[go: up one dir, main page]

Next Issue
Volume 3, June
Previous Issue
Volume 2, December
 
 

Atmosphere, Volume 3, Issue 1 (March 2012) – 12 articles , Pages 1-245

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
265 KiB  
Article
Unveiling Assigned Amount Unit (AAU) Trades: Current Market Impacts and Prospects for the Future
by Elizabeth Lokey Aldrich and Cassandra L. Koerner
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 229-245; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010229 - 7 Mar 2012
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 8815
Abstract
The sale of assigned amount units (AAUs) from countries whose emissions have declined since their baseline year under the Kyoto Protocol has led critics to be skeptical of carbon markets due to the lack of actual emission reductions that occur as a result [...] Read more.
The sale of assigned amount units (AAUs) from countries whose emissions have declined since their baseline year under the Kyoto Protocol has led critics to be skeptical of carbon markets due to the lack of actual emission reductions that occur as a result of these trades. This policy review describes the historical context of AAU trading, current market price and volumes, and environmental and economic impacts of the current AAU trading rules. Options for how to handle current, and prevent the creation of future, surplus AAUs are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Assigned amount unit (AAU) Sales. [<a href="#B19-atmosphere-03-00229" class="html-bibr">19</a>]</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Assigned amount unit (AAU) Purchases. [<a href="#B19-atmosphere-03-00229" class="html-bibr">19</a>]</p>
Full article ">
1897 KiB  
Article
Numerical Simulation of the Global Neutral Wind System of the Earth’s Middle Atmosphere for Different Seasons
by Igor V. Mingalev, Victor S. Mingalev and Galina I. Mingaleva
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 213-228; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010213 - 5 Mar 2012
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 6860
Abstract
A non-hydrostatic model of the global neutral wind system of the Earth’s atmosphere, developed earlier, is utilized to simulate the large-scale global circulation of the middle atmosphere for conditions of different seasons. In the model calculations, not only the horizontal components, but also [...] Read more.
A non-hydrostatic model of the global neutral wind system of the Earth’s atmosphere, developed earlier, is utilized to simulate the large-scale global circulation of the middle atmosphere for conditions of different seasons. In the model calculations, not only the horizontal components, but also the vertical component of the neutral wind velocity, are obtained by means of a numerical solution of a generalized Navier-Stokes equation for compressible gas, so the hydrostatic equation is not applied. Moreover, the global temperature field is assumed to be a given distribution, (i.e., the input parameter of the model) and obtained from one of the existing empirical models. The results of simulation indicate that the horizontal non-uniformity of the neutral gas temperature, which is distinct in different seasons, ought to considerably influence the formation of the global neutral wind system in the middle atmosphere, in particular, the large-scale circumpolar vortices of the northern and southern hemispheres. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The distributions of the given neutral gas temperature (top panel), vector of the calculated horizontal component of the neutral wind velocity (middle panel), and calculated vertical component of the neutral wind velocity (bottom panel) as functions of longitude and latitude at the altitude of 50 km, obtained for 16 January. The temperature is given in K and wind velocities are given in m/s, with positive direction of the vertical component being upward.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The same as in <a href="#atmosphere-03-00213-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> but obtained for 16 April.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The same as in <a href="#atmosphere-03-00213-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> but obtained for 16 July.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The same as in <a href="#atmosphere-03-00213-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> but obtained for 16 October.</p>
Full article ">
209 KiB  
Review
Anthropogenic Climate Change and Allergic Diseases
by James Blando, Leonard Bielory, Viann N. Nguyen-Feng, Rafael Diaz and Hueiwang Anna Jeng
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 200-212; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010200 - 28 Feb 2012
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 10888
Abstract
Climate change is expected to have an impact on various aspects of health, including mucosal areas involved in allergic inflammatory disorders that include asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis and anaphylaxis. The evidence that links climate change to the exacerbation and the development of [...] Read more.
Climate change is expected to have an impact on various aspects of health, including mucosal areas involved in allergic inflammatory disorders that include asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis and anaphylaxis. The evidence that links climate change to the exacerbation and the development of allergic disease is increasing and appears to be linked to changes in pollen seasons (duration, onset and intensity) and changes in allergen content of plants and their pollen as it relates to increased sensitization, allergenicity and exacerbations of allergic airway disease. This has significant implications for air quality and for the global food supply. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Seasonal trends in asthma hospitalization related to the presence of aeroallergens. Source: New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, 2003–2004; NJ Hospital Discharge file (UB-92) ICD-9-CM code: Asthma 493.0–493.9 as the primary diagnosis [<a href="#B62-atmosphere-03-00200" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">
805 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Transferability of the Regional Climate Model REMO to Different COordinated Regional Climate Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX) Regions
by Daniela Jacob, Alberto Elizalde, Andreas Haensler, Stefan Hagemann, Pankaj Kumar, Ralf Podzun, Diana Rechid, Armelle Reca Remedio, Fahad Saeed, Kevin Sieck, Claas Teichmann and Christof Wilhelm
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 181-199; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010181 - 21 Feb 2012
Cited by 225 | Viewed by 19901
Abstract
The transferability of the regional climate model REMO with a standard setup over different regions of the world has been evaluated. The study is based on the idea that the modeling parameters and parameterizations in a regional climate model should be robust to [...] Read more.
