CSIRO PUBLISHING
Soil Research
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SR14060
Carbon dynamics from carbonate dissolution
in Australian agricultural soils
Waqar Ahmad A,D,E, Balwant Singh A, Ram C. Dalal B,C, and Feike A. Dijkstra A
A
Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney,
Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia.
B
Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park,
Qld 4102, Australia.
C
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
D
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, NARC Premises, Park Road, Islamabad, Pakistan.
E
Corresponding author. Email: waqar.ahmad@sydney.edu.au
Abstract. Land-use and management practices on limed acidic and carbonate-bearing soils can fundamentally alter
carbon (C) dynamics, creating an important feedback to atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. Transformation
of carbonates in such soils and its implication for C sequestration with climate change are largely unknown and there is
much speculation about inorganic C sequestration via bicarbonates. Soil carbonate equilibrium is complicated, and all
reactants and reaction products need to be accounted for fully to assess whether specific processes lead to a net removal
of atmospheric CO2. Data are scarce on the estimates of CaCO3 stocks and the effect of land-use management practices
on these stocks, and there is a lack of understanding on the fate of CO2 released from carbonates. We estimated
carbonate stocks from four major soil types in Australia (Calcarosols, Vertosols, Kandosols and Chromosols). In
>200-mm rainfall zone, which is important for Australian agriculture, the CaCO3-C stocks ranged from 60.7 to 2542
Mt at 0–0.3 m depth (dissolution zone), and from 260 to 15 660 Mt at 0–1.0 m depth. The combined CaCO3-C stocks in
Vertosols, Kandosols and Chromosols were about 30% of those in Calcarosols. Total average CaCO3-C stocks in the
dissolution zone represented 11–23% of the stocks present at 0–1.0 m depth, across the four soil types. These estimates
provide a realistic picture of the current variation of CaCO3-C stocks in Australia while offering a baseline to estimate
potential CO2 emission–sequestration through land-use changes for these soil types. In addition, we provide an overview
of the uncertainties in accounting for CO2 emission from soil carbonate dissolution and major inorganic C
transformations in soils as affected by land-use change and management practices, including liming of acidic soils
and its secondary effects on the mobility of dissolved organic C. We also consider impacts of liming on mineralisation of
the native soil C, and when these transformations should be considered a net atmospheric CO2 source or sink.
Additional keywords: carbonatedissolution,landusechangeandacidification,limedacidicsoils,managementpractices,
soilcarbonatestocks,soiltypes.
Received10March2014,accepted2October2014,publishedonline25February2015
Introduction
Soils play an important role in the global carbon (C) cycle, and
soil C is considered the largest terrestrial C pool, with nearly
three times the amount of C as in living plants and twice the
amount of C as in the atmosphere (Schlesinger 1990, 1995).
Globally, the top 1 m of soil stores ~1500 Pg (1 Pg = 1 Gt = 1015
g) as soil organic C (SOC) and 900–1700 Pg as soil inorganic C
(SIC; carbonates) (Lal 2008). Soil C is therefore of great
importance in the context of climate change, because small
changes in the soil C pool can have a significant impact on
atmospheric CO2 concentration and subsequent global-warming
potential (Ehhalt and Prather 2001). Research has largely
focused on the dynamics of SOC and its management, and
little attention has been given to soil carbonates in general
Journal compilation CSIRO 2015
(Monger and Martinez-Rios 2002; Mikhailova and Post 2006;
Mi et al. 2008). Since SIC accounts for more than one-third
of the total soil C pool, the prediction of potential responses
of soil C to land-use change and management practices and
future global changes cannot be based entirely on that of
SOC. Recently, subsoil C losses have been advocated due to
the dissolution of SIC and lack of SOC replenishment (Kalbitz
et al. 2013). The baseline values of SIC stocks in different soil
types could be valuable for predicting the magnitude of changes
in these stocks resulting from land use and land-use change.
However, data are scarce on carbonate stocks in soils and the
impact of land-management practices on these stocks. Although
the fate of bicarbonate ions (HCO3–) released from the
dissolution of soil carbonates is considered important in the
www.publish.csiro.au/journals/sr
B
Soil Research
context of C sequestration (Nordt et al. 2000; Lal 2008;
Sanderman 2012), the dynamics and fate of HCO3– ions in
different soil types are not well understood.
Carbonates in soil are categorised into primary or lithogenic
carbonates and secondary or pedogenic carbonates. Lithogenic
carbonates are derived from the weathering of calcareous parent
material, whereas pedogenic carbonates are formed through the
reaction of atmospheric CO2 with Ca2+ and Mg2+ brought in
from outside the local ecosystem, for example in calcareous
dust, irrigation water, fertilisers and manures (Lal 2008). Based
on the source of Ca2+ during the precipitation of pedogenic
carbonates, they are further subdivided into pedo-lithogenic
and pedo-atmogenic carbonates. The source of Ca2+ for pedolithogenic carbonates is a carbonate mineral, whereas
non-carbonate mineral is the precursor of Ca2+ in the pedoatmogenic carbonates (Monger and Martinez-Rios 2002). SIC
stocks are dynamic and change significantly with time
depending on climate, land-use change and management
practices. Increased aridity may result in increased formation
of stable carbonate materials; hence, there may be an increased
sequestration of atmospheric CO2 under the climate change
scenario of decreasing precipitation, especially in semi-arid
regions. Land-use change resulting in soil acidification may
increase the release of large amounts of C through carbonate
dissolution from soils (Suarez 2000). Similarly, the dissolution of
lime, applied for the remediation of acidic soils for agricultural
production, causes the release of CO2. Considering the extent of
area occupied by acidic soils and the widespread use of lime in
agricultural production systems on these soils, even small changes
in C dynamics could substantially contribute to atmospheric CO2.
Thus, SIC stocks play an important role in the global terrestrial C
cycle in the context of atmospheric CO2 sequestration through
both natural and human-induced processes (Nordt et al. 2000;
Drees et al. 2001; Eshel et al. 2007) and need consideration in the
context of global climate change.
The principal objective of this review is to evaluate the
contribution of land use and management practices to CO2
emissions from the dissolution of carbonates in Australian
agricultural soils. We use the term ‘soil carbonates’ for both
the carbonates in calcareous soils and lime added to acidic
soils. We discuss the mechanism of temperature sensitivity
for carbonate dissolution and its feedback to the atmospheric
CO2. Additionally, we present an estimate of the carbonate
stocks from four major Australian soils used for agriculture,
and highlight the secondary role of lime in the mobility of
dissolved organic C (DOC) in acidic soils, which could be an
important component of the terrestrial C balance.
