[go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 13, 2011 Does female mortality drive male semelparity in dasyurid marsupials? Ken Kraaijeveld, Femmie J. L. Kraaijeveld-Smit and Greg J. Adcock Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003 270, S251-S253 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0082 References Article cited in: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/270/Suppl_2/S251#related-urls Email alerting service Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B go to: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions This journal is © 2003 The Royal Society Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 13, 2011 Does female mortality drive male semelparity in dasyurid marsupials? Ken Kraaijeveld1*, Femmie J. L. Kraaijeveld-Smit2 and Greg J. Adcock3 1 Department of Biology, Galton Laboratory, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK 2 Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, UK 3 Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia * Author for correspondence (k.kraaijeveld@ucl.ac.uk). Recd 06.05.03; Accptd 17.07.03; Online 22.08.03 In some members of the marsupial families Didelphidae and Dasyuridae, males are semelparous, that is, they live for only one mating season. Semelparity is proposed to be the result of the high energy demands of competing for matings with many females during a short breeding season. We argue that high adult female mortality rates between mating and weaning of the offspring selects for a ‘bethedging’ mating strategy in males. We tested this hypothesis in a well-studied field population of Antechinus agilis by estimating the number of females a male needs to mate with in order to have a high chance of siring at least one offspring that survives to the next breeding season. Our hypothesis predicts that species in which males are semelparous should have higher female mortality rates than species in which males are iteroparous. The limited available data for dasyurid marsupials support this prediction. with a low probability of males surviving to the next breeding season, resulted in the highest fitness pay-off to males that invested all reproductive effort in a single breeding event. Recent work has shown that females mate with multiple males and that larger males tend to sire more offspring (Kraaijeveld-Smit et al. 2002, 2003), suggesting that male–male competition is indeed intense. Dickman (1993) suggested that male die-off is a result of selective pressure on males to maximize their success in sperm competition. The costs of producing large amounts of sperm would result in mortality. However, Taggart & Temple-Smith (1994) showed that ejaculates of male Antechinus contain rather low numbers of spermatozoa and that the number of ejaculates per male is fixed. The costs of sperm competition are therefore unlikely to explain male semelparity. We extend the hypothesis of Braithwaite & Lee (1979) to include the effect of female mortality. Female mortality in small marsupials tends to be high, perhaps because the long lactation period makes reproduction relatively stressful. We argue that this selects for a ‘bet-hedging’ reproductive tactic among males, which in turn leads to selection for male semelparity. 2. DOES HIGH FEMALE MORTALITY SELECT FOR MALE PROMISCUITY? If many females die between being fertilized and weaning their offspring, and if males are unable to predict which females are likely to survive, the optimal mating strategy for males might be to inseminate as many females as possible. By spreading their sperm among many females, males increase the chance that at least one of these females will survive and successfully wean his offspring. We calculated the likelihood of a male siring at least one offspring that survives to the next breeding season under different female survival rates for a field population of A. agilis as P{at least one offspring survives to next season} = P{at least one offspring survives and at least one mother survives} = SP{at least one offspring survives given that y mothers survive}P{y mothers survive}; for all 0 , y < number of females fertilized. Keywords: semelparity; mortality; dasyurid; marsupial; Antechinus 1. INTRODUCTION Semelparity among mammals is restricted to members of the marsupial families Didelphidae and Dasyuridae (Lee & Cockburn 1985; Cockburn 1997). Species in these families share a predisposition for high degrees of postreproductive senescence (Cockburn 1997), but not all exhibit semelparity. In semelparous species, such as those of the genus Antechinus, all males die after a short, highly synchronous mating season. While the physiological