The transferability of the regional climate model REMO with a standard setup over different regions of the world has been evaluated. The study is based on the idea that the modeling parameters and parameterizations in a regional climate model should be robust to adequately simulate the major climatic characteristic of different regions around the globe. If a model is not able to do that, there might be a chance of an “overtuning” to the “home-region”, which means that the model physics are tuned in a way that it might cover some more fundamental errors, e.g., in the dynamics. All simulations carried out in this study contribute to the joint effort by the international regional downscaling community called COordinated Regional climate Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX). REMO has been integrated over six CORDEX domains forced with the so-called perfect boundary conditions obtained from the global reanalysis dataset ERA-Interim for the period 1989 to 2008. These six domains include Africa, Europe, North America, South America, West Asia and the Mediterranean region. Each of the six simulations was conducted with the identical model setup which allows investigating the transferability of a single model to regions with substantially different climate characteristics. For the consistent evaluation over the different domains, a new evaluation framework is presented by combining the Köppen-Trewartha climate classification with temperature-precipitation relationship plots and a probability density function (PDF) skill score method. The evaluation of the spatial and temporal characteristics of simulated precipitation and temperature, in comparison to observational datasets, shows that REMO is able to simulate the mean annual climatic features over all the domains quite reasonably, but still some biases remain. The regions over the Amazon and near the coast of major upwelling regions have a significant warm bias. Wet and dry biases appear over the mountainous regions and East Africa, respectively. The temperature over South America and precipitation over the tundra and highland climate of West Asia are misrepresented. The probable causes leading to these biases are discussed and ideas for improvements are suggested. The annual cycle of precipitation and temperature of major catchments in each domain are also well represented by REMO. The model has performed well in simulating the inter- and intra-seasonal characteristics of different climate types in different regions. Moreover, the model has a high ability in representing the general characteristics of different climate types as measured by the probability density function (PDF) skill score method. Although REMO seems to perform best over its home domain in Europe (domain of development and testing), the model has simulated quite well the climate characteristics of other regions with the same set of parameterization options. Therefore, these results lead us to the conclusion that REMO is well suited for long-term climate change simulations to examine projected future changes in all these regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Orography (m) of the 6 COordinated Regional Climate Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX) model domains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The derived Köppen-Trewartha (K-T) climate classification based on the 30-year mean of the CRUv3.0 dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Differences of simulated and observed (CRU) annual mean air temperature (2 m height) in [°C]; (<b>b</b>) Relative annual mean differences between simulated and observed (CRU) precipitation in [%]. The period considered is 1989 to 2006.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Annual cycles of (<b>a</b>) Precipitation [mm/month] (<b>b</b>) Temperature [°C] of selected catchments over each domain. Black and Red curves denote the CRU observations and REMO results respectively. The period considered is 1989 to 2006.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Seasonal Climate types Ar (<b>a</b>) and Dc (<b>b</b>). Each group of data represents observations and model results. Each dot represents the monthly mean value of precipitation and temperature in each month of the corresponding season. Seasons at each plot are identified by their different temperature-precipitation regime that results in two clusters of two groups of data. The seasons were chosen to represent the periods in which precipitation and/or temperature maximum and minimum values take place throughout the year, in this way, maximal annual amplitude is represented, note that the Ar climate type in Africa has two wet periods in the year (March, April, May and September, October, November), then June, July, August was selected as the dry season. The mean for both variables, temperature and precipitation, is represented by a square or a circle for each season. The bars represent the standard deviation. The percentage values correspond to the area covered by the climate type with respect to the total land area in the region. The period considered is 1989 to 2006.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Probability density function (PDF) Skill scores for (<b>a</b>) temperature (T) and (<b>b</b>) precipitation (P). Example PDF results in selected regions: temperate continental climate (Dc) over Europe (a and b, left); and tropical humid climate (Ar) over Africa (a and b, right). The temperature and precipitation PDF curves for the observed (black) and simulated (red) distributions are shown. The precipitation plots are in logarithmic scale and the probability values shown are equal or greater than 10<sup>−5</sup>. (<b>c</b>) Summary of the PDF skill scores for all climate types. The last column shows the weighted mean of PDF skill scores (W_mean_CT) across different domains for every climate type. The period considered is 1989 to 2006.</p>
Full article ">
1426 KiB  
Article
Pre-Harvest Sugarcane Burning: Determination of Emission Factors through Laboratory Measurements
by Daniela de Azeredo França, Karla Maria Longo, Turibio Gomes Soares Neto, José Carlos Santos, Saulo R. Freitas, Bernardo F. T. Rudorff, Ely Vieira Cortez, Edson Anselmo and João Andrade Carvalho, Jr.
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 164-180; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010164 - 15 Feb 2012
Cited by 67 | Viewed by 13763
Abstract
Sugarcane is an important crop for the Brazilian economy and roughly 50% of its production is used to produce ethanol. However, the common practice of pre-harvest burning of sugarcane straw emits particulate material, greenhouse gases, and tropospheric ozone precursors to the atmosphere. Even [...] Read more.
