Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
Shallow-water facies setting around the Kačák Event:
a multidisciplinary approach
P. KÖNIGSHOF1*, A. C. DA SILVA2, T. J. SUTTNER3, E. KIDO3, J. WATERS4,
S. K. CARMICHAEL4, U. JANSEN1, D. PAS2 & S. SPASSOV5
1
Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum,
Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
2
Sedimentary Petrology, B 20, University of Liege, Sart-Tilman, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
3
University of Graz, Institute of Earth Sciences, Heinrichstraße 26, A-8010 Graz, Austria
4
Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA
5
Geophysical Centre, Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, 1 rue du Centre
Physique, B 5670 Dourbes (Viroinval), Belgium
*Corresponding author (e-mail: peter.koenigshof@senckenberg.de)
Abstract: In the Eifel area (western Rheinisches Schiefergebirge), a shallow- to deep-subtidal
sequence of mixed carbonates and siltstones around the Kačák Event Interval close to the Eifelian– Givetian stage boundary was studied. An overall transgressive trend is inferred by the microfacies evolution. The stratigraphic variations of magnetic susceptibility in carbonates and in shale
intervals show an overall decreasing evolution towards the top, which fits well with the transgressive trend. In addition, carbon and oxygen isotopes, and major, trace and rare earth element (REE)
analysis have been used to get a better understanding of palaeoenvironmental variations in a
shallow-water realm in the late Eifelian (kockelianus and ensensis conodont biozones): for
example, the d13C excursion and Ce anomaly are interpreted to be the local representation of
the beginning of the Kačák Event Interval, which is also consistent with the stratigraphy and
microfacies analyses.
Black shales at the Eifelian–Givetian boundary sections are very common in Europe and elsewhere
(summarized in House 1996), representing a global
(eustatic) sea-level rise. The Kačák Event (Budil
1995; House 2002) occurs just below the Eifelian– Givetian Stage boundary at the Jebel Mech
Irdane section in Morocco, the Global Stratotype
Section and Point (GSSP). The Kačák Event is a
typical black shale event, connected with the global
rise in sea level at the base of the transgressive–
regressive (T– R) Cycle Ie of Brett et al. (2011).
The sea-level rise is connected with increasing
d13C values of about 2‰ at the Eifelian –Givetian
boundary (e.g. Buggisch & Mann 2004; van Geldern
et al. 2006), and the positive excursion can be attributed to an increased burial of isotopically light
organic carbon or increased riverine weathering
flux (Kump et al. 1999; Saltzman 2002). This event
is characterized by a biotic turnover that is primarily
recorded in pelagic faunas, such as conodonts,
cephalopods and dacryoconarids (e.g. Chlupáč &
Kukal 1986; Bultynck 1987, 1989; Becker & House
2000). The dacryoconarid Nowakia otomari is considered to be an indicator of the Kačák Event or the
otomari Event sensu Walliser (1985).
In Germany, the otomari Event was described in
pelagic carbonates of, for instance, the Odershausen
Formation in the eastern Rheinisches Schiefergebirge (eastern RSG) in the Kellerwald area (e.g.
Walliser 1985; Schöne 1997) (Fig. 1). The Eifelian –Givetian boundary interval in the Eifel area
(western RSG) is characterized by shallow-water
successions. The otomari Event has been placed at
the boundary between the Nims and Giesdorf members by Struve et al. (1997), whereas Schöne et al.
(1998) suggested placing this event at the boundary
between the Junkerberg and Freilingen formations
(see Table 1). A detailed stratigraphic correlation
of sections in the eastern RSG with those of the
Eifel area is difficult owing to the different depositional settings (deep-water facies setting v. shallowwater facies setting) and correlation problems:
for example, the lack of the dacryoconarid Nowakia
otomari in the shallow-water setting.
The effects of anoxic events in Earth’s history on
shallow-water realms are still poorly documented.
In this paper, we describe a shallow-water sequence
around the Kačák Event Interval, with special focus
on a comparison of magnetic susceptibility data,
facies analysis and geochemical data in order to
From: Becker, R. T., Königshof, P. & Brett, C. E. (eds) Devonian Climate, Sea Level and Evolutionary Events.
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 423, http://doi.org/10.1144/SP423.4
# 2015 The Geological Society of London. For permissions: http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/permissions.
Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Fig. 1. Geological map of the Rheinisches Schiefergebirge (RSG) and Ardennes (slightly modified from Wehrmann
et al. 2005). The rectangle demarcates the study area (Fig. 2).
get a better understanding of mainly climate-driven
changes and sea-level fluctuations.
Geological setting
The RSG belongs to the European Variscides, which
have been interpreted by a number of studies as a
collage of microplates (e.g. Matte 1986; Franke
et al. 1990; Franke & Oncken 1990, 1995; Franke
2000) successively accreted during the Early Devonian–Late Carboniferous and leading to the amalgamation of the supercontinent Pangaea (e.g.
Scotese & Barret 1990; Kroner & Hahn 2003;
Romer et al. 2003; Kroner et al. 2007; Linnemann
et al. 2010; Eckelmann et al. 2014). It is widely
accepted that the bulk of the RSG is part of the
Table 1. Stratigraphic position of the outcrop west of Blankenheim within the Junkerberg Formation, and the
transition to the Freilingen Formation
Biostratigraphy after Struve (1996), Ochs & Wolfart (1961) and Struve (1982).
Geological events: see Schöne et al. (1998), Struve (1982) and Struve et al. (1997).
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 2. Facies model of the Middle Devonian of the Eifel
region (modified from Winter 1977). Facies type (a)
facies dominated by clastic input; facies type (b)
carbonate platforms and biostromal reefs (including the
mid-Eifelian High); facies type (c) facies characterized
by reduced clastic input and increasing carbonate
sedimentation. The black star marks the investigated
section near Blankenheimerdorf (50826′ 29.22′′ N,
6838′ 12.79′′ E).
Avalonia terrane, which was separated from Gondwana in the Early Ordovician and drifted northwards (e.g. Oncken et al. 2000; Tait et al. 2000;
Torsvik & Cocks 2004; Linnemann et al. 2008,
2010; Romer & Hahne 2010). At about 450 Ma,
Avalonia collided with Baltica in the Late Ordovician –early Silurian, which led to the closure of
the Tornquist Sea. Owing to the collision of
Baltica and Avalonia with Laurentia, the Iapetus
Ocean was closed at around 420 Ma and Laurussia
was formed (Kroner et al. 2007; Linnemann et al.
2008; Nance et al. 2010). The closure of the Rheic
Ocean began in the late Silurian –Early Devonian
and continued until the Early Carboniferous by successive closing from west to east. The ‘Amorican
Terrane Assemblage’ (ATA) is believed to have
separated from Gondwana in the Ordovician and
followed Avalonia in a northwards direction. An
island arc may have formed between Avalonia and
the ATA during closure of the Rheic Ocean and
accreted to Avalonia in the Early Devonian
(Franke & Oncken 1995; Franke 2000). This arc is
documented by magmatic rocks in the ‘Northern
Phyllite Zone’ and the ‘Mid-German-Crystalline
Zone’ (MGCZ) (e.g. Brinkmann 1948; Dombrowski
et al. 1995; Reischmann et al. 2001). During the
Early Devonian, the Rhenohercynian Basin developed as a narrow (about 250–300 km) but rather
elongate (more than 2000 km) sedimentary trough
south of the Old Red Continent (Stets & Schäfer
2009). Towards the south, the trough was confined
by the MGCZ during the Lochkovian and Pragian.
Detrital supply came from northern (Wierich
1999), as well as from southern, source areas
(Hahn 1990; Hahn & Zankl 1991). Lower Devonian
sequences are characterized mainly by sandstones
and siltstones, whereas carbonates are less frequent.
Sedimentation generally changed during the Middle
Devonian. Biostromes began to flourish in the northern RSG (Pas et al. 2013 and references therein). In
the SE RSG, biostromes are associated with volcaniclastic deposits indicating increased volcanic
activity (e.g. Königshof et al. 1991, 2010; Nesbor
et al. 1993; Braun et al. 1994; Nesbor 2004). The
RSG east of the river Rhine is characterized by
several autochthonous and parautochthonous (e.g.
Wachendorf 1986; Meischner 1991; Schwan 1991;
Bender & Königshof 1994), as well as allochthonous, units (e.g. Engel et al. 1983; Oczlon 1992;
Franke 2000; Huckriede et al. 2004; Salamon &
Königshof 2010; Eckelmann et al. 2014).
West of the river Rhine, the Eifel synclines, interpreted as part of the north –south-trending axial
depression of the RSG, are the dominant structure
(Fig. 2). In contrast to the entire RSG east of the
river Rhine, the Eifel area shows very low to lowgrade thermal alteration (e.g. Teichmüller & Teichmüller 1979; Helsen & Königshof 1994; Königshof
& Werner 1994). A remagnetization event has
been described in the carbonate rocks of the Devonian of the Rhenohercynian Fold-and-Thrust Belt
in Belgium and NW Germany, near Cologne (Zwing
et al. 2002, 2005, 2009; Zegers et al. 2003; Da Silva
et al. 2012, 2013), but without specific studies on the
Eifel area.
In the Eifel area, siliciclastics were delivered
from the north during the Early Devonian and
early Middle Devonian (Eifelian), but diminished
during Givetian times when shallow subtropical carbonates were established over much of the region.
Struve (1963) established a depositional model of
the Eifel area with a north– south trending basin surrounded by landmasses, which he considered as
the so-called ‘Eifel Sea Strait’. In contrast to this
model, Winter (1977) defined three facies belts
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
(Fig. 2) in the Eifel synclines. Later, Faber (1980)
modified this model, based on detailed microfacies
studies, which gave evidence of small-scale cyclicity developments of a carbonate platform during
the early Eifelian, and of a flat shelf lagoon during the late Eifelian and early Givetian, affecting
the eastern part of the Eifel synclines. Paproth &
Struve (1982) distinguished between north-, west-,
and south-Eifel biofacies based on faunal differences. During the Givetian this facies differentiation broke down to some degree and mainly
stromatoporoid/coral biostromes extended over
the entire area. The studied section lies within the
Blankenheim Syncline (Figs 2 & 3), between the
villages of Blankenheim and Blankenheimerdorf,
and comprises shallow-shelf mixed carbonate and
siliciclastic facies of Middle Devonian age (Eifelian) accumulated on the southern margin of the
former Avalonia microcontinent.
Methods
Microfossil separation and microfacies
analysis
Microfacies analysis is based on facies changes
observed in the field and observations from more
than 80 thin sections of different formats (most of
them in the format of 7.5 × 11 cm). Thin sections
are stored at the Senckenberg Research Institute
and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt. Fourteen
rock samples, between 1 and 3 kg, were treated
with formic acid diluted in water at a ratio of 1:5.
Conodonts were extracted from residues by hand
picking after heavy liquid separation (sodium polytungstate: density 2.79 g cm23) and are stored at the
University of Graz.
Magnetic susceptibility and specific
magnetic measurements
Magnetic susceptibility (x) is considered to be a
proxy parameter for detrital input, and is used for
correlations of different coeval stratigraphic sections (e.g. Ellwood et al. 1999) and palaeoenvironmental or palaeoclimatic reconstructions (Hladil
et al. 2009; Da Silva & Boulvain 2010; Whalen &
Day 2010; Koptı́ková 2011; De Vleeschouwer
et al. 2012; Da Silva et al. 2013). Initial magnetic
susceptibility measurements on 77 samples, cleaned
of surface alteration, were performed on a KLY-3S
Kappabridge (AGICO, noise level 2 × 1028 SI)
at the University of Liège (Belgium). Magnetic
susceptibility (MS) is expressed in m3 kg21; each
data point is the average of three measurements.
The sample mass was weighed with a precision
of 0.01 g.
Fig. 3. Lithological column of the Blankenheim section.
