ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Trait Emotional Intelligence and Its Correlates in
Oman Medical Specialty Board Residents
Salim Al Huseini, MD
Mohammed Al Alawi, MD
Hamed Al Sinawi, MD
Naser Al-Balushi, MD
Sachin Jose, PhD
Samir Al-Adawi, PhD
ABSTRACT
Background As part of the globalization of medical education, residency programs in Oman have adopted competency-based
standards by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education International (ACGME-I). Correctly perceiving the emotions
of others and managing one’s own emotions are essential to high-quality patient care.
Objective We tested the reliability and construct validity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire–Short Form (TEIQueSF), and assessed trait Emotional Intelligence (EI) in Oman Medical Specialty Board (OMSB) residents in multiple specialties. We
explored for correlations with trainees’ sociodemographic background data.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study between February and August 2017. Participants were OMSB
residents. We administered the TEIQue-SF and collected sociodemographic data from participants. Multiple linear regression
analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of trait EI.
Results The present cohort scored high in the trait EI subscale of Well-being, followed by Sociability, Self-control, and
Emotionality. Among sociodemographic factors, female gender and high income were significant predictors of TEIQue-SF’s Wellbeing subscale and high income and living in a rented home were significant predictors of the Sociability subscale.
Conclusions This is the first study conducted among medical residents in Oman regarding trait EI and its correlates. Our findings
of overall high EI and several socioeconomic predictors echo the literature on the assessment of EI in trainees. The findings add to
the evidence of cross-cultural applicability of instruments to measure trait EI, and use assessments of EI in resident selection and
education.
Introduction
In 1999, the Accreditation Council for Graduate
Medical Educations (ACGME) defined 6 competencies important to the practice of medicine: professionalism, systems-based practice, interpersonal and
communication skills, medical knowledge, patient
care, and practice-based learning and improvement.1,2 There is evidence that some of the constituents of these 6 core competencies embrace the
construct of trait emotional intelligence (trait EI).3
Trait EI refers to an ability to monitor one’s own
and others’ emotions, to discriminate among them,
and to use this information to guide one’s thinking
and action.4 There is evidence to suggest that for an
individual to excel in competencies such as interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism,1
higher trait EI is essential.5 On the other hand,
modern medical care is sometimes perceived to be
‘‘dehumanizing,’’ with studies suggesting that physicians are becoming less compassionate or suffering
from ‘‘compassion fatigue.’’6 This has been linked to
reduced levels of EI in physicians.7 Some have
recommended educational interventions to enhance
physicians’ ‘‘people skills,’’8,9 and there are indications that EI might help fill this gap.10 The inclusion
of the trait EI in health care curricula has been
growing in recent years.11,12
Oman’s residency program follows the competency
criteria of ACGME International. To date, no studies
have explored trait EI and its correlates in Omani
trainees. We tested the reliability and construct
validity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) for measuring EI in
Oman Medical Specialty Board (OMSB) residents,
and to explore a possible association between the 4
dimensions of trait EI and the specialty, year of
training, gender, and socioeconomic data.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional, analytical study
between February and August 2017. Subjects were
residents enrolled in the OMSB training programs.
Setting
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00388
Editor’s Note: The online version of this article contains the Trait
Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire–Short Form (TEIQue-SF).
134
OMSB is an autonomous training body located in
Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, serving as the sponsoring
Journal of Graduate Medical Education Supplement, August 2019
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
institution for 17 training programs. In 2017, 597
residents were training in OMSB residency programs.
What was known and gap
Emotional intelligence (EI) has received attention in the
business and medical sectors. EI has not been measured in
trainees in an Arab nation.
Sampling Method
What is new
A study of EI in a sample of Omani residents found higher
overall EI scores in female trainees, and several sociodemographic predictors of EI and its subscores.