features that accompany male die-off are reasonably well understood in a number of species (Bradley 2001; Oakwood et al. 2001), the adaptive benefits of a semelparous mating system are largely unknown. Braithwaite & Lee (1979) demonstrated that the timeinterval between conception and weaning in small (less than 1 kg) marsupials is long compared to that of similarsized eutherian mammals. They also stated that all semelparous mammals live in highly predictable seasonal environments. They argued that these two factors selected for a monoestrous reproductive pattern, synchrony of oestrus and a short mating season. Intense male–male competition during this short mating season, combined Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.) 270, S251–S253 (2003) DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0082 P{at least one offspring survives given that y mothers survive} = 1 2 (k!/x!(k 2 x)! ´ px ´ q ( k 2 x) ), where k is the number of offspring sired per female ´ y; x is the number of surviving offspring surviving between birth and the next breeding season (0); this does not include young that are born, but do not attach to a teat, as these cannot be found in the field and always die immediately after birth; px is the chance that a given offspring survives given that the mother survives; q (k 2 x) = 1 2 p; P{y mothers survive} = n!/y!(n 2 y)! ´ py ´ q (n 2 y) ; n is the number of females fertilized; y is the number of fertilized females surviving between mating and weaning her offspring; p y is the female survival rate; and q (n 2 y) = 1 2 p. The assumption of lack of male selectivity appears to be met in this species because females that weaned offspring S251 Ó 2003 The Royal Society Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 13, 2011 S252 K. Kraaijeveld and others Semelparity in dasyurid marsupials Figure 1. A model for the relation between the number of females fertilized and the chance that a male will sire at least one offspring that survives until the next breeding season for Antechinus agilis at three realistic levels of female mortality: 0.7 (continuous line); 0.5 (dashed line); 0.3 (dotted line). See § 2 for the estimates of the model parameters. period is restricted to two weeks, and each mating has to last for at least 3 h for sperm to be successfully transported to the storage crypts (Shimmin et al. 1999), one can imagine that mating effort will consume large amounts of the males’ energy. We propose this as the major cause of death, rather than the production of sperm. Indeed, mating effort might be limiting the resources available for sperm production and therefore account for the low observed sperm counts. There is a second way in which female mortality could select for male semelparity. When females are philopatric (as in Antechinus) and female mortality is high, many of the breeding females in a given area will be replaced by their daughters during the next season. Any male that sired offspring and then survived to the next season would have a relatively high risk of mating with his daughters. Males would either have to disperse or to display kin recognition, both potentially costly. As all males die in Antechinus, we have no data to address this question. The prediction in iteroparous species is that second-year males should pair with second-year females. were not fertilized by more males, or by bigger males than females that gave birth but did not wean offspring (Kraaijeveld-Smit et al. 2003). Estimates for the model parameters were obtained as follows: offspring survival between birth and weaning is approximately 0.5 (Cockburn et al. 1985). Offspring survival between weaning and reproductive age could only be estimated for females since males disperse immediately after weaning (Cockburn et al. 1985); in the study population, this was 0.42 (Kraaijeveld-Smit 2001). If we assume that this figure is similar for males and females, the overall offspring survival was 0.5 ´ 0.42 = 0.21. Adult female survival in the study population was 0.68 in 1999 and 0.42 in 2000 (Kraaijeveld-Smit et al. 2002, 2003). Female survival in other species of dasyurids can be as low as 0.21 (Bradley 1997). The model shows that mate guarding is unlikely to be a successful strategy. Under the observed level of offspring survival (0.21) and the highest observed level of female survival (0.68), a male that mates with only one female but sires all eight of her offspring has only a 59% chance of having a live offspring during the next breeding season. Field data show that multiple paternity within litters is ubiquitous in this species, and that the median number of young sired per female by a single