Sugarcane is an important crop for the Brazilian economy and roughly 50% of its production is used to produce ethanol. However, the common practice of pre-harvest burning of sugarcane straw emits particulate material, greenhouse gases, and tropospheric ozone precursors to the atmosphere. Even with policies to eliminate the practice of pre-harvest sugarcane burning in the near future, there is still significant environmental damage. Thus, the generation of reliable inventories of emissions due to this activity is crucial in order to assess their environmental impact. Nevertheless, the official Brazilian emissions inventory does not presently include the contribution from pre-harvest sugarcane burning. In this context, this work aims to determine sugarcane straw burning emission factors for some trace gases and particulate material smaller than 2.5 μm in the laboratory. Excess mixing ratios for CO2, CO, NOX, UHC (unburned hydrocarbons), and PM2.5 were measured, allowing the estimation of their respective emission factors. Average estimated values for emission factors (g kg−1 of burned dry biomass) were 1,303 ± 218 for CO2, 65 ± 14 for CO, 1.5 ± 0.4 for NOX, 16 ± 6 for UHC, and 2.6 ± 1.6 for PM2.5. These emission factors can be used to generate more realistic emission inventories and therefore improve the results of air quality models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Emissions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Illustrative drawing of the combustion chamber and (<b>b</b>) interior of the combustion chamber, emphasizing the hood coupled to the chimney and the burning tray positioned on top of the balance [<a href="#B26-atmosphere-03-00164" class="html-bibr">26</a>]; (<b>c</b>) soil placed in the burning tray; (<b>d</b>) biomass placed in the burning tray.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of the typical pattern of the combustion process observed in one of the experiments conducted in the laboratory. Normalized data, as a function of time: gas emissions and their relation with the combustion phases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Observed pattern of the combustion process of the sample with the greatest registered humidity content. Normalized data, as a function of time: gas emissions and their relation with the combustion phases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Graphical representation of the emission factors (EF) for CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NO<sub>X</sub>, and UHC <span class="html-italic">versus</span> the modified combustion efficiency (MCE).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in the average concentration (μg/m<sup>3</sup>) of PM<sub>2.5</sub> emitted during the burning period in the experiments conducted in 2010.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variation in the average diameter (μm) of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> emitted during the burning period in the experiments conducted in 2010.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Real-time emission factors for PM<sub>2.5</sub>.</p>
Full article ">
3698 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Uncertainties in African Biomass Burning Emission Estimates on Modeling Global Air Quality, Long Range Transport and Tropospheric Chemical Lifetimes
by Jason E. Williams, Michiel van Weele, Peter F. J. van Velthoven, Marinus P. Scheele, Catherine Liousse and Guido R. van der Werf
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 132-163; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010132 - 9 Feb 2012
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 7860
Abstract
The chemical composition of the troposphere in the tropics and Southern Hemisphere (SH) is significantly influenced by gaseous emissions released from African biomass burning (BB). Here we investigate how various emission estimates given in bottom-up BB inventories (GFEDv2, GFEDv3, AMMABB) affect simulations of [...] Read more.
The chemical composition of the troposphere in the tropics and Southern Hemisphere (SH) is significantly influenced by gaseous emissions released from African biomass burning (BB). Here we investigate how various emission estimates given in bottom-up BB inventories (GFEDv2, GFEDv3, AMMABB) affect simulations of global tropospheric composition using the TM4 chemistry transport model. The application of various model parameterizations for introducing such emissions is also investigated. There are perturbations in near-surface ozone (O3) and carbon monoxide (CO) of ~60–90% in the tropics and ~5–10% in the SH between different inventories. Increasing the update frequency of the temporal distribution to eight days generally results in decreases of between ~5 and 10% in near-surface mixing ratios throughout the tropics, which is larger than the influence of increasing the injection heights at which BB emissions are introduced. There are also associated differences in the long range transport of pollutants throughout the SH, where the composition of the free troposphere in the SH is sensitive to the chosen BB inventory. Analysis of the chemical budget terms reveals that the influence of increasing the tropospheric CO burden due to BB on oxidative capacity of the troposphere is mitigated by the associated increase in NOx emissions (and thus O3) with the variations in the CO/N ratio between inventories being low. For all inventories there is a decrease in the tropospheric chemical lifetime of methane of between 0.4 and 0.8% regardless of the CO emitted from African BB. This has implications for assessing the effect of inter-annual variability in BB on the annual growth rate of methane. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Emissions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Comparison of the monthly African (34°S–36°N, 20°W–40°E) emission totals for (left) NO<sub>x</sub> and (middle) CO in Tg N/month and Tg CO/month, respectively. The seasonal variation in the corresponding CO/N ratio is also shown (right). The inventories are: (<b><sup>__</sup></b>) GFEDv2, (<sup>.…</sup>) GFEDv3 and (---) AMMABB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The temporal distribution in African BB for (top to bottom) January, April, July and October during 2006 as provided in the GFEDv3 emission inventory. The corresponding CO/N ratio is also provided for all months.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The percentage difference in the monthly BB emission fluxes from Africa (34°S–34°N, 20°W–40°E) between the GFEDv2 and GFEDv2 8-day emission inventories. Also shown is the absolute difference in Tg CO and Gg N per month. The differences are calculated as (8-DAY-MONTHLY)/MONTHLY × 100.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relative percentage differences in the global near-surface concentrations for (<b>a</b>) CO; (<b>b</b>) O<sub>3</sub>; (<b>c</b>) NO<sub>x</sub> and (<b>d</b>) OH for seasons DJF (left) and JJA (right) between GFEDv3 and AMMABB. The relative differences are calculated as ((AMMABB-GFEDv3)/GFEDv3) × 100.