The section has a thickness of about 8 m, and is
composed of bioclastic wackestones, floatstones and
rare grainstones with intercalations of shales and
siltstones.
Diagenetic processes can considerably influence
the detrital susceptibility signal (primary signal); an
aspect that is often underestimated (Schneider et al.
2004; De Vleeschouwer et al. 2010; Riquier et al.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
2010; Da Silva et al. 2012, 2013). Because magnetic
minerals ((titano)magnetite, pyrrhotite and greigite)
are very sensitive to post-depositional diagenesis, it
is essential to understand the nature and origin of the
magnetic minerals carrying the magnetic susceptibility signal. In this respect, the nature and grain
size (detrital grains are classically coarser than
diagenetic grains) of the magnetic minerals should
be scrutinized. Natural materials have three major
magnetic behaviours: diamagnetic minerals have
extremely weak negative values of MS (e.g. calcite and quartz); paramagnetic minerals have weak
positive values (e.g. smectite, illite, biotite, dolomite and pyrite); and ferromagnetic (sensu latu)
minerals have high and positive values (e.g. magnetite, pyrrhotite, hematite and goethite). In this paper,
the nature and grain size of magnetic minerals is
constrained through hysteresis loop measurements,
acquisition of isothermal remanent magnetization
(IRM), backfield curves and short-term remanence
decay, which were measured with a J-coercivity
rotational magnetometer at the Geophysical Centre
of the Royal Meteorological Institute of Dourbes
in Belgium. We selected 20 samples on a regular
interval, which were cut into a cuboidal shape
(approximately 0.9 × 0.7 × 2.5 cm) and weighed
with a precision of 0.001 g. Remanent and induced
magnetizations were measured between +500
and 2500 mT, with averaged field increments of
0.5 mT per magnetization step. The magnetization
duration at each magnetization step is in the order
of tenths of a second. When the backfield curve is
finished, the direct current is switched off automatically and the magnetizing field decreases towards a
constant residual field of about 0.4 mT within the
following 0.4 s. The decay of the remaining remanence (IRM 500 mT, 0.4 s) is monitored over
100 s, and is called the short-term remanence loss.
The following parameters were derived from
the hysteresis loops: saturation magnetization, Ms
(A m2 kg21); remanent saturation magnetization,
Mrs (A m2 kg21); high-field magnetic susceptibility,
xHF (m3 kg21); coercive force, Bc (mT); and remanent coercive force Bcr (mT). Ms, Mrs and xHF were
normalized with respect to sample mass. xHF corresponds to the high-field magnetic susceptibility
values and represents the paramagnetic plus diamagnetic contributions. The ferromagnetic contribution corresponds to xFerro, which is the total
susceptibility (x) minus the xHF. The hysteresis parameters are compared with the classic ‘Day plot’ of
Mrs/Ms v. Bcr/Bc (Day et al. 1977; Dunlop 2002),
allowing an assessment of the grain size of the magnetic minerals. The amount of high- and low-coercivity minerals can be roughly estimated through
the high-field remanence (%), corresponding to the
difference in remanence acquired at 300 and
500 mT.
Geochemical proxies
Carbon (d13Ccarb) and oxygen (d18O) isotope ratios
of whole-rock carbonate total organic carbon
(TOC) and sulphur content were analysed for 45
rock samples collected through the section. Rock
powders were produced from polished rock surfaces
of hand specimens by drilling the micritic matrix
under a binocular microscope. In addition, carbon
isotopes were analysed on isolated prasinophytes
(green algae) in 14 samples in order to compare
d13Ccarb and d13Corg trends. All ratios of d13Ccarb
and d18O, as well as d13Corg, are expressed in the
conventional d-notation as per mil (‰) relative
to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (Vienna-PDB)
standard.
In this study, oxygen isotope values of conodont
apatite were also measured for two samples (BL1229c and BL12-22) to reconstruct the palaeo-seasurface temperature. They were analysed by using
a monogeneric icriodontid conodont assemblage
(exclusively well-preserved platform elements).
The colour alteration index (CAI) of conodont elements is very low, ranging between 1.5 and 2. The
analysis of d18Oapatite was calibrated using a value
of 21.7‰ for standard NBS120c.
Carbon and oxygen isotope analysis on wholerock carbonate were performed using a Kiel II preparation line and Finnigan MAT Delta Plus mass
spectrometer at the University of Graz (Austria).
Carbon isotope analysis of organic carbon and
oxygen isotope analysis on conodont apatite were
performed at the GeoZentrum Nordbayern of the
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (Germany) using
an elemental analyser (Carlo-Erba1110) coupled
online to a ThermoFinnigan Delta Plus mass spectrometer, and a high-temperature reduction furnace
(TC-EA) connected to a ThermoFinnigan Delta
Plus mass spectrometer, respectively.
TOC and sulphur content were analysed on a
LECO CS-300 (version 1.0, Year 1992) at the University of Graz, and are reported as Corg and Stot.
One gram of fine powder of each sample was treated
three times with 2N HCl for 24 h to remove the carbonate component. Following acid treatment, the
samples were rinsed to neutrality (three times with
distilled water). The resulting dried powder was
then analysed.
Whole-rock geochemical analyses (major, trace
and rare earth element (REE)) were performed on
45 samples at Activation Laboratories in Ancaster,
Ontario, Canada. Proxies for detrital input include
total Al2O3, Rb, K2O, TiO2 and SiO2. The carbonate
content was measured by CaO + Loss of Ignition
(LOI) and Sr. Proxies for anoxia include the chalcophile elements (S, Cu, Zn and Pb), authigenic U
(where Uauthigenic ¼ Utotal 2 Th/3) (Wignall &
Myers 1988), Ce anomaly (Wright et al. 1987),
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
V/Cr (Pujol et al. 2006), d13C excursions and TOC
(T. C. Bond et al. 2013). Primary productivity proxies include excess Ba (where Baexcess ¼
Ba 2 0.15 Al2O3) and excess P2O5 (where Pexcess ¼
P2O5 2 0.15 Al2O3) (Pujol et al. 2006). Bulk d18O
values are not correlated with increases in MnO concentrations, nor decreases in total Sr (ppm), nor
increases in Ca/Mg ratio. When using these geochemical data in combination with microfacies
observations, we therefore conclude that diagenetic
alteration is not significant in any of the samples.
Results
Stratigraphy and microfacies
Microfossil biostratigraphy. The Blankenheim section exposes the Junkerberg and Freilingen formations and reaches the latest Eifelian (Table 1).
The conodont assemblage is dominated by ‘shallow-marine forms’ of the genus Icriodus (Weddige
1977; Weddige & Ziegler 1979). Conodonts average approximately 10 –30 elements per kg, with a
higher number of specimens occurring between
samples BL 12-29c and BL 12-22. Elements include
icriodontids (commonly platform and rare coniform
elements), one broken specimen of Belodella sp.,
two broken specimens of Polygnathus linguiformis
linguiformis Hinde, 1879 (two different morphotypes), and two indeterminable platform fragments
of Polygnathus sp. Icriodontid species (Icriodus
arkonensis Stauffer, 1838, I. regularicrescens
Bultynck, 1970 and I. struvei Weddige, 1977) are
the most diagnostic, and constrain the section as
ranging from the Tortodus kockelianus to the
Polygnathus ensensis Biozone. Icriodus regularicrescens occurs from near the base to the top of
the section. The lower boundary of the ensensis
Biozone was tentatively set at the first occurrence
of Icriodus arkonensis near the top of the section (sample BL 12-2) because the marker species
I. obliquimarginatus Bischoff & Ziegler, 1957 was
not found. Illustrations of representative specimens
of diagnostic conodont species are provided in
Figure 4.
Apart from conodonts, pyritized foraminiferid
tests belonging to the genus Pseudopalmula, Semitextularia, probably Paratikhinella, and ostracod
valves of Polyzygia (sample BL 12-34a) and other
forms are obtained from several samples, but they
are less diagnostic in terms of stratigraphy.
Macrofossil biostratigraphy. The succession from
BL 12-25 to BL 12-32 contains a brachiopod fauna
of biostratigraphic significance (Fig. 5):
† Sample BL 12-S 25: Schizophoria schnuri blankenheimensis Struve, 1965;
† Sample BL 12-28D: numerous specimens of
Iridistrophia? cf. undifera (Schnur, 1853) and
Vandercammenina? latistriata (Frech, 1911);
† Sample BL 12-29D: numerous Iridistrophia? cf.
undifera;
† Sample BL 12-32: particularly rich in brachiopods: Vandercammenina? latistriata, Iridistrophia? cf. undifera and few poorly preserved
Athyris (Alvarezites) wolfarti Struve, 1992?
We collected the following taxa from loose blocks
in the sample BL 12: Iridistrophia? cf. undifera,
Schizophoria schnuri blankenheimensis, Carpinaria
vel Subcuspidella sp. (one specimen), Helaspis sp.
(one specimen, probably H. plexa (Wolfart, 1956))
and Strophomenida gen. et sp. indet. (one specimen).
The associations suggest an assignment to the
late middle Eifelian, equivalent to the Junkerberg
Formation and most possibly to the Blankenheim
Member (‘latistriatus-Horizont’ sensu Wolfart in
Ochs & Wolfart 1961). The correlation of the latter with the ‘Type Eifelian’ succession is, however,
controversial. Based on brachiopods, Struve (in
Struve et al. 2008) assigns a ‘Nims age’ to the Blankenheim Member, whereas Basse & Müller (2004),
arguing with the trilobite stratigraphy, regard a
partial Giesdorf age as possible. The study of additional material of the spinocyrtiids from the section
may provide a better-constrained age.
Microfacies analysis. The studied section is about
8 m thick and is characterized by bioclastic wackestones, floatstones and rare grainstones, with a local
occurrence of laminated limestones. The limestone
beds vary in thickness from centimetre- to decimetre-scale and are intercalated with shales. The
section is composed of shallow-shelf mixed carbonate and siliciclastic facies. Open-marine planktonic
organisms, such as dacryoconarid tentaculitids,
cephalopods and/or pelagic ostracodes, are absent.
Bioclasts are dominated by brachiopods, crinoids,
bryozoans and subordinate numbers of trilobites,
corals, algae and/or molluscs, depending on environmental changes. All bioclasts are very wellpreserved due to the low diagenetic overprint
(Helsen & Königshof 1994). Carbonates lack indicators of pressure solution or strong diagenetic
overprint. Microfacies analysis allowed the discrimination of five microfacies, which are described
from shallowest to deepest.
Microfacies 1: Bioclastic wackestone, partly
strongly burrowed. In the outcrop, the grey carbonates of this facies show wavy-nodular to planar
bedding. Wackestones have 20– 25% bioclasts,
including crinoids, brachiopod shells, bryozoans,
trilobites, rare corals (rare Thamnopora), stromatoporoids, ostracodes (Fig. 6a –c: BL 12-23(2), BL
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 4. (a) Icriodus struvei Weddige, 1977, I element, upper view (sample BL 12-34A). (b) Icriodus werneri Weddige,
1977, I element, upper view (sample BL 12-22). (c) Icriodus regularicrescens Bultynck, 1970, I element, upper view
(sample BL 12-22). (d) Belodella sp., coniform element, upper view (sample BL 12-5). (e) Icriodus retrodepressus
Bultynck, 1970, I element, upper view (sample BL 12-3). (f) Icriodus arkonensis Stauffer, 1938, I element, upper view
(sample BL 12-2). (g) & (h) Polygnathus linguiformis linguiformis Hinde, 1879, Pa element, upper and lateral views
(sample BL 12-29C). (i) Polygnathus linguiformis linguiformis Stauffer, 1879, posterior part of broken Pa element,
upper view (sample BL 12-12).
12-24A and BL 12-25) and occasional gastropods.
