphoid, anteromedial and posterolateral views; (<b>2</b>) right semilunate, proximal, lateral, and medial views (bioerosion marked by arrow); (<b>3</b>) left pyramidal, posteromedial and anterolateral views; (<b>4</b>) pisiform; (<b>5</b>) trapezoid; (<b>6</b>) right magnum, lateral, distal, and medial views; (<b>7</b>) right unciform, proximal and distal views; (<b>8</b>) left Mc II, lateral, anterior, medial, and posterior views, and proximal view above the anterior one; (<b>9</b>) left Mc III, medial, anterior, lateral, and posterior views, and proximal view above the anterior one.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><span class="html-italic">Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis</span> from Cova del Rinoceront, individual # 8096. (<b>1</b>) Right calcaneus and astragalus in anatomical position, lateral, anterior, and distal views; (<b>2</b>) right cuboid, proximal, medial, and distal views; (<b>3</b>) right navicular, proximal, lateral, and distal views; (<b>4</b>) right ectocuneiform, proximal, lateral, and distal views; (<b>5</b>) right entocuneiform, posterior view; (<b>6</b>) right Mt II, lateral, anterior, medial, and posterior views, and proximal view above the anterior one; (<b>7</b>) right Mt III, medial, anterior, lateral, and posterior views, and proximal view above the anterior one; (<b>8</b>) right Mt IV, lateral, anterior, medial, and posterior views, and proximal view above the anterior one.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6448 KiB  
Article
Quaternary Mammals from Central-Western Argentina in the Stratigraphic Context of Southern South America
by Esperanza Cerdeño, Natalia P. Lucero and Jorge O. Chiesa
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040059 - 4 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2919
Abstract
This is an updated contribution to the Quaternary geology and paleontology from central-western Argentina, focused on San Luis Province. It is mostly based on unpublished data; only some fossils had previously been briefly mentioned in broader faunal contexts. The fossil-bearing sediments correspond to [...] Read more.
This is an updated contribution to the Quaternary geology and paleontology from central-western Argentina, focused on San Luis Province. It is mostly based on unpublished data; only some fossils had previously been briefly mentioned in broader faunal contexts. The fossil-bearing sediments correspond to eolian and alluvial environments of moderate energy, dominated by sands and sandy silts. They overlie high-energy fluvial cycles and underlie edaphic horizons. They have a wide distribution, and several radiocarbon dates allow their regional correlation. Stratigraphic sequences with the precise origin of fossils allow for the improvement of lithostratigraphic and faunal correlations with the Pampean Region (central and east Argentina; La Pampa and Buenos Aires provinces), where Pleistocene assemblages are better known, but also with central-western (Cuyo Region), northwestern, and northeastern Argentina. Faunal remains correspond to large mammals, represented by xenarthrans (Cingulata and Tardigrada), macraucheniids (Litopterna), gomphotheres (Proboscidea), and equids (Perissodactyla), a typical Pleistocene mixture of native (xenarthrans and litopterns) and immigrant mammals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quaternary Mammals: State of the Art and New Discoveries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic location of the studied area in San Luis Province, central Argentina. The asterisks indicate the geological profiles detailed in the text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Regional distribution of Quaternary formations in San Luis Province, Argentina.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Stratigraphic correlation of piedmont profiles at Barranquita Creek, Pancanta, Estancia La Petra, and Comandante Granville.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Stratigraphic correlation of profiles at different areas of the Conlara Depression: El Carrizal Creek, Puente San Pablo, Los Gaviones, Pasos Malos Creek, and Villa Larca.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Stratigraphic profiles at Los Pocitos Lake and Los Araditos Creek.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>–<b>I</b>) <span class="html-italic">Neosclerocalyptus paskoensis</span>, (<b>A</b>–<b>H</b>) Barranquita Fm., El Carrizal Creek, (<b>A</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 488, skull, ventral view; (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 489, (<b>B</b>) mandible, right lateral view; (<b>C</b>) details of dental series, occlusal view; (<b>D</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 490, cephalic shield, dorsal view; (<b>E</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 499, left humerus, anterior view; (<b>F</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 497, left femur, anterior view; (<b>G</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 498, left tibio-fibula, anterior view. (<b>H</b>,<b>I</b>) Uspara Fm., Pasos Malos Creek: (<b>H</b>) carapace, dorsal view; (<b>I</b>) caudal rings, dorsal view. (<b>J</b>) <span class="html-italic">Panochthus</span> cf. <span class="html-italic">P. tuberculatus</span>, Barranquita Fm., Los Araditos Creek, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 638, osteoderm, dorsal view. (<b>K</b>,<b>L</b>) <span class="html-italic">Glyptodon reticulatus</span>, Papagayos Creek, Conlara Depression, osteoderm, (<b>K</b>) dorsal view, (<b>L</b>) lateral view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>–<b>I</b>) <span class="html-italic">Scelidotherium leptocephalum</span>. Barranquita Fm., La Petra Creek, (<b>A</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 201, left femur, posterior view; (<b>B</b>) V 203, right humerus, anterior view; (<b>C</b>) V 209, left calcaneus; (<b>D</b>) V 207, right astragalus; (<b>E</b>–<b>G</b>) Río Conlara Fm., San Pablo, Conlara Depression, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 536, (<b>E</b>) mf1, (<b>F</b>) mf3, (<b>G</b>) Mf1 or Mf2, occlusal views; (<b>H</b>) Barranquita Fm., La Petra Creek, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 513, ungueal phalanx, dorsal, lateral and distal views; (<b>I</b>) El Chulengo Fm., Los Pocitos Lake, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 690, left maxillary fragment with five molariforms, occlusal view. (<b>J</b>,<b>K</b>) <span class="html-italic">Scelidotherium bravardi</span>, Uspara Fm., Villa Larca, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 372, (<b>J</b>) skull fragment, palatal view; (<b>K</b>) mandibular fragment, lingual view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Catonyx chiliensis</span>, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V199, partial skull, right lateral view. (<b>B</b>–<b>F</b>) <span class="html-italic">Megatherium americanum</span>, Barranquita Fm., Barranquita Creek, (<b>B</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 215, left humerus fragment, anterior view; (<b>C</b>) V 213, left radius, lateral view; (<b>D</b>) V 214, left ulna, anterior view; (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 512, molariform, occlusal and labial views. (<b>G</b>) <span class="html-italic">Macrauchenia patachonica</span>, Barranquita Fm., Los Araditos Creek, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 467, lateral metacarpal (Mc II?) and first phalanx. (<b>H</b>–<b>J</b>) <span class="html-italic">Notiomastodon platensis</span>, Río Conlara Fm., Punta del Agua, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 376, (<b>H</b>) lower molar, occlusal view; (<b>I</b>) V 222, right radius, anterior view; (<b>J</b>) V 510, left manus, anterior view. (<b>K</b>–<b>M</b>) <span class="html-italic">Equus (Amerhippus) neogeus</span>, Uspara Fm., Pasos Malos Creek, Merlo, MHIN-UNSL-GEO V 468, (<b>K</b>) palatal fragment with incisors and canines, ventral view, (<b>L</b>) left M1–2, occlusal view, (<b>M</b>) right M2–3, occlusal view.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4304 KiB  
Article
Past and Present Drivers of Karst Formation of Ciénega de El Mangle, Panama
by Jaime Rivera-Solís, Adolfo Quesada-Román and Fran Domazetović
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040058 - 29 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1653
Abstract
Tropical coastal karst areas represent dynamic, fragile, and biodiverse environments. Central America’s karst regions have been scarcely studied, with most of the research focused on the northern part of the region and on several larger cave systems. The coastal carbonate zones of the [...] Read more.