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The relative percentage differences in the global near-surface concentrations for (<b>a</b>) CO; (<b>b</b>) O<sub>3</sub>; (<b>c</b>) NO<sub>x</sub>; and (<b>d</b>) OH for seasons DJF (left) and JJA (right) between GFEDv2 and 8-DAY. The relative differences are calculated as (8-DAY-GFEDv2)/GFEDv2) × 100.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The seasonal cycle of surface CO in Africa and the Southern Hemisphere. The NOAA ESRL measurements stations shown are (<b>Top</b> row) Assekram (23.1°N, 5.3°E), Ascension Island (7.9°S, 14.4°W), Crozet Island (46.3°S, 51.5°E); (<b>Middle</b> row) Seychelles (4.7°S, 55.2°E), Easter Island (27.2°S, 109.5°W), American Samoa (14.3°S, 170.6°W); (<b>Bottom</b> row) Christmas Island (1.4°N, 157.1°W), Tierra del Fuego (54.9°S, 68.5°W) and Syowa Antarctica (69.0°S, 39.6°E). The simulations shown are NONE (black), GFEDv3 (red) and AMMABB (blue).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Residual values between the monthly mean CO mixing ratios at the surface for the GFEDv2 and 8-DAY simulations. The residuals are calculated by dividing the model monthly means by the observational monthly means at selected stations from the NOAA ESRL network. The measurements stations shown are (top row) Seychelles (4.7°S, 55.2°E), Crozet Island (46.3°S, 51.5°E); (middle row) Ascension Island (7.9°S, 14.4°W), Tierra del Fuego(54.9°S, 68.5°W) and (bottom row) Palmer (64.5°S, 0.4°W) and Syowa Antarctica (69.0°S, 39.6°E). The simulations shown are GFEDv2 (blue) and 8-DAY (red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The relative percentage differences in the global concentrations for (<b>a</b>) CO; (<b>b</b>) O<sub>3</sub>; (<b>c</b>) NO<sub>x</sub>; and (<b>d</b>) OH between the GFEDv3 and AMMABB simulations for seasons DJF (left) and JJA (right) in the middle troposphere of the atmosphere at ~550 hPa. The difference is calculated as (AMMABB-GFEDv3)/GFEDv3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Seasonal comparisons of co-located tropospheric ozone profile composites for seasons DJF (<b>Top</b>) and JJA (<b>Bottom</b>). The soundings stations shown are (<b>Left</b>) Paramaribo (5.8°N, 55.2°W) and (<b>Right</b>) La Reunion Island (21.1°S, 55.5°E), with the measurements taken from the SHADOZ database. The black line represents the measurements along with the 1-σ deviation of the seasonal means, with the number of observations used being shown in the top left of each panel. Three simulations are shown: NONE (blue), GFEDv3 (red) and AMMABB (green).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The relative percentage differences in the global concentrations for (<b>a</b>) CO; (<b>b</b>) O<sub>3</sub>; (<b>c</b>) NO<sub>x</sub>; and (<b>d</b>) OH between the GFEDv2 and 8-DAY simulations for seasons DJF (left) and JJA (right) in the middle troposphere of the atmosphere at ~550 hPa. The difference is calculated as (8-DAY-GFEDv2)/GFEDv2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The relative percentage differences in the zonal annual mean concentrations for (<b>a</b>) CO; (<b>b</b>) O<sub>3</sub>; (<b>c</b>) NO<sub>x</sub>; and (<b>d</b>) OH between the AMMABB and AMMABB_LOWNOX simulations. The differences are calculated as (AMMABB_LOWNOX-AMMABB)/AMMABB ×100.</p>
Full article ">
318 KiB  
Communication
Trends in Intense Typhoon Minimum Sea Level Pressure
by Stephen L. Durden
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 124-131; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010124 - 31 Jan 2012
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5802
Abstract
A number of recent publications have examined trends in the maximum wind speed of tropical cyclones in various basins. In this communication, the author focuses on typhoons in the western North Pacific. Rather than maximum wind speed, the intensity of the storms is [...] Read more.
A number of recent publications have examined trends in the maximum wind speed of tropical cyclones in various basins. In this communication, the author focuses on typhoons in the western North Pacific. Rather than maximum wind speed, the intensity of the storms is measured by their lifetime minimum sea level pressure (MSLP). Quantile regression is used to test for trends in storms of extreme intensity. The results indicate that there is a trend of decreasing intensity in the most intense storms as measured by MSLP over the period 1951–2010. However, when the data are broken into intervals 1951–1987 and 1987–2010, neither interval has a significant trend, but the intensity quantiles for the two periods differ. Reasons for this are discussed, including the cessation of aircraft reconnaissance in 1987. The author also finds that the average typhoon intensity is greater in El Nino years, while the intensity of the strongest typhoons shows no significant relation to El Nino Southern Oscillation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Locations (north latitude and east longitude) at which minimum sea level pressure (MSLP) was reached for typhoons with minimum MSLP &lt;905 hPa. Green triangles are for El Nino years, blue diamonds are for La Nina years, and red squares are for neutral years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scatterplot showing the minimum World Meteorological Organization (WMO) MSLP of western Pacific typhoons 1951–2010. Black dashed line is the usual least-squares regression line. The solid red line toward the bottom of the plot is the 1% quantile regression line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatterplot showing the minimum WMO MSLP of western Pacific typhoons 1951–2010, as in <a href="#atmosphere-03-00124-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> but plotted <span class="html-italic">versus</span> Southern Oscillation Index (SOI). Black dashed line is the usual least-squares regression line. The solid red line toward the bottom of the image is the 1% quantile regression line.</p>
Full article ">
1282 KiB  
Article
An Evaluation of Modeled Plume Injection Height with Satellite-Derived Observed Plume Height
by Sean M. Raffuse, Kenneth J. Craig, Narasimhan K. Larkin, Tara T. Strand, Dana Coe Sullivan, Neil J. M. Wheeler and Robert Solomon
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 103-123; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010103 - 18 Jan 2012
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 9740
Abstract
Plume injection height influences plume transport characteristics, such as range and potential for dilution. We evaluated plume injection height from a predictive wildland fire smoke transport model over the contiguous United States (U.S.) from 2006 to 2008 using satellite-derived information, including plume top [...] Read more.
