About this ebook
A WASHINGTON POST TOP 10 BOOK OF THE YEAR * A NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER and NEW YORK TIMES NOTABLE BOOK OF 2018
“A constant pleasure to read…Everybody who loves books should check out The Library Book.” —The Washington Post
“CAPTIVATING…DELIGHTFUL.” —Christian Science Monitor * “EXQUISITELY WRITTEN, CONSISTENTLY ENTERTAINING.” —The New York Times * “MESMERIZING…RIVETING.” —Booklist (starred review)
A dazzling love letter to a beloved institution—and an investigation into one of its greatest mysteries—from the bestselling author hailed as a “national treasure” by The Washington Post.
On the morning of April 29, 1986, a fire alarm sounded in the Los Angeles Public Library. As the moments passed, the patrons and staff who had been cleared out of the building realized this was not the usual fire alarm. As one fireman recounted, “Once that first stack got going, it was ‘Goodbye, Charlie.’” The fire was disastrous: it reached 2000 degrees and burned for more than seven hours. By the time it was extinguished, it had consumed four hundred thousand books and damaged seven hundred thousand more. Investigators descended on the scene, but more than thirty years later, the mystery remains: Did someone purposefully set fire to the library—and if so, who?
Weaving her lifelong love of books and reading into an investigation of the fire, award-winning New Yorker reporter and New York Times bestselling author Susan Orlean delivers a mesmerizing and uniquely compelling book that manages to tell the broader story of libraries and librarians in a way that has never been done before.
In The Library Book, Orlean chronicles the LAPL fire and its aftermath to showcase the larger, crucial role that libraries play in our lives; delves into the evolution of libraries across the country and around the world, from their humble beginnings as a metropolitan charitable initiative to their current status as a cornerstone of national identity; brings each department of the library to vivid life through on-the-ground reporting; studies arson and attempts to burn a copy of a book herself; reflects on her own experiences in libraries; and reexamines the case of Harry Peak, the blond-haired actor long suspected of setting fire to the LAPL more than thirty years ago.
Along the way, Orlean introduces us to an unforgettable cast of characters from libraries past and present—from Mary Foy, who in 1880 at eighteen years old was named the head of the Los Angeles Public Library at a time when men still dominated the role, to Dr. C.J.K. Jones, a pastor, citrus farmer, and polymath known as “The Human Encyclopedia” who roamed the library dispensing information; from Charles Lummis, a wildly eccentric journalist and adventurer who was determined to make the L.A. library one of the best in the world, to the current staff, who do heroic work every day to ensure that their institution remains a vital part of the city it serves.
Brimming with her signature wit, insight, compassion, and talent for deep research, The Library Book is Susan Orlean’s thrilling journey through the stacks that reveals how these beloved institutions provide much more than just books—and why they remain an essential part of the heart, mind, and soul of our country. It is also a master journalist’s reminder that, perhaps especially in the digital era, they are more necessary than ever.
Editor's Note
Dazzling love letter…
Part true-crime detective book, part history book filled with fascinating anecdotes, the newest book from Susan Orlean begins with a disastrous fire that consumed the Los Angeles Central Library in 1986 and the subsequent search for the suspected arsonist. Delight in discovery powers this book, and Orlean feeds readers’ curiosity.
Susan Orlean
Susan Orlean has been a staff writer at The New Yorker since 1992. She is the New York Times bestselling author of seven books, including The Library Book, Rin Tin Tin, Saturday Night, and The Orchid Thief, which was made into the Academy Award–winning film Adaptation. She lives with her family and her animals in Los Angeles and may be reached at SusanOrlean.com and on Substack at SusanOrlean.Substack.com.
Read more from Susan Orlean
The Orchid Thief: A True Story of Beauty and Obsession Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Writer's Library: The Authors You Love on the Books That Changed Their Lives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rin Tin Tin: The Life and the Legend Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Kind of Place: Travel Stories from a Woman Who's Been Everywhere Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDogs Rough and Smooth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Big New Yorker Book of Dogs Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bullfighter Checks Her Makeup: My Encounters with Extraordinary People Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSaturday Night Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Throw Me a Bone: 50 Healthy, Canine Taste-Tested Recipes for Snacks, Meals, and Treats Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Side of Paradise Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJoyride: A Memoir Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cornbread Nation 7: The Best of Southern Food Writing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2025 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Library Book
Related ebooks
The Shipping News: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Midnight at the Bright Ideas Bookstore: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Woman in the Room: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Castle: The Epic Story of Love, Loss, and American Royalty in the Nation's Largest Home Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Notorious Life: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Manhattan Beach: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tinkers: 10th Anniversary Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Five Tuesdays in Winter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Scent Keeper: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Memory Wall: Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dry: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Infinite Country: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Marriage of Opposites Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Jane Austen Society: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Night Tiger: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How It Always Is: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fifties Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ask Again, Yes: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Magician: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Candy House: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Shell Collector: Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Paris Library: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Four Seasons in Rome: On Twins, Insomnia, and the Biggest Funeral in the History of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Euphoria Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Final Revival of Opal & Nev Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Deep South Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confessions of a Bookseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Social History For You
Black AF History: The Un-Whitewashed Story of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Three Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Day the World Came to Town: 9/11 in Gander, Newfoundland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Seduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Thinking Clearly Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mother Tongue: English and How it Got that Way Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bowling Alone: Revised and Updated: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Whore Stories: A Revealing History of the World's Oldest Profession Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5God Is a Black Woman Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Residence: Inside the Private World of the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Alchemy: The Dark Art and Curious Science of Creating Magic in Brands, Business, and Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory: American Evangelicals in an Age of Extremism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Kind of People: Inside America's Black Upper Class Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Barracoon: The Story of the Last "Black Cargo" Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States: Teaching Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Library Book
1,594 ratings181 reviews
What our readers think
Readers find this title to be a fascinating and well-written exploration of the history of the LA library. The author's detailed research and descriptive storytelling create a captivating narrative that delves into the library's past, the fire incident, and the future of libraries. The book appeals to both history enthusiasts and fans of detective stories, offering a unique and engaging reading experience.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Dec 24, 2018
I love books about books but this is so much more. It's a story of the main branch of the Los Angeles Public Library that is anchored by a horrendous fire that occurred in 1986. Orlean interweaves her story with the employees, alleged arsonist, firefighters, the books and the building. Her research is outstanding and her elegant writing kept me reading. Thoroughly recommend this book. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Sep 29, 2021
Great writing and the intertwining of a detective story with the history of the LA library. I am a library nerd and a detective story geek so I was in heaven. This book could stand alone on its history component, detailing the different librarians and the fights to establish a respectable facility in downtown LA. But the description of the fire and resulting damage and repair plus the search for the origin of the blaze adds another dimension to this book. Even included is thoughts and trends on the future of our libraries.
