The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 98 –106, 2009
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc.
Printed in the USA. All rights reserved
0736-4679/09 $–see front matter
doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.06.022
Clinical
Reviews
RETINAL HEMORRHAGES AND SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME:
AN EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW
Brandon M. Togioka, MD,* Meghan A. Arnold, MD,* Melinda A. Bathurst, MS, MBA,*
Susan M. Ziegfeld, MSN, CRNP,* Rosemary Nabaweesi, MPH, MBCHB,* Paul M. Colombani, MD,
David C. Chang, PHD, MPH, MBA,† and Fizan Abdullah, MD, PHD*
MBA,*
*Center for Pediatric Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Division of Pediatric Surgery and †Center for Surgical Trials and
Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Reprint Address: Fizan Abdullah, MD, PHD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Harvey 319,
Baltimore, MD 21287-0005
e Abstract—Background: Among the causes of nonaccidental head injury (NAHI), shaken baby syndrome
(SBS) is difficult to diagnose and is associated with retinal
hemorrhages (RH). Description: To identify findings and
patterns of RH specific to SBS, a PubMed search using the
keywords “shaken baby syndrome” or “child abuse” and
“retinal hemorrhage” was conducted; 66 articles met the
inclusion criteria. The published data address the utility of
RH in three categories: 1) in diagnosing SBS; 2) as correlated to intracranial pathology; and 3) in prognosticating
SBS. The present review aimed to summarize studies in a
way that facilitates clinical decision-making. Results: Studies found a 53– 80% incidence of RH with abusive head
injury and a 0 –10% incidence with proven severe accidental trauma. RHs are found bilaterally 62.5–100% of the
time in SBS cases, and flame-shaped hemorrhages are the
most common. The incidence of RH from convulsions, chest
compressions, forceful vomiting, and severe persistent
coughing in the absence of another condition known
to cause RH is 0.7%, 0 –2.3%, 0%, and 0%, respectively.
Conclusion: SBS remains a difficult cause of NAHI to diagnose. Ophthalmologic examination can provide critical
diagnostic and prognostic information in cases of suspected
SBS. Child abuse should be highly suspect in children
with RH and a parental explanation of accidental head
injury, especially if the RHs are found to be bilateral,
flame-shaped, or to extend through to all layers of the
retina. © 2009 Elsevier Inc.
RECEIVED: 13 December 2007; FINAL
ACCEPTED: 11 June 2008
e Keywords—shaken baby syndrome; retinal hemorrhages;
pediatric; child abuse
INTRODUCTION
Non-accidental head injury (NAHI) is a significant problem in young children and infants (1,2). It is estimated
that one-fourth to one-half of all children under 24
months of age admitted to the hospital for head trauma
are victims of abuse (3). Brain injuries in these children
have been shown to permanently hinder neurological,
behavioral, and cognitive development, resulting in motor deficits, visual deficits, epilepsy, speech and language
abnormalities, or behavioral problems that may remain
silent for up to 5 years after an episode of abuse (4). Due
to the difficulty in categorizing head trauma as nonaccidental outside of a parent confession, NAHI is often
a diagnosis of exclusion. Three non-child-abuse-related
situations where traumatic hemorrhage can be found are
accidental head trauma, perinatal trauma, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (5–12).
Shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is one of the most
difficult causes of NAHI to diagnose. External bruising
has been shown to be absent in a significant minority
(21%) of fatal non-accidental head injuries, and a history
of previous maltreatment can be absent in up to 40% of
SUBMISSION RECEIVED:
8 April 2008;
98
RH and Shaken Baby Syndrome
cases (13,14). To this extent, the finding of retinal hemorrhage on ophthalmologic examination in a child with
non-specific neurological symptoms can be very helpful
in making the diagnosis of SBS (15).
SBS refers to a constellation of inflicted injuries
mostly seen in young children, caused by violent shaking, and is typically characterized by subdural hematomas (SDH) and retinal hemorrhages (RH) (15). In a
10-year retrospective chart review of 364 cases of SBS
from 11 pediatric tertiary care hospitals in Canada, the
median age of SBS patients was 4.6 months (13). In our
own review of two de-identified national inpatient admission databases that identified 1479 patients with SBS,
the median age was 3.9 months. However, SBS has been
diagnosed in children up to 8 years of age (16). In the
aforementioned report, 19% of children died as a direct
result of shaking, and only 22% of children who survived
showed no signs of health or developmental impairment
at discharge (13). Approximately 1400 cases of SBS are
reported each year in the United States; however, this
number is almost certainly an underestimate, as cases go
unreported and physicians typically miss approximately
one-third of cases (17,18). Sadly, a number of these
children will be reinjured due to the delay in diagnosis
(18,19).
To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review
has been completed to answer the following question: in
children younger than 3 years of age who are suspected
victims of child abuse, what is the probability of SBS
when RHs are found? This review aims to supplement
the understanding of emergency care providers and clinicians who diagnose SBS by providing a comprehensive review of the published literature on RH and SBS.
Additionally, demographic data from a large national
database are presented to supplement the profile of these
patients.
