[go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3167918.3167950acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-cswConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Large scale modeling of genetic networks using gene knockout data

Published: 29 January 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Gene regulatory network (GRN) represents a set of genes and their regulatory interactions. The inference of the regulatory interactions between genes is usually carried out as an optimization problem using an appropriate mathematical model and the time-series gene expression data. Among the various models proposed for GRN inference, our recently proposed Michaelis-Menten kinetics based ODE model provides a good trade-off between the computational complexity and biological relevance. This model, like other known GRN models, also uses an evolutionary algorithm for parameter estimation. Since the search space for large networks is huge, leading to a low accuracy of inference, it is important to reduce the search region for improved performance of the optimization algorithm. In this paper, we propose a classification method using gene knockout data to eliminate a large infeasible region from the optimization search area. We also propose a method for partial inference of regulations when all the regulators of a given regulated gene are unregulated genes. The proposed method is evaluated by reconstructing in silico networks of large sizes.

References

[1]
Tatsuya Akutsu, Satoru Miyano, and Satoru Kuhara. 1999. Identification of Genetic Networks from a Small Number of Gene Expression Patterns Under the Boolean Network Model. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Vol. 4. 1728. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/10380182
[2]
A.R. Chowdhury, M. Chetty, and Nguyen Xuan Vinh. 2012. Adaptive regulatory genes cardinality for reconstructing genetic networks. In Evolutionary Computation (CEC), IEEE Congress on. 1--8.
[3]
Ahsan Raja Chowdhury and Madhu Chetty. 2015. Network decomposition based large-scale reverse engineering of gene regulatory network. Neurocomputing 160, Supplement C (2015), 213 -- 227.
[4]
Ahsan Raja Chowdhury, Madhu Chetty, and Nguyen Xuan Vinh. 2013. Incorporating time-delays in S-System model for reverse engineering genetic networks. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 1 (18 Jun 2013), 196.
[5]
Hui-Yuan Fan and Jouni Lampinen. 2003. A Trigonometric Mutation Operation to Differential Evolution. Journal of Global Optimization 27, 1 (01 Sep 2003), 105--129.
[6]
Michael Hecker, Sandro Lambeck, Susanne Toepfer, Eugene van Someren, and Reinhard Guthke. 2009. Gene regulatory network inference: Data integration in dynamic models - A review. Biosystems 96, 1 (2009), 86 -- 103.
[7]
S.A. Kauffman. 1969. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22, 3 (1969), 437 -- 467.
[8]
Yukihiro Maki, Takanori Ueda, Masahiro Okamoto, Naoya Uematsu, Kentaro Inamura, Kazuhiko Uchida, Yoriko Takahashi, and Yukihiro Eguchi. 2002. Inference of Genetic Network Using the Expression Profile Time Course Data of Mouse P19 Cells. Genome Informatics 13 (2002), 382--383.
[9]
Francesca Petralia, Pei Wang, Jialiang Yang, and Zhidong Tu. 2015. Integrative random forest for gene regulatory network inference. Bioinformatics 31, 12 (2015), 197--205.
[10]
Thomas Schaffter, Daniel Marbach, and Dario Floreano. 2011. GeneNetWeaver: In silico benchmark generation and performance profiling of network inference methods. Bioinformatics 27, 16 (2011), 2263--2270.
[11]
Rainer Storn and Kenneth Price. 1995. Differential Evolution - A Simple and Efficient Adaptive Scheme for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Technical Report TR-95-012. ICSI. http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~storn/litera.html
[12]
Jun Wu, Xiaodong Zhao, Zongli Lin, and Zhifeng Shao. 2016. Large scale gene regulatory network inference with a multi-level strategy. Molecular BioSystems 12, 2 (2016), 588--597. Issue 2.
[13]
Ahammed Sherief Kizhakkethil Youseph, Madhu Chetty, and Gour Karmakar. 2015. Decoupled modeling of gene regulatory networks using Michaelis-Menten kinetics. In Neural Information Processing, Sabri Arik, Tingwen Huang, Kin Weng Lai, and Qingshan Liu (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9491. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 497--505.
[14]
Ahammed Sherief Kizhakkethil Youseph, Madhu Chetty, and Gour Karmakar. 2015. Gene Regulatory Network Inference using Michaelis-Menten Kinetics. In Evolutionary Computation (CEC), IEEE Congress on. 2392--2397.
[15]
Jing Yu, V. Anne Smith, Paul P. Wang, Alexander J. Hartemink, and Erich D. Jarvis. 2004. Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data. Bioinformatics 20, 18 (2004), 3594--3603.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ACSW '18: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference
January 2018
404 pages
ISBN:9781450354363
DOI:10.1145/3167918
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • CORE: Computing Research and Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 January 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. classification
  2. gene knockout
  3. gene regulatory network (GRN)
  4. in-degree
  5. michaelis-menten kinetics
  6. out-degree

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ACSW 2018
Sponsor:
  • CORE
ACSW 2018: Australasian Computer Science Week 2018
January 29 - February 2, 2018
Queensland, Brisband, Australia

Acceptance Rates

ACSW '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 96 submissions, 51%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 204 of 424 submissions, 48%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 68
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 09 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media