Plume injection height influences plume transport characteristics, such as range and potential for dilution. We evaluated plume injection height from a predictive wildland fire smoke transport model over the contiguous United States (U.S.) from 2006 to 2008 using satellite-derived information, including plume top heights from the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) Plume Height Climatology Project and aerosol vertical profiles from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP). While significant geographic variability was found in the comparison between modeled plumes and satellite-detected plumes, modeled plume heights were lower overall. In the eastern U.S., satellite-detected and modeled plume heights were similar (median height 671 and 660 m respectively). Both satellite-derived and modeled plume injection heights were higher in the western U.S. (2345 and 1172 m, respectively). Comparisons of modeled plume injection height to satellite-derived plume height at the fire location (R2 = 0.1) were generally worse than comparisons done downwind of the fire (R2 = 0.22). This suggests that the exact injection height is not as important as placement of the plume in the correct transport layer for transport modeling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Emissions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Example of the method for identifying days and times when the CALIPSO orbit path intersected an HMS smoke plume. The HMS smoke plume data are indicated by blue shading, the CALIPSO orbit paths are shown as green lines, and red circles are the SMARTFIRE fire locations. Red lines indicate times when the CALIPSO orbit path intersected the HMS smoke plume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Model pathway used to develop estimates of plume height and smoke predictions for comparison to MISR and CALIOP observations. FCCS, Consume3.0, and FEPS are used as implemented in the BlueSky Framework, version 3.0.0 [<a href="#B36-atmosphere-03-00103" class="html-bibr">36</a>]. <sup>1</sup> Sullivan, <span class="html-italic">et al.</span> (<a href="http://www.getbluesky.org/smartfire" target="_blank">http://www.getbluesky.org/smartfire</a>) [<a href="#B37-atmosphere-03-00103" class="html-bibr">37</a>]; <sup>2</sup> Fuel Characterization Classification System (FCCS) (<a href="http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/fera/fccs/" target="_blank">http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/fera/fccs/</a>) [<a href="#B38-atmosphere-03-00103" class="html-bibr">38</a>]; <sup>3</sup> Consume 3.0 [<a href="#B39-atmosphere-03-00103" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; <sup>4</sup> Fire Emission Production Simulator (FEPS) (<a href="mailto:http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/fera/feps/index.shtml">http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/fera/feps/index.shtml</a>) [<a href="#B40-atmosphere-03-00103" class="html-bibr">40</a>]; <sup>5</sup> Sparse Matrix Operating Kernel Emissions (SMOKE), version 2.3 [<a href="#B41-atmosphere-03-00103" class="html-bibr">41</a>]; <sup>6</sup> Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, version 4.5.1 [<a href="#B42-atmosphere-03-00103" class="html-bibr">42</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of matched profiles for CALIOP 532 nm total attenuated backscatter data (top), CALIOP aerosol layers (middle), and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations from the BlueSky—CMAQ modeling system (bottom) for 28 August 2006.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Conceptual illustration of the methodology used to derive the CMAQ plume top equivalent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Regression analysis results for modeled plume heights (<span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis) <span class="html-italic">versus</span> the MISR observed plume heights (<span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis). Data points are color coded by region as shown on <a href="#atmosphere-03-00103-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. Also shown on the plot are the linear regression (solid line) and 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1 lines (dotted black lines). Note that a single value is off scale and not shown (MISR height = 2312 m; Modeled height = 18,699 m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Map of the fire locations and corresponding plume height data from the modeled (red bars) and satellite derived (blue bars) data. Regions are color coded to match data points shown in <a href="#atmosphere-03-00103-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Notched box-whisker plot of modeled (red) and MISR observed (blue) plume heights as a function of modeled area burned. The notch is centered on the median concentration, widening to the size of the box to illustrate a 95% confidence interval in the median concentration value. The edges of the box illustrate 25th and 75th percentile concentrations. The whiskers indicate the lowest and highest values that are within 1.5 times the interquartile range (IQR). Outliers (denoted by plus signs) fall between 1.5 and 3 times the IQR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Notched box-whisker plot of the modeled (red) and MISR observed (blue) plume heights as a function of modeled fuel loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Results of the regression analysis of the CALIOP observations (<span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis) and the modeled plume height data (<span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis). Data points are color coded by region as shown on <a href="#atmosphere-03-00103-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>. Also shown on the plot are the linear regression (solid line) and 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1 lines (dotted black lines).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Map of the fire locations used for the comparison of CALIOP observed plume heights (blue bars) to modeled plume heights (red bars). Regions are color coded to match data points shown in <a href="#atmosphere-03-00103-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>.</p>
Full article ">
295 KiB  
Review
Atmosphere: A Source of Pathogenic or Beneficial Microbes?
by Paraskevi N. Polymenakou
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 87-102; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010087 - 16 Jan 2012
Cited by 123 | Viewed by 21475
Abstract
The atmosphere has been described as one of the last frontiers of biological exploration on Earth. The composition of microbial communities in the atmosphere is still not well-defined, and taxonomic studies of bacterial diversity in the outdoor air have just started to emerge, [...] Read more.