The writing was a pleasure, clear and expressive and capable taking you into the center of the fire or watching patrons vying for computer time. I enjoyed the way her words sounded to my inner ear, if you know what I mean. So a double treat of a well researched book and very lovely words. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Apr 16, 2021
Incredible detailed research on LA central library’s history and descriptions of many persons who cared about the library’s purpose - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
May 19, 2020
I really liked this book, which is basically about the fire at the Central Library in LA in 1986. Orlean is a good writer and she knows how to make almost any subject interesting. She looks at so many aspects of the story: the science of fires, the story of the man charged with arson, the history of the library, the story of the Goodhue building (the library's home), the stories of many of the fascinating characters who are involved with the library, and Orlean's own connection with libraries. It's anything but dry, and I highly recommend it. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
May 19, 2020
WOW! This book was AMAZING!! I don't know if my feelings about the book are related to the fact that I had the privilege of working in a library for several years after my retirement from my "real job" or just that I have always loved libraries, but this book is one for the ages!
Every person who has ever worked in a library or been to a library or has heard of a library should read this book!! - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Mar 6, 2020
It's more riveting than a book of its subject matter has any business being, thanks to Orlean's ever-present passion for libraries and the Los Angeles library's rich history. - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Nov 9, 2019
A story of fire, libraries, and their place in our cultural pantheon. As an avid library patron, I wanted to like this book. I resonated with many of the quiet moments the author described, the collective hush and hum of being and working in a library. Unfortunately, most of the book was history, and her historical analysis had huge gaps. Despite covering 1800s to present day in the LA public library system, she doesn't even touch on the segregation of libraries, or how black folks weren't allowed access. She allows her historical subjects to drop in casually racist views with no judgement or analysis, providing tacit endorsement. And she refuses to note that white people are white, playing into a culture of "white as normal" and "black and brown as other." Given her recognition of the radical role libraries play in a society, this was hugely disappointing and predictably whitewashed. I left this book wondering what I was supposed to have learned, and won't be recommending it. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Nov 9, 2019
Orlean book is about a fire in 1986 that nearly destroyed the building and did destroy hundreds of thousands of books. That part of the story is but a small part of the 311 pages. Orlean discusses libraries in general, librarians, and the history of libraries. Many people have criticized the lack of organization in the book, and it’s true that Orlean does skip around chronologically, but I didn’t find that either distracting or hard to follow. I think if you are a book lover, a lover of libraries and librarians, you’ll enjoy this book as much as I did. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Nov 9, 2019
Hard to rate--3.5 seems a mite too low; 4 stars a mite too high. Very well-written exploration of public libraries generally, the Los Angeles Public Library specifically, with nerdy appeal to lovers of books. If this were vinyl, it would be deep cuts of LAPL covering esoteric and ephemeric inner workings of libraries, library finance, maintenance, and portraits of librarians, borrowers, and others central to LAPL over its years. Interwoven is coverage of a potential suspect in what may or may not have actually been arson in a fire that threatened to consume LAPL.Though billed as 'true crime,' that's really only a key thread in the library tapestry Orlean weaves. If you're looking for something in the true crime genre, this probably won't sate that for you.I LOVED the first part of the book, where Orlean describes a love of books and public libraries developed from childhood trips. That was beautiful and I think lifelong readers will relate to it. The rest of the book, while well-written, flagged for me. This was definitely a passion project for the author and it's wonderful it's been published to acclaim and interest. Libraries and their people are a deserving topic. But: this isn't so much a narrative as a collection of essays and observations all set at and involving LAPL. For me, reading this began to feel like indulging in a box of very high quality chocolates - beautifully crafted, deliciously rich and indulgent with a bite or two, but rapidly tiring if over-consumed.I finished, but towards the end, it felt more like a responsibility than sheer joy and pleasure. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Nov 9, 2019
Susan Orlean's "The Library Book" opens with a graphic account of a devastating fire that occurred on April 29, 1986. The blaze burned for more than seven hours and damaged or destroyed hundreds of thousands of books in Los Angeles's Central Library. The investigators declared that the blaze was deliberately set, and their prime suspect was Harry Peak, a charming but irresponsible man who "had a gift for drama and invention." Did Harry Peak commit arson and, if so, why? Orlean discusses this controversial case at length, and comes to some surprising conclusions.
A prodigious amount of research went into this absorbing work of non-fiction. We learn about the horrifying history of book burning, particularly during the Spanish Inquisition, the Nazi era, and China's Cultural Revolution. In addition, Orlean traces the Los Angeles Public Library's origins, back when the city was far from the sprawling metropolis it is now. In the early years, the library had a number of directors, some of whom were wildly eccentric. A few of them, however, were visionaries who worked tirelessly to expand the library and make it more responsive to their community's needs. Furthermore, Orlean includes poignant passages in which she recalls visiting the library as a child, and more recently, with her son. She notes that libraries have changed markedly but still remain a home away from home for their grateful patrons.
