Cox's Fragmenta II: Further Folios from History

CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE

INTRODUCTION

ARTICLES

COPYRIGHT

INTRODUCTION

Unsurprisingly, the content of Cox’s bewildering collection remained consistently inconsistent as its curator moved from 1822 (his seventieth year) to 1834. His sources – predominantly the newspapers of London and Birmingham – continued to feed the popular appetite for local, national and international news; the mixture is spiced with sport, rumour, fashion, gossip, satire and vituperation. What is unexpected is the mushrooming of content collected each year. While the first half of the ninety-four volumes covered a period of thirty years, the second part spans only ten. Why such an increase in the average?

The history of the press at the time offers no clues; there had certainly been no sudden drop in the price of a newspaper. Until 1836 the stamp duty on a paper stood at 4d, and furthermore King George’s six acts of 1819 had required all publishers and printers (of periodicals that cost less than 6d and were published one or more times a month) to post a bond to ensure their ‘good behaviour’. While newspaper consumption outside Britain was largely on the increase, these financial constraints on printers and publishers kept both prices high and readership relatively elite. Mr E.L. Bulwer, writer and MP for Lincoln 1832–41, declared in the House of Commons that the duty was a ‘tax on knowledge’ and that periodicals were a luxury.¹ On 14 June 1832, the day of Bulwer’s speech, a copy of The Times cost 7d – around the same time a plate of meat and pint of ale could be had for 9d.²

Knowing as little as we do about Cox himself, it would be guesswork to suggest personal reasons for his increased interest in obtaining copies of the day’s news (though one could reasonably imagine advancing years gave him a little more time to read). What can be gleaned from the Fragmenta is a growing concern for accuracy and order in his collection. In the earlier volumes of his scrapbook, articles were pasted roughly chronologically, but with no concern for pairing the piece with its date, or source publication; however, in later volumes articles are purposefully cut out to keep title and date. Often a column of text is pasted in its entirety. Sometimes whole papers are neatly folded and included. This decision to bracket articles with their particulars necessarily means more material is saved and the collection fills out.

What is also evident is that this concern for order leads Cox to interact with his materials in a slightly more critical way. On a few occasions he adds the date, publication title or even specific section of the paper by hand,³ and very rarely he even pens marginalia relating to the content. In the bottom gutter of the front page of The Times from Monday 14 March 1831 (v.87, p.60) we are greeted with the following in a clear hand: ‘Number Immense! 153 adverts! the whole amount to about eight hundred.’⁴ Not only did Cox collect and store the papers of his day voraciously, but he was also reading them with an eye for content and proportion.

Are we surprised that Cox chose to write down such thoughts? Whether or not the collection itself was kept private or opened to friends by Cox, we know it was his intention to leave the volumes that comprised his life’s work to the British Museum. He would have been increasingly conscious that at some point the trove would be examined, and so his pen’s rare incursions on to the pages of the Fragmenta must be seen as an aware form of self-display. The reference to the number of adverts, which goes beyond simply recording the figure, expresses a little overplayed astonishment and helps construct a ghost of his character within the collection. In most places the papers exist undisturbed, but in others the pen creeps in, reminding us whose guest we are. This quiet entrance raises a question: what kind of reader did Cox seek to be seen as?

The material selected is the first indication of Cox’s interests; but those pages that have been annotated are proof of a more active curiosity. Auction catalogues are included, the sum each object made often neatly filled in. Not only did he, or someone he knew, attend sales of furniture, coins, prints, books, paintings and so on, but what’s more, it seems, they stayed for the entire event and saw each object sold. Poems also appear, copied out or pasted among the cuttings, with one short verse titled ‘Upon the Death of Lord Nelson’ written by Cox himself. Within the Fragmenta there are also papers and notes, pasted complete with the names (in Cox’s hand) of the prominent individuals that presented him with the ephemera. The list includes Rear Admiral Sir Charles Cunningham, Matthias Attwood MP and a ‘Chandos’ who writes from Pall Mall (the Duke himself?).⁵ The collection also gains a cosmopolitan edge from the geographical range of the publications Cox obtained. Among others there are editions of Le Constitutionnel (France), The Conception-Bay Mercury (Canada) and The Canton Register (China).⁶

It’s easy to understand that like many men of his time Cox read the papers to stay abreast of events, but he is unusual in his desire to keep them. While others consigned their old papers to package wrapping or kindling, what compelled Cox to cut his up after reading and paste them into volumes? Why include other printed matter such as catalogues and speeches, before donating the results to the most impressive bibliographic institute he could?

The period in which Cox lived witnessed a huge number of fundamental transformations, changes George Eliot (writing of 1832) described as ‘the present quickening in the general pace of things’.⁷ The country moved from a collection of mainly rural settlements to expanding cities driven by steam and commerce; the government had begun combating epidemic disease with organised inoculation programmes; the new Metropolitan Police force was in action; parliamentary reform took place and the Far East and South America were opening up as potentially huge sources of trade and revenue. With change so ubiquitous, the daily paper must have been eagerly anticipated. These publications now offer a tremendous perspective on these past events – something Cox, with his collection destined for the sanctity of the British Museum, clearly anticipated. And he wasn’t alone. On Thursday 26 March 1801 an auction was held on the Strand. The advertisement read:

In this day’s sale will also be offered to the public an extraordinary COLLECTION of NEWSPAPERS, consisting of upwards of three hundred Volumes, perfect and half bound, from which the Literati may select Materials for forming a complete history of literature, and of the Times in which the newspapers were written.⁸

The literati, however, have not flocked to Cox’s Fragmenta. Indeed, apart from C.B. Oldman’s 1966 commentary on the work, it has never been – as far as we know – used by or useful to a soul. This can largely be put down to the difficulty of navigating the vast collection. To discover the newsworthy events of a particular day one would have to pluck a volume from