Papers by Weaver D.R. Weinbaum
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Information
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
In this conversation, Weaver D.R. Weinbaum and Marta Lenartowicz discuss the paradigmatic limits ... more In this conversation, Weaver D.R. Weinbaum and Marta Lenartowicz discuss the paradigmatic limits to their argument that social systems are cognitive agents on their own. Integrating Niklas Luhmann's theory of social systems with Francisco Varela's enactive theory of cognition and Gilbert Simondon's theory of individuation Lenartowicz and Weinbaum have argued that the Luhmannian concept of social systems 'observing' their environment can be taken non-metaphorically albeit still in an abstract manner. While presenting this theory they were asked what would the 'physical substrate' of such cognitive agencies be. In their 'Thinking Studio' conversation held at the School of Thinking VUB they discuss what they understand as a profound presupposition carried by the above question: to be validly addressed by science, all phenomena must first be shown to be grounded in relation to a single fundamental layer of reality. Finding this paradigmatic presupposition problematic in relation to social systems, Weinbaum and Lenartowicz seek to demonstrate the case that different phenomenal domains may have different grounds which are not further reducible without losing their significance as a ground. The authors problematize the concept of ground, expose the difficulties it poses, and discursively construct an alternative conceptual framework in relation to which the initial question asked could be answered. Weinbaum and Lenartowicz propose a new understanding of the concept of ground which is relative rather than absolute and itself individuating rather than merely forming an a priori context for individuation. Specifically, they conclude that there is little point to ground social systems in a physical substrate. The notion of hierarchical construction 'from the ground up' is revised to accommodate individuating factors that operate 'top down' as well as 'across' diverse strata without a clear hierarchical distinction. The major consequence is proposing an alternative to the concept of ground as it is commonly applied, this in preparation for a more open-ended and less dogmatic scientific paradigm. The main line of argument analyses the concept of ground and asserts that understanding ground depends on the domain in which problems are described. Furthermore, the ground, far from being absolute is a product of individuation, that is a constructive process. This short volume contains a single 'Thinking Studio' conversation organised by the School of Thinking VUB at the Free University of Brussels.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
We argue the case that human social systems and social organizations in particular are concrete,... more We argue the case that human social systems and social organizations in particular are concrete, non-metaphorical, cognitive agents operating in their own self-constructed environments. Our point of departure is Luhmann’s (1996) theory of social systems as self-organizing systems of communications. Integrating the Luhmannian theory with the enactive theory of cognition (Di Paolo et al., 2010) and Simondon’s (1992) theory of individuation, results in a novel view of social systems as complex, individuating sequences of communicative interactions that together constitute distributed yet distinct cognitive agencies. The relations of such agencies with their respective environments (involving other agencies of the same construction) is further clarified by discussing both the Hayek-Hebb (Hebb; 1949; Hayek, 1952; Edelman, 1987) and the perturbation-compensation (Maturana & Varela, 1980) perspectives on systems adaptiveness as each reveals different and complementary facets of the operat...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Foundations of Science, 2014
This paper introduces Deleuze’s philosophy of becoming in a system theoretic framework and propos... more This paper introduces Deleuze’s philosophy of becoming in a system theoretic framework and proposes an alternative ontological foundation to the study of systems and complex systems in particular. A brief critique of systems theory and the difficulties apparent in it is proposed as an introduction to the discussion. Following is an overview aimed at providing access to the ‘big picture’ of Deleuze’s revolutionary philosophical system with emphasis on a system theoretic approach and terminology. The major concepts of Deleuze’s ontology—difference, virtuality, multiplicity, assemblages, quasi-causation, becoming (individuation), intensity and progressive determination are introduced and discussed. Deleuze’s work is a radical departure from the dogma of western philosophy that guides the foundations of science and systems theory. It replaces identity with difference and being with becoming; in other words, it provides systems theory with an ontological ground based on change, heterogeneity and the inexhaustible novelty-producing process that underlies all phenomena. The conceptual tools made available by this philosophy seem to capture the fundamental aspects of complexity and complex systems much better than the current conceptual system that is based on static transcendent ontological entities.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