Based on the published mean difference and standard
deviations in TEIQue-SF subscales,13 the required
sample size for a 95% confidence interval, 5% a level,
and power of 80%, calculated, was 323, using Epi
Info software (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, GA). Data collection took place
during a mandatory OMSB workshop. To ensure the
representativeness of the study sample, stratified
random sampling was adopted, according to the
specialty (approximately 65% medical, 20% surgical,
and 15% laboratory), reflecting the demographic
distribution of residents in OMSB programs. We used
randomization software to select participants. Subjects were contacted via the OMSB e-mail system to
explain the study and have them provide signed
consent electronically. Those who declined to participate were replaced by other randomly selected
trainees.
Limitations
Single institution study and a majority female sample limit
the ability to generalize.
Bottom line
The findings add to evidence of cross-cultural applicability of
instruments to measure EI and its use of these assessments
in resident selection and education.
a cutoff score of . 0.90. Factor loading . 0.30 of the
individual item was included in the equation.
Bartlett’s test and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index were
performed to gauge the fitness of the data for factor
analysis. Linear regression analysis was carried out
for the significant variables in the univariate level
analysis (ANOVA) to evaluate the predictors of
Emotionality, Well-being, and Sociability factors.
The independent variables were considered given
Study Instrument and Sociodemographic Variable
their theoretical relationship with both outcome and
We used the TEIQue-SF (provided as supplemental
TABLE 1
material),14 a self-administered scale designed to
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Residentsa
capture personality facets and an individual’s dispoVariable
n (%)
sition in relation to the emotions. In addition to
Gender
TEIQue-SF, we collected information on various
sociodemographic variables (TABLE 1).
Male
101 (32)
Ethical approval was granted by the OMSB
Female
219 (68)
Research Ethics Committee and the College of
Age, Mean 6 SD
27.84 6 1.84
Medicine and Health Sciences at Sultan Qaboos Accommodation
University, Muscat, Oman. Written informed consent
Rent
74 (23)
was obtained from all participants.
Owned
246 (77)
Socioeconomic status
Data Analysis
Low income
We computed descriptive statistics for sociodemographic characteristics and items in the TEIQue-SF.
Comparison between groups was conducted using the
2-tailed Student’s t test or one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA). Tukey-post-hoc pairwise comparison was performed to find the statistically
significant ANOVA. Correlation analysis was conducted by calculating the Pearson product-moment
coefficient. Multiple linear regression analysis was
conducted to identify independent predictors of the
residents’ trait EI. Significance was set at .05. All
statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS
Statistics 22 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).
In order to reduce the probability of type 1 errors in
the confirmatory factor analysis of data in the current
study, we used the adjusted goodness of fit index with
5 (2)
Average income
279 (87)
High income
36 (11)
Secondary education
Bilingual school
Government school
21 (7)
299 (93)
Level of residency
Resident 1
121 (38)
Resident 2
105 (33)
Resident 3
94 (29)
Specialty
a
Medical
206 (64)
Surgical
72 (23)
Laboratory
42 (13)
N ¼ 320 under the auspices of Oman Medical Specialty Board from 17
different subspecialties in Oman.
Journal of Graduate Medical Education Supplement, August 2019
135
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
exposure, and their often-observed correlation with
Emotionality, Well-being, and Sociability factors in
univariate analysis (P ¼ .25). The standardized b
coefficients were stated with 95% confidence interval
(CI). The goodness of fit in the linear regression model
was assessed by the coefficient of determination (R2)
Cox and Snell approach.15
Results
A total of 320 participants returned complete
questionnaires (TEIQue-SF), yielding a response rate
of 99%. TABLE 1 presents their sociodemographic
characteristics, which reflects the actual distribution
of residents across the 3 specialty subtypes. The mean
(6 SD) of the trait EI score by factors which are as
follows for each subscale: Well-being 4.57 6 0.67;
Self-control 4.29 6 0.72; Emotionality 3.75 6 0.70;
and Sociability 4.31 6 0.61. The global trait EI of all
residents was 4.20 6 0.42.
