Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi
Journal of Biology Education
http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/JPB
eISSN: 2502-3810 pISSN: 2086-2245
The Development of Illustrated Pocket Book as a Source of Independent
Learning in Indra's System Material in XIth Grade of High School Natural
Science Program
Muliawati, Binari Manurung, Diky Setya Diningrat
1
Biology Education Study Program, Postgraduate Program, State University of Medan, Jl. Willem Iskandar,
Pasar V, Medan, 20221, North Sumatra, Indonesia
ARTICLE INFO
Article History
Received 20 January 2021
Revised 14 April 2021
Accepted 8 June 2021
Published 15 June 2021
Keywords:
Illustrated Pocket Book,
Sensory System,
Independent Learning
Resources
ABSTRACT
Learning resources are a component needed in teaching and learning activities.
One example of a learning resources often used by teachers and students is
books. This study aims to develop a pocket book with a sensory system as a
source of independent learning and to determine the effectiveness of a sensory
system illustrated pocket book on student learning outcomes in the XI th Grade
High School Natural Science Program. This type of research is Research and
Development using the 4D Thiagarajan model (Define, Design, Development
and Dissemination). The effectiveness test used a quasi experimental method
with the pretest post-test control group design. The data obtained were both
quantitative and qualitative. The results of the validation by material experts
scored 95.9 (very feasible), language experts scored 90.77 (very feasible), and
layout design experts scored 83.48 (very feasible). The results of the response
by the Biology teacher were 99.58 (very feasible), and the results of student
responses on individual tests were 97.78, small group tests were 98, and limited
field tests were 99.72 under very feasible category. The effectiveness of
sensory system illustrated pocket book is seen based on the students' Biology
learning outcomes, t-test and N-gain value. The results showed that the sensory
system illustrated pocket book as an independent learning resource was very
feasible to use in biology learning and was quite effective in improving student
learning outcomes in the XIth Grade of High School Natural Science Program.
Copyright © 2021 Medan State University. This Open Access article is licensed under
CC-BY-4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
How to Cite
Muliawati, Manurung, B., Diningrat, D. S. (2021). The Development of Illustrated Pocket Book as a Source of
Independent Learning in Indra's System Material in XI th Grade of High School Natural Science Program. Jurnal
Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 38-50.
PENDAHULUAN
Learning resources are one of the
components needed in learning activities.
Learning resources are something that is available
in a learning environment that functions to help
the learning process for both teachers and students
(Pohan et al., 2018). Learning resources can
provide experiences in learning. With the
existence of learning resources, individuals can
acquire knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, emotions,
and feelings. Learning resources also play a role
as a medium of communication between teachers
and students in learning. Learning resources
consist of materials that can be utilized and
needed in the learning process such as textbooks/
printed media, electronic media, resource persons
Author’s Correspondence: muti.niemut2811@gmail.com (Muliawati)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
and an environment that can increase student
activity in the learning process (Sitepu, 2014).
Books are one of the most used and easiest
learning resources. Until now, textbooks are still
the main learning resource in the learning process
in schools, both for teachers and students (Ami et
al., 2012). Students use books as a means to
support their self-development. The use of books
as a learning resource requires students to read
and understand the subject matter presented
(Suryanda et al., 2019). Textbooks on the market
have a relatively large size (25 cm x 17 cm) and
have relatively long reading descriptions on each
page. Most of these books use very few pictures
and colors and therefore look less attractive (Ami
et al., 2012). Some students rarely use textbooks
because they are reluctant to carry large textbooks. This is one of the reasons for the low level
of reading interest among students (Saputra et al.,
2018).
Based on the results of observations made on
biology teachers and students at SMA Negeri
(Public Senior High School) 1 Percut Sei Tuan, it
was found that teachers and students at the school
used textbooks as the main learning resource in
the learning process. The use of textbooks is
considered ineffective because there are still many
students who are reluctant to repeat lessons all
over again, both at school and at home. Students
also do not prepare enough during lessons and will
only study for an upcoming test/exam, and thus
their learning outcomes are often compromised.
This is proven by the fact that 40% of the students'
scores in Biology are still below the Minimum
Completion Criteria score of 75. In addition, the
results of the needs analysis questionnaire show
that students want additional learning resources in
the form of books with a more attractive
appearance, material that is easy to understand
and is equipped with colorful and practical
pictures to carry and use when they want to study
anywhere and anytime. Teachers also want
additional learning resources in addition to
textbooks. For this reason, additional books are
needed to support textbooks that are easy to carry,
have short reading descriptions on each page and
with an attractive appearance that are presented in
the form of a pocket book.
A pocket book is a small book that can be
stored in a pocket and easy to carry around. Pocket
books are designed in an attractive and practical
way to help students study anytime and anywhere
(Sulistyani et al., 2013). The pocket book’s
appearance makes use of lots of pictures and
colors to make it attractive. Students prefer texts
with a few descriptions but with lots of pictures or
colors. Pictures can increase reading interest
because they assist readers’ imagination (Ami et
al., 2012). Imagination can help a person improve
their memory performance and memorize verbal
terms (Slavin, 2012). Color can also be a form of
non-verbal communication that can convey
messages in an instant and more meaningful way
(Ami et al., 2012).