The matrix is primarily composed of a pelmicrite
with a local occurrence of pelsparite. Burrowing is
very common, so the texture is more or less homogenized. Minor phosphorite intraclasts show variable grain sizes (fine silt to small pebbles) and, in
addition, pyrite and iron oxide crusts occur, mainly
as coverings on bioclasts, such as trilobite fragments or brachiopod shells (Fig. 6d, e: BL 12-33(2)
and BL 12-34A).
Interpretation: The facies points to an upperramp position with moderate water depth just below
the fair-weather wave base. The diverse fauna
includes primarily brachiopods, trilobites and bryozoans, and suggests an open-marine environment.
Gastropods could be an indication of a more
restricted environment in the lower part of the
section but they are less common. The sediments
have been reworked and were deposited close to
the place of origin; the sediments are poorly sorted
and bioclasts show no abrasion. The more clayey/
marly sediments indicate a former soft substrate,
which is strongly burrowed. More calcareous layers occur in the lower part of the sequence. These
layers can be correlated with a sampled section
(Ernst et al. 2011), which is located very close
(less than 20 m) to the described section herein.
These authors described a number of bryozoans
with increasing calcifying taxa, such as trepostome
bryozoans, encrusting worms and calcimicrobes,
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Fig. 5. Brachiopods from the section BL 12 (whitened with MgO before photographing, shown in natural size). (a) &
(b) Iridistrophia? cf. undifera (Schnur, 1853), ventral (a) and dorsal (b) view of partly exfoliated articulated shell.
(c) Schizophoria schnuri blankenheimensis Struve, 1965, dorsal view of articulated shell (sample BL 12-S-25).
(d) Carpinaria vel Subcuspidella sp., ventral valve. (e) Helaspis sp., probably H. plexa (Wolfart, 1956), ventral valve.
(f) Vandercammenina? latistriata (Frech, 1911), ventral valve.
particularly Girvanella from that horizon (Ernst
et al. 2011, fig. 10c, d). Girvanella is an indicator
of low sedimentation rates and may occur in a
water depth of tens of metres (Flügel 2004),
although Riding (1975) suggested that no confident
depth limits can be set for Girvanella occurrences.
A period with preferred calcite precipitation in a
shallow-water setting within a photic zone is
likely. The existence of phosphorite intraclasts and
iron-oxide crusts around some bioclasts, such as trilobites, brachiopod shells (Fig. 6d, e) and corals,
may suggest occasional subaerial exposition. However, Fe oxide crusts may also indicate submarine
weathering of pyrite under oxic conditions (e.g.
Flügel 2004), which is more likely.
Microfacies 2: Brachiopod/crinoid floatstone.
The prevailing bioclasts are brachiopods (Fig. 6f:
BL 12-32) and crinoids; bryozoans are less abundant. Often they occur together as a brachiopod–
crinoid- or brachiopod–bryozoan-floatstone (Fig.
7a: BL 12-29C), but monospecific biota also
occur, such as crinoid-, brachiopod- (Fig. 6f) or
bryozoan-floatstones (Fig. 7a: BL 12-29C). The
large bioclasts are embedded within a bioclastic
wackestone matrix or within a lime-mudstone, as
shown in Figure 6f. Large components show no
abrasion and were transported a relatively short
distance from the source area (many biotic components are complete) and show few effects as a result
of compaction (e.g. very rare clay steams and/or
stylolites). Sometimes, shells have been infested
with boring organisms (Fig. 7b: BL 12-33(3)).
Interpretation: Based on the sizes of the components, the preservation, particularly the accumulation of brachiopods (which may be more or less
autochthonous) and facies/sedimentological criteria, a shallow-water low-energy environment (midramp setting, shallow subtidal) is inferred. The
lower part of the section described herein can be
correlated with another section sampled 20 m to
the north (see Ernst et al. 2011), which also exhibited fenestrate bryozoans that are an indication of
quiet water conditions and the presence of soft substrates (Ernst et al. 2011). Borings are common,
which also suggests low sedimentation rates.
Microfacies 3: Bioclastic wackestone to grainstone. This microfacies is composed of poorly
sorted wackestones to grainstones (e.g. Fig. 7c:
BL 12(1)), typically with a fine-grained micritic
matrix that also contains quartz grains. Burrowing
is absent. This lithofacies occurs in the middle part
of the sequence and in the uppermost part (sample
numbers BL 12-1 –BL 12-3), representing the youngest sediments of the section. Main bioclasts of up
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 6. (a) – (e) Allochthonous bioclastic wackestone, locally strongly burrowed due to an increasing number of
endobenthic organisms. Main bioclasts are crinoids, brachiopods, bryozoans and trilobites; corals, stromatoporoids and
ostracodes are less abundant. (a) Sample BL 12-23(2); (b) sample BL 12-24A; (c) sample BL 12-25; (d) & (e)
occasionally small phosphorite intraclasts, pyrite crystals and iron-oxide crusts occur (d, sample BL 12-33(2); e, sample
BL 12-34A). (f ) Brachiopod– crinoid-floatstone embedded in a lime-mudstone (sample BL 12-32).
to 15% are composed of crinoids, trilobites, brachiopod shells and rare corals. Bioclasts are less
abundant than in Microfacies 1 and they are much
smaller. Furthermore, calcareous algae and gastropods are absent. Very small phosphorite clasts and
some extraclasts occur (Fig. 7d: BL 12-3A(1)).
Some layers show graded bedding.
Wackestones to grainstones, which are dominated by crinoids (Fig. 7e, f: BL 12-12(2) and BL
12-14) and common occurrences of tube worms
(Fig. 8a: BL 12-20(2)), also occur, but they have
less palaeoenvironmental significance as they
occur in shallow-, as well as in deeper-marine settings (Flügel 2004).
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Fig. 7. (a) Brachiopod– bryozoan-floatstone (sample BL 12-29C); (b) brachiopod-floatstone; brachiopod shells are
often infested by boring organisms (sample BL 12-33(3)); (c) & (d) poorly sorted bioclastic wackestone with small
phosphorites and intraclasts (c, sample BL 12-1; d, sample BL 12-3A(1)); (e) & (f) crinoid-dominated wackestones (e,
sample BL 12-12(2); f, sample BL 12-14).
Interpretation: The faunal association, the preservation, the poorly sorted sediment and the fine
bioclastic micritic matrix suggest a generally lowenergy environment, in a mid- to deep-ramp (subtidal environment) setting. The occurrence of rare
grainstones is interpreted as storm layers. Sedimentation (e.g. poorly sorted, reworking) is most probably associated with a sea-level rise.
Microfacies 4: Microbioclastic wackestone. This
microfacies exhibits a variable amount of biota,
which ranges from below 5%, with large isolated
fragments, such as ostracodes (Fig. 8b: BL 12-11(2)),
up to 20% of shell hash of trilobites, brachiopods
and ostracodes, among other organisms. Those
layers can exhibit graded bedding. Rare bryozoans
also occur (Fig. 8c: BL 12-9A). The main difference
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 8. (a) Large occurrences of tube worms in a partly sparitic wackestone (sample BL 12-20(2)); (b)–(c)
microbioclastic wackestone with large fragments of ostracodes; sediment is strongly burrowed (b, sample BL 12-11(2);
c, sample BL 12-9A); (d) matrix composed of quartz-bearing pelmicrite (sample BL 12-15(2)); (e) peloidal calcisiltite
with rare bioclasts (sample BL 12-30).
to Microfacies 1 is the size of bioclasts (microbioclasts in contrast to large bioclasts in Microfacies
1) and the matrix. The matrix is a quartz-bearing,
burrowed pelmicrite (Fig. 8d: BL 12-15(2)) containing occasionally larger crinoid and echinoderm
fragments. Bryozoans are very rare. Burrowing
is a common feature. A bioturbation index, in
which a descriptive grade was assigned to the
degree of bioturbation, was established by Taylor
& Goldring (1993). The degree of bioturbation in
this section can be assigned to grade 4, which
is characterized by high abundance and density.
This facies occurs mainly in the upper part of the
section.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Interpretation: This microfacies suggests generally a low-energy, outer-ramp position. Those layers
that show graded bedding are interpreted as material
reworked during higher-energy events (e.g. storm
deposits).
Microfacies 5: Peloidal calcisiltite. The rock is
composed of densely packed micrite peloids and
silt-sized terrigenous quartz grains. Bioclasts are
very rare, and are composed of crinoid ossicles
and brachiopod remnants. Small-scale lamination
is common. This facies type occurs only in layers
BL 12-30 and BL 12-31 in the lower part of the
section (Fig. 8e: BL 12-30).
Interpretation: The densely packed, quartz-rich
calcisiltite could be interpreted as a post-drowning
phase of a carbonate platform comparable to an
example from Morocco (e.g. Blomeier & Reijmer
1999). Similar finely laminated lime mudstones
also occur in very shallow intertidal and supratidal
environments (e.g. Gammon & James 2001), but
these facies also show microbial mats, fenestral
fabrics and/or desiccation features, which do not
occur in Microfacies 5. Therefore, we interpreted the
latter as representing a deeper, low-energy setting.
Magnetic susceptibility data
The mean initial magnetic susceptibility for the
whole section is 2.25 × 1028m3 kg21, which is a
little bit lower but in the range of the MS marine
standard ¼ 5.5 × 1028 m3 kg21 – the median value
for about 11 000 lithified marine sedimentary rocks,
including siltstone, limestone, marl and shale samples (Ellwood et al. 2011). The lowest susceptibility is 0.45 × 1028m3 kg21 (no negative values,
indicating that the section is not composed of very
pure carbonates) and the highest value is 9.15 ×
1028 m3 kg21.
The section is composed of an alternation of
carbonates and shales, and both lithologies were
sampled. It clearly appears that the shale levels
have systematically higher susceptibility (mean
value of 4.27 × 1028 m3 kg21) than the carbonates
(1.27 × 1028 m3 kg21) (Fig. 9).
Ms (magnetization at saturation) and xFerro
(ferro-magnetic susceptibility) are both proxies for
the concentration of ferromagnetic minerals. The
contribution of Ms is rather low (5.02 × 1024 and
12.62 × 1024 A m2 kg21) and Ms data are not well
correlated with xin (correlation factor r ¼ 0.40:
Fig. 9. Lithological column (scale bar in cm) and magnetic susceptibility evolution compared with magnetic hysteresis
and backfield curve data on selected samples. xin, low-field magnetic susceptibility; Ms, magnetization at saturation; xhf,
high-field magnetic susceptibility; xferro, ferromagnetic susceptibility.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 10. Comparison between magnetic susceptibility values (xin) and hysteresis parameters from selected samples
from Blankenheim section: (a) Ms, magnetization at saturation, r ¼ 0.40; (b) xferro, ferromagnetic susceptibility,
r ¼ 0.54; (c) xHF, high-field magnetic susceptibility, r ¼ 0.98; (d) Bc, coercivity, r ¼ 0.40.
Fig. 10a). xFerro values are also very low (0.01 ×
1028 and 0.86 × 1028 m3 kg21) and correlate
weakly with xin (r ¼ 0.54: Figs 9 & 10b). These
low correlations observed between x and proxies
for ferromagnetic minerals are good arguments in
favour of a low influence of ferromagnetic minerals.
xHF is a proxy for the sum of the paramagnetic and
diamagnetic minerals. xHF values are between
0.26 × 1028 and 6.70 × 1028 m3 kg21 (Fig. 9). All
values are positive, indicative of a relatively large
amount of paramagnetic minerals. There is a very
strong correlation between xHF and xin (r ¼ 0.98:
Figs 9 & 10c), indicating that, in this case, the magnetic signal is mostly linked to paramagnetic minerals. This fits well with the fact that the mean
susceptibility values are systematically higher for
clay mineral levels.
