Papers by Kazimierz Lewartowski
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Światowit, 2001
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Novensia, 2019
Right-handedness dominates among all human populations but the question is if and how the
Aegean ... more Right-handedness dominates among all human populations but the question is if and how the
Aegean artists depicted it in their art, or whether they compromised between reality and artistic concepts.
In order to find answers to those questions, this paper examines wall and vase paintings, stone and metal
vases, ivories, bronzes and terracottas, larnakes, stelae, daggers (seals and sealings are excluded because
of the seal/sealing problem). These are examined according to the categorisation of skilled and unskilled,
bi- and unimanual activities. The results suggest a domination of right-handedness in the Aegean iconography with some exceptions resulting mainly from the symmetry of specific compositions. It is also
notable that the Aegean artists tended to represent right hands as the near ones and they preferred to show
shoulders supporting long objects like spears as the near ones regardless of the orientation of depicted
subjects.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Polish Archaeological Research in Ptolemais (Libya) in 2007-2009 : Preliminary Report / Jerzy Żelazowski, Monika Rekowska-Ruszkowska, Zofia Kowarska, Szymon Lenarczyk, Krzysztof Chmielewski, Elżbieta Rosłoniec, Piotr Jaworski, Krzysztof Misiewicz, Kazimierz Lewartowski, George Yacoub, Miron Bogacki
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
American Journal of Archaeology, 2006
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
American Journal of Archaeology, 2009
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
American Journal of Archaeology, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
American Journal of Archaeology, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Meministine? Pamięć i niepamięć w świecie starożytnym - świat starożytny w pamięci i niepamięci, 2020
After years of considering the problem of whether traces of memories from the Late Bronze Age, or... more After years of considering the problem of whether traces of memories from the Late Bronze Age, or Mycenaean period, can be found in Greek historical or literary sources, one should first ask whether conditions existed for them to be preserved in the first place.
With the demise of the Mycenaean palatial system, its system of writing also vanished. For roughly the next 500 years, Greece was dominated by an oral culture that did not help cultivate historical memory. More helpful in that regard were the ruins of ancient buildings and other Mycenaean or Minoan relics that could be found throughout Greece. We can also observe various elements of cultural continuity. For example, the existence of the ancient past, at least in its broadest outlines, was acknowledged in the archaic period, even if it differed drastically from contemporary realities. We know, too, that modern Greeks are descendants of the Bronze Age inhabitants of Hellas. That tells us little enough, but if we are ready to entertain the possibility that vestiges of ancient times could survive in popular memory, we must consider where and under what conditions this might have happened.
Crete seems to be the place where traditions of past glories had the greatest chance of survival and transmission. The island’s mythology seems closer to Minoan realities than to the Theban or Mycenaean cycles. We can also observe many elements of cultural continuity, the preservation of art forms or sacral architecture. At the turn of the Bronze and Iron Ages, Crete had not experienced the disasters that afflicted mainland Greece and many of the islands. Population movements and migration had mainly a local character. Homer, in mentioning the five tribes inhabiting Crete, almost certainly in his own times, was careful to point out the aboriginal inhabitants, who dwelled there before the arrival of the Achaeans and the Dorians. There was also a surviving language, called Eteocretan, which was probably spoken by the island’s Minoan rulers. Moreover, it was customary on Crete to refer in various ways to the glorious past.
Taken together, all this suggests that shards of memories from the Minoan period could possibly have survived on Crete. Evidence of whether this could be true must be sought in tales about King Minos, the Minotaur, Glaukos, Akakallis or the Labyrinth.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization, 2019
In 2015, an intaglio gem was discovered in Pylos (Messenia, Greece) from the beginning of the Lat... more In 2015, an intaglio gem was discovered in Pylos (Messenia, Greece) from the beginning of the Late Bronze Age with a scene of two warriors in combat. This representation is part of a group of similar images on seals. The analysis of these objects allows the suggestion that the scenes depicted on them are based on the same story/myth. This story helped to build the ideology of the Mycenaean elites based on, among other things,the use time linking the Mycenaeans living in different parts of Greece, especially in Mycenae, Pylos and Vapheio. Perhaps it had an epic dimension similar to Homer’s much later work.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Lewartowski, K. (2018) Ludwika (Lala) Press, in: E. Orzechowska (ed), G. Whitaker (co-ed.), Biographical Dictionary of Polish Women Classicists: 20th Century, Faculty of "Artes Liberales", University of Warsaw: Warsaw, 188-193, 2018
Biography of Professor Ludwika Press
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Libya Antiqua 2013-2014 (printed 2016), 2013
Abstract
In 2008-2010, the Polish Archaeological Mission to Ptolemais of the Institute of Archaeo... more Abstract
In 2008-2010, the Polish Archaeological Mission to Ptolemais of the Institute of Archaeology, University of Warsaw continued the research begun in 2001 in one of the insulae (exxi) sited in the central part of the ancient town of Ptolemais – to the east of the Palazzo delle Colonne. Work has been suspended on this site since the
end of the campaign of 2010. The work of this period was concentrated on examining the area to the north and east of the area previously explored containing part of the House of Leukaktios. Conservation work was also undertaken on the discovered remains. The better-preserved wall paintings were removed from the walls of the buildings and taken to the museum in Tolmeita for further conservation, while the more fragmentary remains were conserved in situ. The mosaics, also left in situ, were also conserved. In addition another project involved the documentation of all the Christian basilicas identified in ancient Ptolemais.