Extent, distribution and liming of acidic soils
Soil acidity is considered one of the major soil constraints for
crop production in the tropical and subtropical regions. In
Australia, soil acidity is a natural attribute of most soils. The
area of acidic soils (low pH soil) includes the low-rainfall zones
of south-eastern Australia, the high-rainfall zone of northeastern Australia and the Mediterranean climatic zone of
Western Australia (Carr and Ritchie 1993; Moody and Aitken
1997). Changes in land use and associated shift in management
practices may directly affect C and nitrogen (N) cycles in soils
and generate soil acidity. Agriculture and overgrazing have
W. Ahmad et al.
seriously degraded much of the Australian landscape. They
have caused widespread acidification, changes in C stocks,
accelerated erosion, and salinisation (Dalal and Mayer 1986a,
1986b; McKenzie et al. 2004; Dalal et al. 2005). Intensive
land use for agricultural production has contributed more to
acidification than less intensive and non-agricultural land use
(Robinson et al. 1995). Higher acidity has been reported in soils
used for cotton production than in similar soils under native
vegetation (Singh et al. 2003). Annual acid addition rates of
0.50–34 kmol H+ ha–1 year–1 have been reported for a range of
land uses (Table 1).
Liming represents a common management practice for crop
production on acidic soils. Agricultural lime (CaCO3 and (CaMg
(CO3)2), as either lime sand or crushed limestone, is usually
applied to ameliorate soil acidity around the globe. In Australia,
~2.5 Mt is applied annually to agricultural fields (Page et al.
2009). The loss of CO2 with other greenhouse gases such as
nitrous oxide (N2O) is expected to increase significantly after the
application and subsequent dissolution of carbonates from the
applied lime (Page et al. 2009). We have estimated the CO2
emission due to neutralisation of acidity by the applied lime
for a range of production systems in Australia with and without
considering the fate of HCO3– ions evolved in the reaction
(scenario 1, scenario 2, Table 1).
Extent and stocks of carbonates in calcareous soils
in Australia
Calcareous soils cover >47% of Earth’s land area and are
mainly concentrated in arid or semi-arid regions, where low
precipitation and biological activity equate to relatively low acid
inputs and leaching. These soils are important for agricultural
production in many areas of the world, including Australia. For
example, in South Australia, about 40% of the wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) crop is produced on the Eyre Peninsula, which
contains >1 Mha of calcareous soils (Holloway et al. 2001).
Over 0.3 Mha of calcareous Vertosols is under cotton production
in New South Wales (Knowles and Singh 2003). Overall, soils
that are calcareous throughout the soil profile (inland eastern
Australia, mainly Vertosols) cover an area of ~2.3 106 km2,
and those with calcareous subsoils (southern and inland regions
of the Murray–Darling Basin) extend to an area of ~1.4 106
km2 (Fitzpatrick and Merry 2000). The dominant land uses on
such calcareous subsoils are dryland cropping, irrigated grain
cropping, horticulture and cotton cultivation (Fitzpatrick and
Merry 2000).
Accumulation and distribution of soil carbonates is greatly
affected by water quality (Eshel et al. 2007; Sanderman 2012).
The Lower Murray Lakes are extensively used for irrigation
purposes in South Australia. From the available data (South
Australia EPA 1998; Earth Systems 2008), we calculated an
average HCO3– concentration of 178 mg L–1 in the Lower
Murray Lakes. Irrigation with such water can potentially add
26.6 kg C ha–1 in a single irrigation event (75 mm). Addition of
C through irrigated water could be a source of C sequestration or
a net source of atmospheric CO2. However, whether the increase
in carbonate density (accumulation) and its distribution or
translocation (from upper layer to the lower soil layer) is C
sequestration or just a pool transfer, and under what situations
it could be considered as C sequestration, would depend on the
Carbonate dissolution in agricultural soils
Soil Research
C
Table 1. Annual acid addition rates for a range of production systems and CO2 emission from carbonates in Australian limed soils
The average values of annual acid addition rates are for the two extreme values provided by the researchers as mentioned in the source column. CO2 emission
has been calculated under two different scenarios: scenario 1 (IPCC Default Methodology Tier-1), scenario 2 (Page et al. 2009). The underlying hypothesis for
Tier-1 methodology is that the entire C contained in carbonates is released into the atmosphere within the year of application; for scenario 2, the partial
sequestration of HCO3– in water was taken into account
Production system
Location
Annual rate
(kmol H+ ha–1 year–1)
Range
Average
Lime
requirement
(kg ha–1 year–1)
CO2 emission
(kg ha–1 year–1)
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Source
Grazed clover pasture
Victoria
0.8–4.4
2.6
130
52
40
Pasture cut for hay
Tropical and subtropical
Queensland
Tropical Australia
Northern Queensland
and Northern Territory
North-eastern Victoria
North-eastern Victoria
Tropical and subtropical
Queensland
Tropical and subtropical
Queensland
Tropical and subtropical
Queensland
Southern Queensland
Victoria
1.0–6.0
3.5
175
70
53
Ridley et al. 1990;
Noble et al. 1997
Moody and Aitken 1997
10.0–11.0
10.6
10.5
10.6
525
530
210
212
160
161
Moody and Aitken 1997
Noble et al. 1997
0.9–4.6
12.5
2.8–4.7
2.8
12.5
3.8
140
625
190
56
250
76
43
190
58
Slattery et al. 1998
Slattery et al. 1998
Moody and Aitken 1997
28–40
34
1700
679
518
Moody and Aitken 1997
1.3–2.5
1.9
95
38
29
Moody and Aitken 1997
0.2–5.1
0.15–4.1
2.7
2.1
135
105
54
42
41
32
0.15–0.9
0.5
25
10
8
Noble et al. 1998
Ridley et al. 1990;
Slattery et al. 1998
Moody and Aitken 1997
7.9–10.4
9.1
455
182
139
5.0
5.0
250
100
76
Pasture cut for hay
Stylosanthes seed
production
Cereals
Lupins
Sugarcane
Banana
Grapes
Wheat–pasture rotation
Wheat–lupin rotations
Cereal–clover pasture
Irrigated rice–
wheat–pasture
Cotton
Tropical and subtropical
Queensland
Southern Queensland
Northern New South Wales
leaching environment and on the fate of HCO3–. The dynamics
of HCO3– are discussed in more details in a later section.
Carbonate stock estimation
More than 70% of Australia is arid or semi-arid and contains
large carbonate stocks. However, estimates of carbonate stocks
are not available for major soil types. We provide below the
estimates of carbonates stocks for 0–0.3 m depth (dissolution
zone), in addition to the stock estimates for 1.0 m depth, in four
major Australian soil types that dominate the arid and semi-arid
region of Australia. Changes in carbonates in the topsoil depths
could be particularly important for determining ecosystem
response and functioning.