In a world that challenges us with ever more complex problems, it is the quality of our thinking ... more In a world that challenges us with ever more complex problems, it is the quality of our thinking that is a critical game-changer in the quest of creating a sane and abundant future. As individuals, organisations, societies, and cultures, we need to foster thinking that proves to be more insightful and farsighted than anything one would ordinarily expect - making it our new norm. We must learn how to mobilise and apply intelligence that is extraordinary - one that continuously exceeds its own limits. The new VUB School of Thinking is an experimental program with the mission of challenging us all to achieve just that. Deploying an innovative combination of mobilization methods, the program sets out to cultivate the cognitive strategies, practices, and habits that are the marks of exceptional thinkers. This book invites the public to join the School of Thinking students in their endeavour. The reader will find here a variety of interdisciplinary research articles and discussions that took place in the school. It's a rare peek into a lively academic project committed to taking seriously the 'Sapiens' in 'Homo Sapiens'.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Information, May 5, 2018
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Springer Proceedings in Complexity, 2013
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Artificial General Intelligence is a field of research aiming to distill the principles of intell... more Artificial General Intelligence is a field of research aiming to distill the principles of intelligence that operate independently of a specific problem domain or a predefined context and utilize these principles in order to synthesize systems capable of performing any intellectual task a human being is capable of and eventually go beyond that. While "narrow" artificial intelligence which focuses on solving specific problems such as speech recognition, text comprehension, visual pattern recognition, robotic motion, etc. has shown quite a few impressive breakthroughs lately, understanding general intelligence remains elusive. In the paper we offer a novel theoretical approach to understanding general intelligence. We start with a brief introduction of the current conceptual approach. Our critique exposes a number of serious limitations that are traced back to the ontological roots of the concept of intelligence. We then propose a paradigm shift from intelligence perceived as a competence of individual agents defined in relation to an a priori given problem domain or a goal, to intelligence perceived as a formative process of self-organization by which intelligent agents are individuated. We call this process open-ended intelligence. Open-ended intelligence is developed as an abstraction of the process of cognitive development so its application can be extended to general agents and systems. We introduce and discuss three facets of the idea: the philosophical concept of individuation, sense-making and the individuation of general cognitive agents. We further show how open-ended intelligence can be framed in terms of a distributed, self-organizing network of interacting elements and how such process is scalable. The framework highlights an important relation between coordination and intelligence and a new understanding of values. We conclude with a number of questions for future research.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
... Vijay A. Saraswat , Kenneth Kahn , David Weinbaum, Detecting stable properties of networks in... more ... Vijay A. Saraswat , Kenneth Kahn , David Weinbaum, Detecting stable properties of networks in concurrent logic programming languages, Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM Symposium on Principles of distributed computing, p.210-222, August 15-17, 1988, Toronto ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Foundations of Science, Sep 9, 2014
This paper introduces Deleuze’s philosophy of becoming in system theoretic terms and proposes an ... more This paper introduces Deleuze’s philosophy of becoming in system theoretic terms and proposes an alternative ontological foundation to the study of systems and complex systems in particular. A brief critique of system theory and difficulties apparent in it is proposed as an initial motivation to the discussion. Following is an overview aiming to provide an access to the ‘big picture’ of Deleuze’s revolutionary philosophical system with emphasize on a system theoretic approach and terminology. The major concepts of Deleuze’s ontology - difference, virtuality, multiplicity, assemblages, quasi-causation, becoming (individuation), intensity and progressive determination are introduced and discussed in some length. Deleuze’s work is a radical departure from the dogma of western philosophy that also guides the foundations of science and system theory. It replaces identity with difference and being with becoming, in other words, it provides system theory with an ontological ground based on...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The Noetic perspective (from Greek: noetikosmental; nousmind) identifies the [human] mind as the ... more The Noetic perspective (from Greek: noetikosmental; nousmind) identifies the [human] mind as the nexus of the future evolution of humanity. At present, human evolution is a mental process rather than biological or technological process. The Noetic model describes mind as a relation generating complex system arising as a product of biological evolution and manifesting certain defining characteristics such as systemic closure, self reference, plasticity, etc. This model aims to integrate a systemic view with the mental constructs of the subjective plane. According to the Noetic model, human identity is a dynamic constructive process that brings forth the human observer as the subject of its perceptive and mental states. This process is identified as mind. Images and narratives are the elements encompassing the experiential and mental aspects of the identity process as they appear to the human observer. The idea of mind as the theater of evolutionary processes is further explored: Mind...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
