THEJOURNAL
OF BIOLOGICAL
CHEMISTRY
Val. 263, No. 11, Issue of April 15, pp. 5070-5074, 1988
Printed in U.S.A.
Angiotensin I1 Receptors and Inhibitory Actions
in Leydig Cells*
(Received for publication, August 3, 1987, and in revised form, November 4, 1987)
Azra Khanum and Maria L. DufauS
From the Molecular EndocrinologySection, Endocrinology ReproductionResearch Branch, National Institute of Child Health
and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Rat Leydig cells possessfunctional high-affinity in swine testis showing the presence of converting enzyme in
receptors for angiotensinI1 (AII). AI1 inhibits adenyl- spermatids and other stages of germinal cells (6).
ate cyclase activity in Leydig cell membranes and reOn the other hand, there is strong evidence that Leydig
duces basal and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-cells possess a membrane system with the potential for negstimulated CAMPpools and testosterone production in ative modulation of gonadotrophic action. In this regard, we
intact cells. Treatment ofcells with an inhibitory dose have demonstrated a novel, high-affinity inhibitory action of
of forskolin (lo-' M) and a submaximal dose of AI1
low doses of forskolin (range 10"2-10-9 M ) upon adenylate
caused additive inhibition of hCG-stimulated events.
cyclase activity and cAMP generation, an effect that appears
The inhibitory action of
AI1 was largely prevented by to be mediated by the pertussis toxin-sensitive guanine nupertussis toxin prior to the addition ofAI1 alone or in
the presence ofhCG. This study and our recent reportcleotide inhibitory unit (Ni) of adenylate cyclase (7). Since
on inhibitory action of low doses of forskolin, 10-l2- AI1 has beenshown to exert an inhibitory influence on
cyclase system of liver (8, 9), adrenal cortex (10,
lo-' M (Khanum, A., and Dufau,M. L. (1986) J. Biol. adenylate
l
l
)
,
renal
cortex
(12), and smooth muscle (13), this hormone
Chem. 261,11456-1 1459)are indicative of a pertussis
toxin-sensitive subunit of adenylate cyclase available couldbe apotential regulator of gonadal function. It is,
for acute regulation of Leydig
cell function. 8-bromo- therefore, conceivable that tubular and locally produced AI1
CAMP bypasses the inhibitory effect of forskolin as could modulate the action of gonadotrophin in Leydig cells.
well as AII. We have, therefore, demonstrated funcEXPERIMENTALPROCEDURES
tional AI1 high-affinity receptor and an acute inhibitory effect of AI1onhCG action in Leydig cells. Our
Materials
results have provided evidence for a pertussis toxinMedium-199 and elutriation medium were obtained from Whitsensitive guanine nucleotide inhibitory proteinas mediator of theeffect of AIL These findings further em- taker M.A. Bioproduct, Inc., Walkersville, MD and National Instiphasized the importance of theCAMPpathway in the tutes of Health Media Supply Units, Bethesda, MD respectively. hCG
(CR-121) was kindly provided by the Center of Population Research,
Leydig cells, and studies also suggest that tubular andNational
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Belocally producedAI1 could negatively modulate lutein- thesda, MD.AI1 was purchased from Sigma. [Sar',Alaa]AII was
izing hormone stimulation of Leydig
cells.
obtained from Vega Biotechnologies,Tucson, A Z , and forskolin from
A number of studies have provided evidence for the presence
of the renin-angiotensin system in reproductive tissues. Immunoreactive renin has been detected in Leydig cells of rat
and human testes andwas found to be pituitary-dependent in
the rat (1, 2). Similarly, more recent studies have shown the
presence of renin, angiotensin I and I1 (AI and AII)' in normal
rat Leydig cells and a murine Leydig cell line (3, 4). Furthermore, angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was demonstrated in rat testis andshown to be localized predominantly
in the germinal cells, whereas only minor activity was found
in the purified adult rat Leydig and Sertoli cells (5). Also,
[3H]captopril bound specifically to cellular fractions enriched
in germinal cells (5). Velletri et al. (5) have suggested that the
pituitary gland is required for development and maintenance
of the rat testicular angiotensin-converting enzyme through
stimulation of steroidogenesis in the testis. The biochemical
evidence (5) was consistent with immunofluorescence studies
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by
the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby
marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734
solely to indicate this fact.