The excavations uncovered traces of different phases of use of the insula. The latest of these (of the Post-Antiquity period) was a wall in herringbone bond and an adjacent surface which lay just below the surface of the ground on the eastern side of the insula. There was a clear change in the area after an earthquake in 365, which destroyed the residential structures. Their ruins were used as the site of industrial activity, totally altering the character of this part of the town.
Evidence of this are the kilns for firing ceramic lamps, ceramic building materials and burning lime which were built here on the bedrock or former floors. There were also found deposits of well-cleaned clay in the storage vats. There were also platforms and circular vats of waterproof mortar, which probably served for wine production.
The exploration of a Late Antique building with an internal apse, built into the ruins of a house with a geometric mosaic to the north of the House of Leukaktios was suspended and left for future work due to the thick layer of destruction rubble filling its interior.
The buildings of the phase predating the earthquake (third to mid-fourth century AD) were the result of successive reconstructions, changes in ownership and property divisions. The oldest walls, especially the two limiting the insula from the east and west come from the Hellenistic period, setting the width of the insula at 36.5
m, while the walls limiting the House of Leukaktios and the House of the Atrium on the north and south are the probably the original frontier of a property at that time
occupied by one house. To the east of the previously exposed parts of the House of Leukaktios was revealed a large courtyard covered with opus signinum. Its entrance led from the east, and under the surface of the courtyard a water tank with two inlets had been built. The premises located along the northern wall of this courtyard resulting from the reconstruction of this part of the adjacent house. A doorway, probably arched, the jambs of which had a richly-decorated base, dates to the last phase of the use of this part of the site.
In the south-eastern part of the excavation, a courtyard paved with stone slabs, containing an impluvium with a mosaic was uncovered. This belonged to yet another house that was not fully explored in this campaign. The large quantities of coarse pottery found dates from the Hellenistic to the Late Roman periods, with the dominant mass being of the Middle Roman period. The assemblage is composed of both local as well as imported products. The pottery has close analogies in the finds from other towns in Cyrenaica.
The non-invasive surveys of areas in the west and north parts of the town were continued with the use of caesium vapour magnetometers and fluxgate radiometers. The Hellenistic street network was clearly visible, as was the Byzantine one, which – together with the use of observation of surface traces and aerial photography – allows the reconstruction of the plan of the town.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Ptolemais in Cyrenaica. Results of Non-Invasive Surveys [Polish Archaeological Mission to Ptolemais. Ptolemais II], P. Jaworski, K. Misiewicz eds., Warsaw 2015
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Burials were found in the dromoi of more than 135 chamber tombs all over Greece with special conc... more Burials were found in the dromoi of more than 135 chamber tombs all over Greece with special concentrations in Mycenae, Prosymna and Asine in the Argolid, and Alyki in Attica. They never deserved much archaeologists' attention and were interpreted usually in 4 ways: 1. bones removed from the chamber in order to make room for new burials; 2. bodies disposed of outside the chambers because of lack of space there; 3. bodies of persons who didn't have the right to be buried inside because of their age or inferior social position; 4. human sacrifices.
The burials can be classified in two different ways: 1. on grounds of method of deposition (primary and secondary burials); 2. on grounds of grave construction (pits, cists, niches, niche-pits, pit-caves, pithoi and bones deposited directly in fill).
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Kazimierz Lewartowski
Aegean artists depicted it in their art, or whether they compromised between reality and artistic concepts.