ECCO Working Paper, 2018 (v.2), 2018
We propose a venture into an existential opportunity for establishing a world ‘good enough’ for h... more We propose a venture into an existential opportunity for establishing a world ‘good enough’ for humans to live in. Defining an existential opportunity as the converse of an existential risk —i.e. a development that promises to dramatically improve the future of humanity— we argue that one such opportunity is available and should be explored now. The opportunity resides in the moment of transition of the Internet — from mediating information to mediating governance. The Internet of tomorrow will mediate the execution of contracts, transactions, public interventions, and all other change-establishing events more reliably and more synergistically than any other technology or institution. It will become a distributed, synthetically intelligent agent in itself. This transition must not be just observed, or exploited instrumentally: it must be ventured into and seized on behalf of entire humanity. We propose that the new coordinating layer of the Internet should be arranged such that it w...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The sociotechnological system is a system constituted of human individuals and their artifacts: t... more The sociotechnological system is a system constituted of human individuals and their artifacts: technological artifacts, institutions, conceptual and representational systems, worldviews, knowledge systems, culture and the whole biosphere as a volutionary niche. In our view the sociotechnological system as a super-organism is shaped and determined both by the characteristics of the agents involved and the characteristics emergent in their interactions at multiple scales. Our approach to sociotechnological dynamics will maintain a balance between perspectives: the individual and the collective. Accordingly, we analyze dynamics of the Web as a sociotechnological system made of people, computers and digital artifacts (Web pages, databases, search engines, etc.). Making sense of the sociotechnological system while being part of it, is also a constant interplay between pragmatic and value based approaches. The first is focusing on the actualities of the system while the second highlights the observer's projections. In our attempt to model sociotechnological dynamics and envision its future, we take special care to make explicit our values as part of the analysis. In sociotechnological systems with a high degree of reflexivity (coupling between the perception of the system and the system's behavior), highlighting values is of critical importance. In this essay, we choose to see the future evolution of the web as facilitating a basic value, that is, continuous open-ended intelligence expansion. By that we mean that we see intelligence expansion as the determinant of the 'greater good' and 'well being' of both of individuals and collectives at all scales. Our working definition of intelligence here is the progressive process of sense-making of self, other, environment and universe. Intelligence expansion, therefore, means an increasing ability of sense-making.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The human cognitive system is a remarkable exemplar of a general intelligent system whose compete... more The human cognitive system is a remarkable exemplar of a general intelligent system whose competence is not confined to a specific problem domain. Evidently, general cognitive competences are a product of a prolonged and complex process of cognitive development. Therefore, the process of cognitive development is a primary key to understanding the emergence of intelligent behavior. This paper develops the theoretical foundations for a model that generalizes the process of cognitive development. The model aims to provide a realistic scheme for the synthesis of scalable cognitive systems with an open-ended range of capabilities. Major concepts and theories of human cognitive development are introduced and briefly explored focusing on the enactive approach to cognition and the concept of sense-making. The initial scheme of human cognitive development is then generalized by introducing the philosophy of individuation and the abstract mechanism of transduction. The theory of individuation provides the ground for the necessary paradigmatic shift from cognitive systems as given products to cognitive development as a formative process of self-organization. Next, the conceptual model is specified as a scalable scheme of networks of agents. The mechanisms of individuation are formulated in context independent information theoretical terms. Finally, the paper discusses two concrete aspects of the generative model -- mechanisms of transduction and value modulating systems. These are topics of further research towards a computationally realizable model.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 2016
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
"It is argued that the prospect of the emergence of a Global... more "It is argued that the prospect of the emergence of a Global Brain as a planetary level Communication Command and Control system capable of demonstrating general intelligence depends on realizing a scalable cognitive process. We have described an agent based framework for scalable cognition by first defining cognition as the combination of two selective processes: Selection for relevance (attention mechanism) and selection for effective action. These selective processes are context sensitive and operate on events that mediate differences in the state of the agent’s environment. The structure of cognitive agents and the structure of the environment co-‐define each other and therefore co-‐emerge. The framework suggests that the up-‐scaling of the cognitive process is realized by the agent’s tendency to form cooperative coalitions. Every such coalition is in fact a super agent constructed from simpler constituent agents operating together in a collective cognitive process. Coalitions are formed and dismantled according to their relevance. The relevance of a coalition or a super agent is derived from: 1. the existence of sufficient triggers from the environment to which they respond effectively according to a context sensitive set of criteria. 2. The extent by which they influence other coalitions and participate in higher level coalitions. 3. A Decay factor that basically represents entropy and the tendency of ordered systems to disintegrate in time. The concept of challenge is introduced into the framework as synonymous with context sensitive items of relevance that are selected by the attention mechanism. These items are analogous to the items ‘brought to consciousness‘ in Baars’ global workspace theory. As attention is spreading among agents, we say that challenges propagate within the population of agents along paths of influence that together form a network of influence. The propagation of challenges is analogous, at least in some aspects, to the monetary flow within a market system. Such flow abstracts the local context sensitive transactions and highlights instead the flow of the currency of attention. This is based on the understanding that the currency of attention ‘buys’ the resources necessary for effective action. Effective action in turn gains influence that further draws attention. This is quite different from the flow of information among agents because we hypothesize that what drives the formation of higher cognitive structures is the spreading of challenges and not only the spreading of information. Of particular interest in this sense is that aspect of propagation we called vertical propagation of challenges. Vertical propagation is associated with the formation of higher cognitive functions and takes place as challenges at a certain level are combined through the interactions of agents to a challenge of a higher level. The final part of the paper explores general considerations and problems of modeling the framework and outlining initial directions for implementation. The approach is modular and divides the frameworkinto a few modeling problems: Modeling agents (the generic agent), modeling challenges and events (modeling the environment), modeling topological aspects and finally modeling coalitions and their formation which is the most critical aspect of the framework. All these are of course subjects to further research. The ultimate test of implementing the framework is the demonstration of general intelligence i.e. the spontaneous discovery of problems in the environment and the emergence of specific problem solving capabilities without the guidance of a designer. This is of course a very hard problem to begin with but this paper makes some conceptual headway in figuring how to get there."
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Our envisioning of the brink of Singularity begins with redefining Singularity as an historical p... more Our envisioning of the brink of Singularity begins with redefining Singularity as an historical process, rather than an event. It is the process of continuous intelligence expansion since the beginning of human civilization. We emphasize the value and significance of the continuity of this process rather than the intermediate stages through which it passes. By that, we position the brink of Singularity situation within the continuum of human evolution, the evolution of life and evolution as a universal process. We raise the question of what would be the desired configuration and dynamics of the sociotechnological system able to facilitate open-ended intelligence expansion. A World of Views is our vision of
such a configuration. We then argue why a World of Views is likely to be the only feasible configuration capable of sustaining the Singularity as a process of intelligence escaping its biological constraints and beyond. Finally, we propose
distributed social governance as a bootstrapping mechanism for a World of Views and link it with the current momentum of the sociotechnological system. At the basis of the evolutionary shift humanity is undergoing on the brink of Singularity is the progressive process of entering into symbiotic relationships
with its technological artifacts. This symbiotic convergence deemphasizes the anthropocentric perspective in regard to the future. Furthermore, the past consensual understanding of what constitutes our humanity cannot serve us effectively under circumstances of accelerating sociotechnological change. From the social perspective, the most important are those artifacts that augment social interaction of intelligent agents as currently the Internet primarily is. Such artifacts do not only change us individually, they transform the very fabric of human civilization. We take therefore a systemic approach, first by focusing our discussion on the dynamics of the sociotechnological organism humanity is becoming, and second by introducing worldviews as the relevant units of
evolution of sociotechnological organisms.
Our analysis of the sociotechnological evolution shows that circumstances of hyper-connectivity, reflexivity and acceleration beyond their many obvious benefits expose the sociotechnological system to fragility that will only increase in
the near future and may lead to some catastrophic though yet unpredictable consequences. In order to counter this systemic effect we apply the concept of antifragility - the property of systems that thrive on volatility and uncertainty -
and conclude that antifragility is necessary to secure the sociotechnological system from devastating catastrophic events. To that end, we need a paradigm shift towards what we call a World of Views. A World of Views is a nested, self-
organizing structure, where worldviews occupy the highest level but in themselves are modular, open and diverse. Diversity, modularity and openness are the essential properties that together characterize an adaptive structure
capable of containing failures while propagating successes within the larger system, thus realizing antifragility at multiple scales. An antifragile sociotechnological system, however, is much more than just dodging existential risks. We argue that the benefits of technology will gradually transport humanity into an age of abundance, which will in turn have profound
effects on sociotechnological evolution. This self-amplifying reciprocity will result in decline and even disappearance of evolutionary pressures that arise from limited resources and survival needs. We propose that abundance will catalyze
active expressions of freedom that will become novel evolutionary selectors. In our vision of the future, the expression of freedom rather than survival is the ultimate driving force of evolution. We conclude that the World of Views is a catalyst of future abundance, which in turn reinforces the dynamics intrinsic of the World of Views. This positive feedback mechanism, once set in motion, will bootstrap the sociotechnological system towards a World of Views.
Finally, we introduce in broad lines a distributed social governance system that we foresee as instrumental to the development of a World of Views. Distributed social governance system is the implementation of a World of Views
on the social plane. It is a radical extension of a democratic governance regime in a sense of abolishing the single unified paradigm, in favor of continuous construction and dismantling of experimental models that partially work. It is clear to us that global education systems are the essential key towards distributed social governance, teaching us to live in a world without survival constraints, giving up the idea of a single value system, constructing individual and shared realities and constantly innovating on them.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
It is argued that the prospect of the emergence of a Global Brain as a planetary level Communicat... more It is argued that the prospect of the emergence of a Global Brain as a planetary level Communication Command and Control system capable of demonstrating general intelligence depends on realizing a scalable cognitive process. We have described an agent based framework for scalable cognition by first defining cognition as the combination of two selective processes: Selection for relevance (attention mechanism) and selection for effective action. These selective processes are context sensitive and operate on events that mediate differences in the state of the agent’s environment. The structure of cognitive agents and the structure of the environment co-‐define each other and therefore co-‐emerge.
The framework suggests that the up-‐scaling of the cognitive process is realized by the agent’s tendency to form cooperative coalitions. Every such coalition is in fact a super agent constructed from simpler constituent agents operating together in a collective cognitive process. Coalitions are formed and dismantled according to their relevance. The relevance of a coalition or a super agent is derived from: 1. the existence of sufficient triggers from the environment to which they respond effectively according to a context sensitive set of criteria. 2. The extent by which they influence other coalitions and participate in higher level coalitions. 3. A Decay factor that basically represents entropy and the tendency of ordered systems to disintegrate in time.
The concept of challenge is introduced into the framework as synonymous with context sensitive items of relevance that are selected by the attention mechanism. These items are analogous to the items ‘brought to consciousness‘ in Baars’ global workspace theory. As attention is spreading among agents, we say that challenges propagate within the population of agents along paths of influence that together form a network of influence. The propagation of challenges is analogous, at least in some aspects, to the monetary flow within a market system. Such flow abstracts the local context sensitive transactions and highlights instead the flow of the currency of attention. This is based on the understanding that the currency of attention ‘buys’ the resources necessary for effective action. Effective action in turn gains influence that further draws attention. This is quite different from the flow of information among agents because we hypothesize that what drives the formation of higher cognitive structures is the spreading of challenges and not only the spreading of information. Of particular interest in this sense is that aspect of propagation we called vertical propagation of challenges. Vertical propagation is associated with the formation of higher cognitive functions and takes place as challenges at a certain level are combined through the interactions of agents to a challenge of a higher level.