METHODS
Data that shed light on the issue of RH in SBS were
extracted and reorganized into the following three categories: 1) diagnostic utility of RH in SBS; 2) correlative
significance of RH to intracranial pathology; and 3)
prognostic utility of RH in SBS. The following keyword
phrases were used to search all English medical literature
published on PubMed: “shaken baby syndrome” or
“child abuse” and “retinal hemorrhage.” All articles eligible for inclusion in this review contained 1) a discussion or analysis of non-accidental head trauma in the
pediatric population, and 2) a discussion on RH. For
purposes of this review, we defined SBS as a finding of
SDH or RH in a child whom the investigators of the trials
presumed to have been shaken. Although we excluded
99
impact-associated abusive head trauma from our definition, trials that lumped together this group with SBSassociated abusive head trauma were in some cases included in this study, when pertinent studies investigating
only SBS were not available.
Evidence in this review is rated as follows: class I is
from prospective randomized controlled trials; class II is
from observational studies, cohort studies, prevalence
studies, and case control studies; class III is from clinical
series, databases or registries, case reviews, case reports,
and expert opinion (20). Recommendations in this review are rated as follows: level I is from a preponderance
of class I data or strong class II data in areas where
randomization may be very difficult; level II is from
class II data or a preponderance of class III evidence;
level III is generally supported by class III data (20).
Our initial literature search yielded 235 articles. Online titles of articles and abstracts were reviewed to
screen for eligibility. After examining this information,
62 articles (reviews, case reports, and trials) that met our
inclusion criteria remained. A thorough review of the
citations contained in these 62 articles allowed us to add
32 articles to our pool. Once this review of citations had
been completed, all review articles that did not present
data (n ⫽ 22) were excluded from the review. From the
full text of the 72 articles that remained, the following
was extracted: objective, design, outcome measures, statistical analyses (if pertinent), and limitations. Final review of the extracted data narrowed the final set of
articles that met inclusion criteria down to 64. An additional two articles were added to this pool as they were
published after our initial search, but before final editing
was complete (6,21).
To supplement this review, a retrospective analysis of
a non-overlapping combination of the National Inpatient
Sample (NIS) and Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID)
(1998 –2003) was performed. Both databases have been
developed as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization
Project (HCUP) of the Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality. The NIS is an all-payer database that contains data on up to 8 million inpatient discharges from
approximately 1000 hospitals across the United States
each year. Hospitals are sampled to represent a 20%
stratified sample of all community hospitals. Currently,
data are available from 37 states (22). The KID contains
a sample of pediatric (age 20 years or younger) discharges from all community, non-rehabilitation hospitals
in states that participate in the HCUP. Unlike the NIS,
which samples at the hospital level, the KID samples patient
discharges that are then weighted to obtain national estimates. The sampling algorithm involves systematic random
sampling to select 10% of uncomplicated in-hospital
births and 80% of complicated in-hospital births as well
as other selected pediatric cases. The KID contains in-
100
B. M. Togioka et al.
formation from up to 36 states (23). Information collected on patients in both databases included age at
admission, gender, and race. Patients were included in
the analysis if they had an International Classification of
Diseases (ICD)-9 procedure code of 995.55 (shaken infant syndrome).
RESULTS
We present our results by answering clinical questions
organized into the following three categories: 1) diagnostic utility of RH in SBS; 2) correlative significance of
RH to intracranial pathology; 3) prognostic utility of RH
in SBS.
Diagnostic Utility of RH in SBS
Can the finding of RH help to distinguish abusive from
accidental head injury in infants? Our search yielded a
total of 18 publications, of which eight are presented
(five class II and three class III clinical studies), that
sought to address this question (2,5,24 –29). Seven studies were excluded because they did not include an accidental head injury group, one study was excluded because it grouped abuse occurring at all sites on the body
together, and two studies were excluded due to insufficient power due to small sample size. Pierre-Kahn et al.
compiled a prospective case series from January 1996 to
September 2001 on 241 consecutive infants hospitalized
for a SDH (26). Children were split into three categories
corresponding to the degree of certainty that they were
shaken: children presumed to have been shaken (group
1), children with signs of head trauma without a relevant
history of trauma (group 2), and children with proven
severe accidental trauma (group 3). Intraocular hemorrhage was seen in 77.5% of children in group 1, 20% of
children in group 2, and no children in group 3, leading the
author to conclude that intraocular hemorrhages are suggestive of SBS, but not specific for the syndrome (26).
In other studies, the intermediate category was removed and children were categorized as having been
victims of either abuse or accident (2,24,25,27,28). Three
prospective studies and two retrospective reviews conducted in this manner reported an incidence of RH of
53– 80% in the NAHI group, compared with an incidence
of 0 –10% in the accidental group (2,24,25,27,28). One
of these studies, a prospective analysis of 150 cases of
head trauma collected over 3 years, calculated a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative
predictive value for RH and child abuse of 75%, 93.2%,
89.4%, and 82.9%, respectively (2).
Further evidence that RH in accidental injury is exceedingly rare can be found in a study conducted by
Johnson et al. that sought to determine the incidence of
RH in known accidental circumstances (5). In this study,
only two of 140 children with accidental injury sufficient
to cause skull fracture or intracranial hemorrhage had
RH. Those two children were victims of a side-impact
motor vehicle accident (5).
A very common explanation given by perpetrators
when their child presents at the hospital is that the patient
fell a short distance. A retrospective review by Reece and
Sege of 287 children with head injuries admitted to a
children’s hospital over a 5-year time span attempted to
examine this question (29). They found that for falls of ⬍
4 feet, none of the children in the accidental group had
RH, and 25% of the children in the abused category had
RH (29). This led the author to conclude that “RHs are
virtually never seen in short falls” (29).