The Biology material chosen in the
development of this illustrated pocket book is the
sensory system. In terms of sensory system
material, there are many pictures that must be
presented clearly and completely. With a sensory
system illustrated pocket book, students can
observe pictures, ask for information, play games,
reason or associate existing materials and
pictures, and communicate or make conclusions
about the information that has been obtained on
the sensory system material. This is in accordance
with the demands of the 2013 Curriculum which
requires learning to lead to empowering all
potential students to become competent human
beings in life (Dion, 2014).
Based on this study, a research with the title
"The Development of Illustrated Pocket Books as
a Source of Independent Learning in the Sensory
System Material in the XIth Grade High School
Natural Science Program" was conducted with the
purpose of developing a sensory system
illustrated pocket book as a source of independent
learning and determining its effectiveness on
learning outcomes of students in the XIth Grade
High School Natural Science Program.
METODE
This study is a research and development
conducted using the 4D model developed by
Thiagarajan with the stages of Define, Design,
Development, and Dissemination (Sugiyono,
2019); (Thiagarajan et al., 1974). The purpose of
this study is to develop a sensory system
illustrated pocket book as a source of independent
learning and to determine the effectiveness of a
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
39
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
sensory system illustrated pocket book on student
learning outcomes in the XIth Grade High School
Natural Science Program. The effectiveness of the
sensory system illustrated pocket book illustrated
by the students' Biology learning outcomes, t-test
and N-gain value.
sheet for the assessment (response) of Biology
teachers; (3) a scaled questionnaire sheet for
student responses; and (4) multiple choice
questions, totaling 25 questions.
Research Venue
This research was conducted at one of the
public high schools in Percut Sei Tuan District,
Deli Serdang Regency, namely SMA Negeri 1
Percut Sei Tuan, which is located at Irian Barat
street. The research was conducted from January
2020 to July 2020. The student response test to the
product developed was carried out at SMA Negeri
13 Medan, while the test of the effectiveness of
sensory system illustrated pocket books was
carried out in the XIth Grade Natural Science
Program of SMA Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan.
Procedure
The procedure in this study uses the
Thiagarajan 4D development model which
consists of 4 stages, namely Define, Design,
Development, and Dissemination. The define
stage is useful for determining and defining needs
in the learning process and gathering relevant
information related to the product to be
developed. The design stage aims to select a
learning product that can be used as an
independent learning resource and also as a
support for Biology textbooks on the sensory
system material. The development stage is the
process of producing a development product from
the initial design that has been designed. The
dissemination stage aims to disseminate books
and test the effectiveness of the books being
developed. Following are the steps in developing
a sensory system illustrated pocket book based on
the Thiagarajan 4D model (Figure 1).
The feasibility of the sensory system
illustrated pocket book is assessed based on the
guidelines issued by BSNP (2014) which include
aspects of content and presentation feasibility,
aspects of language feasibility, and aspects of
graphic feasibility. There are four instruments
used in this study, namely: (1) a scaled
questionnaire sheet for book validation by three
experts (material expert, language expert, and
layout design expert); (2) a scaled questionnaire
Figure 1. Steps to develop a sensory system illustrated
pocket book based on the Thiagarajan 4D model.
There are two types of data obtained in this
study, namely quantitative and qualitative data.
Quantitative data in the form of validation by 3
expert lecturers (material, language, and layout
design experts), biology teacher assessments, and
student responses to sensory system illustrated
pocket book that were being developed.
Meanwhile, qualitative data is in the form of
suggestions and input from 3 expert lecturers
(material experts, language experts and layout
design experts) as well as suggestions and input
from Biology teachers and students.
Data Analysis
The data analysis used in this study came
from the book's feasibility data according to three
validation experts (material experts, linguists,
layout design experts), test respondents (biology
teachers and students), and data on book
effectiveness. Determination of the feasibility
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
40
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
criteria or category of the developed illustrated
pocket book is done by calculating the feasibility
value and respondent test of each data, both from
the validation of the illustrated pocket book by
three validation experts (material experts,
language expert, layout design expert),
assessments from biology teachers and student
response data. The feasibility data obtained in the
form of a score using a Likert scale is converted
into a value form. Changing the feasibility data for
the illustrated pocket book is carried out with the
following formula:
=
∑𝑄
× 100
∑𝑅
Description:
P : The value obtained for each component or
aspect of the observed assessment.
∑Q
: The number of scores obtained by each
component / aspect of the observed
assessment.
∑R
: The maximum amount of scores for
each component or aspect of the
observed assessment.
(Ridwan, 2010).
lesson of the sensory system material. The pre-test
and post-test data that had been collected were
subsequently analyzed to determine student
learning outcomes using the developed illustrated
pocket book (as well as using the Biology
textbook) and without using the illustrated pocket
book (using only Biology textbooks). The pre-test
and post-test data that had been collected were
then analyzed to determine student learning
outcomes using illustrated pocket book and
without using the developed illustrated pocket
book. The pretest and post-test data were analyzed
in two stages, namely the t-test and the N-gain test
using MS software program Excel 2016 and IBM
SPSS Statistic 22. The formula for finding
Normalized gain (N-gain) by Meltzer (2002) is as
follows:
<𝒈>=
𝑆𝑘𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 − 𝑆𝑘𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡
𝑆𝑘𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 − 𝑆𝑘𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡
The results of the N-gain calculation are then
classified according to the gain index category
<g> specified in Table 2. Furthermore, the results
of the N-gain value can be presented with the
interpreted category of the percentage of N-gain
effectiveness as in Table 3.