male was 2 (Kraaijeveld-Smit et al. 2002). Figure 1 shows the outcome of the model under these parameter values for three levels of female survival. The results show that when female survival is high (0.7), a male must mate with at least six females to have a greater than 80% chance of gaining an offspring in the next generation. When female survival is low (0.3), this figure rises to at least 14. Field data show that such figures are realistic: single males sired offspring with up to nine of the sampled females (Kraaijeveld-Smit et al. 2002). As 0.55% of all females present during the mating season were subsequently caught with offspring, the true number of inseminated females per male may have been as high as 16. It seems clear that there is intense pressure on males to fertilize as many females as possible. Since the mating 3. DOES SELECTION FOR MALE PROMISCUITY LEAD TO MALE SEMELPARITY? Males are likely to face a trade-off between mating effort and post-reproductive survival. If high female mortality rates select for increased male promiscuity, as argued above, there might be a threshold beyond which males must invest all their mating effort in a single season. In other words, a male that invests resources into survival after the first mating season instead of in mating may fertilize insufficient females during his lifetime to ensure his genes are passed on to the next generation. This predicts that species with male semelparity should have higher levels of female mortality. A literature survey yielded data on female mortality for 10 species of dasyurids (table 1). These have similar life histories, except that males of Dasyurus viverrinus, Parantechinus bilarni and one population of Parantechinus apicalis are iteroparous. The female mortality rate of these iteroparous species was significantly lower than that of semelparous species (female mortality arcsine-transformed, Student’s t = 24.88, d.f. = 9, p = 0.001). However, this analysis treats species as independent data points, which may not be justifiable (Harvey & Pagel 1991). Only three independent contrasts could be generated from this dataset, insufficient for analysis. Nevertheless, male semelparity has evolved several times in marsupials (Krajewski et al. 2000), so it should be possible to test this hypothesis more rigorously once data on female mortality rates become available for more species in the future. Perhaps the most interesting species in which to study the evolution of male semelparity are those in which semelparity does not occur in every population. Two such species are known: P. apicalis and Dasyurus hallucatus. No information on female mortality is available for D. hallucatus populations in which males live for more than one season. However, Mills & Bencini (2000) reported trapping data for two populations of P. apicalis; one in which males were semelparous, and one in which they were not. In accordance with our prediction, female mortality was much higher in the semelparous population (approximately 0.60) than in the non-semelparous chance of at least one offspring in the next breeding season 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 number of females fertilized Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.) 16 Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 13, 2011 Semelparity in dasyurid marsupials K. Kraaijeveld and others S253 Table 1. Female mortality rate and ecological variables in dasyurid marsupials. (All species are monoestrous (although Dasyurus viverrinus is facultatively polyoestrous), have seasonal breeding seasons of restricted length and reach sexual maturity at about 11 months of age (Krajewski et al. 2000).) breeding seasons per male female mortality rate n (female-years) 1 0.68/0.67 22/25 Dasyurus viverrinus Parantechinus apicalis a .1 1 0.33 0.44/0.60 6 70/58 Parantechinus apicalis b Parantechinus bilarni Phascogale tapoatafa Phascogale calura Antechinus agilis Antechinus bellus Antechinus leo Antechinus swainsonii .1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.27 0.31 0.67/0.67 0.79 0.45 0.59 0.61 0.61 55 64 12/46 38 94 29 28 52 species Dasyurus hallucatus a b reference Begg (1981b), Dickman & Braithwaite (1992) Godsell (1982) Dickman & Braithwaite (1992), Mills & Bencini (2000) Mills & Bencini (2000) Begg (1981a) Cuttle (1982), Sodderquist (1993) Bradley (1997) Kraaijeveld-Smith (2001) Friend (1985) Leung (1999) Lee & Cockburn (1985) Boullanger Island. Whitlock Island. population (approximately 0.27; table 1). In P. apicalis and D. hallucatus, the hypothesis put forward in this paper might be verifiable in field experiments in which females (but not males) are removed from