The final part of the paper explores general considerations and problems of modeling the framework and outlining initial directions for implementation. The approach is modular and divides the frameworkinto a few modeling problems: Modeling agents (the generic agent), modeling challenges and events (modeling the environment), modeling topological aspects and finally modeling coalitions and their formation which is the most critical aspect of the framework. All these are of course subjects to further research.
The ultimate test of implementing the framework is the demonstration of general intelligence i.e. the spontaneous discovery of problems in the environment and the emergence of specific problem solving capabilities without the guidance of a designer. This is of course a very hard problem to begin with but this paper makes some conceptual headway in figuring how to get there.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Weaver D.R. Weinbaum
such a configuration. We then argue why a World of Views is likely to be the only feasible configuration capable of sustaining the Singularity as a process of intelligence escaping its biological constraints and beyond. Finally, we propose
distributed social governance as a bootstrapping mechanism for a World of Views and link it with the current momentum of the sociotechnological system. At the basis of the evolutionary shift humanity is undergoing on the brink of Singularity is the progressive process of entering into symbiotic relationships
with its technological artifacts. This symbiotic convergence deemphasizes the anthropocentric perspective in regard to the future. Furthermore, the past consensual understanding of what constitutes our humanity cannot serve us effectively under circumstances of accelerating sociotechnological change. From the social perspective, the most important are those artifacts that augment social interaction of intelligent agents as currently the Internet primarily is. Such artifacts do not only change us individually, they transform the very fabric of human civilization. We take therefore a systemic approach, first by focusing our discussion on the dynamics of the sociotechnological organism humanity is becoming, and second by introducing worldviews as the relevant units of
evolution of sociotechnological organisms.
Our analysis of the sociotechnological evolution shows that circumstances of hyper-connectivity, reflexivity and acceleration beyond their many obvious benefits expose the sociotechnological system to fragility that will only increase in
the near future and may lead to some catastrophic though yet unpredictable consequences. In order to counter this systemic effect we apply the concept of antifragility - the property of systems that thrive on volatility and uncertainty -
and conclude that antifragility is necessary to secure the sociotechnological system from devastating catastrophic events. To that end, we need a paradigm shift towards what we call a World of Views. A World of Views is a nested, self-
organizing structure, where worldviews occupy the highest level but in themselves are modular, open and diverse. Diversity, modularity and openness are the essential properties that together characterize an adaptive structure
capable of containing failures while propagating successes within the larger system, thus realizing antifragility at multiple scales. An antifragile sociotechnological system, however, is much more than just dodging existential risks. We argue that the benefits of technology will gradually transport humanity into an age of abundance, which will in turn have profound
effects on sociotechnological evolution. This self-amplifying reciprocity will result in decline and even disappearance of evolutionary pressures that arise from limited resources and survival needs. We propose that abundance will catalyze
active expressions of freedom that will become novel evolutionary selectors. In our vision of the future, the expression of freedom rather than survival is the ultimate driving force of evolution. We conclude that the World of Views is a catalyst of future abundance, which in turn reinforces the dynamics intrinsic of the World of Views. This positive feedback mechanism, once set in motion, will bootstrap the sociotechnological system towards a World of Views.
Finally, we introduce in broad lines a distributed social governance system that we foresee as instrumental to the development of a World of Views. Distributed social governance system is the implementation of a World of Views
on the social plane. It is a radical extension of a democratic governance regime in a sense of abolishing the single unified paradigm, in favor of continuous construction and dismantling of experimental models that partially work. It is clear to us that global education systems are the essential key towards distributed social governance, teaching us to live in a world without survival constraints, giving up the idea of a single value system, constructing individual and shared realities and constantly innovating on them.