$ To whom correspondence should be addressed Bldg. 10, Rm. 8C407, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
'The abbreviations used are: AI and AII, angiotensin I and II;
hCG, human chorionic gonadotrophin; Ni, guanine nucleotide inhibitory unit; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography.
Behring Diagnostics. AI1 ( 5 4 , LHRH, AI, and [des-Asp']AII were
obtained through Peninsula Laboratories, San Carlos, CA. Pertussis
toxin was purchased from List Biological Laboratories, Inc., Campbell, CA.'"1-AII
(2200 Ci/mmol) and succinyl cAMP '251-tyrosine
methyl ester (2000pCi/pg)were prepared byMeloy Laboratories,
Springfield, VA, and by Hazleton Biotechnologies,Vienna, VA, using
a modification of the chloramine-T method (14), followed by purification by HPLC (15). [cY-~*P]ATP
(800 Ci/mmol) were obtained from
Du Pont-New England Nuclear.
Methods
Preparation of Leydig Cellsand Membranes-Adult male SpragueDawley rats (Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, MA)
were killed and testes were removed and placed in ice-cold PBS, pH
7.4. Interstitial cells were obtained by collagenase digestion of decapsulated testes, as described previously (16). Crude cell suspension was
washed and then pelleted at 200 X g for 10 min. The cell pellet was
resuspended with elutriation buffer consisting of regular medium-199
with Hanks' salts and L-glutamine containing 1.4 g/liter NaHC03,
0.5% bovine serum albumin-, 1mM EDTA, 50 units/ml heparin, 12.5
pg/ml DNase and 50 pg/ml gentamycin, pH 7.4. The purified cells
were obtained by centrifugal elutriation (17). Cells were centrifuged
and resuspended in medium-199 containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and were incubated a t 34 "C with shaking at 100 cycles/min
under an atmosphere of 02:C02 (955,
v/v) in the presence and in the
absence of various concentrations of hCG with or without AH, forskolin, and 8-bromo-CAMP.For some experiments, cells were pretreated for 60 min with pertussis toxin under the same incubation
conditions prior to theaddition of hCG and/or AIL The incubations
were terminated by transferring the incubation tubes to an ice bath;
all further stepswere carried out at 0 "C and processed for the analysis
of cAMP (intracellular and receptor-bound) and testosterone; and
5070
AII Receptors and Actions
5071
r-
V
0
30
60
90
I
0
120
I
I
I
I
I
30
20
TIME [MINI
10
TIME IMIN)
FIG. 1. Time course specific binding of 121-AII to Leydig
cells during incubation at 4 "C, 22 "C and 37 "C for 120 min.
Nonspecific binding for each time intervalwas determined by addition
.
point represents the mean f S.E. of
of unlabeled AI1 (10 p ~ ) Each
triplicate determinations.
I
FIG. 3. Time course association and dissociation of AI1 binding to Leydig cell receptors. The rate of association of specific
binding to the cells was measured as a function of time after incubating Iz5I-AIIat 22 'C. The rate of dissociation was obtained by the
addition of 10 p~ unlabeled AI1 after 14 min of incubation and by
the measurement of release of'"I-AII.
Each point represents the
mean f S.E. of three determinations.
I
I
10-8
10-4
1
1.o
0
m
m
0.5
7.5
BOUND A Il-pM
FIG. 2. Scatchard analysis and saturation curve (ineet) of
AI1 binding to Leydig cells. Cells were incubated at 22 "C for 20
min with increasing concentrations of Iz5I-AII.Each point represents
the mean of triplicate determinations. The S.E. was less than 10%.
their measurements were performed by radioimmunoassay as described previously (18).