Table 2. N-Gain Value Category
Furthermore, data analysis from 3 validation
experts as well as respondents (Biology teachers
and students) was simplified into a form that was
easier to read and interpreted in order to obtain
conclusions about the illustrated pocket book that
was developed. The book feasibility criteria can
be seen in Table 1.
Table 1. Book Feasibility Criteria
Achievement Level
Predicate
81 – 100
Very Good
61 – 80
41 – 60
21 – 40
0 – 20
Good
Good
enough
Not good
enough
Not Good
Category
Very
Feasible
Feasible
Feasible
enough
Not
feasible
enough
Not
Feasible
N-gain Value
g ≥ 0,70
0,30 < g < 0,70
g ≤ 0,30
Category
High
Medium
Low
Source: Hake (2002)
Table
3.
N-gain
Interpretation Category
Percentage (%)
< 40
40 – 55
56 – 75
> 76
Effectiveness
Percentage
Criteria
Ineffective
Less Effective
Fairly Effective
Effective
Source: Hake (1998)
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The data analysis of the effectiveness of the
illustrated pocket book was obtained from the
pretest and post-test data of students in the biology
Define Stage
The define stage consists of analyzing the
needs of students and teachers, student analysis,
material analysis, curriculum analysis, and
specification of learning objectives. Analysis of
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
41
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
student and teacher needs was carried out by
providing a needs questionnaire to 158 students of
XIth Grade of High School Natural Science
Program and also interviewing Biology teachers
at SMA Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan in January 2020.
Material analysis was carried out by looking at
Biology materials that were considered difficult
for students. One of the Biology materials chosen
in this development research is the sensory system
material. The curriculum analysis was carried out
by examining the curriculum used in the studied
school. Furthermore, the specification of learning
objectives can be obtained by looking at Basic
Competencies (KD), Competency Achievement
Indicators and learning objectives in the Biology
learning tools for students of the XIth Grade of
High School Natural Science program, namely the
syllabus and lesson plans. Thus, the conclusion
obtained from the results of the define stage is that
it is very necessary to develop additional learning
resources in the form of illustrated pocket books
as a source of independent learning on the
material of the sensory system in the XIth Grade of
High School Natural Science program.
Design Stage
At the design stage, there is a selection and
design of the product to be developed. The
product chosen and designed is in the form of a
sensory system illustrated pocket book as a source
of independent learning in the XIth Grade of High
School Natural Science. Then the initial design
was carried out in the form of an outline of the
developed illustrated pocket book. The illustrated
pocket book developed is made on A6 size paper,
which is 10.5 cm x 14.8 cm, and contains pictures.
After the product type is determined and the
product outline is designed, a research instrument
is designed. The instrument designed consisted of
product feasibility by expert validators, responses
and responses by students and biology teachers,
multiple choice questions and a questionnaire for
student learning independence. The instrument
that has been designed is then validated by an
expert validator, namely Dr. Hasruddin, M.Pd.,
until it is declared feasible.
Development Stage
The development stage consists of several
steps, namely: creating the initial draft of the
research product, validating the pocket book by
three validation expert lecturers (material experts,
language experts, and layout design experts),
biology teacher assessment (response), and
student response testing. Student response tests
were carried out in Natural Science XIth Grade of
High School Negeri 13 Medan, which consisted
of individual tests (3 students), small group tests
(9 students), and limited field tests (29 students).
The result of the final product developed is a
"Sensory System Illustrated Pocket Book" which
can be used as a source of independent learning in
the XIth Grade of High School Natural Science
program.
The sensory system illustrated pocket book
was developed based on literature studies from
high school Biology textbooks, journals and also
articles related to the biology learning of the
human sensory system material. The preparation
of sensory system illustrated pocket books is
adjusted to the criteria for making a pocket book.
There are additional pictures in the pocket book to
support and complement the existing materials.
Below is a cover view and excerpts of sections
from the sensory system illustrated pocket book
(Figure 2).
Figure 2. Views of the Cover and Sections of the
Sensory System Illustrated Pocket Book.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
42
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
Validation by Experts
The feasibility of the sensory system
illustrated pocket book illustrated by expert
validation involves three validation experts,
namely material experts, linguists, and layout
design experts. The feasibility of the illustrated
pocket book that was developed includes aspects
of content and presentation feasibility, aspects of
language feasibility, and aspects of graphic
feasibility. The feasibility of the contents and
presentation of the sensory system illustrated
pocket book that was developed was obtained
from the evaluation of the material expert
validator by Dr. Melva Silitonga, MS. The content
and presentation feasibility aspect consists of subaspects of assessing the suitability of the material
with KI, KD, and learning indicators, material
completeness, material accuracy, material
organization, certainty in Law and Legislation,
presentation techniques, supporting material
presentation, learning resentation, and completeness of the presentation.