Carbonate stocks in agricultural soils in Australia
Carbonate stocks in agricultural soils (rainfall >200 mm) for
0–0.3 m and 0–1.0 m depths were estimated using published
data (Stace et al. 1968; Knowles and Singh 2003; McKenzie
et al. 2004) and a dataset provided by R. Dalal (dataset summary
given in Dalal and Mayer 1986a). We included all soil profiles
for which information on soil carbonate contents, bulk density
(rb), land use and parent material was available. Additionally,
for the samples where rb data were not available or were
incomplete, we used a value of 1500 kg m–3 or the surface
horizon rb value to calculate carbonate stocks (t ha–1) for the
profiles.
Noble et al. 1998;
Slattery et al. 1998
Singh et al. 2003
Total average CaCO3-C stocks in the four soil types ranged
from 60.7 to 2542 Mt for 0–0.3 m depth and from 260 to 15 660
Mt for 0–1.0 m depth in the agricultural regions (Table 2;
Fig. 1). The total average CaCO3-C stock within the 0-0.3 m
depth was in the order Calcarosols > Vertosols > Kandosols
> Chromosols. The trend in the CaCO3-C stocks for 0–1.0 m
depth followed a slightly different pattern, i.e. Calcarosols
> Kandosols > Vertosols > Chromosols. At both depths, the
pooled CaCO3-C stocks in the Vertosols, Kandosols and
Chromosols constituted ~30% of the amount present in the
Calcarosols. Total average CaCO3-C stocks at 0–0.3 m depth
represented 11–23% of the stocks present at 0–1.0 m across the
four soil types.
Uncertainties in accounting for CO2 emission from
carbonate dissolution
Scenario 1 is being used in the Australian Carbon Accounting
System to account for CO2 emission from the dissolution of
carbonates in limed soils (Eqn 1). In scenario 1, it is assumed that
all C contained in the applied lime is released into the
atmosphere within the year of application:
CO2
Cemission ¼ fðMLimestone P EFLimestone Þ
þðMDolomite P EFDolomite Þg Cg =1000
ð1Þ
where CO2-C emission is annual C emissions from lime (Gg);
MLimestone and MDolomite are the masses of limestone and
D
Soil Research
Table 2. Estimates of carbonates dissolution rates from different Australian soil types under dominant land uses and CO2 emission scenarios
Australian Soil
Classification
(Isbell 2002)
Great Soil Group
(Stace et al. 1968)
AreaA
(Mha)
Description and
distribution
CaCO3-CB
(t ha–1)
Total CaCO3-C
(Mt)
CaCO3-C dissolution
rateC (kg ha–1 year–1)
Total CO2 emission
(kg year–1)D
Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Calcarosols
(n = 16)
Vertosols
(n = 109)
Kandosols
(n = 7)
Chromosols
(n = 7)
0–0.3 m: range 4.8–411,
45 (42) Lack strong texture-contrast;
mean 83.4, median 56.5
mostly calcareous throughout
0–1 m: range 36.3–1445,
Mediterranean climatic zone
mean 447, median 348
of South Australia, Western
Australia and north-western
Victoria
Black earths; grey,
77 (75) Clay >35%, cracks, slickensides; 0-0.3 m: range 0.13–52.63,
brown and red
Queensland, NSW, Northern
mean 7.71, median 5.39
clays
Territory
0–1 m: range 3.26–196,
mean 29.11, median 24.52
Red and yellow
114 (90) Lack strong texture-contrast;
0–0.3 m: range: 0.66–95.4,
earths; calcareous
pH >5.5 in B horizon;
mean 15.94, median 2.46
red earths
wheatbelt of southern NSW,
0–1 m: range 1.9–313.7,
south-west of Western
mean 90.7, median 21.5
Australia
Non-calcic brown
22 (16) Strong texture-contrast;
0-0.3 m: range 1.6–16.2,
soils; some red-brown
wheatbelt of southern NSW,
mean 5.88, median 2.76
earths; and a range of
northern Victoria, south-west
0–1 m, range 7.4–403.4,
podzolic soil
of Western Australia, parts of
mean 90.0, median 11.8
South Australia
Solonised brown
soils; grey-brown
and red calcareous
soils
0–0.3 m: range 216–18 495, Cereal 16.8
average 2542 0–1 m: range
1633–65 025, average
15 660
2520
1935
0–0.3 m: range 10.0–4052,
average 415 0–1 m: range
251–15 092, average 1888
Sugarcane 22.8
Cotton 30
Banana 204
65 835
50 204
0–0.3 m: range 75.3–10 876,
average 280 0–1 m: range
217–35 761, average 2451
Grapes 11.4
Cereals 16.8
10 716
8208
0–0.3 m: range 35.2–356,
average 60.7 0–1 m: range
163–8875, average 260
Improved pasture
(grazed clover
pasture) 15.6
Cereal 16.8
2376
1826
A
Estimated area of each soil type within the >200-mm average annual rainfall zone (Fig. 1, left panel); most of the Australian agriculture is concentrated at this rainfall zone. In parentheses are the previously
reported areas of soil types within the >200-mm rainfall zone (www.nrm.gov.au; or elsewhere). The difference in the calculated area under four soil types may be because the earlier calculations used different
sources of soil maps or because our generalisation of the rainfall map might have led to some variations.
B
Calculated for profile depths 0.3 m and 1 m for each soil type.
C
The dissolution from different soil types has been calculated by assuming that Calcarosols are cultivated only by cereal cropping; Vertosols are under cotton, wheat and sugarcane cropping; Kandosols are
under cereals and grapes; and Chromosols are under improved pastures and cereal cropping.
D
Calculated by multiplying emission (kg ha–1 year–1) (scenario 1 and scenario 2) by the total cultivated area within >200-mm average rainfall zone for each soil type. Considering the skewness in data
distribution (Fig. 1, right panel), the median rather than the mean value of CaCO3-C (t ha–1) stock was used for estimating the total average stocks (Mt). Further, these estimates were based on measured
carbonates values for the soils, and lithogenic and pedogenic carbonates were not separated.