The atmosphere has been described as one of the last frontiers of biological exploration on Earth. The composition of microbial communities in the atmosphere is still not well-defined, and taxonomic studies of bacterial diversity in the outdoor air have just started to emerge, whereas our knowledge about the functional potential of air microbiota is scant. When in the air, microorganisms can be attached to ambient particles and/or incorporated into water droplets of clouds, fog, and precipitation (i.e., rain, snow, hail). Further, they can be deposited back to earth’s surfaces via dry and wet deposition processes and they can possibly induce an effect on the diversity and function of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems or impose impacts to human health through microbial pathogens dispersion. In addition to their impact on ecosystem and public health, there are strong indications that air microbes are metabolically active and well adapted to the harsh atmospheric conditions. Furthermore they can affect atmospheric chemistry and physics, with important implications in meteorology and global climate. This review summarizes current knowledge about the ubiquitous presence of microbes in the atmosphere and discusses their ability to survive in the atmospheric environment. The purpose is to evaluate the atmospheric environment as a source of pathogenic or beneficial microbes and to assess the biotechnological opportunities that may offer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Effects of Air Pollution)
5236 KiB  
Article
An Investigation of Two Highest Ozone Episodes During the Last Decade in New England
by Tzu-Ling Lai, Robert Talbot and Huiting Mao
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 59-86; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010059 - 27 Dec 2011
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 6878
Abstract
This study examined the role of meteorological processes in two of the highest ozone (O3) episodes within the last decade at monitoring sites in southern New Hampshire (NH), USA. The highest O3 levels occurred on 14 August 2002 at Thompson [...] Read more.
This study examined the role of meteorological processes in two of the highest ozone (O3) episodes within the last decade at monitoring sites in southern New Hampshire (NH), USA. The highest O3 levels occurred on 14 August 2002 at Thompson Farm (TF) and 22 July 2004 at Castle Springs (CS). Ozone mixing ratios in the 2002 episode showed continual high values (>100 ppbv) at the beginning of the episode, and reached 151 ppbv on 14 August. The 2004 episode consisted of one day of high O3 (>100 ppbv) on 22 July at CS with the peak level of 111 ppbv. Our analysis suggested that the August 2002 high O3 event at TF occurred under stagnant synoptic high-pressure conditions that prevailed over the entire eastern USA for an unusually extended time period. The clear skies and stable meteorological conditions resulted in accumulation of pollutants in the boundary layer. At the same time, the mesoscale low-level-jet (LLJ) played an important role in transporting air masses from the polluted Mid-Atlantic areas to the Northeast. Local land-sea-breeze circulations also added to the impact of this event. Our examination showed that the unprecedented high levels of O3 on 22 July 2004 at CS was driven by two mechanisms, stratospheric intrusion and the Appalachian lee trough (APLT), which was not found during other O3 episodes at the site in the decade long data record. This study demonstrated that unusually high O3 levels at New England rural sites were driven by multi-scale processes, and the regional/local scale processes controlled the magnitude and timing of the local pollution episodes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Observation locations. AIRMAP sites are in red; National Weather Service site are in blue; radar wind observation sites are in dark yellow; and IONS-04 sites are in green.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>NCEP 1° × 1° geopotential height in 5-days average in 2002 (left) and 2004 (right) at 500 hPa (top) and 950 hPa (bottom). Shaded interval is 10 hPa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Potential temperature (Theda: θ) vertical profile at KIAD from 9–16 August 2002. X-axis is θ values; Y-axis is height in meter (m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Ozone averages during nighttime (00-11UTC) during 1–31 August 2002 at CS. The dotted line is the monthly-nighttime-average of August.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>AIRNOW hourly ozone data on 10–14 August 2002 (top), and 18–22 July 2004 (below). Values range is from 0 to 160-ppbv. The color interval is 16-ppbv.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Top: The ΔO3 (left) and ΔCO (right) (Δ = actual observed data minus its summer average) at TF during 9–19 August 2002; Below: The ΔO3 (left) and ΔCO (right) at CS on 18–26 July 2004.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The NCEP 1° × 1° data of streamline at 975 mb on 12 August 2002 at 06UTC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The radar wind observations at RUT, PSE, and STW. X-axis is observational date from 9–16 August. Y-axis is height in kilometers. Wind vector was drawn when data was available. Shaded areas are wind speeds higher than 8 m/s in 2 m/s interval [<a href="#B65-atmosphere-03-00059" class="html-bibr">65</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Surface winds (m/s) at 18Z on 14 August 2002 from Plymouth State Weather Center.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(Top) Local hourly wind observations from 10–14 August at KPSM and KBOS. X-axis is observational date from August 10 to 14; (Below) Hourly measurements at TF on 8/9~8/19 2002. Ozone is in green (use left axis), CO is in red (use right axis); and wind vector is in black (top line of the figure).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The observations of O<sub>3</sub> and wind directions at TF from 10–14 August. Radial scales present O<sub>3</sub> mixing ratios from 0 to 160 ppbv, in 10 ppbv interval. Angular degrees in clockwise present wind directions.In degrees of 0°–90° are northerly-to-easterly winds (I); 90°–180° are easterly-to-southerly winds (II); 180°–270° are southerly-to-westerly winds (III); and 270°–360° are westerly-to-northerly winds (IV).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The observations of O<sub>3</sub> (in green dots, left-axis), CO (in red dots, right-axis), and wind directions (in blue dots, right-axis) during afternoon time (18–23 UTC) from 1–31 August 2002 at Appledore Island.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(Top) The NCEP 2.5° × 2.5° Potential Vorticity (PV) at 1200 UTC at 300 mb on 20–22 July 2004. The shaded interval is 0.2 PV. (Bottom) NCEP 1° × 1° Total column ozone (Dobson) on 20–22 July 2004. The interval is 5 Dobson Units.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(Top) The NCEP 1° × 1° tropopause pressure on 21 July 2004. (Bottom) The 4-day anomaly (which was calculated by subtracting the climatology data of 1979–1995) of tropopause pressure from NCEP daily analysis data. The Northeast showed the positive anomaly of tropopause pressure (mean lower tropopause height) during 19–22 July [<a href="#B68-atmosphere-03-00059" class="html-bibr">68</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>IONs-04 Ozone vertical profiles from surface to 12 km during their launching days (July-August) at Narragansett, Wallops, and RH Brown. Ozone values &gt;70 ppbv are shaded. X-axis: launching dates. Y-axis: altitude in km.