With her vivid descriptive writing and eye for unusual and revealing details, the author brings her quirky cast of characters to life. In addition, she delves into such subjects as how libraries deal with the homeless and mentally ill; what being a librarian means to those for whom this profession is not just a job, but a calling; and the many services that libraries provide that go far beyond making books readily available. In today's digital age, libraries remain indispensable by offering classes and workshops, career counseling, and a large variety of entertaining and enlightening programs. What has not changed is the egalitarian nature of these irreplaceable institutions. Knowing that even with the challenges that modern libraries face, they continue to bring tremendous pleasure to kids, teens, and seniors, is a source of comfort to Susan Orlean and to the rest of us, as well. This book is a unique, meticulously crafted, and eloquent reminder of the importance of free access to information. It is our responsibility to make sure that our precious places of learning continue to grow and flourish. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Nov 9, 2019
While this isn't the best, most cohesive book I've read, being a library person, I really enjoyed it. Although it's main premise is the LA Central Library fire, Orlean really wrote a book about the value and breadth of public library services. The history of the LA Central Library and the details of the fire and recovery all provide interesting segments... particularly in how libraries have evolved and the physical aspects of recovering (freezing and vacuum drying) damaged books. However, the book is a bit of an erratic read, jumping to/from unrelated topics.
I particularly enjoyed the mention of our hometown librarians at ACA and the Conversations in English program (which I facilitate for our library). But, in talking about historical library fires, I'm not sure how Orlean could have missed the burning of the Library of Congress and then the burning of the replacement LoC library provided by Thomas Jefferson. The LoC has a beautiful display of the latter of these - at least what remains. - Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5
May 11, 2025
I didn't finish this book. I was expecting fiction based on a true story, but this book is non-fiction. It started OK, but later I lost interest when it started rambling on and on. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Jul 26, 2025
Good background on how libraries developed and are run. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Jun 18, 2025
I enjoyed parts of this nonfiction book about . . . well, that was sort of the problem. Ostensibly, this book is about a library fire in the L.A. public library in the 1980s and the possible arsonist. But, actually, Susan Orlean meanders all over the topic of libraries, librarians, fire and what it does to books, arson, and libraries as community hubs. I never knew where she'd be going next and it bothered me. I suppose every topic had some worth and the topics were connected by the author's love of books and libraries, but I was sometimes bored and sometimes annoyed and sometimes fascinated. Too uneven for me to rate this very highly, though it did have some brilliant moments. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Jan 18, 2023
I really enjoyed this book, especially during corona quarantine. It made me happy. I enjoyed both the mystery of the library fire, and all the tidbits of library history. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Jan 3, 2023
Totally loved the book (which I listened to, enjoying Orlean’s voice as she read her own book).
I’ve always loved libraries and this book really reminded me of when I worked for the Columbus OH Library system. Also the parts about Orlean going to the library as a young girl made me remember fondly bringing my kids to the local library (Robbins Library, in Arlington Mass).
The history of the LA library system was engaging, as was the inconclusive search for the arsonist responsible for the burning of the LA Central library in the 80s.
Great book for a book and library lover! - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Mar 2, 2025
Fascinating history of a library and the libraries in history. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Dec 11, 2022
While the bits about the library were interesting, the telling was choppy. The science behind the saving of the books was fascinating. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Dec 8, 2022
Interesting book on what libraries do built around the tragic fire at L.A. Public Library in 1986. Has a lot of history and bios. of people in Calif. who started the library in So. Calif. Could have been a little shorter but very enjoyable. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Dec 18, 2024
The author made LA library history so interesting! Another wonderful book by Susan Orlean. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Sep 18, 2022
Part true crime, part history, part love letter to a library. Mostly enjoyable, maybe a few too many “in between” parts compared to the fire thread which wove the book together. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Nov 25, 2024
The author read the audio book herself. I didn't like her narration. I had to listen to it a little speed up. Interesting mixture of history. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Mar 15, 2022
I was an adult when the Los Angeles Central Library was destroyed by fire in 1986. I really have not recollection of it even though it kind of made national news. It happened the same week as Chernobyl and was overshadowed just a bit. This one of the tidbits you learn in Orlean's book on the fire. At first, I thought she was all over the place and wondered if I remembered liking The Orchid Thief as much as I thought I did. Then I began to enjoy the little side trips she took into the history of LA, librarianship, the LA public library, arson investigation, etc. I love how she began each chapter with book titles and their Dewey Decimal classification number related to the chapter's content. As I read, I tried to figure out how they related. Interesting read. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Oct 24, 2024
It's a bit cliché to describe a book as simultaneously being several different—even contradictory—things, but this is one case where it's quite true. Most prominently, I suppose, this book is focused on the mystery of the 1986 fire which destroyed the Los Angeles Public Library. That focus instantly cleaves into two separate narratives: One following the prime suspect in the case; the other detailing the library's (and the community's) effort to rally and rebuild the library to its glorious present state. These narratives are fully fleshed out, and each feels substantive on its own. But beyond this, Orlean also provides a historical account of the library's birth, growth, and development over nearly the last century and a half, and along the way has some things to say about the role libraries play in our public life overall.