The framework suggests that the up-‐scaling of the cognitive process is realized by the agent’s tendency to form cooperative coalitions. Every such coalition is in fact a super agent constructed from simpler constituent agents operating together in a collective cognitive process. Coalitions are formed and dismantled according to their relevance. The relevance of a coalition or a super agent is derived from: 1. the existence of sufficient triggers from the environment to which they respond effectively according to a context sensitive set of criteria. 2. The extent by which they influence other coalitions and participate in higher level coalitions. 3. A Decay factor that basically represents entropy and the tendency of ordered systems to disintegrate in time.
The concept of challenge is introduced into the framework as synonymous with context sensitive items of relevance that are selected by the attention mechanism. These items are analogous to the items ‘brought to consciousness‘ in Baars’ global workspace theory. As attention is spreading among agents, we say that challenges propagate within the population of agents along paths of influence that together form a network of influence. The propagation of challenges is analogous, at least in some aspects, to the monetary flow within a market system. Such flow abstracts the local context sensitive transactions and highlights instead the flow of the currency of attention. This is based on the understanding that the currency of attention ‘buys’ the resources necessary for effective action. Effective action in turn gains influence that further draws attention. This is quite different from the flow of information among agents because we hypothesize that what drives the formation of higher cognitive structures is the spreading of challenges and not only the spreading of information. Of particular interest in this sense is that aspect of propagation we called vertical propagation of challenges. Vertical propagation is associated with the formation of higher cognitive functions and takes place as challenges at a certain level are combined through the interactions of agents to a challenge of a higher level.
The final part of the paper explores general considerations and problems of modeling the framework and outlining initial directions for implementation. The approach is modular and divides the frameworkinto a few modeling problems: Modeling agents (the generic agent), modeling challenges and events (modeling the environment), modeling topological aspects and finally modeling coalitions and their formation which is the most critical aspect of the framework. All these are of course subjects to further research.
The ultimate test of implementing the framework is the demonstration of general intelligence i.e. the spontaneous discovery of problems in the environment and the emergence of specific problem solving capabilities without the guidance of a designer. This is of course a very hard problem to begin with but this paper makes some conceptual headway in figuring how to get there.
such a configuration. We then argue why a World of Views is likely to be the only feasible configuration capable of sustaining the Singularity as a process of intelligence escaping its biological constraints and beyond. Finally, we propose
distributed social governance as a bootstrapping mechanism for a World of Views and link it with the current momentum of the sociotechnological system. At the basis of the evolutionary shift humanity is undergoing on the brink of Singularity is the progressive process of entering into symbiotic relationships
with its technological artifacts. This symbiotic convergence deemphasizes the anthropocentric perspective in regard to the future. Furthermore, the past consensual understanding of what constitutes our humanity cannot serve us effectively under circumstances of accelerating sociotechnological change. From the social perspective, the most important are those artifacts that augment social interaction of intelligent agents as currently the Internet primarily is. Such artifacts do not only change us individually, they transform the very fabric of human civilization. We take therefore a systemic approach, first by focusing our discussion on the dynamics of the sociotechnological organism humanity is becoming, and second by introducing worldviews as the relevant units of
evolution of sociotechnological organisms.
Our analysis of the sociotechnological evolution shows that circumstances of hyper-connectivity, reflexivity and acceleration beyond their many obvious benefits expose the sociotechnological system to fragility that will only increase in
the near future and may lead to some catastrophic though yet unpredictable consequences. In order to counter this systemic effect we apply the concept of antifragility - the property of systems that thrive on volatility and uncertainty -
and conclude that antifragility is necessary to secure the sociotechnological system from devastating catastrophic events. To that end, we need a paradigm shift towards what we call a World of Views. A World of Views is a nested, self-
organizing structure, where worldviews occupy the highest level but in themselves are modular, open and diverse. Diversity, modularity and openness are the essential properties that together characterize an adaptive structure
capable of containing failures while propagating successes within the larger system, thus realizing antifragility at multiple scales. An antifragile sociotechnological system, however, is much more than just dodging existential risks. We argue that the benefits of technology will gradually transport humanity into an age of abundance, which will in turn have profound
effects on sociotechnological evolution. This self-amplifying reciprocity will result in decline and even disappearance of evolutionary pressures that arise from limited resources and survival needs. We propose that abundance will catalyze
active expressions of freedom that will become novel evolutionary selectors. In our vision of the future, the expression of freedom rather than survival is the ultimate driving force of evolution. We conclude that the World of Views is a catalyst of future abundance, which in turn reinforces the dynamics intrinsic of the World of Views. This positive feedback mechanism, once set in motion, will bootstrap the sociotechnological system towards a World of Views.