Purified Leydig cell plasma membranes were prepared in the
presence of 5 mM EDTA (19) and stored in liquid nitrogen until use.
Adenylate cyclase assay was carried out by methods previously described (9). For some experiments, membranes were also preincubated
for 20 min with activated pertussis toxin.
Binding Studies-Binding assays with '"I-AII were performed with
intact cells which were incubated in 500 p1 of Dulbecco's PBS in the
presence of 0.2% bovine serum albumin and 100 FM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for various time periods: 0-120 min at different
temperatures: 4 "C, 22 "C and 37 "C. For equilibrium studies, cells
were incubated a t 22 'C for 20 min with increasing concentrations of
~ AI1 or with '%I'261-AIIin the presence or in theabsence of 10 g i of
AI1 and increasing concentrations of unlabeled AIL In some displacement studies, AII-related and -unrelated peptides were used. The
reaction was terminated by adding 2 ml of ice-cold PBS, pH 7.4, in
the tube and immediately filtered under vacuum through GF/C filters
(Whatman, Maidstone, Great Britain). Filters were washed twice
with 3 mlof PBS and bound radioactivity was measured in a y
counter. For kinetic studies, Leydig cells were also incubated with
1261-AIIat various times: 0-30 min. The specific binding of '251-AII
reached to equilibrium after 14 min of incubation. Therefore, the rate
of dissociation of "'I-AII receptor complex was obtained by adding
10 p~ of unlabeled AI1 after 14 min of incubation. The binding
studies were analyzed by the method of Scatchard (20) using computer
0
PEPTIDECONCENTRATION [MI
FIG. 4. Displacement of la6I-AIIby angiotensin-related and
-unrelated peptides and diterpene, forskolin. Bo and E , the
fraction of total tracer bound in the absence and in the presence of
unlabeled peptides, respectively, a t 22 "C for 20 min of incubation.
Each point represents the mean f S.E. of three determinations.
O-",
AII; A-A,
[des-Asp'IAII; X-X,
[Sar',Alas]AII;
H,
AI; -,
LHRH; 0-"0, AI1 (5-8); A, arginine vasopresin; 0, forskolin.
analysis of binding data by a nonlinear model curve fitting program
(21).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this study, we have demonstrated the presence of functional AI1 receptors in rat Leydig cells and have provided the
evidence of its acute inhibitory effects. Cells were incubated
with lZ5I-AIIfor various time periods at 37 "C, 22 "C, and
4 "C. The highest specific binding was observed when the cells
were incubated at 22 "C, and thebinding reached to maximum
within 30 min of incubation (Fig. 1).Thereafter, there was
subsequent decrease in binding. At 37 "C, the specific binding
increased rapidly after 5 min of incubation followed bya rapid
decline. Thisis most likelydue totracer degradation by
proteolytic enzymes as indicated by others (22) or may be due
AII Receptors and Actions
5072
*--+ PT + hCG +All
Y
0
10-10
10-8
10-6
All [MI
0
0.26
2.6
26
hCG IpMl
FIG.5. I,& effect of pertussis toxin (PT) on AII-induced inhibition of intracellular CAMPproduction. Leydig
cells (1 X lo6 cells/ml) were preincubated with pertussis toxin (30 ng/ml) for 60 min. Incubation was further
carried out for 60 min in the presence or in the absence of hCG concentration with and without AII. Each point
represents the mean f S.E. of triplicate incubations. Right, dose-dependent inhibitory effect of AI1 on hCGstimulated intracellular CAMP production. Leydig cells (1 X lo6 cells/ml) were incubated with a range of hCG
concentrations (0.26-260 PM) for 60 min in the presence and in the absence of AI1 (lO-'M). Each point represents
the mean f S.E. of triplicate incubations.