It is possible to obtain information on the nature
of the ferromagnetic minerals through the backfield curve. The high-field remanence saturation
represents the proportion of non-saturated (at
300 mT) magnetic minerals (high-coercivity minerals, such as hematite, as opposed to low-coercivity
minerals, such as magnetite, that are easily saturated). High-field remanence is between 0 and 20%
for 10 samples (small amount of high-coercivity
minerals, such as hematite), between 20 and 50%
for seven samples (larger amount of high-coercivity
minerals), and higher than 50% for three samples
(Fig. 9).
The shape of the hysteresis loops, Bcr/Bc and
Mrs/Ms, provide information on the magnetic
grain size, with the help of the Day plot (Day
et al. 1977; Dunlop 2002). Main grain-size categories correspond, from the coarser to the finest,
to multidomain (MD), pseudo-single domain
(PSD), single domain (SD) and super paramagnetic
(SP). Coarser grains are often interpreted as related
to a detrital origin, while the smallest grains are
interpreted as having formed during diagenesis.
The samples from Blankenheim fall along the PSD
and SD + MD mixing curve (Dunlop 2002), with
only one sample (S12) along the SD + SP mixing
curve (Fig. 11). The remanence decay is also indicative of the grain size. The relative decay viscosity
coefficient (Sd, a dimensionless quantity) was calculated from the remanence decay measured over
100 s. Sd represents the slope in the IRM2500 mT
v. Log(time) diagram. The Blankenheim samples
range between 6 × 1023 and 30 × 1023, with only
one sample (S12) reaching 116 × 1023 (Fig. 9).
According to Spassov & Valet (2012) Sd values
between 3.9 and 6.5 × 1023 are indicative of SD
grains, while values above 100 are indicative of
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Fig. 11. Bi-logarithmic Day plot (Day et al. 1977) for selected samples from the Blankenheim section, compared
with the mixing curves by Dunlop (2002), with classic remagnetized limestones (Jackson 1990), MD magnetite grains
(Parry 1982) and with results from Zwing et al. (2005) on different lithologies from NE Germany (near Cologne). The
majority of the Blankenheim samples fall on the left-hand side of the plot, within the PSD and SD + MD mixing curve.
SP + SD grains. This fits relatively well with the
results obtained with hysteresis data, with a majority of the sample with relatively coarse grains and
only one sample with very-fine SP granulometry
(sample S12).
Interpretation
From the magnetic measurements, we can deduce
that we have a magnetic signal, which is mostly
carried by paramagnetic minerals (probably clay
minerals considering the clear link between claydominated intervals and magnetic susceptibility
highs: Fig. 12). Ferromagnetic (sensu lato) minerals
are present in very low abundance, and they are
dominated by magnetite and hematite, but these
minerals have a small influence on the total bulk
magnetic signal. The Day diagram (cf. Fig. 9) indicates that the ferromagnetic mineral content consists
of a mixture of SD and MD, dominated by MD
grains (i.e. coarse grain sizes indicating detrital
origin). Only one sample shows the influence of
smaller grains (BL S12). Hematite is the most abundant in this sample, suggesting that it was subjected
to a stronger or different diagenetic pathway.
The Rhenohercynian zone has experienced
a widespread remagnetization event, identified
through detailed magnetic studies in Belgium
(Molina Garza & Zijderveld 1996; Zegers et al.
2003; Da Silva et al. 2012, 2013) and in the NW
RSG in Germany, near Cologne (Zwing et al.
2005). The latter study compared magnetic susceptibility data from biohermal carbonate rocks, platform carbonate rocks and siliciclastic rocks (Fig.
11). They identified the most important carrier of
the late Palaeozoic magnetization component as
magnetite. However, results were different, depending on the lithology, with MD (detrital) magnetite
dominating in the siliciclastic rocks and SP (diagenetic) magnetite in the biohermal carbonates, with
the platform carbonates showing intermediate hysteresis properties. Zwing et al. (2005) interpreted
the remagnetization as a widespread event, affecting
all lithologies, but that this remagnetization would
be disguised by the large amount of MD magnetite
in siliciclastic rocks. This remagnetization is interpreted as related to complex processes. In the Late
Devonian and Early Carboniferous sedimentary
rocks, the remagnetization is coeval with clay diagenesis (through the smectite to illite transition
releasing iron); in the Middle Devonian strata,
however, clay diagenesis and remagnetization are
not coeval and pyrite oxidation processes are
observed (Zwing et al. 2009).
In the case of the Blankenheim section, either the
MD detrital magnetite ‘hides’ a remagnetization
event, as in Zwing et al. (2005), or the MD magnetite has a detrital origin and no remagnetization processes occurred in this section. Helsen & Königshof
(1994) have shown that the conodont alteration
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 12. Lithological column showing magnetic susceptibility evolution (in carbonates and shales), stable carbon and oxygen isotopes of bulk rocks, palynomorphs and TOC and
sulphur data.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
index from Lower and Middle Devonian rocks
within the Eifelian area indicate little, if any, effect
of heating, with alteration index ranging between
1.5 and 2.0, indicating very low temperatures of
approximately 55 8C. From thin-section observations, the alteration appears to be very weak, with
no indication of pressure solution and with remarkable preservation of fossils (see above). This is
in accordance with the generally low Sd values,
which indicate that SP grains are not very common
in the samples. However, one would expect an SP
presence in remagnetized samples. Low alteration
and low compaction are explained by a reduced
sedimentation overburden (Helsen & Königshof
1994). Figure 11 displays a Day plot, which includes
the data from Jackson (1990), corresponding to
classic remagnetized limestone samples (Channel
& McCabe 1994), and from Parry (1982), corresponding to coarse-grain magnetite. Figure 11 also
includes data from Zwing et al. (2005) on biohermal
carbonates, platform carbonates and siliciclastic
Devonian rocks, with different magnetic properties
observed for the different lithologies. Our Blankenheim data are on the left-hand side of the plot, separated from the other results, and follow the PSD
and SD + MD mixing curve. Thus, the data correspond to grain size probably even coarser than that
observed by Zwing et al. (2005) on the siliciclastic
rocks in the area of Cologne. The carbonate and
the shale intervals in Blankenheim are carrying
magnetite of the same grain size despite the lithological variations. This is in opposition to Zwing
et al. (2005), in which the carbonates have smaller
grains. In Zwing et al. (2005), the different grain
size related to different lithologies was explained
by the remagnetization event. The steady magnetite
grain size in Blankenheim is in favour of a detrital
origin for the magnetite grains, without any impact
of a remagnetization event, although this needs to
be cross-validated by further studies. Furthermore,
a comparison of magnetic susceptibility results with
geochemical data, and specifically with elements
that are considered as proxy for detrital inputs, such
as Ti, Al, Rb and Zr (Tribovillard et al. 2006;
Calvert & Pedersen 2007), allows us to assess the
influence of detrital inputs on the magnetic susceptibility signal (Riquier et al. 2010; Da Silva et al.
2012, 2013). The correlation is high (the link
between magnetic susceptibility (MS) and detrital
proxy elements on 45 samples: for Al2O3, r ¼ 0.84;
for TiO2, r ¼ 0.83; for Rb, r ¼ 0.79; for Th, r ¼
0.81; and for Zr, r ¼ 0.72), indicating a major
impact of detrital inputs on the MS signal.
As mentioned earlier, the magnetic susceptibility of shale layers is systematically higher than the
adjacent carbonate beds, a link not always observed.
For example, Bertola et al. (2013) have shown that
the magnetic susceptibility values were fairly
similar in the carbonates and in the adjacent shale
beds in two Tournaisian sections from Belgium
(Bertola et al. 2013, fig. 10). These results on Tournaisian Belgian rocks also suggest that the input of
MS-carriers stayed roughly constant during the
deposition of the limestone shale alternation and
that these carriers were probably ferromagnetic. In
the Blankenheim section, magnetic susceptibility
appears more as a proxy for shale proportion (paramagnetic minerals), which can be noted from
outcrop visual observation. However, Figure 9 displays a plot with separate magnetic susceptibility
curves for carbonates v. shales. Both curves show
relatively similar trends, with relatively high peaks
in the lower part of the section and decreasing magnetic susceptibility towards the top, which could be
related to a decrease in detrital inputs, in relation
with the observed transgressive trend. Ellwood
et al. (1999) proposed that during transgression,
sea level increases and the portion of landscape
exposed to erosion decreases, leading to a decrease
in detrital input. This link was actually observed in
various carbonate platform examples (Hladil 2002;
Racki et al. 2002; Da Silva et al. 2010; Whalen &
Day 2010). This interpretation fits well with the
observed deepening trend reflected by the facies.
Geochemical proxies
Carbon and oxygen isotopes
The carbon isotope values of bulk rock samples
(Fig. 12) fall within a range of 22.1 and 1.7‰. A
positive excursion of d13Ccarb values from 20.1‰
(BL 12-34B) to 1.5‰ (BL 12-31) is observed at
the base of the section. The interval between BL
12-31 and BL 12-22 is characterized by a gradual
decrease in d13C from 1.5 to 20.2‰. The second
positive excursion lasts from BL 12-22 until BL
12-16, peaking at 1.2 ‰. Further, two positive
peaks of d13Ccarb values are recorded within the
5–6 and 6–7 m of section separated by low values
at BL 12-15 (0.9‰) and BL 12-9A (0.1‰). The
values decrease between BL 12-7 and BL 12-3B,
ranging from 1.6 to 22.1‰ (lowest d13Ccarb value
obtained across the entire section). Two positive
peaks occur in BL 12-6A and around BL 12-S4.
Carbon isotope values of prasinophytes fluctuate
between a minimum of 229.7‰ and a maximum of
225.7‰. The trend of d13Corg within the lowermost
1 m of the section corresponds to the trend of
d13Ccarb of the same interval. The highest d13Corg
value is recorded in BL 12-14. A negative shift of
23.6‰ is observed from BL 12-14 to BL 12-12.
Below this negative shift, the values are relatively
higher than those above the shift and show an amplitude fluctuation ranging from 228 to 225.7‰ and
from 229.7 to 228‰, respectively. The lowest value
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
of d13Corg, as well as d13Ccarb, is observed around
7.5–8 m of the section. The value increases
towards the top of the section from 229.7‰ (BL
12-3) to 229.1 ‰ (BL 2-1). The increase of
values in the uppermost part of the section is also
observed in MS (carbonate) and d13Ccarb.
Although we provide oxygen isotopes of bulk
sedimentary rocks, we are aware that d18O analyses
from bulk samples do not produce reliable palaeoenvironmental results compared with data from the
calcite of brachiopod shells or the PO4 group of biogenic phosphate. In this paper, d18O values are
plotted to compare variations through the section
with other geochemical and geophysical proxies.
d18O values of bulk-rock samples range between
26.7 and 23.1‰.
TOC and sulphur content
Total organic carbon is below 0.7% throughout the
entire section (Fig. 12), with a minimum of 0.12%
(BL 12-20) and a maximum of 0.69% (BL 12-S6).
Sample BL 12-34B from the base of the section
shows a TOC concentration of 0.24%. The content
decreases to 0.16% and then increases to 0.36%
approximately 1 m above the section base (BL
12-31). A second positive peak (0.51%) is observed
at BL 12-S24, followed by decreasing values to approximately 3.5 m. Another positive shift to 0.43%
is observed between BL 12-22 and BL 12-21. The
following drop to 0.12% (BL 12-20) equates to the
lowest value measured across the entire section.
Two minor positive spikes are recorded at BL
12-18 (0.34%) and BL 12-14 (0.43%) between BL
12-20 and BL 12-7, followed by a low-amplitude
fluctuation to approximately 7 m above the section
base. Sulphur content varies between 0.02 (BL
12-S5) and 1.54% (BL 12-31). The significant positive shift near the base of the section peaks at the
same level, with the first maximum in the d13Ccarb
and the TOC curves. Sulphur content then decreases
to 0.36% (BL 12-29C), followed by a minor positive excursion (maximum 0.73%: BL 12-29B).