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>NCEP 1° × 1° geopotential height at 975 mb (right) and 950 mb (left) on 20 July 2004.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Forty-eight hours backward trajectories from NOAA HYSPLIT model starting at CS. The starting altitude 400 m is in red, 800 m in blue, and 1300 m in green [<a href="#B69-atmosphere-03-00059" class="html-bibr">69</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>(Top panel) The NCEP 2.5° × 2.5° Potential Vorticity (PV) at 300 mb for the four highest events. Images from left to right represent years from 2002 to 2005. The shaded interval is 0.2 PV. (Middle panel) NCEP 1° × 1° total column O<sub>3</sub> (in Dobson units) values are listed from 2002 (right) to 2005 (left). The interval is 5 Dobson Units. (Bottom panel) The NCEP 1° × 1° geopotential height at 975mb during the years of interest. A trough was present along the eastern coast in 2004.</p>
Full article ">
3036 KiB  
Article
Radar-Based Analysis of Convective Storms over Northwestern Italy
by Paolo Davini, Renzo Bechini, Roberto Cremonini and Claudio Cassardo
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 33-58; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010033 - 27 Dec 2011
Cited by 45 | Viewed by 5684
Abstract
Thunderstorms may cause large damages to infrastructures and population, therefore the possible identification of the areas with the highest occurrence of these events is especially relevant. Nevertheless, few extensive studies of these phenomena with high spatial and temporal resolution have been carried out [...] Read more.
Thunderstorms may cause large damages to infrastructures and population, therefore the possible identification of the areas with the highest occurrence of these events is especially relevant. Nevertheless, few extensive studies of these phenomena with high spatial and temporal resolution have been carried out in the Alps and none of them includes North-western Italy. To analyze thunderstorm events, the data of the meteorological radar network of the regional meteorological service of Piedmont region (ARPA Piemonte) have been used in this work. The database analyzed includes all thunderstorms occurred during the warm months (April to September) of a 6-year period (2005–2010). The tracks of each storm have been evaluated using a storm tracking algorithm. Several characteristics of the storms have been analyzed, such as the duration, the spatial and the temporaldistribution, the direction and the distance travelled. Obtained results revealed several important characteristics that may be useful for nowcasting purposes providing a first attempt of radar-based climatology in the considered region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The area considered during the analysis: triangles and dots show respectively the location of weather radars and of radiosounding stations; (<b>b</b>) The altimetry of the region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Maximum reflectivity map (projection to the ground of the maximum reflectivity along the vertical) from the <span class="html-italic">Bric della Croce</span> radar on 13 August 2010 at 20:20 UTC before (<b>a</b>) and after (<b>b</b>) the clutter removal procedure. The map is shown on a reduced 75 km range domain for clarity, with range rings overplotted every 25 km. The Alps (on the West and North side) and Apennines (South) are clearly visible in the original data (left panel), with peak reflectivities above 60 dBZ.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Reflectivity maxima averaged in each instant of the cell development for several track durations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Absolute maximum values of reflectivity (red line) and mean reflectivity (blue line), averaged for different track duration. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Number of events in function of the maximum of reflectivity recorded at the second instant (after 20 min) of the storm life cycle. The blue, green and red lines represent short, medium and long events, respectively. The black line represents the number of events within each class of reflectivity (2 dBZ).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of the IDs during the hours of the day. Hours are expressed in universal time (UTC). To get the local time, it is necessary to add 2 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mean values of maximum reflectivity and distance travelled by the cells as a function of the hour in which the cell has been detected for the first time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Oversampled spatial distribution of IDs density on the Northwestern Italy (IDs per square km). Redder areas indicate the presence of a greater number of IDs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution of IDs density over the Monviso area (contour lines) overplotted over topography (color scale).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of IDs density over the Torino area (contour lines) overplotted over topography (color scale).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spatial distribution of IDs density during different periods of the day: (<b>a</b>) night (20–04 UTC); (<b>b</b>) morning (04–12 UTC); (<b>c</b>) afternoon (12–15 UTC); and (<b>d</b>) evening (15–20 UTC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Frequency distribution of the direction of daily provenance of storms (in black) and of winds at different levels (in grey tones). The direction classes have been evaluated every 20°. Circles are drawn every 20 days; (<b>b</b>) Same as (<b>a</b>), but for the direction of provenance of storms in the different hours of the days. Circles are drawn every 100 storms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Spatial distribution of mean IDs density (colors) and track directions (vectors) over North-Western Italy. Arrow lengths represent the mean distance travelled. Averages have been evaluated for each 16 km grid box.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Spatial distribution of mean IDs density (colors) and track directions (vectors) over North-Western Italy in function of the wind mean direction in the layer 500–700 hPa. Arrow lengths represent the mean distance travelled. Averages have been evaluated for each 16 km grid box. (<b>a</b>) Eastern sector (directions from 0° to 180°); (<b>b</b>) South-South-Western sector (180°–240°); (<b>c</b>) Western sector (240°–300°); (<b>d</b>) North-North-Western sector (300°–360°).</p>
Full article ">
1590 KiB  
Review
A Review of Tropospheric Atmospheric Chemistry and Gas-Phase Chemical Mechanisms for Air Quality Modeling
by William R. Stockwell, Charlene V. Lawson, Emily Saunders and Wendy S. Goliff
Atmosphere 2012, 3(1), 1-32; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010001 - 21 Dec 2011
Cited by 65 | Viewed by 20805
Abstract
Gas-phase chemical mechanisms are vital components of prognostic air quality models. The mechanisms are incorporated into modules that are used to calculate the chemical sources and sinks of ozone and the precursors of particulates. Fifty years ago essential atmospheric chemical processes, such as [...] Read more.