B
a
d
A I1
K
+
A 11
hCG
hCG
12.6pMI
+
All
PTihCG
hCG
+
1260 pMI
All
hCG PT+ hCG
+
+
All
AI1
FIG. 6. Effect of pertussis toxin (PT)on AII-induced inhibition of receptor-bound CAMP. Leydig cells (1 X lo6 cells/ml)
were preincubated with pertussis toxin (30 ng/ml) for 60 min. Incubation was further carried out for 60 min in the presence or inabsence
of the indicated hCG doses with and without AIL Each point represents themeans 2 S.E. of triplicate incubations.
to internalization of receptor complex and subsequent receptor degradation. In fact, this receptor-mediated internalization has been indicated in cases of various peptide hormones
(23). However at 4 "C, the specific binding was increased
gradually and reached equilibrium after 90 min of incubation.
In this case the specific binding was only 10% of that observed
at 22 "C during 20 min of incubation. Therefore, for binding
studies, the incubation was carried out at 22 "C for 20 min.
Scatchard plot derived from equilibrium binding data obtained at 22 "C showed the presence of high-affinity binding
sites with KOof 1.7 X 10'' M" f 0.41 ( n = 4) and number of
2018 & 408 ( n= 4)receptor sites percell (Fig. 2). The binding
was saturable andreversible as indicated by saturation analy-
sis of binding data and association and dissociation studies,
respectively. The rates of association (kl) and dissociation
( k 1 ) of Iz5I-AIIbinding to Leydig cells were 0.885 nM" min-'
and 0.04 rnin", respectively (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the calculated half-life was 17.5 min. From the kinetic data, the calculated equilibrium constant, K,, was 2.2 X 10" M-l. This
value is veryclose to the value obtained by equilibrium
analysis. Fig. 4 showed the specificity of AI1 binding to Leydig
cell receptor sites. No inhibition in binding was observed with
the neurohypophyseal peptide, arginine vasopressin and diterpene, forskolin. On the other hand, the binding-inhibition
potency of various analogues and fragment was noted.
[Sar1,Ala8]AII,AII, and [des-Asp']AII were potent displacers
of specific '251-AIIbinding and theirKOvalues were similar to
the observed K. for AI1 (1.7 X 10" M-'). AI was found to be
100 times less potent than AI1 in the binding assay, and the
smaller fragment of AI1 (AII, Refs. 5-8) displayed weak inhibitory effect on '251-AIIbinding. LHRH (hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone), an unrelated decapeptide,
competed quite effectively with lZ5I-AIIfor binding to Leydig
cell receptor sites when present in relatively high concentrations, although it was less potent (1000 times) than the AII.
The potency order of these compounds for AI1 receptors is
AII> [Sar',Ala8]AII> [des-Asp']AII> AI>LHRH> AI1 (5-8).
LHRH (hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone) has
shown its ability to inhibit lZ5I-AIIbinding in Leydig cells.
This is consistent with earlier studies by Capponi and Catt
(25) in the adrenal cortex and uterus suggesting that the
binding inhibition ofAI1by
LHRH is probably due to a
common structural feature in the COOH-terminal sequence
of LHRH and AII.
Although a number of studies have indicated the presence
of the renin-angiotensinsystem in reproductive tissues on the
basis of immunohistochemical, immunofluorescence, HPLC,
and radioimmunoassay studies (1-4,6, 26), its physiological
significance and possiblerole in gonadal function are still
unclear. Our studies have provided direct evidence for the
5073
AII Receptors and Actions
FIG.7. Left, inhibitory effect ofAI1
on testosterone production. Leydig cells
(1 X 10' cells/ml) were incubated for 120
min with various concentrations of AI1
(lO"o-lO"j M) in the presence of hCG
and hCG plus forskoli (39.Each point
represents the mean f S.E. of triplicate
incubations. Right, effect of pertussis
toxin (Py)on AII-induced inhibition on
testosterone production. Leydig cells (1
x 10' cell/ml) were preincubated with
pertussis toxin (30 ng/ml) for 60 min.
