Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2014, Feminist Review
Feminist Review 107
Book Review: becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics and art by Elizabeth Grosz2014 •
In this paper, I evaluate Elizabeth Grosz's corporeal feminism and ontology of sexual difference(s), by moving through her Derridean and Irigarayian conceptual heritage. The question here is asked whether Grosz succeeds at deconstructing feminism's enemy; biological determinism, and if she deconstructs binary dichotomizes or in the end reinforces them. Grosz's Darwinian ontology of sexual differences is then analyzed via these two leading motives, and through the perspectives of Derrida and Irigaray.
2017 •
In this article on Elizabeth Grosz's philosophy and its implications for discussions about feminist theory, I first suggest that Charles Darwin plays a particular role in Grosz's recent ontological thought. This role is to provide help in joining together two incompatible sources in her work: Gilles Deleuze's monistic ontology of a constant flow of new differentiations, on the one hand, and Luce Irigaray's thought of sexual difference as the primary ontological difference, on the other. I argue that Grosz's intellectual project has developed into a grand general theory of change in which both Darwin and Irigaray are turned into ontologists in a Deleuzian vein. I then point out that Grosz's ontology also includes a political aspect, which manifests in the fact that Grosz redescribes Darwin through interpreting him primarily as a theorist of “event” and the unexpected. However, through an analysis of the discussion on Grosz between Luciana Parisi and Jami Weins...
This book introduces the philosophy of Luce Irigaray (1930) and sketches her position within the philosophical tradition. Luce Irigaray is a representative of the feminist critique of philosophy from the seventies and eighties. Her attention to the examination of the gender neutrality of philosophy is special for it encompasses critique on a metaphysical level. She not only questions the structures of philosophical discourse, but carefully reconstructs them, thereby developing an alternative, namely a philosophy of sexual difference. In this book I investigate Irigaray's strategy of analyzing the masculine philosophical tradition. The alliance in the eighties between poststructuralism and feminism, along with criticism within feminism of the notion of a female subject, forms the background for interpreting Irigaray's work. Because Irigaray aims at developing possibilities for female subjectivity (the early works) and gendered identity for both sexes (the later works) conflict with the poststructuralist and feminist tradition seems inevitable. The goals of her project raise questions concenring Irigaray's often supposed poststrycturalism and pave the way for my interpretation of her philosophical position. investigates Irigaray's strategy of analyzing the masculine philosophical tradition, namely mimesis, and presents an overview over her entire project. It concentrates on her later works, in which she develops a dialectics of sexual difference.
Questioning the Oneness of Philosophy. 4th. Workshop of the Project Experimentation and Dissidence, Eds. José Miranda Justo, Paulo Alexandre Lima y Fernando M. F. Silva, Centre for Philosophy at the University of Lisbon, Lisboa 2018, pp. 171-186. ISBN. 978-989-8553-48-5.
About a new Realism of the sexual Difference as Pattern of Dissidence and Transformation2018 •
The official history of philosophy has been thought and formulated by men in accordance with a substantialist dualism, commanded by the phallo-onto-theo-logic transcendence of the perfect and immaterial Act. The emergence of feminist thinking has disrupted that hegemonic paradigm deconstructing its theoretical assumptions, and rehabilitating a new pattern based on the immanence of a dynamic and self-differing ma(t)ter. In the context of contemporary feminist philosophy, the current paper aims at reconsidering the sexual difference of female identity out of phallogocentric dualism or transgender nominalism as a new pattern of being and thinking.
Luce Irigaray's project elaborates an original concept of sexual difference. While this concept is widely discussed in feminist philosophy, there are multiple readings of sexual difference and some of these are contradictory. This essay surveys the various readings of sexual difference in English. Foci include the debate over the status of essentialism, ontology, and the controversy over the primacy of sexual difference, including discussion of whether her oeuvre marginalizes differences of race and sexuality. I conclude by arguing that her thinking of difference is open to the future and non-totalisable in principle. This means that, difference, the concept at the heart of her thinking of sexual difference, cannot be primarily oriented toward engendering sexual difference because it is necessarily open to engendering relations that cannot be predicted.
2023 •
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
B1MG D4.2 Secure data access demonstrator2023 •
Journal of the Franklin Institute
New modeling approach of secondary control layer for autonomous single-phase microgrids2019 •
Solid State Communications
Effect of Umklapp on the low temperature electrical resistivity of nonmagnetic dilute alloys1972 •
International Journal of Thermodynamics
New Thermodynamic Equation of State for Refrigerant HFO-1243zf2013 •
Setrum : Sistem Kendali-Tenaga-elektronika-telekomunikasi-komputer
Studi Pemanfaatan Arus Laut Sebagai Sumber Energi Listrik Alternatif di Wilayah Selat Sunda2015 •