I suppose by definition it's a dense book, as it packs all that into ~300 pages, but it doesn't feel dense. The narrative glides along; I found myself consistently excited to continue along with it. It doesn't read like fiction, the way some of the best creative nonfiction does. But if you enjoy nonfiction generally, as I do, I would definitely recommend it. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Feb 28, 2022
The better title of this book is "The Los Angeles Public Library Fire and My Memoirs on Libraries". I honestly couldn't finish it, I listened to a good 25% of the book before quitting. If one goes into the book with proper expectations, I think it's fine, however the title of the book and description led me to believe that the LAPL and the fire would be present and form an outline, however would not dominate the book. Rather the book very much IS about the fire and the author's experiences with libraries, and then sprinkled throughout are facts about libraries, their history, and how they work. I would have loved a book that went deep into the history of libraries, how they function, their evolution over time, but this is not that. Further there are no real chapter titles, but the author uses various books with their Dewey Decimal System numbers that are related to the contents of the chapter, but no table of contents. If a proper table of contents had existed with good chapter titles, I likely could have skipped to bits I cared about. As it is, I gave up and really think this is a 2.5 stars, but rounding up. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Feb 25, 2022
Quite good. I have happy memories of being a Central Library patron in the early 2000s. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Jun 8, 2024
Wonderful fascinating exploration of libraries and the people they employ and those they serve, focusing on the Los Angeles Central Library & the result of the great fire in 1986. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Oct 5, 2021
In writing this book, the author has obviously done a mammoth job in research. I didn’t know about the 1986 fire that destroyed the Los Angeles public library. The details are amazing and I was fascinated with the investigative work in the years that followed. This is also an account of the managers, the librarians, the support staff and all the other people who made up and today use this colossal public space. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Sep 8, 2021
I've loved books and libraries, ever since I was a kid. So I figured I would love this book, and I was not disappointed. The author bases her story around the devastating 1986 fire at the Central Library in Los Angeles but branches out into many other related areas. Having worked as a library aide for four years, I can relate to many of the crazy things that go on in libraries. I found it fascinating. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Oct 16, 2024
I was intrigued by the premise but disappointed by the execution. This could and should have been better. My first impression after reading it was that she didn’t have enough information about the library fire to write a whole book about it, and I suspected that she broadened her scope accordingly. However, the end result jumps around a lot and is part history, part conjecture, and part memoir. At the very least, this should have been better organized. It lacks the structure that I would expect from work of nonfiction.
Okay, so here are my thoughts: You know how when you read novels, very often they’ll cover two timelines? And so the story will jump back and forth between them? Well, this was like that, but with five storylines going. And unlike some novels where each chapter has a specific timeline, and it’s clear what happens when, the times here can jump back and forth from paragraph to paragraph, so it’s tough to know when things are happening. She had one storyline describing the events of the day of the fire. I would have expected this to be the main plot of the book, but it’s not as much front and center as I’d have thought. This thread gets lost under all the others. Orlean also describes the history of the library, discussing different people who have run the library through the years. This is interesting, but she doesn’t go into much depth for any of it, so it feels like summary. Another thread touches on the investigation into the fire, but since nothing definitive was ever found, there isn’t much to say. She uses plenty of words to say it, though. She describes someone suspected of starting the fire, but again, no one even knows if it was an accidental fire or a deliberate one. All of this goes nowhere, and it’s crammed in between the segments about the other stuff.
And speaking of other stuff, the last two narrative threads are pure memoirs. She describes her childhood visits to a different library, and she describes her research experiences. It’s a little confusing, too, because the connections for these threads aren’t clear. The library from her childhood is a different one—it’s not relelvent to the fire in the Los Angeles Central Library—it’s only relevelent to her, personally. She’s tracing libraries’ influence on her life generally. Similarly, much of her research into the library fire has been simply trying to be aware of what libraries are and how they operate. She was an outsider, and she shares her misconceptions that she had had prior to the start of her research on libraries. And a big portion of THAT research has been just sitting inside the library and people-watching. So there are sections of the book where you can read about everybody that she observed during a given time: how many people, what they looked like, what clothes they wore, and what they said. At least, what little snippets of conversation Orlean overheard. None of this is relevant to the fire, and it feels invasive. At first, I thought she was piecing together what happened the morning of the disaster, trying to pinpoint who was where, and when. But no—these are all people from years afterward. People who were library users, who were simply minding their own business in an institution that tries to serve their needs and respect their privacy. Orlean doesn’t reveal anything too personal, and I think that the whole point of this section was to give readers a sense of what it’s like to be in a library, so that they could picture what she could see and hear. So I understand it, I think. But even so, it’s clear that libraries are so foreign to Orlean that she feels compelled to study them, and to study their patrons in their natural habitat. It’s well-intended, but it’s a little creepy, and it doesn’t have anything to do with the fire.
I wanted to like this book. It’s an elegy, and it’s a history, and it celebrates books and libraries and community. But it’s all over the place; it tries to do a lot, but it doesn’t do any of it well. Perhaps if the book had been divided into sections, each one tackling a different angle, it might have worked. I sympathize with Orlean because she’s obviously using this book to work through her personal feelings, and those feelings are valid. Her mother has dementia, and so Orlean is now feeling far more sentimental about those early shared memories in libraries. I think there’s also a compelling parallel between her mother losing her memory and the LA Library, the collective memory of the community, losing its archives. But for a book described as historical research into a single event, this one misses the mark.
Book preview
The Library Book - Susan Orlean
1.
Stories to Begin On (1940)
By Bacmeister, Rhoda W.
X 808 B127
Begin Now—To Enjoy Tomorrow (1951)
By Giles, Ray
362.6 G472
A Good Place to Begin (1987)
By Powell, Lawrence Clark
027.47949 P884
To Begin at the Beginning (1994)
By Copenhaver, Martin B.
230 C782
Even in Los Angeles, where there is no shortage of remarkable hairdos, Harry Peak attracted attention. He was very blond. Very, very blond,
his lawyer said to me, and then he fluttered his hand across his forehead, performing a pantomime of Peak’s heavy swoop of bangs. Another lawyer, who questioned Peak in a deposition, remembered his hair very well. He had a lot of it,
she said. And he was very definitely blond.
An arson investigator I met described Peak entering a courtroom with all that hair,
as if his hair existed independently.