Finally, we introduce in broad lines a distributed social governance system that we foresee as instrumental to the development of a World of Views. Distributed social governance system is the implementation of a World of Views
on the social plane. It is a radical extension of a democratic governance regime in a sense of abolishing the single unified paradigm, in favor of continuous construction and dismantling of experimental models that partially work. It is clear to us that global education systems are the essential key towards distributed social governance, teaching us to live in a world without survival constraints, giving up the idea of a single value system, constructing individual and shared realities and constantly innovating on them.
The framework suggests that the up-‐scaling of the cognitive process is realized by the agent’s tendency to form cooperative coalitions. Every such coalition is in fact a super agent constructed from simpler constituent agents operating together in a collective cognitive process. Coalitions are formed and dismantled according to their relevance. The relevance of a coalition or a super agent is derived from: 1. the existence of sufficient triggers from the environment to which they respond effectively according to a context sensitive set of criteria. 2. The extent by which they influence other coalitions and participate in higher level coalitions. 3. A Decay factor that basically represents entropy and the tendency of ordered systems to disintegrate in time.
The concept of challenge is introduced into the framework as synonymous with context sensitive items of relevance that are selected by the attention mechanism. These items are analogous to the items ‘brought to consciousness‘ in Baars’ global workspace theory. As attention is spreading among agents, we say that challenges propagate within the population of agents along paths of influence that together form a network of influence. The propagation of challenges is analogous, at least in some aspects, to the monetary flow within a market system. Such flow abstracts the local context sensitive transactions and highlights instead the flow of the currency of attention. This is based on the understanding that the currency of attention ‘buys’ the resources necessary for effective action. Effective action in turn gains influence that further draws attention. This is quite different from the flow of information among agents because we hypothesize that what drives the formation of higher cognitive structures is the spreading of challenges and not only the spreading of information. Of particular interest in this sense is that aspect of propagation we called vertical propagation of challenges. Vertical propagation is associated with the formation of higher cognitive functions and takes place as challenges at a certain level are combined through the interactions of agents to a challenge of a higher level.
The final part of the paper explores general considerations and problems of modeling the framework and outlining initial directions for implementation. The approach is modular and divides the frameworkinto a few modeling problems: Modeling agents (the generic agent), modeling challenges and events (modeling the environment), modeling topological aspects and finally modeling coalitions and their formation which is the most critical aspect of the framework. All these are of course subjects to further research.
The ultimate test of implementing the framework is the demonstration of general intelligence i.e. the spontaneous discovery of problems in the environment and the emergence of specific problem solving capabilities without the guidance of a designer. This is of course a very hard problem to begin with but this paper makes some conceptual headway in figuring how to get there.
don and Deleuze an alternative metaphysics is proposed, one that replaces the individual as the primary metaphysical element with individuation as a primary metaphysical process and consequently makes difference primal to identity. This paradigmatic shift, it is shown, is the key to going beyond representation and understanding thought and cognition as open-ended, creative processes of self-organization. These
formative processes are of a universal scope and precede any kind of representable object, agency, or relation. Specifically they precede the subject-object dichotomy. In bringing forth order from non-order, sense from non-sense, knowledge from the unknown, they manifest open-ended intelligence – a kind of intelligence which is neither purposeful or predictive but rather experimental and productive. Guided by this
metaphysical approach and in conjunction with the theory of enactive cognition, population thinking and cybernetics, a framework of distributed systemic cognition is developed. It offers conceptual tools that can be applied to the study of complex systems and situations as they evolve.