Reliability and Validity of TEIQue-SF
The reliability and validity of TEIQue-SF have been
established across different populations,16–18 but not
with trainees in the Arab world. Internal consistency
reliabilities of the 4 factors were as follows: Cronbach
a ¼ 0.70 for Emotionality, a ¼ 0.8 for Self-control, a ¼
0.78 for Well-being, and a ¼ 0.75 for Sociability.
Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in 4 factors
having an Eigenvalue . 1 and accounting for 68% of
the total variance. We confirmed internal consistency
and 4 factors as previously reported.19 These factors
were congruent with the original scale, Sociability,
Emotionality, Self-control, and Well-being. The individual items loaded well on each factor.
TABLE 2 shows the univariate analysis of the 4
subscales of the trait EI as well: Well-being, Selfcontrol, Emotionality, and Sociability, correlated with
different sociodemographic characteristics. Female
gender and high income were associated with the
higher mean score on Well-being of trait EI (P ¼.019;
P ¼.002) and living in a rented house and high income
correlated with Sociability in univariate analysis
(mean 6 SD 4.44 6 0.61, P ¼ .043; mean 6 SD
4.00 6 0.44, P ¼ .003, respectively). No association
was found between other independent explanatory
sociodemographic variables (age, marital status,
income, year of residency, specialty, and education
level) and any EI subscales. There also was no single
independent variable that was associated with the
composite EI score.
TABLES 3 and 4 show multiple linear regressions we
ran to predict EI subscales Well-being and Sociability,
which were significant in univariate analysis.
136
Discussion
The current study, which is the first of its kind in the
region, investigated the level and correlates of EI in
OMSB residents using the TEIQue-SF. We also
explored the psychometric properties of the generic
TEIQue-SF.
Our average composite score for the TEIQue-SF
was 4.20 6 0.42, lower than the average score for the
general population and for surgical residents in a
prior study,20 but comparable to a study of family
medicine residents.3 Our study did not find any
significant difference in trait EI and its subscales
among residents in different specialties, years of
training, and by marital status and age, which is
similar to a study of Iranian students of medical
sciences21 and a study of American residents in their
senior year.22
Omani residents scored high on indices of Wellbeing, followed by Sociability, Self-control, and
Emotionality, respectively, in contrast to a study in
which the lowest scores were on the Sociability
subscale.23 Our lowest score was Emotionality, and
there may be cultural factors in this finding. Omani
culture, due to traditional value systems, may be less
likely to openly express emotion,24 and there is some
propensity in Omani culture to somatize emotionality.25 Future studies could explore whether there are
cultural differences in some aspects of trait EI.
Prior studies have examined the determinants of the
trait EI in medical trainees and practitioners.26–28 In
our sample, gender was a strong predictor of high
trait EI: women scored significantly higher in trait EI
scores than men in the Well-being subscale, echoing
the findings of a systematic review of studies on trait
EI.1 Female gender and high income also showed
strong links to the Well-being subscale, in contrast to
studies that found no association between trainees’ (?)
gender and overall EI.20,22,29,30 Our findings are
consistent with research from Sri Lanka,31 Saudi
Arabia,32 Malaysia,33 Iran,21 and India.34 This could
be explained by women being better at articulating
emotions compared to men.35 In addition, over the
last decade, Omani women have academically outnumbered their male colleagues,36 resulting in a
‘‘feminization’’ of health care services in the country.37 Therefore, it is possible that the observed higher
EI among female residents could be partly reinforced
by the increasing participation of women in the health
workforce.