Tropical coastal karst areas represent dynamic, fragile, and biodiverse environments. Central America’s karst regions have been scarcely studied, with most of the research focused on the northern part of the region and on several larger cave systems. The coastal carbonate zones of the Central American region represent a unique karstic landscape, which, so far, has been insufficiently studied. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to describe the (i) landscape geomorphology and (ii) chemical conditions that define Ciénega de El Mangle in Panama as a distinctive karstic site. Carried geomorphological mapping and the characterization of karstic features have resulted in the identification of the different karstic forms and processes that are present within this unique karstic area. Considering that the chosen karstic study area is located in a marine–coastal fringe on the periphery of a lagoon, it is affected by a combination of several factors and processes, including seawater intrusion (through sinkholes), the formation of conchiferous limestone (CaCO3), and NaCl precipitation related to efflorescence. Due to the seasonally humid tropical climate, the chemical weathering processes are intense, thus forming alkaline soils that are hindering the development of mangrove vegetation. The geomorphology of the area results from intense evaporation combined with an influx of brackish groundwater, due to which a landscape has evolved in the marine–coastal strips, of seasonal tropical climates, that exhibit saline beaches, known as a littoral shott. In total, 24 karstic microdolines have evolved within the shott, of which six represent domical geoforms formed by gradual evaporitic precipitation, while seven other geoforms represent active karstic sinkholes filled with brackish water. These results are key for understanding the past and present climate interactions and conditions that have led to the formation of tropical karst environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study site in the Panamanian context.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Climograph of Divisa for the period 1964–2020. The red line represents mean monthly temperature, the blue line means monthly precipitation totals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geomorphological map of Ciénega de El Mangle, Panama.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Geofacies and geotopes of Ciénega El Mangle, Panama.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Littoral shott. (<b>a</b>) Partial view in rainy period showing a polygonal beach defined by calcareous crusts. (<b>b</b>) Partial view in dry period exposing the polygonal beach covered by salt precipitates (efflorescence), product of intense evaporation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Karst sinkholes filled with brackish water and microdolines. (<b>a</b>) Micro-dolines filled of water during rainy season, the diameters are below half meter in must of them. (<b>b</b>–<b>c</b>) Saline efflorescence in micro-dolines. (<b>d</b>) Karst sinkholes over a meter diameter filled with water during dry season.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trial pit of 1.2 m depth and two horizons (<b>H1</b> and <b>H2</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Shelly limestone (coquina) rock outcrop on the geofacies, where remains of shells of marine organisms were observed. (<b>b</b>) Hand sample from the rock coquina outcrop. (<b>c</b>) Fractured hand sample on which bivalve shells are attached. (<b>d</b>) Fractured hand sample within which remains of bivalves and gastropods are embedded.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 4688 KiB  
Article
The Fox from Bajiazui (Qingyang, Central China) and an Update on Early Pleistocene Foxes from China
by Saverio Bartolini-Lucenti, Qigao Jiangzuo, Hao Jiang, Zhaoyu Li, Kun Xie and Joan Madurell-Malapeira
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040057 - 20 Nov 2023
Viewed by 2323
Abstract
(1) Background: despite the fact that nowadays the genus Vulpes Frisch, 1775, is the most diverse among extant Canidae, its fossil record is utterly scarce, especially in the Asian Pliocene. The sparse nature of this record further complicates the reconstruction of the evolutionary [...] Read more.
(1) Background: despite the fact that nowadays the genus Vulpes Frisch, 1775, is the most diverse among extant Canidae, its fossil record is utterly scarce, especially in the Asian Pliocene. The sparse nature of this record further complicates the reconstruction of the evolutionary scenario to fit these taxa with extant species. The situation seems to change slightly in the Early Pleistocene when two species are recorded: Vulpes alopecoides (Del Campana, 1913) in Europe and Vulpes chikushanensis, Young, 1930, in Asian localities. Unlike the former, which has an extensive record, the remains of the Chinese V. chikushanensis are sporadic and the validity of the taxon has also been questioned. (2) Methods: the study of the specimens from the Early Pleistocene site of Bajiazui (1.8–1.2 Ma, Qingyang, Gansu) in comparison to an extensive sample of Vulpes spp. The Pliocene–Early Pleistocene is relevant for the delimitation of fossil foxes variability; (3) Results: morphologically and morphometrically, the specimens of Bajiazui fit with the specimens of V. chikushanensis from other Chinese localities of the Early Pleistocene, e.g., Longdan (Gansu) and Huiyu (Fangshang), highlighting some difference with the latest Early Pleistocene forms of Jigushan fox; (4) Conclusions: the revision of the Asian fossil record of Vulpes is crucial in our attempt to understand and reconstruct the evolution of carnivoran guild during the late Early Pleistocene (1.8–0.8 Ma). The fox remains from Bajiazui, although fragmentary, add a valuable piece to our knowledge of V. chikushanensis, a species possibly strongly related to the extant Vulpes corsac (Linnaeus, 1768). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quaternary Mammals: State of the Art and New Discoveries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Localization of the late Early Pleistocene (1.8–1.2 Ma) site of Bajiazui (Qingyang, Gansu), red star, compared to other sites cited in the text, yellow stars. Abbreviations: ZKD, Zhoukoudian.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Early Pleistocene fossil fox remains from Bajiazui (Qingyang, Gansu), China. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) MLS028, cranial fragment in dorsal (<b>a</b>), ventral (<b>b</b>), and left lateral (<b>c</b>) views. (<b>d</b>–<b>h</b>) M63022, left and right mandibular fragments with teeth; left hemimandible fragment with m1–m2 in buccal (<b>d</b>), lingual (<b>e</b>), and occlusal (<b>f</b>) views; right hemimandible fragment with p3 and isolated c, p2, and p4 (<b>g</b>) in buccal view; right m2 (<b>h</b>) in occlusal view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of upper teeth morphologies (occlusal view of P4–M2) of various <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> spp. from Eurasia. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> from Bajiazui (China), MLS028, left P4–M2 (mirrored). (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes chikushanensis</span> from Longdan (Gansu, China): (<b>b</b>) X1805, left P4–M2 (mirrored); (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) V.13533, right (<b>c</b>) and left mirrored (<b>d</b>) P4–M2. (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> sp. from Musselievo (Bulgaria) [<a href="#B13-quaternary-06-00057" class="html-bibr">13</a>], right P4 with catalogue number. (<b>f</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> sp. from Odessa Catacombs (Ukraine) [<a href="#B12-quaternary-06-00057" class="html-bibr">12</a>], O-7764, right P4–M2. (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes rooki</span> from Xiakou (Yushe basin, China), AMNH F:AM 97027, right P4–M2. (<b>h</b>,<b>i</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes beihaiensis</span> from Asia (Turkey and China): (<b>h</b>) MNHN.F.ACA-357, left P4 (mirrored) from Çalta-1 (Turkey); (<b>i</b>) AMNH F:AM 97062, right P4–M2 right from Baihai, Yushe Basin (China). (<b>j</b>–<b>b′</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes alopecoides</span> from European localities: (<b>j</b>) IGF 12110, right M1–M2 (type specimen of the species) from Il Tasso (Il Tasso); (<b>k</b>) MHNL 20.161684, right P4-M2 from St. Vallier (France); (<b>l</b>) PP 789, left P4–M2 (mirrored) from Pirro Nord (Italy); (<b>m</b>) MGPT-PU104618, right P4 from Pirro Nord (Italy); (<b>n</b>) MGPT-PU104805, left P4 (mirrored) from Pirro Nord (Italy); (<b>o</b>) KSR-PO221, P4–M2 (mirrored) from Kastritsi (Greece); (<b>p</b>) V.61.1401, left P4–M2 (reversed) from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>q</b>) APL-20, right P4 from Apollonia-1 (Greece); (<b>r</b>) V.13.04696.3, left P4 (mirrored) from Nagyharsanyhegy 4 (Hungary); (<b>s</b>) VER.2018.2676, left P4 (mirrored) from Somssich Hill 2 (Hungary); (<b>t</b>) VER.2018.2682, right M1 from Somssich Hill 2 4 (Hungary); (<b>u</b>) V.61.2164_1, left P4–M1 (mirrored) from Villany 8 (Hungary); (<b>v</b>) V.61.2164_2, right P4 from Villany 8 (Hungary); (<b>w</b>) unnumbered specimen, left M2 (mirrored) from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>x</b>) unnumbered specimen, right M1 from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>y</b>) unnumbered specimen, left P4 from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>z</b>) IPS 45634 (cast), right M1 from Venta Micena (Spain); (<b>a′</b>) UWPI 2275/13/10, left P4-M2 (mirrored) from Deutsch Altenburg 2C (Austria); (<b>b′</b>) UWPI 2275/13/11, right P4–M2 from Deutsch Altenburg 2C (Austria).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of lower teeth morphologies (occlusal view of p4–m3) of various <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> spp. from Eurasia. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> from Bajiazui (China), M63022, left m1–m2. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes chikushanensis</span> from Longdan (Gansu, China): (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) V.13533, left p4–m2 (<b>b</b>) and right mirrored p4–m3 (<b>c</b>). (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes qiuzhudingi</span> from Himalayan–Tibetan Plateau (China): (<b>d</b>) IVPP V19060, left m2 from IVPP locality KL0605, Kunlun Pass Basin (China); (<b>e</b>) IVPP V18923, left m1 from Zanda Basin (China). (<b>f</b>,<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> sp. from Odessa Catacombs (Ukraine) [<a href="#B12-quaternary-06-00057" class="html-bibr">12</a>]: (<b>f</b>) O-1519, left m1-m2; (<b>g</b>) O-1520, right p4–m1 (mirrored). (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes rooki</span> from Xiakou (Yushe basin, China), AMNH F:AM 97058, right p4–m3 (mirrored). (<b>i</b>–<b>m</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes beihaiensis</span> from Asia (Turkey and China): (<b>i</b>) MNHN.F.ACA-293b, left m1-m2 from Çalta-1 (Turkey); (<b>j</b>) MNHN.F.ACA-293a, right p4–m3 (mirrored) from Çalta-1 (Turkey); (<b>k</b>) AMNH F:AM 97068, right m1–m3 (mirrored) from Zhuangwagou, Yushe Basin (China); (<b>l</b>) AMNH F:AM 97071, left m1 from Zhaozhuang, Yushe Basin (China); (<b>m</b>) AMNH F:AM 97070, left p4–m1 from Zhaozhuang, Yushe Basin (China). (<b>n</b>–<b>u′</b>) <span class="html-italic">Vulpes alopecoides</span> from European localities: (<b>n</b>) LGPUT DFN-22, left p4–m3 from Dafnero-1 (Greece); (<b>o</b>) LGPUT DFN-172, right p4–m2 (mirrored) from Dafnero-1 (Greece); (<b>p</b>) MG-29-2013/461, right m1–m2 (mirrored) from Kvabebi (Georgia); (<b>q</b>) IPS 27246, left m1–m2 from La Puebla de Valverde (Spain); (<b>r</b>) IPS 27248, right m1 (mirrored) from La Puebla de Valverde (Spain); (<b>s</b>) IPS 27259, right p4–m3 from La Puebla de Valverde (Spain); (<b>t</b>) PN 28, left p4–m1 from Pirro Nord (Italy); (<b>u</b>) MGPT-PU104721, right m1 (reversed) from Pirro Nord (Italy); (<b>v</b>) MGPT-PU106227, right m1 (reversed) from Pirro Nord (Italy); (<b>w</b>) V.61.1401, right m1–m2 (mirrored) from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>x</b>) LGPUT APL-11, right p4–m2 (mirrored) from Apollonia-1 (Greece); (<b>y</b>,<b>z</b>) V.13.04696.0, right m2 (mirrored) and left m1 from Nagyharsanyhegy 4 (Hungary); (<b>a′</b>) V.61.1372, left p4–m1 from Villany 8 (Hungary); (<b>b′</b>) V.13.04785.0, right m1 talonid (mirrored) from Püspökfurdȍ/Betfia 2 (Romania); (<b>c′</b>) VER.2018.2630, left m1 from Somssich Hill 2 (Hungary); (<b>d′</b>) VER.2018.2638, right m1 (mirrored) from Somssich Hill 2 (Hungary); (<b>e′</b>) VER.2018.2641, left m1 from Somssich Hill 2 (Hungary); (<b>f′</b>) VER.2018.2676, left m1 from Somssich Hill 2; (<b>g′</b>) V.2014.2.5.1, right m1–m2 (mirrored) from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>h′</b>) VER.2018.2678, left p4 and m2 from Somssich Hill 2 (Hungary); (<b>i</b>′) V.2014.5.1.2, right m1(mirrored) from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>j′</b>) unnumbered specimen, right m1–m2 (mirrored) from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>k′</b>) V.2014.2.5.2, left p4–m1 from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>l′</b>) V. 2014.2.5.4, right m1 (mirrored) from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>m′</b>) V.13.3632_c, right m1 (mirrored) from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>n′</b>) V.13.3632_d, left m1 from Villany 3 (Hungary); (<b>o′</b>) V.13.10754.1, right m1 (mirrored) from Püspökfurdȍ/Betfia 2 (Romania); (<b>p′</b>) LGPUT PET-1600, left m1-m2 from Petralona (Greece); (<b>q′</b>) LGPUT PET-1602, right m1-m3 (mirrored) from Petralona (Greece); (<b>r′</b>) IPS 14748, right m1-m2 (mirrored) from Cal Guardiola (Spain); (<b>s’</b>) UWPI 2275/13/17, left p4–m2 from Deutsch Altenburg 2C (Austria); (<b>t′</b>) UPWI 2275/13/1, right p4–m3 (mirrored) from Deutsch Altenburg 2C (Austria); (<b>u′</b>) UPWI 2275/13/26, right m1–m3 (mirrored) from Deutsch Altenburg 2C (Austria).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Principal component analysis on upper teeth variables (P3–M2 length and width) on extant and fossil <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> species. Symbols are explained in the legend. The red diamond is MLS028. <span class="html-italic">Vulpes chikushanensis</span> specimens from Jigushan (China) [<a href="#B25-quaternary-06-00057" class="html-bibr">25</a>] are reported in light cerulean whereas that of Longdan (China) [<a href="#B15-quaternary-06-00057" class="html-bibr">15</a>] in dark cerulean.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Principal component analysis on lower teeth variables (p3–m2 length and width) on extant and fossil <span class="html-italic">Vulpes</span> species. Symbols are explained in the legend. The red diamond is M63022. <span class="html-italic">Vulpes chikushanensis</span> specimens from Jigushan (China) [<a href="#B25-quaternary-06-00057" class="html-bibr">25</a>] are reported in light cerulean whereas that of Longdan (China) [<a href="#B15-quaternary-06-00057" class="html-bibr">15</a>] are in dark cerulean.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 6903 KiB  
Article
Ecological Constraints and Drivers for Human Dispersals and Adaptations in the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene Environments of the East Siberian Arctic
by Vladimir V. Pitulko and Elena Y. Pavlova
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040056 - 6 Nov 2023
Viewed by 2215
Abstract
Starting roughly 50,000 years ago, the Arctic region of East Siberia remained continuously populated by groups of anatomically modern humans including the most uncomfortable episodes in the development of the late Quaternary environment; for some of them, human presence in the area became [...] Read more.