In order to find answers to those questions, this paper examines wall and vase paintings, stone and metal
vases, ivories, bronzes and terracottas, larnakes, stelae, daggers (seals and sealings are excluded because
of the seal/sealing problem). These are examined according to the categorisation of skilled and unskilled,
bi- and unimanual activities. The results suggest a domination of right-handedness in the Aegean iconography with some exceptions resulting mainly from the symmetry of specific compositions. It is also
notable that the Aegean artists tended to represent right hands as the near ones and they preferred to show
shoulders supporting long objects like spears as the near ones regardless of the orientation of depicted
subjects.
With the demise of the Mycenaean palatial system, its system of writing also vanished. For roughly the next 500 years, Greece was dominated by an oral culture that did not help cultivate historical memory. More helpful in that regard were the ruins of ancient buildings and other Mycenaean or Minoan relics that could be found throughout Greece. We can also observe various elements of cultural continuity. For example, the existence of the ancient past, at least in its broadest outlines, was acknowledged in the archaic period, even if it differed drastically from contemporary realities. We know, too, that modern Greeks are descendants of the Bronze Age inhabitants of Hellas. That tells us little enough, but if we are ready to entertain the possibility that vestiges of ancient times could survive in popular memory, we must consider where and under what conditions this might have happened.
Crete seems to be the place where traditions of past glories had the greatest chance of survival and transmission. The island’s mythology seems closer to Minoan realities than to the Theban or Mycenaean cycles. We can also observe many elements of cultural continuity, the preservation of art forms or sacral architecture. At the turn of the Bronze and Iron Ages, Crete had not experienced the disasters that afflicted mainland Greece and many of the islands. Population movements and migration had mainly a local character. Homer, in mentioning the five tribes inhabiting Crete, almost certainly in his own times, was careful to point out the aboriginal inhabitants, who dwelled there before the arrival of the Achaeans and the Dorians. There was also a surviving language, called Eteocretan, which was probably spoken by the island’s Minoan rulers. Moreover, it was customary on Crete to refer in various ways to the glorious past.
Taken together, all this suggests that shards of memories from the Minoan period could possibly have survived on Crete. Evidence of whether this could be true must be sought in tales about King Minos, the Minotaur, Glaukos, Akakallis or the Labyrinth.
In 2008-2010, the Polish Archaeological Mission to Ptolemais of the Institute of Archaeology, University of Warsaw continued the research begun in 2001 in one of the insulae (exxi) sited in the central part of the ancient town of Ptolemais – to the east of the Palazzo delle Colonne. Work has been suspended on this site since the
end of the campaign of 2010. The work of this period was concentrated on examining the area to the north and east of the area previously explored containing part of the House of Leukaktios. Conservation work was also undertaken on the discovered remains. The better-preserved wall paintings were removed from the walls of the buildings and taken to the museum in Tolmeita for further conservation, while the more fragmentary remains were conserved in situ. The mosaics, also left in situ, were also conserved. In addition another project involved the documentation of all the Christian basilicas identified in ancient Ptolemais.
The excavations uncovered traces of different phases of use of the insula. The latest of these (of the Post-Antiquity period) was a wall in herringbone bond and an adjacent surface which lay just below the surface of the ground on the eastern side of the insula. There was a clear change in the area after an earthquake in 365, which destroyed the residential structures. Their ruins were used as the site of industrial activity, totally altering the character of this part of the town.
Evidence of this are the kilns for firing ceramic lamps, ceramic building materials and burning lime which were built here on the bedrock or former floors. There were also found deposits of well-cleaned clay in the storage vats. There were also platforms and circular vats of waterproof mortar, which probably served for wine production.
The exploration of a Late Antique building with an internal apse, built into the ruins of a house with a geometric mosaic to the north of the House of Leukaktios was suspended and left for future work due to the thick layer of destruction rubble filling its interior.
The buildings of the phase predating the earthquake (third to mid-fourth century AD) were the result of successive reconstructions, changes in ownership and property divisions. The oldest walls, especially the two limiting the insula from the east and west come from the Hellenistic period, setting the width of the insula at 36.5
m, while the walls limiting the House of Leukaktios and the House of the Atrium on the north and south are the probably the original frontier of a property at that time
occupied by one house. To the east of the previously exposed parts of the House of Leukaktios was revealed a large courtyard covered with opus signinum. Its entrance led from the east, and under the surface of the courtyard a water tank with two inlets had been built. The premises located along the northern wall of this courtyard resulting from the reconstruction of this part of the adjacent house. A doorway, probably arched, the jambs of which had a richly-decorated base, dates to the last phase of the use of this part of the site.