What patterns for RH are specific to SBS? Four class II
and three class III clinical studies were found that examined whether RHs from SBS are more commonly found
unilaterally or bilaterally (15,24,26,30 –33). Six of these
studies found incidences of bilateral RH in children with
presumed abusive head trauma from 40 –100% (15,24,
26,30 –32). This was supported by a review article by
Levin published in June of 1990 that found an incidence
range for bilateral RH of 58 –100%, the broad range
being attributed to differences in sample size and to some
of the examinations being performed at the bedside,
whereas others were performed at autopsy, giving greater
freedom to explore the retina (33). This can be compared
to an incidence of 1.5% for bilateral RH in hospitalized
children younger than 2 years of age exposed to accidental head trauma (24).
Three class II and seven class III clinical articles were
examined that commented on where in the retina to look
when searching for RH in a child with suspected SBS
(15,24,26,32–38). As evidenced by reviews, case reports,
and trials, it is a commonly held belief that most RHs in
abusive head injury concentrate on the posterior pole of
the retina (26,32,33,35,36,38). However, it also has been
noted that “the most common clinical eye examination
visualizes only the posterior retina. Only indirect ophthalmic examination reveals the retinal periphery” (34).
Kivlin et al. found that on clinical examination by direct
ophthalmoscopy, 0% of 123 children with suspected
abuse had RH on the peripheral retina near the ora
serrata, whereas on autopsy, 77% had involvement there
(15). Furthermore, according to Bechtel et al., the finding
of a peripheral RH can be quite useful in helping to
differentiate abusive vs. accidental head injury (24).
They found peripheral RH in 27% of patients in the
abusive head injury group and in 0% of patients in the
accidental group (24). A report from the National Australian Conference on Shaken Baby Syndrome even went
RH and Shaken Baby Syndrome
so far as to state that “only SBS (not accidental injury or
disease) can result in a pattern of multiple hemorrhages
distributed throughout the retina to the periphery” (37).
Although both severe and widespread RH and small
and scattered RH have been found to be indicative of
abusive head trauma, a class II clinical study was able to
show a correlation between the amount of retina covered
by RH and the likelihood that the mechanism was physical child abuse (39,40). In a study by Betz et al., RHs
were found in at least one eye covering 19.2–73.2% of
the entire retinal area in all seven cases of physical abuse
(40). In only 2 of 24 children with severe non-inflicted
head trauma (e.g., from falls, aircraft accidents, traffic
accidents) were RH found. These were only located
unilaterally and covered 1.18% and 3.33%, respectively,
of the entire retinal area.
Three class II and three class III clinical studies were
examined that support the assertion that RHs are found
most commonly in the superficial layers of the retina,
also known as the nerve fiber and ganglion cell layers
(31,33,36,38 – 40). This correlates with the clinical prevalence of flame-shaped retinal hemorrhages, the most
common form of RHs in SBS, which occur from blood in
the nerve-fiber layer (36). In a retrospective study of the
eyes of 12 infants who died with a clinical and pathologic diagnosis of SBS, RH was found in the superficial
layers in at least one eye in 11 of the 12 infants and
graded moderate or severe in 10 of those 11 (38). Riffenburgh and Sathyavagiswaran similarly found an extremely high incidence of RH in the superficial layers of
the retina in the eyes of victims of child abuse (39). Out
of 101 eyes examined by autopsy, 100 eyes had involvement of the superficial layers. Additionally, both Riffenburgh and Sathyavagiswaran and Rao et al. noted that in
all of the eyes in which the deeper layers were involved,
the superficial layers were more heavily involved, and no
cases were found in which only the deeper layers were
involved (31,39). When all layers of the retina are involved, Betz et al. found that physical abuse should be
highly suspected (40). RH extending through to all layers
was found in all seven cases of physical abuse and in 0 of
24 children with severe non-inflicted head trauma (40).
In addition to RH, vitreous hemorrhage, retrohyaloidal
hemorrhages, premacular hemorrhages, preretinal hemorrhages, subretinal hemorrhages, retinal folds, dome-like
hemorrhages, macular holes, and Roth spots without evidence of bacterial endocarditis all have been linked to
abusive head trauma in children (15,24,26,30 –33,35,36,38,
39,41– 45).
Out of these additional forms of hemorrhage, vitreous
hemorrhage probably has the most evidence linking it to
child abuse. Two class II and three class III clinical
studies found data supporting the assertion that although
vitreous hemorrhage is a less common form of hemor-
101
rhage in SBS, it is not uncommonly found and it has an
incidence of 10 –14% when looked for on clinical examination (15,24,26,31,35,36). Furthermore, in the abovementioned article by Bechtel et al., an incidence of 13%
was found in the abusive head trauma group, whereas an
incidence of 0% was found in the accidental group (24).
Some evidence has now accumulated to suggest that the
vitreous hemorrhage found in SBS may not be a primary
injury, but rather may be due to RH progressively over
time breaking through to the vitreous cavity (44). Four
class III clinical studies reported that vitreous hemorrhage developed in infants after a delay of 2 days to
weeks (32,33,35,44). Two additional class II studies
found that every time a vitreous hemorrhage was found,
it was associated with a RH, all of which were described
by Pierre-Kahn et al. as being “large” (26,39). Two of the
above-cited articles suggested that the typically delayed
appearance of vitreous hemorrhages could help with
estimating time of injury (33,35).