We also explored the effects of socioeconomic status
on trait EI. In Oman, one’s social standing often
reflects his or her family origin or tribe, while in
Western Europe or North America, one’s education,
income, and occupation define socioeconomic status.38
Journal of Graduate Medical Education Supplement, August 2019
2
Univariate Analysis of Trait Emotional Intelligence Subscales and Associations With Different Sociodemographic Characteristics of Study Participants
TABLE
Well-Being
Variable
Gender
Male
4.44 6 0.68
Female
4.63 6 0.66
Self-Control
P Value
a
.019
Emotionality
Sociability
(Mean 6 SD)
P Value
(Mean 6 SD)
P Value
(Mean 6 SD)
4.3360.77
.54
3.76 6 0.68
.75
4.34 6 0.70
4.2760.70
3.74 6 0.71
P Value
.62
4.30 6 0.57
Age
Age
r ¼ –0.083
.14
r ¼ 0.023
.68
r ¼ 0.039
.48
r ¼ 0.005
.93
Marital status
Married
4.60 6 0.79
.86
4.19 6 0.54
.72
3.55 6 0.86
.62
4.50 6 0.58
.57
Single
4.55 6 0.63
Rent
4.53 6 0.66
Owned
4.58 6 0.67
Acccomodation
Secondary education
Level of residency
Specialty
4.32 6 0.73
.59
4.40 6 0.76
3.73 6 0.65
.14
4.26 6 0.71
a
.002
3.78 6 0.72
4.32 6 0.57
.45
3.70 6 0.69
4.44 6 0.61
4.27 6 0.61
Low income
4.63 6 0.32
Average income
4.53 6 0.68
4.27 6 0.73
3.74 6 0.69
High income
4.80 6 0.52
4.42 6 0.60
3.76 6 0.77
Public
4.47 6 0.57
Private
4.57 6 0.67
Resident 1
4.59 6 0.67
Resident 2
4.08 6 0.82
Resident 3
4.52 6 0.67
Medical
4.55 6 0.68
Surgical
4.52 6 0.68
4.20 6 0.85
3.61 6 0.73
4.25 6 0.58
Diagnostic
4.74 6 0.56
4.44 6 0.56
3.63 6 0.56
4.29 6 0.57
4.33 6 0.77
.48
4.17 6 0.69
.39
4.28 6 0.74
.52
.45
4.3060.72
3.76 6 0.71
3.69 6 0.71
.003a
4.63 6 0.58
.07
4.34 6 0.56
.81
4.31 6 0.61
.77
4.32 6 0.63
.48
3.83 6 0.47
3.70 6 0.70
.22
4.00 6 0.44
4.28 6 0.60
3.69 6 0.09
4.32 6 0.65
4.29 6 0.70
3.48 6 0.47
.46
3.76 6 0.71
.53
3.75 6 1.53
.20
4.13 6 0.88
.043a
4.29 6 0.56
.50
4.34 6 0.63
.58
Statistically significant.
Note: To study the relationship between independent variables and emotional intelligence subscales, 2-tailed Student’s t test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used. A Tukey-post-hoc pair wise comparison was
performed for a statistically significant ANOVA. Correlation analysis was conducted by calculating the Pearson product-moment coefficient.
137
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Journal of Graduate Medical Education Supplement, August 2019
Socioeconomic status
a
(Mean 6 SD)
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
TABLE 3
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for Predicting WellBeing Factor From Explanatory Independent
Sociodemographic Variables of Study Participants
References
1. Arora S, Ashrafian H, Davis R, Athanasiou T, Darzi A,
Sevdalis N. Emotional intelligence in medicine: a
systematic review through the context of the ACGME
Variable
B
SEB
b
P Value
competencies. Med Educ. 2010; 44(8):749–764. doi:10.
Intercept
30.453 3.508
1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03709.x.
a
Gender
1.057 0.487
0.123
.031
2. Joyner BD. A historical review of graduate medical
Age
–0.142 0.124 –0.065
.25
education and a protocol of Accreditation Council for
Rented home
–0.077 0.534 –0.008
.89
Graduate Medical Education compliance. J Urol.