In the south-eastern part of the excavation, a courtyard paved with stone slabs, containing an impluvium with a mosaic was uncovered. This belonged to yet another house that was not fully explored in this campaign. The large quantities of coarse pottery found dates from the Hellenistic to the Late Roman periods, with the dominant mass being of the Middle Roman period. The assemblage is composed of both local as well as imported products. The pottery has close analogies in the finds from other towns in Cyrenaica.
The non-invasive surveys of areas in the west and north parts of the town were continued with the use of caesium vapour magnetometers and fluxgate radiometers. The Hellenistic street network was clearly visible, as was the Byzantine one, which – together with the use of observation of surface traces and aerial photography – allows the reconstruction of the plan of the town.
The burials can be classified in two different ways: 1. on grounds of method of deposition (primary and secondary burials); 2. on grounds of grave construction (pits, cists, niches, niche-pits, pit-caves, pithoi and bones deposited directly in fill).
Aegean artists depicted it in their art, or whether they compromised between reality and artistic concepts.
In order to find answers to those questions, this paper examines wall and vase paintings, stone and metal
vases, ivories, bronzes and terracottas, larnakes, stelae, daggers (seals and sealings are excluded because
of the seal/sealing problem). These are examined according to the categorisation of skilled and unskilled,
bi- and unimanual activities. The results suggest a domination of right-handedness in the Aegean iconography with some exceptions resulting mainly from the symmetry of specific compositions. It is also
notable that the Aegean artists tended to represent right hands as the near ones and they preferred to show
shoulders supporting long objects like spears as the near ones regardless of the orientation of depicted
subjects.
With the demise of the Mycenaean palatial system, its system of writing also vanished. For roughly the next 500 years, Greece was dominated by an oral culture that did not help cultivate historical memory. More helpful in that regard were the ruins of ancient buildings and other Mycenaean or Minoan relics that could be found throughout Greece. We can also observe various elements of cultural continuity. For example, the existence of the ancient past, at least in its broadest outlines, was acknowledged in the archaic period, even if it differed drastically from contemporary realities. We know, too, that modern Greeks are descendants of the Bronze Age inhabitants of Hellas. That tells us little enough, but if we are ready to entertain the possibility that vestiges of ancient times could survive in popular memory, we must consider where and under what conditions this might have happened.
Crete seems to be the place where traditions of past glories had the greatest chance of survival and transmission. The island’s mythology seems closer to Minoan realities than to the Theban or Mycenaean cycles. We can also observe many elements of cultural continuity, the preservation of art forms or sacral architecture. At the turn of the Bronze and Iron Ages, Crete had not experienced the disasters that afflicted mainland Greece and many of the islands. Population movements and migration had mainly a local character. Homer, in mentioning the five tribes inhabiting Crete, almost certainly in his own times, was careful to point out the aboriginal inhabitants, who dwelled there before the arrival of the Achaeans and the Dorians. There was also a surviving language, called Eteocretan, which was probably spoken by the island’s Minoan rulers. Moreover, it was customary on Crete to refer in various ways to the glorious past.
Taken together, all this suggests that shards of memories from the Minoan period could possibly have survived on Crete. Evidence of whether this could be true must be sought in tales about King Minos, the Minotaur, Glaukos, Akakallis or the Labyrinth.
In 2008-2010, the Polish Archaeological Mission to Ptolemais of the Institute of Archaeology, University of Warsaw continued the research begun in 2001 in one of the insulae (exxi) sited in the central part of the ancient town of Ptolemais – to the east of the Palazzo delle Colonne. Work has been suspended on this site since the
end of the campaign of 2010. The work of this period was concentrated on examining the area to the north and east of the area previously explored containing part of the House of Leukaktios. Conservation work was also undertaken on the discovered remains. The better-preserved wall paintings were removed from the walls of the buildings and taken to the museum in Tolmeita for further conservation, while the more fragmentary remains were conserved in situ. The mosaics, also left in situ, were also conserved. In addition another project involved the documentation of all the Christian basilicas identified in ancient Ptolemais.
The excavations uncovered traces of different phases of use of the insula. The latest of these (of the Post-Antiquity period) was a wall in herringbone bond and an adjacent surface which lay just below the surface of the ground on the eastern side of the insula. There was a clear change in the area after an earthquake in 365, which destroyed the residential structures. Their ruins were used as the site of industrial activity, totally altering the character of this part of the town.
Evidence of this are the kilns for firing ceramic lamps, ceramic building materials and burning lime which were built here on the bedrock or former floors. There were also found deposits of well-cleaned clay in the storage vats. There were also platforms and circular vats of waterproof mortar, which probably served for wine production.