Thereafter, values decrease to 0.04% (BL 12-S24),
followed by an interval of low-amplitude fluctuation through to sample level BL 12-13. Above this
interval, although values increase to 0.26% (BL
12-11), and to 0.33 –0.41% between BL 12-S8 and
BL 12-7, they consistently show less fluctuation
than the section below.
Estimated palaeotemperature
In recent years, the oxygen isotope composition
of conodont apatite has been used to estimate the
palaeotemperature (e.g. Joachimski et al. 2004,
2009; Trotter et al. 2008). In this study, we measured exclusively icriodontid platform elements of
two samples (BL 12-29c and BL 12-22). d18Oapatite
values of both samples show a ratio of 19.2‰ (1
SD ¼ +0.2‰). Assuming an oxygen isotope composition of 21‰ for Middle Devonian seawater, a
palaeotemperature of 29.7 8C is calculated using
the temperature equation provided by Pucéat et al.
(2010). According to Joachimski et al. (2009),
who summarized d18Oapatite data of conodonts from
Germany, France, the Czech Republic and the
United States for the Middle Devonian using a
value of 22.6‰ for NBS120c, the d18Oapatite values ranging from 19 to 21‰ (VSMOW) gave
palaeotemperatures from 22 to 30 8C.
Major, trace and REE analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) of normalized
whole-rock values was conducted using PAST software (Hammer et al. 2001). The first two principal
components contribute meaningful information for
the interpretation of geochemical patterns throughout the section (Fig. 13). PC-1 values are interpreted
as a detrital signal due to the positive and negative
loadings of siliciclastic detrital indicators v. carbonate indicators (Fig. 14). Conversely, PC-2 values are
consistent with the signals indicated by d13C and
TOC (Fig. 15), even if they are not proxies for
anoxia. Plotting individual signals against stratigraphy provides a clearer signal of detrital input
(Fig. 16) and events (Figs 17 & 18).
Given the tectonic complexity of the area, we
analysed samples to determine sediment provenance. Trace elements, such as Hf, Nb, Sc, Ta, Th,
U, Y, Yb and Zr, are found in the titanium-bearing
detrital fraction of sedimentary rocks and can be
used to distinguish the maturity (Carpentier et al.
2013) or the tectonic environment (Wood 1980;
Pearce et al. 1984; Bhatia & Crook 1986) of the
source rock. Analysis of Th/U ratios in sediments
in the Blankenheim section suggests that the sediment source is juvenile, with Th/U ,3 (Fig. 19).
In addition, trace-element geochemical signatures
suggest that the sedimentary provenance for the detrital material is consistent with a continental island
arc environment (Fig. 20). This interpretation supports earlier research that the Blankenheim section
was part of the newly amalgamated Avalonian
microcontinent (Franke & Oncken 1995; Franke
2000), as well as recently published data of the
eastern part of the Rheinisches Schiefergebirge
(e.g. Eckelmann et al. 2014).
Detrital signatures are seen between 61 and
148 cm (around samples BL 12-32 and BL
12-29B) above the base of the section, with two
major pulses of detrital input higher up in the section at 738 and 759 cm (around samples BL
12-S5 –BL 12-3C: Fig. 16). Based on increases of
chalcophile elements, such as Zn, Pb, Cu and S
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Fig. 13. Principal component analysis (PCA) of normalized whole-rock values showing PC1 v. PC2. PC1 is interpreted
as a detrital signal, with PC2 showing an anoxia signal.
(Fig. 17), a signature of anoxia is suggested at 89 cm
above the base of the section (samples BL 12-31 and
BL 12-30), although redox proxies such as authigenic U and Ce anomalies do not support anoxia
in this interval (Fig. 18). A second event at the top
of the section (from 738 to 779 cm) possibly indicates anoxia through a set of staggered negative d13C
excursions, a Ce anomaly and increases in TOC
(Fig. 18). This upper event begins with the pulse
of detrital input at 738 cm and continues through
779 cm. Although there is a spike in excess Ba,
excess P and V/Cr at 365 cm (Fig. 18), we are reluctant to assign a meaning to this interval as V/Cr is a
proxy for anoxia, while excess Ba and P are proxies
Fig. 14. PC1 loadings showing the detrital signal in contrast (positive values) to the carbonate signal (negative values).
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 15. PC2 loadings showing the anoxia signals, with positive loadings in chalcophile elements and P2O5.
Fig. 16. Stratigraphic distribution of detrital proxies in addition to d13C and d18O signatures. There is a major excursion
at 738 cm and at 759 cm, which we interpret as a major sediment influx. Note that TOC and d18O are correlated with
this pulse of detrital input. An earlier flux of material can be seen at 89 cm above the base of the section.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Fig. 17. Stratigraphic distribution of chalcophile element proxies in addition to d13C and d18O signatures. There is an
excursion of the chalcophile elements at 89 cm above the base of the section.
for primary productivity, which are not generally
seen in the same interval in known anoxia events
(Dymond et al. 1992; Pujol et al. 2006), and
because the use of Ba as an indicator is dependent
on a variety of local water-column conditions
(Von Breymann et al. 1992; Paytan et al. 2007).
In addition, these signals are not replicated by the
other proxies used in this study. While TOC has
been used as a proxy for anoxia in many studies
(Ingall et al. 1993; Algeo & Maynard 2004; Pujol
et al. 2006; Marynowski & Filipiak 2007; D.P.
Bond et al. 2013), it may not be an appropriate
proxy to use in this case, as it has a positive correlation with detrital input (Fig. 15).
Interpretation
In the lower event (89 cm), elevations in chalcophile
element concentrations are not correlated with
redox-sensitive element anomalies in comparison
to the upper potentially anoxic horizon (738 –
779 cm) (Fig. 17). This may possibly be due to the
differences in sediment supply and flux to the
environment; the lower horizon shows a gradual
increase in detrital fraction elements above the
increases of chalcophile elements. The reason for
this discrepancy between anoxia proxies is unclear,
and may represent bacterial sulphate reduction
in buried sediments rather than an anoxic event at
the sediment –water interface. At the top of the
section, however, the sharp spike in redox-sensitive
elemental anomalies and a negative excursion in
d13C concurrent with, and subsequent to, two large
sediment pulses may indicate anoxia at the sediment –water interface.
Discussion and conclusions
The entire section is composed of shallow subtidal
to moderately deep subtidal mixed carbonates and
siltstones. According to Struve (1990), the stratigraphical extent of the so-called ‘Great Gap’ period
lasting from the lower Eifelian into the lower Givetian is characterized by sedimentary gaps and not
full-marine sediments, and may also have been
recognized in the Couvin area, Belgium (Bultynck
& Hollevoet 1999). Phosphorite intraclasts and ironoxide crusts around some bioclasts have been found
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 18. Stratigraphic distribution of anoxia (V/Cr) and productivity proxies (normalized Ba, excess P2O5) in addition
to d13C and d18O signatures. There is a major excursion at 365 cm, which we are reluctant to classify as an anoxic
event or an event correlated with changes in sedimentation.
in some thin sections, which may be an indication of
submarine weathering and does not necessarily
mean that an area further in the north underwent
subaerial exposure, as suggested by Winter (1977).
Thus, we favour a shallow-marine environment for
the entire section, which shows an overall slightly
transgressive trend. The latter is also confirmed by
magnetic susceptibility data.
According to DeSantis & Brett (2011), magnetic
susceptibility data suggest a signature for a regressive phase in eastern North America for deposits
of the Stony Hollow, followed by the transgressive
succession of the Hurley–Cherry Valley deposits
(Brett et al. 2011). Magnetic susceptibility data of
the Blankenheim section show similar patterns in
the same stratigraphic position and are also comparable to those described from the GSSP Mech Irdane,
Tafilalt, Morocco (Crick et al. 2000). It might be
possible that the lower event at the base of the Blankenheim section is based on regional variations in
sediment supply and/or sea-level changes, or may
be correlated with the Stony Hollow Event
associated with probable warming and incursion of
tropical species into the subtropical to temperate
shelf region of eastern North America (DeSantis &
Brett 2011).
As shown earlier, geochemical proxies of the
Blankenheim section exhibit two major signals: an
increase in chalcophile elements that occurs at the
base of the section at 89 cm within the kockelianus
conodont Biozone; and a second peak that occurs
from 738 to 779 cm from the base of the section.
Above the alluvial sediment influx at 738 cm,
there is a large negative excursion in d13C and a
Ce anomaly ,20.1 (Fig. 15), the latter of which
has been seen in other sections with anoxia
(Morad & Felitsyn 2001; Pujol et al. 2006; Carmichael et al. 2014). Although spikes in V/Cr are
not readily apparent in this interval, they do show
increases from a secular low (Fig. 17). Any potential
authigenic U signatures are likely to have been
overprinted by high levels of detrital Th in this
part of the section, invalidating authigenic U as a
potential anoxia tracer in this particular location.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Fig. 19. (a) Th/U ratios in basinal sediments can be used to determine the sediment source, with Th/U values for
mature, cratonic sediments with highly variable ratios (average of c. 6), and juvenile sediment sources with Th/U values
clustered around 3 (modified from Carpentier et al. 2013). (b) The source of sediments in the Blankenheim section has a
clustered Th/U value of approximately 2, suggesting a juvenile source.
While there is a phase offset between the d13C
and Ce anomaly at 779 cm in comparison with the
detrital pulses at 738 cm and 759 cm, this could be
due to bacterial reduction of the organic matter
in the sediments, which will lead to carbon isotope
fractionation (Kump et al. 1999). This mechanism
is consistent with our observation that TOC in this
section is often correlated with detrital sedimentation, and the negative d13C excursion seen may
be due to bacterial reduction, fractionation and
mobilization of accumulated organic carbon in the
detrital sediments below. While this explanation
for a negative excursion is highly dependent on
local conditions, negative excursions in d13C have
been seen immediately prior to the Kačák Event
both in Ontario, Canada (van Hengstum & Gröcke
2008) and in Morocco (Ellwood et al. 2003).
The d13C excursion and Ce anomaly are, therefore,
interpreted to be the local representation of the
beginning of the ‘true’ Kačák Event Interval,
which is also consistent with the conodont and
microfacies analyses presented above. The major
conclusions of our multidisciplinary approach are
as follows:
† Based on micro- and macrofossils, the Blankenheim section exposes the Junkerberg and Freilingen formations, and reaches the uppermost
Eifelian (kockelianus and ensensis conodont
biozones).
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Fig. 20. Tectonomagmatic discrimination diagrams showing sediment-source signatures in detrital Ti-bearing minerals
from (a) basalts (modified from Wood 1980), (b) greywacke sediments (modified from Bhatia & Crook 1986) and (c) &
(d) granitic sources (modified from Pearce et al. 1984). Regardless of the signature suite used, the Blankenheim
sediments clearly cluster as arc-volcanic signatures, consistent with deposition along the newly amalgamating
Avalonia microcontinent.
† The entire section is composed of shallow- to
deep-subtidal mixed carbonates and siltstones.
The beginning of the Kačák Event Interval
can be recognized even in the shallow-marine
environment (open-marine organisms, such as
tentaculites, cephalopods and/or pelagic ostracodes are absent). The overall section shows a
slightly transgressive trend.
† From the magnetic measurements, we can
deduce that we have a magnetic signal, which
is mostly carried by paramagnetic minerals.
The magnetic susceptibility of shale layers is
systematically higher than the adjacent carbonate beds. Furthermore, hysteresis plots point to
preserved primary coarse (MD) detrital magnetite, which is classically not the case in most of
the remagnetized Rhenohercynian zone. Magnetic susceptibility (MS) shows a generally
decreasing trend in the section, which could be
related to a decrease in detrital input, consistent
with the observed transgressive trend.