Four class II and seven class III clinical studies support the assertion that the finding of retrohyaloidal hemorrhages, premacular hemorrhages, preretinal hemorrhages, subretinal hemorrhages, dome-like hemorrhages,
Roth spots without evidence of bacterial endocarditis,
retinal folds, and macular holes can help one to make the
diagnosis of SBS (15,24,26,30,31,33,38,41– 43,45). The
incidence of these other types of retinal damage in SBS
has been estimated at: 47% for retrohyaloidal hemorrhages (hemorrhages beneath the envelope that encompasses the vitreous humor), 20% for premacular hemorrhages (hemorrhage between the macula and posterior
vitreous face), 30 –38% for preretinal hemorrhages (hemorrhages behind the internal limiting membrane and in
front of the nerve fiber layer), 10% for subretinal hemorrhages (bleeding under the retina), 7% for dome-like
hemorrhages (hemorrhages in the superficial layers causing the internal limiting membrane to bubble up), and
15% for Roth spots (white-centered retinal hemorrhages)
(15,24,26,30). The incidence of retrohyaloidal hemorrhages, premacular hemorrhages, and preretinal hemorrhages in accidental head trauma was 0% (24,26). Additionally, retinal folds, a sign of retinal detachment, have
been linked to death resulting from SBS. Munger et al.
and Rao et al. found such folds in 5 of 12 and in 1 of 5
children presumed to have been fatally shaken, respectively (31,38,41). Macular holes in patients diagnosed
with SBS are mentioned in only one article where they
are associated with poor visual acuity outcome (45).
What diseases can mimic the RH seen in SBS? Our
search yielded seven class III case reports and one class
II observational study for infants with RH attributed to
102
the following disease etiologies: osteogenesis imperfecta, Terson syndrome (intraocular bleeding associated
with acute intracranial hemorrhage), homozygous protein C deficiency, glutaric aciduria type 1 (a rare autosomal recessive neurometabolic disorder), HermanskyPudlak Syndrome (an autosomal recessive condition
characterized by albinism and platelet abnormalities),
and hemorrhagic disease of the newborn (an acquired
disorder of vitamin K deficiency) (46 –53).
Can internally generated forceful body movements cause
RH? Our review found three class II observational studies that sought to answer this question (21,54). Herr et al.
conducted a descriptive study of 100 infants with a
history of forceful vomiting from hypertrophic pyloric
stenosis (54). All patients received a dilatated funduscopic examination and no RHs were identified in any of
the cases. Goldman et al. looked at 100 consecutive
children aged 3–24 months who were hospitalized for at
least 3 days of coughing (21). In this study, no RHs were
found in any of the children. Herr et al. followed 153
children younger than 24 months of age brought to the
emergency department after a convulsive episode (54).
After examining both eyes in all 153 children, only one
eye was found to have a retinal hemorrhage.
Can CPR in children cause RH? Our search produced
two prospective studies that addressed this relationship
(9,55). In the first, Odom et al. found only one incidence
of a small punctuate RH in 43 patients hospitalized for
non-traumatic illnesses in intensive care and who received at least 1 min of chest compressions and survived
long enough for a retinal examination (55). Similarly,
Kanter found RH in only one patient out of 49 consecutive children who received chest compressions in whom
child abuse was not suspected (9). It should be noted that
in both studies, pre-arrest funduscopic examinations
were not performed and it is therefore impossible to
definitively determine the cause of the RH.
Can RH form from birth trauma and what is the typical
time to resolution? Our literature search produced three
studies with class II evidence that were fairly consistent
in finding an incidence of RH of slightly ⬎ one-third and
a time to resolution of ⬍ 1 week (6 – 8). Hughes et al.
found RHs in 34% of 53 neonates examined 1 to 4 days
after birth (6). Bergen et al. found RHs in 35% of 100
newborns and Levin et al. found RHs in 37.3% of 410
newborns examined within 24 h of delivery (7,8).
Whereas Bergen et al. found a correlation between both
mode of delivery and length of labor with the incidence
of RH, Levin et al. found no such correlations. Both
Bergen and Margolis and Levin et al. found that the
majority of neonatal RHs resolved completely in 5– 6
B. M. Togioka et al.
days, whereas Hughes et al. found that most RHs resolved completely by 3 to 9 days (6 – 8).
Can you date abuse by examination of RH? A class III
study does not support the use of an ophthalmologic
examination to estimate the interval between a traumatic
event and presentation to medical personnel (56). In a
retrospective study by McCabe and Donahue, the following times to resolution of RH for 20 patients who received follow-up were noted: 7 patients by 1 month, 5
patients by 2 months, 4 patients by 3 months, 2 patients
by 4 months, 1 patient by 9 months, and 1 patient by 11
months (56).
Correlative Significance of RH to
Intracranial Pathology
Can the presence or severity of RH be correlated with
severity of intracranial trauma? Two class III clinical
series were found that support using extent of eye hemorrhage as a rough estimate for severity of head trauma
(57,58). In the first study, a forensic pathology study of
eye and brain injuries in 23 consecutive children who
died of non-accidental injury from 1988 through 1992, a
very strong correlation between severity of central nervous system (CNS) trauma and both total eye trauma
(p ⬍ 0.0001) and the degree of eye hemorrhage (p ⬍
0.0001) was found (57). Green et al. also found RH in 12
of 16 children who died of CNS failure, compared with
only 1 of 7 children without CNS death (p ⬍ 0.02) (57).