Incubation was further carried out for 60
min in the presence or inabsence of the
indicated hCG doses with or without AII.
Each point representsthe means f S.E.
of triplicate incubations.
100
1-
1
hCG 1260 pMI t A 1
I
hCG + F110-9 MI t A I1
1
Testosterone
150-
.- 0
10°C
Angiotensin II (MI
I
t
A 1
I
A11
I
hcG
+
hCG
hCG PT+hCG
I260 OMI +
+
AI1
All
A11
TABLE
I1
Effect of pertussis toxin(PT)on AIZ-induced inhibition of adenylate
cyclnse activity
Adenylate cyclase activity was determined in the membranes of
Leydig cells, pretreated and untreated with pertussis toxin (pg/ml).
The membranes were incubated with GTP (lo-' M) and LH (lo-' M)
in the presence and in the absence of AI1 (lo-' M). Mean values
between groups by student's t test are as follows: b versus a and c ( p
< 0.05);e versus d and f ( p < 0.01).
Additions
Adenylate cyclase
activity
pnwl/mg protein/
15 min
-I
hCG
cAMP
12.6 pMI
hCG
+
cAMP
hCG
+
A II
CAMP+ hCG+
hCG
hCG
A II CAMP+ I260 pMI
+
A II
cAMP
hCG
t
hCG + CAM
+ A II
TABLE
I
Effect of 8-bromo-CAMP on
forskolin-induced inhibition of
testosterone productionby Leydig cells
Testosterone production was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures." Leydig cells (lo6cells/ml) were incubated for
120 min in the presence and in the absence of described additions.
Mean values between groups by student's t test are as follows: b
versus a and d ( p < 0.05);b versus c ( p < 0.01).
Additions
10-9 M
8-Bromo-CAMP
lo-' M
hCG
260 pM
Testosterone
w/l@
&dig cells
-
+
+
+
29 f 2
39 f 3
71 f 7 (a)
88f7
51 f 4 ( b )
113 f 10 ( c )
121 f 14 ( d )
82 f 8 ( e )
154 f 12 (f)
A II
FIG. 8. Effect of 8-bromo-CAMP on An-induced inhibition
of testosterone production. Leydig cells (1 X 10' cells/ml) were
incubated for 60 min with 8-bromo-CAMPin the presence and in the
absence of hCG and/or AII. Each point represents the mean f S.E.
of triplicate incubations.
Forskolin
Control
Control + PT
GTP
GTP + PT
GTP + AI1
GTP + AI1 + PT
LH + GTP
LH + GTP + AI1
LH + GTP + AI1 + PT
28 f 2
16 t 1
319 f 24
337 -+ 28 (a)
338 f 12
246 f 11 ( b )
308 -+ 15 ( c )
299 f 10 ( d )
presence of functional AI1 receptors, since AI1 acutely inhibits
(as early as 15 min) gonadotrophin stimulation of cyclic AMP
pools and testosterone production in Leydig cells. Fig. 5, left,
shows AII-induced inhibition of intracellular cAMP production and the effect of pertussis toxin on this inhibition. Cells
were stimulated with a submaximal dose of hCG in the
presence and in the absence of increasing concentrations of
M. The inhibitory effect of AI1 was doseAII, lO-"-lO"j
dependent with an ID5, of 0.5 X 10"' M. However, this effect
was found to be largely prevented when cells were incubated
with pertussis toxin prior to the addition of AI1 and/or hCG.
The inhibitory effect of AI1 affected the hormonal stimulus
over the entire dose-response range of hCG concentrations.