The exploration of a Late Antique building with an internal apse, built into the ruins of a house with a geometric mosaic to the north of the House of Leukaktios was suspended and left for future work due to the thick layer of destruction rubble filling its interior.
The buildings of the phase predating the earthquake (third to mid-fourth century AD) were the result of successive reconstructions, changes in ownership and property divisions. The oldest walls, especially the two limiting the insula from the east and west come from the Hellenistic period, setting the width of the insula at 36.5
m, while the walls limiting the House of Leukaktios and the House of the Atrium on the north and south are the probably the original frontier of a property at that time
occupied by one house. To the east of the previously exposed parts of the House of Leukaktios was revealed a large courtyard covered with opus signinum. Its entrance led from the east, and under the surface of the courtyard a water tank with two inlets had been built. The premises located along the northern wall of this courtyard resulting from the reconstruction of this part of the adjacent house. A doorway, probably arched, the jambs of which had a richly-decorated base, dates to the last phase of the use of this part of the site.
In the south-eastern part of the excavation, a courtyard paved with stone slabs, containing an impluvium with a mosaic was uncovered. This belonged to yet another house that was not fully explored in this campaign. The large quantities of coarse pottery found dates from the Hellenistic to the Late Roman periods, with the dominant mass being of the Middle Roman period. The assemblage is composed of both local as well as imported products. The pottery has close analogies in the finds from other towns in Cyrenaica.
The non-invasive surveys of areas in the west and north parts of the town were continued with the use of caesium vapour magnetometers and fluxgate radiometers. The Hellenistic street network was clearly visible, as was the Byzantine one, which – together with the use of observation of surface traces and aerial photography – allows the reconstruction of the plan of the town.
The burials can be classified in two different ways: 1. on grounds of method of deposition (primary and secondary burials); 2. on grounds of grave construction (pits, cists, niches, niche-pits, pit-caves, pithoi and bones deposited directly in fill).
CALL FOR PAPERS is open till JANUARY 31st 2017.
The organizers invite proposals on all themes related to Aegean Archaeology, i.e. Aegean areas and cultures in the Bronze Age, also in a broader context. Proposals are welcomed from PhD students or candidates, as well as scholars who have already completed their doctoral research.
The proposals for 20 min. lectures should consist of an abstract (in English) of max. 300 words.
Please send the proposals to egea@uw.edu.pl by January 31st 2017.
The provisional program of the Conference will be announced after February 15th.
Conference fee: 50,00 PLN per person (c. 4,45 PLN = 1 EUR).
For questions and detailed information feel free to contact us via e-mail (egea@uw.edu.pl).
Please send your abstracts (in English, max. 250 words), your personal details (title, full name, affiliation, email address) and a short personal biography (max. 100 words including ORCID number and/or research webpage links) to egea@uw.edu.pl by March 20th 2023.
Here you can also find the conference programme and the book of abstracts
Proposals are especially welcomed from early career researchers, such as PhD students or candidates, as well as scholars who have already completed their doctoral research and recently obtained the title. The proposals for 15 min. lectures should consist of an abstract (in English) of max. 250 words. Please send the APPLICATION FORM* to egea@uw.edu.pl by March 1st, 2019. Conference fee (including conf. materials, coffee breaks, and lunches) is 35,00 EUR per person. Publication of the proceedings is planned (after completing the peer-review process). Organising Committee: Katarzyna Żebrowska, MA, Dr Agata Ulanowska, Prof. Kazimierz Lewartowski *APPLICATION FORM available for download in the FILES section above.
The organisers invite proposals on all themes related to Aegean Archaeology (i.e. Aegean areas and cultures in the Bronze Age, e.g. art, crafts, everyday life; social, funerary, political landscapes; long-distance relations, Aegeans overseas, influence on other cultures, etc.) also in a broader context (new methods, approaches, technologies applied to the research; new technologies in data, research, site management, etc.). Proposals are especially welcomed from early career researchers: PhD students or candidates, as well as scholars who have already completed their doctoral research and recently obtained the title.
The proposals for 20 min. lectures should consist of an abstract (in English) of max. 250 words. Please send the APPLICATION FORM* to egea@uw.edu.pl by January 31st, 2018. The provisional program of the Conference will be announced on February 15th, 2018. Conference fee is 35,00 EUR per person.
Organising Committee
Katarzyna Żebrowska, MA, Dr Agata Ulanowska, Prof. Kazimierz Lewartowski
*APPLICATION FORM available for download in the FILES section above.