In a second study of 75 children with apparent NAHI
consistent with SBS, Morad et al. found a strong correlation between severity of cranial trauma and degree of
RH (p ⬍ 0.04) (58). No association was found between
anatomic site of RH and location of intracranial findings.
With what types of intracranial pathology are RHs associated? Four studies addressed this question. One
study was excluded because it was a single case study
and no statistically significant conclusions could be
drawn. Although Morad et al. found no association between intracranial and retinal findings, two additional
studies correlated RH with specific types of intracranial
pathology (58 – 60). A retrospective case series of infants
younger than 24 months of age with confirmed or suspected SBS correlated RH with parenchymal brain lesions (59). In this study, 1 of 8 infants without RH had a
parenchymal brain lesion, compared with 17 of 18 infants
with RH. In another study, 53 cases of NAHI in children
underwent detailed neuropathologic study, which revealed
a significant association between subdural bleeding and the
presence of RH (P ⬍ 0.001) (60).
RH and Shaken Baby Syndrome
Prognostic Utility of RH in SBS
Can neurologic outcome be predicted by severity or
presence of RH? The largest comprehensive series that
includes both clinical and autopsy findings was a retrospective study of 123 children admitted to a children’s
hospital for SDH secondary to abuse from January 1987
through December 1998 (15). Ninety percent of the
children had an ophthalmologic examination; 83% of
those had RH. The presence of RH increased mortality
by an odds ratio of 5.12 (15). There was a significant
trend of increasing mortality with increasing severity of
hemorrhage from no RH 10% mortality, to unilateral RH
23% mortality, to bilateral RH 38% mortality (p ⬍
0.012). This study did not find an association between
the presence of RH and visual outcome (p ⬎ 0.05) or
neurological outcome (p ⬎ 0.05).
Five other studies, which had sample sizes of 5 to 23
children, found a similar correlation between severity of
intraocular trauma and neurological outcome (61– 65). In
a study of 9 children with confirmed SBS and a normal
head computed tomography scan on admission, severe
RH, found in 5 children, was correlated with abnormal
neurological outcome that included: developmental motor delay, ataxia, poor head control, seizure disorder, and
swallowing difficulty (61). Bonnier et al. found severe
disability in 9 of 12 children with retinal detachment or
vitreous hemorrhage (considered a more severe finding
than RH), compared with 5 of 11 patients with less
severe or no ocular damage (p ⫽ 0.04) (62). Wilkinson
et al. found a significant correlation between degree of
retinal injury and initial neurologic injury (p ⬍ 0.05) and
a borderline correlation between degree of retinal injury
and late neurologic injury (p ⬎ 0.05) (63). Matthews and
Das found that a dense vitreous hemorrhage in SBS is
correlated with poor final visual outcome, even when
accounting for corrective surgery (64). Lastly, in a study
of 10 children diagnosed with SBS, Mills found a significant correlation between mortality and the presence
of either perimacular retinal folds (p ⬍ 0.05) or peripheral retinoschisis (p ⬍ 0.02), a condition in which the
retina splits into layers (65).
DISCUSSION
SBS remains among the most difficult causes of NAHI to
diagnose. A lack of visible external injuries or no previous history of maltreatment in up to 40% of cases makes
the ophthalmologic examination critical in the work-up
of a child who is a suspected victim of abuse (13,14).
Although the presence of RH does not confirm the diagnosis of SBS, the articles reviewed show that RHs are
common in abused children and exceedingly rare in
103
cases of accidental head injury. Although the data cannot
remove any uncertainty about the precise etiology of
injury in the absence of a witnessed inflicted head injury
or confession by an alleged perpetrator, the sheer number
of articles with consistent findings supports using RH as
a physical examination finding consistent with SBS.
The correlation between hemorrhages in the deeper
layers of the retina and SBS is founded on the idea that
such hemorrhages originate in the superficial retinal layers and spread with increasing damage. It is speculated
that greater trauma to the retina occurs during shaking
due to a shearing effect that does not occur during typical
accidental head trauma. Thus, when all layers of the
retina are involved, physical abuse is often found.
Although RHs are one of the cardinal features of SBS,
there are numerous potential causes of RH in children
under the age of 3 years (46 –53). Among these causes
are a number of “zebra” diseases that can mimic the RH
seen in SBS. Should a child fit into one of these clinical
syndromes, clinical suspicion for SBS can be lowered.
However, a history of forceful vomiting, persistent
coughing, seizures, or prolonged chest compressions has
not been shown to reproduce the RH seen in SBS. In
1972, Caffey speculated that the elevated intrathoracic
venous pressure transmitted to the head during CPR
could lead to eye damage (66). Since Caffey first hypothesized this mechanism of action, several case reports
have come out attempting to link resuscitation attempts
with RH (9 –12). Data to date, though limited, do not
support prolonged chest compressions as a potential
cause of RH.