Having a presence mattered a great deal to Harry Omer Peak. He was born in 1959, and grew up in Santa Fe Springs, a town in the paddle-flat valley less than an hour southeast of Los Angeles, hemmed in by the dun-colored Santa Rosa Hills and a looming sense of monotony. It was a place that offered the soothing uneventfulness of conformity, but Harry longed to stand out. As a kid, he dabbled in the minor delinquencies and pranks that delighted an audience. Girls liked him. He was charming, funny, dimpled, daring. He could talk anyone into anything. He had a gift for drama and invention. He was a storyteller, a yarn-spinner, and an agile liar; he was good at fancying up facts to make his life seem less plain and mingy. According to his sister, he was the biggest bullshitter in the world, so quick to fib and fabricate that even his own family didn’t believe a word he said.
The closeness of Hollywood’s constant beckoning, combined with his knack for performance, meant, almost predictably, that Harry Peak decided to become an actor. After he finished high school and served a stint in the army, Harry moved to Los Angeles and started dreaming. He began dropping the phrase when I’m a movie star
into his conversations. He always said when
and not if.
For him, it was a statement of fact rather than speculation.
Although they never actually saw him in any television shows or movies, his family was under the impression that during his time in Hollywood, Harry landed some promising parts. His father told me Harry was on a medical show—maybe General Hospital—and that he had roles in several movies, including The Trial of Billy Jack. IMDb—the world’s largest online database for movies and television—lists a Barry Peak, a Parry Peak, a Harry Peacock, a Barry Pearl, and even a Harry Peak of Plymouth, England, but there is nothing at all listed for a Harry Peak of Los Angeles. As far as I can tell, the only time Harry Peak appeared on screen was on the local news in 1987, after he was arrested for setting the Los Angeles Central Library on fire, destroying almost half a million books and damaging seven hundred thousand more. It was one of the biggest fires in the history of Los Angeles, and it was the single biggest library fire in the history of the United States.
Central Library, which was designed by the architect Bertram Goodhue and opened in 1926, is in the middle of downtown Los Angeles, at the corner of Fifth Street and Flower, on the downslope of a rise once known as Normal Hill. The hill used to be higher, but when it was chosen as the site of the library, the summit was clawed off to make it more buildable. At the time the library opened, this part of downtown Los Angeles was a busy neighborhood of top-heavy, half-timbered Victorians teetering on the flank of the hills. These days, the houses are gone, and the neighborhood consists of dour, dark office towers standing shoulder to shoulder, casting long shafts of shade across what is left of the hill. Central Library is an entire city block wide, but it is only eight stories high, making it sort of ankle-height compared to these leggy office towers. It projects a horizontality that it probably didn’t in 1926, when it debuted as the high point in what was then a modest, mostly four-story-tall city center.
The library opens at ten A.M., but by daybreak there are always people hovering nearby. They lean against every side of the building, or perch half on and half off the low stone walls around the perimeter, or array themselves in postures of anticipation in the garden northwest of the main entrance, from which they can maintain a view of the front door. They watch the door with unrewarded vigilance, since there is no chance that the building will open earlier than scheduled. One recent warm morning, the people in the garden were clustered under the canopy of trees, and beside the long, trickling watercourse that seemed to emit a small breath of chilled air. Rolling suitcases and totes and book bags were stashed here and there. Pigeons the color of concrete marched in a bossy staccato around the suitcases. A thin young man in a white dress shirt, a hint of sweat ringing his underarms, wobbled on one foot, gripping a file folder under his arm while trying to fish a cell phone out of his back pocket. Behind him, a woman with a sagging yellow backpack sat on the edge of a bench, leaning forward, eyes closed, hands clasped; I couldn’t tell if she was napping or praying. Near her stood a man wearing a bowler hat and a too-small T-shirt that revealed a half-moon of shiny pink belly. Two women holding clipboards herded a small, swirling group of kids toward the library’s front door. I wandered over to the corner of the garden, where two men sitting by the World Peace Bell were debating a meal they’d apparently shared.
You have to admit that garlic dressing was good,
one of the men was saying.
I don’t eat salad.
Oh, come on, man, everyone eats salad!
Not me.
Pause. I love Dr Pepper.
Between each volley of their conversation, the men cast glances at the main entrance of the library, where a security guard was sitting. One of the doors was open, and the guard sat just inside, visible to anyone passing by. The open door was an irresistible conversation starter. One person after another approached the guard, and he deflected them without even blinking an eye:
Is the library open yet?
No, it’s not open.
Next: Ten A.M.
Next: You’ll know when it’s time.
Next: No, not open yet.
Next: Ten A.M., man
—shaking his head and rolling his eyes—ten A.M., like it says on the sign.
Every few minutes, one of the people approaching the guard flashed an identification badge and was waved in, because the library was actually already in gear, humming with staff members who were readying it for the day. The shipping department had been at work since dawn, packing tens of thousands of books into plastic bins. These were books requested at one of the city’s seventy-three libraries, or that had been returned to one in which they didn’t belong and were being repatriated, or they were brand-new books that had been just cataloged at Central Library and were now on their way to one of the branches. Security guards are at the library around the clock; the guards on duty had started their shift at six A.M. Matthew Mattson, who runs the library’s website, had been at his desk in the basement for an hour, watching the number of website visits surge as the morning advanced.
In each of the eight subject departments throughout the building, librarians and clerks were tidying shelves, checking new books, and beginning the business of the day. The reading tables and carrels were empty, each chair tucked under each table, all enfolded in a quiet even deeper than the usual velvety quiet of the library. In the History Department, a young librarian named Llyr Heller sorted through a cart of books, weeding out the ones that were damaged or deeply unloved. When she finished, she pulled out a list of books the department wanted to order, checking to make sure they weren’t already in the collection. If they passed that test, she would look at reviews and librarian tip sheets to make sure they warranted buying.