Starting roughly 50,000 years ago, the Arctic region of East Siberia remained continuously populated by groups of anatomically modern humans including the most uncomfortable episodes in the development of the late Quaternary environment; for some of them, human presence in the area became ephemeral. At present, archaeological fossil records allow for distinguishing three main stages in human occupation of the area: Early (~50 to ~29 ka, MIS 3), middle (~29 to ~11.7 ka, MIS 2), and late (from 11.7 to ~8 ka). For most of the time, they the populated open landscapes of the Mammoth Steppe, which declined at the onset of the Holocene. Human settlement of the Arctic was driven by various abiotic and biotic factors and thus archaeologically visible cardinal cultural and technological changes correspond to the most important paleoclimatic and habitat changes in the late Pleistocene and early Holocene. Successful peopling of the Arctic was largely facilitated by the adoption of critically important innovations such as sewing technology based on the use of the eyed bone needle and the manufacture of long shafts and pointed implements made of mammoth tusks. Mammoth exploitation is seen in mass accumulations of mammoths formed by hunting. An obvious connection between archaeological materials and such accumulations is observed in the archaeological record. In the lithic technology, the early stage is presented by archaic-looking flake industries. Starting the LGM, the wedge-core based-microblade technology known as the Beringian microblade tradition spread widely following the shrinkage of the mammoth range. At the late stage, starting at the Holocene boundary, microprismatic blade technology occurs. In all stages, the complex social behavior of the ancient Arctic settlers is revealed. The long-distance transport of products, knowledge, and genes occurs due to the introduction of the land transportation system. Initial human settlement of this region is associated with carriers of the West Eurasian genome who became replaced by the population with East Asian ancestry constantly moving North under the pressure of climate change. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Climatic, paleoenvironmental, and archaeological record of the East Siberian Arctic. (<b>A</b>) Regional stratigraphic scheme of the Yano-Kolyma lowland and its mountain framing, after Stratigraphic Code... [<a href="#B21-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">21</a>]; (<b>B</b>) NorthGRIP δ18O scale and the sequence of Greenland interstadials (GI1–GI13), according to Svensson et al. [<a href="#B22-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">22</a>], blue bands mark the approximate position of the Younger Dryas cooling (YD) and Heinrich events (H1–H5) according to Tierney et al. [<a href="#B23-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">23</a>]; (<b>C</b>) general composition of palynospectra retrieved from Quaternary sediments of Mkh IC section, according to Sher et al. [<a href="#B24-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">24</a>] and bottom sediment core from Dolgoe Lake, after Pisaric et al. [<a href="#B25-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">25</a>], Klemm et al. [<a href="#B26-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">26</a>]; (<b>D</b>–<b>G</b>), after Pavlova and Pitulko [<a href="#B16-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">16</a>]: (<b>D</b>) biomes; (<b>E</b>) paleoclimatic reconstructions based on paleofloristic analysis: ΔMTWA—deviation of air temperatures of the warmest month (°C), ΔPANN—average annual precipitation (mm/year); (<b>F</b>) total climate change; (<b>G</b>) archaeological record of the East Siberian Arctic; (<b>H</b>) archaeological objects according their calendar age; (<b>I</b>) phases of human dispersal within the area; (<b>J</b>) dated anthropological remains from various regions of Siberia. For (<b>H</b>), dated archaeological sites are indicated: 1—Sopkarga mammoth, 2—the locality of Bunge-Toll-1885, 3—Kyuchus, 4—Upstream Point, Yana complex of sites (YCS), 5—Zyryanka, 6—Irelyakh-Siene, 7—Bolshoy Anyui, 8—New Siberia/West, 9—New Siberia/East, 10—AL044-2005 site, 11—Omoloy, 12—Yana complex of sites (YCS): Northern Point, Yana B area and Yana mammoth “graveyard”/YMAM, 13—Diring-Ayan, 14—Buor-Khaya/Ortho-Stan, 15—Kastykhtakh mammoth, 16—Tabayuryakh mammoth, 17—Lagernyi Point/YCS, 18—Yana A area/YCS, 19—Ilin-Syalakh 034, 20—Wrangel island, 21—Zyryanka 1, 22—Urez-22, 23—Ilin-Syalakh, 24—Achchaghyi-Allaikha, 25—Berelekh geoarchaeological complex; 26—Nikita Lake, 27—Cape Kamennyi, 28—Tytylvaam IV, 29—Naivan, 30—Zhokhov site, 31—Chelkun IV, 32—Tuguttakh, 33—Tagenar VI, 34—Siktyakh I, 35—Rodinka burial, 36—Chertov Ovrag, 37—Burulgino, 38—Rauchuagytgyn I, 39—Pegtymel, 40—Aachim-base, 41—Aachim-lighthouse, 42—Cape Baranov, 43—Pegtymel cave, 44—Shalaurova Izba, after Pavlova and Pitulko ([<a href="#B16-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">16</a>]: Table 1) (with modifications based on Pitulko et al., 2015 [<a href="#B27-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">27</a>]), Pitulko and Pavlova 2016 [<a href="#B28-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">28</a>], Novgorodov et al. [<a href="#B29-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">29</a>], Cheprasov et al. [<a href="#B30-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">31</a>], Pavlov and Suzuki 2020 [<a href="#B32-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">32</a>], Chlachula et al. [<a href="#B33-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">33</a>], Kirillova at al. [<a href="#B34-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">34</a>]; Pitulko et al. [<a href="#B35-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Dikov [<a href="#B37-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Kиpьяк [<a href="#B38-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">38</a>], Khlobystin [<a href="#B39-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">39</a>], Gusev [<a href="#B40-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">40</a>]. Geographic locations of the sites are indicated on the maps organized by time slices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Early stage of the human settlement of the arctic East Siberia and MIS 3 paleoenvironments of the area. (<b>A</b>) Locations that yielded evidence of human presence during the early MIS 3 interstadial (57–45.7 ka). Paleoenvironments: dry land extent and land/sea boundary at 49 ka with ocean level decrease to −40 m is based on Pico et al. [<a href="#B50-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">50</a>]; mountain glaciation margin, after Barr and Clark [<a href="#B51-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">51</a>], Galanin [<a href="#B52-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">52</a>]; extent of the mammoth habitat: in NE Asia and in Alaska, after McDonald et al. [<a href="#B53-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. Dated archaeological sites are indicated: 1—Sopohnaya Karga mammoth, 2—the locality of Bunge-Toll-1885, 3—Kyuchus, 4—Upstream Point, Yana complex of sites (YCS), 5—Zyryanka, 6—Irelyakh-Siene, 7—Bolshoy Anyui. (<b>B</b>) Locations that yielded evidence of human presence during middle and late MIS 3 interstadial (45.7–29 ka). Paleoenvironments: dry land extent and land/sea boundary at 32—31 ka with ocean level decrease to −90 m is based on Pico et al. [<a href="#B50-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">50</a>]; mountain glaciation margin, after Barr and Clark [<a href="#B51-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">51</a>], Galanin [<a href="#B52-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">52</a>]; extent of the mammoth habitat: in NE Asia and in Alaska, after McDonald et al. [<a href="#B53-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">53</a>], in NE Asia, after Pitulko, Nikolskiy [<a href="#B54-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">54</a>], in West Siberia, after Kahlke [<a href="#B55-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">55</a>]. Dated archaeological sites are indicated: 8—New Siberia/West, 9—New Siberia/East, 10—AL044-2005 site, 11—Omoloy, 12—Yana complex of sites (YCS): Northern Point, Yana B area and Yana mammoth “graveyard”/YMAM, 13—Diring-Ayan, 14—Buor-Khaya/Ortho-Stan, 15—Kastykhtakh mammoth, 16—Tabauyriakh mammoth. Archaeological sites of that time in South Siberia: 45—Makarovo IV. Location of the sites and their age estimate is based on Pitulko et al., 2016b [<a href="#B3-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">3</a>], Pitulko [<a href="#B4-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">4</a>], Pavlova and Pitulko [<a href="#B16-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">16</a>], Cheprasov et al., 2015 [<a href="#B30-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">30</a>], Cheprasov et al., 2018 [<a href="#B31-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">31</a>], Pavlov, Suzuki 2020 [<a href="#B32-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">32</a>], Chlachula et al., 2021 [<a href="#B33-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">33</a>], Kirillova et al., 2012 [<a href="#B34-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">34</a>], Novgorodov et al., 2014 [<a href="#B29-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">29</a>], Pitulko et al., 2015 [<a href="#B27-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">27</a>], Pitulko et al., 2015 [<a href="#B56-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">56</a>], Pitulko et al., 2017 [<a href="#B57-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">57</a>], Goebel and Aksenov 1995 [<a href="#B58-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">58</a>], Derevianko 1998 [<a href="#B59-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">59</a>], Goebel et al., 2000 [<a href="#B60-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">60</a>], Rybin and Khatsenovich [<a href="#B61-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">61</a>]. Note numbers provided for archaeological sites are the same as shown in <a href="#quaternary-06-00056-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>H.