† The lower part of the sequence (89 cm above the
base of the section, around samples BL 12-31
and BL 12-30) exhibits a correlation of the
occurrence of chalcophile elements with the
occurrence of quartz-rich calcisiltite. This
event may be a result of local variations in sediment supply and/or sea-level changes or may be
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
associated with the pre-Kačák Stony Hollow
Event. The d13C excursion and Ce anomaly in
the upper part of the section (738 –779 cm) are
interpreted to be the local representation of the
beginning of the ‘real’ Kačák Event Interval,
which is also consistent with the conodont and
microfacies analyses presented herein.
† The conodont apatite oxygen isotope record
from our samples is interpreted as reflecting the
palaeotemperature of the Devonian tropical and
subtropical sea surface. The estimated palaeotemperature of our samples is 29.7 8C.
† In terms of plate tectonics, the analysed trace
elements, such as Hf, Nb, Sc, Ta, Th, U, Y, Yb
and Zr, suggest that the sediment source is juvenile and consistent with the Avalonian microcontinent. Furthermore, we can conclude that the
sedimentary provenance for the detrital material
is consistent with continental island-arc or
ribbon continent volcanic-arc settings.
† A multidisciplinary approach has great potential
for investigating palaeoenvironmental changes,
particularly with respect to events in shallowwater realms.
EK and TJS are grateful for the financial support of FWF P
23775-B17. We thank Michael Joachimski (Erlangen) for
measuring the oxygen isotope composition of conodont
apatite. Petra Tonarova (Prague) is thanked for picking
additional prasinophytes that were used for organic
carbon stable isotopes analyses. Jana Anger (Senckenberg
Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt)
is thanked for preparing some figures. This paper is a contribution to IGCP 580 and IGCP 596.
References
Algeo, T. J. & Maynard, J. B. 2004. Trace-element
behavior and redox facies in core shales of Upper
Pennsylvanian Kansas-type cyclothems. Chemical
Geology, 206, 289– 318.
Basse, M. & Müller, P. 2004. Eifel-Trilobiten. 3.
Corynexochida, Proetida (2), Harpetida, Phacopida
(2), Lichida, 1st edn. Quelle & Meyer, Wiebelsheim.
Becker, R. T. & House, M. R. 2000. Devonian ammonoid
zones and their correlation with established series and
stage boundaries. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 220, 113–151.
Bender, P. & Königshof, P. 1994. Regional maturation
patterns of the Devonian strata in the eastern Rheinisches Schiefergebirge (Lahn-Dill area) based on
conodont colour alteration (CAI). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 168, 335– 345.
Bertola, C., Boulvain, F., Da Silva, A. C. & Poty, E.
2013. Sedimentology and magnetic susceptibility
of Mississippian (Tournaisian) carbonate sections in
Belgium. Bulletin of Geosciences, 88, 69– 82.
Bhatia, M. R. & Crook, K. A. W. 1986. Trace element
characteristics of graywackes and tectonic setting
discrimination of sedimentary basins. Contributions
to Mineralogy and Petrology, 92, 181–193.
Bischoff, G. & Ziegler, W. 1957. Die Conodontenchronologie des Mitteldevons und des tiefsten Oberdevons.
Abhandlungen des hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 22, 1 –136.
Blomeier, D. P. G. & Reijmer, J. J. G. 1999. Drowning of
a Lower Jurassic carbonate platform: Jbel Bou Dahar,
High Atlas, Morocco. Facies, 41, 81– 110.
Bond, D. P., Zatoń, M., Wignall, P. B. & Marynowski,
L. 2013. Evidence for shallow-water ‘Upper Kellwasser’
anoxia in the Frasnian–Famennian reefs of Alberta,
Canada. Lethaia, 46, 355– 368.
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J. et al. 2013. Bounding the
role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific
assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid
Earth, 118, 5380– 5552, http://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.
50171
Braun, R., Oetken, S., Königshof, P., Kornder, L. &
Wehrmann, A. 1994. Development and biofacies of
reef-influenced carbonates (Central Lahn Syncline,
Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 169, 351– 386.
Brett, C. E., Baird, G. C., Bartholomew, A. J., DeSantis, K. M. & Ver Straeten, C. A. 2011. Sequence
stratigraphy and a revised sea-level curve for the
Middle Devonian of eastern North America. In:
Brett, C. B., Schindler, E. & Königshof, P. (eds)
Sea-Level Cyclicity, Climate Change, and Bioevents
in Middle Devonian Marine and Terrestrial Environments. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 304, 21– 53.
Brinkmann, R. 1948. Die Mitteldeutsche Schwelle. Geologische Rundschau, 36, 56– 66.
Budil, P. 1995. Demonstrations of the Kačák Event
(Middle Devonian, uppermost Eifelian) at some Barrandian localities. Vestnik Ceskeho Geologickeho
ustavu, 70, 1–24.
Buggisch, W. & Mann, U. 2004. Carbon isotop stratigraphy of Lochkovian to Eifelian limestones from
the Devonian of central and southern Europe. International Journal of Earth Sciences, Geologische
Rundschau, 93, 521 –541.
Bultynck, P. 1970. Révision stratigraphique et paléontologique (brachiopodes et conodontes) de la coupe type
du Couvinian. Mémoires de l’Institute Géologique de
l’Université de Louvain, 26, 152.
Bultynck, P. 1987. Pelagic and neritic condont successions from the Givetian of pre-Sahara Morocco and
the Ardennes. Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences
Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 59,
95–103.
Bultynck, P. 1989. Conodonts from a potential EifelianGivetian global boundary stratotype at Jebel Ou Driss.
Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de
Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 57, 149– 181.
Bultynck, P. & Hollevoet, C. 1999. The EifelianGivetian boundary and Struve’s Middle Devonian
Great Gap in the Courvin area (Ardennes, southern
Belgium). Senckenbergiana lethaea, 79, 3– 11.
Calvert, S. E. & Pedersen, T. F. 2007. Elemental proxies
for palaeoclimatic and palaeoceanographic variability in marine sediments: interpretation and application.
In: Hillaire-Marcel, C. & Vernal, A. D. (eds)
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Proxies in Late Cenozoic Paleoceanography. Developments in Marine Geology, 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam,
567–644.
Carmichael, S. K., Waters, J. A., Suttner, T. S., Kido,
E. & DeReuil, A. A. 2014. A new model for the Kellwasser Anoxia Events (Late Devonian): Shallow water
anoxia in an open oceanic setting in the Central Asian
Orogenic belt. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, 399, 394 –403.
Carpentier, M., Weis, D. & Chauvel, C. 2013. Large U
loss during weathering of upper continental crust: the
sedimentary record. Chemical Geology, 340, 91– 104.
Channel, J. E. T. & McCabe, C. 1994. Comparison of
magnetic hysteresis parameters of unremagnetized
and remagnetized limestones. Journal of Geophysical
Research, 99, 4613–4623.
Chlupáč, I. & Kukal, Z. 1986. Reflection of possible
global Devonian events in the Barrandian area,
C.S.S.R. In: Walliser, O. H. (ed.) Global BioEvents. A Critical Approach Proceedings of the First
International Meeting of the IGCP Project 216:
‘Global Biological Events in Earth History’. Lecture
Notes in Earth Sciences, 8, 169–179.
Crick, R. E., Ellwood, B. B., El Hassani, A. & Feist,
R. 2000. Proposed magnetostratigraphy susceptibility
magnetostratotype for the Eifelian-Givetian GSSP
(Anti-Atlas, Morocco). Episodes, 23, 93– 101.
Da Silva, A. C. & Boulvain, F. 2010. Magnetic susceptibility correlation of km-thick Eifelian-Frasnian sections (Ardennes and Moravia). Geologica Belgica,
13, 309–318.
Da Silva, A. C., Yans, J. & Boulvain, F. 2010. EarlyMiddle Frasian (Early Late Devonian) sedimentology
and magnetic susceptibility of the Ardennes area
(Belgium): identification of severe and rapid sea-level
fluctuations. Geologica Belgica, 13, 319 –332.
Da Silva, A. C., Dekkers, M. J., Mabille, C. & Boulvain,
F. 2012. Magnetic signal and its relationship with
paleoenvironments, diagenesis and remagnetization –
examples from the Devonian carbonates of Belgium.
Studia Geophysica & Geodaedica, 56, 677–704.
Da Silva, A. C., De Vleeschouwer, D. et al. 2013.
Magnetic susceptibility as a high-resolution correlation
tool and as a climatic proxy in Paleozoic rocks – Merits
and pitfalls: Examples from the Devonian in Belgium.
Marine and Petroleum Geology, 46, 173–189.
Day, R., Fuller, M. & Schmidt, V. A. 1977. Hysteresis
propreties of titanomagnetites: grain-size and compositional dependence. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 13, 260–267.
DeSantis, M. K. & Brett, C. E. 2011. Late Eifelian
(Middle Devonian) biocrises: Timing and signature
of the pre-Kačák Bakhoven and Stony Hollow Events
in eastern North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 304, 113–135.
De Vleeschouwer, D., Da Silva, A. C., Boulvain, F.,
Crucifix, M. & Claeys, P. 2012. Precessional and
half-precessional climate forcing of Mid-Devonian
monsoon-like dynamics. Climate of the Past, 7,
1427–1455.
De Vleeschouwer, X., Petitclerc, E., Spassov, S. &
Préat, A. 2010. The Givetian– Frasnian boundary at
Nismes parastratotype (Belgium): the magnetic susceptibility signal controlled by ferromagnetic minerals.
In: Da Silva, A. C. & Boulvain, F. (eds) Magnetic
Susceptibility, Correlations and Palaeozoic Environments. Geologica Belgica, 13, (4), 351– 366.
Dombrowski, A., Henjes-Kunst, F., Höhndorf, A.,
Kröner, A., Okrusch, M. & Richter, P. 1995.
Orthogneisses in the Spessart Crystalline Complex,
Northwest Bavaria: Silurian granitoid magmatism at
an active continental margin. Geologische Rundschau,
84, 399 –411.
Dunlop, D. J. 2002. Theory and application of the Day
plot (Mrs/Ms v. Hcr/Hc) – 1. Theoretical curves and
tests using titanomagnetite data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 1 –22.
Dymond, J., Suess, E. & Lyle, M. 1992. Barium in
deep-sea sediment: a geochemical proxy for paleoproductivity. Paleoceanography, 7, 163– 181.
Eckelmann, K., Nesbor, H.-D., Königshof, P., Linnemann, U., Hofmann, M., Lange, J.-M. & Sagawe,
A. 2014. Plate interactions of Laurussia and Gondwana during the formation of Pangaea – Constraints
from U– Pb LA-SF-ICP-MS detrital zircon ages of Devonian and Early Carboniferous siliciclastics of the
Rhenohercynian zone, Central European Variscides.
Gondwana Research, 25, 1484–1500, http://doi.org/
10.1016/j.gr.2013.05.018
Ellwood, B. B., Crick, R. E. & El Hassani, A. 1999.
Magnetosusceptibility event and cyclostratigraphy
(MSEC) method used in geological correlation of
Devonian rocks from Anti-Atlas Morocco. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 83,
1119– 1134.
Ellwood, B. B., Benoist, S. L., El Hassani, A.,
Wheeler, C. & Crick, R. E. 2003. Impact ejecta
layer from the Mid-Devonian possible connection to
global mass extinctions. Science, 300, 1734– 1737.
Ellwood, B. B., Tomkin, J. H. et al. 2011. A climatedriven model and development of a floating point
time scale for the entire Middle Devonian Givetian
Stage: A test using magnetostratigraphy susceptibility
as a climate proxy. In: Brett, C. B., Schindler, E.