the population after the breeding season. Begg, R. J. 1981a The small mammals of little Nourlangie Rock, NT. II. Ecology of Antechinus bilarni, the sandstone antechinus (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Aust. Wildl. Res. 8, 57–72. Begg, R. J. 1981b The small mammals of little Nourlangie Rock, NT. III. Ecology of Dasyurus hallucatus, the Northern Quoll (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Aust. Wildl. Res. 8, 73–85. Bradley, A. J. 1997 Reproduction and life history in the red-tailed phascogale, Phascogale calura (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae): the adaptive-stress senescence hypothesis. J. Zool. Lond. 241, 739–755. Bradley, A. J. 2001 Stress, hormones and mortality in small dasyurid marsupials. In Predators with pouches: the biology of carnivorous marsupials (ed. M. Jones, C. Dickman & M. Archer), pp. 254–270. Sydney: CSIRO. Braithwaite, R. W. & Lee, A. K. 1979 A mammalian example of semelparity. Am. Nat. 113, 151–156. Cockburn, A. 1997 Living slow and dying young: senescence in marsupials. In Marsupial biology: recent research new perspectives (ed. N. Saunders & L. Hinds), pp. 28–40. Berlin: Springer. Cockburn, A., Scott, M. P. & Scotts, D. J. 1985 Inbreeding avoidance and male-biased natal dispersal in Antechinus spp. (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Anim. Behav. 33, 908–915. Cuttle, P. 1982 Life history strategy of the dasyurid marsupial Phascogale tapoatafa. In Carnivorous marsupials (ed. M. Archer), pp. 13–22. Sydney: Royal Zoology Society of New South Wales. Dickman, C. R. 1993 Evolution of semelparity in male dasyurid marsupials: a critique and a hypothesis of sperm competition. In The biology and management of Australasian carnivorous marsupials (ed. M. Roberts, J. Carnio, G. Crawshaw & M. Hutchins), pp. 25–38. Toronto: Metropolitan Toronto Zoo. Dickman, C. R. & Braithwaite, R. W. 1992 Postmating mortality of males in the Dasyurid marsupials, Dasyurus and parantechinus. J. Mamm. 73, 143–147. Friend, G. R. 1985 Ecological studies of a population of Antechinus Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.) bellus (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae) in tropical northern Australia. Aust. Wildl. Res. 12, 151–162. Godsell, J. 1982 The population ecology of the eastern quoll Dasyurus viverrinus (Dasyuridae, Marsupialia), in southern Tasmania. In Carnivorous marsupials (ed. M. Archer), pp. 199–207. Sydney: Royal Zoology Society of New South Wales. Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. 1991 The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press. Kraaijeveld-Smit, F. J. L. 2001 Sexual encounters, size and siring in the small marsupial Antechinus agilis. PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne, Australia. Kraaijeveld-Smit, F. J. L., Ward, S. J. & Temple-Smith, P. D. 2002 Multiple paternity in a field population of a small carnivorous marsupial, the agile antechinus Antechinus agilis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 84–91. Kraaijeveld-Smit, F. J. L., Ward, S. J. & Temple-Smith, P. D. 2003 Paternity success and the direction of sexual selection in a field population of a semelparous marsupial, Antechinus agilis. Mol. Ecol. 12, 475–484. Krajewski, C., Woolley, P. A. & Westerman, M. 2000 The evolution of reproductive strategies in dasyurid marsupials: implications of molecular phylogeny. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71, 417–435. Lee, K. A. & Cockburn, A. 1985 Evolutionary ecology of marsupials. Cambridge University Press. Leung, L. K. P. 1999 Ecology of Australian tropical rainforest mammals. I. The Cape York antechinus, Antechinus leo (Dasyuridae: Marsupialia). Wildl. Res. 26, 287–306. Mills, H. R. & Bencini, R. 2000 New evidence for facultative male die-off in island populations of dibblers, Parantechinus apicalis. Aust. J. Zool. 48, 501–510. Oakwood, M., Bradley, A. J. & Cockburn, A. 2001 Semelparity in a large marsupial. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 407–411. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1369.) Shimmin, G. A., Jones, M., Taggart, D. A. & Temple-Smith, P. D. 1999 Sperm transport and storage in the agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis). Biol. Reprod. 60, 1353–1359. Sodderquist, T. R. 1993 Maternal strategies of Phascogale tapoatafa (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). I. Breeding seasonality and maternal investment. Aust. J. Zool. 41, 549–566. Taggart, D. A. & Temple-Smith, P. D. 1994 Comparative studies of epididymal morphology and sperm distribution in dasyurid marsupials during the breeding season. J. Zool. Lond. 232, 365–381.