The linguistic feasibility of the sensory
system illustrated pocket book was obtained based
on the assessment of the language expert validator
by Mrs. Fitriani Lubis, S.Pd., M.Pd. The language
feasibility aspect includes the sub-aspects of
assessing student development, legibility,
coherence, conformity with Indonesian language
rules and the use of terms and symbols.
Furthermore, the feasibility of the developed
sensory system illustrated pocket book was
obtained based on the evaluation of the book
layout design expert validator by Dr. R. Mursid,
S.T., M.Pd. The graphic feasibility aspect of the
illustrated pocket book consists of several subaspects of assessment, namely book size, book
cover design, and book content design. The
following is a recapitulation of the results of
validation of sensory system illustrated pocket
book by three experts (Table 4).
Table 4. Recapitulation of the Assessment Results of
the Sensory Pocket Book by Three Expert Validators
No
1.
2.
3.
Evaluation
Aspect
Content and
presentation
feasibility
Linguistic
feasibility
Graphic
feasibility
Average
Score
95.44
Predicate
Category
Very
Good
Very
Feasible
90.77
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Feasible
Very
Feasible
83.48
Based on the results in Table 4, it shows that
the aspects of the feasibility of content and
presentation by material experts scored an average
of 95.44 with the predicate "Very Good" and
belonging to the category "Very Feasible". The
aspect of language feasibility by language experts
scored an average of 90.77 with the predicate
"Very Good" and belonging to the "Very
Feasible" category. Meanwhile, the aspect of
graphic feasibility by layout design experts scored
an average of 83.48 with the predicate "Very
Good" and classified in the "Very Feasible"
category. Overall, the results of the validation of
the three experts show that the sensory system
illustrated pocket book as a source of independent
learning is very feasible for use in learning
Biology.
Biology Teacher Response
The Biology teacher's response to the
developed sensory system illustrated pocket book
was obtained from the assessment (response) by
two Biology teachers at SMA Negeri 1 Percut Sei
Tuan. The goal is to gain additional information
on the four aspects being assessed, so that
suggestions for better pocket book product
improvement can be obtained. These aspects
include content and presentation feasibility,
language feasibility, and graphic feasibility.
The four aspects of the pocket book with the
sensory system based on the assessment
(response) of the Biology teacher obtained an
average value of 99.58 with the predicate "Very
Good" and classified in the "Very Feasible"
category. The following is a recapituation of the
results of evaluation of sensory system illustrated
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
43
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
pocket book according to Biology teacher’s
assessment (response) (Table 5).
Student Response
The student response test was carried out in
three stages, namely individual testing (3
students), small group testing (9 students) and
limited field testing (29 students). The aspects
assessed in the student response test include the
illustrated Pocket Book’s appearance, mastery of
materials, learning motivation, and source of
information. In addition, there are comments and
suggestions about the sensory system illustrated
pocket book that was developed. The following is
a recapitulation of the results of students'
responses to the sensory system illustrated pocket
book (Table 6).
Table 5. Recapitulation of the Assessment Results of
the Sensory Pocket Book Based on the Response of the
Biology Teacher
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Evaluation
Aspect
Content
feasibility
Presentation
feasibility
Linguistic
feasibility
Graphic
feasibility
Average
Average
Score
Predicate
Category
100
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Feasible
Very
Feasible
Very
Feasible
Very
Feasible
Very
Feasible
100
98.75
99.57
99.58
Table 6. Recapitulation of Student Responses to the Sensory System Illustrated Pocket Book
No.
Evaluation Aspect
1.
Benefits of Illustrated
Pocket Book
Material Presentation
Learning Motivation
Benefits of the Illustrated
Pocket Book
Average
2.
3.
4.
Individual
Test
Value
Small
Group Test
Limited
Field Test
Predicate
Category
100
100
100
Very Good
Very Feasible
91.69
100
96.11
100
98.97
100
Very Good
Very Good
Very Feasible
Very Feasible
100
97.78
100
98.96
100
99.72
Very Good
Very Good
Very Feasible
Very Feasible
Based on Table 6, it shows that the aspects of
the feasibility of content and presentation by
material experts scored an average of 97.78 with
the predicate "Very Good" and belonging to the
category "Very Feasible". The small group test
scored an average of 98 with the predicate "Very
Good" and classified in the "Very Feasible"
category, and in the limited field test it was 99.72
with the predicate "Very Good" and classified in
the "Very Feasible" category.