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Middle stage of the human settlement in the arctic East Siberia and MIS 2 paleoenvironments. (<b>A</b>) Archaeological localities of the extreme cold phase of MIS 2 stadial (MIS 2 pessimum, 29–15.5 ka). Paleoenvironments: dry land extent and land/sea boundary at 27 ka with ocean level decrease to −120 m is based on Pico et al. [<a href="#B50-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">50</a>]; Eurasian Ice Sheet Complex at 27 ka and 22 ka, after Hughes et al. [<a href="#B67-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">67</a>] mountain glaciation margin, after Barr and Clark [<a href="#B51-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">51</a>], Galanin [<a href="#B52-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">52</a>], Glushkova [<a href="#B104-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">104</a>]; extent of the mammoth habitat: in NE Asia, after Pitulko, Nikolskiy [<a href="#B54-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">54</a>], in West Siberia, after Kahlke [<a href="#B55-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">55</a>], in Alaska, after McDonald et al. [<a href="#B53-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. Dated archaeological sites of the East Siberian Arctic are indicated: 13—Diring-Ayan, 17—Lagernyi Point/YCS, 18—Yana A area/YCS, 19—Ilin-Syalakh 034, 20—Wrangel island, 21—Zyryanka 1, after Pavlova and Pitulko [<a href="#B16-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">16</a>], Cheprasov et al., 2018 [<a href="#B31-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">31</a>]; Pitulko et al., 2016a [<a href="#B36-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">36</a>]; Pitulko et al., 2015 [<a href="#B27-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">27</a>]; Pitulko et al., 2017 [<a href="#B57-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">57</a>]. Archaeological site of that time in South Siberia: 46—Khaiyrgas Cave, 47—Malta [<a href="#B102-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">102</a>]. Site location and age estimate provided based on Kuzmin et al., 2017 [<a href="#B105-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">105</a>], Derevianko et al., 2003 [<a href="#B106-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">106</a>], Raghavan et al., 2014 [<a href="#B107-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">107</a>], Sitlivy et al., 1997 [<a href="#B108-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">108</a>]. (<b>B</b>) Archaeological locations belonging to the late glacial stage of MIS 2 (15.5–11.7 ka). Paleoenvironments: dry land extent and land/sea boundary at 14–13.5 ka with ocean level decrease to −70 m is based on Pico et al. [<a href="#B50-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">50</a>]; extent of the mammoth habitat: in NE Asia, after Pitulko, Nikolskiy [<a href="#B54-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">54</a>], in West Siberia, after Kahlke [<a href="#B55-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">55</a>], in Alaska, after McDonald et al. [<a href="#B53-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. Dated archaeological sites are indicated: 22—Urez-22, 23—Ilin-Syalakh, 24—Achchaghyi-Allaikha, 25—Berelekh geoarchaeological complex; 26—Nikita Lake, 27—Cape Kamennyi, after Pavlova and Pitulko [<a href="#B16-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">16</a>], Pitulko et al., 2016a [<a href="#B36-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Pitulko et al., 2017 [<a href="#B57-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">57</a>]. Archaeological sites in South Siberia confined to the same time span: 48—Dyuktai Cave, 49—Bolshoy Iakor, 50—Ushki site; 51—Ezhantsy; 52—Kheta. Site location and age estimate for them is based on Mochanov 1977 [<a href="#B109-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">109</a>]; Ineshin and Tetenkin 2017 [<a href="#B110-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">110</a>], Dikov 1979 [<a href="#B111-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">111</a>], Slobodin 1999 [<a href="#B112-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">112</a>] Note geographic pattern in which northern group of sites with a single microblade site (Urez-22) are located within the range of the local population of woolly mammoths, while in the archaeological contexts of the southern group outside the range of mammoths, narrow-front wedge-shaped core technology is confidently presented.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Late stage of the human settlement in the arctic East Siberia and paleoenvironments of MIS 1: (<b>A</b>) The Early Holocene archaeological sites (11.7–8.2 ka). Paleoenvironments: dry land extent and land/sea boundary at 9 ka with ocean level decrease to −30 m is based on Pico et al. [<a href="#B50-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">50</a>], Bauch et al. [<a href="#B119-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">119</a>]; extent of the mammoth habitat on Wrangel Island, after Vartanyan et al. [<a href="#B145-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">145</a>]; northern limit for tree vegetation based on dated remains of Betula trees and Larix trees at 9 ka, after Kremenetski, et al. [<a href="#B146-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">146</a>], Binney, et al. [<a href="#B147-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">147</a>,<a href="#B148-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">148</a>]. Dated archaeological sites of the East Siberian Arctic are indicated: 28—Tytylvaam IV, 29—Naivan, 30—Zhokhov site, 31—Chelkun IV, after Pavlova and Pitulko [<a href="#B16-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">16</a>], Kiryak et al., 2003 [<a href="#B38-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">38</a>], Dikov 1993 [<a href="#B37-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">37</a>], Gusev 2002 [<a href="#B40-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">40</a>], Pitulko 1999 [<a href="#B149-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">149</a>]; Pitulko, Pavlova 2016 [<a href="#B28-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">28</a>]. Archaeological site of that time in South Siberia: 53—Ust-Timpton; 54—Uptar I. Site location and their age estimate are provided based on Mochanov 1977 [<a href="#B109-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">109</a>], Slobodin 1999 [<a href="#B112-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">112</a>]. Objects are shown to estimate the time of the occurrence of microprismatic blade technology in the region. (<b>B</b>) Archaeological objects of Middle-Late MIS 1 (after 8.2 ka), dated archaeological sites are indicated: 32—Tuguttakh, 33—Tagenar VI, 34—Siktyakh I, 35—Rodinka burial, 36—Chertov Ovrag, 37—Burulgino, 38—Rauchuagytgyn I, 39—Pegtymel, 40—Aachim-base, 41—Aachim-lighthouse, 42—Cape Baranov, 43—Pegtymel cave, 44—Shalaurova Izba, after Pitulko and Pavlova 2016 [<a href="#B28-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">28</a>]; Pavlova and Pitulko 2020 [<a href="#B16-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">16</a>], Khlobystin 1998 [<a href="#B39-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">39</a>], Mochanov 1977 [<a href="#B109-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">109</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Demographic modeling for Siberian and North American ancient native population: Identified patterns, the time of event (in thousand years ago), and assessment of connection of various genetic lineages (in percent) (after Sikora et al., 2019 [<a href="#B62-quaternary-06-00056" class="html-bibr">62</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 6826 KiB  
Article
The River Valleys of the Greek Colony of Selinunte: Results of an Offshore Investigation
by Emanuele Lodolo, Luca Baradello, László Szentpeteri, Michele Deponte, Emiliano Gordini and Dario Civile
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040055 - 19 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1554
Abstract
The ancient Greek colony of Selinunte, with its acropolis on a promontory on the south-western coast of Sicily, is flanked by two valleys where two modest rivers flow today: the Modione to the west and the Cottone to the east. Archaeological reconstructions, historical [...] Read more.