As a result of addition of a submaximal dose of AI1 to the
Leydig cells stimulated by various doses of hCG, the doseresponse curve showed a significant increase in EDso(2-fold),
Fig. 5, right. Our studies have also provided evidence for an
inhibitory effect of AI1 on receptor-bound cAMP (Fig. 6).
Both basal and hCG-stimulated cAMP production were inhibited by the addition ofAI1 to the cells.However, this
inhibition was prevented when cells were incubated with
pertussis toxin prior to the addition of AI1 and/or hCG. As a
result of reduced production of CAMP,AI1 (10"o-10-6 M), in
a dose-dependent manner, inhibited testosterone production
by Leydig cells stimulated by hCG (ID50l x 10"' M). This
was commensurate with its binding affinity. Further addition
5074
AII Receptors and Actions
of forskolin (lo-’ M) to a submaximal inhibitory dose of AI1
caused an additive inhibition of testosterone production (Fig.
7, left),and this finding, therefore, indicated that both substances are exerting their
inhibitory effects through a common
pathway. This inhibitory action of AI1 was found to be prevented when cells were pretreated with pertussis toxin prior
to theaddition of hCG and/or AI1 (Fig. 7, right).This finding
resembles our previous studies, demonstrating the involvement of a pertussis toxin-sensitive regulatory protein in the
inhibitory action of low doses of forskolin (7). Moreover, our
results are consistent with early studies on the adrenal (22)
and more recent studies in liver (27) and kidney (28) which
showed that AI1 receptors are functionally linked to the
inhibitory unit of the adenylate cyclase system.
M) bypassed the inhibFurthermore, 8-bromo-CAMP(
itory effect of AI1in hCG-stimulatedcells (Fig. 8).This cAMP
derivative was also shown to exert a similar effect on the
inhibitory action of a low dose of forskolin (Table I). Also,
AI1 significantly decreased GTP and luteinizing hormone plus
GTP-stimulated adenylate cyclase activities in membranes,
and this inhibition was prevented by pretreatment of membranes with pertussis toxin (Table 11). Thus, thereduction in
cAMP levels by AI1 is attributable to the inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity in the plasma membrane. It is, therefore, proposed on the basis of our studies that the Ni unit of
adenylate cyclase is involved in the inhibitory action of AI1
on adenylate cyclase and consequently on cAMP pools and
testosterone production. However, we cannot rule out the
participation of other additional signal-transducing systems
in mediating the inhibitory action of AI1 in the Leydig cells,
since the role of calcium as a second messenger in the action
ofAI1 is well documented in liver (29), adrenals (30,31),
smooth muscle (32), and kidney (28). Also, the existence of a
pertussis toxin-independentguanine nucleotide inhibition has
been postulated for several systems (27,33,34). Furthermore,
in liver (27) and in kidney (28), two different kinds of receptor-dependent mechanisms were delineated for the cellular
responses of AI1 including phospholipase C/increase in intracellular calcium and adenylate cyclase system. However, in
the present study, the finding that 8-bromo-CAMPbypassed
the inhibitory effect of AI1 on hCG-stimulated testosterone
production is suggestive that the pertussis-sensitive regulatory protein (Ni) mainly mediates the inhibitory effect of AI1
and modulates LH stimulationof Leydig cells.Because of the
predominant localization of angiotensin-converting enzyme
in the testicular tubular elements, it is likely that AI1 possesses a physiological paracrine regulatory function and the
locally produced hormone would also effectively exert homologous negative modulatory influence on hormonal-stimulated
events in the Leydig cells.
REFERENCES
1. Parmentier, M., Inagami, T., Pochet, R., and Desclin, J. C. (1983)
Endocrinology 112,1318-1323
2. Naruse, K., Murakoshi, M., Osamura, R. Y., Naruse, M., Toma,
H., Watanabe, K., Demura, H., Inagami, T., and Shizume, K.