& Königshof, P. (eds) Sea-Level Cyclicity, Climate
Change, and Bioevents in Middle Devonian Marine
and Terrestrial Environments. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 304, 85–95,
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.10.014
Engel, W., Franke, W., Grote, C., Weber, K.,
Ahrendt, H. & Eder, F. W. 1983. Nappe tectonics
in the southeastern part of the Rheinisches Schiefergebirge. In: Martin, H. & Eder, F. W. (eds) Intracontinental Fold Belts. Springer, Berlin, 267–287.
Ernst, A., Königshof, P., Taylor, P. D. & Bohaty, J.
2011. Microhabitat complexity – an example from
Middle Devonian bryozoans-rich sediments in the
Blankenheim Syncline (northern Eifel, Rheinisches
Schiefergebirge). Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 91, 257– 284, http://doi.org/10.1007/
s12549-011-0060-6
Faber, P. 1980. Fazies-Gliederung und -Entwicklung im
Mittel-Devon der Eifel (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge).
Mainzer geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, 8, 83–149.
Flügel, E. 2004. Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks.
Springer, Berlin.
Franke, W. 2000. The mid-European segment of the Variscides: tectonostratigraphic units, terrane boundaries
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
and plate tectonic evolution. In: Franke, W., Haak,
V., Oncken, O. & Tanner, D. (eds) Orogenic Processes: Quantification and Modelling in the Variscan
Belt. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 179, 35–61, http://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.
2000.179.01.05
Franke, W. & Oncken, O. 1990. Geodynamic evolution
of the northcentral Variscides – a comic strip. In:
Freeman, R., Giese, P. & Mueller, S. (eds) The
European Geotraverse. European Science Foundation,
Strasbourg, 187–194.
Franke, W. & Oncken, O. 1995. Zur prädevonischen
Geschichte des Rhenohercynischen Beckens. Nova
Acta Leopoldina NF, 71, 53– 72.
Franke, W., Bortfeld, R. K. et al. 1990. Crustral structur of the Rhenish Massif: results of deep seismic
reflection lines DEKORP 2-North and 2-North-Q.
Geologische Rundschau, 79, (3), 523– 566.
Gammon, P. R. & James, N. P. 2001. Palaeogeographical
influence on Late Eocene biosiliceous sponge-rich
sedimentation, southern Western Australia. Sedimentology, 48/3, 559 –584, http://doi.org/10.1046/
j.1365-3091.2001.00379.x
Hahn, H. D. 1990. Fazies grobklastischer Gesteine des
Unterdevons (Graue Phyllite bis Taunusquarzit) im
Taunus (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). PhD thesis,
University of Marburg.
Hahn, H. D. & Zankl, H. 1991. Sedimentation in the
Lower Devonian of the Taunus area (Graue Phyllite
to Taunusquarzit). Zentralblatt für Geologie und
Paläontologie, Teil I, 1990, 1509– 1520.
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. 2001.
PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for
education and data analysis. Palaeontologia electronica, 4, (1), art. 4.
Helsen, S. & Königshof, P. 1994. Conodont thermal
alteration patterns in Paleozoic rocks from Belgium,
northern France and western Germany. Geological
Magazine, 131, 369– 386.
Hinde, G. J. 1879. On conodonts from the Chazy and
Cincinnati group of the Cambro-Silurian and from
the Hamilton and Genesee-Shale divisions of the
Devonian in Canada and the United States. Quarterly
Journal of the Geological Society of London, 35,
351– 369.
Hladil, J. 2002. Geophysical records of dispersed weathering products on the Frasnian carbonate platform and
early Famennian ramps in Moravia, Czech Republic: proxies for eustasy and palaeoclimate. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 181,
213– 250.
Hladil, J., Koptikova, L. et al. 2009. Early Middle Frasnian platform reef strata in the Moravian
Karst interpreted as recording the atmospheric
dust changes: the key to understanding perturbations
in the punctata conodont Zone. Bulletin of Geosciences, 84(1), 75–106.
House, M. R. 1996. The Middle Devonian Kacak Event.
Proceedings of the Ussher Society, 9, 79– 84.
House, M. R. 2002. Strenght, timing, setting and cause of
mid-Paleozoic extinctions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 181, 5–25.
Huckriede, H., Wemmer, W. & Ahrendt, H. 2004.
Palaeogeography and tectonic structure of allochtonous
units in the German part of the Rheno-Hercynian Belt
(Central European Variscides). International Journal
of Earth Sciences, 93, 414–431.
Ingall, E. D., Bustin, R. M. & Van Cappellen, P. 1993.
Influence of water column anoxia on the burial and
preservation of carbon and phosphorus in marine shales.
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57, 303– 316.
Jackson, M. 1990. Diagenetic sources of stable remanence
in remagnetized paleozoic cratonic carbonates: A rock
magnetic study. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95,
2753– 2761.
Joachimski, M. M., van Geldern, R., Breisig, S., Day, J.
& Buggisch, W. 2004. Oxygen isotope evolution
of biogenetic calcite and apatite during the Middle
and Upper Devonian. International Journal of Earth
Sciences, 93, 542– 553.
Joachimski, M. M., Breisig, S. et al. 2009. Devonian
climate and reef evolution: insights fom oxygen isotopes in apatite. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
284, 599 –609.
Koptı́ková, L. 2011. Precise position of the Basal Choteč
event and evolution of sedimentary environments near
the Lower–Middle Devonian boundary: the magnetic
susceptibility, gamma-ray spectrometric, lithological, and geochemical record of the Prague Synform
(Czech Republic). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 304, 96–112.
Königshof, P. & Werner, R. 1994. Zur Bestimmung der
Versenkungstemperaturen im Devon der Eifeler Kalkmulden-Zone mit Hilfe der Conodontenfarbe. Courier
Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 168, 255–265.
Königshof, P., Gewehr, B., Kornder, L., Wehrmann,
A., Braun, R. & Zankl, H. 1991. StromatoporenMorphotypen aus einem zentralen Riffbereich (Mitteldevon) in der südwestlichen Lahnmulde. Geologica et
Palaeontologica, 25, 19–35.
Königshof, P., Nesbor, H.-D. & Flick, H. 2010. Volcanism and reef development in the Devonian: a case study
from the Lahn syncline, Rheinisches Schiefergebirge
(Germany). Gondwana Research, 17, 264–280, http://
doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2009.09.006
Kroner, U. & Hahn, T. 2003. Sedimentation, Deformation and Metamorphose im Saxothuringikum
während der variszischen Orogenese: die komplexe
Entwicklung von Nord-Gondwana während kontinentaler Subduktion und schiefer Kollision. In: Linnemann, U. (ed.) Das Saxothuringikum – Abriss der
präkambrischen und paläozoischen Geologie von
Sachsen und Thüringen. Geologica Saxonica, 48/49,
137–150.
Kroner, U., Hahn, T., Romer, R. L. & Linnemann, U.
2007. The Variscan orogeny in the Saxo-Thuringian
zone-heterogenous overprint of Cadomian/Palaeozoic
peri-Gondwana crust. In: Linnemann, U., Nance,
R. D., Kraft, P. & Zulauf, G. (eds) The Evolution
of the Rheic Ocean: From Avalonian– Cadomian
Active Margin to Alleghenian– Variscan Collision.
Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 423,
153–172.
Kump, I. R., Arthur, M. A., Patzkowsky, M. E., Gibbs,
M. T., Pinkus, D. S. & Sheehan, P. M. 1999. A weathering hypothesis for glaciation at high atmosheric
pCO2 during the Late Ordovician. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 152, 173 –187.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Linnemann, U., D’Lemos, R., Drost, K., Jeffries, T.,
Gerdes, A., Romer, R. L. & Samsor, S. D. 2008.
Introduction (Chapter 3: The Cadomian Orogeny). In:
McCann, T. (ed.) The Geology of Central Europe.
Geological Society, London, 103–154.
Linnemann, U., Hofmann, M., Romer, R. L. & Gerdes,
A. 2010. Transitional stages between the Cadomian
and Variscan Orogenies: Basin development and
tectonomagmatic evolution of the southern margin
of the Rheic Ocean in the Saxo-Thuringian Zone
(North Gondwana shelf). In: Linnemann, U. &
Romer, R. L. (eds) Pre-Mesozoic Geology of SaxoThuringia – From the Cadomian Active Margin to
the Variscan Orogen. Schweizerbart Science, Stuttgart, 59–98.
Marynowski, L. & Filipiak, P. 2007. Water column
euxinia and wildfire evidence during deposition of the
Upper Famennian Hangenberg event horizon from the
Holy Cross Mountains (central Poland). Geological
Magazine, 144, 569– 595.
Matte, Ph. 1986. Tectonics and plate tectonics model for
the Variscan Belt of Europe. Tectonophysics, 126,
329–374.
Meischner, D. 1991. Kleine Geologie des Kellerwaldes
(Exkursion F). Jahresbericht und Mitteilungen des
Oberrheinischen Geologischen Vereins, NF, 73,
115–142.
Molina Garza, R. S. & Zijderveld, J. D. A. 1996.
Paleomagnetism of Paleozoic strata, Brabant and
Ardennes Massifs, Belgium: Implications of prefolding and postfolding Late Carboniferous secondary
magnetizations for European apparent polar wander.
Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 799–818.
Morad, S. & Felitsyn, S. 2001. Identification of primary
Ce-anomaly signatures in fossil biogenic apatite:
implication for the Cambrian oceanic anoxia and phosphogenesis. Sedimentary Geology, 143, 259– 264.
Nance, R. D., Gutiérrez-Alonso, G. et al. 2010. Evolution of the Rheic Ocean. Gondwana Research, 17,
194–222.
Nesbor, H.-D. 2004. Paläozoischer Intraplattenvulkanismus im östlichen Rheinischen Schiefergebirge – Magmenentwicklung und zeitlicher Ablauf. Geologisches
Jahrbuch Hessen, 131, 145– 182.
Nesbor, H.-D., Buggisch, W., Flick, H., Horn, M. &
Lippert, H.-J. 1993. Vulkanismus im Devon des
Rhenoherzynikums. Fazielle und paläogeographische
Entwicklung vulkanisch geprägter mariner Becken
am Beispiel des Lahn-Dill-Gebietes. Geologisches
Jahrbuch Hessen, 98, 3– 87.
Ochs, G. & Wolfart, R. 1961. Geologie der Blankenheimer Mulde (Devon, Eifel). Abhandlungen der
Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft,
501.
Oczlon, M. S. 1992. Gondwanan and Laurussia Before
and During the Variscan Orogeny in Europe and
Related Areas. Heidelberger Geowissenschaftliche
Abhandlungen, 53.
Oncken, O., Plesch, A., Weber, K., Ricken, W. &
Schrader, S. 2000. Passive margin detachment
during arc–continent collision (Central European Variscides). In: Franke, W., Haak, V., Oncken, O. &
Tanner, D. (eds) Orogenic Processes: Quantification
and Modelling in the Variscan Belt. Geological Society,
London, Special Publications, 179, 199–216, http://
doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.179.01.13
Paproth, E. & Struve, W. 1982. Bemerkungen zur
Entwicklung des Givetium am Niederrhein. Paläogeographischer Rahmen der Bohrung Schwarzbachtal
1. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 63, 359– 376.
Parry, L. G. 1982. Magnetization of immobilized
particle dispersions with two distinct particles sizes.
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 28,
230– 241.
Pas, D., Da Silva, A. C., Cornet, P., Bultynck, P.,
Königshof, P. & Boulvain, F. 2013. Sedimentary
development of a continuous Middle Devonian to Mississippian section from the fore-reef fringe of the
Brilon Reef Complex (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge,
Germany). Facies, 59, (4), 969– 990, http://doi.org/
10.1007/s10347-012-0351-z
Paytan, A., Averyt, K., Faul, K., Gray, E. & Thomas,
E. 2007. Barite accumulation, ocean productivity, and
Sr/Ba in barite across the Paleocene-Eocene thermal
maximum. Geology, 35, 1139–1142.