Dissemination Stage
After the development stage is complete, the
dissemination stage is carried out. At the
dissemination stage, an effectiveness test was also
carried out to determine the effectiveness of using
a sensory system illustrated pocket book as a
source of independent learning in the XIth Grade
of High School Natural Science Program. The
dissemination was carried out in a limited manner
by distributing sensory system illustrated pocket
books to an entire class of XIth grade Natural
Science Program at SMA Negeri 1 Percut Sei
Tuan. The effectiveness test of the sensory system
illustrated pocket book used the quasi
experimental design method in the form of a
pretest-posttest control group design in which
there were two groups, namely the experimental
group / class and the control group / class. In this
design, both the experimental group and the
control group were given a pretest, then given
different treatment, and then given a final test
(post-test). The number of questions given at the
pretest and post-test was 25 multiple choice
questions.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
44
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
Book Effectiveness Test
The book effectiveness test aims to
determine the effectiveness of illustrated pocket
books as a source of independent learning on the
sensory system material in XIth Grade of High
School Natural Science Program. The
effectiveness of sensory system illustrated pocket
book is seen from the results of XIth Grade Natural
Science Program students of SMA Negeri 1
Percut Sei Tuan on the sensory system material,
the t test and the N-gain value.
Student learning outcomes
Student learning outcomes were obtained
from analysis of students' pretest and post-test
data. Student pretest and post-test data collection
was carried out by assigning scores to each
question. Correct answers are given a score of 1,
and incorrect answers are given a score of 0. The
following are the results of the pretest and posttest students of the experimental class and the
control class at the distribution stage (Table 7).
Table 7. Pretest and Post-test Data for the Experiment Class and Control Class
Origin of Data
Experimental Class
Control class
Overall Score
Pretest
Post-test
300
636
316
563
Overall Value
Pretest
Post-test
1200
2544
1264
2252
The t-test (t-test) aims to determine whether
or not there is a difference in the average post-test
score of the experimental class and the average
post-test score of the control class. The following
Average Score
Pretest
Post-test
38.71
82.06
40.77
72.65
are the results of the statistical test (t-test) of the
average post-test score of the experimental class
and the average post-test score of the control class
(Table 8).
Table 8. Date are the results of the statistical test (t-test) of the average post-test score of the experimental class
and the average post-test score of the control class
Origin of Data
Experimental Class
Control class
Average Score
Post-test
82.06
72.65
Standard deviation
tcount
Sig. (2-tailed)
7.07
7.16
5.211
0.000
Based on the results of the t test calculation
in Table 7, the t value is 5,211; P ≤ 0.000, with the
mean post-test score for the experimental class,
namely 82.06 ± 7.07 and the average post-test
score for the control class, namely 72.65 ± 7.16.
Therefore it can be concluded that there are
significant differences in student learning
outcomes taught using a sensory system
illustrated pocket book and without sensory
system illustrated pocket book.
The N-gain test carried out at the dissemination stage aims to determine the effectiveness of
the illustrated pocket book developed for
improving student learning outcomes on the
sensory system material in XIth Grade of High
School Natural Science Program. The N-gain test
involves the pretest and post-test scores of the
experimental class and the control class. The
following are the results of the N-gain test
statistics for the experimental class and control
class (Table 9).
Table 9. Data on the results of the N-Gain statistical test in the experimental class and control class
Origin of Data
Experimental Class
Control class
N-gain Score
Total N-gain
Average N-gain
Score
score
22.24
0.72
16.78
0.54
N-gain Percentage (%)
Total N-gain
Average N-gain
Percentage (%)
Percentage (%)
2,224.21
71.75
1,677.50
54.11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
45
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
Based on the data from the results of the Ngain calculation in Table 9, the average N-gain
score in the experimental class is 0.72, which is in
the "High" category, and the average N-gain
percent (%) is 71.75. % in the “Fairly Effective”
category. Meanwhile, in the control class, the
average N-gain score was 0.54 in the "Medium"
category and the average N-gain percent (%) was
54.11% in the "Less Effective" category. These
results indicate that the sensory system illustrated
pocket book is quite effective in improving
student learning outcomes on the sensory system
material in XIth grade of High School Natural
Science Program.
Discussion
This independent learning resource in the
form of sensory system illustrated pocket book
was developed by referring to the 4D model
development model developed by Thiagarajan
with the stages of Define, Design, Development,
and Dissemination (Sugiyono, 2019; Thiagarajan
et al., 1974). There are two data analysis techniques used in this study, namely quantitative data
analysis techniques and qualitative data analysis
techniques. The data obtained in this study came
from the book's feasibility data according to three
validation experts (material experts, linguists,
layout design experts), test respondents (biology
teachers and students), and book effectiveness
data.
Based on the results of the validation of the
pocket book with the senses system by three
validation experts, the highest average value of
the pocketbook feasibility came from the material
expert's validation, namely 95.44, in the aspect of
content and presentation feasibility. The next
highest average feasibility value is obtained from
the validation of linguists, namely 90.77 in the
aspect of language feasibility. While the lowest
average feasibility value is obtained from the
validation of the layout design expert with an
average value of 83.48 in the graphic feasibility
aspect. The level of achievement of the feasibility
criteria for the sensory system illustrated pocket
book is in the range of 81 - 100. This means that
the pocket book with the sensory system is
classified into the predicate "Very Good" with the
category "Very Feasible" based on the book's
feasibility criteria by Sugiyono (2013). This
shows that all the components presented in the
pocket book with the sensory system picture are
suitable for use in learning and as an additional
learning resource for Biology textbooks.