View publication stats
(1985) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 61, 172-177
3. Pandey, K. N., Misono, K. S., and Inagami, T. (1984) Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 122, 1337-1343
4. Pandey, K. N., and Inagami, T. (1986) J.Biol. Chem. 261,39343938
5. Velletri, P. A., Aquilano, D. R., Bruckwick, E., Tsai-Morris, C.
H., Dufau, M. L., and Lovenberg, W. (1985) Endocrinology
116,2516-2522
6. Yotsumoto, H., Sato, S., and Shibuya, M. (1984) Life Sci. 35,
1257-1261
7. Khanum, A., and Dufau, M. L. (1986) J.Biol. Chem. 261,1145611459
8. Jard, S., Cantau, B., and Jakobs, K.H. (1981) J. Biol. Chem.
256,2603-2606
9. Crane, J. K., Campanile, P. C., and Garrison, J. C. (1982) J.Biol.
Chem. 257,4959-4965
10. Marie, J., and Jard, S . (1983) FEBS Lett. 1 5 9 , 97-101
11. Woodcock, E. A., and Johnston, C. I. (1984) Endocrinology 115,
337-341
12. Woodcock, E. A., and Johnston,C. I. (1982) Endocrinology 1 1 1 ,
1687-1691
13. Anand-Srivastava, M. B. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
117,420-428
14. Greenwood, F.C., Hunter, W. J., and Glover, J. J. (1963) Biochem.
J. 8 9 , 114-123
15. Mendelsohn, F. A. O., Quizion, R., Saavedra, J. M., Aguilera, G.,
and Catt,K. J. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81,15751579
16. Dufau, M.L., Mendelson, C., and Catt, K. J. (1974) J. Clin.
Endocrinol. Metab. 39,610-613
17. Aquilano, D. R., and Dufau, M.L. (1984) Endocrinology 1 1 4 ,
499-510
18. Dufau, M. L., Tsuruhara, T., Homer, K.A., Podesta, E., and
Catt, K. J. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.A . 74,3419-3423
19. Dufau, M.L., Baukal, A. J., and Catt, K. J. (1980) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77,5837-5841
20. Scatchard, G. (1949) Ann. N . Y.Acad. Sci. 81,660-672
21. Ketelslegers, J. M., Knott, G. D., and Catt,K. J. (1975) Biochemistry 14,3075-3083
22. Glossmann, N., Baukal, A., and Catt, K. J. (1974) J. Biol. Chem.
249,664-666
23. H a m , E., Cuatrecasas, P., Marian, J., and Conn, P. M. (1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 77,6692-6695
24. Deleted in proof
25. Capponi, A. M., and Catt,K. J. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254,51205127
26. Culler, M. D., Tarlatzis, B. C., Lightman, A., Fernandez, L. A.,
Decherney, A. H., Negro-Vilar, A., and Naftolin, F. (1986) J.
Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 62,613-615
27. Pobiner, B. F., Hewlett, E. L., and Garrison, J. C. (1985) J. Biol.
Chem. 260,16200-16209
28. Hackenthal, E., Aktories, K., and Jakobs, K. H. (1985) Mol. CeU.
Endocrinol. 4 2 , 113-117
29. Keppens, S., Vandenheede, J. R., and De wulf,H. (1977) Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 496,448-457
30. Fakunding, J. L., and Catt, K. J. (1982) Endocrimlogy 1 1 0 ,
2006-2010
31. Kojima, I., Kojima, K., and Rasmussen, H. (1985) J. Biol. Chem.
260,9177-9184
32. Smith, J. B., Smith, L., Brown, E. R., Barnes, D., Sabir, M. A.,
Davis, J. S., and Farese, R. V. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.
S. A. 8 1 , 7812-7816
33. Hausdroff, W. P., Sekura, R. D., Aguilera, G. A., and Catt, K. J.
(1987) Endocrinology 1 2 0 , 1668-1678
34. Lucas, D. O.,Bajjalieh, S . M., Kowalchyk, J. A., and Martin, T.
F. J. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 132, 721-728