In the Children’s Department, children’s librarians from around the city were gathered in the puppet theater for their regular meeting. The topic being discussed was how to run an effective story time. The thirty full-size adult humans who were wedged into the tiny seats of the theater listened to the presentation with rapt attention. Use an appropriate-sized teddy bear,
the librarian running the session was saying as I walked in. I had been using one I thought was the size of a baby, but I was wrong—it was the size of a very premature baby.
She pointed to a bulletin board that was covered with felt. Don’t forget, flannel boards are wonderful,
she said. You may want to use them for things like demonstrating penguins getting dressed. You can also hide things inside them, like rabbits and noses.
Upstairs, Robert Morales, the library’s budget director, and Madeleine Rackley, the business manager, were talking about money with John Szabo, who holds the job of Los Angeles city librarian, in charge of all the libraries in Los Angeles. Just below them, the main clock clicked toward ten, and Selena Terrazas, who is one of Central Library’s three principal librarians, stationed herself at the center axis of the lobby so she could keep watch over the morning rush when the doors officially opened.
There was a sense of stage business—that churn of activity you can’t hear or see but you feel at a theater in the instant before the curtain rises—of people finding their places and things being set right, before the burst of action begins. The library entrances have been thrown open thousands of times since 1859, the year that a public library first existed in Los Angeles. Yet every time the security guard hollers out that the library has opened, there is a quickening in the air and the feeling that something significant is about to unfold—the play is about to begin. This particular morning, Selena Terrazas checked her watch, and the head of security, David Aguirre, checked his as well, and then Aguirre radioed the guard at the entrance to give the all-clear. After a moment, the guard clambered off his stool and pushed the door open, letting the buttery light of the California morning spill into the entry.
A puff of outside air wafted in and down the hall. Then, in an instant, people poured in—the hoverers, who bolted from their posts in the garden, and the wall-sitters, and the morning fumblers, and the school groups, and the businesspeople, and the parents with strollers heading to story time, and the students, and the homeless, who rushed straight to the bathrooms and then made a beeline to the computer center, and the scholars, and the time-wasters, and the readers, and the curious, and the bored—all clamoring for The Dictionary of Irish Artists or The Hero with a Thousand Faces or a biography of Lincoln or Pizza Today magazine or The Complete Book of Progressive Knitting or photographs of watermelons in the San Fernando Valley taken in the 1960s or Harry Potter—always, Harry Potter—or any one of the millions of books, pamphlets, maps, musical scores, newspapers, and pictures the library holds in store. They were a rivering flow of humanity, a gush, and they were looking for baby-name guides, and biographies of Charles Parnell, and maps of Indiana, and suggestions from a librarian for a novel that was romantic but not corny; they were picking up tax information and getting tutored in English and checking out movies and tracing their family history. They were sitting in the library, just because it was a pleasant place to sit, and sometimes they were doing things that had nothing to do with the library. On this particular morning, in Social Sciences, a woman at one of the reading tables was sewing beads onto the sleeve of a cotton blouse. In one of the carrels in History, a man in a pin-striped suit who had books on his desk but wasn’t reading held a bag of Doritos under the lip of the table. He pretended to muffle a cough each time he ate a chip.
I grew up in libraries, or at least it feels that way. I was raised in the suburbs of Cleveland, just a few blocks from the brick-faced Bertram Woods branch of the Shaker Heights Public Library system. Throughout my childhood, starting when I was very young, I went there several times a week with my mother. On those visits, my mother and I walked in together but as soon as we passed through the door, we split up and each headed to our favorite section. The library might have been the first place I was ever given autonomy. Even when I was maybe four or five years old, I was allowed to head off on my own. Then, after a while, my mother and I reunited at the checkout counter with our finds. Together we waited as the librarian at the counter pulled out the date card and stamped it with the checkout machine—that giant fist thumping the card with a loud chunk-chunk, printing a crooked due date underneath a score of previous crooked due dates that belonged to other people, other times.
Our visits to the library were never long enough for me. The place was so bountiful. I loved wandering around the bookshelves, scanning the spines until something happened to catch my eye. Those visits were dreamy, frictionless interludes that promised I would leave richer than I arrived. It wasn’t like going to a store with my mom, which guaranteed a tug-of-war between what I wanted and what my mother was willing to buy me; in the library I could have anything I wanted. After we checked out, I loved being in the car and having all the books we’d gotten stacked on my lap, pressing me under their solid, warm weight, their Mylar covers sticking a bit to my thighs. It was such a thrill leaving a place with things you hadn’t paid for; such a thrill anticipating the new books we would read. On the ride home, my mom and I talked about the order in which we were going to read our books and how long until they had to be returned, a solemn conversation in which we decided how to pace ourselves through this charmed, evanescent period of grace until the books were due. We both thought all of the librarians at the Bertram Woods Branch Library were beautiful. For a few minutes we would discuss their beauty. My mother then always mentioned that if she could have chosen any profession at all, she would have chosen to be a librarian, and the car would grow silent for a moment as we both considered what an amazing thing that would have been.
When I was older, I usually walked to the library myself, lugging back as many books as I could carry. Occasionally, I did go with my mother, and the trip would be as enchanted as it was when I was small. Even when I was in my last year of high school and could drive myself to the library, my mother and I still went together now and then, and the trip unfolded exactly as it did when I was a child, with all the same beats and pauses and comments and reveries, the same perfect pensive rhythm we followed so many times before. When I miss my mother these days, now that she is gone, I like to picture us in the car together, going for one more magnificent trip to Bertram Woods.