Low income
0.828 1.794
0.026
.65
2004;172(1):34–39. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000121804.
High income
1.648 0.702
0.130
.020a
51403.ef.
Abbreviations: B, unstandardized regression coefficient; SEB, standard error
3. Webb AR, Young RA, Baumer JG. Emotional
of the coefficient; b, standardized coefficient.
intelligence and the ACGME competencies. J Grad Med
a
P , .05.
Educ. 2010;2(4):508–512. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-10A number of studies reported a weak to modest
00080.1.
relation between EI trait measures and income 4. Mayer J, Salovey P. What is emotional intelligence? In:
level.27,39,40 Our finding, consistent with other
Salovey P, Sluyter DJ, eds. Emotional Development and
Emotional Intelligence: Educational Implications. New
studies,41 was that well-being significantly related to
York, NY: Basic Books; 1997:3–31.
high income.
5.
Libbrecht
N, Lievens F, Carette B, Côté S. Emotional
Our male to female distribution (219 women, 101
intelligence
predicts success in medical school.
men) might reduce the generalizability of our findings.
Emotion. 2014;14(1):64–73. doi:10.1037/a0034392.
In addition, as the validity and reliability of EI have
6. Sinclair S, Raffin-Bouchal S, Venturato L, Mijovicbeen debated in the literature, many existing conKondejewski J, Smith-MacDonald L. Compassion
structs of EI lack cut-off points to define whether a
fatigue: a meta-narrative review of the healthcare
subject has high or suboptimal EI.
literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;69:9–24. doi:10.1016/
j.ijnurstu.2017.01.003.
Conclusion
7. Ishak WW, Lederer S, Mandili C, Nikravesh R,
Seligman L, Vasa M, et al. Burnout during residency
In our study, Omani residents scored high in the
training: a literature review. J Grad Med Educ.
subscale of Well-being of trait EI, followed by
2009;1(2):236–242. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-09-00054.1.
Sociability, Self-control, and Emotionality. In terms 8. Williams B, Sadasivan S, Kadirvelu A, Olaussen A.
of determinants, female gender, high income, and
Empathy levels among first year Malaysian medical
living in a rented home were significant predictors of
students: an observational study. Adv Med Educ Pract.
TEIQue-SF’s subscales of Well-being and Sociability,
2014;5:149–156. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S58094.
respectively. Our study lays the groundwork for 9. Mintz LJ, Stoller JK. A systematic review of physician
leadership and emotional intelligence. J Grad Med
further exploration of culturally adapted instruments
Educ. 2014;6(1):21–31. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-13to assess EI in the recruitment and training of future
00012.1.
physicians.
10. Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patientTABLE 4
centred care. BMJ. 2001;322(7284):444–445.
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for Predicting
11. Grewal D, Davidson HA. Emotional intelligence and
Sociability Factor From Explanatory Independent
graduate medical education. JAMA.
Sociodemographic Variables of Study Participants
2008;300(10):1200–1202. doi:10.1001/jama.300.10.
Variable
B
SEB
b
P Value
1200.
12. Doherty E, O’Keeffe D, Traynor O. Developing a
Intercept
27.027 3.186
human factors and patient safety programme at the
Gender
–0.198 0.442 –0.025
.65
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Surgeon.
Age
–0.052 0.112 –0.026
.64
2011;9(suppl
1):38–39. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2010.11.
a
Rented home
0.967 0.485
0.112
.047
003.
Low income
–1.707 1.630 –0.058
.29
13. Birks Y, McKendree J, Watt I. Emotional intelligence
High income
2.081 0.638
0.180
.001a
and perceived stress in healthcare students: a multiAbbreviations: B, unstandardized regression coefficient; SEB, standard error
institutional, multi-professional survey. BMC Med
of the coefficient; b, standardized coefficient.
a
P , .05.
Educ. 2009;9:61. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-9-61.