Pearce, J. A., Harris, N. B. & Tindle, A. G. 1984. Trace
element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic
interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology,
25, 956 –983.
Pucéat, E., Joachimski, M. M. et al. 2010. Revised
phosphate-water fractionation equation reassessing
paleotemperatures derived from biogenic apatite.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 298, 135 –142,
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.07.034
Pujol, F., Berner, Z. & Stüben, D. 2006. Palaeoenvironmental changes at the Frasnian/Famennian boundary in key European sections: Chemostratigraphic
constraints. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, 240, 120– 145.
Racki, G., Racka, M., Matyja, H. & De
Vleeschouwer, X. 2002. The Frasnian/Famennian
boundary interval in the South Polish-Moravian
shelf basins: integrated event-stratigraphical approach.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,
181, 251–297.
Reischmann, T., Anthes, G., Jaeckel, P. & Altenberger, U. 2001. Age and origin of the Böllsteiner Odenwald. Mineralogy and Petrology, 72, 29– 44.
Riding, R. 1975. Girvanella and other algae as depth indicators. Lethaia, 8, 173– 179, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.
1502-3931.1975.tb01310.x
Riquier, L., Averbuch, O., De Vleeschouwer, X. &
Tribovillard, N. 2010. Diagenetic v. detrital origin
of the magnetic susceptibility variations in some carbonate Frasnian-Famennian boundary sections from
Northern Africa and Western Europe: implications
for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. International
Journal of Earth Sciences, 99 (Suppl. 1), S57–S73.
Romer, R. L. & Hahne, K. 2010. Life of the Rheic Ocean:
scrolling through the shale record. Gondwana
Research, 17, 408–421.
Romer, R. L., Linnemann, U. & Gehmlich, M. 2003.
Geochronologische und isotopengeochemische Randbedingungen für die cadomische und variszische Orogenese im Saxothuringikum. In: Linnemann, U. (ed.)
Das Saxothuringikum – Abriss der präkambrischen
und paläozoischen Geologie von Sachsen und Thüringen. Geologica Saxonica, 48/49, 19–28.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
P. KÖNIGSHOF ET AL.
Salamon, M. & Königshof, P. 2010. Middle Devonian
olistostromes in the Rheno-Hercynian (Rheinisches
Schiefergebirge) – an indication of back arc rifting on
a passive margin of Laurussia? Gondwana Research,
17, 281–291, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2009.10. 004
Saltzman, M. R. 2002. Carbon isotope (d13C) stratigraphy across the Silurian– Devonian transition in North
America: evidence for a perturbation of the global
chemical cycle. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, 187, 83–100.
Schneider, J., Bechstadt, T. & Machel, H. G. 2004.
Covariance of C- and O-isotopes with magnetic
susceptibility as a result of burial diagenesis of
sandstones and carbonates: an example from the
Lower Devonian La Vid Group, Cantabrian Zone,
NW Spain. International Journal of Earth Science,
93, 990–1007.
Schöne, B. R. 1997. Der Otomari-Event und seine Auswirkungen auf die Fazies des Rhenoherzynischen
Schelfs (Devon Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). Göttinger Arbeiten zur Geologie und Paläontologie, 70,
1–140.
Schöne, B. R., Basse, M. & May, A. 1998. Korrelationen
des Eifelium/Givetium- Grenzbereichs im Rheinischen Schiefergebirge. Senckenbergiana lethaea,
77, 233–242.
Schwan, W. 1991. Geologie des Acker-Bruchberg-Ilsenburg-Zuges (Oberharz) – Derzeitiger Forschungsstand
und Diskussion der Probleme. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie, Teil 1, 7, 787– 850.
Scotese, C. R. & Barret, S. F. 1990. Gondwana’s movement over the South Pole during the Palaeozoic: evidence from lithological indicators of climate. In:
McKerrow, W. S. & Scotese, C. R. (eds) Palaeozoic
Palaeogeography and Biogeography. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 12, 75–85, http://doi.org/ 10.
1144/GSL.MEM.1990.012.01.06
Spassov, S. & Valet, J. P. 2012. Detrital magnetization
from redeposition experiments of different natural
sediments. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
351– 352, 147–157.
Stauffer, C. R. 1938. Conodonts of the Olentangy Shale.
Journal of Paleontology, 12, 411 –443.
Stets, J. & Schäfer, A. 2009. The Siegenian delta:
land –sea transitions at the northern margin of the
Rhenohercynian Basin. In: Königshof, P. (ed.) Devonian Change: Case Studies in Palaeogeography and
Palaeoecology. Geological Society, London, Special
Publications, 314, 37– 72, http://doi.org/10.1144/
SP314.3
Struve, W. 1963. Das Korallen-Meer der Eifel vor 300
Millionen Jahren – Funde, Deutungen, Probleme.
Natur und Museum, 93, 237–276.
Struve, W. 1982. The Great Gap in the record of the
marine Devonian. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 55, 433–447.
Struve, W. 1990. Paläozoologie III (1986–1990). In:
Ziegler, W. (ed.) Wissenschaftlicher Jahresbericht
1988/89 des Forschungsinstituites Senckenberg,
Frankfurt am Main. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 127, 251–279.
Struve, W. 1996. Trilobiten, Rheinisches Schiefergebirge, Mitteldevon. In: Weddige, K. (ed.) Devon –
Korrelationstabelle. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 76, 280.
Struve, W., Plodowski, P. & Weddige, K. 1997. Biostratigraphische Stufengrenzen und Events in der
Prümer und Hillesheimer Mulde. Terra Nostra, 97,
123–167.
Struve, W., Basse, M. & Weddige, K. 2008. Prädevon, Ober-Emsium und Mitteldevon der Eifeler
Kalkmulden-Zone. In: DEUTSCHE STRATIGRAPHISCHE
KOMMISSION (eds) Stratigraphie von Deutschland
VIII. Devon. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Geowissenschaften, 52, 297–374.
Tait, J. A., Schätz, M., Bachtadse, V. & Soffel, H.
2000. Palaeomagnetism and Palaeozoic paleogeography of Gondwana and European terranes. In: Franke,
W., Haak, V., Oncken, O. & Tanner, D. (eds) Orogenic Processes: Quantification and Modelling in the
Variscan Belt. Geological Society, London, Special
Publications, 179, 21–34, http://doi.org/10.1144/
GSL.SP.2000.179.01.04
Taylor, A. M. & Goldring, R. 1993. Description and
analysis of bioturbation and ichnofabric. Journal
of the Geological Society, London, 150, 141– 148,
http://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.150.1.0141
Teichmüller, M. & Teichmüller, R. 1979. Ein Inkohlungsprofil entlang der linksrheinischen Geotraverse
von Schleiden nach Aachen und die Inkohlung der
Nord-Süd Zone der Eifel. Fortschritte in der Geologie
von Rheinland und Westfalen, 27, 323– 355.
Torsvik, T. H. & Cocks, L. R. M. 2004. Earth geography
from 400 to 250 Ma: a palaeomagnetic, faunal and
facies review. Journal of the Geological Society,
London, 161, 555–572, http://doi.org/10.1144/
0016-764903-098
Tribovillard, N., Algeo, T. J., Lyons, T. & Riboulleau, A. 2006. Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies: an update. Chemical Geology,
232, 12– 32.
Trotter, J. A., Williams, I. S., Barnes, C. R., Lecuyer,
C. & Nicoll, R. S. 2008. Did cooling oceans trigger
Ordovician biodiversification? Evidence from the conodont thermometry. Science, 321, 550– 554.
van Geldern, R., Joachimski, M. M., Day, J., Jansen,
U., Alvarez, F., Yolkin, E. A. & Ma, X.-P. 2006.
Carbon, oxygen and strontium isotope records of
Devonian brachiopod shell calcite. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 240, 47–67.
van Hengstum, P. J. & Gröcke, D. R. 2008. Stable
isotope record of the Eifelian–Givetian boundary
Kačák-otomari Event (Middle Devonian) from
Hungary Hollow, Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal
of Earth Sciences, 45, 353– 366.
Von Breymann, M. T., Emeis, K. C. & Suess, E. 1992.
Water depth and diagenetic constraints on the use
of barium as a palaeoproductivity indicator. In: Summerhayes, C. P., Prell, W. L. & Emeis, K. C. (eds)
Upwelling Systems: Evolution Since the Early Miocene. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 64, 273– 284, http://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.
SP.1992.064.01.18
Wachendorf, H. 1986. Der Harz – variszischer Bau und
geodynamische Entwicklung. Geologisches Jahrbuch,
A91, 3 –67.
Walliser, O. H. 1985. Natural boundaries and commission boundaries in the Devonian. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 75, 401–408.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 10, 2015
SHALLOW-WATER FACIES AROUND THE KAČÁK EVENT
Weddige, K. 1977. Die Conodonten der Eifel – Stufe
im Typusgebiet und in benachbarten Faziesgebieten.
Senckenbergiana lethaea, 58, 271–419.
Weddige, K. & Ziegler, W. 1979. Evolutionary patterns
in Middle Devonian conodont genera Polygnathus and
Icriodus. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 13, 157– 164.
Wehrmann, A., Blieck, A. et al. 2005. Palaeoenvironment and palaeoecology of intertidal deposits in a
Lower Devonian siliciclastic sequence of the Mosel
Region, Germany. Palaios, 20, 101–120.
Whalen, M. T. & Day, J. 2010. Cross-basin variations
in magnetic susceptibility influenced by changing
sea level, paleogeography, and paleoclimate: upper
Devonian, Western Canada. Journal of Sedimentary
Research, 80, 1109–1127.
Wierich, F. 1999. Orogene Prozesse im Spiegel synorogener Sedimente – Korngefügekundliche Liefergebietsanalyse siliziklastischer Sedimente im Devon
des Rheinischen Schiefergebirges. Marburger Geowissenschaften: Zeitschrift der Marburger Geowissenschaftlichen Vereinigung, 1.
Wignall, P. B. & Myers, K. J. 1988. Interpreting benthic
oxygen levels in mudrocks: a new approach. Geology,
16, 452–455.
Winter, J. 1977. Excursion guide Eifel synclines. In:
Meyer, W., Stoltidis, J. & Winter, J. (eds) Geologische Exkursion in den Raum Weyer-SchuldHeyroth-Niederehe-Üxheim-Ahütte. Decheniana, 130,
322–334.
Wood, D. A. 1980. The application of a ThHfTa diagram
to problems of tectonomagmatic classification and
to establishing the nature of crustal contamination
of basaltic lavas of the British Tertiary Volcanic Province. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 50, 11–30.
Wright, R. T., Coffin, R. B. & Lebo, M. 1987. Dynamics
of planktonic bacteria and heterotrophic microflagellates in the Parker estuary, northern Massechusetts.
Continental Shelf Research, 7, 1383– 1397.
Zegers, T. E., Dekkers, M. J. & Baily, S. 2003. Late
Carboniferous to Permian remagnetization of Devonian limestones in the Ardennes: role of temperature, fluids, and deformation. Journal of Geophysical
Research, 108, 5/1– 5/19.
Zwing, A., Bachtadse, V. & Soffel, H. C. 2002. Late
Carboniferous remagnetisation of Palaeozoic rocks in
the NE Rhenish Massif, Germany. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27, 1179–1188.
Zwing, A., Matzka, J., Bachtadse, V. & Soffel, H. C.
2005. Rock magnetic properties of remagnetized
Palaeozoic clastic and carbonate rocks from the NE
Rhenish Massif, Germany. Geophysical Journal International, 160, 477–486.
Zwing, A., Clauer, N., Liewig, N. & Bachtadse, V.
2009. Identification of remagnetization processes in
Paleozoic sedimentary rocks of the northeast Rhenish
Massif in Germany by K-Ar dating and REE tracing
of authigenic illite and Fe oxides. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 114, B06104.