W. Ahmad et al.
Carbonate dissolution in agricultural soils
Soil Research
0–1.0 m depth
0–0.3 m depth
Calcarosols
Soil types
N
W
Calcarosols
E
E
Median = 56.5
Median = 348
Mean = 83.4
Mean = 447
S
Chromosols
Kandosols
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0
Chromosols
Vertosols
0
5
Kandosols
250
500
750 1000 1250 1500
Median = 2.76
Median = 11.8
Mean = 5.88
Mean = 90.0
10
15
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Median = 2.46
Median = 21.5
Mean = 15.94
Mean = 90.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Vertosols
0 1 2
4
6
8
Median = 5.39
Median = 24.52
Mean = 7.71
Mean = 29.11
Decimal degrees
0
50
100
150
200 0
10
20
30
40
50
CaCO3-C (t ha–1)
Fig. 1. Distribution of Calcarosols, Chromosols, Kandosols and Vertosols in the >200-mm rainfall zone (left panel), and histograms showing distribution of
CaCO3-C (t ha–1) in these four selected soil types (right panel). In Australia, agriculture is largely dependent on rainfall, and three of four selected soil types are
confined to the >200-mm average annual rainfall zone. Therefore, it was assumed that the area of each soil used came from the agricultural sites where average
annual rainfall was >200 mm. This area for each soil type was calculated by overlaying the classified Australian rainfall map in GIS environment (ESRI 2011)
with the major soil type map. Once the overlay was carried out, the area of soil types present in zone of annual cumulative rainfall >200 mm was extracted.
dolomite applied to soils (t or Mg); P represents the fractional
purity, 0.9 for lime stone and 0.95 for dolomite; EFLimestone
and EFDolomite are IPCC (2006) default emission factors for
limestone (0.12) and dolomite (0.13); and Cg equals 44/12, the
factor to convert CO2-C into CO2.
However, this assumption has been challenged by some
researchers (West and McBride 2005; Hamilton et al. 2007;
Page et al. 2009). Some of the C contained in lime may not be
released into the atmosphere as CO2 because of the formation of
HCO3– ions and their subsequent riverine transport into the sea
after dissolution (Biasi et al. 2008; Page et al. 2009). Using
scenario 2, Page et al. (2009) calculated 14–34% lower CO2
emission following lime dissolution considering 2.49 Mt of lime
applied in Australia during 2002 as a baseline for comparison
with scenario 1.
We compared both scenarios for estimating the CO2 emission
from the dissolution of carbonates in the four soil types
(Table 2). The CO2 evolved from carbonate dissolution for
the selected soils was calculated considering an average value
of the range 0.659–0.860 Tg CO2 emitted from 2.49 Mt applied
lime. About 23% reduced CO2 emission was computed from
the four soils, taking into consideration the mobility of Ca2+ and
accompanying HCO3–.
As such, a similar decrease in the CO2 emission was
predicted for a range of production systems by employing
scenario 2 (Table 1). It is arguable that because of the
differences in soil properties, there should not be congruent
variations in the total amounts of CO2 generated from the four
soil types. The acid neutralisation via soil carbonate dissolution
and CO2 fluxes are variable because the magnitude and
direction of CO2 fluxes are governed by site-specific
conditions. The acid addition rates from different production
systems could be responsible for the release of varied amounts
of CO2 from the carbonates dissolution in Australia (Table 1).
Additionally, factors such as Ca2+ concentration, movement of
lime via erosion, and surface runoff as used by Page et al.
(2009) in scenario 2 may yield different outcomes for a range of
soils. Admittedly, the emission factor as used in Eqn 1 would
vary depending on the soil type and its impact on lime
movement, carbonate dissolution, and mobility and residence
time of HCO3–. Soil-related data for the mobility of Ca2+ and
associated HCO3– for the Australian soils are not available
separately. The inclusion of experimental data for each
mentioned parameter for various limed agricultural soils
would lead to the development of more scenarios for accurate
estimation of CO2 release from lime dissolution. Significant
differences (although at similar rates across the soil types)
are observed in the CO2 emissions from the carbonate
dissolution following the two scenarios; it is argued that such
uncertainties should be addressed for budgeting C emissions
from the dissolution of soil carbonates.
Carbonate morphology, soil attributes and role
of rhizosphere
Carbonates occur in different forms such as hardpans, nodular or
pisolitic layers, mottled carbonate-rich layers, and calcareous
F
Soil Research
W. Ahmad et al.
fine earths (Milnes and Hutton 1983). Specific morphologies of
calcite accumulation related to vegetation have been described in
soils. For example, the presence of needle-shaped calcite crystals
near the soil surface is attributed to the occurrence of higher
biological activity. Roots are responsible for the concentration of
such calcite crystals in the root channel (Jaillard et al. 1991).
Further, needle-shaped crystals are due to more CO2 input into
the soil via respiration, Ca2+ extraction by roots, and direct
precipitation by soil organisms (Monger 2002). By contrast, the
presence of soft and small-sized nodules with loose micrite
crystals suggests limited development of pedogenic calcite
(Khormeli et al. 2006; Owliaie 2012).
Carbonate dissolution is variable and depends on the kind
and amounts of acid produced during land use (Table 1). The
non-biological dissolution of carbonates produces CO2 during
the process of neutralising soil acidity. If the carbonates are
dissolved by strong acids, 1 mole of CO2 is emitted for every
mole of carbonate dissolved. However, estimates of the relative
proportion of carbonate dissolved by weak or strong acids do not
exist for the Australian landscape (Page et al. 2009). From
several European and North American studies, it can be inferred
that strong acids dissolve 12–38% of the carbonates in limed
soils (West and McBride 2005; Oh and Raymond 2006;
Hamilton et al. 2007). Under the prevailing intensity of
acidification and current single-liming practice in Australia,
the dissolution of carbonates with strong acids could be
greater than the aforementioned dissolution range observed in
Europe and the USA.
Disturbance and displacement of soils containing carbonates
under farm operations can profoundly change the soil
environment. The rate of proton (H+) addition in soil is
expected to be faster under intensive agriculture involving
application of large amounts of nitrogenous fertilisers,
irrigation and the use of deep-rooted legumes. Under such
systems, carbonates continue to dissolve, resulting in
increased loss of CO2, as represented by the following equation:
2Hþ þ CaCO3 !Ca2þ þ H2 O þ CO2 "
ð2Þ
Carbonate dissolution may further be enhanced through (i)
increased surface area or smaller particle size; (ii) lower density
or increased porosity; and (iii) movement of carbonates into the
dissolution zone in soil from deeper horizons to near-surface
horizons by erosion or physical transport upward in Vertosols
(Hartwig et al. 1990; Hartwig and Loeppert 1991; Miller et al.
2007). The reactivity of carbonates is controlled by mineralogy,
surface morphology, and aggregation of carbonates with other
soil components (Hartwig and Loeppert 1991). Carbonates of
similar size to the clay and fine-silt fractions are the most reactive
form in soils (Hartwig et al. 1990). Clayey soils (e.g. Vertosols)
limit the diffusion of acids produced by agricultural practices
and allow the formation of soil micro-environments that shield
carbonates from bulk soil conditions. The longevity of the
carbonates is increased and the overall reactivity is decreased
by the shielding effect, which may be predominantly observed in
clayey soils. By contrast, relatively coarse-textured soils may
promote rapid dissolution of carbonates. Consequently, the
fraction of soil carbonate dissolution and emission as CO2
into the atmosphere may challenge the potential of soil C
sequestration and augment the positive C–climate feedback
(Yang et al. 2012).