The description of the material presented in
the sensory system pocket book is shorter than the
Biology textbook without reducing the important
information elements in the material. The material
presented in the pocket book with the sensory
system pictured is adjusted to the Basic
Competence, competency achievement indicators
and pursuit objectives in the Biology learning
device for class XI IPA SMA, the sensory system
material, namely the Syllabus and RPP. This is in
accordance with the opinion of Prastowo (2012)
which states that the criteria for good teaching
materials are as the substance of the material has
relevance to the basic competencies that must be
mastered by students, the material in the complete
book, at least provides a complete explanation
such as a definition or summary, solid in
knowledge and has a clear scientific sequence, the
correctness of the material can be accounted for,
short and clear sentences, and their physical
appearance is attractive or motivates them to read.
The sensory system illustrated pocket book is
also equipped with pictures adapted to the
material and has an interesting color combination.
The image size is adjusted to the size of the paper
used in the illustrated pocket book. According to
Natali and Lakoro (2012), the existence of
feasible image illustrations is able to explain the
information written in the book, so that readers
can understand the material in depth. In line with
this, Ami et al. (2012) explained that illustrations
can increase reading interest because they help
readers with their imagination. Imagination in
turn can help a person improve their memory
performance and memorize verbal terms (Slavin,
2012).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
46
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
The use of language in the sensory system
illustrated pocket book is based on aspects of
student development, legibility, coherence,
conformity with Indonesian language rules and
proper use of terms and symbols. This is in line
with research conducted by Ulfa et al., (2013) that
the use of good language is adjusted to Indonesian
grammar rules and refers to Enhanced Spelling of
the Indonesian language. Likewise with the
research of Rahmawati et al. (2016) that the
choice of language in learning media must pay
attention to good and correct Indonesian
principles such as the use of spelling, word
writing, and punctuation. Furthermore, according
to Widodo (2008) which states that consistency
must be met in terms of the form, letters, words
and sentences of each page. Sapta (2009) in
Rahmawati et al. (2013) also states that good
teaching materials are teaching materials written
in good and easy to understand language,
presented attractively, equipped with pictures and
descriptions.
The design of the cover layout and contents
of the pocket book with the sensory system is
made attractive with a variety of color
combinations so that users of the illustrated
pocket book would not feel bored. Anna in Ami et
al. (2012) states that color can be a form of nonverbal communication that can convey messages
instantly and in a more meaningful way. The same
thing is also conveyed by Arsyad (2016) that color
is used as a tool to guide and attract attention to
important information and to distinguish each
component. Furthermore, based on Kurniasari's
(2014) research, the use of a book cover that
reflects and is in accordance with the contents of
the book can attract reading interest and make it
easier for readers to find out the contents of the
book.
Overall, the assessment (response) of the
Biology teacher to the feasibility of the sensory
system illustrated pocket book is that the sensory
system illustrated pocket book is very feasible and
interesting to read. Especially as a supporting
book for Class XI High School Biology text
lessons and as a source of independent learning
for students. The cover of the sensory system
illustrated pocket book is also very interesting the
design displays a title, an illustration of the
sensory organs and use a background with a
matching color. As explained by Susilana et al.,
(2008) that one of the efforts that can be made to
make learning media more attractive is to use a
variety of colors. This color will make students
interested in studying the learning material, focus
on the presentation of the material, and make the
presentation of the material more lively.
In addition, the sensory system illustrated
pocket book is equipped with colorful and neatly
arranged pictures to complement the presentation
of the material description in the pocket book.
This is in accordance with the opinion of Arsyad
(2016) that the combination of text and images on
a printed page can increase attractiveness and can
facilitate understanding of information presented
in two formats, verbal and visual. The main
purpose of the appearance of these various types
of images is to visualize the concept that the
concept is trying to convey to students.
The results of the feasibility test (response)
of students to the pocket book with the sense
system, both in the one-on-one (individual) test,
the small group test, and on the limited field test,
it was found that the display aspects of the pocket
book with the sensory system picture, the learning
motivation aspect, and the benefit aspects of
illustrated pocket book has the same score of 100.
Meanwhile, the lowest average value was
obtained by the material presentation aspect. But
overall, the level of achievement of the feasibility
criteria for the sensory system illustrated pocket
book is based on the feasibility test (response) of
students is in the range 81-100. This means that
the sensory system illustrated pocket book is
classified as "Very Good" with the category "Very
Feasible" based on the book's feasibility criteria
by Sugiyono (2013).
All students in the student's feasibility test
(response) stated that they liked and were
interested in the appearance and content of the
sensory system illustrated pocket book.
Moreover, the pocket book is equipped with
colorful and neatly arranged pictures to
complement the presentation of the material
description in the pocket book. This is supported
by Wardani's research in Rahmawati et al., (2013)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
47
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
which concluded that students tend to like
interesting readings with few descriptions and lots
of pictures or colors. In line with this, Sulistyani
et al., (2013) explained that the benefits of pocket
books as learning media are that the delivery of
material can be uniformed, making the learning
process clearer, fun and attractive because the
design is printed in many colors, efficient in time
and energy, fostering positive attitudes towards
the material and learning process so that students
can develop their potential to become independent
learners.