In addition to the above-mentioned difficulty in distinguishing between abusive and accidental head trauma,
our ability to draw strong conclusions in certain areas
was hindered by a lack of prospective studies and studies
with small sample sizes. Due to the paucity of information available on certain topics that relate to SBS, several
articles included in this analysis were retrospective reviews or analyses with small sample sizes: (1,13,15,27–
29,38,56 – 62,64,65,67,68) and (4,31,38,40,57,62– 65,69),
respectively. This raises concerns that interpreter bias
may be present, confounding variables may not have
been identified, and study groups may not have been
comparable, or that studies may have been underpowered
to find true differences or causal relationships.
Another limitation of this analysis is the absence of
the ophthalmologic examination from the repertoire of
procedures performed regularly by most clinicians. It is
well documented that when an ophthalmologic examination is performed by a physician unaccustomed to performing the examination, there is an increased incidence
of false negatives (15,68). In a study by Morad et al., 72
children were examined first by a non-ophthalmologist and
then by an ophthalmologist (68). Sixty-one patients had RH
104
B. M. Togioka et al.
documented by the ophthalmologist, compared to only 28
by the non-ophthalmologist. The non-ophthalmologists indicated that they tried but were unable to examine the
retina in 14 patients, whereas in an additional 26 patients,
there was no documentation that a retinal examination
was attempted. When the retinal examination was completed by the non-ophthalmologist, a correct diagnosis
was made in 28 of 32 patients, or 87% of the time. In the
remaining four children, the non-ophthalmologist incorrectly documented normal retinas when, in fact, RHs were
present. Furthermore, none of the non-ophthalmologists
noted the type, location, or number of hemorrhages or
used pupil-dilatating drops, when these steps are standard and were performed by all the ophthalmologists in
the study. Although some of the studies cited in this
article employed a pediatric ophthalmologist, many of
the studies relied on the ability of the first responder, who
sometimes was not an ophthalmologist, to either screen
for or diagnose RH (21,54 –56).
CONCLUSION
This review forms the basis for the following level II
recommendations: 1) child abuse should be highly suspected in children with RH and a parental explanation of
accidental head injury, 2) the finding of bilateral RH
should be considered a physical examination finding
supporting the diagnosis of SBS, and 3) that the finding
of flame-shaped retinal hemorrhages on clinical examination and the finding of RH in the superficial layers of
the retina on autopsy, especially if the RH is found to
extend through to all layers, should serve as evidence
supporting the diagnosis of child abuse (2,5,15,24 –33).
This review forms the basis for the following level III
recommendations: 1) in cases of suspected SBS, indirect
ophthalmic examination should be used to examine both
the retinal periphery and the posterior pole, 2) clinical
suspicion should be peaked when ⬎ 20% of the retinal
area is covered by RH, 3) the severity of intraocular
damage should be used as a rough estimate for neurological prognosis, with higher severity being correlated
to worse neurological outcome, 4) a history of forceful
vomiting, persistent coughing, seizures, or prolonged
chest compressions should not lessen clinical suspicion
for child abuse in patients with RH, and 5) the extent of eye
hemorrhage should be used as a rough estimate for severity
of head trauma (9,15,24,26,32– 40,55,57,58,61– 65).
Additionally, although the literature on dating abuse
by examination of RH is sparse, the wide range in
resolution times of RH supports the idea that the appearance or lack of presence of RH on fundoscopic examination gives little information that can be used to date
abuse (56).
REFERENCES
1. Barlow KM, Milne S, Aitken K, Minns RA. A retrospective
epidemiological analysis of non-accidental head injury in children
in Scotland over a 15 year period. Scott Med J 1998;43:112– 4.
2. Vinchon M, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Desurmont M, Dhellemmes
P. Accidental and nonaccidental head injuries in infants: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 2005;102(4 Suppl):380 – 4.
3. Duhaime AC, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ, et al. Head injury in very
young children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic
findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age.
Pediatrics 1992;90:179 – 85.
4. Barlow KM, Thomson E, Johnson D, Minns RA. Late neurologic
and cognitive sequelae of inflicted traumatic brain injury in infancy. Pediatrics 2005;116:e174 – 85.
5. Johnson DL, Braun D, Friendly D. Accidental head trauma and
retinal hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1993;33:231– 4.
6. Hughes LA, May K, Talbot JF, Parsons MA. Incidence, distribution, and duration of birth-related retinal hemorrhages: a prospective study. J AAPOS 2006;10:102– 6.
7. Bergen R, Margolis S. Retinal hemorrhages in the newborn. Ann
Ophthalmol 1976;8:53– 6.
8. Levin S, Janive J, Mintz M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value
of retinal hemorrhages in the neonate. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:
309 –14.
9. Kanter RK. Retinal hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary resuscitation or child abuse. J Pediatr 1986;108:430 –2.
10. Goetting MG, Sowa B. Retinal hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary
resuscitation in children: an etiologic reevaluation. Pediatrics
1990;85:585– 8.
11. Kirschner RH, Stein RJ. The mistaken diagnosis of child abuse. A
form of medical abuse? Am J Dis Child 1985;139:873–5.
12. Weedn VW, Mansour AM, Nichols MM. Retinal hemorrhage in an
infant after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Forensic Med
Pathol 1990;11:79 – 82.
13. King WJ, MacKay M, Sirnick A. Shaken baby syndrome in Canada: clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospital cases. CMAJ
2003;168:155–9.
14. Atwal GS, Rutty GN, Carter N, Green MA. Bruising in nonaccidental head injured children; a retrospective study of the prevalence, distribution and pathological associations in 24 cases. Forensic Sci Int 1998;96:215–30.
15. Kivlin JD, Simons KB, Lazoritz S, Ruttum MS. Shaken baby
syndrome. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1246 –54.
16. Mierisch RF, Frasier LD, Braddock SR, Giangiacomo J, Berkenbosch JW. Retinal hemorrhages in an 8-year-old child: an uncommon presentation of abusive injury. Pediatr Emerg Care 2004;20:
118 –20.
17. Newton AW, Vandeven AM. Unexplained infant and child death:
a review of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Sudden Unexplained
Infant Death, and child maltreatment fatalities including shaken
baby syndrome. Curr Opin Pediatr 2006;18:196 –200.
18. Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A, Reinert SE, Hay TC. Analysis of
missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA 1999;281:621– 6.
19. Warner JE, Hansen DJ. The identification and reporting of physical
abuse by physicians: a review and implications for research. Child
Abuse Negl 1994;18:11–25.
20. Tisherman SA, Barie P, Bokhari F, et al. Clinical practice guideline: endpoints of resuscitation. J Trauma 2004;57:898 –912.
21. Goldman M, Dagan Z, Yair M, Elbaz U, Lahat E, Yair M. Severe
cough and retinal hemorrhage in infants and young children. J Pediatr 2006;148:835– 6.
22. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Introduction to the
HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Available at: http://www.
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed January 14, 2007.
23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Introduction to the
HCUP Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID). Available at: http://www.
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/kidoverview.jsp. Accessed January 14, 2007.
24. Bechtel K, Stoessel K, Leventhal JM, et al. Characteristics that
distinguish accidental from abusive injury in hospitalized young
children with head trauma. Pediatrics 2004;114:165– 8.
RH and Shaken Baby Syndrome
25. Ewing-Cobbs L, Kramer L, Prasad M, et al. Neuroimaging, physical, and developmental findings after inflicted and noninflicted
traumatic brain injury in young children. Pediatrics 1998;102:
300 –7.
26. Pierre-Kahn V, Roche O, Dureau P, et al. Ophthalmologic findings
in suspected child abuse victims with subdural hematomas. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1718 –23.
27. Dashti SR, Decker DD, Razzaq A, Cohen AR. Current patterns
of inflicted head injury in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 1999;31:
302– 6.
28. Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Marshall SW, Nocera MA, Merten DF.
A population-based comparison of clinical and outcome characteristics of young children with serious inflicted and noninflicted
traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics 2004;114:633–9.
29. Reece RM, Sege R. Childhood head injuries: accidental or inflicted? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:11–5.
30. Nakagawa TA, Skrinska R. Improved documentation of retinal
hemorrhages using a wide-field digital ophthalmic camera in patients who experienced abusive head trauma. Arch Pediatr Adolesc
Med 2001;155:1149 –52.
31. Rao N, Smith RE, Choi JH, Xu XH, Kornblum RN. Autopsy
findings in the eyes of fourteen fatally abused children. Forensic
Sci Int 1988;39:293–9.
32. Greenwald MJ, Weiss A, Oesterle CS, Friendly DS. Traumatic
retinoschisis in battered babies. Ophthalmology 1986;93:618 –25.
33. Levin AV. Ocular manifestations of child abuse. Ophthalmol Clin
North Am 1990;3:249 – 64.
34. Gilliland MG, Luckenbach MW, Chenier TC. Systemic and ocular
findings in 169 prospectively studied child deaths: retinal hemorrhages usually mean child abuse. Forensic Sci Int 1994;68:117–32.
35. Greenwald MJ. The shaken baby syndrome. Semin Ophthalmol
1990;5:202–15.
36. Lancon JA, Haines DE, Parent AD. Anatomy of the shaken baby
syndrome. Anat Rec 1998;253:13– 8.
37. Moran KT. National Australian conference on shaken baby syndrome. Med J Aust 2002;176:310 –1.
38. Munger CE, Peiffer RL, Bouldin TW, Kylstra JA, Thompson RL.
Ocular and associated neuropathologic observations in suspected
whiplash shaken infant syndrome. A retrospective study of 12
cases. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1993;14:193–200.
39. Riffenburgh RS, Sathyavagiswaran L. Ocular findings at autopsy
of child abuse victims. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1519 –24.
40. Betz P, Puschel K, Miltner E, Lignitz E, Eisenmenger W. Morphometrical analysis of retinal hemorrhages in the shaken baby
syndrome. Forensic Sci Int 1996;78:71– 80.
41. Gaynon MW, Koh K, Marmor MF, Frankel LR. Retinal folds in
the shaken baby syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;106:423–5.
42. Kapoor S, Schiffman J, Tang R, Kiang E, Li H, Woodward J. The
significance of white-centered retinal hemorrhages in the shaken
baby syndrome. Pediatr Emerg Care 1997;13:183–5.
43. Kivlin JD. A 12-year ophthalmologic experience with the shaken
baby syndrome at a regional children’s hospital. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1999;97:545– 81.
44. Mushin AS. Ocular damage in the battered-baby syndrome. Br
Med J 1971;3:402– 4.
45. Ou JI, Moshfeghi DM, Tawansy K, Sears JE. Macular hole in the
shaken baby syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:913–5.
46. Ganesh A, Jenny C, Geyer J, Shouldice M, Levin AV. Retinal
hemorrhages in type I osteogenesis imperfecta after minor trauma.
Ophthalmology 2004;111:1428 –31.
47. Schloff S, Mullaney PB, Armstrong DC, et al. Retinal findings in
children with intracranial hemorrhage. Ophthalmology 2002;109:
1472– 6.
48. Hattenbach LO, Beeg T, Kreuz W, Zubcov A. Ophthalmic manifestation of congenital protein C deficiency. J AAPOS 1999;3:
188 –90.
105
49. Kumagai K, Nishiwaki K, Sato K, et al. [Perioperative management of a patient with purpura fulminans syndrome due to protein
C deficiency]. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:1070 – 4.
50. Gago LC, Wegner RK, Capone A Jr, Williams GA. Intraretinal
hemorrhages and chronic subdural effusions: glutaric aciduria type
1 can be mistaken for shaken baby syndrome. Retina 2003;23:
724 – 6.
51. Knapp JF, Soden SE, Dasouki MJ, Walsh IR. A 9-month-old baby
with subdural hematomas, retinal hemorrhages, and developmental
delay. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002;18:44 –7.
52. Russell-Eggitt IM, Thompson DA, Khair K, Liesner R, Hann IM.
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome presenting with subdural haematoma and retinal haemorrhages in infancy. J R Soc Med 2000;93:
591–2.
53. Rutty GN, Smith CM, Malia RG. Late-form hemorrhagic disease
of the newborn: a fatal case report with illustration of investigations that may assist in avoiding the mistaken diagnosis of child
abuse. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1999;20:48 –51.
54. Herr S, Pierce MC, Berger RP, Ford H, Pitetti RD. Does valsalva
retinopathy occur in infants? An initial investigation in infants with
vomiting caused by pyloric stenosis. Pediatrics 2004;113:1658 – 61.
55. Odom A, Christ E, Kerr N, et al. Prevalence of retinal hemorrhages
in pediatric patients after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective study. Pediatrics 1997;99:E3.
56. McCabe CF, Donahue SP. Prognostic indicators for vision and
mortality in shaken baby syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:
373–7.
57. Green MA, Lieberman G, Milroy CM, Parsons MA. Ocular and
cerebral trauma in non-accidental injury in infancy: underlying
mechanisms and implications for paediatric practice. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:282–7.
58. Morad Y, Kim YM, Armstrong DC, Huyer D, Mian M, Levin AV.
Correlation between retinal abnormalities and intracranial abnormalities in the shaken baby syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;
134:354 –9.
59. Biousse V, Suh DY, Newman NJ, Davis PC, Mapstone T, Lambert
SR. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in Shaken
Baby Syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:249 –55.
60. Geddes JF, Hackshaw AK, Vowles GH, Nickols CD, Whitwell
HL. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. I. Patterns
of brain damage. Brain 2001;124:1290 – 8.
61. Morad Y, Avni I, Benton SA, et al. Normal computerized tomography of brain in children with shaken baby syndrome. J AAPOS
2004;8:445–50.
62. Bonnier C, Nassogne MC, Saint-Martin C, Mesples B, Kadhim H,
Sebire G. Neuroimaging of intraparenchymal lesions predicts outcome in shaken baby syndrome. Pediatrics 2003;112:808 –14.
63. Wilkinson WS, Han DP, Rappley MD, Owings CL. Retinal hemorrhage predicts neurologic injury in the shaken baby syndrome.
Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1472– 4.
64. Matthews GP, Das A. Dense vitreous hemorrhages predict poor
visual and neurological prognosis in infants with shaken baby
syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1996;33:260 –5.
65. Mills M. Funduscopic lesions associated with mortality in shaken
baby syndrome. J AAPOS 1998;2:67–71.
66. Caffey J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants. Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Am J Dis Child 1972;124:161–9.
67. Gilliland MG, Luckenbach MW. Are retinal hemorrhages found
after resuscitation attempts? A study of the eyes of 169 children.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1993;14:187–92.
68. Morad Y, Kim YM, Mian M, Huyer D, Capra L, Levin AV.
Nonophthalmologist accuracy in diagnosing retinal hemorrhages
in the shaken baby syndrome. J Pediatr 2003;142:431– 4.
69. Gilliland MG, Folberg R, Hayreh SS. Age of retinal hemorrhages
by iron detection: an animal model. Am J Forensic Med Pathol
2005;26:1– 4.
106
B. M. Togioka et al.
ARTICLE SUMMARY
1. Why is this topic important?
Shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is a common and underdiagnosed cause for permanent psychological and
neurological morbidity in a completely defenseless population (infants).
2. What does this study attempt to show?
Retinal hemorrhage (RH) in an infant should reflexively
prompt clinicians to rule out SBS even in the setting of a
described accidental head injury, convulsions, chest compressions, forceful vomiting, or severe persistent coughing.
3. What are the key findings?
The incidence of RH with abusive head trauma is
53– 80%, whereas the incidence of RH with proven severe accidental trauma, convulsions, chest compressions,
forceful vomiting, and severe persistent vomiting found
in five studies is 0 –10%, 0.7%, 0 –2.3%, 0%, and 0%,
respectively.
4. How is patient care impacted?
SBS can be diagnosed earlier and should be missed
less often, leading to less infant morbidity and mortality
if clinicians better understand the implications of the
disease’s hallmark finding: retinal hemorrhages.