Apart from these determinants, the form of carbonates may
be very important in determining the dissolution rate. The
solubility of carbonates may vary significantly depending on
the form and impurities. The presence of small amounts of iron
(Fe) and aluminium (Al) in carbonate minerals can reduce
their solubility. In soils, the reduction and oxidation of Fe
and manganese (Mn) due to seasonal changes in soil
moisture contributes to the formation of cutans, forming
coatings and concretions (Zhang and Karathanasis 1997). The
finer soil carbonate fraction is more rapidly altered than the
coarser fraction by the soil acidity resulting from any increase in
the use of nitrogenous fertilisers or introduction of perennial
crops under changing land use (Rawlins et al. 2011). Finely
distributed carbonate in limed acidic soil diffuses well through
the soil and dissolves easily. Lime present in the form of fineearth particles could be more soluble than nodules because of
its increased reactive surface area. Therefore, the role of
carbonate morphology in ease of dissolution and contribution
to atmospheric CO2 is important, but the order of magnitude of
this process is yet to be investigated in detail.
Root-induced physical and biochemical processes occur in
the rhizosphere, and are responsible for the release of root
exudates and H+. The degree of root-mediated pH changes in
the rhizosphere varies broadly with plant species and form of
applied N during plant growth. Ash alkalinity provides an
estimate of H+ extrusion, and soil carbonates are solubilised
through H+ release from the plant. Acidification driven by ash
alkalinity may further enhance the carbonate dissolution rate
and CO2 production and induce leaching of dissolved
inorganic C. Thus, the rhizosphere has direct acidifying
effects through the release of H+ during the excess uptake of
basic cations over anions (Mubarak and Nortcliff 2010; Ahmad
et al. 2013). However, the phenomenon of ash alkalinity cannot
be generalised and is predominant only for legumes that are
fully reliant on N2 fixation. Higher rhizospheric acidification
under legumes may be due to greater excretion of H+ because
of excessive cation uptake during biological N2 fixation (Tang
et al. 2011). The relation between ash alkalinity and ion uptake
largely depends on the form of N applied to the plants.
Therefore, dissolution of soil carbonates and subsequent
changes in C dynamics could be related to plant species and
form of N applied to soil during the plant growing season.
Direct priming effects of liming on the mineralisation
of native soil carbon
Microbial communities are more active in utilising recently
exuded C compounds in limed soils than in unlimed soils
(Rangel-Castro et al. 2005). Both limed and organic-residueamended soils are high in particulate organic C and lability.
Because of such attributes, the soils are better related to
microbial community structure and function than the total soil
organic matter (SOM) (Briedis et al. 2012; Murphy et al. 2011).
Liming may temporally reduce the stability of macro-aggregates
through the decomposition of particulate organic C (Baldock
et al. 1994; Chan and Heenan 1999), which could further
enhance the native soil-C decomposition. Therefore, liming
Carbonate dissolution in agricultural soils
can potentially stimulate SOM decomposition, mainly by
affecting soil pH. Enhanced CO2 release from SOM
decomposition by liming of acidic soils has been reported
(Bertrand et al. 2007; Dumale et al. 2011; Ahmad et al.
2014). In addition, decreased SOC contents were evidenced
with lime application in cropping zones of southern New
South Wales and in south-eastern Australia under a wheat–
subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) system
(Coventry et al. 1992; Chan and Heenan 1999).
Loss of soil carbon via leaching of the dissolved
organic matter
Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is an important indicator
of a healthy soil system, because it is more responsive to
environmental changes than total SOC (Silveira 2005).
Simultaneously, DOC is the most mobile and important C
source of microorganisms, and hence is arguably an
important intermediate in the global C cycle (Battin and
Brumaghim 2009).
Lime addition has been shown to increase DOC
concentration in both forest (Hildebrand and Schack-Kirchner
2000) and agricultural (Karlik 1995) soils. In fact, lime often
results in enhanced biological activity (SOM transformation),
which could promote the formation of leaching-susceptible,
low-molecular-weight organic compounds (Andersson et al.
1994). Increased leaching of DOC from limed soils can lead
to long-term changes in the migration pattern of chemical
compounds and lowers organic C contents in the surface soil
(Karlik 1995; Ahmad et al. 2013). For example, in a pot
experiment, increased leaching of the DOC reduced organic
C contents by ~9% in limed soils compared with the unlimed
soil (Karlik and Zyczyfiska-Baloniak 1985). The amounts of
DOM leached from 1 ha of amended and non-amended soil
were 102.4 kg and 76.8 kg, respectively, during the whole
experimental period of 4 years (Karlik 1995). Loss of DOC
from agricultural soils has a negative impact on soil nutrient
cycling and may lead to further soil degradation.
Liming can influence DOC composition by increasing the
fraction of hydrophobic acids, humic acids and carboxylic
groups in DOC (Karlik 1995; Andersson et al. 1999).
Changes in quantity and quality of DOC may affect the
adsorption properties and thereby the storage and microbial
availability of C and N (Andersson et al. 1999). However,
migration patterns of the DOC and concomitant loss of C
from the upper layers of soils could be tempered by the
organo-mineral association.
Global warming and soil carbonates dissolution
Carbonate dissolution may be altered with an increase in
temperature either directly, or indirectly through the products
of SOC decomposition. Temperature effect on the solubility of
carbonates is linked with the solubility of CO2 in water (devoid
of soil and plant presence), which decreases when temperature
increases (Duan and Sun 2003). The potential for CO2 evolution
(due to more CO2 solubility) from limed agricultural soils
was higher at 58 158C than 158 258C (Buysse et al. 2013).
However, the contribution of soil carbonates to CO2 evolution
was not isolated in this study. In contrast to the above study, we
Soil Research
G
found a 59% increase in the cumulative release of lime-derived
C when the incubation temperature was increased from 208C to
408C in an incubation study. Further, the temperature sensitivity
of the native soil C was decreased in the lime-amended soils
(in laboratory and growth chamber experiments; Ahmad et al.
2014; W. Ahmad, F. A. Dijkstra, R. C. Dalal, B. Singh, unpubl.
data).
We contend that because of organo-mineral interactions,
carbonates (in limed acidic soils) may act differently from the
CaCO3–H2O–CO2 equilibrium system. Additionally, if soil
water content decreases with rising temperature, then more
CO2 could be emitted by the soil at the same time. Higher
temperatures could influence surface reactions and mass
transfer, which are possibly responsible for the enhanced
dissolution rates and C release from soil carbonates at
increased temperature. The rate of lime dissolution in soil is
perhaps controlled by the supply of H+, which may be
accelerated with increased temperature due to nitrification
and/or humification processes.
