Papers by Frederick Conrad
Field Methods, Jan 4, 2013
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Quality & Quantity, Mar 29, 2023
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of survey statistics and methodology, Dec 3, 2020
Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) has been widely used to collect sensitive infor... more Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) has been widely used to collect sensitive information from respondents in face-to-face interviews. Interviewers ask questions that are not sensitive or only moderately sensitive and then allow respondents to self-administer more sensitive questions, listening to audio recordings of the questions and typically entering their responses directly into the same device that the interviewer has used. According to the conventional thinking, ACASI is taken as independent of the face-to-face interaction that almost always precedes it. Presumably as a result of this presumed independence, the respondents’ prior interaction with the interviewer is rarely considered when assessing the quality of ACASI responses. There is no body of existing research that has experimentally investigated how the preceding interviewer–respondent interaction may create sufficient social presence to affect responses in the subsequent ACASI module. The study reported here, a laboratory experiment with eight professional interviewers and 125 respondents, explores the carryover effects of preceding interactions between interviewer and respondent on responses in the subsequent ACASI. We evaluated the impact of the similarity of the live and recorded interviewer’s voice for each respondent as well as respondents’ rapport with interviewers in the preceding interview. We did not find significant main effects of vocal similarity on disclosure in ACASI. However, we found significant interaction effects between vocal similarity and respondents’ rapport ratings in the preceding interview on disclosure in ACASI. When the ACASI voice was similar to the interviewer’s voice in the preceding interaction, respondent-rated rapport led to more disclosure but, when the ACASI voice is clearly different from the interviewer’s voice, respondent-rated rapport in the prior interaction did not affect disclosure.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks, Oct 29, 2007
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Political Research Quarterly, Sep 17, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Memory, Jul 1, 1998
When people answer survey questions of the form "During the past month, how many times d... more When people answer survey questions of the form "During the past month, how many times did you...?" their responses provide valuable data for researchers and policy makers. Yet the way respondents produce their answers to these "behavioural frequency questions" is not well understood. This article demonstrates that survey respondents can use an array of distinct estimation strategies, depending on what information is available in their memories. The kind of event information that people use is related to factors such as the regularity of occurrence, similarity of one episode to the next, and frequency. In a study conducted as a telephone survey, respondents' verbal reports and response-time patterns indicate that they usually answer behavioural frequency questions by either retrieving and counting episodes, retrieving or estimating rates of occurrence, or converting a general impression of frequency into a numerical quantity. The third strategy should be of particular concern to survey researchers because respondents provide a quantitative estimate without any relevant numerical knowledge. The set of strategies and the factors that influence their use are integrated into a statistical model that could help survey practitioners to improve data quality and memory researchers to broaden their perspective.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of survey statistics and methodology, Feb 6, 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of survey statistics and methodology, Sep 27, 2021
With the ubiquity of smartphones, it is possible to collect self-reports as well as to passively ... more With the ubiquity of smartphones, it is possible to collect self-reports as well as to passively measure behaviors and states (e.g., locations, movement, activity, and sleep) with native sensors and the smartphone’s operating system, both on a single device that usually accompanies participants throughout the day. This research synthesis brings structure to a rapidly expanding body of literature on the combined collection of self-reports and passive measurement using smartphones, pointing out how and why researchers have combined these two types of data and where more work is needed. We distinguish between five reasons why researchers might want to integrate the two data sources and how this has been helpful: (1) verification, for example, confirming start and end of passively detected trips, (2) contextualization, for example, asking about the purpose of a passively detected trip, (3) quantifying relationships, for example, quantifying the association between self-reported stress and passively measured sleep duration, (4) building composite measures, for example, measuring components of stress that participants are aware of through self-reports and those they are not through passively measured speech attributes, and (5) triggering measurement, for example, asking survey questions contingent on certain passively measured events or participant locations. We discuss challenges of collecting self-reports and passively tracking participants’ behavior with smartphones from the perspective of representation (e.g., who owns a smartphone and who is willing to share their data), measurement (e.g., different levels of temporal granularity in self-reports and passively collected data), and privacy considerations (e.g., the greater intrusiveness of passive measurement than self-reports). While we see real potential in this approach it is not yet clear if its impact will be incremental or will revolutionize the field.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Oxford University Press eBooks, May 1, 2013
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Psychology Press eBooks, Jun 17, 2013
... and Douglas Raybeck 3 Basic and Applied Memory Research: Empirical, Theoretical, and Metatheo... more ... and Douglas Raybeck 3 Basic and Applied Memory Research: Empirical, Theoretical, and Metatheoretical Issues 45 David G. Payne, Frederick G. Conrad ... We would also like to thank our spouses (Robyn M. Reichert and Elizabeth A. Brooksl and families for their continued love ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
There has been much interest in using social media to track public opinion. We introduce a higher... more There has been much interest in using social media to track public opinion. We introduce a higher level of scrutiny to these types of analyses, specifically looking at the relationship between presidential approval and “Trump” tweets and developing a framework to interpret its strength. We use placebo analyses, performing the same analysis but with tweets assumed to be unrelated to presidential approval, to assess the relationship and conclude that the relationship is less strong than it might otherwise seem. Secondly, we suggest following users longitudinally, which enables us to find evidence of a political signal around the 2016 presidential election. For the goal of supplementing traditional surveys with social media data, our results are encouraging, but cautionary.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Oct 8, 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Social Science Computer Review, Feb 1, 2004
Several alternative response formats are available to the web survey designer, but the choice of ... more Several alternative response formats are available to the web survey designer, but the choice of format is often made with little consideration of measurement error. The authors experimentally explore three common response formats used in web surveys: a series of radio buttons, a drop box with none of the options initially displayed until the respondent clicks on the box, and a scrollable drop box with some of the options initially visible, requiring the respondent to scroll to see the remainder of the options. The authors reversed the order of the response options for half the sample. The authors find evidence of response order effects but stronger evidence that visible response options are endorsed more frequently, suggesting that visibility may be a more powerful effect than primacy in web surveys. The results suggest that the response format used in web surveys does affect the choices made by respondents.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Oxford University Press eBooks, May 1, 2013
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Frederick Conrad