138
Journal of Graduate Medical Education Supplement, August 2019
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
14. Cooper A, Petrides KV. A psychometric analysis of the
Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form
(TEIQue-SF) using item response theory. J Pers Assess.
2010;92(5):449–457. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.
497426.
15. Appelbaum M, Cooper H, Kline RB, Mayo-Wilson E,
Nezu AM, Rao SM. Journal article reporting standards
for quantitative research in psychology: the APA
Publications and Communications Board task force
report. Am Psychol. 2018;73(1):3–25. doi:10.1037/
amp0000191.
16. Feher A, Yan G, Saklofske DH, Plouffe RA, Gao Y. An
investigation of the psychometric properties of the
Chinese Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire
Short Form (Chinese TEIQue-SF). Front Psychol.
2019;10:435. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00435.
17. Stamatopoulou M, Galanis P, Prezerakos P.
Psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the
Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form
(TEIQue-SF). Pers Individ Dif. 2016;(95):80–84.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.035.
18. Gökçen E, Furnham A, Mavroveli S, Petrides KV. A
cross-cultural investigation of trait emotional
intelligence in Hong Kong and the UK. Pers Individ Dif.
2014;65:30–35. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.053.
19. Borges NJ, Stratton TD, Wagner PJ, Elam CL.
Emotional intelligence and medical specialty choice:
findings from three empirical studies. Med Educ.
2009;43(6):565–572. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.
03371.x.
20. Lin DT, Kannappan A, Lau JN. The assessment of
emotional intelligence among candidates interviewing
for general surgery residency. J Surg Educ.
2013;70(4):514–21. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.03.010.
21. Miri MR, Kermani T, Khoshbakht H, Moodi M. The
relationship between emotional intelligence and
academic stress in students of medical sciences. J Educ
Health Promot. 2013;2:40. doi:10.4103/2277-9531.
115836.
22. Kilpatrick CC, Doyle PD, Reichman EF, Chohan L,
Uthman MO, Orejuela FJ. Emotional intelligence and
selection to administrative chief residency. Acad
Psychiatry. 2012;36(5):388–390. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.
10100151.
23. McKinley SK, Petrusa ER, Fiedeldey-Van Dijk C,
Mullen JT, Smink DS, Scott-Vernaglia SE, et al. Are
there gender differences in the emotional intelligence of
resident physicians? J Surg Educ. 2014;71(6):e33–e40.
doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.05.003.
24. Al-Adawi S. Adolescence in Oman. In: Arnett JJ, ed.
International Encyclopedia of Adolescence. New York,
NY: Routledge; 2006:713–728.
25. Viernes N, Zaidan ZAJ, Dorvlo ASS, Kayano M,
Yoishiuchi K, Kumano H, et al. Tendency toward
deliberate food restriction, fear of fatness and somatic
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
attribution in cross-cultural samples. Eat Behav.
2007;8(3):407–417. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.12.003.
Abe K, Niwa M, Fujisaki K, Suzuki Y. Associations
between emotional intelligence, empathy and
personality in Japanese medical students. BMC Med
Educ. 2018;18:47. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1165-7.
Fischer AH, Kret ME, Broekens J. Gender differences in
emotion perception and self-reported emotional
intelligence: a test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis.
PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190712. doi:10.1371/
journal.pone.0190712.
Gallagher EN, Vella-Brodrick DA. Social support and
emotional intelligence as predictors of subjective wellbeing. Pers Individ Dif. 2008;44(7):1551–1561. doi:10.
1016/j.paid.2008.01.011.
Jensen AR, Wright AS, Lance AR, O’Brien KC, Pratt
CD, Anastakis DJ, et al. The emotional intelligence of
surgical residents: a descriptive study. Am J Surg.
2008;195(1):5–10. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.
049.
Satterfield J, Swenson S, Rabow M. Emotional
intelligence in internal medicine residents: educational
implications for clinical performance and burnout. Ann
Behav Sci Med Educ. 2009;14(2):65–68.