My family was big on the library. We were very much a reading family, but we were a borrow-a-book-from-the-library family more than a bookshelves-full-of-books family. My parents valued books, but they grew up in the Depression, aware of the quicksilver nature of money, and they learned the hard way that you shouldn’t buy what you could borrow. Because of that frugality, or perhaps independent of it, they also believed that you read a book for the experience of reading it. You didn’t read it in order to have an object that had to be housed and looked after forever, a memento of the purpose for which it was obtained. The reading of the book was a journey. There was no need for souvenirs.
By the time I was born, my parents’ financial circumstances were comfortable, and they learned how to splurge a little, but their Depression-era mentality adhered stubbornly to certain economies, which included not buying books that could be gotten very easily from the library. Our uncrowded bookshelves at home had several sets of encyclopedias (an example of something not convenient to borrow from the library, since you reached for it regularly and urgently) and a random assortment of other books which, for one reason or another, my parents had ended up buying. That included a few mild sex manuals (Ideal Marriage: Its Physiology and Technique is the one I remember best, because of course I read it whenever my parents were out of the house). I assume my parents bought the sex books because they would have been embarrassed to present them at the checkout desk of the library. There were also some travel guides, some coffee table books, a few of my father’s law books, and a dozen or so novels that were either gifts or for some reason managed to justify being owned outright.
When I headed to college, one of the many ways I differentiated myself from my parents was that I went wild for owning books. I think buying textbooks was what got me going. All I know is that I lost my appreciation for the slow pace of making your way through a library and for having books on borrowed time. I wanted to have my books around me, forming a totem pole of the narratives I’d visited. As soon as I got my own apartment, I lined it with bookcases and loaded them with hardcovers. I used the college library for research, but otherwise, I turned into a ravenous buyer of books. I couldn’t walk into a bookstore without leaving with something, or several somethings. I loved the fresh alkaline tang of new ink and paper, a smell that never emanated from a broken-in library book. I loved the crack of a newly flexed spine, and the way the brand-new pages almost felt damp, as if they were wet with creation. I sometimes wondered if I was catching up after spending my childhood amid sparsely settled bookcases. But the reason didn’t matter to me. I actually became a little evangelical about book ownership. Sometimes I fantasized about starting a bookstore. If my mother ever mentioned to me that she was on the waiting list for some book at the library, I got annoyed and asked why she didn’t just go buy it.
Once I was done with college, and done with researching term papers in the stacks of the Harold T. and Vivian B. Shapiro Undergraduate Library, I sloughed off the memory of those wondrous childhood trips to the Bertram Woods branch, and began, for the first time in my life, to wonder what libraries were for.
It might have remained that way, and I might have spent the rest of my life thinking about libraries only wistfully, the way I thought wistfully about, say, the amusement park I went to as a kid. Libraries might have become just a bookmark of memory more than an actual place, a way to call up an emotion of a moment that occurred long ago, something that was fused with mother
and the past
in my mind. But then libraries came roaring back into my life unexpectedly. In 2011, my husband accepted a job in Los Angeles, so we left New York and headed west. I didn’t know Los Angeles well, but I’d spent time there over the years, visiting cousins who lived in and around the city. When I became a writer, I went to Los Angeles many times to work on magazine pieces and books. On those visits, I had been to and from the beach, and up and down the canyons, and in and out of the valley, and back and forth to the mountains, but I never gave downtown Los Angeles a second thought, assuming it was just a glassy landscape of office buildings that hollowed out by five o’clock every night. I pictured Los Angeles as a radiant doughnut, rimmed by milky ocean and bristling mountains, with a big hole in the middle. I never went to the public library, never thought about the library, although I’m sure I assumed there was a public library, probably a main branch, probably downtown.
My son was in first grade when we moved to California. One of his first assignments in school was to interview someone who worked for the city. I suggested talking to a garbage collector or a police officer, but he said he wanted to interview a librarian. We were so new to town that we had to look up the address of the closest library, which was the Los Angeles Public Library’s Studio City branch. The branch was about a mile away from our house, which happened to be about the same distance that the Bertram Woods branch was from my childhood home.
As my son and I drove to meet the librarian, I was flooded by a sense of absolute familiarity, a gut-level recollection of this journey, of parent and child on their way to the library. I had taken this trip so many times before, but now it was turned on its head, and I was the parent bringing my child on that special trip. We parked, and my son and I walked toward the library, taking it in for the first time. The building was white and modish, with a mint green mushroom cap of a roof. From the outside, it didn’t look anything like the stout brick Bertram Woods branch, but when we stepped in, the thunderbolt of recognition struck me so hard that it made me gasp. Decades had passed and I was three thousand miles away, but I felt like I had been lifted up and whisked back to that time and place, back to the scenario of walking into the library with my mother. Nothing had changed—there was the same soft tsk-tsk-tsk of pencil on paper, and the muffled murmuring from patrons at the tables in the center of the room, and the creak and groan of book carts, and the occasional papery clunk of a book dropped on a desk. The scarred wooden checkout counters, and the librarians’ desks, as big as boats, and the bulletin board with its fluttering, raggedy notices were all the same. The sense of gentle, steady busyness, like water on a rolling boil, was just the same. The books on the shelves, with some subtractions and additions, were certainly the same.
It wasn’t that time stopped in the library. It was as if it were captured here, collected here, and in all libraries—and not only my time, my life, but all human time as well. In the library, time is dammed up—not just stopped but saved. The library is a gathering pool of narratives and of the people who come to find them. It is where we can glimpse immortality; in the library, we can live forever.