The ancient Greek colony of Selinunte, with its acropolis on a promontory on the south-western coast of Sicily, is flanked by two valleys where two modest rivers flow today: the Modione to the west and the Cottone to the east. Archaeological reconstructions, historical documents from various sources, and recent remote sensing surveys indicate two important bays corresponding to the ancient mouths of these two rivers, now completely covered by a thick layer of sediments. It is believed that the ports of the colony were located in these bays, although the remains of these ports are still sparse and contradictory. Here we present a multibeam bathymetric map of part of the marine area immediately off Selinunte and a series of high-resolution seismic profiles acquired parallel to the coastline. They show the geometries and stratigraphic context of the two buried river valleys offshore, from which information about the palaeoenvironmental setting and evolution of the landscape can be derived and which may be used in adequately guiding future archaeological excavation programs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Satellite map (from Google Earth) of the Selinunte archaeological park and a multibeam swath bathymetric map of the nearshore area, integrated with EMODNET data (<a href="https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/bathymetry" target="_blank">https://emodnet.ec.europa.eu/en/bathymetry</a>, accessed on 17 July 2023). The positions of the three high-resolution seismic profiles discussed in the text are also plotted. The yellow dot indicates the location of the stratigraphic well [<a href="#B1-quaternary-06-00055" class="html-bibr">1</a>] displayed in Figure 6. The box in the upper-left corner shows the location of the Greek colony of Selinunte in Sicily (red star).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>top</b>) High-resolution seismic profile SEL-01_CC (see location in <a href="#quaternary-06-00055-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>), and simplified line drawing (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>top</b>) High-resolution seismic profile SA-01 (see location in <a href="#quaternary-06-00055-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>), and simplified line drawing (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>top</b>) High-resolution seismic profile SA-02 (see location in <a href="#quaternary-06-00055-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>), and simplified line drawing (<b>bottom</b>). The two boxes indicate the corresponding zooms displayed in Figure 7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Geomorphological sketch map of the Selinunte area derived from the interpretation of the geophysical data offshore, integrated with the available literature information onshore (cfr. [<a href="#B21-quaternary-06-00055" class="html-bibr">21</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Stratigraphic column (redrawn from [<a href="#B1-quaternary-06-00055" class="html-bibr">1</a>]) of the borehole in the valley of the Modione river (see location in <a href="#quaternary-06-00055-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>) Part of the high-resolution seismic profile SA-02 (see location in <a href="#quaternary-06-00055-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>) crossing the Modione palaeo valley and line drawing (<b>bottom</b>), and (<b>B</b>) part of the high-resolution seismic profile SA-02 (see location in <a href="#quaternary-06-00055-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>) crossing the Cottone palaeo valley and line drawing (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>top left</b>) Mouth of the Cottone River (photo taken on 24 May 2023). (<b>top right</b>) The final segment of the Cottone valley, where a small lagoon basin has formed as a consequence of a major flood event that occurred in December 2022, and where squared blocks can be seen, perhaps attributable to port infrastructure (photo taken on 24 May 2023). (<b>bottom</b>) Some evidence of aligned squared blocks along the shoreline (photo taken on 24 May 2023), possibly related to port docks (?).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>(<b>top left</b>) Mouth of the Cottone River (photo taken on 24 May 2023). (<b>top right</b>) The final segment of the Cottone valley, where a small lagoon basin has formed as a consequence of a major flood event that occurred in December 2022, and where squared blocks can be seen, perhaps attributable to port infrastructure (photo taken on 24 May 2023). (<b>bottom</b>) Some evidence of aligned squared blocks along the shoreline (photo taken on 24 May 2023), possibly related to port docks (?).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 5675 KiB  
Article
Stage or Sub-Stage: The Contribution of Small Mammals to the Characterization of Middle Pleistocene Local Climate Variation
by Loïc Lebreton and Juan Manuel López-García
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040054 - 10 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2391
Abstract
In western Europe, the Middle Pleistocene is marked by Acheulean settlement and their diversification after the MIS 12. The Arago cave recovery of numerous human settlements correlate to MIS 14, 13 and MIS 12 making it an important site for the understanding of [...] Read more.
In western Europe, the Middle Pleistocene is marked by Acheulean settlement and their diversification after the MIS 12. The Arago cave recovery of numerous human settlements correlate to MIS 14, 13 and MIS 12 making it an important site for the understanding of the Lower Palaeolithic in Southwestern Europe. It is also an important site for the understanding of palaeoenvironments and palaeobiodiversity as it has yielded rich faunal associations. The faunal associations allow us to observe three climatic stages within this study: two cold ones and a mild one. Small vertebrates, with their abundance and their diversity, are particularly useful for observing these periods, which historically have been correlated to glacial or interglacial stages. If the first cold phase, dated 438 ± 31 ka, is correlated to the Marine Isotopic Stage 12 (MIS 12), the correlation of the following phases to isotopic stages can be discussed. They may correspond to climatic variations of the MIS 12. Indeed, the latest studies about palaeoclimatic reconstitution which allow us to define the evolution of the palaeo-temperature show that these differences are relatively small. Therefore, instead of a correlation to MIS 12, 13 and 14, the medium complex of the Arago cave could belong solely to MIS 12. The correlation of these environmental changes to other global data, notably the isotopic curve, is challenging because there are various local factors influencing faunal association. We propose here both hypotheses and discuss the various factors which influence the distribution and the representation of the small vertebrate species present on the site. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location of the Arago cave. (<b>b</b>) Synthetic stratigraphic column of the Arago cave [<a href="#B21-quaternary-06-00054" class="html-bibr">21</a>], dating and correlation with the MIS come from [<a href="#B16-quaternary-06-00054" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Correspondence analysis (CA) between rodent species and layers of the Arago cave. Axis 1 represents 50.3% inertia and axis 2 represents 23.2% inertia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dendrogram plot obtained from the cluster analysis based on the first three CA axes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Reconstructed palaeocoastlines and mean annual temperature estimates between −433 ka and −540 ka using the 10 ka stepped outputs from Gamisch [<a href="#B41-quaternary-06-00054" class="html-bibr">41</a>]. Colour scale based on minimum (−16.5 °C, dark blue) and maximum values (19 °C, dark red).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5840 KiB  
Article
The Long-Term Deep Loessal Sediments of Northeast China: Loess or Loessal Paleosols?
by Zhong-Xiu Sun, Nai-Wen Zhang, Ying-Ying Jiang, Qiu-Bing Wang and Gan-Lin Zhang
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040053 - 7 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1497
Abstract
Previous research assumed deep buried loess as the initial composition of the overlying paleosol and failed to address the long-term continuous pedogenic weathering history in the deep loess-paleosol sequence, which was attributed to little understanding on the difference between loess and paleosol in [...] Read more.