The effectiveness of the sensory system
illustrated pocket book illustrated by looking at
students' biology learning outcomes on the
sensory system material, the t test and the N-gain
value. Based on the results of biology learning
among the XIth Grade of High School Natural
Science Program students of SMA Negeri 1
Percut Sei Tuan, it was found that in the
experimental class, the average pretest score was
38.71 with an average minimum score of 24 and
an average maximum value of 56. Furthermore,
the average post-test score was 82.06 with an
average minimum score of 68 and an average
maximum value of 92. While in the control class,
the average pretest score was 40.07 with an
average minimum score of 24 and an average
maximum value of 56. Next, the average post-test
score was 72.65 with an average minimum score
of 60 and an average maximum value of 84. These
results indicate that the use of the sensory system
illustrated pocket book in the experimental class
can improve student learning outcomes based on
the results of students' pretest and post-test scores.
The results of the research by Pohan et al., (2015)
show that the use of a pocket book on the
classification of living things can improve
students' understanding of this material which is
marked by improved student learning outcomes.
In line with this, based on the results of research
by Khulafa and Santoso (2018), pocket books as a
learning medium for making Jumput Batik in
Multicultural Art and Scarf Subjects are feasible
to use and are able to improve student learning
outcomes.
The results of the t-test calculation obtained
the value of tcount = 5.211; P ≤ 0.000, with the mean
post-test score for the experimental class of 82.06
± 7.07 and the average post-test score for the
control class, namely 72.65 ± 7.16. Therefore, it
can be concluded that there is a significant
difference between the learning outcomes of
students who are taught using pictorial pocket
books and without using pictorial pocket books in
the Biology subject matter of the sensory system
material. This is in line with the research results
of Sulistyani et al., (2013) which showed that
students in the experimental class who used
pocket books had better learning outcomes than
students in control classes who did not use pocket
books (instead they used a conventional
textbook). The pocket book also encourages
students to study independently.
The results of the N-gain calculation in this
study obtained an average N-gain score in the
experimental class, namely 0.72 in the "High"
category and the average N-gain percent (%)
obtained 71.75% in the "Fairly Effective"
category. . Meanwhile, in the control class, the
average N-gain was 0.54 in the "Medium"
category and the average N-gain percent (%) was
54.11% in the "Less Effective" category. These
results indicate that the sensory system illustrated
pocket book is quite effective in improving
student learning outcomes on the sensory system
material in XIth grade of High School Natural
Science Program. This is supported by the results
of research by Muhammad et al., (2015) which
show that the developed pocket book on
respiratory system material is classified as valid,
practical, and effective. The learning outcomes of
all students have also passed the learning mastery
standards. In line with this, based on the results of
Masita and Wulandari's (2018) research, it shows
that mind mapping-based handbooks in science
learning, heat material and its transfer have been
tested effectively because they can improve
student learning outcomes and are proven to be
practically used in learning.
Basically, pocket books are the same as
textbooks, which distinguishes them in terms of
size and presentation. The sensory system
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
48
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
illustrated pocket book presentation developed in
this study uses a lot of illustration and color
combinations to give it an attractive appearance.
The use of illustrated pocket books can encourage
students to study independently and improve
student learning outcomes (Saputra et al., 2018).
Students tend to like reading materials that are
interesting with little description but with a full
explanation and lots of pictures or colors (Lisa et
al., 2015).
Pocket books are a form of printed media
with its own advantages and disadvantages
(Susilana et al., 2008). The advantages of pocket
books are able to present messages or information
in large quantities, messages or information can
be learned by students according to the needs of
their respective interests and speed, can be learned
anytime and anywhere because it is easy to carry,
it will be more attractive if it is equipped with
pictures and colors, easy remedies / revisions.
Whereas the disadvantages of the pocket book are
as the manufacturing process takes a long time,
printed pocket books are usually thicker than
textbooks, if the binding and paper are bad, the
printed material will be easily damaged and torn.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the development of
sensory system illustrated pocket book, it can be
concluded that the sensory system illustrated
pocket book as an independent learning resource
developed is very suitable for use in Biology
learning of sensory system material in XIth Grade
of High School Natural Science Program based on
validation by three experts (material expert,
language expert, layout design expert) and also
respondent test (Biology teacher and students’
responses). The sensory system illustrated pocket
book that was developed was also quite effective
in improving student biology learning outcomes
on the sensory system material in XIth Grade of
High School Natural Science Program.
REFERENCES
Arsyad, A. (2008). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja
Grafindo Persada.
Ami, M. S., Susantini, E., & Raharjo (2012).
Pengembangan Buku Saku Materi Sistem Ekskresi
Manusia di SMA/MA Kelas XI. BioEdu Unesa,
1(2), 10-13.
National Education Standards Agency. (2014).
Instrumen Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran. Jakarta:
Ministry of Education and Culture.
Dion, B. (27 April, 2014). Tuntutan Pembelajaran
dalam Kurikulum 2013, Kurikulum (Online).
Accessed
from
http://kurikulm.blogspot.com/2014/04/tuntutanpembelajaran-kurikulum-2013.html?m=1
Hake, R. R. (1998). Promoting Student Crossover To
The Newtonian world. American Journal of
Physics, 55(10), 878-884.