The rhizospheric CO2 is commonly derived from the
respiration of soil microbes and fauna, and plant roots, and
via diffusion of CO2 from the atmosphere (Curtis et al. 1995). A
warm growing season increases the CO2 concentration in the
rooting zone. In addition, the dissolution of carbonates may be
affected in the rhizosphere, particularly because of the decreased
pH (associated with increased CO2 concentration). The influence
of temperature on the dissolution of carbonates in the presence of
plants has not been investigated. Knowledge of the temperature
sensitivity of soil carbonates in the presence of crop plants is
important for C-accounting under climate-change scenarios.
Does the dissolution of soil carbonates lead
to atmospheric carbon sequestration?
The generation of HCO3– from limed acidic soils and from soils
containing carbonates depends on the presence of weak and
strong acids, and is closely related to soil pH. Dissolution by the
weak carbonic acid results in sequestration of 1 mole of CO2 for
each mole of CaCO3, whereas dissolution by strong acids results
in the production of 1 mole of CO2 for each mole of CaCO3
(because of consumption of HCO3– into CO2). Because of the
limited anion exchange capacity of soils, HCO3– ions are prone
to leaching into groundwater, where their fate varies greatly.
They can reappear in rivers quite quickly, where they remain
in anionic form and act to sequester CO2, or react in situ with H+
to release CO2. The HCO3– ions can also be stored in the
groundwater for thousands of years (Nordt et al. 2000) or reprecipitate as CaCO3 under water-deficit conditions, higher
concentrations of Ca2+ or HCO3– ions, and alkaline pH.
Thus, the dynamics of HCO3– ions highlights the importance
of the temporal frame of reference if the mobility of HCO3–
ions (containing CO2) is to be considered in the context of SIC
sequestration.
The quantification of HCO3– ions formed and their relative
fluxes in different pathways are intricate processes. For the
Australian landscape, the proportion of Ca2+ released from
soil moving to waterways varies from 10% to 100%, whereas
the proportion of Ca2+ leached with HCO3– ions has been
estimated at 50–62% (Page et al. 2009). Of the HCO3– ions
H
Soil Research
in waterways, 95% have been estimated to reach the ocean
environment and 60% to re-precipitate to form CaCO3 (Page
et al. 2009). These estimates were deduced from Australian
landscape data and there is no experimental evidence to confirm
these estimates. We calculated that ~30–40% of carbonates
(Table 1) are converted to CO2, but more research is required
to determine the fate of HCO3– originating from the soil
carbonate dissolution in Australia.
Perspectives
Transformations in soil carbonates and the magnitude of CO2
emission are dependent on land use and management practices.
We have provided estimates of inorganic C stocks in four major
soil types in Australia, offering a baseline to estimate potential
CO2 emission or sequestration through land-use changes. The
fate of HCO3– ions produced from the carbonate dissolution is
difficult to determine, which creates a large uncertainty in
measuring the C sequestration potential from the dissolution
of inorganic C. We contend that carbonate dissolution may be a
net source of CO2. The movement of HCO3–ions is a core
question and future research should be conducted to track the
mobility of these anions by using 14C in conjunction with other
suitable methodologies to understand the potential role of
carbonates in the global terrestrial C budget. As such, liming
in the long term may cause a loss of DOC from the upper soil
layers that would be highly variable and depend on the nature of
the soil profile. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbonate
dissolution is very important under climate change. Given the
importance of the rhizosphere in the dissolution of soil
carbonates via root exudates and H+ in agricultural soils,
carbonate dissolution is mostly plant-mediated (Mubarak and
Nortcliff 2010; Ahmad et al. 2013). Based on the results from
our laboratory, glasshouse and growth-chamber experiments,
we conclude that the addition of lime increases the C released
from the SOC. On the other hand, liming could decrease the
temperature sensitivity of the SOC, which is important under
the changing climate scenario. This divergent role of lime
warrants detailed investigation on a variety of soils, to
improve understanding of the mechanisms controlling C
fluxes in such system. Moreover, such an understanding of
soil carbonate dynamics, in which all reactants and products
are fully accounted for, may elucidate whether or not specific
processes lead to a net sequestration of C in soil.
References
Ahmad W, Singh B, Dijkstra FA, Dalal RC (2013) Inorganic and organic
carbon dynamics in a limed acid soil are mediated by plants. Soil
Biology & Biochemistry 57, 549–555. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.013
Ahmad W, Singh B, Dijkstra FA, Dalal RC, Geelan-Small P (2014)
Temperature sensitivity and carbon release in an acidic soil amended
with lime and mulch. Geoderma 214–215, 168–176. doi:10.1016/
j.geoderma.2013.09.014
Andersson S, Valeur I, Nilsson I (1994) Influence of lime on soil respiration,
leaching of DOC, and C/S relationships in the mor humus of a haplic
podsol. Environment International 20, 81–88. doi:10.1016/0160-4120
(94)90070-1
Andersson S, Nilsson I, Valeur I (1999) Influence of dolomitic lime on DOC
and DON leaching in a forest soil. Biogeochemistry 47, 297–317.
doi:10.1007/BF00992911
W. Ahmad et al.
Baldock J, Aoyama M, Oades J, Susant O, Grant C (1994) Structural
amelioration of a South Australian red-brown earth using calcium
and organic amendments. Australian Journal of Soil Research 32,
571–594. doi:10.1071/SR9940571
Battin E, Brumaghim J (2009) Antioxidant activity of sulfur and selenium: A
review of reactive oxygen species scavenging, glutathione peroxidase,
and metal-binding antioxidant mechanisms. Cell Biochemistry and
Biophysics 55, 1–23. doi:10.1007/s12013-009-9054-7
Bertrand I, Delfosse O, Mary B (2007) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization
in acidic, limed and calcareous agricultural soils: Apparent and
actual effects. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39, 276–288. doi:10.1016/
j.soilbio.2006.07.016
Biasi C, Lind SE, Pekkarinen NM, Huttunen JT, Shurpali NJ, Hyvönen NP,
Repo ME, Martikainen PJ (2008) Direct experimental evidence for the
contribution of lime to CO2 release from managed peat soil. Soil Biology
& Biochemistry 40, 2660–2669. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.07.011
Briedis C, de Moraes Sá JC, Caires EF, de Fátima Navarro J, Inagaki TM,
Boer A, de Oliveira Ferreira A, Neto CQ, Canalli LB, Bürkner dos Santos
J (2012) Changes in organic matter pools and increases in carbon
sequestration in response to surface liming in an Oxisol under longterm no-till. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76, 151–160.
