[go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Global labour’s answers to global war Continuities and ruptures in the international labour movement’s positioning on the question of peace and war (Work in Progress) Research Department IISG, Amsterdam Presentation Adrian Zimmermann, 12 May 2015 Edo Fimmen (1881-1942) Speech Peace Congress, The Hague, 10 December 1922: “(…) war, in whatever shape or form, never furthers his [the worker’s] interest, but only enables the capitalist to extend his sphere of interest and to tighten his hold.” Speech to German Workers, BBC London, 1 September 1940: “A working class firmly organised which knows, what is at stake: all that it has conquered in past decades, the elementary human rights, human dignity, life itself. (…). A working class that would sweep away a weak government and organise itself the fight until victory.” Strike against war? • Before 1914: Proposals for international general strike against war rejected as “utopian” by several international socialist congresses. • At the end of and immediately after First World War: largest global wave of protests, strikes and revolutions in history • 1920-21: Congresses of Transportworkers’-, Metalworkers- and Miners’ International decide that threat of war must be opposed by boycott and strike, “general staff against war” formed. • IFTU Congresses 1920-1927: confirm position, that a war threat shall be answered by international general strike • With the rise of fascism this position becomes increasingly problematic • Growing awareness that future wars will be launched by states without democracy and free labour movement • There, a general strike is not possible, general strike in attacked democratic countries will help the aggressor. The Two World Wars: Impact on the Labour Movement World War I • No clear positioning of the international labour movement possible • Labour movement retains some scope for legal action in most countries (except Russian Empire) • Double Split: along national loyalties and between those supporting war efforts and growing anti-war opposition • Neutral countries (Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden) become centres of International labour movement (instead of Germany, Britain and Belgium) • At the end of and immediately after war: largest global wave of protests, strikes and revolution in history World War II • International labour movement clearly sides with anti-fascist coalition • In the Axis powers and the territories occupied by them: no legal labour movement • Only a few democratic neutral countries remain and are surrounded by Axis (Sweden, Switzerland) • Complicating factor: Soviet Union • United Kingdom becomes centre of International labour movement • Involvement of international trade union structures in propaganda and intelligence activities of UK and USA