Hake, R. R. (2002). Lessons From The Physics
Education Reform Effort. Conservation Ecology,
5(2), 28
Khulafa, F. N., & Santosa, P. (2018). The Development
Of Pocketbook As Learning Media To Make Batik
Jumput In Multicultural Art And Scarf Subject.
Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education
and Communication Technology, 4(1), 51-57.
Kurniasari, D. A. N., Rusilowati, A., & Subekti, N.
(2014). Pengembangan Buku Suplemen IPA
Terpadu dengan Tema Pendengaran Kelas VIII.
Unnes Science Educational Journal, 3(2), 462-467.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/USEJ.V3l2.3329
Lisa, S., Ramses., & Efendi, Y. (2015). Pengaruh
Model Pembelajaran Terbalik (Reciprocal
Teaching) Menggunakan Buku Saku Terhadap
Hasil Belajar Biologi Peserta Didik Kelas VII MTs
USB Sagulung Batam, Simbiosa, 4(1), 35-41.
Masita, M., & Wulandari, D. (2018). Pengembangan
Buku Saku Berbasis Mind Mapping Pada
Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Kreatif, 8(2), 191-198.
https://doi.org/10.15294/kreatif.v9i1.16509
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship Between
Mathematics Preparation an Conceptual Learning
Gain in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variable in
Diagnostic Pretest Scores”. American Journal
Physics,
70(12),
1259–1268.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
Muhammad, N. N., Taiyeb, A. M., & Azis, A. A.
(2015). Pengembangan Buku Saku Pada Materi
Sistem Rsepirasi untuk SMA Kelas XI
(Development of Pocket Book at the Respiratory
System Subject for Senior High School Grade XI).
Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP
UNS (162-167).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
49
Muliawati et al./Journal of Biology Education 10 (1) (2021) 38 - 50
Natali, A., & Lakoro, R. (2012). Perencanaan Buku
Ilustrasi Sejarah Musik Keroncong. Jurnal Teknik
Pomits, 1(1), 1-6.
Prastowo, A. (2012). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan
Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.
Pohan, M. S., Nevrita., & Amelia, T. (2018).
Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Buku Saku
Materi Klasifikasi Makhluk Hidup Untuk Siswa
Kelas VII SMP Negeri 12 Tanjungpinang: Aspek
Validitas Media. Artikel Skripsi Biologi 03,
Kepulauan Riau: Program Studi Pendidikan
Biologi FKIP Universitas Maritim Raja Ali.
Rahmawati, N. L., Sudarmin., & Pukan, K. K. (2013).
Pengembangan Buku Saku IPA Terpadu Bilingual
Dengan Tema Bahan Kimia Dalam Kehidupan
Sebagai Bahan Ajar Di MTs. Unnes Science
Education Journal, 2(1), 157-164. DOI:
10.15294/USEJ.V2l1.1769
Rahmawati, I. S., Roekhan., & Nurhasanah. (2016).
Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Menulisa
Teks Fabel Dengan Macromedia Flash Bagi Siswa
SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(7): 1323-1329.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i7.6561
Ridwan. (2010). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel
Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
Saputra, M., Abidin, T. F., Ansari, B. I., & Hidayat, M.
(2018). The Feasibility Of An Android-Based
Pocketbook As Mathematics Learning Media In
Senior High School. Journal of Physics,
Conference Series, 1-6. DOI:10.1088/17426596/1088/1/012056
Sitepu. (2014). Pengembangan Sumber Belajar.
Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Slavin, R. E. (2012). Educational Psychologgy: Theory
and Practice, Tenth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson
Education, Inc.
Sulistyani, N. H. D., Jamzuri., Rahardjo, D. (2013).
Perbedaan
Hasil
Belajar
Siswa
Antara
Menggunakan Media Pocket Book dan Tanpa
Pocket Book pada Materi Kinematika Gerak
Melingkar Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1
(1), 164-172.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi. Bandung: PT Alfabeta
Sugiyono.
(2019).
Metode
Penelitian
&
Pengembangan (Research and Development).
Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryanda, A., Azrai, E. P., & Julita, A. (2019). Expert
Validation on The Development Biology
Pocketbook Based on Mind Map (BIOMAP)
(Validasi Ahli pada Pengembangan Buku Saku
Biologi Berbasis Mind Map (BIOMAP)). Biodik:
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 5(3), 197-214.
https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v5i3.687
Susilana, R., Hadi., & Riyana, C. (2008). Media
Pembelajaran
Hakekat
Pengembangan
Pemanfaatan dan Penilaian. Bandung: Wacana
Prima.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I.
(1974). Intructional Development for Training of
Expectional Children. Minneapolis, Minnesota:
Leadership Training Institute/Special Education,
University of Minnesota.
Ulfah, A., Bintari, S. H., & Pamelasari, S. D. (2013).
Pengembangan LKS IPA Berbasis Word Square
Model Keterpaduan Connected. Unnes Science
Education Journal, 2(1), 239-244. DOI:
10.15294/USEJ.V2l2.2030
Widodo, C. S. (2008). Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar
Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: PT Alex Media
Komputindo.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v10i1.22775
50