So the spell libraries once cast on me was renewed. Maybe it had never really been extinguished, although I had been away long enough that it was like visiting a country I’d loved but forgotten as my life went galloping by. I knew what it was like to want a book and to buy it, but I had forgotten what it felt like to amble among the library shelves, finding the book I was looking for but also seeing who its neighbors were, noticing their peculiar concordance, and following an idea as it was handed off from one book to the next, like a game of telephone. I might start at Dewey decimal 301.4129781 (Pioneer Women by Joanna L. Stratton) and a few inches later find myself at 306.7662 (Gaydar by Donald F. Reuter) and then 301.45096 (Dreams from My Father by Barack Obama) and finally 301.55 (The Men Who Stare at Goats by Jon Ronson). On a library bookshelf, thought progresses in a way that is logical but also dumbfounding, mysterious, irresistible.
Not long after my son interviewed the librarian, I happened to meet a man named Ken Brecher who runs the Library Foundation of Los Angeles, the nonprofit organization that champions the city’s libraries and raises money for extra programming and services. Brecher offered to give me a tour of Central Library, so a few days later, I drove downtown to meet him. From the highway, I could see the quiver of dark skyscrapers in the center of the city that surrounded the library. The summer and fall had been rainless. The landscape around me was bright and bleached, blasted, with an almost ashy pallor. Even the palm trees seemed sapped of color, and the reddish rooftops were whitened, as if dusted with sugar.
I felt new here, and the sheer breadth of Los Angeles still astonished me. It seemed like I could drive and drive and the city would just keep unfurling, almost as if it were a map of Los Angeles being unrolled as I drove over it, rather than a real city that started and stopped somewhere specific. In Los Angeles, your eye keeps reaching for an endpoint and never finds it, because it doesn’t exist. The wide-openness of Los Angeles is a little intoxicating, but it can be unnerving, too—it’s the kind of place that doesn’t hold you close, a place where you can picture yourself cartwheeling off into emptiness, a pocket of zero gravity. I’d spent the previous five years living in the Hudson Valley of New York, so I was more used to bumping into a hill or a river at every turn and settling my gaze on some foreground feature—a tree, a house, a cow. For twenty years before that, I’d lived in Manhattan, where the awareness of when you are in or out of the city is as clear as day.
I expected Central Library to look like the main libraries I knew best. New York Public Library and the Cleveland Public Library are serious buildings, with grand entrances and a stern, almost religious aura. By contrast, the Los Angeles Central Library looks like what a child might assemble out of blocks. The building—buff-colored, with black inset windows and a number of small entrances—is a fantasia of right angles and nooks and plateaus and terraces and balconies that step up to a single central pyramid surfaced with colored tiles and topped with a bronze sculpture of an open flame held in a human hand. It manages to look ancient and modern at the same time. As I approached, the simple blocky form of the building resolved into a throng of bas-relief stone figures on every wall. There were Virgil and Leonardo and Plato; bison herds and cantering horses; sunbursts and nautiluses; archers and shepherds and printers and scholars; scrolls and wreaths and waves. Philosophical declarations in English and Latin were carved across the building’s face like an ancient ticker tape. Compared to the mute towers around it, the library seemed more a proclamation than a building.
I circled, reading as I walked. Socrates, cool-eyed and stony-faced, gazed past me. I followed the bustle of visitors to the center of the main floor, and then I continued past the clatter and buzz of the circulation desk and climbed a wide set of stairs that spilled me out into a great rotunda. The rotunda was empty. I stood for a moment, taking it in. The rotunda is one of those rare places that have a kind of sacred atmosphere, full of a quiet so dense and deep that it almost feels underwater. All the rotunda’s features were larger than life, overpowering, jaw-dropping. The walls were covered with huge murals of Native Americans and priests and soldiers and settlers, painted in dusty mauve and blue and gold. The floor was glossy travertine, laid out in a pattern of checkerboard. The ceiling and archways were tiled with squares of red and blue and ocher. In the center of the rotunda hung a massive chandelier—a heavy brass chain dangling a luminous blue glass Earth ringed by the twelve figures of the zodiac.
I crossed the rotunda and walked toward a large sculpture known as the Statue of Civilization—a marble woman with fine features and perfect posture and a trident in her left hand. I was so stirred by the library’s beauty that when Brecher arrived to give me my tour, I was chattering like someone on a successful first date. Brecher is as thin as a pencil and has bright eyes, pure white hair, and a brisk, barking laugh. He began a running commentary about each fixture, each carving, each plaque on the wall. He also told me about his path to the library, which included stints living with a preliterate tribe of indigenous people in the Central Amazon and working for the Sundance Institute. He seemed electrified by everything he told me about the library, and between his electricity and my excitement, we must have made quite a lively pair. We inched along, stopping every few feet to examine another feature of the building, or to eyeball another shelf of books, or to hear about this or that person who had importance to the place. Everything about the library had a story—the architect, the muralist, the person who developed each collection, the head of each department, the scores of people who worked at the library or patronized it over the decades, many now long gone but still somehow present there, lingering in the wings, a durable part of its history.
We finally made our way to the Fiction Department and stopped near the first row of shelves. Brecher took a break from his commentary and reached for one of the books, cracked it open, held it up to his face, and inhaled deeply. I had never seen someone smell a book quite like that before. Brecher inhaled the book a few more times, then clapped it shut and placed it back on the shelf.
You can still smell the smoke in some of them,
he said, almost to himself. I wasn’t quite sure what he meant, so I tried this: They smell like smoke because the library used to let patrons smoke?
No!
Brecher said. Smoke from the fire!
The fire?
The fire!
The fire? What fire?
The fire,
he said. The big fire. The one that shut the library down.
On April 29, 1986, the day the library burned, I was living in New York. While my romance with libraries had not been renewed yet, I cared a lot about books, and I am sure I would have noticed a story about a massive fire in a library, no matter where that library was. The Central Library fire was not a minor matter, not a cigarette smoldering in a trash can that would have gone without mention. It was a huge, furious fire that burned for more than seven hours and reached temperatures of 2000 degrees; it was so fierce that almost every firefighter in Los Angeles was called upon to fight it.