Previous research assumed deep buried loess as the initial composition of the overlying paleosol and failed to address the long-term continuous pedogenic weathering history in the deep loess-paleosol sequence, which was attributed to little understanding on the difference between loess and paleosol in the long-term deep loess-paleosol sequence. To distinguish between the loess and paleosol, in the long-term deep loess-paleosol sequence in northeast China, the morphology, dust deposition fluxes, geochemical characteristics, magnetic susceptibility, and grain size distributions were investigated. Results showed that the loess layers buried at depth could be differentiated from the paleosol by their poor pedogenic development. The presence of coarser grains in the loess as well as lesser amounts of clay and Fe–Mn coatings compared to paleosol indicated weaker weathering of the loess. Also, optical iron clay films deposited on the surface of the skeleton particles were less visible in the loesses than in the paleosols. From the loess evolution perspective, the pedogenic formation process of the newly formed loess soils should be considered as important as that of the reddish paleosol layer based on criteria of formation time, depth within profile, and morphological characteristics. The formation of the reddish or yellowish paleosol layer was constrained by pedogenic environments associated with climatic change and by the relative rates of deposition and pedogenesis. The terms “loessal paleosol” and “loessal paleosol sequence” are suggested to aid in systematically and consistently addressing the long-term pedogenic weathering evolution recorded in the complex formation of deep loess and paleosol sequences in pedology research. The long-term deep loessal sediments of Northeast China are loessal paleosols, which cannot be simply used as a reference for the overlying paleosol and be deducted from pedogenesis consideration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic map presenting the location of the Chaoyang loess-paleosol profile. The black solid circle on the inset map shows the location of Chaoyang in China. The red triangle and blue square represent the Fenghuangshan mountain and Chaoyang profile, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) The associated landscape photo of the Chaoyang profile, and (<b>B</b>) the Chaoyang profile photo and the schematic representation of its stratigraphy with corresponding time constraints where “L” indicates loess and “S” indicates paleosol. The blue rectangle on (<b>A</b>) shows the location of the Chaoyang profile. The data on age for the plot are cited from Chen, Wang, Han and Wu [<a href="#B31-quaternary-06-00053" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. The chronostratigraphic data were obtained by using 10 reliable age controls interpolated by using the model of susceptibility and accumulation rate, and then its interpretations were addressed by relating with the Marine Oxygen Isotope Stratigraphy of SPECMAP (data cited from a reference [<a href="#B32-quaternary-06-00053" class="html-bibr">32</a>] Lisiecki and Raymo, 2007). The marine oxygen isotope record of SPECMAP δ <sup>18</sup>O was subdivided into 11 stages (MIS) since 423 ka BP [<a href="#B32-quaternary-06-00053" class="html-bibr">32</a>]. Note: S0 represents modern soil. The upper part (0–195 cm), middle part (195–228 cm), and lower part of the observed profile (228–1985 cm) were abbreviated as UPP, MIP, and LOP, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The redness ratings (RR) with depth for the lower part of the Chaoyang profile (LOP, 228–1985 cm). The “L” indicates loess and “S” indicates paleosol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Thin section micrographs of different horizons in the lower part of the Chaoyang profile (LOP, 228–1985 cm), under a single polarized light. The “L” indicates loess and “S” indicates paleosol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mineral dust flux of loess and paleosols in the lower part of the Chaoyang profile (LOP, 228–1985 cm). The “L” indicates loess and “S” indicates paleosol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>AUCC-normalized pattern of major elemental distributions of loess and paleosols in the lower part of the Chaoyang profile (LOP, 228–1985 cm). The AUCC (the average upper continental crust) was cited from Rudnick and Gao [<a href="#B46-quaternary-06-00053" class="html-bibr">46</a>]. The “L” indicates loess and “S” indicates paleosol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes of the chemical index of alteration (CIA) (<b>A</b>) and Na<sub>2</sub>O/K<sub>2</sub>O (<b>B</b>) with depth in the lower part of the Chaoyang profile (LOP, 228–1985 cm). The “L” indicates loess and “S” indicates paleosol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes of magnetic susceptibility (<b>A</b>) and mean grain size (<b>B</b>) in the lower part of the Chaoyang profile (LOP, 228–1985 cm). The “L” indicates loess and “S” indicates paleosol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter diagram of the chemical index of alteration (CIA) and Na/K molar ratio of the lower part (LOP, 228–1985 cm) in the Chaoyang profile (CY). The data of Xuancheng aeolian red clay (XC) was cited from Li et al. [<a href="#B56-quaternary-06-00053" class="html-bibr">56</a>]. The elemental composition data of typical loess-paleosol sequences: the Lingtai section (LY) and the Luochuan section (LC) from the China Loess Plateau was cited from Yang, Ding and Ding [<a href="#B19-quaternary-06-00053" class="html-bibr">19</a>] and Li et al. [<a href="#B56-quaternary-06-00053" class="html-bibr">56</a>] and used in calculating CIA and Na/K molar ratio values. Note, the available Lingtai data cannot be separated successfully for loess or paleosols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Grain size distributions of loess and paleosols in the lower part of the Chaoyang profile (LOP, 228–1985 cm). The “L” indicates loess and “S” indicates paleosol.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 4984 KiB  
Article
Heat Treatment of Flint at the Late Neanderthal Site Sesselfelsgrotte (Germany)
by Aviad Agam, Merlin Hattermann, Iddo Pinkas, Jürgen Richter and Thorsten Uthmeier
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040052 - 7 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1810
Abstract
We examined lithic artifacts from the late Neanderthal site Sesselfelsgrotte (Bavaria, Germany) in order to evaluate the possibility of fire use and intentional flint heat treatment performed by late Neanderthals. We analyzed 1113 flint pieces from the G-layer complex (~60 to 45 kya; [...] Read more.
