Primary Cardiac Lymphoma in a Heart Transplant Recipient
D. Nart, S. Nalbantgil, T. Yagdi, F. Yılmaz, M. Hekimgil, G. Yüce, and A. Hamulu
ABSTRACT
Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is one of the most serious
complications of chronic immunosuppression in transplant recipients. Involvement of the
cardiac allograft or development of lymphoma in the heart is extremely rare. We report a
primary cardiac lymphoma that developed about 14 months after the operation in a cardiac
recipient. The patient presented with vague abdominal complaints. Multiorgan failure
developed within a short period of time, and the patient died. The diagnosis of “diffuse
large cell lymphoma of B cell type” was made on postmortem examination.
P
OSTTRANSPLANTATION lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLDs) are the most serious and frequently
fatal complications of chronic immunosuppression in transplant recipients. The incidence ranges from 2% to 6% in
heart transplants.1– 4 It is the third leading cause of death in
these patients.2–5 More than 50% of patients with PTLD
present with extranodal masses.6 The disease occurs frequently in the gastrointestinal tract, lungs, skin, liver, central nervous system, but involvement of the cardiac allograft
or development of lymphoma in the heart is extremely
rare.7 We report a primary cardiac lymphoma that developed as a PTLD in a cardiac recipient.
CASE REPORT
A 50-year-old man underwent orthotopic heart transplantation for ischemic cardiomyopathy. The operation and
postoperative course were uncomplicated. He was discharged 15 days after surgery on an immunosuppressive
regimen of prednisone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine
(CyA). He had no acute rejection episode requiring antilymphocytic antibody.
Although the patient’s clinical and laboratory status had
been stable, CMV reactivation was observed at 12 months
after transplantation. Gancyclovir was administered. Fourteen months after transplantation, the patient presented
with fatigue and vague abdominal pain. His liver function
tests were mildly elevated, but other chemistry determinations were within the normal range. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed hepatic congestion. Histopathological examination of the liver biopsy was also consistent with
congestion. Echocardiography revealed global hypokinesia.
Congestion was believed to be the consequence of cardiac
failure due to rejection. Cardiac biopsy was performed.
There was a mixed CD3 (⫹) T lymphocyte and CD20 (⫹)
B lymphocyte infiltration in the subepicardial fat tissue, but
there was no rejection. However, occasional large lymphoid
cells appeared in the myocardium. Possible sources of
infection were extensively sought, but all cultures were
negative. A mass that was located between the right ventricle and the sternum was detected by computed tomography
of the chest. The patient’s overall clinical picture and
hemodynamic status worsened gradually. The patient died
of multiorgan failure before the diagnostic workup of this
lesion could be performed.
On postmortem examination, a mass lesion, 5 cm in its
greatest dimension, was seen within the pericardial cavity.
This subepicardial mass was located on the anterior wall of
the right ventricle and atrium bridging the atrioventricular
groove. It also invaded the inferior vena cava at the
diaphragmatic level. The cut surface revealed a nodular,
gray-white appearence with hemorrhagic and necrotic areas
(Fig 1).
Microscopic examination showed an infiltrate of small
lymphocytes plasma cells and transformed lymphocytes
with scattered large, bizarre lymphoid cells containing
vesicular nuclei and nucleoli. Mitosis and necrosis were
abundant. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were CD45and CD20-positive and CD3, CD15, CD30, cytokeratin and
bcl-2 negative. In situ hybridization showed staining with a
probe for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA (EBER) (Fig
From the Department of Pathology (D.N., F.Y., M.H., G.Y.),
Department of Cardiology (S.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (T.Y., A.H.), Ege University Medical Faculty,
Bornova, Turkey.
Address reprint requests to Sanem Nalbantgil, MD, Ege University Medical Faculty, Department of Cardiology, Bornova,
Izmir 35100, Turkey. E-mail: sanamn@hotmail.com
0041-1345/05/$–see front matter
doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.01.034
© 2005 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
360 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010-1710
1362
Transplantation Proceedings, 37, 1362–1364 (2005)
CARDIAC LYMPHOMA IN HEART TRANSPLANT
Fig 1.
Macroscopic appearance of the cardiac lymphoma.
2). Based on these pathological findings, the diagnosis was
“diffuse large cell lymphoma of B cell type.”
DISCUSSION
Two pathogenetic factors are important in PTLD: immunosuppressive therapy3,4 and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
infection.7,8 The degree of immunosuppression is a major
determinant of the development of a lymphoproliferative
disorder. The incidence appears to be highest among heart
recipients9 in whom a greater degree of immunosuppres-
1363
sion is required because of the most serious consequences
of transplant rejection. Transplant patients at increased risk
for PTLD are those receiving both CyA and azathioprine,
or polyclonal (antilymphocyte serum) or monoclonal
(OKT3) antilymphocyte antibodies.3,4,10 The incidence of
PTLD is highest in the first year, which could be due to
intense immunosuppression.1 The pathogenesis of PTLD in
most cases, appears to be related to B-cell proliferation
induced by infection with EBV, in the setting of chronic
immunosuppression.11,12 Although EBV has been linked to
PTLD in the majority of cases, EBV is not found in 10% to
20% of patients.13 There seems to be an increase in the
proportion of EBV-negative PTLD; the EBV-negative
PTLD appears to have a delayed-onset compared with
EBV-positive disease.14
The PTLDs range from indolent polyclonal hyperplasia
to aggressive monoclonal lymphomas.15–17 The rates of
allograft involvement by PTLD vary widely depending on
the types of transplant. They have been reported to be as
high as 60% to 80% of heart–lung transplants,18 17% to
33% in renal transplants and 8.6% to 33% in liver transplants.6,18 Affinity of PTLD for the allograft in cases of
isolated organ involvement suggests that a local immune
reaction against the graft may play a role in promoting
malignant transformation.
Reported cases of cardiac allograft involvement by PTLD
had multiorgan involvement.19 –23 Cardiac involvement
showed an incidence of 4% to 5% among all PTLDs.24
However, isolated heart involvement is rare. Ying et al19
reported a case of lymphoma that was confined to a cardiac
allograft valve. Confirming the presence of cardiac lymphoma is often difficult, and the diagnosis is often estab-
Fig 2. Microscopic examination
showed an infiltrate of small lymphocytes plasma cells and transformed lymphocytes with scattered large, bizarre lymphoid cells
with vesicular nuclei and nucleoli.
1364
lished on postmortem examination.23 Empirical antibiotherapy without any positive cultures and pulse steroids
without any definitive sign of rejection failed to prevent the
clinical deterioration in this patient. A mass lesion detected
by CT was difficult to reach for biopsy without a resternotomy. However, this was the only positive finding that could
have led to a definitive diagnosis premortem.
Our case is a rare example of PTLD confined to the
heart. In heart transplant recipients, the whole body, including the transplanted organ, must be aggressively
searched for PTLD, especially if a downhill clinical course
cannot be explained by either rejection or infection.
REFERENCES
1. Walker RC, Paya CV, Marshall WF, et al: Pretransplantation
seronegative Epstein-Barr virus status is the primary risk factor for
posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in adult heart,
lung, and other solid organ transplantations. J Heart Lung Transplant 14:214, 1995
2. Armitage JM, Kormos RL, Stuart RS, et al: Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease in thoracic organ transplant patients: ten years of cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. J Heart
Lung Transplant 10:877, 1991
3. Swinnen LJ, Constanza-Nordin MR, Fisher SG, et al: Increased incidence of lymphoproliferative disorder after immunosuppression with the monoclonal antibody OKT3 in cardiac transplant recipients. N Engl J Med 323:1723, 1990
4. Opelz G, Henderson R, for the Collaborative Transplant
Study: incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in kidney and heart
transplant recipients. Lancet 342:1514, 1993
5. Swinnen LJ, Mullen GM, Carr TJ, et al: Aggressive treatment
for postcardiac transplant lymphoproliferation. Blood 86:3333,
1995
6. Nalesnik MA, Jaffe R, Starzl TS, et al: The pathology of
posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders occurring in the setting of cyclosporine A–prednisone immunosuppression. Am J
Pathol 133:173, 1988
7. Knowles DM, Cesarman E, Chadburn A, et al: Correlative
morphologic and molecular genetic analysis demonstrates three
distinct categories of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. Blood 85:552, 1995
8. Young L, Alfieri C, Heennessy K, et al: Expression of
Epstein-Barr virus transformation-associated genes in tissue of
patients with EBV lymphoproliferative disease. N Engl J Med
321:1080, 1989
NART, NALBANTGIL, YAGDI ET AL
9. Penn I: The changing patterns of post-transplant malignancies. Transplant Proc 23:375, 1991
10. Cockfield SM, Preiksaitis JK, Jewell LD, et al: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in renal allograft recipients.
Clinical experience and risk factor analysis in a single centre.
Transplantation 56:88, 1993
11. Patton DF, Wilkowski CW, Hanson CA, et al: Epstein-Barr
virus determines clonality in post-transplant lymphoproliferative
disorders. Transplantation 49:1080, 1990
12. Randhawa PS, Jaffe R, Demetris AJ, et al: Expression of
Epstein-Barr virus encoded small RNA (by the EBER-1 gene) in
liver specimens from transplant recipients with posttransplantation
lymphoproliferative disease. N Engl J Med 327:1710, 1992
13. Harris NL, Ferry JA, Swerdlow SH: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders: summary of Society for Hematopathology
Workshop. Semin Diagn Pathol 14:8, 1997
14. Nelson BP, Nalesnik MA, Bahler DW, et al: Epstein-Barr
virus negative posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders: a distinct entity? Am J Surg Pathol 24:375, 2000
15. Chadburn A, Chen JM, Hsu DT, et al: The morphometric
and molecular genetic categories of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders are clinically relevant. Cancer 82:1978, 1998
16. Chadburn A, Cesarman E, Knowles DM: Molecular pathology of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. Semin
Diagn Pathol 14:15, 1997
17. Swedlow SH: Classification of the posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders: from the past to present. Semin Diagn Pathol
14:2, 1997
18. Cohen J: Epstein-Barr virus lymphoproliferative disease
associated with acquired immunodeficiency. Medicine 70:137, 1991
19. Ying AJ, Myerowitz PD, Marsh WL: Posttransplantation
lymphoproliferative disorder in cardiac transplant allografts. Ann
Thorac Surg 64:1822, 1997
20. Weissman DJ, Ferry JA, Harris NL, et al: Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders in solid organ recipients are
predominantly aggressive tumor of host origin. Am J Clin Pathol
103:748, 1995
21. Abu-Farsakh H, Cagle PT, Buffone GJ, et al: Heart allograft
involvement with Epstein-Barr virus associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Arch Pathol Lab Med 116:93, 1992
22. Burtin P, Guerci A, Boman F, et al: Malignant lymphoma in
the donor heart after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J 14:1143,
1993
23. Sibley RK, Olivari MT, Bolman RM, et al: Endomyocardial
biopsy in the cardiac allograft recipient: a review of 570 biopsies.
Ann Surg 203:177, 1986
24. Eisen HJ, Hicks D, Kant JA, et al: Diagnosis of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder by endomyocardial biopsy
in a cardiac allograft recipient. J Heart Lung Transplant 13:241,
1994