doi:10.2136/sssaj2011.0128
Buysse P, Goffin S, Carnol M, Malchair S, Debacq A, Longdoz B, Aubinet
M (2013) Short-term temperature impact on soil heterotrophic
respiration in limed agricultural soil samples. Biogeochemistry 112,
441–455. doi:10.1007/s10533-012-9739-7
Carr S, Ritchie G (1993) Al toxicity of wheat grown in acidic subsoils in
relation to soil solution properties and exchangeable cations. Australian
Journal of Soil Research 31, 583–596. doi:10.1071/SR9930583
Chan KY, Heenan DP (1999) Lime-induced loss of soil organic carbon and
effect on aggregate stability. Soil Science Society of America Journal
63, 1841–1844. doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.6361841x
Coventry DR, Hirth JR, Reeves TG (1992) Interactions of tillage and lime in
wheat-subterranean clover rotations on an acidic sandy clay loam in
southeastern Australia. Soil & Tillage Research 25, 53–65. doi:10.1016/
0167-1987(92)90062-G
Curtis PS, O’Neill EG, Teeri JA, Zak DR, Pregitzer KS (1995)
‘Belowground responses to rising atmospheric CO2: Implications for
plants, soil biota, and ecosystem processes.’ (Kluwer Academic Press:
Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
Dalal R, Mayer R (1986a) Long term trends in fertility of soils under
continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in southern Queensland.
I. Overall changes in soil properties and trends in winter cereal
yields. Soil Research 24, 265–279. doi:10.1071/SR9860265
Dalal R, Mayer R (1986b) Long term trends in fertility of soils under
continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in southern Queensland.
II. Total organic carbon and its rate of loss from the soil profile.
Australian Journal of Soil Research 24, 281–292. doi:10.1071/
SR9860281
Dalal RC, Harms B, Krull E, Wang W (2005) Total soil organic matter and
its labile pools following mulga (Acacia aneura) clearing for pasture
development and cropping 1. Total and labile carbon. Australian Journal
of Soil Research 43, 13–20. doi:10.1071/SR04044
Drees LR, Wilding LP, Nordt LC (2001) Inorganic and organic carbon
sequestration across broad geoclimatic regions. In ‘Soil carbon
sequestration and the greenhouse effect’. Soil Science Society
of America Special Publication No. 57. 1st edn (Ed. R Lal)
pp. 155–172. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA)
Duan Z, Sun R (2003) An improved model calculating CO2 solubility in pure
water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000
bar. Chemical Geology 193, 257–271. doi:10.1016/S0009-2541(02)
00263-2
Dumale WA Jr, Miyazaki T, Hirai K, Nishimura T (2011) SOC turnover and
lime-CO2 evolution during liming of an acid Andisol and Ultisol. Open
Journal of Soil Science 1, 49–53.
Carbonate dissolution in agricultural soils
Earth Systems (2008) Management of options for acid sulfate soils in the
lower Murray Lakes, South Australia. Stage 2. Preliminary Assessment
of Prevention, Control and Treatment Options. Earth Systems Report for
South Australian Government.
Ehhalt D, Prather M (2001) ‘IPCC Third Assessment Report. The Scientific
Basis. 4. Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases.’ pp. 241–287.
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva)
Eshel G, Fine P, Singer MJ (2007) Total soil carbon and water quality: An
Implication for carbon sequestration. Soil Science Society of America
Journal 71, 397–405. doi:10.2136/sssaj2006.0061
ESRI (2011) ‘ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.’ (Environmental Systems
Research Institute: Redlands, CA, USA)
Fitzpatrick RW, Merry RH (2000) Pedogenic carbonate pools and climate
change in Australia. In ‘Global climate change and pedogenic
carbonates’. (Eds R Lal, JM Kimble, H Eswaran, BA Stewart)
pp. 105–119. (CRC/Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA)
Hamilton SK, Kurzman AL, Arango C, Jin L, Robertson GP (2007)
Evidence for carbon sequestration by agricultural liming. Global
Biogeochemical Cycles 21, GB2021. doi:10.1029/2006GB002738
Hartwig RC, Loeppert RH (1991) Pretreatment effect on dispersion of
carbonates in calcareous soils. Soil Science Society of America
Journal 55, 19–25. doi:10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500010004x
Hartwig RC, Loeppert RH, Moore TJ (1990) Steady-state procedure for
determining the effective particle-size distribution of soil carbonates.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 54, 55–59. doi:10.2136/
sssaj1990.03615995005400010008x
Hildebrand EE, Schack-Kirchner H (2000) Initial effects of lime and rock
powder application on soil solution chemistry in a dystric cambisol—
results of model experiments. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 56,
69–78. doi:10.1023/A:1009714927385
Holloway RE, Bertrand I, Frischke AJ, Brace DM, McLaughlin MJ,
Shepperd W (2001) Improving fertiliser efficiency on calcareous and
alkaline soils with fluid sources of P, N and Zn. Plant and Soil 236,
209–219. doi:10.1023/A:1012720909293
IPCC (2006) ‘IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories,
Vol. 4. Agriculture, forestry and other land use.’ (Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change: Geneva)
Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing:
Melbourne)
Jaillard B, Guyon A, Maurin AF (1991) Structure and composition of
calcified roots, and their identification in calcareous soils. Geoderma
50, 197–210. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(91)90034-Q
Kalbitz K, Kaiser K, Fiedler S, Kolbl A, Amelung W, Brauer T, Cao ZH,
Don A, Grootes P, Jahn R, Schwark L, Vogelsang V, Wissing L,
Kogel-Knabner I (2013) The carbon count of 2000 years of rice
cultivation. Global Change Biology 19, 1107–1113. doi:10.1111/
gcb.12080
Karlik B (1995) Liming effect on dissolved organic matter leaching.
Water, Air and Soil Pollution 85, 949–954. doi:10.1007/BF00476952
Karlik B, Zyczyfiska-Baloniak I (1985) Soil organic matter from cultivated
and uncultivated soils due to liming. Intercol Bulletin 12, 103–106.
Khormeli F, Abtahi A, Stoops G (2006) Micromorphology of calcitic
pedofeatures in highly calcareous soils of Fars province, Southern
Iran. Catena 132, 31–46.
Knowles TA, Singh B (2003) Carbon storage in cotton soils of northern
New South Wales. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 889–903.
doi:10.1071/SR02023
Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society: Biological Sciences 363, 815–830.
McKenzie N, Jacquier D, Isbell R, Brown K (2004) ‘Australian soils and
landscapes.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Mi NA, Wang S, Liu J, Yu G, Zhang W, Jobbágy E (2008) Soil inorganic
carbon storage pattern in China. Global Change Biology 14, 2380–2387.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01642.x
Soil Research
I
Mikhailova EA, Post CJ (2006) Effect of land use on soil inorganic carbon
stocks in the Russian Chernozem. Journal of Environmental Quality 35,
1384–1388. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0151
Miller DL, Mora CI, Driese SG (2007) Isotopic variability in large carbonate
nodules in Vertisols: Implications for climate and ecosystem
assessments. Geoderma 142, 104–111. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.
