https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
Frontispiece Restoration of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis depicted among a shoal of the large, predatory actinopterygian fish, Saurichthys. Artwork copyright Marlene Donnelly.
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1–33, 2024
Spontaneous Article
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis Li, 2003: a remarkable marine
archosauromorph from the Middle Triassic of
southwestern China
Stephan N.F. SPIEKMAN1 , Wei WANG2, Lijun ZHAO3, Olivier RIEPPEL4,
Nicholas C. FRASER5* and Chun LI2*
1
Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 10191 Stuttgart, Germany.
Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of
Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology, Beijing 100044, China.
3
Zhejiang Museum of Natural History, 310014, Hangzhou, China.
4
The Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
5
National Museums Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1 JF, UK.
* Corresponding author. Email: lichun@ivpp.ac.cn; nick.fraser@nms.ac.uk
2
ABSTRACT: The non-archosauriform archosauromorph Dinocephalosaurus orientalis was first
described from the Upper Member of the Guanling Formation (late Anisian, Middle Triassic) of Guizhou Province by Li in 2003 on the basis of a complete articulated skull and the first three cervical vertebrae exposed in dorsal to right lateral view. Since then, additional specimens have been discovered in
southwestern China. Here, five newly discovered specimens are described for the first time, and redescriptions of the holotype IVPP V13767 and another referred specimen, IVPP V13898, are provided.
Together, these permit the description of the complete skeleton of this remarkable long-necked marine
reptile. The postcranial skeleton is as much as 6 metres long, and characterised by its long tail and even
longer neck. The appendicular skeleton exhibits a high degree of skeletal paedomorphosis recalling that
of many sauropterygians, but the skull and neck are completely inconsistent with sauropterygian affinities. The palate does not extend back over the basisphenoid region and lacks any development of the
closed condition typical of sauropterygians. The arrangement of cranial elements, including the presence of narial fossae, is very similar to that seen in another long-necked archosauromorph, Tanystropheus hydroides, which at least in part represents a convergence related to an aquatic piscivorous
lifestyle. The long and low cervical vertebrae support exceptionally elongate cervical ribs that extend
across multiple intervertebral joints and contribute to a ‘stiffening bundle of ribs’ extending along the
entire ventral side of the neck, as in many other non-crocopodan archosauromorphs. The functional significance of the extraordinarily elongate neck is hard to discern but it presumably played a key role in
feeding, and it is probably analogous to the elongate necks seen in pelagic, long-necked plesiosaurs.
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis was almost certainly a fully marine reptile and even gave birth at sea.
KEY WORDS:
late Anisian, marine reptile, non-archosauriform, southern China.
Introduction
Archosauromorpha first appeared in the Permian and subsequently radiated into one of the dominant terrestrial vertebrate
groups of the Mesozoic following the end-Permian mass extinction event (Ezcurra et al. 2014). Although most research has
focussed on the radiation of crown archosaurs, the pseudosuchian
or croc-line archosaurs and the avemetatarsalian or bird-line archosaurs, respectively (e.g., Brusatte et al. 2010; Langer et al. 2010;
Butler et al. 2011; Nesbitt 2011), the earliest branching archosaurs
or non-archosauriform archosauromorphs achieved remarkably
high diversity and represented important components of both
terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems during the Triassic (Foth et al.
2016; Ezcurra & Butler 2018; Spiekman et al. 2021). This group
consists, among others, of the robust and herbivorous Rhynchosauria and Allokotosauria, as well as the more gracile Protorosaurus speneri, Prolacerta broomi, and long-necked
Tanystropheidae. These gracile forms were previously considered
to represent a monophyletic clade, ‘Protorosauria’, but several
independent phylogenetic analyses have since revealed this to
represent a para- or polyphyletic grouping, depending on the
placement of Prolacerta broomi (e.g., Pritchard et al. 2015;
Ezcurra 2016; Spiekman et al. 2021). Instead, these taxa can be
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use,
distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S175569102400001X
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
described as non-crocopodan archosauromorphs, since Crocopoda comprises all archosauromorphs more closely related to
allokotosaurs, rhynchosaurs and archosauriforms than to Protorosaurus speneri and tanystropheids (Ezcurra 2016).
The occurrence of terrestrial (e.g., Macrocnemus bassanii),
aquatic (Tanytrachelos ahynis [freshwater] and Tanystropheus
hydroides [marine]) and possibly even gliding forms (Ozimek
volans) with widely different postcranial proportions and dental
configuration suggests that non-crocopodan archosauromorphs,
and in particular the tanystropheids, were highly diverse during
the Triassic (Dzik & Sulej 2016; Spiekman et al. 2020a, 2021).
Our understanding of these forms has been quite restricted due
to the generally poor (highly compressed) and fragmentary preservation of specimens, particularly when compared with the
largely complete and generally three-dimensionally preserved
skulls known from other early archosauromorphs. However,
the recent descriptions of Tanystropheus hydroides (Spiekman
et al. 2020a, 2020b) and Macrocnemus bassanii (Miedema
et al. 2020) aided by high resolution μCT data have provided
much-needed insights into the three-dimensional cranial anatomy of key taxa. Nevertheless, additional relatively complete
and three-dimensionally preserved fossils of other taxa are still
required to allow us to appreciate the anatomical and ecological
disparity of the group. In the last twenty years, new discoveries
from the Middle Triassic of China have yielded a remarkable
array of non-crocopodan archosauromorphs that either
represent tanystropheids or closely related taxa. These include
the highly gracile Pectodens zhenyuensis (Li et al. 2017b) and
the long-necked and long-snouted Fuyuansaurus acutirostris
(Fraser et al. 2013), both of which are known from relatively
complete skeletons. Remains of Macrocnemus and Tanystropheus from China also suggest close ties between both aquatic
and terrestrial faunas from the western and eastern Tethys provinces (Li 2007; Rieppel et al. 2010; Scheyer et al. 2020). However, the most remarkable among these new discoveries has
been Dinocephalosaurus orientalis.
The original description of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis was
based on an isolated well-preserved skull and the first three anterior cervical vertebrae preserved in articulation, and it was identified as a ‘protorosaur’ (Li 2003). Further specimens revealed
that Dinocephalosaurus orientalis had a very similar size to Tanystropheus hydroides with comparable body proportions, including an extremely long neck, in addition to a very similar type
of dentition. However, the paddle-shaped autopodia and much
reduced carpal and tarsal bones in Dinocephalosaurus orientalis
contrast sharply with the limb elements of Tanystropheus spp.
and other non-crocopodan archosauromorphs. Furthermore,
in contrast to the highly elongated neck of Tanystropheus hydroides and Tanystropheus longobardicus, composed only of 13
hyper-elongate cervical vertebrae, the neck of Dinocephalosaurus
orientalis was found to consist of at least 32 vertebrae, suggesting
that both genera had achieved their comparable neck elongation
independently (Li et al. 2004; Nosotti 2007; Rieppel et al. 2008;
Rieppel et al. 2010). The degree of adaptation to a marine lifestyle has additionally been highlighted by the discovery of two
separate embryos, referable to Dinocephalosaurus sp. (Liu et al.
2017) and a separate closely related, but unnamed, taxon (Li
et al. 2017a), respectively. The former occurs in the abdominal
region of a partially articulated specimen, while the latter is an
isolated, curled-up, complete skeleton. Both originate from
Luoping County (Yunnan Province) as opposed to Guizhou
Province, where the primary Dinocephalosaurus orientalis specimens were discovered. Together, these two records provided the
first evidence of viviparity in the archosauromorph lineage.
Although viviparity has also been established in terrestrial lepidosaurs (i.e., in some snakes and squamates), it is likely to
represent an important adaptation for certain secondarily
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
3
aquatic tetrapods, as it foregoes the need to venture on land to
lay eggs. A recent revision of the phylogeny of non-crocopodan
archosauromorphs (i.e., the former ‘Protorosauria’), recovered
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis in a clade with Pectodens zhenyuensis, dubbed Dinocephalosauridae, which formed the sister clade
to Tanystropheidae (Spiekman et al. 2021). This result corroborates the convergent acquisition of aquatic adaptations and neck
elongation that was previously discussed (Li et al. 2004; Rieppel
et al. 2008) between Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Tanystropheus spp., providing further evidence of the high diversity of Triassic non-archosauriform archosauromorphs.
The holotype specimen of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing,
IVPP V13767) was collected near Xinmin in Panxian County,
southwestern Guizhou Province. It came from the Upper Member of the Guanling Formation, which is of Pelsonian (late Anisian, Middle Triassic) age as indicated by the conodont
Nicoraella kockeli (Sun et al. 2006, 2009; Zhang et al. 2009).
This stratum has yielded a rich assemblage of marine reptiles,
in particular numerous ichthyosaurs and sauropterygians, as
well as fishes (Jiang et al. 2003, 2005a, 2005b, 2006a, 2006b,
2007, 2008; Li et al. 2006; Shang 2006; Motani et al. 2008). Dinocephalosaurus orientalis is not a common member of this assemblage, but since the discovery of the holotype a number of
additional specimens have come to light. The first of these
(referred specimen, IVPP V13898; Li et al. 2004; Rieppel et al.
2008), a nearly complete but partially disarticulated skeleton
with the tail missing, has been described previously, and was
the first specimen to reveal much of the postcranium. The skull
in this specimen is strongly dorsoventrally compressed and
exposed in ventral view only. Another specimen, this time from
Luoping County, has been described (Liu et al. 2017) with associated embryonic remains (see above). Preserving fragmentary
cranial remains, as well as part of the neck, thorax, tail and hindlimbs, it was referred to the genus Dinocephalosaurus (Liu et al.
2017), but the authors deferred from assigning it to a species. In
recent years, five additional specimens have been collected from
the type locality, which are housed either at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing (IVPP), or
at the Zhejiang Museum of Natural History, Hangzhou
(ZMNH). Here, we provide a detailed description of the skeletal
anatomy of this new material, including comparisons to other
non-crocopodan archosauromorphs, and a phylogenetic revision
of the taxon. Due to the excellent preservation of the material,
which includes relatively undistorted material and articulated
remains, Dinocephalosaurus orientalis now represents one of
the best-known non-crocopodan archosauromorphs.
1. Systematic palaeontology
Diapsida Osborn 1903
Archosauromorpha von Huene 1946
Dinocephalosauridae Spiekman et al. 2021
Dinocephalosaurus Li 2003.
Type species: Dinocephalosaurus orientalis Li 2003.
Diagnosis: as for the type species, the only known species in
this genus.
Distribution: Upper Member of the Guanling Formation (late
Anisian, Middle Triassic) near Xinmin in Panxian County,
southwestern Guizhou Province, and in Luoping County, eastern
Yunnan Province, P.R. China.
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis Li 2003
Holotype: Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, IVPP V13767; skull and lower jaw exposed
in right laterodorsal view; atlas, axis and partial third cervical
vertebra; fragments of anterior cervical ribs.
4
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Referred specimens: IVPP V13898: nearly complete but partially disarticulated skeleton, tail missing; IVPP V17977: skull
and mandible exposed in ventral view, in articulation with 16 cervical vertebrae; IVPP V20295: the most complete specimen with
skull exposed in dorsal view and the neck and body coiled
around each other and the entire tail preserved; ZMNH
M8727: partially preserved skull, neck and anterior trunk with
forelimbs; ZMNH M8728: partially preserved skull, neck and
anterior trunk with forelimbs; ZMNH M8752: complete skeleton (skull badly crushed).
Emended diagnosis: A non-crocopodan archosauromorph of
relatively large size (up to 6 metres in total body length) diagnosed
by the following unique combination of characters (* indicates
autapomorphies among non-archosauriform archosauromorphs):
neck that is more than twice as long as the trunk; skull with short
postorbital region; antorbital recess distinct with external naris
located in its anterior corner; jugal without posterior process;
quadratojugal absent*; suborbital fenestra obliterated; interpterygoid vacuity very short and narrow, nearly completely obliterated;
pterygoid separates palatine from vomer*; retroarticular process
on lower jaw strongly reduced; a single premaxillary fang present;
anterior maxillary and dentary fangs present; palatal dentition
absent on at least the vomer and pterygoid*; 62 presacral vertebrae
(32 cervical vertebrae), two sacral vertebrae and 81 caudal vertebrae; cervical vertebrae without hollow centrum and a neural
spine with an anterodorsal anterior projection and posterodorsal
posterior projection; vertebral centra constricted (ventral margin
concave in lateral view), weakly amphicoelous; cervical ribs long
and slender, aligned along neck and bridging from two to three
(anterior neck) to five (middle neck) to six (posterior neck) intervertebral joints; cervical ribs with an elongate free-ending anterior
process that extends considerably anteriorly beyond the prezygapophyses of the corresponding vertebra; sacral ribs not fused with corresponding vertebrae; absence of an ossified interclavicle; ilium
lacking a preacetabular process but with a distinct dorsal iliac
blade; thyroid fenestra absent; limbs relatively short and stout; stylopodium and zeugopodium of hindlimb somewhat shorter than
of forelimb*; six carpal elements ossified; three tarsal elements ossified*; phalangeal count in manus reduced due to skeletal paedomorphosis*; no sutural contact between astragalus and
calcaneum*; fifth metatarsal straight.
Type locality: Xinmin, Panxian County, Guizhou Province,
southwestern China.
Horizon: Upper Member of Guanling Formation, Pelsonian,
Anisian, Middle Triassic.
Ontogenetic assessment: LPV 30280 represents a gravid female
and is thus sexually mature (Liu et al. 2017). Although this specimen currently cannot unambiguously be assigned to Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, it is referred to the same genus and was
certainly closely related to the type species. Since this individual
is smaller than all known specimens of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, it can reasonably be ascertained that these also represented
sexually mature individuals. The postcranium is poorly ossified
in these specimens, but this is attributable to paedomorphosis
related to aquatic adaptation, rather than skeletal immaturity.
2. Description
2.1. Holotype, specimen IVPP V13767
The holotype (Fig. 1) has been described by Li (2003), and again
by Rieppel et al. (2008). It is represented by the skull and the
right mandibular ramus exposed in right dorsolateral view, associated with the first three cervical vertebrae and the respective
cervical ribs. It is the best-preserved skull amongst all the material, although it does not expose the dermal palate (which is beautifully exposed in IVPP V17977; see below). Unfortunately,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
sutural detail is frequently difficult to establish, possibly due to
diagenesis. One of the most difficult regions to differentiate is
the postorbital bar and the delimitation of the jugal, squamosal
and postorbital. Li (2003) illustrated a pronounced dorsal process of the jugal separating the squamosal from the postorbital.
However, a reinterpretation of the holotype by Rieppel et al.
(2008) found that this region, which forms the posterior margin
of the orbit, is formed by a prominent triradiate postorbital and
that the jugal consequently did not reach as far dorsally as
inferred by Li (2003). The element indicated as the postorbital
by Li (2003) was instead found to be part of the postfrontal,
which consequently forms a prominent, elongated element that
is oriented transversely relative to the long axis of the skull. As
such, the postfrontal forms the posterodorsal margin of the
orbit and much of the anterior margin of the supratemporal fenestra. The interpretation by Rieppel et al. (2008) is corroborated
here based on observations on IVPP V20295 (see below). However, the exact sutural contact between the squamosal, postorbital and jugal remains uncertain because the sutures
between these elements have been obliterated in IVPP V13767
and because this region is badly broken in IVPP V20295. The
holotype confirms the diapsid affinities of the taxon, with a
lower temporal arch that remains incomplete (the quadratojugal
is missing and was almost certainly absent, since it is not present
in any of the well-preserved, articulated skulls). IVPP V13767
represents the largest known skull of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and has a total length of 230 mm. The largest preserved tooth
measures 28 mm from the base of the crown to the tip.
The holotype displays the highly characteristic dentition of the
species, with a single premaxillary and two maxillary fangs.
Three, possibly four, mandibular fangs fit in between the premaxillary and maxillary fangs when the jaws are closed. Equally
characteristic of the species, and similar to the condition seen
in Tanystropheus hydroides (Spiekman et al. 2020a, 2020b), is a
distinct antorbital depression or recess that extends along the rostrum in front of the orbit. The external nares are positioned very
close to the end of the rostrum, resembling the condition of Pectodens zhenyuensis (Li et al. 2017b). The lower jaw reveals a
weakly developed coronoid process, and the reduction of the retroarticular process which – together with the weak posterior concavity of the quadrate – indicates the absence of a well-developed
tympanic membrane in this marine organism.
2.2. Referred specimen, IVPP V13898
(Figure 2). IVPP V13898, which was described in detail by Rieppel et al. (2008; see also Li et al. 2004), comprises the skull, most
of the vertebral column, elements of all four limbs and some elements of the pectoral and pelvic girdle (Fig. 2). The skull is relatively poorly preserved, strongly dorsoventrally compressed and
exposed in ventral view. The cervical vertebral column is broken
near the middle of the neck and again more posteriorly. The posterior trunk is represented by an incomplete string of vertebrae
that curls around the remaining, partially disarticulated, trunk
skeleton. The left fore- and hindlimbs are beautifully exposed
and preserved in articulation. The right fore- and hindlimbs
are partially obscured by ribs and elements of the remaining
appendicular skeleton. The tail is missing.
The new material of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis that came to
light after the description of IVPP V13898 (Li et al. 2004; Rieppel et al. 2008) clarified many details of the skeletal anatomy of
this taxon, especially with respect to the vertebral column, which
remained ambiguous on the basis of information gleaned from
IVPP V13898 alone. This prompted us to reinvestigate the latter
specimen in the light of the new discoveries.
2.2.1. The skull. The skull is preserved in palatal view and
the palate is rather badly crushed so that no sutures can reliably
be distinguished. Nevertheless, certain details, particularly on
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
5
Figure 1 The holotype of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis Li, 2003. (a) Photograph. (b) Photograph with interpretative drawing. Abbreviations: fr = frontal;
j = jugal; la = lacrimal; mx = maxilla; na = nasal; op = opisthotic; pa = parietal; pl = palatine; pm = premaxilla; pof = postfrontal; po = postorbital; pro
= prootic; pt = pterygoid; scl = sclerotic plates; soc = supraoccipital; sq = squamosal.
the right side, can be determined. For example, the contact
between the maxilla and palatine is quite well exposed but there
is no evidence of a suborbital fenestra. More anteriorly there is
a narrow opening in the palate that we interpret as the posterior
end of the right internal naris. Also, on the right side, the transverse process of the pterygoid, which would have articulated
with, and ventrally overlapped, the ectopterygoid, is visible. It is
characterised by a well-defined ridge that curves anterolaterally
from the margin of the interpterygoid vacuity, but there is clearly
no development of any ventrally directed pterygoid-ectopterygoid
flange. This is a feature that is preserved even more clearly in IVPP
V17977 (see below). Rieppel et al. (2008) postulated that the pterygoids met posteriorly along the midline and possibly even covered the basicranium. However, with the discovery of IVPP
V17977, we now know that this is an artifact of preservation,
and that the basioccipital and parabasisphenoid must be displaced
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
in this specimen. The posterior end of the right mandibular ramus
is well preserved and, as noted previously (Rieppel et al. 2008),
supports earlier observations that the retroarticular process is considerably reduced in Dinocephalosaurus orientalis.
2.2.2. The cervical series. Behind the skull, the centrum of
the atlas is preserved in direct articulation with the axis. As previously described (Rieppel et al. 2008), an additional 16 cervical
vertebrae are articulated as a series behind the axis (making a
total of 18 cervical vertebrae) before there is a clean break in
the column. Following this an additional series of seven articulated cervical vertebrae extends at a right angle to the proximal
18 cervical vertebrae and in close association with a tight bundle
of cervical ribs. It is not clear whether there are any cervical vertebrae missing at this first break in the axial skeleton, although it
seems unlikely as there are no isolated sections of rib that cannot
be matched with either of the two articulated sections.
6
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Figure 2 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, IVPP V13898 (referred specimen). (a) Photograph. (b) Interpretative drawing, reproduced with permission of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology.
There then follows a second break in the cervical column corresponding to a point between cervical 25 and 26. Here it appears
that cervical 26 and 27 have been displaced and ‘twisted’ out of
alignment with the rest of the column (Fig. 2) and are slightly disarticulated. Rieppel et al. (2008) were unable to come to any
definitive conclusion on the number of cervical vertebrae, but
based on a discernible reduction in length of the centra considered it most likely that the next vertebra in the series represented
the first dorsal, despite the fact that the pectoral girdle is situated
more posteriorly. However, we now know that in some longnecked early archosauromorphs, for example Tanystropheus
spp., there is a distinct shortening of the most posterior cervical
vertebrae compared to the anterior and mid cervical vertebrae.
In this case the vertebrae can still be distinguished as cervical vertebrae based on their association with characteristic ploughshaped ribs (Rieppel et al. 2010), although those ribs are much
shorter and more robust than the more anterior cervical ribs.
Based on this knowledge it is now apparent that there are at
least five additional vertebrae behind cervical 27 that are associated with shortened rather plough-shaped ribs with very robust
heads. Thus, we consider this individual to show at least 32 cervical vertebrae. The ribs associated with vertebrae 28 and 29 have
a clear anterior process, but this becomes less pronounced in the
next three vertebrae. Nevertheless, they have greatly thickened
heads that turn in sharply towards their articulations with the
vertebrae. However, the exact distinction between the cervical
and dorsal series remains somewhat equivocal as the region
around the pectoral girdle is rather poorly preserved. Indeed,
details of much of the trunk region, including the pectoral and
pelvic girdles, are rather indistinct.
Rieppel et al. (2008) recorded the presence of the right ilium
and pubis in fairly close association although not in complete
articulation. The posterior edge of the pubis is relatively straight
and lacks any posterior emargination. This is a condition that is
confirmed by examination of ZMNH M8752 and IVPP V20295
(see below). Dinocephalosaurus orientalis therefore lacked a thyroid fenestra entirely. A thyroid fenestra is present in most tanystropheids, but it is absent in Tanytrachelos ahynis and
Fuyuansaurus acutirostris, and in the probable non-tanystropheid
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
archosauromorph Jesairosaurus lehmani (Spiekman et al. 2021).
The ilium possesses a well-defined facet for the ischium set off
from that for the pubis (Rieppel et al. 2008), but the ischium
appears to be missing completely and therefore did not form a
fused pubo-ischiadic plate with the pubis, similar to other early
archosauromorphs. There may even have been a slight separation
of the ischium and pubis along their ventral symphysis.
2.3. Referred specimen, IVPP V17977
(Figure 3). The specimen comprises the skull and mandible preserved in ventral view on one block, followed by the first to the
16th cervical vertebrae, together with associated cervical ribs,
preserved in articulation on three additional slabs (Fig. 3). The
skull measures 206 mm in length and 103 mm in width as preserved across the widest point of the skull.
2.3.1. The skull. The dermal palate is nearly closed in Dinocephalosaurus orientalis. Although beautifully exposed and lacking
the level of crushing seen in IVPP V13898, it is still difficult to clarify details of the sutures, particularly between the palatines and the
pterygoid. Some of the clearest are the interdigitating sutures separating the vomers from the pterygoids, and on the right side there
appears to be a fairly well-defined suture between the palatine and
vomer (Fig. 3b). Lateral to this suture, the posterior margin of the
internal naris is clearly visible on the right side bounded by the palatine. A suborbital fenestra is absent, and the broad palatal rami of
the pterygoids meet each other at the midline for most of their
length. The contact between them is established shortly in front
of the open palatobasal articulation. The palatal ramus of the pterygoid meets the ectopterygoid and palatine laterally and the broad
vomer anteriorly, thus separating the paired palatines from each
other along the midline. The very wide palatal ramus of the pterygoid resembles the condition seen in Tanystropheus hydroides
(Spiekman et al. 2020b) and contrasts with the much narrower
pterygoid seen in other tanystropheids and early archosauromorphs (e.g., Macrocnemus spp., Miedema et al. 2020; Scheyer
et al. 2020, and Azendohsaurus madagaskarensis, Flynn et al.
2010). The boundaries between the palatines and pterygoids are
completely indistinct. On the left side of the palate there is a prominent ridge running anteroposteriorly for at least two-thirds of the
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
7
Figure 3 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, IVPP V17977 (referred specimen). (a) The specimen as preserved on four slabs (photograph, scale bar in cm). (b)
Interpretative drawing of the skull, lower jaw and cervical vertebrae 2–9. Abbreviations: ang = angular; ax = axis; bs = basisphenoid; cv = cervical vertebra; d
= dentary; ncr = neural crest; oph = opisthotic; pl = palatine; poz = postzygapophysis; prz = prezygapophysis; pt = pterygoid; q = quadrate; v = vomer.
length of the entire palate (Fig. 3b). While superficially this appears
to be an articulation between the two elements, significantly it is
not repeated on the right side and it is completely inconsistent
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
with the configuration of the palatine and pterygoid in other diapsids. A long connection with the palatine along the lateral margin
of the palatal ramus of the pterygoid can also be observed in dorsal
8
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
view through the orbit in IVPP V20295 (see below). Therefore, the
condition of the left side of the palate of IVPP V13898 is considered to be an artifact of preservation. Likewise, there is no obvious
separation between the ectopterygoid and pterygoid. As noted
above for IVPP V13898, there is a very clear ridge that essentially
demarcates the anterior boundary of the pterygoid transverse process. This is preserved symmetrically on both sides but does not
seem likely to represent the ectopterygoid-pterygoid boundary.
Nor does it seem to represent an impression resulting from the
extreme compression of the dorsal roof of the skull since its position is inconsistent with the position of either the orbital margins
or the borders of the temporal fenestrae. We therefore regard this
ridge as a characteristic feature of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis.
The posterolateral corner of the transverse process of the pterygoid
is curved posteriorly and hook-shaped in ventral view, which is a
condition that is also found in Jesairosaurus lehmani, Tanstropheus
spp., Amotosaurus rotfeldensis and certain allokotosaurs among
early archosauromorphs (Spiekman et al. 2021). This posterior
hook of the transverse flange of the pterygoid is absent in Macrocnemus spp. and Prolacerta broomi.
Although the palate would seem to be generally devoid of any
dentition, there are the possible remnants of two small denticles
preserved on what is taken to be the posterior edge of the right
palatine just anterior to the transverse process of the pterygoid.
Palatal dentition is present on the pterygoid, vomer and palatine
in most non-archosauriform archosauromorphs in which these
regions have been observed (Ezcurra 2016; Spiekman et al.
2021). However, Tanystropheus hydroides also shows a distinct
reduction in palatal dentition, since it only possesses a single
row of well-developed teeth along the outer margin of the
vomer (Spiekman et al. 2020b).
The quadrate process of the pterygoid is broad and distinctly
curved posterolaterally, its deeply concave lateral margin defining the medial contours of the relatively short subtemporal fenestra. The quadrate process of the pterygoid terminates in a blunt
tip that contacts the medial aspect of the quadrate narrowly
above its mandibular condyle.
Between the quadrate rami of the pterygoids the basicranium is
exposed in ventral view. The ventral surface of the parabasisphenoid posterior to the palatobasal articulation is concave. Little
morphological detail is discernible in the crushed bone that comprises the basioccipital, occipital condyle and the atlas centrum
and neural arches. The first cervical ribs appear to have been
articulating on the atlas. The right exoccipital and opisthotic are
well preserved and exposed, however, indicating lack of fusion of
these two elements. The exoccipital and opisthotic are generally
not fused in mature specimens of non-archosauriform archosauromorphs, with the exception of Tanystropheus hydroides and certain allokotosaurs (Spiekman et al. 2021).
2.3.2. The mandible. The articulated mandible is exposed in
ventral view. On the left mandibular ramus, a faint suture may
represent the boundary of the splenial, but its boundaries remain
unclear. In the right mandibular ramus, below the mandibular
joint, the angular is exposed as a distinct medial expansion.
The retroarticular process projects only slightly posterior to the
glenoid fossa.
The broadened anterior tips of the premaxillaries protrude
anteriorly from below the anterior ends of the dentaries. This condition is typical of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis among archosauromorphs, and can also be observed in the holotype skull. The
right premaxilla shows that the fourth premaxillary tooth formed
the enlarged premaxillary fang, as was also inferred to be the case
in the holotype (Rieppel et al. 2008). On both sides, two enlarged
maxillary fangs protrude from below the mandibular rami, separated from the premaxillary fang by a series of smaller teeth, the
number of which cannot unequivocally be established. Indeed,
the difficulty in unequivocally identifying maxillary versus
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
dentary teeth, more numerously exposed on the right than on
the left side, renders a precise tooth count for these two elements
impossible. Those teeth lying immediately behind the right premaxillary fang belong to a well-defined series of anterior dentary
teeth, which indicates the possible existence of a diastema in the
upper jaw tooth row separating the premaxillary from the maxillary dentition. In the holotype skull, this diastema appears to
accommodate two, possibly three, dentary teeth.
2.3.3. The vertebrae. The series of vertebrae are preserved
with their right lateral sides exposed. The first nine elements
are preserved in almost perfect articulation and even the cervical
ribs are paired in relatively close association with their respective
vertebrae, although they are splayed ventrally away from the long
axis of the neck. There is then a short gap in the slab that
accounts for the posterior part of the ninth vertebra together
with all of the tenth vertebra. Vertebrae 11 to 17 are also preserved in perfect articulation with each other and their respective
ribs. Each rib has a very distinctive anterior process that extends
beyond the separate capitulum and tuberculum. In lateral view
this anterior process has a distinct excavation on its dorsal
edge just in front of the capitulum. The process then broadens
out slightly before tapering again towards its anterior tip. This
depression corresponds exactly to the position of the posterior
edge of the preceding centrum and it seems likely that in life it
formed a direct articulation with the centrum. If this was the
case it might have permitted a certain degree of dorsiflexion of
the neck. The relative length of the anterior process of the ribs
is comparable to that seen in Sclerostropheus fossai, Tanytrachelos ahynis and Pectodens zhenyuensis among tanystropheids and
dinocephalosaurids (Olsen 1979; Li et al. 2017b; Spiekman &
Scheyer 2019) and also similar to that seen in the putative
early archosauromorph Czatkowiella harae (Borsuk-Białynicka
& Evans 2009), and considerably longer than that seen in
other early archosauromorphs. The ribs on the first nine or ten
vertebrae are almost entirely straight. But from cervical
11 onwards the ribs assume a very gentle uniform curvature.
None exhibit the slight kinks described in the cervical ribs of a
specimen of Tanystropheus (Rieppel et al. 2010) where they
extended across the intervertebral joints.
2.4. Referred specimen, ZMNH M8727
(Figure 4). The exposed parts of the skeleton comprise elements
of the exploded skull, a total of 28 cervical vertebrae of which the
axis and the following 17 cervical vertebrae are preserved in
articulation; two scattered vertebrae located next to the 28th cervical vertebra, one of them exposed in anterior view, represent
shortened posterior cervical vertebrae. A string of six vertebrae
lying in front of the remains of the pectoral girdle and forelimbs
represent the posteriormost cervical and anteriormost dorsal
vertebrae. Associated cervical, dorsal and gastral ribs are likewise exposed. The scattered remains of both pectoral girdles
and forelimbs are also preserved (Fig. 4).
2.4.1. The skull and dentary. In the exploded skull the wellpreserved right premaxilla (Fig. 5a) is exposed in medial view.
The alveolar margin of the body of the premaxilla carries five
identifiable tooth positions, of which the anteriormost and posteriormost ones are empty. The slender, tapering nasal process
(prenarial process) of the premaxilla extends posterodorsally;
its length is about twice that of the body of the premaxilla.
This process would have separated the two external nares from
each other, as is the case in most non-archosauriform archosauromorphs, except for Tanystropheus spp., certain allokotosaurs
(e.g., Shringasaurus indicus, Azendohsaurus madagaskarensis,
Pamelaria dolichotrachela), rhynchosaurs and Teyujagua paradoxa, in which the external nares are confluent (Dilkes 1998;
Flynn et al. 2010; Pinheiro et al. 2019; Spiekman et al. 2020a,
2021). The process directed posteriorly from the main body of
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
9
Figure 4 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, ZMNH M8727 (referred specimen). (a) Photograph. (b) Interpretative drawing. Abbreviations: ax = axis; co =
coracoid; d = dentary; hu = humerus; mx = maxilla; pm = premaxilla; pt = pterygoid; q = quadrate; ra = radius; sc = scapula; ul = ulna.
the premaxilla (postnarial process) is strongly reduced in Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and tapers posterodorsally. Three premaxillary teeth are preserved in the second to the fourth tooth
positions. Tooth implantation (sensu Ezcurra 2016) is subthecodont. The third and fourth teeth are equal in length while distinctly longer than the second tooth. The teeth are pointed and
recurved, and the enamel surface is distinctly striated in the
apical part. Resorption pits are located on the labial side of the
tooth base, with a replacement tooth located inside its pit at
the base of the third premaxillary tooth.
Located behind the right premaxilla lies the right maxilla,
which is also exposed in medial view (Fig. 5b). The maxilla carries a rather slender anterior process that projects beyond the
anteriormost preserved tooth, and that ends in a blunt tip. Its
Figure 5 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, ZMNH M8727, interpretative drawings of selected cranial remains. (a) Premaxilla, dentary and mandibular condyle of quadrate. (b) Right maxilla in medial view. (c) Left pterygoid in ventral view. (d) Right (?) quadrate in medial (?) view. Abbreviations: as.p = ascending process of the maxilla; d = dentary; np.pm = nasal process of the premaxilla; pl.p.pt = palatine process of the pterygoid; pm = premaxilla; pm.f =
premaxillary process of the maxilla; q.cph.c = cephalic condyle of the quadrate; q.md.c = medial condyle of the quadrate; q.p.pt = quadrate process of
the pterygoid; sym = symphysis; tr.p.pt = transverse process of the pterygoid.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
10
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
dorsal margin would seem to have defined the lateral margin of the
external naris that was located within the antorbital recess. The
ascending (facial) process of the maxilla ascends rather abruptly
at what appears to have been the level of the posterior margin of
the external naris. From there, the dorsal margin of the ascending
process gently curves posterodorsally, the maxilla thus gaining in
height. The ascending process is damaged (incomplete) in its posterior part, which does not allow us to ascertain whether it defined
the anterior margin of the orbit, or whether a lacrimal was present. Although again incomplete at its posterior end, the maxilla
does show a tapering, tooth-bearing suborbital process extending
posteriorly below the anterior part of the orbit, as is also seen in
the skull of the holotype.
The holotype skull (Fig. 1) shows a minimum of three maxillary teeth preceding the paired maxillary fangs, and the same is
observed in ZMNH M8727. If this is indeed the natural condition, the anterior process of the maxilla, lining the external
naris laterally, would be edentulous and the premaxillary and
maxillary tooth row would thus be separated by a diastema
that accommodates anterior dentary teeth. The total number
of teeth preserved on the left maxilla amounts to 13, to which
may be added four, possibly five, empty tooth positions (the posterior tip of the maxilla is missing). Tooth implantation is thecodont (sensu Ezcurra 2016). The relatively long anterior maxillary
teeth are distinctly recurved, the shorter posterior maxillary
teeth are straight. All teeth are pointed, the enamel covering distinctly striated towards the apex of the crown. The base of the
teeth reveals deep striations that appear to result from infolding,
thus revealing the presence of plicidentine in Dinocephalosaurus
orientalis. Plicidentine has previously not been established in any
archosauromorph reptile, but is known to occur in ichthyosaurs,
choristoderes, squamates and possibly sauropterygians among
diapsids (Maxwell et al. 2011; Spiekman & Klein 2021). The
morphology of the tooth crowns is very similar to that seen in
Tanystropheus hydroides (Spiekman et al. 2020b). This taxon
similarly possesses fang-like, striated maxillary teeth that are heterogeneous in size. In Tanystropheus hydroides, the maxillary
teeth increase in size until tooth position seven, after which the
size of the teeth gradually decreases until the 15th and terminal
tooth position. However, in contrast to Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, tooth implantation in the maxilla of Tanystropheus hydroides is distinctly subthecodont and there is no plicidentine
infolding at the tooth roots.
The parietal skull table is preserved in ventral view, pierced by
the relatively large pineal foramen located well within the parietal.
The posterolateral (supratemporal) processes of the parietal are
incomplete, however. The irregularly shaped, but essentially triradiate element located next to the parietal skull table most likely
represents a damaged, or incompletely exposed postorbital.
The left pterygoid is well exposed in ventral view (Fig. 5c). It
shows the large, broad, plate-like palatal ramus, which, as mentioned above, is similar in outline to that of Tanystropheus hydroides (Spiekman et al. 2020b), and which dominates the formation
of the nearly closed dermal palate. The transverse posterior margin that defines the anterior margin of the subtemporal fenestra
is nearly straight. The relatively slender quadrate ramus of the
pterygoid curves posterolaterally, forming a concave lateral margin. A distinct notch on the medial margin of the pterygoid,
located at the juncture of the palatine and quadrate rami,
marks the location of the palatobasal articulation. The anterior
end of the palatal ramus of the left pterygoid is crossed over by
the anterior end of the incompletely preserved palatal ramus of
the right pterygoid, its posterior end broken.
Two ossifications are identifiable as representing the quadrates
(Fig. 4b). One is located next to the disarticulated right dentary.
It is a relatively small ossification of irregular pentagonal shape,
its smoothly convex ventral margin forming the mandibular
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
condyle. The other quadrate lies at some distance from the posterior end of the left pterygoid, again showing the same convex
configuration of the mandibular condyle. In contrast to the (presumably) right quadrate, the (presumably) left quadrate is dorsally broadly expanded (Fig. 5d). It lacks the hook-shaped
posterior end of the dorsal head seen in Tanystropheus hydroides,
Tanystropheus longobardicus and allokotosaurs (Flynn et al.
2010; Spiekman et al. 2020b, 2021; Sengupta & Bandyopadhyay
2022). The posterior margin is distinctly concave due to a posterodorsal expansion that terminates in a pointed tip. Much more
expansive is an anterodorsal, deep and flange-like expansion,
forming what looks like an anterodorsal wing of the quadrate.
By comparison to the holotype skull, it appears that the (presumably) left quadrate is associated with incomplete remains
of the squamosal.
The right dentary is beautifully exposed in medial view
(Fig. 5a). It is a slender element that is expanded at its anterior
tip, forming a somewhat fortified mandibular symphysis, which
is similar to the condition seen in Tanystropheus hydroides, albeit
less strongly developed (Spiekman et al. 2020b). A distinct alveolar shelf overhangs Meckel’s canal and carries the dentary teeth.
Posteriorly, the dentary gains somewhat in depth, terminating in
an indented convex margin. The indentations most probably
accommodated the anterior tip of the surangular. A total of 13
complete teeth are preserved on the dentary, an incomplete number. The complete tooth count is difficult to estimate, but could
comprise as many as 20 to 21 teeth. Tooth implantation is thecodont (sensu Ezcurra 2016). The teeth are pointed, covered with
striated enamel apically, and showing indications of resorption
pits and plicidentine infolding on the lingual aspect of the
tooth base. The anteriormost preserved dentary tooth is distinctly recurved, but more anteriorly than in the upper tooth
row the dentary teeth subsequently become upright.
2.4.2. The vertebral column. (Table 1). Two kidney-shaped
ossifications located in front of the axis could represent the
atlas neural arches. The axis is disarticulated but aligned with
the cervical series behind it and it is beautifully exposed in left
lateral view (Fig. 6a). It is distinctly shorter than the third and
subsequent cervical vertebrae. The ventral margin of the centrum is strongly concave in lateral view. At the anterior end of
the centrum the pedicel of the neural arch contributes to the formation of a short yet distinct transverse process that supported
the cervical rib (not preserved). The neurocentral suture is
fused. The prezygapophysis is damaged (incomplete), but the
postzygapophysis is distinct and bears a well-developed epipophysis dorsally. Between the pre- and postzygapophyses the
neural arch shows a slight elevation with a weakly convex dorsal
margin, which is all there is in terms of a rudimentary neural
spine, or rather neural crest. Thus, Dinocephalosaurus orientalis
lacks the anterodorsal expansion of the axial neural spine seen
in tanystropheids (Spiekman et al. 2021).
Behind the axis, the third through to the 18th cervical vertebrae are preserved in an undisturbed, articulated string of vertebrae that is bent backwards. The morphology of the cervical
vertebrae is generally very similar throughout this section of
the neck (Fig. 6b, c). The vertebrae are distinctly elongated,
increasing in length all the way up to the 18th cervical vertebra,
the last one preserved in articulation. The ventral margin of the
centrum is distinctly concave in lateral view, similar to that seen
in Augustaburiania vatagini (Sennikov 2011). The articular facets
for the cervical ribs are located closely together, low on the centrum near its anterior margin. The neurocentral suture is obliterated. The postzygapophysis is slender and underlain by the more
massively built prezygapophysis, the latter terminating in a deep,
rounded (anteriorly convex) tip. Dorsal to the postzygapophysis,
a pronounced, slender and lateromedially narrow epipophysis is
present, which extends posteriorly beyond the articular facet of
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
11
Table 1 Length and height of the cervical vertebrae, specimens ZMNH M8727, IVPP V13898, IVPP V0666, and ZMNH M8752. Abbreviation: CV =
cervical vertebra. The length was measured across the ventral margin of the centrum; the height was measured across mid-centrum and includes the neural
crest. All measurements are in mm. The measurements of ZMNH M8752 are approximate only, which is due to the tight articulation between vertebrae, as
well as to the cervical ribs often obscuring the ventral margin of the centrum. Superscripts: 1 = estimate; 2 = incomplete element; 3 = element is missing
part of the centrum, but the ventral limit of the bone can be accurately measured from the impression of the bone in the matrix; 4 = includes a fine crack
running through the element; 5 = element partially crushed and distorted; 6 = element minimally obscured along the margin; 7 = unclear where the
articulation between the centra lies. Combined length of centra 25 + 26 is 189.
ZMNH M8727
Element
Atlas
Axis
CV 3
CV 4
CV 5
CV 6
CV 7
CV 8
CV 9
CV 10
CV 11
CV 12
CV 13
CV 14
CV 15
CV 16
CV 17
CV 18
CV 19
CV 20
CV 21
CV 22
CV 23
CV 24
CV 25
CV 26
CV 27
CV 28
CV 29
CV 30
CV 31
CV 32
Length
–
24
–
51.9
63.9
72.7
78.2
81
88
90.01
84.41
87.4
93.3
93.01
96.5
100.5
101.2
111
–
–
–
112.5
–
109
91.57
89.57
85
502
–
–
40.1
–
Height
–
21.8
–
14.8
16
14.9
17
17.6
19.2
20
21.9
23
21.7
–
22.3
23.9
24
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
IVPP V13898
Length
–
21
35
46
53.5
62.5
66
65
69
68
74
75
78
85
84
91
941
96
901
801
821
76
70
64
55
48
45
42
–
–
–
–
Height
–
20
13
143
13
14
14
15
17
17.5
19
18
20
21.5
21
19
21
22
24
221
30
34
36.5
38
35
35
38
–
–
–
–
–
postzygapophysis, as in the long-necked tanystropheids Tanystropheus spp., Amotosaurus rotfeldensis, Raibliania calligarisi,
Augustaburiania vatagini and Fuyuansaurus acutirostris (Spiekman et al. 2021). The neural spine is represented by a low neural
crest with a weakly concave dorsal margin that dorsally expands
between the pre- and postzygapophysis, which is similar to the
condition seen in Amotosaurus rotfeldensis and Augustaburiania
vatagini (Fraser & Rieppel 2006; Sennikov 2011). The cervical
neural spines do not bear mammillary processes, nor are they
transversely expanded distally to form a spine table, in contrast
to several archosauromorph taxa, including certain tanystropheids (Pritchard et al. 2015; Ezcurra 2016; Scheyer et al. 2020;
Spiekman et al. 2021). Generally, this neural crest becomes progressively more distinctly developed in an antero-posterior gradation within this articulated series of cervical vertebrae.
Behind the series of 18 articulated cervical vertebrae a set of
six partially or fully disarticulated cervical vertebrae is located,
which retain the distinctly elongated morphology. Of these,
four elements continue the string of the 18 articulated elements
across an area damaged by breakage. Two elements are fully disarticulated and oriented at an angle relative to the long axis of
the articulated cervical column. Within this set of six cervical
vertebrae, an increasingly more prominent development of the
neural crest is the only distinctive feature that distinguishes
them from more anterior cervical vertebrae. The neural crest is
most prominently developed in a vertebra that is fully
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
IVPP V0666
Length
1
12.0
272
38.5
51.84
63.5
65.7
69.9
70.9
51.52
–
71.02
84.2
86.5
87.8
88.4
87.2
82.3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Height
–
23.5
19.3
20.34
18.4
19
19.5
21.2
21.2
–
25.4
24.7
26.8
28.6
31.6
32.8
37
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
ZMNH M8752
Length
–
–
partially exposed
37.6
46
49.55
56.55
–
–
76.04
71.5
86.04
65
80.07
84.07
86.07
94.07
93.07
93.07
94.07
93.07
94.07
–
–
–
70.06
66.56
–
–
–
–
–
Height
–
–
–
13.1
12.1
9.05
13.6
–
16.4
15.06
–
–
19.7
18.5
21.2
20.1
18.6
20.5
19.4
19.8
21.3
19.9
–
–
31
36.5
38.05
38
–
–
–
–
disarticulated and dislocated, lying somewhat to the side with
its postzygapophysis pointing in an anterior direction relative
to the whole skeleton. By virtue of its well-developed neural
crest, this element is identified as the 24th cervical (Fig. 6c).
The 25th to the 28th cervical vertebrae again form an articulated
series, preserved in reverse orientation relative to the anterior series of the 18 articulated cervical vertebrae. The 28th cervical is
incompletely preserved, whereas the neural crest on the 27th cervical is either incompletely preserved or incompletely exposed.
The 25th and 26th cervical vertebrae document a further elaboration of the neural crest, which gains in height particularly in its
posterior part, and acquires a more pronounced convex dorsal
margin.
With reference to other specimens of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis to be described below, more posterior cervical vertebrae are
known to be much shorter in length compared to the preceding
cervical vertebrae and to approach the morphology of anterior
dorsal elements. A string of nine shortened but otherwise incompletely exposed posterior cervical vertebrae and/or anterior dorsal vertebrae lies in front of the preserved elements of the pectoral
girdle. On the basis of associated relatively short posterior cervical ribs, four out of the string of nine vertebrae in front of
the elements of the pectoral girdle are identified as shortened
posterior cervical vertebrae. The next element in the series is
overlain by a dorsal rib, which might have been associated with
it. It is therefore counted as one out of five anterior dorsal
12
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Figure 6 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, ZMNH M8727, interpretative drawings of selected postcranial elements. (a) Axis in left lateral view. (b) Sixth
cervical vertebra in left lateral view. (c) Posterior cervical vertebra (between 18th and 24th) in right lateral view. (d) Anterior dorsal vertebra in anterior
view. (e) Right scapula in medial view. (f) Both coracoids, right coracoid in medial view and left coracoid in lateral view. Abbreviations: c = centrum;
co.dex = right coracoid; co.sin = left coracoid; gl.f = glenoid facet; ncr = neural crest; poz = postzygapophysis; prz = prezygapophysis; sc = scapula
blade; tr.p = transverse process.
vertebrae preserved in the series. Including the atlas and the axis,
the vertebral count for the cervical region is thus a string of 18
fully articulated elements that includes the atlas and axis, two dislocated elongated elements, another section of four articulated
elongated elements of which the last one is the 28th cervical,
and a minimum of four shortened, posteriormost cervical vertebrae, which amounts to a total of 32 cervical vertebrae.
The cervical ribs are typical of non-crocopodan archosauromorphs, much elongated and aligned parallel to the ventrolateral
margin of the cervical series of vertebrae. A distinct, free-ending
anterior process projects beyond the articular head of the rib.
The latter is oriented at a right angle to the shaft of the rib and
articulates on a facet located low on the centrum near the latter’s
anterior margin. As preserved, the cervical ribs are deflected
away from the posteriorly bent neck (Fig. 4). In their natural
orientation, ribs associated with the fourth cervical vertebra
would have bridged three successive intervertebral joints; the
rib associated with the eighth cervical would have bridged five
successive intervertebral joints; the rib associated with the 13th
cervical would also have bridged five succeeding intervertebral
joints. Cervical ribs extend the length of two or more cervical vertebrae in Protorosaurus speneri, Pectodens zhenyuensis and most
tanystropheids, except for Tanytrachelos ahynis and
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
Langobardisaurus pandolfii, which have relatively shorter cervical
ribs (Spiekman et al. 2021). In the posterior part of the cervical
vertebral column, where the vertebrae become shorter, the cervical ribs likewise become shorter, and at the same time more
massively built, as is also the case in tanystropheids.
Partially overlapping the laterodorsal aspect of the (articulated) 18th cervical is a disarticulated anterior dorsal vertebra
that is beautifully exposed in anterior view (Fig. 6d). The entire
height of the element, from the ventral margin of the centrum to
the tip of the neural spine, is 73.1 mm; the total width across the
transverse processes is 85 mm. The height of the centrum alone is
34.7 mm and its width is 33.9 mm. The articular surface of the
centrum is of rounded circumference, amphicoelous, and the
centrum is non-notochordal. The neural canal is of rectangular
contours, the massive prezygapophyses projecting from its dorsal
margin. A distinct neural spine, which is not transversely
expanded distally, rises up from the neural arch behind the prezygapophyses. Laterally, the neural arch is developed into deep
transverse processes. Their tall distal articular surface faces
ventrolaterally. In Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, the transverse
processes of the posteriormost cervical vertebrae and anterior
dorsal vertebrae are very distinctively differentiated in that
their anterior surface is deeply excavated (concave) and their
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
posterior surface correspondingly convex in lateral view (see
below). The dorsal surface is flat, the anterodorsal margin forming an overhanging shelf. A second anterior dorsal is incompletely exposed in the area between the 18th and 27th cervical.
A number of disarticulated dorsal ribs are preserved, scattered
across the specimen (Fig. 4). They are evenly curved and show a
slight distal expansion. Their proximal articular head is distinctly expanded to match the articular surface on the tall transverse process of the dorsal vertebrae. In addition to the cervical
and dorsal ribs, scattered gastral ribs are likewise preserved. Generally slender and of delicate structure, they display two different
morphologies. The medioventrally located elements are slightly
angulated and taper to a fine tip on both sides. The collateral elements are weakly but evenly curved, terminating in a blunt tip
proximally and in a finely pointed tip distally. Although disarticulated, the dense accumulation of gastralia suggests they
formed a tightly bundled gastral basket.
2.4.3. The pectoral girdle and forelimb. Of the elements of
the pectoral girdle, both coracoids are preserved lying next to
one another (Fig. 6f). They form kidney-shaped plate-like elements 77 mm long (left coracoid) and 51 mm deep (right coracoid). A well-demarcated peduncle carries the ventral part of the
glenoid facet. The coracoid foramen is located below and somewhat in front of this glenoid ‘process’. The right scapula is dislocated but fully exposed (Fig. 6e). Again, a kidney-shaped
plate-like element 98 mm long and 63.5 mm deep, it carries a
glenoid ‘peduncle’ or ‘process’ that, together with its counterpart
on the coracoid, completes the glenoid facet. A kidney-shaped
scapulawith a semicircular scapular blade is typical of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, Pectodens zhenyuensis and tanystropheids
among archosauromorphs (Spiekman et al. 2021), and it is absent
in other archosauromorphs, including the non-crocopodans Protorosaurus speneri and Prolacerta broomi (Gottmann-Quesada
& Sander 2009; Spiekman 2018). The shape of the anterior margins of both the scapula and coracoid suggests that a scapulocoracoidal fenestra, as is present in tanystropheids, is absent in
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis. This observation is corroborated in
IVPP V20295, which preserves an articulated scapulacoracoid
(see below). The left scapula is only partially exposed, but its posteroventral portion protrudes from below the left coracoid. The
anterior part is developed into a broad plate, the exact contours
of which remain concealed by the overlapping coracoid. Posteriorly, the element appears to extend into a robust posterior stem
that tapers to a blunt tip. A broken curved ossification located
near the left coracoid could represent an incomplete clavicle, but
it could also be a fragment of a dorsal rib.
Both the left and the right humeri are well preserved and exposed
(Fig. 4). They are slightly curved elements which, due to skeletal
paedomorphosis, show little morphological differentiation. An
entepicondylar foramen is absent. The ectepicondylar groove is
shallow, with a weakly expressed ectepicondylar notch at its distal
end. Only a fragment of the distal end of the left radius is preserved.
Of the left ulna, only the distinctly expanded proximal part is
exposed. The right zeugopodium is more completely preserved
and exposed, although overlying ribs again obscure parts of the elements. The proximal end of the ulna is more distinctly expanded
than that of the radius, whereas distally the radius is more massively built than the ulna. A total of seven rounded carpal ossifications are scattered across the slab distal to the stylopodial and
zeugopodial elements, as are five, possibly six, metacarpals and a
numberof phalanges (Fig. 4). These autopodial elements evidently
derive from both hands. Their disarticulation and incompleteness
do not allow a reconstruction of the structure of the manus.
2.5. Referred specimen, ZMNH M8728
(Figure 7). The exposed parts of the skeleton comprise a partially
preserved skull exposed in right lateral view; the cervical and
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
13
most of the dorsal vertebral column represented by 56 vertebrae
preserved in articulation (32 cervical vertebrae and 23 dorsal vertebrae), cervical and dorsal ribs; elements of both pectoral girdles and forelimbs; and the gastral rib basket. The posterior
part of the dorsal column, sacrum, pelvic girdles and hindlimbs,
as well as the tail, are missing (Fig. 7).
2.5.1. The skull and mandible. The incompletely preserved
right side of the skull and the right mandible are preserved in
articulation. The body of the right premaxilla shows five tooth
positions with the first four teeth preserved in situ and the fifth
tooth being broken. The third premaxillary tooth is the largest,
given that the fourth tooth position shows an erupting replacement tooth. The tooth crown is recurved and pointed, covered
by striated enamel towards the apex. Behind the premaxilla
extends a strip of bone that represents the partially preserved
and exposed maxilla; the maxillary tooth row is not preserved
or exposed, except for two alveolar sockets located at the level
of the anterior margin of the orbit. A gap located behind the
body of the premaxilla, separating the preserved/exposed part
of the maxilla from a sheet of bone that represents the nasal,
most probably corresponds to the antorbital recess. Posterior
to the maxilla and nasal lies a well-defined, vertically oriented,
semi-lunar prefrontal with a strongly convex anterior margin,
and a concave posterior margin that defines the anterior margin
of the orbit, which is typical of early archosauromorphs, including tanystropheids (e.g., Flynn et al. 2010; Miedema et al. 2020;
Spiekman et al. 2020b). Crushed and distorted parts of the parietal skull table, involving the frontal and parietal, are exposed at
the dorsal margin of the skull above the orbital and temporal
region. Crushed bone fragments, which are posterodorsally
located and offer no anatomical detail, most probably represent
remains of the braincase. The right pterygoid is very well preserved (Fig. 8b) and exposed below the posterior part of the maxilla, the orbit and the temporal region. The palatine ramus of the
pterygoid can be seen reaching far forward to a level well in front
of the prefrontal, although its further anterior extent disappears
below the remains of the maxilla. The prominent and rounded
transverse process is deflected ventrally as a consequence of distortion, and exhibits a strongly rugose lateral surface, which is
similar to that seen in Tanystropheus hydroides (Spiekman et al.
2020b). The quadrate process of the pterygoid is revealed to be
rather deep in lateral view. It terminates in a tall posterior edge
that has separated from the crushed quadrate lying behind it.
Within the area of the orbit, behind the posterior end of the
exposed part of the maxilla and located right at the base of the
palatine ramus of the pterygoid, lie a couple of trapezoid-shaped
ossifications, their lateral margins slightly convex. Given their
intact preservation and location, these elements are identified
as ectopterygoids.
The right mandibular ramus is preserved in right lateral view
(Fig. 8a); from below it emerges the lower margin of the left mandibular ramus, with the left dentary sheared off and exposed ventrally. The anterior tip of the dentary is slightly broadened to
form a fortified mandibular symphysis. The largest dentary
teeth, four in number, follow two or three much smaller anterior
dentary teeth. The four enlarged dentary teeth would thus come
to lie in between the premaxillary and the maxillary fangs. The
dentary tooth row is not completely preserved, but with 14 complete and incomplete dentary teeth preserved in situ, a total of
19–21 tooth positions can be assumed. While the enlarged anterior dentary teeth are still somewhat recurved, those located
behind them are straight upright. Again, the dentary teeth are
pointed, their enamel covering striated towards the apex of the
crown. Some of the more posteriorly located dentary teeth
show plicidentine infolding at their base. If any coronoid process
were developed it could form a weak elevation only, obscured by
the overlapping transverse process of the pterygoid. A
14
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Figure 7 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, ZMNH M8728 (referred specimen). (a) Photograph. (b) Interpretative drawing. Abbreviations: cl = clavicle; co =
coracoid; co-sc = articulated coracoid and scapula; cr = cervical rib; cv = cervical vertebra; hu = humerus; ns = neural spine; ra = radius; ul = ulna.
retroarticular process is again confirmed to be reduced in size.
Sutural details are hardly identifiable except for the partial posterior delimitation of the dentary. What looks like a sinuously
curved crack in the postdentary part of the mandible might
represent the natural separation of the dorsally located surangular from the ventrally located angular.
2.5.2. The vertebral column. (Table 2). The atlas is not identifiable and the axis is only partially exposed, crushed between
the posterior end of the right mandibular ramus and bone fragments that most probably represent remnants of the braincase.
But from the third cervical vertebra on backwards, the entire
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
cervical and most of the dorsal region is beautifully preserved
in articulation (with a break between cervical 23 and cervical
24), and exposed in right lateral view (Fig. 7). Cervical vertebrae
3 through to 28 show the elongated morphology also characteristic of the other specimens of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis. The
length of the centrum increases steadily from cervical vertebra 3
to cervical vertebra 23, behind which it decreases again more rapidly. Up to cervical vertebra 24, the ventral margin of the centrum is strongly concave in lateral view, which gives the
impression of a markedly expanded anterior and posterior intervertebral articular facet. The articular facets for the cervical ribs
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
15
Figure 8 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, ZMNH M8728, interpretative drawings of selected elements. (a) Right mandibular ramus in lateral view. (b) Right
pterygoid in lateral view. (c) Posterior cervical vertebrae and anteriormost dorsal vertebra (cv26–do.v1) in right lateral view. (d) Mid-dorsal vertebrae in right
lateral view. (e) Right forelimb, as preserved. (f) Left forelimb, as preserved. Abbreviations: ang = angular; ar = articular; c = centrum; cv = cervical vertebra;
d = dentary; dc = distal carpal; do.v = dorsal vertebra; hu = humerus; int = intermedium; mc = metacarpal; ncr = neural crest; ns = neural spine; pl.p.pt =
palatine process of the pterygoid; poz = postzygapophysis; prz = prezygapophysis; q.p.pt = quadrate process of the pterygoid; sang = surangular; sym = symphysis; tr.p = transverse process; tr.p.pt = transverse process of the pterygoid; ra = radius; rad = radiale; ul = ulna; uln = ulnare.
lie low on the centrum near its anterior margin. The prezygapophysis is again shorter and more massively built than the postzygapophyses, the latter bearing prominent epipophyses that
extend beyond the posterior margin of the centrum as it tapers
to a pointed tip. Up to cervical vertebra 24, the neural crest is
extremely shallow, its concave dorsal margin resulting in weakly
expressed anterior and posterior dorsal projections located
between the pre- and postzygapophyses respectively. The neurocentral suture is fused; there is no indication that the vertebral
centra would be hollow, as they are in Tanystropheus (Wild
1973; Spiekman et al. 2020b).
A transition in the morphology of the cervical vertebrae starts
with cervical 26 (Fig. 8c). Somewhat shorter already (see
Table 5), the vertebra gains in depth, the ventral margin of the
centrum being less concave in lateral view, the neural crest
more prominently developed and with a straight dorsal margin.
Posteriorly, the neural crest develops into a posterior projection
that overhangs the zygapophyseal articulation. Pre- and postzygapophyses are more symmetrically developed, projecting less
beyond the anterior and posterior margins of the centrum than
in more anteriorly located cervical vertebrae. In
cervical vertebra 27, the same trend of morphological transformation continues, culminating in cervical vertebra 28, which again
has diminished in length compared to the directly preceding vertebrae. The central margin of the centrum is only slightly concave
in lateral view; the neural crest is rather prominently developed
with a distinctly convexdorsal margin, and it carries a posterior
projection that extends well beyond the zygapophyseal articulation. In addition, the diapophysis, which in preceding cervical
vertebrae was positioned directly adjacent to the parapophysis
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
near the anteroventral end of the centrum, has shifted dorsally
onto about the mid-height of the centrum.
Further modifications occur in more posterior cervical vertebrae as these lead up to the anterior dorsal vertebrae (Fig. 8c).
The length of the centrum decreases rapidly, whereas its depth
increases, such that the centrum of cervical vertebra 32 has
acquired the proportions characteristic of dorsal vertebrae. The
ventral margin of the centrum becomes more pronouncedly concave again in lateral view. The articular facets for the cervical rib
are increased (to match the size of the articular heads of the short
and more massively built cervical rib), with the diapophysis
being positioned further dorsally, possibly being placed partially
on the neural arch, and a laterally projecting crest develops that
runs from the diapophysis backwards along the length of the centrum. Pre-and postzygapophyses are symmetrically developed,
and between them rises up a prominent yet slender, curved,
finger-like neural spine pointing posterodorsally, which is a
morphology that is apparently unique among early archosauromorphs. The 32rd presacral vertebra can be identified as a
cervical based on its position distinctly anterior to the pectoral
and its short associated rib that is oriented mostly posterior
and slightly ventral to the vertebral column (i.e., a rib that therefore does not contribute to the rib cage of the trunk). The 36th
presacral vertebra can be identified as a dorsal element, as it is
associated with a dorsal rib (i.e., a rib that curves ventrolaterally
from its head to contribute to the rib cage). The 33rd presacral
vertebra has only a partial rib associated with it, whereas no
ribs are preserved in association with the 34th and 35th presacral
vertebrae, and these elements might be considered transitional
elements.
16
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Table 2 Length and height of the presacral vertebrae, specimens IVPP V20295 and ZMNH M8728. Abbreviations: CV = cervical vertebra; PSV =
presacral vertebra. The length was measured across the ventral margin of the centrum; the height was measured across mid-centrum and includes the
neural crest. All measurements are in mm. Superscripts: 1 = not completely exposed; 2 = dorsals 5 and 6 are slightly distorted; 3 = element marginally
obscured; 4 = approximate length as the element is broken.
IVPP V20295
Element
Atlas
Axis
CV 3
CV 4
CV 5
CV 6
CV 7
CV 8
CV 9
CV 10
CV 11
CV 12
CV 13
CV 14
CV 15
CV 16
CV 17
CV 18
CV 19
CV 20
CV 21
CV 22
CV 23
CV 24
CV 25
CV 26
CV 27
CV 28
CV 29
CV 30
CV 31
CV 32
Length
–
23.6
40
54.4
–
–
69.8
69.6
73.3
74.7
74.5
76.5
77.4
77.3
84.1
84.6
88.5
89.9
90.2
89
–
–
–
–
–
67.4
57.3
45.6
–
–
–
–
Height
–
23.9
19.3
19.8
20.3
20.5
20.1
21.7
20.7
23.6
25
24
25
25
–
25.2
26.1
25.4
26.2
28.3
31.7
38.7
–
–
–
43
49.5
54.2
54.4
–
–
–
ZMNH M8728
Length
Height
–
24.11
38.9
50.5
59.5
69.4
79.2
78.5
82.1
84.5
86
82.04
–
89.54
90.6
92.1
98.3
100.21
97.2
100.6
110.7
105.53
115.81
105.7
99.8
92.3
82.9
73.51
63.8
50.5
37.6
38.5
–
16.5
17.5
17.8
17.6
17.9
18.7
18.3
18
21.5
22
24.6
25
25.2
26.9
25.2
26.7
26.4
26.2
27.4
28.2
29.5
32.5
28.1
43.8
48.8
48.4
49.5
55.4
60.9
60.2
60.6
The anterior cervical ribs are much elongated, their shaft
aligned along the long axis of the cervical vertebral column
(Fig. 7). The rectangular articular heads, which are set parallel
to each other, are oriented at a right angle relative to the long
axis of the shaft, and the cervical rib terminates anteriorly in
an elongate free-ending, anterior process. The ribs associated
with cervical vertebrae 3 and 4 are clearly identifiable, which
leaves the shafts of a total of four cervical ribs bridging the intervertebral joint between axis and cervical 3. This confirms that the
first pair of cervical ribs articulated on the atlas. It is noteworthy
that the shaft of these anteriormost cervical ribs is much elongated already, as its posterior tip lies behind the intervertebral
joint between cervical 3 and 4. Towards the middle and more
posterior parts of the neck, cervical ribs may bridge up to five
or six intervertebral joints. The last of these slender, much elongated cervical ribs, articulating with cervical vertebra 27 and –
possibly – cervical vertebra 28, terminate posteriorly just in
front of, or below, cervical vertebra 32 and the first dorsal vertebra. Starting with cervical vertebra 29, the cervical ribs undergo
a characteristic modification, which also occurs in other longnecked archosauromorphs like Tanystropheus spp. and Tanytrachelos ahynis (Olsen 1979; Rieppel et al. 2010): they become
much more robustly built and shorter. The articular head
increases in relative size, as does the free-ending anterior process,
while the posteriorly extending shaft is short, distinctly curved,
and terminating in a pointed tip.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
IVPP V20295
ZMNH M8728
Element
Length
Height
Length
Height
PSV 33
PSV 34
PSV 35
PSV 36
PSV 37
PSV 38
PSV 39
PSV 40
PSV 41
PSV 42
PSV 43
PSV 44
PSV 45
PSV 46
PSV 47
PSV 48
PSV 49
PSV 50
PSV 51
PSV 52
PSV 53
PSV 54
PSV 55
PSV 56
PSV 57
PSV 58
PSV 59
PSV 60
PSV 61
PSV 62
–
–
–
33.4
34.7
29.02
28.52
–
–
33.4
–
–
–
–
41.2
–
–
33.6
29.3
–
31.3
31.4
–
–
–
33.1
29.8
30.9
30.6
30.6
–
–
–
–
–
57.9
60.2
–
–
64.8
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
63.9
64.8
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
37.5
36.8
–
35.5
32
–
–
34.4
31.9
32.6
32
34.7
31.7
–
–
33.2
31.6
31.3
30.8
30.9
29.23
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
61.53
–
–
55.9
54.8
–
–
51.53
62.7
61.2
60
61.1
62.3
64.3
63
62
62.3
64.1
63.4
60.6
55.2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
A string of 21 dorsal vertebrae is preserved, the last one in the
series only incompletely so. The centra of the dorsal vertebrae are
both laterally and ventrally strongly constricted (Fig. 8d). The
neural arch of the dorsal vertebrae is very robust, being in that
regard more similar to that seen in sauropterygians than that
of archosauromorphs (Rieppel 2000; Ezcurra 2016; Spiekman
et al. 2021). Pre- and postzygapophyses are symmetrically differentiated and do not project far beyond the anterior and posterior
margins of the centrum. The well-developed transverse processes
are of a rather peculiar morphology: they are very tall in their
dorso-ventral dimension, but slender in their antero-posterior
dimension. Their anterior surface is deeply excavated or concave,
which translates into a prominently convex posterior surface. As
was described above, cervical vertebrae 29 through to 32 develop
a prominent neural spine that forms a slender, posterodorsally
curving projection. With presacral vertebra 33 begins a reduction
in the relative size of the neural spine that continues through to
the 40th and 41st presacral vertebra. Further posteriorly, the
development of the neural spine becomes more prominent
again, now assuming rectangular contours in lateral view.
Their anterior and posterior margin is slightly concave in lateral
view, whereas their dorsal margin is either straight or slightly
convex. The dorsal ribs are evenly curved and show a slight distal
expansion. Their proximal articular head is much expanded into
a triangular structure that matches the height of the transverse
processes.
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
The gastral rib basket is well preserved, albeit mostly disarticulated (Fig. 7). Some of the gastral ribs retain their natural configuration, however, showing that each gastral rib is composed of
three elements, an angulated medioventral one, the apex pointing
forwards, and one collateral element on either side, forming an
overlapping contact. The collateral elements are slender, pointed
at both ends, and weakly curved dorsally in their lateral part. The
gastral basket was clearly tightly bunched.
2.5.3. The pectoral girdle and forelimb. Despite the pectoral
girdle of ZMNH M8728 being otherwise complete and the entire
skeleton being largely in articulation, an interclavicle is not preserved, nor is it in any other known specimen of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis. This suggests that an ossified interclavicle was
probably absent in this taxon, as is also the case in Tanystropheus
spp. and Ozimek volans (Spiekman et al. 2021). The right clavicle
is broken across the transition from the cervical to the dorsal vertebral column. The anterior (medial) part of the left clavicle protrudes from below the right scapula (Fig. 7). The clavicle is an
evenly curved, blade-like element, with its anterior (medial)
end slightly set off by a weak constriction. The right scapulocoracoid is well preserved and exposed in articulation; it overlaps,
and thus partly obscures, the left scapulocoracoid. The right coracoid forms a kidney-shaped element with the dorsal ‘glenoid
process’ located in its posterodorsal part. The coracoid foramen
is located just anteroventral to this ‘glenoid process’, and it is
fully enclosed by bone. The length of the coracoid is 93 mm
and its depth is 47 mm. The scapula again forms a kidney-shaped
element with a ‘glenoid process’ located at its anterior end, which
together with its counterpart from the coracoid completes the
glenoid facet. The length of the right scapula is about 82 mm
and its depth is 67.8 mm.
The right humerus is well preserved and exposed (Figs 7, 8e);
the distal end of the left humerus protrudes from below the two
coracoids and passes below the distal end of the right humerus.
In ZMNH M8728, the (right) humerus is a rather straight element, unlike in ZMNH M8727, where it appears curved. Possibly,
this is the result of the angle under which the elements are exposed,
which cannot be discerned confidently due to the lack of observable features (attributable to paedomorphosis). Its proximal and
distal ends are expanded, which results in a biconcave shaft. Little
morphological detail is differentiated or identifiable. An entepicondylar foramen is absent. The ectepicondylar groove and (distal) notch are weakly expressed. Both the right and the left
zeugopodium are well preserved and exposed (Fig. 8e, f). The
radius and ulna are subequal in length, the ulna being just a bit
shorter than the radius (see Table 3). The radius is a bit more
robustly built than the ulna. It is expanded proximally as well as
distally to a similar degree, which results in a biconcave shaft.
The concavity of the postaxial margin of the shaft, defining the
spatium interosseum, is more pronounced than the concavity of
the preaxial margin of the shaft. The ulna is markedly expanded
proximally but only weakly expanded distally. An ossified olecranon is absent. The preaxial margin, defining the spatium interosseum, is concave; its preaxial margin is rather straight instead, with
a weak concavity expressed at the distal end.
Five carpal ossifications are preserved in the right manus
(Fig. 8e) and six in the left autopodium (Fig. 8f). In both
hands, there are three proximal carpal ossifications, and two versus three distal carpal ossifications, respectively. In the right
manus, the irregularly polygonically shaped proximal carpals
are preserved in articulation (sutural contact) and comprise the
radiale (maximum exposed length: left, 19.2 mm; right, 19.6
mm), intermedium (left, 21 mm; right, 20.7 mm) and ulnare
(left, 13,6 mm; right, 15.2 mm). Of those, the intermedium is
the largest and the ulnare the smallest. In the distal carpal row
of the right hand, a distinctly larger element lies in a preaxial position relative to the smaller distal carpal located postaxially. The
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
17
Table 3 Length and width of the individual forelimb elements in the
four specimens preserving the forelimbs, ZMNH M8727, ZMNH
M8728, ZMNH M8752 and IVPP V20295. Abbreviations: L = length;
PW = proximal width; MW = minimal width; DW = distal width. All
measurements are in mm.
ZMNH
M8727
Right humerus
Left humerus
Right ulna
Left ulna
Right radius
Left radius
Left metacarpal I
Right metacarpal I
Left metacarpal II
Right metacarpal II
Left metacarpal III
Right metacarpal III
Left metacarpal IV
Right metacarpal IV
Left metacarpal V
Right metacarpal V
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
121.4
27.5
23.6
30.0
124.5
25.2
21.2
26.1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
ZMNH ZMNH
M8728 M8752
127.5
33.5
∼19.0
29.0
83.5
31.5
–
30.0
–
–
–
–
82.0
28.5
–
30.0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
21.0
20.6
31.2
30.8
33.6
35.0
33.0
34.4
20.0
22.0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
71.0
27.5
–
17.8
–
–
–
–
73.0
28.8
10.6
27.5
17.5
∼20.0
27.8
26.7
32.3
∼28.6
30.4
29.8
–
18.4
IVPP
V20295
125.0
29.8
21.6
30.9
–
–
21.3
28.5
89.5
26.4
4.6
18.2
–
–
–
–
83.3
30.2
12.4
26.5
87.2
28.5
12.5
25.3
26.0
25.4
34.8
–
35.8
–
–
36.8
25.1
24.0
same two distal carpals of similar relative size can be identified in
the left manus, where the larger preaxially located element lies
proximal to metacarpal II. The somewhat smaller postaxially
located element is situated proximal to metacarpal IV, albeit a
bit removed from it. A much smaller third distal carpal is located
in between the two aforementioned elements, situated proximal
to metacarpal III. This latter element has been lost or failed to
ossify in the right manus. In ZMNH M8728, there are thus
three distal carpals ossified, of which dcII is the largest, dcIII
the smallest, and dcIV is intermediate in size.
Of the five metacarpals (Fig. 8e, f), the first through to the
fourth are relatively elongated, slender elements with a biconcave
shaft. Amongst them, the third and the fourth are the longest.
The fifth metacarpal is distinctly shorter, approximately of the
same length as the first metacarpal, but more sturdily built.
The phalangeal count is 1–2–4–5–1 in both hands and only the
digits III and IV terminate in an element that is clearly identifiable as an ungual. It thus appears that the more distal phalanges
in digits I, II and V were absent or did not ossify. There is no indication of a juvenile status of this specimen, since it is of respectable adult size, and this limited phalangeal count probably
represents a paedomorphism related to aquatic adaptation.
2.6. Referred specimen, ZMNH M8752
(Figure 9). This is one of the more complete specimens of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis available for study. It comprises the skull
18
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Figure 9 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, ZMNH M8752 (referred specimen). (a) Photograph. (b) Interpretative drawing. Abbreviations: as = astragalum;
ca = calcaneum; ca.v = caudal vertebra; cl = clavicle; co = coracoid; cv = cervical vertebra; do.v = dorsal vertebra; dt = distal tarsal; fib = fibula; hu =
humerus; in = intermedium; mand = mandible; ra = radius; sc = scapula; tib = tibia.
and mandible, neck, trunk and complete tail, ribs, gastral ribs,
pectoral girdle and forelimbs as well as pelvic girdle and hindlimbs (Fig. 9). Measurements allow the assessment of the relative body proportions of this specimen, which are: skull, 16 cm;
neck, 234 cm; trunk (including the sacrum), 100 cm; tail, 160 cm;
total length, 510 cm. The neck is thus shown to be more than
twice as long as the trunk and the tail more than 1.5 times as
long as the trunk.
2.6.1. The skull and mandible. The skull and mandible are
preserved in articulation and exposed in left lateral view. Preservation is such, however, that little anatomical detail is discernible. The tip of the snout is deflected to the left so as to expose
the premaxillae in anterior view. As a consequence, a left and a
right premaxillary fang embrace the tip of the left mandible.
On the dorsal surface of the rostrum, the anterior end of the
antorbital recess is particularly well exposed on the left side,
lined medially by the very elongate posterior (nasal) process of
the premaxilla. The remainder of the skull is preserved as a
crushed mass of bone, with the isolated left squamosal rotated
and exposed anterodorsal to the well-preserved and welldelineated left quadrate. The latter shows a broad expansion of
the cephalic condyle atop a relatively slender shaft. The quadrate
is only weakly concave posteriorly. Little morphological detail is
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
again discernible on the mandible. As in other specimens of
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, the dentary is somewhat expanded
anteriorly as it participates in the formation of a reinforced mandibular symphysis. There is no indication of a coronoid process.
The way the specimen is preserved suggests the presence of a
large, posteroventrally deflected retroarticular process, but
since such is absent in other specimens of Dinocephalosaurus
orientalis, this appearance must be due to breakage and deformation, and a dislocation of the left mandible and left quadrate
relative to one another.
Three teeth are preserved in situ on the left premaxilla, of
which the anterior two form premaxillary fangs. A total of 15
teeth are preserved in situ on the left maxilla, of which the anterior four are distinctly larger than the succeeding maxillary teeth.
The largest maxillary fang is the fourth tooth preserved in the
tooth row, behind which the maxillary teeth gradually decrease
in size. A total of at least 12 dentary teeth can be counted as preserved in situ, of which three enlarged anterior fangs are located
in between the posteriormost preserved premaxillary tooth and
the anteriormost preserved maxillary tooth. This again suggests
a diastema in the upper tooth row in the area of the relatively
slender anterior process of the maxilla that lines the lateral margin of the anterior end of the antorbital recess housing the
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
external naris. It appears possible, however, that a much smaller
maxillary tooth located in front of the anterior maxillary fangs is
largely concealed by the third dentary fang. The large anterior
fang-like teeth are only weakly recurved if at all, and the more
posterior teeth are upright. All teeth are pointed, the enamel surface striated apically. Especially in the larger teeth, plicidentine
infolding is apparent at the base of the tooth.
2.6.2. The vertebral column. (Table 1). The atlas and axis are
not exposed in ZMNH M8752. The elongated and slender third
cervical vertebra protrudes from below the left mandible. Starting with cervical vertebra 3, the cervical vertebral column is
well preserved and exposed in left lateral view in an articulated
series up to cervical vertebra 28 (Fig. 9). The general morphology of the cervical vertebrae is again very similar to that
observed in other specimens of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis.
The cervical vertebrae 23 through to 25 are broken and incompletely preserved, but the neck vertebrae in front of that break
are longer and more delicately built than vertebrae 26 to 28.
The first 20 cervical vertebrae are elongated and slender, with a
very shallow neural crest that retains a concave dorsal margin
in lateral view. This results in antero- and posterodorsal neural
crest projections located in between the pre- and postzygapophyses respectively. The epipophyses dorsal to the postzygapophyses form a distinct, slender, posterior projection capping
the more sturdily built prezygapophyses as they extend well
beyond the posterior margin of the centrum. The articular facets
for the cervical ribs are located low on the centrum near its anterior margin. The intervertebral articulation between the centra is
somewhat obliquely oriented, slanted in an anterodorsal–posteroventral direction. The 26th through to the 28th cervical vertebrae increase in depth but decrease in length. The centrum
gains in height, as does the neural crest, which develops a convex
dorsal margin. In cervical 27, and even more so in cervical 28,
the neural crest furthermore develops into an increasingly distinct posterior projection located in between the postzygapophyses. Up to the tenth cervical, the cervical ribs are deflected
away from the posteriorly bent neck. They show the typical structure with a medially directed articular head that is oriented at
right angles to the much-elongated shaft, and that carries a freeending anterior process. Starting with cervical 11, the cervical
ribs retain their natural position, together forming a tight bundle
of bony rods that runs along the ventrolateral aspect of the cervical vertebral column, obscuring the ventral margin of the
centra.
At the position of cervical 28, the cervical series partially disappears below four segments of the proximal caudal vertebral
column that have snapped and separated but still remain clustered. At the transition from neck to trunk, the vertebral column
turns around and becomes fully exposed again from below more
distal parts of the tail (Fig. 9). The anterior region of the dorsal
vertebral column is intersected by the neck (cervical 23 to 25).
Subsequent, more posteriorly located dorsal vertebrae have
been subjected to crushing, distortion or incomplete preservation. A complete count of 62 presacral vertebrae (including the
non-exposed atlas and axis) is nonetheless possible, comprising
32 cervical vertebrae and 30 dorsal vertebrae.
Behind the elements of the pectoral girdle five dorsal
vertebrae are located, which are well preserved and exposed
(Fig. 9). They show the marked lateral as well as ventral constriction of the centrum, and the sturdily built neural arch that forms
the tall, anteriorly deeply excavated transverse processes. The preand postzygapophyses are symmetrically developed, the plane of
articulation between them horizontally oriented. The neural
spine is distinct, marked by essentially rectangular contours but
slanting slightly backwards. Progressing backward within the dorsal region, the neural spines become more prominent, increasing
both their height as well as their antero-posterior dimension.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
19
The anterior dorsal ribs form evenly curved elements; more posterior dorsal ribs are mttore pronouncedly curved in the proximal
‘shoulder’ region. The dorsal ribs are distally slightly expanded
and form a distinct articular head proximally.
As is true of the posterior dorsal vertebrae, the sacrum is
poorly preserved (Fig. 9). It is possible to identify two sacral vertebrae, which however offer no relevant anatomical detail.
The tail in ZMNH M8752 is broken into several segments in
its proximal part. A total of 69 caudal vertebrae are
preserved (Fig. 9 ) but this is an incomplete count. The first
few caudal vertebrae are partially obscured by overlying elements
of the left hindlimb (femur and tibia). Caudal ribs are associated
(not fused) with the first six caudal vertebrae. They decrease in
both width and length in a posterior direction. Small, ‘stubby’
transverse processes can be identified on three more caudal vertebrae, but there is no evidence of caudal ribs being present
beyond the ninth caudal. The neural spine morphology again
shows significant changes within the caudal vertebral column
(Fig. 10). Of essentially rectangular shape in the first six caudal
vertebrae, they resemble those of the posterior dorsal vertebrae.
Between the sixth and the ninth caudal vertebra, the neural
spines begin to assume rounded contours (i.e., with a distinctly
convex dorsal margin in lateral view), which become fully
expressed beyond the ninth caudal vertebra resulting in a highly
distinctive morphology. Very prominent anteriorly, the neural
spines gradually decrease in size posteriorly, particularly past the
39th caudal vertebra. More posteriorly, beginning around the
40th to 43rd preserved caudal vertebrae, the neural spines start
to form a posterodorsally directed projection. Prominent at first,
and characterised by an anteroposterior expansion towards the distal end, the neural spines progressively decrease in size more posteriorly; the last, diminutive rudiment of a neural spine can be
identified on the 65th preserved caudal vertebra. The chevrons
similarly show a changing morphology along the caudal vertebral
column (Fig. 10). Articulating in an intervertebral position, they
form a broad plate-like ventral expansion of rounded contours in
the anterior tail region, mirroring the neural spines in their structure (Fig. 10a). Again, in the area of the 40th through to the
43rd preserved caudal vertebrae, the chevrons are seen to gradually
change their shape, forming an inverted T-bar, the stem of which
articulates in an intervertebral position on the ventral edge of the
centra (Fig. 10b, c). This morphology is not unique to Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, as a somewhat similar distal expansion of the
chevrons is also present in Trilophosaurus buettneri (Spielmann
et al. 2008). Again, the chevrons continue to gradually decrease
in size in a posterior direction; the last diminutive chevron articulates on the 64th and 65th preserved caudal vertebrae respectively.
The gastral rib basket is preserved in a somewhat disarticulated condition in the anterior, middle and posterior trunk region
(Fig. 9). Particularly in the anterior trunk, it can be ascertained
that each gastral rib is composed of three elements: an angulated
midventral element, the apex pointing anteriorly, and two collateral elements that meet the midventral element in an overlapping
contact, and that are slightly curved in their lateral part.
2.6.3. The pectoral girdle and forelimb. The distal (dorsal)
ends of both left and right clavicles are exposed, their proximal
ends being buried below the caudal vertebral column. The
distal part of the clavicle is evenly curved and tapers to a blunt
tip. The left scapula is preserved in articulation with the left
coracoid, which itself is incomplete. The scapular blade
forms a kidney-shaped ossification with a convex dorsal and
concave ventral margin that carries a glenoid process near its
posteroventral end. The length of the scapula is 80 mm and its
depth is 51.1 mm. The left coracoid is less well preserved, but
shows the coracoid foramen to be located in its anterior part,
in front of and below the glenoid facet. The right scapulocoracoid is not preserved or exposed.
20
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Figure 10 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, ZMNH M8752, detailed drawings of selected caudal vertebrae. (a) Anterior caudal vertebraea in right lateral
view. (b) Mid- to posterior caudal vertebrae in right lateral view. (c) Posterior caudal vertebrae in right lateral view. Abbreviations: ca.c = caudal centrum;
chv = chevron; ns = neural spine.
Both forelimbs are preserved in ZMNH M8752, but the left
one is better exposed than the right one (Table 3), which is partly
obscured by rib fragments (Fig. 9). The humerus in ZMNH
M8752 is rather straight, as is also the case in ZMNH M8728,
whereas it appears curved in ZMNH M8727, which is probably
attributable to its angle of preservation. The proximal head of the
left humerus is incomplete; its minimal width at mid-shaft is 17
mm and its distal width is 30 mm. The length of the right
humerus is 103 mm, but both its proximal and distal ends are
not fully exposed, such that their width cannot be measured.
An entepicondylar foramen is absent. The ectepicondylar
groove, as well as the distal ectepicondylar notch, are weakly
expressed. The left radius and ulna are very well preserved and
exposed. Again, as in ZMNH M8728, the radius is somewhat
more robustly built than the ulna. The radius shows marked
expansions both proximally and distally, which result in a biconcave shaft, the postaxial margin of which is more deeply concave
than the preaxial margin. The ulna is distinctly expanded proximally, but only weakly expanded distally. Its preaxial margin
is concave, although less so than the postaxial margin of the
radius. Together, the two elements define the spatium interosseum. The postaxial margin of the ulna is rather straight, yet
damaged in its distal part.
Six carpal elements are ossified and preserved in the left
manus. The proximal row of carpal elements of pentagonal circumference is preserved in articulation. Of those, the intermedium is the largest (maximum exposed length: 15.4 mm),
followed by the radiale (15.2 mm) and the ulnare (14.3 mm).
The distal carpal row comprises three ossifications of rounded
contours, a large distal carpal 4 and smaller distal carpals 3
and 2. The metacarpals of the left manus are deflected away
from the distal carpal ossifications and have been pushed up
against one another, partially obscuring metacarpal
V. Metacarpals I through to IV are all straight elements, with
expanded proximal and distal ends and a biconcave shaft. Metacarpal V, well exposed in the right manus, is short and somewhat
more massively built. Of all metacarpals, mcIII is the longest in
the left manus, mcIV is the longest in the right manus and mcV is
the shortest in both (Table 3).
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
Preservation of the phalanges is incomplete in the left manus.
Digit II preserves two phalanges, digit III comprises two phalanges (a third one possibly lying atop a dorsal rib) and digit IV preserves three phalanges – evidently an incomplete count.
In the right forelimb, radius and ulna are partially obscured
and crossing over each other. In the proximal carpal row, the
radiale, intermedium and ulnare are identifiable yet less well preserved and exposed than in the left manus. The distal carpal ossifications cannot be located except for one that protrudes from
below a phalanx. A total of nine disarticulated phalanges can
be identified.
2.6.4. The pelvic girdle and hindlimb. As mentioned above,
the sacral region is poorly preserved in ZMNH M8752, although
two sacral vertebrae are identifiable. Neither ilium can be identified, but the ventral part of the left pubo-ischiadic plate is well
preserved and exposed. It shows that, at least in their ventral
parts, both the pubis and ischium are broad, plate-like ossifications, which meet each other for most of their depth in a suture.
The thyroid fenestra is thus eliminated. The fact that this is not a
primitive condition but a secondary development is indicated by
the persistence of a small yet distinct cleft between pubis and
ischium in the ventral margin of the pubo-ischiadic plate.
Both hindlimbs are preserved, but the left one is broken across
the clustered segments of the proximal caudal vertebral column
(Fig. 9). The femur is a rather straight element that is both proximally and distally expanded. Its preaxial (anterior) margin is at
best only slightly concave, while the postaxial (posterior) margin
is more distinctly concave. Like the other zeugopodial and stylopodial elements, the femur shows little morphological differentiation. The internal trochanter is not distinct and the articulation
for tibia and fibula is continuous. The proximal end of the right
femur is crushed and distorted.
The tibia and fibula are well preserved and exposed in the left
hindlimb. The tibia is broadly expanded proximally, but less distinctly expanded distally. The shaft is biconcave, with the postaxial margin more deeply excavated than the preaxial margin. The
proximal end of the tibia has straight pre- and postaxial margins,
and its proximal margin is incomplete (broken). The fibula is
only weakly expanded proximally, but it is very broadly
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
expanded distally. Its preaxial margin is deeply concave, its postaxial margin slightly convex. Together, the tibia and fibula define
the spatium interosseum distal to which the astragalus is located.
The left tarsus comprises three ossifications of rounded contours. The astragalus, located distal to the spatium interosseum
in an intermedium position, is the largest (maximum exposed
length: 18.5 mm), followed by the calcaneum (17.5 mm) located
distal to the fibula; the distal tarsal IV (11.6 mm) is located proximal to metatarsal IV (Table 5). All five metatarsals are beautifully preserved and exposed in the left foot. The first
metatarsal is distinctly shorter than the other ones and almost
of rectangular contours. All other metatarsals are straight elements with somewhat expanded proximal and distal ends and
a biconcave shaft; there is no overlap of their proximal heads.
Of all the metatarsals, mtIII is the longest. Other than the
most proximal ones, the phalanges of the left foot are obscured
by overlying caudal vertebrae. The right foot, broken across a
proximal segment of the tail, allows a phalangeal count in the
fourth digit only, which shows five phalanges (four phalanges
and an ungual) – the primitive number.
2.7. Referred specimen, IVPP V20295
(Figure 11). This is the most complete and fully articulated specimen recovered to date. The skull is preserved in dorsal view and
is in complete articulation with the neck and the rest of the body,
which is essentially exposed on its left side. The total vertebral
count is 145, comprising 32 cervical vertebrae, 30 dorsal vertebrae, 2 sacral vertebrae and 81 caudal vertebrae. It is estimated
21
that the total length of the individual was approximately 521
cm and therefore just slightly longer than ZMNH M8752.
Note that the incomplete holotype specimen IVPP V13767
represents the largest known individual of Dinocephalosaurus
orientalis: its skull measures 23.06 cm in total length compared
to 20.1 cm for IVPP V20295 and 17.01 cm for ZMNH M8752.
2.7.1. The skull and mandible. (Figure 12). The skull is 201
mm long and 108.7 mm wide across the temporal region as preserved. At the anteriormost end, the premaxillae have separated
slightly along the midline. This is the result of dorsoventral compression of the skull, causing the anterior end to be somewhat
splayed laterally. Clearly defined medial processes of the
premaxillae extend posteriorly together over one third of the
total length of the skull. The sutures marking the edges of the
maxillae are clearly marked on both sides and are mirror images
of each other. The sutures separating the nasals from the frontals
and the parietal from the frontals are less clearly distinguishable,
but they generally seem to follow the pattern in the holotype with
interdigitating sutures. The presence of the distinctive narial gutters (antorbital recess) extending posteriorly from the external
nares likewise mirrors the morphology of the holotype. The frontals are broad anteriorly where they meet the prefrontals, but
they become noticeably constricted posteriorly, where they
form the posterodorsal borders of the orbits. The frontals of
most non-archosauriform archosauromorphs are also somewhat
constricted in the interorbital region, with the notable exceptions
of Tanystropheus hydroides and Tanystropheus longobardicus, in
which the frontals are widened above the orbits, covering them
Figure 11 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis IVPP V20295. Complete articulated skeleton in dorsal to left lateral view. Abbreviations: ax = axis; ca.v = caudal
vertebra; cv = cervical vertebra; do.v = dorsal vertebra; ga = gastralia; l.co = left coracoid; l.fe = left femur; l.hu = left humerus; l.il = left ilium; l.is left
ischium; l.man = left manus; l.pes = left pes; l.pu = left pubis; l.ra = left radius; l.sc = left scapula; r.hu = right humerus; r.co = right coracoid; r.fi =
right fibula; r,ma = right manus; r.ra = right radius; r.sc = right scapula; r.ti = right tibia; r.ul = right ulna.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
22
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Figure 12 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis IVPP V20295. Detail of skull in dorsal view. (a) Photograph. (b) Photograph with interpretative drawing. Abbreviations: fr = frontal; la = lacrimal; mx = maxilla; n = nasal; pa = parietal; pl = palatine; pm = premaxilla; po = postorbital; prf = prefrontal; pt = pterygoid: rap retroarticular process.
dorsally (Nosotti 2007; Spiekman et al. 2020a, 2020b). There is a
pronounced interdigitating median suture separating the frontals
just anterior to the parietal. The parietal table is narrow, but
flares posteriorly into the parietal ‘wings’ marking the posterior
borders of the sub-circular supratemporal fenestrae. These parietal ‘wings’ are oriented posterolaterally as in most early archosauromorphs, except Tanystropheus spp., Protorosaurus speneri
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
and Azendohsaurus madagaskarensis, which exhibit a lateral
orientation of these processes (Gottmann-Quesada & Sander
2009; Flynn et al. 2010; Spiekman et al. 2020a). The prominent
pineal foramen is of an elongate oval shape. A pineal foramen is
generally present in most non-archosauriform archosauromorphs, although it is missing in Macrocnemus spp., Trilophosaurus buettneri, certain specimens of Prolacerta broomi and
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
23
teeth project up from the mandible. On the right side, two mandibular teeth can be observed through the orbit as a result of the
deformation of the specimen. Two very weakly developed retroarticular processes can be seen behind the temporal region on
both sides.
2.7.2. The vertebral column. (Table 4). The neural arch elements of the atlas are slightly displaced, but essentially the
neck is in complete articulation with the skull. The first 22 cervical vertebrae flex around to form an almost complete circle
with the tip of the snout before the series continues, passing backwards under the posterior region of the trunk immediately in
front of the pelvis and straight back to the pectoral girdle. The
cervical ribs of the first 17 cervical vertebrae have moved out
of natural articulation with the individual vertebrae, lying in
bundles just to one side of the neck. However, from cervical 18
onwards they are more closely articulated with their respective
vertebrae.
In ZMNH M8728 (above) we noted a change in the form of
the cervical vertebrae from a less concave ventral margin in lateral view together with an increase in the height of the neural
spine at cervical 24. They also become shorter at this point. It
would seem that this change in morphology might take place
at vertebra 22 in IVPP V20295, although it should be noted
that this is also exactly the region where the neck is overlain by
the curled dorsal vertebrae and it is therefore somewhat difficult
to assess this with complete confidence. Where the neck emerges
from under the dorsal vertebrae, the vertebra (considered to be
cervical vertebra 25) is very poorly preserved.
Cervical vertebra 27 has a neural spine that is much anteroposteriorly narrower and slightly taller than the preceding cervical
vertebrae. The posteriormost cervical vertebrae (presacral vertebrae 28–32) together with the anterior dorsal vertebrae have
the putative archosauromorph Czatkowiella harae (Spielmann
et al. 2008; Borsuk-Białynicka & Evans 2009; Spiekman 2018;
Miedema et al. 2020). The postfrontal is an elongated bone,
oriented transversely relative to the longitudinal axis of the
skull. On its medial end it articulates with the parietal on its posterior half and the frontal on its anterior half. This configuration
corresponds with that of the holotype as outlined above (following the interpretation of Rieppel et al. 2008). As with the holotype skull, the strong dorsoventral crushing of the skull
hampers observation of the relationship between the squamosal,
postorbital and jugal. The postorbital in particular is badly broken and incomplete, and the dorsal portion of the jugal is also
poorly preserved.
Parts of the palate can be observed in dorsal view through the
orbit and supratemporal fenestra. On the right side a clear articulation is observed between the broad pterygoid and palatine,
whereas the exact articulation between these elements is unclear
on the left side. An additional disarticulated element is poorly
preserved, but based on its relative position it might represent
an ectopterygoid. Posteriorly, the articulation between the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid and the pterygoid wing of the quadrate is well preserved, with the latter overlapping the former
laterally.
The two large ‘fangs’ seen on the maxilla of the holotype are
not readily apparent in this new specimen, although the base
of one such tooth has been exposed on the right side with the distal part extending into the matrix. The larger teeth develop striations towards the apex of the enamel crown, as in the other
specimens. On the left side a break in the block has resulted in
the loss of the posterior end of the premaxilla and the anterior
portion of the maxilla. Nevertheless, each premaxilla is seen to
bear at least one large tooth, and on the right side two similar
Table 4 Length and height of the sacral and caudal vertebrae, specimen IVPP V20295. Abbreviations: CAV = caudal vertebra; SV = sacral vertebra. The
length was measured across the ventral margin of the centrum; the height was measured across mid-centrum and includes the neural crest. All
measurements are in mm.
IVPP V20295
Element
Length
Height
Element
Length
Height
Element
Length
Height
SV 1
SV 2
CAV 1
CAV 2
CAV 3
CAV 4
CAV 5
CAV 6
CAV 7
CAV 8
CAV 9
CAV 10
CAV 11
CAV 12
CAV 13
CAV 14
CAV 15
CAV 16
CAV 17
CAV 18
CAV 19
CAV 20
CAV 21
CAV 22
CAV 23
CAV 24
CAV 25
CAV 26
31.7
29
29.2
–
–
29.1
28.8
25.5
29
27.6
–
29.2
–
–
–
25.7
27.8
–
–
24.2
25.8
–
–
–
24.9
26.1
24.3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
54.1
–
–
CAV 27
CAV 28
CAV 29
CAV 30
CAV 31
CAV 32
CAV 33
CAV 34
CAV 35
CAV 36
CAV 37
CAV 38
CAV 39
CAV 40
CAV 41
CAV 42
CAV 43
CAV 44
CAV 45
CAV 46
CAV 47
CAV 48
CAV 49
CAV 50
CAV 51
CAV 52
CAV 53
CAV 54
–
23.2
24.1
24.6
–
24.4
24.4
24
25.4
24.2
23.2
24.1
24
24.6
23.3
23.8
–
22.8
22.1
22.1
22.4
20.5
20.8
20.3
19.8
17.7
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
45.6
44.5
42.3
43.2
42.3
40.1
40.6
37.8
36.9
35.1
34.8
33.3
31.8
30.1
29.4
27.7
26.6
–
23.5
CAV 55
CAV 56
CAV 57
CAV 58
CAV 59
CAV 60
CAV 61
CAV 62
CAV 63
CAV 64
CAV 65
CAV 66
CAV 67
CAV 68
CAV 69
CAV 70
CAV 71
CAV 72
CAV 73
CAV 74
CAV 75
CAV 76
CAV 77
CAV 78
CAV 79
CAV 80
CAV 81
16.9
16.4
15.9
15.9
15.2
–
14.1
14
13.7
12
11.1
11
10
9.8
8.5
8.3
7.1
7
5.4
4.4
4.2
2.7
2.4
2.6
2.2
2.1
1.7
22.4
21.8
21.1
19.5
18.5
16.2
16.2
15
15.1
–
11.7
10
8.7
7.5
6.5
5.3
5.2
5
4.5
3.4
3.2
2.9
1.8
1.8
1
1
0.8
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
24
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
characteristic neural spines that take the form of a relatively narrow backward-pointing hook. The transition to the dorsal vertebrae seems to be partially marked by this neural spine having a
slight anterior projection or knob (forming a weak T-shape in
lateral view). Whereas all the preceding cervical ribs have a
clear anterior process and a posteriorly curving shaft, the rib
of presacral vertebra 32 is transitional; it lacks an anterior process and its shaft is straight but posteroventrally directed, relatively short, and with a blunt distal end. Since this rib is
considerably shorter than the subsequent dorsal ribs and does
not seem to contribute to the dorsal rib cage, its corresponding
vertebra is identified as the posteriormost cervical, as in
ZMNH M8728.
In contrast to Tanystropheus hydroides, the neck of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis is often preserved strongly flexed, and in IVPP
V20295 the neck is coiled to the extreme. As in other specimens,
many of the ribs have ‘popped out’ of position – not flexed nor
broken, so that they retain their long straight shafts. This may
simply be because of the relatively shorter but greater numbers
of vertebrae allowing the neck to flex postmortem. It is very
unlikely that the neck was so flexible in life. The ribs certainly
maintain a straight position with no major flexion. Although
the rib heads may have been displaced away from the vertebral
column, they still remain very much aligned with their respective
vertebrae – they have moved relatively little forward or backward
from the positions in life. This is perhaps indicative of these
splayed ribs being encased by skin at the time of burial. On the
other hand, although shorter than in Tanystropheus in absolute
terms, they do traverse a greater number of intervertebral joints
– five is a typical number crossed – which in the absence of any
dewlap would suggest a degree of rigidity from these bundles
of ribs.
The first six dorsal vertebrae are slightly out of articulation
with each other and describe a tight radius. There is then a
small break followed by the remaining dorsal vertebrae that complete the circular disposition of the body. There are either 29 or
30 dorsal vertebrae depending on which vertebra is considered
the first sacral, but 30 is considered the most likely.
Where the posteriormost cervical and anteriormost dorsal vertebrae lie alongside the proximal tail, the vertebrae are rather
poorly preserved and the bone surface is very fragmented. The
same condition also pertains to most of dorsal vertebrae 5–15,
as well as sections of the caudal vertebrae including those situated alongside the first two dorsal vertebrae.
The neural spines of all the dorsal vertebrae are relatively small
and narrow, but expand distally into a low, rugose ridge, so that
they are broadly T-shaped in lateral view. As in all other specimens, the anterior dorsal vertebrae (1 through to approximately
12) have very distinctive and well developed transverse processes
with a deeply excavated anterior surface and a concomitantly
markedly convex posterior edge. They are also very tall and narrow. In the region of dorsal vertebra 13 or 14 the height of the
transverse process is somewhat reduced and the diapophysis
becomes more prominent and circular. This reduction in height
and development of a more circular facet for the rib continues
to the sacral vertebrae.
For the most part the dorsal ribs lie disarticulated from the vertebrae, but still in close association. They are all single-headed,
but anteriorly they have deeper heads with what could be
described as a more robust tuberculum portion that extends ventrally into a narrow and elongate capitulum region. In the more
posterior ribs, the heads become more rounded, corresponding
to the reduction in complexity of the transverse processes.
The short transverse processes on vertebrae 60–63 are quite
pronounced, with those on 61 and 62 being the largest, and
which we regard here as the two sacral vertebrae. Yet at first
glance vertebrae 61 and 62 also seem to have associated ‘haemal
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
spines’, which is hard to reconcile. However, on closer inspection,
it is clear that these ‘haemal spines’ have exceptionally anteroposteriorly flared distal rami and it is almost certain that they
represent sacral ribs that have been displaced, in turn indicating
that they were not fused to the sacral vertebrae. These ribs are
also consistent with the element thought to be a sacral rib overlying the top edge of the left ilium. If they are sacral ribs then
there are only four preserved, which in turn is indicative of just
two sacral vertebrae, the number present in all known nonarchosauriform archosauromorphs. Equally, it does not appear
as though both ribs could articulate with the ilium, as the iliac
blade is so reduced (see below). Vertebra 63 also has a broad
and prominent facet on the end of a short transverse process,
but it must be assumed to be the first caudal. It would have
been impossible for the associated rib to have made any contact
with the pelvis.
The left femur partially covers the neural spines of the last dorsal, both sacral and the anteriormost caudal vertebrae. In addition, the left fibula partially obscures the second caudal, so it
is not possible to state unequivocally whether there is a distinct
change in the nature of the neural spines between the dorsal vertebrae, sacral vertebrae and caudal vertebrae. However, from
what is exposed of these elements, it would appear that both
sacral vertebrae have relatively tall neural spines that are rectangular in lateral view, a condition shared with the anterior caudal vertebrae. This contrasts with the somewhat ‘waisted’ (or
weakly T-shaped) appearance of the preceding dorsal neural
spines terminating in a distinctly rugose surface.
It is difficult to measure the dimensions of the dorsal vertebrae
(Table 4) because of the way the torso curls around on itself and
the ribs overlap the vertebrae, but dorsal vertebrae 6 and 7
(although distorted) are clearly exposed and provide potentially
useful reference points for other specimens, as does
dorsal vertebra 20.
The tail is preserved completely intact and fully articulated
with a complement of 81 vertebrae. The mid to distal tail is beautifully exposed, and displays the remarkable hatchet-shaped
chevrons mirroring the rounded neural processes. The first
haemal arches are quite broad-based and occur in the first two
caudal vertebrae. At least the first ten – if not more – caudal vertebrae have a ‘typical’ rectangular neural spine and chevron
bones. The transition to the hatchet-shaped form appears to
begin at around caudal 16, although bones of the pectoral girdle
obscure part of the tail in this region. The chevrons become
much shallower and more elongate at caudal 44, and there is
also a change in shape, so that the ventral edge is convex in lateral
view. At about the same point there is also a noticeable shift in
the shape of the neural spines so that they are more inclined posteriorly and more clearly expressed on the posterior half of the
vertebra. The chevrons and neural spines progressively diminish
in size but the chevrons can still be clearly distinguished as separate elements even as far posteriorly as caudal 75, where the centra is a mere disc of bone.
The gastralia are loosely associated and extend from about the
sixth dorsal vertebra back as far as the sacrum. As in other specimens, they display two different morphologies: the medioventral
elements that are slightly angulated and the collateral elements
that terminate in a blunt tip proximally and a slender tapering
tip distally.
2.7.3. The pectoral girdle and forelimb. Both pectoral girdles
and forelimbs are almost intact and only partially disarticulated.
The left limb and girdle lie a short distance from the vertebral
column and are missing the proximal head of the humerus and
the glenoid portion of the coracoid. The right pectoral girdle is
also displaced from its natural position and lies partially under
the dorsal ribs (the scapula) and over the proximal tail (the coracoid) where it coils around the body. Both the scapula and
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
25
Figure 13 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis IVPP V20295. Detail of left hindlimb as preserved. Abbreviations: ac = acetabulum; as = astragalus; ca = calcaneum; ect = ectopterygoid; in tr = internal trochanter; mt = metatarsal; po p = posterior process of the ilium; pu f = pubic foramen: sa.r = sacral rib.
coracoid are kidney-shaped elements of approximately equal
size, the scapula just marginally larger in the development of
the posterodorsally projecting scapular blade. The posterior
margin of the coracoid is deeply notched below the level of the
glenoid fossa, and there is a distinct coracoid foramen. Neither
interclavicle nor clavicles are preserved.
The humeri and epipodials are all columnar elements with
minimal development of the proximal and distal heads. The
left radius almost completely overlies the left ulna, and in the
right limb the radius is also out of position. The arrangement
of carpals is difficult to discern as both wrists overlap. Nevertheless, there is a total of 12 circular carpals and therefore presumably a total of six in each wrist. As preserved in the left forelimb
the phalangeal formula is 1:2:3:5:1 (Table 3), but the terminally
preserved hourglass-shaped phalanges are similar in form to all
the other phalanges and are not spatulate or claw-shaped as
might be expected for unguals. The right forelimb is a bit disrupted where it extends over the left forelimb, and digits 1 and
2 are disassociated. However, digit 3 bears three phalanges,
digit 4 has six phalanges, with the terminal one being expressed
as a small round disc, and in digit 5 just a single phalanx is preserved. Thus, it would seem that terminal phalanges fail to ossify
in this taxon.
2.7.4. The pectoral girdle and hindlimb. (Figure 13) Of all
the specimens of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis described here,
the elements of the pelvis are the most clearly displayed in
IVPP V20295. There is no definitive embayment constituting
the thyroid fenestra between the pubis and ischium, although
there was almost certainly a deep notch along the articulation
between the two towards the median symphysis.
The three elements of the left pelvic girdle have separated
slightly from each other, with the ischium and ilium almost in
their original position relative to each other. The pubis has
been pushed forward slightly by the intervention of the right
femur and ischium. The pubis is an almost circular element
that is slightly larger than the ischium. It bears a rugose area
on its dorsal margin that articulated directly with the ilium.
The ischium is of an approximate trapezoidal shape with the
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
posterior margin being slightly convex, resulting in a very weak
posterior process. The left ilium is complete but the small dorsal
process is partially covered by the second sacral rib. This dorsal
process is not developed anteriorly at all (i.e., a preacetabular
process is completely absent) but has a short, poorly developed
posterior projection (i.e., a postacetabular process). The acetabulum is shallow and the acetabular contribution of the ilium is
semi-lunate shaped.
The right ilium is not obviously visible, but it is probably covered by the left pubis. A short section of bone extending between
the left pubis and left ilium apparently represents a short section
of the dorsal process of the right ilium. The right pubis lies just
anterior to its left counterpart. It displays a weakly developed
bony strut extending anteroventrally from the margin of the acetabulum. The right ischium is draped over and closely oppressed
to the proximal half of the femur, such that the boundaries of the
femur can be clearly distinguished through the plate-like
ischium. The anterior margin is a little fragmented and the posterior margin is covered by the left ischium so that it adds nothing further to the description.
The right hindlimb is almost in full articulation so that the
proximal head of the femur appears to be resting within the acetabulum, although it is covered by the ischium. The left femur preserves a clear internal trochanter, which is proximodistally
straight. Proximally, the trochanter does not quite reach the
proximal end of the femur. The femur is a robust, relatively
straight element, and the tibia is the more robust of the two columnar epipodials, which bow away from each other to leave a
prominent spatium interosseum as in all other specimens. The
only tarsal elements preserved are the astragalus and calcaneum,
and these are simple rounded discs that are not in contact with
each other. There is a noticeable gap between the proximal carpals and the metatarsals, strongly implying that distal carpals
were not ossified.
Unfortunately, the distal end of digit 3 is missing on the block,
but the other four digits would appear to be complete. If so, this
gives the rather unusual formula of 1:2:?:2:1 with the third digit
having a minimum of three phalanges (Table 5). The left
26
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Table 5 Length and width of hindlimb elements in the two specimens
preserving the hindlimbs, ZMNH M8752 and IVPP V20295.
Abbreviations: L = length; PW = proximal width; MW = minimal
width; DW = distal width. All measurements are in mm.
Left femur
Right femur
Left tibia
Right tibia
Left fibula
Right fibula
Left metatarsal I
Right metatarsal I
Left metatarsal II
Right metatarsal II
Left metatarsal III
Right metatarsal III
Left metatarsal IV
Right metatarsal IV
Left metatarsal V
Right metatarsal V
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
PW
MW
DW
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
ZMNH M8752
IVPP V20295
∼111.0
–
13.0
30.0
∼110.0
36.0
13.3
23.3
62.5
23.3
11.2
18.1
59.5
24.9
12.5
18.8
–
∼13.0
10.1
28.1
–
–
–
–
15.3
–
26.9
26.4
35.5
34.0
34.1
33.6
25.4
–
126.1
34.2
17.3
32.4
–
–
15.4
31.7
72.5
25.9
15.5
16.9
70.4
–
13.7
18.2
81.8
–
–
–
–
16.7
–
30.2
–
22.2
–
35.6
–
42.0
–
42.9
–
31.9
hindlimb is more disarticulated with the femur and epipodials
draped over the proximal tail, although the fibula is deflected
away from the tibia distally. The astragalus and calcaneum lie
on top of the neural spines of the sixth and seventh caudal vertebrae, and the digits extend backward below the tail. However,
only three digits are clearly exposed. The longest digit (likely
digit 3) has six phalanges including a blunt spatulate-shaped terminal phalanx.
2.7.5. Remains in the abdomen. (Figure 14). Within the body
cavity in the mid-dorsal region lie the remains of a minimum of
four fishes. Their scales clearly overlap the right ribs, but are
under the left ribs. At least one of these fishes, the most complete,
can be referred to the genus Lashanichthys, a holostean. In addition, two partially preserved specimens lying close by, probably
belong to the same taxon. A larger specimen with distinct ganoid
scales is possibly a member of the genus Colobodus, which is
known from Panxian (currently known as Panzhou) (e.g., Sun
et al. 2008). Further posteriorly, there are remains of a number
of small vertebral elements and a possible limb bone. These
could conceivably represent an embryo, or alternatively are the
remnants of a small prey reptile, but their identities remain
equivocal. The three most complete of the tiny vertebrae lie on
top of the 23rd cervical. One has a distinct and quite broad
neural spine that is perhaps not entirely consistent with any of
the Dinocephalosaurus vertebrae apart from the axis. The limb
element is a straight shaft with no distinct enlargement of either
end and is 26.6 mm long.
3. Discussion
Liu et al. (2017) referred the Luoping specimens to Dinocephalosaurus sp. While they did note the existence of ‘slight differences’,
they felt that the incomplete nature of the available material was
insufficient to demonstrate consistent differences between specimens from the two different locations (Liu et al. 2017: page 3).
We note that LPV 30280 is the smallest of all the specimens
referred to Dinocephalosaurus. LPV 30280 is particularly
Figure 14 Dinocephalosaurus orientalis IVPP V20295. Detail of gut contents (fishes) in gastral region. On the left is a complete specimen of Lashanichthys sp. and on the right a partial specimen referred to Colobodus sp.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
noteworthy for the description of a partial embryo in the abdominal region (Liu et al. 2017). Although incomplete, these remains
are certainly consistent with them being referable to Dinocephalosaurus sp., and therefore evidence of viviparity in this form.
This in turn demonstrates sexual maturity in this small individual, which may constitute possible evidence of taxonomic differences or sexual dimorphism between LPV 30280 and the larger
specimens described herein. However, the incompleteness of
LPV 30280 makes further speculation simply that.
Despite extensive sampling during close to three centuries,
unequivocal remains of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis or closely
related taxa have not been discovered from the western Tethys
(i.e., Europe and the Middle East). However, the excellent preservation of the here newly described material of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis allows for a re-evaluation of certain enigmatic,
isolated remains from the Germanic Basin. In particular, jaw
remains attributed to Lamprosauroides goepperti, a taxon that
is currently considered a nomen dubium (Rieppel 1995), exhibit
a morphology that is remarkably similar to that of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis. Lamprosauroides goepperti is known from two
isolated maxillae from the Lower Muschelkalk of Krapkowice
and Gogolin in Upper Silesia, Poland, whereas a single, isolated
dentary from the Lower Muschelkalk of Winterswijk in the
Netherlands was recently attributed to cf. Lamprosauroides goepperti (Spiekman & Klein 2021). Like Dinocephalosaurus, the
dentition of Lamprosauroides is composed of slender, slightly
recurved teeth anteriorly, and wider, straight teeth in the middle
and posterior sections of the jaw, which only possess striations on
the distal half of the crown. And like Dinocephalosaurus, the two
maxillae referred to Lamprosauroides also have a sinusoidal outline of the tooth row, and they both possess two enlarged, fanglike teeth in what are possibly the fourth and fifth tooth positions.
Finally, the presence of plicidentine, which is present in Dinocephalosaurus, was also confidently established in the lower jaw
from Winterswijk. The presence of dinocephalosaurids in the
western Tethys would corroborate previous findings that suggest
a close similarity between the faunas of the eastern and western
Tethys regions (e.g., Li 2007; Rieppel et al. 2010; Jaquier et al.
2017). However, the material of Lamprosauroides is very fragmentary, and it also shows distinct similarities with (possibly
cymatosaur) eosauropterygians (Rieppel 1995; Spiekman &
Klein 2021). Therefore, there is currently insufficient evidence
to assign this material to Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, nor to
convincingly indicate the presence of dinocephalosaurids in the
Germanic Basin. Nevertheless, the discovery of new taxa from
the eastern Tethys represented by articulated specimens clearly
merits the re-evaluation of isolated remains from historical European collections.
3.1. Phylogeny
3.1.1. Methods. The new morphological information for
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis has been incorporated into a
detailed phylogenetic character data matrix focusing on the
interrelationships of non-crocopodan archosauromorphs. This
matrix was first presented by Spiekman et al. (2021), and has
subsequently been applied and modified by Wang et al. (2023).
Based on the new findings, 12 characters have been modified
and several character scorings have been updated relative to the
most recent iteration of the matrix (Wang et al. 2023), including
88 character state modifications for Dinocephalosaurus orientalis. These modifications, as well as an updated version of the character list and character matrix, can be found in the
supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1017/
S175569102400001X.
The matrix was analysed using TNT 1.5 (Goloboff & Catalano 2016). Following the methodology of Spiekman et al.
(2021), the problematic operational taxonomic units (OTUs)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
27
Czatkowiella harae, Tanystropheus ‘conspicuus’ and ‘Tanystropheus antiquus’ were excluded a priori from the analysis. Ratio
characters are included and the characters indicated as ordered
(= additive) in the character list were treated as such, corresponding to analysis 4 of Spiekman et al. (2021). Characters 1, 2, 4, 5,
7, 9, 13, 35, 43, 62, 73, 77, 78, 83, 84, 88, 89, 110, 114, 118, 128,
136, 140, 144, 153, 158, 159, 162, 178, 185, 187, 194, 195, 200,
205, 209, 219, 220, 224, 230, 232, 242, 248, 251, 258, 259, 264,
267, 276, 292, 294, 297, 298, 299 and 305 were thus treated as
additive. Tree searches were conducted under equal weights
using a traditional search that included 1,000 Wagner trees replications with random addition sequence and TBR branch swapping holding ten trees per replicate. Values of Bremer and
bootstrap support were calculated for the equal weight analysis,
with the latter being conducted using a traditional search with
1,000 iterations. Following the methodology of Spiekman et al.
(2021), the iterative PCR protocol implemented in TNT (Pol &
Escapa 2009) was used to identify an unstable OTU in the analysis and to exclude this taxon from the strict consensus tree
(SCT). This resulted in a more resolved reduced strict consensus
tree (RSCT), which allows easy assessment of the relationships of
taxa that are obscured by the unstable OTU in the SCT.
3.1.2. Results. The updated phylogenetic analysis recovers
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Pectodens zhenyuensis within
a monophyletic Dinocephalosauridae, which forms the sister
clade to Tanystropheidae in all most parsimonious trees
(MPTs) (Fig. 15a). This contrasts with the results of the same
analysis in both Spiekman et al. (2021: analysis 4, fig. 36a) and
Wang et al. (2023), in which the position of Dinocephalosauridae relative to Tanystropheidae, Prolacerta broomi and Crocopoda was unresolved in the SCTs. The exact composition of
Tanystropheidae, which is defined as ‘The most recent common
ancestor of Macrocnemus, Tanystropheus, and Langobardisaurus
and all of its descendants’ (Dilkes 1998), is unclear based on the
SCT, since a polytomy is formed by Fuyuansaurus acutirostris,
Augustaburiania vatagini, a clade composed of Macrocnemus
spp. and Elessaurus gondwanoccidens, and a clade composed of
all remaining tanystropheids. The iterative PCR protocol
identified Augustaburiania vatagini as an unstable OTU and
the resulting RSCT found Fuyuansaurus acutirostris outside
Tanystropheidae as its sister taxon (Fig. 15b). The relationships
within Tanystropheidae have also changed relative to previous
iterations of this analysis (Spiekman et al. 2021; Wang et al.
2023). Elessaurus gondwanoccidens is now found as the sister
taxon to Macrocnemus obristi within a clade also composed of
Macrocnemus bassanii and Macrocnemus fuyuanensis. In the
RSCT, the Macrocnemus spp. + Elessaurus gondwanoccidens
clade forms the sister group to all remaining tanystropheids.
Within this more inclusive tanystropheid clade, Ozimek volans
and Amotosaurus rotfeldensis are recovered as sister taxa, and a
large polytomy is found that comprises Gracilcollum latens
(Wang et al. 2023), Tanytrachelos ahynis, AMNH FARB 7206,
Langobardisaurus pandolfii, Sclerostropheus fossai, and a clade
composed of Tanystropheus spp. and Raibliania calligarisi, in
which the latter is found as the sister taxon to Tanystropheus longobardicus. Outside Tanystropheidae, the position of Jesairosaurus lehmani and the relative positions of Prolacerta broomi,
Tanystropheidae, Dinocephalosauridae and Crocopoda differ
from those seen in analysis 4 of Spiekman et al. (2021) and
that of Wang et al. (2023) Rather than being the sister taxon to
Dinocephalosauridae, Jesairosaurus lehmani is recovered at the
very base of Archosauromorpha as the sister taxon to all other
archosauromorphs, similar to analysis 3 of Spiekman et al.
(2021: fig. 35). Prolacerta broomi forms the sister taxon to a
clade comprising Crocopoda + Dinocephalosauridae + Tanystropheidae, again similar to analysis 3 of Spiekman et al.
(2021). The interrelationships within Crocopoda remain
28
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Figure 15 Cladograms of the phylogenetic analysis. (a) SCTof eight trees of 1,240 steps. Bremer values above 1 and bootstrap frequencies above 50% are
provided above and below each node, respectively. (b) RSCT after the exclusion a posteriori of Augustaburiania vatagini, which has gained one additional
node relative to the SCT.
unchanged relative to analysis 4 of Spiekman et al. (2021) and
that of Wang et al. (2023).
3.1.3. Discussion. The results of our analyses corroborate
previous analyses (e.g., Liu et al. 2017; De Oliveira et al. 2020;
Spiekman et al. 2021) that suggest that Dinocephalosaurus orientalis represents a non-crocopodan archosauromorph (i.e., the
paraphyletic grouping which, among others, includes Protorosaurus speneri, Jesairosaurus lehmani, tanystropheids and possibly Prolacerta broomi; Ezcurra 2016; Spiekman et al. 2021).
As in previous iterations of this analysis (Spiekman et al. 2021
and Wang et al. 2023), it is found within a monophyletic Dinocephalosauridae, but this clade is now recovered as the sister
clade to Fuyuansaurus acutirostris + Tanystropheidae. Support
values among dinocephalosaurids and tanystropheids in our
analysis are low, with bootstrap support under 50% and Bremer
support values of one for all nodes in this part of the tree. Only a
single additional step is required to force Dinocephalosaurus
orientalis and Pectodens zhenyuensis within Tanystropheidae.
When Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Pectodens zhenyuensis
are constrained within Tanystropheidae, the resulting analysis
is highly unstable, with 278 recovered MPTs, but Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Pectodens zhenyuensis both generally recovered deeply nested within Tanystropheidae. Other recent analyses
have found Dinocephalosaurus orientalis to form the sister taxon
to tanystropheids (Liu et al. 2017) or in a clade with Jesairosaurus
lehmani, which together formed the sister clade to all other archosauromorphs (De Oliveira et al. 2020). Note that both Pectodens zhenyuensis and Fuyuansaurus acutirostris were not
included in either analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
In general, tanystropheid and dinocephalosaurid phylogeny is
strongly hampered by widespread homoplasy, particularly when
it comes to cervical morphology, as has been recently outlined in
detail (Wang et al. 2023). Consequently, the phylogenetic position of other, more enigmatic forms that also possess particularly long necks or elongate cervical vertebrae, such as
Sclerostropheus fossai and Gracilicollum latens, remains highly
ambiguous. The only known specimen of Gracilicollum latens
comprises a poorly preserved skull and partial cervical column,
and therefore comparatively few phylogenetic characters can be
scored for this taxon. Certain features, such as the presence of a
dentition indicating a piscivorous diet and a large number of cervical vertebrae (>18), might suggest this taxon is actually closely
related to Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, rather than the tanystropheid affinity currently recovered. As has been noted previously (Wang et al. 2023), more specimens of Gracilicollum
latens are probably required to more confidently assess its phylogenetic affinities. The extremely long-necked Raibliania calligarisi is recovered as the sister taxon of Tanystropheus longobardicus
within a Tanystropheus spp. clade. This result is unsurprising
considering the postcranial morphology of Raibliania calligarisi,
which is very similar to that of Tanystropheus longobardicus
(Dalla Vecchia 2020). No cranial material other than a disputed
tooth is known for Raibliania calligarisi, but this taxon can probably be referred to the genus Tanystropheus. Elessaurus gondwanoccidens is found nested within a Macrocnemus spp. clade. This
taxon is represented only by a largely complete hindlimb and a
partial pelvis, sacrum and anterior caudal vertebrae (De Oliveira
2020), and it can currently only be distinguished from
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
Macrocnemus spp. by the relative proportions of its hindlimb and
pes, as well as by possessing a femur with a lateral condyle that
projects further distally than the medial condyle (ch. 282) and
the absence of a posterior groove on the astragalus (ch. 290). Currently, insufficient information is available to confidently ascertain the relationship of this taxon relative to Macrocnemus spp.
and tanystropheids generally.
Certainly, Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Tanystropheus
spp. largely independently achieved a comparable and impressive
degree of neck elongation (Li et al. 2004). In Tanystropheus spp.,
this is achieved primarily through elongation of the length of
individual cervical vertebrae, with the neck being composed of
only 13 cervical vertebrae (Wild 1973; Nosotti 2007; Rieppel
et al. 2010), whereas in Dinocephalosaurus orientalis the elongation of the individual vertebrae is more modest (Wang et al.
2023), but the number of cervical vertebrae is dramatically
increased to 32. Nevertheless, due to the poorly constrained phylogeny of tanystropheids and dinocephalosaurids, the possibility
that both taxa are more closely related than currently considered
cannot be excluded. Consequently, an initial elongation of the
neck, achieved either through limited elongation of individual
vertebrae or a small increase in cervical number, or a combination of both, could have occurred in a common aquatic ancestor
that both taxa shared to the exclusion of terrestrial tanystropheids like Macrocnemus spp. and Langobardisaurus pandolfii.
Interestingly, Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Tanystropheus
spp. also share several other features besides neck elongation to
the exclusion of most other tanystropheids. These include,
among others: a reduction in the number of premaxillary and
maxillary teeth (chs. 13 and 26), the presence of a fish-trap
type dentition (ch. 165), the presence of striations on marginal
dentition (ch. 173, also present in Gracilicollum latens), the
absence of a constriction on the ventral margin of the ischium
(ch. 278) and the absence of a pedal centrale (ch. 291). It is apparent that many of these features probably represent adaptations to
an aquatic environment, such as dental traits related to diet,
altered limb proportions, a reduction in complexity in pelvic girdle morphology and the number of carpal and tarsal ossifications, which represent paedomorphic features that widely occur
in aquatic reptiles (Rieppel 1989; Chen et al. 2014).
In addition to this, Dinocephalosaurus orientalis shares a
remarkable set of cranial features with Tanystropheus hydroides
(Fig. 16), which are absent or considerably less well developed
in the smaller-sized Tanystropheus longobardicus and other tanystropheids: the presence of an antorbital recess (ch. 33), fused
parietals (ch. 74), an absence of teeth on the palatine and anterior ramus of the pterygoid (ch. 100), a large and anteriorly
rounded anterior ramus of the pterygoid (ch. 108) and the presence of a keel on the anterior end of the dentary (ch. 146). It
seems likely that at least some of these features represent adaptations to the piscivorous, aquatic lifestyle that these two taxa
share. In contrast, the diet of Tanystropheus longobardicus probably consisted of soft-shelled invertebrates (Spiekman et al.
2020a).
However, Dinocephalosaurus orientalis also possesses several
features that differentiate it, together with Pectodens zhenyuensis,
from all or most tanystropheids, including Tanystropheus hydroides. These character states include: the presence of a prenarial
process of the premaxilla (ch. 7), the absence of a posterior process of the jugal (ch. 42, shared with Amotosaurus rotfeldensis), a
ratio of the length of the ventral process of the postorbital versus
the length of the posterior process of the postorbital less than 1.0
(ch. 62), postaxial cervical vertebrae without a transverse expansion of the neural spine (ch. 180), posterodorsally inclined neural
spines of the anterior to mid-postaxial cervical vertebrae (ch.
194), holocephalous anterior dorsal ribs (ch. 213), a ratio of
the longest metacarpal versus the longest metacarpal of 0.6
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
29
(ch. 258) and a relatively elongate, straight metatarsal V (chs.
300 and 305). Although it cannot be assumed a priori that
these shared character states are not homoplastic between Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Pectodens zhenyuensis, they are
highly unlikely to represent convergences related to lifestyle,
given the large size discrepancy and marked difference in
dentition and general body plan between the two taxa.
Our outcome corroborates previous analyses (Liu et al. 2017;
De Oliveira et al. 2020; Spiekman et al. 2021) that Dinocephalosaurus and Tanystropheus are most likely relatively distantly
related taxa among non-crocopodan archosauromorphs and
that their close morphological similarities (highly elongated
neck, skeletal paedomorphosis and shared cranial features
including fish-trap type dentition and narial recess) were
acquired convergently, highlighting the high evolutionary diversity of non-archosauriform archosauromorphs within 10 million
years of the Permo-Triassic extinction event.
3.2. Lifestyle
It is remarkable that within one group of tetrapods (noncrocopodan archosauromorphs) the excessive elongation of the
neck (Fig. 16d) should be achieved convergently in quite different ways. Does the increased number of cervical vertebrae in
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis compared to Tanystropheus spp.
confer more mobility of the neck? At first, this does not seem
likely as the cervical ribs extend across a number of intervertebral
joints and are bundled together underneath the cervical column.
The same configuration has previously been suggested to have
provided strength and rigidity to the neck in Tanystropheus
spp. (Tschanz 1986). Histological sectioning of the cervical ribs
of Tanystropheus sp. indet. has shown that they are primarily
composed of lamellar bone rather than being formed by ossified
tendons as in, for instance, sauropod dinosaurs (Jaquier &
Scheyer 2017). This suggests that the cervical ribs were indeed
stiffened structures that were well developed to provide strength
and rigidity to the cervical column. Although it has so far not
been possible to conduct such an analysis on the cervical ribs
of Dinocephalosaurus due to the rarity of the material, it is likely
that they had a similar developmental origin and function, since
elongated cervical ribs are widespread among non-crocopodan
archosauromorphs (Spiekman et al. 2021). Dinocephalosaurus
orientalis also shares the presence of dorsoventrally very low
neural spines of the cervical vertebrae with Tanystropheus spp.,
as well as with Pectodens zhenyuensis and several (other) tanystropheids. Tschanz (1986) previously suggested for Tanystropheus that this would severely limit accommodation for epaxial
musculature, thus limiting dorsoventral flexion of the neck.
However, it is important to note that modern quantitative biomechanical testing of neck flexibility is lacking for both Tanystropheus and Dinocephalosaurus, and this could provide important
new insights into the cervical flexibility of these long-necked
taxa.
What evolutionary advantage these extraordinary long necks
might have conferred is difficult to imagine. Li et al. (2004) postulated that the long neck together with the arrangement of the
cervical ribs might confer an ability to employ an unusual suction feeding strategy, which would require deflection of the cervical ribs in a different functional context from the one
outlined above. However, as has also been outlined by Spiekman
et al. (2020b) for Tanystropheus hydroides, the fish-trap type dentition of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, which is functionally
equivalent to that of Tanystropheus hydroides, negates the possibility of suction feeding, since the long and curved teeth prevent
the prey from entering the buccal cavity in such a scenario. Also,
as has similarly been described for Tanystropheus hydroides, no
heavily ossified hyobranchial apparatus is known for Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, despite the availability of several highly
30
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Figure 16 Restoration of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis. The skull in (a) left lateral; (b) dorsal; and (c) ventral views. (d) The skeleton in left lateral
view with a silhouette of a diver for scale. Abbreviations; ect = ectopterygoid; fr = frontal; j = jugal; la = lacrimal; mx = maxilla; na = nasal; pa = parietal;
pal = palatine; pm = premaxilla; po = postorbital; pof = postfrontal; prf = prefrontal; pt = pterygoid; q = quadrate; sq = squamosal; vo = vomer.
complete specimens, which also argues against suction feeding in
this taxon. Instead, the close convergence in cranial morphology,
particularly in the snout, between Dinocephalosaurus orientalis
and Tanystropheus hydroides suggests a similarity in function.
It was proposed that Tanystropheus hydroides most probably
acquired its prey through a (laterally directed) snapping bite
(Spiekman et al. 2020b), as was previously hypothesised for piscivorous Triassic sauropterygians (Rieppel 2002), and this also
represents a likely hypothesis for the feeding mechanism of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis.
The largest specimens of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis clearly
represent relatively mature individuals. In the holotype skull
there is frequent fusion of dermatocranial elements (Fig. 1),
and in IVPP V20295 and V13898 there is no separation of the
neural arch from the centra in the trunk region. Furthermore,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
as outlined above, the gravid LPV 30280 is considerably smaller
than the referred specimens of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis.
Even though this specimen cannot be unequivocally assigned
to this species, it is clearly very closely related, and thus indicative
of the mature state of the Dinocephalosaurus orientalis specimens. Yet the limbs of the Dinocephalosaurus orientalis specimens are atypical for early archosauromorphs in that they are
relatively short, show little development of articular surfaces,
and the carpus and tarsus are very poorly ossified. Carpals and
tarsals are typically developed as simple discs with no sutural
contact except in the proximal carpus. Distal carpals and tarsals
are sometimes missing altogether and the fifth metatarsal shows
no degree of modification. By contrast, even Tanystropheus spp.,
which among all other early archosauromorphs exhibits the
greatest level of paedomorphosis, retains a contact between the
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
astragalus and calcaneum, and the fifth metatarsal shows a proximal broadening of the ancestrally hooked fifth metatarsal. The
limbs of Tanystropheus hydroides were thus better suited to terrestrial locomotion than those of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis.
Bone density analysis showed the sauropterygian Lariosaurus
to be more clearly adapted to a fully aquatic lifestyle than Tanystropheus, which on that basis was inferred to have been amphibious (Jaquier & Scheyer 2017). Fishing from the shoreline
(Renesto 2005) has not been generally accepted as a mode of predation in Tanystropheus hydroides (Nosotti 2007; Jaquier &
Scheyer 2017; Renesto & Saller 2018; Spiekman et al. 2020a,
2020b), and we consider it highly unlikely that it habitually
emerged onto land: its long, straight and rigid neck making
extended movement on land improbable (Tschanz 1986). If it
was difficult for Tanystropheus hydroides to move on land then
it would have been impossible for Dinocephalosaurus orientalis.
Based on the highly elongated, serpentine body shape of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, including a characteristically elongated
thorax and tail, it is speculated that lateral undulation was probably the main propulsive force. Thus, Dinocephalosaurus orientalis is very much a serpentine-like form, whereas Tanystropheus
hydroides is more crocodile- or varanid-like, but with a very
long neck. The degree of skeletal paedomorphosis in Dinocephalosaurus orientalis is pronounced and indicates adaptation to life
in the open water, a lifestyle that is additionally supported by the
presence of vivipary in Dinocephalosaurus sp. and a closely
related taxon (Li et al. 2017a; Liu et al. 2017). To date, all specimens of Dinocephalosaurus sp. have been recovered from the
Upper Member of the Guanling Formation of Anisian age.
Although Tanystropheus sp. has been recorded from eastern
Tethyan deposits (Li et al. 2004; Rieppel et al. 2010), specimens
occur in the younger Zhuganpo Member of the Falang Formation of latest Ladinian or earliest Carnian age. The two forms
were therefore apparently not coeval, based on the currently
available evidence.
31
fish, which are preserved in the stomach contents of one of the
specimens.
5. Institutional abbreviations
AMNH = American Museum of Natural History, New York,
NY, USA; IVPP = Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and
Palaeoanthropology, Beijing, China; LPV = Chengdu Institute
of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu, China; ZMNH
= Zhejiang Museum of Natural History, Hangzhou, China.
6. Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.
1017/S175569102400001X.
7. Acknowledgements
Shi-Xue Hu kindly provided access to the specimens of Dinocephalosaurus in the Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral
Resources. The work was supported by Strategic Priority
Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
XDB26000000. We also thank IVPP for supporting the visits
of N.C.F. and O.R. to Beijing. SNFS is funded by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG project no. SCHO 791/7-1 to
Rainer Schoch). We are grateful to Marlene Donnelly for the
specimen line drawings and Martín Ezcurra is thanked for discussions on the use of TNT. We acknowledge the Willi Hennig
Society for the free use of TNT. We also thank the Editor, Martin
Ezcurra and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on the
original submission.
8. Competing interests
The authors declare none.
4. Summary
The Middle Triassic (latest Anisian) marine reptile Dinocephalosaurus orientalis is fully described in detail on the basis of seven
beautifully preserved specimens from southwestern Guizhou
Province, southern China, five of which are presented for the
first time. Characters in the skull and neck are consistent with
Dinocephalosaurus orientalis being included within Archosauromorpha. With 32, mostly elongate, cervical vertebrae, it had an
extraordinarily long neck that draws comparison with the neck
of Tanystropheus hydroides, another aquatic non-crocopodan
archosauromorph that has been recorded from the Middle Triassic of both Europe and China. Both taxa share several other cranial features, including a fish-trap type dentition, a distinct
antorbital recess and a wide palatal ramus of the pterygoid.
The phylogenetic placement of Dinocephalosaurus orientalis is
hampered by high levels of homoplasy, but our analysis suggests
that the similarities between Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and
Tanystropheus hydroides are largely convergent. Instead, the
results corroborate the presence of a monophyletic Dinocephalosauridae outside Tanystropheidae. A greater expression of
paedomorphosis in the appendicular skeleton and the presence
of paddle-shaped autopodia in Dinocephalosaurus orientalis
also suggest an adaptation to more open waters than in Tanystropheus hydroides. Dinocephalosaurus orientalis and Tanystropheus
sp. were not contemporaries in the eastern Tethys based on current fossil occurrences: all finds of Tanystropheus sp. to date being
from latest Ladinian or earliest Carnian sequences. The exact
function of the extraordinary long neck of Dinocephalosaurus
orientalis is unclear but it almost certainly aided in catching
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
9. References
Borsuk-Białynicka, M. & Evans, S. E. 2009. A long-necked archosauromorph from the Early Triassic of Poland. Palaeontologia Polonica
65, 203–34.
Brusatte, S. L., Benton, M. J., Lloyd, G. T., Ruta, M. & Wang, S. C. 2010.
Macroevolutionary patterns in the evolutionary radiation of archosaurs (Tetrapoda: Diapsida). Earth and Environmental Science
Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 101, 367–82.
Butler, R. J., Brusatte, S. L., Reich, M., Nesbitt, S. J., Schoch, R. R. &
Hornung, J. J. 2011. The sail-backed reptile Ctenosauriscus from
the latest Early Triassic of Germany and the timing and biogeography of the early archosaur radiation. PLOS ONE 6, e25693.
Chen, X.-H., Motani, R., Cheng, L., Jiang, D.-Y. & Rieppel, O. 2014.
The enigmatic marine reptile Nanchangosaurus from the Lower Triassic of Hubei, China and the phylogenetic affinities of Hupehsuchia. PLOS ONE 9, e102361.
Dalla Vecchia, F. M. 2020. Raibliania calligarisi gen. n., sp. n., a new
tanystropheid (Diapsida, Tanystropheidae) from the Upper Triassic
(Carnian) of northeastern Italy. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e
Stratigrafia 126, 197–222.
De Oliveira, T. M., Pinheiro, F. L., Stock Da Rosa, Á. A., Dias Da Silva,
S. & Kerber, L. 2020. A new archosauromorph from South America
provides insights on the early diversification of tanystropheids.
PLOS ONE 15, e0230890.
Dilkes, D. W. 1998. The Early Triassic rhynchosaur Mesosuchus browni
and the interrelationships of basal archosauromorph reptiles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological
Sciences 353, 501–41.
Dzik, J. & Sulej, T. 2016. An early Late Triassic long-necked reptile with a
bony pectoral shield and gracile appendages. Acta Palaeontologica
Polonica 61, 805–23.
Ezcurra, M. D. 2016. The phylogenetic relationships of basal archosauromorphs, with an emphasis on the systematics of proterosuchian
archosauriforms. PeerJ 4, e1778.
32
STEPHAN SPIEKMAN ET AL.
Ezcurra, M. D. & Butler, R. J. 2018. The rise of the ruling reptiles and
ecosystem recovery from the Permo-Triassic mass extinction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285, 20180361.
Ezcurra, M. D., Scheyer, T. M. & Butler, R. J. 2014. The origin and early
evolution of Sauria: reassessing the Permian saurian fossil record
and the timing of the crocodile-lizard divergence. PLOS ONE 9,
e89165.
Flynn, J. J., Nesbitt, S. J., Michael Parrish, J., Ranivoharimanana, L. &
Wyss, A. R. 2010. A new species of Azendohsaurus (Diapsida: Archosauromorpha) from the Triassic Isalo Group of southwestern
Madagascar: cranium and mandible. Palaeontology 53, 669–88.
Foth, C., Ezcurra, M. D., Sookias, R. B., Brusatte, S. L. & Butler, R. J.
2016. Unappreciated diversification of stem archosaurs during the
Middle Triassic predated the dominance of dinosaurs. BMC Evolutionary Biology 16, 188.
Fraser, N. C. & Rieppel, O. 2006. A new protorosaur (Diapsida) from the
Upper Buntsandstein of the Black Forest, Germany. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26, 866–71.
Fraser, N. C., Rieppel, O. & Li, C. 2013. A long-snouted protorosaur
from the Middle Triassic of southern China. Journal of Vertebrate
Paleontology 33, 1120–26.
Goloboff, P. A. & Catalano, S. A. 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full
implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32, 221–
38.
Gottmann-Quesada, A. & Sander, P. M. 2009. A redescription of the
early archosauromorph Protorosaurus speneri Meyer, 1832, and its
phylogenetic relationships. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 287,
123–220.
Jaquier, V. P., Fraser, N. C., Furrer, H. & Scheyer, T. M. 2017. Osteology
of a new specimen of Macrocnemus aff. M. fuyuanensis (Archosauromorpha, Protorosauria) from the Middle Triassic of Europe:
potential implications for species recognition and paleogeography
of tanystropheid protorosaurs. Frontiers in Earth Science 5, https://
doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00091.
Jaquier, V. P. & Scheyer, T. M. 2017. Bone histology of the Middle Triassic
long-necked reptiles Tanystropheus and Macrocnemus (Archosauromorpha, Protorosauria). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 37,
e1296456.
Jiang, D. Y., Hao, W. C., Maisch, M. W., Matzke, A. T. & Sun, Y. L.
2005b. A basal mixosaurid ichthyosaur from the Middle Triassic
of China. Palaeontology 48, 869–82.
Jiang, D.-Y., Hao, W.-C., Sun, Y.-L., Maisch, M. W. & Matzke, A. T.
2003. The mixosaurid ichthyosaur Phalarodon from the Middle Triassic of China. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und PaläontologieMonatshefte 11, 656–66.
Jiang, D.-Y., Maisch, M. W., Hao, W.-C., Pfretzschner, H., Sun, Y.-L. &
Sun, Z.-Y. 2005a. Nothosaurus sp. (Reptilia, Sauropterygia, Nothosauridae) from the Anisian (Middle Triassic) of Guizhou, southwestern
China.
Neues
Jahrbuch
für
Geologie
und
Paläontologie-Monatshefte 9, 565–76.
Jiang, D.-Y., Maisch, M. W., Hao, W.-C., Sun, Y.-L. & Sun, Z.-Y. 2006b.
Nothosaurus yangjuanensis n. sp. (Reptilia, Sauropterygia, Nothosauridae) from the middle Anisian (Middle Triassic) of Guizhou.
Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Monatshefte 2006,
257–76.
Jiang, D.-Y., Motani, R., Hao, W.-C., Rieppel, O., Sun, Y.-L., Schmitz,
L. & Sun, Z.-Y. 2008. First record of Placodontoidea (Reptilia,
Sauropterygia, Placodontia) from the eastern Tethys. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28, 904–08.
Jiang, D.-Y., Schmitz, L., Hao, W.-C. & Sun, Y.-L. 2006a. A new mixosaurid ichthyosaur from the Middle Triassic of China. Journal of
Vertebrate Paleontology 26, 60–69.
Jiang, D.-Y., Schmitz, L., Motani, R., Hao, W.-C. & Sun, Y.-L. 2007. The
mixosaurid ichthyosaur Phalarodon cf. P. fraasi from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou Province, China. Journal of Paleontology 81, 602–
05.
Langer, M. C., Ezcurra, M. D., Bittencourt, J. S. & Novas, F. E. 2010.
The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs. Biological Reviews
85, 55–110.
Li, C. 2003. First record of protorosaurid reptile (Order Protorosauria)
from the Middle Triassic of China. Acta Geologica Sinica 77,
419–23.
Li, C. 2007. A juvenile Tanystropheus sp. (Protorosauria, Tanystropheidae) from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou, China. Vertebrata Palasiatica 45, 37–42.
Li, C., Fraser, N. C., Rieppel, O., Zhao, L.-J. & Wang, L.-T. 2017a. A
new diapsid from the Middle Triassic of southern China. Journal
of Paleontology 91, 1306–12.
Li, C., Rieppel, O. & Fraser, N. C. 2017b. Viviparity in a Triassic marine
archosauromorph reptile. Vertebrata Palasiatica 7, 210–17.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
Li, C., Rieppel, O. & LaBarbera, M. C. 2004. A Triassic aquatic protorosaur with an extremely long neck. Science 305, 1931.
Li, C., Wu, X.-C., Cheng, Y.-N., Sato, T. & Wang, L. 2006. An unusual
archosaurian from the marine Triassic of China. Naturwissenschaften 93, 200–06.
Liu, J., Organ, C. L., Benton, M. J., Brandley, M. C. & Aitchison, J. C.
2017. Live birth in an archosauromorph reptile. Nature Communications 8, 14445.
Maxwell, E. E., Caldwell, M. W. & Lamoureux, D. O. 2011. The structure and phylogenetic distribution of amniote plicidentine. Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology 31, 553–61.
Miedema, F., Spiekman, S. N. F., Fernandez, V., Reumer, J. W. F. &
Scheyer, T. M. 2020. Cranial morphology of the tanystropheid
Macrocnemus bassanii unveiled using synchrotron microtomography. Scientific Reports 10, 12412.
Motani, R., Jiang, D.-Y., Tintori, A., Sun, Y.-L., Hao, W.-C., Boyd, A.,
Hinic-Frlog, S., Schmitz, L., Shin, J.-Y. & Sun, Z.-Y. 2008. Horizons
and assemblages of Middle Triassic marine reptiles from Panxian,
Guizhou, China. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28, 900–03.
Nesbitt, S. J. 2011. The early evolution of archosaurs: relationships and
the origin of major clades. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 352, 1–292.
Nosotti, S. 2007. Tanystropheus longobardicus (Reptilia, Protorosauria):
re-interpretations of the anatomy based on new specimens from
the Middle Triassic of Besano (Lombardy, northern Italy). Memorie
della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di
Storia Naturale di Milano 35, 1–88.
Olsen, P. E. 1979. A new aquatic eosuchian from the Newark Supergroup
(Late Triassic–Early Jurassic) of North Carolina and Virginia. Postilla 176, 1–14.
Osborn, H. F. 1903. The reptilian subclasses Diapsida and Synapsida
and the early history of the Diaptosauria. Memoirs of the American
Museum of Natural History 1, 449–519.
Pinheiro, F. L., Simão-Oliveira, D. D. & Butler, R. J. 2019. Osteology of
the archosauromorph Teyujagua paradoxa and the early evolution
of the archosauriform skull. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 189, 378–417.
Pol, D. & Escapa, I. H. 2009. Unstable taxa in cladistic analysis: identification and the assessment of relevant characters. Cladistics 25,
515–27.
Pritchard, A. C., Turner, A. H., Nesbitt, S. J., Irmis, R. B. & Smith, N. D.
2015. Late Triassic tanystropheids (Reptilia, Archosauromorpha)
from Northern New Mexico (Petrified Forest Member, Chinle Formation) and the biogeography, functional morphology, and evolution of Tanystropheidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 35,
e911186.
Renesto, S. 2005. A new specimen of Tanystropheus (Reptilia Protorosauria) from the Middle Triassic of Switzerland and the ecology
of the genus. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 111,
377–94.
Renesto, S. & Saller, F. 2018. Evidences for a semi aquatic life style in the
Triassic diapsid reptile Tanystropheus. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 124, 23–34.
Rieppel, O. 1989. The hind limb of Macrocnemus bassani (Nopcsa) (Reptilia, Diapsida): development and functional anatomy. Journal of
Vertebrate Paleontology 9, 373–87.
Rieppel, O. 1995. Fragmenta Sauropterygiana. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen 197, 383–97.
Rieppel, O. 2000. Sauropterygia I: Placodontia, Pachypleurosauria,
Nothosauroidea, Pistosauroidea. Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology
12, 1–134.
Rieppel, O. 2002. Feeding mechanics in Triassic stem-group sauropterygians: the anatomy of a successful invasion of Mesozoic seas. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 135, 33–63.
Rieppel, O., Jiang, D.-Y., Fraser, N. C., Hao, W.-C., Motani, R., Sun,
Y.-L. & Sun, Z.-Y. 2010. Tanystropheus cf. T. longobardicus from
the early Late Triassic of Guizhou Province, southwestern China.
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30, 1082–89.
Rieppel, O., Li, C. & Fraser, N. C. 2008. The skeletal anatomy of the
Triassic protorosaur Dinocephalosaurus orientalis, from the Middle
Triassic of Guizhou Province, southern China. Journal of Vertebrate
Paleontology 28, 95–110.
Scheyer, T. M., Wang, W., Li, C., Miedema, F. & Spiekman, S. N. F. 2020.
Osteological re-description of Macrocnemus fuyuanensis (Archosauromorpha, Tanystropheidae) from the Middle Triassic of
China. Vertebrata Palasiatica 58, 169–87.
Sengupta, S. & Bandyopadhyay, S. 2022. The osteology of Shringasaurus
indicus, an archosauromorph from the Middle Triassic Denwa Formation, Satpura Gondwana Basin, Central India. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 41, e2010740.
THE ARCHOSAUROMORPH DINOCEPHALOSAURUS ORIENTALIS
Sennikov, A. G. 2011. New tanystropheids (Reptilia: Archosauromorpha) from the Triassic of Europe. Paleontological Journal 45, 90–
104.
Shang, Q.-H. 2006. A new species of Nothosaurus from the early Middle
Triassic of Guizhou, China. Vertebrata Palasiatica 44, 237–49.
Spiekman, S. N. F. 2018. A new specimen of Prolacerta broomi from the
lower Fremouw Formation (Early Triassic) of Antarctica, its biogeographical implications and a taxonomic revision. Scientific
Reports 8, 17996.
Spiekman, S. N. F., Fraser, N. C. & Scheyer, T. M. 2021. A new phylogenetic hypothesis of Tanystropheidae (Diapsida, Archosauromorpha)
and other ‘protorosaurs’, and its implications for the early evolution
of stem archosaurs. PeerJ 9, e11143.
Spiekman, S. N. F. & Klein, N. 2021. An enigmatic lower jaw from the
Lower Muschelkalk (Anisian, Middle Triassic) of Winterswijk provides insights into dental configuration, tooth replacement and histology. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 100, e17.
Spiekman, S. N. F., Neenan, J. M., Fraser, N. C., Fernandez, V., Rieppel,
O., Nosotti, S. & Scheyer, T. M. 2020a. The cranial morphology of
Tanystropheus hydroides (Tanystropheidae, Archosauromorpha) as
revealed by synchrotron microtomography. PeerJ 8, e10299.
Spiekman, S. N. F., Neenan, J. M., Fraser, N. C., Fernandez, V., Rieppel,
O., Nosotti, S. & Scheyer, T. M. 2020b. Aquatic habits and niche
partitioning in the extraordinarily long-necked Triassic reptile.
Tanystropheus Current Biology 30, 3889–3895.
Spiekman, S. N. F. & Scheyer, T. M. 2019. A taxonomic revision of the
genus Tanystropheus (Archosauromorpha, Tanystropheidae).
Palaeontologia Electronica 22, https://doi.org/10.26879/1038.
Spielmann, J. A., Lucas, S. G., Rinehart, L. F. & Heckert, A. B. 2008.
The Late Triassic archosauromorph Trilophosaurus. New Mexico
Museum Natural History and Science Bulletin 43, 1–177.
Sun, Z.-Y., Hao, W.-C., Sun, Y.-L. & Jiang, D.-Y. 2009. The conodont
genus Nicoraella and a new species from the Anisian of Guizhou,
South China. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und PaläontologieAbhandlungen 252, 227–35.
Sun, Z.-Y., Sun, Y.-L., Hao, W.-C. & Jiang, D.-Y. 2006. Conodont
evidence for the age of the Panxian Fauna, Guizhou, China. Acta
Geologica Sinica 80, 621–30.
Sun, Z., Tintori, A., Lombardo, C., Jiang, D.-Y., Hao, W., Sun, Y., Wu, F.
& Rusconi, M. 2008. A new species of the genus Colobodus Agassiz,
1844 (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Pelsonian (Anisian,
Middle Triassic) of Guizhou, South China. Rivista Italiana di
Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 114, 363–76.
Tschanz, K. 1986. Funktionelle Anatomie der Halswirbelsäule von Tanystropheus longobardicus (Bassani) aus der Trias (Anis/Ladin) des
Monte San Giorgio (Tessin) auf der Basis vergleichend morphologischer Untersuchungen an der Halsmuskulatur rezenter Echsen.
PhD Thesis, Universität Zürich, Switzerland.
von Huene, F. R. 1946. Die grossen Stämme der Tetrapoden in den geologischen Zeiten. Biologisches Zentralblatt 65, 268–75.
Wang, W., Spiekman, S. N. F., Zhao, L.-J., Rieppel, O., Scheyer, T. M.,
Fraser, N. C. & Li, C. 2023. A new long-necked archosauromorph
from the Guanling Formation (Anisian, Middle Triassic) of southwestern China and its implications for neck evolution in tanystropheids. The Anatomical Record, https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25216.
Wild, R. 1973. Die Triasfauna der Tessiner Kalkalpen XXII. Tanystropheus longobardicus (Bassani) (Neue Ergebnisse). Schweizerische
Paläontologische Abhandlungen 95, 1–162.
Zhang, Q.-Y., Zhou, C.-Y., Lu, T., Xie, T., Lou, X.-Y., Liu, W., Sun, Y.-Y.,
Huang, J.-Y. & Zhao, L.-S. 2009. A conodont-based Middle Triassic
age assignment for the Luoping Biota of Yunnan, China. Science in
China Series D: Earth Sciences 52, 1673–78.
MS received 5 April 2023. Accepted for publication 21 December 2023
https://doi.org/10.1017/S175569102400001X Published online by Cambridge University Press
33