Ranasinghe P, Wathurapatha WS, Mathangasinghe Y,
Ponnamperuma G. Emotional intelligence, perceived
stress and academic performance of Sri Lankan medical
undergraduates. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):41.
doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0884-5.
Ibrahim NK, Algethmi WA, Binshihon SM, Almahyawi
RA, Alahmadi RF, Baabdullah MY. Predictors and
correlations of emotional intelligence among medical
students at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. Pak J
Med Sci. 2017;33(5):1080–1085. doi:10.12669/pjms.
335.13157.
Saddki N, Sukerman N, Mohamad D. Association
between emotional intelligence and perceived stress in
undergraduate dental students. Malays J Med Sci.
2017;24(1):59–68. doi:10.21315/mjms2017.24.1.7.
Kumar A, Puranik MP, Sowmya KR. Association
between dental students’ emotional intelligence and
academic performance: a study at six dental colleges in
India. J Dent Educ. 2016;80(5):526–532.
Stevens JS, Hamann S. Sex differences in brain
activation to emotional stimuli: a meta-analysis of
neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia.
2012;50(7):1578–1593. doi:10.1016/j.
neuropsychologia.2012.03.011.
Eloul L, Ambusaidi A, Al-Adawi S. Silent epidemic of
depression in women in the Middle East and North
Africa region: emerging tribulation or fallacy? Sultan
Qaboos Univ Med J. 2009;9(1):5–15.
Mohamed NA, Abdulhadi NN, Al-Maniri AA, AlLawati NR, Al-Qasmi AM. The trend of feminization
of doctors’ workforce in Oman: is it a phenomenon that
Journal of Graduate Medical Education Supplement, August 2019
139
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
38.
39.
40.
41.
could rouse the health system? Hum Resour Health.
2018;16:19. doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0283-y.
Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey
Smith G. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1).
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(1):7–12.
doi:10.1136/jech.2004.023531.
Carmeli A. The relationship between emotional
intelligence and work attitudes, behavior and outcomes:
an examination among senior managers. J Managerial
Psych. 2003;18(8):788–813. doi:10.1108/
02683940310511881.
Kafetsios K, Zampetakis LA. Emotional intelligence
and job satisfaction: testing the mediatory role of
positive and negative affect at work. Pers Individ Dif.
2008;44(3):712–722. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.004.
Goveas S. Growth in the number of female medical
doctors in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J.
2012;12(3):380–381.
Salim Al Huseini, MD, is Psychiatric Resident, Oman Medical
Specialty Board, Muscat, Oman; Mohammed Al Alawi, MD, is
140
Senior House Officer, Department of Behavioral Medicine, Sultan
Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman; Hamed Al Sinawi,
MD, is Senior Consultant, Department of Behavioral Medicine,
Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman; Naser AlBalushi, MD, is Psychiatric Resident, Oman Medical Specialty
Board, Muscat, Oman; Sachin Jose, PhD, is Senior Statistician,
Studies and Research Section, Oman Medical Specialty Board,
Oman; and Samir Al-Adawi, PhD, is Professor, Department of
Behavioral Medicine, College of Medicine & Health Sciences,
Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.
Funding: The authors report no external funding source for this
study.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing
interests.
The authors would like to thank all the residents who participated
in the study, the leadership at Oman Medical Specialty Board for
their capable and generous contributions to the project, and
Sajjeev Antony for his helpful suggestions on an earlier draft of
this manuscript.
Corresponding author: Samir Al-Adawi, PhD, Sultan Qaboos
University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department
of Behavioral Medicine, PO Box 35, Al-Khoudh 123, Muscat,
Sultanate of Oman, adawi@squ.edu.om
Received May 17, 2018; revisions received May 23, 2019, and June
11, 2019; accepted June 18, 2019.
Journal of Graduate Medical Education Supplement, August 2019