Gas-phase chemical mechanisms are vital components of prognostic air quality models. The mechanisms are incorporated into modules that are used to calculate the chemical sources and sinks of ozone and the precursors of particulates. Fifty years ago essential atmospheric chemical processes, such as the importance of the hydroxyl radical, were unknown and crude air quality models incorporated only a few parameterized reactions obtained by fitting observations. Over the years, chemical mechanisms for air quality modeling improved and became more detailed as more experimental data and more powerful computers became available. However it will not be possible to incorporate a detailed treatment of the chemistry for all known chemical constituents because there are thousands of organic compounds emitted into the atmosphere. Some simplified method of treating atmospheric organic chemistry is required to make air quality modeling computationally possible. The majority of the significant differences between air quality mechanisms are due to the differing methods of treating this organic chemistry. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of atmospheric chemistry that is incorporated into air quality mechanisms and to suggest areas in which more research is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution Modeling: Reviews of Science Process Algorithms)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Typical ozone isopleth generated with the RADM mechanism [<a href="#B21-atmosphere-03-00001" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Excited oxygen atom (O(<sup>1</sup>D)) for the O<sub>3</sub> only case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>HO<sup>•</sup> and HO<sub>2</sub><sup>•</sup> radicals for the O<sub>3</sub> only case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Ozone mixing ratios for the O<sub>3</sub> only case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Ozone mixing ratios are shown for the NO<sub>2</sub> only case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Ozone mixing ratios are shown for the ethene cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The CH<sub>2</sub>OH-CH<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub><sup>•</sup>, radical mixing ratios are shown for the ethene cases. The number indicates the initial VOC/NO<sub>x</sub> ratio in ppbC/ppbN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Hydroperoxy radical, HO<sub>2</sub><sup>•</sup>, mixing ratios are shown for the ethene cases. The number indicates the initial VOC/NO<sub>x</sub> ratio in ppbC/ppbN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The uppermost curve is the time dependent NO<sub>2</sub> photolysis frequency divided by the rate constant for the O<sub>3</sub> + NO reaction. The lower plots are the ratio, [O<sub>3</sub>] × [NO]/[NO<sub>2</sub>], for the three ethene cases. The number indicates the initial VOC/NO<sub>x</sub> ratio in ppbC/ppbN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Hydroxyl radical, HO<sup>•</sup>, mixing ratios are shown for the ethene cases. The number indicates the initial VOC/NO<sub>x</sub> ratio in ppbC/ppbN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Nitrate radical mixing ratios for the ethene cases. The number indicates the initial VOC/NO<sub>x</sub> ratio in ppbC/ppbN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Nitric acid mixing ratios are shown for the ethene cases. The number indicates the initial VOC/NO<sub>x</sub> ratio in ppbC/ppbN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Hydrogen peroxide mixing ratios are shown for the ethene cases. The number indicates the initial VOC/NO<sub>x</sub> ratio in ppbC/ppbN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Organic peroxide mixing ratios are shown for the ethene cases. The number indicates the initial VOC/NO<sub>x</sub> ratio in ppbC/ppbN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Ozone, NO and NO<sub>2</sub> mixing ratios are shown for the polluted urban atmosphere case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Hydroxyl radical, nitrate radical and dinitrogen pentoxide mixing ratios are shown for the polluted urban atmosphere case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Production rates of HO<sup>•</sup> initiated through the photolysis of formaldehyde (red line) and the photolysis of O<sub>3</sub> (blue line) are shown for the polluted urban atmosphere case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Daytime relative production rates of HO<sup>•</sup> resulting from the photolysis of formaldehyde (red line) and the photolysis of O<sub>3</sub> (blue line) are shown for the polluted urban atmosphere case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>This figure shows the relative fraction of HO<sup>•</sup> that react with each class of VOC for the polluted urban atmosphere case. The time for the plot is noon on the second simulated day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>The mixing ratios of organic peroxy radicals by organic class are shown for the polluted urban atmosphere case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>The mixing ratio of HO<sub>2</sub><sup>•</sup> and the total mixing ratio of organic peroxy radicals are shown for the polluted urban atmosphere case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>The time dependent fate of the nitrogen containing species is shown as a stack plot for the polluted urban atmosphere case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Maximum O<sub>3</sub> mixing ratios on the first day as a function of temperature for the polluted urban atmosphere case.</p>
Full article ">
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop