Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2011 •
The literature on international regulatory regimes has highlighted how rival standards can create different points of convergence. Scholarly attention has also focused on how the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) attempt to ‘export’ their environmental standards internationally. Here, we explore the effectiveness of these attempts by means of third states’ decisions to ratify the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, a multilateral environmental agreement (MEA) regulating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that is promoted by the EU but opposed by the US. Our findings confirm that both rivals are able to influence the ratification decision of states, but they also suggest that these effects may have different origins. Countries relying more heavily on US markets for food exports tend to be less likely to ratify the Cartagena Protocol while countries that have applied for EU membership are more likely to ratify the protocol.
Global Environmental Politics
Vogel, David. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States . Princeton: Princeton University Press2014 •
Social Studies of Science
Regulatory Standards for Environmental Risks2006 •
US and European Union (EU) approaches to the regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are often explained using the ideas of ‘sound science’ and the ‘precautionary principle’. These stereotypes, however, can be misleading. They can conceal conflicts within jurisdictions and important interactions between them. This paper avoids these ideas and instead analyses conflicts and interactions associated with the regulation of GMOs in the USA and the EU, using the example of Bt maize - a genetically modified crop. It focuses on risk assessment as a standard-setting process, and explains changes in regulatory standards. In this case, public protest and trade conflict created an opportunity for a transatlantic network of critical scientists to challenge regulatory standards and for non-governmental organizations to press for higher ones. The paper links two analytical perspectives to account for how this happened. ‘Regulatory science’ helps to explain what happens when the ‘privat...
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Opening Editorial to the Special Issue on Transnational Risks and Multilevel Governance2005 •
During the 1990s, a new regulatory pattern in domestic environmental policy making emerged. This pattern is largely a result of policy diffusion. In the absence of formal obligations, regulatory instruments that have been communicated internationally and were already being practiced elsewhere were voluntarily emulated and adopted by policy makers. While the international promotion of regulatory instruments often facilitated their diffusion, the instruments’ characteristics determined the extent and speed by which regulatory instruments spread across countries. The voluntary adoption of regulatory instruments cannot be exclusively explained by the rational motivation of policy makers to improve effectiveness. In addition, they were motivated by concerns of legitimacy and perceived pressure to conform with international norms.
Journal of Law and Society
Globalizing Regulation: Reaching Beyond the Borders of Chemical Safety2009 •
This article argues that although globalization can benefit both exporters and importers of regulation in absolute terms, it may turn the globalization of regulation into a game with relative winners and losers. Using the EU REACH Regulation of chemicals as a case study, it explores the normative, social, economic, and strategic reasons that push the EU to promote the global adoption of REACH. Notwithstanding its attractions, rules globalization may result in a mismatch between global norms and local priorities, particularly for developing countries. It reduces regulatory diversity, and amplifies the strengths but equally the weaknesses of the dominant regulatory framework. While it can foster international trade through mutual recognition of regulatory decisions and the development of transnational regulatory frameworks, it increases the likelihood of conflict and trade flow desequilibria. The article calls for further careful consideration of rules globalization, so that harmonization does not come at the expense of local interests and values.
Ethics & International Affairs
All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes, Daniel W. Drezner (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2007), 254 pp., $29.95 cloth2007 •
David Vogel and Johan F. M. Swinnen (eds.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: The Shifting Roles of the EU, the US and California
C. Ansell & J. Balsiger. 2009. The Circuits of Regulation: Transatlantic Perspectives on Persistent Organic Pollutants and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals2011 •
Errori, orrori, regole e falsi miti nell'italiano contemporaneo
Errori, orrori, regole e falsi miti nell'italiano contemporaneo, Firenze, Cesati, 20222022 •
Journal of Contemporary Asia
Anti-Royalism in Thailand Since 2006: Ideological Shifts and Resistance2018 •
2018 •
The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
Hybrid capture as a tool for cervical lesions screening in HIV-infected women: insights from a Brazilian cohort2017 •
Journal of Dairy Science
Different distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence profiles of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical mastitis in six countries2020 •
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
An explanation for the 18O excess in Noelaerhabdaceae coccolith calcite2016 •
Jurnal Kawistara
Siklus Hidup Destinasi Wisata di Kabupaten Pangandaran2023 •
PLoS Pathogens
Transmission Characteristics of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic: Comparison of 8 Southern Hemisphere Countries2011 •
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BIOLOGY AND BIOMEDICINE
Discrete Type SIR Epidemic Model with Nonlinear Incidence Rate in Presence of Immunity2020 •