08.007
Milnes AR, Hutton JT (1983) Calcretes in Australia. In ‘Soils: an Australian
viewpoint’. pp. 119–162. (Division of Soils, CSIRO: Melbourne)
Monger HC (2002) Pedogenic carbonate: links between biotic and abiotic
CaCO3. In ‘17th World Conference of Soil Science’. 14–21 August
2002, Bangkok. (International Union of Soil Sciences)
Monger HC, Martinez-Rios JJ (2002) Inorganic carbon sequestration in
grazing lands. In ‘The potential of grazing lands to sequester carbon and
mitigate the greenhouse gas effect’. (Eds RM Follett, JM Kimble, R Lal)
pp. 87–118. (Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA)
Moody PW, Aitken RL (1997) Soil acidification under some tropical
agricultural systems. 1. Rates of acidification and contributing factors.
Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 163–173. doi:10.1071/S96069
Mubarak AR, Nortcliff S (2010) Calcium carbonate solubilization through
H-proton release from some legumes grown in calcareous saline-sodic
soils. Land Degradation & Development 21, 24–31. doi:10.1002/
ldr.962
Murphy DV, Cookson WR, Braimbridge M, Marschner P, Jones DL,
Stockdale EA, Abbott LK (2011) Relationships between soil organic
matter and the soil microbial biomass (size, functional diversity, and
community structure) in crop and pasture systems in a semi-arid
environment. Soil Research 49, 582–594. doi:10.1071/SR11203
Noble AD, Cannon M, Muller D (1997) Evidence of accelerated soil
acidification under Stylosanthes-dominated pastures. Australian
Journal of Soil Research 35, 1309–1322. doi:10.1071/S97053
Noble AD, Thompson CH, Jones RJ, Jones RM (1998) The long-term impact
of two pasture production systems on soil acidification in southern
Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38,
335–343. doi:10.1071/EA98039
Nordt LC, Wilding LP, Drees LR (2000) Pedogenic carbonate
transformation in leaching soil systems: Implications for the global C
cycle. In ‘Global climate change and pedogenic carbonate’. (Eds R Lal,
JM Kimble, H Eswaran, BA Stewart) pp. 43–64. (Lewis Publishers:
Boca Raton, FL, USA)
Oh N-H, Raymond PA (2006) Contribution of agricultural liming to
riverine bicarbonate export and CO2 sequestration in the Ohio River
basin. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 20, GB3012. doi:10.1029/
2005GB002565
Owliaie HR (2012) Micromorphology of calcitic features in calcareous soils
of Kohgilouye Province, Southwestern Iran. Journal of Agriculture
Science and Technology 14, 225–239.
Page KL, Allen DE, Dalal RC, Slattery W (2009) Processes and magnitude
of CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes from liming of Australian acidic soils: a
review. Australian Journal of Soil Research 47, 747–762. doi:10.1071/
SR09057
Rangel-Castro JI, Killham K, Ostle N, Nicol GW, Anderson IC, Scrimgeour
CM, Ineson P, Meharg A, Prosser JI (2005) Stable isotope probing
analysis of the influence of liming on root exudate utilization by soil
microorganisms. Environmental Microbiology 7, 828–838. doi:10.1111/
j.1462-2920.2005.00756.x
Rawlins BG, Henrys P, Breward N, Robinson DA, Keith AM, Garcia-Bajo
M (2011) The importance of inorganic carbon in soil carbon databases
and stock estimates: a case study from England. Soil Use and
Management 27, 312–320.
Ridley AM, Slattery WJ, Helyar KR, Cowling A (1990) The importance of
the carbon cycle to acidification of a grazed annual pasture. Australian
Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 529–537. doi:10.1071/
EA9900529
J
Soil Research
W. Ahmad et al.
Robinson B, Malfroy H, Chartres C, Helyar K, Ayers G (1995) The
sensitivity of ecosystems to acid inputs in the Hunter Valley,
Australia. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 85, 1721–1726. doi:10.1007/
BF00477228
Sanderman J (2012) Can management induced changes in the carbonate
system drive soil carbon sequestration? A review with particular focus on
Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 155, 70–77.
doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.015
Schlesinger WM (1990) Evidence from chronosequence studies for a low
carbon-storage potential of soils. Nature 348, 232–234. doi:10.1038/
348232a0
Schlesinger WM (1995) An overview of the C cycle. In ‘Soils and global
change’. (Eds RK Lal, J Levine, E Stewart, BA Stewart) pp. 9–26. (CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)
Silveira MLA (2005) Dissolved organic carbon and bioavailability of N and
P as indicators of soil quality. Scientia Agricola 62, 502–508.
doi:10.1590/S0103-90162005000500017
Singh B, Odeh IOA, McBratney AB (2003) Acid buffering capacity and
potential acidification of cotton soils in northern New South Wales.
Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 875–888. doi:10.1071/
SR02036
Slattery WJ, Edwards DG, Bell LC, Coventry DR, Helyar KR (1998)
Soil acidification and the carbon cycle in a cropping soil of northeastern Victoria. Australian Journal of Soil Research 36, 273–290.
doi:10.1071/S96095
South Australia EPA (1998) Ambient water quality monitoring of Lake
Alexandrina and Lake Albert. South Australian EPA Water Monitoring
Report No. 1, September 1998.
Stace HCT, Hubble GD, Brewer R, Northcote KH, Sleeman JR, Mulcahy
MJ, Hallsworth EG (1968) ‘A handbook of Australian soils.’ (Rellim
Technical Publications: Glenside, S. Aust.)
Suarez DL (2000) Impact of agriculture on CO2 as affected by changes in
inorganic carbon. In ‘Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates’.
(Eds R Lal, JM Kimble, H Eswaran, BA Stewart) pp. 257–272. (CRC/
Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA)
Tang C, Conyers MK, Nuruzzaman M, Poile GJ, Liu DL (2011) Biological
amelioration of subsoil acidity through managing nitrate uptake by wheat
crops. Plant and Soil 338, 383–397. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0552-6
West TO, McBride AC (2005) The contribution of agricultural lime to
carbon dioxide emissions in the United States: dissolution, transport, and
net emissions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 108, 145–154.
doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.01.002
Yang YH, Fang JY, Ji CJ, Ma WH, Mohammat A, Wang SF, Wang SP,
Datta A, Robinson D, Smith P (2012) Widespread decreases in topsoil
inorganic carbon stocks across China’s grasslands during
1980s–2000s. Global Change Biology 18, 3672–3680. doi:10.1111/
gcb.12025
Zhang M, Karathanasis A (1997) Characterization of iron-manganese
concretions in Kentucky Alfisols with perched water tables. Clays
and Clay Minerals 45, 428–439. doi:10.1346/CCMN.1997.0450312
www.publish.csiro.au/journals/sr