Papers by Michael Meeropol
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The international journal of interdisciplinary social sciences, 2007
The “crowding-out” debate or the argument that" fiscal discipline" will bring p... more The “crowding-out” debate or the argument that" fiscal discipline" will bring private investment to a growth path as a result of a decrease in real interest rates is appealing and an important discussion within Economics. More recently, the crowding-out debate was ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Challenge: The Magazine of Economic Affairs, May 1, 2012
Sometimes, it is useful to take a step back and remind ourselves why recessions occur and why rec... more Sometimes, it is useful to take a step back and remind ourselves why recessions occur and why recoveries usually follow shortly thereafter. Having done that, we can try to understand the causes of far more serious recessions and what must be done to recover. The authors point out how such severe recessions, including the Great Recession of 2007 to 2009, differ profoundly from most others.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Humanomics, Aug 28, 2009
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze and understand the Rubinomics hypothesis or the... more Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze and understand the Rubinomics hypothesis or the argument that “fiscal discipline” will bring private investment to a growth path as a result of a decrease in real interest rates, during the 1990s in the USA. Design/methodology/approach - The paper relies on a range of previously published works and macroeconomic data to test the Rubinomics hypothesis. Findings - The paper concludes based on data from the experience of the US economy during the 1990s that the evidence does not validate the arguments of Rubinomics. Originality/value - The “crowding-out” debate is an important controversy in macroeconomics. By shedding light over this controversial issue, this paper shows that the US experience during the so-called roaring 1990s, a period of extraordinary “fiscal discipline,” did not follow the classical crowding-out hypothesis.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
I think that the data that went out in the case of the Rosenbergs was of minor value. I would nev... more I think that the data that went out in the case of the Rosenbergs was of minor value. I would never say that publicly. Again, that is something while it is not secret, I think should be kept very quiet, because irrespective of the value of that in the overall picture, the Rosenbergs deserved to hang, and I would not like to see anything that would make people say General Groves thinks they didn't do much damage after all.1
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Routledge eBooks, Mar 10, 2015
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
https://works.swarthmore.edu/alum-books/1019/thumbnail.jp
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Routledge eBooks, Aug 6, 2018
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Michael Meeropol