We examined lithic artifacts from the late Neanderthal site Sesselfelsgrotte (Bavaria, Germany) in order to evaluate the possibility of fire use and intentional flint heat treatment performed by late Neanderthals. We analyzed 1113 flint pieces from the G-layer complex (~60 to 45 kya; Micoquian) and 946 from the lower-layer complex (~115 to 70 kya; Mousterian). Based on macroscopic traits associated with the exposure of flint to heat and fire, we assigned artifacts to one of three groups: burnt, unburnt, and possibly intentionally heated. Our results show that while both complexes demonstrate the clear presence of fire, fire is more common in the younger G-layer complex. Moreover, possibly intentionally heated pieces are significantly more frequent in the G-layer complex, especially among the tools and specifically among side scrapers, suggesting a link between heat treatment and the production of these tools, most probably due to their functional and cultural significance. We therefore suggest that the flint in the G-layer complex of Sesselfelsgrotte underwent intentional heat treatment. The proportions of burnt flint artifacts in both complexes suggest an intensification in fire use at the site over time, while the appearance of possibly intentionally heated artifacts in the G-layer complex suggests the development of this advanced pyrotechnology by Neanderthals sometime between these two timeframes. Our results are supported by sedimentological and faunal data. We view these results as further indication of the advanced cognitive and technological capabilities of Neanderthals, which did not fall short of those of early modern humans. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the site (insert on the top left), view from South to the Jurassic limestone formation of the Sesselfelsgrotte with Sesselfelsgrotte in the center (white square in the insert on the left), and view into the section (with labels indicating geological layers of the Eastern profile) (photo: FAU Erlangen–Nürnberg).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Absolute dates for the lower-layer complex and G-layer complex (highlighted in red) of Sesselfelsgrotte. AMS radiocarbon dates without contaminated outliers from the slope after the Richter [<a href="#B29-quaternary-06-00052" class="html-bibr">29</a>] and calibrated with OxCal v4.4. Thermoluminescence (TL) dates as mean from several dates after Richter et al. [<a href="#B30-quaternary-06-00052" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flint artifacts from the G-layer complex showing evidence of burning: crazing, color change, potlids, fractures, and cracks. (<b>A</b>) Debris; (<b>B</b>) broken flake; (<b>C</b>) debris; (<b>D</b>) chip; (<b>E</b>) chip; (<b>F</b>) flake; (<b>G</b>) broken flake; (<b>H</b>) broken flake. A piece of debris is defined as an artifact missing any distinguishable typo-technological traits that is larger than 2 mm. A broken flake is defined as an artifact with a ventral face missing the bulb of percussion. A chip is defined as an artifact missing distinguishable typo-technological traits, smaller than 2 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flint artifacts from the lower-layer complex showing evidence of burning: crazing, color change, potlids, fractures, and cracks. (<b>A</b>) Flake; (<b>B</b>) debris; (<b>C</b>) debris; (<b>D</b>) debris; (<b>E</b>) flake; (<b>F</b>) debris; (<b>G</b>) broken flake; (<b>H</b>) debris. Debris is defined as an artifact missing any distinguishable typo-technological traits, larger than 2 mm. A broken flake is defined as an artifact with a ventral face missing the bulb of percussion. A chip is defined as an artifact missing distinguishable typo-technological traits, smaller than 2 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) The proportions of possibly intentionally heated artifacts by categories in both complexes. (<b>b</b>) The proportions of possibly intentionally heated pieces among the tools in both complexes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) The breakdown of each fire-associated trait among the 22 scrapers of the G-layer complex. The dashed line separates the heating-related traits from the traits associated with undesired thermal damage; (<b>b</b>) the breakdown of each fire-associated trait among the full sample of the lower-layer complex. The dashed line separates the heating-related traits from the traits associated with undesired thermal damage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Possibly intentionally heated side scrapers side scrapers from the G-layer complex. Each letter represents both views—ventral and dorsal—of the same artifact.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Examples of evident features from the lower-layer complex and G-layer complex interpreted as fireplaces. Except for the fireplace of Layer M1, which is shown in side view and was documented during sampling for micromorphological analysis in 2023, all features were documented in plane view during the excavations of G. Freund [<a href="#B25-quaternary-06-00052" class="html-bibr">25</a>] (photos: archive of FAU Erlangen–Nürnberg).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic mapping of evident combustion features identified as fireplaces in the lower-layer complex and G-layer complex of Sesselfelsgrotte, with an indication of the layer. The resolution is one square meter. In cases of more than one fireplace per square meter, symbols were arranged to fit. In one case of the lower-layer complex, when dealing with fireplace in squares A4/B4 of layer M1, the feature was prominently larger than one square meter. Letters within the red markings of the combustion features identified represent their labelling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Boxplot of relative frequencies (percentages) of burnt faunal remains in the two studied complexes (whisker length: one sigma, quartile method: interpolation; data taken from [<a href="#B27-quaternary-06-00052" class="html-bibr">27</a>], <a href="#quaternary-06-00052-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a> and <a href="#quaternary-06-00052-t006" class="html-table">Table 6</a> for the lower-layer complex and from Rathgeber, in preparation for the G-layer complex; for the complete data on burnt and unburnt faunal remains, see <a href="#quaternary-06-00052-t005" class="html-table">Table 5</a> of this article).</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 3158 KiB  
Article
Lower Paleolithic Shaped Stone Balls—What Is Next? Some Cultural–Cognitive Questions
by Ella Assaf, Javier Baena Preysler and Emiliano Bruner
Quaternary 2023, 6(4), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat6040051 - 1 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1857
Abstract
Shaped stone balls (SSBs) were an integral part of human culture across the Old World for nearly 2 million years. They are one of the oldest implements made and used by humans. In this significant era, which was characterised by biological and cultural [...] Read more.
Shaped stone balls (SSBs) were an integral part of human culture across the Old World for nearly 2 million years. They are one of the oldest implements made and used by humans. In this significant era, which was characterised by biological and cultural transformations, these round implements were a stable hallmark throughout the Lower Paleolithic period and beyond. However, while much research progress has been made in other stone tool categories, and despite the increased research efforts in recent years, attempts to define SSB function and typology have remained inconclusive, and broader cultural and cognitive aspects related to their production techniques, use and dispersal have yet to be explored in depth. What is the significance of their continuous presence and wide geographical distribution? What do these imply regarding the cognitive abilities of Oldowan and Acheulian humans? In this paper, we turn the spotlight on these enigmatic items. We address unresolved issues and explore the ergonomic and perceptual properties stimulated by the geometry of these items. We show that stone ball variability matches (modern) human hand palm variability. Moreover, when using SSBs in percussion activities, they are handled with the entire palm. Following, we discuss the role of SSBs in the context of socio-cultural processes. We suggest that SSBs reflect some of the earliest evidence in human history of a specific form that was conceptualised and recurrently acted upon. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Shaped stone ball made of carbonatic rock from Qesem Cave, Israel, dated back to earlier than 300,000 BP (by Rodika Pinhas).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A sample of shaped stone balls from Qesem Cave, dated to earlier than 300,000 BP. As is evident, some items have smoother faces compared to others with more angular morphologies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An experimental SSB replica made of limestone used for bone breaking. It can be seen that while some areas are more angular, showing high ridges and detachments, other areas (showing white dots) are smoother. The smooth areas were used for bone breaking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Hand palm (black dots) and stone ball (red dots) length and width. A preliminary analysis of covariance supports differences in the intercept (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001) but not in the slope (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.80). Namely, despite their differences in size, the modern human palm and the stone balls do vary with the same pattern of proportions. In particular, stone balls are shorter than the human palm, but display a similar range of width. Data from [<a href="#B30-quaternary-06-00051" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B52-quaternary-06-00051" class="html-bibr">52</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A principal component analysis of the chopper (red dots) and handaxe (blue dots) shape (including the outline and the position of the maximum thickness) showing that the first axis of variation is due to elongation, while the second is due to the longitudinal position of the maximum thickness. A perfect sphere (black dot), in this case, lies in the centre of the choppers’ range. Data from [<a href="#B55-quaternary-06-00051" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop