Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Empower Workers to Innovate and
Entrepreneurship: Raison d’être of
Successful Workers Cooperatives
Sapovadia, Vrajlal
American University of Nigeria
10 January 2015
Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/68762/
MPRA Paper No. 68762, posted 11 Jan 2016 14:46 UTC
“Empower Workers to Innovate and Entrepreneurship:
Raison d'être of Successful Workers Cooperatives”
Dr. Vrajlal Sapovadia
Introduction:
Indian cooperative movement has unique status, role and impact in the socio-economic development by
providing impetus to employment. With 595215 cooperatives, largest cooperative movement in the
world houses 249 million members, employing 16.69 million workers and self-employments (National
Cooperative Union of India statistics, Indian Cooperative Movement at a Glance: 2008). Cooperative
activities stand tall in economic sphere as third pillar. Cooperative movement is recognized as effective
instrument for social development and viable economic enterprise. Workers’ Cooperatives has grown
over time, workers in the country has steadily grown (Sapovadia et al. 2013). This paper analyses
selected 10 Workers Cooperatives engaged in different activities registered under various statutes.
Worker ownership is gaining attention in a variety of forms and regions. The study critically analyses
workers cooperatives to find reasons over time of its success or failures, has qualitative research design
employed on variety of entities. Study looks at phenomena of business cycle, value creation, value
distribution, overlapping role of workers (as members, entrepreneurs and managers), management
practices and innovation vis-à-vis business performance. We attempts to explore and interpret
dynamism of activities and interactions among key stakeholders to ascertain success factors. We are
studying various forms of workers cooperative to analyze the governance structure, system and
processes vis-à-vis economic and social performance. This kind of research is important to determine
success factors of cooperatives to replicate it for others (Carlberg et al. 2006).
Workers cooperatives are businesses like any other business; owned and controlled by their employees.
Workers in business are essential like other assets. Workers cooperatives are found in several sectors of
industry, e.g. construction, agriculture, producers, processing, restaurants, sewing, timber, dairy farming
etc. The history of workers’ cooperative is evolved to bring harmony between capital and labour. These
cooperatives are also known as Industrial or Labour Cooperatives; registered under The Cooperatives
Societies Act, Public Trust Act, Society Registration Act, Trade Union Act and Companies Act (Sapovadia
et al. 2013).
What is Workers’ Cooperative?
We mean ‘workers cooperative’, as a firm owned and controlled by workers; may not be formal
cooperative. The right of ownership is derived being worker of cooperative. It is form of organization for
employment of workers who are associated with one another for working together and joint reward
from business.
Member participation and control are crucial for success of cooperative. Ownership of workers
influences style of functioning; however success is based on entrepreneurship, sustainable innovation of
products and business processes. The workers cooperative has immense potential to arrive at ideal form
of cooperative which runs by and for each member; close to routine business affairs. It require skilled
workforce in value-addition, actively interacting with market forces and understand importance of
upgrading their skills to survive in market. They are active agents of change and responsible for success
or failure. High frequency of interaction among workers may leads to disagreements, which needs to be
controlled under able leadership (Seetharaman et al. 1981). Success of workers cooperative depends
upon resources, entrepreneurial leadership, sustainable products, innovation, democratic governance,
esprit de corps, fraternity, member centrality, adaptability, activeness, community and government
support. The literature reveals that economic and social performance of worker cooperative depends
upon enabling conditions of their formation, environmental influences, and internal organizational
characteristics (Sapovadia et al. 2013).
The Uralungal Labour Contract Cooperative Society Limited (ULCCS Ltd)
ULCCS Ltd is constructions cooperative society; ISO 9001:2008 certified (International Organization of
Standardization); obtains construction contracts through competitive bidding process from reputed
organizations to construct road, culverts, bridges, and modern building. The mission of ULCCS is to
deliver quality and timely work. The focus of activities is on societal uplifting and nation building by
providing appropriate job opportunities to downtrodden, through collective initiative of members. Over
period of time, the membership is expanded and venturing into bigger works with higher investments,
and procured new machineries for advanced constructions. ULCCS has well-defined organizational
structure to execute decisions of the board and consultation wing to associate in making policy
decisions.
ULCCS Ltd aims at imparting training to members at affordable rates and provides education to make
them employable. The society has own facility for quality testing, stone crusher, granite quarry, crushing
equipment, brick manufacturing, mechanical workshop etc. The society also ventures into agriculture
sector with motive of providing employment to workers round the year. The society owns 33 acres farm
to cultivate various garden crops like coconut, mangoes, spices, tapioca etc. The society has completed
3722 projects till date and 100 on-going projects on hand. (Sapovadia et al. 2013).
The members are encouraged to attend meetings, are expected to adhere to norms like maintaining
peaceful atmosphere at worksite. The Board exercises strict discipline by punishing default members,
can suspend defaulter but cannot remove the members without permission of general body. The society
emphasize on establishment of professional governance starting from policy formulation, work
execution and financial management. For various policy decisions it takes consultation from professional
bodies.
Only workers can be elected as director, who is assigned responsibility of project execution to ensure
timely completion. This system is derivative of cooperative principles helps in achieving excellence.
Members attend cooperative education and training programs. A worker is free to take appropriate
decision as per prescribed procedure; enabling worker to sharpen leadership skill. Worker gets daily
wages for work done, usually higher than market with additional benefits like provident fund, medical
allowance and gratuity. These practices make joint responsibility from bottom to top, which in turn
improves contribution and efficiency by several folds leading to success.
Self Employed Women's Association (SEWA)
SEWA, Ahmedabad based union comprised of self-employed women is convergence of labour,
cooperative and women’s movement. The union is open for membership by nominal fees to selfemployed women. Self Help Group (SHG) and cooperatives are formed, who are small vendors, homebased producers and labourers working in unorganized sector. SEWA’s objective is to offer integrated
plan for developments of self-employed women including childcare, leadership training through unique
organizational structure of decentralization in governance with two-tier level of elected representation
to govern the union.
SEWA organizes women workers through strategy of struggle and development for two main goals,
employment and self-reliance. Members work in markets, from home, fields, forests, on riverbanks and
in desert. The members are divided in home based workers, Vendors/Hawkers, Manual labourers and
service providers/producers; who undertake activities like capacity building, livelihood, marketing,
financial services etc. SEWA’s approach is need based and demand driven, by identifying the needs and
issues of the communities they link with government schemes. This helps in leveraging government
resources and policy action. Due to this approach and services like banking, insurance and health care,
the expansion and growth is spectacular (Sapovadia et al. 2013).
SEWA builds the capacities of members through spearhead teams, to make them owners and managers
of their own trades. As a measure of decentralization, district association implements all activities in
districts. This support provides firm foundation for growth; leads to collective strength and increased
bargaining power of workers. Flexibility in organizational style and structure encourages
experimentation and learning, willingness to take advantage of partnerships with others and hence
synergy of fraternity and cooperation.
The Indian Coffee House (ICH)
The Indian Coffee House is restaurant chain, run by series of worker co-operative societies having strong
presence of 400 coffee houses. ICH is owned and managed by its employees since 1950. The society is
engaged in selling coffee powder with rich aroma at reasonable prices and typical South Indian foods.
Over the years, the society maintained traditional values of good taste, courteous service and
unmatched quality.
The Coffee Board started ICH in early 1940s, but within few years, several restaurants were closed. The
Coffee Board took decision to dismiss all employees. Large number of employees lost their jobs, they
began agitation and compelled Coffee Board to handover the outlets to workers who then formed
Indian Coffee Workers' Co-operatives and rechristened the network as ICH. Communist Gopalan
Nambiar took leadership and organized societies across India. Several dismissed employees dedicated
their life, money and services to the society. First such society was formed in Bengaluru in 1957 followed
by several in later years. An eleven member managing committee elected from the employees governs
the society.
ICH runs 13 workers cooperatives governed by managing committee, elected by employees. National
level federation unites them under one umbrella. Market positioning is done by traditional ambience,
healthy food, affordable price, courteous services and allowing refreshment place as meeting place to
customers. On the basis on research conducted by research firm, The Nielsen, ICH was honoured with
CNBC Awaaz Consumer Awards 2008, most preferred consumer Indian brand.
Gambhira Farming Cooperative Society Limited (GFCSL)
Farmers of Gujarat’s Kheda District established GFCSL in 1953. GFCSL has members from 3 villages near
Anand, town famous largest dairy cooperative AMUL. The state government distributed 201 acres of
land on the riverbed to 176 farmers. The members of society have been divided into 30 working groups
for operational convenience. Each group has 8-14 members, who choose their group leader allocates
13-24 acres for farming. The land and other assets belong to the society. The members do not have
ownership rights on assets or cultivation decisions. The society undertakes primary farming activities
including tillage, purchase, irrigation, storage and marketing of produce (Patel et al. 2010).
The farming by small farmers becomes non-viable due to downsizing of land holdings, limited resource,
low investment capabilities, limited bargaining power in procurement of inputs, storage capacity; and
changing market conditions. Procurement of inputs and cropping pattern is decided collectively, while
technical help is provided by society. Members give half of their produce to the society. The strategy is
based on two fundamental principles; the small size homogenous groups of 10-12 households are better
unit of cultivation than individual farmer or large collectives, these groups are supported by quality
infrastructure to enhance productivity (Sudarshan, 2012).
The society helps to earn livelihood to farmers and have improved their socioeconomic condition. Sales
revenue in year 2010-11 was INR 32.60 million. A member contribute labour for 150-180 days,
significantly earn higher than cultivating individually and allows yearly earning of INR 90,000 (Sudarshan
2014).
Shri Mahila Griha Udyog (Lijjat)
Popularly known as Lijjat, a cottage industry, is Indian women's cooperative engaged in manufacturing
of food and fast-moving consumer goods. Women empowerment is done by providing employment
opportunities and enabling them decent earning and dignified livelihood. Lijjat started informally in
1959 with small capital, crossed sale of INR 6500 million in 2010. Lijjat provides employment to 42,000
people through 67 branches. All members are owners; decisions are based on consensus. Lijjat is famous
for products like papad (thin crisp food preparation served in India as an accompaniment to meal made
of black gram, pulses, salt, pepper and spices) and ‘sasa’ detergent powder.
Lijjat emphasize importance of quality standards, working as business enterprise and transparency. Only
woman looking for work can approach any branch to join without fees, monthly earn approximate INR
3,000 working from home. Lijjat works on Gandhian philosophy of ‘Sarvodaya’ (universal uplift) and
‘Trusteeship’. To achieve motive of generating self-employment for women, no machinery is used in
production. Lijjat believes in quality goods at reasonable prices and has adopted the concept of mutual
family affection, concern and trust. All affairs are dealt in manner similar to a family. Lijjat believes that
for members and employees; the organization is place of worship to devote one’s energy for benefit of
all.
The management is entrusted to the 21 members’ elected managing committee. Irrespective of
seniority, responsibility or work type, each member gets equal share of profit. Woman who pledges to
adopt the institution’s values can become member of Lijjat and can participate in election. The members
involved in rolling of the papads require clean house and space to dry the papads they make. Woman
without house can take up other responsibilities, like kneading dough, packaging or testing for quality.
Once pledge form is signed, she becomes member and considered as sister-member. Production is
carried out from thousands of individual homes. Every branch ensures that all activity is within standard.
The branch is responsible for all activities from production, testing, packaging, collection, and profit
distribution. Core activities like purchases are centralized to gain advantage of collective bargaining and
control.
Lijjat has evolved good governance structure by giving branches autonomous status. Profits remain with
the respective branches which is used to augment business after due share is distributed among
members. Lijjat focus on division of work among different divisions based on expertise like advertising,
marketing, sales promotion and exports. There is greater coordination between different branches and
divisions.
Working Women’s Forum – India (WWF)
Padmsri award recipient Dr. Jaya Arunachalam founded WWF in 1978 with an objective of social and
economic up-liftment of poor women in Tamilnadu (Nachiappan et al. 2008). WWF is strong working
women cooperative functioning in tandem with sister-concerns; Indian Co-operative Network for
Women (ICNW) and National Union of Working Women (NUWW). Mission of WWF is poverty reduction
and strengthening of economic and social status of poor working women through micro-credit, training,
social mobilization and other interventions. WWF and ICNW has commendable task of serving its
members in South India. WWF enhances the social and financial independence of women through credit
wing and provides loan at low interest rates encouraging entrepreneurship.
WWF is characterized by grassroots orientation, with feminist approach based on promotion of
leadership among working women through cost-effective large-scale outreach. WWF's purpose is to
raise awareness and promote collective action for social change and sustainable development. The
organizational structure is innovative based on group dynamics. The aim is to integrate target group of
marginalized and vulnerable women at all levels in institutional framework, using them as effective
delivery mechanism to reach other poor women. At the apex level of the structure are members of the
Forum. Membership at WWF is based on the group principle. Generally 5-10 members, irrespective of
their occupation, form group and elect group-leader. The group-leader is responsible for the repayment
of loan by the group and as an incentive, a higher amount of loan to the group-leader. Each member
vouches for the other members and is "guarantor" for each other. Area leaders are next in hierarchy,
become link between WWF and members. A unique feature of the organizational structure is that it
paves way for members to move up hierarchical ladder and reach the position of Vice President. There is
facilitation of free flow of information from the President to members and vice versa. WWF provides an
organized platform, access to credit, education, healthcare, training, orientation towards promoting
social and financial independence to fight poverty and gender discrimination.
The credit program of ICNW has extended credit to 410,545 entrepreneurs of approximate INR 1203
million; the recovery rate of credit is 98.66%. NUWW, WWF's trade union wing facilitates the poor
women in their struggles to fight for labour, land, housing, human rights issues like female foeticide,
child prostitution etc. (Sapovadia at el. 2013).
Kamani Tubes Workers’ Cooperative Society Limited (KTLWCS)
Kamani Tubes Limited (KTL) was set up in 1960 to manufacture copper alloy tubes by private
entrepreneur. In 1985, due to management problems, the manufacturing unit became sick and was
closed. When the owners abandoned, the independent workers’ union consisting of 600 workers
approached the creditors and government to help revival of KTL. The union then formed a cooperative
to take over KTL. Claiming that workers could raise the share-capital from their provident fund, wage
arrears and loans, the union filed petition in Supreme Court. The court asked the Board for Industrial
and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) to examine the union's proposal. Amidst legal hurdles, Supreme
Court upheld the workers' action to own factory through workers cooperatives. The existing workers in
KTL formed KTLWCS. At the behest of Court, workers’ co-operative society took over KTL after sanction
of rehabilitation scheme by BIFR in 1988, accordingly, shares were transferred to the cooperative. In
addition to workers' contribution, the state government sanctioned sizeable grant.
Initially after revival, the company has made good progress. Production, wages and profit gone up, in
next couple of years, the workers and management rift started. The hired managers failed to satisfy
workers’ demands. The workers failed as entrepreneur, mainly because leaders had disregarded
democratic processes of decision-making, mounting financial problems, lack of participation made
workers wary of leaders. The divide between workers and managers was re-created; as a result,
productivity and profit fell. The worker lost interest in the functioning of KTL. KTL could not implement
the sanctioned scheme, BIFR declared the scheme as failed. When all efforts fatigued, the
manufacturing unit was closed and creditors took the control to find out buyer for the sick unit. A
private entrepreneur purchased company in 2006. The workers were paid their dues, many of them
were retained in the job, but KTLWCS failed to retain ownership and control of KTL.
Mumbai Tiffin Box Supplier's Association (MTBSA)
The Mumbai Tiffin service originated by dabbawala (person carrying lunchbox) in 1880, informally
unionized in 1930, registered in 1956 as Nutan Mumbai Tiffin Box Suppliers Trust. Its commercial arm
MTBSA was registered in 1968. Daily approximately 5000 dabbawalas deliver homemade food to about
200,000 customers in every corner of Mumbai. Dabbawala collect lunchbox from customer’s home,
carry and deliver to the workplace. Office-goers usually leave early in morning and get back late evening,
mostly commute from Mumbai outskirts and travel south, main commercial area. Railway network
during the peak hours is jam-packed, hence commuters cannot carry lunchbox. Homemade hygienic
lunch is preferred over expensive outside meal. By delivering lunch filled with home prepared food,
dabbawalas provide viable solution to office-goers. Depending on location and collection time,
dabbawala charge very small amount for delivering lunchbox.
MTBSA is three-tier organization (i) governing council with nine directors and executives (ii) mukadams
(supervisor) and (iii) dabbawalas. Under the supervision of four mukadams, dabbawalas are divided
into small groups, responsible for day-to-day functioning. A dedicated worker can be member of MTBSA.
The member will invest small capital of INR 5000 to bring bicycle, wooden crate for carrying lunchboxes,
white cotton clothes and Gandhi style cap. MTBSA regulates activities of members and resolves their
conflicts with, customers or authorities. The mukadams has authority to impose reasonable fines on
dabbawala who commit repeated errors. The group is financially independent but coordinates with
other groups for deliveries of lunchbox. The process is competitive at the customers end due to low fee
based on cooperative efforts. All members are treated equal regardless of the work done; gets paid
about 2000-4000 rupees per month.
The dabbawala pick up lunchbox, appropriately coded and sorted at each suburban as per location of
delivery. Though number of transactions per day is large, each person handles limited number of
transactions. The external container that houses the lunchbox is of standard shape and size. The
containers are placed in wooden crate with the lids of the entire lot visible. They never lose custody of
the wooden crate throughout the delivery process. Area wise crates are loaded in train and unloaded as
per code at its destination, where another dabbawala collect and deliver lunchbox to the building of
client, who identifies his box based on markings on lunchbox, and puts back after lunch. The local
dabbawalas and customers know each other. Dabbawalas are generally well accustomed to the local
areas they cater, use shortcuts and other low profile routes to deliver lunchbox on time. Though
dabbawalas are virtually illiterate, there is only one mistake in every 6,000,000 transactions (Forbes
Magazine 2002). This error rate means in effect only one tiffin is lost every two months. MTBSA carries
‘ISO’ certificates awarded for high quality work. They are recognized for excellence in supply chain
management, time management, commitment, honesty and integrity. Forbes awarded MTBSA ‘the 6
Sigma performance rating’, a term used in quality assurance if the percentage of correctness literally is
absolute. The success of the operation is due to extreme certainty, predictability of the operation,
simple design and low cost.
Management of Enterprise and Development of Women (MEDOW)
Titan and MYRADA set up MEDOW in 1996, with the aim of providing employment opportunities to
young women. By redefining societal attitudes MEDOW has given wings of social and economic
empowerment to rural women of Karnataka, The profits are shared equally among working members
with a significant amount being added every year to corpus. This takes care of the company’s various
needs and benefits the employees’ families. Titan has its manufacturing facility in Krishnagiri district,
drought-prone, backward area suffering from multiple social problems, low literacy, gender inequality,
child labour etc. To address these issues, Titan is working since 1992 with MYRADA, Non-Governmental
Organization that facilitates women’s self-help groups, to combat gender inequality (Ujjwala, 2006).
Titan extensively trained the women in required skills, in accounting and documentation procedures.
They were provided worktables, tools, and also introduced to the SAP system. The company
collaborated with MEDOW to create infrastructure by contributing 50% of initial investment, provided
technical training and expertise to run the business.
Titan’s jewelry division began outsourcing in 2005 to MEDOW for some of the key activities in studded
jewelry manufacturing. The women were trained intensively by Titan to hone their skills in jewelry
making. Starting with the single task of bracelet link assembly, the women have acquired skills to
undertake 16 different tasks at multiple locations. This brings win-a-win situation for workers and TITAN.
The spirit of building livelihoods while doing business has enriched Titan with the satisfaction of
empowering rural women to form a micro-enterprise and run it effectively. This engagement led to
establishment of cost-effective, reliable and flexible skill base for company.
The Kerala Dinesh Beedi Workers' Cooperative Society (KDB)
The Kerala Dinesh Beedi Workers' Cooperative Society is home industry comprised of workers of Kerala
Dinesh Beedi, now a diversified group engaged in various modern industries. Beedi is local homemade
thin cigarette filled with tobacco flake and wrapped in Tendu leave.
KDB was formed from several unions of beedi workers with different political affiliations to bring
workers together to overcome prevalent issues of unemployment and achieve concrete developmental
task through team spirit and worker solidarity. Kerala State government implemented Cigar and Beedi
Workers Act in 1967 to support beedi workers. A prominent private firm, Mangalore Ganesh Beedi,
closed down all production operations in 1968, rendered 12000 workers jobless. Due to this crisis and
with support of Government, KDB was formed in 1969, is the fourth largest beedi firm in India
(Seetharaman et al., 1981). With the mission of the upliftment of weaker sections of society and
foreseeing reducing smoking, it started new ventures to create employments like coconut milk
extraction, curry powder, pickle and fruit processing unit. Dinesh Umbrella, division of KDB was started
as diversification programme with wings of operations like Dinesh Apparels, Dinesh Software, Dinesh
Foods, Dinesh Umberlla, Dinesh Beedi and Dinesh Auditorium. KDB provide full time employment to
12,000 workers through its functional units of beedi rolling, food processing, umbrella assembling,
garments manufacturing and Information Technology (Gulati et al. 2002).
KDB offers higher benefits to workers then the state law; provides benefits like holiday wages, medical
allowances, maternity, retirement, death benefits, and thrift loans. KDB do not employ child labour, and
provide improved work environment by construction of work sheds, water and sanitary facilities,
adequate space, ventilation and benches with backrests for beedi rollers.
Raw-material purchase in bulk is centralized like managing financial resources and marketing. KDB
coordinates and supervises primary cooperative societies. The majority of the boards of directors are
the workers. The surplus is distributed to workers and paid out as a reward for work as dividends.
Beedies are manufactured by all 18 primaries under one brand. Sound financial management and
efficient marketing have opened the doors to real improvements in living and working conditions of
members. KDB pays INR 250 million as wages to workers who roll 1800 million bidis annually. KDB has
adopted a piece-rate system of wages to provide a built-in mechanism to encourage output. The
centralization of certain activities has allowed to "maintain effective balance between distribution of
surplus and need for investment for future".
Findings:
The workers cooperatives under study have performed well except few. Worker Cooperatives combines
entrepreneurship, cooperative values and commitment to community. The success of cooperative
should not measure only by profit. Success of workers cooperative can be measured on two pillars,
business enterprise and cooperative. Success depends upon entrepreneurship, innovation and good
governance in ambit of cooperative principles. Annexure-I captures environmental crux of the study, in
light of the above; following critical factors are considered to determine success of worker cooperatives.
Entrepreneurship: Workers’ Cooperative is a business like any other business. As business enterprise, it
gets value by supplying products and services to customers. To be successful enterprise, it must satisfy
needs of customers through value creation. The strategy, execution, culture, and structure are the
pillars of success, built by entrepreneur leader. The strategy should be well defined and clearly
communicated. Irrespective of management tools and techniques it uses, strong hold of business basics
is critical to success. Value it gets from the customers for supplying products and services must exceed
cost involved in converting into output. In highly competitive business environment, workers
cooperative must be innovative in product design and processes.
To make enterprise sustainable, workers’ cooperative organization structure should appropriate blend
of centralization and decentralization of authority. Extent of centralization is irrelevant for success if
organizational structure is simple, without compromising the excellence. Make organization easy to
work; put best people near important tasks. Careful selection of managerial workforce, delegation of
power and appropriate control assist planned operations (Whyte et al. 1991). Promote cooperation and
exchange of information across organization; establish seamless system for knowledge sharing.
Lijjat has successfully delegated authority for managing local affairs at branch level while purchase and
finance is centralized. Branches are accountable for local marketing. GFCSL has delegated authority to
decide crop pattern at group level and accordingly small land is handed over to groups. Marketing of
farm produces are centralized to get scale of economies. SEWA has decentralized activities at group
level. ULCCH has centralized work procurement, but group headed by director manages the
implementation of project. WWF has successfully created group for lending credit, all group members
are reciprocal guarantor, while leader of the group is given incentive for proper recovery. Technology is
important but implementing it seamless is vital.
Workers cooperative can be registered under diverse statutes, each statute differently determines the
power, scope, obligations, limitations and procedure to be followed by organization. Able leader
succeeds irrespective of statute under which it is registered.
Evolution circumstance of workers cooperative is important. An organization comes with purpose as
result of several environmental forces. If the people unite because of compelling circumstances, the
cooperative get a boost to succeed. Cooperatives are formed for mutual socio-economic benefits. If the
members perceive such benefits, chances of success will be higher. Entrepreneurship augments business
strength based on its evolution. The cooperatives under study emerged due to socio-economic need,
primarily to provide employment or capacity development. Rather than profit, providing salary, wages
and livelihood to workers are prime objective. Entrepreneurial leader incorporate social value in
organizational culture.
At time of inception, entrepreneurial leadership is vital. Strong local leadership may provide robust
foundation to cooperative. Cooperatives attach importance and adherence to cooperation and
institutional values which distinguishes them from other profit-oriented enterprises. Successful
cooperative leader is visionary, entrepreneur and good human being (Sapovadia, 2004). The
conventional wisdom says that what works best shifts with time. Success of Lijjat is based on leadership
role with strong humanity and entrepreneurship. The role of the cooperative leader is not only to ensure
economic goals, but they are met within underlying cooperative values and principles. Success of
MTBSA is based on having imbibed cooperation in business operation and strong local acquaintance.
Leader know local business environment and people around it, one can lead the group if he is one
among them. The success of GFCSL, ULCCH, KDB and ICH is based on strong local entrepreneurial
leadership. Leader who create environment of trust and fraternity amongst its member can provide
strong cooperative culture. Successful leader is perfect blend of cooperator and entrepreneur. His
capacity to undertake business risk within given resources is critical to create and maintain trust of
stakeholders.
Cooperative is organization for, by and of the people. Workers’ cooperative is born as a result of local
demand. Local support is sine-qua-non for the cooperative to succeed. Entrepreneurial leader
understands local needs and satisfy by appropriate blending in its operations. Ability to manage
resources effectively is necessary condition for success. Entrepreneurship uses resources optimally to
make business viable.
Sustainability of cooperative organization depends on homogeneous members and mutuality of
interest. Members have similar socio-economic status leading to better understanding. True leader keep
members united and ensure member homogeneity. The essence of cooperative is to give and take
cooperation. This kind of mutuality is possible, when there is feeling of fraternity and equality amongst
members. Mutuality, equality and fraternity bring harmonic and peaceful relation. Successful leader
keep their workers as fraternity to create synergy for mutual benefits.
Economic importance of cooperative in member’s life is enormous. Higher the economic return, higher
member involvement and commitment towards the cooperative. Cooperatives are considered to lead
increased productivity, worker satisfaction, better job quality, and greater control of local economy.
(Dickestein, 1991). True cooperative spirit lies in member centrality, i.e. keeping members in center
while taking strategic decisions.
Mutuality of members and institutional goals, leads to success. A common enthusiasm, devotion, sense
of unity, common interests and responsibilities in workers’ cooperative are critical for smooth
functioning and success. The leader at helm succeeds if sprit of cooperative is maintained throughout, as
esprit de corps is the basis of strength.
Involvement of the member in workers’ cooperative is indispensable. Involvement comes from the
commitment. Involvement remains persistent if economic benefit is high. High frequency of transaction
leads to more involvement of the member. The entrepreneurial leader ensures more transactions of
workers with the cooperatives.
To establish strong cooperative require democratic governance system; appropriate organization
structure, transparency and accountability. Leader must be able to build sentiment of spirit- de- corps
and fraternity amongst members and promote member centrality. Success of SEWA is based on creating
environment of fraternity. Good leader is open minded, quick learner and expert in number and he
maintains economic interest of the society and members. Workers cooperatives are social entities and
hence, leader needs to have good rapport with the government and society. The leaders who possessed
creativity, credibility, and good communication have established strong cooperatives.
Governance is system of defining role and responsibilities of stakeholders so as to achieve objective of
the organization. The workers’ cooperatives are organization of its kind; confluence of enterprise and
cooperative. Workers, those who govern are owner and who are governed are workers. Cooperative
governance includes; board selection process, board composition, compensation, responsibilities,
reporting and evaluation, member and stakeholder relations. Better the governance, better stability and
success. The quality of governance ensures cooperative’s survival and growth. Unless a cooperative
develops a culture of accountability across the value chain, it is difficult to sustain. In competitive
environment only fittest survive; the cooperative has to be fittest to succeed. Those who exercise good
governance practices have a greater chance of success.
Workers cooperatives as business entity are democratic institutions with a difference. In other type of
business entities, quantum of equity determines member’s power to vote. This is not true in worker
cooperative, where all members get only one vote. If workers cooperative is governed by democratic
process giving due importance to all workers, workers elect competent and honest board members,
chances of success of the cooperative is higher (Bellas, 1972).
Decisions are means by which organizations turn ideas into action and decisions determines the fate.
Decision tree has stems and roots in shareholders who from inception to be vigilant in selecting
competent directors. Directors need continuous training in their duty as entrepreneur, trustee, manager
and cooperator. They must instill with cooperative value and business skills. Decision making authority
close to the front lines employees can make them react quickly to changing market conditions.
Successful entrepreneurs are adaptive, dynamic and vibrant. To be sustainable, workers cooperatives
needs to understand and absorb changes that are happening in its environment (Nicholas et al. 2010).
To remain sustainable, leaders must constantly change products and business processes through
innovation in a viable way.
Innovation: The organization to be sustainable requires constant changes in product and processes. In
competitive and changing environment, customers demand new product and approaches. Success of
new generation cooperative is due to satisfaction of current demand of the consumers (Carlberg, 2006).
Innovation help to discover what opportunities exist, or likely to emerge. Successful businesses respond
to their customer or organisational needs, anticipate future trends and develop idea, product or service
to effectively serve demand. Innovation help to stay ahead of competition as markets, technologies or
trends shifts continuously. Innovative focus on existing business processes and practices to improve
efficiency, find new customers, cut down waste to increase profits. Constantly innovating and improving
business practices help to attract and retain workers.
Affordable pricing is important to address needs of small but many consumers. Responsive cooperatives
launch innovative products by anticipating consumer mindset, persistently pursues technologies to
develop products to enhance operating processes. It constantly strives to eliminate all forms of excess
and waste to improve productivity.
The existence of any organization is based on product it serves to customers. Selection of products gives
edge over competitors. Main asset of workers cooperative is human capital. They should select products
in which workers are expert. Lijjat’s papad with variety of products are daily consumables at small
prices. KDB has expanded its umbrella by bringing modern industries like software. ULCCH has bought
modern machinery to construct bridges and high-rise building. ICH has lost its shining by serving
traditional products. MTBSA uses cost effective approaches by choosing local train routes, using bicycles
and coding system.
Businesses operate on profit margin. There is an economic justification for worker cooperatives to exist
even if they cannot make profit so long as they provide economic benefit to their workers as salary.
Within prevailing business environment, worker cooperative has the advantage; by reducing the price of
products in comparison with its competitors, and adjust salary and benefits of workers in comparison
with comparable employees.
Annexure-I
Environmental analysis of Workers’ Cooperatives
No.
1
Basics
strengths
Limitations
Weaknesses
Owning precious assets like
farms,
mines,
modern
machinery
Extraordinary
skill
in
construction
Local business expertise
Mutual trust and help
Collective
leadership/
decisions
Model cannot be
replicated, Heavily
relying
on
government,
Limited dividend
can be distributed
under the law
Private
contractors,
Professional,
technicians
managing
competing
firms, Change
in government
Heterogeneous
trade, members.
Traditional
technology
True
representative
of
members
Elected through democratic
process
Governance structures
Dedicated social workers
Competition
with local
trade, Change
in government
policy
ULCCS, registered under
The Cooperative Societies
Act, employ 750
construction workers
engaged in Construction
2
SEWA, registered under
Indian Trade Unions Act
engage 1,300,000 Selfemployed woman, run
Individual small businesses
3
The Indian Coffee House,
registered under
Cooperative Societies Act,
employ 466 workers,
engaged in restaurant and
trade
Prime locations in cities
Expertise in procuring coffee
Viable in big cities,
Rising prices of
land,
Traditional
system
Change of
food habits in
new
generation,
Competing
with modern
restaurants
4
GCFSL, registered under
Cooperative Societies Act,
291 farmer of Gambhira,
nearby villages are
members, engaged in
farming
Local visionary leadership,
Attachment with local people
and their needs
Market proximity
Farming depends
on rain, climate
Processing of
farm products
require huge
investment,
Limited
storage
capacity
Decentralized
manufacturing
Strong
manufacturing,
marketing network
Flexible timings
Low investment
Society
Registration
Act
prohibits
distribution
of
dividend, Relying
on central office
for raw material
Readymade
food,
producers
using high
tech
machinery,
Changing food
habits
Heterogeneous
members
New Micro
Finance
institutes
5
6
Lijjat Papad, registered
under Societies
Registration Act 1860.
Approximately 43,000
woman works in
manufacturing of food,
households
WWF, registered under
Multi State Cooperative
Act. 50,000 plus working
woman are members,
Individual businesses
Dedicated credit wing
Combining
economic
activities with social issues
Innovative
governance
structure, credit system,
recovery system
7
8
KTLWCS, registered under
Cooperative Societies Act,
employed 400 worker
engaged in manufacturing
of steel tubes
MEDOW, registered under
The Companies Act 1956,
employs 275 rural woman
willing to work in industry
engaged in assembling &
finishing of parts for
parent organization
Union
lacks
strategic,
managerial skills
Financial institute & court
support
Feeling of fraternity amongst
workers
Operational capacity
Company was
taken over in
2006 by
private
entrepreneurs
Support from TITAN
Assured market
Private company
cannot have more
than 50 members
Viability of
MEDOW in
long run may
be affected if
manual work
replaced by
automation
Workers inability
to
manage
operations
independently
Relying on sole
support
from
TITAN
9
10
Mumbai
Dabbawala,
registered under Bombay
Public Trust Act, employs
5000 workers as Tiffin
supplier, delivering to
offices
KDB Workers Central Coop Society registered
under Cooperative
Societies Act. Employs
12000 workers engaged in
production of beedi, other
products
Cheap local train network
Local
acquaintance
of
workers
Low investment
Linear city
Cannot
be
replicated in other
cities,
Law
prohibits dividend
distribution
Changing
eating habits
of new
generation
Market Conditions,
Sponsored by government
Strong diversification
Good
rapport
among
management,
regulatory
authorities
Tobacco
cause
health problems in
workers, Primaries
depend on Central
society for raw
material, finance &
marketing
Awareness
about tobacco
causing
cancer,
Modern cigar
manufacturing
technology
Bibliography:
Bellas C.J.(1972). Industrial Democracy and Workers Owned Firms, Praeger, New York
Carlberg J.G; C.E. Ward and RodneyB.H.(2006). Success Factors of New Generation Cooperatives,
International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Volume IX
Dickestein C.(1991). The Promise & Problems of Worker Cooperatives, Journal of Planning Literature,
Sage Publications
Gulati G.M. and T.M.Thomas and William A.K. (2002). When a Worker Cooperative Works? The Case of
Kerala Dinesh Beedi, UCLA Law Review-V
Nachiappan S. and S.N.Soundara (2008), The Economic Empowerment of Women: The Case of Working
Women, Journal of International Women's Studies
Nicholas L. and S.Amy and Hoyt L.(2010). “Sustainable Economic Democracy: Worker Cooperatives for
the 21st Century”, MIT Community Innovators Lab
Patel K.V. and S.Kolluri (2010). Success Story of Gambhira Cooperative Farming: Survival of the Weakest
Through Anti Darwinian Principle, ICA Research Conference, Lyon
Sapovadia V.K. (2004). Comparative Financial Performance of Indian vs. US Cooperatives, Ph.D.-Thesis,
Saurashtra University
Sapovadia V.K. and A.V.Patel (2013). What Works for Workers' Cooperatives? Empirical Research on
Success & Failure of Indian Workers' Cooperatives, ILO Workshop, Geneva
Seetharaman S.P. & N.Mohan (1981), Workers Cooperative - An Indian Experience, Indian Institute of
Management Ahmedabad Working Paper
Sudarshan, N.T.(2012). Co-Operative Farming: A Case of Gambhira Collective Farming Society, Working
Paper, IRMA
Sudarshan, N.T.(2014). Case study of Gambhira Collective Farming Society, Adapted Working Paper
IRMA
Ujjwala M.(2006). Corporate-nonprofit Partnerships - Case study of MEADOW, IIM-B
Whyte W.F. and K.K. Whyte(1991). Making Mondragón: Growth & Dynamics of Worker Cooperatives
http://www.ncui.coop/
http://www.ulccsltd.com/
http://sewa.org/
http://www.lijjat.com/
http://www.indiancoffeehouse.com/
http://www.dabbawala.in/
http://workingwomensforum.org/
http://kamanitubes.com/index.aspx
http://www.tata.com/
http://www.keraladinesh.com/